May 25, 2025 • 19 mins
At the end of last week, President Donald Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on the European Union starting June 1st after complaining the bloc was slow-walking negotiations and unfairly targeting US companies with lawsuits and regulations. Now today, President Trump said he would extend the deadline for the EU to face 50% tariffs until July 9 after a phone call with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. We get market perspective from Stephanie Leung, Chief Investment Officer at StashAway.
Plus - Nippon Steel shares rose after President Trump says he will back a partnership between the Japanese company and US Steel. This comes as Japan is aiming for a trade deal with the US in June. We get reaction from Kurt Tong, Managing Partner at the Asia Group.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Welcome to the Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner. So
we begin with a story on trade. At the end
of last week, you may recall President Trump threatened a
fifty percent tariff on imports from the European Union effective
June first. Now, he said this was in response to
what he called unsatisfactory trade negotiations with Brussels. However, now
(00:31):
the President says he has agreed to extend that fifty
percent tariff for the EU until July ninth. Trump made
the change after a phone call with European Commissioned President
Ursula Vanderleyan.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
We had a very nice call and I agreed to movement.
I believe June ninth would be July ninth would be
the day.
Speaker 4 (00:51):
That was the date.
Speaker 3 (00:52):
She requested, Could we move it from June first to
July ninth? And I agreed to do that, and that
she said, we will rapidly get together and see if
we could work something out.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
Now in a post on x, vonder Layan said the
European Union is ready to advance talk swiftly and decisively.
By the way, the date of July ninth is the
same day, Trump's ninety day pause on those so called
reciprocal tariffs had been set to end. For a closer
look at some of the market action, I am joined
now by Stephanie Lunghi is the CIO at Stashaway, joining
(01:24):
from our studios in Hong Kong. Stephanie, thank you so
much for making time to chat with me. Can we
start with a trade story and what I think may
be a little bit of whiplash for markets? How do
you understand the situation right now, not just where the
European Union is concerned, but more broadly how the Trump
administration is dealing with these various trade negotiations.
Speaker 4 (01:45):
Yeah. I think indeed, if you look at kind of
a broad set of things going on, it's it's quite
a lot. I mean, they try to negotiate with eighteen
key kind of trading partners, but also I mean there
are a lot of other things line up for them
to sort of try to make a deal as well.
And I think if we kind of roll back in history,
twenty eighteen was actually a very very good playbook for
(02:07):
kind of understanding or sort of I guess, of putting
a framework as to what's happening so if you kind
of remember twenty eighteen, we also had a sort of
a trade short, short term trade war between US and
China in the last quarter of twenty eighteen, and the
market actually found it slow on December twenty fourth of
(02:30):
that year, And similar to kind of what's happening right now,
I think initially, I mean, Trump tries to put out
a very very forceful kind of ask and they try
to negotiate down from there, and of course during the
negotiation it.
Speaker 5 (02:44):
Was also very very messy.
Speaker 4 (02:46):
There was a lot of back and forth, and I
mean one of Trump's tactics that he likes to use
when he's trying to make deals is he walks out
of the room at the last minute. So I mean,
I wouldn't be surprised that if Trump is kind of
deployed some of the similar tactics. But I think we
have to remember that, I mean, Trump is not a
(03:06):
person without constraints, right He being the President of the
United States, of course have a lot of power, but
at the end of the day, he needs to answer
to the median vota, and also he needs to kind
of realize that there are economic constraints as we've seen
just very very recently with bond yields.
Speaker 2 (03:21):
So you mentioned the backup that we had in US
treasury yields last week. There has been a debate, as
you well know, in the bond market about the extent
to which these tariffs may be inflationary. But for the moment,
what seems to be driving a lot of the price
section in the bond market is the concern over the
government's ability to continue to cover these massive budget deficits.
(03:44):
Are we going to be in a world now until
this tax bill has been signed in the law where
there's going to be a lot more volatility in the
bond market.
Speaker 4 (03:52):
So at the beginning of the year, we put out
our twenty and twenty five outlook and the title I
use was FAT as the New Normal FAT And the
reason why I use FAT. F stands for Fiscal dominance,
A stands for AI, T stands for Trump, and it's
basically I think these are three forces that would drive
markets for quite some time, and not just this year,
(04:14):
but perhaps I mean for the rest of the decade
to come. And in terms of physical dominance, when we're
seeing a lot of that happening, and I think if
you look at that the US treasury yield.
Speaker 5 (04:23):
Of course it's in spiking.
Speaker 4 (04:25):
I mean there's a lot of kind of I think
US centric concerns, but also it's not just a US story,
right if even if you look at the Japanese long rates,
I mean, these are at historical highs. So I do
think that there is a reflection of the market's concern
on the fiscal deficits for governments or across the world,
(04:45):
and sort of the I guess the return they demand
from holding a lot of these sovereign debt is increasing
because of the long time concern on the sustainability of
these debt levels.
Speaker 5 (04:56):
So I think again, if you look at.
Speaker 4 (04:59):
Kind of a as a classes during this past a
few months of trade war concerns, you can see that
actually bond is the weakest link. And I think if
you kind of ask around of as allocatus a few
months ago, I think very very few people would have
predicted that. I mean, actually, I mean bond is even weaker.
(05:20):
It's even kind of more concerning than that equities.
Speaker 2 (05:23):
So we've talked about the f fiscal We've talked about
the t Trump, let's talk about the A now artificial intelligence.
We get the Nvidia earnings after the closing bell on
Wednesday here in the US, Bloomberg data showed that revenue
from that core chip business is forecast to rise over
the next four quarters. But a number of analysts are
(05:44):
now beginning to talk about how the trade pressures could
put in Vidia's guidance at risk. Do you think that's
a fair criticism or at least a fair warning.
Speaker 4 (05:54):
Yeah, I think that's if you look at invidious revenue mix,
I mean, the significant part of that does come from China,
and of course, I think over the years, I mean,
they have tried to kind of I guess more of
their business in order to get rounds of these regulations.
I think indeed, I mean this morning, we're seeing that
they are gonna adopt a lower kind of power version
(06:17):
of the GPUs to be able to sell to China.
Speaker 5 (06:19):
And I think that.
Speaker 4 (06:21):
I mean, of course, for the past two and a
half years, I mean, a video was sort of the
only story in te right. If you look at the
phases of AI development, I mean, the first kind of
obvious phase or the first obvious traits are buying chips
and training of the large language models. I think I
(06:41):
do think that apart from the regulations. I mean there
are some of the more structural movements or moves away
from this phase one that I mean we're now kind
of entering phase two.
Speaker 5 (06:51):
So I mean what is phase two?
Speaker 6 (06:53):
Right?
Speaker 4 (06:53):
If you look at the l ms, I mean a
lot of them are already quite commoditized. They are very
very powerful already with kind of the lms more stabilized,
like stabilizing in the developments. I mean that actually enables
application developers to be able to make use of these
lms to develop a lot of different use cases. And indeed,
(07:16):
if you look at the within the equity markets, I
mean what's leading in this round of rebounds is a
lot of the so called AI first software companies, right,
companies like appalenteer companies like Spotify, even like do Lingo,
and a lot of these companies that are actually realizing
the benefit of AI in the business, either from the revenue.
Speaker 5 (07:38):
Side or the cost site.
Speaker 4 (07:40):
I mean, these are sort of the leading pack in
this round of rebound.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
I'm curious to get your take on how you expect
AI in China to advance, at least over the near term.
Reuters was reporting that in videos planning to launch a
new AI chip especially for the Chinese market. Do you
think that is going to accelerate the chain in Ai
in China that they would have perhaps a little bit
more advanced technology.
Speaker 4 (08:05):
The key devolvement in China, I think has been that
the of course, we had the deep Seek moment, and
it shows us that, I mean, the Chinese technology companies
can can do quite a bit of things with limited resources.
But I think what I guess more importantly is that
the because of the I guess, the restrictions that Trump
(08:25):
has put onto exporting technology to China, it forces China
to really I mean think about and invest into his
own technology stack. And if you look at companies like Huawei,
right they I mean they already possessed quite a bit
of good technology, and I think the Chinese government or
kind of Chinese companies is going to double down that
(08:47):
just because of security reasons. Right you don't know when
I mean the US is going.
Speaker 5 (08:51):
To restrict.
Speaker 4 (08:53):
Exports of chips or various other kind of important technologies.
And I think what the Deep Seat moment shows us
is that, I mean, China is not too far behind.
Speaker 5 (09:04):
And I think Nvidia.
Speaker 4 (09:06):
Is announcing this kind of news chip because they realize
that fress all right there for it perhaps is not
so much AMV or other chip companies, but really like
Chinese companies like Huawei.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
Okay, we'll leave it there, Stephanie. It's always a pleasure.
Thank you so much. Stephanie Lyung. She is the CIO
at Stashuay. Joining from Hong Kong here on the Daybreak
Asia Podcast. Welcome back to the Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm
Doug Chrisner. We go to Japan next, where shares and
(09:40):
Nippon Steele are trading higher in the Tokyo session. This
comes after President Trump said he will back up partnership
between the Japanese company and US Steel. We've got reaction
from Kurt Tong. He is managing partner at the Asia Group.
Mister Tong spoke with Bloomberg's Paul Allen and Heidi Stroud Watts.
Speaker 7 (09:59):
US Steel Knipon Steel deal details are scant, a little
bit confusing here, but at least can we say that
this is a good i'mon ahead of US Japan talks.
Speaker 8 (10:08):
It certainly establishes positive momentum going into this next month
of negotiations. It's also a very interesting signal that the
Japan side is thinking of trying to finish earlier rather
than later. As you know, there's an election coming up
later in July, and the Japanese government really needs to
have a positive outcome in this negotiation to set up
(10:31):
for that election or punt the entire negotiation until after
the election. So I actually think this is very very
positive news for the atmosphere of the negotiations, for the
level of trust between the two sides. But it still
comes down to a game of chicken over the automobiles.
Speaker 7 (10:47):
Tariffs and perhaps currency as well applays a factor here
as well. We heard from the Finance Minister of Scott
Basin last week saying, look, let's let the market handle
the currency. But is the end just always there in
the background.
Speaker 8 (11:00):
I think it's in the background, and the japan side
interestingly has waived that flag a bit as well to
remind the United States that it's a mutually beneficial and
potentially mutually destructive relationship in the financial markets. At the
negotiating table, I believe the two sides, just as they've indicated,
pretty much decided to set that aside as a negotiation item.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
Negotiations with the TPP feels like, you know, millennials ago, right,
But that was so much concentrated on the monutier of
trade clauses. What kind of deal do you think do
we end up getting? Is it sort of more on
the vibe as we've seen with some of the other
trade deals that have been tentatively agreed between the US
(11:44):
and its trading partners. Do you expect a fair degree
of actual substantive detail.
Speaker 8 (11:48):
I think there will be some substance on trade barrier reduction,
and agriculture has been mentioned, and as a clear point
of contention, there are some non tariff barriers around automobiles
which could be eased. The main thrust of it, however,
is how much is Japan going to jump in and
help Donald Trump reindustrialize the United States? And he has
(12:10):
specific asks on shipbuilding and on the energy infrastructure, particularly
Alaska gas that Japan is considering. But these are big,
risky projects, very high ticket, extraordinarily risky, and so how
they could participate in these sort of things I think
is another really important topic of discussion.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
Some of those sectors are also quite domestically sensitive, right,
how much you know we've seen kind of the success
story for cgmping, for example, in holding that strong line.
Does Japan and the government they need to do that
to a certain extent or risk domestic further diminishing popularity.
Speaker 6 (12:49):
I think that's right.
Speaker 8 (12:50):
Well, they're going to make clear to the US side
we can do this, we can't do that, and then
help to use the timeline to their advantage edge in
convincing the United States. Well, okay, that's good enough. We
do want to reach a deal, we do want to
move on. We don't want to have to raise retaliatory
tariffs again. So the deadline's in a sense starting to
(13:12):
work in Japan's favor. But again, I want to emphasize
the crucial importance of the automobile's tariff. It's twenty five
percent tariff could have a devastating impact on some Japanese
companies if it's allowed to drag on for a long time.
Speaker 7 (13:26):
Let's talk more broadly about some of these other trade
deals that are going on, because the US is trying
to negotiate dozens within a ninety day period. I mean,
normally free trade agreements take years to reach agreement on.
Does this suggest to you that some of what's being
achieved here is cosmetic for domestic political purposes and can
some of these wins in due beyond the Trump p residency.
Speaker 8 (13:48):
This process has been excruciating for all of the partners
working with the United States. That said, there will be
some substantive outcomes which are mutually beneficial, some which are
just complete concessions to the United States in order to
get the deal done, and a lot of cosmetics. A
lot of cosmetics will also go into this because the
(14:10):
US side has now discovered that the tariffs can be
a problem for the United States as much as for
the counterpart, and that leverage reduction that is implicit when
the President walked back a week after Liberation Day does
really change the dynamic of the situation.
Speaker 7 (14:28):
If you're advising some of these other countries in their
negotiations with the US, what would you be saying.
Speaker 8 (14:34):
Choose a few really interesting things, sell them to Donald Trump,
dress them up a little bit if necessary, but they
do need to be substantive at the same time, and
then be consistent and sell them over and over again
until you get across the finish line.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
The big focus is still on whether the daytone with
China can be sustained. How do you feel about that?
Speaker 6 (14:56):
So Dayton's a great word for it.
Speaker 8 (14:58):
They have I agreed to talk, there's no agenda, there's
no timeline.
Speaker 6 (15:03):
And both sides have reserved the right and.
Speaker 8 (15:06):
Are already exercising the right to continue to take action
against one another on other issues technology controls, export controls,
the Section two three to two tariff investigations. So what
I expect is that this truce on the big tariffs
will hold.
Speaker 6 (15:23):
The negotiations will take.
Speaker 8 (15:25):
A long time, and it'll be a very bumpy ride,
with lots of ups and downs, action, counteraction, angry words,
stretching all the way to and past the first meeting
of the leaders, which I would anticipate taking place in
the fall. I see two real milestones on this. One
is the meeting of President Trump and mister she The
(15:47):
other is the midterm election, where I think by the
midterm election, President Trump needs to demonstrate that all of
this effort that he's put into leveraging the size of
the US economy has paid off, because the American public
is starting to get skeptical about how this tariff strategy
is working for them.
Speaker 9 (16:08):
We've talked a lot about the stickiness of tariffs and
whether you know there are views that you know obviously
the previous Trump administration policies, some which are still in place.
But do you also look at the stickiness of what, say,
Beijingia is trying to do with its outreach in terms
of building those economics and soft and you know, harder
power alliances. Do you think that's going to be something
(16:30):
that extends beyond this administration?
Speaker 6 (16:33):
Absolutely?
Speaker 8 (16:33):
I mean this is a long term strategy for China. Now,
the Belton Road was a piece of it that's now
been refined, made less transactional, if you will, less focused
on China's needs, and there's more discussion about trade agreements,
about softer forms of investment and economic interaction, more digital,
(16:54):
less infrastructure, and I would expect China to really continue
to push that. And they have a bit of a
tear win right now because of the distrust that's been
engendered by the US tariff approach. That may be temporary,
may last a little while, but I expect China to
continue this effort to make friends and try to rally
(17:16):
them against the United States for years to come. That
latter part is harder because they don't want to burn
bridges with the United States either.
Speaker 7 (17:24):
Can you see a scenario in which China joins the
cp TPP.
Speaker 8 (17:29):
I think that it's not inconceivable. A couple of years
ago it was close to inconceivable. I think Australia has
a major vote in this. Japan has a very strong
opinion about it holding the content of the TPP and
keeping it high level penetrating liberalization. China is not yet
(17:53):
ready to make the compromises necessary to meet those standards,
but it's not inconceivable, especially as the Chinese onomy grows
slower in future years, that they'll be more willing to
revisit economic reforms that would qualify them for TPP.
Speaker 6 (18:08):
As an American citizen, I.
Speaker 8 (18:09):
Hope that the US gets its act together first and
makes it in before that happens.
Speaker 1 (18:16):
Trump has a very unconventional approach when it comes to trade, right,
He's not interested in looking at you revisiting FDAs and
multilateral bilateral agreements. Does that make the structure of these
agreements less relevant in sort of today's political atmosphere?
Speaker 8 (18:32):
It makes their outcomes less lasting? I think that in
the short term they're highly relevant. For example, the Nippon
Steel deal that you mentioned at the outset very significant,
very positive realignment of the rhetoric around Uster Pan economic relations.
Speaker 6 (18:51):
But that's one episode.
Speaker 8 (18:53):
It'll be good for the relationship for a few couple months,
but the structures are really important over time, and that
unwillingness to commit the United States to lasting structures and
the economic realm is a problem for the US. On
the defense side, I think the US is still very
much there, but the economic policy side, it's been absent
from the table for over eight years now.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
Really great to have you with us, and great to
see here is Sydney Koktong, who's a managing partner of
the Asia Group.
Speaker 2 (19:23):
Thanks for listening to today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak
Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday, we look at the story
shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. You
can find us on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel,
or anywhere else you listen. Join us again tomorrow for
insight on the market moves from Hong Kong to Singapore
(19:46):
and Australia. I'm Doug Chrisner, and this is Bloomberg
Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Welcome to the Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner. So
we begin with a story on trade. At the end
of last week, you may recall President Trump threatened a
fifty percent tariff on imports from the European Union effective
June first. Now, he said this was in response to
what he called unsatisfactory trade negotiations with Brussels. However, now
(00:31):
the President says he has agreed to extend that fifty
percent tariff for the EU until July ninth. Trump made
the change after a phone call with European Commissioned President
Ursula Vanderleyan.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
We had a very nice call and I agreed to movement.
I believe June ninth would be July ninth would be
the day.
Speaker 4 (00:51):
That was the date.
Speaker 3 (00:52):
She requested, Could we move it from June first to
July ninth? And I agreed to do that, and that
she said, we will rapidly get together and see if
we could work something out.
Speaker 2 (01:01):
Now in a post on x, vonder Layan said the
European Union is ready to advance talk swiftly and decisively.
By the way, the date of July ninth is the
same day, Trump's ninety day pause on those so called
reciprocal tariffs had been set to end. For a closer
look at some of the market action, I am joined
now by Stephanie Lunghi is the CIO at Stashaway, joining
(01:24):
from our studios in Hong Kong. Stephanie, thank you so
much for making time to chat with me. Can we
start with a trade story and what I think may
be a little bit of whiplash for markets? How do
you understand the situation right now, not just where the
European Union is concerned, but more broadly how the Trump
administration is dealing with these various trade negotiations.
Speaker 4 (01:45):
Yeah. I think indeed, if you look at kind of
a broad set of things going on, it's it's quite
a lot. I mean, they try to negotiate with eighteen
key kind of trading partners, but also I mean there
are a lot of other things line up for them
to sort of try to make a deal as well.
And I think if we kind of roll back in history,
twenty eighteen was actually a very very good playbook for
(02:07):
kind of understanding or sort of I guess, of putting
a framework as to what's happening so if you kind
of remember twenty eighteen, we also had a sort of
a trade short, short term trade war between US and
China in the last quarter of twenty eighteen, and the
market actually found it slow on December twenty fourth of
(02:30):
that year, And similar to kind of what's happening right now,
I think initially, I mean, Trump tries to put out
a very very forceful kind of ask and they try
to negotiate down from there, and of course during the
negotiation it.
Speaker 5 (02:44):
Was also very very messy.
Speaker 4 (02:46):
There was a lot of back and forth, and I
mean one of Trump's tactics that he likes to use
when he's trying to make deals is he walks out
of the room at the last minute. So I mean,
I wouldn't be surprised that if Trump is kind of
deployed some of the similar tactics. But I think we
have to remember that, I mean, Trump is not a
(03:06):
person without constraints, right He being the President of the
United States, of course have a lot of power, but
at the end of the day, he needs to answer
to the median vota, and also he needs to kind
of realize that there are economic constraints as we've seen
just very very recently with bond yields.
Speaker 2 (03:21):
So you mentioned the backup that we had in US
treasury yields last week. There has been a debate, as
you well know, in the bond market about the extent
to which these tariffs may be inflationary. But for the moment,
what seems to be driving a lot of the price
section in the bond market is the concern over the
government's ability to continue to cover these massive budget deficits.
(03:44):
Are we going to be in a world now until
this tax bill has been signed in the law where
there's going to be a lot more volatility in the
bond market.
Speaker 4 (03:52):
So at the beginning of the year, we put out
our twenty and twenty five outlook and the title I
use was FAT as the New Normal FAT And the
reason why I use FAT. F stands for Fiscal dominance,
A stands for AI, T stands for Trump, and it's
basically I think these are three forces that would drive
markets for quite some time, and not just this year,
(04:14):
but perhaps I mean for the rest of the decade
to come. And in terms of physical dominance, when we're
seeing a lot of that happening, and I think if
you look at that the US treasury yield.
Speaker 5 (04:23):
Of course it's in spiking.
Speaker 4 (04:25):
I mean there's a lot of kind of I think
US centric concerns, but also it's not just a US story,
right if even if you look at the Japanese long rates,
I mean, these are at historical highs. So I do
think that there is a reflection of the market's concern
on the fiscal deficits for governments or across the world,
(04:45):
and sort of the I guess the return they demand
from holding a lot of these sovereign debt is increasing
because of the long time concern on the sustainability of
these debt levels.
Speaker 5 (04:56):
So I think again, if you look at.
Speaker 4 (04:59):
Kind of a as a classes during this past a
few months of trade war concerns, you can see that
actually bond is the weakest link. And I think if
you kind of ask around of as allocatus a few
months ago, I think very very few people would have
predicted that. I mean, actually, I mean bond is even weaker.
(05:20):
It's even kind of more concerning than that equities.
Speaker 2 (05:23):
So we've talked about the f fiscal We've talked about
the t Trump, let's talk about the A now artificial intelligence.
We get the Nvidia earnings after the closing bell on
Wednesday here in the US, Bloomberg data showed that revenue
from that core chip business is forecast to rise over
the next four quarters. But a number of analysts are
(05:44):
now beginning to talk about how the trade pressures could
put in Vidia's guidance at risk. Do you think that's
a fair criticism or at least a fair warning.
Speaker 4 (05:54):
Yeah, I think that's if you look at invidious revenue mix,
I mean, the significant part of that does come from China,
and of course, I think over the years, I mean,
they have tried to kind of I guess more of
their business in order to get rounds of these regulations.
I think indeed, I mean this morning, we're seeing that
they are gonna adopt a lower kind of power version
(06:17):
of the GPUs to be able to sell to China.
Speaker 5 (06:19):
And I think that.
Speaker 4 (06:21):
I mean, of course, for the past two and a
half years, I mean, a video was sort of the
only story in te right. If you look at the
phases of AI development, I mean, the first kind of
obvious phase or the first obvious traits are buying chips
and training of the large language models. I think I
(06:41):
do think that apart from the regulations. I mean there
are some of the more structural movements or moves away
from this phase one that I mean we're now kind
of entering phase two.
Speaker 5 (06:51):
So I mean what is phase two?
Speaker 6 (06:53):
Right?
Speaker 4 (06:53):
If you look at the l ms, I mean a
lot of them are already quite commoditized. They are very
very powerful already with kind of the lms more stabilized,
like stabilizing in the developments. I mean that actually enables
application developers to be able to make use of these
lms to develop a lot of different use cases. And indeed,
(07:16):
if you look at the within the equity markets, I
mean what's leading in this round of rebounds is a
lot of the so called AI first software companies, right,
companies like appalenteer companies like Spotify, even like do Lingo,
and a lot of these companies that are actually realizing
the benefit of AI in the business, either from the revenue.
Speaker 5 (07:38):
Side or the cost site.
Speaker 4 (07:40):
I mean, these are sort of the leading pack in
this round of rebound.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
I'm curious to get your take on how you expect
AI in China to advance, at least over the near term.
Reuters was reporting that in videos planning to launch a
new AI chip especially for the Chinese market. Do you
think that is going to accelerate the chain in Ai
in China that they would have perhaps a little bit
more advanced technology.
Speaker 4 (08:05):
The key devolvement in China, I think has been that
the of course, we had the deep Seek moment, and
it shows us that, I mean, the Chinese technology companies
can can do quite a bit of things with limited resources.
But I think what I guess more importantly is that
the because of the I guess, the restrictions that Trump
(08:25):
has put onto exporting technology to China, it forces China
to really I mean think about and invest into his
own technology stack. And if you look at companies like Huawei,
right they I mean they already possessed quite a bit
of good technology, and I think the Chinese government or
kind of Chinese companies is going to double down that
(08:47):
just because of security reasons. Right you don't know when
I mean the US is going.
Speaker 5 (08:51):
To restrict.
Speaker 4 (08:53):
Exports of chips or various other kind of important technologies.
And I think what the Deep Seat moment shows us
is that, I mean, China is not too far behind.
Speaker 5 (09:04):
And I think Nvidia.
Speaker 4 (09:06):
Is announcing this kind of news chip because they realize
that fress all right there for it perhaps is not
so much AMV or other chip companies, but really like
Chinese companies like Huawei.
Speaker 2 (09:17):
Okay, we'll leave it there, Stephanie. It's always a pleasure.
Thank you so much. Stephanie Lyung. She is the CIO
at Stashuay. Joining from Hong Kong here on the Daybreak
Asia Podcast. Welcome back to the Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm
Doug Chrisner. We go to Japan next, where shares and
(09:40):
Nippon Steele are trading higher in the Tokyo session. This
comes after President Trump said he will back up partnership
between the Japanese company and US Steel. We've got reaction
from Kurt Tong. He is managing partner at the Asia Group.
Mister Tong spoke with Bloomberg's Paul Allen and Heidi Stroud Watts.
Speaker 7 (09:59):
US Steel Knipon Steel deal details are scant, a little
bit confusing here, but at least can we say that
this is a good i'mon ahead of US Japan talks.
Speaker 8 (10:08):
It certainly establishes positive momentum going into this next month
of negotiations. It's also a very interesting signal that the
Japan side is thinking of trying to finish earlier rather
than later. As you know, there's an election coming up
later in July, and the Japanese government really needs to
have a positive outcome in this negotiation to set up
(10:31):
for that election or punt the entire negotiation until after
the election. So I actually think this is very very
positive news for the atmosphere of the negotiations, for the
level of trust between the two sides. But it still
comes down to a game of chicken over the automobiles.
Speaker 7 (10:47):
Tariffs and perhaps currency as well applays a factor here
as well. We heard from the Finance Minister of Scott
Basin last week saying, look, let's let the market handle
the currency. But is the end just always there in
the background.
Speaker 8 (11:00):
I think it's in the background, and the japan side
interestingly has waived that flag a bit as well to
remind the United States that it's a mutually beneficial and
potentially mutually destructive relationship in the financial markets. At the
negotiating table, I believe the two sides, just as they've indicated,
pretty much decided to set that aside as a negotiation item.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
Negotiations with the TPP feels like, you know, millennials ago, right,
But that was so much concentrated on the monutier of
trade clauses. What kind of deal do you think do
we end up getting? Is it sort of more on
the vibe as we've seen with some of the other
trade deals that have been tentatively agreed between the US
(11:44):
and its trading partners. Do you expect a fair degree
of actual substantive detail.
Speaker 8 (11:48):
I think there will be some substance on trade barrier reduction,
and agriculture has been mentioned, and as a clear point
of contention, there are some non tariff barriers around automobiles
which could be eased. The main thrust of it, however,
is how much is Japan going to jump in and
help Donald Trump reindustrialize the United States? And he has
(12:10):
specific asks on shipbuilding and on the energy infrastructure, particularly
Alaska gas that Japan is considering. But these are big,
risky projects, very high ticket, extraordinarily risky, and so how
they could participate in these sort of things I think
is another really important topic of discussion.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
Some of those sectors are also quite domestically sensitive, right,
how much you know we've seen kind of the success
story for cgmping, for example, in holding that strong line.
Does Japan and the government they need to do that
to a certain extent or risk domestic further diminishing popularity.
Speaker 6 (12:49):
I think that's right.
Speaker 8 (12:50):
Well, they're going to make clear to the US side
we can do this, we can't do that, and then
help to use the timeline to their advantage edge in
convincing the United States. Well, okay, that's good enough. We
do want to reach a deal, we do want to
move on. We don't want to have to raise retaliatory
tariffs again. So the deadline's in a sense starting to
(13:12):
work in Japan's favor. But again, I want to emphasize
the crucial importance of the automobile's tariff. It's twenty five
percent tariff could have a devastating impact on some Japanese
companies if it's allowed to drag on for a long time.
Speaker 7 (13:26):
Let's talk more broadly about some of these other trade
deals that are going on, because the US is trying
to negotiate dozens within a ninety day period. I mean,
normally free trade agreements take years to reach agreement on.
Does this suggest to you that some of what's being
achieved here is cosmetic for domestic political purposes and can
some of these wins in due beyond the Trump p residency.
Speaker 8 (13:48):
This process has been excruciating for all of the partners
working with the United States. That said, there will be
some substantive outcomes which are mutually beneficial, some which are
just complete concessions to the United States in order to
get the deal done, and a lot of cosmetics. A
lot of cosmetics will also go into this because the
(14:10):
US side has now discovered that the tariffs can be
a problem for the United States as much as for
the counterpart, and that leverage reduction that is implicit when
the President walked back a week after Liberation Day does
really change the dynamic of the situation.
Speaker 7 (14:28):
If you're advising some of these other countries in their
negotiations with the US, what would you be saying.
Speaker 8 (14:34):
Choose a few really interesting things, sell them to Donald Trump,
dress them up a little bit if necessary, but they
do need to be substantive at the same time, and
then be consistent and sell them over and over again
until you get across the finish line.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
The big focus is still on whether the daytone with
China can be sustained. How do you feel about that?
Speaker 6 (14:56):
So Dayton's a great word for it.
Speaker 8 (14:58):
They have I agreed to talk, there's no agenda, there's
no timeline.
Speaker 6 (15:03):
And both sides have reserved the right and.
Speaker 8 (15:06):
Are already exercising the right to continue to take action
against one another on other issues technology controls, export controls,
the Section two three to two tariff investigations. So what
I expect is that this truce on the big tariffs
will hold.
Speaker 6 (15:23):
The negotiations will take.
Speaker 8 (15:25):
A long time, and it'll be a very bumpy ride,
with lots of ups and downs, action, counteraction, angry words,
stretching all the way to and past the first meeting
of the leaders, which I would anticipate taking place in
the fall. I see two real milestones on this. One
is the meeting of President Trump and mister she The
(15:47):
other is the midterm election, where I think by the
midterm election, President Trump needs to demonstrate that all of
this effort that he's put into leveraging the size of
the US economy has paid off, because the American public
is starting to get skeptical about how this tariff strategy
is working for them.
Speaker 9 (16:08):
We've talked a lot about the stickiness of tariffs and
whether you know there are views that you know obviously
the previous Trump administration policies, some which are still in place.
But do you also look at the stickiness of what, say,
Beijingia is trying to do with its outreach in terms
of building those economics and soft and you know, harder
power alliances. Do you think that's going to be something
(16:30):
that extends beyond this administration?
Speaker 6 (16:33):
Absolutely?
Speaker 8 (16:33):
I mean this is a long term strategy for China. Now,
the Belton Road was a piece of it that's now
been refined, made less transactional, if you will, less focused
on China's needs, and there's more discussion about trade agreements,
about softer forms of investment and economic interaction, more digital,
(16:54):
less infrastructure, and I would expect China to really continue
to push that. And they have a bit of a
tear win right now because of the distrust that's been
engendered by the US tariff approach. That may be temporary,
may last a little while, but I expect China to
continue this effort to make friends and try to rally
(17:16):
them against the United States for years to come. That
latter part is harder because they don't want to burn
bridges with the United States either.
Speaker 7 (17:24):
Can you see a scenario in which China joins the
cp TPP.
Speaker 8 (17:29):
I think that it's not inconceivable. A couple of years
ago it was close to inconceivable. I think Australia has
a major vote in this. Japan has a very strong
opinion about it holding the content of the TPP and
keeping it high level penetrating liberalization. China is not yet
(17:53):
ready to make the compromises necessary to meet those standards,
but it's not inconceivable, especially as the Chinese onomy grows
slower in future years, that they'll be more willing to
revisit economic reforms that would qualify them for TPP.
Speaker 6 (18:08):
As an American citizen, I.
Speaker 8 (18:09):
Hope that the US gets its act together first and
makes it in before that happens.
Speaker 1 (18:16):
Trump has a very unconventional approach when it comes to trade, right,
He's not interested in looking at you revisiting FDAs and
multilateral bilateral agreements. Does that make the structure of these
agreements less relevant in sort of today's political atmosphere?
Speaker 8 (18:32):
It makes their outcomes less lasting? I think that in
the short term they're highly relevant. For example, the Nippon
Steel deal that you mentioned at the outset very significant,
very positive realignment of the rhetoric around Uster Pan economic relations.
Speaker 6 (18:51):
But that's one episode.
Speaker 8 (18:53):
It'll be good for the relationship for a few couple months,
but the structures are really important over time, and that
unwillingness to commit the United States to lasting structures and
the economic realm is a problem for the US. On
the defense side, I think the US is still very
much there, but the economic policy side, it's been absent
from the table for over eight years now.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
Really great to have you with us, and great to
see here is Sydney Koktong, who's a managing partner of
the Asia Group.
Speaker 2 (19:23):
Thanks for listening to today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak
Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday, we look at the story
shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. You
can find us on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel,
or anywhere else you listen. Join us again tomorrow for
insight on the market moves from Hong Kong to Singapore
(19:46):
and Australia. I'm Doug Chrisner, and this is Bloomberg
Popular Podcasts
Boysober
Have you ever wondered what life might be like if you stopped worrying about being wanted, and focused on understanding what you actually want? That was the question Hope Woodard asked herself after a string of situationships inspired her to take a break from sex and dating. She went "boysober," a personal concept that sparked a global movement among women looking to prioritize themselves over men. Now, Hope is looking to expand the ways we explore our relationship to relationships. Taking a bold, unfiltered look into modern love, romance, and self-discovery, Boysober will dive into messy stories about dating, sex, love, friendship, and breaking generational patterns—all with humor, vulnerability, and a fresh perspective.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com