July 7, 2025 • 49 mins
Bolling on Real America's Voice
Segment A: SEN. CRUZ ON KERRVILLE, TX. FLOODS
Segment B: TRUMP SUES PULITZER PRIZE BOARD
Segment C: MEXICANS WANT AMERICANS OUT OF MX.
Segment D: EPSTEIN HAD NO CLIENT LIST?
Segment E: LISTENING TO YOUR VOICEMAILS
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
Ring the bell, guys, ring the darn bell. Broad Wall
and Wall Street in New York City marks closed. We
are open for business, Martin a little bit of a
tough day to day. The doll looks like it's going
to close around four hundred and twenty five points lower.
S ANDP down about fifty or so. Nasdaq down less
than two hundred and a lot of this was Beston
came out earlier today saying that some of the tariffs
(00:33):
that aren't negotiated may go back to July ninth, or
they may push them off again.
Speaker 2 (00:39):
Confusion in the.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Markets really really disrupts markets, and they saw at one point.
Speaker 2 (00:42):
The Dow is down more than five hundred points.
Speaker 1 (00:44):
Bounced back a little bit, but a couple of other
interesting plays here.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
Oil. We've been watching this.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Remember I asked President Trump last what was it Thursday
or Friday?
Speaker 2 (00:52):
Please?
Speaker 1 (00:53):
Can we fill up the SPR sixty four dollars a
barrel right now? We're up to sixty eight dollars a
barrel right now and on its way up.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
Unfortunate. We're going to talk a lot about this later.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
With the price of gas and whatnot, we want to
get that SPR filled, give us energy security, and the
other big market that we talk about a lot is.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
Crypto very very quiet, unbelievably quiet.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Like the market took a big move down in the
stock market, but Crypto down a little bit down to
touch one eight one hundred and eight thousand for a
big cooin. All right, folks, our own RAB correspondent and
hosts of Law and Border, Ben Berkwam is in Caribo, Texas,
where he's been reporting on the flood that has claimed
at least ninety people. Now, Ben, give us the latest,
and we wanted you had a quick chat with ten
(01:32):
Cruz in a second, just give us up the speed
that latest minute or so.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
Yeah, it's as you mentioned, up to ninety anticipated to
go high. And asked the question, what's the total universe
of missing? I've been asking that all weekend and I
said they said they still couldn't give me an answer
a total missing. But I followed up with are we
talking dozens or hundreds? And they said a lot, so
would lead you to believe it's towards the lot larger number.
(01:58):
That's really where we're at. We've entered that phase of
recovery rather than rescue. After seventy two hours, its very
rare to find somebody's still alive, but we're still praying
for that, and that's what we're asking pray for the community.
Absolute devastation. You can see behind me. I mean, we've
been covering it all weekend. To think that I would
be underwater right now is just really unfathomable.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
It's really incredible.
Speaker 1 (02:22):
It's scary, it's scary, and you know, one of the
most disgusting things we've been seeing. There are still people
out there. We're still looking for bodies. And the left
wing media, I think is the anopolis. I think of
Dan and Bash pointing a finger at Trump already. I mean,
there are people still missing right now. You had a
chance to talk to Senator Ted Cruz about this and
other things.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Let's take a little bite of the SoundBite that you
sent us.
Speaker 4 (02:44):
Fast about the politicization, and you're right.
Speaker 5 (02:46):
With any tragedy, there are people that try to play
politics with that. They try to blame their political opponents,
and in today's partisan world, if there's a hurricane, if
there's a tornado, if there's a flood, there are some
who want to say it's all Donald Trump fault, because
everything bad, they say, is Donald Trump's fault.
Speaker 4 (03:03):
Look, I think that is is.
Speaker 5 (03:06):
Wrong, it is inappropriate, and I think most people don't
want to see partisan fingerpaint pointing. What they want to
see is let's come together and let's get through this,
and then afterwards, after we rebuild, there does need to
be a process, a process of carefully looking back and saying, Okay,
what could have been done differently to save more lives?
Speaker 4 (03:27):
How could the response have been better?
Speaker 5 (03:29):
We know that the warnings went out from the National
Weather Service just after one am and just after four am.
Obviously most people were asleep then and they missed those warnings,
And so I think it's perfectly reasonable to have a conversation.
We know floods will occur, natural disasters occur. How can
we be better at being proactive? And in hindsight, everyone
(03:49):
would agree that we should not have had little girls,
particularly seven to eight year old the youngest girls on
the camp in cabins right by the river's edge as
the flood warning were coming out. And in hindsight, I
hope we have a better system to have an early
warning and then act proactively to remove the children, remove
anyone vulnerable from harm's way, to prevent this loss of life.
(04:11):
That's a reasonable and in fact, very important conversation to have,
but it shouldn't be in the context of just trying
to score political points.
Speaker 4 (04:19):
It should be learning lessons.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
And you know, Ben, I'm gonna throw it to you,
but very quickly. I've been watching Weather Channel all day
and all these folks are saying, this thing happens so fast.
Speaker 2 (04:29):
This water rose.
Speaker 1 (04:31):
Something like three feet in a matter of forty five minutes.
So any warning system would never been able to get
these people out of harm's way in time.
Speaker 2 (04:37):
But go ahead, I'll go give it to you.
Speaker 3 (04:41):
Yeah, no, you're right. Living in Arkansas, we get the
same weather patterns that Texas gets, and it's so unpredictable.
They can predict torrential downpour and all of a sudden
it's blue skies and sunny.
Speaker 2 (04:52):
This is what we've.
Speaker 3 (04:53):
Come to expect. And so to go from three inches
to four inches to fifteen to twenty inches, you cannot
predict that. And once that happens, the biggest problem is
where do you go because all the other roads could
be flooded.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
Too, So do you leave?
Speaker 3 (05:07):
Do you get all these little kids up at three
in the morning and have them trudged through the the
you know, the woods. What do you do with these kids?
All the second guessing the Monday morning quarterbacking from totally
disingenuous people. It's disgusting. It's absolutely disgusting. And as Ted
crew says, we need to look at some of these
things in hindsight, look at what can be done in
the future. But some of these things you can't predict,
(05:29):
and that's just unfortunately the reality of life.
Speaker 1 (05:33):
Yeah, and we hear the shop are coming, These search
and rescues and unfortunately recovery efforts are on way.
Speaker 2 (05:39):
Ben Berkelem, thank you. Stay safe, my friend, Please stay
out of harm's way. Thank you. We'll do thank you,
all right.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
Folks, All right, folks, we'll go back to Ben. As
the week goes on and things information comes out a
little while we go ahead, a chance to sit down
with Mike. Ben's we talked a little bit about this
Epstein dibaccle.
Speaker 2 (05:57):
What's going on?
Speaker 1 (05:58):
Take a listen, all right, and gears is just a
little bit the Department of Justice and guess what, folks,
how one DOJ official was told to back off Epstein
because he belonged to quote Intelligence. So Jeffrey Epstein received
the Plea deal in two thousand and eight, we knew
about that. My next guest delves into this and Epstein's connection.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
To us AID.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
Happy to have the executive director of the Foundation for
Freedom Online, mister Mike Bentz, to join us again. Mike,
tell us a just break this down, for there are
so many theories circling. One is that Epstein was an
intelligence asset. Another is there was never really a client list,
and there are another one. Yet another one is there
is but it is way too damaging for both sides.
(06:40):
What do you think is really going on here, my friend, Well.
Speaker 6 (06:43):
There's two separate lines of inquiry. I think the public
wants to know about the Epstein story. One is the
extent of the network, and this is where you get
questions around the existence of a potential client list.
Speaker 7 (06:55):
We obviously know that there was the so.
Speaker 6 (06:57):
Called little Black book that came out in Glene Maxwell's
trial that evidently contained names and addresses, but didn't formally
link them as clients. There was a belief there was
a client list, based on Pambondi's statements several months ago
that it was sitting on our desk, But now that
appears to be potentially a misstatement in the official word
(07:20):
that we are well semi official. The dj has not
yet acknowledged this new Axios report claiming that the DOJ's
internal memos are indicating that there's no client list, that
Epstein commits suicide and the like. But what I think
is kind of the meta question that hangs over all
of this is the question around Epstein's links to intelligence
(07:43):
and Epstein, the use of Epstein and the Epstein network
for covert funding of intelligence activity. That is a question
that's intricately linked today to the restructuring of USAID.
Speaker 7 (07:58):
Just last week, USAID fold it.
Speaker 6 (08:00):
Up and its remaining portfolio merged with the US State Department,
largely because the USA idea as an independent agency, was
engaged in all sorts of rogue money laundering activity and
was effectively setting its own bign policy and running operations
without the White House knowing about it. Now, the Epstein
(08:23):
story that I think the public really should be focused
on in the midst of the Justice Department investigation, specifically
around the intelligence links Jeffrey Epstein. While he's famous for
the child trafficking allegations, that are sort of the big
headlines and what turned so many eyes here. Jeffrey Epstein
(08:46):
is really a wall was a Wall Street hedge fund
mover and shaker and got his start in the business
after leaving bear Stearns in nineteen eighty one, starting a
group called interc Netal Asset Group, which was a one
man consultancy serving high net worth individuals, principally ad Non Koshogi,
(09:08):
the Saudi weapons dealer who was the moneyman for the
illegal and the scandal that really dogged the Reagan administration
called Iran Contra, which was when the Congress had barred
any use of taxpayer funds in order to provide economic
assistance to the Nicaraguan contras in a regime change operation
(09:32):
against the Sandinista government Nicaragua, and there was a congressional
ban on sales of weapons to Iran because of the
nineteen seventy nine Act, and the White House ran a
covert operation using offshore financiers and hid it from Congressional
oversight through this web of effectively wandered wandered funds. This
(09:57):
all came out in congressional hearings and last almost the
duration of the Reagan presidency.
Speaker 7 (10:02):
But Jeffrey Epstein was the.
Speaker 2 (10:06):
I don't want to.
Speaker 1 (10:06):
I don't interrupt you, Mike, I just want to stay on,
you know, the present. There's a lot of folks, a
lot of maga folks were hoping and looking for some
purp walks. We want to see if there's members of
Congress or higher you know, former administration officials who were involved.
Epstein cut a deal in two thousand and eight and basically,
you know, got a slap on the wrist, and then
(10:27):
there's other things. Mike, Gisely Maxwell is behind bars? Now
are we saying that? I don't know if there's no
client list? And maybe should she even be behind bars
if there is no actual client list?
Speaker 6 (10:42):
Right, So, where we're left with the official explanation on
that is that because there's no client list, that justice
bars saying that effectively all of the child sex trafficking
and prostitution charges were effectively to Jeffrey Epstein. And I
know that's something that obviously, I think is going to
be hard for a lot of people to believe. You're
(11:03):
talking about a large volume of young women and if
Jeffrey Epstein was the sole customer, that's a lot of girls.
Speaker 7 (11:12):
For one guy.
Speaker 6 (11:13):
And so that obviously is something that does not sit well,
I think with much of the public hearing that Glene
Maxwell is behind bars for twenty years, all servicing Jeffrey
Epstein and Jeffrey Epstein, especially when the sweetheart deal cut
by Alex Acosta in two thousand and eight, the Plea
deal explicitly encompassed all co conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein so
(11:36):
that no one else who was a part of the
network could be criminally prosecuted, and of course the Alex
The point that I was driving at earlier, though, is
that I think that a lot of people are looking
at the FBI in this story when they really should
be looking at the CIA, because Jeffrey Epstein was intimately
involved forty four years ago, at the start of his career,
(12:00):
really in what is known as intelligence work by official
historians in the Iran Contra affair. So at least at
that point, you should be able to pull CIA files
to see all CIA analyst memos and planning documents around
the structuring of that operation, and you're gonna have Jeffrey
(12:23):
Epstein in a code name there. They won't say Epstein
by name, but you can simply go to the index
and you should be able to find them.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
I got them, I got about a minute.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
If Epstein was an intelligence asset? Are are Pambondi and
cash Fttel doing the right thing by keeping some of
these things under wraps? I guess that's the sixty four
thousand dollars question.
Speaker 6 (12:46):
Well, the big one hundred and twenty eight thousand dollars
question on top of that is what even are they
doing on that?
Speaker 8 (12:53):
All?
Speaker 6 (12:53):
We've heard about our statements from the FBI and ELAK
document to axios from the Justice Department. What conversations has
bam Bondi had with John Ratcliffe? What search queries have
gone into the CIA search files in order to pull
documents about Jeffrey Epstein and the intelligence relationship. We've were
hearing about security cameras. We're hearing about client lists. No
(13:16):
client list. Everyone wants to know was alex Acosta's statement
reported by by Vicky Ward twenty nineteen. Was that true
or not? What has the Justice Department? What conversations have
they had with the CIA? Has the CIA turned over
any documents at all? Has the Justice Department even asked
(13:36):
for them? It's disturbing. We don't know the answer to
that question.
Speaker 1 (13:40):
You know, we don't we don't we need that. Well,
there's a lot more answers, you know, a lot more questions.
The further down this road we go, the more questions arise,
especially since there was that remember the bolt the binders
that the Attorney General Pam Bondi handed out to Jack
Basovak a couple of the other folks. It just feels
and we just need some answers. Mike Bence, We're not
to get them today, but we will love to stay
(14:02):
on this with you going forward.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Mike Benz, thank you for your time. Thanks Eric.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
All Right, folks, before I had to break, I just
want to let you know tomorrow will be doing a
bowling special protecting America's food supply from the US Department
of Agriculture.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
It's amazing.
Speaker 1 (14:16):
I'm gonna sit down with Brooke Rowlinds and Pete Hexp.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
What do you think of that? You don't want to
miss tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (14:20):
I got the great John Solomon sit next to me
right after the break. Now, I, folks, happy to be
here in d C with my next guest, the CEO
and editor in chief of Just the News, No Noise,
a great John Solomon. John happy to be here with
you here in DC Helus about this new thing you published.
(14:42):
This is really fascinating.
Speaker 2 (14:43):
I love this.
Speaker 9 (14:44):
Yeah, listen, there are two parts to the deep state
when you look at how they carried out the last
ten years of political interference. One is the bureaucrats and
then the people that the bureaucrats lead to in the media.
And of course the Russian coclusion story wouldn't have been
possible if it word for The New York Times in
Washington Post running way beyond facts in creating the area
that there was a scandal when there's not there. They
won Pulitzers. Donald Trump has sued the Plitzer Committee because
(15:06):
in twenty twenty two the Plitzer Committee said those stories
are all fine, and Donald Trump, no, they're not. Listen
if youve been debunked by John Durham. They still put
the statement out saying the awards tan Donald Trump suit
him for deformation. He's moving forward in Florida. I went
through the court file over the weekend. You see some
pretty extraordinary things in this thing. First off, Donald Trump
wasn't the first person to complain about the accuracy of
(15:27):
the articles. They got two complaints before Donald Trump came in.
Maybe five or six total, which means other people had
the same concerns as Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
Two.
Speaker 9 (15:34):
You see the Plitzer Committee's own depositions. They don't agree
with each other. Journalists are supposed to get the story
straight before they go forward. They're all over the map
on certain factual explanations. And three journalists who spend all
day arguing for transparency. The Plitzer Committee doesn't want to
tell us who did the reviews. They don't want to
make public the reviews of why they are standing by
the awards. They don't want to even give us the
(15:56):
names of people that were involved in the reviews. So
you see journalism of living by rules for the but
not for me.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
This kind of it feels like it's like the celebrity
awards shows that they're all on one side.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
They all it's it's just for themselves.
Speaker 1 (16:10):
It's not like, what's the best real actual movie or
the best actor. Who do we need to give an award.
Speaker 2 (16:15):
To that's on our side?
Speaker 9 (16:16):
That's right, That's exactly what the plits have become for
a long time now. But in this case, they gave
awards to two institutions whose stories are inaccurate, and one
of the stories that are in the package. I focus
on today's story. It's a twenty seventeen article. It says
Donald Trump wouldn't accept the Intelligence Committee's belief that Pewtin
(16:37):
had interfered specifically to help him get elected. Donald Trump
always was doubtful that. It turns out he wasn't the
only person doubtful. That we now know from the great
information that John Ratcluff, as new CIA director, put out
that the senior leaders of the CIA also had doubts
about that assessment, specifically pegging it on the Steele dossier,
which we know to be discredited. Well, John Brennan gave
(16:58):
a lot of testimony to congres. His testimonies conflicts directly
with this new evidence.
Speaker 2 (17:04):
I loved it. I remembered this whole thing. Oh yeah, Brennan.
Speaker 1 (17:08):
You could see him lying through his teeth, swearing under oath,
talking can't.
Speaker 2 (17:12):
We can he be held accountable?
Speaker 1 (17:15):
Likely be held accountable with purp walk lying to Congress.
Speaker 9 (17:20):
So he gives two testimonies twenty seventeen, that's outside the
statute of limitations. Now eight years.
Speaker 2 (17:24):
He gets a walk on that one.
Speaker 9 (17:25):
But in twenty twenty three, Matt Gates, for some reason
straight off a topic in the House Jediary Committee and
penned John Brennan down just two years ago. That's in
the Statue of five limitation of the five year Statute
of Limitations. In that testimony, he said two things, the
FBI wanted it and they're not me, And two I
didn't overrule anyone. Well, the document show. He asked for
it to be in and he did overrull two of
(17:46):
his experts who said, we don't believe the Steele Doss
should be included in the intelligence too.
Speaker 2 (17:51):
They got him.
Speaker 1 (17:52):
SA was gonna do a dis Department Justice can and should.
Speaker 2 (17:55):
Right, that's right.
Speaker 9 (17:56):
Well, we're gonna have Jim Jordan on my show time.
We're gonna ask him. It was his committee that took
this test.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
Jim is amazing. They're great.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
But I will tell you I'll speak for the folks.
We need the recommendation for the investigations.
Speaker 9 (18:08):
That's for the DOJ's got through the work.
Speaker 2 (18:11):
They got it.
Speaker 9 (18:11):
Pam Bondy, the balls in Pambomdi's corners. Listen, it's not
going to be hard to figure this one out. You
got his words, you got the emails case.
Speaker 1 (18:18):
Pam, let's talk about the other elephant in the room
right now?
Speaker 2 (18:21):
Yes, is there an Epstein list? Do you think there is?
What's going on? My reporting of two things.
Speaker 9 (18:26):
One, all the reporting I've done does indicate that the
evidence points to a suicide. Now I've done, and actually
twenty years ago actually got a case reopened and proved
that a man who originally was concluded to have died
by suicide in prison was in fact murdered. Family even
won a settlement as a result of the reporting. And
I did in this case, you're missing a lot of
that evidence. You don't see that. I think most of
the evidence leans towards suicide. The second part of it is,
(18:50):
I think what Jeffrey Epstein did is he had a
phone book falls people he knew in his head who
were the clients and who were just the friends. And
he was never going to put that on paper because
it would be like writing down a confession. So I
think the anticipation that there was going to be a
list that said this guy paid this much money for
this girl, it wasn't going to be. There's no way
Epstein was going to be that dangerous and put that
on paper. So I think Pam Bonnie probably raised expectations
(19:13):
a little bit, and then it didn't quite turn out
to be what we thought. That said, I think you're
going to get the rest of the documents, were starting
to get them now.
Speaker 2 (19:21):
It is what it is. I think, you know.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
I asked Mike Bence if this is the case, if
there is no actual list, and he didcumitsu in if
he was an answer or not, should just laying Maxwell's
be in prison right now?
Speaker 9 (19:36):
She looks like she was pretty involved in what went on,
right and you look at the record of evidence, she
clearly knew and was facilitating what he was doing. I
think the greatest missed opportunity for people. People want to
go back and say, we're really disappointed. Where should we
put our anger at. It's in seven o eight when
the Justice Department did the first investigation.
Speaker 2 (19:53):
They could have gone so much deeper.
Speaker 9 (19:56):
The Bush Justice Department took a dive, and I think
they let the entire country down when they did that.
Speaker 2 (20:00):
It gave him a slap on the road.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
He was worried about going away for maybe live for
you know, dozens of years or decades, and what do
you do, like six months or And.
Speaker 9 (20:08):
That's where they could have got the financial records. That's
where they could have really shown who was paid to.
Speaker 2 (20:13):
Get someone hard.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
They start turning things over.
Speaker 2 (20:18):
Quickly. You know, where do we go from here? I'll listen.
Speaker 9 (20:21):
There's a lot more to sell us to be disclosed,
and I think that this record of getting information out
so we can decide whether more prosecutions should occur. And
there's a lot of things about Ukraine impeachment that we
now look back at the testimony looks like there was
a lot of false testimony there. There's a lot of
things in the intelligence community that occurred with Afghanistan. People
need to be held accountable. There's a lot of place
to go discovery, folks.
Speaker 1 (20:42):
This guy is so connected the information that you bring. John,
thank you so much. Appreciate you on the show. Thank
you John. I folks, let's bring in a good friend
of ours, good friend.
Speaker 2 (20:53):
Of the show.
Speaker 8 (20:54):
When we first heard the five five five, and we've
been hearing you on route for quite a while and
we finally made that decision. But I've lost fifty three
pounds since.
Speaker 10 (21:06):
We started getting Okay, my weight change was seventeen pounds.
I'm melting away.
Speaker 4 (21:12):
Well.
Speaker 10 (21:13):
The cool thing is we are eighty six inches closer together.
Tell everybody it has brought us together, but not just physically,
spiritually as well.
Speaker 11 (21:24):
Oh.
Speaker 10 (21:24):
Absolutely, your program is absolutely amazing.
Speaker 12 (21:28):
This has been an awesome journey so far.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
Well that was a look at another happy couple who
took the five to five to five Challenge. Most people
think of health as just weight or lost weight loss
or energy, but two studies published in the Journal of
Health and Human Behavior demonstrate that health really affects everything,
our relationship, everything we do. For more information on this
and the five five to five Challenge, let's bring in
(21:51):
the founder of Energize Health, John Julie. John tell us
the latest on what we're finding. Again, let's just talk
about it. What is the five to five to five challenge?
How can folks get in?
Speaker 13 (22:01):
Well, hey, great to see you, Eric, and yeah, the
five five five Challenge one of the funnest things that
Chelsea and I get to do together. Uh, you know,
we simply offer people an opportunity to come and spend
five you know, like five cups of coffee. It's like
having five cups of coffee together costs five dollars. It's
five days. We spend about an hour together, but we
(22:21):
walk people through you know, what is the connection between
your relationship, you know, your relationships, How do you have
healthy relationships? How do you get healthy at the sailor
level so that you make sure that you're going to
be around for those people that you know that you love.
You know, I was with a group of men this
morning and have a men's group. And one of the guys,
(22:43):
you know, his his dad. He lost him at fifty four.
Another one lost his dad at forty four. You know,
the guys dropping dead early. You know, you've got to
be around for the people in your life. And so
let's find out, you know, what are the strategies that
are sustainable in life. We've all done on these crazy diets,
Eric and you know, and everybody's lost some weight, but
(23:04):
you know, most of the time we just we just
lose water. We gained it all back because we've all
made the same mistakes. And the other thing on the
five five five is we teach people what are the
five things to never do again? To never fail again?
You know, so one of the most right things we
can do is not to do the wrong thing.
Speaker 1 (23:25):
So intracellular hydration hydration is directly affected.
Speaker 2 (23:30):
By salt intake.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
I'm just going to throw it out, Johnny, this salt good?
Speaker 2 (23:34):
Is it bad for us? How do we regulate it?
Speaker 1 (23:36):
And what does energized health tell us to do regarding salt?
Speaker 13 (23:41):
Well, Jesus said you're the salt of the earth. So
I'm pretty sure salt's a good thing. I'm pretty sure
it's a good thing if he said you're the salt
of the earth, and he meant it in a good way.
So salt and potassium are the two natural electrolytes that
God created. So everybody tries to create all these fancy
duras and you know, gatorade, you know, started putting, But
(24:03):
if you look at it, it comes down to, yes,
we do need salt. There is an amount we need,
but it's directly proportionate to how much intracellular hydration we have.
So the first thing we have to know is, well,
how much intersalular hydration do I have? So I know
how much salt I can take safely. And the more
intersalular hydration you have, frankly, the more salt you can have,
(24:25):
you actually can get to a point, you know, where
you can have all the salt that you want, because
that interstalar hydration is like a river of living water
flowing through your body and it'll just flush out any
excess salt that you have. So salt is a good
thing for sure.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
That's great.
Speaker 1 (24:43):
And the really good thing is that energized health will
take a holistic approach to all these different things, all
the questions the folks may have.
Speaker 2 (24:51):
Just check it out.
Speaker 1 (24:52):
Energize Health, John Jubilee, appreciate your time, my friend, Thank you.
Speaker 2 (24:56):
Thank you, and Eric.
Speaker 13 (24:56):
It's my five to five to five challenge dot com
for people for this one. It's my five to five
to five challenge a little different than the normal website.
So thank you so much for having us on.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Insanely good John, the good to talk to you. We
talked to you again very very soon. Folks will be
back two and a half minutes. All right, Get the
gringos out, Get the gringos out. Sorry, not my words, folks.
(25:28):
Imagine the irony of Mexican people wanting Americans to get
out of their own country. Do you know that Mexicans
in Mexico City are out protesting right now against Americans
immigrating to Mexico. Mexicans are protesting against rich Americans buying
and renting.
Speaker 2 (25:44):
Properties in Mexico City.
Speaker 1 (25:46):
They're accusing Americans of causing a housing crisis in Mexico City.
They're shouting about Americans refusing to learn Spanish and debasing
the native culture of Mexico.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
Oh, the irony is so thick, you see.
Speaker 1 (25:59):
Apparently the Americans aren't assimilating and the Mexicans are not
having it.
Speaker 2 (26:03):
Just look at the scenes in.
Speaker 1 (26:05):
Mexico City a couple of days ago. Well well, well,
well what do we have? They're lucky, looky lucky. So
now Mexicans are protesting foreigners, Americans changing their culture and
(26:27):
driving up housing costs. Welcome to what Americans have been
dealing with Mexico for decades.
Speaker 2 (26:33):
With your folks coming over the border.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
Writers in Mexico City demand that Americans stop immigrating to
their country and quote stop stealing their homes.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
You can't make this stuff.
Speaker 14 (26:43):
Up, Kentucky, Benetraspaces and some of your extra heroes.
Speaker 4 (26:47):
Okay.
Speaker 14 (26:47):
In Pictura susprezios plas Mexicanos.
Speaker 15 (26:54):
Kopur que, lacking Trica, colonist vocals, good ingo In case
you missed it, Yes, someone actually spray painted kill a
gringo on that wall there.
Speaker 1 (27:09):
Do you see that you see, locals are fuming. They're
actually fuming Americans imposing our culture, American culture on Mexicans.
Speaker 2 (27:16):
And taking over, so to speak.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
Some went as far as to say gringos should be killed,
while others told them to get out of Mexico. You see,
since COVID American digital nomads they're called, have been flocking
the Mexico City, and the locals don't like it at all.
They don't like any of these foreigners in their country,
namely Americans who are overstaying their visas.
Speaker 2 (27:36):
You just can't make this up, guys.
Speaker 1 (27:39):
The people of Mexico who've been flooding into this country
for years, both legally and mostly illegally by the millions,
well they've had it with us. So hundreds of unruly
demonstrators held a protests in Mexico City against the gentrification
of their neighborhoods, which is playing a role in rising
housing prices what happens. Mexicans accused Americans of stealing their
(28:01):
homes and imposing their culture, our culture, American culture on
Mexico City. Mexican nationalists, leftists, and Antifa attacked the businesses
to demand that Americans in foreigners asta la Vista. Leave
moms and protesters waving fuetas gringos that means get rid
of all gringoes. Banners targeting banks and Americans businesses chanting.
(28:23):
This is how we do it, comrades as they trash
United States interests on foreign soil.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
I mean, what are they so angry about?
Speaker 1 (28:31):
White Americans who's fed up with Republicans and is crippled
with trun' rangs and syndrome moves to Mexico City to
start a new life.
Speaker 2 (28:37):
He illegally immigrates there.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
Maybe he gets a free hotel room, never even tries
to learn Spanish, maybe even opens up a Texas barbecue
truck with American flags flying everywhere. Oh and he has
ten children, but don't worry, welfare helps put the bill
on all that.
Speaker 2 (28:53):
Oh and he.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Somehow managed to vote in Mexican elections. But relax, what
are you so angry about? Oh, this is because he's white.
I get it. Well, you must be racist, then, right,
it's because Mexicans don't want white people in their country.
Speaker 2 (29:06):
Well how dare they?
Speaker 1 (29:08):
It doesn't matter if they're in there illegally or legally,
doesn't matter if they're sucking your resources dry. Or vote
illegally in your elections. If you're okay and not okay,
well you must be racist severe against white people doing it?
Speaker 2 (29:22):
Got it okay?
Speaker 1 (29:23):
Shout out to the Department of Homeland Security for this
post and I'm quoting. If you're in the United States
illegally and wish to join the next protest in Mexico City,
use the CBP home app to facilitate your demarchure. Well done, Christy,
nom by all means, because here's a fact. Most Americans
want all, not some, all undocumented immigrants gone from this country.
Speaker 16 (29:45):
Watch see you see really uniformity deport all immigrants who
are here illegally fifty five percent of New York Times
Marquette sixty four percent, CBS News fifty seven percent, ABC
News with a slightly different question fifty six percent.
Speaker 4 (29:57):
So what you're.
Speaker 16 (29:57):
Seeing essentially here is very clear indication that a majority
of Americans, in fact, when they're asked us one question,
which I believe gets that the underlying feelings, do in
fact want to port all immigrants who are here illegally.
There's no arguing with these different numbers because they're all
essentially the sam across four different polsters.
Speaker 1 (30:16):
Here here's that he said all even CNN has to
admitted a more majority of Americans want people who came
here into this country illegally.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
To be deported, period, end of story.
Speaker 1 (30:26):
The rig the Big Beautiful Bill gives ICE forty five billion,
forty five billion dollars for detaining the illegals. That's more
than gotten last fifteen years combined, millions more in funding
for ICE and DHS, So undue years of the Democrat
endorsed invasion, illegal invasion of this country.
Speaker 2 (30:44):
But that's racist thereic.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
Meanwhile, Mexico City has a population of over nine million,
and there's a maximum of ten thousand of these American
digital nomads living in the city. Ten thousand.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Check New York and LA lately.
Speaker 1 (30:58):
And so Mexicans respond with violent rioting. A quarter of
all people with Mexican heritage live in the United States.
And we're supposed to be fine with that. But it
doesn't matter. We're held to different standards, you see, because
if we want to preserve our country, our culture, our resources,
our homeland, and defend Americans, that's not okay with them
(31:22):
because you see, or on the left, it's not okay
because on the left, they'll call U xenophobic when white
people are the ones expressing it.
Speaker 2 (31:28):
Do you get it? Do you get it? Do you
see the hypocrisy? I hope?
Speaker 1 (31:32):
So all right, if you're stressed out about back taxes,
maybe you miss deadline, the April fifteenth deadline, or your
books are a.
Speaker 2 (31:40):
Mess, don't wait.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
The IRS is cracking down penalties add up fast five
percent per month, up to twenty five percent just for
not Finally, but there's help. Tax Network USA can help
the burden. Take the burden off your shoulders and stop
the spiral before it gets worse. They've helped thousands of Americans.
Whether you're an employee, a small business, own, own, or
haven't even filed in years. Got messy books, no problem.
(32:04):
They've seen it all and know exactly how to clean
it up. With direct asss to the powerful IRS programs
and expert negotiators on your side, Tax Network.
Speaker 2 (32:14):
USA knows how to win.
Speaker 1 (32:16):
You get a free consultation, and if you're qualified, they
may even even be able to reduce or eliminate.
Speaker 2 (32:21):
What you owe the IRS. More importantly, they'll help.
Speaker 1 (32:24):
You protect you from wage garnishments or bank levies. So
don't wait for the next IRS letter call one eight
hundred nine zero five eight thousand, or visit TNUSA dot
com slash rav to talk.
Speaker 2 (32:38):
To a real expert at Text Network USA. Take the
pressure off. Let Text Network USA handle your tax issues.
Speaker 1 (32:46):
We'll be back two and a half minutes. All right, folks,
We've seen bold moves out of Washington since President Trump
took GOFF as fast action, real results. But there's one
thing you can't outsource to government. Looking out for your
(33:09):
own financial future. If you watch what's happening rising in inflation,
out of control, debt, global uncertainty, you know it's time
to diversify. That's why personally, I really do I trust
Birch Gold Group. Gold is surged over forty percent in
the past twelve months alone. Central banks around the world
are buying gold at record levels. Why because gold holds
(33:29):
value when paper money just doesn't. With Birch Gold, it's
easy to convert your Ira or four oh one k
into a gold Ira or to buy physical, actual real
gold coins and bars and start at home if you want.
That's what I do. They walk you through every single step.
Just text the word America America to eight nine eight
nine eight to get your free infoKit on gold.
Speaker 2 (33:50):
There's no cost, no obligation, just smart information.
Speaker 1 (33:53):
Again text the word America to nine eight nine eight
nine eight take control of your financial future. Now, all righty,
something's going on. Take a look at this New York
Post headline. Will you quoting Jeffrey Epstein didn't have a
client list and committed suicide? DOJNFBI say in findings that
debunked conspiracy theories?
Speaker 2 (34:14):
I'm sorry? What was that?
Speaker 11 (34:15):
Now?
Speaker 2 (34:15):
Tell me that again one more time.
Speaker 1 (34:17):
So, basically, after many many years, decades actually hearing about
the elusive Epstein flight logs, client lists, were just now
being told that everything we thought we knew about this man,
well just wasn't true.
Speaker 2 (34:29):
What happened to this?
Speaker 17 (34:31):
But in this case, in Epstein's case, it is incredibly disturbing.
We have flight logs, we have information, names that will
come out.
Speaker 2 (34:40):
Is it going to be shocking?
Speaker 1 (34:45):
I don't see how it's.
Speaker 17 (34:46):
Not shocking that there were so many individuals that were
hidden and kept secret and not been held accountable. Let's
talk about the reverse. I believe in accountability. So you
have to now go through your process. Now I won't
say they're guilty until they go through their time in court.
(35:06):
But again, now it's time for accountability. We have seen
for so many years Pierce in this country, many investigations,
subpoena's testimonies in Congress, et cetera, et cetera. But there's
a general frustration with accountability. We take it halfway, we
don't take it home. And I really believe that now
with Cash and Pam, there will be accountability.
Speaker 11 (35:25):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (35:26):
I just got to hear it, got to know it.
Give us, I guess, give us the flight logs. I
know we've seen someone, give us the little Black book.
Just give us the names.
Speaker 2 (35:34):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (35:34):
Let someone else that bends or so. These guys are
investigator reporters, they'll find it. Obviously, Pam Bondy has meant
the center of this chaos surrounding the public release of
any Epstein related information. She's been very confident in the
sheer amount of evidence that this administration immediately acquired on
Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 18 (35:52):
Watch I said yesterday, and all that Epstein fell from message.
Speaker 19 (35:59):
No NOI yeah, the FBI they're reviewing. There are tens
of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn,
and there are hundreds of victims, and no one victim will.
Speaker 1 (36:15):
Ever get released.
Speaker 19 (36:16):
It's just the volume, and that's what they're going through
right now. The FBI is diligently going through that. I
haven't seen that statement, but I'll call him later and
find out.
Speaker 1 (36:26):
So call me crazy, you know. I trust the lean
habit Pam Binley. I think the two of the most
credible and trustworthy people that work with President Trump. But
even Melinda Gates, remember her. She was confident enough in
her hatred for Epstein and his island that she divorced
Bill Gates, a billion multi second richest man in the world.
Speaker 2 (36:46):
Remember this.
Speaker 1 (36:47):
You know.
Speaker 20 (36:48):
It was also widely reported that Bill had a friendship
or business or some kind of contact with Jeffrey Epstein,
and that you were not that. That was very upsetting
to you. Did that play a role in the divorce
at all in this process?
Speaker 21 (37:02):
Yeah, As I said, it's not one thing. It was
many things. But I did not like that he'd had
meetings with Jefrey Epstein.
Speaker 2 (37:10):
Now, and you made that clear to him.
Speaker 21 (37:13):
I made that clear to him. I also met Jeffrey
Epstein it exactly one time, did you Yes, Because I
wanted to see who this man was and I regretted
it from the second I stepped in the door.
Speaker 2 (37:26):
He was abhorrent.
Speaker 21 (37:28):
He was evil personified. I had nightmares about it afterwards.
Speaker 2 (37:35):
Trying to figure it out.
Speaker 1 (37:36):
Meanwhile, as the Jeffrey Epstein flight log release seemingly gets
further and further away, Elon Musk decided to launch his
own political party. The reactions have been all over the board.
Let's start with a warning message from Scott Besant.
Speaker 4 (37:51):
I let you go.
Speaker 22 (37:52):
It's not a big secret that you had your differences
with Elon Musk when he was working in the administration.
He announced this weekend that he is starting a new
political party. Does that worry that Trump administration?
Speaker 23 (38:04):
Look, the principles of those were very popular. I think
if you looked at the polling, Elon was not.
Speaker 1 (38:10):
So.
Speaker 2 (38:11):
I believe that.
Speaker 23 (38:13):
The boards of directors at his various companies wanted him
to come back and run those companies, which he is
better at than anyone. So I imagine that those board of
directors did not like this announcement yesterday, and we'll be
encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his
political activities.
Speaker 22 (38:31):
Thank you, mister secretary, appreciate your time.
Speaker 1 (38:33):
Thank you, and I'm going to have to agree with
Scott Vessant right there. Listen, Elon's at love on Muska,
but you know he should really focused on Tesla. Hear
what happened Tesla stock today lost sixty eight billion dollars.
Tesla stock in one day, sixty eight billion dollars when
he announced this idea to run a third party in America.
Speaker 2 (38:52):
I don't really get it.
Speaker 1 (38:53):
Jamie Raskin loves to tell us not to trust our
lying eyes, yet he himself tends to lie about everything,
every event, everything captured on video, like the La riots,
which he still thinks were totally what peaceful protests.
Speaker 24 (39:06):
Listen, Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass had the situation under
control in California. It was like massive, nonviolent, peaceful protests.
And then there was an eight or ten block area
where there were riots happening, and they dealt with it.
They've got the police power there, they've got the chief
of police.
Speaker 1 (39:23):
They didn't need.
Speaker 2 (39:23):
Donald Trump coming in.
Speaker 24 (39:24):
But of course he didn't see riots happening six blocks
away from where he was on January sixth, twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1 (39:31):
Yeah, no riots, just peaceful protests. Like twenty twenty Jamie Reskin, Folks,
liberals are just nuts. Gavin Newsome to, speaking of ninety liberals,
finally offered his take on Trump's new alligator Alcatraz migrant
detention center. On Surprisingly, the California governor not a big.
Speaker 2 (39:47):
Fan of the idea.
Speaker 1 (39:48):
Well, listen to Gavin Newscomb, as Trump would say, Now.
Speaker 18 (39:52):
I know I made a comment about the Alcatraz alligator
that was just these are flim flammers.
Speaker 2 (39:58):
They're not serious people. I want an embarrassment.
Speaker 18 (40:01):
Imagine the rest of the world looking at that, mocking
people saying, well, if you're going to run zig and
zag the president of the United States of America, I
revere that office.
Speaker 2 (40:10):
We all should.
Speaker 18 (40:13):
Founding fathers didn't live and die to see that show.
Speaker 2 (40:17):
What an embarrassment.
Speaker 18 (40:18):
Four hundred and fifty million dollars a year of wasted
tax money for pure theater. So for strong opinions, but
will continue to push back in very aggressive ways.
Speaker 1 (40:31):
You know, Alligator Alcatraz reminds me of re member Joe Rpyle,
the Great, the Great sheriff in Arizona, who used to
put his inmates in tps and make him wear pink jumps.
It's guess what no one wanted to. Don't wanted to
do that, so they stayed out of trouble. I don't
maybe Alligator Alcatraz will stop people from coming over across
the border illegally. Karen Bass, remember her mayor of La,
(40:51):
the woke, deranged mayor of La, I should say, also
decided to give her take on Florida's new detention center.
Let's not forget her city is falling apart by the day,
largely due to her mayoral incompetence and the governor you
just heard from there. Yeah, apparently she's got time to
meddle in Florida, which is doing very very well Florida's business.
Here's Karen Bass on how Trump's latest latest innovation makes
(41:12):
her mad.
Speaker 25 (41:13):
Let me just say that I know that LA is
the test ground. We're the Petri dish for the experiment
to see how much will the American people tolerate.
Speaker 26 (41:24):
But even polling has shown that even amongst Trump's supporters
who agree with the policy are not in favor of
some of the just inhumane tactics. You know, today he's
having a press conference at Alligator Alcatraz in Florida, where
essentially building a tent city, and to secure that, they
(41:46):
put it where it's surrounded by water with alligators and
pythons in it. I mean, you know, if it wasn't
so inhumane, it would be laughable.
Speaker 25 (41:55):
But this is the United States, and in a minute,
it's gonna be difficult to recognize our times.
Speaker 2 (42:02):
What's in Humaine.
Speaker 1 (42:03):
I was there, the brand new beds, it's beautiful.
Speaker 2 (42:05):
Don't leave it won't be in humane. Don't break out,
get the ported at home.
Speaker 1 (42:10):
That's the whole point, Karen Bass, maybe you should try
that in California, you lunatics. I go to break on
to let you know. We'll be doing a big, big
show tomorrow, Bowling show. It's a special protecting America's food supply.
Look at that full screen right there. You're gonna have Pam.
Look at this crew that I'm gonna talk to tomorrow.
I have to sit down with Brooke Rowinds and I'm
also getting a few minutes with Pete Hegseth. Still working
(42:32):
on Pam and Christy. But we'll let you know, but
we'll bring it all to you tomorrow. Don't miss it.
You're not gonna want to miss it. Also, voicemails are
coming up next you have to have full screen eight
eight eight six one oh three to two toll free
always tell us Richard thinking, So you got some great ones.
About five hundred came in between Thursday and today.
Speaker 2 (42:49):
Maybe even a little more. I got to some of them.
Speaker 1 (42:51):
I can't say I got to all of them, but
we're gonna play some of the good ones for you
coming out next. All right, let's do this, mad dog.
(43:13):
Let's do this, my friend. We got some voicemail. I
got some good ones today. Listen, folks sent five or
six hundred in. I got to some of them. I'd
say about half. Still working through them, but I can't
get them all up. I got some fun ones, mad dog.
What do you got?
Speaker 2 (43:24):
First?
Speaker 14 (43:25):
This is someone that says, the Big Beautiful Bill having
strategic Petroleum Reserve money, do it?
Speaker 12 (43:32):
Yeah, Eric just wanted to point out to you the
Big Beautiful Bill does have one hundred and seventy one
million dollars in it to help refill the strategical reserve.
Speaker 2 (43:40):
I thought you'd be happy to hear that. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (43:44):
I am very happy to hear that, sir. And you're
one hundred percent right, but we need a lot more.
And again I talked to the Chief of Staff, Susie
wils and she says cost six several sixty seventy billion
dollars to do what I suggest. That said, Susie, you're
not spending it. You're taking from the treasury and you're
putting over in the strategic It's still an asset. You're
just moving from cash into an asset. We're not spending it.
(44:05):
And you know Trump likes it. So I'm hoping it
will cost tens of billions to do it. I hope
we do it because it will help energy security. Mad dog,
what do you got?
Speaker 14 (44:14):
This is a viewer that says the Portland Trailblazers, the
basketball team drafted a Chinese national.
Speaker 2 (44:20):
Listen to this, folks, this is a good one.
Speaker 12 (44:23):
The National Basketball Association Portland Trailblazers their first draft choice
in a recent draft was this seven foot Chinese nationals.
You know what that means? How many teams are in
the NBA? How many teams fly out of major airports
(44:45):
across the country.
Speaker 2 (44:46):
How many of.
Speaker 12 (44:47):
Those major airports are right next to a United States
military base, like here at Portland International, we've got the
Oregon Airguard Fighter win. How many millions of dollars they're
calling in. Is China paid the trail Blazers to get
their insider into the country. Just wondering, just wonder if
(45:08):
you realize what they've done Hill Portland or I'm.
Speaker 2 (45:13):
Trying to be good. He's trying to be good. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (45:17):
I can't say that the Chinese paid the Portland trail
Blazers big, but they did get seven foot tie, which
I tend to think that maybe they did to win games. However,
you're right.
Speaker 2 (45:25):
Though, how many Chinese people are working.
Speaker 1 (45:29):
There's thirty teams in the NBA, by the way, in
the NFL, you got the Major League Baseball. How many
Chinese nationals are getting in and out with certain sort
of immunity. I'm a little nervous about that too, especially
with the proximity our airports. Are they tend to share
runways or at least areas with military airports, Air Force,
Navy or whatever.
Speaker 2 (45:49):
Yeah, it's a great question. Mad dog got one.
Speaker 14 (45:52):
This is LA ticked off about legal immigration.
Speaker 2 (45:56):
Good.
Speaker 11 (45:57):
Hi, I'm calling from Los Angeles and I just wanted
to you. I'm disgusted with Karen Vass and how she
says that she's protecting the people away from ice, and
she talked about the immigrants said, oh, they can't go
to work and everything else. Well, if they can't go
to work, and if they have a job, they have
to have a Social Security number. If they're illegal, they
(46:17):
don't have one, so that means they've stolen identities. And
they have to do the same thing to get medical insurance.
And also we have all these street vendors that have
been raided supposedly, well what about those street vendors. They
don't have to have any county public health inspections. There's
people touching the food, breathing on the food, and it's
(46:38):
taken the business away from the local restaurants in my
community that have been there for years and years and
pay rent in taxes. So that's what I'm ticked off about.
Speaker 2 (46:50):
Yeah, you listen, you're a hundred percent right.
Speaker 1 (46:52):
And unfortunately the lunatics run in California, your state. I
feel sorry if you move moved to Texas, moved to Florida.
They let illegals get Social Security cards without even being citizens.
It's insane. It's insane what they do. They get driver's license,
they even vote.
Speaker 2 (47:07):
It's nuts. What's going on in California.
Speaker 1 (47:09):
Let's get to this this, let's get to Timmy D.
You got Timmy D meadon, Yes, sir, it is Eric.
Speaker 27 (47:15):
It's Timmy D in Columbus, Ohio. I really enjoy your
show and I'm glad you have this format for leaving comments.
So we need to do something about the unholy Trinity
of Hakim AOC and e mom. You give them a lie
detectors test. So the first question, have you received financial
(47:39):
benefit from any foreign or domestic organizations or individuals that
promote anti American agendas? Question number two, do you denounce
jihad on America.
Speaker 12 (47:53):
And uphold will you uphold.
Speaker 27 (47:56):
The morals and ethics of our founding fathers as stage
in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence?
Speaker 12 (48:03):
God bless you, brother.
Speaker 1 (48:06):
God bless you too, my friend, and great idea. Give
them the light detecht to test see how they pass
and fail those two very important questions.
Speaker 2 (48:13):
But then Timmy D gave us a call back.
Speaker 27 (48:15):
Listen, anyway, here's my little surprise at Eric.
Speaker 11 (48:20):
How we tell the truth.
Speaker 2 (48:34):
Yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah, timm D, mad dog.
Speaker 1 (48:38):
I have an affinity to people who sing and perform
on these calls. Keep them tight, though, Keep them tight.
Got time for one more dog.
Speaker 14 (48:44):
Yes, sir, here's a China buying farmland.
Speaker 28 (48:49):
M miserable and I think you need to have somebody
look into China buying up all this property, especially when
they're buying out farm lands and bringing across all these fungus,
diseases and everything, crop destroying things. They're trying to undermine us.
They say, if you control the food, you control the people.
(49:12):
Who do we have to call? Did you have them
start working on this now?
Speaker 4 (49:16):
Thank you, sir.
Speaker 2 (49:16):
I'll tell you.
Speaker 4 (49:17):
I'll tell you called if you had a good fourth
of July.
Speaker 1 (49:21):
Come on, I'll tell you call you call me because
tomorrow MS sit down with Brook Rollins, she's its Secretary
of Agriculture and asking that exact question.
Speaker 2 (49:27):
It's a very very very.
Speaker 1 (49:28):
Very important question. What are we doing about the Chinese nationals,
Chinese people who work for the Chinese government buying our farmland.
Food security is NAW security. Very quickly, take a look
at the full screen. We can take a look tomorrow.
It's gonna be a big show. You got to make
sure you join us for that show special all about
our food security tomorrow. This show right here, That's why
I'm in DC, Hey folks, Steve Benn and Warrem is
(49:49):
coming up next. Stay tuned and I will see you
tomorrow after that big event.
Ring the bell, guys, ring the darn bell. Broad Wall
and Wall Street in New York City marks closed. We
are open for business, Martin a little bit of a
tough day to day. The doll looks like it's going
to close around four hundred and twenty five points lower.
S ANDP down about fifty or so. Nasdaq down less
than two hundred and a lot of this was Beston
came out earlier today saying that some of the tariffs
(00:33):
that aren't negotiated may go back to July ninth, or
they may push them off again.
Speaker 2 (00:39):
Confusion in the.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Markets really really disrupts markets, and they saw at one point.
Speaker 2 (00:42):
The Dow is down more than five hundred points.
Speaker 1 (00:44):
Bounced back a little bit, but a couple of other
interesting plays here.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
Oil. We've been watching this.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Remember I asked President Trump last what was it Thursday
or Friday?
Speaker 2 (00:52):
Please?
Speaker 1 (00:53):
Can we fill up the SPR sixty four dollars a
barrel right now? We're up to sixty eight dollars a
barrel right now and on its way up.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
Unfortunate. We're going to talk a lot about this later.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
With the price of gas and whatnot, we want to
get that SPR filled, give us energy security, and the
other big market that we talk about a lot is.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
Crypto very very quiet, unbelievably quiet.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Like the market took a big move down in the
stock market, but Crypto down a little bit down to
touch one eight one hundred and eight thousand for a
big cooin. All right, folks, our own RAB correspondent and
hosts of Law and Border, Ben Berkwam is in Caribo, Texas,
where he's been reporting on the flood that has claimed
at least ninety people. Now, Ben, give us the latest,
and we wanted you had a quick chat with ten
(01:32):
Cruz in a second, just give us up the speed
that latest minute or so.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
Yeah, it's as you mentioned, up to ninety anticipated to
go high. And asked the question, what's the total universe
of missing? I've been asking that all weekend and I
said they said they still couldn't give me an answer
a total missing. But I followed up with are we
talking dozens or hundreds? And they said a lot, so
would lead you to believe it's towards the lot larger number.
(01:58):
That's really where we're at. We've entered that phase of
recovery rather than rescue. After seventy two hours, its very
rare to find somebody's still alive, but we're still praying
for that, and that's what we're asking pray for the community.
Absolute devastation. You can see behind me. I mean, we've
been covering it all weekend. To think that I would
be underwater right now is just really unfathomable.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
It's really incredible.
Speaker 1 (02:22):
It's scary, it's scary, and you know, one of the
most disgusting things we've been seeing. There are still people
out there. We're still looking for bodies. And the left
wing media, I think is the anopolis. I think of
Dan and Bash pointing a finger at Trump already. I mean,
there are people still missing right now. You had a
chance to talk to Senator Ted Cruz about this and
other things.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Let's take a little bite of the SoundBite that you
sent us.
Speaker 4 (02:44):
Fast about the politicization, and you're right.
Speaker 5 (02:46):
With any tragedy, there are people that try to play
politics with that. They try to blame their political opponents,
and in today's partisan world, if there's a hurricane, if
there's a tornado, if there's a flood, there are some
who want to say it's all Donald Trump fault, because
everything bad, they say, is Donald Trump's fault.
Speaker 4 (03:03):
Look, I think that is is.
Speaker 5 (03:06):
Wrong, it is inappropriate, and I think most people don't
want to see partisan fingerpaint pointing. What they want to
see is let's come together and let's get through this,
and then afterwards, after we rebuild, there does need to
be a process, a process of carefully looking back and saying, Okay,
what could have been done differently to save more lives?
Speaker 4 (03:27):
How could the response have been better?
Speaker 5 (03:29):
We know that the warnings went out from the National
Weather Service just after one am and just after four am.
Obviously most people were asleep then and they missed those warnings,
And so I think it's perfectly reasonable to have a conversation.
We know floods will occur, natural disasters occur. How can
we be better at being proactive? And in hindsight, everyone
(03:49):
would agree that we should not have had little girls,
particularly seven to eight year old the youngest girls on
the camp in cabins right by the river's edge as
the flood warning were coming out. And in hindsight, I
hope we have a better system to have an early
warning and then act proactively to remove the children, remove
anyone vulnerable from harm's way, to prevent this loss of life.
(04:11):
That's a reasonable and in fact, very important conversation to have,
but it shouldn't be in the context of just trying
to score political points.
Speaker 4 (04:19):
It should be learning lessons.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
And you know, Ben, I'm gonna throw it to you,
but very quickly. I've been watching Weather Channel all day
and all these folks are saying, this thing happens so fast.
Speaker 2 (04:29):
This water rose.
Speaker 1 (04:31):
Something like three feet in a matter of forty five minutes.
So any warning system would never been able to get
these people out of harm's way in time.
Speaker 2 (04:37):
But go ahead, I'll go give it to you.
Speaker 3 (04:41):
Yeah, no, you're right. Living in Arkansas, we get the
same weather patterns that Texas gets, and it's so unpredictable.
They can predict torrential downpour and all of a sudden
it's blue skies and sunny.
Speaker 2 (04:52):
This is what we've.
Speaker 3 (04:53):
Come to expect. And so to go from three inches
to four inches to fifteen to twenty inches, you cannot
predict that. And once that happens, the biggest problem is
where do you go because all the other roads could
be flooded.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
Too, So do you leave?
Speaker 3 (05:07):
Do you get all these little kids up at three
in the morning and have them trudged through the the
you know, the woods. What do you do with these kids?
All the second guessing the Monday morning quarterbacking from totally
disingenuous people. It's disgusting. It's absolutely disgusting. And as Ted
crew says, we need to look at some of these
things in hindsight, look at what can be done in
the future. But some of these things you can't predict,
(05:29):
and that's just unfortunately the reality of life.
Speaker 1 (05:33):
Yeah, and we hear the shop are coming, These search
and rescues and unfortunately recovery efforts are on way.
Speaker 2 (05:39):
Ben Berkelem, thank you. Stay safe, my friend, Please stay
out of harm's way. Thank you. We'll do thank you,
all right.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
Folks, All right, folks, we'll go back to Ben. As
the week goes on and things information comes out a
little while we go ahead, a chance to sit down
with Mike. Ben's we talked a little bit about this
Epstein dibaccle.
Speaker 2 (05:57):
What's going on?
Speaker 1 (05:58):
Take a listen, all right, and gears is just a
little bit the Department of Justice and guess what, folks,
how one DOJ official was told to back off Epstein
because he belonged to quote Intelligence. So Jeffrey Epstein received
the Plea deal in two thousand and eight, we knew
about that. My next guest delves into this and Epstein's connection.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
To us AID.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
Happy to have the executive director of the Foundation for
Freedom Online, mister Mike Bentz, to join us again. Mike,
tell us a just break this down, for there are
so many theories circling. One is that Epstein was an
intelligence asset. Another is there was never really a client list,
and there are another one. Yet another one is there
is but it is way too damaging for both sides.
(06:40):
What do you think is really going on here, my friend, Well.
Speaker 6 (06:43):
There's two separate lines of inquiry. I think the public
wants to know about the Epstein story. One is the
extent of the network, and this is where you get
questions around the existence of a potential client list.
Speaker 7 (06:55):
We obviously know that there was the so.
Speaker 6 (06:57):
Called little Black book that came out in Glene Maxwell's
trial that evidently contained names and addresses, but didn't formally
link them as clients. There was a belief there was
a client list, based on Pambondi's statements several months ago
that it was sitting on our desk, But now that
appears to be potentially a misstatement in the official word
(07:20):
that we are well semi official. The dj has not
yet acknowledged this new Axios report claiming that the DOJ's
internal memos are indicating that there's no client list, that
Epstein commits suicide and the like. But what I think
is kind of the meta question that hangs over all
of this is the question around Epstein's links to intelligence
(07:43):
and Epstein, the use of Epstein and the Epstein network
for covert funding of intelligence activity. That is a question
that's intricately linked today to the restructuring of USAID.
Speaker 7 (07:58):
Just last week, USAID fold it.
Speaker 6 (08:00):
Up and its remaining portfolio merged with the US State Department,
largely because the USA idea as an independent agency, was
engaged in all sorts of rogue money laundering activity and
was effectively setting its own bign policy and running operations
without the White House knowing about it. Now, the Epstein
(08:23):
story that I think the public really should be focused
on in the midst of the Justice Department investigation, specifically
around the intelligence links Jeffrey Epstein. While he's famous for
the child trafficking allegations, that are sort of the big
headlines and what turned so many eyes here. Jeffrey Epstein
(08:46):
is really a wall was a Wall Street hedge fund
mover and shaker and got his start in the business
after leaving bear Stearns in nineteen eighty one, starting a
group called interc Netal Asset Group, which was a one
man consultancy serving high net worth individuals, principally ad Non Koshogi,
(09:08):
the Saudi weapons dealer who was the moneyman for the
illegal and the scandal that really dogged the Reagan administration
called Iran Contra, which was when the Congress had barred
any use of taxpayer funds in order to provide economic
assistance to the Nicaraguan contras in a regime change operation
(09:32):
against the Sandinista government Nicaragua, and there was a congressional
ban on sales of weapons to Iran because of the
nineteen seventy nine Act, and the White House ran a
covert operation using offshore financiers and hid it from Congressional
oversight through this web of effectively wandered wandered funds. This
(09:57):
all came out in congressional hearings and last almost the
duration of the Reagan presidency.
Speaker 7 (10:02):
But Jeffrey Epstein was the.
Speaker 2 (10:06):
I don't want to.
Speaker 1 (10:06):
I don't interrupt you, Mike, I just want to stay on,
you know, the present. There's a lot of folks, a
lot of maga folks were hoping and looking for some
purp walks. We want to see if there's members of
Congress or higher you know, former administration officials who were involved.
Epstein cut a deal in two thousand and eight and basically,
you know, got a slap on the wrist, and then
(10:27):
there's other things. Mike, Gisely Maxwell is behind bars? Now
are we saying that? I don't know if there's no
client list? And maybe should she even be behind bars
if there is no actual client list?
Speaker 6 (10:42):
Right, So, where we're left with the official explanation on
that is that because there's no client list, that justice
bars saying that effectively all of the child sex trafficking
and prostitution charges were effectively to Jeffrey Epstein. And I
know that's something that obviously, I think is going to
be hard for a lot of people to believe. You're
(11:03):
talking about a large volume of young women and if
Jeffrey Epstein was the sole customer, that's a lot of girls.
Speaker 7 (11:12):
For one guy.
Speaker 6 (11:13):
And so that obviously is something that does not sit well,
I think with much of the public hearing that Glene
Maxwell is behind bars for twenty years, all servicing Jeffrey
Epstein and Jeffrey Epstein, especially when the sweetheart deal cut
by Alex Acosta in two thousand and eight, the Plea
deal explicitly encompassed all co conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein so
(11:36):
that no one else who was a part of the
network could be criminally prosecuted, and of course the Alex
The point that I was driving at earlier, though, is
that I think that a lot of people are looking
at the FBI in this story when they really should
be looking at the CIA, because Jeffrey Epstein was intimately
involved forty four years ago, at the start of his career,
(12:00):
really in what is known as intelligence work by official
historians in the Iran Contra affair. So at least at
that point, you should be able to pull CIA files
to see all CIA analyst memos and planning documents around
the structuring of that operation, and you're gonna have Jeffrey
(12:23):
Epstein in a code name there. They won't say Epstein
by name, but you can simply go to the index
and you should be able to find them.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
I got them, I got about a minute.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
If Epstein was an intelligence asset? Are are Pambondi and
cash Fttel doing the right thing by keeping some of
these things under wraps? I guess that's the sixty four
thousand dollars question.
Speaker 6 (12:46):
Well, the big one hundred and twenty eight thousand dollars
question on top of that is what even are they
doing on that?
Speaker 8 (12:53):
All?
Speaker 6 (12:53):
We've heard about our statements from the FBI and ELAK
document to axios from the Justice Department. What conversations has
bam Bondi had with John Ratcliffe? What search queries have
gone into the CIA search files in order to pull
documents about Jeffrey Epstein and the intelligence relationship. We've were
hearing about security cameras. We're hearing about client lists. No
(13:16):
client list. Everyone wants to know was alex Acosta's statement
reported by by Vicky Ward twenty nineteen. Was that true
or not? What has the Justice Department? What conversations have
they had with the CIA? Has the CIA turned over
any documents at all? Has the Justice Department even asked
(13:36):
for them? It's disturbing. We don't know the answer to
that question.
Speaker 1 (13:40):
You know, we don't we don't we need that. Well,
there's a lot more answers, you know, a lot more questions.
The further down this road we go, the more questions arise,
especially since there was that remember the bolt the binders
that the Attorney General Pam Bondi handed out to Jack
Basovak a couple of the other folks. It just feels
and we just need some answers. Mike Bence, We're not
to get them today, but we will love to stay
(14:02):
on this with you going forward.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Mike Benz, thank you for your time. Thanks Eric.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
All Right, folks, before I had to break, I just
want to let you know tomorrow will be doing a
bowling special protecting America's food supply from the US Department
of Agriculture.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
It's amazing.
Speaker 1 (14:16):
I'm gonna sit down with Brooke Rowlinds and Pete Hexp.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
What do you think of that? You don't want to
miss tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (14:20):
I got the great John Solomon sit next to me
right after the break. Now, I, folks, happy to be
here in d C with my next guest, the CEO
and editor in chief of Just the News, No Noise,
a great John Solomon. John happy to be here with
you here in DC Helus about this new thing you published.
(14:42):
This is really fascinating.
Speaker 2 (14:43):
I love this.
Speaker 9 (14:44):
Yeah, listen, there are two parts to the deep state
when you look at how they carried out the last
ten years of political interference. One is the bureaucrats and
then the people that the bureaucrats lead to in the media.
And of course the Russian coclusion story wouldn't have been
possible if it word for The New York Times in
Washington Post running way beyond facts in creating the area
that there was a scandal when there's not there. They
won Pulitzers. Donald Trump has sued the Plitzer Committee because
(15:06):
in twenty twenty two the Plitzer Committee said those stories
are all fine, and Donald Trump, no, they're not. Listen
if youve been debunked by John Durham. They still put
the statement out saying the awards tan Donald Trump suit
him for deformation. He's moving forward in Florida. I went
through the court file over the weekend. You see some
pretty extraordinary things in this thing. First off, Donald Trump
wasn't the first person to complain about the accuracy of
(15:27):
the articles. They got two complaints before Donald Trump came in.
Maybe five or six total, which means other people had
the same concerns as Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
Two.
Speaker 9 (15:34):
You see the Plitzer Committee's own depositions. They don't agree
with each other. Journalists are supposed to get the story
straight before they go forward. They're all over the map
on certain factual explanations. And three journalists who spend all
day arguing for transparency. The Plitzer Committee doesn't want to
tell us who did the reviews. They don't want to
make public the reviews of why they are standing by
the awards. They don't want to even give us the
(15:56):
names of people that were involved in the reviews. So
you see journalism of living by rules for the but
not for me.
Speaker 1 (16:02):
This kind of it feels like it's like the celebrity
awards shows that they're all on one side.
Speaker 2 (16:08):
They all it's it's just for themselves.
Speaker 1 (16:10):
It's not like, what's the best real actual movie or
the best actor. Who do we need to give an award.
Speaker 2 (16:15):
To that's on our side?
Speaker 9 (16:16):
That's right, That's exactly what the plits have become for
a long time now. But in this case, they gave
awards to two institutions whose stories are inaccurate, and one
of the stories that are in the package. I focus
on today's story. It's a twenty seventeen article. It says
Donald Trump wouldn't accept the Intelligence Committee's belief that Pewtin
(16:37):
had interfered specifically to help him get elected. Donald Trump
always was doubtful that. It turns out he wasn't the
only person doubtful. That we now know from the great
information that John Ratcluff, as new CIA director, put out
that the senior leaders of the CIA also had doubts
about that assessment, specifically pegging it on the Steele dossier,
which we know to be discredited. Well, John Brennan gave
(16:58):
a lot of testimony to congres. His testimonies conflicts directly
with this new evidence.
Speaker 2 (17:04):
I loved it. I remembered this whole thing. Oh yeah, Brennan.
Speaker 1 (17:08):
You could see him lying through his teeth, swearing under oath,
talking can't.
Speaker 2 (17:12):
We can he be held accountable?
Speaker 1 (17:15):
Likely be held accountable with purp walk lying to Congress.
Speaker 9 (17:20):
So he gives two testimonies twenty seventeen, that's outside the
statute of limitations. Now eight years.
Speaker 2 (17:24):
He gets a walk on that one.
Speaker 9 (17:25):
But in twenty twenty three, Matt Gates, for some reason
straight off a topic in the House Jediary Committee and
penned John Brennan down just two years ago. That's in
the Statue of five limitation of the five year Statute
of Limitations. In that testimony, he said two things, the
FBI wanted it and they're not me, And two I
didn't overrule anyone. Well, the document show. He asked for
it to be in and he did overrull two of
(17:46):
his experts who said, we don't believe the Steele Doss
should be included in the intelligence too.
Speaker 2 (17:51):
They got him.
Speaker 1 (17:52):
SA was gonna do a dis Department Justice can and should.
Speaker 2 (17:55):
Right, that's right.
Speaker 9 (17:56):
Well, we're gonna have Jim Jordan on my show time.
We're gonna ask him. It was his committee that took
this test.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
Jim is amazing. They're great.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
But I will tell you I'll speak for the folks.
We need the recommendation for the investigations.
Speaker 9 (18:08):
That's for the DOJ's got through the work.
Speaker 2 (18:11):
They got it.
Speaker 9 (18:11):
Pam Bondy, the balls in Pambomdi's corners. Listen, it's not
going to be hard to figure this one out. You
got his words, you got the emails case.
Speaker 1 (18:18):
Pam, let's talk about the other elephant in the room
right now?
Speaker 2 (18:21):
Yes, is there an Epstein list? Do you think there is?
What's going on? My reporting of two things.
Speaker 9 (18:26):
One, all the reporting I've done does indicate that the
evidence points to a suicide. Now I've done, and actually
twenty years ago actually got a case reopened and proved
that a man who originally was concluded to have died
by suicide in prison was in fact murdered. Family even
won a settlement as a result of the reporting. And
I did in this case, you're missing a lot of
that evidence. You don't see that. I think most of
the evidence leans towards suicide. The second part of it is,
(18:50):
I think what Jeffrey Epstein did is he had a
phone book falls people he knew in his head who
were the clients and who were just the friends. And
he was never going to put that on paper because
it would be like writing down a confession. So I
think the anticipation that there was going to be a
list that said this guy paid this much money for
this girl, it wasn't going to be. There's no way
Epstein was going to be that dangerous and put that
on paper. So I think Pam Bonnie probably raised expectations
(19:13):
a little bit, and then it didn't quite turn out
to be what we thought. That said, I think you're
going to get the rest of the documents, were starting
to get them now.
Speaker 2 (19:21):
It is what it is. I think, you know.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
I asked Mike Bence if this is the case, if
there is no actual list, and he didcumitsu in if
he was an answer or not, should just laying Maxwell's
be in prison right now?
Speaker 9 (19:36):
She looks like she was pretty involved in what went on,
right and you look at the record of evidence, she
clearly knew and was facilitating what he was doing. I
think the greatest missed opportunity for people. People want to
go back and say, we're really disappointed. Where should we
put our anger at. It's in seven o eight when
the Justice Department did the first investigation.
Speaker 2 (19:53):
They could have gone so much deeper.
Speaker 9 (19:56):
The Bush Justice Department took a dive, and I think
they let the entire country down when they did that.
Speaker 2 (20:00):
It gave him a slap on the road.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
He was worried about going away for maybe live for
you know, dozens of years or decades, and what do
you do, like six months or And.
Speaker 9 (20:08):
That's where they could have got the financial records. That's
where they could have really shown who was paid to.
Speaker 2 (20:13):
Get someone hard.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
They start turning things over.
Speaker 2 (20:18):
Quickly. You know, where do we go from here? I'll listen.
Speaker 9 (20:21):
There's a lot more to sell us to be disclosed,
and I think that this record of getting information out
so we can decide whether more prosecutions should occur. And
there's a lot of things about Ukraine impeachment that we
now look back at the testimony looks like there was
a lot of false testimony there. There's a lot of
things in the intelligence community that occurred with Afghanistan. People
need to be held accountable. There's a lot of place
to go discovery, folks.
Speaker 1 (20:42):
This guy is so connected the information that you bring. John,
thank you so much. Appreciate you on the show. Thank
you John. I folks, let's bring in a good friend
of ours, good friend.
Speaker 2 (20:53):
Of the show.
Speaker 8 (20:54):
When we first heard the five five five, and we've
been hearing you on route for quite a while and
we finally made that decision. But I've lost fifty three
pounds since.
Speaker 10 (21:06):
We started getting Okay, my weight change was seventeen pounds.
I'm melting away.
Speaker 4 (21:12):
Well.
Speaker 10 (21:13):
The cool thing is we are eighty six inches closer together.
Tell everybody it has brought us together, but not just physically,
spiritually as well.
Speaker 11 (21:24):
Oh.
Speaker 10 (21:24):
Absolutely, your program is absolutely amazing.
Speaker 12 (21:28):
This has been an awesome journey so far.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
Well that was a look at another happy couple who
took the five to five to five Challenge. Most people
think of health as just weight or lost weight loss
or energy, but two studies published in the Journal of
Health and Human Behavior demonstrate that health really affects everything,
our relationship, everything we do. For more information on this
and the five five to five Challenge, let's bring in
(21:51):
the founder of Energize Health, John Julie. John tell us
the latest on what we're finding. Again, let's just talk
about it. What is the five to five to five challenge?
How can folks get in?
Speaker 13 (22:01):
Well, hey, great to see you, Eric, and yeah, the
five five five Challenge one of the funnest things that
Chelsea and I get to do together. Uh, you know,
we simply offer people an opportunity to come and spend
five you know, like five cups of coffee. It's like
having five cups of coffee together costs five dollars. It's
five days. We spend about an hour together, but we
(22:21):
walk people through you know, what is the connection between
your relationship, you know, your relationships, How do you have
healthy relationships? How do you get healthy at the sailor
level so that you make sure that you're going to
be around for those people that you know that you love.
You know, I was with a group of men this
morning and have a men's group. And one of the guys,
(22:43):
you know, his his dad. He lost him at fifty four.
Another one lost his dad at forty four. You know,
the guys dropping dead early. You know, you've got to
be around for the people in your life. And so
let's find out, you know, what are the strategies that
are sustainable in life. We've all done on these crazy diets,
Eric and you know, and everybody's lost some weight, but
(23:04):
you know, most of the time we just we just
lose water. We gained it all back because we've all
made the same mistakes. And the other thing on the
five five five is we teach people what are the
five things to never do again? To never fail again?
You know, so one of the most right things we
can do is not to do the wrong thing.
Speaker 1 (23:25):
So intracellular hydration hydration is directly affected.
Speaker 2 (23:30):
By salt intake.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
I'm just going to throw it out, Johnny, this salt good?
Speaker 2 (23:34):
Is it bad for us? How do we regulate it?
Speaker 1 (23:36):
And what does energized health tell us to do regarding salt?
Speaker 13 (23:41):
Well, Jesus said you're the salt of the earth. So
I'm pretty sure salt's a good thing. I'm pretty sure
it's a good thing if he said you're the salt
of the earth, and he meant it in a good way.
So salt and potassium are the two natural electrolytes that
God created. So everybody tries to create all these fancy
duras and you know, gatorade, you know, started putting, But
(24:03):
if you look at it, it comes down to, yes,
we do need salt. There is an amount we need,
but it's directly proportionate to how much intracellular hydration we have.
So the first thing we have to know is, well,
how much intersalular hydration do I have? So I know
how much salt I can take safely. And the more
intersalular hydration you have, frankly, the more salt you can have,
(24:25):
you actually can get to a point, you know, where
you can have all the salt that you want, because
that interstalar hydration is like a river of living water
flowing through your body and it'll just flush out any
excess salt that you have. So salt is a good
thing for sure.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
That's great.
Speaker 1 (24:43):
And the really good thing is that energized health will
take a holistic approach to all these different things, all
the questions the folks may have.
Speaker 2 (24:51):
Just check it out.
Speaker 1 (24:52):
Energize Health, John Jubilee, appreciate your time, my friend, Thank you.
Speaker 2 (24:56):
Thank you, and Eric.
Speaker 13 (24:56):
It's my five to five to five challenge dot com
for people for this one. It's my five to five
to five challenge a little different than the normal website.
So thank you so much for having us on.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Insanely good John, the good to talk to you. We
talked to you again very very soon. Folks will be
back two and a half minutes. All right, Get the
gringos out, Get the gringos out. Sorry, not my words, folks.
(25:28):
Imagine the irony of Mexican people wanting Americans to get
out of their own country. Do you know that Mexicans
in Mexico City are out protesting right now against Americans
immigrating to Mexico. Mexicans are protesting against rich Americans buying
and renting.
Speaker 2 (25:44):
Properties in Mexico City.
Speaker 1 (25:46):
They're accusing Americans of causing a housing crisis in Mexico City.
They're shouting about Americans refusing to learn Spanish and debasing
the native culture of Mexico.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
Oh, the irony is so thick, you see.
Speaker 1 (25:59):
Apparently the Americans aren't assimilating and the Mexicans are not
having it.
Speaker 2 (26:03):
Just look at the scenes in.
Speaker 1 (26:05):
Mexico City a couple of days ago. Well well, well,
well what do we have? They're lucky, looky lucky. So
now Mexicans are protesting foreigners, Americans changing their culture and
(26:27):
driving up housing costs. Welcome to what Americans have been
dealing with Mexico for decades.
Speaker 2 (26:33):
With your folks coming over the border.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
Writers in Mexico City demand that Americans stop immigrating to
their country and quote stop stealing their homes.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
You can't make this stuff.
Speaker 14 (26:43):
Up, Kentucky, Benetraspaces and some of your extra heroes.
Speaker 4 (26:47):
Okay.
Speaker 14 (26:47):
In Pictura susprezios plas Mexicanos.
Speaker 15 (26:54):
Kopur que, lacking Trica, colonist vocals, good ingo In case
you missed it, Yes, someone actually spray painted kill a
gringo on that wall there.
Speaker 1 (27:09):
Do you see that you see, locals are fuming. They're
actually fuming Americans imposing our culture, American culture on Mexicans.
Speaker 2 (27:16):
And taking over, so to speak.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
Some went as far as to say gringos should be killed,
while others told them to get out of Mexico. You see,
since COVID American digital nomads they're called, have been flocking
the Mexico City, and the locals don't like it at all.
They don't like any of these foreigners in their country,
namely Americans who are overstaying their visas.
Speaker 2 (27:36):
You just can't make this up, guys.
Speaker 1 (27:39):
The people of Mexico who've been flooding into this country
for years, both legally and mostly illegally by the millions,
well they've had it with us. So hundreds of unruly
demonstrators held a protests in Mexico City against the gentrification
of their neighborhoods, which is playing a role in rising
housing prices what happens. Mexicans accused Americans of stealing their
(28:01):
homes and imposing their culture, our culture, American culture on
Mexico City. Mexican nationalists, leftists, and Antifa attacked the businesses
to demand that Americans in foreigners asta la Vista. Leave
moms and protesters waving fuetas gringos that means get rid
of all gringoes. Banners targeting banks and Americans businesses chanting.
(28:23):
This is how we do it, comrades as they trash
United States interests on foreign soil.
Speaker 2 (28:28):
I mean, what are they so angry about?
Speaker 1 (28:31):
White Americans who's fed up with Republicans and is crippled
with trun' rangs and syndrome moves to Mexico City to
start a new life.
Speaker 2 (28:37):
He illegally immigrates there.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
Maybe he gets a free hotel room, never even tries
to learn Spanish, maybe even opens up a Texas barbecue
truck with American flags flying everywhere. Oh and he has
ten children, but don't worry, welfare helps put the bill
on all that.
Speaker 2 (28:53):
Oh and he.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Somehow managed to vote in Mexican elections. But relax, what
are you so angry about? Oh, this is because he's white.
I get it. Well, you must be racist, then, right,
it's because Mexicans don't want white people in their country.
Speaker 2 (29:06):
Well how dare they?
Speaker 1 (29:08):
It doesn't matter if they're in there illegally or legally,
doesn't matter if they're sucking your resources dry. Or vote
illegally in your elections. If you're okay and not okay,
well you must be racist severe against white people doing it?
Speaker 2 (29:22):
Got it okay?
Speaker 1 (29:23):
Shout out to the Department of Homeland Security for this
post and I'm quoting. If you're in the United States
illegally and wish to join the next protest in Mexico City,
use the CBP home app to facilitate your demarchure. Well done, Christy,
nom by all means, because here's a fact. Most Americans
want all, not some, all undocumented immigrants gone from this country.
Speaker 16 (29:45):
Watch see you see really uniformity deport all immigrants who
are here illegally fifty five percent of New York Times
Marquette sixty four percent, CBS News fifty seven percent, ABC
News with a slightly different question fifty six percent.
Speaker 4 (29:57):
So what you're.
Speaker 16 (29:57):
Seeing essentially here is very clear indication that a majority
of Americans, in fact, when they're asked us one question,
which I believe gets that the underlying feelings, do in
fact want to port all immigrants who are here illegally.
There's no arguing with these different numbers because they're all
essentially the sam across four different polsters.
Speaker 1 (30:16):
Here here's that he said all even CNN has to
admitted a more majority of Americans want people who came
here into this country illegally.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
To be deported, period, end of story.
Speaker 1 (30:26):
The rig the Big Beautiful Bill gives ICE forty five billion,
forty five billion dollars for detaining the illegals. That's more
than gotten last fifteen years combined, millions more in funding
for ICE and DHS, So undue years of the Democrat
endorsed invasion, illegal invasion of this country.
Speaker 2 (30:44):
But that's racist thereic.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
Meanwhile, Mexico City has a population of over nine million,
and there's a maximum of ten thousand of these American
digital nomads living in the city. Ten thousand.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Check New York and LA lately.
Speaker 1 (30:58):
And so Mexicans respond with violent rioting. A quarter of
all people with Mexican heritage live in the United States.
And we're supposed to be fine with that. But it
doesn't matter. We're held to different standards, you see, because
if we want to preserve our country, our culture, our resources,
our homeland, and defend Americans, that's not okay with them
(31:22):
because you see, or on the left, it's not okay
because on the left, they'll call U xenophobic when white
people are the ones expressing it.
Speaker 2 (31:28):
Do you get it? Do you get it? Do you
see the hypocrisy? I hope?
Speaker 1 (31:32):
So all right, if you're stressed out about back taxes,
maybe you miss deadline, the April fifteenth deadline, or your
books are a.
Speaker 2 (31:40):
Mess, don't wait.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
The IRS is cracking down penalties add up fast five
percent per month, up to twenty five percent just for
not Finally, but there's help. Tax Network USA can help
the burden. Take the burden off your shoulders and stop
the spiral before it gets worse. They've helped thousands of Americans.
Whether you're an employee, a small business, own, own, or
haven't even filed in years. Got messy books, no problem.
(32:04):
They've seen it all and know exactly how to clean
it up. With direct asss to the powerful IRS programs
and expert negotiators on your side, Tax Network.
Speaker 2 (32:14):
USA knows how to win.
Speaker 1 (32:16):
You get a free consultation, and if you're qualified, they
may even even be able to reduce or eliminate.
Speaker 2 (32:21):
What you owe the IRS. More importantly, they'll help.
Speaker 1 (32:24):
You protect you from wage garnishments or bank levies. So
don't wait for the next IRS letter call one eight
hundred nine zero five eight thousand, or visit TNUSA dot
com slash rav to talk.
Speaker 2 (32:38):
To a real expert at Text Network USA. Take the
pressure off. Let Text Network USA handle your tax issues.
Speaker 1 (32:46):
We'll be back two and a half minutes. All right, folks,
We've seen bold moves out of Washington since President Trump
took GOFF as fast action, real results. But there's one
thing you can't outsource to government. Looking out for your
(33:09):
own financial future. If you watch what's happening rising in inflation,
out of control, debt, global uncertainty, you know it's time
to diversify. That's why personally, I really do I trust
Birch Gold Group. Gold is surged over forty percent in
the past twelve months alone. Central banks around the world
are buying gold at record levels. Why because gold holds
(33:29):
value when paper money just doesn't. With Birch Gold, it's
easy to convert your Ira or four oh one k
into a gold Ira or to buy physical, actual real
gold coins and bars and start at home if you want.
That's what I do. They walk you through every single step.
Just text the word America America to eight nine eight
nine eight to get your free infoKit on gold.
Speaker 2 (33:50):
There's no cost, no obligation, just smart information.
Speaker 1 (33:53):
Again text the word America to nine eight nine eight
nine eight take control of your financial future. Now, all righty,
something's going on. Take a look at this New York
Post headline. Will you quoting Jeffrey Epstein didn't have a
client list and committed suicide? DOJNFBI say in findings that
debunked conspiracy theories?
Speaker 2 (34:14):
I'm sorry? What was that?
Speaker 11 (34:15):
Now?
Speaker 2 (34:15):
Tell me that again one more time.
Speaker 1 (34:17):
So, basically, after many many years, decades actually hearing about
the elusive Epstein flight logs, client lists, were just now
being told that everything we thought we knew about this man,
well just wasn't true.
Speaker 2 (34:29):
What happened to this?
Speaker 17 (34:31):
But in this case, in Epstein's case, it is incredibly disturbing.
We have flight logs, we have information, names that will
come out.
Speaker 2 (34:40):
Is it going to be shocking?
Speaker 1 (34:45):
I don't see how it's.
Speaker 17 (34:46):
Not shocking that there were so many individuals that were
hidden and kept secret and not been held accountable. Let's
talk about the reverse. I believe in accountability. So you
have to now go through your process. Now I won't
say they're guilty until they go through their time in court.
(35:06):
But again, now it's time for accountability. We have seen
for so many years Pierce in this country, many investigations,
subpoena's testimonies in Congress, et cetera, et cetera. But there's
a general frustration with accountability. We take it halfway, we
don't take it home. And I really believe that now
with Cash and Pam, there will be accountability.
Speaker 11 (35:25):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (35:26):
I just got to hear it, got to know it.
Give us, I guess, give us the flight logs. I
know we've seen someone, give us the little Black book.
Just give us the names.
Speaker 2 (35:34):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (35:34):
Let someone else that bends or so. These guys are
investigator reporters, they'll find it. Obviously, Pam Bondy has meant
the center of this chaos surrounding the public release of
any Epstein related information. She's been very confident in the
sheer amount of evidence that this administration immediately acquired on
Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 18 (35:52):
Watch I said yesterday, and all that Epstein fell from message.
Speaker 19 (35:59):
No NOI yeah, the FBI they're reviewing. There are tens
of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn,
and there are hundreds of victims, and no one victim will.
Speaker 1 (36:15):
Ever get released.
Speaker 19 (36:16):
It's just the volume, and that's what they're going through
right now. The FBI is diligently going through that. I
haven't seen that statement, but I'll call him later and
find out.
Speaker 1 (36:26):
So call me crazy, you know. I trust the lean
habit Pam Binley. I think the two of the most
credible and trustworthy people that work with President Trump. But
even Melinda Gates, remember her. She was confident enough in
her hatred for Epstein and his island that she divorced
Bill Gates, a billion multi second richest man in the world.
Speaker 2 (36:46):
Remember this.
Speaker 1 (36:47):
You know.
Speaker 20 (36:48):
It was also widely reported that Bill had a friendship
or business or some kind of contact with Jeffrey Epstein,
and that you were not that. That was very upsetting
to you. Did that play a role in the divorce
at all in this process?
Speaker 21 (37:02):
Yeah, As I said, it's not one thing. It was
many things. But I did not like that he'd had
meetings with Jefrey Epstein.
Speaker 2 (37:10):
Now, and you made that clear to him.
Speaker 21 (37:13):
I made that clear to him. I also met Jeffrey
Epstein it exactly one time, did you Yes, Because I
wanted to see who this man was and I regretted
it from the second I stepped in the door.
Speaker 2 (37:26):
He was abhorrent.
Speaker 21 (37:28):
He was evil personified. I had nightmares about it afterwards.
Speaker 2 (37:35):
Trying to figure it out.
Speaker 1 (37:36):
Meanwhile, as the Jeffrey Epstein flight log release seemingly gets
further and further away, Elon Musk decided to launch his
own political party. The reactions have been all over the board.
Let's start with a warning message from Scott Besant.
Speaker 4 (37:51):
I let you go.
Speaker 22 (37:52):
It's not a big secret that you had your differences
with Elon Musk when he was working in the administration.
He announced this weekend that he is starting a new
political party. Does that worry that Trump administration?
Speaker 23 (38:04):
Look, the principles of those were very popular. I think
if you looked at the polling, Elon was not.
Speaker 1 (38:10):
So.
Speaker 2 (38:11):
I believe that.
Speaker 23 (38:13):
The boards of directors at his various companies wanted him
to come back and run those companies, which he is
better at than anyone. So I imagine that those board of
directors did not like this announcement yesterday, and we'll be
encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his
political activities.
Speaker 22 (38:31):
Thank you, mister secretary, appreciate your time.
Speaker 1 (38:33):
Thank you, and I'm going to have to agree with
Scott Vessant right there. Listen, Elon's at love on Muska,
but you know he should really focused on Tesla. Hear
what happened Tesla stock today lost sixty eight billion dollars.
Tesla stock in one day, sixty eight billion dollars when
he announced this idea to run a third party in America.
Speaker 2 (38:52):
I don't really get it.
Speaker 1 (38:53):
Jamie Raskin loves to tell us not to trust our
lying eyes, yet he himself tends to lie about everything,
every event, everything captured on video, like the La riots,
which he still thinks were totally what peaceful protests.
Speaker 24 (39:06):
Listen, Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass had the situation under
control in California. It was like massive, nonviolent, peaceful protests.
And then there was an eight or ten block area
where there were riots happening, and they dealt with it.
They've got the police power there, they've got the chief
of police.
Speaker 1 (39:23):
They didn't need.
Speaker 2 (39:23):
Donald Trump coming in.
Speaker 24 (39:24):
But of course he didn't see riots happening six blocks
away from where he was on January sixth, twenty twenty one.
Speaker 1 (39:31):
Yeah, no riots, just peaceful protests. Like twenty twenty Jamie Reskin, Folks,
liberals are just nuts. Gavin Newsome to, speaking of ninety liberals,
finally offered his take on Trump's new alligator Alcatraz migrant
detention center. On Surprisingly, the California governor not a big.
Speaker 2 (39:47):
Fan of the idea.
Speaker 1 (39:48):
Well, listen to Gavin Newscomb, as Trump would say, Now.
Speaker 18 (39:52):
I know I made a comment about the Alcatraz alligator
that was just these are flim flammers.
Speaker 2 (39:58):
They're not serious people. I want an embarrassment.
Speaker 18 (40:01):
Imagine the rest of the world looking at that, mocking
people saying, well, if you're going to run zig and
zag the president of the United States of America, I
revere that office.
Speaker 2 (40:10):
We all should.
Speaker 18 (40:13):
Founding fathers didn't live and die to see that show.
Speaker 2 (40:17):
What an embarrassment.
Speaker 18 (40:18):
Four hundred and fifty million dollars a year of wasted
tax money for pure theater. So for strong opinions, but
will continue to push back in very aggressive ways.
Speaker 1 (40:31):
You know, Alligator Alcatraz reminds me of re member Joe Rpyle,
the Great, the Great sheriff in Arizona, who used to
put his inmates in tps and make him wear pink jumps.
It's guess what no one wanted to. Don't wanted to
do that, so they stayed out of trouble. I don't
maybe Alligator Alcatraz will stop people from coming over across
the border illegally. Karen Bass, remember her mayor of La,
(40:51):
the woke, deranged mayor of La, I should say, also
decided to give her take on Florida's new detention center.
Let's not forget her city is falling apart by the day,
largely due to her mayoral incompetence and the governor you
just heard from there. Yeah, apparently she's got time to
meddle in Florida, which is doing very very well Florida's business.
Here's Karen Bass on how Trump's latest latest innovation makes
(41:12):
her mad.
Speaker 25 (41:13):
Let me just say that I know that LA is
the test ground. We're the Petri dish for the experiment
to see how much will the American people tolerate.
Speaker 26 (41:24):
But even polling has shown that even amongst Trump's supporters
who agree with the policy are not in favor of
some of the just inhumane tactics. You know, today he's
having a press conference at Alligator Alcatraz in Florida, where
essentially building a tent city, and to secure that, they
(41:46):
put it where it's surrounded by water with alligators and
pythons in it. I mean, you know, if it wasn't
so inhumane, it would be laughable.
Speaker 25 (41:55):
But this is the United States, and in a minute,
it's gonna be difficult to recognize our times.
Speaker 2 (42:02):
What's in Humaine.
Speaker 1 (42:03):
I was there, the brand new beds, it's beautiful.
Speaker 2 (42:05):
Don't leave it won't be in humane. Don't break out,
get the ported at home.
Speaker 1 (42:10):
That's the whole point, Karen Bass, maybe you should try
that in California, you lunatics. I go to break on
to let you know. We'll be doing a big, big
show tomorrow, Bowling show. It's a special protecting America's food supply.
Look at that full screen right there. You're gonna have Pam.
Look at this crew that I'm gonna talk to tomorrow.
I have to sit down with Brooke Rowinds and I'm
also getting a few minutes with Pete Hegseth. Still working
(42:32):
on Pam and Christy. But we'll let you know, but
we'll bring it all to you tomorrow. Don't miss it.
You're not gonna want to miss it. Also, voicemails are
coming up next you have to have full screen eight
eight eight six one oh three to two toll free
always tell us Richard thinking, So you got some great ones.
About five hundred came in between Thursday and today.
Speaker 2 (42:49):
Maybe even a little more. I got to some of them.
Speaker 1 (42:51):
I can't say I got to all of them, but
we're gonna play some of the good ones for you
coming out next. All right, let's do this, mad dog.
(43:13):
Let's do this, my friend. We got some voicemail. I
got some good ones today. Listen, folks sent five or
six hundred in. I got to some of them. I'd
say about half. Still working through them, but I can't
get them all up. I got some fun ones, mad dog.
What do you got?
Speaker 2 (43:24):
First?
Speaker 14 (43:25):
This is someone that says, the Big Beautiful Bill having
strategic Petroleum Reserve money, do it?
Speaker 12 (43:32):
Yeah, Eric just wanted to point out to you the
Big Beautiful Bill does have one hundred and seventy one
million dollars in it to help refill the strategical reserve.
Speaker 2 (43:40):
I thought you'd be happy to hear that. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (43:44):
I am very happy to hear that, sir. And you're
one hundred percent right, but we need a lot more.
And again I talked to the Chief of Staff, Susie
wils and she says cost six several sixty seventy billion
dollars to do what I suggest. That said, Susie, you're
not spending it. You're taking from the treasury and you're
putting over in the strategic It's still an asset. You're
just moving from cash into an asset. We're not spending it.
(44:05):
And you know Trump likes it. So I'm hoping it
will cost tens of billions to do it. I hope
we do it because it will help energy security. Mad dog,
what do you got?
Speaker 14 (44:14):
This is a viewer that says the Portland Trailblazers, the
basketball team drafted a Chinese national.
Speaker 2 (44:20):
Listen to this, folks, this is a good one.
Speaker 12 (44:23):
The National Basketball Association Portland Trailblazers their first draft choice
in a recent draft was this seven foot Chinese nationals.
You know what that means? How many teams are in
the NBA? How many teams fly out of major airports
(44:45):
across the country.
Speaker 2 (44:46):
How many of.
Speaker 12 (44:47):
Those major airports are right next to a United States
military base, like here at Portland International, we've got the
Oregon Airguard Fighter win. How many millions of dollars they're
calling in. Is China paid the trail Blazers to get
their insider into the country. Just wondering, just wonder if
(45:08):
you realize what they've done Hill Portland or I'm.
Speaker 2 (45:13):
Trying to be good. He's trying to be good. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (45:17):
I can't say that the Chinese paid the Portland trail
Blazers big, but they did get seven foot tie, which
I tend to think that maybe they did to win games. However,
you're right.
Speaker 2 (45:25):
Though, how many Chinese people are working.
Speaker 1 (45:29):
There's thirty teams in the NBA, by the way, in
the NFL, you got the Major League Baseball. How many
Chinese nationals are getting in and out with certain sort
of immunity. I'm a little nervous about that too, especially
with the proximity our airports. Are they tend to share
runways or at least areas with military airports, Air Force,
Navy or whatever.
Speaker 2 (45:49):
Yeah, it's a great question. Mad dog got one.
Speaker 14 (45:52):
This is LA ticked off about legal immigration.
Speaker 2 (45:56):
Good.
Speaker 11 (45:57):
Hi, I'm calling from Los Angeles and I just wanted
to you. I'm disgusted with Karen Vass and how she
says that she's protecting the people away from ice, and
she talked about the immigrants said, oh, they can't go
to work and everything else. Well, if they can't go
to work, and if they have a job, they have
to have a Social Security number. If they're illegal, they
(46:17):
don't have one, so that means they've stolen identities. And
they have to do the same thing to get medical insurance.
And also we have all these street vendors that have
been raided supposedly, well what about those street vendors. They
don't have to have any county public health inspections. There's
people touching the food, breathing on the food, and it's
(46:38):
taken the business away from the local restaurants in my
community that have been there for years and years and
pay rent in taxes. So that's what I'm ticked off about.
Speaker 2 (46:50):
Yeah, you listen, you're a hundred percent right.
Speaker 1 (46:52):
And unfortunately the lunatics run in California, your state. I
feel sorry if you move moved to Texas, moved to Florida.
They let illegals get Social Security cards without even being citizens.
It's insane. It's insane what they do. They get driver's license,
they even vote.
Speaker 2 (47:07):
It's nuts. What's going on in California.
Speaker 1 (47:09):
Let's get to this this, let's get to Timmy D.
You got Timmy D meadon, Yes, sir, it is Eric.
Speaker 27 (47:15):
It's Timmy D in Columbus, Ohio. I really enjoy your
show and I'm glad you have this format for leaving comments.
So we need to do something about the unholy Trinity
of Hakim AOC and e mom. You give them a lie
detectors test. So the first question, have you received financial
(47:39):
benefit from any foreign or domestic organizations or individuals that
promote anti American agendas? Question number two, do you denounce
jihad on America.
Speaker 12 (47:53):
And uphold will you uphold.
Speaker 27 (47:56):
The morals and ethics of our founding fathers as stage
in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence?
Speaker 12 (48:03):
God bless you, brother.
Speaker 1 (48:06):
God bless you too, my friend, and great idea. Give
them the light detecht to test see how they pass
and fail those two very important questions.
Speaker 2 (48:13):
But then Timmy D gave us a call back.
Speaker 27 (48:15):
Listen, anyway, here's my little surprise at Eric.
Speaker 11 (48:20):
How we tell the truth.
Speaker 2 (48:34):
Yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah, timm D, mad dog.
Speaker 1 (48:38):
I have an affinity to people who sing and perform
on these calls. Keep them tight, though, Keep them tight.
Got time for one more dog.
Speaker 14 (48:44):
Yes, sir, here's a China buying farmland.
Speaker 28 (48:49):
M miserable and I think you need to have somebody
look into China buying up all this property, especially when
they're buying out farm lands and bringing across all these fungus,
diseases and everything, crop destroying things. They're trying to undermine us.
They say, if you control the food, you control the people.
(49:12):
Who do we have to call? Did you have them
start working on this now?
Speaker 4 (49:16):
Thank you, sir.
Speaker 2 (49:16):
I'll tell you.
Speaker 4 (49:17):
I'll tell you called if you had a good fourth
of July.
Speaker 1 (49:21):
Come on, I'll tell you call you call me because
tomorrow MS sit down with Brook Rollins, she's its Secretary
of Agriculture and asking that exact question.
Speaker 2 (49:27):
It's a very very very.
Speaker 1 (49:28):
Very important question. What are we doing about the Chinese nationals,
Chinese people who work for the Chinese government buying our farmland.
Food security is NAW security. Very quickly, take a look
at the full screen. We can take a look tomorrow.
It's gonna be a big show. You got to make
sure you join us for that show special all about
our food security tomorrow. This show right here, That's why
I'm in DC, Hey folks, Steve Benn and Warrem is
(49:49):
coming up next. Stay tuned and I will see you
tomorrow after that big event.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.