August 11, 2025 • 50 mins
Just the News No Noise on Real America's Voice
Segment A: REP. ERIC BURLISON ON FEDERALIZING DC POLICE, EPSTEIN FILES AND MORE
Segment B: CAN PRESIDENT TRUMP GET A DEAL DONE WITH VLADIMIR PUTIN?
Segment C: TEA-PARTY IRS SCANDAL UPDATE
Segment D: RFK JR'S MOVE ON MRNA VACCINES
Segment E: JUST THE NEWS HAS SOME BREAKING NEWS FOR YOU AT 8:30!
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:22):
Good evening, America. Welcome to the Mond edition of Just
the News, No Noise. I'm your host, John Solomon, reporting
to you, as always from the nation's capital here in Washington,
d C. Where it was a historic day and it's
going to be a historic day all through the night time.
Let me explain. First, we've got the decision by President
Trump over the weekend to federalize law enforcement in Washington,
(00:42):
d C. The streets here have been unsafe for years.
People are afraid to go out after six or seven
o'clock at night in Washington, d C. Donald Trump wants
to do something about that. Last week we showed you
the statistics Washington, d C way more unsafe than any
other major capital city in any other country in the world.
That's a shame. President Trumping the lead today to take
the city back, And tonight we're going to start to
(01:04):
take you to new places in the weaponization investigation. For
the last few months, we've been helping you understand just
how much involved the FBI and the CIA wasn't helping
Hillary Clinton and the Democrats create a false narrative against
Donald Trump weaponizing the intelligence tools of this country to
intervene in three consecutive elections. We've given you the evidence.
(01:26):
More is to come, but you have a pretty good
sense of who did what and when and why they
did it and why it's a corruption the system. Starting
tonight at eight thirty, mark your time on your watch,
we're going to start to tell you how the news
media got enlisted to be the co conspirator in setting
these false stories. We're going to tell you who the
FBI thought was leaking classified information. They had really good evidence,
(01:48):
including whistleblowers who came out and fingered the exact whistleblowers.
You're going to get to see that starting tonight and
for the next three four days, you'll see how the
CIA and the FBI worked the news media to create
that false narrative. We're going to do that over at
justinews dot com, So mark your time, check your app,
make sure you look for the news alert around eight
thirty tonight. Every night this week around eight thirty, we're
(02:11):
going to drop a new segment of this story. And
by what time we're done, I think you'll know who
the leakers were and also how the media became a
complicit and duped part of this false narrative. Setting in America.
With that, let me bring in my amazing co host,
Amanda Head, who's tracking some other headlines. She's in California
this week, Amada, what's on your radar?
Speaker 2 (02:31):
Indeed, John, in fact, I think that these drops every night,
we should call this transparency Week. Courtesy of John Solomon
and his reporting team. John, I know that the American
people feel such a dead of gratitude to you for
continuing to put this information out there. So I'm looking
forward to putting all of that out there. But President
Trump today in the briefing room, John in absolute president
(02:53):
Trump fashion, taking over and delivering a ton of news.
He was also accompanied by other members of his cabinet
and also DCUs a Jeanine Pierro, who made it very
clear that she is going to be no nonsense when
it comes to her approach for federalizing Washington d C.
I love the analogy that President Trump made from the podium.
Speaker 3 (03:14):
He said, you know, you would never go to a
restaurant if.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
It had a dirty door, because if the front of
the business, if the front of the house is dirty,
you know the kitchen is too. And he made that
comparison to Washington d C. If you come to the
nation's capital and it's dirty and crime britten, with homelessness abounding,
empty empty storefronts. Then that is a reflection on the
rest of the country. And I thought that that was
just such an apt comparison. So I'm looking forward to
(03:38):
seeing what happened. You've got, you know, DC Police Union
president endorsing this idea, saying that our officers have been
under pressure, they have been stretched thin for a very
very long time. So d C I have a feeling
in a few months maybe going into the fall is
going to look very very different compared to what it
has been because, you know, as we were discussing before
(03:58):
we came to air, especially for petite women like me,
but everybody in general, it's just not a safe place
to go once the sun goes down, and you don't
even know where these pockets of crime are. It could
be anywhere in the city. So I'm looking very forward
to seeing that eradicated. And I know a lot of
folks who who live in d C, work in d C,
or travel to d C are as well.
Speaker 1 (04:17):
Yeah, no doubt about it. By the way, that police
union endorsement was a complete surprise to President Trump and
the White house. They did not know that was going
to happen. A pleasant surprise for them, but it tells
you how suppressed the frustrations of law enforcement have been
in DC. They just want to do their job. They
know they can make the city safer, but the city
council and its policies have kept them handcuffed them from
(04:39):
keeping us safe. And we just see that crime every night.
Gangs of hooligan's running around attacking people, carjacking people, killing people.
It's unacceptable. We're keeping a close Eyemanda on one story
down in Texas. A mass shooting at a target in Texas.
Looks like the suspects incus the history of mental illness.
Our prayers and thoughts are with the family and victims
(05:00):
and everybody traumatized by that. We'll be watching that throughout
the night, hopefully give you an update before the show
is over. If this big takeover DC is going to happen,
and I think it's going to happen. Congress is going
to have to help the president. And we're very lucky
to be joined at the top of the show by
a man who has injected lots of common sense since
he got to Washington, d C. He's a Congressman for
the great state of Missouri, a great friend of the show,
(05:22):
a great friend of truth and oversight in America. Congressman
Eric Burlson, Congress. Good to have you on the show.
Speaker 4 (05:29):
Great to be on. John, good to see you, and
Amanda you.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
As well, Sir, good to see you. We love all
the work you're doing. I'd like to just get your
reaction to the process that started today. Today's the police Department,
But I suspect by Labor Day that the takeover of Washington,
d C. By the federalment will be much larger. Your
thoughts and what you're seeing and hearing, and how Congress
may be able to help.
Speaker 4 (05:51):
Yeah, it's long overdue.
Speaker 5 (05:53):
Anybody that lives in the DC area understands that this
is necessary. Look, whenever I first got elected, I will
never forget walking at night on the Capitol Mall and
seeing a gang of young individuals on motorcycles riding their
motorcycles across the Capitol lawn evading law enforcement. It was crazy,
(06:15):
crazy in our nation's capital that we have, that we
have gangs doing things like that. In that first year,
I heard about about two or three members of Congress
that were either carjacked or mugged. We had one senator's
senator's staff who was stabbed in the head right near
(06:36):
the Capitol. And then, of course, just recently you had
the event where the intern of ron Estes was murdered,
and then of course you have the DOGE employee that
was nearly beaten to death.
Speaker 4 (06:50):
And so these are all anecdotes. But look, at the
end of the day, anybody that lives.
Speaker 5 (06:55):
In DC area understands that it's not safe, which is
really sad, because we're the greatest country on the face
of the earth, and we should have the safe we
should It should reflect our gnacious capitals, should reflect that
we're the greatest country on the earth.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
Yeah, exactly, I'm a congressman. In today's day and age,
everything in politics has become politicized, including impossibly especially law
enforcement and law and order.
Speaker 3 (07:21):
However, in Washington, d C.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
You don't have these hooligans out there saying, oh, I
think that's a Republican leaving Capitol Hill. It doesn't matter,
it doesn't They don't discriminate. It could be a Republican,
it could be a Democrat. Are you hearing from your
colleagues on the other side of the isle. I know
you're in your district, but are you hearing that they
are supportive of this idea as well, or does it
seem like they're pushing back against it.
Speaker 4 (07:42):
Well, I think that you're seeing a little bit of
a pulling back on this.
Speaker 5 (07:46):
I think that the Democratic Party, many of them, other
than the crazies like AOC and Mom Donnie, most Democrats
have recognized that they went too far, that this defund
the police effort is not is not logical, and it's
not politically a good idea either, and so it's not
(08:07):
good for your personal safety, especially when it's in the
city that you're living in. So I think that you're
seeing Democrats take a knee here, or I haven't seen
them come out public and any of them come out
publicly in favor of this. But I don't think that
you'll see a lot of fighting either. This might actually
be a resolution because the President has thirty days to
(08:33):
federalize law enforcement in DC. After that, it'll take an
Act of Congress and a resolution. And I think, because
this is to your point, a manon this is a
bipartisan issue.
Speaker 4 (08:45):
I mean, everybody likes to be safe.
Speaker 5 (08:47):
In their person and so I would hope that we
could pass this resolution to extend the president's ability to
keep this city safe.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
I think a lot of people should forget that before
nineteen seventynine it was truly a federal city. The government
ran it obviously home rule given to by a Democratic
Congress and the Democratic president at the time, Jimmy Carter,
But for most of our country it ran under the
auspices of the federal government. And now it seems like
it's headed back in that. When we're done, I assume
if the president does all of the things that would
(09:19):
require a federal takeover, the Congress got to figure out
what to appropriate right for moneies in terms of, you know,
we have problems with streets here. This has got to
sometimes driving in d DC is like driving in Beirut
after eleven on explosion. The seats are tough, you've got
the crime. Is Congress ready to walk through that process
and get the right funding and get the city fixed?
Speaker 5 (09:41):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (09:41):
I think so.
Speaker 5 (09:42):
I mean, look to your point, what we've seen the
last few years had really not been an improvement in DC.
I can think of, for example, the traffic issue, the
fact that all of these woke liberal members on the
board of Aldermen and for DC, they've really prioritized bicycle
(10:03):
lanes as opposed to people actually driving, and as a result,
it's just complicated things that it's made it more difficult
to navigate DC in a vehicle, things like that, along
with all of the restrictive building codes and restrictive policies
when it comes to road construction. For the President Trump
(10:26):
even mentioned it that once they take over, they can
actually get things done, not the way that they've been,
not the way that this bureaucracy strangles any kind of
development or construction or innovation.
Speaker 4 (10:39):
And so we might see Washington, d C. Become beautiful again.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
Yeah. Well, I.
Speaker 2 (10:48):
Know what a normul idea our capital city, our representation
to the world looking beautiful, sir.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
I want to shift gears.
Speaker 2 (10:54):
To something I know Congress can do, and I know
that there is a will there as well, especially for Republicans.
Speaker 3 (11:00):
You guys just got done with the one big beautiful bill.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
You're now home in your districts, but you got to
come back and hit the ground running with spending cuts.
Speaker 3 (11:07):
What are your main targets?
Speaker 5 (11:10):
Yeah, to me, I think that there's a We've left
a lot on the field when it comes to reductions
in the in the in the Green New Deal or
the Green New scam, there's a lot of that that's
still in place, and I think that look, as members
have realized they've made those cuts, they're not nobody's.
Speaker 4 (11:29):
Going to lose their seat over it.
Speaker 5 (11:30):
There isn't a huge outcry for this, So hopefully that
builds some courage we can come back and do some
more spending reductions in that. I also think that we
can find savings in in the Metacare program by making
it actually better for seniors.
Speaker 4 (11:48):
There is a there's.
Speaker 5 (11:49):
A way that insurance companies are able to manipulate the
structure and the classification of individuals so that the insurance
companies make more money and it costs the taxpayer more
that it doesn't necessarily or actually it doesn't really benefit
the patient at all.
Speaker 4 (12:04):
And so there's.
Speaker 5 (12:05):
Things like that that I think that we have a
responsibility to do that would actually save the taxpayer dollars
while at the same time making sure that these programs
are good for everybody that actually needs them.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
So I want to turn to another subject that I
know as close to your heart, and it isn't about
scoring political points. It's about getting justice for a series
of victims who were denied it, going all the way
back to the Bush Justice Department of seven and eight,
when there was a chance to bring real justice to
Jeffrey Epstein. Subpoenas went out from your committee last week.
James Comer was on the show talking about that. The Chairman,
(12:40):
your thoughts about what will happen in September when Congress
gets back. Can we get to the bottom of how
we let this monster slide without any real punishment?
Speaker 5 (12:49):
Yeah, I hope so. And look, the efforts of Chairman
Comber have been very admirable. I'm really proud to serve
on the Oversight Committee. The committee has had to vote
to subpoena these individuals, and the Chairman is following through
on that. We had to vote to subpoena the records,
and the Chairman is following through on that, which I
(13:11):
think will As long as there's momentum and there's progress
being made, I think that that's a good thing. And
if there isn't any progress being made and Chairman Comer
is being blocked, then we've got the fallback, which is
the Massy Bill that resolution. So I think one way
or another. This information is more. There's information that's going
(13:35):
to be released, and that's a good thing, because, look,
the American people are sick and tired of this government
holding on to all these secrets. They're sick and tired
of being lied to by the intelligence community and by
a deep state that we're just like, for example, we're
just now getting information about what really happened in the
jfk assassination. I hope that we don't have to wait
(13:58):
sixty seventy years to find out what really happened when
it came to Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 3 (14:06):
Goodness me, I hope you're right, sir.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
Before we let you go, I also want to ask you,
because I know that Chairman Comber is also champing at
the bit to question Hillary Clinton regarding Russia Gate.
Speaker 3 (14:15):
Now, we all.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
Remember the interrogations of your where she said at this point,
at this point, what difference does it make?
Speaker 3 (14:24):
Does it make?
Speaker 2 (14:24):
Do you anticipate that we're going to get some real
answers for her? And even if statutes have run out,
how important is it for the American people to at
least hear things from her mouth and hear her either
defend it, plead the fifth or totally cave.
Speaker 5 (14:39):
Yeah, I think that the Clintons have really his history
will demonstrate that they're one of the worst stains on
the United States.
Speaker 4 (14:49):
You have an individual like.
Speaker 5 (14:50):
Bill Clinton, who was very close to Epstein. It may
very well be that he was involved or at least
knew about some of the less station that was occurring. Look,
he was on the Lolita Express over almost two dozen times.
There were reports that he was at Epstein Island twenty
plus times, and so somebody that's spent that much activity
(15:13):
on the plane and at the island, it's highly likely
that he knew what was going on. Then you have
Hillary who may have been involved in trying to suppress
the investigations on f scene as well while during her
time as Secretary of State. And so these are things
that I think the American people deserve answers for, and
(15:35):
I hope that they don't plead the fifth. I don't
think that they can deny Congress the deposition. But look,
it'll be very telling if the president, former president of
the United States, has to plead the fifth because anything
that he talks about related Jeffrey Fstein would be self incriminating.
Speaker 1 (15:56):
Yeah, that would be an extraordinary moment for history. Nob
out about it. Commson and Eric Purlson for the great
sent of Missouri. We always love having you on. We
always get lots of wisdom when you're on. Thanks for
joining us today. Thank you, Yeah, great to have you on.
All right, folks, After the break, we'll look ahead to
President Trump's meeting with Vladimir Putin on Friday? Can he
get a deal done? And does Russia actually want to
(16:17):
play ball? We'll have that with Colonel Rob Madus right
after these messages. Hey, folks, a new administration in Washington,
DC has brought lots of positive changes when it comes
to fixing our broken healthcare system. The reality is, however,
that there's only so much the government can do, and
if we really want to make America healthy again, that
(16:38):
starts at home with each and every one of us,
myself included. Could your health issues be caused by an
invisible enemy? Fatigue, bloating brain fog? What if parasites are
the real culprit? Did you know sixty million Americans apparently
have parasites there everywhere in our food, water, and Pat's
secretly invading your body in wreaking hav it on your
gut energy levels, even your brain. And Big medicine doesn't
(17:02):
want you to think about this because one good cleanse
could change everything. Our friends at the Wellness Company have
a real solution, a gold standard parasite cleans combining Ivermectim
with my Benzazol two FDA improved medications. His prescription base
just fell out. A quick medical intake and get a
three month supply ship to your door. Go to TWC
dot health sash just news and use the code just
(17:23):
news to save sixty bucks plus free shipping. Go there
right now.
Speaker 6 (17:34):
Well, we're going to have a meeting with Latimir Putin,
and at the end of that meeting, probably in the
first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a
deal can be reading because just what they do on the.
Speaker 3 (17:47):
Everybody.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
That was a clip from earlier today, President Trump talking
about his upcoming meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, so
to talk to us about if that deal can be struck.
As United States Air Force veteran and host of The
Rob Maynas Show and founder and chairman of Gator Pat
Colonel Rob manis, Colonel, thank you so much for being
back with us.
Speaker 7 (18:06):
Hi, Amanda, John it's good to be back.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Yeah, good to have.
Speaker 3 (18:10):
You, sir.
Speaker 2 (18:10):
History has shown us not only in this administration, but
in President Trump's first administration when it comes to negotiating.
Despite the naysayers who say he's never had any you know,
foreign policy experience, he's never had any of the experience
to negotiate foreign trade deals or foreign foreign policy deals,
it seems like he's doing a bang up job of it.
Do you anticipate that he's right that within the first
two minutes he's going to know which way this goes?
Speaker 3 (18:34):
Well?
Speaker 7 (18:34):
I think so.
Speaker 8 (18:35):
You know, he's been communicating with Putin for quite some
time now, over the last you know, ten twelve years,
and Wit Costs, Eve Wit Costs doing a great job
presenting our views and presenting Ukraine's views, I'm sure, and
that has resulted in this meeting, quite frankly, and nobody
(18:57):
thought that this meeting would actually add and quite honestly,
but Donald Trump keeps proving people wrong because that's what
he does.
Speaker 7 (19:07):
He said it, that's what I do. I do deals.
He's going to know. Now.
Speaker 8 (19:11):
One of the things that's happening on the ground in
the war, guys, is that the Russians have made some
significant gains based on reporting from both sides that we're
seeing in the last twelve hours or so around a
town called ob Rosk, which is a main logistical hub,
and they have several ouns around there that have key
(19:33):
logistics hubs connected to that also that are in their sights.
So they've moved rather quickly on this one day, considering
they move slowly and grind it.
Speaker 7 (19:42):
Out all the days previous to this.
Speaker 8 (19:45):
But as I've said before, President Putin has his military
objectives in mind, and I said last week that I
thought he was probably close enough to where he could
set up a deal. And then the next thing we
heard about was Witcock comes home and President Trump and
now is the meeting. So I think the president's right.
He's going to know right away. And it looks like
(20:06):
Putin is making some objectives that he's been wanting and
that'll set him up to be able to negotiate swamping land.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
Yeah, that's what it seems like. We're brought down there.
And that's right. You did actually predicted this would happen.
He wasn't done with where the military strategy was. I
wanted to get to a certain point to strengthen his hand,
and it seems like he could be at that moment now.
President Zelenski in Ukraine was at a different note on Sidday, saying,
I've never given up land for a deal. I mean,
he has to be delusional, right. The only way he's
(20:37):
going to get a peace deal is if he gives
up some of the land, right.
Speaker 7 (20:41):
I honestly don't think he's delusional.
Speaker 8 (20:43):
He's just staying pat on the current position and he's
got their constitution to rely back on that.
Speaker 1 (20:49):
John Right.
Speaker 8 (20:50):
But once this negotiation actually happens and the president comes
away from it understanding exactly what's going on with the Russians,
mister Lezzki, I predict will change his team.
Speaker 1 (21:03):
Yeah, I think good prediction. I think.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
What does Russia stand to lose if a deal is
not made when it comes to their current partners and
folks who could and nations that could become future partners.
Speaker 7 (21:16):
Well, and that's the challenge.
Speaker 8 (21:17):
You know, they don't stand to lose a lot militarily,
but they're trading partners and their economics standing, which translates
into their ability to continue to resource their forces and
keep their forces in the field like they are doing,
and are able to do better than even NATO and
our western industrial.
Speaker 7 (21:37):
Base is doing. But that challenge is also a double
edged sword. Guys.
Speaker 8 (21:42):
You know, if we put more sanctions on China for
because of the Russia oil they buy, that has another
effect on our economy.
Speaker 7 (21:52):
So the president's looking at that.
Speaker 8 (21:54):
I'm sure he's a lot smarter guy when it comes
to trade and when it's fastened up to warfare that
most people realize, and he's looking at that very closely
to make sure that if he needs to, he's able
to do it the right way. He's already taken some
steps with India, but the China part of it is
a much bigger deal and he's going to have to
(22:14):
take that on with the right perspective and in the
right avenue.
Speaker 1 (22:21):
Colonel, I want to turn to some of the things
that the Ukraine Russia war has done to military strategy
in general. Obviously, we have hypersonic missiles, we have nuclear weapons,
we've got stealth bombers, and we've got all these things.
But it turned out cheap and expensive drones were an
effective way against traditional warfare, and both sides have used him.
(22:44):
Now it's a great effect. Is the US military adapting
to realize that that was one of the unexpected strategies
that this war has proven out, and are we ready
to have a war one day where drones might be
one of the bigger challenges we face.
Speaker 8 (23:00):
You know, John, when you all asked me that a
year ago, I was skeptical because of some of a
lot of the things that we were seeing and had
heard about over our key facilities and our installation here
inside the United States. I've seen some good movement forward
in open source reporting that indicates that we are taking
it seriously. But quite honestly, I'm very concerned about our installations,
(23:22):
especially our strategically vital installations right here at home, because
of the rules of engagement, than commanders are at risk
averse when it comes to kinetically taking down a drone,
whether it be through electronic means or through the means
of shooting it down. And that's a concern because we
have some very important installations that have to be protected,
(23:44):
not to mention protecting our families and our troops that
are on the ground in this Yeah, good point.
Speaker 3 (23:52):
I'm colonel.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
President Trump has an unconventional attitude when it comes to
meeting foreign leaders adversaries, sometimes I think that that applies
here with Russian President Vladimir Putin. But he's meeting with
him nonetheless, and I look at the reaction of folks.
Speaker 3 (24:05):
I see all these.
Speaker 2 (24:06):
Headlines on CNN and liberal news media and President Trump's
former national security advisor John Bolton out there and they
saying the meeting, say that it's not going to produce
any fruit.
Speaker 3 (24:18):
Why would they be saying.
Speaker 8 (24:19):
That, Well, it's the same old never Trumper set an
outfit demand. You know, the President doesn't know what he's doing.
He's playing the Putin. Putin's going to take advantage of him.
Speaker 1 (24:33):
I don't know.
Speaker 8 (24:33):
When they're going to figure it out, if ever, But
the man is a lot smarter than they are.
Speaker 7 (24:38):
And it's almost as if.
Speaker 8 (24:40):
He's done foreign a national security policy when combined with
trade policy for his entire life, where these people are
supposed to be the experson and they keep getting it wrong.
Speaker 7 (24:50):
When was the last time we won a war?
Speaker 8 (24:52):
What about the debacle withdrawing from Afghanistan? And over and
over again? And if he listened to them, we would
never have been successful with the strikes in Iran against
their nuclear facilities because they don't know how to get
the job done. He does. So, I listen to what
they say. I look at it, but I really discounted
(25:13):
a lot.
Speaker 7 (25:13):
I mean it's kind.
Speaker 8 (25:14):
Of like the Boy that Cried Wolf at this point.
Speaker 1 (25:18):
Yeah, no doubt. Before we let you go, Klon, I
want to ask real quickly about another dynamic that's coming
into much more clear focus, and that is the top
echelons of the CIA and the FBI clearly involved in
manipulating political intelligence for political purposes, launching investigations knowing that
what they were investigating was a dirty trick by Hillary
(25:39):
Clinton to make it look like Donald Trump was a
Russian stooge. I think we may have crossed the rubricon
in the last decade. That even pales in comparison to
what we learned from Watergate. Your thoughts on the state
of our intelligence agency and the politicalization of it.
Speaker 8 (25:54):
This politicization of our intelligence agencies and they're overtaking of
the unelect did parts of the executive branch of the
United States government makes Watergate looks like a preschool exercise, John,
That is how bad this is. We have to hold
people accountable. There have to be more than just investigations.
(26:17):
There need to be indictments and trials and hold these
people accountable. And it's not just inside the CIA, although
the CIA is a major culprit in this corruption and
this law breaking, but the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Executive Branch,
bureaucrats in the Department of Defense, the National Security Agency,
(26:39):
all of them are infested with partisans at the top
and the middle management level, and probably at the management
level just below middle management level.
Speaker 7 (26:50):
And we've got to get a handle on this.
Speaker 8 (26:52):
And that's where the personnel system has got to come
into play. I know russ Vote developed a plan to
address policy making positions that were a career civil servant.
That has to be a part of this holding folks accountable.
And it's got to be cleaned out. And we've got
to look at some reorganization and recreation of some of
(27:13):
our intelligence capabilities, in our law enforcement capabilities, because they
have completely destroyed and abused them and abused Americans' rights.
And I'm so glad Harmeiat Dylan is in the Civil
Rights Division at the Department of Justice because I think
she's going to be a key player in some of
these crimes.
Speaker 1 (27:31):
I think you are right. We had her on the
show last right too.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
A lot of folks on the show have acted exactly
what you just said, which is, unless there are purp walks,
it's just going to continue happening and we can't afford
that as a victory. United States say Forest veteran and
host of the Rob Mainus Show. Everybody go check out
his show. Colonel Rob Mainis, thank you so much for
being here, sir.
Speaker 3 (27:50):
And on the other side of this brief, we have
an update on a.
Speaker 2 (27:53):
Story that we brought you a few weeks ago regarding
the IRS, so we're going to get to that. On
the other side of these formercial.
Speaker 1 (27:59):
Messages, Hey, folks, in today's world of misinformation and political spend,
it's more important than ever to support organizations that put
truth and values firus. That's why I support and belong
to AMAC, the Association of Mature American Citizens. They're the
conservative alternative to AARP, and they're working to preserve faith, family,
(28:23):
and freedom, three things that matter to all of us.
AMAC members get valuable benefits, discounts on healthcare, travel and
health insurance, exclusive online resources, and a subscription to AMAX
Beautiful magazine, one of the best reads out there for
an informed patriot like you, and I and all of
this is available for as little as a dollar twenty
a month with a five year membership. That's what I have,
(28:43):
a five year membership. Join me, join the movement today,
visit AMAC dot us, slash just News, and help AMAC
protect America's future. Welcome back in America. A couple of
weeks ago, we had a segment highlighting that some of
the folks inside the IRS who go all the way
(29:05):
back to the Tea Party targeting scandal, Remember when the
IRS wrongly went after conservative groups just because they were conservative,
not because they had a nonprofit problem. Well, we have
an update. There's been some impact from the great work
for the Alliance for IRS Accountabilities. Whore joining us right
now to give us that update. The CEO for the
Alliance Virus Accountability Chuck Flint, Chuck Goodevy back on the show.
Speaker 4 (29:27):
John, I'm great to be with you.
Speaker 1 (29:29):
All right. There's been a lot of up people at
the IRS the last few months. I mean I think
four or five, maybe six new leaders over the last time,
but more importantly down from the leader maybe some changes now.
Tell us what happened since the last time we had
you on the show.
Speaker 9 (29:43):
Well, Elizabeth Cassenberg and Hollypaz had both been placed on administratively.
They were both involved in the Tea Party scandal. Holly
Paz was accused of misleading Congress. She was closely tied
to lowest learner. And they've been placed on leave. And
there are more people at the IRS who are like this,
These deep state burrowed in employees john who view the
(30:07):
IRS as their playground to just go ahead and dish
out punishment to taxpayers according to whatever personal agenda it
is that they bring to work that day. And there's
still a unit over there that the one woman, Holly
pass who was placed on leave, she was the commissioner
of a division, if you can believe that, and she
was running a pass through audit team over there that
(30:30):
has been absolutely bludgeoning conservative businesses into, you know, with fines,
and it's been very disruptive. I've talked to a lot
of businesses and partnerships. It's been a big problem over there.
Speaker 1 (30:46):
Important to get it.
Speaker 7 (30:46):
Thanks Chuck.
Speaker 2 (30:48):
Under President Trump and with this class of Republicans in Congress,
it seems like they are looking for any way to
draw down the impact of the IRS on the American people.
They've talked about how recisions are going to be a
tool belt, a tool and their tool belt they're going
to be wielding back and forth. Is the IRS untouchable
though when it comes to recisions. Is there a way
(31:09):
to clawback funding and clawback their resources such that they're
not going after everybody willy nilly and using it as
their own weapon of politicization.
Speaker 9 (31:19):
I don't think that the IRS is untouchable at all.
And you've seen Secretary Best in highlight and now that
he's the acting Commissioner, he's spoken a lot about modernization
and the reason that that's so important is that the
IRS can actually do more with less and they can
focus on serving taxpayers rather than harassing them. There was
actually a report that came out talking about these taxpayer
(31:41):
assistant centers and kiosks that they have where they're self
service kiosks for the taxpayers and they're just not operable.
And this is what we're getting back to once again,
the IRS needs to focus more on serving the taxpayer
rather than just audits and enforcement and quite frankly, harassment.
(32:01):
So to answer your question, yes, and they've downsized the
workforce by some reports, the IRS perhaps twenty five percent.
They're headed in the right direction and we feel very
confident about where they're going.
Speaker 1 (32:14):
Yeah, what are some other places check that we can
make some improvements. I mean, when you call the IRS,
it's like going to the DMB. Nobody wants to have
a conversation. We've spent billions of dollars trying to get
better computer systems, better customer service, but I think the
impression of the American people is it's only gotten worse.
What are some other ideas that you've been working on
(32:35):
to try to find a more customer friendly, more common
sense IRS for the future.
Speaker 9 (32:41):
Well, John, it all starts with the morale and the
attitude that they have. I know that that sounds kind
of cliche, but it's so deep seated and deep rooted
over there that before you can go ahead and start
making these changes, you have to change and fix the
culture then.
Speaker 4 (33:00):
Set over there.
Speaker 9 (33:01):
And that's what we're very focused on is and that's
why I bring up the pass through audit team over
there that's been going after conservative businesses in partnerships and
they have employees that have made very politically charged comments.
That's where it has to start, and then you can
begin to peel back some of the other layers. Secretary
(33:21):
Veston has mentioned the modernization aspect of it that is
so crucial to the IRS because they run some of
the oldest information technology systems in the federal government. They
date back to the nineteen sixties. And it's not that
this hasn't been a focus of the agency, it's just
that they don't. They haven't had anybody that has wanted
(33:42):
to get it done because they've had, frankly, other agendas
and agendas that have not been well suited to helping conservatives.
Speaker 2 (33:52):
Yeah, Chuck, I flew into Burbank on Friday morning, and
as a lot of airplanes do when they're coming into
Burbank or lax, they do an around swoop and they
come from the west side, And so that actually put
me right above the Pacific Palisades and the destruction that
is still there. Shouldn't the IRS be spending time, I
don't know, auditing the one hundred to one hundred and
(34:14):
fifty million dollars that was donated that those folks haven't
seen a dime of.
Speaker 9 (34:20):
Man, it's a great point, and that scandal is only growing.
Speaker 4 (34:25):
Fire Aid raised one hundred million.
Speaker 9 (34:27):
Dollars on you through a series of concerts, and they
promised direct relief to people thousands of people who lost
to their homes out there, some of whom I know,
and those people have not seen a dime of that money.
It's disappeared into a web of about one hundred and
sixty nonprofits. A lot of these seem like, you know,
(34:51):
kind of like liberal pet causes. You've got the California
Climate Core, which trains climate activists. You've got the California
Native Project, which got money they claim that California has
stolen land, and they're a social justice mission. When you
look at these groups, you have to say to yourself,
what in the world do they know about disaster relief
(35:13):
and helping people? And you know, without kind of going overboard,
but you know, I'm a former prosecutor and I look
at this and it looks a heck of a lot
like money laundering.
Speaker 4 (35:24):
You've got fire Aid.
Speaker 9 (35:26):
Fire Aid gave the money to the Andenberg Foundation, and
then the Annenberg Foundation went ahead and distributed it to
one hundred and sixty plus groups. And the victims say
that they haven't received a dime of that money. How
do you lose one hundred million dollars and so is
there a role for the IRS. The answer is yes,
(35:47):
they should go in and look at these groups and
if they haven't lived up to their charitable mission for
which they were incorporated, well, frankly they should strip their
tax exempt status.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
Yeah. The tools are there, they just need to act
a real quick check before we go. Take to today
the Inspector General for Taxpayer Protection founder these self service
chios at the IRISHPA out there. I guess they didn't work, right.
We deployed these.
Speaker 9 (36:10):
They don't work, John, and some of them haven't worked
for four hundred and sixty three days.
Speaker 4 (36:16):
It's crazy and it is the most amazing thing.
Speaker 9 (36:20):
And going back to your question again about ways to
improve the IRS and things we're working on. We actually
highlighted that issue a couple of months ago and then
the Inspector General followed up on that in report now
saying that the program lacked proper oversight, but that those
kiosks excuse me, are critical for helping these taxpayers because
(36:44):
they go into these what they call taxpayer assistance centers
and they can it makes the process more streamlined.
Speaker 4 (36:53):
They can either deal with an official or they can.
Speaker 9 (36:56):
Go and they can use one of these kiosks, and
that's connected to IRS dot gov and it's so anyway,
it is a method by which they can go ahead
and improve the taxpayer experience. They haven't done it, and
it's very disappointing to see that, but I have a
feeling that it's probably going to be cleaned up.
Speaker 1 (37:15):
Well. The fact that take to investigate it is exactly
why Americans should be watching all the great work you're
doing at Alliance Virus Accountability. You're actually finding things that
need to be fixed. Jacqu Flent. Great to have you
on the show today. Thanks for joining us.
Speaker 4 (37:27):
Sure, thanks so much, appreciate it that great conversation.
Speaker 1 (37:30):
All Right, folks, we can take a quick comercial break
when we come back. One of my favorites, doctor Peter McCullough,
he had it all right during COVID nineteen. He's going
to be here to discuss the latest about what AHHS
Secretary of RK Junior has done on mRNA vaccines. If
you thought the idea of Robert Kennedy he did last
week's out up familiar it was, doctor McCollough said on
the show A long time And I'll have him next
right after these.
Speaker 2 (37:49):
Messages welcome back everybody. A big splash in the MAHA movement.
Last week, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Junior pulled the
plug on twenty two federal contracts for mRNA vaccines, everything
(38:12):
from COVID to the flu. It's, by the way, going
to save American taxpayers about a half a billion dollars.
And of course there are a lot of concerns surrounding
mRNA vaccine technology.
Speaker 3 (38:21):
So here to talk.
Speaker 2 (38:22):
About all of that with us is world renowned doctor.
He's also the chief scientific officer at the Wellness Company
and he is the author of Vaccines Mythology, Ideology and Reality.
Our good friend, doctor Peter McCullough. Doctor McCullough, great to
see you.
Speaker 3 (38:37):
Thank you, sir.
Speaker 2 (38:39):
We all know about the spike putteines. There are a
lot of folks who got vaccinated who are concerned about
it and have been asking about how they can get
rid of the get rid of it, if that's even possible.
You guys have an answer, the Ultimate spike detox.
Speaker 3 (38:54):
Tell us about it.
Speaker 10 (38:56):
This has been a big advance the Ultimate Spike detogs,
which is a combination of critical natural ingredients to help
the body get rid of the spike protein. I just
finished with a patient who's had a very nice reduction
and the spike protein antibody levels. We can directly measure
spike protein in the blood and researched patients out to
three point two years after the shots. It needs to
(39:18):
be cleared. Everybody should be looking at the ultimate spike detox.
Speaker 1 (39:23):
Yeah important, all right, So the mRNA vaccine, you have
long been helping us understand the potential dangers and some
of the information that was covered up. Now the HHS
Secretary himself has pulled back mr vaccine development. How important
a moment is this and what do you think comes next.
Speaker 10 (39:40):
We've had a chance to look at Messenger RNA vaccines
and you know, the Achilles heel of the technology is
that it's the synthetic genetic code for a protein or
an anigen. There's no ability to shut this genetic code
off once it goes into the body. I mentioned Fizer
Maderna lasting three point two years producing the dangerous, potentially
(40:02):
lethal spike protein. All the same would be true for
you any bola antigen or an antigen for Marburg virus,
and the Messenger RNA technology is just far too dangerous
it's not understood. And I think Kennedy was right by
pulling back on these projects. Now the projects were government
dollars invested with you know, Santa Fe or Maderna or Pfizer.
(40:27):
And if these companies want to take on the development efforts,
and you know, you know, they certainly can do that.
But we don't need the government, especially BARDA, which is
a unit of the NIH, it doesn't need to be
in the vaccine business.
Speaker 2 (40:41):
Sure, doctor McColloch. When Secretary Kennedy announced this on c
in Unison, big med and big Pharma immediately started criticizing
the decision, saying it was anti science, fear mongering, saying
people were going to die. Are people going to die
just for pulling federal contracts?
Speaker 10 (41:00):
No, because the companies, you know are fleshwish cass cash.
If they believe there's a compelling market, they can bring
forward these technologies. We don't even to have government dollars
assisting private companies or public health companies to make these vaccines.
And not only that these were just twenty two contracts.
We have DARPA, the research unit of the military, which
(41:22):
has an adept P three program since twenty twelve, trying
to develop vaccines to end pandemics within sixty days. That's
still going on. So the United States is still deep
into messenger rn AY development.
Speaker 4 (41:35):
I think the.
Speaker 10 (41:36):
Withdrawal ought to be broad, it ought to be complete.
The technology does not look ready for prime time.
Speaker 1 (41:42):
Yeah, I think a lot of people are starting to
feel that way. I want to talk about the mosquito
borne virus that's been spreading across China. A lot of
hype in the media about that. What's up another Trump presidency,
another virus emerging in China? People think, oh no, not again,
DejaVu all over again. What are you seeing?
Speaker 10 (42:00):
Wonder about the genesis of these stories. We're talking about
the chicky unavirus, which is an RNA virus.
Speaker 4 (42:07):
Carried by mosquitos.
Speaker 10 (42:09):
A paper by Ribiero and colleagues indicates that there's thirty
five million cases a year. So you get a mosquito
bite and develop a fever and some muscle lakes and
it's transient. Why is China reporting on several thousand cases?
You know, they probably contribute to millions of cases themselves
in China. Turns out there's a new vaccine called Vimcuna
(42:33):
mcunha was just released a few months ago, and I
do have to wonder is the genesis of these stories?
Is it really just market generation for a new vaccine.
Speaker 2 (42:44):
No, absolutely, because it's not particularly fatal. Is it has
anybody died from it?
Speaker 10 (42:50):
Well, there have been deaths, but they're not adjudicated. And
you know, elderly people can get sick with other illnesses
and it can be part of this spiral. And importantly,
there are therapeutics that look very promising in pre clinical
studies and early clinical studies, ivermactin being one of them,
nicol simide as well as nitas oxide.
Speaker 4 (43:12):
So the bottom line.
Speaker 10 (43:13):
Is, you know, even if this became a big issue
in the United States, we have treatment. But the principles
are mosquito control, just like what's done for yellow fever,
it's done for malaria, and should be done for chicken univirus.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
Makes sense, that's indeed.
Speaker 3 (43:29):
Doctor Peter mccalluch. We love having you on.
Speaker 2 (43:31):
I want to ask you one more question though, because
if they've got a vaccine for it, that's great. But
I see people in China being locked down. I see
the same you know, all of the same things that
they did leading up to COVID I'm seeing them doing. Now,
what message is that sending to the rest of the
world about that? And are we going to have people
on this side of the globe who are panicking the
same way.
Speaker 10 (43:52):
There seems to be, unfortunately, a marketing approach that's fear based,
that is to be fear for, become locked down, and
then seek a vaccine to be liberated, to get freedoms back.
Speaker 4 (44:07):
I think it's wrong.
Speaker 10 (44:08):
I think it's dangerous, it's coeresive, and it's not advancing
the ideals of vaccinology broadly or in medicine. So this
is a bad pattern and it's disturbing to see it.
I hope the rest of the world doesn't fall for
this thirty five million cases a year. We can get
(44:29):
through it. There are therapeutics, There is a vaccine the
in the Wings, But the bottom line is the vaccine
has never been tested for safety. It's actually never been
tested to see if it prevents chicky unit disease. These
vaccines are broad on the market because they raise antibodies,
which sometimes can be a false surrogate.
Speaker 2 (44:48):
Wow, Doctor Peter McCullough with the Wellness Company, thank you
so much for being with us.
Speaker 7 (44:52):
Sir, thank you.
Speaker 2 (44:55):
All right, everybody, go to TWC dot health slash just
News today. You're going to use the code just News
and you're going to get ten percent off on anything.
Speaker 3 (45:04):
Anything that you.
Speaker 2 (45:05):
Put in your order, anything you put in your cart
and purchase, you're going to get ten percent off. So again,
use the code just News at checkout. We're going to
take a quick break. We've got a few more stories
that we want to wrap up before we head out,
so we'll see on the other side.
Speaker 3 (45:30):
Welcome back, everybody.
Speaker 2 (45:31):
I want to touch a little on the teas that
John gave at the top of the show regarding these
stories that he's going to be putting out every single night.
Speaker 3 (45:38):
John, I'm going to put you in the hot seat
and say.
Speaker 2 (45:39):
Give us a little bit more information, give us a
little bit more of a taste of what we're going.
Speaker 3 (45:43):
To be getting.
Speaker 1 (45:43):
Well, we had whistleblowers who came forward to the FBI
as early as twenty seventeen saying this member of Congress
was leaking classified information. I was in a meeting where
he authorized the leak of classified information. By the way,
members of Congress can't authorize the leak of classified information.
It's illegal to do. So tomorrow where you're going to know,
(46:04):
or at eight thirty tonight you're going to know who
that lawmaker was and what the whistleblower said. It's really
remarkable stuff. In the days that follow, you're going to
see other people close to senior officials in Washington who
said I was present when this official agreed to leak
classified information to the media. It raises the question, if
they had this good and evidence, why wasn't anyone prosecuted
(46:25):
for leaks. I hear lots of attorneys generals over the
last two decades say I'm upset about all the cause
of my leaks. Well, they had real evidence, they could
have prosecuted people, but like often in Washington, they whiffed.
I think that pattern is really important. I think the
other thing that's important reminding everybody that there were willful
and eight are the betters in the news media, the
traditional news media, in fomenting these false stories to us
(46:49):
from the leakers, and I think they will be held
accountable to You're going to see certain reporters and news
organizations named in these documents. It's going to be an
eye opener for a lot of folks.
Speaker 3 (47:00):
So everybody that's going to be happening in about an
hour and a half. So everybody turn up the volume
on your TV right now.
Speaker 2 (47:05):
I'm going to help you out right now, Hey, Siri,
set a timer for an hour and a half. Okay,
so now you're going to get a timer, and about
six minutes after that time or five minutes after that
timer goes off, you go to justinnews dot com and
check out what John is posting. Now, John, I want
to shift to a few different other stories because one
of the things that Chuck Flint said regarding auditing this
(47:25):
one hundred million dollars that was supposed to go to
victims of the Pacific Palisades fire, he made a comment,
he said, how do you just lose one hundred million dollars?
And I chuckled to myself, and it's not funny at all.
I suppose it's Gallo's humor, But California had this infamous
story from a few years ago where they allotted twenty
four billion dollars to take care of the homelessness crisis
(47:47):
here in California and they basically just lost the money.
So when he said that, I wanted to say myself,
I wanted to say to him, California loses one hundred
million dollars very very easily, especially considering they lost twenty
four billion on that homelessness situation.
Speaker 3 (48:04):
But it's sad to see, but he's exactly right.
Speaker 2 (48:06):
You know, you've got the IRS targeting middle and low
income Americans for not dotting their eyes and crossing their
te's exactly shoperly, exactly the way that the IRS wants
them to. And instead they are allowing one hundred million
dollars that should be going to people who lost everything.
And you know, it's just a very different way of
handling things inenttioning.
Speaker 1 (48:26):
Yeah, and I don't think we're done hearing about the
pains and maybe the gains of Californians. I suspect that
LA is going to be the next city after Washington,
DC to maybe see a federal takeover of police or
certainly some sort of National Guard. We had the National
Guard out there for the ice protest. But I'm guessing
President Trump drops some hints today that DC isn't the
(48:47):
only city he's looking to clean up. I got to
think Los Angeles is at the top of LIS What
do you think?
Speaker 2 (48:52):
I think so too, especially considering in a few years.
We are really going to be ramping up the preparations
for the Olympics, but also just next year.
Speaker 3 (49:01):
We've got FIFA World Cup coming.
Speaker 2 (49:03):
So they got to do something because I know there
are a lot of people who look at Los Angeles,
they see the news stories, they see the crime and
the homelessness, and they think to themselves, I don't know
if that's somewhere I really want to go. So it
would be for California's own good John.
Speaker 1 (49:15):
Yeah, well, keep an eye. I think that's next after Washington,
d C. By the way, we're not done with DC.
We took the police today, but I think the rest
of the city is going to be federalized before the
end of this month.
Speaker 2 (49:24):
Yeah, speaking of the protesters that took place there, the
protests that took place here. Regarding ice, President Trump said,
you spit, we hit. He was talking about protesters getting
in the face of law enforcement and spitting in their faces,
which is assault.
Speaker 3 (49:39):
You should be prosecuted for that.
Speaker 2 (49:40):
But I'm already seeing liberal media like Bloomberg a headline
saying that President Trump was saying that to homeless people.
Speaker 3 (49:47):
That was not the case.
Speaker 2 (49:48):
President Trump was saying that about people who are assaulting
law enforcements.
Speaker 3 (49:53):
So let's go ahead and to this in the bud.
Let's not let this.
Speaker 2 (49:55):
Become another Charlottesville. Everybody, have a wonderful night. We'll see tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (49:59):
Night
Good evening, America. Welcome to the Mond edition of Just
the News, No Noise. I'm your host, John Solomon, reporting
to you, as always from the nation's capital here in Washington,
d C. Where it was a historic day and it's
going to be a historic day all through the night time.
Let me explain. First, we've got the decision by President
Trump over the weekend to federalize law enforcement in Washington,
(00:42):
d C. The streets here have been unsafe for years.
People are afraid to go out after six or seven
o'clock at night in Washington, d C. Donald Trump wants
to do something about that. Last week we showed you
the statistics Washington, d C way more unsafe than any
other major capital city in any other country in the world.
That's a shame. President Trumping the lead today to take
the city back, And tonight we're going to start to
(01:04):
take you to new places in the weaponization investigation. For
the last few months, we've been helping you understand just
how much involved the FBI and the CIA wasn't helping
Hillary Clinton and the Democrats create a false narrative against
Donald Trump weaponizing the intelligence tools of this country to
intervene in three consecutive elections. We've given you the evidence.
(01:26):
More is to come, but you have a pretty good
sense of who did what and when and why they
did it and why it's a corruption the system. Starting
tonight at eight thirty, mark your time on your watch,
we're going to start to tell you how the news
media got enlisted to be the co conspirator in setting
these false stories. We're going to tell you who the
FBI thought was leaking classified information. They had really good evidence,
(01:48):
including whistleblowers who came out and fingered the exact whistleblowers.
You're going to get to see that starting tonight and
for the next three four days, you'll see how the
CIA and the FBI worked the news media to create
that false narrative. We're going to do that over at
justinews dot com, So mark your time, check your app,
make sure you look for the news alert around eight
thirty tonight. Every night this week around eight thirty, we're
(02:11):
going to drop a new segment of this story. And
by what time we're done, I think you'll know who
the leakers were and also how the media became a
complicit and duped part of this false narrative. Setting in America.
With that, let me bring in my amazing co host,
Amanda Head, who's tracking some other headlines. She's in California
this week, Amada, what's on your radar?
Speaker 2 (02:31):
Indeed, John, in fact, I think that these drops every night,
we should call this transparency Week. Courtesy of John Solomon
and his reporting team. John, I know that the American
people feel such a dead of gratitude to you for
continuing to put this information out there. So I'm looking
forward to putting all of that out there. But President
Trump today in the briefing room, John in absolute president
(02:53):
Trump fashion, taking over and delivering a ton of news.
He was also accompanied by other members of his cabinet
and also DCUs a Jeanine Pierro, who made it very
clear that she is going to be no nonsense when
it comes to her approach for federalizing Washington d C.
I love the analogy that President Trump made from the podium.
Speaker 3 (03:14):
He said, you know, you would never go to a
restaurant if.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
It had a dirty door, because if the front of
the business, if the front of the house is dirty,
you know the kitchen is too. And he made that
comparison to Washington d C. If you come to the
nation's capital and it's dirty and crime britten, with homelessness abounding,
empty empty storefronts. Then that is a reflection on the
rest of the country. And I thought that that was
just such an apt comparison. So I'm looking forward to
(03:38):
seeing what happened. You've got, you know, DC Police Union
president endorsing this idea, saying that our officers have been
under pressure, they have been stretched thin for a very
very long time. So d C I have a feeling
in a few months maybe going into the fall is
going to look very very different compared to what it
has been because, you know, as we were discussing before
(03:58):
we came to air, especially for petite women like me,
but everybody in general, it's just not a safe place
to go once the sun goes down, and you don't
even know where these pockets of crime are. It could
be anywhere in the city. So I'm looking very forward
to seeing that eradicated. And I know a lot of
folks who who live in d C, work in d C,
or travel to d C are as well.
Speaker 1 (04:17):
Yeah, no doubt about it. By the way, that police
union endorsement was a complete surprise to President Trump and
the White house. They did not know that was going
to happen. A pleasant surprise for them, but it tells
you how suppressed the frustrations of law enforcement have been
in DC. They just want to do their job. They
know they can make the city safer, but the city
council and its policies have kept them handcuffed them from
(04:39):
keeping us safe. And we just see that crime every night.
Gangs of hooligan's running around attacking people, carjacking people, killing people.
It's unacceptable. We're keeping a close Eyemanda on one story
down in Texas. A mass shooting at a target in Texas.
Looks like the suspects incus the history of mental illness.
Our prayers and thoughts are with the family and victims
(05:00):
and everybody traumatized by that. We'll be watching that throughout
the night, hopefully give you an update before the show
is over. If this big takeover DC is going to happen,
and I think it's going to happen. Congress is going
to have to help the president. And we're very lucky
to be joined at the top of the show by
a man who has injected lots of common sense since
he got to Washington, d C. He's a Congressman for
the great state of Missouri, a great friend of the show,
(05:22):
a great friend of truth and oversight in America. Congressman
Eric Burlson, Congress. Good to have you on the show.
Speaker 4 (05:29):
Great to be on. John, good to see you, and
Amanda you.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
As well, Sir, good to see you. We love all
the work you're doing. I'd like to just get your
reaction to the process that started today. Today's the police Department,
But I suspect by Labor Day that the takeover of Washington,
d C. By the federalment will be much larger. Your
thoughts and what you're seeing and hearing, and how Congress
may be able to help.
Speaker 4 (05:51):
Yeah, it's long overdue.
Speaker 5 (05:53):
Anybody that lives in the DC area understands that this
is necessary. Look, whenever I first got elected, I will
never forget walking at night on the Capitol Mall and
seeing a gang of young individuals on motorcycles riding their
motorcycles across the Capitol lawn evading law enforcement. It was crazy,
(06:15):
crazy in our nation's capital that we have, that we
have gangs doing things like that. In that first year,
I heard about about two or three members of Congress
that were either carjacked or mugged. We had one senator's
senator's staff who was stabbed in the head right near
(06:36):
the Capitol. And then, of course, just recently you had
the event where the intern of ron Estes was murdered,
and then of course you have the DOGE employee that
was nearly beaten to death.
Speaker 4 (06:50):
And so these are all anecdotes. But look, at the
end of the day, anybody that lives.
Speaker 5 (06:55):
In DC area understands that it's not safe, which is
really sad, because we're the greatest country on the face
of the earth, and we should have the safe we
should It should reflect our gnacious capitals, should reflect that
we're the greatest country on the earth.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
Yeah, exactly, I'm a congressman. In today's day and age,
everything in politics has become politicized, including impossibly especially law
enforcement and law and order.
Speaker 3 (07:21):
However, in Washington, d C.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
You don't have these hooligans out there saying, oh, I
think that's a Republican leaving Capitol Hill. It doesn't matter,
it doesn't They don't discriminate. It could be a Republican,
it could be a Democrat. Are you hearing from your
colleagues on the other side of the isle. I know
you're in your district, but are you hearing that they
are supportive of this idea as well, or does it
seem like they're pushing back against it.
Speaker 4 (07:42):
Well, I think that you're seeing a little bit of
a pulling back on this.
Speaker 5 (07:46):
I think that the Democratic Party, many of them, other
than the crazies like AOC and Mom Donnie, most Democrats
have recognized that they went too far, that this defund
the police effort is not is not logical, and it's
not politically a good idea either, and so it's not
(08:07):
good for your personal safety, especially when it's in the
city that you're living in. So I think that you're
seeing Democrats take a knee here, or I haven't seen
them come out public and any of them come out
publicly in favor of this. But I don't think that
you'll see a lot of fighting either. This might actually
be a resolution because the President has thirty days to
(08:33):
federalize law enforcement in DC. After that, it'll take an
Act of Congress and a resolution. And I think, because
this is to your point, a manon this is a
bipartisan issue.
Speaker 4 (08:45):
I mean, everybody likes to be safe.
Speaker 5 (08:47):
In their person and so I would hope that we
could pass this resolution to extend the president's ability to
keep this city safe.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
I think a lot of people should forget that before
nineteen seventynine it was truly a federal city. The government
ran it obviously home rule given to by a Democratic
Congress and the Democratic president at the time, Jimmy Carter,
But for most of our country it ran under the
auspices of the federal government. And now it seems like
it's headed back in that. When we're done, I assume
if the president does all of the things that would
(09:19):
require a federal takeover, the Congress got to figure out
what to appropriate right for moneies in terms of, you know,
we have problems with streets here. This has got to
sometimes driving in d DC is like driving in Beirut
after eleven on explosion. The seats are tough, you've got
the crime. Is Congress ready to walk through that process
and get the right funding and get the city fixed?
Speaker 5 (09:41):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (09:41):
I think so.
Speaker 5 (09:42):
I mean, look to your point, what we've seen the
last few years had really not been an improvement in DC.
I can think of, for example, the traffic issue, the
fact that all of these woke liberal members on the
board of Aldermen and for DC, they've really prioritized bicycle
(10:03):
lanes as opposed to people actually driving, and as a result,
it's just complicated things that it's made it more difficult
to navigate DC in a vehicle, things like that, along
with all of the restrictive building codes and restrictive policies
when it comes to road construction. For the President Trump
(10:26):
even mentioned it that once they take over, they can
actually get things done, not the way that they've been,
not the way that this bureaucracy strangles any kind of
development or construction or innovation.
Speaker 4 (10:39):
And so we might see Washington, d C. Become beautiful again.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
Yeah. Well, I.
Speaker 2 (10:48):
Know what a normul idea our capital city, our representation
to the world looking beautiful, sir.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
I want to shift gears.
Speaker 2 (10:54):
To something I know Congress can do, and I know
that there is a will there as well, especially for Republicans.
Speaker 3 (11:00):
You guys just got done with the one big beautiful bill.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
You're now home in your districts, but you got to
come back and hit the ground running with spending cuts.
Speaker 3 (11:07):
What are your main targets?
Speaker 5 (11:10):
Yeah, to me, I think that there's a We've left
a lot on the field when it comes to reductions
in the in the in the Green New Deal or
the Green New scam, there's a lot of that that's
still in place, and I think that look, as members
have realized they've made those cuts, they're not nobody's.
Speaker 4 (11:29):
Going to lose their seat over it.
Speaker 5 (11:30):
There isn't a huge outcry for this, So hopefully that
builds some courage we can come back and do some
more spending reductions in that. I also think that we
can find savings in in the Metacare program by making
it actually better for seniors.
Speaker 4 (11:48):
There is a there's.
Speaker 5 (11:49):
A way that insurance companies are able to manipulate the
structure and the classification of individuals so that the insurance
companies make more money and it costs the taxpayer more
that it doesn't necessarily or actually it doesn't really benefit
the patient at all.
Speaker 4 (12:04):
And so there's.
Speaker 5 (12:05):
Things like that that I think that we have a
responsibility to do that would actually save the taxpayer dollars
while at the same time making sure that these programs
are good for everybody that actually needs them.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
So I want to turn to another subject that I
know as close to your heart, and it isn't about
scoring political points. It's about getting justice for a series
of victims who were denied it, going all the way
back to the Bush Justice Department of seven and eight,
when there was a chance to bring real justice to
Jeffrey Epstein. Subpoenas went out from your committee last week.
James Comer was on the show talking about that. The Chairman,
(12:40):
your thoughts about what will happen in September when Congress
gets back. Can we get to the bottom of how
we let this monster slide without any real punishment?
Speaker 5 (12:49):
Yeah, I hope so. And look, the efforts of Chairman
Comber have been very admirable. I'm really proud to serve
on the Oversight Committee. The committee has had to vote
to subpoena these individuals, and the Chairman is following through
on that. We had to vote to subpoena the records,
and the Chairman is following through on that, which I
(13:11):
think will As long as there's momentum and there's progress
being made, I think that that's a good thing. And
if there isn't any progress being made and Chairman Comer
is being blocked, then we've got the fallback, which is
the Massy Bill that resolution. So I think one way
or another. This information is more. There's information that's going
(13:35):
to be released, and that's a good thing, because, look,
the American people are sick and tired of this government
holding on to all these secrets. They're sick and tired
of being lied to by the intelligence community and by
a deep state that we're just like, for example, we're
just now getting information about what really happened in the
jfk assassination. I hope that we don't have to wait
(13:58):
sixty seventy years to find out what really happened when
it came to Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 3 (14:06):
Goodness me, I hope you're right, sir.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
Before we let you go, I also want to ask you,
because I know that Chairman Comber is also champing at
the bit to question Hillary Clinton regarding Russia Gate.
Speaker 3 (14:15):
Now, we all.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
Remember the interrogations of your where she said at this point,
at this point, what difference does it make?
Speaker 3 (14:24):
Does it make?
Speaker 2 (14:24):
Do you anticipate that we're going to get some real
answers for her? And even if statutes have run out,
how important is it for the American people to at
least hear things from her mouth and hear her either
defend it, plead the fifth or totally cave.
Speaker 5 (14:39):
Yeah, I think that the Clintons have really his history
will demonstrate that they're one of the worst stains on
the United States.
Speaker 4 (14:49):
You have an individual like.
Speaker 5 (14:50):
Bill Clinton, who was very close to Epstein. It may
very well be that he was involved or at least
knew about some of the less station that was occurring. Look,
he was on the Lolita Express over almost two dozen times.
There were reports that he was at Epstein Island twenty
plus times, and so somebody that's spent that much activity
(15:13):
on the plane and at the island, it's highly likely
that he knew what was going on. Then you have
Hillary who may have been involved in trying to suppress
the investigations on f scene as well while during her
time as Secretary of State. And so these are things
that I think the American people deserve answers for, and
(15:35):
I hope that they don't plead the fifth. I don't
think that they can deny Congress the deposition. But look,
it'll be very telling if the president, former president of
the United States, has to plead the fifth because anything
that he talks about related Jeffrey Fstein would be self incriminating.
Speaker 1 (15:56):
Yeah, that would be an extraordinary moment for history. Nob
out about it. Commson and Eric Purlson for the great
sent of Missouri. We always love having you on. We
always get lots of wisdom when you're on. Thanks for
joining us today. Thank you, Yeah, great to have you on.
All right, folks, After the break, we'll look ahead to
President Trump's meeting with Vladimir Putin on Friday? Can he
get a deal done? And does Russia actually want to
(16:17):
play ball? We'll have that with Colonel Rob Madus right
after these messages. Hey, folks, a new administration in Washington,
DC has brought lots of positive changes when it comes
to fixing our broken healthcare system. The reality is, however,
that there's only so much the government can do, and
if we really want to make America healthy again, that
(16:38):
starts at home with each and every one of us,
myself included. Could your health issues be caused by an
invisible enemy? Fatigue, bloating brain fog? What if parasites are
the real culprit? Did you know sixty million Americans apparently
have parasites there everywhere in our food, water, and Pat's
secretly invading your body in wreaking hav it on your
gut energy levels, even your brain. And Big medicine doesn't
(17:02):
want you to think about this because one good cleanse
could change everything. Our friends at the Wellness Company have
a real solution, a gold standard parasite cleans combining Ivermectim
with my Benzazol two FDA improved medications. His prescription base
just fell out. A quick medical intake and get a
three month supply ship to your door. Go to TWC
dot health sash just news and use the code just
(17:23):
news to save sixty bucks plus free shipping. Go there
right now.
Speaker 6 (17:34):
Well, we're going to have a meeting with Latimir Putin,
and at the end of that meeting, probably in the
first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a
deal can be reading because just what they do on the.
Speaker 3 (17:47):
Everybody.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
That was a clip from earlier today, President Trump talking
about his upcoming meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, so
to talk to us about if that deal can be struck.
As United States Air Force veteran and host of The
Rob Maynas Show and founder and chairman of Gator Pat
Colonel Rob manis, Colonel, thank you so much for being
back with us.
Speaker 7 (18:06):
Hi, Amanda, John it's good to be back.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Yeah, good to have.
Speaker 3 (18:10):
You, sir.
Speaker 2 (18:10):
History has shown us not only in this administration, but
in President Trump's first administration when it comes to negotiating.
Despite the naysayers who say he's never had any you know,
foreign policy experience, he's never had any of the experience
to negotiate foreign trade deals or foreign foreign policy deals,
it seems like he's doing a bang up job of it.
Do you anticipate that he's right that within the first
two minutes he's going to know which way this goes?
Speaker 3 (18:34):
Well?
Speaker 7 (18:34):
I think so.
Speaker 8 (18:35):
You know, he's been communicating with Putin for quite some
time now, over the last you know, ten twelve years,
and Wit Costs, Eve Wit Costs doing a great job
presenting our views and presenting Ukraine's views, I'm sure, and
that has resulted in this meeting, quite frankly, and nobody
(18:57):
thought that this meeting would actually add and quite honestly,
but Donald Trump keeps proving people wrong because that's what
he does.
Speaker 7 (19:07):
He said it, that's what I do. I do deals.
He's going to know. Now.
Speaker 8 (19:11):
One of the things that's happening on the ground in
the war, guys, is that the Russians have made some
significant gains based on reporting from both sides that we're
seeing in the last twelve hours or so around a
town called ob Rosk, which is a main logistical hub,
and they have several ouns around there that have key
(19:33):
logistics hubs connected to that also that are in their sights.
So they've moved rather quickly on this one day, considering
they move slowly and grind it.
Speaker 7 (19:42):
Out all the days previous to this.
Speaker 8 (19:45):
But as I've said before, President Putin has his military
objectives in mind, and I said last week that I
thought he was probably close enough to where he could
set up a deal. And then the next thing we
heard about was Witcock comes home and President Trump and
now is the meeting. So I think the president's right.
He's going to know right away. And it looks like
(20:06):
Putin is making some objectives that he's been wanting and
that'll set him up to be able to negotiate swamping land.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
Yeah, that's what it seems like. We're brought down there.
And that's right. You did actually predicted this would happen.
He wasn't done with where the military strategy was. I
wanted to get to a certain point to strengthen his hand,
and it seems like he could be at that moment now.
President Zelenski in Ukraine was at a different note on Sidday, saying,
I've never given up land for a deal. I mean,
he has to be delusional, right. The only way he's
(20:37):
going to get a peace deal is if he gives
up some of the land, right.
Speaker 7 (20:41):
I honestly don't think he's delusional.
Speaker 8 (20:43):
He's just staying pat on the current position and he's
got their constitution to rely back on that.
Speaker 1 (20:49):
John Right.
Speaker 8 (20:50):
But once this negotiation actually happens and the president comes
away from it understanding exactly what's going on with the Russians,
mister Lezzki, I predict will change his team.
Speaker 1 (21:03):
Yeah, I think good prediction. I think.
Speaker 2 (21:06):
What does Russia stand to lose if a deal is
not made when it comes to their current partners and
folks who could and nations that could become future partners.
Speaker 7 (21:16):
Well, and that's the challenge.
Speaker 8 (21:17):
You know, they don't stand to lose a lot militarily,
but they're trading partners and their economics standing, which translates
into their ability to continue to resource their forces and
keep their forces in the field like they are doing,
and are able to do better than even NATO and
our western industrial.
Speaker 7 (21:37):
Base is doing. But that challenge is also a double
edged sword. Guys.
Speaker 8 (21:42):
You know, if we put more sanctions on China for
because of the Russia oil they buy, that has another
effect on our economy.
Speaker 7 (21:52):
So the president's looking at that.
Speaker 8 (21:54):
I'm sure he's a lot smarter guy when it comes
to trade and when it's fastened up to warfare that
most people realize, and he's looking at that very closely
to make sure that if he needs to, he's able
to do it the right way. He's already taken some
steps with India, but the China part of it is
a much bigger deal and he's going to have to
(22:14):
take that on with the right perspective and in the
right avenue.
Speaker 1 (22:21):
Colonel, I want to turn to some of the things
that the Ukraine Russia war has done to military strategy
in general. Obviously, we have hypersonic missiles, we have nuclear weapons,
we've got stealth bombers, and we've got all these things.
But it turned out cheap and expensive drones were an
effective way against traditional warfare, and both sides have used him.
(22:44):
Now it's a great effect. Is the US military adapting
to realize that that was one of the unexpected strategies
that this war has proven out, and are we ready
to have a war one day where drones might be
one of the bigger challenges we face.
Speaker 8 (23:00):
You know, John, when you all asked me that a
year ago, I was skeptical because of some of a
lot of the things that we were seeing and had
heard about over our key facilities and our installation here
inside the United States. I've seen some good movement forward
in open source reporting that indicates that we are taking
it seriously. But quite honestly, I'm very concerned about our installations,
(23:22):
especially our strategically vital installations right here at home, because
of the rules of engagement, than commanders are at risk
averse when it comes to kinetically taking down a drone,
whether it be through electronic means or through the means
of shooting it down. And that's a concern because we
have some very important installations that have to be protected,
(23:44):
not to mention protecting our families and our troops that
are on the ground in this Yeah, good point.
Speaker 3 (23:52):
I'm colonel.
Speaker 2 (23:52):
President Trump has an unconventional attitude when it comes to
meeting foreign leaders adversaries, sometimes I think that that applies
here with Russian President Vladimir Putin. But he's meeting with
him nonetheless, and I look at the reaction of folks.
Speaker 3 (24:05):
I see all these.
Speaker 2 (24:06):
Headlines on CNN and liberal news media and President Trump's
former national security advisor John Bolton out there and they
saying the meeting, say that it's not going to produce
any fruit.
Speaker 3 (24:18):
Why would they be saying.
Speaker 8 (24:19):
That, Well, it's the same old never Trumper set an
outfit demand. You know, the President doesn't know what he's doing.
He's playing the Putin. Putin's going to take advantage of him.
Speaker 1 (24:33):
I don't know.
Speaker 8 (24:33):
When they're going to figure it out, if ever, But
the man is a lot smarter than they are.
Speaker 7 (24:38):
And it's almost as if.
Speaker 8 (24:40):
He's done foreign a national security policy when combined with
trade policy for his entire life, where these people are
supposed to be the experson and they keep getting it wrong.
Speaker 7 (24:50):
When was the last time we won a war?
Speaker 8 (24:52):
What about the debacle withdrawing from Afghanistan? And over and
over again? And if he listened to them, we would
never have been successful with the strikes in Iran against
their nuclear facilities because they don't know how to get
the job done. He does. So, I listen to what
they say. I look at it, but I really discounted
(25:13):
a lot.
Speaker 7 (25:13):
I mean it's kind.
Speaker 8 (25:14):
Of like the Boy that Cried Wolf at this point.
Speaker 1 (25:18):
Yeah, no doubt. Before we let you go, Klon, I
want to ask real quickly about another dynamic that's coming
into much more clear focus, and that is the top
echelons of the CIA and the FBI clearly involved in
manipulating political intelligence for political purposes, launching investigations knowing that
what they were investigating was a dirty trick by Hillary
(25:39):
Clinton to make it look like Donald Trump was a
Russian stooge. I think we may have crossed the rubricon
in the last decade. That even pales in comparison to
what we learned from Watergate. Your thoughts on the state
of our intelligence agency and the politicalization of it.
Speaker 8 (25:54):
This politicization of our intelligence agencies and they're overtaking of
the unelect did parts of the executive branch of the
United States government makes Watergate looks like a preschool exercise, John,
That is how bad this is. We have to hold
people accountable. There have to be more than just investigations.
(26:17):
There need to be indictments and trials and hold these
people accountable. And it's not just inside the CIA, although
the CIA is a major culprit in this corruption and
this law breaking, but the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Executive Branch,
bureaucrats in the Department of Defense, the National Security Agency,
(26:39):
all of them are infested with partisans at the top
and the middle management level, and probably at the management
level just below middle management level.
Speaker 7 (26:50):
And we've got to get a handle on this.
Speaker 8 (26:52):
And that's where the personnel system has got to come
into play. I know russ Vote developed a plan to
address policy making positions that were a career civil servant.
That has to be a part of this holding folks accountable.
And it's got to be cleaned out. And we've got
to look at some reorganization and recreation of some of
(27:13):
our intelligence capabilities, in our law enforcement capabilities, because they
have completely destroyed and abused them and abused Americans' rights.
And I'm so glad Harmeiat Dylan is in the Civil
Rights Division at the Department of Justice because I think
she's going to be a key player in some of
these crimes.
Speaker 1 (27:31):
I think you are right. We had her on the
show last right too.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
A lot of folks on the show have acted exactly
what you just said, which is, unless there are purp walks,
it's just going to continue happening and we can't afford
that as a victory. United States say Forest veteran and
host of the Rob Mainus Show. Everybody go check out
his show. Colonel Rob Mainis, thank you so much for
being here, sir.
Speaker 3 (27:50):
And on the other side of this brief, we have
an update on a.
Speaker 2 (27:53):
Story that we brought you a few weeks ago regarding
the IRS, so we're going to get to that. On
the other side of these formercial.
Speaker 1 (27:59):
Messages, Hey, folks, in today's world of misinformation and political spend,
it's more important than ever to support organizations that put
truth and values firus. That's why I support and belong
to AMAC, the Association of Mature American Citizens. They're the
conservative alternative to AARP, and they're working to preserve faith, family,
(28:23):
and freedom, three things that matter to all of us.
AMAC members get valuable benefits, discounts on healthcare, travel and
health insurance, exclusive online resources, and a subscription to AMAX
Beautiful magazine, one of the best reads out there for
an informed patriot like you, and I and all of
this is available for as little as a dollar twenty
a month with a five year membership. That's what I have,
(28:43):
a five year membership. Join me, join the movement today,
visit AMAC dot us, slash just News, and help AMAC
protect America's future. Welcome back in America. A couple of
weeks ago, we had a segment highlighting that some of
the folks inside the IRS who go all the way
(29:05):
back to the Tea Party targeting scandal, Remember when the
IRS wrongly went after conservative groups just because they were conservative,
not because they had a nonprofit problem. Well, we have
an update. There's been some impact from the great work
for the Alliance for IRS Accountabilities. Whore joining us right
now to give us that update. The CEO for the
Alliance Virus Accountability Chuck Flint, Chuck Goodevy back on the show.
Speaker 4 (29:27):
John, I'm great to be with you.
Speaker 1 (29:29):
All right. There's been a lot of up people at
the IRS the last few months. I mean I think
four or five, maybe six new leaders over the last time,
but more importantly down from the leader maybe some changes now.
Tell us what happened since the last time we had
you on the show.
Speaker 9 (29:43):
Well, Elizabeth Cassenberg and Hollypaz had both been placed on administratively.
They were both involved in the Tea Party scandal. Holly
Paz was accused of misleading Congress. She was closely tied
to lowest learner. And they've been placed on leave. And
there are more people at the IRS who are like this,
These deep state burrowed in employees john who view the
(30:07):
IRS as their playground to just go ahead and dish
out punishment to taxpayers according to whatever personal agenda it
is that they bring to work that day. And there's
still a unit over there that the one woman, Holly
pass who was placed on leave, she was the commissioner
of a division, if you can believe that, and she
was running a pass through audit team over there that
(30:30):
has been absolutely bludgeoning conservative businesses into, you know, with fines,
and it's been very disruptive. I've talked to a lot
of businesses and partnerships. It's been a big problem over there.
Speaker 1 (30:46):
Important to get it.
Speaker 7 (30:46):
Thanks Chuck.
Speaker 2 (30:48):
Under President Trump and with this class of Republicans in Congress,
it seems like they are looking for any way to
draw down the impact of the IRS on the American people.
They've talked about how recisions are going to be a
tool belt, a tool and their tool belt they're going
to be wielding back and forth. Is the IRS untouchable
though when it comes to recisions. Is there a way
(31:09):
to clawback funding and clawback their resources such that they're
not going after everybody willy nilly and using it as
their own weapon of politicization.
Speaker 9 (31:19):
I don't think that the IRS is untouchable at all.
And you've seen Secretary Best in highlight and now that
he's the acting Commissioner, he's spoken a lot about modernization
and the reason that that's so important is that the
IRS can actually do more with less and they can
focus on serving taxpayers rather than harassing them. There was
actually a report that came out talking about these taxpayer
(31:41):
assistant centers and kiosks that they have where they're self
service kiosks for the taxpayers and they're just not operable.
And this is what we're getting back to once again,
the IRS needs to focus more on serving the taxpayer
rather than just audits and enforcement and quite frankly, harassment.
(32:01):
So to answer your question, yes, and they've downsized the
workforce by some reports, the IRS perhaps twenty five percent.
They're headed in the right direction and we feel very
confident about where they're going.
Speaker 1 (32:14):
Yeah, what are some other places check that we can
make some improvements. I mean, when you call the IRS,
it's like going to the DMB. Nobody wants to have
a conversation. We've spent billions of dollars trying to get
better computer systems, better customer service, but I think the
impression of the American people is it's only gotten worse.
What are some other ideas that you've been working on
(32:35):
to try to find a more customer friendly, more common
sense IRS for the future.
Speaker 9 (32:41):
Well, John, it all starts with the morale and the
attitude that they have. I know that that sounds kind
of cliche, but it's so deep seated and deep rooted
over there that before you can go ahead and start
making these changes, you have to change and fix the
culture then.
Speaker 4 (33:00):
Set over there.
Speaker 9 (33:01):
And that's what we're very focused on is and that's
why I bring up the pass through audit team over
there that's been going after conservative businesses in partnerships and
they have employees that have made very politically charged comments.
That's where it has to start, and then you can
begin to peel back some of the other layers. Secretary
(33:21):
Veston has mentioned the modernization aspect of it that is
so crucial to the IRS because they run some of
the oldest information technology systems in the federal government. They
date back to the nineteen sixties. And it's not that
this hasn't been a focus of the agency, it's just
that they don't. They haven't had anybody that has wanted
(33:42):
to get it done because they've had, frankly, other agendas
and agendas that have not been well suited to helping conservatives.
Speaker 2 (33:52):
Yeah, Chuck, I flew into Burbank on Friday morning, and
as a lot of airplanes do when they're coming into
Burbank or lax, they do an around swoop and they
come from the west side, And so that actually put
me right above the Pacific Palisades and the destruction that
is still there. Shouldn't the IRS be spending time, I
don't know, auditing the one hundred to one hundred and
(34:14):
fifty million dollars that was donated that those folks haven't
seen a dime of.
Speaker 9 (34:20):
Man, it's a great point, and that scandal is only growing.
Speaker 4 (34:25):
Fire Aid raised one hundred million.
Speaker 9 (34:27):
Dollars on you through a series of concerts, and they
promised direct relief to people thousands of people who lost
to their homes out there, some of whom I know,
and those people have not seen a dime of that money.
It's disappeared into a web of about one hundred and
sixty nonprofits. A lot of these seem like, you know,
(34:51):
kind of like liberal pet causes. You've got the California
Climate Core, which trains climate activists. You've got the California
Native Project, which got money they claim that California has
stolen land, and they're a social justice mission. When you
look at these groups, you have to say to yourself,
what in the world do they know about disaster relief
(35:13):
and helping people? And you know, without kind of going overboard,
but you know, I'm a former prosecutor and I look
at this and it looks a heck of a lot
like money laundering.
Speaker 4 (35:24):
You've got fire Aid.
Speaker 9 (35:26):
Fire Aid gave the money to the Andenberg Foundation, and
then the Annenberg Foundation went ahead and distributed it to
one hundred and sixty plus groups. And the victims say
that they haven't received a dime of that money. How
do you lose one hundred million dollars and so is
there a role for the IRS. The answer is yes,
(35:47):
they should go in and look at these groups and
if they haven't lived up to their charitable mission for
which they were incorporated, well, frankly they should strip their
tax exempt status.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
Yeah. The tools are there, they just need to act
a real quick check before we go. Take to today
the Inspector General for Taxpayer Protection founder these self service
chios at the IRISHPA out there. I guess they didn't work, right.
We deployed these.
Speaker 9 (36:10):
They don't work, John, and some of them haven't worked
for four hundred and sixty three days.
Speaker 4 (36:16):
It's crazy and it is the most amazing thing.
Speaker 9 (36:20):
And going back to your question again about ways to
improve the IRS and things we're working on. We actually
highlighted that issue a couple of months ago and then
the Inspector General followed up on that in report now
saying that the program lacked proper oversight, but that those
kiosks excuse me, are critical for helping these taxpayers because
(36:44):
they go into these what they call taxpayer assistance centers
and they can it makes the process more streamlined.
Speaker 4 (36:53):
They can either deal with an official or they can.
Speaker 9 (36:56):
Go and they can use one of these kiosks, and
that's connected to IRS dot gov and it's so anyway,
it is a method by which they can go ahead
and improve the taxpayer experience. They haven't done it, and
it's very disappointing to see that, but I have a
feeling that it's probably going to be cleaned up.
Speaker 1 (37:15):
Well. The fact that take to investigate it is exactly
why Americans should be watching all the great work you're
doing at Alliance Virus Accountability. You're actually finding things that
need to be fixed. Jacqu Flent. Great to have you
on the show today. Thanks for joining us.
Speaker 4 (37:27):
Sure, thanks so much, appreciate it that great conversation.
Speaker 1 (37:30):
All Right, folks, we can take a quick comercial break
when we come back. One of my favorites, doctor Peter McCullough,
he had it all right during COVID nineteen. He's going
to be here to discuss the latest about what AHHS
Secretary of RK Junior has done on mRNA vaccines. If
you thought the idea of Robert Kennedy he did last
week's out up familiar it was, doctor McCollough said on
the show A long time And I'll have him next
right after these.
Speaker 2 (37:49):
Messages welcome back everybody. A big splash in the MAHA movement.
Last week, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Junior pulled the
plug on twenty two federal contracts for mRNA vaccines, everything
(38:12):
from COVID to the flu. It's, by the way, going
to save American taxpayers about a half a billion dollars.
And of course there are a lot of concerns surrounding
mRNA vaccine technology.
Speaker 3 (38:21):
So here to talk.
Speaker 2 (38:22):
About all of that with us is world renowned doctor.
He's also the chief scientific officer at the Wellness Company
and he is the author of Vaccines Mythology, Ideology and Reality.
Our good friend, doctor Peter McCullough. Doctor McCullough, great to
see you.
Speaker 3 (38:37):
Thank you, sir.
Speaker 2 (38:39):
We all know about the spike putteines. There are a
lot of folks who got vaccinated who are concerned about
it and have been asking about how they can get
rid of the get rid of it, if that's even possible.
You guys have an answer, the Ultimate spike detox.
Speaker 3 (38:54):
Tell us about it.
Speaker 10 (38:56):
This has been a big advance the Ultimate Spike detogs,
which is a combination of critical natural ingredients to help
the body get rid of the spike protein. I just
finished with a patient who's had a very nice reduction
and the spike protein antibody levels. We can directly measure
spike protein in the blood and researched patients out to
three point two years after the shots. It needs to
(39:18):
be cleared. Everybody should be looking at the ultimate spike detox.
Speaker 1 (39:23):
Yeah important, all right, So the mRNA vaccine, you have
long been helping us understand the potential dangers and some
of the information that was covered up. Now the HHS
Secretary himself has pulled back mr vaccine development. How important
a moment is this and what do you think comes next.
Speaker 10 (39:40):
We've had a chance to look at Messenger RNA vaccines
and you know, the Achilles heel of the technology is
that it's the synthetic genetic code for a protein or
an anigen. There's no ability to shut this genetic code
off once it goes into the body. I mentioned Fizer
Maderna lasting three point two years producing the dangerous, potentially
(40:02):
lethal spike protein. All the same would be true for
you any bola antigen or an antigen for Marburg virus,
and the Messenger RNA technology is just far too dangerous
it's not understood. And I think Kennedy was right by
pulling back on these projects. Now the projects were government
dollars invested with you know, Santa Fe or Maderna or Pfizer.
(40:27):
And if these companies want to take on the development efforts,
and you know, you know, they certainly can do that.
But we don't need the government, especially BARDA, which is
a unit of the NIH, it doesn't need to be
in the vaccine business.
Speaker 2 (40:41):
Sure, doctor McColloch. When Secretary Kennedy announced this on c
in Unison, big med and big Pharma immediately started criticizing
the decision, saying it was anti science, fear mongering, saying
people were going to die. Are people going to die
just for pulling federal contracts?
Speaker 10 (41:00):
No, because the companies, you know are fleshwish cass cash.
If they believe there's a compelling market, they can bring
forward these technologies. We don't even to have government dollars
assisting private companies or public health companies to make these vaccines.
And not only that these were just twenty two contracts.
We have DARPA, the research unit of the military, which
(41:22):
has an adept P three program since twenty twelve, trying
to develop vaccines to end pandemics within sixty days. That's
still going on. So the United States is still deep
into messenger rn AY development.
Speaker 4 (41:35):
I think the.
Speaker 10 (41:36):
Withdrawal ought to be broad, it ought to be complete.
The technology does not look ready for prime time.
Speaker 1 (41:42):
Yeah, I think a lot of people are starting to
feel that way. I want to talk about the mosquito
borne virus that's been spreading across China. A lot of
hype in the media about that. What's up another Trump presidency,
another virus emerging in China? People think, oh no, not again,
DejaVu all over again. What are you seeing?
Speaker 10 (42:00):
Wonder about the genesis of these stories. We're talking about
the chicky unavirus, which is an RNA virus.
Speaker 4 (42:07):
Carried by mosquitos.
Speaker 10 (42:09):
A paper by Ribiero and colleagues indicates that there's thirty
five million cases a year. So you get a mosquito
bite and develop a fever and some muscle lakes and
it's transient. Why is China reporting on several thousand cases?
You know, they probably contribute to millions of cases themselves
in China. Turns out there's a new vaccine called Vimcuna
(42:33):
mcunha was just released a few months ago, and I
do have to wonder is the genesis of these stories?
Is it really just market generation for a new vaccine.
Speaker 2 (42:44):
No, absolutely, because it's not particularly fatal. Is it has
anybody died from it?
Speaker 10 (42:50):
Well, there have been deaths, but they're not adjudicated. And
you know, elderly people can get sick with other illnesses
and it can be part of this spiral. And importantly,
there are therapeutics that look very promising in pre clinical
studies and early clinical studies, ivermactin being one of them,
nicol simide as well as nitas oxide.
Speaker 4 (43:12):
So the bottom line.
Speaker 10 (43:13):
Is, you know, even if this became a big issue
in the United States, we have treatment. But the principles
are mosquito control, just like what's done for yellow fever,
it's done for malaria, and should be done for chicken univirus.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
Makes sense, that's indeed.
Speaker 3 (43:29):
Doctor Peter mccalluch. We love having you on.
Speaker 2 (43:31):
I want to ask you one more question though, because
if they've got a vaccine for it, that's great. But
I see people in China being locked down. I see
the same you know, all of the same things that
they did leading up to COVID I'm seeing them doing. Now,
what message is that sending to the rest of the
world about that? And are we going to have people
on this side of the globe who are panicking the
same way.
Speaker 10 (43:52):
There seems to be, unfortunately, a marketing approach that's fear based,
that is to be fear for, become locked down, and
then seek a vaccine to be liberated, to get freedoms back.
Speaker 4 (44:07):
I think it's wrong.
Speaker 10 (44:08):
I think it's dangerous, it's coeresive, and it's not advancing
the ideals of vaccinology broadly or in medicine. So this
is a bad pattern and it's disturbing to see it.
I hope the rest of the world doesn't fall for
this thirty five million cases a year. We can get
(44:29):
through it. There are therapeutics, There is a vaccine the
in the Wings, But the bottom line is the vaccine
has never been tested for safety. It's actually never been
tested to see if it prevents chicky unit disease. These
vaccines are broad on the market because they raise antibodies,
which sometimes can be a false surrogate.
Speaker 2 (44:48):
Wow, Doctor Peter McCullough with the Wellness Company, thank you
so much for being with us.
Speaker 7 (44:52):
Sir, thank you.
Speaker 2 (44:55):
All right, everybody, go to TWC dot health slash just
News today. You're going to use the code just News
and you're going to get ten percent off on anything.
Speaker 3 (45:04):
Anything that you.
Speaker 2 (45:05):
Put in your order, anything you put in your cart
and purchase, you're going to get ten percent off. So again,
use the code just News at checkout. We're going to
take a quick break. We've got a few more stories
that we want to wrap up before we head out,
so we'll see on the other side.
Speaker 3 (45:30):
Welcome back, everybody.
Speaker 2 (45:31):
I want to touch a little on the teas that
John gave at the top of the show regarding these
stories that he's going to be putting out every single night.
Speaker 3 (45:38):
John, I'm going to put you in the hot seat
and say.
Speaker 2 (45:39):
Give us a little bit more information, give us a
little bit more of a taste of what we're going.
Speaker 3 (45:43):
To be getting.
Speaker 1 (45:43):
Well, we had whistleblowers who came forward to the FBI
as early as twenty seventeen saying this member of Congress
was leaking classified information. I was in a meeting where
he authorized the leak of classified information. By the way,
members of Congress can't authorize the leak of classified information.
It's illegal to do. So tomorrow where you're going to know,
(46:04):
or at eight thirty tonight you're going to know who
that lawmaker was and what the whistleblower said. It's really
remarkable stuff. In the days that follow, you're going to
see other people close to senior officials in Washington who
said I was present when this official agreed to leak
classified information to the media. It raises the question, if
they had this good and evidence, why wasn't anyone prosecuted
(46:25):
for leaks. I hear lots of attorneys generals over the
last two decades say I'm upset about all the cause
of my leaks. Well, they had real evidence, they could
have prosecuted people, but like often in Washington, they whiffed.
I think that pattern is really important. I think the
other thing that's important reminding everybody that there were willful
and eight are the betters in the news media, the
traditional news media, in fomenting these false stories to us
(46:49):
from the leakers, and I think they will be held
accountable to You're going to see certain reporters and news
organizations named in these documents. It's going to be an
eye opener for a lot of folks.
Speaker 3 (47:00):
So everybody that's going to be happening in about an
hour and a half. So everybody turn up the volume
on your TV right now.
Speaker 2 (47:05):
I'm going to help you out right now, Hey, Siri,
set a timer for an hour and a half. Okay,
so now you're going to get a timer, and about
six minutes after that time or five minutes after that
timer goes off, you go to justinnews dot com and
check out what John is posting. Now, John, I want
to shift to a few different other stories because one
of the things that Chuck Flint said regarding auditing this
(47:25):
one hundred million dollars that was supposed to go to
victims of the Pacific Palisades fire, he made a comment,
he said, how do you just lose one hundred million dollars?
And I chuckled to myself, and it's not funny at all.
I suppose it's Gallo's humor, But California had this infamous
story from a few years ago where they allotted twenty
four billion dollars to take care of the homelessness crisis
(47:47):
here in California and they basically just lost the money.
So when he said that, I wanted to say myself,
I wanted to say to him, California loses one hundred
million dollars very very easily, especially considering they lost twenty
four billion on that homelessness situation.
Speaker 3 (48:04):
But it's sad to see, but he's exactly right.
Speaker 2 (48:06):
You know, you've got the IRS targeting middle and low
income Americans for not dotting their eyes and crossing their
te's exactly shoperly, exactly the way that the IRS wants
them to. And instead they are allowing one hundred million
dollars that should be going to people who lost everything.
And you know, it's just a very different way of
handling things inenttioning.
Speaker 1 (48:26):
Yeah, and I don't think we're done hearing about the
pains and maybe the gains of Californians. I suspect that
LA is going to be the next city after Washington,
DC to maybe see a federal takeover of police or
certainly some sort of National Guard. We had the National
Guard out there for the ice protest. But I'm guessing
President Trump drops some hints today that DC isn't the
(48:47):
only city he's looking to clean up. I got to
think Los Angeles is at the top of LIS What
do you think?
Speaker 2 (48:52):
I think so too, especially considering in a few years.
We are really going to be ramping up the preparations
for the Olympics, but also just next year.
Speaker 3 (49:01):
We've got FIFA World Cup coming.
Speaker 2 (49:03):
So they got to do something because I know there
are a lot of people who look at Los Angeles,
they see the news stories, they see the crime and
the homelessness, and they think to themselves, I don't know
if that's somewhere I really want to go. So it
would be for California's own good John.
Speaker 1 (49:15):
Yeah, well, keep an eye. I think that's next after Washington,
d C. By the way, we're not done with DC.
We took the police today, but I think the rest
of the city is going to be federalized before the
end of this month.
Speaker 2 (49:24):
Yeah, speaking of the protesters that took place there, the
protests that took place here. Regarding ice, President Trump said,
you spit, we hit. He was talking about protesters getting
in the face of law enforcement and spitting in their faces,
which is assault.
Speaker 3 (49:39):
You should be prosecuted for that.
Speaker 2 (49:40):
But I'm already seeing liberal media like Bloomberg a headline
saying that President Trump was saying that to homeless people.
Speaker 3 (49:47):
That was not the case.
Speaker 2 (49:48):
President Trump was saying that about people who are assaulting
law enforcements.
Speaker 3 (49:53):
So let's go ahead and to this in the bud.
Let's not let this.
Speaker 2 (49:55):
Become another Charlottesville. Everybody, have a wonderful night. We'll see tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (49:59):
Night
Popular Podcasts
Fudd Around And Find Out
UConn basketball star Azzi Fudd brings her championship swag to iHeart Women’s Sports with Fudd Around and Find Out, a weekly podcast that takes fans along for the ride as Azzi spends her final year of college trying to reclaim the National Championship and prepare to be a first round WNBA draft pick. Ever wonder what it’s like to be a world-class athlete in the public spotlight while still managing schoolwork, friendships and family time? It’s time to Fudd Around and Find Out!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.