March 25, 2025 • 48 mins
THE WAR ROOM WITH STEPHEN K. BANNON, MARCH 25TH, 2025
GUEST:
NATALIE WINTERS
JACK POSOBIEC
REP. BEN CLINE (R)
JULIE KELLY
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Now coming in this this morning, Wicker of the Senate
Armed Services coming. He said he's going to hold hearings,
bipartisan hearings and get to the bottom of it, which
we don't like to hear. This is a total and
complete setup. That's why the hearing was today. It's absolutely outrageous.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
Good news is Trump Trump Night in support of Mike Waller.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
So I'm going to give it to you, Steve.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
Really good talking to see you tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
Brother. Yeah, Eric, thank you so much. Great hour. Always
good to follow you and do the handoff crocs versus gates. Okay,
here's what we're going to do. We're going to now
have a cold open. It's going to be I don't know,
seven or so minutes long. It's going to get to
the intensity today. Also, President Trump signed a number of
executive orders on election integrity. A couple of other law
(00:41):
firms that the government is going to have a discussion
with about their practices, their lawfair practices were going to
play some of the intensity. This was a setup today.
The event happened on the IDEs of March on fifteen March.
You remember we were here live that morning on on
War Room, and of course the guy, the journalist supposedly
(01:04):
was watching this eleven forty four when these things started.
He waited nine days? Why do you wait nine days?
Because they knew they had a previously scheduled Senate Intelligence
Committee meeting today. All of that was basically turned to
this situation a total and complete setup. Let's play it.
We're going to go to the White House. We got
Natalie Winners, we got Jack Pasovic, we have from the
House Intelligence Committee, benk client's going to join us, all
(01:27):
of it. Let's go ahead and roll some.
Speaker 3 (01:28):
Director Cabart, did you participate in the group chat and
with Secretary of Defense and other Trump senior officials discussing
the m and war plans.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
Senator, I don't want to get into this s math, ma'am.
Did you were you on that?
Speaker 3 (01:41):
You're not going to be willing to conversation, so you're
not are you denying? Matt Will you would answer my question,
ma'am you were not TG on this group chat.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
I'm not going to get into this specific so.
Speaker 3 (01:52):
You've refused to acknowledge whether you were on this group chat.
Speaker 4 (01:56):
Senator, I'm not going to get into this.
Speaker 3 (01:58):
Why are you Why are you going to get into
the specifics, say is it because it's.
Speaker 5 (02:01):
All classified, because this is currently under review by the
National Security.
Speaker 3 (02:05):
Because it's all classified. If it's not classified, share the text.
Speaker 2 (02:08):
Now as the White House previous is it.
Speaker 3 (02:12):
Classified or non classified information?
Speaker 5 (02:14):
On this tap, I can confer to Radcliffe, were you
on the group chat, contact the Defense Secretary or others
after this specific military planning was put out and say hey,
we should be doing this in a skiff. There is
no classified material that was shared in that So then
if there were.
Speaker 3 (02:32):
No classified material, share it with the committee. You can't
have it both ways. These are important jobs. This is
our national security bobbing and weaving and trying to you know,
filibuster your answer, criticize.
Speaker 6 (02:52):
He's a very good man and he will continue to
do a good job.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
In addition to him, we had very good.
Speaker 6 (03:00):
People in that meeting, and those people have done a
very very effective job.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
And you can see it and it goes on. By
the way, it's going to.
Speaker 6 (03:08):
Go on, and I think the hoodies wish that it
didn't happen, but that's what it's all about. We have
to create a safe country, a safe world, and that's
what we're doing.
Speaker 7 (03:20):
Well, let's put it this way direct directly, if a
discussion by senior US officials on the timing and risks
of a proposed military campaign and disagreements between the President
and the Vice President about US plans and intentions, would
be of obvious interest to foreign intelligence services, would it not?
Speaker 2 (03:39):
Yes? And they were.
Speaker 7 (03:43):
Discussing the timing of sending US air crews into enemy
airspace where they faced an air defense threat.
Speaker 2 (03:56):
Correct.
Speaker 8 (03:58):
I'm going to center to the other principles that you're
trying to do about what the meaning and the context
of what I think.
Speaker 7 (04:06):
About the timing of US air strikes correct. Yes, yes,
and therefore the timing of sending US air crews into
hostile airspace correct. Yes, and therefore the time period during
which enemy air defenses could target US air crews flying
in enemy airspace.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
Correct. I don't know that you do know that? Fine?
Speaker 9 (04:29):
Do you think that Mike Walt made it in the
stake and doesn't need to apologize?
Speaker 10 (04:34):
No, I don't think he should apologize.
Speaker 6 (04:36):
I think he's doing his best. It's equipment and technology
that's not perfect, and probably he.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
Won't be using it again, at least not in the
very air future. That's sir.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
I agree.
Speaker 11 (04:49):
With you.
Speaker 12 (04:49):
Let's get everybody in the room whenever possible.
Speaker 2 (04:54):
A lot of.
Speaker 6 (04:54):
Times you find out defects by exactly things like that.
Speaker 7 (04:59):
And would not information about the timing of air strikes
allow a military to preposition or q air defense systems
to shoot down enemy aircraft.
Speaker 9 (05:18):
I think, Senator, from our perspective, any any advanced warning is.
Speaker 1 (05:24):
Something that we certainly are trying to protect.
Speaker 7 (05:27):
Director Rectliffe, this was a huge mistake.
Speaker 13 (05:31):
Correct, No, a national No, No, Director, We asked them.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
No question.
Speaker 7 (05:44):
And now you'll hold on a national political reporter you can.
Speaker 2 (05:49):
Was made privy.
Speaker 7 (05:51):
Sensitive information about military operations, foreign terrorist adding a reporter
and that wasn't a huge mistake. Wasn't a huge mistake.
Speaker 8 (06:01):
I think they characterized the embarrassment.
Speaker 7 (06:05):
This is utterly unprofessional. There's been no apology, there has
been no recognition of the gravity of this error.
Speaker 2 (06:13):
And by the way, we.
Speaker 7 (06:14):
Will get the full transcript of this chain, and your
testimony will be measured carefully against its content.
Speaker 6 (06:21):
This certainly we'll look at this. But the main thing
was nothing happened. The attack was totally successful. It was
I guess from what I understand, took place during and
it wasn't classified information, so this was not classified now,
but classified information. It's probably a little bit different, but
I always say you have to learn from every experience.
(06:43):
I think it was very unfair the way they attacked Michael.
He's a good person. The person that was on just
happens to be a slesbag. So maybe that's just coincidence.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
I don't know.
Speaker 11 (06:55):
Let me ask you when he was added to the thread.
You're the CIA direct Sure, why didn't you call out
that he.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
Was present on the signal thread?
Speaker 8 (07:06):
I don't know if you use signal messaging, am I do?
Speaker 11 (07:10):
I do, not for classified information, not for targeting remote. Well,
that's what your testimony is today. It absolutely is.
Speaker 8 (07:19):
Not, Senator, were you at the beginning No, When I
said that I was using it as permitted, it is permissible.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
I agree.
Speaker 11 (07:27):
That's your testimony. Yeah, I agree, that's your testament. You
asked me if I use it, and I said, not
for targeting, not for classified information, and I said I
don't either. I also know Jeff Goldberg. I don't use
it to communicate with him, but you thought it was
appropriate by the way. I think he's one of the
more outstanding journalists in America. But I'm shocked to find
(07:52):
him on a thread that he's reading in the parking
lot of a grocery store in Washington, d C. And
your testimony as the director of the CIA is that
it's totally appropriate.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
Is it appropriate? Now? That is not what I?
Speaker 1 (08:07):
Okay?
Speaker 2 (08:07):
Did I say it was? When did I use the
word appropriate? Well? Go ahead, please, I didn't that.
Speaker 11 (08:13):
Everybody in America clearly keeping senator here is what your
testimony is.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
No, I never said that. Just a normal day at.
Speaker 11 (08:20):
The CIA where we chat about this kind of stuff
over a signal. In fact, it's so normal that the
last administration left it here for us.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
That's your testimony today. That's final point. Miss I'm out
of Well are you going to give me? Is it appropriate?
Speaker 11 (08:36):
Did you know that the President's Middle East advisor was
in Moscow on this thread while you were as director
of the CIA, participating in this in this thread?
Speaker 2 (08:51):
Were you aware of that? Are you? Are you aware
of that today?
Speaker 8 (08:56):
I'm not aware of that.
Speaker 11 (08:57):
This swoppiness, this incompetence, it's this disrespect for our intelligence
agencies and the personnel who work for him is entirely unacceptable.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
It's an embarrassment. Senator, you need to do better. You
need to do better. Thank you, I'm being gabbled.
Speaker 1 (09:20):
The appropriate response for that was Tulca Garbert's open it's
under review. I'm not here to talk about it. They're
there to talk about the annual intelligence brief against major
Powers in major threats, in the threat assessment, the unclassified
version of the public version. What the Director of National
Intelligence said at the beginning of the hearing was the
(09:43):
appropriate and they should have dug in right there. This
is not a search for truth and particularly those jackals.
You saw that, and we can play so much more
the entire two hours eight every time we went to
why was it that we didn't go to Republicans because
they were asking smart questions about the overall thread assessment.
Every Democrat came right back to the thread. Why they
(10:06):
want to scout, they want to break. This is the
deep state rising up and coming after President Trump publicly
with the fangs bared. Do you think that it was
just random that this hearing was held today, that Goldberg
had the information from essentially eleven forty four am Eastern
(10:30):
Standard Time on Saturday, the fifteenth of March. On the
IDEs of March, nine days ago or ten days ago today,
and he just released it yesterday. What took so long
to release it? They had to have a legal review. No,
they knew. They had a previously scheduled intelligence briefing today
and this is where they were going to ambush. And
(10:52):
that's what this was. Ambush the senior intelligence officials of
the President Trump administration and Tulca Gabbert's UH was absolutely accurate.
It's under review by the National Security Council and at
the appropriate time, we will get back to you, Senator
full stop. Don't engage them. You don't need to talk
(11:13):
about anything. It's under review. They're looking for a scalp
and we're now hunkered down in the no scalp business.
Need to tighten it up and hunker down right now.
This is the deep state. That's a pincer move, and
we're spending the next two hours going through this. A
pincer move between the radical judiciary, the UH, the a
(11:37):
deep state. I'm gonna throw on a little of the
resistance moving on top of it, the Color Revolution. Natalie Winters,
you're at the White House, give me the give me
the mood today at the White House, UH, particularly after
the President was in was in full fine form. But
after this hearing today on Capitol Hill where the center is,
let me just add a that was a shot. Let
(11:59):
me give you the check wicker An. Remember wicker this
is the guy wants to use tactical nuclear weapons or
remember this beauty tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine. He said, Oh,
Armed Services is going to have a full investigation, and
it's going to be bipartisan. Jack Reid, who was on Intel,
who's sitting there chopping people up, is going to be
(12:19):
with Jack Reed. So that's where we are now. Natalie
Winners from the White House, your thoughts, ma'am?
Speaker 14 (12:25):
Sure, Well, two very disparate moods. Obviously, there's the legacy media,
which I think, to be honest, having just said in
the briefing room for not even more than ten minutes,
there was sort of, I think an almost gleeful joy
that they sort of have now a got a moment,
or at least the opening.
Speaker 4 (12:41):
Salvo of one with this Jeffrey Goldberg story.
Speaker 14 (12:44):
It's obviously everything that everyone is talking about, whether it's
in their conversations or even as I walked down all
the tents, every single outlet was hammering it NonStop, but
specifically through the paradigm that this somehow suggests that the
Trump administration is and competent, that they lack legitimacy, that
our allies won't trust us, which I think fits in
(13:05):
nicely with that color evolution framework. We can get into it.
After the break with the White House, sort of proactive
messaging and response has been because they've really put out
quite a lot in terms of information.
Speaker 4 (13:14):
How they're spinning it.
Speaker 1 (13:17):
Yeah, no, they're they're on fire right now. We've got
Natalie Winners at the White House. Jack Psobak's going to
join us by phone. Congresson, Ben Klein is going to
join us, he's on the House Intel. Then we're going
to pivot. We've got a lot in the judicial insurrection.
Julie Kelly joins us. Rass Mustin joins us with Mark
(13:38):
Mitchell because they've got some polling that's quite interesting where
the American people are coming down on these mass deportations,
and of course the one and only Mike Davis. They
also signed an election integrity executive order. Today we're going
to try to get the Secretary of State of the
Great State of Wyoming, who is driving election integrity in
(13:59):
his state. He's gonna be here. We're packed for the
next two hours. A judicial insurrection and the deep state
coming from President Trump and his administration. It's time to
hunker down. They're playing for keeps and so are we.
Bottom line, we're winning. But man, get to the ramparts.
(14:19):
It's fixed. Bannet Tuesday. Here in the in the war room,
Birch Gold right now, take your phone out text Bannon
nine eight nine eight. Get the complete ultimate guide to
investing in gold and precious metals in the era of Trump.
Find Out why it's a store of value. Find out
what's been a hedge for five thousand years. Find out
(14:40):
all about it and talk to Philip Patrick and the team.
Johnny Kahn takes us out with American Heart back in
a moment.
Speaker 2 (14:57):
In America.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
Here's your host, Stephen k Man with the House working
on the House, the Center working on the reconciliation. They
say it's gonna be done on the seventh. The budget
for next year, with all the tax cuts, everything quite complicated.
We're gonna be at wall to wall. But couple with this,
couple with the judicial insurrection, we're gonna have some turbulence.
(15:21):
Birch gold dot com slash Bannon the end of the
end of the Dollar Empire. Also talk to Philipatrion team
find out why gold is a hedge against times of turbulence.
It's only been like that for five thousand years of
man's recorded history, so go check it out today talk
to Philip Patrian team gold finished, I think over three
thousand again today market at least before the hearing wasn't
(15:43):
too bad, and check it all out. Natalie Winters, please
tee up this clip. We want the audience to understand
who Jeffrey Goldberg is, so you please tee this up
and then after you're finished up with like Denver to
play it and then you'll come back for commentary and observations.
Speaker 14 (15:57):
Ma'am well, I think there's probably a sense of dejas
vous that the audience may have had watching the cold
open to the show, right Senators grilling these individuals. It
kind of brings us back, I don't know, let's say,
to the first impeachment right where you sort of have
this fundamental divide, not necessarily over the results, but more
so about the process, right, whether it was President Trump's
(16:18):
phone call, and I think the best way to conceive
of someone like Jeffrey Goldberg, Like I said, and like
I think you're right on this is essentially the opening salvo,
the first maybe a stage, and what will later become
I think more information warfare against the Trump administration, particularly
on the international affairs front. But I think that Goldberg
should be really be viewed as sort of a Vindmin
(16:38):
esque figure in all of this, right, someone who really
takes an issue with I think the America first worldview,
evidenced by the fact that he has repeatedly been the
hit man, not just because he's a nicely hold up
at the railhead of so much of the resistance media,
right that is the Atlantic, but he's been behind some
of the really the top dollar sneers, not just against
(16:59):
President true during the last campaign, but even his first administration, right,
the suckers and losers, the hitler.
Speaker 4 (17:05):
Generals, all of that stuff, right.
Speaker 14 (17:07):
But really, if you get granular at the intersection of
sort of the military industrial complex, the world view that
buttress to the first Trump impeachment, right, he is the
spokesperson for that, and I guess the Iraq War. But
I digress on that. So I want to play this
clip he's talking on the Bulwark. Interesting choice of outlet
to sort of give your take on. But he's speaking
with Tim Miller, and I want to just have people
(17:28):
really pay attention to the body language when he's giving
this an interview. I don't know about you. I always
look at the camera because I'm telling the truth. He
refuses to make eye contact with the camera. He's talking,
particularly about what was contained in the tax messages that
he refused to share in the Atlantic, at least in
the initial piece. So Denver, if you want to roll
the clip, I think the audience should really pay attention
to the way that he comports himself.
Speaker 15 (17:50):
I think if the White House now the Secretary of
Defense and the White House Press Secretary have said you're lying,
said there are no war plans there, I've said, there's
no classified information. So the obvious question is, shouldn't you
now demonstrate shouldn't you publish the text?
Speaker 1 (18:07):
No, because they're wrong. They're wrong, But.
Speaker 2 (18:12):
How could you prove that you're wrong? Maybe?
Speaker 1 (18:13):
Could you?
Speaker 15 (18:13):
Should you provide them to the House and Senate special
committees on intelligence?
Speaker 2 (18:17):
Maybe I don't know.
Speaker 16 (18:20):
Wow, you want to become my lawyer.
Speaker 15 (18:23):
I'm just I'm throwing this out there.
Speaker 2 (18:24):
Jeff, I don't know.
Speaker 3 (18:25):
I looked.
Speaker 16 (18:26):
I mean, look, I feel like no, no, no, I
mean obviously, let me just put it this way. My
colleagues and I and the advice that and and the
people who are giving us advice on this have some
interesting conversations to have about this. But just because they're
irresponsible with material doesn't mean that I'm going to be
(18:48):
irresponsible with this material. And you know what, I could whatever.
I mean, you've you've had long history as I have
with dealing with them, and at moments like this, when
they're under pressure because they've been caught with their hand
in the cookie jar or whatever, you know, they will
just literally say anything to get out of the moment,
(19:10):
to get out of the jam.
Speaker 1 (19:11):
And that's okay, I get it.
Speaker 16 (19:14):
I get the defensive reaction. And but here's the thing.
My obligation, I feel is too to the idea that
we take national security information seriously. And maybe there's and
maybe maybe in the coming days, I'll I'll be able
to let you know that, Okay, I have a I
have a plan to uh to have this material vetted publicly,
(19:39):
but I'm not going to say that now because there's
a lot of conversations that have to happen about that.
All of my inclinations, as you can tell, including withholding
the name of the CIA undercover officer, all of my
inclinations are I have a pretty I have a pretty
clear standards in my own behavior of what I consider
(20:03):
information that I consider to be in the public interest,
even if it's technically classified or not. Information that's in
the public interest, and information it's not in public interest.
And I'm just going to like, I'm sticking to my
principles here, I understood it.
Speaker 1 (20:18):
Natalie One, does please describe this individual's principles. Please describe
how he's handled classified information. Please describe what he says
is the sacred information he's dealt with in the past,
ma'am please.
Speaker 14 (20:31):
Well, that's sort of the general air of hypocrisy, right,
like The Atlantic has not published or works to, I think,
with classified with leaked documents, whether under the Biden energy
under the first Trump administration. I'm sorry, that's the only
information that they deal with, and I think that is
extremely cagey and rather weird response to a not extremely
hostile question. I think that's quite a defensive answer saying, well,
(20:54):
do you want to be my lawyer all Tim Miller.
I'll take Tim Miller's side in this. Did is ask, Hey,
well then why don't you show the text?
Speaker 3 (21:00):
Right?
Speaker 14 (21:00):
And I think that frankly, that's what we should be
calling for.
Speaker 4 (21:03):
I think he should be putting them out.
Speaker 14 (21:05):
But I think against you, it's really important to I
think view this in sort of the framing, and it
certainly I think to some extent what the White House
has been doing of the first impeachment, where the distinction,
the difference is between the process versus the results. Right,
And obviously the Washington consensus that Jeffrey Goldberg represents melted.
Speaker 4 (21:24):
Down right over his demeanor and.
Speaker 14 (21:26):
Conduct on that now infamous phone call back with Zelenski, right,
and now they don't like the conduct, the demeanor, which
sure unforced error in.
Speaker 4 (21:35):
This group chat.
Speaker 14 (21:36):
But I think the White House is messaging today in
addition to downplaying and discounting straight up saying that Jeffrey
Goldberg is lying, Caroline Lovett tweeting out earlier saying quote,
no war plans were discussed and that no classified material
was sent to the thread. But they put out a
long form sort of document circulated to the entire White
House press pool saying the heading of it was quote
(21:56):
Trump Administration's actions made houthy terrorists pay, And they walk
through a bunch of figures, numbers showing how under Joe
Biden the attacks in that area and that region skyrocketed.
Funny how I don't think any of these journalists around
me had anything to say about that when that was happening.
They noted how Biden had removed them from the foreign
list of foreign terrorist organizations, how President Trump reinstated them.
(22:19):
So what they're really doing is focusing on it. And
you even hear I think in President Trump's response to this, right,
the strike one is planned, there was no issue in
the carrying out the actual implementation of it. And if
you look at the results of these strikes, overwhelmingly they
were successful again through their paradigm of success. But I
think that's the important distinction kind of to have and
(22:42):
the really just I think unnuanced meltdown of my dare
I say, colleagues around here acting like this is just
you know, the original sin. This is a cardinal sin
of the Trump administration using a messaging app the classified
documents Clinton servers aside. It's quite hypocritical because last time
I checked all these people I've ever dealt with is
leaking intentionally weaponizing information classified at that too.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
Hangar for one second, I have Jack Pasovak on the phone. Jack,
you just heard the clip. You heard Natalie's analysis of
the White House going on offense. Your thoughts, sir, Okay,
I don't have Jack. Okay, uh do we have Jack up?
(23:30):
But okay, fine, Natalie. Once again, I want to get
the I want to get what the White House put out.
I want to put it. I want to get it up,
and I want to get it to Grace and Nemo
and put it out everywhere. Because the White House is
going on offense right now taking a very hard stand
against this. I still believe that the appropriate response right
now is still Tulci Gabbert's review it. Internally. You've already
(23:54):
had Wicker over at the Senate Armed Services say he's
going to investigate, he's going to make it, he's going
to make it bipartisan, include Jack Read and these radical Democrats.
And so I think it's a time to hunker down
for the White House and to make sure you have
all the information, review it. Take your time, don't be
forced by these jackals and hyenas because they're going to
try to quick march you every second of every day.
(24:16):
Your thoughts, ma'am, Yeah, I think.
Speaker 14 (24:19):
A lot of the calm strategy too, is to sort
of attack and impugne Jeffrey Goldberg right as this obviously
far left Democrat activists registered democrat.
Speaker 4 (24:27):
I think the wife's a Democrat donor.
Speaker 14 (24:29):
But I think you're saying, and I agree, that it's
already sort of conceding right, too much ground, too much
territory to them, the proper answers that it's under review.
What Ratcliffe did today I don't think was particularly helpful.
But I want to read the data points too from
this fact sheet that the White House put out, just
so you can sort of better understand their messaging. They
(24:49):
specifically called out how that houthy terrorist had attacked US
warships one hundred and seventy four times and commercial vessels
one hundred and forty five times since twenty twenty three,
Like I said, foreign terrorist designation, and in bold they
really underscored that quote. This is a coordinated effort to distract,
to distract from the successful actions taken by President Trump
(25:10):
and his and his administration to make America's enemies pay
and keep Americans safe.
Speaker 1 (25:18):
Natalie, your social media? Where do people get you? I
know you're going to be on top of this NonStop
Where do people go as the White House now hunkers
down in this full on assault by the deep State?
Speaker 4 (25:32):
Yes, Natalie g you enters on all social media platforms.
Thank you for having me.
Speaker 1 (25:37):
Thanks, great job. Okay, we're going to take a short
commercial break. We've got Congressman Ben Klein. He is actually
on the House Intelligence Committee. I'm going to ask you
about his thoughts today about this hearing. Also, we're going
to ask Congressman Klient about Wicker. Remember Wicker want to
(25:57):
drop talking about dropping tactical nucletar weapons. Remember that we
had the big debate back in about a year and
a half ago when Mitchell O'Connell got taken out as
as the leader, right, Remember that he basically stepped down
from that and said he was going to retire from Congress,
which now he's he's in the process of doing that.
Wicker was in that debate. He is a definitely he's
(26:19):
beyond a New York guy's a warmonger. Right, So short
commercial break home title lock, We need you at the
ramparts is even going to get more intense in the
next couple of days. The deep state, and he is
coming from President Trump. The how do I say this,
the judicial insurrection is coming from President Trump. All of it.
Home title Lock one million dollar triple lock protection number one,
(26:43):
they have twenty four to seven cover your title. Two
if anything happens to me on the night, they let
you know. Three they have a one million dollar restoration program,
including legal if anything happens home title lock dot com,
Steve twenty five, go today.
Speaker 16 (27:00):
Use your host, Stephen k Ba.
Speaker 1 (27:04):
Look, look about your title. This is why we're going
to need you at the ramparts. Whether you think this
is a deep state syop or it's just the deep
state at work, the way they do things, this is
a thing now, there's always some flash pulling out. How
the media is running with this, what the American people
(27:26):
think and want to see? And I keep telling you
these neoliberal neo cons in the Senate will get wobbly
on you. It's only fifty three forty seven. You get
a couple of votes, you get Collins, she was sick today.
She was sick today. Jack Psobik, your thoughts on this.
(27:47):
This was a setup. This committee hearing been planned for weeks.
This is why the Atlantic magazine waited nine days. In
that way, they were not getting this vetted by the
lawyers for nine days. They waited until the eve of
this to drop it and then had to set up
an ambush for the senior high command of the intelligence
(28:08):
apparatus for President Trump.
Speaker 17 (28:10):
Your thoughts, sir, well, Steve, this is absolutely an ambush
that was certainly planned in coordination with the Democrats on
the Senates, like Committee on Intel. You're talking to your
Mark Werners, your Widens, all the rest of them.
Speaker 18 (28:24):
There.
Speaker 17 (28:24):
There's no question in my mind that that's exactly what
Chef Greenberg Goldberg was up to. And the question that
I have is who on the Democrats' staff knew about this?
How many of their colleagues let that Look, look, you
go up to that hearing and you think that, oh,
we're just going to operate in good faith and they
(28:44):
just want to get to the bottom of this. No,
they're looking to operationalize anything they can with a nullification
project like they did in twenty seventeen. They're already talking
ab Wickers up there. He's talking about running concurrent investigations.
They want to get another rush so they can what impeachments,
and then they're going to talk about running next year,
(29:06):
and they're going to turn that into we're going to
impeach whoever they can up to and including President of
the United States. They're going to say this is they're
trying to run another Watergate play here. It's so patently
obvious what they're doing. And that's exactly why I think
the entire thing stinks. And the fact that it's Jeffrey Goldberg,
the guy who's been involved with Russia Gate, the guy
(29:26):
who was involved with the Iraq War, the guy who
was involved with the Suckers and Losers hopes is involved
with this. It stinks to high Heaven.
Speaker 1 (29:36):
To know how programmed this was. You see asoff we
played his but he came at the very end. He
had had a couple he had had a couple of
days to think too. That also, I've done do that
top of his head. That was like a lawyer. That
was like a lawyer in a deposition, right. He knew
exactly where he was going to take it. That that
came from, that came from practice. Our belief is that
(29:56):
the appropriate response today, Taulca Gabbertt was, hey, it's under review.
Our belief now is the same. You've got two committees
Armed Services, Senate Armed Services, where Wickers said he's going
to open an investigation, and you've got Senate Intelligence we
said they're going to continue this investigation. The White House
better hunker down hard on this, and I think fight
fire with fire. This is why with Johnson, Hey, it's
(30:17):
not a better time. I said this yesterday when the
story first broke. Now's the time that you have a
couple of committee meetings and let's get some of these
radical judges up there and let's see the radical judges
the coordination on the judicial insurrection, which is so obvious.
Jack Pisobik, look you need this.
Speaker 17 (30:34):
And of course, by the way, the tener Crow Gabbert
understands what's going on. She was a Democrat, she was
on their side of the football. She's seen them do
this a million times, and so the minute that she
saw this play coming up, that's how she said, you
know what, hardline, I'm not going to give you any
rope with you know, with which to hang me. So
going to I'm a lockdown. We're not talking about this,
(30:57):
This is going to the lawyer's lawyers are going to
deal with it. We're not going to just here period,
full stop. Secondly, what you need to start doing is
flipping back on this, going and looking at the Democrats,
looking at the Democrats, Staffer, sure, find go look at
the judge, and I see Johnson says you, well, okay,
he wants to, you know, look at non non impeachment possibilities.
(31:19):
Whether it's the you know, we gave that quote out
earlier today, so whatever, whether it's you know, whether it's budgetary,
or whether it's get getting rid of a couple of
two districts. Because by the way, those those districts are
not constitutional. It actually says the Supreme Court may create
such districts. And this is in fact a check on
the judiciary, one which the legislative never really uses. But
(31:42):
certainly anyone at the art I'll defer the Article three
project on that. But it's absolutely constitutional, something that we
never even really discussed as the power of the federal government.
But look, the momentum here is that the administration, they
seem like they're on the defensive. They're trying to make
the Greenland story come up again, which I know I
have this planned visit. Jadie Van says that he's going
(32:02):
out there. By the way, in the midst of all
of this, we have the Ukraine Russian negotiations are going
on right now in viadd you've got the expert team
sitting down. You just announced essentially a new grain deal
that's come out. The ceasefire is taken hold. Of course,
both sides flaming each other for taking it off. But again,
there's so many things that are happening around the world
(32:26):
with the Trump agenda. That's why it's stuff like this
that starts coming up the works. And now all of
a sudden, the flood the zone strategy is getting broken
up because of this type of thing, and it only
is going to get amplified by the media.
Speaker 1 (32:44):
Don't stop all offense, Jack, social media. Where do people
get you? You're putting up stuff twenty four to seven
on this story, sir, Where do people go?
Speaker 17 (32:51):
We're at Jack PSOBC, up on x on Telegram, up
on truth and by the way, we had a huge
deep dive with Richard Barris on all the holsters, by
the way that are going belly up in the wake
of the twenty twenty four election. That nobody Mama five
thirty eight and Telter, nobody wants to talk about that.
How come there's no narrative about these quote unquote gold standard,
(33:13):
gold standard polsters going belly up after twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1 (33:17):
Belly Thank you, brother, appreciate you. Look forward to having
you on tomorrow. Follow u from the story, We're going
to have a rass mussin Smart Mitchell on Blowway numbers
for President Trump talked about on CNN this morning. We'll
have him on also about the mass deportations. Want to
go now to Virginia six Kleenson, Ben Kleink Comson client,
(33:38):
correct me if I'm wrong. You're in house intel. Give
us your assessment of what you've seen and heard so
far on this on this story about the signal incident, Sir, well.
Speaker 12 (33:48):
We've heard a lot of noise, a lot of the
media really spinning this up. The President has said he
has confidence in Mike Waltz, keeping him on board, and
you know, we have questions.
Speaker 2 (34:02):
We're going to ask them tomorrow.
Speaker 12 (34:04):
Follow up on the Senate's questioning today, we're going to
be an open session, we're going to be in a
closed session, and we're going to get all the answers,
and we're going to continue on. And the important thing
to remember is this administration is fighting terrorism where they live,
fighting it in m and fighting the Houthis who are
attacking commercial vessels, who are attacking Israel, and the Americans
(34:28):
have responded, responded strongly and successfully, a very efficient operation,
and we need to continue the focus on the terrorists.
Speaker 1 (34:39):
So, congcon how you going to today? We cover this
gavel to gavel for the unclassified part. The assessment that
the intelligence community has done is so important and talks
about major threats. We barely got any of that. The
Democrats took over the hearing. The Republicans ask great questions,
but we're overwhelmed by the Democrats and we played the
cold open. It led to a shindo of screaming at
(35:02):
certain witnesses. How given the House, the House Democrats are
twice as crazy as the ones in the Senate, how
are you guys going to keep control of that? Tomorrow?
Speaker 12 (35:12):
Sir, We're going to make sure that we stay focused
on what this hearing was originally noticed for, which was
global threat environment. We're going to talk about China, We're
going to talk about Russia. We're going to talk about Iran,
We're going to talk about North Korea. We're going to
talk about the border and the cartels. We're going to
talk about the drug trade. It's a very, very focused agenda.
(35:36):
This is a hearing that we have on a regular basis,
and the fact that this reporter waited and held on
to this information until the day before is of concern
as well. It shows an attempt to play politics with
the intelligence of the United States, with the intelligence community,
and with the national.
Speaker 2 (35:57):
Security of the United States.
Speaker 12 (35:58):
And so we are going to make sure that we
stay focused on the issues that are important to this nation,
and that is fighting terrorism and making sure we protect
this country against foreign and foreign threats and those international
forces like cartels, like the drug trade that are threatening
(36:20):
us as well.
Speaker 1 (36:22):
Okay, so we started the story of the show today.
We're not conspiracy theorists, we're the opposite. But we said
there's no coincidence. So let's go back. This has been
on the books for a while. The incident happened on
the fifteenth. He waits until the afternoon of the day
before the Senate and two days before the House to
release it. Does not look does it not look like
a coordinated deep state, democratic intel community ambush, sir.
Speaker 12 (36:49):
That does give me concern and I'm sure that there
will be questions about that.
Speaker 2 (36:55):
And if this was it did rise to the.
Speaker 12 (37:01):
Importance that mister Goldberg claimed that it did, then he
would have released it immediately and spoken to the concerns
that he had about it.
Speaker 2 (37:13):
Instead, he waited until the day.
Speaker 12 (37:14):
Before a hearing to reveal it and distract from really
the agenda that we have tomorrow, which is the national security,
the foreign.
Speaker 2 (37:26):
Threats, the entities like.
Speaker 12 (37:30):
Those who are engaged in fentanyl trade, which kill over
fifty thousand people in the United States last year alone.
Speaker 1 (37:40):
It coustuantly. You just got back from a week in
the district. Virginia six is kind of one of the
heartlands of this country. I mean, these are hard work
of folks. Where are their heads at? And what President
Trump's first sixty days, sir?
Speaker 12 (37:55):
They could not be more excited about this administration accomplished
in just under two months, making sure that we move
forward on reconciliation, on extending the Trump tax cuts, making
sure we have fair trade laws visa the other countries
around the world, engaging in trade negotiations with other countries,
(38:19):
making sure we those make the way that we're treated
by other.
Speaker 2 (38:23):
Countries more fair.
Speaker 12 (38:25):
Great job there securing the border, fantastic job, successful percent
reduction in appearances at the border. And so I think
my district is overwhelmingly in favor of what Trump's accomplished
in just a short time, delivering on his promises. And
we look forward to more successes down the line.
Speaker 1 (38:49):
What do they think of the philosophy of flood the zone,
all gas, no break. What's their perception, your constituents perception
of that his process?
Speaker 12 (38:57):
Well, I know my colleagues in the House are trying
to play catch up a lot with the administration, and
this administration is smart to keep its foot on the gas.
Speaker 2 (39:07):
To push through.
Speaker 12 (39:08):
And now to my constituents, I think most of them
are excited. They for whatever their concerns were, you know,
they're excited about the steps that this administration has taken
returning control of education to states and localities and parents.
That's something Glenn Youngkin ran on and won on in
his run for governor because it was up in Loudon
County where those school boards were ignoring parents, arresting parents
(39:32):
for daring to speak out against the indoctrination that was
going on of their kids. And so it's grounds zero
for these types of.
Speaker 2 (39:43):
Concerns that are being addressed by this administration. And to
take the woke, to.
Speaker 12 (39:48):
Take the dei out of the federal government is a great,
a great accomplishment for them.
Speaker 1 (39:58):
Kyrsmin Klein. How do people follow you?
Speaker 2 (40:00):
They go Rep.
Speaker 12 (40:02):
Ben Klein is the Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and encourage people
to keep.
Speaker 2 (40:08):
In touch and visit.
Speaker 1 (40:11):
We're going to cover gavel to gavel to gavel tomorrow.
We'll hope to see you there. Thank you, Congressman. I
appreciate you. Virginia six, God's country man. Conresson Ben Klein.
What he say his constituents, they love the uh all gas,
no break, go on offense, White House, go on offense.
(40:34):
This is the deep State. It's the twin pillars. Now
they've got they've got the they've got the resistance, the
cover revolution. But they got two main pincer moves, a
radical judicial insurrection at the federal level and now the
deep State coming for the intel part of President Trump's administration.
Short commercial break, Julie Kelly, Mike Davis.
Speaker 9 (40:55):
Next, lastly, Sir, an executive order for your attention on
the very important subject of election integrity. We believe that
this executive order is the farthest reaching executive action taken
in the history of the Republic to secure our elections.
Among numerous other aspects of this executive order, this is
(41:18):
going to cut down on illegal immigrants on the voter
rolls ensure that the Department of Homeland Security and the
data that they have available is being fully weaponized to
ensure that illegal immigrants aren't voting. This will include a
citizenship question on the federal voting form for the first time.
This executive order instructs the EAC to cut federal funding
(41:39):
to states that don't take reasonable steps.
Speaker 2 (41:42):
To secure their election.
Speaker 9 (41:43):
This calls on the Department of Justice to vigorously prosecute
election crimes, particularly in states that we don't believe are
in compliance with federal law around election integrity. I could
go on and on for a while, sir, but compliance
with national Election Day rules down and investigating and prosecuting
foreign interference in our elections. Revoking President Biden's Executive Order
(42:07):
fourteen oh one to nine, which essentially weaponized government to
corrupt and pollute our election process.
Speaker 2 (42:13):
There's a lot in.
Speaker 9 (42:14):
Here, but we believe that these are very important steps
that we need to be taking as an administration in
your direction to ensure that our elections are as secure
as they possibly can be.
Speaker 10 (42:25):
Okay, you will understand that this.
Speaker 2 (42:29):
Election frouic.
Speaker 10 (42:31):
You've earned the term we'll ended. Hopefully this will go
a long way toward ending it. There are other steps
that we will be taken as an ext in the
coming weeks, and we think we'll be able to end
up getting fair elections. Perhaps some people think I shouldn't
be complaining because we've won in a landslide, but.
Speaker 1 (42:55):
We've got to straighten out our election.
Speaker 10 (42:56):
This country is so sick because of the election to
fake actions and the band elections, and we're going to
straighten it out one way or the other. And it's
an honor to sign this one. To sign all of them,
but to sign this one is a great honor.
Speaker 1 (43:24):
It's a great honor, and we still got to investigate
twenty twenty. Hurry said, right there, the most important thing
what happened to the country because they stole the election
and President Trump's not doing I just said, he just
won in a landslide popular vote. All the battleground states
three hundred and twelve, three and sixteen electoral votes won everywhere,
every every place, every demographic except for college educated women.
(43:49):
That's for another day, but he knows that he's got
to sign this. We got to get back to and
we've got to make sure the election platforms that we
have election territy. Mike Lindell. This is how I'm telling you, folks,
take your number two personal right now. These state attorney generals,
they're going to be the assassins. Mike Lindell was going
to be there today. Mike Lindell's work is tail off
(44:11):
for this. But Mike Lindell's at the company. Mikedale's folks
in the company. Why, because they're trying to put Mike
Lindell to business. Mike, How historic a day was this?
You guys have fought the entire group stern, everybody fought
for this day. Has his executive order signed? What's in it?
Why is it important?
Speaker 16 (44:29):
Sir?
Speaker 18 (44:31):
Just historically it really is. This is amazing. It's one
of my happiest days. I like when the presidents at
other steps we will be taking you all know. One
of the things I want to put in there, melt
down the voting machines and tournament at prison bars. But
that's for another day. One of the biggest things. You
start from the top here. I'm going to kind of
frame this mandatory voting ID with proof of citizenship.
Speaker 2 (44:53):
What a concept.
Speaker 18 (44:54):
Right, you have to have a government, you have to
have mandatory This isn't just okay maybe in some states,
maybe not in others. Because what he also put in
there was all federal funding is going to be tied.
Speaker 2 (45:04):
To these elections this executive order.
Speaker 18 (45:08):
So you want to do something like that lady from
Maine when she says I really like men and women's sports,
No you don't. We're going to defund you. So this
is great that he put that in there. No more
ballots counting after election day. Okay, that's it. None of
this nonsense that went on in the twenty twenty four
election where it took two weeks for say, these ballots
(45:28):
to be counted, and it's funny how they all went
to the Democrats. All these down tickets stay stold in
the twenty twenty four election. I'm talking to everybody. So
we got rid of that. No more counting ballots after
election day. Now paper ballots. You gotta paper ballots, but
with no QR codes and no bar codes, it's kind
of like this.
Speaker 2 (45:48):
One's a little harder to understand.
Speaker 18 (45:50):
And I haven't dove into it all on this one,
but basically saying we're not going to have machines running
with these papers and with these know you're going to
know nobody knows what was behind these QR codes. This
came up in a lot of states during our fight.
Everybody nobody knew what that. You know, what was behind
that and what you're even doing. And so that's in there.
(46:12):
And now this is another one that needs a little
more saying binds EO one four zero nine zero one
nine was officially revoked.
Speaker 2 (46:21):
That was another one. I don't know. I don't know
a lot about it.
Speaker 18 (46:24):
But this goes on and on, Steve, this is probably
seventy percent of everything my teams have been fighting for
out there, and everyone's going, well, what you know, and
you heard them say other steps will be taken, and
so this is to me, this is just a giant
(46:45):
step forward to finally get the most go from worse
to first. Right now, we have the worst election platforms
in the history of the world, in the history of
the world. No one has worse, but we're going to
go from worse to first. Now this brings it up there,
and I'm gonna tell you everybody, my excitement is all
my teams that work across all fifty states, the Cosmo
(47:06):
America are Election Bureau, all these all of us out
there that have worked tireshly for four years and including
the precinct strategist Steve Stearns and everyone. Now I believe Steve,
we're gonna be able to go into these counties and
states and say, hey, point to what the President just
did today and say, hey, he wants to have secure elections.
(47:26):
What do you mean we can't do this, this or this,
And we're gonna call them out. We're gonna call every
one of these unit party blockers out. And I'm really
looking forward to that because.
Speaker 1 (47:38):
A great, a great day. We signed the Executive Order
on Election Integrity. Sell me a pillow, You got a minute?
Speaker 18 (47:43):
Okay, guys, this is I told you, YESI we had
orders in and they canceled.
Speaker 2 (47:49):
Just today.
Speaker 18 (47:50):
We're celebrating by giving the war room posse what they
would have had to pay at the box store queen
size of our sheets for Kale sheets twenty nine ninety
eight Kings thirty four ninety eight promo code Warroom. You guys,
go to the website, scroll down, click on Steve. There
you see the crosses made in the USA. That the
cross I wear, say thirty percent on that. There's the
(48:13):
nine ninety eight pillows. That all the commemorative pillows. The
war Room specials there limit.
Speaker 2 (48:18):
Of fifteen the my Pillow two point zero call.
Speaker 18 (48:21):
The operators get the phones ring limited fifteen the my
Pillow two point zero call. The operators get the phones
ringing us A data Celebrate eight hundred and eighty seven
to three one zero six y two pre shipping options
available for the war Room polse.
Speaker 2 (48:36):
You guys got make those calls.
Speaker 18 (48:38):
Now. I'm gonna be downstairs celebrating. Maybe I'll be on
the phone with you soon.
Speaker 1 (48:43):
Take a call. We're gonna take a short commercial break.
Brass Muscling with Polling, Why Owning with Election Integrity, and
Julie Kelly and Mike Davis on the Judicial Insurrection. Next
in the War Room,
Now coming in this this morning, Wicker of the Senate
Armed Services coming. He said he's going to hold hearings,
bipartisan hearings and get to the bottom of it, which
we don't like to hear. This is a total and
complete setup. That's why the hearing was today. It's absolutely outrageous.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
Good news is Trump Trump Night in support of Mike Waller.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
So I'm going to give it to you, Steve.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
Really good talking to see you tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
Brother. Yeah, Eric, thank you so much. Great hour. Always
good to follow you and do the handoff crocs versus gates. Okay,
here's what we're going to do. We're going to now
have a cold open. It's going to be I don't know,
seven or so minutes long. It's going to get to
the intensity today. Also, President Trump signed a number of
executive orders on election integrity. A couple of other law
(00:41):
firms that the government is going to have a discussion
with about their practices, their lawfair practices were going to
play some of the intensity. This was a setup today.
The event happened on the IDEs of March on fifteen March.
You remember we were here live that morning on on
War Room, and of course the guy, the journalist supposedly
(01:04):
was watching this eleven forty four when these things started.
He waited nine days? Why do you wait nine days?
Because they knew they had a previously scheduled Senate Intelligence
Committee meeting today. All of that was basically turned to
this situation a total and complete setup. Let's play it.
We're going to go to the White House. We got
Natalie Winners, we got Jack Pasovic, we have from the
House Intelligence Committee, benk client's going to join us, all
(01:27):
of it. Let's go ahead and roll some.
Speaker 3 (01:28):
Director Cabart, did you participate in the group chat and
with Secretary of Defense and other Trump senior officials discussing
the m and war plans.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
Senator, I don't want to get into this s math, ma'am.
Did you were you on that?
Speaker 3 (01:41):
You're not going to be willing to conversation, so you're
not are you denying? Matt Will you would answer my question,
ma'am you were not TG on this group chat.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
I'm not going to get into this specific so.
Speaker 3 (01:52):
You've refused to acknowledge whether you were on this group chat.
Speaker 4 (01:56):
Senator, I'm not going to get into this.
Speaker 3 (01:58):
Why are you Why are you going to get into
the specifics, say is it because it's.
Speaker 5 (02:01):
All classified, because this is currently under review by the
National Security.
Speaker 3 (02:05):
Because it's all classified. If it's not classified, share the text.
Speaker 2 (02:08):
Now as the White House previous is it.
Speaker 3 (02:12):
Classified or non classified information?
Speaker 5 (02:14):
On this tap, I can confer to Radcliffe, were you
on the group chat, contact the Defense Secretary or others
after this specific military planning was put out and say hey,
we should be doing this in a skiff. There is
no classified material that was shared in that So then
if there were.
Speaker 3 (02:32):
No classified material, share it with the committee. You can't
have it both ways. These are important jobs. This is
our national security bobbing and weaving and trying to you know,
filibuster your answer, criticize.
Speaker 6 (02:52):
He's a very good man and he will continue to
do a good job.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
In addition to him, we had very good.
Speaker 6 (03:00):
People in that meeting, and those people have done a
very very effective job.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
And you can see it and it goes on. By
the way, it's going to.
Speaker 6 (03:08):
Go on, and I think the hoodies wish that it
didn't happen, but that's what it's all about. We have
to create a safe country, a safe world, and that's
what we're doing.
Speaker 7 (03:20):
Well, let's put it this way direct directly, if a
discussion by senior US officials on the timing and risks
of a proposed military campaign and disagreements between the President
and the Vice President about US plans and intentions, would
be of obvious interest to foreign intelligence services, would it not?
Speaker 2 (03:39):
Yes? And they were.
Speaker 7 (03:43):
Discussing the timing of sending US air crews into enemy
airspace where they faced an air defense threat.
Speaker 2 (03:56):
Correct.
Speaker 8 (03:58):
I'm going to center to the other principles that you're
trying to do about what the meaning and the context
of what I think.
Speaker 7 (04:06):
About the timing of US air strikes correct. Yes, yes,
and therefore the timing of sending US air crews into
hostile airspace correct. Yes, and therefore the time period during
which enemy air defenses could target US air crews flying
in enemy airspace.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
Correct. I don't know that you do know that? Fine?
Speaker 9 (04:29):
Do you think that Mike Walt made it in the
stake and doesn't need to apologize?
Speaker 10 (04:34):
No, I don't think he should apologize.
Speaker 6 (04:36):
I think he's doing his best. It's equipment and technology
that's not perfect, and probably he.
Speaker 2 (04:44):
Won't be using it again, at least not in the
very air future. That's sir.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
I agree.
Speaker 11 (04:49):
With you.
Speaker 12 (04:49):
Let's get everybody in the room whenever possible.
Speaker 2 (04:54):
A lot of.
Speaker 6 (04:54):
Times you find out defects by exactly things like that.
Speaker 7 (04:59):
And would not information about the timing of air strikes
allow a military to preposition or q air defense systems
to shoot down enemy aircraft.
Speaker 9 (05:18):
I think, Senator, from our perspective, any any advanced warning is.
Speaker 1 (05:24):
Something that we certainly are trying to protect.
Speaker 7 (05:27):
Director Rectliffe, this was a huge mistake.
Speaker 13 (05:31):
Correct, No, a national No, No, Director, We asked them.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
No question.
Speaker 7 (05:44):
And now you'll hold on a national political reporter you can.
Speaker 2 (05:49):
Was made privy.
Speaker 7 (05:51):
Sensitive information about military operations, foreign terrorist adding a reporter
and that wasn't a huge mistake. Wasn't a huge mistake.
Speaker 8 (06:01):
I think they characterized the embarrassment.
Speaker 7 (06:05):
This is utterly unprofessional. There's been no apology, there has
been no recognition of the gravity of this error.
Speaker 2 (06:13):
And by the way, we.
Speaker 7 (06:14):
Will get the full transcript of this chain, and your
testimony will be measured carefully against its content.
Speaker 6 (06:21):
This certainly we'll look at this. But the main thing
was nothing happened. The attack was totally successful. It was
I guess from what I understand, took place during and
it wasn't classified information, so this was not classified now,
but classified information. It's probably a little bit different, but
I always say you have to learn from every experience.
(06:43):
I think it was very unfair the way they attacked Michael.
He's a good person. The person that was on just
happens to be a slesbag. So maybe that's just coincidence.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
I don't know.
Speaker 11 (06:55):
Let me ask you when he was added to the thread.
You're the CIA direct Sure, why didn't you call out
that he.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
Was present on the signal thread?
Speaker 8 (07:06):
I don't know if you use signal messaging, am I do?
Speaker 11 (07:10):
I do, not for classified information, not for targeting remote. Well,
that's what your testimony is today. It absolutely is.
Speaker 8 (07:19):
Not, Senator, were you at the beginning No, When I
said that I was using it as permitted, it is permissible.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
I agree.
Speaker 11 (07:27):
That's your testimony. Yeah, I agree, that's your testament. You
asked me if I use it, and I said, not
for targeting, not for classified information, and I said I
don't either. I also know Jeff Goldberg. I don't use
it to communicate with him, but you thought it was
appropriate by the way. I think he's one of the
more outstanding journalists in America. But I'm shocked to find
(07:52):
him on a thread that he's reading in the parking
lot of a grocery store in Washington, d C. And
your testimony as the director of the CIA is that
it's totally appropriate.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
Is it appropriate? Now? That is not what I?
Speaker 1 (08:07):
Okay?
Speaker 2 (08:07):
Did I say it was? When did I use the
word appropriate? Well? Go ahead, please, I didn't that.
Speaker 11 (08:13):
Everybody in America clearly keeping senator here is what your
testimony is.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
No, I never said that. Just a normal day at.
Speaker 11 (08:20):
The CIA where we chat about this kind of stuff
over a signal. In fact, it's so normal that the
last administration left it here for us.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
That's your testimony today. That's final point. Miss I'm out
of Well are you going to give me? Is it appropriate?
Speaker 11 (08:36):
Did you know that the President's Middle East advisor was
in Moscow on this thread while you were as director
of the CIA, participating in this in this thread?
Speaker 2 (08:51):
Were you aware of that? Are you? Are you aware
of that today?
Speaker 8 (08:56):
I'm not aware of that.
Speaker 11 (08:57):
This swoppiness, this incompetence, it's this disrespect for our intelligence
agencies and the personnel who work for him is entirely unacceptable.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
It's an embarrassment. Senator, you need to do better. You
need to do better. Thank you, I'm being gabbled.
Speaker 1 (09:20):
The appropriate response for that was Tulca Garbert's open it's
under review. I'm not here to talk about it. They're
there to talk about the annual intelligence brief against major
Powers in major threats, in the threat assessment, the unclassified
version of the public version. What the Director of National
Intelligence said at the beginning of the hearing was the
(09:43):
appropriate and they should have dug in right there. This
is not a search for truth and particularly those jackals.
You saw that, and we can play so much more
the entire two hours eight every time we went to
why was it that we didn't go to Republicans because
they were asking smart questions about the overall thread assessment.
Every Democrat came right back to the thread. Why they
(10:06):
want to scout, they want to break. This is the
deep state rising up and coming after President Trump publicly
with the fangs bared. Do you think that it was
just random that this hearing was held today, that Goldberg
had the information from essentially eleven forty four am Eastern
(10:30):
Standard Time on Saturday, the fifteenth of March. On the
IDEs of March, nine days ago or ten days ago today,
and he just released it yesterday. What took so long
to release it? They had to have a legal review. No,
they knew. They had a previously scheduled intelligence briefing today
and this is where they were going to ambush. And
(10:52):
that's what this was. Ambush the senior intelligence officials of
the President Trump administration and Tulca Gabbert's UH was absolutely accurate.
It's under review by the National Security Council and at
the appropriate time, we will get back to you, Senator
full stop. Don't engage them. You don't need to talk
(11:13):
about anything. It's under review. They're looking for a scalp
and we're now hunkered down in the no scalp business.
Need to tighten it up and hunker down right now.
This is the deep state. That's a pincer move, and
we're spending the next two hours going through this. A
pincer move between the radical judiciary, the UH, the a
(11:37):
deep state. I'm gonna throw on a little of the
resistance moving on top of it, the Color Revolution. Natalie Winters,
you're at the White House, give me the give me
the mood today at the White House, UH, particularly after
the President was in was in full fine form. But
after this hearing today on Capitol Hill where the center is,
let me just add a that was a shot. Let
(11:59):
me give you the check wicker An. Remember wicker this
is the guy wants to use tactical nuclear weapons or
remember this beauty tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine. He said, Oh,
Armed Services is going to have a full investigation, and
it's going to be bipartisan. Jack Reid, who was on Intel,
who's sitting there chopping people up, is going to be
(12:19):
with Jack Reed. So that's where we are now. Natalie
Winners from the White House, your thoughts, ma'am?
Speaker 14 (12:25):
Sure, Well, two very disparate moods. Obviously, there's the legacy media,
which I think, to be honest, having just said in
the briefing room for not even more than ten minutes,
there was sort of, I think an almost gleeful joy
that they sort of have now a got a moment,
or at least the opening.
Speaker 4 (12:41):
Salvo of one with this Jeffrey Goldberg story.
Speaker 14 (12:44):
It's obviously everything that everyone is talking about, whether it's
in their conversations or even as I walked down all
the tents, every single outlet was hammering it NonStop, but
specifically through the paradigm that this somehow suggests that the
Trump administration is and competent, that they lack legitimacy, that
our allies won't trust us, which I think fits in
(13:05):
nicely with that color evolution framework. We can get into it.
After the break with the White House, sort of proactive
messaging and response has been because they've really put out
quite a lot in terms of information.
Speaker 4 (13:14):
How they're spinning it.
Speaker 1 (13:17):
Yeah, no, they're they're on fire right now. We've got
Natalie Winners at the White House. Jack Psobak's going to
join us by phone. Congresson, Ben Klein is going to
join us, he's on the House Intel. Then we're going
to pivot. We've got a lot in the judicial insurrection.
Julie Kelly joins us. Rass Mustin joins us with Mark
(13:38):
Mitchell because they've got some polling that's quite interesting where
the American people are coming down on these mass deportations,
and of course the one and only Mike Davis. They
also signed an election integrity executive order. Today we're going
to try to get the Secretary of State of the
Great State of Wyoming, who is driving election integrity in
(13:59):
his state. He's gonna be here. We're packed for the
next two hours. A judicial insurrection and the deep state
coming from President Trump and his administration. It's time to
hunker down. They're playing for keeps and so are we.
Bottom line, we're winning. But man, get to the ramparts.
(14:19):
It's fixed. Bannet Tuesday. Here in the in the war room,
Birch Gold right now, take your phone out text Bannon
nine eight nine eight. Get the complete ultimate guide to
investing in gold and precious metals in the era of Trump.
Find Out why it's a store of value. Find out
what's been a hedge for five thousand years. Find out
(14:40):
all about it and talk to Philip Patrick and the team.
Johnny Kahn takes us out with American Heart back in
a moment.
Speaker 2 (14:57):
In America.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
Here's your host, Stephen k Man with the House working
on the House, the Center working on the reconciliation. They
say it's gonna be done on the seventh. The budget
for next year, with all the tax cuts, everything quite complicated.
We're gonna be at wall to wall. But couple with this,
couple with the judicial insurrection, we're gonna have some turbulence.
(15:21):
Birch gold dot com slash Bannon the end of the
end of the Dollar Empire. Also talk to Philipatrion team
find out why gold is a hedge against times of turbulence.
It's only been like that for five thousand years of
man's recorded history, so go check it out today talk
to Philip Patrian team gold finished, I think over three
thousand again today market at least before the hearing wasn't
(15:43):
too bad, and check it all out. Natalie Winters, please
tee up this clip. We want the audience to understand
who Jeffrey Goldberg is, so you please tee this up
and then after you're finished up with like Denver to
play it and then you'll come back for commentary and observations.
Speaker 14 (15:57):
Ma'am well, I think there's probably a sense of dejas
vous that the audience may have had watching the cold
open to the show, right Senators grilling these individuals. It
kind of brings us back, I don't know, let's say,
to the first impeachment right where you sort of have
this fundamental divide, not necessarily over the results, but more
so about the process, right, whether it was President Trump's
(16:18):
phone call, and I think the best way to conceive
of someone like Jeffrey Goldberg, Like I said, and like
I think you're right on this is essentially the opening salvo,
the first maybe a stage, and what will later become
I think more information warfare against the Trump administration, particularly
on the international affairs front. But I think that Goldberg
should be really be viewed as sort of a Vindmin
(16:38):
esque figure in all of this, right, someone who really
takes an issue with I think the America first worldview,
evidenced by the fact that he has repeatedly been the
hit man, not just because he's a nicely hold up
at the railhead of so much of the resistance media,
right that is the Atlantic, but he's been behind some
of the really the top dollar sneers, not just against
(16:59):
President true during the last campaign, but even his first administration, right,
the suckers and losers, the hitler.
Speaker 4 (17:05):
Generals, all of that stuff, right.
Speaker 14 (17:07):
But really, if you get granular at the intersection of
sort of the military industrial complex, the world view that
buttress to the first Trump impeachment, right, he is the
spokesperson for that, and I guess the Iraq War. But
I digress on that. So I want to play this
clip he's talking on the Bulwark. Interesting choice of outlet
to sort of give your take on. But he's speaking
with Tim Miller, and I want to just have people
(17:28):
really pay attention to the body language when he's giving
this an interview. I don't know about you. I always
look at the camera because I'm telling the truth. He
refuses to make eye contact with the camera. He's talking,
particularly about what was contained in the tax messages that
he refused to share in the Atlantic, at least in
the initial piece. So Denver, if you want to roll
the clip, I think the audience should really pay attention
to the way that he comports himself.
Speaker 15 (17:50):
I think if the White House now the Secretary of
Defense and the White House Press Secretary have said you're lying,
said there are no war plans there, I've said, there's
no classified information. So the obvious question is, shouldn't you
now demonstrate shouldn't you publish the text?
Speaker 1 (18:07):
No, because they're wrong. They're wrong, But.
Speaker 2 (18:12):
How could you prove that you're wrong? Maybe?
Speaker 1 (18:13):
Could you?
Speaker 15 (18:13):
Should you provide them to the House and Senate special
committees on intelligence?
Speaker 2 (18:17):
Maybe I don't know.
Speaker 16 (18:20):
Wow, you want to become my lawyer.
Speaker 15 (18:23):
I'm just I'm throwing this out there.
Speaker 2 (18:24):
Jeff, I don't know.
Speaker 3 (18:25):
I looked.
Speaker 16 (18:26):
I mean, look, I feel like no, no, no, I
mean obviously, let me just put it this way. My
colleagues and I and the advice that and and the
people who are giving us advice on this have some
interesting conversations to have about this. But just because they're
irresponsible with material doesn't mean that I'm going to be
(18:48):
irresponsible with this material. And you know what, I could whatever.
I mean, you've you've had long history as I have
with dealing with them, and at moments like this, when
they're under pressure because they've been caught with their hand
in the cookie jar or whatever, you know, they will
just literally say anything to get out of the moment,
(19:10):
to get out of the jam.
Speaker 1 (19:11):
And that's okay, I get it.
Speaker 16 (19:14):
I get the defensive reaction. And but here's the thing.
My obligation, I feel is too to the idea that
we take national security information seriously. And maybe there's and
maybe maybe in the coming days, I'll I'll be able
to let you know that, Okay, I have a I
have a plan to uh to have this material vetted publicly,
(19:39):
but I'm not going to say that now because there's
a lot of conversations that have to happen about that.
All of my inclinations, as you can tell, including withholding
the name of the CIA undercover officer, all of my
inclinations are I have a pretty I have a pretty
clear standards in my own behavior of what I consider
(20:03):
information that I consider to be in the public interest,
even if it's technically classified or not. Information that's in
the public interest, and information it's not in public interest.
And I'm just going to like, I'm sticking to my
principles here, I understood it.
Speaker 1 (20:18):
Natalie One, does please describe this individual's principles. Please describe
how he's handled classified information. Please describe what he says
is the sacred information he's dealt with in the past,
ma'am please.
Speaker 14 (20:31):
Well, that's sort of the general air of hypocrisy, right,
like The Atlantic has not published or works to, I think,
with classified with leaked documents, whether under the Biden energy
under the first Trump administration. I'm sorry, that's the only
information that they deal with, and I think that is
extremely cagey and rather weird response to a not extremely
hostile question. I think that's quite a defensive answer saying, well,
(20:54):
do you want to be my lawyer all Tim Miller.
I'll take Tim Miller's side in this. Did is ask, Hey,
well then why don't you show the text?
Speaker 3 (21:00):
Right?
Speaker 14 (21:00):
And I think that frankly, that's what we should be
calling for.
Speaker 4 (21:03):
I think he should be putting them out.
Speaker 14 (21:05):
But I think against you, it's really important to I
think view this in sort of the framing, and it
certainly I think to some extent what the White House
has been doing of the first impeachment, where the distinction,
the difference is between the process versus the results. Right,
And obviously the Washington consensus that Jeffrey Goldberg represents melted.
Speaker 4 (21:24):
Down right over his demeanor and.
Speaker 14 (21:26):
Conduct on that now infamous phone call back with Zelenski, right,
and now they don't like the conduct, the demeanor, which
sure unforced error in.
Speaker 4 (21:35):
This group chat.
Speaker 14 (21:36):
But I think the White House is messaging today in
addition to downplaying and discounting straight up saying that Jeffrey
Goldberg is lying, Caroline Lovett tweeting out earlier saying quote,
no war plans were discussed and that no classified material
was sent to the thread. But they put out a
long form sort of document circulated to the entire White
House press pool saying the heading of it was quote
(21:56):
Trump Administration's actions made houthy terrorists pay, And they walk
through a bunch of figures, numbers showing how under Joe
Biden the attacks in that area and that region skyrocketed.
Funny how I don't think any of these journalists around
me had anything to say about that when that was happening.
They noted how Biden had removed them from the foreign
list of foreign terrorist organizations, how President Trump reinstated them.
(22:19):
So what they're really doing is focusing on it. And
you even hear I think in President Trump's response to this, right,
the strike one is planned, there was no issue in
the carrying out the actual implementation of it. And if
you look at the results of these strikes, overwhelmingly they
were successful again through their paradigm of success. But I
think that's the important distinction kind of to have and
(22:42):
the really just I think unnuanced meltdown of my dare
I say, colleagues around here acting like this is just
you know, the original sin. This is a cardinal sin
of the Trump administration using a messaging app the classified
documents Clinton servers aside. It's quite hypocritical because last time
I checked all these people I've ever dealt with is
leaking intentionally weaponizing information classified at that too.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
Hangar for one second, I have Jack Pasovak on the phone. Jack,
you just heard the clip. You heard Natalie's analysis of
the White House going on offense. Your thoughts, sir, Okay,
I don't have Jack. Okay, uh do we have Jack up?
(23:30):
But okay, fine, Natalie. Once again, I want to get
the I want to get what the White House put out.
I want to put it. I want to get it up,
and I want to get it to Grace and Nemo
and put it out everywhere. Because the White House is
going on offense right now taking a very hard stand
against this. I still believe that the appropriate response right
now is still Tulci Gabbert's review it. Internally. You've already
(23:54):
had Wicker over at the Senate Armed Services say he's
going to investigate, he's going to make it, he's going
to make it bipartisan, include Jack Read and these radical Democrats.
And so I think it's a time to hunker down
for the White House and to make sure you have
all the information, review it. Take your time, don't be
forced by these jackals and hyenas because they're going to
try to quick march you every second of every day.
(24:16):
Your thoughts, ma'am, Yeah, I think.
Speaker 14 (24:19):
A lot of the calm strategy too, is to sort
of attack and impugne Jeffrey Goldberg right as this obviously
far left Democrat activists registered democrat.
Speaker 4 (24:27):
I think the wife's a Democrat donor.
Speaker 14 (24:29):
But I think you're saying, and I agree, that it's
already sort of conceding right, too much ground, too much
territory to them, the proper answers that it's under review.
What Ratcliffe did today I don't think was particularly helpful.
But I want to read the data points too from
this fact sheet that the White House put out, just
so you can sort of better understand their messaging. They
(24:49):
specifically called out how that houthy terrorist had attacked US
warships one hundred and seventy four times and commercial vessels
one hundred and forty five times since twenty twenty three,
Like I said, foreign terrorist designation, and in bold they
really underscored that quote. This is a coordinated effort to distract,
to distract from the successful actions taken by President Trump
(25:10):
and his and his administration to make America's enemies pay
and keep Americans safe.
Speaker 1 (25:18):
Natalie, your social media? Where do people get you? I
know you're going to be on top of this NonStop
Where do people go as the White House now hunkers
down in this full on assault by the deep State?
Speaker 4 (25:32):
Yes, Natalie g you enters on all social media platforms.
Thank you for having me.
Speaker 1 (25:37):
Thanks, great job. Okay, we're going to take a short
commercial break. We've got Congressman Ben Klein. He is actually
on the House Intelligence Committee. I'm going to ask you
about his thoughts today about this hearing. Also, we're going
to ask Congressman Klient about Wicker. Remember Wicker want to
(25:57):
drop talking about dropping tactical nucletar weapons. Remember that we
had the big debate back in about a year and
a half ago when Mitchell O'Connell got taken out as
as the leader, right, Remember that he basically stepped down
from that and said he was going to retire from Congress,
which now he's he's in the process of doing that.
Wicker was in that debate. He is a definitely he's
(26:19):
beyond a New York guy's a warmonger. Right, So short
commercial break home title lock, We need you at the
ramparts is even going to get more intense in the
next couple of days. The deep state, and he is
coming from President Trump. The how do I say this,
the judicial insurrection is coming from President Trump. All of it.
Home title Lock one million dollar triple lock protection number one,
(26:43):
they have twenty four to seven cover your title. Two
if anything happens to me on the night, they let
you know. Three they have a one million dollar restoration program,
including legal if anything happens home title lock dot com,
Steve twenty five, go today.
Speaker 16 (27:00):
Use your host, Stephen k Ba.
Speaker 1 (27:04):
Look, look about your title. This is why we're going
to need you at the ramparts. Whether you think this
is a deep state syop or it's just the deep
state at work, the way they do things, this is
a thing now, there's always some flash pulling out. How
the media is running with this, what the American people
(27:26):
think and want to see? And I keep telling you
these neoliberal neo cons in the Senate will get wobbly
on you. It's only fifty three forty seven. You get
a couple of votes, you get Collins, she was sick today.
She was sick today. Jack Psobik, your thoughts on this.
(27:47):
This was a setup. This committee hearing been planned for weeks.
This is why the Atlantic magazine waited nine days. In
that way, they were not getting this vetted by the
lawyers for nine days. They waited until the eve of
this to drop it and then had to set up
an ambush for the senior high command of the intelligence
(28:08):
apparatus for President Trump.
Speaker 17 (28:10):
Your thoughts, sir, well, Steve, this is absolutely an ambush
that was certainly planned in coordination with the Democrats on
the Senates, like Committee on Intel. You're talking to your
Mark Werners, your Widens, all the rest of them.
Speaker 18 (28:24):
There.
Speaker 17 (28:24):
There's no question in my mind that that's exactly what
Chef Greenberg Goldberg was up to. And the question that
I have is who on the Democrats' staff knew about this?
How many of their colleagues let that Look, look, you
go up to that hearing and you think that, oh,
we're just going to operate in good faith and they
(28:44):
just want to get to the bottom of this. No,
they're looking to operationalize anything they can with a nullification
project like they did in twenty seventeen. They're already talking
ab Wickers up there. He's talking about running concurrent investigations.
They want to get another rush so they can what impeachments,
and then they're going to talk about running next year,
(29:06):
and they're going to turn that into we're going to
impeach whoever they can up to and including President of
the United States. They're going to say this is they're
trying to run another Watergate play here. It's so patently
obvious what they're doing. And that's exactly why I think
the entire thing stinks. And the fact that it's Jeffrey Goldberg,
the guy who's been involved with Russia Gate, the guy
(29:26):
who was involved with the Iraq War, the guy who
was involved with the Suckers and Losers hopes is involved
with this. It stinks to high Heaven.
Speaker 1 (29:36):
To know how programmed this was. You see asoff we
played his but he came at the very end. He
had had a couple he had had a couple of
days to think too. That also, I've done do that
top of his head. That was like a lawyer. That
was like a lawyer in a deposition, right. He knew
exactly where he was going to take it. That that
came from, that came from practice. Our belief is that
(29:56):
the appropriate response today, Taulca Gabbertt was, hey, it's under review.
Our belief now is the same. You've got two committees
Armed Services, Senate Armed Services, where Wickers said he's going
to open an investigation, and you've got Senate Intelligence we
said they're going to continue this investigation. The White House
better hunker down hard on this, and I think fight
fire with fire. This is why with Johnson, Hey, it's
(30:17):
not a better time. I said this yesterday when the
story first broke. Now's the time that you have a
couple of committee meetings and let's get some of these
radical judges up there and let's see the radical judges
the coordination on the judicial insurrection, which is so obvious.
Jack Pisobik, look you need this.
Speaker 17 (30:34):
And of course, by the way, the tener Crow Gabbert
understands what's going on. She was a Democrat, she was
on their side of the football. She's seen them do
this a million times, and so the minute that she
saw this play coming up, that's how she said, you
know what, hardline, I'm not going to give you any
rope with you know, with which to hang me. So
going to I'm a lockdown. We're not talking about this,
(30:57):
This is going to the lawyer's lawyers are going to
deal with it. We're not going to just here period,
full stop. Secondly, what you need to start doing is
flipping back on this, going and looking at the Democrats,
looking at the Democrats, Staffer, sure, find go look at
the judge, and I see Johnson says you, well, okay,
he wants to, you know, look at non non impeachment possibilities.
(31:19):
Whether it's the you know, we gave that quote out
earlier today, so whatever, whether it's you know, whether it's budgetary,
or whether it's get getting rid of a couple of
two districts. Because by the way, those those districts are
not constitutional. It actually says the Supreme Court may create
such districts. And this is in fact a check on
the judiciary, one which the legislative never really uses. But
(31:42):
certainly anyone at the art I'll defer the Article three
project on that. But it's absolutely constitutional, something that we
never even really discussed as the power of the federal government.
But look, the momentum here is that the administration, they
seem like they're on the defensive. They're trying to make
the Greenland story come up again, which I know I
have this planned visit. Jadie Van says that he's going
(32:02):
out there. By the way, in the midst of all
of this, we have the Ukraine Russian negotiations are going
on right now in viadd you've got the expert team
sitting down. You just announced essentially a new grain deal
that's come out. The ceasefire is taken hold. Of course,
both sides flaming each other for taking it off. But again,
there's so many things that are happening around the world
(32:26):
with the Trump agenda. That's why it's stuff like this
that starts coming up the works. And now all of
a sudden, the flood the zone strategy is getting broken
up because of this type of thing, and it only
is going to get amplified by the media.
Speaker 1 (32:44):
Don't stop all offense, Jack, social media. Where do people
get you? You're putting up stuff twenty four to seven
on this story, sir, Where do people go?
Speaker 17 (32:51):
We're at Jack PSOBC, up on x on Telegram, up
on truth and by the way, we had a huge
deep dive with Richard Barris on all the holsters, by
the way that are going belly up in the wake
of the twenty twenty four election. That nobody Mama five
thirty eight and Telter, nobody wants to talk about that.
How come there's no narrative about these quote unquote gold standard,
(33:13):
gold standard polsters going belly up after twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1 (33:17):
Belly Thank you, brother, appreciate you. Look forward to having
you on tomorrow. Follow u from the story, We're going
to have a rass mussin Smart Mitchell on Blowway numbers
for President Trump talked about on CNN this morning. We'll
have him on also about the mass deportations. Want to
go now to Virginia six Kleenson, Ben Kleink Comson client,
(33:38):
correct me if I'm wrong. You're in house intel. Give
us your assessment of what you've seen and heard so
far on this on this story about the signal incident, Sir, well.
Speaker 12 (33:48):
We've heard a lot of noise, a lot of the
media really spinning this up. The President has said he
has confidence in Mike Waltz, keeping him on board, and
you know, we have questions.
Speaker 2 (34:02):
We're going to ask them tomorrow.
Speaker 12 (34:04):
Follow up on the Senate's questioning today, we're going to
be an open session, we're going to be in a
closed session, and we're going to get all the answers,
and we're going to continue on. And the important thing
to remember is this administration is fighting terrorism where they live,
fighting it in m and fighting the Houthis who are
attacking commercial vessels, who are attacking Israel, and the Americans
(34:28):
have responded, responded strongly and successfully, a very efficient operation,
and we need to continue the focus on the terrorists.
Speaker 1 (34:39):
So, congcon how you going to today? We cover this
gavel to gavel for the unclassified part. The assessment that
the intelligence community has done is so important and talks
about major threats. We barely got any of that. The
Democrats took over the hearing. The Republicans ask great questions,
but we're overwhelmed by the Democrats and we played the
cold open. It led to a shindo of screaming at
(35:02):
certain witnesses. How given the House, the House Democrats are
twice as crazy as the ones in the Senate, how
are you guys going to keep control of that? Tomorrow?
Speaker 12 (35:12):
Sir, We're going to make sure that we stay focused
on what this hearing was originally noticed for, which was
global threat environment. We're going to talk about China, We're
going to talk about Russia. We're going to talk about Iran,
We're going to talk about North Korea. We're going to
talk about the border and the cartels. We're going to
talk about the drug trade. It's a very, very focused agenda.
(35:36):
This is a hearing that we have on a regular basis,
and the fact that this reporter waited and held on
to this information until the day before is of concern
as well. It shows an attempt to play politics with
the intelligence of the United States, with the intelligence community,
and with the national.
Speaker 2 (35:57):
Security of the United States.
Speaker 12 (35:58):
And so we are going to make sure that we
stay focused on the issues that are important to this nation,
and that is fighting terrorism and making sure we protect
this country against foreign and foreign threats and those international
forces like cartels, like the drug trade that are threatening
(36:20):
us as well.
Speaker 1 (36:22):
Okay, so we started the story of the show today.
We're not conspiracy theorists, we're the opposite. But we said
there's no coincidence. So let's go back. This has been
on the books for a while. The incident happened on
the fifteenth. He waits until the afternoon of the day
before the Senate and two days before the House to
release it. Does not look does it not look like
a coordinated deep state, democratic intel community ambush, sir.
Speaker 12 (36:49):
That does give me concern and I'm sure that there
will be questions about that.
Speaker 2 (36:55):
And if this was it did rise to the.
Speaker 12 (37:01):
Importance that mister Goldberg claimed that it did, then he
would have released it immediately and spoken to the concerns
that he had about it.
Speaker 2 (37:13):
Instead, he waited until the day.
Speaker 12 (37:14):
Before a hearing to reveal it and distract from really
the agenda that we have tomorrow, which is the national security,
the foreign.
Speaker 2 (37:26):
Threats, the entities like.
Speaker 12 (37:30):
Those who are engaged in fentanyl trade, which kill over
fifty thousand people in the United States last year alone.
Speaker 1 (37:40):
It coustuantly. You just got back from a week in
the district. Virginia six is kind of one of the
heartlands of this country. I mean, these are hard work
of folks. Where are their heads at? And what President
Trump's first sixty days, sir?
Speaker 12 (37:55):
They could not be more excited about this administration accomplished
in just under two months, making sure that we move
forward on reconciliation, on extending the Trump tax cuts, making
sure we have fair trade laws visa the other countries
around the world, engaging in trade negotiations with other countries,
(38:19):
making sure we those make the way that we're treated
by other.
Speaker 2 (38:23):
Countries more fair.
Speaker 12 (38:25):
Great job there securing the border, fantastic job, successful percent
reduction in appearances at the border. And so I think
my district is overwhelmingly in favor of what Trump's accomplished
in just a short time, delivering on his promises. And
we look forward to more successes down the line.
Speaker 1 (38:49):
What do they think of the philosophy of flood the zone,
all gas, no break. What's their perception, your constituents perception
of that his process?
Speaker 12 (38:57):
Well, I know my colleagues in the House are trying
to play catch up a lot with the administration, and
this administration is smart to keep its foot on the gas.
Speaker 2 (39:07):
To push through.
Speaker 12 (39:08):
And now to my constituents, I think most of them
are excited. They for whatever their concerns were, you know,
they're excited about the steps that this administration has taken
returning control of education to states and localities and parents.
That's something Glenn Youngkin ran on and won on in
his run for governor because it was up in Loudon
County where those school boards were ignoring parents, arresting parents
(39:32):
for daring to speak out against the indoctrination that was
going on of their kids. And so it's grounds zero
for these types of.
Speaker 2 (39:43):
Concerns that are being addressed by this administration. And to
take the woke, to.
Speaker 12 (39:48):
Take the dei out of the federal government is a great,
a great accomplishment for them.
Speaker 1 (39:58):
Kyrsmin Klein. How do people follow you?
Speaker 2 (40:00):
They go Rep.
Speaker 12 (40:02):
Ben Klein is the Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and encourage people
to keep.
Speaker 2 (40:08):
In touch and visit.
Speaker 1 (40:11):
We're going to cover gavel to gavel to gavel tomorrow.
We'll hope to see you there. Thank you, Congressman. I
appreciate you. Virginia six, God's country man. Conresson Ben Klein.
What he say his constituents, they love the uh all gas,
no break, go on offense, White House, go on offense.
(40:34):
This is the deep State. It's the twin pillars. Now
they've got they've got the they've got the resistance, the
cover revolution. But they got two main pincer moves, a
radical judicial insurrection at the federal level and now the
deep State coming for the intel part of President Trump's administration.
Short commercial break, Julie Kelly, Mike Davis.
Speaker 9 (40:55):
Next, lastly, Sir, an executive order for your attention on
the very important subject of election integrity. We believe that
this executive order is the farthest reaching executive action taken
in the history of the Republic to secure our elections.
Among numerous other aspects of this executive order, this is
(41:18):
going to cut down on illegal immigrants on the voter
rolls ensure that the Department of Homeland Security and the
data that they have available is being fully weaponized to
ensure that illegal immigrants aren't voting. This will include a
citizenship question on the federal voting form for the first time.
This executive order instructs the EAC to cut federal funding
(41:39):
to states that don't take reasonable steps.
Speaker 2 (41:42):
To secure their election.
Speaker 9 (41:43):
This calls on the Department of Justice to vigorously prosecute
election crimes, particularly in states that we don't believe are
in compliance with federal law around election integrity. I could
go on and on for a while, sir, but compliance
with national Election Day rules down and investigating and prosecuting
foreign interference in our elections. Revoking President Biden's Executive Order
(42:07):
fourteen oh one to nine, which essentially weaponized government to
corrupt and pollute our election process.
Speaker 2 (42:13):
There's a lot in.
Speaker 9 (42:14):
Here, but we believe that these are very important steps
that we need to be taking as an administration in
your direction to ensure that our elections are as secure
as they possibly can be.
Speaker 10 (42:25):
Okay, you will understand that this.
Speaker 2 (42:29):
Election frouic.
Speaker 10 (42:31):
You've earned the term we'll ended. Hopefully this will go
a long way toward ending it. There are other steps
that we will be taken as an ext in the
coming weeks, and we think we'll be able to end
up getting fair elections. Perhaps some people think I shouldn't
be complaining because we've won in a landslide, but.
Speaker 1 (42:55):
We've got to straighten out our election.
Speaker 10 (42:56):
This country is so sick because of the election to
fake actions and the band elections, and we're going to
straighten it out one way or the other. And it's
an honor to sign this one. To sign all of them,
but to sign this one is a great honor.
Speaker 1 (43:24):
It's a great honor, and we still got to investigate
twenty twenty. Hurry said, right there, the most important thing
what happened to the country because they stole the election
and President Trump's not doing I just said, he just
won in a landslide popular vote. All the battleground states
three hundred and twelve, three and sixteen electoral votes won everywhere,
every every place, every demographic except for college educated women.
(43:49):
That's for another day, but he knows that he's got
to sign this. We got to get back to and
we've got to make sure the election platforms that we
have election territy. Mike Lindell. This is how I'm telling you, folks,
take your number two personal right now. These state attorney generals,
they're going to be the assassins. Mike Lindell was going
to be there today. Mike Lindell's work is tail off
(44:11):
for this. But Mike Lindell's at the company. Mikedale's folks
in the company. Why, because they're trying to put Mike
Lindell to business. Mike, How historic a day was this?
You guys have fought the entire group stern, everybody fought
for this day. Has his executive order signed? What's in it?
Why is it important?
Speaker 16 (44:29):
Sir?
Speaker 18 (44:31):
Just historically it really is. This is amazing. It's one
of my happiest days. I like when the presidents at
other steps we will be taking you all know. One
of the things I want to put in there, melt
down the voting machines and tournament at prison bars. But
that's for another day. One of the biggest things. You
start from the top here. I'm going to kind of
frame this mandatory voting ID with proof of citizenship.
Speaker 2 (44:53):
What a concept.
Speaker 18 (44:54):
Right, you have to have a government, you have to
have mandatory This isn't just okay maybe in some states,
maybe not in others. Because what he also put in
there was all federal funding is going to be tied.
Speaker 2 (45:04):
To these elections this executive order.
Speaker 18 (45:08):
So you want to do something like that lady from
Maine when she says I really like men and women's sports,
No you don't. We're going to defund you. So this
is great that he put that in there. No more
ballots counting after election day. Okay, that's it. None of
this nonsense that went on in the twenty twenty four
election where it took two weeks for say, these ballots
(45:28):
to be counted, and it's funny how they all went
to the Democrats. All these down tickets stay stold in
the twenty twenty four election. I'm talking to everybody. So
we got rid of that. No more counting ballots after
election day. Now paper ballots. You gotta paper ballots, but
with no QR codes and no bar codes, it's kind
of like this.
Speaker 2 (45:48):
One's a little harder to understand.
Speaker 18 (45:50):
And I haven't dove into it all on this one,
but basically saying we're not going to have machines running
with these papers and with these know you're going to
know nobody knows what was behind these QR codes. This
came up in a lot of states during our fight.
Everybody nobody knew what that. You know, what was behind
that and what you're even doing. And so that's in there.
(46:12):
And now this is another one that needs a little
more saying binds EO one four zero nine zero one
nine was officially revoked.
Speaker 2 (46:21):
That was another one. I don't know. I don't know
a lot about it.
Speaker 18 (46:24):
But this goes on and on, Steve, this is probably
seventy percent of everything my teams have been fighting for
out there, and everyone's going, well, what you know, and
you heard them say other steps will be taken, and
so this is to me, this is just a giant
(46:45):
step forward to finally get the most go from worse
to first. Right now, we have the worst election platforms
in the history of the world, in the history of
the world. No one has worse, but we're going to
go from worse to first. Now this brings it up there,
and I'm gonna tell you everybody, my excitement is all
my teams that work across all fifty states, the Cosmo
(47:06):
America are Election Bureau, all these all of us out
there that have worked tireshly for four years and including
the precinct strategist Steve Stearns and everyone. Now I believe Steve,
we're gonna be able to go into these counties and
states and say, hey, point to what the President just
did today and say, hey, he wants to have secure elections.
(47:26):
What do you mean we can't do this, this or this,
And we're gonna call them out. We're gonna call every
one of these unit party blockers out. And I'm really
looking forward to that because.
Speaker 1 (47:38):
A great, a great day. We signed the Executive Order
on Election Integrity. Sell me a pillow, You got a minute?
Speaker 18 (47:43):
Okay, guys, this is I told you, YESI we had
orders in and they canceled.
Speaker 2 (47:49):
Just today.
Speaker 18 (47:50):
We're celebrating by giving the war room posse what they
would have had to pay at the box store queen
size of our sheets for Kale sheets twenty nine ninety
eight Kings thirty four ninety eight promo code Warroom. You guys,
go to the website, scroll down, click on Steve. There
you see the crosses made in the USA. That the
cross I wear, say thirty percent on that. There's the
(48:13):
nine ninety eight pillows. That all the commemorative pillows. The
war Room specials there limit.
Speaker 2 (48:18):
Of fifteen the my Pillow two point zero call.
Speaker 18 (48:21):
The operators get the phones ring limited fifteen the my
Pillow two point zero call. The operators get the phones
ringing us A data Celebrate eight hundred and eighty seven
to three one zero six y two pre shipping options
available for the war Room polse.
Speaker 2 (48:36):
You guys got make those calls.
Speaker 18 (48:38):
Now. I'm gonna be downstairs celebrating. Maybe I'll be on
the phone with you soon.
Speaker 1 (48:43):
Take a call. We're gonna take a short commercial break.
Brass Muscling with Polling, Why Owning with Election Integrity, and
Julie Kelly and Mike Davis on the Judicial Insurrection. Next
in the War Room,
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!