August 11, 2025 • 47 mins
SEGMENT 1: PRESIDENT TRUMP TAKES OVER DC POLICING
SEGMENT 2: MEXICO'S PRESIDENT BALKS AT U.S. MILITARY GOING AFTER CARTELS
SEGMENT 3: NANCY PELOSI IS THE GREATEST STOCK TRADER OF ALL TIME
SEGMENT 4: MAKE YOURSELF HEALTHY AGAIN
SEGMENT 5: GRANT SHARES HIS FINAL THOUGHTS
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
Well, good evening, everyone, Welcome to Stinsfield.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
President Trump doing what President Trump does best, and that's
making America safe again, making d C, the District of
Columbia safe again, and ultimately, let's hope, great again. He
has officially taken control of d C, federalizing it. The
one city in America that actually is already under the
control of federal lawmakers in d C, but this time
(00:45):
setting National Guard troops in because of all of the crime,
the blight, the homelessness, and even taking federal control of
the d C Metro Police Department.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
This is big, folks.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
They formerly declaring a public safety emergency. This is an emergency.
This is a tragic emergency. And it's embarrassing for me
to be up here. You know, I'm gonna see Putin.
I'm going to Russia on Friday. I don't like being
up here talking about how unsafe and how dirty and
disgusting this once beautiful capital was.
Speaker 2 (01:23):
Think about all across America, the once beautiful cities. Los Angeles, California,
one of the most beautiful cities in the country. It
was until liberals absolutely ruined it with coddling criminals, letting homelessness, flourish.
Speaker 1 (01:39):
Same situation in DC.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
We can go blue city to blue city to blue city.
That probably all need to be federalized. But DC is
the nation's capital and quite frankly, it's a third world country. Now,
how do I know this? Just compare it to the
numbers when you look at the murder rate, okay, twenty
seven people per one hundred thousand people in DC. But
(02:02):
look at the other cities, and it beats Bogata, Mexico City,
even as Lamabad, Okay, gets beat by DC when it
comes to the murder rate. We saw a three year
old shot and killed while sitting in a car. You
had that doze employee, they call him big balls last week,
(02:23):
just obliterated on the streets trying to stop a carjacking
in progress, and he was beaten to a pulp staffers
murdered and mugged in that city, and yes, murdered in
that city. Liberal lunacy, lets it all flourish. This is
judginging Piro in the new US attorney in that area.
Speaker 4 (02:44):
Here's the problem.
Speaker 5 (02:46):
Assuming that there's seventeen years older.
Speaker 4 (02:50):
Than seventeen years old, I can get the case.
Speaker 6 (02:53):
If they're under eighteen years of age, I can only
get the case if it's.
Speaker 1 (02:56):
Murder, rob one rape.
Speaker 7 (03:00):
Even if they shoot a gun but don't kill you,
I can't get it.
Speaker 1 (03:03):
So the law has to be changed. Yeah, the law
has to change.
Speaker 2 (03:08):
So we now have district attorneys who prosecute crimes, and
not just in DC, but all across America in these
blue cities, so people can feel safe again. They'll do
their best in DC. Now, President Trump said, I'm gonna
need Republican help here to change federal laws so they
can prosecute in the District of Columbia and prosecute the crimes.
Speaker 1 (03:28):
They need to.
Speaker 2 (03:29):
A thousand National Guard troops will be called in. They
will join federal agents to go after I'm sure illegal
gun owners. Most of the gang bangers and bruisers who
rule the streets in DC are illegal gun owners, prohibited possessors.
How about we go after them install instead of law
abiding gun owners for a change. And yes, I mentioned
(03:51):
the National Guard. They have been called up. Here's the
Secretary of Defense at your direction.
Speaker 4 (03:56):
This morning we mobilize the DC National Guard.
Speaker 8 (03:59):
It'll be operatinged by the Secretary of the Army, Dan Driscoll.
Speaker 4 (04:02):
Through the DC Guard, you will see them flowing into
the streets of Washington in the coming week at your
direction as well, Sir.
Speaker 5 (04:09):
There are other units we are prepared to bring in,
other National Guard units, other specialized units.
Speaker 4 (04:14):
They will be strong.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
I have no doubt that they will be, Mister Secretary,
I thank him for his leadership, Jean Piro for hers,
and of course President Trump for his. But instead of
gratitude from the so called leaders of Washington, d C.
Speaker 1 (04:31):
Mayor Muriel Bowser, for instance, we.
Speaker 2 (04:34):
Get absolute ineptitude comments again that don't talk about gratitude.
Instead we get ineptitude and more politics as usual.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
This is the mayor of DC.
Speaker 9 (04:49):
We know that access to our democracy is tenuous. That
is why you have heard me and many many Washingtonians
before me, advocate for full statehood for the District of Columbia.
And while this action today is unsettlingly and unprecedented, I
(05:10):
can't say that, given some of the rhetoric of the past,
that we're totally surprised.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
So it's interesting because President Trump, even our buddy Tim Burchett,
the Republican from Tennessee, talks highly about Mayor Bowser as
being a very nice lady.
Speaker 1 (05:27):
She may be a very nice lady. She's very misinformed
as well.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
She's not clued into the Constitution or how it works.
Speaker 1 (05:35):
She doesn't study the issues. Listen to this.
Speaker 9 (05:37):
We don't, and I think I speak for all Americans.
We don't believe or believe it's legal to use the
American military against American citizens on American soil. I'm not
a lawyer, so, but I think that's a fairly widely held.
Speaker 10 (05:57):
Fact.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
I'm sorry, Madam Mayor, it's not. And the Supreme Court
just took this up.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
The Supreme Court is allowing President Trump to use the
National Guard as he sees fit to keep the peace, okay,
because quite frankly, they may be American citizens, but to
people of DC, these gang bangers are terrorists that are
terrorizing that city and they need help.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
President Trump is bringing it in.
Speaker 2 (06:24):
He's going to move the homeless to other areas, get
him outside of the central district, and he's going to
clean up the blight and of course the trash out
of that city. Blightant trash, real trash, and people trash.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
All right, I'm with me now.
Speaker 2 (06:40):
Is retired US Navy intel officer and former police lieutenant
Stephen Rodgers is back with us. Lieutenant Rodgers, It's great
to have you on the program.
Speaker 10 (06:49):
Always a pleasure to be with you. Thank you.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
Well, what do you make of this move by President Trump?
And I believe it'll make a difference to you.
Speaker 11 (06:58):
Oh, it's already making a difference. Let me share this
with you. This is called liberation Day for the people
that live in Washington, d C. It has become liberation
day for every single law enforcement officer across this country.
They're going to be able to do their job knowing
that they're not putting their pensions on the line, knowing
that the government is going to back them. But even
in addition to that, this, let this serve as a
(07:20):
warning to every liberal, to every progressive, and sadly to say,
to every Democrat that has supported the policies that cause
these cities that go to hell in a handbasket. They're
next on the agenda, believe me. And it'll be up
to the people the toss mayors like they want in Washington,
d C. Out of office and those across the country
that got us into this mess.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
All right, lou how do you think the Metro Police
Department will react? My guess is the line officers will
embrace this. Top brass will not. But what does it
do to that police department now? And logistically can they
really get this to work with the FEDS overseeing Metro Police.
Speaker 11 (08:00):
Well, to begin with, I've spoken to a number of
Metro police officers while I visit Washington, and they're all
on board with the President. Every cop I've talked to,
not just in DC, but in cities around the country
they want action.
Speaker 10 (08:12):
They want to be able to do their job.
Speaker 11 (08:14):
They want the handcuffs taken off of their risk and
them being given the ability back to put handcuffs on.
Speaker 10 (08:20):
The bad guys risks. So, yes, you're right.
Speaker 11 (08:22):
Rank and file will absolutely support the president and the
partnership with the other law enforcement agencies. And there are
superior officers who can't speak up because they'll get fired,
they'll lose their jobs, but are willing to stand by
the troops that they're putting out in the streets. Troops
I mean the police officers who are called to protect
and serve.
Speaker 2 (08:41):
I think the people are going to openly embrace this,
even the people in the so called hood that, for
whatever reason, Democrats feel they need to coddle by somehow
allowing criminals to go free. You know, there's this term
that President Trump talked about, no cash bail. I actually
think it's a confusing term if you don't know the issue,
because I would think, all right, no bail means we
(09:02):
lock them up for good. Well, in fact, it means
just the opposite, no bail. You come in and we
let you out. So I wrote a term no jail,
no bail, free to sail. That is actually what's happening
in DC. Can he change this idea of arresting criminals
and letting him out on the street in a few hours.
Can we start putting them behind bars, because that'll make
(09:24):
a huge difference alone.
Speaker 11 (09:26):
Sure we could, And I think the judge Pyro had
actually touched upon that when she mentioned that there has
to be some accountability on judges. Judges have to be look,
I believe judges should be term limited and in some
cases they should have psychological exams for goodness akes and
what in the world they thinking putting killers and rapists
and people just doing great damage to innocent people in
(09:49):
this society. So it's going to be a total effort
on the part of the entire criminal justice system in
order to make this happen.
Speaker 10 (09:55):
But President Trump could do it.
Speaker 11 (09:57):
I believe he could do it, and the Congress has
to wake up. I realize that they got a president
there who's leading. Imagine we got a president leading in
front of us, not from behind.
Speaker 2 (10:07):
Us, on so many issues as too. I think everybody.
They may not admit it, but I think this nation
was hungry for leadership like we're seeing for President Trump.
Let me play a clip from his news conference today,
went an hour and a half.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
Byway speak a leadership. You wouldn't have seen Biden all the.
Speaker 2 (10:22):
News conference for ninety minutes, but this is President Trump
about who will be targeted in.
Speaker 12 (10:27):
All of this.
Speaker 3 (10:28):
They'll immediately begin massive enforcement operations targeting known gangs, drug dealers,
and criminal networks to get them the hell off the street,
maybe get them out of the country because a lot
of them came into our country illegally.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
They shouldn't have been allowed in.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
They come from Venezuela, they come from all over the world.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
We're going to get them the hell out.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
I would like to see law enforcement finally go after
illegal gun owners, not law abiding gun owners like the
left likes to target.
Speaker 1 (10:54):
I think that'll be part of all of this.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
Do you think we'll see federal agents as well in
and around DC doing their thing too, Lieutenant.
Speaker 11 (11:03):
Oh, no doubt about it. It's going to be a
partnership on all law enforcement levels. But you made a
point earlier about the Hood. People in the Hood they
want peace, they don't want crime. They got babies themselves,
they got kids being slaughtered on the streets.
Speaker 10 (11:15):
They welcome this action.
Speaker 11 (11:16):
So when the Democrats say, well, you're hurting the Hood,
you're hurting this, you're hurting that.
Speaker 10 (11:20):
No, these people are Americans.
Speaker 11 (11:22):
They want to feel safe and they want their children
to wake up the next day. Again, to your point,
it'll be a tire partnership between every level of law enforcement,
from the local guys all the way up to the
federal government.
Speaker 10 (11:33):
And this is gonna work. And by the way, yeah,
the LA mayor is a little.
Speaker 11 (11:36):
Upset today over this because she feels that they're coming
to LA.
Speaker 10 (11:40):
They're coming this mayor. Same thing with New York City.
Speaker 11 (11:42):
We got a communist running for office, and he thinks
he's going to solve all the problems. Well, the President's
going to solve the problems because you're going to make
sure this guy don't get elected and the police are
going to be able to do their job.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
Wouldn't that be great in every city across America? And
that ultimately is the goal. Lieutenant Stephen Rodgers, thank you
so much for coming on tonight.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
We appreciate you, sir.
Speaker 10 (12:02):
Oh, thank you for having me. I salute you for
the work you're doing. Thank you.
Speaker 1 (12:06):
I appreciate that as well.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
Imagic folks, you're a little kid, you're ten eleven years old.
Speaker 1 (12:11):
You put your head on a pillow every.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
Night, the gunshots outside, not knowing if your brother or
sisters going to come home. That's what's happening in American
cities today. This is what President Trump wants to stop.
And I think the people in those towns, in the
blighted areas, the low income areas of these cities, they
want it stopped too.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
All right, how do we do it? Well, we get
more Republicans in Congress.
Speaker 2 (12:33):
How do we do that? What's Jerry Manner the hell
out of these red states? That's right, I said it.
Screw you Democrats. I want to play politics as long
as it's well within the law to do so. If
you're not playing politics, you are losing in America today.
Speaker 1 (12:48):
Lord knows the Democrats play it.
Speaker 2 (12:51):
So we've got this issue in Texas to add five
more Republican seats. We know that the census was totally flawed. Well,
the democ scrats are melting down over all of this.
This is Obama, Lackey, Eric Holder.
Speaker 13 (13:05):
Well, there's no question that jerry mandering is a threat
to our democracy. It allows politicians to pick their voters
as opposed to citizens choosing their representatives. But we are
now in a situation where we find ourselves where authoritarian
moves are being made by the White House through various states,
Texas most prominent among them, and there has to be
a response to that. What I've said is that we
(13:26):
have to protect our democracy now if we ultimately want
to be able to save it, and so taking the
reasonable steps that have been proposed in California.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
Oh, give me a break.
Speaker 2 (13:39):
They love to use buzzwords protect our democracy. So because
Texas is open and honest about redistricting, Illinois and New
York we're not honest about it. And how about this,
I pulled the numbers, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, Rhode Island.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
That's New England, folks.
Speaker 2 (14:01):
Not one Republican lawmaker from those states. Let's add Hawaii
onto the list. Let's add Rhode Island, Delaware onto the list.
Not one Republican member of Congress, and they make up
anywhere between twenty six and forty two percent of the
vote Republicans do when those states, and they were jerry
mannered the hell out of them. In Illinois, I mentioned
(14:24):
seventeen percent of members of Congress or Republicans in that state.
But wait a second, thirty percent of the voters are Republicans.
You jerry mannered that. But here's the thing, of course,
Illinois did. Democrats are the party in control of that state.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
You want to change to vote, amount of office. So
don't get mad at Texans for this.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
The great thing is, though, finally the mainstream media confronted
the governor of Illinois on this very fact.
Speaker 14 (14:51):
You talk about preserving democracy, How do you preserve democracy.
Speaker 7 (14:55):
If you're using the same tactics that you've criticized Texas
Republicans for.
Speaker 15 (15:01):
But, as I say, what they're talking about is a distraction.
The reality is that the violation of people's voting rights
is what Texas is attempting to do.
Speaker 1 (15:10):
That's what's wrong with their efforts right now.
Speaker 15 (15:13):
And the fact that the President of the United States
knows it and nevertheless is asking them to do it.
That is what's wrong with what we're seeing right now.
Democracy is at stake.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
There they go again, Democracy at stake. It's a non
freaking answer.
Speaker 1 (15:31):
He just gave you. Okay, how about Kathy Hockel.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
Kathy Hochl, the governor of New York sounds like a
petulant child here.
Speaker 6 (15:40):
So your state's highest court at the time, all the
judges appointed by democratic governors.
Speaker 4 (15:45):
They threw the maps out.
Speaker 6 (15:46):
So fair to say Democrats have done what they're now
accusing Republicans of doing. No, we follow the rules. We
do it every ten years. Based on that, you didn't
follow the rules. Well, we did follow the rules, so
the court was wrong. We've followed the rules.
Speaker 2 (16:03):
We followed the rules of a robot. I was told
to say, we followed the rules. Well, Shannon Breen was right.
The court said you didn't follow the rules. That's happened
in Texas too. By the way, when I ran for
Congress in twenty eleven, going into twenty twelve, there was
redistricting going on. They threw the maps out. There had
to be redrawn over and over. And over again. Not easy,
but the system works. And by the way, the census
(16:24):
data was all flawed, which is why Texas needs to
do this again because I believe seats were lost because
of that flawed census data. Now on to a national
security issue. I guess you could include jerrymandering is a
national security issue, but this one is serious. This national
security issue has me concerned.
Speaker 1 (16:42):
Because it's something nobody's talking about.
Speaker 2 (16:45):
So Senator Rick Scott of Florida has introduced the Protect
Act and he wants an investigation into these so called
smart appliances, high powered appliances that are connected to the Internet,
your electric vehicle chargers, dryers, smart ovens.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
He is fearful that.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
These appliances made by adversarial nations like China could be
used to overload our grid and cause an entire problem
simply because they're connected to the Internet. Our adversaries could
use these smart appliances against us to virtually shut our
electricity off. This is a gentleman that studied the issue
(17:32):
at one of.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
The local colleges.
Speaker 16 (17:33):
Take a listen, so high watage IoT devices such as
electric vehicle chargers, electric heaters, gitchback devices, or air purifiers
can be compromised and controls remotely by attackers, and an
attacker who has access to a large number of such
(17:55):
IoT spots, they can turn them on or off simultaneously
from random locations to cause technical issues in the power grid.
Speaker 2 (18:08):
All right, imagine you're in Texas right now, it's one
hundred and five degrees out, air conditioners going wild, and
your adversary ups the power wattage of these appliances to
basically overload the grid. Well, to discuss this, I want
to bring in the president and CEO for the nonprofit
Center for Security Policies, retired Lieutenant colonel from the Marine Corps,
(18:29):
Tommy Waller is with us.
Speaker 1 (18:30):
Colonel, great to have you on the program.
Speaker 8 (18:33):
Yeah, Grant, thank you for having me on, and thank
you for covering the topic of the grid. It's absolutely,
as you said, one of the most important that we
could be discussing right now.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
You know, Colonel, I've talked a lot about parts used
in the grid and Biden overturning a Trump order from
the first presidency of Trump that we want to make
sure we don't have Chinese parts in the grid. But
I don't remember talking about our air conditioners being connected
to the Internet and hackers hacking in to overload the grid.
Speaker 1 (19:01):
Is this truly a concern with tennant Colonel.
Speaker 8 (19:05):
Yeah, yeah, granted, it really is a concern. And that
video that you showed is actually six years old. So
that was back in twenty nineteen Princeton University doing presentations
on this, which was termed asmad IoT or mad IoT.
So people may have some familiarity with the term IoT.
That's Internet of things, right, so you think about all
the smart the quote smart devices out there. And to
(19:29):
President Trump's credit, back in twenty nineteen, he had passed
an executive order to start to force the government to
look at how these different communications and technology devices could
be harmful to our national security. And to credit Senator
Rick Scott, he actually codified with this bill. As you mentioned,
it's called a Protect Act that stands for preventing remote
(19:52):
operations by threatening entities on critical technology. The Protect Act
codifies President Trump's twenty nineteen executive or are into.
Speaker 17 (20:01):
Law the law of the land.
Speaker 8 (20:02):
And to answer that question, Grant, how does this work, Well,
this mad IoT.
Speaker 1 (20:08):
Is manipulation of demand.
Speaker 8 (20:10):
As you just said, Imagining you're sitting there, air conditions
are running. All these appliances are running, and then all
of a sudden remotely they get manipulated and it increases
the demand or perhaps decreases the demand, and then that
can cause failures of our electric grid. And so that's
exactly what this bill is meant to have the Commerce
(20:31):
Department study and come back with recommendations and how to
thwart this method of attack.
Speaker 2 (20:36):
All right, if you control the electricity, boy, I'll tell
you what, you almost nearly control the entire country, right,
I mean, think of air traffic control and people on
oxygen tanks and life support, not to mention, you know,
people with air conditioning in very hot places during the summer.
Are we doing enough right now to secure our electricity
(20:59):
grid nation from a threat like this?
Speaker 1 (21:03):
Now? Grant?
Speaker 8 (21:03):
Unfortunately, we're not doing enough. I will say that that
the president, President Trump, having come in on a second term,
is moving rapidly to fix a lot of things that
were broken. In fact, I have an article I published
just a couple of weeks ago at the National Interest
that talks about the big beautiful bill. It quotes stops
the bleeding. Right, if you look at our electric grid
as if it were a patient a trauma patient, someone
(21:26):
that had just experienced, you know, gunshot wounds. What the
President has done with the first part is first one
hundred days, is stop the bleeding. There's a lot more
life saving care that needs to be applied to the
electric grid, and this is going to be one of
those forms of care. Because look for our adversaries, especially China,
using all this quote smart technology, that's an indirect way
(21:46):
to attack our grid.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
Right.
Speaker 8 (21:48):
Our grid operators are somewhat accustomed to looking for cybersecurity threats.
These are devices that are not part of that network.
Speaker 4 (21:55):
They're attached to it, but.
Speaker 8 (21:56):
We don't have visibility within the utility industry on your
washer and dryer, for example. But I'll tell you Grant,
probably the single biggest element that made this worse during
the Bide administration was the electrification of everything, and specifically
electrical vehicles. So when you look at Senator Scott's bill,
it talks about five hundred watts or higher any device.
(22:17):
And so if you start at the bottom, you're looking
at washers right at like five hundred. If you go
up from there you get to things like stoves and
all these different smart appliances, which, oh, by the way,
during the Biden administration, there was lots and lots of
incentives to increase the use of that EV charging stations
electrical vehicles. Now you're talking about fifty thousand to three
(22:37):
hundred and fifty thousand watts. If foreign adversary gets control
of that type of infrastructure, then it can cause extraordinary
damage very quickly to our grid. And that's exactly what
the Senator is seeking to be able to defend against,
and I want to commend him for that.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (22:54):
Absolutely, Look, our goal is to raise awareness on this.
I don't think there's enough lawmakers from either of the aisle,
specially from the left though that is looking at this
as a true national security threat. We need lawmakers to
step in. I know Tommy Waller that our utility company
is going to be hesitant to spend money on this
because they don't want to spend money. They want to
make money. But in the end it's going to be devastating.
(23:16):
If the whole thing crashes, nobody's going to be making
any money.
Speaker 1 (23:19):
Something needs to be done.
Speaker 2 (23:20):
I appreciate your organization fighting for this, and as always
I appreciate you coming on.
Speaker 1 (23:24):
Please keep us posted on this topic and beyond.
Speaker 8 (23:27):
Colonel absolutely happy to do, sir.
Speaker 17 (23:29):
Thank you Grant for.
Speaker 1 (23:30):
Having me on. Absolutely and thank you all right, folks.
Speaker 2 (23:34):
The Trump administration is bringing positive changes to our healthcare system.
But to truly make America healthy again, it starts at
home with you. That's where the Wellness Company comes in,
offering top quality products to keep your family.
Speaker 1 (23:45):
Safe and healthy.
Speaker 2 (23:46):
Their prescription medical kits I've got one right here, includes
life saving medications and guide books. Plus they offer parasite cleanses.
Speaker 1 (23:54):
I'm on one, folks.
Speaker 2 (23:56):
I'm telling you, after about a week of this, I've
now just realized I've got more energy than I ever had.
I owe this to the parasite Clinton, I really do.
All of this is designed to help you live longer.
So visit TWC dot Help Forward slash voice. Do it today.
Use the promo code voice to save ten percent. That's
TWC Dot Health Forward slash Voice.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
Use the promo code voice to.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Save ten percent. Our in America has decided to put
an end to the cartels. Mexico apparently is not happy
about our plan. That's next, welcome back to everyone. So
(24:41):
President Trump is set to meet with Vladimir Putin this
Friday in Alaska. He's gonna talk about ending the Ukraine War.
Can President Trump make it happen? This is President Trump
on that today.
Speaker 3 (24:53):
Well, we're gonna have a meeting with Ladimir Putin, and
at the end of that meeting, probably in the first
two minutes, I'll know exactly whether.
Speaker 1 (25:00):
Or not a deal can be read. To know that,
because that's what I do. I make deals.
Speaker 2 (25:08):
What a dumb question, you know. I own businesses, not
like President Trump's level. I call myself a small time capitalist.
But let me tell you something about the art of
the deal. President Trump is the king of the art
of the deal. But even I know you can walk
into a room and assess the situation and know what
the reality is gonna be within just a few seconds.
(25:29):
But that reporter, they're so disconnected from real life because
they've never been outside of anything other than a newsroom.
Speaker 1 (25:38):
They don't get real life.
Speaker 2 (25:39):
I promise you President Trump's gonna be able to make
that assessment within a few minutes. And then you get dopey,
dopey people like this that appear on MSNBC making wild claims.
Speaker 18 (25:50):
Plutin gets Trump in a room, He's gonna use his
you know, old intelligence training to flatter and these are
some things that Trump seems to seems to like. And
then you're gonna have a press conference when the concern
is that Trump kind of gives away the farm. In
terms of Ukraine, I don't see any national security professional,
a political professional who thinks this is going to turn
out well on Friday and Alaska, I think there really
(26:12):
is great concern.
Speaker 1 (26:15):
What a ding dong?
Speaker 2 (26:17):
You think President Trump is going to be manipulated by
Vladimir Putin with his KGB mind control.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
I don't think so.
Speaker 2 (26:25):
If anybody's going to control the situation, it's going to
be President Trump.
Speaker 1 (26:28):
Not to take away from Putin. The guy is a.
Speaker 2 (26:30):
Smart, sly guy, but he's not going to take advantage
of President Trump. Neither is the president of Mexico. By
the way, So President Trump, you may remember, comes out
last week along with Pambody. They issued arrest warrants for
Nicholas Maduro, who is the leader of Venezuela as the
largest narco trafficker in the world. Well Shinbaum, the President
(26:54):
of Mexican says, I haven't seen the evidence.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
Come on.
Speaker 2 (26:57):
All of these drugs are funneling through Venezuela, ill us
straight through Mexico and then of course into the United States.
President Trump says, We're going to take the fight to
Mexico with our military. Marco Rubio backs up President Trump,
saying we need to go after the cartels in Mexico
and basically chop the head of the snake off that way.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
This is Marco Rubio, excuse me.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
This is the president of Mexico pushing back against that idea.
Speaker 5 (27:24):
The United States is not going to come to Mexico
with their military.
Speaker 15 (27:30):
We cooperate, we collaborate, but there will be no invasion.
Speaker 5 (27:36):
That's ruled out.
Speaker 1 (27:40):
It depends on what you call an invasion.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
We're not storming the borders of Mexico, but you better
believe I could see special forces going in there, and
if President Trump wants it, Scheinbaum will ultimately have to
say yes because Mexico needs us on with me. Now,
rav Border correspondent Ben Birkwam is with us. Nobody knows
this is you better than my man, be Ben.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
Welcome to the program.
Speaker 10 (28:04):
Thank you.
Speaker 14 (28:05):
Grant Man. Talk about irony after being invaded for four
years directly through our southern border and a little bit
through the northern border, but mostly from our Mexican partners,
our allies, allowing our border just to be completely cross Now,
at granted, that wasn't her fault, that was Joe Biden,
the Democrats that were inviting it in. They were just
to pass through. But the irony of calling what President
(28:27):
Trump is calling for an invasion, It's one of two things. Grant.
I think she's in a tough spot, and no country
wants a sovereign foreign country to come in and do
their dirty work for them. But the reality is Mexico
is a failed narco state, and I think she's one
of two places right now. One is she's trying to
appease the average Mexican voter that says, wait a second,
(28:49):
we can do this, We don't need America to do this.
Speaker 1 (28:51):
Can't we go.
Speaker 14 (28:52):
Take the cartel out ourselves? And she realizes, no, we can't,
but I actually have to put on a good face
and pretend like we can. Or the other side is
this that she's bought off by Elmeo's crew on the
Cineloa cartel and basically everything she's been doing up to
this point has been window dressing, and she's at a
place where she just cannot go any further.
Speaker 1 (29:11):
Either way, you're right.
Speaker 14 (29:12):
If President Trump, if this is something President Trump wants,
it's gonna happen.
Speaker 2 (29:16):
You know, Ben, as I listened to you, it could
be a little bit of both here. You know, she
gave basically the out in that one little comment where
said this is about cooperation, will work with it. She
could ultimately go back to the people of Mexico.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
This wasn't invasion. He told us he could come in.
Speaker 2 (29:30):
They're working with our special forces and they're working together
all the while a wink and a nod. I don't
really trust her because I think most politicians are bought
off by the cartels in Mexico.
Speaker 1 (29:41):
So you may see a little bit of both of
what you just laid out at play here, Ben.
Speaker 14 (29:47):
Yeah, and look, our next episode of lo On Border
is going to be focused on that our time down
in Couliacan, Mexico, Cineloa, down with Oscar And that was
the sense you got from the people. In fact, the
guy we interviewed down there, I don't remember that, Aeronie Barra.
He said, until you start seeing politicians arrested and the
DA's arrested and the judges arrested, you're not gonna see
any change in Mexico. Mexico is such a failed country
(30:09):
when it comes to narco trafficking, human trafficking. They control
every aspect, every layer of society. So part of this
is not gonna happen without the United States in there.
But the reality is we're already doing a lot of that.
Our intelligence services already working with Mexico. They're the only
reason we got the heads off the snakes earlier on,
you know, just a couple of months ago we extracted
(30:29):
them from Mexico was because of partly our intelligent services.
So a lot of that's already happening, and you're right.
Part of it is she has to put on a
happy face for the country, saying we're doing this, but
we're gonna you know, we're gonna be in control. But
at the same time, she also can't piss off her
narco bosses, who the Again, the speculation is the only
reason she's in the position she's in is she made
a few the right people happy and they're the ones
(30:52):
who put her in there, and if if she upsets
them too much, she'll be out just as fast. So
it's it's a tricky, you know, tricky situation. But The
truth is, we cannot combat narco terrorism in America unless
we deal with it globally. And that's exactly what President
Trump and Pambondi and our military is talking about.
Speaker 2 (31:10):
To me, let me play a clip from me from
Marco Rubio cut eight for the guys behind the.
Speaker 19 (31:14):
Glass different cartels that operate in Mexico and in between.
You find them in Ecuador, you find them in Guatemala.
You find TDA what people would call street gangs, but
actually operating as criminal enterprises, but very well organized ones.
So what it changes is it gives us legal authorities
to target them in ways you can't do if they're
just a bunch of criminals. It's no longer a law
(31:35):
enforcement issue. It becomes a national security.
Speaker 2 (31:39):
And that's about label them as terror organizations. Been real
quick if you can for me. You briefly mentioned it.
The cartels have been battered and bruised here, but by
no means are they dead and wiped out. How hard
will this battle be to take out the cartels?
Speaker 1 (31:56):
Extremely hard?
Speaker 14 (31:57):
And you mentioned it with the last guest. I'm actually
going to be going up to you a location with
some hydro power equipment tomorrow and you talk about terror
threats in America. Look, these cartel terrorists are in America.
Once we start going after them, they're gonna act in
the same way any foreign adversary would act, and they're
gonna attack us in our soft spots. And so, uh,
it's not it's not just dangerous because this is a
foreign threat. This is a threat that's on our step,
(32:18):
that's in our country, it's inside of our house. And
so it's gonna be it's gonna be bloody, it's gonna
be ugly, it's you know, it's it's gonna be all
those things. But it has to happen or else we're
gonna become like Mexico in just you know, years, if
not decades, decades. It's it's it's it's on. We're on
the road to becoming like Mexico. If this doesn't happen.
Speaker 2 (32:36):
Well, and that would that would be about as bad
as it gets. Looks like President Trump and team have
got us on the right track. Uh, your insight better
than anybody else's, Ben Burkewe we're blessed to have you
on the program.
Speaker 1 (32:47):
Thank you, my friend, my pleasure.
Speaker 10 (32:51):
Thanks Gren.
Speaker 2 (32:52):
Absolutely all right, folks, we'll continue to cover that story.
She thinks they're not coming into Mexico. President Trump wonsea
and he's getting in all right. Pelosi, she happens to
be the greatest stock trader of all time? Or is
this all about inside or trading? What if I told
you maybe you could profit off of her?
Speaker 1 (33:12):
It's true. I'll show you how next. Welcome back here.
Speaker 2 (33:26):
When all of back to twenty twelve, I pushed members
of Congress to pass something called the Stock Act, which
prohibited members of Congress from trading on inside information. It
was a start, but besides some reporting, it really doesn't
have a lot of teeth, and we still see members
of Congress getting rich off of what I believe is
(33:46):
inside information. The queen of that is none other than
Nancy Pelosi. This is what President Trump truthed yesterday. Okay,
it reads crooked. Nancy Pelosi and are very interesting. Husband
beat every hedge fund in twenty twenty four. In other words,
these two very average minds beat all of the super
(34:07):
geniuses on Wall Street, thousands of them. It's all inside information.
Is anybody looking into this? She's a disgusting degenerate who
impeached me twice on no grounds and lost. How are
you feeling now, Nancy, Well, the question becomes, should members
of Congress just flat out be banned from trading stocks?
(34:31):
This is Pelosi being asked about all of this.
Speaker 1 (34:34):
Last week, he.
Speaker 10 (34:35):
Accused you of insider trading.
Speaker 1 (34:37):
What's your response to that?
Speaker 7 (34:39):
That's very ridiculous. In fact, I very much supportop the
trading of members of Congress, not that I think anybody's
doing anything wrong. If they are, they are prosecuted and
they go to jail. But because of the confidence and
it stills in American people don't worry about this.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
She goes out to say, my husband handles all of
this for us. Yeah, you're lying in bed. You tell
her you're going to pass a certain piece of legislation
that's going to send a stock skyrocketing or plumbting. They
buy it, they short it, whatever they have to do
to make them rich, like something like seventy percent.
Speaker 1 (35:17):
They made on their money last year.
Speaker 2 (35:20):
Well, I want to bring in now, founder of auto Pilot,
a trading app which allows users to track the portfolios
of politicians and top investors, Chris Josephs is back with us.
He was on when he started this app. Chris, welcome
to the program.
Speaker 17 (35:38):
Thanks for having me on again. It's been a journey,
all right.
Speaker 1 (35:43):
I bet so.
Speaker 2 (35:44):
When you were on last you were just starting this out.
This is I don't know, maybe a couple of years
ago here on Real America's Voice. Now, Autopilot's still going strong.
Nancy Pelosi?
Speaker 1 (35:55):
Is she your number one?
Speaker 2 (35:57):
I don't want to call it an advisor, but at
least the politician that you track and investors make money
off of she is.
Speaker 12 (36:05):
She started out number one, and she's held supreme the
entire time. We initially kind of first launched our app,
which to your what you're describing is exactly right. It
allows you to take your stock portfolio and trade alongside
politicians and other investors. We launched it in January twenty
twenty three. Pelosi was the most popular then. We've since
grown to the point where we now have eight hundred
(36:26):
million dollars plus invested on our platform. Pelosi is still
the most popular now, and since we've been tracking her,
her performance is up one hundred and eighty percent since
that date back in January of twenty twenty three, which
is insane.
Speaker 2 (36:41):
All right, So you're two and a half years she's
up one hundred and eighty percent, Chris, you've been in
and around this business that defies the odds, does it not?
Speaker 17 (36:52):
Absolutely?
Speaker 12 (36:53):
Yeah, So from hedge funds, they don't make one hundred
eighty percent.
Speaker 17 (36:57):
To passive investors, they don't.
Speaker 12 (36:59):
Make one hundred eighty percent to even kind of like
some of these other low level politicians.
Speaker 17 (37:03):
They don't make one hundred and eighty percent. Pelosi on
our platform is one.
Speaker 12 (37:06):
Of the only ones that have been able to kind
of put those numbers up at a consistent basis. And
last year, in the year of twenty twenty four, where
Trump was referencing that she outperformed top hedge fund managers
on our platform, she was up fifty four percent, which
is incredible in that kind of era. What people don't understand, though,
is she actually trades long dated call options, which are
(37:29):
essentially called leaps, which would make her performance be even
higher than the fifty four percent that we're able to track.
We just don't have the information to know the exact
performance of what she did, but her on our platform
performing fifty four percent for sure makes her kind of
the top quartile of money managers quote unquote in America.
Speaker 2 (37:49):
All Right, I want to make sure I get this clear.
So the fifty one percent if you had followed her
using the autopilot platform, would you too have made the
fifty one percent correct?
Speaker 12 (38:00):
Yep, if you were in from January first all the
way through. And there are some winners that The biggest
winner that she had in twenty twenty four was in video.
She bought in Nvidia at the end of twenty twenty three,
and that stock perfectly time. She got in right before
it went up one hundred and ninety percent. She also
had other winners like Apple, which was up which a
lot of people own. But she made another notable kind
(38:22):
of really good time trade in July of last year
when she bought Broadcom, and since her by in July
twenty twenty four, the stock was up another forty percent.
So it's not even just one off stocks that are
making a killing for her. She's hit on a number
of them, and that I think is why she's still
the queen.
Speaker 2 (38:42):
All right, Chris Joseph with autopilot, What's amazing about this
is the fifty percent you were delayed in getting this
information to get to the people using autopilot.
Speaker 1 (38:53):
She doesn't make a trade, you get it.
Speaker 2 (38:55):
In ten seconds later. You can tweet that out or
push that out on the app. People, you're what thirty
days delayed and thirty days delayed, you're getting.
Speaker 1 (39:05):
Still returns of fifty percent. She could have been making
eighty ninety who knows what percent. I think that was your.
Speaker 12 (39:11):
Point, Chris, Yeah, yeah, And so kudos to you for
being able to get the Stock Act passed back in
twenty twelve. But part of that kind of one of
the negatives of it moving forward now is the delay
where they have up to forty five days to delay.
The performance that we have on the platform is does
bring that delay in. So there really is kind of
a little bit of a discrepancy. But with the way
(39:35):
that you're describing is right. Even with the delay, it
was up four percent, which also though to be clear,
it doesn't include the fees associated with autopilot.
Speaker 17 (39:43):
I gotta say that for a legal reason.
Speaker 1 (39:45):
Okay, Well, and the fees are not all that big.
Speaker 2 (39:48):
Now, it looks like some guys are, Okay, Ken, So
Nancy Pelosi can handle that. I'm sure both people out
there Ken as well. It's so fascinating what you've done. Look,
the bottom line is, I guess if you can't beat
them join them personally, I would like, I don't want
to ban members of Congress from having investments, but I
(40:11):
think if it goes into a blind trust or you're
in a fidelity account that's managed by somebody else, you
have no say in it. You know, that's fine. But
this idea, they are all many of them. I'll give
you the last word on this. She's not the only
politician that does really well, is she, Chris?
Speaker 17 (40:27):
She is absolutely not.
Speaker 12 (40:29):
And what we do kind of on autopilot side, is
we a very bipartisan. We call out Republicans, we call
out Democrats. Anytime we see a suspicious trade, we call
them out. And we've been calling out Marjorie Taylor Green,
We've been calling out Dan Crenshaw. Pelosi still though, is
the one with the best performing stocks. But it is
definitely a bipartisan issue. And going to the debate of
(40:49):
should politicians be allowed to trade? I think you do
enter this whole world of like is it constitutional to
limit a politician's kid or a politician's spouse or trading stocks.
Speaker 17 (41:01):
It becomes very complicated, very quickly.
Speaker 12 (41:03):
But what the average everyday American is essentially asking is
just don't trade individual stocks. Just put it in a
blind trust or put it in the broader s and
P five hundred where if the broader market goes up,
you still.
Speaker 17 (41:14):
Win, but you cannot, you know, down tick.
Speaker 12 (41:17):
A specific sock right before a law comes out.
Speaker 17 (41:22):
It's pretty common sense.
Speaker 2 (41:24):
I think all of that makes a lot of sense.
The name of your app is Auto Pilot. I urge
people to check it out that you guys aren't paying
for this. I asked you to come on, and it's
just a cool thing that you guys do. And I
appreciate talking to you, and I'm grateful and happy that
you're having so much success.
Speaker 1 (41:41):
Chris Joseph, thank you for coming on.
Speaker 17 (41:44):
Appreciate it.
Speaker 12 (41:44):
And let's keep the pressure on them because if we
can get that band through, I can retire that Pelosi
tracker once and for good and move on to our
next thing.
Speaker 2 (41:53):
Hey man, ma Man, thank you for coming on. As
always again, his app is Auto Pilot. All right, folks,
coming up next, we will take back control of your health.
Speaker 1 (42:06):
In fact, will help you take back control of your health.
Speaker 4 (42:08):
Stick around, Welcome back to everyone.
Speaker 2 (42:20):
What if I told you renew your health, you could
renew your relationships.
Speaker 20 (42:24):
Watch this I started with the five five five challenge.
But since I started, my feet don't hurt, my ankles
are so much better, and just little things. My eyelids
are so saggy, and I can see my eyeballs again.
This morning was the first time that he got up
(42:46):
and said, I feel really great. I have energy this morning,
and I slew last night. There's no love handles anymore.
Speaker 13 (42:55):
You know, it is really easy to adopt a perspective
that has some expectation for good things to come.
Speaker 1 (43:04):
All right, folks again, it's the my five five five Challenge.
Speaker 2 (43:08):
Five pounds, five days, five dollars guaranteed from the folks
that energize help.
Speaker 1 (43:14):
John ju believes with us, John, welcome back, my man.
All right, John, So I would imagine you get in shape.
Speaker 2 (43:23):
It does improve every aspect of your life, including your relationships.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
Is that what you're seeing?
Speaker 5 (43:29):
Well, it really does grant because we don't realize that.
You know, when we lack energy, when we lack vitality,
when we lack our strength just to do the everyday things,
there's no way we can show up for other people
in our life. You know, we just get used to well,
I'm just in pain, you know, we're running about fifty percent.
Speaker 1 (43:51):
You know why, because.
Speaker 10 (43:52):
We're a bunch of raisins.
Speaker 5 (43:54):
For those of you that have heard me speak before,
I say, what's the difference between that great and a raisin.
Grape is hydrated or raisin is dehydrated. So when your
brain is dehydrated, your heart, your thyroid, your kidneys, you're pancreas,
all of your levels are just debilitated, your half of
what you really could be. And so when all of
(44:15):
a sudden you get back the energy, like you just
heard this woman's share that her husband got back his
energy for the first time and she lost all of
her pain. Well, they show up differently for their children,
for their grandchildren, for their great grandchildren, and grant. I
love to share this example because my mother, my mother,
became my client later in life.
Speaker 4 (44:36):
It took her a while, but.
Speaker 10 (44:37):
My mom got on the protocol.
Speaker 5 (44:40):
And my mother has almost fifty that's right, almost fifty
grandchildren and great grandchildren, and she still gets on the floor,
gets on the ground and plays with the what we
call the littles in our family, the littles, the littlest
of the great grandchildren. He goes on cross country trips
(45:02):
with the adult grandchildren. She absolutely is showing up relationally
differently because of her energy. And she still works a
real job, by the way, and takes care of about
thirty old people that are younger than her, by the way,
but she feeds them.
Speaker 1 (45:17):
And visits them.
Speaker 5 (45:17):
She absolutely shows up different relationally and everyone can have
what she has.
Speaker 1 (45:23):
Well.
Speaker 2 (45:24):
I just said today on the podcast pitching the my
five to five to five Challenge and energized health. I
used it so I can still play one on one
basketball with my son. He's sixteen years old, and I'm
still moving now. We're about fifty to fifty on wins.
But it's working and it's keeping you younger. And so
whether you're older and a grandparent or whether you're like
(45:46):
me and a dad of a sixteen year old, there's
so many things that getting hydrated at cellular level can do,
and my five to five to five Challenge is a
great way to start.
Speaker 1 (45:55):
At John, I'll give you the last word here.
Speaker 5 (45:58):
Yeah, Well, Grant, I want to encourage people. Well, when
you sign up for the five five five, please upgrade
yourself to a VIP. And you say, John, why would
I want to spend an extra night? It's ninety nine dollars. Guys,
here's why we're gonna fed x you a medical grade
device to measure twelve health markers that even your doctor
has not went over these twelve health markers with you.
Speaker 1 (46:20):
You need to know your hydration level.
Speaker 5 (46:23):
You're gonna get a one on one with one of
our health experts. You're not only gonna get everything in
the five five five, You're gonna get a lot of
extra stuff, but the most important thing you're gonna get
is the device to measure so you know where am
I in my cellular hydration and a one on one
person to go over your twelve main health markers with you.
You get a bunch of other things, extra time with
(46:45):
Chelsea and I. We will answer your one on one
questions on the five five five.
Speaker 2 (46:50):
John, I'll tell you what I have one of those
devices thanks to you, guys.
Speaker 1 (46:54):
I use it.
Speaker 2 (46:54):
Every day and those markers really are my religion to
see how I'm doing along the way you believe. Let
me tell people how they can find you and energize
health and specifically the five five to five challenge. Go
to my five five five challenge dot com. That's my
five five five challenge dot com. Lose five pounds in
five days for only five dollars and upgrade to.
Speaker 1 (47:18):
That VIP for ninety nine bucks. Well worth it. Take
it from me.
Speaker 2 (47:22):
Okay, all right, upnext, some final thoughts Stinchfields next. All right,
welcome back everybody, as you know Stinsfield seventeen seventy six
on all the social media platforms.
Speaker 1 (47:40):
Give me a follow.
Speaker 2 (47:41):
You can check out my podcast uh every afternoon twelve
Eastern time on Rumble. It's a great place, Studio six B.
And the guys upnext, stick around for them. Stinchfield's Army
Rolls see tomorrow
Well, good evening, everyone, Welcome to Stinsfield.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
President Trump doing what President Trump does best, and that's
making America safe again, making d C, the District of
Columbia safe again, and ultimately, let's hope, great again. He
has officially taken control of d C, federalizing it. The
one city in America that actually is already under the
control of federal lawmakers in d C, but this time
(00:45):
setting National Guard troops in because of all of the crime,
the blight, the homelessness, and even taking federal control of
the d C Metro Police Department.
Speaker 1 (00:57):
This is big, folks.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
They formerly declaring a public safety emergency. This is an emergency.
This is a tragic emergency. And it's embarrassing for me
to be up here. You know, I'm gonna see Putin.
I'm going to Russia on Friday. I don't like being
up here talking about how unsafe and how dirty and
disgusting this once beautiful capital was.
Speaker 2 (01:23):
Think about all across America, the once beautiful cities. Los Angeles, California,
one of the most beautiful cities in the country. It
was until liberals absolutely ruined it with coddling criminals, letting homelessness, flourish.
Speaker 1 (01:39):
Same situation in DC.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
We can go blue city to blue city to blue city.
That probably all need to be federalized. But DC is
the nation's capital and quite frankly, it's a third world country. Now,
how do I know this? Just compare it to the
numbers when you look at the murder rate, okay, twenty
seven people per one hundred thousand people in DC. But
(02:02):
look at the other cities, and it beats Bogata, Mexico City,
even as Lamabad, Okay, gets beat by DC when it
comes to the murder rate. We saw a three year
old shot and killed while sitting in a car. You
had that doze employee, they call him big balls last week,
(02:23):
just obliterated on the streets trying to stop a carjacking
in progress, and he was beaten to a pulp staffers
murdered and mugged in that city, and yes, murdered in
that city. Liberal lunacy, lets it all flourish. This is
judginging Piro in the new US attorney in that area.
Speaker 4 (02:44):
Here's the problem.
Speaker 5 (02:46):
Assuming that there's seventeen years older.
Speaker 4 (02:50):
Than seventeen years old, I can get the case.
Speaker 6 (02:53):
If they're under eighteen years of age, I can only
get the case if it's.
Speaker 1 (02:56):
Murder, rob one rape.
Speaker 7 (03:00):
Even if they shoot a gun but don't kill you,
I can't get it.
Speaker 1 (03:03):
So the law has to be changed. Yeah, the law
has to change.
Speaker 2 (03:08):
So we now have district attorneys who prosecute crimes, and
not just in DC, but all across America in these
blue cities, so people can feel safe again. They'll do
their best in DC. Now, President Trump said, I'm gonna
need Republican help here to change federal laws so they
can prosecute in the District of Columbia and prosecute the crimes.
Speaker 1 (03:28):
They need to.
Speaker 2 (03:29):
A thousand National Guard troops will be called in. They
will join federal agents to go after I'm sure illegal
gun owners. Most of the gang bangers and bruisers who
rule the streets in DC are illegal gun owners, prohibited possessors.
How about we go after them install instead of law
abiding gun owners for a change. And yes, I mentioned
(03:51):
the National Guard. They have been called up. Here's the
Secretary of Defense at your direction.
Speaker 4 (03:56):
This morning we mobilize the DC National Guard.
Speaker 8 (03:59):
It'll be operatinged by the Secretary of the Army, Dan Driscoll.
Speaker 4 (04:02):
Through the DC Guard, you will see them flowing into
the streets of Washington in the coming week at your
direction as well, Sir.
Speaker 5 (04:09):
There are other units we are prepared to bring in,
other National Guard units, other specialized units.
Speaker 4 (04:14):
They will be strong.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
I have no doubt that they will be, Mister Secretary,
I thank him for his leadership, Jean Piro for hers,
and of course President Trump for his. But instead of
gratitude from the so called leaders of Washington, d C.
Speaker 1 (04:31):
Mayor Muriel Bowser, for instance, we.
Speaker 2 (04:34):
Get absolute ineptitude comments again that don't talk about gratitude.
Instead we get ineptitude and more politics as usual.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
This is the mayor of DC.
Speaker 9 (04:49):
We know that access to our democracy is tenuous. That
is why you have heard me and many many Washingtonians
before me, advocate for full statehood for the District of Columbia.
And while this action today is unsettlingly and unprecedented, I
(05:10):
can't say that, given some of the rhetoric of the past,
that we're totally surprised.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
So it's interesting because President Trump, even our buddy Tim Burchett,
the Republican from Tennessee, talks highly about Mayor Bowser as
being a very nice lady.
Speaker 1 (05:27):
She may be a very nice lady. She's very misinformed
as well.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
She's not clued into the Constitution or how it works.
Speaker 1 (05:35):
She doesn't study the issues. Listen to this.
Speaker 9 (05:37):
We don't, and I think I speak for all Americans.
We don't believe or believe it's legal to use the
American military against American citizens on American soil. I'm not
a lawyer, so, but I think that's a fairly widely held.
Speaker 10 (05:57):
Fact.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
I'm sorry, Madam Mayor, it's not. And the Supreme Court
just took this up.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
The Supreme Court is allowing President Trump to use the
National Guard as he sees fit to keep the peace, okay,
because quite frankly, they may be American citizens, but to
people of DC, these gang bangers are terrorists that are
terrorizing that city and they need help.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
President Trump is bringing it in.
Speaker 2 (06:24):
He's going to move the homeless to other areas, get
him outside of the central district, and he's going to
clean up the blight and of course the trash out
of that city. Blightant trash, real trash, and people trash.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
All right, I'm with me now.
Speaker 2 (06:40):
Is retired US Navy intel officer and former police lieutenant
Stephen Rodgers is back with us. Lieutenant Rodgers, It's great
to have you on the program.
Speaker 10 (06:49):
Always a pleasure to be with you. Thank you.
Speaker 2 (06:52):
Well, what do you make of this move by President Trump?
And I believe it'll make a difference to you.
Speaker 11 (06:58):
Oh, it's already making a difference. Let me share this
with you. This is called liberation Day for the people
that live in Washington, d C. It has become liberation
day for every single law enforcement officer across this country.
They're going to be able to do their job knowing
that they're not putting their pensions on the line, knowing
that the government is going to back them. But even
in addition to that, this, let this serve as a
(07:20):
warning to every liberal, to every progressive, and sadly to say,
to every Democrat that has supported the policies that cause
these cities that go to hell in a handbasket. They're
next on the agenda, believe me. And it'll be up
to the people the toss mayors like they want in Washington,
d C. Out of office and those across the country
that got us into this mess.
Speaker 2 (07:41):
All right, lou how do you think the Metro Police
Department will react? My guess is the line officers will
embrace this. Top brass will not. But what does it
do to that police department now? And logistically can they
really get this to work with the FEDS overseeing Metro Police.
Speaker 11 (08:00):
Well, to begin with, I've spoken to a number of
Metro police officers while I visit Washington, and they're all
on board with the President. Every cop I've talked to,
not just in DC, but in cities around the country
they want action.
Speaker 10 (08:12):
They want to be able to do their job.
Speaker 11 (08:14):
They want the handcuffs taken off of their risk and
them being given the ability back to put handcuffs on.
Speaker 10 (08:20):
The bad guys risks. So, yes, you're right.
Speaker 11 (08:22):
Rank and file will absolutely support the president and the
partnership with the other law enforcement agencies. And there are
superior officers who can't speak up because they'll get fired,
they'll lose their jobs, but are willing to stand by
the troops that they're putting out in the streets. Troops
I mean the police officers who are called to protect
and serve.
Speaker 2 (08:41):
I think the people are going to openly embrace this,
even the people in the so called hood that, for
whatever reason, Democrats feel they need to coddle by somehow
allowing criminals to go free. You know, there's this term
that President Trump talked about, no cash bail. I actually
think it's a confusing term if you don't know the issue,
because I would think, all right, no bail means we
(09:02):
lock them up for good. Well, in fact, it means
just the opposite, no bail. You come in and we
let you out. So I wrote a term no jail,
no bail, free to sail. That is actually what's happening
in DC. Can he change this idea of arresting criminals
and letting him out on the street in a few hours.
Can we start putting them behind bars, because that'll make
(09:24):
a huge difference alone.
Speaker 11 (09:26):
Sure we could, And I think the judge Pyro had
actually touched upon that when she mentioned that there has
to be some accountability on judges. Judges have to be look,
I believe judges should be term limited and in some
cases they should have psychological exams for goodness akes and
what in the world they thinking putting killers and rapists
and people just doing great damage to innocent people in
(09:49):
this society. So it's going to be a total effort
on the part of the entire criminal justice system in
order to make this happen.
Speaker 10 (09:55):
But President Trump could do it.
Speaker 11 (09:57):
I believe he could do it, and the Congress has
to wake up. I realize that they got a president
there who's leading. Imagine we got a president leading in
front of us, not from behind.
Speaker 2 (10:07):
Us, on so many issues as too. I think everybody.
They may not admit it, but I think this nation
was hungry for leadership like we're seeing for President Trump.
Let me play a clip from his news conference today,
went an hour and a half.
Speaker 1 (10:19):
Byway speak a leadership. You wouldn't have seen Biden all the.
Speaker 2 (10:22):
News conference for ninety minutes, but this is President Trump
about who will be targeted in.
Speaker 12 (10:27):
All of this.
Speaker 3 (10:28):
They'll immediately begin massive enforcement operations targeting known gangs, drug dealers,
and criminal networks to get them the hell off the street,
maybe get them out of the country because a lot
of them came into our country illegally.
Speaker 1 (10:40):
They shouldn't have been allowed in.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
They come from Venezuela, they come from all over the world.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
We're going to get them the hell out.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
I would like to see law enforcement finally go after
illegal gun owners, not law abiding gun owners like the
left likes to target.
Speaker 1 (10:54):
I think that'll be part of all of this.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
Do you think we'll see federal agents as well in
and around DC doing their thing too, Lieutenant.
Speaker 11 (11:03):
Oh, no doubt about it. It's going to be a
partnership on all law enforcement levels. But you made a
point earlier about the Hood. People in the Hood they
want peace, they don't want crime. They got babies themselves,
they got kids being slaughtered on the streets.
Speaker 10 (11:15):
They welcome this action.
Speaker 11 (11:16):
So when the Democrats say, well, you're hurting the Hood,
you're hurting this, you're hurting that.
Speaker 10 (11:20):
No, these people are Americans.
Speaker 11 (11:22):
They want to feel safe and they want their children
to wake up the next day. Again, to your point,
it'll be a tire partnership between every level of law enforcement,
from the local guys all the way up to the
federal government.
Speaker 10 (11:33):
And this is gonna work. And by the way, yeah,
the LA mayor is a little.
Speaker 11 (11:36):
Upset today over this because she feels that they're coming
to LA.
Speaker 10 (11:40):
They're coming this mayor. Same thing with New York City.
Speaker 11 (11:42):
We got a communist running for office, and he thinks
he's going to solve all the problems. Well, the President's
going to solve the problems because you're going to make
sure this guy don't get elected and the police are
going to be able to do their job.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
Wouldn't that be great in every city across America? And
that ultimately is the goal. Lieutenant Stephen Rodgers, thank you
so much for coming on tonight.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
We appreciate you, sir.
Speaker 10 (12:02):
Oh, thank you for having me. I salute you for
the work you're doing. Thank you.
Speaker 1 (12:06):
I appreciate that as well.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
Imagic folks, you're a little kid, you're ten eleven years old.
Speaker 1 (12:11):
You put your head on a pillow every.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
Night, the gunshots outside, not knowing if your brother or
sisters going to come home. That's what's happening in American
cities today. This is what President Trump wants to stop.
And I think the people in those towns, in the
blighted areas, the low income areas of these cities, they
want it stopped too.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
All right, how do we do it? Well, we get
more Republicans in Congress.
Speaker 2 (12:33):
How do we do that? What's Jerry Manner the hell
out of these red states? That's right, I said it.
Screw you Democrats. I want to play politics as long
as it's well within the law to do so. If
you're not playing politics, you are losing in America today.
Speaker 1 (12:48):
Lord knows the Democrats play it.
Speaker 2 (12:51):
So we've got this issue in Texas to add five
more Republican seats. We know that the census was totally flawed. Well,
the democ scrats are melting down over all of this.
This is Obama, Lackey, Eric Holder.
Speaker 13 (13:05):
Well, there's no question that jerry mandering is a threat
to our democracy. It allows politicians to pick their voters
as opposed to citizens choosing their representatives. But we are
now in a situation where we find ourselves where authoritarian
moves are being made by the White House through various states,
Texas most prominent among them, and there has to be
a response to that. What I've said is that we
(13:26):
have to protect our democracy now if we ultimately want
to be able to save it, and so taking the
reasonable steps that have been proposed in California.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
Oh, give me a break.
Speaker 2 (13:39):
They love to use buzzwords protect our democracy. So because
Texas is open and honest about redistricting, Illinois and New
York we're not honest about it. And how about this,
I pulled the numbers, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, Rhode Island.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
That's New England, folks.
Speaker 2 (14:01):
Not one Republican lawmaker from those states. Let's add Hawaii
onto the list. Let's add Rhode Island, Delaware onto the list.
Not one Republican member of Congress, and they make up
anywhere between twenty six and forty two percent of the
vote Republicans do when those states, and they were jerry
mannered the hell out of them. In Illinois, I mentioned
(14:24):
seventeen percent of members of Congress or Republicans in that state.
But wait a second, thirty percent of the voters are Republicans.
You jerry mannered that. But here's the thing, of course,
Illinois did. Democrats are the party in control of that state.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
You want to change to vote, amount of office. So
don't get mad at Texans for this.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
The great thing is, though, finally the mainstream media confronted
the governor of Illinois on this very fact.
Speaker 14 (14:51):
You talk about preserving democracy, How do you preserve democracy.
Speaker 7 (14:55):
If you're using the same tactics that you've criticized Texas
Republicans for.
Speaker 15 (15:01):
But, as I say, what they're talking about is a distraction.
The reality is that the violation of people's voting rights
is what Texas is attempting to do.
Speaker 1 (15:10):
That's what's wrong with their efforts right now.
Speaker 15 (15:13):
And the fact that the President of the United States
knows it and nevertheless is asking them to do it.
That is what's wrong with what we're seeing right now.
Democracy is at stake.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
There they go again, Democracy at stake. It's a non
freaking answer.
Speaker 1 (15:31):
He just gave you. Okay, how about Kathy Hockel.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
Kathy Hochl, the governor of New York sounds like a
petulant child here.
Speaker 6 (15:40):
So your state's highest court at the time, all the
judges appointed by democratic governors.
Speaker 4 (15:45):
They threw the maps out.
Speaker 6 (15:46):
So fair to say Democrats have done what they're now
accusing Republicans of doing. No, we follow the rules. We
do it every ten years. Based on that, you didn't
follow the rules. Well, we did follow the rules, so
the court was wrong. We've followed the rules.
Speaker 2 (16:03):
We followed the rules of a robot. I was told
to say, we followed the rules. Well, Shannon Breen was right.
The court said you didn't follow the rules. That's happened
in Texas too. By the way, when I ran for
Congress in twenty eleven, going into twenty twelve, there was
redistricting going on. They threw the maps out. There had
to be redrawn over and over. And over again. Not easy,
but the system works. And by the way, the census
(16:24):
data was all flawed, which is why Texas needs to
do this again because I believe seats were lost because
of that flawed census data. Now on to a national
security issue. I guess you could include jerrymandering is a
national security issue, but this one is serious. This national
security issue has me concerned.
Speaker 1 (16:42):
Because it's something nobody's talking about.
Speaker 2 (16:45):
So Senator Rick Scott of Florida has introduced the Protect
Act and he wants an investigation into these so called
smart appliances, high powered appliances that are connected to the Internet,
your electric vehicle chargers, dryers, smart ovens.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
He is fearful that.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
These appliances made by adversarial nations like China could be
used to overload our grid and cause an entire problem
simply because they're connected to the Internet. Our adversaries could
use these smart appliances against us to virtually shut our
electricity off. This is a gentleman that studied the issue
(17:32):
at one of.
Speaker 1 (17:32):
The local colleges.
Speaker 16 (17:33):
Take a listen, so high watage IoT devices such as
electric vehicle chargers, electric heaters, gitchback devices, or air purifiers
can be compromised and controls remotely by attackers, and an
attacker who has access to a large number of such
(17:55):
IoT spots, they can turn them on or off simultaneously
from random locations to cause technical issues in the power grid.
Speaker 2 (18:08):
All right, imagine you're in Texas right now, it's one
hundred and five degrees out, air conditioners going wild, and
your adversary ups the power wattage of these appliances to
basically overload the grid. Well, to discuss this, I want
to bring in the president and CEO for the nonprofit
Center for Security Policies, retired Lieutenant colonel from the Marine Corps,
(18:29):
Tommy Waller is with us.
Speaker 1 (18:30):
Colonel, great to have you on the program.
Speaker 8 (18:33):
Yeah, Grant, thank you for having me on, and thank
you for covering the topic of the grid. It's absolutely,
as you said, one of the most important that we
could be discussing right now.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
You know, Colonel, I've talked a lot about parts used
in the grid and Biden overturning a Trump order from
the first presidency of Trump that we want to make
sure we don't have Chinese parts in the grid. But
I don't remember talking about our air conditioners being connected
to the Internet and hackers hacking in to overload the grid.
Speaker 1 (19:01):
Is this truly a concern with tennant Colonel.
Speaker 8 (19:05):
Yeah, yeah, granted, it really is a concern. And that
video that you showed is actually six years old. So
that was back in twenty nineteen Princeton University doing presentations
on this, which was termed asmad IoT or mad IoT.
So people may have some familiarity with the term IoT.
That's Internet of things, right, so you think about all
the smart the quote smart devices out there. And to
(19:29):
President Trump's credit, back in twenty nineteen, he had passed
an executive order to start to force the government to
look at how these different communications and technology devices could
be harmful to our national security. And to credit Senator
Rick Scott, he actually codified with this bill. As you mentioned,
it's called a Protect Act that stands for preventing remote
(19:52):
operations by threatening entities on critical technology. The Protect Act
codifies President Trump's twenty nineteen executive or are into.
Speaker 17 (20:01):
Law the law of the land.
Speaker 8 (20:02):
And to answer that question, Grant, how does this work, Well,
this mad IoT.
Speaker 1 (20:08):
Is manipulation of demand.
Speaker 8 (20:10):
As you just said, Imagining you're sitting there, air conditions
are running. All these appliances are running, and then all
of a sudden remotely they get manipulated and it increases
the demand or perhaps decreases the demand, and then that
can cause failures of our electric grid. And so that's
exactly what this bill is meant to have the Commerce
(20:31):
Department study and come back with recommendations and how to
thwart this method of attack.
Speaker 2 (20:36):
All right, if you control the electricity, boy, I'll tell
you what, you almost nearly control the entire country, right,
I mean, think of air traffic control and people on
oxygen tanks and life support, not to mention, you know,
people with air conditioning in very hot places during the summer.
Are we doing enough right now to secure our electricity
(20:59):
grid nation from a threat like this?
Speaker 1 (21:03):
Now? Grant?
Speaker 8 (21:03):
Unfortunately, we're not doing enough. I will say that that
the president, President Trump, having come in on a second term,
is moving rapidly to fix a lot of things that
were broken. In fact, I have an article I published
just a couple of weeks ago at the National Interest
that talks about the big beautiful bill. It quotes stops
the bleeding. Right, if you look at our electric grid
as if it were a patient a trauma patient, someone
(21:26):
that had just experienced, you know, gunshot wounds. What the
President has done with the first part is first one
hundred days, is stop the bleeding. There's a lot more
life saving care that needs to be applied to the
electric grid, and this is going to be one of
those forms of care. Because look for our adversaries, especially China,
using all this quote smart technology, that's an indirect way
(21:46):
to attack our grid.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
Right.
Speaker 8 (21:48):
Our grid operators are somewhat accustomed to looking for cybersecurity threats.
These are devices that are not part of that network.
Speaker 4 (21:55):
They're attached to it, but.
Speaker 8 (21:56):
We don't have visibility within the utility industry on your
washer and dryer, for example. But I'll tell you Grant,
probably the single biggest element that made this worse during
the Bide administration was the electrification of everything, and specifically
electrical vehicles. So when you look at Senator Scott's bill,
it talks about five hundred watts or higher any device.
(22:17):
And so if you start at the bottom, you're looking
at washers right at like five hundred. If you go
up from there you get to things like stoves and
all these different smart appliances, which, oh, by the way,
during the Biden administration, there was lots and lots of
incentives to increase the use of that EV charging stations
electrical vehicles. Now you're talking about fifty thousand to three
(22:37):
hundred and fifty thousand watts. If foreign adversary gets control
of that type of infrastructure, then it can cause extraordinary
damage very quickly to our grid. And that's exactly what
the Senator is seeking to be able to defend against,
and I want to commend him for that.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (22:54):
Absolutely, Look, our goal is to raise awareness on this.
I don't think there's enough lawmakers from either of the aisle,
specially from the left though that is looking at this
as a true national security threat. We need lawmakers to
step in. I know Tommy Waller that our utility company
is going to be hesitant to spend money on this
because they don't want to spend money. They want to
make money. But in the end it's going to be devastating.
(23:16):
If the whole thing crashes, nobody's going to be making
any money.
Speaker 1 (23:19):
Something needs to be done.
Speaker 2 (23:20):
I appreciate your organization fighting for this, and as always
I appreciate you coming on.
Speaker 1 (23:24):
Please keep us posted on this topic and beyond.
Speaker 8 (23:27):
Colonel absolutely happy to do, sir.
Speaker 17 (23:29):
Thank you Grant for.
Speaker 1 (23:30):
Having me on. Absolutely and thank you all right, folks.
Speaker 2 (23:34):
The Trump administration is bringing positive changes to our healthcare system.
But to truly make America healthy again, it starts at
home with you. That's where the Wellness Company comes in,
offering top quality products to keep your family.
Speaker 1 (23:45):
Safe and healthy.
Speaker 2 (23:46):
Their prescription medical kits I've got one right here, includes
life saving medications and guide books. Plus they offer parasite cleanses.
Speaker 1 (23:54):
I'm on one, folks.
Speaker 2 (23:56):
I'm telling you, after about a week of this, I've
now just realized I've got more energy than I ever had.
I owe this to the parasite Clinton, I really do.
All of this is designed to help you live longer.
So visit TWC dot Help Forward slash voice. Do it today.
Use the promo code voice to save ten percent. That's
TWC Dot Health Forward slash Voice.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
Use the promo code voice to.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
Save ten percent. Our in America has decided to put
an end to the cartels. Mexico apparently is not happy
about our plan. That's next, welcome back to everyone. So
(24:41):
President Trump is set to meet with Vladimir Putin this
Friday in Alaska. He's gonna talk about ending the Ukraine War.
Can President Trump make it happen? This is President Trump
on that today.
Speaker 3 (24:53):
Well, we're gonna have a meeting with Ladimir Putin, and
at the end of that meeting, probably in the first
two minutes, I'll know exactly whether.
Speaker 1 (25:00):
Or not a deal can be read. To know that,
because that's what I do. I make deals.
Speaker 2 (25:08):
What a dumb question, you know. I own businesses, not
like President Trump's level. I call myself a small time capitalist.
But let me tell you something about the art of
the deal. President Trump is the king of the art
of the deal. But even I know you can walk
into a room and assess the situation and know what
the reality is gonna be within just a few seconds.
(25:29):
But that reporter, they're so disconnected from real life because
they've never been outside of anything other than a newsroom.
Speaker 1 (25:38):
They don't get real life.
Speaker 2 (25:39):
I promise you President Trump's gonna be able to make
that assessment within a few minutes. And then you get dopey,
dopey people like this that appear on MSNBC making wild claims.
Speaker 18 (25:50):
Plutin gets Trump in a room, He's gonna use his
you know, old intelligence training to flatter and these are
some things that Trump seems to seems to like. And
then you're gonna have a press conference when the concern
is that Trump kind of gives away the farm. In
terms of Ukraine, I don't see any national security professional,
a political professional who thinks this is going to turn
out well on Friday and Alaska, I think there really
(26:12):
is great concern.
Speaker 1 (26:15):
What a ding dong?
Speaker 2 (26:17):
You think President Trump is going to be manipulated by
Vladimir Putin with his KGB mind control.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
I don't think so.
Speaker 2 (26:25):
If anybody's going to control the situation, it's going to
be President Trump.
Speaker 1 (26:28):
Not to take away from Putin. The guy is a.
Speaker 2 (26:30):
Smart, sly guy, but he's not going to take advantage
of President Trump. Neither is the president of Mexico. By
the way, So President Trump, you may remember, comes out
last week along with Pambody. They issued arrest warrants for
Nicholas Maduro, who is the leader of Venezuela as the
largest narco trafficker in the world. Well Shinbaum, the President
(26:54):
of Mexican says, I haven't seen the evidence.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
Come on.
Speaker 2 (26:57):
All of these drugs are funneling through Venezuela, ill us
straight through Mexico and then of course into the United States.
President Trump says, We're going to take the fight to
Mexico with our military. Marco Rubio backs up President Trump,
saying we need to go after the cartels in Mexico
and basically chop the head of the snake off that way.
Speaker 1 (27:18):
This is Marco Rubio, excuse me.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
This is the president of Mexico pushing back against that idea.
Speaker 5 (27:24):
The United States is not going to come to Mexico
with their military.
Speaker 15 (27:30):
We cooperate, we collaborate, but there will be no invasion.
Speaker 5 (27:36):
That's ruled out.
Speaker 1 (27:40):
It depends on what you call an invasion.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
We're not storming the borders of Mexico, but you better
believe I could see special forces going in there, and
if President Trump wants it, Scheinbaum will ultimately have to
say yes because Mexico needs us on with me. Now,
rav Border correspondent Ben Birkwam is with us. Nobody knows
this is you better than my man, be Ben.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
Welcome to the program.
Speaker 10 (28:04):
Thank you.
Speaker 14 (28:05):
Grant Man. Talk about irony after being invaded for four
years directly through our southern border and a little bit
through the northern border, but mostly from our Mexican partners,
our allies, allowing our border just to be completely cross Now,
at granted, that wasn't her fault, that was Joe Biden,
the Democrats that were inviting it in. They were just
to pass through. But the irony of calling what President
(28:27):
Trump is calling for an invasion, It's one of two things. Grant.
I think she's in a tough spot, and no country
wants a sovereign foreign country to come in and do
their dirty work for them. But the reality is Mexico
is a failed narco state, and I think she's one
of two places right now. One is she's trying to
appease the average Mexican voter that says, wait a second,
(28:49):
we can do this, We don't need America to do this.
Speaker 1 (28:51):
Can't we go.
Speaker 14 (28:52):
Take the cartel out ourselves? And she realizes, no, we can't,
but I actually have to put on a good face
and pretend like we can. Or the other side is
this that she's bought off by Elmeo's crew on the
Cineloa cartel and basically everything she's been doing up to
this point has been window dressing, and she's at a
place where she just cannot go any further.
Speaker 1 (29:11):
Either way, you're right.
Speaker 14 (29:12):
If President Trump, if this is something President Trump wants,
it's gonna happen.
Speaker 2 (29:16):
You know, Ben, as I listened to you, it could
be a little bit of both here. You know, she
gave basically the out in that one little comment where
said this is about cooperation, will work with it. She
could ultimately go back to the people of Mexico.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
This wasn't invasion. He told us he could come in.
Speaker 2 (29:30):
They're working with our special forces and they're working together
all the while a wink and a nod. I don't
really trust her because I think most politicians are bought
off by the cartels in Mexico.
Speaker 1 (29:41):
So you may see a little bit of both of
what you just laid out at play here, Ben.
Speaker 14 (29:47):
Yeah, and look, our next episode of lo On Border
is going to be focused on that our time down
in Couliacan, Mexico, Cineloa, down with Oscar And that was
the sense you got from the people. In fact, the
guy we interviewed down there, I don't remember that, Aeronie Barra.
He said, until you start seeing politicians arrested and the
DA's arrested and the judges arrested, you're not gonna see
any change in Mexico. Mexico is such a failed country
(30:09):
when it comes to narco trafficking, human trafficking. They control
every aspect, every layer of society. So part of this
is not gonna happen without the United States in there.
But the reality is we're already doing a lot of that.
Our intelligence services already working with Mexico. They're the only
reason we got the heads off the snakes earlier on,
you know, just a couple of months ago we extracted
(30:29):
them from Mexico was because of partly our intelligent services.
So a lot of that's already happening, and you're right.
Part of it is she has to put on a
happy face for the country, saying we're doing this, but
we're gonna you know, we're gonna be in control. But
at the same time, she also can't piss off her
narco bosses, who the Again, the speculation is the only
reason she's in the position she's in is she made
a few the right people happy and they're the ones
(30:52):
who put her in there, and if if she upsets
them too much, she'll be out just as fast. So
it's it's a tricky, you know, tricky situation. But The
truth is, we cannot combat narco terrorism in America unless
we deal with it globally. And that's exactly what President
Trump and Pambondi and our military is talking about.
Speaker 2 (31:10):
To me, let me play a clip from me from
Marco Rubio cut eight for the guys behind the.
Speaker 19 (31:14):
Glass different cartels that operate in Mexico and in between.
You find them in Ecuador, you find them in Guatemala.
You find TDA what people would call street gangs, but
actually operating as criminal enterprises, but very well organized ones.
So what it changes is it gives us legal authorities
to target them in ways you can't do if they're
just a bunch of criminals. It's no longer a law
(31:35):
enforcement issue. It becomes a national security.
Speaker 2 (31:39):
And that's about label them as terror organizations. Been real
quick if you can for me. You briefly mentioned it.
The cartels have been battered and bruised here, but by
no means are they dead and wiped out. How hard
will this battle be to take out the cartels?
Speaker 1 (31:56):
Extremely hard?
Speaker 14 (31:57):
And you mentioned it with the last guest. I'm actually
going to be going up to you a location with
some hydro power equipment tomorrow and you talk about terror
threats in America. Look, these cartel terrorists are in America.
Once we start going after them, they're gonna act in
the same way any foreign adversary would act, and they're
gonna attack us in our soft spots. And so, uh,
it's not it's not just dangerous because this is a
foreign threat. This is a threat that's on our step,
(32:18):
that's in our country, it's inside of our house. And
so it's gonna be it's gonna be bloody, it's gonna
be ugly, it's you know, it's it's gonna be all
those things. But it has to happen or else we're
gonna become like Mexico in just you know, years, if
not decades, decades. It's it's it's it's on. We're on
the road to becoming like Mexico. If this doesn't happen.
Speaker 2 (32:36):
Well, and that would that would be about as bad
as it gets. Looks like President Trump and team have
got us on the right track. Uh, your insight better
than anybody else's, Ben Burkewe we're blessed to have you
on the program.
Speaker 1 (32:47):
Thank you, my friend, my pleasure.
Speaker 10 (32:51):
Thanks Gren.
Speaker 2 (32:52):
Absolutely all right, folks, we'll continue to cover that story.
She thinks they're not coming into Mexico. President Trump wonsea
and he's getting in all right. Pelosi, she happens to
be the greatest stock trader of all time? Or is
this all about inside or trading? What if I told
you maybe you could profit off of her?
Speaker 1 (33:12):
It's true. I'll show you how next. Welcome back here.
Speaker 2 (33:26):
When all of back to twenty twelve, I pushed members
of Congress to pass something called the Stock Act, which
prohibited members of Congress from trading on inside information. It
was a start, but besides some reporting, it really doesn't
have a lot of teeth, and we still see members
of Congress getting rich off of what I believe is
(33:46):
inside information. The queen of that is none other than
Nancy Pelosi. This is what President Trump truthed yesterday. Okay,
it reads crooked. Nancy Pelosi and are very interesting. Husband
beat every hedge fund in twenty twenty four. In other words,
these two very average minds beat all of the super
(34:07):
geniuses on Wall Street, thousands of them. It's all inside information.
Is anybody looking into this? She's a disgusting degenerate who
impeached me twice on no grounds and lost. How are
you feeling now, Nancy, Well, the question becomes, should members
of Congress just flat out be banned from trading stocks?
(34:31):
This is Pelosi being asked about all of this.
Speaker 1 (34:34):
Last week, he.
Speaker 10 (34:35):
Accused you of insider trading.
Speaker 1 (34:37):
What's your response to that?
Speaker 7 (34:39):
That's very ridiculous. In fact, I very much supportop the
trading of members of Congress, not that I think anybody's
doing anything wrong. If they are, they are prosecuted and
they go to jail. But because of the confidence and
it stills in American people don't worry about this.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
She goes out to say, my husband handles all of
this for us. Yeah, you're lying in bed. You tell
her you're going to pass a certain piece of legislation
that's going to send a stock skyrocketing or plumbting. They
buy it, they short it, whatever they have to do
to make them rich, like something like seventy percent.
Speaker 1 (35:17):
They made on their money last year.
Speaker 2 (35:20):
Well, I want to bring in now, founder of auto Pilot,
a trading app which allows users to track the portfolios
of politicians and top investors, Chris Josephs is back with us.
He was on when he started this app. Chris, welcome
to the program.
Speaker 17 (35:38):
Thanks for having me on again. It's been a journey,
all right.
Speaker 1 (35:43):
I bet so.
Speaker 2 (35:44):
When you were on last you were just starting this out.
This is I don't know, maybe a couple of years
ago here on Real America's Voice. Now, Autopilot's still going strong.
Nancy Pelosi?
Speaker 1 (35:55):
Is she your number one?
Speaker 2 (35:57):
I don't want to call it an advisor, but at
least the politician that you track and investors make money
off of she is.
Speaker 12 (36:05):
She started out number one, and she's held supreme the
entire time. We initially kind of first launched our app,
which to your what you're describing is exactly right. It
allows you to take your stock portfolio and trade alongside
politicians and other investors. We launched it in January twenty
twenty three. Pelosi was the most popular then. We've since
grown to the point where we now have eight hundred
(36:26):
million dollars plus invested on our platform. Pelosi is still
the most popular now, and since we've been tracking her,
her performance is up one hundred and eighty percent since
that date back in January of twenty twenty three, which
is insane.
Speaker 2 (36:41):
All right, So you're two and a half years she's
up one hundred and eighty percent, Chris, you've been in
and around this business that defies the odds, does it not?
Speaker 17 (36:52):
Absolutely?
Speaker 12 (36:53):
Yeah, So from hedge funds, they don't make one hundred
eighty percent.
Speaker 17 (36:57):
To passive investors, they don't.
Speaker 12 (36:59):
Make one hundred eighty percent to even kind of like
some of these other low level politicians.
Speaker 17 (37:03):
They don't make one hundred and eighty percent. Pelosi on
our platform is one.
Speaker 12 (37:06):
Of the only ones that have been able to kind
of put those numbers up at a consistent basis. And
last year, in the year of twenty twenty four, where
Trump was referencing that she outperformed top hedge fund managers
on our platform, she was up fifty four percent, which
is incredible in that kind of era. What people don't understand, though,
is she actually trades long dated call options, which are
(37:29):
essentially called leaps, which would make her performance be even
higher than the fifty four percent that we're able to track.
We just don't have the information to know the exact
performance of what she did, but her on our platform
performing fifty four percent for sure makes her kind of
the top quartile of money managers quote unquote in America.
Speaker 2 (37:49):
All Right, I want to make sure I get this clear.
So the fifty one percent if you had followed her
using the autopilot platform, would you too have made the
fifty one percent correct?
Speaker 12 (38:00):
Yep, if you were in from January first all the
way through. And there are some winners that The biggest
winner that she had in twenty twenty four was in video.
She bought in Nvidia at the end of twenty twenty three,
and that stock perfectly time. She got in right before
it went up one hundred and ninety percent. She also
had other winners like Apple, which was up which a
lot of people own. But she made another notable kind
(38:22):
of really good time trade in July of last year
when she bought Broadcom, and since her by in July
twenty twenty four, the stock was up another forty percent.
So it's not even just one off stocks that are
making a killing for her. She's hit on a number
of them, and that I think is why she's still
the queen.
Speaker 2 (38:42):
All right, Chris Joseph with autopilot, What's amazing about this
is the fifty percent you were delayed in getting this
information to get to the people using autopilot.
Speaker 1 (38:53):
She doesn't make a trade, you get it.
Speaker 2 (38:55):
In ten seconds later. You can tweet that out or
push that out on the app. People, you're what thirty
days delayed and thirty days delayed, you're getting.
Speaker 1 (39:05):
Still returns of fifty percent. She could have been making
eighty ninety who knows what percent. I think that was your.
Speaker 12 (39:11):
Point, Chris, Yeah, yeah, And so kudos to you for
being able to get the Stock Act passed back in
twenty twelve. But part of that kind of one of
the negatives of it moving forward now is the delay
where they have up to forty five days to delay.
The performance that we have on the platform is does
bring that delay in. So there really is kind of
a little bit of a discrepancy. But with the way
(39:35):
that you're describing is right. Even with the delay, it
was up four percent, which also though to be clear,
it doesn't include the fees associated with autopilot.
Speaker 17 (39:43):
I gotta say that for a legal reason.
Speaker 1 (39:45):
Okay, Well, and the fees are not all that big.
Speaker 2 (39:48):
Now, it looks like some guys are, Okay, Ken, So
Nancy Pelosi can handle that. I'm sure both people out
there Ken as well. It's so fascinating what you've done. Look,
the bottom line is, I guess if you can't beat
them join them personally, I would like, I don't want
to ban members of Congress from having investments, but I
(40:11):
think if it goes into a blind trust or you're
in a fidelity account that's managed by somebody else, you
have no say in it. You know, that's fine. But
this idea, they are all many of them. I'll give
you the last word on this. She's not the only
politician that does really well, is she, Chris?
Speaker 17 (40:27):
She is absolutely not.
Speaker 12 (40:29):
And what we do kind of on autopilot side, is
we a very bipartisan. We call out Republicans, we call
out Democrats. Anytime we see a suspicious trade, we call
them out. And we've been calling out Marjorie Taylor Green,
We've been calling out Dan Crenshaw. Pelosi still though, is
the one with the best performing stocks. But it is
definitely a bipartisan issue. And going to the debate of
(40:49):
should politicians be allowed to trade? I think you do
enter this whole world of like is it constitutional to
limit a politician's kid or a politician's spouse or trading stocks.
Speaker 17 (41:01):
It becomes very complicated, very quickly.
Speaker 12 (41:03):
But what the average everyday American is essentially asking is
just don't trade individual stocks. Just put it in a
blind trust or put it in the broader s and
P five hundred where if the broader market goes up,
you still.
Speaker 17 (41:14):
Win, but you cannot, you know, down tick.
Speaker 12 (41:17):
A specific sock right before a law comes out.
Speaker 17 (41:22):
It's pretty common sense.
Speaker 2 (41:24):
I think all of that makes a lot of sense.
The name of your app is Auto Pilot. I urge
people to check it out that you guys aren't paying
for this. I asked you to come on, and it's
just a cool thing that you guys do. And I
appreciate talking to you, and I'm grateful and happy that
you're having so much success.
Speaker 1 (41:41):
Chris Joseph, thank you for coming on.
Speaker 17 (41:44):
Appreciate it.
Speaker 12 (41:44):
And let's keep the pressure on them because if we
can get that band through, I can retire that Pelosi
tracker once and for good and move on to our
next thing.
Speaker 2 (41:53):
Hey man, ma Man, thank you for coming on. As
always again, his app is Auto Pilot. All right, folks,
coming up next, we will take back control of your health.
Speaker 1 (42:06):
In fact, will help you take back control of your health.
Speaker 4 (42:08):
Stick around, Welcome back to everyone.
Speaker 2 (42:20):
What if I told you renew your health, you could
renew your relationships.
Speaker 20 (42:24):
Watch this I started with the five five five challenge.
But since I started, my feet don't hurt, my ankles
are so much better, and just little things. My eyelids
are so saggy, and I can see my eyeballs again.
This morning was the first time that he got up
(42:46):
and said, I feel really great. I have energy this morning,
and I slew last night. There's no love handles anymore.
Speaker 13 (42:55):
You know, it is really easy to adopt a perspective
that has some expectation for good things to come.
Speaker 1 (43:04):
All right, folks again, it's the my five five five Challenge.
Speaker 2 (43:08):
Five pounds, five days, five dollars guaranteed from the folks
that energize help.
Speaker 1 (43:14):
John ju believes with us, John, welcome back, my man.
All right, John, So I would imagine you get in shape.
Speaker 2 (43:23):
It does improve every aspect of your life, including your relationships.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
Is that what you're seeing?
Speaker 5 (43:29):
Well, it really does grant because we don't realize that.
You know, when we lack energy, when we lack vitality,
when we lack our strength just to do the everyday things,
there's no way we can show up for other people
in our life. You know, we just get used to well,
I'm just in pain, you know, we're running about fifty percent.
Speaker 1 (43:51):
You know why, because.
Speaker 10 (43:52):
We're a bunch of raisins.
Speaker 5 (43:54):
For those of you that have heard me speak before,
I say, what's the difference between that great and a raisin.
Grape is hydrated or raisin is dehydrated. So when your
brain is dehydrated, your heart, your thyroid, your kidneys, you're pancreas,
all of your levels are just debilitated, your half of
what you really could be. And so when all of
(44:15):
a sudden you get back the energy, like you just
heard this woman's share that her husband got back his
energy for the first time and she lost all of
her pain. Well, they show up differently for their children,
for their grandchildren, for their great grandchildren, and grant. I
love to share this example because my mother, my mother,
became my client later in life.
Speaker 4 (44:36):
It took her a while, but.
Speaker 10 (44:37):
My mom got on the protocol.
Speaker 5 (44:40):
And my mother has almost fifty that's right, almost fifty
grandchildren and great grandchildren, and she still gets on the floor,
gets on the ground and plays with the what we
call the littles in our family, the littles, the littlest
of the great grandchildren. He goes on cross country trips
(45:02):
with the adult grandchildren. She absolutely is showing up relationally
differently because of her energy. And she still works a
real job, by the way, and takes care of about
thirty old people that are younger than her, by the way,
but she feeds them.
Speaker 1 (45:17):
And visits them.
Speaker 5 (45:17):
She absolutely shows up different relationally and everyone can have
what she has.
Speaker 1 (45:23):
Well.
Speaker 2 (45:24):
I just said today on the podcast pitching the my
five to five to five Challenge and energized health. I
used it so I can still play one on one
basketball with my son. He's sixteen years old, and I'm
still moving now. We're about fifty to fifty on wins.
But it's working and it's keeping you younger. And so
whether you're older and a grandparent or whether you're like
(45:46):
me and a dad of a sixteen year old, there's
so many things that getting hydrated at cellular level can do,
and my five to five to five Challenge is a
great way to start.
Speaker 1 (45:55):
At John, I'll give you the last word here.
Speaker 5 (45:58):
Yeah, Well, Grant, I want to encourage people. Well, when
you sign up for the five five five, please upgrade
yourself to a VIP. And you say, John, why would
I want to spend an extra night? It's ninety nine dollars. Guys,
here's why we're gonna fed x you a medical grade
device to measure twelve health markers that even your doctor
has not went over these twelve health markers with you.
Speaker 1 (46:20):
You need to know your hydration level.
Speaker 5 (46:23):
You're gonna get a one on one with one of
our health experts. You're not only gonna get everything in
the five five five, You're gonna get a lot of
extra stuff, but the most important thing you're gonna get
is the device to measure so you know where am
I in my cellular hydration and a one on one
person to go over your twelve main health markers with you.
You get a bunch of other things, extra time with
(46:45):
Chelsea and I. We will answer your one on one
questions on the five five five.
Speaker 2 (46:50):
John, I'll tell you what I have one of those
devices thanks to you, guys.
Speaker 1 (46:54):
I use it.
Speaker 2 (46:54):
Every day and those markers really are my religion to
see how I'm doing along the way you believe. Let
me tell people how they can find you and energize
health and specifically the five five to five challenge. Go
to my five five five challenge dot com. That's my
five five five challenge dot com. Lose five pounds in
five days for only five dollars and upgrade to.
Speaker 1 (47:18):
That VIP for ninety nine bucks. Well worth it. Take
it from me.
Speaker 2 (47:22):
Okay, all right, upnext, some final thoughts Stinchfields next. All right,
welcome back everybody, as you know Stinsfield seventeen seventy six
on all the social media platforms.
Speaker 1 (47:40):
Give me a follow.
Speaker 2 (47:41):
You can check out my podcast uh every afternoon twelve
Eastern time on Rumble. It's a great place, Studio six B.
And the guys upnext, stick around for them. Stinchfield's Army
Rolls see tomorrow
Popular Podcasts
Fudd Around And Find Out
UConn basketball star Azzi Fudd brings her championship swag to iHeart Women’s Sports with Fudd Around and Find Out, a weekly podcast that takes fans along for the ride as Azzi spends her final year of college trying to reclaim the National Championship and prepare to be a first round WNBA draft pick. Ever wonder what it’s like to be a world-class athlete in the public spotlight while still managing schoolwork, friendships and family time? It’s time to Fudd Around and Find Out!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.