January 5, 2025 • 33 mins
"Exvangelical" Drew McCoy (aka The Genetically Modified Skeptic) continue to explore how religion and conspiracies overlap. Are non-believers playing followers? What's Drew's personal journey to becoming the atheist and conspiracy buster he is now?
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
I'm John Cipher and I'm Jerry O'Shea. I was a
CIA officer stationed around the world in high threat posts
in Europe, Russia, and in Asia.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
And I served in Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East
and in war zones. We sometimes created conspiracies to deceive
our adversaries.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
Now we're going to use our expertise to deconstruct conspiracy
theories large and small.
Speaker 3 (00:24):
Could they be true?
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Or are we being manipulated?
Speaker 1 (00:27):
This is mission implausible.
Speaker 4 (00:31):
This is part two of our interview with Adam's friend
Drew McCoy. Drew McCoy as a host of the podcast
Genetically Modified Skeptic. Last week we were discussing the overlap
between religion and conspiratorial thinking. So let's pick up where
we left off for part two.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
I got a not a long PERI Rasia. I got
a question for you. How do you view the conflation
now between the Trumpest movement and evangelicals where Trump himself
is fulfilling biblical prophecies according to some people, right, so
this itself is a conspiracy theory that Trump is not
if he plays in his own realizes this thing that
(01:09):
the world is screwed up in God sent Trump. He
plays this himself, and he plays into this. How do
you view that the sort of the religiousification of trump Ism.
Speaker 5 (01:19):
Well, Trump is a populist, right, so he's saying that
there's this big conspiracy against him, against the common man.
They need to drain the swamp, they need to abolish
the deep state, all of these things. And this just
has a hand in hand relationship with pre existing pre
Trump Evangelical Christian theology. We believe that the world was
(01:42):
ruled by the prince of this world, Satan. That's something
that I was raised to believe and is to be
sold this idea that, oh, all of my political opponents,
everyone that's against the Trump brand is just a part
of the deep state, a part of a Satanic conspiracy theory.
It's the most natural thing in the world. It's the
easiest thing to possibly see coming if you grew up
(02:04):
in the evangelical world.
Speaker 6 (02:06):
I think for those of us not in the world,
it's one of the great puzzles of our age, Like,
how is it possible that these people who got so
outraged by Bill Clinton's now almost quaintctions a blowjob could
embrace this theatrically libertine. I mean the only way he
describes himself is as immoral, I mean literally playing with
(02:30):
the ideas of incest and constant sexual immorality. So for
I think, for us outside, it just seems utterly confounding.
It just makes no sense. But you're saying, for you,
it's there's no mystery, it's just obvious. Yeah.
Speaker 5 (02:43):
I think a lot of people from the outside see
Christianity and religion in general is nothing more than a
moral framework, and the moral framework of any given religion
is usually very important and somewhat central. But people from
the outside looking into something like evangelical as will not
see the narrative framework, the interpretive framework for just everyday
(03:06):
life that occurs in these circles. So while yes, evangelicals
are very puritanical about sex and drugs and to a
certain extent, alcohol, certainly they don't approve of making sexually
suggestive comments about your own children, that's for sure. They
do see a deeply dualistic reality in everything, and when
(03:30):
someone comes along and says that they represent pure good
fighting pure evil, that's a pretty strong selling point, especially
when you are able to hit on points like bureaucracy
itself is flooded with people who are fundamentally evil, which
is like a subplot in the evangelical Christian narrative. So
(03:53):
we really can't get hung up too much on just
thinking of anything within religion, anything within evangelicalism, as just
some kind of moral framework for people to follow. We
have to look at the stories, the myths, the legends
that they tell themselves in everyday life that they teach
their children.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
But if someone like Biden had done the same myths
and said, you know, I'm finding evil, would that have worked.
It seems to me that it already fits into a
narrative of right wing.
Speaker 5 (04:16):
It's really hard to say. I do think that Biden
probably would have had a harder time going against somebody
who does not have any prior affiliation with the Catholic Church.
The evangelical vote used to be quite anti Catholic. Now
it's getting a lot more ecumenical. In order to vote
for someone like Trump, in order to support people like
(04:37):
pundits like Matt Walsh and Michael Knowles who are Catholic,
it's got to become more ecumenical. But I think that
if you were to put two candidates in opposite opposition
to each other, all things being equal, except for one
having more of a Protestant background, like Trump, arguably versus
Joe Biden, who's a long time Catholic. I would see
(04:57):
the person with more of a Protestant background probably out.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
On the ecumenical part on gob Smith, that someone like
Tulci Giebert, someone who belongs to a breakaway Hari Krishna
sect that believes that this guy Chris Butler is the
literal word of God on earth and must be obeyed.
And someone like this running in charge of CIA and
(05:23):
the US intelligence community. I'm shocked that the evangelical community
is like fine with it, and it seems to me
that almost the Great Man is more important than anything.
I also want to ask how you escaped from that mindset.
Speaker 6 (05:38):
I mean, everything we talked about on this show. I
was looking at some statistics. Twenty seven percent of evangelical
Christians believe QAnon is mostly true, highest group by far,
I think, double any other group. Over sixty percent believe
that the election was stolen. In twenty twenty, fifty five
percent believed that there's a deep state that you guys
(05:59):
are representatives of that is controlling outcome. So that doesn't
feel like a very practical political project that we just
have to take fifty five percent of evangelical Christians and
get them to no longer be evangelical Christians, which we
don't want to do in and of itself. It's just
how do you break the conspiracy theory?
Speaker 5 (06:18):
I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that. I don't
think that when it comes to evangelicals and conspiracy theories,
that the call is only coming from inside the house
at this point. I think that the evangelical conspiracy mill,
the circling the wagons to protect religious identity infrastructure that's
(06:38):
in place, is the only thing that is producing conspiracy theories.
I think that the fact that evangelicals have harved a
path in American society so strongly of working with governments
ken Ham's Ark encounter, being able to work with local
governments in Kentucky in order to get taxpayer dollars to
support his mission of building a Noah's Ark based theme
(07:01):
park for fundamentalist Christians, his project of getting DVDs that
talk about creation quote science and sending them to schools
to be actually used a science curriculum. That path having
been carved in American society means that kind of morally
flexible grifters who don't care about religion, they don't care
about the Gospel or anything like this, can just jump
(07:23):
directly in that path that's already been carved. They can
copy it, and then they can also prey on an
audience that has been psychologically primed to accept conspiracy theories
when it comes to something like QAnon. I don't think
that it is the most devout of evangelicals that are
actually taking that up. I think it's people who identify
as evangelical, yes, and maybe we're primed to accept things
(07:47):
like conspiracy theories, But I don't think that it's people
who are in church super regularly, who are really integrated
into religious community and this sort of thing, you know,
strong enmeshment in religious life, that are the strongest believers
in q If you can indulge me in a little
bit of analysis of some of the psychological components of
(08:09):
a person who accepts conspiracy theories, if we look at
the research that we've seen some psychologists do in the past,
had to twenty years or so. This is I'm sourcing
this from American studies scholar Peter Knight. He said that
psychologists have developed an ever more detailed picture of what
we call the conspiratorial mind. They found correlations between conspiracy
(08:30):
thinking and personality traits such as paranoia, narcissism, suspiciousness, and cynicism,
as well as feelings of alienation it's a really important one. Uncertainty, powerlessness,
that's a really important one. Anxiety and loss of control
another important one. If we look at the people who
attend church and are the most enmeshed in evangelical communities,
(08:54):
these are not poor lonely people. Actually people who go
to evangelical church, which more often people that go weekly,
are actually the folks that tend to have more money
and more power and are just have more stable lives
in general. So per Ryan Burge, as one becomes more educated,
(09:14):
the less likely they are as an evangelical to be
someone who rarely or seldom or never attends church. Now,
the same is true of income. The richer you get,
the more likely you are of being a regularly attending evangelical.
So I think that we need to consider the idea
that maybe people who are horror people who are not
(09:38):
in Meshan religious communities that identify as evangelicals might be
the people who are most up for grabs for like
morally flexible grifters who pretend to be evangelicals, people like
Q to gain power to manipulate people. I think that
it's probably poor, not particularly and meshed lonely people who
(10:02):
identify as evangelical, who are actually gravitating toward these conspiracies
in the most extreme way.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
Let's take a quick break. We'll be right back, Drew.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
I saw your video about becoming an atheist. I thought
it was very interesting and very well argued. You've become
an atheist, obviously there was a community that you were
in before. What is it that you've kept from your
past religious belief Have you totally broken from those sort
of viewer? What is it you still keep even if
it's not part of a specific religion.
Speaker 5 (10:36):
I do think that I've kept a certain amount of
the Protestant Christian moral framework. I like to think that
I'm not as prone to conspiracy theories, but I guess
maybe that's not entirely for the individual to judge. Always,
I still cite certain teachings of both the Apostle Paul
and Jesus as not the moral foundations for my kind
(11:00):
of moral ideology, but the catalysts or the impetus for
the moral foundations that I do have. So if you
look at the story of the Good Samaritan, you know
found in the Gospel of Luke, there's this idea of
that you should love and support your neighbor, that you
should show them kindness, you should express altruism to people
(11:23):
who are not in your in group, and in fact
that the ability to do this maybe is the truest
indication of moral righteousness, or at least centeredness. And that
is something that I think that very parables focused Protestant
Christians actually are pretty good at teaching their kids a
(11:44):
lot of the time. I like to think that my
parents did a good job of teaching me that kind
of thing. I definitely credit them for that. I don't
think that people like my parents, Evangelical Christians who are
very conspiratorial, do a particularly good job of actually acting
upon the things they've taught their children. I see myself
as representative of kind of a generation of Evangelicals who
(12:06):
took to the moral teachings of Jesus, and we ran
with them so hard that we ran up against the
church communities that we saw as betraying them. So in
a way. I think that becoming an atheist morally speaking,
was one of the most Christian decisions I have ever made.
(12:26):
I was taught about discernment, about moral purity, and in
order to abide by what I thought was right, both
morally and philosophically and scientifically, I had to get out
of the church community and be something else.
Speaker 2 (12:40):
Was there a damascene moment or cascade of events where
you woke up one morning and like, yeah, I don't
believe anymore.
Speaker 5 (12:48):
I describe my exodus from Christianity as a set of
dominoes falling, and the first domino fell, and then after
or maybe years, another domino fell, and with every domino
there's an acceleration of these dominoes falling, and eventually, within
(13:08):
a period of just a few months, which was right
around the time when I was graduating from college, most
of the dominoes started to fall. So it started with
me really questioning the creation narrative that I was taught,
and then eventually going into grad school and studying human sexuality.
It was the moral narrative that homosexuality was an abomination,
(13:30):
even though, as far as I could tell, trying to
suppress someone's sexual orientation is actually extremely harmful for them.
And eventually, you know, that led me to just fundamentally
questioning the nature of God in existence and of the supernatural.
And I got to the point again over a matter
of years of slow deliberation and contemplation into a period
(13:52):
of a few months, I would say about four months
of really extremely intense philosophical moral delay liberation that led
me out of identifying as a Christian. The silver lining
to the awful experience was that I didn't feel bad
about finally reading all of the educational books that I
knew existed but I thought were wrong somehow. So me
(14:15):
actually being able to read something like the Origin of
the Species rather than just hearing about it was an
ecstatic experience for me. But there is only so much
reading of old, stuffy science books that can distract you
from social suicide. It was nearly complete social suicide in
(14:36):
a lot of ways. The reason I started my YouTube
channel was so that I could vent about all of
the ideas that were going on in my head. But
I just didn't have anybody to speak to in real
life about this. My community around me was all evangelical,
so I had to go online to talk about it,
and through that venture things absolutely have gotten better. But
(14:56):
leaving evangelical circles is, especially when you're going to become
an atheist, is extremely difficult. It sucks for sure.
Speaker 2 (15:05):
There's a parallel in the intelligence community. So historically, some
of our best agents, people who've spied for SAA were
true believers in their own systems or their own ideologies
and the union. They believed in communism. They were some
of the stars, the best and brightest, and then, almost
(15:25):
mirroring your own set of experiences, they realized that they
had been either been had or that try as they might,
they simply couldn't believe the force of logic and events
and what they saw led them to break at least internally.
But they couldn't open a YouTube channel to tell the truth. Instead,
they would look up someone like John and say, I
(15:48):
just can't live with myself. I need someone to talk
to I need to say what I really think, And
then that flipped off into espionage.
Speaker 3 (15:55):
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (15:56):
I started my channel as a way to help myself
to vent when I was in a really difficult social situation,
but eventually the channel became a way to try to
help other people. I started getting a lot of messages
a few months in that said things like I'm desperately alone,
(16:16):
no one supports me. I've never heard anyone say the
things that you're saying without being heavily criticized or punished, essentially,
And I just want you to know how therapeutic it
is for me to know that someone like you even
exists at all. And these people, these are Americans, people
in a country with freedom of religion, telling me that
(16:38):
what I'm saying sounds like something that has been horribly
suppressed and that you would suffer horrible consequences for saying. Eventually,
I even started getting some messages where people were saying
that just consuming my content and knowing that someone like
me existed helped the person decide against ending their lives.
And it's it's a honestly, it's a relatable experience.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
You know.
Speaker 5 (17:02):
When I opened that up and read it, I wasn't
actually very shocked that someone would say that. I was
maybe surprised that my little YouTube videos made that kind
of an impact, but I wasn't surprised the person was
going through that not at all as.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
A CIA off. So one of the most moving episodes
for me was in the third world country. I'm sitting
at a bar. I have gotten to know this North
Korean and he's had his third drink and we're building
a genuine friendship and he like pulps hard and he
looks at me. He looks, looks over both of his
shoulders and he says, I don't really love the great leader.
(17:38):
And it was like what he said is a death
sentence if he'd sent this to his mother, anybody he loved.
And yet sitting across from someone, it was like, I
can say this, I'm gonna I'm safe here, And it
was like extraordinarily difficult and dangerous for him to even
entertain this idea.
Speaker 3 (17:57):
And because you were drunk, you gave him up.
Speaker 6 (18:00):
Yeah, and demon in the sport. But that was something
I experienced in Iraq, talking to Iraqis who knew in
their minds they always hated Saddam. Often they would have
people in their life they could whisper too, but only
a small number. But still confronting the post Saddam world
(18:21):
was really disorienting and figuring out how to talk about
this kind of defining structure of their lives. I mean,
I remember I was in Baghdad the day Saddam was caught,
and then if you remember, they had those videos of
him looking all disheveled and poking around in his mouth.
I think that was a huge mistake for the US
to release those videos because it really I think it
(18:41):
humiliated iraqis. Like I remember sitting with my translator and
him just sharing like I hated him, but I had
a lot of pride that I'm from his country. That
the core narrative of my life was that this all
powerful genius with superpowers, like we believed on some level
that he could see you through the TV and knew
what you were thinking. And to see him that he's
(19:04):
just this old foolish man who's being pushed around and humiliated,
that was unbearable. Even though he hated this guy hated Saddam.
It sure feels like a more muscular evangelicalism is on
the upswing right now, and that conspiracy theory belief is
on the upswing right now. Weirdly, the thing you said
(19:25):
about how it's lonely isolated folks, it's actually somewhat optimistic
in that maybe that's an avenue that if people have
more connection more and again, I don't think we have
an agenda. We want people to have a different religion,
but we're not for conspiracy theories like we see them
as a corrosive part of our political system, and if
(19:46):
fewer people believe to them, it feels like it would
be better. So are there things we can do other
than having a kind of podcast where we mock each
other a lot and occasionally talk about conspiracy theories.
Speaker 5 (19:56):
From my perspective, a thing that combats radicalization, whether it's
ideological or believing in conspiracy theories, whatever, is mostly human connection.
It's a bit counterintuitive to say, but the evangelicals that
I think are peddling conspiracy theories the most are the
people who are actually not very involved in the kind
(20:18):
of religious community in real life. They're just spending time
in online circles and trying to defend their identities while
being extremely lonely and cut off from anyone through waxing
poetic about conspiracy theories on four Chan or something like this.
I think it'd be better for if those people just
went to church. To be honest, as an atheist, I
don't agree with the epistemology within evangelical church or in
(20:41):
any kind of tradition that affirms supernaturalist ideas. But I think,
just on a practical level, if people are integrated into
communities in real life more often than I think that
the underlying factors that predispose you to conspiracy belief start
to be eroded away. If people are not in their basements,
or they're den or something, or on their phones just
(21:03):
peddling conspiracy theories just to feel something. If instead they're
in the pew and they're singing about something that makes
them happy and hanging out with people who like them,
I think they're less of a danger to people like me.
Speaker 6 (21:15):
You've talked to me about it, I know a bit.
But what is it like with your family now, Like
they still have the same beliefs right.
Speaker 5 (21:22):
To a certain degree, My family has the same beliefs.
My parents raise me independent fundamental Baptist, although they go
to a Southern Baptist church now, which is really similar.
But they're not white as dogmatic about kind of the
literalist younger creationism bit. They're a little bit more interested
(21:42):
in integrating into American society than fundamentalists, who are basically separatists.
But through the influence of alternative medicine and anti vax
conspiracy theories. Some people in my immediate family, on my side,
not on my wife's side, are anti vaxxers who believe
in re incarnation. They believe in chakras.
Speaker 3 (22:02):
As fundamentalist Christians well.
Speaker 5 (22:04):
As Evangelical Christians sevangelical Christians. The funny thing is that
I think because of the priming to accept pseudoscience, they
actually see things like reincarnation and the chakras and essential
oils and quantum mysticism as all having a scientific basis,
so they're not in conflict with Christianity. This is how
God made the world. He made us having a root
(22:26):
chakra and the heart chakra and things like this. But
if you want to receive salvation, the plan is basically
the same that I grew up with, and the moral
values that I grew up with are basically the same
for them as well as the whole We need to
drain the swamp spiritually speak.
Speaker 1 (22:42):
Since you've moved away from and you become an atheist,
and you said earlier if following the values is not enough,
you're going to go to hell. How do you deal
when you deal with your family, who obviously loves you,
that they think you're going to hell? Or you would
think you're going to.
Speaker 5 (22:54):
Hell, I should say. The first thing that I was
concerned about when I came out to my family as
an atheist was that my parents were going to think
I was going to Hell. And I couldn't imagine personally
having a family member, especially a child, that I thought
was going to burn in hell for all eternity. We
believed in a literal lake of fire. Its pretty gnarly stuff,
(23:16):
and so I didn't want to burden them with that.
Even if I didn't think that it was true, they
would think it's true, and that's enough. When I came
out to them, I asked them straight away. I was like, guys,
I'm an atheist. Do you think I'm going to Hell?
And they pretty immediately said no. Because there is this
doctrine within a subset of evangelic Christians of Once Saved,
(23:37):
Always Saved a lot of people say that if you
ever become an atheist or another religion when you were
a practicing Christian, then you never really were a true Christian.
But my family could not accept the idea that I
was never a true Christian. They raised me to be
a Christian. They saw me act on my Christian values.
They saw the evidence of the fruits of the spirit
(23:57):
in me, and their faith in my faith could not
be shaken, So that actually did smooth things over a bit.
Speaker 1 (24:05):
But you think you're going to hell.
Speaker 5 (24:06):
I think I'm going to hell. They don't think I'm
going to hell.
Speaker 6 (24:09):
And that's how you don't believe in hell, which makes
it a little easier.
Speaker 2 (24:13):
But I've got good news for you, guys. If you
go seek, they don't believe that you're going to go
to hell. If you live a good life, if you're
a good Christian, a good Jew, a good Muslim, a
good Hindu, you're gonna make it.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
Hold on just a second, Well we take a quick break.
Speaker 6 (24:34):
We've been talking about the connection between conspiracy theories and
evangelical Certain evangelical faith almost get an organic phenomenon. But
to what extent is this industrialized? You talked about morally questionable,
morally flexible grifters. If what we wanted to do is
make a lot of money, there's a really clear path
(24:54):
to spout these theories. So how organized is this? How
much dare I say, how much of a real conspira
is the conspiracy theory pedaling to evangelical audiences.
Speaker 5 (25:05):
Let's talk about someone who I'm sure you guys have
spoken about more times than you would like. Marjorie Taylor Green.
Marjorie Taylor Green obviously Jewish space laser's lady, right.
Speaker 3 (25:15):
Yeah, she We looked into it.
Speaker 6 (25:17):
It seems unlikely that there are Jewish space lazers. It
also seems impractical, just so you know.
Speaker 5 (25:23):
Yeah, but Marjorie Taylor Green was raised Catholic, but around
the time she started running for public office, she started
getting involved in an evangelical community called North Point Church.
It's a non denominational megachurch in northern Atlanta, I believe,
and she was publicly baptized there. She started getting integrated
(25:44):
into that church. And while her brand, while her own
autobiographical blurbs about herself make it sound like she's extremely
heavily involved in North Point in religious community, in real life,
I'm not so sure that's the case. So I came
across this really great article from Elena plot calabro And
(26:07):
that was published in the Atlantic, and she says that
Green's involvement per a source that Elena spoke to in
north Point Church, her involvement tapered off after several years
and Elena also noted that Brad Raffensberger, the Georgia Secretary
of State who defied Donald Trump, he's very long been
(26:28):
involved with North Point, and apparently no one ever really
asks about him. So this guy who's strongly integrated into
this evangelical community is someone who I most certainly remiss
a little bit for partisan reasons saying this about a
strong Republican, But he seems like a guy with a
pretty stable moral center, with real principles, who's willing to
(26:50):
stand up against basically attempted fascism, Whereas Marjorie Taylor Green
gets involved in religious communities from the outside in order
to gain a base that is psychologically primed to accept
the kind of bullshit that she spews for cash.
Speaker 6 (27:07):
Although also I think the human brain can allow you
to not confront these obvious contradictions inside your head. I've
met enough people to feel like she has some stories
she tells herself where she's the hero and it's not
a contradiction, and she really believes something, and it's just
quite malleable what she believes.
Speaker 5 (27:26):
I actually have another example that I think is interesting. Here,
are you guys familiar with this hundant that works for
the Blaze Media named alib Stucky. Sure, Okay, imagine a
thirty one year old, very blonde, very white woman who
was raised Southern Baptist and now works for the Blaze Media. Okay,
it's very generic image, right, that is alib Stucky.
Speaker 3 (27:49):
You got it.
Speaker 5 (27:50):
Alib Stucky mostly promotes conspiracy theories that are very Christian
identitarian focused on her show Relatable Again, produced by The Blaze.
It's pretty clear to me a side note here that
her viewership would not actually make enough money to support
the kind of infrastructure that she has were it not
for Glenn Beck's massive connections. So there's obviously serious funding
(28:14):
behind this show. I do better than alib Stucky, and
I am not wealthy like she is. But Ali grew
up in Prestonwood Baptist Church, which is actually a church
in Plano, Texas, where I know multiple people who go
every week. I have an inn at this church. Essentially,
I've been to this church, I've met the pastor, I
know people who are there all the time. When I
(28:35):
go visit family, people from the church are at their
house hanging out. Sometimes I happen to know from those
people that Alibi Stucky does not actually attend that church.
She goes for Christmas and Easter and basically acts like
a Baptist would say, like a good Catholic. Disparagingly here,
but in September of this year, twenty twenty four, Ali
(28:58):
was able to host a conference for four thousand attendees
off of her YouTube channel that's much smaller than mine
at Preston Wood Baptist Church. She was able to use
the literal physical infrastructure that exists in the evangelical community
to peddle right wing conspiracy theories and enrich herself even
(29:21):
though she's not actually integrated into these communities very well.
And unfortunately people at Preston Wood kind of let it happen.
Speaker 6 (29:30):
I mean, you could obviously see the shared interest, and
it sounds like there may be some third party that
we don't know that's funding this and making this possible.
Speaker 5 (29:39):
I would say, I know about it. It's mostly the
Wilkes brothers, but it's mostly Ferris Wilkes, actually the co
founder of The Daily Wire. But that's a bit of
an aside. Obviously, legacy media does have a big role here.
If we look at things like Fox News and the
want to be future of American conservative TV news Max
and Oan and things like this. That plays a role.
(30:02):
But I actually think that new media is probably a
bigger part of this than something like Fox News. We
have to realize that the Daily Wire, which is this
conservative media group, actually as far as I know, has
a larger viewer base than CNN. It has a larger
viewer base than Fox News. And that's just this one
media group with basically a handful of influencers who create
(30:26):
you know, new media, create tiktoks, create YouTube videos, create podcasts,
this sort of thing. But there are there's a whole litany.
There are dozens hundreds thousands of essentially brand new, totally
unconnected political pundits for the right that are able to
receive money from similar sources to something like the Daily Wire. Yeah, Russians,
(30:50):
so like Timpoole, this very popular new media, really big
name conservative podcaster, was revealed to have been receiving something
like four hundred thousand dollars a month from the Russian state.
And he's not the only one. It seems like Dave Rubin,
who has worked with the Daily Wire but isn't a
part of the Daily Wire, also was receiving money regularly Osco.
Speaker 3 (31:10):
We'll do it for half that. I'm just saying, I
swear Moscow if you're listening.
Speaker 5 (31:14):
And I think that if we consider the fact that
new media might be driving this, maybe even more so
than legacy media, we have to consider what happened when
the printing press and the Protestant Revolution went hand in hand.
There was a much more free market approach to religiosity,
to ideology, and the things that won out, at least
in the short term, were inflammatory ideas. It was moral panics,
(31:39):
things that drove people to burn witches. The second most
printed book as far as I know, after the Bible,
after the printing press was invented, was actually the I
think it's called the Malice Malificarum, which is basically a
witch hunting and burning book. So I think what we're
seeing now is a resurgence of what we might have
called the Satanic panic back in the nineteen eighties, where
(32:00):
there are a ton of new voices who are all
competing in this extremely free market, in this kind of
hyper capitalist ecosystem on YouTube and TikTok and Instagram and
things like this, and they're all vying for the spotlight,
which means that, Okay, we have to go with what
works if we want to keep our careers. What works
(32:21):
moral panic, inflammatory rhetoric. I see it in my own audience.
When I have an inflammatory video where I am shitting
on someone's ideas, even in the way that I think
is not particularly overly inflammatory, I see that my audience
responds more strongly to that than just an educational video.
And I do think that just the fact that we
(32:43):
have the new platforms that we have is enough of
a factor to explain why we are having a new
satanic panic which is much bigger, much more influential, and
much more dangerous than the one we had in the
nineteen eighties.
Speaker 3 (33:00):
All Right, Drew, this was amazing. Thank you for spending
so much time.
Speaker 1 (33:03):
Really, thank you for what you're doing. It's important work.
Speaker 5 (33:05):
Yeah, I appreciate the conversation. Guys.
Speaker 3 (33:07):
I think that the work that you.
Speaker 5 (33:08):
Guys do is really valuable, and I've enjoyed listening and
I'm happy to be a part of it.
Speaker 4 (33:16):
Mission Implausible is produced by Adam Davidson, Jerry O'shay, John Cipher,
and Jonathan Stern. The associate producer is Rachel Harner. Mission
Implausible it is a production of honorable mention and abominable
pictures for iHeart podcasts.
I'm John Cipher and I'm Jerry O'Shea. I was a
CIA officer stationed around the world in high threat posts
in Europe, Russia, and in Asia.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
And I served in Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East
and in war zones. We sometimes created conspiracies to deceive
our adversaries.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
Now we're going to use our expertise to deconstruct conspiracy
theories large and small.
Speaker 3 (00:24):
Could they be true?
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Or are we being manipulated?
Speaker 1 (00:27):
This is mission implausible.
Speaker 4 (00:31):
This is part two of our interview with Adam's friend
Drew McCoy. Drew McCoy as a host of the podcast
Genetically Modified Skeptic. Last week we were discussing the overlap
between religion and conspiratorial thinking. So let's pick up where
we left off for part two.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
I got a not a long PERI Rasia. I got
a question for you. How do you view the conflation
now between the Trumpest movement and evangelicals where Trump himself
is fulfilling biblical prophecies according to some people, right, so
this itself is a conspiracy theory that Trump is not
if he plays in his own realizes this thing that
(01:09):
the world is screwed up in God sent Trump. He
plays this himself, and he plays into this. How do
you view that the sort of the religiousification of trump Ism.
Speaker 5 (01:19):
Well, Trump is a populist, right, so he's saying that
there's this big conspiracy against him, against the common man.
They need to drain the swamp, they need to abolish
the deep state, all of these things. And this just
has a hand in hand relationship with pre existing pre
Trump Evangelical Christian theology. We believe that the world was
(01:42):
ruled by the prince of this world, Satan. That's something
that I was raised to believe and is to be
sold this idea that, oh, all of my political opponents,
everyone that's against the Trump brand is just a part
of the deep state, a part of a Satanic conspiracy theory.
It's the most natural thing in the world. It's the
easiest thing to possibly see coming if you grew up
(02:04):
in the evangelical world.
Speaker 6 (02:06):
I think for those of us not in the world,
it's one of the great puzzles of our age, Like,
how is it possible that these people who got so
outraged by Bill Clinton's now almost quaintctions a blowjob could
embrace this theatrically libertine. I mean the only way he
describes himself is as immoral, I mean literally playing with
(02:30):
the ideas of incest and constant sexual immorality. So for
I think, for us outside, it just seems utterly confounding.
It just makes no sense. But you're saying, for you,
it's there's no mystery, it's just obvious. Yeah.
Speaker 5 (02:43):
I think a lot of people from the outside see
Christianity and religion in general is nothing more than a
moral framework, and the moral framework of any given religion
is usually very important and somewhat central. But people from
the outside looking into something like evangelical as will not
see the narrative framework, the interpretive framework for just everyday
(03:06):
life that occurs in these circles. So while yes, evangelicals
are very puritanical about sex and drugs and to a
certain extent, alcohol, certainly they don't approve of making sexually
suggestive comments about your own children, that's for sure. They
do see a deeply dualistic reality in everything, and when
(03:30):
someone comes along and says that they represent pure good
fighting pure evil, that's a pretty strong selling point, especially
when you are able to hit on points like bureaucracy
itself is flooded with people who are fundamentally evil, which
is like a subplot in the evangelical Christian narrative. So
(03:53):
we really can't get hung up too much on just
thinking of anything within religion, anything within evangelicalism, as just
some kind of moral framework for people to follow. We
have to look at the stories, the myths, the legends
that they tell themselves in everyday life that they teach
their children.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
But if someone like Biden had done the same myths
and said, you know, I'm finding evil, would that have worked.
It seems to me that it already fits into a
narrative of right wing.
Speaker 5 (04:16):
It's really hard to say. I do think that Biden
probably would have had a harder time going against somebody
who does not have any prior affiliation with the Catholic Church.
The evangelical vote used to be quite anti Catholic. Now
it's getting a lot more ecumenical. In order to vote
for someone like Trump, in order to support people like
(04:37):
pundits like Matt Walsh and Michael Knowles who are Catholic,
it's got to become more ecumenical. But I think that
if you were to put two candidates in opposite opposition
to each other, all things being equal, except for one
having more of a Protestant background, like Trump, arguably versus
Joe Biden, who's a long time Catholic. I would see
(04:57):
the person with more of a Protestant background probably out.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
On the ecumenical part on gob Smith, that someone like
Tulci Giebert, someone who belongs to a breakaway Hari Krishna
sect that believes that this guy Chris Butler is the
literal word of God on earth and must be obeyed.
And someone like this running in charge of CIA and
(05:23):
the US intelligence community. I'm shocked that the evangelical community
is like fine with it, and it seems to me
that almost the Great Man is more important than anything.
I also want to ask how you escaped from that mindset.
Speaker 6 (05:38):
I mean, everything we talked about on this show. I
was looking at some statistics. Twenty seven percent of evangelical
Christians believe QAnon is mostly true, highest group by far,
I think, double any other group. Over sixty percent believe
that the election was stolen. In twenty twenty, fifty five
percent believed that there's a deep state that you guys
(05:59):
are representatives of that is controlling outcome. So that doesn't
feel like a very practical political project that we just
have to take fifty five percent of evangelical Christians and
get them to no longer be evangelical Christians, which we
don't want to do in and of itself. It's just
how do you break the conspiracy theory?
Speaker 5 (06:18):
I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that. I don't
think that when it comes to evangelicals and conspiracy theories,
that the call is only coming from inside the house
at this point. I think that the evangelical conspiracy mill,
the circling the wagons to protect religious identity infrastructure that's
(06:38):
in place, is the only thing that is producing conspiracy theories.
I think that the fact that evangelicals have harved a
path in American society so strongly of working with governments
ken Ham's Ark encounter, being able to work with local
governments in Kentucky in order to get taxpayer dollars to
support his mission of building a Noah's Ark based theme
(07:01):
park for fundamentalist Christians, his project of getting DVDs that
talk about creation quote science and sending them to schools
to be actually used a science curriculum. That path having
been carved in American society means that kind of morally
flexible grifters who don't care about religion, they don't care
about the Gospel or anything like this, can just jump
(07:23):
directly in that path that's already been carved. They can
copy it, and then they can also prey on an
audience that has been psychologically primed to accept conspiracy theories
when it comes to something like QAnon. I don't think
that it is the most devout of evangelicals that are
actually taking that up. I think it's people who identify
as evangelical, yes, and maybe we're primed to accept things
(07:47):
like conspiracy theories, But I don't think that it's people
who are in church super regularly, who are really integrated
into religious community and this sort of thing, you know,
strong enmeshment in religious life, that are the strongest believers
in q If you can indulge me in a little
bit of analysis of some of the psychological components of
(08:09):
a person who accepts conspiracy theories, if we look at
the research that we've seen some psychologists do in the past,
had to twenty years or so. This is I'm sourcing
this from American studies scholar Peter Knight. He said that
psychologists have developed an ever more detailed picture of what
we call the conspiratorial mind. They found correlations between conspiracy
(08:30):
thinking and personality traits such as paranoia, narcissism, suspiciousness, and cynicism,
as well as feelings of alienation it's a really important one. Uncertainty, powerlessness,
that's a really important one. Anxiety and loss of control
another important one. If we look at the people who
attend church and are the most enmeshed in evangelical communities,
(08:54):
these are not poor lonely people. Actually people who go
to evangelical church, which more often people that go weekly,
are actually the folks that tend to have more money
and more power and are just have more stable lives
in general. So per Ryan Burge, as one becomes more educated,
(09:14):
the less likely they are as an evangelical to be
someone who rarely or seldom or never attends church. Now,
the same is true of income. The richer you get,
the more likely you are of being a regularly attending evangelical.
So I think that we need to consider the idea
that maybe people who are horror people who are not
(09:38):
in Meshan religious communities that identify as evangelicals might be
the people who are most up for grabs for like
morally flexible grifters who pretend to be evangelicals, people like
Q to gain power to manipulate people. I think that
it's probably poor, not particularly and meshed lonely people who
(10:02):
identify as evangelical, who are actually gravitating toward these conspiracies
in the most extreme way.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
Let's take a quick break. We'll be right back, Drew.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
I saw your video about becoming an atheist. I thought
it was very interesting and very well argued. You've become
an atheist, obviously there was a community that you were
in before. What is it that you've kept from your
past religious belief Have you totally broken from those sort
of viewer? What is it you still keep even if
it's not part of a specific religion.
Speaker 5 (10:36):
I do think that I've kept a certain amount of
the Protestant Christian moral framework. I like to think that
I'm not as prone to conspiracy theories, but I guess
maybe that's not entirely for the individual to judge. Always,
I still cite certain teachings of both the Apostle Paul
and Jesus as not the moral foundations for my kind
(11:00):
of moral ideology, but the catalysts or the impetus for
the moral foundations that I do have. So if you
look at the story of the Good Samaritan, you know
found in the Gospel of Luke, there's this idea of
that you should love and support your neighbor, that you
should show them kindness, you should express altruism to people
(11:23):
who are not in your in group, and in fact
that the ability to do this maybe is the truest
indication of moral righteousness, or at least centeredness. And that
is something that I think that very parables focused Protestant
Christians actually are pretty good at teaching their kids a
(11:44):
lot of the time. I like to think that my
parents did a good job of teaching me that kind
of thing. I definitely credit them for that. I don't
think that people like my parents, Evangelical Christians who are
very conspiratorial, do a particularly good job of actually acting
upon the things they've taught their children. I see myself
as representative of kind of a generation of Evangelicals who
(12:06):
took to the moral teachings of Jesus, and we ran
with them so hard that we ran up against the
church communities that we saw as betraying them. So in
a way. I think that becoming an atheist morally speaking,
was one of the most Christian decisions I have ever made.
(12:26):
I was taught about discernment, about moral purity, and in
order to abide by what I thought was right, both
morally and philosophically and scientifically, I had to get out
of the church community and be something else.
Speaker 2 (12:40):
Was there a damascene moment or cascade of events where
you woke up one morning and like, yeah, I don't
believe anymore.
Speaker 5 (12:48):
I describe my exodus from Christianity as a set of
dominoes falling, and the first domino fell, and then after
or maybe years, another domino fell, and with every domino
there's an acceleration of these dominoes falling, and eventually, within
(13:08):
a period of just a few months, which was right
around the time when I was graduating from college, most
of the dominoes started to fall. So it started with
me really questioning the creation narrative that I was taught,
and then eventually going into grad school and studying human sexuality.
It was the moral narrative that homosexuality was an abomination,
(13:30):
even though, as far as I could tell, trying to
suppress someone's sexual orientation is actually extremely harmful for them.
And eventually, you know, that led me to just fundamentally
questioning the nature of God in existence and of the supernatural.
And I got to the point again over a matter
of years of slow deliberation and contemplation into a period
(13:52):
of a few months, I would say about four months
of really extremely intense philosophical moral delay liberation that led
me out of identifying as a Christian. The silver lining
to the awful experience was that I didn't feel bad
about finally reading all of the educational books that I
knew existed but I thought were wrong somehow. So me
(14:15):
actually being able to read something like the Origin of
the Species rather than just hearing about it was an
ecstatic experience for me. But there is only so much
reading of old, stuffy science books that can distract you
from social suicide. It was nearly complete social suicide in
(14:36):
a lot of ways. The reason I started my YouTube
channel was so that I could vent about all of
the ideas that were going on in my head. But
I just didn't have anybody to speak to in real
life about this. My community around me was all evangelical,
so I had to go online to talk about it,
and through that venture things absolutely have gotten better. But
(14:56):
leaving evangelical circles is, especially when you're going to become
an atheist, is extremely difficult. It sucks for sure.
Speaker 2 (15:05):
There's a parallel in the intelligence community. So historically, some
of our best agents, people who've spied for SAA were
true believers in their own systems or their own ideologies
and the union. They believed in communism. They were some
of the stars, the best and brightest, and then, almost
(15:25):
mirroring your own set of experiences, they realized that they
had been either been had or that try as they might,
they simply couldn't believe the force of logic and events
and what they saw led them to break at least internally.
But they couldn't open a YouTube channel to tell the truth. Instead,
they would look up someone like John and say, I
(15:48):
just can't live with myself. I need someone to talk
to I need to say what I really think, And
then that flipped off into espionage.
Speaker 3 (15:55):
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (15:56):
I started my channel as a way to help myself
to vent when I was in a really difficult social situation,
but eventually the channel became a way to try to
help other people. I started getting a lot of messages
a few months in that said things like I'm desperately alone,
(16:16):
no one supports me. I've never heard anyone say the
things that you're saying without being heavily criticized or punished, essentially,
And I just want you to know how therapeutic it
is for me to know that someone like you even
exists at all. And these people, these are Americans, people
in a country with freedom of religion, telling me that
(16:38):
what I'm saying sounds like something that has been horribly
suppressed and that you would suffer horrible consequences for saying. Eventually,
I even started getting some messages where people were saying
that just consuming my content and knowing that someone like
me existed helped the person decide against ending their lives.
And it's it's a honestly, it's a relatable experience.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
You know.
Speaker 5 (17:02):
When I opened that up and read it, I wasn't
actually very shocked that someone would say that. I was
maybe surprised that my little YouTube videos made that kind
of an impact, but I wasn't surprised the person was
going through that not at all as.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
A CIA off. So one of the most moving episodes
for me was in the third world country. I'm sitting
at a bar. I have gotten to know this North
Korean and he's had his third drink and we're building
a genuine friendship and he like pulps hard and he
looks at me. He looks, looks over both of his
shoulders and he says, I don't really love the great leader.
(17:38):
And it was like what he said is a death
sentence if he'd sent this to his mother, anybody he loved.
And yet sitting across from someone, it was like, I
can say this, I'm gonna I'm safe here, And it
was like extraordinarily difficult and dangerous for him to even
entertain this idea.
Speaker 3 (17:57):
And because you were drunk, you gave him up.
Speaker 6 (18:00):
Yeah, and demon in the sport. But that was something
I experienced in Iraq, talking to Iraqis who knew in
their minds they always hated Saddam. Often they would have
people in their life they could whisper too, but only
a small number. But still confronting the post Saddam world
(18:21):
was really disorienting and figuring out how to talk about
this kind of defining structure of their lives. I mean,
I remember I was in Baghdad the day Saddam was caught,
and then if you remember, they had those videos of
him looking all disheveled and poking around in his mouth.
I think that was a huge mistake for the US
to release those videos because it really I think it
(18:41):
humiliated iraqis. Like I remember sitting with my translator and
him just sharing like I hated him, but I had
a lot of pride that I'm from his country. That
the core narrative of my life was that this all
powerful genius with superpowers, like we believed on some level
that he could see you through the TV and knew
what you were thinking. And to see him that he's
(19:04):
just this old foolish man who's being pushed around and humiliated,
that was unbearable. Even though he hated this guy hated Saddam.
It sure feels like a more muscular evangelicalism is on
the upswing right now, and that conspiracy theory belief is
on the upswing right now. Weirdly, the thing you said
(19:25):
about how it's lonely isolated folks, it's actually somewhat optimistic
in that maybe that's an avenue that if people have
more connection more and again, I don't think we have
an agenda. We want people to have a different religion,
but we're not for conspiracy theories like we see them
as a corrosive part of our political system, and if
(19:46):
fewer people believe to them, it feels like it would
be better. So are there things we can do other
than having a kind of podcast where we mock each
other a lot and occasionally talk about conspiracy theories.
Speaker 5 (19:56):
From my perspective, a thing that combats radicalization, whether it's
ideological or believing in conspiracy theories, whatever, is mostly human connection.
It's a bit counterintuitive to say, but the evangelicals that
I think are peddling conspiracy theories the most are the
people who are actually not very involved in the kind
(20:18):
of religious community in real life. They're just spending time
in online circles and trying to defend their identities while
being extremely lonely and cut off from anyone through waxing
poetic about conspiracy theories on four Chan or something like this.
I think it'd be better for if those people just
went to church. To be honest, as an atheist, I
don't agree with the epistemology within evangelical church or in
(20:41):
any kind of tradition that affirms supernaturalist ideas. But I think,
just on a practical level, if people are integrated into
communities in real life more often than I think that
the underlying factors that predispose you to conspiracy belief start
to be eroded away. If people are not in their basements,
or they're den or something, or on their phones just
(21:03):
peddling conspiracy theories just to feel something. If instead they're
in the pew and they're singing about something that makes
them happy and hanging out with people who like them,
I think they're less of a danger to people like me.
Speaker 6 (21:15):
You've talked to me about it, I know a bit.
But what is it like with your family now, Like
they still have the same beliefs right.
Speaker 5 (21:22):
To a certain degree, My family has the same beliefs.
My parents raise me independent fundamental Baptist, although they go
to a Southern Baptist church now, which is really similar.
But they're not white as dogmatic about kind of the
literalist younger creationism bit. They're a little bit more interested
(21:42):
in integrating into American society than fundamentalists, who are basically separatists.
But through the influence of alternative medicine and anti vax
conspiracy theories. Some people in my immediate family, on my side,
not on my wife's side, are anti vaxxers who believe
in re incarnation. They believe in chakras.
Speaker 3 (22:02):
As fundamentalist Christians well.
Speaker 5 (22:04):
As Evangelical Christians sevangelical Christians. The funny thing is that
I think because of the priming to accept pseudoscience, they
actually see things like reincarnation and the chakras and essential
oils and quantum mysticism as all having a scientific basis,
so they're not in conflict with Christianity. This is how
God made the world. He made us having a root
(22:26):
chakra and the heart chakra and things like this. But
if you want to receive salvation, the plan is basically
the same that I grew up with, and the moral
values that I grew up with are basically the same
for them as well as the whole We need to
drain the swamp spiritually speak.
Speaker 1 (22:42):
Since you've moved away from and you become an atheist,
and you said earlier if following the values is not enough,
you're going to go to hell. How do you deal
when you deal with your family, who obviously loves you,
that they think you're going to hell? Or you would
think you're going to.
Speaker 5 (22:54):
Hell, I should say. The first thing that I was
concerned about when I came out to my family as
an atheist was that my parents were going to think
I was going to Hell. And I couldn't imagine personally
having a family member, especially a child, that I thought
was going to burn in hell for all eternity. We
believed in a literal lake of fire. Its pretty gnarly stuff,
(23:16):
and so I didn't want to burden them with that.
Even if I didn't think that it was true, they
would think it's true, and that's enough. When I came
out to them, I asked them straight away. I was like, guys,
I'm an atheist. Do you think I'm going to Hell?
And they pretty immediately said no. Because there is this
doctrine within a subset of evangelic Christians of Once Saved,
(23:37):
Always Saved a lot of people say that if you
ever become an atheist or another religion when you were
a practicing Christian, then you never really were a true Christian.
But my family could not accept the idea that I
was never a true Christian. They raised me to be
a Christian. They saw me act on my Christian values.
They saw the evidence of the fruits of the spirit
(23:57):
in me, and their faith in my faith could not
be shaken, So that actually did smooth things over a bit.
Speaker 1 (24:05):
But you think you're going to hell.
Speaker 5 (24:06):
I think I'm going to hell. They don't think I'm
going to hell.
Speaker 6 (24:09):
And that's how you don't believe in hell, which makes
it a little easier.
Speaker 2 (24:13):
But I've got good news for you, guys. If you
go seek, they don't believe that you're going to go
to hell. If you live a good life, if you're
a good Christian, a good Jew, a good Muslim, a
good Hindu, you're gonna make it.
Speaker 1 (24:24):
Hold on just a second, Well we take a quick break.
Speaker 6 (24:34):
We've been talking about the connection between conspiracy theories and
evangelical Certain evangelical faith almost get an organic phenomenon. But
to what extent is this industrialized? You talked about morally questionable,
morally flexible grifters. If what we wanted to do is
make a lot of money, there's a really clear path
(24:54):
to spout these theories. So how organized is this? How
much dare I say, how much of a real conspira
is the conspiracy theory pedaling to evangelical audiences.
Speaker 5 (25:05):
Let's talk about someone who I'm sure you guys have
spoken about more times than you would like. Marjorie Taylor Green.
Marjorie Taylor Green obviously Jewish space laser's lady, right.
Speaker 3 (25:15):
Yeah, she We looked into it.
Speaker 6 (25:17):
It seems unlikely that there are Jewish space lazers. It
also seems impractical, just so you know.
Speaker 5 (25:23):
Yeah, but Marjorie Taylor Green was raised Catholic, but around
the time she started running for public office, she started
getting involved in an evangelical community called North Point Church.
It's a non denominational megachurch in northern Atlanta, I believe,
and she was publicly baptized there. She started getting integrated
(25:44):
into that church. And while her brand, while her own
autobiographical blurbs about herself make it sound like she's extremely
heavily involved in North Point in religious community, in real life,
I'm not so sure that's the case. So I came
across this really great article from Elena plot calabro And
(26:07):
that was published in the Atlantic, and she says that
Green's involvement per a source that Elena spoke to in
north Point Church, her involvement tapered off after several years
and Elena also noted that Brad Raffensberger, the Georgia Secretary
of State who defied Donald Trump, he's very long been
(26:28):
involved with North Point, and apparently no one ever really
asks about him. So this guy who's strongly integrated into
this evangelical community is someone who I most certainly remiss
a little bit for partisan reasons saying this about a
strong Republican, But he seems like a guy with a
pretty stable moral center, with real principles, who's willing to
(26:50):
stand up against basically attempted fascism, Whereas Marjorie Taylor Green
gets involved in religious communities from the outside in order
to gain a base that is psychologically primed to accept
the kind of bullshit that she spews for cash.
Speaker 6 (27:07):
Although also I think the human brain can allow you
to not confront these obvious contradictions inside your head. I've
met enough people to feel like she has some stories
she tells herself where she's the hero and it's not
a contradiction, and she really believes something, and it's just
quite malleable what she believes.
Speaker 5 (27:26):
I actually have another example that I think is interesting. Here,
are you guys familiar with this hundant that works for
the Blaze Media named alib Stucky. Sure, Okay, imagine a
thirty one year old, very blonde, very white woman who
was raised Southern Baptist and now works for the Blaze Media. Okay,
it's very generic image, right, that is alib Stucky.
Speaker 3 (27:49):
You got it.
Speaker 5 (27:50):
Alib Stucky mostly promotes conspiracy theories that are very Christian
identitarian focused on her show Relatable Again, produced by The Blaze.
It's pretty clear to me a side note here that
her viewership would not actually make enough money to support
the kind of infrastructure that she has were it not
for Glenn Beck's massive connections. So there's obviously serious funding
(28:14):
behind this show. I do better than alib Stucky, and
I am not wealthy like she is. But Ali grew
up in Prestonwood Baptist Church, which is actually a church
in Plano, Texas, where I know multiple people who go
every week. I have an inn at this church. Essentially,
I've been to this church, I've met the pastor, I
know people who are there all the time. When I
(28:35):
go visit family, people from the church are at their
house hanging out. Sometimes I happen to know from those
people that Alibi Stucky does not actually attend that church.
She goes for Christmas and Easter and basically acts like
a Baptist would say, like a good Catholic. Disparagingly here,
but in September of this year, twenty twenty four, Ali
(28:58):
was able to host a conference for four thousand attendees
off of her YouTube channel that's much smaller than mine
at Preston Wood Baptist Church. She was able to use
the literal physical infrastructure that exists in the evangelical community
to peddle right wing conspiracy theories and enrich herself even
(29:21):
though she's not actually integrated into these communities very well.
And unfortunately people at Preston Wood kind of let it happen.
Speaker 6 (29:30):
I mean, you could obviously see the shared interest, and
it sounds like there may be some third party that
we don't know that's funding this and making this possible.
Speaker 5 (29:39):
I would say, I know about it. It's mostly the
Wilkes brothers, but it's mostly Ferris Wilkes, actually the co
founder of The Daily Wire. But that's a bit of
an aside. Obviously, legacy media does have a big role here.
If we look at things like Fox News and the
want to be future of American conservative TV news Max
and Oan and things like this. That plays a role.
(30:02):
But I actually think that new media is probably a
bigger part of this than something like Fox News. We
have to realize that the Daily Wire, which is this
conservative media group, actually as far as I know, has
a larger viewer base than CNN. It has a larger
viewer base than Fox News. And that's just this one
media group with basically a handful of influencers who create
(30:26):
you know, new media, create tiktoks, create YouTube videos, create podcasts,
this sort of thing. But there are there's a whole litany.
There are dozens hundreds thousands of essentially brand new, totally
unconnected political pundits for the right that are able to
receive money from similar sources to something like the Daily Wire. Yeah, Russians,
(30:50):
so like Timpoole, this very popular new media, really big
name conservative podcaster, was revealed to have been receiving something
like four hundred thousand dollars a month from the Russian state.
And he's not the only one. It seems like Dave Rubin,
who has worked with the Daily Wire but isn't a
part of the Daily Wire, also was receiving money regularly Osco.
Speaker 3 (31:10):
We'll do it for half that. I'm just saying, I
swear Moscow if you're listening.
Speaker 5 (31:14):
And I think that if we consider the fact that
new media might be driving this, maybe even more so
than legacy media, we have to consider what happened when
the printing press and the Protestant Revolution went hand in hand.
There was a much more free market approach to religiosity,
to ideology, and the things that won out, at least
in the short term, were inflammatory ideas. It was moral panics,
(31:39):
things that drove people to burn witches. The second most
printed book as far as I know, after the Bible,
after the printing press was invented, was actually the I
think it's called the Malice Malificarum, which is basically a
witch hunting and burning book. So I think what we're
seeing now is a resurgence of what we might have
called the Satanic panic back in the nineteen eighties, where
(32:00):
there are a ton of new voices who are all
competing in this extremely free market, in this kind of
hyper capitalist ecosystem on YouTube and TikTok and Instagram and
things like this, and they're all vying for the spotlight,
which means that, Okay, we have to go with what
works if we want to keep our careers. What works
(32:21):
moral panic, inflammatory rhetoric. I see it in my own audience.
When I have an inflammatory video where I am shitting
on someone's ideas, even in the way that I think
is not particularly overly inflammatory, I see that my audience
responds more strongly to that than just an educational video.
And I do think that just the fact that we
(32:43):
have the new platforms that we have is enough of
a factor to explain why we are having a new
satanic panic which is much bigger, much more influential, and
much more dangerous than the one we had in the
nineteen eighties.
Speaker 3 (33:00):
All Right, Drew, this was amazing. Thank you for spending
so much time.
Speaker 1 (33:03):
Really, thank you for what you're doing. It's important work.
Speaker 5 (33:05):
Yeah, I appreciate the conversation. Guys.
Speaker 3 (33:07):
I think that the work that you.
Speaker 5 (33:08):
Guys do is really valuable, and I've enjoyed listening and
I'm happy to be a part of it.
Speaker 4 (33:16):
Mission Implausible is produced by Adam Davidson, Jerry O'shay, John Cipher,
and Jonathan Stern. The associate producer is Rachel Harner. Mission
Implausible it is a production of honorable mention and abominable
pictures for iHeart podcasts.
Hosts And Creators
Adam Davidson
John Sipher
Jerry O'Shea
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com