June 7, 2021 • 23 mins
Remember when the media roundly dismissed the idea that COVID could have begun as a laboratory accident in Wuhan, China? Remember when so-called journalists demonized anyone who thought the Wuhan lab-leak theory had legs as a racist, crackpot conspiracy theorist? Gianno does, too. For this podcast, Gianno explains why the media owes us all an apology for not doing their jobs when it comes to the origins of COVID. He discusses Dr. Anthony Fauci's emails, the media’s malpractice regarding COVID, and much more.
Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Up next, How woud what Janno called? I'm part of
the Remember when the media roundly dismissed the idea that
COVID could have begun as a laboratory accident in Wuhan, China.
Remember when so called journalists demonized anyone who thought the
Wuhan lablick theory had legs as a racist, crackpot conspiracy theorist.
(00:23):
I do. I know you do too. And now it
looks like the media owes us all an apology for
not doing their jobs. This is out allowed with Gianno
called will thank you for joining that. While with Giano
(00:43):
calls out. Today is a very special day because I
want to talk to you directly about what's going on
in our country. As you all, I'm sure are aware,
we've been living in a scenario whereas freedoms have been you, sir,
the ability to make money for many Americans has diminished.
(01:04):
The ability to go outside with your normal everyday clothing
without the face masks, of course, has been beyond us
for over a year. The ability to just live your
life as you have always gone. Why. Because COVID nineteen
(01:25):
came around, many doctors didn't know what it was or
how to respond to it, and we understand that it
was new for all of us. But then there were
individuals in which we relied on to tell us the truth.
Certainly we know we weren't going to get that from
the media person and we were in the midst of
an election and an economy that was booming was no longer.
(01:50):
So what do we do. We look for the White House,
We look for our infectious disease experts to tell us
how we should move in this pandemic, what should we
be doing one And for many of us, we didn't
begin to take it seriously until they canceled the NBA.
Then that's when it was a true panic that ensued.
But there was one guy, doctor Anthony Fauci, who was
(02:15):
supposed that got us through one of the most horrific
events our country has ever experienced. And unfortunately, I have
some bad news to report, and I actually have a
word of the day. The word of the day is finessed,
doctor Anthony Fauci. Finessed. The majority of the American public
(02:36):
and the mainstream media was totally complicit in it. They
were complicit by not taking in all sides of information.
They were complicit by virtue of listening to one man
who in some cases did not follow all the science.
They were complicit because they wanted to ensure that another
(02:56):
man by the name of Donald Trump was going to
lose the election. To what costs, people lost their livelihoods.
But I guess in Trump is in president, so for
them perhaps it was well worth it. And as you know,
Dr Anthony Fauci is the director of the National Institute
(03:18):
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and he is the media's
golden boy throughout the coronavirus, almost like another governor that
we know who was the golden boy throughout the coronavirus,
Andrew Como, the governor of New York. But thanks to
the Freedom of Information Act, we now have thousands of
private emails did doctor Anthony Fauci has sent or received
(03:40):
talking about COVID nineteen And I'm gonna read one of
them to you, and I'm sure you will be very
upset by the fact that we've lived through all of
this and this man had a point of view that
he talked about on television and privately through emails he
was saying something else all together. A writer sent him
(04:02):
a note asking about face masks while traveling, and he
said mask are really for infected people to prevent them
from spreading infection to people who are not infected, rather
than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection. The typical mask
you're buying a drug store is not really effective in
keeping out virus which is small enough to pass through
(04:25):
the material. He also went on to say, this is
what really gets me, and we're talking about the country's
leading infectious disease expert. He said the writer if they
were to where they didn't need to wear a mask
(04:46):
during travel, to a very low risk location. All right, now,
I don't know what very low risk location really means,
but certainly if we listen to this SoundBite as Dr
Fauci has described the important to wearing masks and honestly
flip flopped on him many times, maybe he'll tell us
(05:08):
what exactly that means, but I doubt it. Take a listen.
He spoke about my emails. You look at my emails.
I never in the email said anything derogatory about President Trump. Well,
the true mark of someone is if they look good
even when their personal emails come out. So you pass
the chest that very feel with us with foot fast
Now I don't know about you, but just listening to
(05:30):
what he had to say and just hearing the various
sound bites, I'm a bit confused, and I feel like
Dr Fauci was also confused by telling us one thing
and believe in another. Now, interestingly enough, there's been actual
elected officials in the Senate and the House of Representatives,
even Donald Trump himself who questioned Doctor Fauci's quote unquote science.
(05:56):
And I'm a big believer in science. So don't think
that I'm providing conspiracies here, because we can all find
a media reporting on this. Senator Rand Paul was one
of them. He started an argument with Dr Fauci when
he came before one of the Senate committees. It was
a congressional hearing on the origins of COVID nineteen and
(06:20):
theories have circulated throughout the pandemic about whether the coronavirus
sprouted in a lab and was accidentally or purposefully released,
And of course the consensus varied in a lot of
cases where Dr Fauci said no, it was this. The
media just believed that they didn't listen to any opposing
(06:41):
viewpoints on the issue, and they just took his word
as gold. And you know it's honestly just that's not journalism.
You're supposed to you hear what a person says, you
investigate and you source it, and then you come to
your own conclusions. You don't just take the word of
one individual. And and how do I know this to
(07:02):
be true? Because whenever Trump said something was true, they
would say, oh, uh no, we need to we don't
believe you, We don't believe you. And they would maybe somebody,
possibly in one of those conservative media outlets, would would
find something that verifies what he said. Others would say, oh,
it's just a conspiracy theory, right wing conspiracy theory, just
like the origins of COVID nineteen. We need to pause
(07:26):
him for a quie break. We'll be back in a minute.
So during the Senate Committee hearing, Paul and we're talking
about Senator Ran Paul focused on the speculation that the
virus may come from may have came from a lab
in Wuhan, China, and Dr Fauci. Dr Fauci was questioned
(07:50):
about this. Paul said, Dr Fauci, we don't know whether
the pandemic started in the lab and Wuhan or evolved naturally,
but what we what we want to know? Paul began
to say, three million people have died from this pandemic
and that should call us to explore all possibilities. Now,
Rand Paul has talked about the fact that he believes
(08:11):
that the virus did originate in Wuhan, China, in a lab.
But in this instance, he was telling Dr Fauci, Listen,
we have all these people who have died from COVID nighteen.
Shouldn't all cards being on the table as to what
we should be exploring to to see if this is
true or not? Like, shouldn't we be asking these these questions.
(08:33):
Shouldn't we be investigating everything? You know what Dr Fauci said,
He told him he was wrong, flat out, You're wrong. Basically,
you don't know what you're talking about. Now we're talking
about Senator Rand Paul isn't just a senator. He's elected clearly,
he represents his constituency constituency, but he's also a scientist.
(08:56):
He's a fellow scientist. He's a doctor just like Dr Fauci,
and he has every right just like we do who
lost our freedoms and rights over the course of over
a year. We should be questioning it too, but Dr
Filgi said, no, you're wrong, and you know what the
media did. He wrote them off as another Trump conspiracy
theorist who was against science, even though he's a doctor.
(09:20):
This is where we are in a place where you
simply put, cannot just trust something that the mainstream media says.
If you read it, you better go try to find
five other sources to verify what you just read. I
never thought that I would be in a place, especially
(09:40):
when it comes to science, which we know the Democratic
Party is supposed to be the party of science, where
people who are so afraid to be honest. And we're
talking about now a number of doctors who have lost
everything because they were honest about what their beliefs were
with the origins of COVID nineteen, how Ton in new
COVID nineteen, who legitimately were labeled conspiracy theories. Let's not
(10:06):
even just talk about that. Let's move on. Let's move
on beyond just those who were labeled conspiracy theories. What
about those who said that if you believe that the
virus occurred in this lab in China, that you were
a racist. What about that? What about if you Donald
Trump labeled the virus, which a lot of reporting now
backs up, and a lot of journalists, if you if
(10:27):
you're looking at the reporting now, a lot of journalists
have admitted on the record that they dismissed the the
origin of the virus coming from the Wuhan lab because
Donald Trump and Republicans mentioned it. Let this again because
of the source of it. Instead of investigating it, they decided, Hey,
you know, we're we're gonna label this, uh, this is
(10:50):
a racism which we often see on the left. We're
gonna label this as racist and we're going to We're
going to say that in this case because Donald Trump
meant should do. There's some fringe theory that is in
the back rooms of the internet, the black hole of
the internet where all Trump supporters lie and don't when
they reside and don't believe in science. You understand that,
(11:13):
you who may not have believed the mainstream media, you're
not crazy. Even though your friends and family maybe have said, listen,
you gotta stop listening to that. This is what you
need to do. You need to go do this, that
and the other because that's what the media said you
should do. And he said, no, I want to think
for myself. I want to do the research. I want
(11:34):
to see the compelling evidence. Of course, we all want
to be safe. And I'm not saying that folks should
not have taken precautions. Absolutely they should have, but we
we we want the press to hold those accountable for
what they what they told us. But they're not gonna
They're not gonna do that because they've been complicit. You know,
it's interesting. There's an individual who's a reporter. He used
(11:57):
to work for Fox News Channel. He recently tweeted about
the origins of it. And as we know, China has
not obliged American investigators to go into this particular lab
and and and see was there any origins of it theory.
(12:18):
They've pretty much locked Americans and any health officials out
of the process. It's a guy by the name of
Adam hows Ling. He has reported and we're talking about
the origins of it. He is reported that U. S
Intelligence now has a Chinese defector with Wuhan Info in
(12:40):
Chinese trying to produce variants that suggested came from bats
to cover up that the coronavirus originally came from a lab.
And we're talking about that that Wuhan Lab in particular.
Now I'm interested in knowing now with the press taking
a turn, said, oh maybe that was something to this
after all. Sorry they we you know, pretty much ended
(13:02):
livelihoods for millions of people across the across the country,
and we were complicit and uh not actually getting a
fact fact based analysis and getting other points of view
and allow them to speak openly about this. Maybe maybe
maybe maybe it'll jump in on it now and see,
(13:23):
you know, how to how to possibly uh verify what's
what's being reported now I kind of doubt it though.
You know what, folks, I think what we're looking at
now is medium outpractice. The institution that is supposed to
look out for our best interests has failed us. They've
(13:44):
been derelicting their duties, and now it's upon us to
look for other sources of information or verify three or
four times what we read because we just simply put,
cannot be trusting to an institution that has failed us
(14:05):
far too many times. You know, you would think when
officials like CDC former CDC Director Robert Redfield back the
live leak theory, you would think the media would take
it more seriously. Some of the scientists that we're working
(14:25):
in the Wuhan lab. They're back in November twenty nineteen,
were hospitalized with COVID nineteen symptoms. That's back in November
twenty nineteen, among other circumstantial evidence. We've seen other instances
where there was clearly, in my opinion, a cover up
(14:46):
by way of China. Why don't you allow people to investigate?
We know exactly how COVID nineteen would benefit China. They're
gonna overtake the US economy sooner than they I'd have
And truthfully speaking, when Trump got in and he was
ushering in a prosperity that we've never seen before. The
(15:06):
lowest black unemployment rate ever recorded, the lowest his spending
unemployment rate ever recorded, the lowest for Asians, winning fifty
year low. I mean, the list goes on and on.
With GDP growth rocketing, you know, we can talk about
spending it. I'm all about us containing our spending as
(15:26):
a country. I think we all should always should do that.
But the Trump was spending money, but we had a
GDP growth that would have allowed us to spend and
be able to pay whatever debt we head back, especially
if things were to continue. Also we know China trade.
Trump was very hard on China when it came to trade,
(15:48):
and there was a lot of words fired back and forth.
When it came to trade. We're talking about a trade
deficited over five hundred billion dollars a year. You're talking
with the B five million, five hund a billion dollar
trade deficit with China. And Trump said, hey, we need
(16:09):
we need to get this this deficit under control. They
need to be doing better trade with us. We we
shouldn't be at a deficit. Of course, mainstream media, oh no, no, no, no, no,
we can't have that. We absolutely cannot have that. We
you know, we don't want to get into the fight
with China. We don't want to get into a fight
with China. I mean, you're the president of the United States.
You represent your country. You should be getting the best
(16:31):
deal for your country. And the economy continued to do well.
So I can't factually say that China released it, but
I can say it, in my opinion looks like it
to me. It in my opinion, looks like that it
would have benefited them, especially with all the fights that
(16:51):
were going on when it came to trade. And if
you can weaken the US economy and thereby other economies
around the world. You're in a position to really dominate.
We know that China has been doing work in Africa,
we know they've been doing work all all across the
globe because they want to be the world's superpower. We
understand that. So we we understand exactly what, why, why
(17:17):
it would make sense for China to release something like
that from their point of view. I mean, all of
us obviously suffered because of it. How many people have
lost loved ones because of this, millions of people across
the world, And then you look in the US and
you look state by state. This was a very serious thing.
And we continue to see evidence that points to China.
(17:40):
And maybe now the media is beginning to think, oh,
maybe we should hold them, account of them. But what
will happen? What would Joe Biden do? We know about
his son and his business dealings with China, And we've
heard the reporting from the New York Post and Joe
Biden's sons business partner who talked about tem percent for
the big Guy, which he alleged was ten percent of
(18:01):
whatever Joe Biden's son earned would go to Joe Biden himself.
We understand that. So can we have faith and a president,
a commander in chief to take action if we were
to discover, and it were to be fully verified that
China unleashed this virus in the world, can we expect
(18:23):
him to do anything about it? I don't have much hope,
my friends. I'm gonna be honest with you about that.
I really don't. Before we move on, let's take a
quick brand back in a second. I mean, the question
is that political correctness play a part in all of this?
Did it? I mean it was? Was that a part
(18:46):
of it? You can't call people out now because it's
deemed racist. I don't know, but perhaps it did. I
know for some folks that truly did. If you read
the New York Times and the Washington Post, it clearly
clearly shows that if you if you mentioned China in
a particular light, especially if it was coming from Trump,
it was deemed to be racist. We saw what Nancy
Pelosi did. She went down to Chinatown in San Francisco
(19:09):
and said, hey, we're open for business. And I'm not
sure if that tweet is still up because she called
Trump essentially a racist for saying, hey, we need to
close the border um allowing certain people into into the
country coming from particular regions of the world, it was
considered racist. Do we see group thinking media? Absolutely? Absolutely.
(19:32):
Whatever the New York Times says, it's gold for so
many people in the media, it's the gold standard, especially
especially that idea. Is disappointing when you see them operate
with so much liberal bias on these issues on a
weekly basis, and sometimes they don't even admit it. And
this is this is what I don't understand. Where are
(19:55):
the standards in journalism. They've gotta be more, more, more
honest journalists out there, and I know that there are.
We had hair is foking on a couple of maybe
two or three weeks ago. I had hair Is foking
on talking about integrity and the press. I see some
of my colleagues in in the in the media, Fox
News in other places they do. But you see a
(20:15):
report comes out by them, and people on New York
Times and other places try to debunk it and ends
up being true. And you know what, I gotta tell you,
I am honestly tired of Donald Trump being so right
on these issues. He'll say something that media will say, oh,
that's completely outlandish, can't be true. It sounds crazy. And
(20:38):
to be honest with you, he said some things where
I'm like, no, that can't be true. It does sound crazy,
and then he comes out he was right the whole time.
I'm honestly, I'm tired of it because I expect much
more from our institutions. I expect much more from our press.
I expect them to operate with integrity. I expect them
(20:59):
to be unbiased, which is almost not even a word
you can apply to the mainstream media because some of
them are operating like democrats with press passes all day.
And now we're in a scenario where our lives, our
livelihood for many of us have been usurped. Folks have
(21:20):
lost their families and couldn't even go to the funerals,
they couldn't travel on planes. And we find out that
one man, Dr Anthony Fauci, and there's thousands of emails
out there, and I encourage people to go we as
much of it as you can wasn't completely in totally
honest with us. And that, my friends, is why I
(21:42):
needed to speak to you very directly, just one on one,
because I'm very, very disappointed well where we are as
a country, and my only hope is that we'll see
more people who are willing to come out and be honest.
I'm hoping that there the factor that Adam Howsley is
(22:03):
reporting on, who has Wuhan info. I'm hoping that that
person comes to light, and I'm hoping that our government,
our government takes very serious action if it is proven,
if it is proven without question and without doubt, that
China unleashed its virus in the world, that there will
(22:24):
be legit action taken and no other country will be
able to do this to us. Again, thank you for
joining me today on Outline with Giano Caldwell. Thank you
all again, God bless. If you're enjoying the show, please
(22:46):
leave us a review and read us with five stars
on Apple Podcasts. If you have any questions for me,
please email me as Outlied of Gingli Street six dot
com and I'll try to answer them in our future episodes.
And please sign up for my monthly newsletter at Gingli
Street sixt dot com slash you'all a loud. You can
also follow me on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and parlor at
Gianno Caldwell and if you're interested in learning more about
my story, please pick up a copy of my best
(23:06):
selling book titled Taken for Granted, How Conservatism Can Win
Back to Americans to Liberalism Failed. Special thanks to our
producer John Cassio, researcher Aaron Kleinman, and executive producers Debbie
Meyers and Speaker New Gang, which all part of the
Ginglish three sixty network
Up next, How woud what Janno called? I'm part of
the Remember when the media roundly dismissed the idea that
COVID could have begun as a laboratory accident in Wuhan, China.
Remember when so called journalists demonized anyone who thought the
Wuhan lablick theory had legs as a racist, crackpot conspiracy theorist.
(00:23):
I do. I know you do too. And now it
looks like the media owes us all an apology for
not doing their jobs. This is out allowed with Gianno
called will thank you for joining that. While with Giano
(00:43):
calls out. Today is a very special day because I
want to talk to you directly about what's going on
in our country. As you all, I'm sure are aware,
we've been living in a scenario whereas freedoms have been you, sir,
the ability to make money for many Americans has diminished.
(01:04):
The ability to go outside with your normal everyday clothing
without the face masks, of course, has been beyond us
for over a year. The ability to just live your
life as you have always gone. Why. Because COVID nineteen
(01:25):
came around, many doctors didn't know what it was or
how to respond to it, and we understand that it
was new for all of us. But then there were
individuals in which we relied on to tell us the truth.
Certainly we know we weren't going to get that from
the media person and we were in the midst of
an election and an economy that was booming was no longer.
(01:50):
So what do we do. We look for the White House,
We look for our infectious disease experts to tell us
how we should move in this pandemic, what should we
be doing one And for many of us, we didn't
begin to take it seriously until they canceled the NBA.
Then that's when it was a true panic that ensued.
But there was one guy, doctor Anthony Fauci, who was
(02:15):
supposed that got us through one of the most horrific
events our country has ever experienced. And unfortunately, I have
some bad news to report, and I actually have a
word of the day. The word of the day is finessed,
doctor Anthony Fauci. Finessed. The majority of the American public
(02:36):
and the mainstream media was totally complicit in it. They
were complicit by not taking in all sides of information.
They were complicit by virtue of listening to one man
who in some cases did not follow all the science.
They were complicit because they wanted to ensure that another
(02:56):
man by the name of Donald Trump was going to
lose the election. To what costs, people lost their livelihoods.
But I guess in Trump is in president, so for
them perhaps it was well worth it. And as you know,
Dr Anthony Fauci is the director of the National Institute
(03:18):
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and he is the media's
golden boy throughout the coronavirus, almost like another governor that
we know who was the golden boy throughout the coronavirus,
Andrew Como, the governor of New York. But thanks to
the Freedom of Information Act, we now have thousands of
private emails did doctor Anthony Fauci has sent or received
(03:40):
talking about COVID nineteen And I'm gonna read one of
them to you, and I'm sure you will be very
upset by the fact that we've lived through all of
this and this man had a point of view that
he talked about on television and privately through emails he
was saying something else all together. A writer sent him
(04:02):
a note asking about face masks while traveling, and he
said mask are really for infected people to prevent them
from spreading infection to people who are not infected, rather
than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection. The typical mask
you're buying a drug store is not really effective in
keeping out virus which is small enough to pass through
(04:25):
the material. He also went on to say, this is
what really gets me, and we're talking about the country's
leading infectious disease expert. He said the writer if they
were to where they didn't need to wear a mask
(04:46):
during travel, to a very low risk location. All right, now,
I don't know what very low risk location really means,
but certainly if we listen to this SoundBite as Dr
Fauci has described the important to wearing masks and honestly
flip flopped on him many times, maybe he'll tell us
(05:08):
what exactly that means, but I doubt it. Take a listen.
He spoke about my emails. You look at my emails.
I never in the email said anything derogatory about President Trump. Well,
the true mark of someone is if they look good
even when their personal emails come out. So you pass
the chest that very feel with us with foot fast
Now I don't know about you, but just listening to
(05:30):
what he had to say and just hearing the various
sound bites, I'm a bit confused, and I feel like
Dr Fauci was also confused by telling us one thing
and believe in another. Now, interestingly enough, there's been actual
elected officials in the Senate and the House of Representatives,
even Donald Trump himself who questioned Doctor Fauci's quote unquote science.
(05:56):
And I'm a big believer in science. So don't think
that I'm providing conspiracies here, because we can all find
a media reporting on this. Senator Rand Paul was one
of them. He started an argument with Dr Fauci when
he came before one of the Senate committees. It was
a congressional hearing on the origins of COVID nineteen and
(06:20):
theories have circulated throughout the pandemic about whether the coronavirus
sprouted in a lab and was accidentally or purposefully released,
And of course the consensus varied in a lot of
cases where Dr Fauci said no, it was this. The
media just believed that they didn't listen to any opposing
(06:41):
viewpoints on the issue, and they just took his word
as gold. And you know it's honestly just that's not journalism.
You're supposed to you hear what a person says, you
investigate and you source it, and then you come to
your own conclusions. You don't just take the word of
one individual. And and how do I know this to
(07:02):
be true? Because whenever Trump said something was true, they
would say, oh, uh no, we need to we don't
believe you, We don't believe you. And they would maybe somebody,
possibly in one of those conservative media outlets, would would
find something that verifies what he said. Others would say, oh,
it's just a conspiracy theory, right wing conspiracy theory, just
like the origins of COVID nineteen. We need to pause
(07:26):
him for a quie break. We'll be back in a minute.
So during the Senate Committee hearing, Paul and we're talking
about Senator Ran Paul focused on the speculation that the
virus may come from may have came from a lab
in Wuhan, China, and Dr Fauci. Dr Fauci was questioned
(07:50):
about this. Paul said, Dr Fauci, we don't know whether
the pandemic started in the lab and Wuhan or evolved naturally,
but what we what we want to know? Paul began
to say, three million people have died from this pandemic
and that should call us to explore all possibilities. Now,
Rand Paul has talked about the fact that he believes
(08:11):
that the virus did originate in Wuhan, China, in a lab.
But in this instance, he was telling Dr Fauci, Listen,
we have all these people who have died from COVID nighteen.
Shouldn't all cards being on the table as to what
we should be exploring to to see if this is
true or not? Like, shouldn't we be asking these these questions.
(08:33):
Shouldn't we be investigating everything? You know what Dr Fauci said,
He told him he was wrong, flat out, You're wrong. Basically,
you don't know what you're talking about. Now we're talking
about Senator Rand Paul isn't just a senator. He's elected clearly,
he represents his constituency constituency, but he's also a scientist.
(08:56):
He's a fellow scientist. He's a doctor just like Dr Fauci,
and he has every right just like we do who
lost our freedoms and rights over the course of over
a year. We should be questioning it too, but Dr
Filgi said, no, you're wrong, and you know what the
media did. He wrote them off as another Trump conspiracy
theorist who was against science, even though he's a doctor.
(09:20):
This is where we are in a place where you
simply put, cannot just trust something that the mainstream media says.
If you read it, you better go try to find
five other sources to verify what you just read. I
never thought that I would be in a place, especially
(09:40):
when it comes to science, which we know the Democratic
Party is supposed to be the party of science, where
people who are so afraid to be honest. And we're
talking about now a number of doctors who have lost
everything because they were honest about what their beliefs were
with the origins of COVID nineteen, how Ton in new
COVID nineteen, who legitimately were labeled conspiracy theories. Let's not
(10:06):
even just talk about that. Let's move on. Let's move
on beyond just those who were labeled conspiracy theories. What
about those who said that if you believe that the
virus occurred in this lab in China, that you were
a racist. What about that? What about if you Donald
Trump labeled the virus, which a lot of reporting now
backs up, and a lot of journalists, if you if
(10:27):
you're looking at the reporting now, a lot of journalists
have admitted on the record that they dismissed the the
origin of the virus coming from the Wuhan lab because
Donald Trump and Republicans mentioned it. Let this again because
of the source of it. Instead of investigating it, they decided, Hey,
you know, we're we're gonna label this, uh, this is
(10:50):
a racism which we often see on the left. We're
gonna label this as racist and we're going to We're
going to say that in this case because Donald Trump
meant should do. There's some fringe theory that is in
the back rooms of the internet, the black hole of
the internet where all Trump supporters lie and don't when
they reside and don't believe in science. You understand that,
(11:13):
you who may not have believed the mainstream media, you're
not crazy. Even though your friends and family maybe have said, listen,
you gotta stop listening to that. This is what you
need to do. You need to go do this, that
and the other because that's what the media said you
should do. And he said, no, I want to think
for myself. I want to do the research. I want
(11:34):
to see the compelling evidence. Of course, we all want
to be safe. And I'm not saying that folks should
not have taken precautions. Absolutely they should have, but we
we we want the press to hold those accountable for
what they what they told us. But they're not gonna
They're not gonna do that because they've been complicit. You know,
it's interesting. There's an individual who's a reporter. He used
(11:57):
to work for Fox News Channel. He recently tweeted about
the origins of it. And as we know, China has
not obliged American investigators to go into this particular lab
and and and see was there any origins of it theory.
(12:18):
They've pretty much locked Americans and any health officials out
of the process. It's a guy by the name of
Adam hows Ling. He has reported and we're talking about
the origins of it. He is reported that U. S
Intelligence now has a Chinese defector with Wuhan Info in
(12:40):
Chinese trying to produce variants that suggested came from bats
to cover up that the coronavirus originally came from a lab.
And we're talking about that that Wuhan Lab in particular.
Now I'm interested in knowing now with the press taking
a turn, said, oh maybe that was something to this
after all. Sorry they we you know, pretty much ended
(13:02):
livelihoods for millions of people across the across the country,
and we were complicit and uh not actually getting a
fact fact based analysis and getting other points of view
and allow them to speak openly about this. Maybe maybe
maybe maybe it'll jump in on it now and see,
(13:23):
you know, how to how to possibly uh verify what's
what's being reported now I kind of doubt it though.
You know what, folks, I think what we're looking at
now is medium outpractice. The institution that is supposed to
look out for our best interests has failed us. They've
(13:44):
been derelicting their duties, and now it's upon us to
look for other sources of information or verify three or
four times what we read because we just simply put,
cannot be trusting to an institution that has failed us
(14:05):
far too many times. You know, you would think when
officials like CDC former CDC Director Robert Redfield back the
live leak theory, you would think the media would take
it more seriously. Some of the scientists that we're working
(14:25):
in the Wuhan lab. They're back in November twenty nineteen,
were hospitalized with COVID nineteen symptoms. That's back in November
twenty nineteen, among other circumstantial evidence. We've seen other instances
where there was clearly, in my opinion, a cover up
(14:46):
by way of China. Why don't you allow people to investigate?
We know exactly how COVID nineteen would benefit China. They're
gonna overtake the US economy sooner than they I'd have
And truthfully speaking, when Trump got in and he was
ushering in a prosperity that we've never seen before. The
(15:06):
lowest black unemployment rate ever recorded, the lowest his spending
unemployment rate ever recorded, the lowest for Asians, winning fifty
year low. I mean, the list goes on and on.
With GDP growth rocketing, you know, we can talk about
spending it. I'm all about us containing our spending as
(15:26):
a country. I think we all should always should do that.
But the Trump was spending money, but we had a
GDP growth that would have allowed us to spend and
be able to pay whatever debt we head back, especially
if things were to continue. Also we know China trade.
Trump was very hard on China when it came to trade,
(15:48):
and there was a lot of words fired back and forth.
When it came to trade. We're talking about a trade
deficited over five hundred billion dollars a year. You're talking
with the B five million, five hund a billion dollar
trade deficit with China. And Trump said, hey, we need
(16:09):
we need to get this this deficit under control. They
need to be doing better trade with us. We we
shouldn't be at a deficit. Of course, mainstream media, oh no, no, no, no, no,
we can't have that. We absolutely cannot have that. We
you know, we don't want to get into the fight
with China. We don't want to get into a fight
with China. I mean, you're the president of the United States.
You represent your country. You should be getting the best
(16:31):
deal for your country. And the economy continued to do well.
So I can't factually say that China released it, but
I can say it, in my opinion looks like it
to me. It in my opinion, looks like that it
would have benefited them, especially with all the fights that
(16:51):
were going on when it came to trade. And if
you can weaken the US economy and thereby other economies
around the world. You're in a position to really dominate.
We know that China has been doing work in Africa,
we know they've been doing work all all across the
globe because they want to be the world's superpower. We
understand that. So we we understand exactly what, why, why
(17:17):
it would make sense for China to release something like
that from their point of view. I mean, all of
us obviously suffered because of it. How many people have
lost loved ones because of this, millions of people across
the world, And then you look in the US and
you look state by state. This was a very serious thing.
And we continue to see evidence that points to China.
(17:40):
And maybe now the media is beginning to think, oh,
maybe we should hold them, account of them. But what
will happen? What would Joe Biden do? We know about
his son and his business dealings with China, And we've
heard the reporting from the New York Post and Joe
Biden's sons business partner who talked about tem percent for
the big Guy, which he alleged was ten percent of
(18:01):
whatever Joe Biden's son earned would go to Joe Biden himself.
We understand that. So can we have faith and a president,
a commander in chief to take action if we were
to discover, and it were to be fully verified that
China unleashed this virus in the world, can we expect
(18:23):
him to do anything about it? I don't have much hope,
my friends. I'm gonna be honest with you about that.
I really don't. Before we move on, let's take a
quick brand back in a second. I mean, the question
is that political correctness play a part in all of this?
Did it? I mean it was? Was that a part
(18:46):
of it? You can't call people out now because it's
deemed racist. I don't know, but perhaps it did. I
know for some folks that truly did. If you read
the New York Times and the Washington Post, it clearly
clearly shows that if you if you mentioned China in
a particular light, especially if it was coming from Trump,
it was deemed to be racist. We saw what Nancy
Pelosi did. She went down to Chinatown in San Francisco
(19:09):
and said, hey, we're open for business. And I'm not
sure if that tweet is still up because she called
Trump essentially a racist for saying, hey, we need to
close the border um allowing certain people into into the
country coming from particular regions of the world, it was
considered racist. Do we see group thinking media? Absolutely? Absolutely.
(19:32):
Whatever the New York Times says, it's gold for so
many people in the media, it's the gold standard, especially
especially that idea. Is disappointing when you see them operate
with so much liberal bias on these issues on a
weekly basis, and sometimes they don't even admit it. And
this is this is what I don't understand. Where are
(19:55):
the standards in journalism. They've gotta be more, more, more
honest journalists out there, and I know that there are.
We had hair is foking on a couple of maybe
two or three weeks ago. I had hair Is foking
on talking about integrity and the press. I see some
of my colleagues in in the in the media, Fox
News in other places they do. But you see a
(20:15):
report comes out by them, and people on New York
Times and other places try to debunk it and ends
up being true. And you know what, I gotta tell you,
I am honestly tired of Donald Trump being so right
on these issues. He'll say something that media will say, oh,
that's completely outlandish, can't be true. It sounds crazy. And
(20:38):
to be honest with you, he said some things where
I'm like, no, that can't be true. It does sound crazy,
and then he comes out he was right the whole time.
I'm honestly, I'm tired of it because I expect much
more from our institutions. I expect much more from our press.
I expect them to operate with integrity. I expect them
(20:59):
to be unbiased, which is almost not even a word
you can apply to the mainstream media because some of
them are operating like democrats with press passes all day.
And now we're in a scenario where our lives, our
livelihood for many of us have been usurped. Folks have
(21:20):
lost their families and couldn't even go to the funerals,
they couldn't travel on planes. And we find out that
one man, Dr Anthony Fauci, and there's thousands of emails
out there, and I encourage people to go we as
much of it as you can wasn't completely in totally
honest with us. And that, my friends, is why I
(21:42):
needed to speak to you very directly, just one on one,
because I'm very, very disappointed well where we are as
a country, and my only hope is that we'll see
more people who are willing to come out and be honest.
I'm hoping that there the factor that Adam Howsley is
(22:03):
reporting on, who has Wuhan info. I'm hoping that that
person comes to light, and I'm hoping that our government,
our government takes very serious action if it is proven,
if it is proven without question and without doubt, that
China unleashed its virus in the world, that there will
(22:24):
be legit action taken and no other country will be
able to do this to us. Again, thank you for
joining me today on Outline with Giano Caldwell. Thank you
all again, God bless. If you're enjoying the show, please
(22:46):
leave us a review and read us with five stars
on Apple Podcasts. If you have any questions for me,
please email me as Outlied of Gingli Street six dot
com and I'll try to answer them in our future episodes.
And please sign up for my monthly newsletter at Gingli
Street sixt dot com slash you'all a loud. You can
also follow me on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and parlor at
Gianno Caldwell and if you're interested in learning more about
my story, please pick up a copy of my best
(23:06):
selling book titled Taken for Granted, How Conservatism Can Win
Back to Americans to Liberalism Failed. Special thanks to our
producer John Cassio, researcher Aaron Kleinman, and executive producers Debbie
Meyers and Speaker New Gang, which all part of the
Ginglish three sixty network
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.