June 1, 2025 • 19 mins
2024 was a difficult year for the Royal Family, with King Charles and the Princess of Wales both going public with cancer diagnoses, which required lengthy treatment that took them out of the spotlight.
Things have been looking rosier for the family so far this year, and the King is even flexing his diplomatic muscles in a visit to Canada amidst tensions between the country and the United States.
However, in recent weeks, the friction between the monarchy and Prince Harry has made headlines once again.
Today on The Front Page, for King’s Birthday, we’re touching in on the current state of the Royal Family with UK correspondent Gavin Grey.
Follow The Front Page on iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
You can read more about this and other stories in the New Zealand Herald, online at nzherald.co.nz, or tune in to news bulletins across the NZME network.
Host: Chelsea Daniels
Sound Engineer/Producer: Richard Martin
Producer: Ethan Sills
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:05):
Kyota.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a
daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. Twenty twenty
four was a difficult year for the royal family, with
King Charles and the Princess of Wales both going public
with cancer diagnoses which required lengthy treatment that took them
(00:27):
out of the spotlight.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Things have been.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
Looking rosier for the family so far this year, and
the King is even flexing his diplomatic muscles in a
visit to Canada amidst tensions between the country and the
United States. However, in recent weeks, the friction between the
monarchy and Prince Harry has made headlines once again. Today
on the front page four King's Birthday. We're joined by
(00:50):
UK correspondent Gavin Gray. Gavin, we last touched base with
you on the Royals a year ago, and that was
when the cancer diagnoses were still quite fresh.
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Where are the King and Kate at at the moment?
Speaker 3 (01:10):
Well, probably the easiest one to start with is Princess Kate,
the Princess of Wales, Catherine. She is now formally in remission,
so great news for her.
Speaker 4 (01:21):
She's been seen out more and more now.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
Although I have to say that although she's back in
the royal fold doing the duties and back on the roster,
as it were, we are seeing much less of her
than before the diagnosis. And I think that's a direct
result of the thought that actually, you know, this was
a very serious bump in the road for her, This
was a very very serious health condition. I think it
(01:45):
could have been a lot worse. I think it was
extremely serious, and I think it's probably made her and
Prince William rather take stock of the situation.
Speaker 4 (01:55):
So obviously.
Speaker 3 (01:56):
In March twenty twenty four, she announced that she'd been
die knows with cancer, and then announced that she was
in remission in January of this year.
Speaker 4 (02:05):
Since we've seen her.
Speaker 3 (02:06):
Out in about a few times, as you can imagine,
the scrutiny of her, how she behaves, how she looks
as been enormous. So good news as regards her treatment
for King Charles, well, he's continuing to have this treatment.
That recent trip to Canada, which was only twenty hours long,
was actually kept that short, not because he didn't want
(02:27):
to stay longer, but because they were determined, I hear,
not to want to interrupt the usual schedule of his treatments.
So the treatment is ongoing. He still is, you know,
somebody being treated for cancer. Prince Harry didn't really help
matters when he said he didn't know how much longer
his father had got left, which was something that lots
(02:48):
of people were quite shocked about. But there was that
bump in the road for him back in March when
he did have to cancel a couple of engagements, but
that was quite simply because of a side effect to
the most recent bout of treatment.
Speaker 2 (03:02):
Well this might sound like a grim takeaway, but do
you think that the openness about their conditions has perhaps
helped humanize the royals a bit more.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
I remember stories at the time about how.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
There were just massive surges and visits to cancer websites
after they both went public.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Yeah, I absolutely have no doubt, Chelsea. Actually that's been
enormously important to people. I think it has made the
Royals seem much more human, much more like you and
I I think, as well, as made these visits that
they made to cancer hospitals and to hospitals around the
world seem that much more poignant. Both at the moment
(03:40):
are so in the public eye. I mean, King Charles
is seventy six.
Speaker 4 (03:45):
You know, it's.
Speaker 3 (03:46):
Exhausting going on travel, it's exhausting chatting to people and
remaining on messages it were for all this time, and
so I think it is something that his team are
very careful.
Speaker 4 (03:58):
Not to exhaust him.
Speaker 3 (03:59):
But at the same time, he as well, is determined
not to let cancer, I think, sort of identify him
and not to let the cancer the thing take over
his life. And that's why we're seeing him out and
about so much and doing many more visits to hospitals
than perhaps he might otherwise have done.
Speaker 5 (04:16):
Well.
Speaker 2 (04:16):
You mentioned the big news in the last week has
been that the King and Queen visited Canada.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
Can you explain to us what were they doing there?
Speaker 3 (04:24):
Well, it was hugely symbolic, actually, because the main focus
off his trip was the opening of the State Parliament
and delivering the Canadian government's message as delivered by the
new Prime Minister, the Liberal Prime Minister there, Mark Carney.
It was an interesting one because of course King Charles's
head of state in Canada and his mother had given
(04:48):
the previous speech from the throne as it's called, that
throne being a wooden walnut throne, and over the years
I suppose the ties between Canada and the UK part
of the Commonwealth. They've always been pretty close, but I
think things have been a little more distant over the
last few years. However, the reason for that trip, without doubt,
(05:11):
was the fact that Donald Trump was trying to pressure
Canada into becoming the fifty first state. That is something
Mark Carney, the Prime Minister of Canada, said is not
going to happen. But he would have been very pleased
to be able to invite King Charles over in order
to really round that home. At no point, to my knowledge,
did King Charles actually use the word Trump. But everything
(05:33):
in that opening address to the Ottawa Building, the Ottawa Parliament,
everything in that address was about Canada being independent, part
of the Commonwealth, very happy being Canada, very happy not
being for sale to America.
Speaker 6 (05:52):
I've always had the greatest admiration for Canada's unique identity,
which is recognized across the world, for bravery and sacrifice
in defense of national values, and for the diversity and
kindness of Canadians.
Speaker 2 (06:13):
Well, I guess that's a sign of how the monarchy
can utilize itself in these kind of diplomatic sendings. Hey,
this is basically the ultimate power move by Mark Kearney.
This is the extent of what the Royals can do
to show support, though, isn't it. The King would never
actually directly call out anything Trump is doing, would he.
Speaker 4 (06:32):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
And it's a bit of a tightrope though this particular
trip because for King Charles, of course, Donald Trump has
been invited to be a guest of King Charles and
the country later this year.
Speaker 4 (06:45):
So King Charles really very difficult trope.
Speaker 3 (06:49):
Walk because he's got to say all the right things
for Canada while he's there while not directly angering Donald Trump. Now,
as you say, ros go around naming and shaming. But
at the same time, you know, the UK is pretty
dependent on good trade with America and it's seen pretty
(07:09):
much a soft power to use the Royal family, who
we know Donald Trump is a massive fan of in
order to try and build bridges, and King Charles very
careful in Canada not to destroy any of those bridges
before the second visit by Donald Trump over to the
UK as part of his second presidential term.
Speaker 2 (07:30):
Do you think the visit to Canada will quell any
Republican sentiment that seems to arise whenever the Royals tend
to visit any of the realms.
Speaker 4 (07:38):
Really, it won't have done any harm, that's for sure.
Speaker 3 (07:41):
A lot of people interviewed on the streets of Canada
are saying things like he's bringing us together.
Speaker 4 (07:47):
Hearing from the king has been very good. I think
there is a.
Speaker 3 (07:51):
Universal dislike of Donald Trump, almost universal in Canada, and
certainly an almost universal denial of wanting to be part
of America. And by tapping into that and by reinforcing
that with this visit, I think that's bound to have
gone down well. Canada is always an interesting one for
the king or queen to visit, for any monarch to visit,
(08:15):
because of course of its French British ties and being
you know that sort of really unusual combination part of
the Commonwealth, but you know, very strong French contingent among
some of the states in the Canada. So that's a
very difficult balancing act that he's had to walk. But
it is one that I think will have strengthen the
(08:36):
monarchy's grip as part of the Commonwealth for Canada, and
I think it's a I don't think it's been a
great trip. I know there's all sorts of talk that
the King will revisit Canada, possibly next year.
Speaker 4 (08:51):
I think they we're talking about later this year.
Speaker 3 (08:53):
I can't see that happening, but next year and then
it won't be that whistle stoctor. I mean, a twenty
hour visit on a vow of kilometers travel is almost
unheard of in royal circus. So I think this is
all to do with the cancer and the treatment and
not disrupting that the regulation appointments.
Speaker 4 (09:12):
But it is something that I.
Speaker 3 (09:13):
Know perhaps when that is all over and that treatment
is done and Dustin and King Charles is feeling better,
he will want to go back for a longer trip.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
Well, I have to say as well, Gavin the King
did skip New Zealand on his royal visit last year.
I know that Odawa is a little closer to London
than we are, of course, but have you heard any
rumblings of a visit down south.
Speaker 3 (09:31):
I do know that he's absolutely desperate to get around
as much of the Commonwealth as possibly, particularly the much
closer members.
Speaker 4 (09:40):
So yes, of course New Zealand.
Speaker 3 (09:42):
And I do know at the time from sources he
was absolutely gutted actually not to be able to complete
the tour, as was initially envisaged, although he didn't make
it there this time. I think New Zealand's going to
be pretty much top of the list for places for
him to visit when he's fully better. I think it
is simply the length of the flight's Chelsea at the
(10:04):
age of seventy six as well. I mean, I know
they're flying, you know, in the superb luxury and so forth,
but when they get there, they're really busy and they
can't just turn up at these events without having thought
about what they're going to say, without knowing who the
main players are. So the idea that it's just a
sort of jolly jaunt is rather wide at the mark,
and I think that the King is going to be
(10:26):
very keen to get back to New Zealand, but only
when he can do it justice.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
It does feel like two conversations have dominated the royals
in recent years. One is, of course, death, illness, succession.
The other, Gavin is Prince Harry. About a month ago,
Harry gave an interview to the BBC where he said
that the King won't speak to him and that he'd
love to reconcile with the family now that all went
(11:00):
down a bit like a lead balloon, didn't it?
Speaker 3 (11:02):
Yeah, it did, and I think reconciliation is a long
way wide at the mark. And let's not forget. He
made those comments in an interview about how he had
failed in an appeal against effectively the British government and
that was all about his security level. Now, when he
and Megan left back in twenty twenty, they simply decided
(11:25):
that they no longer when they revisited the UK were
entitled to the same level of protection as they were
when they were a working royal. Now Prince Harry has said, look,
I get the most awful hate mail. You don't appreciate
how dangerous it is for me and my family, And
the Roles are saying, well, it's not like we're not
going to give you any protection. We're going to give
(11:48):
you the protection which we think is adequate for your
individual visits and each visit is measured independently by this committee. Well,
Harry lost his appeal again a louder another hearing with
regardless security, and we got a very terse statement from
the Royals at Buckingham Palace effectively saying we've looked at
(12:09):
all this time and again the review has come back
with the same conclusions that it did. It sounded like
a very weary parent and that's why I think reconciliation
is still wider than mark. It was a very odd
time to bring it in, having just tried to sort
of talk about how the government and needs to do
more and how Buckingham Palace is a bit of a
broken machine.
Speaker 7 (12:32):
I've seen constituents in the UK rights to their mp
saying I don't want to as a taxpayer, I don't
want to pay for Megan and Harry's security at this cost.
They're literally quoting headlines from British newspapers. Those figures are
obviously grossly exaggerated by about eighteen nineteen times. And further
(12:53):
to that, if you know that other people being protected,
people that have made a choice for public office, would
you'd be comfortable happy with with with someone in my
position who's given thirty years thirty five years so this
to his country.
Speaker 2 (13:09):
Well, Harry in that interview also alleged that his father
could help resolve the security issues that he says are
preventing him from returning to the UK. And you mentioned
that quite terse weary parentage kind of Buckingham Palace statement
that they said, all of these issues have been examined
repeatedly and meticulously by the courts. How high up does
a statement like that need to get signed off?
Speaker 1 (13:32):
Wasn't the weary parent that signed that off?
Speaker 3 (13:35):
Well, I suspect somebody by the cast an eye on it.
But I think if King Charles had demanded there were
a change in security, there probably would have been.
Speaker 4 (13:45):
But you know, as he as was.
Speaker 3 (13:47):
Pointed out by lots of royal watchers and lots of
royal experts, myself included, the King can't is not part
of the committee that makes the decision. And if that
sounds rather administrative and rather the it is the case.
I mean, you know, the security and the funding for
the roles is not for the royals to decide themselves.
(14:08):
It is for others, and King Charles getting involved would
have been, I think a very slippery slip. So he
took the attitude that the right people on that committee
know what they're talking about, and they are the ones
that should make the decision. And I think it really
has been another wage between father and son and also
between brothers. Prince William absolutely unimpressed by Prince Harry's constant
(14:32):
going back to the courts appealing these decisions, and let's
not forget Chelsea who's putting the bill From the government side,
the answer is the UK taxpayer, And if Harry wanted
to win over people, it just seems a funny way
of doing it. Plus the fact while he was in
the UK, admittedly not with Megan and his family, but
(14:55):
when he was in the UK he was found or
reported to be found in London buzzing a number of
front doors trying to find a friend whose address he
couldn't remember. Well, if you were really worried about your security,
would you really, as a royal somebody worried that they
(15:15):
were going to be attacked, would you wander down a
busy London street ringing on doorbells to see if your
friend lived there. It seems very odd, But there is
video doorbell footage of these exchanges. These videos purport to
be from the time he was in London for the
court case, so it does seem more I think probably
in Harry's defense, what he means is he's worried about
(15:36):
the safety of his children and Meghan, among whom There
is a lot of.
Speaker 4 (15:41):
Scorn from some people at the UK.
Speaker 3 (15:43):
But whether it's as realistic and violent as Harry's making out,
I don't know. Sadly, he says he can't see a
time at the moment when he would bring his children
back over to the UK because he doesn't believe the
security is enough.
Speaker 5 (15:57):
And I do remember a few years ago writing in
my piece and I'd put a source in there, and
some magazin nurse rang me up and said, can I
just double check this? This feels very close to the source.
Who's the sauce? And I said the sources X And
they're like, ah, okay, So you have to be very
careful with how you go about it. And I would
(16:17):
say the most important thing in this job, with what
you think it is.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
Trust Now, Gavin, I often see reports quoting royal sources
or royal insiders who are sharing bits of gossip or
supposed feelings from a family member of the royal family,
someone close to the royal family, and I do I
always wonder who these sources are, How real are they are,
these proxies for the royals sharing stuff on their behalf
(16:43):
or is it like a made eavesdropping on something than
dming the Daily Mail.
Speaker 4 (16:47):
It's a combination of different things.
Speaker 3 (16:49):
First of all, there are tip offs that you get,
and they often come from people in and around the
starf of Buckingham Palace and the theyre households. There are
the communications teams, of course, who put out their statements,
but they also too may push a particular story or
(17:10):
an angle one way or the other. And Prince Harry
was always deeply, deeply against that and thought, you know,
it was Prince William's press officer against his press officer
and all the rest of it. It is, and they
do tend to work together, after all, they want to
maximize the publicity of the good that the roles are doing. It.
(17:30):
If they all went on high profile state visits all together,
only one of probably the King's visits would make headlines.
The others wouldn't get a headline. So they of course
they coordinate diaries. Of course they coordinate causes that they
want to support and lend publicity to. But yes, there
are those people then I think, frankly, you know, I
(17:51):
think there are some people who sit at home and
probably make quite a lot up and put it on
the internet as though a fact. So I think there's
a whole load of combination about these things.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
It's been a tumultuous period for the royals.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
You've got megxt, the Prince Andrew Epstein controversy, the deaths
of the Queen, and of course Prince Philip and the
double cancer diagnoses. Does it feel like the monarchy is
getting any closer to stability.
Speaker 3 (18:14):
I think you're right. I think at the moment it's
in a state of flux. And part of that is
the uncertainty over the King's health. After all, he's not
been that long in the job. And the one thing
that you like with stability is a stability of the cast,
you know, the main players in the royal family. So
it has been now a decade, as you said, Prince Andrew,
(18:37):
Prince Harry, the death of Prince Philip, the death of
the Queen. It's been a very very difficult time for
the royal family to hold it together, particularly as I said,
in the eyes of the public. And it's a very
very deeply scrutinizing public and deeply scrutinizing social media world
that we live in. You really can't have any secrets
(18:58):
and everybody is watching your remove and I think we're
seeing that accidentally with Princess Catherine returning to work after
her remission a diagnosis for cancer. About everywhere she goes,
you know, the cameras are trying to zoom in and
see how she's looking and how has she changed in
the last year or so, and that must be very
difficult when you've got a she has three young children.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
Thanks for joining us, Kevin.
Speaker 4 (19:22):
My pleasure. Thank you very much, Chelsea.
Speaker 2 (19:27):
That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You
can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage
at enziherld dot co dot nz. The Front Page is
produced by Ethan Sills and Richard Martin, who is also
a sound engineer.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
I'm Chelsea Daniels.
Speaker 2 (19:46):
Subscribe to The Front Page on iHeartRadio or wherever you
get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow for another look
behind the headlines.
Kyota.
Speaker 2 (00:05):
I'm Chelsea Daniels and this is the Front Page, a
daily podcast presented by the New Zealand Herald. Twenty twenty
four was a difficult year for the royal family, with
King Charles and the Princess of Wales both going public
with cancer diagnoses which required lengthy treatment that took them
(00:27):
out of the spotlight.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Things have been.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
Looking rosier for the family so far this year, and
the King is even flexing his diplomatic muscles in a
visit to Canada amidst tensions between the country and the
United States. However, in recent weeks, the friction between the
monarchy and Prince Harry has made headlines once again. Today
on the front page four King's Birthday. We're joined by
(00:50):
UK correspondent Gavin Gray. Gavin, we last touched base with
you on the Royals a year ago, and that was
when the cancer diagnoses were still quite fresh.
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Where are the King and Kate at at the moment?
Speaker 3 (01:10):
Well, probably the easiest one to start with is Princess Kate,
the Princess of Wales, Catherine. She is now formally in remission,
so great news for her.
Speaker 4 (01:21):
She's been seen out more and more now.
Speaker 3 (01:24):
Although I have to say that although she's back in
the royal fold doing the duties and back on the roster,
as it were, we are seeing much less of her
than before the diagnosis. And I think that's a direct
result of the thought that actually, you know, this was
a very serious bump in the road for her, This
was a very very serious health condition. I think it
(01:45):
could have been a lot worse. I think it was
extremely serious, and I think it's probably made her and
Prince William rather take stock of the situation.
Speaker 4 (01:55):
So obviously.
Speaker 3 (01:56):
In March twenty twenty four, she announced that she'd been
die knows with cancer, and then announced that she was
in remission in January of this year.
Speaker 4 (02:05):
Since we've seen her.
Speaker 3 (02:06):
Out in about a few times, as you can imagine,
the scrutiny of her, how she behaves, how she looks
as been enormous. So good news as regards her treatment
for King Charles, well, he's continuing to have this treatment.
That recent trip to Canada, which was only twenty hours long,
was actually kept that short, not because he didn't want
(02:27):
to stay longer, but because they were determined, I hear,
not to want to interrupt the usual schedule of his treatments.
So the treatment is ongoing. He still is, you know,
somebody being treated for cancer. Prince Harry didn't really help
matters when he said he didn't know how much longer
his father had got left, which was something that lots
(02:48):
of people were quite shocked about. But there was that
bump in the road for him back in March when
he did have to cancel a couple of engagements, but
that was quite simply because of a side effect to
the most recent bout of treatment.
Speaker 2 (03:02):
Well this might sound like a grim takeaway, but do
you think that the openness about their conditions has perhaps
helped humanize the royals a bit more.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
I remember stories at the time about how.
Speaker 2 (03:13):
There were just massive surges and visits to cancer websites
after they both went public.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Yeah, I absolutely have no doubt, Chelsea. Actually that's been
enormously important to people. I think it has made the
Royals seem much more human, much more like you and
I I think, as well, as made these visits that
they made to cancer hospitals and to hospitals around the
world seem that much more poignant. Both at the moment
(03:40):
are so in the public eye. I mean, King Charles
is seventy six.
Speaker 4 (03:45):
You know, it's.
Speaker 3 (03:46):
Exhausting going on travel, it's exhausting chatting to people and
remaining on messages it were for all this time, and
so I think it is something that his team are
very careful.
Speaker 4 (03:58):
Not to exhaust him.
Speaker 3 (03:59):
But at the same time, he as well, is determined
not to let cancer, I think, sort of identify him
and not to let the cancer the thing take over
his life. And that's why we're seeing him out and
about so much and doing many more visits to hospitals
than perhaps he might otherwise have done.
Speaker 5 (04:16):
Well.
Speaker 2 (04:16):
You mentioned the big news in the last week has
been that the King and Queen visited Canada.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
Can you explain to us what were they doing there?
Speaker 3 (04:24):
Well, it was hugely symbolic, actually, because the main focus
off his trip was the opening of the State Parliament
and delivering the Canadian government's message as delivered by the
new Prime Minister, the Liberal Prime Minister there, Mark Carney.
It was an interesting one because of course King Charles's
head of state in Canada and his mother had given
(04:48):
the previous speech from the throne as it's called, that
throne being a wooden walnut throne, and over the years
I suppose the ties between Canada and the UK part
of the Commonwealth. They've always been pretty close, but I
think things have been a little more distant over the
last few years. However, the reason for that trip, without doubt,
(05:11):
was the fact that Donald Trump was trying to pressure
Canada into becoming the fifty first state. That is something
Mark Carney, the Prime Minister of Canada, said is not
going to happen. But he would have been very pleased
to be able to invite King Charles over in order
to really round that home. At no point, to my knowledge,
did King Charles actually use the word Trump. But everything
(05:33):
in that opening address to the Ottawa Building, the Ottawa Parliament,
everything in that address was about Canada being independent, part
of the Commonwealth, very happy being Canada, very happy not
being for sale to America.
Speaker 6 (05:52):
I've always had the greatest admiration for Canada's unique identity,
which is recognized across the world, for bravery and sacrifice
in defense of national values, and for the diversity and
kindness of Canadians.
Speaker 2 (06:13):
Well, I guess that's a sign of how the monarchy
can utilize itself in these kind of diplomatic sendings. Hey,
this is basically the ultimate power move by Mark Kearney.
This is the extent of what the Royals can do
to show support, though, isn't it. The King would never
actually directly call out anything Trump is doing, would he.
Speaker 4 (06:32):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
And it's a bit of a tightrope though this particular
trip because for King Charles, of course, Donald Trump has
been invited to be a guest of King Charles and
the country later this year.
Speaker 4 (06:45):
So King Charles really very difficult trope.
Speaker 3 (06:49):
Walk because he's got to say all the right things
for Canada while he's there while not directly angering Donald Trump. Now,
as you say, ros go around naming and shaming. But
at the same time, you know, the UK is pretty
dependent on good trade with America and it's seen pretty
(07:09):
much a soft power to use the Royal family, who
we know Donald Trump is a massive fan of in
order to try and build bridges, and King Charles very
careful in Canada not to destroy any of those bridges
before the second visit by Donald Trump over to the
UK as part of his second presidential term.
Speaker 2 (07:30):
Do you think the visit to Canada will quell any
Republican sentiment that seems to arise whenever the Royals tend
to visit any of the realms.
Speaker 4 (07:38):
Really, it won't have done any harm, that's for sure.
Speaker 3 (07:41):
A lot of people interviewed on the streets of Canada
are saying things like he's bringing us together.
Speaker 4 (07:47):
Hearing from the king has been very good. I think
there is a.
Speaker 3 (07:51):
Universal dislike of Donald Trump, almost universal in Canada, and
certainly an almost universal denial of wanting to be part
of America. And by tapping into that and by reinforcing
that with this visit, I think that's bound to have
gone down well. Canada is always an interesting one for
the king or queen to visit, for any monarch to visit,
(08:15):
because of course of its French British ties and being
you know that sort of really unusual combination part of
the Commonwealth, but you know, very strong French contingent among
some of the states in the Canada. So that's a
very difficult balancing act that he's had to walk. But
it is one that I think will have strengthen the
(08:36):
monarchy's grip as part of the Commonwealth for Canada, and
I think it's a I don't think it's been a
great trip. I know there's all sorts of talk that
the King will revisit Canada, possibly next year.
Speaker 4 (08:51):
I think they we're talking about later this year.
Speaker 3 (08:53):
I can't see that happening, but next year and then
it won't be that whistle stoctor. I mean, a twenty
hour visit on a vow of kilometers travel is almost
unheard of in royal circus. So I think this is
all to do with the cancer and the treatment and
not disrupting that the regulation appointments.
Speaker 4 (09:12):
But it is something that I.
Speaker 3 (09:13):
Know perhaps when that is all over and that treatment
is done and Dustin and King Charles is feeling better,
he will want to go back for a longer trip.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
Well, I have to say as well, Gavin the King
did skip New Zealand on his royal visit last year.
I know that Odawa is a little closer to London
than we are, of course, but have you heard any
rumblings of a visit down south.
Speaker 3 (09:31):
I do know that he's absolutely desperate to get around
as much of the Commonwealth as possibly, particularly the much
closer members.
Speaker 4 (09:40):
So yes, of course New Zealand.
Speaker 3 (09:42):
And I do know at the time from sources he
was absolutely gutted actually not to be able to complete
the tour, as was initially envisaged, although he didn't make
it there this time. I think New Zealand's going to
be pretty much top of the list for places for
him to visit when he's fully better. I think it
is simply the length of the flight's Chelsea at the
(10:04):
age of seventy six as well. I mean, I know
they're flying, you know, in the superb luxury and so forth,
but when they get there, they're really busy and they
can't just turn up at these events without having thought
about what they're going to say, without knowing who the
main players are. So the idea that it's just a
sort of jolly jaunt is rather wide at the mark,
and I think that the King is going to be
(10:26):
very keen to get back to New Zealand, but only
when he can do it justice.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
It does feel like two conversations have dominated the royals
in recent years. One is, of course, death, illness, succession.
The other, Gavin is Prince Harry. About a month ago,
Harry gave an interview to the BBC where he said
that the King won't speak to him and that he'd
love to reconcile with the family now that all went
(11:00):
down a bit like a lead balloon, didn't it?
Speaker 3 (11:02):
Yeah, it did, and I think reconciliation is a long
way wide at the mark. And let's not forget. He
made those comments in an interview about how he had
failed in an appeal against effectively the British government and
that was all about his security level. Now, when he
and Megan left back in twenty twenty, they simply decided
(11:25):
that they no longer when they revisited the UK were
entitled to the same level of protection as they were
when they were a working royal. Now Prince Harry has said, look,
I get the most awful hate mail. You don't appreciate
how dangerous it is for me and my family, And
the Roles are saying, well, it's not like we're not
going to give you any protection. We're going to give
(11:48):
you the protection which we think is adequate for your
individual visits and each visit is measured independently by this committee. Well,
Harry lost his appeal again a louder another hearing with
regardless security, and we got a very terse statement from
the Royals at Buckingham Palace effectively saying we've looked at
(12:09):
all this time and again the review has come back
with the same conclusions that it did. It sounded like
a very weary parent and that's why I think reconciliation
is still wider than mark. It was a very odd
time to bring it in, having just tried to sort
of talk about how the government and needs to do
more and how Buckingham Palace is a bit of a
broken machine.
Speaker 7 (12:32):
I've seen constituents in the UK rights to their mp
saying I don't want to as a taxpayer, I don't
want to pay for Megan and Harry's security at this cost.
They're literally quoting headlines from British newspapers. Those figures are
obviously grossly exaggerated by about eighteen nineteen times. And further
(12:53):
to that, if you know that other people being protected,
people that have made a choice for public office, would
you'd be comfortable happy with with with someone in my
position who's given thirty years thirty five years so this
to his country.
Speaker 2 (13:09):
Well, Harry in that interview also alleged that his father
could help resolve the security issues that he says are
preventing him from returning to the UK. And you mentioned
that quite terse weary parentage kind of Buckingham Palace statement
that they said, all of these issues have been examined
repeatedly and meticulously by the courts. How high up does
a statement like that need to get signed off?
Speaker 1 (13:32):
Wasn't the weary parent that signed that off?
Speaker 3 (13:35):
Well, I suspect somebody by the cast an eye on it.
But I think if King Charles had demanded there were
a change in security, there probably would have been.
Speaker 4 (13:45):
But you know, as he as was.
Speaker 3 (13:47):
Pointed out by lots of royal watchers and lots of
royal experts, myself included, the King can't is not part
of the committee that makes the decision. And if that
sounds rather administrative and rather the it is the case.
I mean, you know, the security and the funding for
the roles is not for the royals to decide themselves.
(14:08):
It is for others, and King Charles getting involved would
have been, I think a very slippery slip. So he
took the attitude that the right people on that committee
know what they're talking about, and they are the ones
that should make the decision. And I think it really
has been another wage between father and son and also
between brothers. Prince William absolutely unimpressed by Prince Harry's constant
(14:32):
going back to the courts appealing these decisions, and let's
not forget Chelsea who's putting the bill From the government side,
the answer is the UK taxpayer, And if Harry wanted
to win over people, it just seems a funny way
of doing it. Plus the fact while he was in
the UK, admittedly not with Megan and his family, but
(14:55):
when he was in the UK he was found or
reported to be found in London buzzing a number of
front doors trying to find a friend whose address he
couldn't remember. Well, if you were really worried about your security,
would you really, as a royal somebody worried that they
(15:15):
were going to be attacked, would you wander down a
busy London street ringing on doorbells to see if your
friend lived there. It seems very odd, But there is
video doorbell footage of these exchanges. These videos purport to
be from the time he was in London for the
court case, so it does seem more I think probably
in Harry's defense, what he means is he's worried about
(15:36):
the safety of his children and Meghan, among whom There
is a lot of.
Speaker 4 (15:41):
Scorn from some people at the UK.
Speaker 3 (15:43):
But whether it's as realistic and violent as Harry's making out,
I don't know. Sadly, he says he can't see a
time at the moment when he would bring his children
back over to the UK because he doesn't believe the
security is enough.
Speaker 5 (15:57):
And I do remember a few years ago writing in
my piece and I'd put a source in there, and
some magazin nurse rang me up and said, can I
just double check this? This feels very close to the source.
Who's the sauce? And I said the sources X And
they're like, ah, okay, So you have to be very
careful with how you go about it. And I would
(16:17):
say the most important thing in this job, with what
you think it is.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
Trust Now, Gavin, I often see reports quoting royal sources
or royal insiders who are sharing bits of gossip or
supposed feelings from a family member of the royal family,
someone close to the royal family, and I do I
always wonder who these sources are, How real are they are,
these proxies for the royals sharing stuff on their behalf
(16:43):
or is it like a made eavesdropping on something than
dming the Daily Mail.
Speaker 4 (16:47):
It's a combination of different things.
Speaker 3 (16:49):
First of all, there are tip offs that you get,
and they often come from people in and around the
starf of Buckingham Palace and the theyre households. There are
the communications teams, of course, who put out their statements,
but they also too may push a particular story or
(17:10):
an angle one way or the other. And Prince Harry
was always deeply, deeply against that and thought, you know,
it was Prince William's press officer against his press officer
and all the rest of it. It is, and they
do tend to work together, after all, they want to
maximize the publicity of the good that the roles are doing. It.
(17:30):
If they all went on high profile state visits all together,
only one of probably the King's visits would make headlines.
The others wouldn't get a headline. So they of course
they coordinate diaries. Of course they coordinate causes that they
want to support and lend publicity to. But yes, there
are those people then I think, frankly, you know, I
(17:51):
think there are some people who sit at home and
probably make quite a lot up and put it on
the internet as though a fact. So I think there's
a whole load of combination about these things.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
It's been a tumultuous period for the royals.
Speaker 2 (18:03):
You've got megxt, the Prince Andrew Epstein controversy, the deaths
of the Queen, and of course Prince Philip and the
double cancer diagnoses. Does it feel like the monarchy is
getting any closer to stability.
Speaker 3 (18:14):
I think you're right. I think at the moment it's
in a state of flux. And part of that is
the uncertainty over the King's health. After all, he's not
been that long in the job. And the one thing
that you like with stability is a stability of the cast,
you know, the main players in the royal family. So
it has been now a decade, as you said, Prince Andrew,
(18:37):
Prince Harry, the death of Prince Philip, the death of
the Queen. It's been a very very difficult time for
the royal family to hold it together, particularly as I said,
in the eyes of the public. And it's a very
very deeply scrutinizing public and deeply scrutinizing social media world
that we live in. You really can't have any secrets
(18:58):
and everybody is watching your remove and I think we're
seeing that accidentally with Princess Catherine returning to work after
her remission a diagnosis for cancer. About everywhere she goes,
you know, the cameras are trying to zoom in and
see how she's looking and how has she changed in
the last year or so, and that must be very
difficult when you've got a she has three young children.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
Thanks for joining us, Kevin.
Speaker 4 (19:22):
My pleasure. Thank you very much, Chelsea.
Speaker 2 (19:27):
That's it for this episode of the Front Page. You
can read more about today's stories and extensive news coverage
at enziherld dot co dot nz. The Front Page is
produced by Ethan Sills and Richard Martin, who is also
a sound engineer.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
I'm Chelsea Daniels.
Speaker 2 (19:46):
Subscribe to The Front Page on iHeartRadio or wherever you
get your podcasts, and tune in tomorrow for another look
behind the headlines.
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
True Crime Tonight
If you eat, sleep, and breathe true crime, TRUE CRIME TONIGHT is serving up your nightly fix. Five nights a week, KT STUDIOS & iHEART RADIO invite listeners to pull up a seat for an unfiltered look at the biggest cases making headlines, celebrity scandals, and the trials everyone is watching. With a mix of expert analysis, hot takes, and listener call-ins, TRUE CRIME TONIGHT goes beyond the headlines to uncover the twists, turns, and unanswered questions that keep us all obsessed—because, at TRUE CRIME TONIGHT, there’s a seat for everyone. Whether breaking down crime scene forensics, scrutinizing serial killers, or debating the most binge-worthy true crime docs, True Crime Tonight is the fresh, fast-paced, and slightly addictive home for true crime lovers.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com