Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
On this episode of Newts World. Ninety five percent of
Americans over sixty have at least one chronic disease, and
almost as many have two chronic killers. Diabetes, obesity, heart disease, cancer,
and neurodegeneration are all diseases that need treatments to begin
long before middle age. In thirty years, will have five
(00:26):
times as many people at least one hundred years old,
and they will be healthier than ever because of new
medical breakthroughs. In his new book, super Agers and Evidence
Based Approach to Longevity, doctor Eric Topol provides a detailed
guide to a revolution transforming human longevity. And let me
say I've been through several briefings and meetings over the
(00:48):
years that doctor Topel is one of the most brilliant
and extraordinary people I've ever had the privilege of learning from,
and I'm thrilled that he's here. His unprecedented evidence based
guide is about how you and your family and friends
can benefit from new treatments coming available at a faster
rate than ever. From his unique position as a leader
(01:08):
overseeing millions in research funding, Doctor Topel also explains the
fundamental reasons from semaglutides to artificial intelligence that we can
be confident these breakthroughs will continue. I'm really pleased to
welcome my guest, doctor Eric tople. He is the executive
vice president and a professor of molecular Medicine at SCRIPTS Research,
(01:30):
the largest nonprofit biomedical institute of the United States. He
is also founder and director of the Script's Research Translational Institute,
and a practicing cardiologist. He is one of the top
ten most cited researchers in medicine, known for his groundbreaking
studies in AI in medicine, genomics, and digitized clinical trials.
(01:51):
He was named the Time one hundred list of the
most Influential People in Health in twenty twenty four. Doctor Topel,
thank you very much for joining us.
Speaker 2 (02:12):
Oh, thank you. It's wonderful to be with you and
to have a chance to have another conversation.
Speaker 1 (02:17):
In well in super agers, you expand the definition of
healthy lifestyle into what you call lifestyle plus. Why is
this broader approach factoring in things like pollution, loneliness, posture,
and even social connection so important to living longer and better?
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Right, So, we have been traditionally just thinking of diet, exercise,
and in more recent years sleep health as the big
lifestyle factors, but we've learned so much about these other
layers of data and factors, as you mentioned, the environmental
burden of air pollution, microplastics and nanoplastics, the forever chemicals,
(03:00):
the consumption of ultra processed foods, but the good things
about social interactions, avoiding isolation, being out in nature. I mean,
there's so many different things now that add to the mix,
and that's why I try to come up with a
term to encompass it all. Because lifestyle factors was the
best one I could come up with, and they are
really important as part of our path to prevention. We
(03:23):
are in a position now to prevent the three major
age related diseases cancer, cardiovascler neurodegenerative. We've never been able
to do that. It's been a fantasy for millennia in medicine.
But we now, not just because of the lifestyle factors
that we understand at a much more granular level, but
because of other ways that we'll be discussing. This is
(03:46):
a really propitious moment in medicine now.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
You suggestin I found those fascinating good The idea of
a one size fits all healthy diet is fundamentally flawed.
Why is it flawed and should we be looking at
a more personalized focus on nutrition.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
Well, everything about us is unique. I mean even identical
twins are unique. So the fact that we would prescribe
a diet or anything for all people is really a miscue.
So a lot of work being done right now for
this whole concept of personalized nutrition for certain foods that
are really exacerbating the health of people because of promoting inflammation,
(04:27):
whereas others it doesn't have that effect. So in the
years ahead, a lot is being done to understand what
is the best diet at the individual level.
Speaker 1 (04:37):
By recently going through a series of briefings on the
whole concept of making America healthy again, and they keep
talking about ultraprocessed food, and you make a case that
clearly ultra processed food has a huge impact on cardiovascular
metabolic diseases. I'm absolutely fascinated by the degree to which
ultra processed food is a major problem.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
It is in the United States is the worst defender
in the world. The problem here is that we have
allowed a big food to spike their foods with all
sorts of things that are alien. If you look at
the ingredients on packages. You'll see things will never seen
before that aren't in our kitchen. And it turns out,
(05:21):
whether it's to promote texture, whether it's to get a
rush of the food that is absorbed more quickly, these
are things that are in a classification. There's a classification
called Nova Nova four. These are things that are really
promoting inflammation throughout the body and in the brain, and
it's really bringing on a much higher risk of these
(05:45):
age related diseases. So we have to get arms around this,
and very little has been done because the food industry,
of course, as opposed to it. What's really interesting is
that when people are taking these DLP one drugs like
ozembic and when jarrow, it changes their reward circuits and
they eat less ultra processed foods. They shift to healthy food.
(06:08):
It's amazing, you know. It isn't just using a way,
It isn't just about less inflammation and their body and
their brain. But they actually, somehow or other, they don't
get rewarded like they did previously by these I would
say contaminate or alien foods that are really bad for
our health.
Speaker 1 (06:25):
I've probably gotten into this recently. I've been sort of
startled as you talk about the big food spends so
much on lobbying and such a huge impact that it
has been able to basically block efforts to get nutrition
in a serious way back into the core of the
decisions of the government.
Speaker 2 (06:44):
Absolutely. You know, one of my colleagues in the UK
as a great physician scientist named Christan Tellican. He wrote
a book called Ultra process People. And in that book
he did an experiment on himself which is representative. I mean,
a healthy guy who is not overweight. For thirty days,
he took as much ultra processed food as he could.
(07:07):
Before he started, he took a brain scan and all
these blood has for inflammation, and by thirty days his
brain structures showed mark inflammation. All his blood tested he
gained twenty pounds. So this is a huge problem in
this country because we are way out in front of
the rest of the world on our consumption of ultra
(07:28):
processed foods, and that's going to really impede our ability
to prevent diseases. I mean, we have a path now
to do that, but the fact that our food supply
is so poor, particularly it's consumption of these food it's
because they're made to help people want to eat more
of them and not be satiated, and so we have
to do something about it.
Speaker 1 (07:49):
I haven't sort of thinking this may be goofy that
you almost need to have an end factor for nutrition,
because the same tomato, depending on where it's grown, be
radically different in how much nutrition it has, And there
has to be some way for an average normal person
in the same way you could pick up a package
and look at calories, you ought to be able to see,
(08:10):
you know, is this one hundred percent nutrition or twenty
percent or ten percent? Because a lot of the stuff
that we buy, this inexpensive is mass produced in a
way that actually makes it less healthy.
Speaker 2 (08:22):
That's right. I mean, I think if we stick to
fruits and vegetables, whole grains. There was a really big
study of over one hundred and five thousand people followed
for thirty years, and only nine percent of them made
it to this super agor status without the age related diseases.
And what did they eat. They ate this diet, you know,
(08:42):
a Mediterranean like diet low in red meat, not necessarily
you know, absent, but mainly concentrating on a plant based diet.
That is what correlated with their ability adjusting for all
other factors of how they could go to their seventy
eight seventy five and not have these diseases.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
Do you bring a lifetime of study and I'm really
regard you as one of the leading students of human health.
What are the practical steps listeners to this podcast could
take to ensure healthy agent.
Speaker 2 (09:16):
Yeah, so it isn't just the lifestyle factors as we've
been discussing. You know, ways to improve deep sleep because
that gets reduced during our aging as we get older,
and exercise being paramount and not just aerobic, but you
know resistance, strength, core, exercise, balance, positive, all that. But
(09:37):
what we really need to do is to define the
risk of people because we have twenty years before any
of these diseases actually take hold in our body and
show up. So with twenty years and inflammation being in
the common thread, we have a way partly using lifestyle factors,
but first we have to identify so we have to say, what,
(10:00):
if any disease are you at risk for in your
forties and fifties ideally, and then how are we going
to prevent that from ever occurring in your lifetime. We
have a way to do that now because what's happened.
You know, there's this amazing science of aging progress. Some
of it, of course, is being directed to the private
sector startup companies to try to reverse aging. Now that's exciting,
(10:25):
but we're not there yet. We're good at that in mice,
but not in people, right, and it carries risk. The
other part of the science of aging, which is extraordinary
that most people don't know about, are these clocks organ clocks.
So if I could draw a tube of your blood,
I could say, you know what, I got eight organs
on tracking and your immune system from these plasma proteins
(10:48):
up to eleven thousand plasma proteins in your body, and
I can say, you know, you check out well, all
your clocks are at your real age, your chronologic age,
or one of them. Let's say your heart is out
of sync and it's accelerating of aging. That gives me
a clue as to what I need to zoom in
on and find out are you at risks for let's say,
(11:09):
heart disease and get all over it long before you
ever would have a significant artery problem. So this is
a capability we have right now. We have markers for
Alzheimer's that show up more than twenty years before a
person would have mild cognitive impairment. We have a capability
(11:29):
now to really make a huge den in these big
three age related diseases, and we're not taking advantage of it.
Speaker 1 (11:37):
One of the points you make is that strength training
is really important at a level you had not understood before.
Tell us about that.
Speaker 2 (11:44):
Yeah, so what's interesting. As a cardiologist, I was always
big on only aerobic and when I had patients come
in with these big beach muscles, I'd say, well, wait
a minute, now, what about the aerobic exercise. Well, it
turns out strength training is equally important and its association
with healthy aging is vital. As we get older, we
(12:07):
lose muscle mass and we also have a propensity for falls,
and this is not good for longevity, particularly healthy agent.
So now the data show unequivocally that we should be
doing some resistance strength training at least a couple of
sessions a week, and that is a really important part
of the story to promote healthy aging.
Speaker 1 (12:48):
One of the things you talk about is the importance
of deep sleep. I have sleep appness, so I actually
use a seatpap machine and I've been sort of surprised
that the machine has trained me. So I actually go
to sleep faster with my machine than I would if
I were, say at a hotel and did not have a
with me, And presumably it's really helpful over the long one.
(13:11):
I can report now as a witness that it seems
to have a very positive effect.
Speaker 2 (13:17):
Yeah, so there's two things there that's really important. First,
there is a lot of sleep apnue that needs to
be treated, and a lot of people aren't aware of that.
But secondly, even if you are not having these spells
of slowed or stopping breathing, there's another part of the
deep sleep, so that during our sleep, particularly in the
early part of the night, we need to slow wate
(13:39):
sleep because it's during that where we clear our metabolites
from our brain, our waste products through a system that
we now know of as glim fattics, not limphatics, but
glim fatics, And so these glimpatics, these channels in our brain,
they basically get rid of all this toxic waste on
any basis. Now, what's amazing is we've learned now that
(14:04):
drugs like ambient you may feel like you slept, but
as it turns out, it actually backs up these metabolizes,
it prevents them from getting out of the brain. This
is one of the biggest risk factors for Alzheimer's disease.
So what we have to do is if we knew
that somebody had a risk for that, which we could
know decades in advance, we would really work on their sleep.
(14:25):
In fact, everyone should because as we get older, you know,
our deep sleep could get down to just single digit minutes,
which is really bad, and we want to get it
up to as high as we can, ideally close to
an hour people seventy and older. And so with tracking it,
that is you can either ring or smart watch, you
(14:46):
can find out exactly how many minutes each night you're
getting in deep sleep. It's pretty accurate, and then you
can work on it, like what is it that you're
doing in exercise or lack of it, What is it
you're eating, how late in the evening are you eating?
How do you handle? All these things will affect it.
And one of the biggest thing is regularity is sleep.
Our body wants to go to sleep at the same
(15:08):
time every night, but we don't let it. And sleep
regularity has a big association with all three of the
age related diseases.
Speaker 1 (15:16):
We've noticed that we tend to go to bed earlier
then we used to, and I think it's probably helped us.
I notice you have a ring on your finger. Do
you believe in wearables and are they helpful?
Speaker 2 (15:28):
I am using this R A ring. There are several
other rings like this, but what I found with it,
it helped me quite a bit to get deep sleep
more deep sleep. So basically a smart watch and a
R ring and I wear them every night just because
now I'm tracking how many minutes of deep sleep, knowing
how important that is to prevent Alzheimer's, which is something
(15:50):
I don't want to get. I was a poor sleeper.
I started with less than fifteen minutes a night, and
just by learning about all these things like sleep regularity,
like the interactions with what I was eating when I
was eating, what exercise when I was exercised, all these things,
I was able to get it up to over forty
five minutes tonight on average. For me at least, it
(16:12):
has help. And I think this is something that people
should think about, particularly as we get older, because that's
when the deep sleep becomes a big issue. We want
to get that stuff out of our brain those waste products,
and the only way we can do it is with
these glim fatics during deep sleep. That is the restoration
of sleep, the magic that we need. You know, you
(16:32):
could sleep maybe just six hours or even less, but
if you have forty five minutes to an hour of
deep sleep, that's a golden From.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
A mental health standpoint, just having thirty minutes a week
in outdoor green spaces leads to lower rates of depression
and less high blood pressure.
Speaker 2 (16:49):
It's true. That is the data for being out in
nature is striking. I was not aware of this until
I went in deep on this research and reviewed all
the papers. I have really struck by it. And now
we're talking about nature prescriptions for patients. We never talked
about that. This is another part of that lifestyle factors
(17:10):
that we have to acknowledge that it's really great when
you're with other people. That's even a double benefit because
social interactions and being out of nature are quite important.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
This reminds me we currently have a sick care system
when what we actually want is a healthcare system that
simple breakpoint. This is a good example. If I can
get you to go out for thirty minutes or more
a week, and that actually lowers the likelihood of depression
as opposed to taking a drug for it. Some of
(17:42):
the stuff that you've put together is I assume it's
all true, but it sure is astonishing.
Speaker 2 (17:46):
Well, I'll tell you another thing related to that, which
is astonishing. There's a graph and a book and also
texts associated with it. There's a study so striking on
people with depression taking these ssri I drs which are
pervasive like prozac and all the others, and every form
of exercise was better than the drugs, whether it's dancing
(18:09):
or walking or you name, it was better than the
drugs for reducing depression.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
So a doctor who prescribed physical activity as opposed to
giving you a drug.
Speaker 2 (18:20):
It's such an extraordinary study. And now one of the
biggest things it isn't that we don't know about these
lifestyle factors, but we in the US. You know, we're
great with technology. We're a leader, we're a leader in AI,
and what we want to do instead of trying to
treat diseases is truly prevent them. We couldn't do that before,
(18:42):
we couldn't do it. But now the combination of lifestyle
factors with AI, you know, we couldn't do this without AI.
You have to assemble billions of data points on each
person to say this is your risk and this is
what we're going to do about it. And so it
isn't just the lifestyle factors. We got to use all
the layers of data the AI to give us the
(19:04):
accurate and temporal So used to be let's say you
did a gene sequence and you say, oh, you're at
risk for Alzheimer's disease. Well, we didn't know from that
whether it's at age ninety eight or sixty eight. Now
we can pinpoint the time, not just the risk, and
it's very precise. So the whole idea is that we're
(19:24):
in a different time right now when prevention, which is
so attractive for its potential, right now, we need to
go after this and we're the perfect place to lead
the way.
Speaker 1 (19:35):
I'm a big believer that artificial intelligence is going to
empower us both in efficiency and in the ability to
aggregate huge volumes of data and pinpoint things that you
just literally couldn't have done before. How do you see
that getting applied to the system, right.
Speaker 2 (19:53):
So what we want to do now is to prove
that when you have all these layers of data. Obviously,
things like the Electronic Health rugty of all that, labs
and whatever skins AI can pick up things that we
never see, for example, normal labs. You've had normal labs
throughout your life, but it sees trends. We just look
at it normal or not. But this so called set
(20:16):
points for you. Then we add things like apologenic risk score,
which we have that for all common diseases, the common cancers,
heart disease, Alzheimer's, so we have that. And then we
have these clocks body wide clock it's called a methylation
epigenetic clock. We have organ clocks. We have all these
biomarker proteins. All these are inexpensive. When you put it
(20:40):
all together, along with a person's current lifestyle, you can
say this is your risk, whether it's a particular type
of cancer, heart disease, or neurodegenerate. And that's what we're
not doing. We're not doing these well before a person
ever has a disease. For example, the marker for Alzheimer's
(21:01):
it's called p COW two seventeen, that has been available
in the US for two years. Nobody knows about it,
but it's as good as a cerebral spinal fluid assessment.
It's as good as a PET scan. And this marker
is lowered by exercise and by healthy lifestyle, So it's
(21:22):
like an LDL cholesterol for heart disease. So why aren't
we using this? Why aren't we preventing Alzheimer's? You know
very well how much it costs to care for a
person with Alzheimer's who would want to get that dread
of disease. And that's why lifespan is not what we're after.
It's health span free of these diseases. We can do this,
but we haven't set our minds yet on our priorities,
(21:45):
our resources to do it. And we have the tools,
and the immune system is the common thread, and we
now have an immune system clock that we can use.
So why aren't we doing this? That's really what the
book is about, reviewing the lifestyle actors, but providing a
blueprint for how we can change the face of what
(22:05):
we call the elderly. That you started with, how many
people are sick to the welderly, which is the study
we did of fourteen hundred people with whole genomes, and
we didn't find anything these people, it's not their genes
that are doing it. It's their lifestyle, their immune system,
not in your DNA. For the most part.
Speaker 1 (22:43):
You make the comment in your book that we're stuck
in the nineteen sixties in our approach to cancer. But
that's true almost across the border. I mean, we have
somehow culturally in the medical professions, financially, in these big companies,
including the insurance companies in the hospitals, have gotten locked
into a model which we objectively now know makes you
(23:05):
less likely to live longer and less likely to be healthy.
How do we get the transference to get the average
doctor to decide they can offer you a prescription to
go exercise instead of giving you an antidepressant. That's a
revolution that will be culturally very challenging.
Speaker 2 (23:24):
It will be because we have such reliance on antidepressant
medications that don't work very well and can be superseded
by things like exercise. But I think the bigger problem,
and you allude to this with the cancer. You know,
this reactive rut that we're in. We stream for cancer
(23:44):
based on only age, you know, So if you're a
only in age forty or forty five, you're just to
have mammograms on a frequent basis. Well, eighty eight percent
of women, eighty eight percent will never have breast cancer
in their lifetime. Why do we put all these women
through all the waste? We can determine a person's risk
and partition the screening, but we don't do it. We
(24:07):
have so much more knowledge that we are implementing in
the daily practice of medicine. How is that going to
change if we don't really articulate the priorities, the opportunities,
and make for the compelling evidence. So the whole medical community,
all the clinicians, buy into it and change their practice.
Speaker 1 (24:26):
You are extraordinarily knowledgeable. Ten years from now this has happened.
How did it happen?
Speaker 2 (24:33):
Yeah, it could happen if we said, you know what,
we're going to be the world leader in preventing the
Big three age related diseases. That is what accounts for
our health span limits. And this is how we're going
to do it, and our investment in prevention is going
to be so extraordinary compared to where we are today.
(24:54):
We're going to make this accessible to all that is
this risk assessment, and we're not going to to do
it on stupid grounds of just age. It's not about
age only. There's other things here, and we're going to
have a systematic assessment of people as part of their
annual checkup to prevent diseases. And when we discover that
(25:14):
a person does have a high risk for one of
these three age related disease, we're going into high prevent mode.
We're going to pull out all the stops. We're going
to work with the person on their lifestyle. The excitement
regarding these drugs like azempic is not just because they
have such a remarkable weight loss. They have potent anti
(25:34):
inflammatory effects in the brain and in the body, and
they're being tested in Alzheimer's in thin people, large trials,
and there are so many other drugs that are coming
in the pipeline. These gut hormones that talk to our
immune system in our brain that are going to be
in pills, not just injectables, so it be inexpensive. We're
(25:55):
going to be having ways to modulate our immune system
like a riostat. We can do that. That's how we
prevent these diseases and we get all these super agers.
We want to have superagers. We don't want to have
people like we have today, which are just so much
chronic disease. I mean, there's an article in today's Wall
Street Journal about how we're the outlier of chronic diseases
(26:18):
among all the rich countries in the world.
Speaker 1 (26:20):
That seems to be a combination of our cultural behaviors
and things like big food and the degree to which
we've talked to ourselves out of being an active country physically,
then we have undervalued the importance of being outdoors.
Speaker 2 (26:37):
Those things are absolutely true, But we also want to
adopt a new strategy that is getting ahead of people.
When you think that we have twenty plus years before
these three diseases strikes, that gives us an amazing runway
to work with, but we're not using it, you know,
we're just, oh, well, the person had a heart attack
that we're going to really get on their LDL cholesterol.
(27:00):
A person has cancer, we're going to treat it and
hope for a remission. That's not when we want to
get all over. We want to just from MPs from happening.
We couldn't do it before, frankly, but we sure can now.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
Do You talk as an example of all this, about
the breakthrough that the twenty twenty four Nobel Prize in
chemistry sort of outline and really dramatically changing things. As
a person who doesn't have nearly your knowledge, could you
explain to me why it was such a big deal
and what it means.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
Yeah, So the work by Demis, yesabas John Jumper at
deep Mind, they basically figured out that we could predict
at atomic resolution the structure three D of essentially all
proteins in the universe, but hundreds of millions of them,
and that used a type of AI transformer AI now
(27:55):
known as large language models generative AI. And it was
a breakthrough because it started with protein structure and now
everybody's jumped on that to you name it, antibodies, small molecules, RNA.
There's now models for all this. So what that's doing
is accelerating drug discovery, and of course, you know throughout
(28:16):
the world there's now so many different efforts to bring
drugs that will help prevent these diseases. And that's why Demis,
who won that Nobel Prize, said recently on Sixty Minutes
that he thinks that we could eliminate these diseases in
the next decade. I'm not quite as optimistic, I can
say it, because we don't change easily. You know, we
(28:37):
are very kind of sclerotic in our medical community. I'm
representing the medical community here, and I know it takes
much longer than it should to affect the change, but
I do share the optimism.
Speaker 1 (28:50):
It's really interesting. I just got a briefing this last
week for about two hours on the whole concept of
making America healthy again, and the parallelisms are hearing. And
I think that the President and Secretary of Health Human
Services Kennedy, are going to do a joint event maybe
next Thursday and lay out that you have to have
(29:10):
this fundamental revolution and how we think about it, and
that if we do it right, we actually dramatically lower
the cost are sick care because people just stay healthy. Frankly,
one of the biggest fights they're going to have is
big food. I mean, big food is going to go
nuts at the idea that we're going to try to
transition the country off of ultra processed food.
Speaker 2 (29:32):
Absolutely we've never tackled them. That's just incredible, really, And
you know what if we provided incentives for people to
do these healthy lifestyle things and we just promoted that
like we've never done, you know, that's not been something
and that's a great opportunity, and I'm glad, of course
that that's a goal. Now. I hope that Big Food
will we put in their proper place.
Speaker 1 (29:53):
Oh, I think this will be one of the great
historic fights. This will be comparable to taking on the
railroads in the eighteen nineties or standard oiler at and T.
As I think about this, you know you could in
fact have this is just blue sky, but you could have,
for example, an annual tax credit. If in fact you
(30:15):
had a health score for every person who avoids Alzheimer's,
the amount we say would be staggering, So you could
over time bend the curve by creating incentives for health
rather than just payments for sickness. And I think if
you said to people, I'm going to minimize your risk
(30:35):
of heart disease, minimize your risk of cancer, and minimize
your risk of Alzheimer's. But that means this program you
might have astonishing uptake.
Speaker 2 (30:45):
We should be right getting on it, because you know
these are easy to track. You don't have to be
a spartan athlete, just go for a walk. But if
you do these things and you work on sleep health
and you have a healthy diet, I review this in
the book, you can get seven to ten years of
healthy agent without these three age related diseases. Just that
(31:08):
it's extraordinary, and so to prevent these diseases at the
individual level and at the American population level, that should
be objective number one.
Speaker 1 (31:18):
And I think in that sense, making clear that we
are now for the first time, going to create a
healthcare system, not a sick care system, that could become
a very very exciting effort that I think would attract
an amazing amount of attention.
Speaker 2 (31:32):
I'm excited about it. I'm bringing with optimism about what
the opportunities are right now, knowing you you'll potentially help
to make it actualize it to a reality.
Speaker 1 (31:42):
Your book is coming out at I think an amazingly
almost miraculous moment. I think because you're providing a scientific
basis a lifetime of investment, and it's pretty hard for
people not to say that you are a serious person
with a serious understanding. This is real, this is not
just rhetoric. I hope we can work together in some
(32:04):
of these things. I think we could be right at
the edge of an extraordinary revolution that moves us decisively
towards being a much healthier country with much longer lives
and as a consequence, a much less expensive health system.
Speaker 2 (32:18):
You nailed it. I hope we can seize the opportunity.
Speaker 1 (32:21):
Really, Look, Eric, I want to thank you for joining me.
As I said at the beginning, every time I'm with you,
it is an exhilarating experience. You are a remarkable person.
Your new book, Superagers and Evidence Based Approach to Longevity
is available now on Amazon and in bookstores everywhere, and
it's a very important book. I recommend everyone get a copy,
(32:42):
read it and then apply it to your life. It's
not just a book to be read and say less interesting.
It's a book to be read and say wow. It's
a cookbook for living longer and healthier. For listeners who
want to follow your regular work, they can subscribe to
your newsletter Ground Truths on substep. And I really appreciate
your being with me today.
Speaker 2 (33:00):
Oh I've enjoyed the conversation immensely. Thank you.
Speaker 1 (33:06):
Thank you to my guests, doctor Eric Topel. You can
get a link to buy his new book, super Agers
an Evidence Based Approach to Longevity on our show page
at Newtsworld dot com. Newsworld is produced by Gingristree sixty
and iHeartMedia. Our executive producer is Guarnsi Sloan. Our researcher
is Rachel Peterson. The artwork for the show was created
(33:26):
by Steve Penley. Special thanks to the team at Gingridtree sixty.
If you've been enjoying Newtsworld, I hope you'll go to
Apple Podcast and both rate us with five stars and
give us a review so others can learn what it's
all about. Right now, listeners of Newsworld can sign up
for my three free weekly columns at Gingrispree sixty dot
com slash newsletter. I'm Newt Gingrich. This is Newtsworld.