Just the News No Noise with John Solomon and Amanda Head, July 15th, 2025

Just the News No Noise on Real America's Voice

Segment A: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STANDS UP TO LEFTIST SECURITY FORUM
Segment B: FORMER WORLD BANK PRESIDENT DISCUSSES WHY FED CHAIR JEROME POWELL WON'T LOWER RATES
Segment C: ADAM SCHIFF IN MORTGAGE FRAUD TROUBLE? - AND PRESIDENT TRUMP SPEAKS

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:21):
Caodading America. Happy Tuesday.

Speaker 2 (00:23):
Welcome to the latest edition of justin News, No Noise.
I'm your host, John Solomon, reporting you as always from Washington,
d C. And the Wiredofish Coffee dot com studios. You
know this Wire to Fish Coffee is the official coffee
of justin News.

Speaker 1 (00:34):
This is my favorite coffee.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
And you can go right now to wiedofish Coffee dot
com and get a fantastic temper sent discount of All
you gotta do is use the promo code just News
at check up Wired the number two Fishcoffee dot Com.
Go there, they support us, Give them a big trick.

Speaker 1 (00:47):
They're awesome.

Speaker 2 (00:48):
All right, we have a big update for you on
reporting we did here at justin News last October around
California Senator Adam Schiff, the man behind Russia callis you
remember him, and a concern about mortgage fraud concerts. Last year,
we reported that Senator Shift had repeatedly declared in mortgage
filings that two of his homes won in California one
in Maryland. We're both in his primary residences, and that

(01:11):
is a problem because Americans are only allowed to claim
one primary residence, which is the home that they live
in the majority of the year. Claiming both homes as
his primary residence ended up netting the senator some great
benefits like lower mortgage interest rates, tax advantages.

Speaker 1 (01:25):
And the ability to run for the House in California.

Speaker 2 (01:27):
Now fast forward to today and the President is now
speaking about it. Why because Fanny made the mortgage giant
has concluded there's a reason to believe his conduct, that is,
Adam Shift's conduct was mortgage fraud. They made a referral
to the Justice Department on True Social This morning, President
talked about it and then he gave some comments about
it in response to a question by Real America's Voice,

(01:48):
his own Brian Glenn, take a listen.

Speaker 3 (01:50):
First, Letitia James alleged mortgage fraud.

Speaker 4 (01:53):
Now we have Adam Schiff allegedly committed mortgage fraud.

Speaker 5 (01:56):
At all.

Speaker 6 (01:57):
Your thoughts on that, well, I just should and I
think the thing with Adam Schiff is very serious, and
I think what they have on Letitia James is very serious.
That's a very very serious situation. But I have to
leave that up to the history attorneys, as to the prosecutors,
as to the Attorney General. Most importuly, and Adam Schiff

(02:17):
looks very serious. Look, he's a sleeves ball. Everybody knows that.
And I was a little surprised. I thought he would
have covered his vases a little bit better than that.

Speaker 7 (02:27):
Adam Schiff is a low life. He deserves what he gets.

Speaker 2 (02:32):
Wow, no subtlety in that answer, but an important one.
To go back and check our story out from October.
We have it up on the site. We also have
the latest coverage today. And Democrats, do you have a
mortgage problem? Remember beyond Letitia James being under investigation now
Adam Schiff, Carol Moseby, the state attorney Democrats state attorney
in Baltimore, also was convicted in a mortgage fraud case

(02:53):
about a year ago. So this is a growing problem. Amanda,
watch what happens you go around your cameraund And here's
another little twists. Remember that Joe Biden, I think put
Adam Shift on the pardons.

Speaker 5 (03:03):
Huh.

Speaker 2 (03:04):
You know what Adam Shift can't do in any proceeding
before the Justice Department? Now claim the fifth you can't
take it for the men. Yeah, So fate has a
funny way of turning itself for out of.

Speaker 5 (03:13):
Isn't it funny?

Speaker 8 (03:13):
Also that Adam shift even realizes how bad the housing
market is in California.

Speaker 1 (03:19):
Before I thought of that. All the headlines you watch.

Speaker 8 (03:21):
Yes, all right, So here's one that some folks might
have missed, and it involves the aftermath of as we
were talking about in California, those Pacific Palisades fires. The
state of California has still not dealt with all of
the fallout yet, but their latest attempt is catching some
very harsh criticism. Now, we already know that California Governor
Gavenusom announced that the state would allocate one hundred and
one million dollars in taxpayer funds to create what they

(03:44):
call multi family low income housing developments in the communities
that were affected by the Palisades Eaten and Hughes wildfires.
And now the California Senate has passed a bill that
ends up allowing the City of Los Angeles to use
fire destroyed lots to build low income housing. And the
bill gives the government authority to fund resilient building authorities

(04:07):
and through that allow them to purchase fire damage lots
to build on. Income restricted housing has become a big
business in Los Angeles. This year alone, seventy three percent
of planning applications are for income restricted housing. Meanwhile, in
the previous four years before this, that number was only
thirty percent. So John, my goodness, I mean, this is

(04:28):
what a lot of people predicted. They said, these houses
are going to get raised and then they're going to
put low income housing on them.

Speaker 5 (04:33):
And here we are, We're taking.

Speaker 1 (04:35):
This extraordinary beautiful paradise.

Speaker 2 (04:37):
Say, California is a year after year liberal election after
a liber election, destroying one of the most beautiful places
in the world.

Speaker 1 (04:43):
It's just terrible.

Speaker 2 (04:45):
We focus on trends centers a lot here, Amenda, and
the Pentagon has always been a trend center, whether it
is the latest weaponry, the latest military strategies, all the
great work that is done by the men and women
in uniform in this gay country. But they set a
new trend this week. That's right, Pentagon, under Defense Secretary Pte.
Tex Hath, decided to tell its employees they can no
longer go to the Aspen Security. I call it a boondoggle.

(05:08):
And guess what other agencies started following suit. It started
to try it all across watching what a good idea taxpayers,
you save money, DoD workers, they go back to protecting
the country instead of sitting at some fancy schmancy thing.
Joining us right now, the Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson Kingsley,
great to have you on the show.

Speaker 5 (05:26):
Thanks so much for having me. Great to be with
you tonight.

Speaker 1 (05:28):
A lot of amazing story.

Speaker 2 (05:30):
The Pentagon sets the example, tells its people we don't
need to spend taxpayer.

Speaker 1 (05:33):
Dollars on this. Stay home and do your work.

Speaker 2 (05:36):
And now all across Washington people are canceling going to
the Aspen. Tell us why the Defense Secretary made this decision.

Speaker 9 (05:44):
Absolutely, and as you point out, I think this security
conference could be described as a boondoggle. And listen, at
the Department of Defense, we are focused on war fighting.
We're not a think tank. We are in the job
of creating deadly, lethal, professional war fighter. So anything that
detracts from that mission or that takes our focus away
isn't something that the American taxpayer should be paying for,

(06:07):
and isn't something that our senior military leaders should be frequenting.
And attending. Bird watching at the Aspen Security Forum in
Colorado is not a good amount of effort and time
for senior military leaders in this department to be doing.

Speaker 5 (06:21):
We can do better things.

Speaker 9 (06:22):
We have emerging threats, we have real crises across the world.

Speaker 5 (06:25):
We need to be.

Speaker 9 (06:26):
Focused on lethality, putting our war fighters first and getting
back to basics. Unfortunately, the previous administration injected ideology into
the Department of Defense, and they put politics into our military.
We're taking that away and we are focusing on what
matters and what our mission set is. And I think
Secretary Hagseth, from the top down, has instilled that across

(06:48):
this department. And that's what you are seeing here in
this decision and in every decision we make going forward.

Speaker 5 (06:54):
Yeah, I love it, and I do too.

Speaker 8 (06:56):
And Kingsley, when it comes to the Aspen Institute, this
is I think they do claim to be nonpartisan, but
they do seem to also be captured by the annals
of the far left. How did they manage to create
such momentum on the left side of the aisle because
they've been inching closer and closer to that to that
direction for a while.

Speaker 9 (07:15):
Absolutely, it's a fantastic question. And I think sadly, a
lot of the folks that frequent these events, they are
lauded by the mainstream media as being national security quote
experts right, when in reality their records are abysmal. They
have created chaos abroad and they have at home executed
utter and complete failure. Under President Trump and Secretary Hegseth,

(07:37):
we are refocusing on our homeland. We've got two twelve
seven hundred troops at our southern border for goodness sakes.
We are putting our borders first, and we are getting
out of these endless quagmires across the world that get
our troops drawn into things that don't benefit the American
people and that don't put America first. But sadly so
many of the elite class for decades has instead focused

(08:00):
on the false ideology of globalism, and they have put
America last at every single turn. What we are doing
at this Department of Defense under Secretary Hagcept is getting
back to basics, but also putting America first in every
single aspect of what we do.

Speaker 1 (08:18):
You mentioned the failures of the past.

Speaker 2 (08:19):
Some of the faces of those failures are present at.

Speaker 1 (08:22):
Has Aspen event.

Speaker 2 (08:24):
Jake Sullivan, the National security advisor to Joe Biden, the
architect of the failed withdrawal from Afghanistan. Susan Rice, who
was the face of the terrible tragedy in Libya where
we lost an ambassador and lost a lot of credibility,
and the attack on the compound there at Benghazi.

Speaker 1 (08:40):
The fact that Biden folks are all over this.

Speaker 2 (08:42):
Are they trying to structure aspen as sort of a
resistance to the Trump doctrine that is now very clear
in the world today.

Speaker 9 (08:50):
Perhaps I can't speak on their behalf, but we can
only guess as to what their agendas are to subvert
President Trump. We saw that in the first term, right.
They're a lot of folks on the outside trying to
kind of detract from our mission set and what we
are doing here at the Department.

Speaker 5 (09:06):
We are laser.

Speaker 9 (09:06):
Focused on executing and implementing President Trump's America First agenda,
top down, full stop. And folks like Jake Sullivan do
not represent the best of our warfighters, right. Jake Sullivan
for decades has advocated for endless war across the world,
yet he's someone who's never served himself. We want to
make sure that if we are asking our warfighters to

(09:27):
go to war, which is a horrible thing, we like
to deter and ensure that our warfighters are never put
in those positions. But if they are asked to do that,
we want them to know that it is worth it.
And in President Trump and Secretary Hegseth, our warfighters know
that they have a commander in chief and a Secretary
of Defense who has their back and is going to
put their interests first. And I think that's really why

(09:48):
you see recruitment skyrocking. We are breaking records across the board, Army,
Air Force, Navy, everyone is hitting their recruitment goals early
months early, and that is going to continue because again,
we're getting back to basics. We're reinstilling that warrior ethos
across the department, and we're ensuring that at the end
of the day, our war fighters have everything they need

(10:10):
to be successful to protect their home, win and keep
Americans safe.

Speaker 6 (10:14):
Yea.

Speaker 8 (10:14):
And that record breaking recruitment I think is a direct
result of what seems like a very hard reset at
the Department of Defense and within America's military and Pete
Hegseth actually spoke about that this weekend when he said,
we are back to basics. We are moving away from
the DEI garbage that was so distracting during the Biden administration,
and now it's back to basics. What does that mean
for the Department of Defense in the military.

Speaker 9 (10:36):
Absolutely, it's a great point and it's been a real
focus of Secretary hag Seth from the moment he swore
in is getting this woke ideology, this garbage out of
our Department of Defense.

Speaker 5 (10:47):
We want to get back to war fighting.

Speaker 9 (10:49):
We want to get back to basics, standards, meritocracy. Gone
are the days where we focus on things like climate
change and pronouns. We are focused on the MIDI, on
putting America first, and on keeping the American people safe.
And that's again across the department. Just to give you
an example, you even look at our policy shops western hemisphere.

(11:11):
Prior to Secretary agcess tenure under the previous administration was
really focused on climate change across the Western hemisphere and.

Speaker 5 (11:19):
What we could do to go green.

Speaker 9 (11:20):
Now we're focused on getting China out of our hemisphere.
We're focused on the Panama Canal. We've secured first and
free navigation through that canal, and we're.

Speaker 5 (11:30):
Focused on our southern border.

Speaker 9 (11:31):
We've got a lot of troops down there who are
proud to be working alongside customs and Border patrol to
ensure that illegal aliens can no longer cross into our country,
and we've seen illegal crossings drop too, nearly zero, and
that is a testament to Secretary Highss leadership and what
we are doing under this department, Cusie.

Speaker 2 (11:50):
One of the things I learned as a reporter early
on was that the Pentagon is not only just an
incredible war fighting machine, it's one of the largest education
systems in the world. It teaches all of our fighting
men and women's children and bases around the globe. And
Secretary Hegsath and the Department is doing some really unique
stuff to empower parents, homeschooling, other things like that. This
is a major initiative. Just tell us a little bit

(12:11):
about the success of it thus far.

Speaker 9 (12:14):
Absolutely, the Secretary is a big supporter of homeschooling and
of parents being able to provide the education that they
see fit for their children. And we want to do
everything that we can to ensure that parents have options,
especially our military families who already sacrifice so much for
this country and do so much to support our cause
and our mission. So it's really a way that we

(12:36):
can give back, give them the options they deserve, and
also prioritize flexibility. A lot of our military families are
moving all across the globe at different times, and it
can be difficult on children. So we want to make
sure that all options are on the table and they
have all the support that they need to take care
of their families, because again we recognize that they make
incredible sacrifices for this country. It's not just the person

(12:57):
who serves right, it's their entire family that is supporting
them and behind them every single step of the way.
So we really are trying to improve across the board
quality of life for our service members and their families.
That's very near and dear to the Secretary's heart and
it will continue to be so as we look forward
as a department.

Speaker 8 (13:15):
No, it's a really important ecosystem of support is for
people's children whose parents serve in the military. At Kingsley
a year ago, would you have ever expected that you
would be placing your hand on the Bible and taking
an oath as the Secretary for the Pentagon.

Speaker 9 (13:29):
Definitely not, But it has been quite an honor. It's
a whirlwind, for sure. I us we're in inauguration day,
so I've been here almost six months now, I think,
and it flies by, but I can just tell you,
it is really such an honor to serve President Trump
and Secretary Hugseeth. But the biggest honor of my job
is just shining a light on everything that our warfighters

(13:49):
are doing. I always say I have the best job
in the world because I get to talk about our
nation's heroes, and that is truly an incredible honor, and
I'm very thankful to have the opportunity to do it.

Speaker 2 (14:00):
The photos you put up on social media today were
just awesome. Such a great moment to capture. I've seen
it happen many times in thirty five years, but it's
special every time it happens. Kingsley, thank you for spending
some time with us. Thanks for allowing us to cover
this very important story over the last several days with
Jerry dunleavy and now the show here.

Speaker 1 (14:16):
Great to have you in the show today.

Speaker 10 (14:18):
Thanks so much, Thank you so much.

Speaker 2 (14:20):
He said, a little bit of bird watching us thinking, asked,
but there's probably a lot of turkeys, we'll seem sorry,
all right, all right, we're gonna.

Speaker 1 (14:27):
Take cor commercial break.

Speaker 2 (14:28):
A few days ago, we had an incredible opportunity to
sit down with the former World Bank President David Malthouse.
He served under President Trump. He was a critic of
the World Bank. He did a lot of reforms there.
We're talking about the battle between Jerome Poll, the FED chairman,
and President Trump. It's an amazing conversation. I want to
come back to the commercial break.

Speaker 1 (14:44):
We're going to come down.

Speaker 7 (14:45):
We'll be right back here.

Speaker 2 (14:50):
Hey, folks, there's just one simple lifestyle upgrade we can
all make.

Speaker 3 (14:54):
I made it.

Speaker 1 (14:54):
You should do Field of Greens.

Speaker 2 (14:56):
If you drink a delicious glass of doctor formulated Field
of Greens each.

Speaker 1 (14:59):
Day, you're going to feel amazing.

Speaker 10 (15:01):
Like I do.

Speaker 1 (15:01):
Plus, your doctor's going to notice your improved health. You're
going to get your money back. Who does that anymore?

Speaker 2 (15:06):
One Field of Greens customer wrote, the best blood work
I've had in a decade. My doctor said, whatever you do,
and keep doing it. That's exactly what my doctor told me.
Another said, for the first time in years, my cholesterol
numbers are normal. And this mob said after Field of Greens,
my hair, nails, energy, and blood work were all better.
How can a fruit and vegetable drink promise better health?

Speaker 10 (15:24):
What's easy?

Speaker 2 (15:24):
Each fruit and vegetable and Field of Greens was doctor
selected to support vital organs like your heart, deliver kidneys,
your metabolism and the immune system, and of course the
healthy blood cells. Let me get you started on the
same path I'm on with twenty percent off and free shipping.

Speaker 1 (15:39):
Visit fieldogreens dot com and use my code just News.

Speaker 2 (15:42):
That's fieldogreens dot com promo code just News.

Speaker 8 (15:53):
Welcome back everybody. Earlier, we got the chance to speak
to the former President of the World Bank, David Malpass
about FED shared Jerome Powell. A lot of theories floating
around about why rates aren't coming down yet. You're going
to be interested in what he has to say specifically
about that and other things too. Take a look, David.
It's an honor to have you here and in person,
live and in person.

Speaker 10 (16:12):
I'd great to be here.

Speaker 5 (16:13):
Absolutely all right.

Speaker 8 (16:14):
President Trump has had a lot to say about Jerome
Powell FED Chair. I think a lot of people anticipated
a rate change, especially considering that the economy it's not
where President Trump wants it to be, but it's definitely
moving in the right direction.

Speaker 10 (16:27):
The economy is doing well. The rates are too high.

Speaker 11 (16:29):
They should be cut, but you know, the fed's models
just don't allow that.

Speaker 10 (16:33):
The way they're set up right now.

Speaker 11 (16:35):
They look mindlessly at the CPI inflation or the core
PCEE defilator and they say, well, it's still too high,
and also growth is too fast in their mind.

Speaker 10 (16:45):
You know, there's this core.

Speaker 11 (16:48):
Problem at the FED that they think growth is bad.
So I think that's got to be changed.

Speaker 5 (16:52):
Fully, government's antiquated.

Speaker 11 (16:54):
What it's fifty years old, and all their models actually
and it's amazing.

Speaker 2 (17:02):
Where the world's biggest and most important economy and we
have a FED that actually probably operates in the like
a nineteen eighty seventies mindset. What's the way to put
the cardiac paddles on that and start to change it
in a way that it's probably resistant to.

Speaker 11 (17:15):
I think you have to realize it's a sea change,
a new paradigm, whatever word you want to do.

Speaker 10 (17:20):
I say, I call it a full up people.

Speaker 11 (17:22):
And that means changing the models so that growth is
a positive. It makes us better able to pay our debt.
The interstrates can be lower with more growth. Think of
a company. If a company's doing well, they get to
borrow more money, and the market rewards that. Their bond
rating goes up and their interest rates go down. That's
not the way it's done for central banking. And so

(17:45):
you just really have to say, throw that model away
and give us a model that gives us a stable
dollar and lower interest rates. And I think that can
be done, but it's going to take some work explaining
to people and new people at the FED.

Speaker 8 (18:01):
Fresh one does room, Yeah, does Jerom Powell strike you
as the type of person who can institute a new model.
He's been there with seven years at this point and
really no changes.

Speaker 11 (18:10):
And he was there as even prior, and so I
don't think that's the mindset of the current veed of
to make changes.

Speaker 10 (18:17):
They're kind of happy with what they've done.

Speaker 11 (18:20):
Think of the problems though they've had inflation deflation cycles.
They've lost literally a trillion dollars to taxpayers. If you
think the national death's gone from thirty five to thirty
six trillion, that one of those trillions is the FED
in their at risk of doing another trillion they did.
You know, they're supposed to be a regulator, but Silicon

(18:40):
Valley Bank just blew up. And so important to me
is small business lending hasn't been growing and the FED,
the FED is causing that. This is the inequality or
the weakness in median income growth. I think owes a
lot to what thes models are doing. They basically favor

(19:03):
safety and rich people in the way that they operate
the policy. So that all has to every part of
that can be changed. It's up to President Trump, but
also you have to fight for change within the country
and the economy.

Speaker 2 (19:18):
Yeah, no doubt, it is sort of stuck in its ways,
and so it needs that little boost. I want to
turn to what the president has achieved already in just
the first six months. You've got a record amount of
tariff revenues coming in one hundred billion as of last week.
Come in, You've got the jobs report exceeding expectation for
four straight months. You've got the first real spending cuts

(19:41):
in Congress for selling and spending in Congress in three decades.
Still a lot of work to be done, but I
think the economy is probably performing way better than people
would have imagined in January.

Speaker 10 (19:52):
It is, and people sell short the US.

Speaker 11 (19:57):
The wonder of this country is the resilience of businesses,
and so they change rapidly. One of the things going
on is on energy. So if you create the prospect
that you're going to be putting.

Speaker 10 (20:11):
Out more energy.

Speaker 11 (20:13):
Then businesses say, oh, I'm going to be able to
participate in that supply chain, and also I'm going to
be able to make my products, and so they invest.
Look at Europe, they don't have energy and so they're
dead in the water. It's almost a perpetual recession there.
They could change that, but they don't seem to want to.

Speaker 10 (20:32):
Trump.

Speaker 11 (20:32):
President Trump has changed that completely, and so businesses then say,
I'll do sweat equity. One of the problems, and I
dwell on this, is the banks aren't able to lend
to small businesses because of the regulatory framework and what
the FED is doing.

Speaker 10 (20:49):
That also could be changed.

Speaker 11 (20:50):
Think if you had a resurgence in small business lending.
It's been dead flat in nominal terms for three years
and industrial loans, so how can.

Speaker 10 (21:02):
You grow that way? So it's under it.

Speaker 11 (21:05):
It's almost like people in the US are so strong
they're swimming upstream, which is amazing.

Speaker 10 (21:12):
But that's right, Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 2 (21:16):
With Kelly Laughler. Why haven't we changed that regulatory framework yet?

Speaker 11 (21:20):
Now the Small Business Administration kind of does direct.

Speaker 10 (21:24):
Help small business.

Speaker 11 (21:26):
This is not the way a market economy really, So
it's a useful side car, but the core has to
be private sector people starting new businesses and able to
walk into their bank and say, well, you loan against
my inventory.

Speaker 10 (21:41):
I'm trying.

Speaker 11 (21:42):
I'm so successful, I need more inventory and I'm good
for it. And you can look at the inventory. It's saleable.
So make me a loan so I can get more.
And the banks are basically saying no. So I wouldn't
rest on the idea that some part of the US
government can cause this.

Speaker 10 (22:02):
They have to get out of the way.

Speaker 11 (22:04):
I want less government, less fed regulation, less bias toward
big government and big business.

Speaker 8 (22:13):
That makes sense when it comes to the value of
the US dollar. There are a lot of nations out
there who like to leverage their argument by criticizing the
value of our dollars. Part of the reason that the
bricks nations that that coalition was formed. But President Trump
could act quite quickly and make sure that the strength
of the dollar was solidified, couldn'ty.

Speaker 11 (22:30):
I think he could, And may you know, with his
little finger if he said I actually I really like
the dollar and I don't want it to be weaker,
I think it would stop. But you know, those other
countries are jealous of the dollar, and so they love
to bad mouth the dollar. I think the US is
waiting its time. But can I make the case if

(22:51):
you knew that thirty years from now the dollar was
going to be stable and hold its value, interest rates
would be lower, that would really contribute both to short
term and long term interest rates being lower, and that
would allow the housing boom and the construction boom that
we really need. So the question I think for the administration,

(23:14):
and it's you know, a Treasury Department question, is what's
your timing? You know, we went into twenty twenty five
with failures by Biden all over the place, including on trade,
and they've been rightly focused on trade and the tax.
The tax bill, the big beautiful bill, was vital.

Speaker 10 (23:35):
To get done.

Speaker 11 (23:36):
So now the decks are clear on that some of
the trade deals are coming in.

Speaker 10 (23:41):
So I think it's time to think.

Speaker 11 (23:42):
About how do you create a crypto world where the
US is dominant.

Speaker 2 (23:47):
That's key move to the next the next generation of currency.
The other big super player on the stage is China,
and it seems to me watching the last six months
of China's economy, there is real serious troubles there that
maybe don't get reported in.

Speaker 1 (24:02):
The American media.

Speaker 2 (24:03):
That's good for America, But tell us what's going on
with China.

Speaker 11 (24:06):
They had really they were pumping money into real estate
and also excess manufacturing. So now Trump's pulling the rug
out from under them, so They're in trouble. One thing
to keep in mind, though, they really have created a
big economy. I think sometimes people don't realize really.

Speaker 10 (24:25):
How successful they were.

Speaker 11 (24:27):
Part of that was on the back of the trading
system and of the US So as you take that away,
they feel the pressure. But I don't want to be
over confident. They're going to go around the world and
lock up new markets for themselves and we have to
guard against that.

Speaker 10 (24:46):
So for right now, they're kind of.

Speaker 11 (24:48):
Politically bailing out various parts of the country when they
feel like it, and they'll probably keep doing that.

Speaker 5 (24:54):
It makes sense, all right.

Speaker 8 (24:55):
Before we let you go a two for fed church Room, Powell,
you've crossed path paths with him.

Speaker 5 (25:00):
Just a few times.

Speaker 8 (25:02):
Do you anticipate that President Trump's criticism of him is
having any type of impact, And even if so, who
would you like.

Speaker 5 (25:08):
To see in that position?

Speaker 10 (25:09):
I don't know about the impact.

Speaker 11 (25:10):
You know, the FED is this institution that's been entrenched
for a long time, So don't underestimate them either, like.

Speaker 10 (25:17):
Kind of like China. As far as.

Speaker 11 (25:21):
What I think should be done is somebody that has
massive change and realizes what Trump stands for. That means
the median income and if you think of the forgotten manner,
the manufacturing worker, what's going to be good for them?
And I am insistent that if you have a stable
dollar over time, you're going to get lower interest rates

(25:44):
and more job creation and that's going to drive up
real wages, and so the person's going to benefit. And
that's Trump's core audience, that's who he's campaigned on protecting.
So we need to see change at the FED in order.

Speaker 10 (25:58):
To do that.

Speaker 8 (26:00):
US always a wonderful conversation. You're so wise in these issues.
Thank you for being here.

Speaker 10 (26:03):
Thank you both.

Speaker 5 (26:04):
Absolutely all right, everybody, we're going to take a quick
break and we'll be read back.

Speaker 2 (26:13):
Hey, it's a new day in America and a new
administration in Washington, d C. There is a lot of
excitement and optimism about the future, but the reality is
there's a lot of work to do as well, especially
when it comes to fixing our broken healthcare system. The
truth is that the forces that are responsible for breaking
our healthcare system aren't going to simply go away. The
challenges our system faces won't disappear overnight. Now more than ever,

(26:37):
you need to be prepared. That's where the Wellness Company
comes in. Their doctors are medical professionals that you can trust,
and their line of prescription medical kits are the gold
standard when it comes to keeping you safe and healthy
as well as your family. Whether it's the medical Emergency Kit,
the contagion Kit, the first Aid Kit, or the travel kit.
These prescription kits contain an assortment of life saving medications

(26:58):
and guidebooks to a system the proper use of these medications,
from the flu to strap throat, from COVID to the
bird flu, from a trip to the beach to a
trip overseas. The Wellness Company has a prescription kit designed
to keep you and your family safe, make America healthy again,
Start it, set home to your part and protect the
health of you and your family. Go to TWC dot

(27:20):
health slash just news today in order that's TWC dot
Health slash just News and use the promo code just
news to save ten percent off.

Speaker 1 (27:35):
Welcome back in America.

Speaker 2 (27:37):
As we said at the top of the show, Democrats
have a mortgage fraud problem. First it was Karrol Moseby,
the Baltimore State's Attorney Democrat in Maryland, got convicted. Then
it was the Attorney General of New York and pursued
Donald Trump. She is now under investigation. And now Senator
Adam Schiff. Now that last one will probably sound familiar
to you because back in October we had Seamus Burner

(27:59):
on the show did really important story that said the
Senator was using two homes at the same time as
his primary residence, which a lot of people said was
Margarete fraud. Today we learned from President Trump there's a
referral from Fanny May, the mortgage giant, to the Justice
Department to investigate that. Joining us now, the man who
broke that great story right here on Justin News in

(28:21):
Real America's Voice. He's the executive director of research at
the Government Accountability Institute, one of the best investigative reporters known,
and a best selling author of the book Compromised in
Controlling Arcs and Fallout, which I was lucky enough to
work on. He is our good friend, seamous printer Shamous welcome.

Speaker 12 (28:37):
Back, Hey John Amanda, It's great to see you. Yeah,
this is big news. No one is above the law.
As the Democrats like to remind us, that story outlined
the pattern of a parent mortgage fraud where Adam Schiff
since two thousand and three has owned homes in either
Maryland or Burbank, California, refinancing them several times along the way,

(29:00):
and claiming that both homes were his primary residents.

Speaker 3 (29:03):
That's a huge no no.

Speaker 12 (29:05):
It comes with all kinds of financial perks, you know,
homestead exemptions and lower interest rates. You're supposed to pay
a higher interest rate on your second home. Well, if
they're both your primary residents, this could amount to tens
of thousands of dollars. And in twenty twenty, Adam Shift
basically admitted by reclassifying the Maryland home as his secondary

(29:27):
residence that he had for over ten years been double
dipping here.

Speaker 3 (29:31):
So this is big news.

Speaker 12 (29:32):
Fandi MADS Financial Crimes Division says that this is an
apparent pattern of mortgage fraud. They've shipped it off, as
you said, to the DOJ and next steps are whether
there's going to be a grand jury. And there's a
few other things that could happen.

Speaker 8 (29:50):
Do you anticipate that the outcome will be anything close
to justice though, because well, I suppose you look at
instances like Bobby Goldbar's bomban Indez and a lot of
people lot, Well, nothing's actually going to happen there, but
it did.

Speaker 5 (30:02):
Maybe that's because we're.

Speaker 8 (30:03):
In a new era of law and order and under
a department of Justice that actually believes in keeping and
enforcing the laws.

Speaker 12 (30:11):
Yeah, well, there's a number of potential remedies here, I
mean beyond there.

Speaker 3 (30:15):
I mean Adam Schiff apparently.

Speaker 12 (30:16):
Got to get out of jail a free card from
Joe Biden on the way out for all kinds of
you know, any kind of possible crime. So that's that's
a tough thing to get past. But there's other civil penalties.
Fannie May can actually retroactively claw back some of this money,
slap him with a fine. I believe GOP House investigators

(30:36):
can open up hearings and get him on the record
and him him going down as a you know, potential
mortgage cheat is a form of justice.

Speaker 2 (30:44):
Yeah, it would be forever appended to his bio, which
a politician does not like to have negativity attached to
their bio. When you are pardoned, like and obviously there's
a big question about whether the pardons are lawful. Well,
let's a super second, they would stand scrutiny. You still
can be sued civilly, so the mortgage giant could sue

(31:05):
him for margat fraud under the civil statute. See and
perceive that. There's an interesting twist. Once you've been pardoned
for something, you can't take the Fifth Amendment anymore because
you're no longer in danger of being prosecuted. So he
may actually be forced to allocute in some of these venues,
like let's say Congress call them. He might have to

(31:26):
confess to you because he couldn't take the Fifth Amendment. It
really does put Adam Schiff in a really awkward position
right now, doesn't it.

Speaker 12 (31:35):
Yeah, that you're exactly right, John, And this interesting twist
with you know, once pardoned, you get this immunity. Therefore,
you know you can't claim the Fifth because you don't
face any legal jeopardy. Hunter Biden was in the same situation,
and this really does actually make Joe Biden look bad
for giving these kind of blanket pardons when you don't
even know what potential crimes may have been committed. Like

(31:56):
I don't think Joe Biden, if he knew anything at
all when he was signing these pardons or having the
auto pen sign these pardons. I don't think he was
thinking about Adam Schiff's mortgage fraud problems. He was thinking about,
you know, all of the investigative witch hunts that he
was involved with. So signing these blanket pardons, I mean this,
there's got to be something done about this. You can't

(32:16):
just say retroactively anything this person ever committed. You know,
they're getting out of jail free for. But it does
present this new interesting scenario where he can't plead the
fifth So this will be this will be kind of
fun to watch what I expect the justice that will
be done. He'll probably pay a fine, pay back the
back taxes that he saved on, and you know potentially

(32:39):
the you know, the homestead exemptions and all of that,
and the maybe Fanny may will make him pay that
interest that he saved by claiming as a primary residence.
So there's a number of remedies, but overall, just look
forward to hearing him have to actually finally answer for this.

Speaker 8 (32:54):
Yeah, as Sean said, having that asterisk next to his
bio is.

Speaker 5 (32:58):
Definitely going to lead struggling that one. Seamus.

Speaker 8 (33:02):
I want to ask you about this explosive reporting put
out by a legendary journalist by the name of John
Selman regarding this possible ten year grand conspiracy being investigated
starting essentially in twenty sixteen twenty seventeen, investigating wiretapping.

Speaker 5 (33:19):
Who knows Donald Trump carried.

Speaker 1 (33:21):
Out It was a big part of a baraging right right.

Speaker 8 (33:25):
And carried through the twenty twenty and the twenty twenty
four election. That's going to be a really, really long
and hard and nuanced and probably really difficult investigation.

Speaker 5 (33:35):
But do you think we'll finally get some answers at
the end.

Speaker 3 (33:39):
Yeah, it is good. I mean thankfully for John.

Speaker 12 (33:42):
Actually, I mean thanks to John's reporting, Sarah Carter's, Peter
Schweitzer's too many to list.

Speaker 3 (33:48):
Three elections were interfered.

Speaker 12 (33:49):
With the twenty sixteen, the twenty twenty, and even the
most recent election. You've got FBI and swamp monsters trying
to put their fingers on the scales in these elections
going back to Komy, but then through twenty twenty and
into twenty twenty four. So a grand conspiracy is truly
what happened here, and fortunately we know most of the

(34:10):
things that went down.

Speaker 3 (34:11):
Now it's just time to finally.

Speaker 12 (34:13):
I mean, I was so encouraged to see, you know,
CIA Director Ratcliffe, the CIA memo where they finally admit
things we've known for years with Carter Page and the FISA,
you know, the defrauding, really the FISA court with this stuff.
It's good to see finally the agency's fessing up to
what went down and whether charges, whether we're past the

(34:35):
statute of limitations or not, remains to be seen. But
you know, twenty twenty four wasn't that long ago, and
you definitely have shenanigans happening. Shenanigans have probably happened in
every election, but not to the same scale as twenty seamous.

Speaker 2 (34:50):
We're going to win to Rocky for a second. President
Trump just came out at the airport. We want to
catch what he's saying. Will you come run back to
hang on one second?

Speaker 6 (34:56):
Explained any better? The letters are a deal. Depress doesn't
want to pick that up.

Speaker 7 (35:01):
But I will veer.

Speaker 6 (35:02):
From those deals on occasion when somebody is willing, like
if Japan would open up their country.

Speaker 7 (35:07):
They don't do that. They just don't do that, and
I don't either. I don't subscribe to it one way
or the other. But they won't do that, So we
might just stick with a letter.

Speaker 6 (35:18):
South Korea is inclined to maybe do that, so we'll
let you know.

Speaker 7 (35:22):
But we have letters out every time I send out
a letter. Essentially, that's a deal.

Speaker 13 (35:27):
The President on your grillings loggut part, what the gate
that you gave August part?

Speaker 7 (35:32):
Why stick with the gag? And you're saying that you know,
I haven't payments started on August. The only thing about
that's really sacred about August first is.

Speaker 6 (35:41):
That's when payments start, so they have to start paying
billions of dollars to you as people. Are you a
citizen of the gun Ta? All right, good, you'll be
very happy because you're going.

Speaker 7 (35:52):
To be getting a lot of money.

Speaker 6 (35:54):
Just like they found a budget surplus. We have a
budget surplus, a twenty five billion dollars.

Speaker 7 (36:00):
Everyone said, how did that happen?

Speaker 6 (36:02):
It hasn't happened in many years. It happened because of
good management and tariff.

Speaker 7 (36:08):
Planner.

Speaker 13 (36:08):
Really, he's all right, do planner release more details for
Vietnam China deals, there're gonna be a paperwork.

Speaker 7 (36:15):
Release the public.

Speaker 6 (36:16):
But I might I don't think it matters how much
you release of the deal. We have a Vietnam deal,
and I would say that that deal is being pretty
well set, pretty well set.

Speaker 7 (36:28):
Again, that's an opening of their country. They've opened it up.
Just so you know, these were close countries. They were
wonderful people, wonderful.

Speaker 6 (36:35):
Leaders, very strong, smart leaders. But their countries were close
to us.

Speaker 7 (36:40):
But our country wasn't close to them. And so I said,
you got to open up your country. So we're gonna see.
But the Vietnam deal, we may open it. I mean,
I don't know. I can't tell you. Is it necessary?

Speaker 1 (36:52):
No, yeah, I don't think so.

Speaker 14 (36:54):
Behind you crave, why did you settle on giving food
in another fifty days?

Speaker 4 (36:58):
It seems like he's had.

Speaker 7 (36:59):
A lot of time.

Speaker 6 (37:00):
I don't think it's a long time. I think really
the question should be asked, why did Biden get us
into that ridiculous war?

Speaker 7 (37:07):
Why did Biden bring us there that should never ever
have happened? That war, this is Biden's war.

Speaker 6 (37:13):
I'm just trying to end it because we're saving a
lot of lives.

Speaker 4 (37:16):
Why do you think his opinion will change in fifty
days when he hasn't over the last a lot.

Speaker 6 (37:20):
Of opinions changed very rapidly. Might not be fifty This
might be much sooner than fifty days.

Speaker 7 (37:26):
So that end.

Speaker 4 (37:27):
When do you think the first patriot missiles? Some of
these weapons that.

Speaker 7 (37:30):
Are allied, why they're already.

Speaker 4 (37:32):
Being shipped for what countries?

Speaker 7 (37:34):
They're coming in.

Speaker 6 (37:34):
From Germany and then replaced by Germany. And in all
cases the United States gets paid back in full. So
what's happening, as you know, is the European Union, if
you look mostly European.

Speaker 7 (37:47):
Unions, but let's put it in the form of NATO.
It's very similar. But NATO is going to pay us
back for everything.

Speaker 6 (37:55):
In some cases, we're going to be paid back by
countries of the European Union.

Speaker 4 (38:00):
I'm just starting to see this.

Speaker 7 (38:01):
But we're always getting our money back in full. So
we're not going to have any more investment to make.
We're getting our money backed in full.

Speaker 6 (38:09):
And if we can make a deal, that'd be great.
We're saving five or six thousand soldiers a week. They're
Russian and the Ukrainian soldiers.

Speaker 7 (38:17):
They're not American soldiers. And we won't have foods in
the ground. But uh, it's a shame.

Speaker 6 (38:24):
Five thousand last week they say seven thousand, one hundred
soldiers both Russian and Ukraine.

Speaker 7 (38:31):
We're killed.

Speaker 4 (38:32):
Guy's Iran. Have you seen any progressing talks with Ron.
We haven't really heard about that long.

Speaker 7 (38:36):
Well, they want to talk, I'm in no Russian to talk.
They would like to talk.

Speaker 6 (38:42):
I'm in no Russian to talk because we obliterated this site.

Speaker 7 (38:46):
They'd have to start all over.

Speaker 6 (38:47):
In fact, it's obliterated to the point that it's not
usable anymore.

Speaker 7 (38:52):
They have to figure a different mountain. That mountain is
so blown up inside and so unstable that they would
have to pick a different mount our. People really did
the job. Yes, please on the bed there?

Speaker 4 (39:06):
Would you fire?

Speaker 13 (39:08):
Jrun Howell over the treachery.

Speaker 7 (39:10):
Well, he spent two and a half million dollars building
this place. I have to say this.

Speaker 6 (39:16):
I think he's terrible. I think he's a total stiff.
But the one thing I didn't see him as a
guy that needed a palace to live in.

Speaker 7 (39:24):
You talk to the guy, it's like talking to nothing.
It's like talking to a chair. No personality, no high intelligence,
no nothing.

Speaker 6 (39:34):
But the one thing I would have never guessed is
that he would be spending two and a half million
dollars to build a little extension onto the bed nobody's
ever seen.

Speaker 7 (39:44):
I think it sort of. It is because if you
look at.

Speaker 6 (39:46):
His testimony to the House for the Senate, you take
a look at the testimony, it's under earth.

Speaker 7 (39:53):
That whole thing is he's not you know, he's not
talking about the problem. It should be problem two and
a half million. And that's doing a half billion. Now,
that's gonna be a lot more money than two and
a half billion to a spend. And with all of
that to house thousands of people to give him information.

Speaker 6 (40:11):
And yet out of the seventy one economists and they included.

Speaker 7 (40:15):
Me, Me and one of the first got it right.
I got it right, and one of other genius got
it right, and everybody else was wrong. Sixty nine were
wrong and two were right. I was one of them.
And I don't have a lot of people. I have hours,
I have Doug, I have a few people. He has
thousands of people, and he got it wrong.

Speaker 6 (40:37):
Though, I think when you spent two and a half
billion dollars on really a renovation, I think it's pretty disgraceful.

Speaker 5 (40:47):
Have you spoken to.

Speaker 9 (40:48):
President poven since you're announcing go I have. Do you
think when you're seeking to him on the phone, does
he say that he wants he is.

Speaker 7 (40:56):
Yes, he says he wants peace. He says, so far
it's all talk and no accident. But you know, if
you think about it, India, Pakistan, we did so many
to Congo, and I mean, look at the deals we've met.
We made all these beast seals. Look at Rwanda.

Speaker 3 (41:14):
It was an.

Speaker 7 (41:14):
Impossible deal to make with the Congo. I made that.

Speaker 6 (41:17):
I made all of these deals, Serbia, Kosovo, and here's
the one deal.

Speaker 7 (41:23):
And actually Vladimir called me up. He said, I'd love
to help you with respect to making a deal with
a couple of them like a rat.

Speaker 6 (41:34):
I'd love to help you, I say, Vladimir, I only
want to help with one deal Russia, because.

Speaker 7 (41:39):
You're the only deal that we're not doing.

Speaker 6 (41:42):
Dwelling He oftentimes oftentimes he said no, he wants the.

Speaker 7 (41:47):
Beast and I think he does. I hope he does.
We're gonna find out soon and it could be before
the fifty days.

Speaker 4 (41:53):
Was it twice yesterday you were talking about this. You
mentioned conversations you had with the first lady after talking
with President Food. Has she influenced your thinking on this event.

Speaker 6 (42:03):
She's very smart, she's very new Jewels, she's very new Jeel.
In a sense, she's sort of like me. She'd like
to see people stop dying. You know, people said, are
you for one side or another? I'm for the side
of people stopping dying. We have five thousand, six thousand
and seven thousand people a week at least, and that

(42:24):
doesn't include.

Speaker 7 (42:25):
People from the cities and towns that are having rockets
loved in there.

Speaker 6 (42:30):
I mean people are dying in the cities in towns too,
but we're talking about seven thousand, one hundred in the
last eight days die and I'm for stopping them.

Speaker 13 (42:42):
On the bed chair Stark, sir, if sto fessing your
Treasury secretary, your number one option whenever JOm Powell leaves her.

Speaker 7 (42:50):
Oh he's an option ing her taught he's very good.
Well he's not because I like the job he's doing right.
That's why he's nothing to closed her.

Speaker 6 (42:57):
I'd like I don't know if he was under pleasant,
maybe he wasn't, but I do like the job he's
done right.

Speaker 7 (43:04):
So in that sense, probably it's not that much of
an option.

Speaker 10 (43:08):
Right.

Speaker 7 (43:08):
Scott's been great, He's been terrific. He did a good
job today. He's a very soothing part. You know, he's soothing,
all right.

Speaker 4 (43:16):
He's a person farmer cuticle life.

Speaker 6 (43:19):
And for farmer suticals will be tariff probably at the
end of the month, and we're gonna start off with
a low tariff and give the pharmaceutical companies a year
or so to bill, and then we're gonna make it
a very high.

Speaker 10 (43:31):
Tariff because.

Speaker 7 (43:33):
We got to move them. And look, there's two ways
you do it.

Speaker 6 (43:36):
You make money and for and or you have them
move here so they don't have to pay the terror.
Those are the two ways the farmeraceutical companies are moving
back to America where they should be.

Speaker 2 (43:48):
Then I count out for sure, is that in the
same timeline the semi conductor to Terraff's.

Speaker 6 (43:53):
Similar actually less complicated, but similar semiconductors.

Speaker 4 (43:59):
And Jeff, he's a president. I know you people to
move on, but I'm curious, why do you think your
supporters in particular have been so interested in the Epstein story.
I don't so upset about how it's been handled.

Speaker 7 (44:11):
I don't understand why they would be so interested.

Speaker 6 (44:14):
He's dead for a long time. He was never a
big factor in terms of life. I don't understand what
the interest or what the fascination is. I really don't.

Speaker 7 (44:26):
And the credible information has been given. Don't forget.

Speaker 6 (44:30):
We went through years of the mother witch hunt and
all of the different things to steal dossier which was
all fake. All that information was fake. But I don't
understand why the Jeffrey Emstein case would be of interest
to anybody. It's pretty boring stuff. It's sorted, but it's boring,
and I don't understand why it keeps going. I think

(44:52):
we really only pretty bad people, including fake Deuce, want
to keep something like like that.

Speaker 7 (44:57):
Goes but credible information, let.

Speaker 6 (45:00):
Them give it anything that's credible, I would say, let
them have it.

Speaker 4 (45:05):
Mister President, Our question on AI, how do you want
Americans to think about it?

Speaker 13 (45:10):
Are you concerned about soft laws or God or the
new technology?

Speaker 7 (45:16):
Which interesting because we need jobs. We need a lot
of people to work. You know, we're building we're gonna
be building very shortly hundreds of factories, including AI. We're
building a lot of car factories. They're all coming in
from other countries now in order to avoid paying the derabs.
And we need people working.

Speaker 6 (45:36):
So if AI can help us with that, that's a
positive because we're not going to have enough workers to
take care of it if we don't create something.

Speaker 7 (45:43):
So, whether it's robots or whether it's AI, we need
somebody to take care of You agree with them.

Speaker 10 (45:49):
I need so many jobs to fill it.

Speaker 7 (45:52):
I mean, think about fifteen trillion dollars. That's five million.

Speaker 15 (45:56):
People working in these factories, building them great high paying
jobs in America. President Trump is brought back, so goose
shops of course aren't if you win.

Speaker 7 (46:07):
So let's go. Let's train America and let's get it going.

Speaker 6 (46:11):
Anyway, what we.

Speaker 14 (46:13):
Want to say about this, I think with AI, as
Howard the President said, we're going to need more workers
in this country. Because President Trump is the greatest economic
developer that this country's ever had. It's brought back this
record amount of foreign direct investment and a record amount
of US investment going back into job creation.

Speaker 7 (46:31):
But the mix is going to change. AI will take.

Speaker 14 (46:34):
Jobs away, like software development because AI can write.

Speaker 7 (46:37):
Code, but AI can't.

Speaker 14 (46:39):
Why you're building new plumbing. I mean kids go into
the trades today they're all going to be making one
hundred and fifty grand and they all have amazing live
build companies, start businesses.

Speaker 4 (46:48):
I mean this is this is part of the boom
of America.

Speaker 14 (46:51):
Because middle class, working class, working Americans will never.

Speaker 4 (46:55):
Have had it as good.

Speaker 14 (46:56):
They have a lower taxes, more regulation, and more opportunities
to go to work to building.

Speaker 6 (47:01):
We need people, we really need because we're building so
many factories in the country, and so AI can.

Speaker 7 (47:06):
Help with that. But what also is gonna help. We're
gonna be robots, you know, the robots.

Speaker 6 (47:11):
I think are gonna be a big deal, and that's
gonna help.

Speaker 5 (47:14):
Also Russian actions here on the secondary part.

Speaker 4 (47:17):
For you concerned that secondary tariffs.

Speaker 7 (47:20):
On buyers, the rush and whale will hurt Americans if
we re fire guy, I don't think so. I think
that whole thing is gonna go away. Eventually, it should
have gone away. And Putin does say I want piece,
I want piece, but so far he hasn't lived up
to that. So I think it's gonna go away. But
we're gonna find out soon. We're gonna find that soon.

Speaker 9 (47:37):
More details on the sanction is no, I don't want
to do that, but.

Speaker 7 (47:41):
They're very fighting, they're.

Speaker 6 (47:43):
Very significant, and they're gonna be very bad for the
countries involved, and they'll be very very powerful and very
bad for the country is involved. And I hope we
don't have to pull that strength and maybe we'll.

Speaker 7 (47:56):
Say gotta end, gotta stop the killing.

Speaker 14 (48:00):
Pres a reproustrated time that the House wasn't able to
move on that crypto legislation.

Speaker 6 (48:04):
Oh you know, the interesting thing is that twelve votes
were votes where they wanted it to be stronger in terms.

Speaker 7 (48:11):
Of crypto vapul.

Speaker 6 (48:13):
I figured, oh wow, that's sort of interesting because I
was focused really on today's reading, not that.

Speaker 7 (48:18):
But the interesting is the vote, so it's necative. Most
were because they wanted it to be at the safe cuts.

Speaker 6 (48:24):
They wanted to be stronger for people with fittcoin or crypto.

Speaker 7 (48:29):
They wanted more strike, which is interesting. Don't want to
refine in the UK trade deal. We have a little
bit discuss but the deal is really very well done.

Speaker 6 (48:39):
But I'll beat with the Prime Minutes and we have
a good relationship and I think it's going to be
and it'll be very shortly and it'll be probably a
Paperdine Scott.

Speaker 7 (48:49):
Lauss at any of it. Want to with saticized text.

Speaker 4 (48:53):
You want to goble savicause Jerry member of fat again, we're.

Speaker 7 (48:56):
Spacer size taxes.

Speaker 1 (48:57):
When you like Republicans to.

Speaker 7 (48:58):
Redraw the Congression, there's about four of them. I'll let
you figure that one out. But we have about four
of them.

Speaker 6 (49:04):
In three cases it's one, and in one case it's
two or three, where at Texas would be five.

Speaker 4 (49:10):
Are you concern California will turn around and do the
same thing.

Speaker 7 (49:13):
Well, we'll fight them. You know, they're so corrupted in California.
You never know what's going to happen. But we've done
pretty well in the courts at California. You see, we're
batting about one thousand.

Speaker 6 (49:23):
Ultimately, we start off a little bit slow and then
we get a lot of hits.

Speaker 7 (49:27):
I'm just the president.

Speaker 13 (49:28):
You said today at the event in Pittsburgh that if
it wasn't for mister Luddy, mister Besson, who wanted to
do more heels, that you would basically just go with
the letters.

Speaker 7 (49:38):
You've said that a few off the time.

Speaker 13 (49:39):
I just want to clarify you just want to go
with the parrels.

Speaker 7 (49:42):
And I think they would like to make deals more
than me.

Speaker 6 (49:46):
I'm satisfied, but they would like to make deals more
than I'm not saying that they're wrong after this night.

Speaker 7 (49:53):
In my opinion, he and Scott and maybe even Dug.

Speaker 6 (49:57):
To a certain extent, you're more like me, I think,
but they would like to make deals more than then.

Speaker 7 (50:02):
I'm very happy with the deals the way they are.
Those are very right. There's a very simple deals.

Speaker 6 (50:07):
It's whatever the percentages, and we base that in a
lot of things, including the deficit.

Speaker 7 (50:13):
And you know various things that you know. I think
it's a much faster and we don't forget.

Speaker 6 (50:19):
We'll be releasing a letter soon talking about many countries
that are much smaller.

Speaker 7 (50:25):
Well, you're not going to do letters per se. You
might do an individual letter, but it's going to go
very quickly, and the number will also be less much
fucking books.

Speaker 6 (50:32):
These are countries that are many of them, you know,
like two hundred countries you want to.

Speaker 7 (50:38):
Have in countries, African countries.

Speaker 15 (50:41):
You have a huge amount of countries that are small,
and the President's just going to deal with them sort
of the way he thinks that.

Speaker 7 (50:47):
The right way to deal with it. We'll be possibly
set one tar up for all.

Speaker 4 (50:51):
Of over ten percent over ten percent, How.

Speaker 7 (50:53):
I'm probably a little over ten percent. You know, fift
means we don't do a lot.

Speaker 6 (50:57):
Of business, but we do.

Speaker 7 (50:58):
You don't still significant?

Speaker 4 (51:00):
What about Israel?

Speaker 6 (51:00):
Is the president?

Speaker 4 (51:01):
Is that related to your other like the Caza negotiations.
Is that tied up in other issues?

Speaker 8 (51:06):
Now?

Speaker 6 (51:06):
I think Israel is going to be It was going
to be fine. We had a great victory with Israel.
It was a great, great victory what we did with
the Bat two.

Speaker 7 (51:15):
Bombers and all of that.

Speaker 6 (51:17):
And you know, I never thought of it, but so
many people are thanking me. They say, no president had
the guts to do it, because you know, this has
been going on for twenty five years. In fact, when
the pilots came to the Oval office, they said, Sir,
we and our predecessors have been working on this attack,
but ty five years. Have a good time, everybody, And

(51:40):
if you're backing the president, backing, thank you.

Speaker 10 (51:51):
Wow.

Speaker 2 (51:51):
A lot of news there, Amanda, the President talking about
his expectation for terrorists, how it's going to play out,
the revenue that's going to come in, and also a
lot of discussion about don't worry about the inflation, it's
not going to drive inflation where you're going to get
these stairs negotiated down to a good spot, a pretty
robust Q and A. It's remarkable any times a day

(52:13):
President Trump comes out and just starts taking questions. He's
not afraid to answer. Joe Biden could have done any
of that.

Speaker 8 (52:18):
Yeah, I'm trying to remember the metric that they talked
about at the beginning of President Trump's second term, and
it was like, you know, in the first three months
of President Trump's first his second term in office, he
took more questions than Joe Biden did his entire care office.

Speaker 5 (52:33):
It's amazing.

Speaker 8 (52:33):
And you know, President Trump talking about the tariffs, that
is again messaging to Jerome Powell, saying, chill it on
the inflation talk. We've got these tariffs, this tariff revenue
coming in. And I love what he said about August first.
It is not a magical date. It's you know, the world,
especially renters in the world. I've been a renter, you know,
for much of my life, and I think of you know,
that's when rents.

Speaker 5 (52:52):
Do, and that's when the payments are due for the tariffs.

Speaker 2 (52:54):
So of course, yes, yeah, it's really remarkable. Speaking of
getting questions to the President.

Speaker 1 (53:00):
We're going to mount tomorrow.

Speaker 5 (53:00):
Indeed, we are so the show.

Speaker 1 (53:02):
We're really excited about that.

Speaker 2 (53:03):
Lots of talk about over just the last few days
of developments, a pretty remarkable day all around. I think
we'll be watching now. We had some guests lined up.
We're going to get them on tomorrow. Bud Cummins, former
US attorney Little Box going to be here. We'll talk
about the Grand Conspiracy case and also what sort of
fate a senator from California might just face. Yeah, we're

(53:25):
talking about Adam Shift. So tuning tomorrow. It's going to
be a great night.

Speaker 8 (53:27):
As it turns out, Shifty Shift was shifting back and
forth from his Maryland to his California residents and apparently
even realizes how bad the California market is in real estate.

Speaker 5 (53:36):
All right, everybody, thanks.

Speaker 1 (53:37):
So much for Maryland was going to be the time.

Speaker 8 (53:40):
I know who knew Maryland was going to be the
cheaper option between the two because I've seen housing prices
in Maryland and along the state they're quite expensive. All Right, everybody,
thanks so much for being here with us tonight. We're
going to be back here again tomorrow night at six pm.
Eastern with the President of the United States and many
other amazing guests like we were talking about but comes,
we'll be back to market