Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is perhaps the low moment in the low career
lately of Jake Tapper on CNN. It pains me to
say that because I thought he was really more down
the you know, not down the middle, because that's the
wrong term, actually sane and not a partisan hack. And
(00:21):
he's increasingly come off as a partisan hack. And this
may be one of the most pathetic attempts to create
a controversy where there is none I've ever heard. And
this is amazing enough, but there's a new wrinkle. So
clip twenty six. Please. Michael Trump on.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
Truth Social yesterday wrote quote, they never went after those
that rigged the election. They only went after those that
fought to find the riggers, a word that I'm not
particularly familiar with, riggers. Keith Boyke and a Democratic political
commentator in former White House a to Bill Clinton. He
took issue with that term. Take a listen, boh, and
(00:57):
he wants to find their viggers.
Speaker 1 (00:59):
His word, not mine.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
Who's throw the election from?
Speaker 4 (01:03):
Please?
Speaker 2 (01:04):
He Boykind went on to say Trump's choice of words
is not an accident. After spending days making racist attacks
against Fannie Willis, the black woman leading the prosecution against
him in Atlanta, what do you make of that?
Speaker 1 (01:19):
I'm sorry, I laughed because it's laughable. So because he
used the term riggers, and that rhymes with brace yourselves, folks,
a racial slur. That was a hint, a dog whistle,
a wolf howl.
Speaker 5 (01:38):
I can't I haven't heard this yet. So now we
have a pha.
Speaker 1 (01:40):
Wait. No, no, no, no, no, no no oh oh, let
me do my magic please.
Speaker 5 (01:46):
I interrupted the magic. I walked in, the dove flew
out of the hat. Everything's ruined.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
Hey, is that the tough you head beyond your pat No?
Speaker 3 (01:56):
No.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
So anytime you say you're buying a pillow, I want
the bigger one, you're a racist. Anytime you roll around
in the grass and you get chiggers, you're a racist.
Anytime you see a bunch of swinging drinks and you
notice they're swiggers, you're a racist. Because it sounds the same.
Speaker 4 (02:19):
And we are like Middle ages scab covered IQ of
thirty half witten morons, and it sounds the same. So
I think it means the same unspeakable elephanting idiocy from
Jake Tapper.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
Inexcusable, unforgivable. Damn you. But if you have a situation
this idiotic this nonsensical? Is there any way to make
it more so? Yes, there is. You you invite one
Al Sharpton to the party.
Speaker 3 (02:56):
Donald Trump himself their leader using the term riggers, which
clearly rhymes with the in word. Right.
Speaker 1 (03:05):
I mean this is not exactly ten.
Speaker 3 (03:07):
Years ago, thirty years ago when we watched agains from
under Central Fire. Oh, I'm talking about he and within
the last twenty four hours use the term riggers. Is
this the kind of party the Republicans want to show
the country that they are?
Speaker 5 (03:23):
Wow?
Speaker 1 (03:23):
And Nika said, yes, you're right exactly, Yes, Reverend. Yes.
Speaker 5 (03:30):
So here's what's most interesting to me about this. I
assume that so that's from Morning Joe. I recognize Mika
Brazinski's patronizing, condescending Yes, yes, anywhere a Morning Joe. They
desperately well, they desperately want ratings. We all do who
are in this business. But they desperately want to stop Trump.
(03:51):
They hate Trump for already reasons, including the fact that
he says her husband killed an intern once but.
Speaker 1 (03:57):
Andy out of their affair when they're both married.
Speaker 5 (04:02):
Oh my god. Anyway, they hate Trump, But how do
they not get Okay, so you did this story some
over your audience who hates Trump. I suppose gonna say, Yep,
it does rhyme with that, and that's what he meant.
Some of your iudends is gonna say it gotta be
dumb as a dump. I know a lot of your audience,
I don't know if it's the majority or not, is
gonna say uh. I think it's a bit of a stretch,
(04:23):
but I agree with you. I hate Trump. But anybody
that I assume you think you're trying to convince who's
on Trump's side or could even possibly be on Trump's side.
You think this is gonna be the nail macoffin.
Speaker 1 (04:37):
You're so wrong.
Speaker 5 (04:38):
This made everybody who's in that middle ground of I
don't know Trump really bothers me.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
I don't know, maybe I.
Speaker 5 (04:43):
Won't vote, or thinking, oh, screw you people, and you're unending.
Apparently there is no limit to how far you will
go to try to paint us his races.
Speaker 3 (04:55):
Screw you.
Speaker 5 (04:55):
I'm voting for Trump again. How do you not get
that you caused more people to vote for Trump with
that segment? Then less.
Speaker 1 (05:02):
I just think you're you're getting their business model wrong.
They're their their entire target is the twenty percent of America.
That's the furthest left, and they just want to present
the most purely distilled, one hundred percent progressive version of
progressivism to attract those viewers. They don't have any interest
in anybody with a shred of bipartisanship or fairness or sense.
(05:28):
It's like some of the super right wingy websites that
are just they're just cuckoo birds. They have no interest
in attracting Mitt Romney's fans and the uh oh great,
oh never mind, or uh you know you're your your
Christen New New crowd.
Speaker 5 (05:48):
You may be right, but that is so hilarious.
Speaker 1 (05:54):
You can grown ups make those words come out of
their mouths well, because they've they've gotten very wealthy in
the very sort of panon I've described, I need to
grow up myself. We should all grow up and wake
up and smell the pandering