July 14, 2025 • 50 mins
Just the News No Noise on Real America's Voice
Segment A : FBI OPENS "GRAND CONSPIRACY" PROBE INTO RUSSIAGATE AND MORE - AND SENATOR RON JOHNSON WEIGHS IN
Segment B: REP. ABE HAMADEH CALLS FOR THE RESIGNATION OF FED CHAIR JEROME POWELL
Segment C: HILLARY CLINTON'S EMAILS BACK IN THE SPOTLIGHT
Segment D: DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH TALKS FAUCI PARDON, DOCTOR WHO STOOD UP DURING COVID GETTING HIS CHARGES DROPPED, AND MORE
Segment E: EPSTEIN FILES - WILL WE EVER SEE THEM?
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:21):
Cad Evening America. Happy Monday.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Welcome to the latest and very busy edition of Justin
News No Noise. You've got a lot of losing for
you tonight. I'm your host, John Solomon, reporting to Zoeis
from the Nation's Capital and the Wiredfishcoffee dot Com studios.
Wire to Fish Coffee. You know this is the official
coffee of Justin's. It's my favorite coffee. I just had
a cup before it came on set. You can go
right now to Wired to Fishcoffee dot Com. That's Wired
the number two Fishcoffee dot Com. Get a fantastic ten
(00:44):
percent discount on all of their great plans and the
Justin News timber go check that out.
Speaker 1 (00:48):
All I gotta do is use the promo code just
News at checkout. All Right.
Speaker 2 (00:52):
The theme of tonight show is accountability, and we are starting
to get some. Recently, our new reporting up at justinews
dot Com says that the FBI has opened what they
are calling a Grand Conspiracy probe on the weaponization of
government and the Department of Justice, dealing with everything from
the Russian collusion hoax back in twenty sixteen right up
to Jacksmith's antics nearly a decade later, it will be
(01:14):
investigated as a possible ongoing criminal conspiracy.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
A lot of things happen with that. Now.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
The investigation was opened several weeks ago by FBI Director
Cash Betel, and now it might get a bit time
boost from President Trump. They need him to classify tranches
of evidence that could signal how the twenty sixteen Russian
collusion conspiracy started.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
We're going to try to see if can get President
Trump on the show tomorrow night. We'll keep you posting up.
Speaker 2 (01:36):
Now, remember Hillary Clinton's classified email server. That's what the
first piece of evidence is related to a classified annex
and the Inspector General's probe of the Clinton email server. Now,
apparently that annex is said to show some wrongdoing was done,
but it was ignored by the FBI didn't.
Speaker 1 (01:51):
Look at it.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
We'll have a guest on later in the show that
can help us understand what that's all about. Second tranche
of evidence also deals with Hillary Clinton, and it was
identified before were russiagates special account John Durham. It was
placed in a classified annex aucile. It was dubbed in
Durham's report that Clinton plan intelligence. So the central question
is twofold. What did the government know about how Russia
Gate started and when did they know it? Because if
(02:14):
they knew, it was incredible that Hillary Clinton was behind
it and it was just a dirty trick, and they
started to investigate it. Anyways, it's going to be a
big proba, big part of that conspiracy. The ball is
now in Attorney General Pambondies court. She can decide to
appoint a special prosecutor on this, and if she does
and treats it like an ongoing conspiracy, the statute of
limitation for old crimes goes away, and she can panel
(02:35):
grand jury to place like Florida, not District of Columbia.
Why because Jack Smith rated President Trump's Marlago home in Florida.
Speaker 1 (02:41):
So that'll be a big advantage for the prosecution.
Speaker 2 (02:43):
We'll keep you up to date on all of that
at justinnews dot com on these breaking topics and talking
about all of it in a few minutes with Senator
Ron Johnson, our first guest. Now, a quick note on
a story I first mentioned right here off Friday night,
when I revealed FBI Deputy Director Dan Bodg, you know,
taking a few days off to cont plate whether he
might want to quit after Jeffrey Epstein documents feud with
(03:03):
the Attorney General. Pampond I predicted Friday coolere it's might
prevail with the time off. In just a little while ago,
I confirmed that Oppen Banjina return to work. He's got
no plans to leave all right. Time to bring in
my amazing ghost, Amanda had Amanda one of the headlines
you're watching for us.
Speaker 3 (03:17):
Today, LORDI, John, you covered a lot, but we do.
Let's talk about Ukraine, the other big story today, because
the President spoke a lot about it today with NATO
Secretary Mark Ruda, and it seems that President of Vladimir
Putin of Russia is not playing very nice with President Trump.
And the plan involves the United States sending more weapons
to Ukraine, but it won't be how the government typically
(03:38):
has done it before. Now the US will sell weapons
to other European nations and then these countries can and
will transfer them over to Ukraine. And he also has
a deadline for Russia. He is giving them fifty five
o days to reach an agreement to end the war
with Ukraine or he is set to impose what the
President calls severe tariffs on Russia at a rate of
one hundred percent severe in d And the President also
(04:01):
revealed that he felt he had a deal in place
with Putin about three or four times, but those deals
kept falling through. And we have more big Supreme Court
news for you again today, and this ruling will continue
to help President Trump shrink the size of government. The
Court ruled today to allow President Trump to fire hundreds
of employees over at the Department of Education. And they
had to issue that ruling because of a previous ruling
(04:23):
by a federal judge in Massachusetts who decided that those
laid off workers had to be reinstated. And it now
looks like President Trump's school of shutting down the Department
of Education could become a reality or ely shrinking it. John,
Thanks time we get to our first guest, because I
know he's got a lot to say about your story.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Big news, big news of the Supreme Court. President keeps
winning there and that government's going to keep shrinking as
a result of it.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
All Right, a little while ago.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
We had a chance to speak to the man who
found some of the very first Russia collusion evidency. But
those text messages between the love birds Pete Struck and
his lawyer friend. It was editor Rod Johns, right, Lisa Page.
Senator n Johnson spent some time with us. Listenbody had
to say joining us now, I'm man who's been at
the forefront of trying to finally get Americans out accountability,
(05:06):
whether it's in the medical community, the FBI, or in
the assassination of Secret Service records. He represents a great
state of Wisconsin. He's a chairman of the most powerful
investigative body in the Senate. He is Senator Ron Johnson, Senator.
Great to have you back on the show. Well, John,
Low Mantel, were doing well, we are, sir. I wanted
to ask you about this story we wrote about this morning.
(05:28):
The FBI a few weeks ago opened a grand conspiracy
probe looking at the entire last decade, from Hillary Clinton
being cleared to Jack Smith pursuing Donald Trump as one
ongoing conspiracy to hijack the powers of the government, weaponize
them against one side and protect the other side even
when they had criminal liability. Your thoughts on that approaching,
whether it leads itself to a special.
Speaker 4 (05:50):
Prosecutor, Well, John, I don't know what your thoughts are,
but you know, as much about this as I do,
and I felt these people are criminals for many years now.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
I mean, the fact that they knew.
Speaker 4 (06:01):
This was the whole Russian Gate was a conspiracy hatch
by the Clinton campaign back in twenty sixteen, the President
Bamba was briefed on that. I mean, they all knew
the fact that in Michael Horowitz's Inspector General report on
the PISI abuse that under a redacted footnote totally contradicted
(06:23):
what was in the.
Speaker 1 (06:23):
Body of the report.
Speaker 4 (06:24):
That the FBI knew that, for example, one of the
sources of the Steele dossier was somebody they were investigating
as a Russian spy. Again, they knew all these things,
so how they could move forward with the multi million
dollar Robert Moeller Special Council investigation. They put America through unbelievable,
really historic political turmoil, knowing that the entire narrative.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
Was completely false.
Speaker 4 (06:49):
So you follow that all the way through to the
fifty plus intelligence officials claiming that the Hunter Biden laptop
was had all the earmarks Russian information campaign, when they
had to know because the FBI had possession of that computer,
that know it was a real computer.
Speaker 1 (07:07):
Had real information on it.
Speaker 4 (07:09):
So again, when you've been at the heart of these
investigations like you and I have, again, I've just viewed
these people as criminal for years.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
Centator as as John laid out in his reporting, and
the left, the left protects their own and people like
Hillary Clinton at the inception of this possible conspiracy, operated
with impunity. It seems like, so the left is going
to fight back tooth and nail. What does that look
like in the face of multiple different venues, multiple different investigators,
multiple different possible crimes.
Speaker 5 (07:41):
How do they fight back, fight back against that?
Speaker 4 (07:44):
Well, again, I thought John Durham seemed to be a
pretty honorable investigator, but we're always told that, you know,
he's only going to indict if he believes he'd get conviction,
and his venue for invite digan would be DC. And
I think he realizes it impossible to get a conviction
against a Democrat politician when you've got ninety percent plus
(08:05):
of the DC jury pool, you know, pretty strongly Democrat supporters.
So you can convict somebody a Republican, you know, people
like the trumpministration officials, they actually.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
Went to jail, but you can't lay a hand on
a Democrat.
Speaker 4 (08:20):
So I've always suspected John Durham probably have the goods
to indict, but you just simply wouldn't do it because
he knew he couldn't convict in DC.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
Well, one of the things being discussed in this plan
is to move this to Florida, where Jack Smith operated
for quite a few times and view that as part
of the conspiracy rating Borrow lago things like that. Does
a venue change potentially change the picture for prosecutors and
what they could potentially accomplish. And then also you mentioned
both Durham and Horowitz, two guys. There are classified aneces
(08:54):
to the reports that have been secret for eight years.
I know you would like to see them be classified
by President Trump.
Speaker 4 (08:59):
Get your thought in that as well, and you probably should.
I think I believe I've seen one of those annexes. Again,
When you see this stuff, it's like, what what do
you try and protect?
Speaker 1 (09:09):
I mean, they always say sources, the methods, and I
just roll my eyes at that.
Speaker 4 (09:14):
Anyway, I do believe I said this from the minute
I heard that they may be investing in this is
unless you have a change in venue, it probably isn't
making any sense to investigate kind kind of a John
Durham approach. If all you're going to do is investigate
and then this is DC's your venue, don't even waste
your time, except for the fact that I do believe
(09:36):
the first step in political accountability is exposure, and it
might be worth just exposing all of this. But as
I said earlier, we've known about this. I mean, this
has been exposed. It's been out in the public domain.
Of course, the corporate the legacy media doesn't report on it,
but we've known about the corruption of people like John
Brennan of James Comia, these other individuals, the corrupt actors,
(09:59):
Hillary Clint, these are corrupt, bad people that, unfortunately, because
they're radical left to the Democrats, they biledge to a pass.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
In the mainstream media.
Speaker 3 (10:12):
Senator, it does kind of feel like we are in
our revelatory era of a lot of things being uncovered
thanks to you and other folks on Capitol Hill.
Speaker 5 (10:20):
But with respect to Joe.
Speaker 3 (10:22):
Biden's mental state during his presidency, a lot of people
finally the feeling liberated to speak.
Speaker 5 (10:28):
Out and talk about it.
Speaker 3 (10:29):
In the latest is that Joe Biden in fact did
know about each of those pardons, whether they were signed
with autopen or not. Is that the threshold that a
president just knows about it?
Speaker 1 (10:39):
Well?
Speaker 4 (10:39):
Probably in case the autopen, it probably is. I mean,
if he says that he knew all about these things,
just direct as people to use the autopen, I think
that that issue probably goes away.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
What doesn't go away is what the.
Speaker 4 (10:52):
Cabinet officers, what's people around him knew, because many of
them swore notes of the Constitution to offended to uphold
it and part of the constitution twenty fifth Amendment. And
so we are diligently going about our investigation. First on
a volunteer basis. We've conducted our first transcribed interviews with
a cabinet official. The rest of the cabinet seems to
(11:15):
be on vacation through August, so okay to me, this
has historical significance. We need to interview people in the cabinet.
Based on those interviews, we'll find out who else we
want to interview. This is a serious investigation. Interviews being
transcribed eventually available to public review and the historical record.
(11:35):
So I'm conducting a serious investigation. We're going to pursue
it doggedly. Just talk to my staff about it again,
I'm not looking for a show trial here.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
I'm looking for the.
Speaker 4 (11:45):
Historical record in terms of what these people knew, when
they knew it, what discussions they had amongst themselves, in
terms of really the competency the capability President Biden when
he was in office.
Speaker 2 (11:56):
So something else that you've worked tireusly on, and I
know you just issued subpena is for this the evidence
surrounding the assassination temp of President Trump and Butler Pennsylvania,
so many questions unanswered. Your reports have given us more
than anyone. What is it do you think you may find?
Is it the possibility of other conspirators there? People aiding?
What are you looking for in these next round of
(12:17):
subpoenas to give us the American public a more full
accounting of what happened that day?
Speaker 4 (12:23):
Well, first of all, I view this as a friendly subpoena,
not an adversary one, just to prompt transparency.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
Now the assumpstit, I had.
Speaker 4 (12:32):
My staff uncovered an awful lot just talking to local
law enforcement in the week or two afterwards, But then
local law enforcement clammed up, probably under the direction of
the FBI. FPI conducted hundreds of interviews. We were able
to talk to maybe a couple of dozens seeking service
people kind of given to us, you know, drip drip.
We requested their notes, the three H two's on those
(12:53):
FBI interviews. We'd like to see the body cam video.
We'd like see the cameras from cars, you know, we
want to see all that evidence. The American people has
the right to see this. My assumption when President Trump
got elected is that once in office, you'd point to
people in the Justice Department, in the FBI that would
conduct a very thorough investigation, realizing they have far more
(13:15):
investigatory tools and personnel than we have, and we'd have
a report by now. I guess the anniversary kind of
knock up on me and realize, man, we just haven't
learned that much more since our initial preliminary report based
on those first investations. So I issued the subpoena in
a friendly manner just to get everybody's tention to go. Guys,
(13:35):
it is time to let the American people know what
you know. I'm hoping it's viewed that way. I want
to be cooperative. But listen, a year down, we don't
know who Thomas Crooks was, We don't know motivation, there's
just so much that we still don't know that we
probably should know center before.
Speaker 5 (13:52):
We let you go.
Speaker 3 (13:52):
I mean, the overarching agency who should have overseen protection
of the president that day was the United States Secret Service,
but they're at least half a dozen other agencies who
are drawn into this protection plan. Do you anticipate I
guess I'm asking what your gut is. Does it seem
like it's incompetence or does it seem like it could
lead somewhere more sinister?
Speaker 4 (14:10):
Well, certainly under Joe Biden, I think it was incompetent.
I think it was incompetent because of their DEI measures
and they're concerned more about what an agent looked like
than the agent's competency. And listen, I also understand President Trump,
anybody who's been protected by the Secret Service has a
great affinity and quite honestly love and respect for those
(14:31):
agents that are willing to literally lay down their life
tect to protect these life. So I understand the reluctance
of really looking at this too close. But it's people
upper management. It's for example, President Biden, who did not
provide the kind of resources direct to see service to
provide the resource to protect Canada.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
Trump at that point in time. In the end, it's really.
Speaker 4 (14:52):
President Biden's responsibility, and I think he failed.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
So we remiss not to mind the audience.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
It was your hard work that gave us the Pete truck,
Lisa Page text messages and the admission that there was
no big there.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
That was really the turning point in the news media.
Speaker 2 (15:10):
I think accepting that maybe the rush of collusion the
investigation was a hoax. You've done such extraordinary work and
you just a lot of a lot of credit for
where these investigations are Tey.
Speaker 1 (15:20):
Really great to have you on the show. Thanks for
joining us. Well, thanks for all your hard working efforts
as well. Thanks for having me on.
Speaker 2 (15:25):
Thank you sir. Great conversation. All right, folks are going
to take a quick commercial break. When me come back,
we're going to go down to Arizona. Congressman Holiday made
some news today. He called for the FED chairman Drome
poul to step down. We'll ask him about that and
also his take on the FBI opening up the Grand
Conspiracy investigation.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
I think he's messaging we'll be right.
Speaker 3 (15:42):
Back, hello friends, as we celebrate America's birthday.
Speaker 5 (15:50):
It's a great time to reflect on the facts, and.
Speaker 3 (15:52):
Here's one that really matters. The freedoms that we enjoy
today didn't happen by accident. They were built on the
foundation of faith, family, hard work, and individual liberty. But
those values don't protect themselves. They need people like you
and me to stand.
Speaker 5 (16:06):
Up for them.
Speaker 3 (16:06):
And that's why I want to encourage you to join AMAC,
the Association of Mature American Citizens. AMAC is working every
day to defend the principles that made this country great,
and right now, in honor of Independence Day, you can
get five full years of AMAC membership for just thirty
five dollars. It's an incredible opportunity to stay informed with
their magazine access, exclusive discounts, free resources, and most importantly,
(16:30):
stand with millions of other Americans who believe in protecting
this nation's future. So go to AMAC dot us slash
just news right now and join this July give America
the gift of more patriots standing up for her.
Speaker 5 (16:51):
Welcome back, everybody.
Speaker 3 (16:52):
As you heard before the break, and as we've been
discussing all of the show so far, it looks like
the deep state might finally get a little bit of
a dose of accountability. Anyone else deserving of it in Washington.
Well maybe Fed Chair Jerome Powell. President Trump certainly thinks so,
and joining us now to speak on both of those topics,
he represents the great state of Arizona. Congressman a Poma Day, Congressman,
thanks so much for being here.
Speaker 6 (17:14):
Good to be with you, sir.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
A grand conspiracy that spans gosh, I mean, for all
of us who have been in politics a decade ago,
it seems like ages ago with the Hillary Clinton email probe,
we all remember watching on that fateful day, was it
the day before fourth of July or after the fourth
of July with James Yeah, James Comey said no, no, no, no,
We're not going to do anything, and spanning basically all
the way up to present day. Maybe I'm Blackfield a little,
(17:39):
but you know all.
Speaker 5 (17:39):
Of the inner workings of Washington.
Speaker 3 (17:41):
Do you think that we could finally see some accountability
at this point?
Speaker 7 (17:46):
Well, if you remember that infamous meeting on the tarmac actually
happened in Phoenix, Arizona, with the tragedy, General Yeah and Bill.
Speaker 6 (17:54):
Clinton, and so hopefully there's accountability.
Speaker 7 (17:57):
It seems like the Republicans are motivated right now to
actually bring accountability because we have the levers of power
and just the sheer number of documents that are being
uncovered so far. It seems like the American people have
woken up a lot to what the fake news media
has been spewing for the past ten years. And we
have to have justice because so many people in this movement,
they supported President Trump back in twenty sixteen on that
(18:19):
idea of holding the powerful accountable, and it seems like
Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton and so many of these
Democrats constantly get away with it. And what we have now,
with a strong FBI director and with President Trump at
the helm, it seems like there's going to be finally
justice coming.
Speaker 1 (18:34):
Yeah. So important.
Speaker 2 (18:35):
I want to get that incredible letter you wrote today
calling for the FED chairman to resign before we do.
Just want to ask quickly, one idea that's out there
now is to move this to a special prosecutor, perhaps
the venue of Florida where the mar lag will rate
and other things occurred. Do you like the idea of
a special prosecutor giving how expansive this potential conspiracy case
could be.
Speaker 7 (18:56):
Well, I haven't read through it to see whether a
special prosecutors wore it or not. You know, I have
full confidence in the Trump Department of Justice, so I
have to assess it more fully and whether to see
it's going to be beneficial. And I don't want to
spend more resources on something if there's not going.
Speaker 6 (19:11):
To be actual results being done on it.
Speaker 7 (19:13):
So I know I have confidence in Cash Fattel and
Trump's DOJ, but I have to first figure out what
the the special prosecutor would entail and what their actual
scope would be. But obviously making sure that we have
accountability is important, But whether what mechanism to do that
is something that I'm going to be working on Congress.
Speaker 3 (19:35):
When I want to move to the FED issue. You know,
President Trump's economy this time around, it seems to be
coming back on a lot of different metrics, but it
seems like he blames the decisions made by the FED,
notably Jerome Powell, for any type of drawing down on
that anything that's possibly holding it back. Do you agree,
and do you think that Jerome Powell is feeling the
(19:55):
heat and therefore might step down.
Speaker 7 (19:59):
You should feel the heat because for too long I've
been talking to so many Arizonas and so many young
people that can no longer afford a home. It's actually
so sad what's happening. If you see the average age
of a first time homeowner at a skyrocket, it's over
forty years old. And something that President Trump actually just proposed,
i believe yesterday, which was eliminating capital gains that would
(20:19):
help spur up the economy. And what Jerome Powell is
doing with the bes chairman of the Federal Reserve by
not lowering interest rates, has been a huge hindrance on
home ownership. And it seems that Jerome Powell's actions he's
looking at the tariff policy, he thought it was gonna
have a negative impact, but instead what we saw just
last month in June, we saw that the Treasury Department
(20:40):
actually had a revenue increase of twenty seven billion dollars
due to President Trump's successful tariff strategy. And I think
that's what's so important for Americans to realize President Trump
has a strategy and everything he's doing is a successful
business manage in president before he knows the psychology of
the leaders of these countries. And what we have is
a Federal Reserve chairman is in charge of monetary and
(21:00):
he's effectively curtailing the successes of bringing in this Golden
Age era that President Trump wants to usher in. And
on top of that, you have the Jerome Powell just
a few weeks ago talk about the renovations that the
Federal Reserve building two point five billion dollars seven hundred
million dollars over budget for a building here in Capital,
(21:21):
in the steps of the Capital right across the National Mall.
It is despicable to see the gross mismanagement of funds
that the Federal Reserve chairman has been doing. So I
believe I think he can be fired for cause at
this point. So I think President Trump has the ability
and the scope of powers to actually fire Jerome Powell.
I'm calling for him to resign before his May twenty
twenty six period is up.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
Yeah, reading your letter and lit'sten you talk. One of
the things that is really become apparent a lot of
the economists I talked to in Washington is that the
FED is actually afraid of growth, like they try to
suppress it and tap it so it doesn't get too large.
We're at a moment where this economy could burst out,
and the FED just seems afraid to let that happen.
What's the mindset that leaves the Federal Reserve afraid to
(22:04):
let this economy reach its full potential.
Speaker 6 (22:08):
I think they're not used to innovative type of thinking.
Speaker 7 (22:10):
So for too long, the monetary policy the Federal Reserve
has been trying to manage a broken system. And unfortunately,
right now you have Jerome Powell who's actively getting in
the way of that.
Speaker 6 (22:19):
President Trump is bringing.
Speaker 7 (22:20):
Such novel new ideas into trying to bring back prosperity
to our country by having I mean, if you look
at the amount of trillions of dollars coming into the
United States of foreign direct investments, this is something that's
unheard of in past administrations.
Speaker 6 (22:34):
In Arizona, here we have TSMC.
Speaker 7 (22:37):
The largest semiconductor microchip manufacturing in the world, coming there.
They're spending over over one hundred and fifty billion dollars,
So there's a lot of money being poured into the system.
And unfortunately, what we have is a Federal Reserve chairman
with Jerome Powell who's not able to respond appropriately.
Speaker 6 (22:52):
So it seems like he's playing political games, to be.
Speaker 7 (22:55):
Honest with you, and I think that's that's the biggest
worry that I have, and that's why I called for
his resignation, and talking to some of my colleagues on
Capitol Hill, there's a huge movement in a push right now,
not just in the House, but also in the Senate
to hopefully push to Rome Powell out because if he
continues to stay as the chairman without lowering interest rates,
having a devastating toll on the economy. We need to
(23:16):
make sure that we are keeping pace with President Trump
because President Trump is moving at lightning speed and we
need to have a federal reserve to be able to
catch up with them.
Speaker 5 (23:23):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (23:24):
Good point, Karsman.
Speaker 3 (23:25):
I have no doubt that you have thought many steps ahead.
So if he does step down, if he is fired
for cause. You know, President Trump has a lot of
economic outside the box thinkers in his administration, Scott Besset,
Peter Navarro, Kevin hass that a lot of folks who.
Speaker 5 (23:39):
Subscribe to him.
Speaker 3 (23:40):
We're unconventional way of managing and growing an economy.
Speaker 5 (23:43):
Do you have a pick.
Speaker 7 (23:45):
I don't have a particular pick, but I know Scott
Descent is doing an amazing job as Secretary of the Treasury,
and honestly, his whole, his whole economic Prosperity team is
doing a good job. So I know President Trump this
is this is kind of the one point that I
know President Trump knows all so well. He will choose
the right person for the right job for the Federal Reserve.
But I think President Trump is no stranger to choosing
(24:06):
someone to have multiple hats. You see Secretary Rubio as
Secretary of State also National Security Advisor, plus I think he's.
Speaker 6 (24:12):
The Archive is too.
Speaker 7 (24:14):
So President is making sure he's putting all these people
to work. And so whoever he chooses, whether it's in
the administration or coming from outside the administration, it's important
to know that they have.
Speaker 6 (24:24):
The ideas this new way of thinking.
Speaker 7 (24:27):
Because the Federal Reserve for so long has been operating
completely in a vacuum. I know it's independent, but we're
entering this new era with crypto, with so much of
this financial institution's happening here in the United States, where
we're entering a new era. We need to make sure
we have a Federal Reserve chairman who understands this moment
that we are entering. And so whether it comes from
the outside or in the inside of administration, I know
(24:48):
President Trump's going to have a great selection because he
wants to run Powell out.
Speaker 6 (24:54):
I know he says he's too late, and you know
he was trying to give him time.
Speaker 7 (24:57):
By the way, Johnny me calling for his resignation, this
isn't the spur of the moment.
Speaker 6 (25:01):
Then we gave him an opportunity.
Speaker 7 (25:03):
Now it's six seven months into President Trump's second term
here and unfortunately, what we see now with the Chairman
is he seems to be stifling growth and the growth
that we desperately need as Americans.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
So important, sir, before we let you go.
Speaker 2 (25:16):
Today's Supreme Court strengthened Donald Trump's hand and shrinking government,
getting wasteful spending under control, clearing the way for the
dismantling of the Education Department, to shrink it down. The
second or third or fourth big consecutive ruling that gives
the president the power to reshape government.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
Your thoughts on that today, what it might do for
the budget a few years now?
Speaker 7 (25:37):
Yeah, absolutely, Well, we know the Department of Education has
been a complete disaster since it's founding fifty some odd
years ago.
Speaker 6 (25:44):
So shrinking the.
Speaker 7 (25:45):
Size of the Department of Education, eventually dismantling has been
always the goal for basically every single Republican president, at
least on the campaign trail, then once they get in office,
they haven't been able to achieve that. President Trump with
Secretary McMahon, they've been doing a spectacular job fighting in
the courts and luckily the Supreme Court has a wild
in favor, not just on this, on so many other
ones as well. So it seems like we have the
(26:06):
momentum on our side, and I want people to understand
that this is not going to hinder education. It's actually
going to unleash our education standards because for so long
we've been seeing that these states, they've had a collapsing
math scores, collapsing English scores, collapsing arithmetic sturce.
Speaker 6 (26:21):
So it's it's quite pathetic that one of the strongest,
most most powerful.
Speaker 7 (26:24):
Countries in the world is doing abysmal in terms of education.
So we need to make sure that the states are
given the power and ability and the grant funding.
Speaker 6 (26:32):
To be able to actually educate the students that they know.
Speaker 7 (26:34):
Best through direct access with the school boards.
Speaker 3 (26:37):
Huge spot on as always, Congress today, hommide from the
great state of Arizona, Thank you so much for being
here with us.
Speaker 6 (26:43):
Sir, thank you a mandon, Thank you John.
Speaker 5 (26:46):
Absolutely all right, everybody.
Speaker 3 (26:47):
Plenty more on government accountability coming up after these messages.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
Hey, folks, if you're a homeowner like me, need to
listen to this.
Speaker 2 (27:01):
In today's AI and CyberWorld, scammers are stealing home titles
and your equity is their target.
Speaker 1 (27:07):
Here's how it works.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
Criminals forge your signature on one document, use a fake
notary stamp, pay a small fee with your county in boom.
Just like that, your home title has been transferred out
of your name. And that's where the problems begin because
they start taking out loans using your equity and even
sell your profity. And you're not even going to find
out what's happened until you get a collection or foreclosure
notice months later. That's a nightmare, right, So when's the
(27:28):
last time you checked on your home title?
Speaker 1 (27:30):
If you like me, the answer is never, right. You
need to do something about that right now.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
That's why I've partnered with home Title Lock so you
can find out today.
Speaker 1 (27:37):
If you're already a victim, use my promo.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
Code JTN at hometitlelock dot com and you'll get a
free title history report and a free trial of their
million dollar triple lock protection. That's twenty four to seven
monitoring of your title, urgent alerts to any changes that
might happen, and if fraud does happen, they'll spend up
to a million.
Speaker 1 (27:54):
Bucks to fix it. That's a good deal.
Speaker 2 (27:56):
Find out why I trust Home title Lock. Go to
home title lock dot com and use the promo code JTN.
That's home downa Locke dot Com promo code JTN.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
Welcome back in America.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
You know this next guest for the extraordinary role he
played in creating the Empower Oversight Whistleblower Center, the center
that gave us the irs whistleblowers, the FBI whistleblowers.
Speaker 1 (28:23):
But in an earlier life, I knew.
Speaker 2 (28:25):
Jason Foster as the Chief Investigative councilors Senate Judiciary Committee,
and it was there that he discovered the classified annex
at the Inspector General the Justice Department had written about
the Hillary Clinton email scandal. It is now at the
heart of this conspiracy investigation the FBI is looking at.
We're very lucky to be joined by Jason today. Jason,
good to have you back on the show.
Speaker 6 (28:45):
Hey, thanks for having me.
Speaker 8 (28:46):
John.
Speaker 1 (28:46):
All right, so you're.
Speaker 2 (28:47):
A Senior the Senior Investigative Council of as Senate Judiciary.
You're working for Chuck Grassley, and you find out there
is this classified annex that suggests that there was intelligence
that came in about Hillary Clinton and Loretta Lynch and
the FBI never investigated out it. And tell us what
you thought when you first heard about it.
Speaker 9 (29:07):
Well, so this was in late summer, early fall of
twenty eighteen. It was right toward the end of my
time with Cinder Grassley's office. And of course, you know,
there were all the public hearings when the Inspector General's
report came out on the whole Hillary Clinton email mess
and a couple of weeks after those public hearings, you know,
there was this classified annex that came up to Capitol Hill.
(29:29):
And of course I can't talk about what's in it.
I posted on AX about it a little earlier today,
not about the substance or the content, but sort of
about the procedure of what happened when that came in
and trying to help people understand the process of what
happened with getting the senators briefed up on it. So
after Michael Horowitz had testified before the various committees in
(29:50):
the House and Senate about that big, you know, high
profile report. We dug into the classified ANNX and the
law Enforcement sensitive ANX, and we asked him to come
up and do a briefing, and we set up a
bipartisan briefing with various senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee,
folks on both sides, and what what I posted earlier
(30:11):
today was just about the what a remarkable experience that
was is one of the most memorable things in all
of my twenty two years on Capitol Hill. You know,
we had very prominent Democrat and Republican senators come in
and the Inspector General, Michael Horwitz, came in and he
briefed them on the contents of that classified annex and
(30:33):
there was universal agreement in the room of a sort
that I really hadn't seen before across.
Speaker 6 (30:41):
The aisle that you know, hey, we don't understand.
Speaker 9 (30:44):
Why the FBI didn't investigate this information further, and it
absolutely needs to be investigated further. You know, it was
maybe I'm naive, but you know, nothing ever happened. You know,
as far as I know, there wasn't a lot of
follow up after that briefing. But you know, I was
pleasantly surprised that the Democrats in the room were, you know,
(31:04):
recognize the seriousness of the issue and recognized that it
needed to have some further follow up and investigation.
Speaker 6 (31:10):
And I sort of sat and.
Speaker 9 (31:11):
Watched there, you know, as they heard from the Inspector
General about why he couldn't because it involved other intelligence
agencies that were outside of his jurisdiction, and you know,
a full review wouldn't be possible, and it was sort
of tangentially related to his main work in the in
the email investigation, and so I suggested, you know, well,
(31:33):
why don't you do a joint project and investigate it
with the Inspector General of the intelligence community because he
would have jurisdiction over all of it.
Speaker 6 (31:43):
You guys could get to all the witnesses you need to.
Speaker 9 (31:44):
And it seems like the senators here want to know
a lot more about what happened here. There's universal bipartisan
agreement that we need to know more. And the senators
in the room agreed with me, and and you know,
but I left shortly after that. I left Capitol Hill
for the private sector for a while before starting in
(32:05):
Power oversight and you know, so I'm sort of not
privy to anything that happened after that in terms of
any follow up that might you know, I see news
reporting about my former boss, Senator Grassley has been pressing
to get this thing declassified and has been pressing for
answers from from the FBI. But you know, one of
the things I did before I left is I tried
(32:26):
to get a meeting. I tried to get a briefing
from the FBI to answer, you know, hey, here's here's
what the OIG says, you guys did not look into
Why didn't you look into it? And I wasn't able
to get that, you know, before I left, So I
don't I'm sure that there's been briefings to my former office,
to my former boss, but I'm not privy to them.
Speaker 5 (32:47):
I'm Jason. So twenty eighteen, so that was.
Speaker 3 (32:49):
That was a few years into what President Trump would
referred to as Trump de arrangement syndrome. Fast forward seven
years to where we are now. If if you were
if you were serving as lead investigator for a House
or a Senate committee, and you brought a bipartisan group
of people together and showed them the same type of
egregious evidence that one party was protected another party was targeted.
(33:13):
Do you think you would get the same reaction now.
Speaker 6 (33:16):
I don't know.
Speaker 9 (33:17):
I mean I was surprised because it was you know,
they weren't doing it for the cameras, they weren't doing
it for show, right, it was a private meeting.
Speaker 6 (33:25):
They seemed to genuinely be concerned on both sides of
the aisle.
Speaker 9 (33:28):
And you know, again maybe I'm naive and thinking that
maybe they were just saying what they thought was a
good look for the Inspector General to hear them say.
And you know, as far as I know, there hasn't
been any actual subjet to follow up after that other
than Center Grassy's efforts that have been publicly reported.
Speaker 6 (33:43):
But you know, I don't know. Things were getting pretty.
Speaker 9 (33:48):
Bad in terms of partisanship before I left, and they
seemed to have only gotten worse. So you know, maybe
maybe they wouldn't have the same sort of honest reaction
that they did.
Speaker 2 (34:00):
Ask a little bit about the pattern that's at the
heart of what Cash Hotel does. So we've confirmed the
Cash Ptel is looking at the last ten years as
sort of an ongoing conspiracy to protect Democrats who might
have engaged in wrongdt Hillary Clinton, Hunter Biden, Joe Biden,
and then foist on to Republicans' investigations that might not
be warranted, such as what happened to Mike Flynn or
Carter Page or Donald Trump, that sort of washer in
(34:24):
three peat cycle. When you look at it as a lawyer,
can you see the possibility of grandeur looking at and saying,
I might see a conspiracy here.
Speaker 9 (34:33):
Well, sure, I mean, you know you'd have to gather
the evidence and make the case, But I mean I'll
make an analogy to this classified annex to something else
that people may be familiar with, which is the ten
twenty three the Biden bribe allegations that Senator Grassley got
from an FBI whistleblower in put out because it's a
(34:53):
similar there is a similar pattern there. When there's something
that looks like that, most people would look at and say, wow,
if this has any credibility at all, it really needs
to be investigated to the hilt, and we need to
figure out we need to get to the bottom of this.
If if the way the bias creeps in is you
just don't look into the things that you think where
(35:16):
you don't want to know the answers, right, And so,
like with the Biden bribe allegations, they buried it for
years and years.
Speaker 6 (35:22):
Hit it from our irs.
Speaker 9 (35:23):
Was a blower clients who were doing the Hunter Biden
and investigation on the tax issues, even though it was
absolutely relevant to their investigation, but the FBI and DJ hid.
Speaker 6 (35:31):
It from them for years.
Speaker 9 (35:33):
And so I think this other you know, this this
classified annex on the Clinton email investigation is a similar
sort of thing. There's information there that objectively, anybody looking
at it fairly would say, wow, we really need to
look into that. But because I think some people were
scared of what they might find if they did look
into it further, you know, there was a see no
(35:55):
evil here, no evil attitude, Whereas, on the other hand,
you contrast that with how they dealt with the Steele dossier, which,
as soon as that was public, a lot of people
just reading it, anybody, any sophisticated person reading it at
the time, you know, could see that it was likely
to be bunk.
Speaker 6 (36:12):
It was sort of crazy.
Speaker 9 (36:14):
And yet that was the center of you know, a
three year hysteria and had to be you know, investigated
for years and years millions of dollars spent by Mueller,
you know, hundreds and hundreds of grand jury witnesses and
subpoenas and millions of dollars, and you know, it's just
that's that's where the you know, you see the disparate treatment,
(36:35):
and you see that it it's on one side. If
they think the ox is going to be going on
one side, then they're not interested. But if they think
it's going to go after the other side, then they're
really really interested.
Speaker 3 (36:45):
Jason, before we let you go, I want to ask
you courage is not exactly contagious among government workers, but
there were a number of courageous people. Gary Schappler, Joseph Siegler,
I want to ask you about the state of the
case is for the IRS whistleblowers and the FBI whistleblowers.
Speaker 9 (37:00):
Yeah, well, we've actually seen some cracks in the ice
on our FBI whistleblower clients, you know, on our IRS clients.
You know, the Treasury Secretary brought them in, gave them
promotions in an unprecedented way, and so there's already been
some measure of justice for them. But our FBI whistleblowers
are still many of them are still suspended without paying
definitely and have lost their security clearances. We are, however,
(37:26):
and in fact, earlier today I had a conversation, we
had a meeting with the FBI, had a conversation with them,
and we are in active settlement talks. UH and the
the ice seems to be breaking a little bit. I
can't get into the details of that, obviously, but there
there are rays of hope on the horizon that we
(37:46):
might get some resolution.
Speaker 1 (37:48):
We have.
Speaker 6 (37:48):
We have ten clients, the.
Speaker 9 (37:50):
Only some of whom are public right and that we're
trying to get some justice for. And I wrote to
the FBI about them last March, and we're finally mean
to get a little bit of traction on those.
Speaker 1 (38:02):
That's great, important for the future. Whistle Bland.
Speaker 2 (38:04):
That's great, Jason, you do such amazing work, whether it's
discovering the class of iteamics and getting those centers of
the room or protecting whistleblowers for very important revelations.
Speaker 1 (38:12):
Great iron to having a show tonight, my friend. Thanks
so much. All right, folks, you can to take a
quick commercial break. When me come back.
Speaker 2 (38:17):
One of my favorite medical experts, doctor Pete mccoua, will
be here We're going to discuss all the things that
are going on, including Pam Bondie's decision last week to
drop charges against the doctor who was against the COVID vaccine.
We have all that right a for these messages.
Speaker 5 (38:38):
Welcome back to just the News and no noise. If
you can't tell.
Speaker 3 (38:41):
There has been a theme to the show tonight and
it is government accountability.
Speaker 5 (38:44):
But what about when it comes to COVID.
Speaker 3 (38:46):
We now know more about the extent to which the
Biden administration used an auto pen to sign pardons, for.
Speaker 5 (38:51):
Example doctor Fauci's.
Speaker 3 (38:53):
And we also now know that Attorney General Pambondi has
taken at least one step to right the wrongs done
during the pandemic dropping chart against doctor Kirkmore, who says
he was wrongfully prosecuted for upholding medical ethics ethics around
the vaccine mandates. So joining us now to talk about
all of that. He is world renowned doctor and chief
scientific officer at the Wellness Company. He's also the author
(39:13):
of his new book Vaccines Mythology, Ideology and Reality.
Speaker 5 (39:18):
Doctor Peter McCullough.
Speaker 3 (39:19):
Doctor McCullough, thanks so much for being here.
Speaker 1 (39:21):
Thank you.
Speaker 3 (39:22):
Let's dive straight into that book, because there's a lot
of information swirling about around vaccines, especially for my generation.
The COVID vaccine was what broke the dam when it
came to just being skeptical about vaccines. Tell us about
your book, boy.
Speaker 10 (39:37):
If you were around, you know, in the early nineteenth
century or even earlyer twentieth centuries and the issue of
the day was smallpox or pertessis or polio, you would
have found characters very similar to Anthony Fauci, including Edward
Jenner and Louis Pastor. Our research showed that in fact,
(40:00):
vaccines for the longest time have had a hubris about them,
lots of money, lots of fear campaigns, coercion, and sadly
vaccines not living up to you know, what they've been
sold to populations. You've got to get a copy of
the book that really is in a sense of mythology
(40:22):
and a vaccine religion that doctors and others now have
followed is irrational and explained so much of what we've
seen with COVID nineteen vaccines.
Speaker 1 (40:31):
Yeah, no doubt, that's going to be a mess read.
Speaker 2 (40:33):
So I want to turn on say on abject for
a second, because last week the federal government approved for
some children people have vulnerabilities to continue getting the COVID vaccine,
young people, particularly at risk of the heart inflammation that
they've now acknowledged existed during the entire COVID vaccination program.
Your thoughts on that recommendation did you concern you?
Speaker 8 (40:54):
It's reckless? You know, I'm a cardiologist. Let me tell you.
Speaker 10 (40:57):
Let's say a child with Down syndrome who has conjoint
all heart disease. This is the last thing you'd want
that child to take a vaccine that causes heart damage.
If a heart has already weakened or has already had surgery,
it's far more likely to have consequences of the micarditis,
including heart fire or cardiac arrest. The FDA just rubber
stamped these through. They promised there was going to be
(41:19):
large prospective clinical trials. None of that was done, and
now America is furious at this most recent approval.
Speaker 3 (41:27):
All right, let's stay on that for a moment. Because
doctor Kirkmore, the case against him has been dropped.
Speaker 5 (41:31):
This is a doctor who you know, in line.
Speaker 3 (41:33):
With his medical ethics felt you know, I think he
did some disposing of vaccines and maybe injected saline and
said case dropped. Is this a step in the right
direction towards towards medical freedom.
Speaker 8 (41:46):
It's the justice that we all wanted to see.
Speaker 10 (41:48):
In great credit to Marjorie Taylor Green and Tom Massey,
Shannon Joy, actually all the health freedom heroes that really
got on the scene. There what we learned as this
doctor gave patients the choice they had informed consent, and yeah,
he disposed of some vaccines. Do you know the United
States government has dumped millions of doses down the.
Speaker 8 (42:11):
Drain because people don't want these vaccines.
Speaker 1 (42:14):
Yeah, so remarkable.
Speaker 2 (42:17):
As you look out now and you see with the
story in the New York Times this weekend about Joe
Biden using the auto pen for doctor Fauci's investigation or
for his pardon, and now you've got to center Rampaul
wants to resubmit now based on that evidence, the criminal
referral on doctor Fauci. Do you think that Fauci's tenure
and his actual decision making we'll get another look at
(42:37):
the Justice Department or has that water already passed the bridge?
Speaker 10 (42:42):
Now we need the referral, a special prosecutor assigned.
Speaker 8 (42:46):
And it looks like now that.
Speaker 10 (42:47):
Fauci probably approached Biden in this neurologically compromised state and
asked for this ten year pardon because Fauci knew he
committed crimes of fraud, that is, he deceived the country
on multiple levels, and his work suppression of treatment and
pushing the vaccines resulted in mass negligent homicide.
Speaker 3 (43:09):
Jarring, before we let you go, I am still hearing
about measles cases. Are we getting to a concerning number yet?
Should we be frightened?
Speaker 6 (43:18):
Worldwide?
Speaker 10 (43:19):
You know, some years there's six hundred thousand measles cases.
Last year in Europe it was over two hundred thousand cases.
So if we're at twelve hundred in the United States,
not concerned at all. There's always going to be some
cases of measles, and they occur in both those who've
taken the vaccines and those who are unvaccinated. What people
need to do is understand how to treat measles using
(43:42):
all the techniques.
Speaker 8 (43:43):
That we have, and stop worrying about this.
Speaker 10 (43:46):
You know, worldwide, six hundred thousand cases, and we're making
a big deal of twelve hundred the United States.
Speaker 3 (43:52):
Good point, Doctor Peter mccallaugh, always bringing the reality like
it says in your book title, world renowned doctor and
chief scientific officer over at the Wellness Company. Thanks so
much for joining us tonight and to our audience, and
thank you to all of you. You could go to
TWC dot health slash just news today and use the
code just news to save ten percent on any order
from the Wellness Company. That is tw dot health slash
(44:15):
just news and use promo code just news to save
ten percent.
Speaker 5 (44:18):
All right, some final thoughts on the other side of
this break. Welcome back everybody.
Speaker 3 (44:32):
It is our final segment of the night and John,
we've got a lot of epscene topics in the rundown
and you know, just looking at the chatter online over
the weekend, people are still very very inflamed and enraged
over this, and we'll see what happens.
Speaker 1 (44:48):
But just a little bit ago, it just happened a
few minutes ago.
Speaker 2 (44:52):
Pam Bondi responded to Justll Maxwell's appeal, saying the Supreme
Court should not take out this case, that the sentences
worthy of her crime and not to waste time in
the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1 (45:03):
That's an interesting twist.
Speaker 2 (45:05):
It's not going to solve the problem, which is that
we haven't been transparent that we the American people, haven't
been given a transparent accounting what document exists. What if
you released not wage your lease, the trust us don't
work it. You've got to give us a list of
the documents, create a vawn index. Let us see that.
And there's another place that we don't talk about very
often in that is the grand jury. FBI would not
(45:28):
have those documents, but Pam Bondi, the DJ would know
what the Southern District of New York was gathered by
grand jury.
Speaker 1 (45:34):
They should unseal those and let the American people see that.
Speaker 5 (45:37):
Welcome on Max. Seems like she's ready to talk anyway.
Speaker 1 (45:40):
Yeah, yeah, I mean is she credible? I don't know.
Speaker 2 (45:42):
She obviously enabled us pretty significant child prostitution scheme. But
whatever the case. You know who is credible is people
like the lawyers. They can tell us a lot too.
We're trying to get the lawyers to come on the show.
There's new things to be learned, and we're not going
to stop trying to get those documents here.
Speaker 5 (46:00):
Yeah, the drum beat will roll on.
Speaker 3 (46:02):
And President Trump's own daughter in law, Laura Trump, seems
to think that this is not the end for the
Trump administration, despite what is being outwardly said at this point.
Speaker 1 (46:09):
Yeah, no, listen, this is a temporary blip. I listened.
Speaker 2 (46:12):
I saw more chatter today about focusing on this conspiracy
case and what it may mean for accountability that people
wanted than the Epstein files. But listen, the Epstein files
was a self made crisis by Pam Bondi, and she
has to find a way.
Speaker 1 (46:26):
To get out of it.
Speaker 2 (46:26):
I think the fastest way is just be transparent. Here's
what we have, here's what we release, Here's what we're
not releasing, why we're not releasing him. Here's what the
grand jury had, Here's what the state had, and here's
what the CIA had. Because the CIA has a file
on Epstein. I don't think it's significant, but get it
all out there. I think President Trump would approve any
release if they just got it done.
Speaker 5 (46:45):
I absolutely think you would too.
Speaker 3 (46:46):
All Right, let's switch gears to the economy. Someone who
I have a tremendous amount of respect where Kevin has
to be is I think he is one of the
best educators and messengers for President Trump's economic policy. Says
that tariffs will raise three trillion dollars in revenue over
the next decade. That is not nothing.
Speaker 2 (47:02):
That's three to four hundred thousand dollars four for three
to four hundred million dollars a year. That brings the
deficit down. So Trump's counts will get it down to
one seven, one eight. Now you're down to one five,
one four. And with these decisions by the Supreme Court,
the true decisions are Trump's authority not to have to
go to Congress and cut jobs as he sees fit,
as long as he certifies that what he's doing is
(47:24):
what Congress wants. I think you could see a one
of the leaner in the out years of the Trump
presidency twenty seven to twenty eight, and then the first
year he heads off to a new president. I think
you can see deficits below a trillion dollars, which is
something we haven't seen in the last fifteen years.
Speaker 1 (47:37):
So it's a big deal.
Speaker 3 (47:38):
Yeah, the decisions are very interesting. Way to just claw
back that way for the American people.
Speaker 1 (47:43):
It's easy.
Speaker 3 (47:44):
Speaking of tariff of a new president's Trump has thround
one hundred percent terriff in Russia. If they don't reach
a deal in fifty days.
Speaker 5 (47:50):
Do you think that Putin's paying attention.
Speaker 1 (47:52):
This will make a pay attention.
Speaker 2 (47:54):
And if the sanctions that the president's talking about include
sanctioning the russ from the central bank, it will paralyze
the Russian economy. We've always talked about that as a
nuclear option. But if you almost everything in Russia has
to go to the Russian Central Bank in order to
act it because of the way the legacy from their
communists era, you sanks in that bank. You have crippled Russia.
(48:15):
You're creating breadlines that will have Putin's attention. And it's
a reminder your president Trump tried. It was very friendly
to bet In at the beginning, but when Putin didn't engage,
Donald Trump could be on the bad side of this
deal will be really tough and Russia could be paid
to your price. I suspect China and Russia are talking
right now because you know China, if these sanctions occur,
China can't do business again. It's oil for Russia. That's
(48:38):
a problem for China. So my guess is there more
than one country in the back of this talk.
Speaker 5 (48:42):
I think that's exactly right, all right.
Speaker 3 (48:43):
So an Ourranian group claims to have raised forty million
dollars in reward money to assassinate President Trump.
Speaker 5 (48:50):
We know they've had plots in the past, for sure.
Speaker 2 (48:52):
Some great work by the Foundations for Defensive Democracy and
Memory Middle East Research Council.
Speaker 1 (48:59):
This is really serving.
Speaker 2 (49:01):
It's not surprising because we know that Iran tried to
last year since i'one that killed Trump.
Speaker 1 (49:07):
But the fact that it's so over.
Speaker 2 (49:09):
And it has been barely condemned except for these two things.
Thanks we brought it to our attention. I just say
something about Trump duringingelmn syndrome, which maybe a global phenomenon,
not just an American phenomenon.
Speaker 3 (49:20):
Indeed, indeed, all right, let's squeeze in one more. Andrew
Kola was going to stay in the race. He's gonna
run as a third party.
Speaker 5 (49:25):
Candidate to try to challenge Momboni Tom Donny.
Speaker 1 (49:28):
Yeah, he splits the independent vote.
Speaker 2 (49:30):
I mean, if there's any chance of knocking mom Donnie,
if you got to hit the other side down.
Speaker 5 (49:34):
To one kid Albanize everybody.
Speaker 1 (49:35):
Eric Adams is at Andrew com mobile seat.
Speaker 5 (49:37):
Yeah all right, everybody. That is all the time that
we have for you tonight. We have a fairy pack
show for you tomorrow night.
Speaker 3 (49:43):
Already, so make sure you tune in right here at
six pm Eastern, everybody, head over to justinews dot com again.
Check out John's incredible article all of the reporting that
he has done about this ten year overarching conspiracy. Go
check it out, grit Sincefield is going to take you
to the next hour, and then we'll be back here
tomorrow
Cad Evening America. Happy Monday.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Welcome to the latest and very busy edition of Justin
News No Noise. You've got a lot of losing for
you tonight. I'm your host, John Solomon, reporting to Zoeis
from the Nation's Capital and the Wiredfishcoffee dot Com studios.
Wire to Fish Coffee. You know this is the official
coffee of Justin's. It's my favorite coffee. I just had
a cup before it came on set. You can go
right now to Wired to Fishcoffee dot Com. That's Wired
the number two Fishcoffee dot Com. Get a fantastic ten
(00:44):
percent discount on all of their great plans and the
Justin News timber go check that out.
Speaker 1 (00:48):
All I gotta do is use the promo code just
News at checkout. All Right.
Speaker 2 (00:52):
The theme of tonight show is accountability, and we are starting
to get some. Recently, our new reporting up at justinews
dot Com says that the FBI has opened what they
are calling a Grand Conspiracy probe on the weaponization of
government and the Department of Justice, dealing with everything from
the Russian collusion hoax back in twenty sixteen right up
to Jacksmith's antics nearly a decade later, it will be
(01:14):
investigated as a possible ongoing criminal conspiracy.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
A lot of things happen with that. Now.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
The investigation was opened several weeks ago by FBI Director
Cash Betel, and now it might get a bit time
boost from President Trump. They need him to classify tranches
of evidence that could signal how the twenty sixteen Russian
collusion conspiracy started.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
We're going to try to see if can get President
Trump on the show tomorrow night. We'll keep you posting up.
Speaker 2 (01:36):
Now, remember Hillary Clinton's classified email server. That's what the
first piece of evidence is related to a classified annex
and the Inspector General's probe of the Clinton email server. Now,
apparently that annex is said to show some wrongdoing was done,
but it was ignored by the FBI didn't.
Speaker 1 (01:51):
Look at it.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
We'll have a guest on later in the show that
can help us understand what that's all about. Second tranche
of evidence also deals with Hillary Clinton, and it was
identified before were russiagates special account John Durham. It was
placed in a classified annex aucile. It was dubbed in
Durham's report that Clinton plan intelligence. So the central question
is twofold. What did the government know about how Russia
Gate started and when did they know it? Because if
(02:14):
they knew, it was incredible that Hillary Clinton was behind
it and it was just a dirty trick, and they
started to investigate it. Anyways, it's going to be a
big proba, big part of that conspiracy. The ball is
now in Attorney General Pambondies court. She can decide to
appoint a special prosecutor on this, and if she does
and treats it like an ongoing conspiracy, the statute of
limitation for old crimes goes away, and she can panel
(02:35):
grand jury to place like Florida, not District of Columbia.
Why because Jack Smith rated President Trump's Marlago home in Florida.
Speaker 1 (02:41):
So that'll be a big advantage for the prosecution.
Speaker 2 (02:43):
We'll keep you up to date on all of that
at justinnews dot com on these breaking topics and talking
about all of it in a few minutes with Senator
Ron Johnson, our first guest. Now, a quick note on
a story I first mentioned right here off Friday night,
when I revealed FBI Deputy Director Dan Bodg, you know,
taking a few days off to cont plate whether he
might want to quit after Jeffrey Epstein documents feud with
(03:03):
the Attorney General. Pampond I predicted Friday coolere it's might
prevail with the time off. In just a little while ago,
I confirmed that Oppen Banjina return to work. He's got
no plans to leave all right. Time to bring in
my amazing ghost, Amanda had Amanda one of the headlines
you're watching for us.
Speaker 3 (03:17):
Today, LORDI, John, you covered a lot, but we do.
Let's talk about Ukraine, the other big story today, because
the President spoke a lot about it today with NATO
Secretary Mark Ruda, and it seems that President of Vladimir
Putin of Russia is not playing very nice with President Trump.
And the plan involves the United States sending more weapons
to Ukraine, but it won't be how the government typically
(03:38):
has done it before. Now the US will sell weapons
to other European nations and then these countries can and
will transfer them over to Ukraine. And he also has
a deadline for Russia. He is giving them fifty five
o days to reach an agreement to end the war
with Ukraine or he is set to impose what the
President calls severe tariffs on Russia at a rate of
one hundred percent severe in d And the President also
(04:01):
revealed that he felt he had a deal in place
with Putin about three or four times, but those deals
kept falling through. And we have more big Supreme Court
news for you again today, and this ruling will continue
to help President Trump shrink the size of government. The
Court ruled today to allow President Trump to fire hundreds
of employees over at the Department of Education. And they
had to issue that ruling because of a previous ruling
(04:23):
by a federal judge in Massachusetts who decided that those
laid off workers had to be reinstated. And it now
looks like President Trump's school of shutting down the Department
of Education could become a reality or ely shrinking it. John,
Thanks time we get to our first guest, because I
know he's got a lot to say about your story.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Big news, big news of the Supreme Court. President keeps
winning there and that government's going to keep shrinking as
a result of it.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
All Right, a little while ago.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
We had a chance to speak to the man who
found some of the very first Russia collusion evidency. But
those text messages between the love birds Pete Struck and
his lawyer friend. It was editor Rod Johns, right, Lisa Page.
Senator n Johnson spent some time with us. Listenbody had
to say joining us now, I'm man who's been at
the forefront of trying to finally get Americans out accountability,
(05:06):
whether it's in the medical community, the FBI, or in
the assassination of Secret Service records. He represents a great
state of Wisconsin. He's a chairman of the most powerful
investigative body in the Senate. He is Senator Ron Johnson, Senator.
Great to have you back on the show. Well, John,
Low Mantel, were doing well, we are, sir. I wanted
to ask you about this story we wrote about this morning.
(05:28):
The FBI a few weeks ago opened a grand conspiracy
probe looking at the entire last decade, from Hillary Clinton
being cleared to Jack Smith pursuing Donald Trump as one
ongoing conspiracy to hijack the powers of the government, weaponize
them against one side and protect the other side even
when they had criminal liability. Your thoughts on that approaching,
whether it leads itself to a special.
Speaker 4 (05:50):
Prosecutor, Well, John, I don't know what your thoughts are,
but you know, as much about this as I do,
and I felt these people are criminals for many years now.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
I mean, the fact that they knew.
Speaker 4 (06:01):
This was the whole Russian Gate was a conspiracy hatch
by the Clinton campaign back in twenty sixteen, the President
Bamba was briefed on that. I mean, they all knew
the fact that in Michael Horowitz's Inspector General report on
the PISI abuse that under a redacted footnote totally contradicted
(06:23):
what was in the.
Speaker 1 (06:23):
Body of the report.
Speaker 4 (06:24):
That the FBI knew that, for example, one of the
sources of the Steele dossier was somebody they were investigating
as a Russian spy. Again, they knew all these things,
so how they could move forward with the multi million
dollar Robert Moeller Special Council investigation. They put America through unbelievable,
really historic political turmoil, knowing that the entire narrative.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
Was completely false.
Speaker 4 (06:49):
So you follow that all the way through to the
fifty plus intelligence officials claiming that the Hunter Biden laptop
was had all the earmarks Russian information campaign, when they
had to know because the FBI had possession of that computer,
that know it was a real computer.
Speaker 1 (07:07):
Had real information on it.
Speaker 4 (07:09):
So again, when you've been at the heart of these
investigations like you and I have, again, I've just viewed
these people as criminal for years.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
Centator as as John laid out in his reporting, and
the left, the left protects their own and people like
Hillary Clinton at the inception of this possible conspiracy, operated
with impunity. It seems like, so the left is going
to fight back tooth and nail. What does that look
like in the face of multiple different venues, multiple different investigators,
multiple different possible crimes.
Speaker 5 (07:41):
How do they fight back, fight back against that?
Speaker 4 (07:44):
Well, again, I thought John Durham seemed to be a
pretty honorable investigator, but we're always told that, you know,
he's only going to indict if he believes he'd get conviction,
and his venue for invite digan would be DC. And
I think he realizes it impossible to get a conviction
against a Democrat politician when you've got ninety percent plus
(08:05):
of the DC jury pool, you know, pretty strongly Democrat supporters.
So you can convict somebody a Republican, you know, people
like the trumpministration officials, they actually.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
Went to jail, but you can't lay a hand on
a Democrat.
Speaker 4 (08:20):
So I've always suspected John Durham probably have the goods
to indict, but you just simply wouldn't do it because
he knew he couldn't convict in DC.
Speaker 1 (08:29):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
Well, one of the things being discussed in this plan
is to move this to Florida, where Jack Smith operated
for quite a few times and view that as part
of the conspiracy rating Borrow lago things like that. Does
a venue change potentially change the picture for prosecutors and
what they could potentially accomplish. And then also you mentioned
both Durham and Horowitz, two guys. There are classified aneces
(08:54):
to the reports that have been secret for eight years.
I know you would like to see them be classified
by President Trump.
Speaker 4 (08:59):
Get your thought in that as well, and you probably should.
I think I believe I've seen one of those annexes. Again,
When you see this stuff, it's like, what what do
you try and protect?
Speaker 1 (09:09):
I mean, they always say sources, the methods, and I
just roll my eyes at that.
Speaker 4 (09:14):
Anyway, I do believe I said this from the minute
I heard that they may be investing in this is
unless you have a change in venue, it probably isn't
making any sense to investigate kind kind of a John
Durham approach. If all you're going to do is investigate
and then this is DC's your venue, don't even waste
your time, except for the fact that I do believe
(09:36):
the first step in political accountability is exposure, and it
might be worth just exposing all of this. But as
I said earlier, we've known about this. I mean, this
has been exposed. It's been out in the public domain.
Of course, the corporate the legacy media doesn't report on it,
but we've known about the corruption of people like John
Brennan of James Comia, these other individuals, the corrupt actors,
(09:59):
Hillary Clint, these are corrupt, bad people that, unfortunately, because
they're radical left to the Democrats, they biledge to a pass.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
In the mainstream media.
Speaker 3 (10:12):
Senator, it does kind of feel like we are in
our revelatory era of a lot of things being uncovered
thanks to you and other folks on Capitol Hill.
Speaker 5 (10:20):
But with respect to Joe.
Speaker 3 (10:22):
Biden's mental state during his presidency, a lot of people
finally the feeling liberated to speak.
Speaker 5 (10:28):
Out and talk about it.
Speaker 3 (10:29):
In the latest is that Joe Biden in fact did
know about each of those pardons, whether they were signed
with autopen or not. Is that the threshold that a
president just knows about it?
Speaker 1 (10:39):
Well?
Speaker 4 (10:39):
Probably in case the autopen, it probably is. I mean,
if he says that he knew all about these things,
just direct as people to use the autopen, I think
that that issue probably goes away.
Speaker 1 (10:49):
What doesn't go away is what the.
Speaker 4 (10:52):
Cabinet officers, what's people around him knew, because many of
them swore notes of the Constitution to offended to uphold
it and part of the constitution twenty fifth Amendment. And
so we are diligently going about our investigation. First on
a volunteer basis. We've conducted our first transcribed interviews with
a cabinet official. The rest of the cabinet seems to
(11:15):
be on vacation through August, so okay to me, this
has historical significance. We need to interview people in the cabinet.
Based on those interviews, we'll find out who else we
want to interview. This is a serious investigation. Interviews being
transcribed eventually available to public review and the historical record.
(11:35):
So I'm conducting a serious investigation. We're going to pursue
it doggedly. Just talk to my staff about it again,
I'm not looking for a show trial here.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
I'm looking for the.
Speaker 4 (11:45):
Historical record in terms of what these people knew, when
they knew it, what discussions they had amongst themselves, in
terms of really the competency the capability President Biden when
he was in office.
Speaker 2 (11:56):
So something else that you've worked tireusly on, and I
know you just issued subpena is for this the evidence
surrounding the assassination temp of President Trump and Butler Pennsylvania,
so many questions unanswered. Your reports have given us more
than anyone. What is it do you think you may find?
Is it the possibility of other conspirators there? People aiding?
What are you looking for in these next round of
(12:17):
subpoenas to give us the American public a more full
accounting of what happened that day?
Speaker 4 (12:23):
Well, first of all, I view this as a friendly subpoena,
not an adversary one, just to prompt transparency.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
Now the assumpstit, I had.
Speaker 4 (12:32):
My staff uncovered an awful lot just talking to local
law enforcement in the week or two afterwards, But then
local law enforcement clammed up, probably under the direction of
the FBI. FPI conducted hundreds of interviews. We were able
to talk to maybe a couple of dozens seeking service
people kind of given to us, you know, drip drip.
We requested their notes, the three H two's on those
(12:53):
FBI interviews. We'd like to see the body cam video.
We'd like see the cameras from cars, you know, we
want to see all that evidence. The American people has
the right to see this. My assumption when President Trump
got elected is that once in office, you'd point to
people in the Justice Department, in the FBI that would
conduct a very thorough investigation, realizing they have far more
(13:15):
investigatory tools and personnel than we have, and we'd have
a report by now. I guess the anniversary kind of
knock up on me and realize, man, we just haven't
learned that much more since our initial preliminary report based
on those first investations. So I issued the subpoena in
a friendly manner just to get everybody's tention to go. Guys,
(13:35):
it is time to let the American people know what
you know. I'm hoping it's viewed that way. I want
to be cooperative. But listen, a year down, we don't
know who Thomas Crooks was, We don't know motivation, there's
just so much that we still don't know that we
probably should know center before.
Speaker 5 (13:52):
We let you go.
Speaker 3 (13:52):
I mean, the overarching agency who should have overseen protection
of the president that day was the United States Secret Service,
but they're at least half a dozen other agencies who
are drawn into this protection plan. Do you anticipate I
guess I'm asking what your gut is. Does it seem
like it's incompetence or does it seem like it could
lead somewhere more sinister?
Speaker 4 (14:10):
Well, certainly under Joe Biden, I think it was incompetent.
I think it was incompetent because of their DEI measures
and they're concerned more about what an agent looked like
than the agent's competency. And listen, I also understand President Trump,
anybody who's been protected by the Secret Service has a
great affinity and quite honestly love and respect for those
(14:31):
agents that are willing to literally lay down their life
tect to protect these life. So I understand the reluctance
of really looking at this too close. But it's people
upper management. It's for example, President Biden, who did not
provide the kind of resources direct to see service to
provide the resource to protect Canada.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
Trump at that point in time. In the end, it's really.
Speaker 4 (14:52):
President Biden's responsibility, and I think he failed.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
So we remiss not to mind the audience.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
It was your hard work that gave us the Pete truck,
Lisa Page text messages and the admission that there was
no big there.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
That was really the turning point in the news media.
Speaker 2 (15:10):
I think accepting that maybe the rush of collusion the
investigation was a hoax. You've done such extraordinary work and
you just a lot of a lot of credit for
where these investigations are Tey.
Speaker 1 (15:20):
Really great to have you on the show. Thanks for
joining us. Well, thanks for all your hard working efforts
as well. Thanks for having me on.
Speaker 2 (15:25):
Thank you sir. Great conversation. All right, folks are going
to take a quick commercial break. When me come back,
we're going to go down to Arizona. Congressman Holiday made
some news today. He called for the FED chairman Drome
poul to step down. We'll ask him about that and
also his take on the FBI opening up the Grand
Conspiracy investigation.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
I think he's messaging we'll be right.
Speaker 3 (15:42):
Back, hello friends, as we celebrate America's birthday.
Speaker 5 (15:50):
It's a great time to reflect on the facts, and.
Speaker 3 (15:52):
Here's one that really matters. The freedoms that we enjoy
today didn't happen by accident. They were built on the
foundation of faith, family, hard work, and individual liberty. But
those values don't protect themselves. They need people like you
and me to stand.
Speaker 5 (16:06):
Up for them.
Speaker 3 (16:06):
And that's why I want to encourage you to join AMAC,
the Association of Mature American Citizens. AMAC is working every
day to defend the principles that made this country great,
and right now, in honor of Independence Day, you can
get five full years of AMAC membership for just thirty
five dollars. It's an incredible opportunity to stay informed with
their magazine access, exclusive discounts, free resources, and most importantly,
(16:30):
stand with millions of other Americans who believe in protecting
this nation's future. So go to AMAC dot us slash
just news right now and join this July give America
the gift of more patriots standing up for her.
Speaker 5 (16:51):
Welcome back, everybody.
Speaker 3 (16:52):
As you heard before the break, and as we've been
discussing all of the show so far, it looks like
the deep state might finally get a little bit of
a dose of accountability. Anyone else deserving of it in Washington.
Well maybe Fed Chair Jerome Powell. President Trump certainly thinks so,
and joining us now to speak on both of those topics,
he represents the great state of Arizona. Congressman a Poma Day, Congressman,
thanks so much for being here.
Speaker 6 (17:14):
Good to be with you, sir.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
A grand conspiracy that spans gosh, I mean, for all
of us who have been in politics a decade ago,
it seems like ages ago with the Hillary Clinton email probe,
we all remember watching on that fateful day, was it
the day before fourth of July or after the fourth
of July with James Yeah, James Comey said no, no, no, no,
We're not going to do anything, and spanning basically all
the way up to present day. Maybe I'm Blackfield a little,
(17:39):
but you know all.
Speaker 5 (17:39):
Of the inner workings of Washington.
Speaker 3 (17:41):
Do you think that we could finally see some accountability
at this point?
Speaker 7 (17:46):
Well, if you remember that infamous meeting on the tarmac actually
happened in Phoenix, Arizona, with the tragedy, General Yeah and Bill.
Speaker 6 (17:54):
Clinton, and so hopefully there's accountability.
Speaker 7 (17:57):
It seems like the Republicans are motivated right now to
actually bring accountability because we have the levers of power
and just the sheer number of documents that are being
uncovered so far. It seems like the American people have
woken up a lot to what the fake news media
has been spewing for the past ten years. And we
have to have justice because so many people in this movement,
they supported President Trump back in twenty sixteen on that
(18:19):
idea of holding the powerful accountable, and it seems like
Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton and so many of these
Democrats constantly get away with it. And what we have now,
with a strong FBI director and with President Trump at
the helm, it seems like there's going to be finally
justice coming.
Speaker 1 (18:34):
Yeah. So important.
Speaker 2 (18:35):
I want to get that incredible letter you wrote today
calling for the FED chairman to resign before we do.
Just want to ask quickly, one idea that's out there
now is to move this to a special prosecutor, perhaps
the venue of Florida where the mar lag will rate
and other things occurred. Do you like the idea of
a special prosecutor giving how expansive this potential conspiracy case
could be.
Speaker 7 (18:56):
Well, I haven't read through it to see whether a
special prosecutors wore it or not. You know, I have
full confidence in the Trump Department of Justice, so I
have to assess it more fully and whether to see
it's going to be beneficial. And I don't want to
spend more resources on something if there's not going.
Speaker 6 (19:11):
To be actual results being done on it.
Speaker 7 (19:13):
So I know I have confidence in Cash Fattel and
Trump's DOJ, but I have to first figure out what
the the special prosecutor would entail and what their actual
scope would be. But obviously making sure that we have
accountability is important, But whether what mechanism to do that
is something that I'm going to be working on Congress.
Speaker 3 (19:35):
When I want to move to the FED issue. You know,
President Trump's economy this time around, it seems to be
coming back on a lot of different metrics, but it
seems like he blames the decisions made by the FED,
notably Jerome Powell, for any type of drawing down on
that anything that's possibly holding it back. Do you agree,
and do you think that Jerome Powell is feeling the
(19:55):
heat and therefore might step down.
Speaker 7 (19:59):
You should feel the heat because for too long I've
been talking to so many Arizonas and so many young
people that can no longer afford a home. It's actually
so sad what's happening. If you see the average age
of a first time homeowner at a skyrocket, it's over
forty years old. And something that President Trump actually just proposed,
i believe yesterday, which was eliminating capital gains that would
(20:19):
help spur up the economy. And what Jerome Powell is
doing with the bes chairman of the Federal Reserve by
not lowering interest rates, has been a huge hindrance on
home ownership. And it seems that Jerome Powell's actions he's
looking at the tariff policy, he thought it was gonna
have a negative impact, but instead what we saw just
last month in June, we saw that the Treasury Department
(20:40):
actually had a revenue increase of twenty seven billion dollars
due to President Trump's successful tariff strategy. And I think
that's what's so important for Americans to realize President Trump
has a strategy and everything he's doing is a successful
business manage in president before he knows the psychology of
the leaders of these countries. And what we have is
a Federal Reserve chairman is in charge of monetary and
(21:00):
he's effectively curtailing the successes of bringing in this Golden
Age era that President Trump wants to usher in. And
on top of that, you have the Jerome Powell just
a few weeks ago talk about the renovations that the
Federal Reserve building two point five billion dollars seven hundred
million dollars over budget for a building here in Capital,
(21:21):
in the steps of the Capital right across the National Mall.
It is despicable to see the gross mismanagement of funds
that the Federal Reserve chairman has been doing. So I
believe I think he can be fired for cause at
this point. So I think President Trump has the ability
and the scope of powers to actually fire Jerome Powell.
I'm calling for him to resign before his May twenty
twenty six period is up.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
Yeah, reading your letter and lit'sten you talk. One of
the things that is really become apparent a lot of
the economists I talked to in Washington is that the
FED is actually afraid of growth, like they try to
suppress it and tap it so it doesn't get too large.
We're at a moment where this economy could burst out,
and the FED just seems afraid to let that happen.
What's the mindset that leaves the Federal Reserve afraid to
(22:04):
let this economy reach its full potential.
Speaker 6 (22:08):
I think they're not used to innovative type of thinking.
Speaker 7 (22:10):
So for too long, the monetary policy the Federal Reserve
has been trying to manage a broken system. And unfortunately,
right now you have Jerome Powell who's actively getting in
the way of that.
Speaker 6 (22:19):
President Trump is bringing.
Speaker 7 (22:20):
Such novel new ideas into trying to bring back prosperity
to our country by having I mean, if you look
at the amount of trillions of dollars coming into the
United States of foreign direct investments, this is something that's
unheard of in past administrations.
Speaker 6 (22:34):
In Arizona, here we have TSMC.
Speaker 7 (22:37):
The largest semiconductor microchip manufacturing in the world, coming there.
They're spending over over one hundred and fifty billion dollars,
So there's a lot of money being poured into the system.
And unfortunately, what we have is a Federal Reserve chairman
with Jerome Powell who's not able to respond appropriately.
Speaker 6 (22:52):
So it seems like he's playing political games, to be.
Speaker 7 (22:55):
Honest with you, and I think that's that's the biggest
worry that I have, and that's why I called for
his resignation, and talking to some of my colleagues on
Capitol Hill, there's a huge movement in a push right now,
not just in the House, but also in the Senate
to hopefully push to Rome Powell out because if he
continues to stay as the chairman without lowering interest rates,
having a devastating toll on the economy. We need to
(23:16):
make sure that we are keeping pace with President Trump
because President Trump is moving at lightning speed and we
need to have a federal reserve to be able to
catch up with them.
Speaker 5 (23:23):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (23:24):
Good point, Karsman.
Speaker 3 (23:25):
I have no doubt that you have thought many steps ahead.
So if he does step down, if he is fired
for cause. You know, President Trump has a lot of
economic outside the box thinkers in his administration, Scott Besset,
Peter Navarro, Kevin hass that a lot of folks who.
Speaker 5 (23:39):
Subscribe to him.
Speaker 3 (23:40):
We're unconventional way of managing and growing an economy.
Speaker 5 (23:43):
Do you have a pick.
Speaker 7 (23:45):
I don't have a particular pick, but I know Scott
Descent is doing an amazing job as Secretary of the Treasury,
and honestly, his whole, his whole economic Prosperity team is
doing a good job. So I know President Trump this
is this is kind of the one point that I
know President Trump knows all so well. He will choose
the right person for the right job for the Federal Reserve.
But I think President Trump is no stranger to choosing
(24:06):
someone to have multiple hats. You see Secretary Rubio as
Secretary of State also National Security Advisor, plus I think he's.
Speaker 6 (24:12):
The Archive is too.
Speaker 7 (24:14):
So President is making sure he's putting all these people
to work. And so whoever he chooses, whether it's in
the administration or coming from outside the administration, it's important
to know that they have.
Speaker 6 (24:24):
The ideas this new way of thinking.
Speaker 7 (24:27):
Because the Federal Reserve for so long has been operating
completely in a vacuum. I know it's independent, but we're
entering this new era with crypto, with so much of
this financial institution's happening here in the United States, where
we're entering a new era. We need to make sure
we have a Federal Reserve chairman who understands this moment
that we are entering. And so whether it comes from
the outside or in the inside of administration, I know
(24:48):
President Trump's going to have a great selection because he
wants to run Powell out.
Speaker 6 (24:54):
I know he says he's too late, and you know
he was trying to give him time.
Speaker 7 (24:57):
By the way, Johnny me calling for his resignation, this
isn't the spur of the moment.
Speaker 6 (25:01):
Then we gave him an opportunity.
Speaker 7 (25:03):
Now it's six seven months into President Trump's second term
here and unfortunately, what we see now with the Chairman
is he seems to be stifling growth and the growth
that we desperately need as Americans.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
So important, sir, before we let you go.
Speaker 2 (25:16):
Today's Supreme Court strengthened Donald Trump's hand and shrinking government,
getting wasteful spending under control, clearing the way for the
dismantling of the Education Department, to shrink it down. The
second or third or fourth big consecutive ruling that gives
the president the power to reshape government.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
Your thoughts on that today, what it might do for
the budget a few years now?
Speaker 7 (25:37):
Yeah, absolutely, Well, we know the Department of Education has
been a complete disaster since it's founding fifty some odd
years ago.
Speaker 6 (25:44):
So shrinking the.
Speaker 7 (25:45):
Size of the Department of Education, eventually dismantling has been
always the goal for basically every single Republican president, at
least on the campaign trail, then once they get in office,
they haven't been able to achieve that. President Trump with
Secretary McMahon, they've been doing a spectacular job fighting in
the courts and luckily the Supreme Court has a wild
in favor, not just on this, on so many other
ones as well. So it seems like we have the
(26:06):
momentum on our side, and I want people to understand
that this is not going to hinder education. It's actually
going to unleash our education standards because for so long
we've been seeing that these states, they've had a collapsing
math scores, collapsing English scores, collapsing arithmetic sturce.
Speaker 6 (26:21):
So it's it's quite pathetic that one of the strongest,
most most powerful.
Speaker 7 (26:24):
Countries in the world is doing abysmal in terms of education.
So we need to make sure that the states are
given the power and ability and the grant funding.
Speaker 6 (26:32):
To be able to actually educate the students that they know.
Speaker 7 (26:34):
Best through direct access with the school boards.
Speaker 3 (26:37):
Huge spot on as always, Congress today, hommide from the
great state of Arizona, Thank you so much for being
here with us.
Speaker 6 (26:43):
Sir, thank you a mandon, Thank you John.
Speaker 5 (26:46):
Absolutely all right, everybody.
Speaker 3 (26:47):
Plenty more on government accountability coming up after these messages.
Speaker 1 (26:58):
Hey, folks, if you're a homeowner like me, need to
listen to this.
Speaker 2 (27:01):
In today's AI and CyberWorld, scammers are stealing home titles
and your equity is their target.
Speaker 1 (27:07):
Here's how it works.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
Criminals forge your signature on one document, use a fake
notary stamp, pay a small fee with your county in boom.
Just like that, your home title has been transferred out
of your name. And that's where the problems begin because
they start taking out loans using your equity and even
sell your profity. And you're not even going to find
out what's happened until you get a collection or foreclosure
notice months later. That's a nightmare, right, So when's the
(27:28):
last time you checked on your home title?
Speaker 1 (27:30):
If you like me, the answer is never, right. You
need to do something about that right now.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
That's why I've partnered with home Title Lock so you
can find out today.
Speaker 1 (27:37):
If you're already a victim, use my promo.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
Code JTN at hometitlelock dot com and you'll get a
free title history report and a free trial of their
million dollar triple lock protection. That's twenty four to seven
monitoring of your title, urgent alerts to any changes that
might happen, and if fraud does happen, they'll spend up
to a million.
Speaker 1 (27:54):
Bucks to fix it. That's a good deal.
Speaker 2 (27:56):
Find out why I trust Home title Lock. Go to
home title lock dot com and use the promo code JTN.
That's home downa Locke dot Com promo code JTN.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
Welcome back in America.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
You know this next guest for the extraordinary role he
played in creating the Empower Oversight Whistleblower Center, the center
that gave us the irs whistleblowers, the FBI whistleblowers.
Speaker 1 (28:23):
But in an earlier life, I knew.
Speaker 2 (28:25):
Jason Foster as the Chief Investigative councilors Senate Judiciary Committee,
and it was there that he discovered the classified annex
at the Inspector General the Justice Department had written about
the Hillary Clinton email scandal. It is now at the
heart of this conspiracy investigation the FBI is looking at.
We're very lucky to be joined by Jason today. Jason,
good to have you back on the show.
Speaker 6 (28:45):
Hey, thanks for having me.
Speaker 8 (28:46):
John.
Speaker 1 (28:46):
All right, so you're.
Speaker 2 (28:47):
A Senior the Senior Investigative Council of as Senate Judiciary.
You're working for Chuck Grassley, and you find out there
is this classified annex that suggests that there was intelligence
that came in about Hillary Clinton and Loretta Lynch and
the FBI never investigated out it. And tell us what
you thought when you first heard about it.
Speaker 9 (29:07):
Well, so this was in late summer, early fall of
twenty eighteen. It was right toward the end of my
time with Cinder Grassley's office. And of course, you know,
there were all the public hearings when the Inspector General's
report came out on the whole Hillary Clinton email mess
and a couple of weeks after those public hearings, you know,
there was this classified annex that came up to Capitol Hill.
(29:29):
And of course I can't talk about what's in it.
I posted on AX about it a little earlier today,
not about the substance or the content, but sort of
about the procedure of what happened when that came in
and trying to help people understand the process of what
happened with getting the senators briefed up on it. So
after Michael Horowitz had testified before the various committees in
(29:50):
the House and Senate about that big, you know, high
profile report. We dug into the classified ANNX and the
law Enforcement sensitive ANX, and we asked him to come
up and do a briefing, and we set up a
bipartisan briefing with various senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee,
folks on both sides, and what what I posted earlier
(30:11):
today was just about the what a remarkable experience that
was is one of the most memorable things in all
of my twenty two years on Capitol Hill. You know,
we had very prominent Democrat and Republican senators come in
and the Inspector General, Michael Horwitz, came in and he
briefed them on the contents of that classified annex and
(30:33):
there was universal agreement in the room of a sort
that I really hadn't seen before across.
Speaker 6 (30:41):
The aisle that you know, hey, we don't understand.
Speaker 9 (30:44):
Why the FBI didn't investigate this information further, and it
absolutely needs to be investigated further. You know, it was
maybe I'm naive, but you know, nothing ever happened. You know,
as far as I know, there wasn't a lot of
follow up after that briefing. But you know, I was
pleasantly surprised that the Democrats in the room were, you know,
(31:04):
recognize the seriousness of the issue and recognized that it
needed to have some further follow up and investigation.
Speaker 6 (31:10):
And I sort of sat and.
Speaker 9 (31:11):
Watched there, you know, as they heard from the Inspector
General about why he couldn't because it involved other intelligence
agencies that were outside of his jurisdiction, and you know,
a full review wouldn't be possible, and it was sort
of tangentially related to his main work in the in
the email investigation, and so I suggested, you know, well,
(31:33):
why don't you do a joint project and investigate it
with the Inspector General of the intelligence community because he
would have jurisdiction over all of it.
Speaker 6 (31:43):
You guys could get to all the witnesses you need to.
Speaker 9 (31:44):
And it seems like the senators here want to know
a lot more about what happened here. There's universal bipartisan
agreement that we need to know more. And the senators
in the room agreed with me, and and you know,
but I left shortly after that. I left Capitol Hill
for the private sector for a while before starting in
(32:05):
Power oversight and you know, so I'm sort of not
privy to anything that happened after that in terms of
any follow up that might you know, I see news
reporting about my former boss, Senator Grassley has been pressing
to get this thing declassified and has been pressing for
answers from from the FBI. But you know, one of
the things I did before I left is I tried
(32:26):
to get a meeting. I tried to get a briefing
from the FBI to answer, you know, hey, here's here's
what the OIG says, you guys did not look into
Why didn't you look into it? And I wasn't able
to get that, you know, before I left, So I
don't I'm sure that there's been briefings to my former office,
to my former boss, but I'm not privy to them.
Speaker 5 (32:47):
I'm Jason. So twenty eighteen, so that was.
Speaker 3 (32:49):
That was a few years into what President Trump would
referred to as Trump de arrangement syndrome. Fast forward seven
years to where we are now. If if you were
if you were serving as lead investigator for a House
or a Senate committee, and you brought a bipartisan group
of people together and showed them the same type of
egregious evidence that one party was protected another party was targeted.
(33:13):
Do you think you would get the same reaction now.
Speaker 6 (33:16):
I don't know.
Speaker 9 (33:17):
I mean I was surprised because it was you know,
they weren't doing it for the cameras, they weren't doing
it for show, right, it was a private meeting.
Speaker 6 (33:25):
They seemed to genuinely be concerned on both sides of
the aisle.
Speaker 9 (33:28):
And you know, again maybe I'm naive and thinking that
maybe they were just saying what they thought was a
good look for the Inspector General to hear them say.
And you know, as far as I know, there hasn't
been any actual subjet to follow up after that other
than Center Grassy's efforts that have been publicly reported.
Speaker 6 (33:43):
But you know, I don't know. Things were getting pretty.
Speaker 9 (33:48):
Bad in terms of partisanship before I left, and they
seemed to have only gotten worse. So you know, maybe
maybe they wouldn't have the same sort of honest reaction
that they did.
Speaker 2 (34:00):
Ask a little bit about the pattern that's at the
heart of what Cash Hotel does. So we've confirmed the
Cash Ptel is looking at the last ten years as
sort of an ongoing conspiracy to protect Democrats who might
have engaged in wrongdt Hillary Clinton, Hunter Biden, Joe Biden,
and then foist on to Republicans' investigations that might not
be warranted, such as what happened to Mike Flynn or
Carter Page or Donald Trump, that sort of washer in
(34:24):
three peat cycle. When you look at it as a lawyer,
can you see the possibility of grandeur looking at and saying,
I might see a conspiracy here.
Speaker 9 (34:33):
Well, sure, I mean, you know you'd have to gather
the evidence and make the case, But I mean I'll
make an analogy to this classified annex to something else
that people may be familiar with, which is the ten
twenty three the Biden bribe allegations that Senator Grassley got
from an FBI whistleblower in put out because it's a
(34:53):
similar there is a similar pattern there. When there's something
that looks like that, most people would look at and say, wow,
if this has any credibility at all, it really needs
to be investigated to the hilt, and we need to
figure out we need to get to the bottom of this.
If if the way the bias creeps in is you
just don't look into the things that you think where
(35:16):
you don't want to know the answers, right, And so,
like with the Biden bribe allegations, they buried it for
years and years.
Speaker 6 (35:22):
Hit it from our irs.
Speaker 9 (35:23):
Was a blower clients who were doing the Hunter Biden
and investigation on the tax issues, even though it was
absolutely relevant to their investigation, but the FBI and DJ hid.
Speaker 6 (35:31):
It from them for years.
Speaker 9 (35:33):
And so I think this other you know, this this
classified annex on the Clinton email investigation is a similar
sort of thing. There's information there that objectively, anybody looking
at it fairly would say, wow, we really need to
look into that. But because I think some people were
scared of what they might find if they did look
into it further, you know, there was a see no
(35:55):
evil here, no evil attitude, Whereas, on the other hand,
you contrast that with how they dealt with the Steele dossier, which,
as soon as that was public, a lot of people
just reading it, anybody, any sophisticated person reading it at
the time, you know, could see that it was likely
to be bunk.
Speaker 6 (36:12):
It was sort of crazy.
Speaker 9 (36:14):
And yet that was the center of you know, a
three year hysteria and had to be you know, investigated
for years and years millions of dollars spent by Mueller,
you know, hundreds and hundreds of grand jury witnesses and
subpoenas and millions of dollars, and you know, it's just
that's that's where the you know, you see the disparate treatment,
(36:35):
and you see that it it's on one side. If
they think the ox is going to be going on
one side, then they're not interested. But if they think
it's going to go after the other side, then they're
really really interested.
Speaker 3 (36:45):
Jason, before we let you go, I want to ask
you courage is not exactly contagious among government workers, but
there were a number of courageous people. Gary Schappler, Joseph Siegler,
I want to ask you about the state of the
case is for the IRS whistleblowers and the FBI whistleblowers.
Speaker 9 (37:00):
Yeah, well, we've actually seen some cracks in the ice
on our FBI whistleblower clients, you know, on our IRS clients.
You know, the Treasury Secretary brought them in, gave them
promotions in an unprecedented way, and so there's already been
some measure of justice for them. But our FBI whistleblowers
are still many of them are still suspended without paying
definitely and have lost their security clearances. We are, however,
(37:26):
and in fact, earlier today I had a conversation, we
had a meeting with the FBI, had a conversation with them,
and we are in active settlement talks. UH and the
the ice seems to be breaking a little bit. I
can't get into the details of that, obviously, but there
there are rays of hope on the horizon that we
(37:46):
might get some resolution.
Speaker 1 (37:48):
We have.
Speaker 6 (37:48):
We have ten clients, the.
Speaker 9 (37:50):
Only some of whom are public right and that we're
trying to get some justice for. And I wrote to
the FBI about them last March, and we're finally mean
to get a little bit of traction on those.
Speaker 1 (38:02):
That's great, important for the future. Whistle Bland.
Speaker 2 (38:04):
That's great, Jason, you do such amazing work, whether it's
discovering the class of iteamics and getting those centers of
the room or protecting whistleblowers for very important revelations.
Speaker 1 (38:12):
Great iron to having a show tonight, my friend. Thanks
so much. All right, folks, you can to take a
quick commercial break. When me come back.
Speaker 2 (38:17):
One of my favorite medical experts, doctor Pete mccoua, will
be here We're going to discuss all the things that
are going on, including Pam Bondie's decision last week to
drop charges against the doctor who was against the COVID vaccine.
We have all that right a for these messages.
Speaker 5 (38:38):
Welcome back to just the News and no noise. If
you can't tell.
Speaker 3 (38:41):
There has been a theme to the show tonight and
it is government accountability.
Speaker 5 (38:44):
But what about when it comes to COVID.
Speaker 3 (38:46):
We now know more about the extent to which the
Biden administration used an auto pen to sign pardons, for.
Speaker 5 (38:51):
Example doctor Fauci's.
Speaker 3 (38:53):
And we also now know that Attorney General Pambondi has
taken at least one step to right the wrongs done
during the pandemic dropping chart against doctor Kirkmore, who says
he was wrongfully prosecuted for upholding medical ethics ethics around
the vaccine mandates. So joining us now to talk about
all of that. He is world renowned doctor and chief
scientific officer at the Wellness Company. He's also the author
(39:13):
of his new book Vaccines Mythology, Ideology and Reality.
Speaker 5 (39:18):
Doctor Peter McCullough.
Speaker 3 (39:19):
Doctor McCullough, thanks so much for being here.
Speaker 1 (39:21):
Thank you.
Speaker 3 (39:22):
Let's dive straight into that book, because there's a lot
of information swirling about around vaccines, especially for my generation.
The COVID vaccine was what broke the dam when it
came to just being skeptical about vaccines. Tell us about
your book, boy.
Speaker 10 (39:37):
If you were around, you know, in the early nineteenth
century or even earlyer twentieth centuries and the issue of
the day was smallpox or pertessis or polio, you would
have found characters very similar to Anthony Fauci, including Edward
Jenner and Louis Pastor. Our research showed that in fact,
(40:00):
vaccines for the longest time have had a hubris about them,
lots of money, lots of fear campaigns, coercion, and sadly
vaccines not living up to you know, what they've been
sold to populations. You've got to get a copy of
the book that really is in a sense of mythology
(40:22):
and a vaccine religion that doctors and others now have
followed is irrational and explained so much of what we've
seen with COVID nineteen vaccines.
Speaker 1 (40:31):
Yeah, no doubt, that's going to be a mess read.
Speaker 2 (40:33):
So I want to turn on say on abject for
a second, because last week the federal government approved for
some children people have vulnerabilities to continue getting the COVID vaccine,
young people, particularly at risk of the heart inflammation that
they've now acknowledged existed during the entire COVID vaccination program.
Your thoughts on that recommendation did you concern you?
Speaker 8 (40:54):
It's reckless? You know, I'm a cardiologist. Let me tell you.
Speaker 10 (40:57):
Let's say a child with Down syndrome who has conjoint
all heart disease. This is the last thing you'd want
that child to take a vaccine that causes heart damage.
If a heart has already weakened or has already had surgery,
it's far more likely to have consequences of the micarditis,
including heart fire or cardiac arrest. The FDA just rubber
stamped these through. They promised there was going to be
(41:19):
large prospective clinical trials. None of that was done, and
now America is furious at this most recent approval.
Speaker 3 (41:27):
All right, let's stay on that for a moment. Because
doctor Kirkmore, the case against him has been dropped.
Speaker 5 (41:31):
This is a doctor who you know, in line.
Speaker 3 (41:33):
With his medical ethics felt you know, I think he
did some disposing of vaccines and maybe injected saline and
said case dropped. Is this a step in the right
direction towards towards medical freedom.
Speaker 8 (41:46):
It's the justice that we all wanted to see.
Speaker 10 (41:48):
In great credit to Marjorie Taylor Green and Tom Massey,
Shannon Joy, actually all the health freedom heroes that really
got on the scene. There what we learned as this
doctor gave patients the choice they had informed consent, and yeah,
he disposed of some vaccines. Do you know the United
States government has dumped millions of doses down the.
Speaker 8 (42:11):
Drain because people don't want these vaccines.
Speaker 1 (42:14):
Yeah, so remarkable.
Speaker 2 (42:17):
As you look out now and you see with the
story in the New York Times this weekend about Joe
Biden using the auto pen for doctor Fauci's investigation or
for his pardon, and now you've got to center Rampaul
wants to resubmit now based on that evidence, the criminal
referral on doctor Fauci. Do you think that Fauci's tenure
and his actual decision making we'll get another look at
(42:37):
the Justice Department or has that water already passed the bridge?
Speaker 10 (42:42):
Now we need the referral, a special prosecutor assigned.
Speaker 8 (42:46):
And it looks like now that.
Speaker 10 (42:47):
Fauci probably approached Biden in this neurologically compromised state and
asked for this ten year pardon because Fauci knew he
committed crimes of fraud, that is, he deceived the country
on multiple levels, and his work suppression of treatment and
pushing the vaccines resulted in mass negligent homicide.
Speaker 3 (43:09):
Jarring, before we let you go, I am still hearing
about measles cases. Are we getting to a concerning number yet?
Should we be frightened?
Speaker 6 (43:18):
Worldwide?
Speaker 10 (43:19):
You know, some years there's six hundred thousand measles cases.
Last year in Europe it was over two hundred thousand cases.
So if we're at twelve hundred in the United States,
not concerned at all. There's always going to be some
cases of measles, and they occur in both those who've
taken the vaccines and those who are unvaccinated. What people
need to do is understand how to treat measles using
(43:42):
all the techniques.
Speaker 8 (43:43):
That we have, and stop worrying about this.
Speaker 10 (43:46):
You know, worldwide, six hundred thousand cases, and we're making
a big deal of twelve hundred the United States.
Speaker 3 (43:52):
Good point, Doctor Peter mccallaugh, always bringing the reality like
it says in your book title, world renowned doctor and
chief scientific officer over at the Wellness Company. Thanks so
much for joining us tonight and to our audience, and
thank you to all of you. You could go to
TWC dot health slash just news today and use the
code just news to save ten percent on any order
from the Wellness Company. That is tw dot health slash
(44:15):
just news and use promo code just news to save
ten percent.
Speaker 5 (44:18):
All right, some final thoughts on the other side of
this break. Welcome back everybody.
Speaker 3 (44:32):
It is our final segment of the night and John,
we've got a lot of epscene topics in the rundown
and you know, just looking at the chatter online over
the weekend, people are still very very inflamed and enraged
over this, and we'll see what happens.
Speaker 1 (44:48):
But just a little bit ago, it just happened a
few minutes ago.
Speaker 2 (44:52):
Pam Bondi responded to Justll Maxwell's appeal, saying the Supreme
Court should not take out this case, that the sentences
worthy of her crime and not to waste time in
the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1 (45:03):
That's an interesting twist.
Speaker 2 (45:05):
It's not going to solve the problem, which is that
we haven't been transparent that we the American people, haven't
been given a transparent accounting what document exists. What if
you released not wage your lease, the trust us don't
work it. You've got to give us a list of
the documents, create a vawn index. Let us see that.
And there's another place that we don't talk about very
often in that is the grand jury. FBI would not
(45:28):
have those documents, but Pam Bondi, the DJ would know
what the Southern District of New York was gathered by
grand jury.
Speaker 1 (45:34):
They should unseal those and let the American people see that.
Speaker 5 (45:37):
Welcome on Max. Seems like she's ready to talk anyway.
Speaker 1 (45:40):
Yeah, yeah, I mean is she credible? I don't know.
Speaker 2 (45:42):
She obviously enabled us pretty significant child prostitution scheme. But
whatever the case. You know who is credible is people
like the lawyers. They can tell us a lot too.
We're trying to get the lawyers to come on the show.
There's new things to be learned, and we're not going
to stop trying to get those documents here.
Speaker 5 (46:00):
Yeah, the drum beat will roll on.
Speaker 3 (46:02):
And President Trump's own daughter in law, Laura Trump, seems
to think that this is not the end for the
Trump administration, despite what is being outwardly said at this point.
Speaker 1 (46:09):
Yeah, no, listen, this is a temporary blip. I listened.
Speaker 2 (46:12):
I saw more chatter today about focusing on this conspiracy
case and what it may mean for accountability that people
wanted than the Epstein files. But listen, the Epstein files
was a self made crisis by Pam Bondi, and she
has to find a way.
Speaker 1 (46:26):
To get out of it.
Speaker 2 (46:26):
I think the fastest way is just be transparent. Here's
what we have, here's what we release, Here's what we're
not releasing, why we're not releasing him. Here's what the
grand jury had, Here's what the state had, and here's
what the CIA had. Because the CIA has a file
on Epstein. I don't think it's significant, but get it
all out there. I think President Trump would approve any
release if they just got it done.
Speaker 5 (46:45):
I absolutely think you would too.
Speaker 3 (46:46):
All Right, let's switch gears to the economy. Someone who
I have a tremendous amount of respect where Kevin has
to be is I think he is one of the
best educators and messengers for President Trump's economic policy. Says
that tariffs will raise three trillion dollars in revenue over
the next decade. That is not nothing.
Speaker 2 (47:02):
That's three to four hundred thousand dollars four for three
to four hundred million dollars a year. That brings the
deficit down. So Trump's counts will get it down to
one seven, one eight. Now you're down to one five,
one four. And with these decisions by the Supreme Court,
the true decisions are Trump's authority not to have to
go to Congress and cut jobs as he sees fit,
as long as he certifies that what he's doing is
(47:24):
what Congress wants. I think you could see a one
of the leaner in the out years of the Trump
presidency twenty seven to twenty eight, and then the first
year he heads off to a new president. I think
you can see deficits below a trillion dollars, which is
something we haven't seen in the last fifteen years.
Speaker 1 (47:37):
So it's a big deal.
Speaker 3 (47:38):
Yeah, the decisions are very interesting. Way to just claw
back that way for the American people.
Speaker 1 (47:43):
It's easy.
Speaker 3 (47:44):
Speaking of tariff of a new president's Trump has thround
one hundred percent terriff in Russia. If they don't reach
a deal in fifty days.
Speaker 5 (47:50):
Do you think that Putin's paying attention.
Speaker 1 (47:52):
This will make a pay attention.
Speaker 2 (47:54):
And if the sanctions that the president's talking about include
sanctioning the russ from the central bank, it will paralyze
the Russian economy. We've always talked about that as a
nuclear option. But if you almost everything in Russia has
to go to the Russian Central Bank in order to
act it because of the way the legacy from their
communists era, you sanks in that bank. You have crippled Russia.
(48:15):
You're creating breadlines that will have Putin's attention. And it's
a reminder your president Trump tried. It was very friendly
to bet In at the beginning, but when Putin didn't engage,
Donald Trump could be on the bad side of this
deal will be really tough and Russia could be paid
to your price. I suspect China and Russia are talking
right now because you know China, if these sanctions occur,
China can't do business again. It's oil for Russia. That's
(48:38):
a problem for China. So my guess is there more
than one country in the back of this talk.
Speaker 5 (48:42):
I think that's exactly right, all right.
Speaker 3 (48:43):
So an Ourranian group claims to have raised forty million
dollars in reward money to assassinate President Trump.
Speaker 5 (48:50):
We know they've had plots in the past, for sure.
Speaker 2 (48:52):
Some great work by the Foundations for Defensive Democracy and
Memory Middle East Research Council.
Speaker 1 (48:59):
This is really serving.
Speaker 2 (49:01):
It's not surprising because we know that Iran tried to
last year since i'one that killed Trump.
Speaker 1 (49:07):
But the fact that it's so over.
Speaker 2 (49:09):
And it has been barely condemned except for these two things.
Thanks we brought it to our attention. I just say
something about Trump duringingelmn syndrome, which maybe a global phenomenon,
not just an American phenomenon.
Speaker 3 (49:20):
Indeed, indeed, all right, let's squeeze in one more. Andrew
Kola was going to stay in the race. He's gonna
run as a third party.
Speaker 5 (49:25):
Candidate to try to challenge Momboni Tom Donny.
Speaker 1 (49:28):
Yeah, he splits the independent vote.
Speaker 2 (49:30):
I mean, if there's any chance of knocking mom Donnie,
if you got to hit the other side down.
Speaker 5 (49:34):
To one kid Albanize everybody.
Speaker 1 (49:35):
Eric Adams is at Andrew com mobile seat.
Speaker 5 (49:37):
Yeah all right, everybody. That is all the time that
we have for you tonight. We have a fairy pack
show for you tomorrow night.
Speaker 3 (49:43):
Already, so make sure you tune in right here at
six pm Eastern, everybody, head over to justinews dot com again.
Check out John's incredible article all of the reporting that
he has done about this ten year overarching conspiracy. Go
check it out, grit Sincefield is going to take you
to the next hour, and then we'll be back here
tomorrow
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.