Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
It's time for Nina's What's trending in Nina is out today,
(00:02):
So Producer Bread has your trending.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
The Baldoni and Lively case continues. I'm going to tell
you more about that in a second. First, Gracie Abrams
has dropped a TikTok teaser of a brand new track.
Fans have gone absolutely wild. Tell us about it, Victoria, I.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
Haven't heard it. I have not heard the song, and
now I'm like, actually.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Like most fans, they claim to be one until the
teaser drops and they didn't even see it.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
Hey, I'm sorry, I was working late. I was not
really of working.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
Is it because you're a singer? Anyway? Gracy Abrams has
shared the new snippet. It's a big teaser. People are
freaking out about it. Go check that out on the
Tiki Talkie. A groom's mom showed up to his ceremony
wearing what could we guess.
Speaker 3 (00:44):
A wedding dress and a veil. Wait what yeah?
Speaker 2 (00:47):
A wedding guest Reddit post has gone viral for sharing
the story of a mother of the groom who wore
a wedding gown and veil to her son's nuptials. Why
reminded everyone that she was the first woman in his life.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
Oh okay, that's a red flag.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
That was so creepy. That's also your son, Like he's
getting mad, like why would you.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Yeah and wait to take away from your son's day.
Oh yeah, just to remind everybody, I was the first woman.
Speaker 3 (01:18):
He ever knew.
Speaker 1 (01:20):
Ever, okay, it makes sense, you're his mom. Crazy lady,
crazy lady.
Speaker 2 (01:27):
He might have met the nurse before he met you. Actually,
that's true, doctor.
Speaker 3 (01:32):
So she should have really came out. Yeah. Right.
Speaker 2 (01:35):
Apparently the bride totally kept her cool, which just means
she was she knew she was marrying, she knew the mom.
Speaker 3 (01:42):
She was very used to it.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
I'm sure a Florida man is facing up to thirty
years in prison for pretending to be a flight attendant
to book free airline flights. Pretend to be a we
need that.
Speaker 3 (01:53):
Hack for definitely, I would be down to do that.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
You should have a great TikTok account, fake badge numbers,
higher dates even wow for seven different airlines.
Speaker 3 (02:06):
Ooh wow, he was really gone places. Yeah, one hundred
and twenty free flights.
Speaker 1 (02:10):
He got Just to think about the kind of work
that went into getting all that information, he probably could
have been just a flight attendant, right, going to jail.
Speaker 3 (02:18):
Ye old job.
Speaker 2 (02:19):
Yeah, all right, Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively, here we go.
Blake Lively just won a major sort of victory when
the judge dismissed Justin Baldoni's four hundred million dollar deformation claim.
But the lawyers like, not so fast. We're going to
continue to try to get this defamation claim done. He said.
(02:41):
Miss Lively and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false.
He went on to say, Miss Lively's own claims are
no truer today than they were yesterday. And we marched
forward with the same confidence we had when Miss Lively
and her cohorts initiated this battle. And so they are.
They're going all in. They're going to continue to go
(03:02):
all in.
Speaker 1 (03:03):
His legal team is really good too, Yeah.
Speaker 3 (03:06):
And hers is also really bad. But I think it's
just what they're working with. But you would think, I
don't know, as someone that famous in Hollywood, she'd have
a really good lawyer. Yeah, I mean, I think she
does have good lawyers.
Speaker 1 (03:16):
But I think that because really like the whole thing
that she that she did, it looks bad on her right,
So I think they just don't have much to work with,
so they're always just like kind of spinning everything.
Speaker 2 (03:28):
Oh, it's an absolute spin factory over there. In the
Reynolds Lively Hurle, they did say that after the case
got dismissed, the seven claims got dismissed, the judge is
allowing them to amend four of them.
Speaker 3 (03:41):
What does that mean?
Speaker 2 (03:42):
So the case got dismissed, there's seven claims. Oh, the
case got dismissed, but he's allowing them to amend four
of the.
Speaker 3 (03:49):
Claims, which means the case is not over.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
It's not ye that those versions of the claims were dismissed,
but he's allowed three he threw completely out, and then
the other four he's allowing them to reach.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
And that's also not good because that means because he's
looked at stuff enough to go, all right, there, these
are nonsense.
Speaker 3 (04:06):
Get rid of these. But those ones you just need
to reword them.
Speaker 2 (04:09):
Yeah, the quest basically.
Speaker 1 (04:10):
It is like, ah, yeah, there's there's a lot in there,
but you can't word it that way. The legal system
in general is all based on interpretation and the way
things are worded. So it's totally crazy, but literally, one
sentence can be debated from each side that says the
exact The sentence says the exact same thing, but they're
just arguing about how it's interpreted.
Speaker 2 (04:30):
Yep.
Speaker 1 (04:30):
So that's probably what it is, is like, hey, this
language just needs to be more clear about this or whatever.
Speaker 2 (04:35):
Yeah, they're allowing them to showcase additional evidence and refine
the allegations.
Speaker 3 (04:39):
Yep.
Speaker 2 (04:39):
So it is not over, and that is what's trending.