October 3, 2024 • 23 mins
Daniel and Katie answer a question about what it would look like to warp through space with the Enterprise
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:08):
Hey, Daniel, would you rather live in the Star Wars
or Star Trek universe?
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Oh? Man, I'm not sure.
Speaker 3 (00:16):
I guess I'd prefer to live in the one that's
more scientific, you know, that follows actual laws.
Speaker 1 (00:22):
I think they use more particle names in Star Trek.
They might be made up. I know in Star Wars
they use Midi Chlorians, which are definitely not made up.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
Yeah, but I think Star Wars leans on the little
magic aspect a bit too much. I think Star Trek
is trying to sound more scientific at least.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
I mean, isn't that basically our jobs, right? We're always
trying to sound more scientific.
Speaker 3 (00:49):
I mean I do my best to sound like a
physics professor. I hope it's working.
Speaker 1 (00:53):
I yeah, I think you had me fooled there for.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
A minute, you and all the listeners.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
I hope the big reveal.
Speaker 3 (01:17):
Hi, I'm Daniel, I'm a particle physicist and a professor
at UC Irvine.
Speaker 2 (01:20):
Really really, I promise I am.
Speaker 1 (01:23):
I'm Katie Golden. I'm none of those things, but you know,
I do have an animal biology podcast, and I'm interested
in physics, or.
Speaker 2 (01:32):
At least you can make it sound like you are.
Speaker 1 (01:35):
That's so interesting, Daniel.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
And Welcome to the podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe,
a production of iHeartRadio in which we sound interested in
the big questions of the universe, because we really really
are interested. We want to know how everything works, where
it all came from, how it all comes together to
create our amazing, glittering, beautiful, mysterious cosmos, and we want
(02:00):
to make sure that everybody out there understands things as
well as we do and as well as we don't.
Thanks very much Katie for joining me on today's episode.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
I'm super excited. I love to hear people's questions because
usually they are something that I am also curious about,
and I also don't know the answer to.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
That's right.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
Many of our episodes are us explaining a concept in
physics to you, but we don't want this podcast to
be a one directional lecture. We want it to be
a conversation. We want to know what you are wondering
about when those ideas don't click in your mind. We
want to hear from you so we can help you understand.
So please, if you have questions, right to me to
(02:41):
questions at Danielandjorge dot com. Everybody gets an answer from
a real live physics professor.
Speaker 2 (02:46):
They really really do.
Speaker 3 (02:48):
And sometimes I hear a question from listeners, I think, well,
I bet a lot of people ask this question, or
a lot of people would appreciate the answer, or that
one would be fun to joke with Katie about. So
let's do it on the podcast.
Speaker 1 (03:01):
No physicists were harmed in the making of this Listener
Questions episode.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
Not yet, but I'll keep you up to date. We'll
see if that changes.
Speaker 3 (03:11):
And so today on the podcast, we'll be answering Listener Questions,
Episode number sixty nine.
Speaker 1 (03:22):
There's nothing funny about that number.
Speaker 3 (03:25):
Absolutely nothing. We have been counting down to Listener Question
sixty nine ever since we've been doing Listener Questions and
we realized we were going to get there.
Speaker 1 (03:33):
I get it. The six looks like a nine upside down.
That's what's funny about it.
Speaker 3 (03:39):
Yeah, that's exactly what's funny about it. It reminds me a
little bit of when comic Shoemaker Levy hit Jupiter. When
it ran around the sun. The comment broke up into
like twenty six pieces. So somebody in NASA was like, ooh,
let's give the comet pieces names and we'll use letters
because there's twenty six of them. So there was the
A fragment, the B fragment, the C fragment, and then
(03:59):
when the first piece hit Jupiter, they called it the
A spot, and the next one when they hit they
called it the B spot. And then when they got
up to the F spot, they realized, uh oh, they
had a problem with the next one because were they
really going to write a scientific paper about Jupiter's G spot.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
I have no idea what you're talking about. That just
sounds like numbers and words to me.
Speaker 3 (04:22):
So they ended up talking about the F spot and
then the G impact site, and then the H spot.
Speaker 1 (04:27):
Somehow that sounds dirtier to me. I don't know impact
site all right.
Speaker 3 (04:32):
Anyway, we've got to do our best to extract humor
from science. But on today's episode, we are not just
making jokes about the number sixty nine. We were answering
questions from listeners like you, and today's episode is discussion
of a question from Dale from Washington. Here is Dale's question.
Speaker 4 (04:49):
Hello, Daniel and Jorge, This is Dale from Chattarroy, Washington.
I was watching Star Trek the other day and it
occurred to me that when the Enterprise D is cruising
a speed of warp six and the stars were all
speeding by, they maybe shouldn't have been able to see
them due to blue shift. Would the light be shifted
(05:10):
all the way into ultraviolet or maybe even X rays
or even further down? Is that even possible at a
large percentage of the speed of light? Anyways, thanks for
listening to my question.
Speaker 3 (05:24):
All right, Katie, are you a Star Trek fan? Have
you wondered about this yourself?
Speaker 1 (05:27):
So? I have watched a good amount of Star Trek,
and I I'm always kind of I don't know. I
guess I kind of gloss over the weird engineering babble.
It doesn't it's like we got to put the transoperitors
or interopertors on the warp schism. I don't really know.
(05:48):
And like I'm also a little bit confused about the
concept of the warp drive. I know there are different
like warp speeds, but like the idea, I guess is
that what you're like ending space and making the ship
go across. I don't know. Do you know if they
ever did like an explanation of warp drive.
Speaker 3 (06:09):
Well, one of the funny things about Star Trek is
that it's not really science fiction. I mean, they don't
actually have any sort of explanation for what they're doing.
It's exactly as you described. It's like particle babble.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
It's sort of like.
Speaker 3 (06:22):
The way jen Ai is. You know, you ask chat
gbt to generate an answer to physics question and it'll
generate a bunch of words which sound like an answer,
and Star Trek is kind of like that. It's like,
here's a convincing number of words which sort of sound
like an explanation for the science, but it's really nonsense,
you know. And I gotta love that about Star Trek.
They're not really trying to be hard sci fi. They
(06:44):
sort of make fun of themselves a little bit. They
don't take themselves too seriously. The science of Star Trek
is not like crisply thought out and click together into
some coherent explanation, as you'll see when we dig into
what a warp drive is in Star Trek and what
it should look like when you look out right.
Speaker 1 (07:01):
But the idea being that you're going really really fast,
like is the idea that you're going at the speed
of light.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
The idea of a warp drive in physics aside from
star trek is an attempt to move faster than the
speed of light. So we have this frustrating limitation on
all motion in the universe that nothing can move faster
than the speed of light through space. So if you
want to fly to Alpha Centari and it's three light
years away, it's going to take you at least three
years to get there because you can't even go at
(07:31):
the speed of light. Nothing with mass can move even
at the speed of light, and nothing at all can
move faster than the speed of light. And the speed
of light is really really fast, you know, one hundred
and eighty six thousand miles per second is incredibly fast,
But distances in space are incredibly vast, and so stars
are far apart even compared to the speed of light.
So our galaxy, for example, is one hundred thousand light
(07:54):
years across. You wanted to go from here to the
other side of it and back, we're talking two hundred
thousand years even if you're a photon. So it's incredibly
hard to get around the universe because the speed of
light is actually very very slow. And in science fiction
universes people often want to have like galaxy spanning empires
or civilizations that go from star to star, and it's
(08:16):
kind of hard to make that work unless you have
faster than light travel. So a warp drive in physics
is a way to try to circumvent use loopholes in
special relativity to make it possible to go from here
to there in less time than a photon would take.
Speaker 1 (08:32):
Okay, so it's some kind of magic.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
Well, there really is a concept in physics of a
warp drive, and it doesn't break special relativity. The law
in special relativity says you can't move through space faster
than light does. But a warp drive doesn't move through space.
It actually compresses space. Because what we've learned in the
last one hundred years or so is that space is
not just like an empty backdrop on which the things
(08:58):
in the universe happen. It's actually like a thing. It
has features, It can bend and curve and ripple and expand.
And so if, for example, you could compress the space
between here and a distant star so that it's not
actually as far, then you could just move a lower
than the speed of light but still get there very
very quickly. That's the basic idea of a warp drive,
(09:20):
and people want to know more about the physics of
a warp drive and is it possible. Can check out
some of the episodes that we have about warp drives.
But that's actually a possibility. We don't know how to
make it work. We don't have to build one, but
the laws of general relativity say it might be possible.
And we're talking about in our real universe. In Star Trek,
their warp drive is a little bit different.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
Okay, so how does the Star Trek warp drive quote
unquote work.
Speaker 3 (09:46):
So the basic principle is the same, is that you're
going faster than the speed of light. And they have
these warped levels, so like warp one, warp two, warp three,
each of those goes faster and faster, and for example,
and warp nine point nine is the maximum that they
could have do. And if they ever go warp nine
point nine, you can really see it straining their ship.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
That seems like airplane or boat logic right where it's
still the idea that you are like moving in a
way where there is some kind of like resistance against
your ship, and then if you're going faster, there's more
strain on the ship. But if this is about scrunching
space time. It doesn't seem like that would have the
(10:27):
same kind of effects as say, like a jet plane
trying to a sound barrier.
Speaker 3 (10:33):
Yeah, exactly, But the warp drive on Star Trek isn't
a general relativistic squeezing space creating a warp bubble kind
of situation. They don't explain at all how it works.
It's just sort of like, we can go faster than
the speed of light.
Speaker 2 (10:45):
We have a warp drive.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
Right, Okay, so part of the question was about blue ships.
So the idea is like, so, okay, you have one
of these warp drives where you can go faster than
the speed of light, and there is the obvious question
of what would like look like to you? But can
you explain what the question asker means when they talk
(11:07):
about blueshift?
Speaker 3 (11:09):
Yeah, I think basically he's wondering, what does it look
like out the window when you are doing the warp drive?
Speaker 2 (11:15):
Right?
Speaker 3 (11:15):
And this is one of my favorite parts of science
fiction is thinking about the consequences, like you've created this
new technology or discovered this new bit of science, what
does that mean? Not just for like what is it
like to be human? In that universe, but what are
the experiences like.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
Of using it? And the best science fiction.
Speaker 3 (11:31):
Are the ones that have really thought this through and
come up with creative or interesting or surprising results.
Speaker 1 (11:36):
It's like in a B movie, the science fiction B
movie where it asks if bees were sentient and all
went on strike, would that be good or bad for
the planet. But we were talking about some of the
best science fiction movies, so of course I thought of
B movie, but going.
Speaker 3 (11:53):
Absolutely yeah, definitely a high point in the science fiction
movie canon.
Speaker 2 (11:58):
But in this case they're wondering.
Speaker 3 (11:59):
Like, well, it look like if you looked out the
window while you were going faster than the speed of light,
which is a really cool question. And the writers on
these TV shows, or the visualization artists or wherever it's
responsible for this, typically do this by making the stars
streak by right like you see this in Star Wars
the stars go from points to these lines, and on
(12:20):
Star Trek they have this particular visualization where the stars
aren't completely solid lines, they sort of zoom by, so
it looks like you're whizzing through the universe and seeing
the stars go by really fast. And the question is like,
would you really be able to see the stars, because
wouldn't their frequency be shifted by the Doppler effect, so
they'd be so blue that you couldn't see them. The
(12:42):
Doppler effect being that if something is moving relative to you,
the light it emits changes frequencies. So, for example, stars
from other distant galaxies are all moving away from us
as the universe is expanding, and so the light from
those stars is shifted red because the stars are moving
away from us, Galaxies like Andromeda are moving towards us,
(13:02):
so light from Andromeda is shifted blue. So if you
were right next to Andromeda and not moving relative to it.
Speaker 2 (13:08):
You would see it's pure light as it's actually emitted.
Speaker 3 (13:11):
We see that light at higher frequencies it's blue shifted
more towards ultraviolet and X ray then it would be
if we weren't moving relative to Andromeda. It's actually a
really powerful way to measure the velocity of distant stuff
by measuring its red shift or its blue shift. So
the question is asking, like, wouldn't the stars out the
window be so blue shifted that they would be invisible?
Speaker 1 (13:32):
I see right, Because if you're moving away or towards something,
it's like the wavelength of that light that would be
hitting your eye is going to change.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 3 (13:42):
It's basic physics of the Doppler effect. It's like when
a police siren is coming towards you, it sounds one way,
and when it's moving away from you, it sounds another way.
It's the same effect but applied to sound.
Speaker 1 (13:51):
Yeah, it sounds like we woo we woo, and it
goes like wee woo woo woo.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
Yeah exactly.
Speaker 3 (13:59):
And that also for light, because light is a wave
in the electromagnetic field. And so he's asking about that,
and so I did a little bit of digging into
the physics of star trek warp drives, and I was
wondering also, like why are we seeing stars whoosh by?
Like is that realistic?
Speaker 1 (14:15):
Right?
Speaker 3 (14:16):
Because warp nine is pretty fast, but it's not actually
that fast. Like I said, it takes two days to
go like ten light years. But if you look at
the window of the enterprise, you see stars whoshing by
all the time. The thing is that stars are way
too far apart for that to happen. Yeah, I mean
stars are typically like three four five light years apart.
(14:36):
So if you're only going ten light years every two days,
then you should see like a star whoosh by like
every twenty four hours. But if you look at the
window of the enterprise, it's like ten stars a second.
So they've taken some real liberties in that visualization.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
I mean one way, I know that Star Trek is
sort of not going with the we are scrunching up space.
But if you were scrunching up space, I could see
an argument for there being some kind of weird optical effect.
Not necessarily stars wooshing by, but you know, I remember
in an episode where we talked about your point of
(15:10):
view from a black hole, where it's like if you
have a very dense point where it would suck in light.
So maybe if you're scrunching space, you could I don't
know exactly how this would work. I'm now beyond my understanding,
but I guess there could be some kind of weird
optical effect.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
I think that kind of creativity in science should get
you a spot as physics consultation on Star Trek.
Speaker 1 (15:39):
Sweet so I can just say, uh, oh, the gasorp
azorp drive went down.
Speaker 3 (15:46):
No, I think there's a lot of room for like,
how could we make this work? What would you have
to do is there any explanation in science? But anyway,
let's take the star trek warp drive and just say
somehow it makes you be able to move faster than
the speed of light. Physics is spended or we've discovered
if the special relativity is wrong or whatever. We're moving
faster than the speed of light. What would it look
like out the window, the front window, the side window,
(16:08):
the back window. And Dale's totally right that the Doppler
effect is a big effect. You're moving very fast relative
to these stars, which is the same thing as saying
they're moving fast relative to you. So, for example, if
you look out the back window of the Enterprise, you're
moving faster than the speed of light. Number one, all
of the light from those stars is really really red shifted.
(16:28):
It's red shifted so far that you wouldn't be able
to see it like our sun amids light in the
visual spectrum. But if you're moving away from the Sun
super duper fast, then its light is going to be
red shifted so far that you'd need like a special
infrared camera to even pick it up.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
I see, yeah, because our eyes can only detect certain wavelengths,
like if something's too I guess wide of a wavelength
or too short of a wavelength, we are not going
to be able to see it.
Speaker 2 (16:56):
Yeah exactly.
Speaker 3 (16:57):
And in addition, you're now moving faster than those photons somehow, right,
we suspended physics, and so you're out running the photons,
so you're not going to be able to see anything
behind you.
Speaker 2 (17:08):
Yeah exactly.
Speaker 3 (17:10):
So it's like I'm trying to throw a baseball at you,
but you're in your ferrari and you're going much faster,
Like my baseball is not going to get to you.
So you're just not going to see anything out the
back window. If you're actually moving faster than the speed
of light. But then what about your front window? Right,
you're moving towards all these stars faster than the speed
of light.
Speaker 2 (17:28):
What should you see?
Speaker 1 (17:29):
Right?
Speaker 3 (17:29):
This is actually also quite counterintuitive what you would actually see.
And instead of imagining ourselves moving towards the stars, imagine
the equivalent scenario of the star moving towards us. Because
in our universe velocity is relative, it doesn't really matter
who's moving.
Speaker 2 (17:44):
It's actually the same thing.
Speaker 3 (17:45):
Think about what it would look like if a star
is moving towards you faster than the speed of.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Light scary, you actually be very scary.
Speaker 2 (17:54):
Now.
Speaker 3 (17:54):
That means that the star is moving faster than the
light that it emits, right, right, So it's like leaving
the light behind, which means again you can't see it,
right because you arrive at the star before the light
that it emitted along the way it gets to you.
Speaker 1 (18:10):
Ah my brain.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
Yeah right.
Speaker 3 (18:14):
And so imagine the star is far away, it emits
a photon, but the star gets to you before the photon, right,
So you don't see that photon until the star has
already passed you. So what happens is as the star
passes you, that's when you see it, and you actually
see it twice. You still go past you, and now
it's emitting photons as it goes past you, and those
photons are coming towards you, and you also start to
(18:36):
receive the photons that it emitted while it was on
its way to you. Those now start arriving, but they
arrive in reverse order, right, because the images it's sent
later arrived before the images it's sent earlier when it
was further away.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
Oh yeah, Because you are moving so fast that you
will approach the star and have those close by photons
you faster than the ones that hit you from when
the star was further away. Yeah, that's wild. You'd see
like an after image of the star before from before.
Speaker 3 (19:13):
Yes, exactly, So you'd see nothing, and then when the
star passes you, you'd suddenly see two stars.
Speaker 2 (19:18):
One going behind you and one going ahead of you.
Speaker 3 (19:21):
It would look like going backwards in time, right, you
would see it in reverse order.
Speaker 2 (19:26):
Very bizarre effect.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
And I've never seen this displayed in science fiction. I
would love to see somebody actually make this work. If
you were writing a new show about people with warp drives,
email me and I will help you get this right.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
Well, I'm going to keep that in mind for my
new show Hot Alien Babes on Neptune.
Speaker 3 (19:45):
Dale's actual question is about the light, and he's right
that the light is also going to be blue shifted,
and so if it was like originally a red dwarf
that emitted in the longer wavelengths, it would be shifted
into the higher frequencies. The exact shift depends on the velocity,
but he's right that that might also be invisible. It
might be that is shifted up way past the ultraviolet,
(20:06):
so that you need like X ray sensors or gamma
ray sensors to be able to detect it. In principle,
there's nothing that's actually invisible, Like if we have enough
particle detectors, we can sense those very very high frequency photons.
For example, orbiting the Earth, we have the Fermi Lat telescope,
which you can measure photons at very very high energies.
So in principle you imagine that these spaceships are probably
(20:28):
equipped with sensors to be able to detect super high
frequency photons, but you wouldn't see them with the naked eye, okay,
but you might see something else. You know that the
universe is filled with the cosmic microwave background photons, photons
left over from a very early universe plasma, and these
are very long wavelength because they've been stretched to very
very infrared by the expansion of the universe. But if
(20:52):
you're flying through the universe faster than the speed of light,
those are all going to.
Speaker 2 (20:56):
Get blue shifted.
Speaker 1 (20:57):
It hits crunched up.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
Yeah, they might.
Speaker 3 (20:59):
Get blue shifted all all the way into the visible spectrum.
So you might be able to see the CMB with
your naked eyes, meaning that the whole universe would be
filled with this fog.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
Oh whoa, it might maybe you would get some kind
of weird spaceship Aura.
Speaker 2 (21:14):
Yeah, would be super cool.
Speaker 3 (21:17):
Anyway, Dale is totally right that the way they describe
it on Star Trek is not really accurate from the
physics point of view, and the engine they have anyway
doesn't really make any sense. But it's a lot of fun.
I don't mean that in a way to criticize Star Trek.
I know what they're going for is not hard sci fi.
There's definitely a niche there, and I love it big
fans Star Trek.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
I hope one of those writers were fired for that
blunder is my opinion.
Speaker 3 (21:40):
No, no, no fire any writers or pro writer. But
please do reach out to us. We would love to
help you get the physics right. And thank you to
Dale for reaching out to us with your question about
the physics of Star Trek. I love that Dale, that
is doing this physics in his mind, he's being a physicist.
He's wondering what would this actually look like? How does
that work? Why not this one that's being a physicist.
(22:02):
All you people out there who are wondering how the
universe works, you're all physicists too sweet.
Speaker 1 (22:07):
Did we get a badge?
Speaker 2 (22:09):
I'll send you all a sticker.
Speaker 3 (22:10):
Yes, digital we get a badge, all right, so please
don't be shy right to us with your questions to
questions Aunt Daniel and Jorge dot com. Everybody gets an answer,
because everybody deserves an explanation. Thanks Katie very much for
joining me on today's special listener Questions sixty nine episode.
Speaker 1 (22:28):
All right, back to work on my hot babes from
Neptune script.
Speaker 3 (22:32):
Can't wait to see that one on the screen. All right, everyone,
Thanks very much. Tune in next time for more science
and curiosity. Come find us on social media where we
answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, disc Org,
Instant and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and remember that
(22:53):
Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio.
For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the Heart Radio, Apple
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Hey, Daniel, would you rather live in the Star Wars
or Star Trek universe?
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Oh? Man, I'm not sure.
Speaker 3 (00:16):
I guess I'd prefer to live in the one that's
more scientific, you know, that follows actual laws.
Speaker 1 (00:22):
I think they use more particle names in Star Trek.
They might be made up. I know in Star Wars
they use Midi Chlorians, which are definitely not made up.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
Yeah, but I think Star Wars leans on the little
magic aspect a bit too much. I think Star Trek
is trying to sound more scientific at least.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
I mean, isn't that basically our jobs, right? We're always
trying to sound more scientific.
Speaker 3 (00:49):
I mean I do my best to sound like a
physics professor. I hope it's working.
Speaker 1 (00:53):
I yeah, I think you had me fooled there for.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
A minute, you and all the listeners.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
I hope the big reveal.
Speaker 3 (01:17):
Hi, I'm Daniel, I'm a particle physicist and a professor
at UC Irvine.
Speaker 2 (01:20):
Really really, I promise I am.
Speaker 1 (01:23):
I'm Katie Golden. I'm none of those things, but you know,
I do have an animal biology podcast, and I'm interested
in physics, or.
Speaker 2 (01:32):
At least you can make it sound like you are.
Speaker 1 (01:35):
That's so interesting, Daniel.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
And Welcome to the podcast Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe,
a production of iHeartRadio in which we sound interested in
the big questions of the universe, because we really really
are interested. We want to know how everything works, where
it all came from, how it all comes together to
create our amazing, glittering, beautiful, mysterious cosmos, and we want
(02:00):
to make sure that everybody out there understands things as
well as we do and as well as we don't.
Thanks very much Katie for joining me on today's episode.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
I'm super excited. I love to hear people's questions because
usually they are something that I am also curious about,
and I also don't know the answer to.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
That's right.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
Many of our episodes are us explaining a concept in
physics to you, but we don't want this podcast to
be a one directional lecture. We want it to be
a conversation. We want to know what you are wondering
about when those ideas don't click in your mind. We
want to hear from you so we can help you understand.
So please, if you have questions, right to me to
(02:41):
questions at Danielandjorge dot com. Everybody gets an answer from
a real live physics professor.
Speaker 2 (02:46):
They really really do.
Speaker 3 (02:48):
And sometimes I hear a question from listeners, I think, well,
I bet a lot of people ask this question, or
a lot of people would appreciate the answer, or that
one would be fun to joke with Katie about. So
let's do it on the podcast.
Speaker 1 (03:01):
No physicists were harmed in the making of this Listener
Questions episode.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
Not yet, but I'll keep you up to date. We'll
see if that changes.
Speaker 3 (03:11):
And so today on the podcast, we'll be answering Listener Questions,
Episode number sixty nine.
Speaker 1 (03:22):
There's nothing funny about that number.
Speaker 3 (03:25):
Absolutely nothing. We have been counting down to Listener Question
sixty nine ever since we've been doing Listener Questions and
we realized we were going to get there.
Speaker 1 (03:33):
I get it. The six looks like a nine upside down.
That's what's funny about it.
Speaker 3 (03:39):
Yeah, that's exactly what's funny about it. It reminds me a
little bit of when comic Shoemaker Levy hit Jupiter. When
it ran around the sun. The comment broke up into
like twenty six pieces. So somebody in NASA was like, ooh,
let's give the comet pieces names and we'll use letters
because there's twenty six of them. So there was the
A fragment, the B fragment, the C fragment, and then
(03:59):
when the first piece hit Jupiter, they called it the
A spot, and the next one when they hit they
called it the B spot. And then when they got
up to the F spot, they realized, uh oh, they
had a problem with the next one because were they
really going to write a scientific paper about Jupiter's G spot.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
I have no idea what you're talking about. That just
sounds like numbers and words to me.
Speaker 3 (04:22):
So they ended up talking about the F spot and
then the G impact site, and then the H spot.
Speaker 1 (04:27):
Somehow that sounds dirtier to me. I don't know impact
site all right.
Speaker 3 (04:32):
Anyway, we've got to do our best to extract humor
from science. But on today's episode, we are not just
making jokes about the number sixty nine. We were answering
questions from listeners like you, and today's episode is discussion
of a question from Dale from Washington. Here is Dale's question.
Speaker 4 (04:49):
Hello, Daniel and Jorge, This is Dale from Chattarroy, Washington.
I was watching Star Trek the other day and it
occurred to me that when the Enterprise D is cruising
a speed of warp six and the stars were all
speeding by, they maybe shouldn't have been able to see
them due to blue shift. Would the light be shifted
(05:10):
all the way into ultraviolet or maybe even X rays
or even further down? Is that even possible at a
large percentage of the speed of light? Anyways, thanks for
listening to my question.
Speaker 3 (05:24):
All right, Katie, are you a Star Trek fan? Have
you wondered about this yourself?
Speaker 1 (05:27):
So? I have watched a good amount of Star Trek,
and I I'm always kind of I don't know. I
guess I kind of gloss over the weird engineering babble.
It doesn't it's like we got to put the transoperitors
or interopertors on the warp schism. I don't really know.
(05:48):
And like I'm also a little bit confused about the
concept of the warp drive. I know there are different
like warp speeds, but like the idea, I guess is
that what you're like ending space and making the ship
go across. I don't know. Do you know if they
ever did like an explanation of warp drive.
Speaker 3 (06:09):
Well, one of the funny things about Star Trek is
that it's not really science fiction. I mean, they don't
actually have any sort of explanation for what they're doing.
It's exactly as you described. It's like particle babble.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
It's sort of like.
Speaker 3 (06:22):
The way jen Ai is. You know, you ask chat
gbt to generate an answer to physics question and it'll
generate a bunch of words which sound like an answer,
and Star Trek is kind of like that. It's like,
here's a convincing number of words which sort of sound
like an explanation for the science, but it's really nonsense,
you know. And I gotta love that about Star Trek.
They're not really trying to be hard sci fi. They
(06:44):
sort of make fun of themselves a little bit. They
don't take themselves too seriously. The science of Star Trek
is not like crisply thought out and click together into
some coherent explanation, as you'll see when we dig into
what a warp drive is in Star Trek and what
it should look like when you look out right.
Speaker 1 (07:01):
But the idea being that you're going really really fast,
like is the idea that you're going at the speed
of light.
Speaker 3 (07:09):
The idea of a warp drive in physics aside from
star trek is an attempt to move faster than the
speed of light. So we have this frustrating limitation on
all motion in the universe that nothing can move faster
than the speed of light through space. So if you
want to fly to Alpha Centari and it's three light
years away, it's going to take you at least three
years to get there because you can't even go at
(07:31):
the speed of light. Nothing with mass can move even
at the speed of light, and nothing at all can
move faster than the speed of light. And the speed
of light is really really fast, you know, one hundred
and eighty six thousand miles per second is incredibly fast,
But distances in space are incredibly vast, and so stars
are far apart even compared to the speed of light.
So our galaxy, for example, is one hundred thousand light
(07:54):
years across. You wanted to go from here to the
other side of it and back, we're talking two hundred
thousand years even if you're a photon. So it's incredibly
hard to get around the universe because the speed of
light is actually very very slow. And in science fiction
universes people often want to have like galaxy spanning empires
or civilizations that go from star to star, and it's
(08:16):
kind of hard to make that work unless you have
faster than light travel. So a warp drive in physics
is a way to try to circumvent use loopholes in
special relativity to make it possible to go from here
to there in less time than a photon would take.
Speaker 1 (08:32):
Okay, so it's some kind of magic.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
Well, there really is a concept in physics of a
warp drive, and it doesn't break special relativity. The law
in special relativity says you can't move through space faster
than light does. But a warp drive doesn't move through space.
It actually compresses space. Because what we've learned in the
last one hundred years or so is that space is
not just like an empty backdrop on which the things
(08:58):
in the universe happen. It's actually like a thing. It
has features, It can bend and curve and ripple and expand.
And so if, for example, you could compress the space
between here and a distant star so that it's not
actually as far, then you could just move a lower
than the speed of light but still get there very
very quickly. That's the basic idea of a warp drive,
(09:20):
and people want to know more about the physics of
a warp drive and is it possible. Can check out
some of the episodes that we have about warp drives.
But that's actually a possibility. We don't know how to
make it work. We don't have to build one, but
the laws of general relativity say it might be possible.
And we're talking about in our real universe. In Star Trek,
their warp drive is a little bit different.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
Okay, so how does the Star Trek warp drive quote
unquote work.
Speaker 3 (09:46):
So the basic principle is the same, is that you're
going faster than the speed of light. And they have
these warped levels, so like warp one, warp two, warp three,
each of those goes faster and faster, and for example,
and warp nine point nine is the maximum that they
could have do. And if they ever go warp nine
point nine, you can really see it straining their ship.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
That seems like airplane or boat logic right where it's
still the idea that you are like moving in a
way where there is some kind of like resistance against
your ship, and then if you're going faster, there's more
strain on the ship. But if this is about scrunching
space time. It doesn't seem like that would have the
(10:27):
same kind of effects as say, like a jet plane
trying to a sound barrier.
Speaker 3 (10:33):
Yeah, exactly, But the warp drive on Star Trek isn't
a general relativistic squeezing space creating a warp bubble kind
of situation. They don't explain at all how it works.
It's just sort of like, we can go faster than
the speed of light.
Speaker 2 (10:45):
We have a warp drive.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
Right, Okay, so part of the question was about blue ships.
So the idea is like, so, okay, you have one
of these warp drives where you can go faster than
the speed of light, and there is the obvious question
of what would like look like to you? But can
you explain what the question asker means when they talk
(11:07):
about blueshift?
Speaker 3 (11:09):
Yeah, I think basically he's wondering, what does it look
like out the window when you are doing the warp drive?
Speaker 2 (11:15):
Right?
Speaker 3 (11:15):
And this is one of my favorite parts of science
fiction is thinking about the consequences, like you've created this
new technology or discovered this new bit of science, what
does that mean? Not just for like what is it
like to be human? In that universe, but what are
the experiences like.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
Of using it? And the best science fiction.
Speaker 3 (11:31):
Are the ones that have really thought this through and
come up with creative or interesting or surprising results.
Speaker 1 (11:36):
It's like in a B movie, the science fiction B
movie where it asks if bees were sentient and all
went on strike, would that be good or bad for
the planet. But we were talking about some of the
best science fiction movies, so of course I thought of
B movie, but going.
Speaker 3 (11:53):
Absolutely yeah, definitely a high point in the science fiction
movie canon.
Speaker 2 (11:58):
But in this case they're wondering.
Speaker 3 (11:59):
Like, well, it look like if you looked out the
window while you were going faster than the speed of light,
which is a really cool question. And the writers on
these TV shows, or the visualization artists or wherever it's
responsible for this, typically do this by making the stars
streak by right like you see this in Star Wars
the stars go from points to these lines, and on
(12:20):
Star Trek they have this particular visualization where the stars
aren't completely solid lines, they sort of zoom by, so
it looks like you're whizzing through the universe and seeing
the stars go by really fast. And the question is like,
would you really be able to see the stars, because
wouldn't their frequency be shifted by the Doppler effect, so
they'd be so blue that you couldn't see them. The
(12:42):
Doppler effect being that if something is moving relative to you,
the light it emits changes frequencies. So, for example, stars
from other distant galaxies are all moving away from us
as the universe is expanding, and so the light from
those stars is shifted red because the stars are moving
away from us, Galaxies like Andromeda are moving towards us,
(13:02):
so light from Andromeda is shifted blue. So if you
were right next to Andromeda and not moving relative to it.
Speaker 2 (13:08):
You would see it's pure light as it's actually emitted.
Speaker 3 (13:11):
We see that light at higher frequencies it's blue shifted
more towards ultraviolet and X ray then it would be
if we weren't moving relative to Andromeda. It's actually a
really powerful way to measure the velocity of distant stuff
by measuring its red shift or its blue shift. So
the question is asking, like, wouldn't the stars out the
window be so blue shifted that they would be invisible?
Speaker 1 (13:32):
I see right, Because if you're moving away or towards something,
it's like the wavelength of that light that would be
hitting your eye is going to change.
Speaker 2 (13:41):
Yeah, exactly.
Speaker 3 (13:42):
It's basic physics of the Doppler effect. It's like when
a police siren is coming towards you, it sounds one way,
and when it's moving away from you, it sounds another way.
It's the same effect but applied to sound.
Speaker 1 (13:51):
Yeah, it sounds like we woo we woo, and it
goes like wee woo woo woo.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
Yeah exactly.
Speaker 3 (13:59):
And that also for light, because light is a wave
in the electromagnetic field. And so he's asking about that,
and so I did a little bit of digging into
the physics of star trek warp drives, and I was
wondering also, like why are we seeing stars whoosh by?
Like is that realistic?
Speaker 1 (14:15):
Right?
Speaker 3 (14:16):
Because warp nine is pretty fast, but it's not actually
that fast. Like I said, it takes two days to
go like ten light years. But if you look at
the window of the enterprise, you see stars whoshing by
all the time. The thing is that stars are way
too far apart for that to happen. Yeah, I mean
stars are typically like three four five light years apart.
(14:36):
So if you're only going ten light years every two days,
then you should see like a star whoosh by like
every twenty four hours. But if you look at the
window of the enterprise, it's like ten stars a second.
So they've taken some real liberties in that visualization.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
I mean one way, I know that Star Trek is
sort of not going with the we are scrunching up space.
But if you were scrunching up space, I could see
an argument for there being some kind of weird optical effect.
Not necessarily stars wooshing by, but you know, I remember
in an episode where we talked about your point of
(15:10):
view from a black hole, where it's like if you
have a very dense point where it would suck in light.
So maybe if you're scrunching space, you could I don't
know exactly how this would work. I'm now beyond my understanding,
but I guess there could be some kind of weird
optical effect.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
I think that kind of creativity in science should get
you a spot as physics consultation on Star Trek.
Speaker 1 (15:39):
Sweet so I can just say, uh, oh, the gasorp
azorp drive went down.
Speaker 3 (15:46):
No, I think there's a lot of room for like,
how could we make this work? What would you have
to do is there any explanation in science? But anyway,
let's take the star trek warp drive and just say
somehow it makes you be able to move faster than
the speed of light. Physics is spended or we've discovered
if the special relativity is wrong or whatever. We're moving
faster than the speed of light. What would it look
like out the window, the front window, the side window,
(16:08):
the back window. And Dale's totally right that the Doppler
effect is a big effect. You're moving very fast relative
to these stars, which is the same thing as saying
they're moving fast relative to you. So, for example, if
you look out the back window of the Enterprise, you're
moving faster than the speed of light. Number one, all
of the light from those stars is really really red shifted.
(16:28):
It's red shifted so far that you wouldn't be able
to see it like our sun amids light in the
visual spectrum. But if you're moving away from the Sun
super duper fast, then its light is going to be
red shifted so far that you'd need like a special
infrared camera to even pick it up.
Speaker 1 (16:44):
I see, yeah, because our eyes can only detect certain wavelengths,
like if something's too I guess wide of a wavelength
or too short of a wavelength, we are not going
to be able to see it.
Speaker 2 (16:56):
Yeah exactly.
Speaker 3 (16:57):
And in addition, you're now moving faster than those photons somehow, right,
we suspended physics, and so you're out running the photons,
so you're not going to be able to see anything
behind you.
Speaker 2 (17:08):
Yeah exactly.
Speaker 3 (17:10):
So it's like I'm trying to throw a baseball at you,
but you're in your ferrari and you're going much faster,
Like my baseball is not going to get to you.
So you're just not going to see anything out the
back window. If you're actually moving faster than the speed
of light. But then what about your front window? Right,
you're moving towards all these stars faster than the speed
of light.
Speaker 2 (17:28):
What should you see?
Speaker 1 (17:29):
Right?
Speaker 3 (17:29):
This is actually also quite counterintuitive what you would actually see.
And instead of imagining ourselves moving towards the stars, imagine
the equivalent scenario of the star moving towards us. Because
in our universe velocity is relative, it doesn't really matter
who's moving.
Speaker 2 (17:44):
It's actually the same thing.
Speaker 3 (17:45):
Think about what it would look like if a star
is moving towards you faster than the speed of.
Speaker 1 (17:49):
Light scary, you actually be very scary.
Speaker 2 (17:54):
Now.
Speaker 3 (17:54):
That means that the star is moving faster than the
light that it emits, right, right, So it's like leaving
the light behind, which means again you can't see it,
right because you arrive at the star before the light
that it emitted along the way it gets to you.
Speaker 1 (18:10):
Ah my brain.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
Yeah right.
Speaker 3 (18:14):
And so imagine the star is far away, it emits
a photon, but the star gets to you before the photon, right,
So you don't see that photon until the star has
already passed you. So what happens is as the star
passes you, that's when you see it, and you actually
see it twice. You still go past you, and now
it's emitting photons as it goes past you, and those
photons are coming towards you, and you also start to
(18:36):
receive the photons that it emitted while it was on
its way to you. Those now start arriving, but they
arrive in reverse order, right, because the images it's sent
later arrived before the images it's sent earlier when it
was further away.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
Oh yeah, Because you are moving so fast that you
will approach the star and have those close by photons
you faster than the ones that hit you from when
the star was further away. Yeah, that's wild. You'd see
like an after image of the star before from before.
Speaker 3 (19:13):
Yes, exactly, So you'd see nothing, and then when the
star passes you, you'd suddenly see two stars.
Speaker 2 (19:18):
One going behind you and one going ahead of you.
Speaker 3 (19:21):
It would look like going backwards in time, right, you
would see it in reverse order.
Speaker 2 (19:26):
Very bizarre effect.
Speaker 3 (19:27):
And I've never seen this displayed in science fiction. I
would love to see somebody actually make this work. If
you were writing a new show about people with warp drives,
email me and I will help you get this right.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
Well, I'm going to keep that in mind for my
new show Hot Alien Babes on Neptune.
Speaker 3 (19:45):
Dale's actual question is about the light, and he's right
that the light is also going to be blue shifted,
and so if it was like originally a red dwarf
that emitted in the longer wavelengths, it would be shifted
into the higher frequencies. The exact shift depends on the velocity,
but he's right that that might also be invisible. It
might be that is shifted up way past the ultraviolet,
(20:06):
so that you need like X ray sensors or gamma
ray sensors to be able to detect it. In principle,
there's nothing that's actually invisible, Like if we have enough
particle detectors, we can sense those very very high frequency photons.
For example, orbiting the Earth, we have the Fermi Lat telescope,
which you can measure photons at very very high energies.
So in principle you imagine that these spaceships are probably
(20:28):
equipped with sensors to be able to detect super high
frequency photons, but you wouldn't see them with the naked eye, okay,
but you might see something else. You know that the
universe is filled with the cosmic microwave background photons, photons
left over from a very early universe plasma, and these
are very long wavelength because they've been stretched to very
very infrared by the expansion of the universe. But if
(20:52):
you're flying through the universe faster than the speed of light,
those are all going to.
Speaker 2 (20:56):
Get blue shifted.
Speaker 1 (20:57):
It hits crunched up.
Speaker 2 (20:58):
Yeah, they might.
Speaker 3 (20:59):
Get blue shifted all all the way into the visible spectrum.
So you might be able to see the CMB with
your naked eyes, meaning that the whole universe would be
filled with this fog.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
Oh whoa, it might maybe you would get some kind
of weird spaceship Aura.
Speaker 2 (21:14):
Yeah, would be super cool.
Speaker 3 (21:17):
Anyway, Dale is totally right that the way they describe
it on Star Trek is not really accurate from the
physics point of view, and the engine they have anyway
doesn't really make any sense. But it's a lot of fun.
I don't mean that in a way to criticize Star Trek.
I know what they're going for is not hard sci fi.
There's definitely a niche there, and I love it big
fans Star Trek.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
I hope one of those writers were fired for that
blunder is my opinion.
Speaker 3 (21:40):
No, no, no fire any writers or pro writer. But
please do reach out to us. We would love to
help you get the physics right. And thank you to
Dale for reaching out to us with your question about
the physics of Star Trek. I love that Dale, that
is doing this physics in his mind, he's being a physicist.
He's wondering what would this actually look like? How does
that work? Why not this one that's being a physicist.
(22:02):
All you people out there who are wondering how the
universe works, you're all physicists too sweet.
Speaker 1 (22:07):
Did we get a badge?
Speaker 2 (22:09):
I'll send you all a sticker.
Speaker 3 (22:10):
Yes, digital we get a badge, all right, so please
don't be shy right to us with your questions to
questions Aunt Daniel and Jorge dot com. Everybody gets an answer,
because everybody deserves an explanation. Thanks Katie very much for
joining me on today's special listener Questions sixty nine episode.
Speaker 1 (22:28):
All right, back to work on my hot babes from
Neptune script.
Speaker 3 (22:32):
Can't wait to see that one on the screen. All right, everyone,
Thanks very much. Tune in next time for more science
and curiosity. Come find us on social media where we
answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, disc Org,
Instant and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and remember that
(22:53):
Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio.
For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the Heart Radio, Apple
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.
Hosts And Creators
Daniel Whiteson
Kelly Weinersmith
Popular Podcasts
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.