Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Where we are going to be sending them weapons and
they're going to be paying for them. The United States
will not be having any payment made. We are not
buying it, but we will manufacture it and they're going
to be paying for it. Our last meeting of a
month ago is very successful and that they agreed to
five percent, which is more than a trillion dollars a year.
(00:21):
So they have a lot of money and they have
These are wealthy nations. They have a lot of money
and they want to do it. They feel very strongly
about it, and we feel strongly about it too. We're
in for a lot of money and we just we
don't want to do anymore.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
We can't.
Speaker 1 (00:35):
But we make the best and we're going to be
sending the best to NATO and in some cases too,
maybe at Mark suggestion, if we go to Germany where
they're going to send early on missiles and they'll be
replaced and NATO is going to take care of it's
going to be coordinated by NATO, and they're going to
work very much with Matt Whitaker, who's right here, is
(00:56):
a great ambassador, and Matt's going to be coordinator. You
better do a good job that I will, but Matt's
going to coordinate. He's a very talented guy. He's going
to coordinate everything. So in a nutshell, we're going to
make top of the line weapons and they'll be sent
to NATO. NATO makes use to have certain of them
sent to other countries where we can get a little
(01:16):
additional speed, where the country will release something and it'll
be mostly in the form of a replacement. And i'd
like to have Mark and again just a highly respected,
pretty young guy, pretty young guy for having had the
career that he's had because he had it. He had
an amazing career before going to NATO. So we spent
(01:38):
a lot of time together over the last couple of months.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
This is really you all, or certainly that you have
taken the decision, and a decision is that your wants
to brain diques to have to maintain to be able
to defend theself against Russia. But you do you be
used to pay for it, which is still pological. And
this is building all the tremendous successes the NATO SUNNT
(02:04):
the five percent, but also the decision to keep Ukraine
strong and the decision to increase our defense indushoal production.
So based on debt. That was your stepping up. This
is again your being stepping up. So I mean in
contact with many countries. I can tell you at this
moment Germany messively, but also Finland and Denmark and Sweden
(02:26):
and Norvating Kingdom, Benemens, Canada. They all want to be
part of this. And this is only the first rate.
There will be more.
Speaker 1 (02:33):
You want to make one statementum again, I said it before.
Speaker 4 (02:36):
This is not Trump's war.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
We're here to try and get it finished and settled whatever,
because nobody went with us, and this is a loser
from every standpoint from Davis, this was Biden, and this
was other people, and it's very sad. It's very sad situation.
Speaker 2 (02:56):
This gentleman is Dode a great job.
Speaker 1 (02:57):
He'd I think he's going to get it mad and
everybody else's working on it. I think you'll get this
thing over with hope into the whole world. That's what
happened in nineteen twenty nine. I said, so you're going
to vote for the other side, Well, Charl'll do what's
really appropriate. You know, the losers, but you have that
really they're grand standards. You know, you have grand standards,
(03:19):
and you have in every business, and the Democrat has
far fewer their grandstanders. But you know the one thing
about them, they have bad policy. They're evil people in
many ways, but they stick together. You don't have it
where you don't have I don't want to use too
many names, but you don't have a Mitt Romney in
the midst who makes you suffer. You don't have some
of the people that I mentioned who make it so hard.
(03:43):
They make it so hard. And the alternative is one
of two things. You can either get all these things
and make the economy strong, or you're going to literally
have perhaps a depression where you people so rich, so beautiful,
so nice to look at, will be totally busted. And
let's see how long your wife stays with you. You're beautiful,
(04:06):
stay with you for about three weeks, and it's just say, darling,
I can't take it anymore. I can't take it anymore, Darling.
Speaker 5 (04:12):
I'm leaving you to escalates further. How far are you
willing to go?
Speaker 4 (04:17):
In response?
Speaker 2 (04:19):
In what?
Speaker 6 (04:19):
In what?
Speaker 7 (04:20):
How far are you willing to go? If Putin were
to escalate? Send more bonds in coming down to ask.
Speaker 4 (04:24):
Me a question like that, how far?
Speaker 1 (04:26):
I don't know I want to get the war settled
and not Americans that are dying in it. And you know,
I have a problem and JD has a problem. It's
a stance that he's at for a long time. They're
not Americans dying, but there are a lot of people
dying and on something that should be able to be settled.
And we all agree with that, this group of people
that you know, we want to defend our country, but
(04:48):
you know, ultimately having a strong Europe is a very
good thing.
Speaker 7 (04:53):
It's a very good thing.
Speaker 2 (04:54):
So I'm okay with.
Speaker 1 (04:55):
As president, I've ended the radical left war on faith
and we're once again detecting religious raatim instead of destroying it.
And God is once again welcome back into our public square.
Speaker 4 (05:07):
Very important.
Speaker 6 (05:14):
Here's all of the consternation out there, and I think
he's going to want to set things right as well.
So I believe that there will probably be more coming
on this, and I believe anything that they are able
to release that doesn't you know, damage any witnesses or
anyone under age or anything like that, I believe they'll
probably try to get out sooner rather than later. We
just they hear it and they understand it, so hopefully
(05:36):
we see that happen soon in the later and that
I guess that would be my advice. But to everybody
out there who's all worked up about it, there's no
great plot to keep this information away then I'm aware of.
I do just believe that maybe it's been slow roll
for reasons that hopefully we understand down the line, and
I think we're probably going to get more transparency on it.
Speaker 5 (05:57):
Ferries.
Speaker 1 (06:00):
This is the.
Speaker 8 (06:01):
Primal scream of a dying regime.
Speaker 7 (06:04):
Pray for our enemies, because we're going to medieval on
these people.
Speaker 2 (06:09):
You've not got a free shot.
Speaker 4 (06:11):
All these networks lying about the people.
Speaker 7 (06:14):
The people have had a belly full of it.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
I know you don't like hearing that.
Speaker 7 (06:17):
I know you tried to do everything in the world
to stop that, but you're not going to stop it.
Speaker 4 (06:20):
It's going to happen.
Speaker 5 (06:21):
And where do people like that go to share the
big line? Mega media?
Speaker 1 (06:26):
I wish in my soul, I wish that any of
these people had a conscience.
Speaker 7 (06:31):
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose?
Speaker 1 (06:35):
If that answer is to save my country, this country
will be saved.
Speaker 2 (06:41):
War Room, use your host.
Speaker 4 (06:43):
Stephen kVA.
Speaker 7 (06:50):
Monday fourteen July The River Lord twenty twenty five. That
was Laurd Trump with the great Benny Johnson there talking
about the Epstein files. But I want to go I
got more. Ben's here. I think currently our best person
that understands the apparatus that controls us Mike. I want
(07:10):
to start first with this morning in the in the
Oval Office. I mean, this is a meeting that a
couple of years ago, or when I say that, not
Jordan bides then because he cawtel to him and glazed them.
But during Trump's first term, when we fought them every
day about even getting to the two percent which they
had committed to. In twenty fourteen, when the EU, in
(07:31):
the United States State Department and NATO combined to have
a color revolution and overthrow at democratically elected a government
in Ukraine, a government by the way, that was very
close to putin, Hey putin, maybe even put his in.
The KGB may have put their thumb on the scale
in the election. But today to see that we're going
(07:53):
up the escalatory ladder. That President Trump was pretty adamant,
it's not his war, It's not Trump's war. These guys
are paying for it.
Speaker 5 (08:01):
Right.
Speaker 7 (08:01):
We put in three hundred and fifty billion dollars. He's
kind of saying that's it, although there was I think
it was Margaret Brennan over CBS did report the other
day there's talking the administration of getting back and giving
financial aid in the beings of dollars on a monthly basis.
I mean, what's your assessment between our intelligence services, particularly
caaa's performance in the Twelve Day War, which we still
(08:24):
don't have a readoubt on why there was such a
sense of urgency and now this massive major escalation in
the Ukraine War, Sir.
Speaker 9 (08:35):
I think the main issue in the Ukraine War is
that while Trump was elected president here in the US,
you have the out of power shadow side of the
US government who is i think, engaged in shadow diplomacy
with the government in Ukraine. And they're turning to governments
in Europe on the Transatlantic side of it to try
(08:56):
to wait Trump out and not strike any deal that
might involved concession of land to Russia. And so I
think that they're hoping that basically if Democrats can win
the House in twenty twenty six, and that they've sort
of resigned themselves I think in a certain respect to
the indomitable Trump just existing here for the next couple
(09:18):
of years. But if they can hamstring him in Congress,
and if they can condition various things on his agenda
on providing financially to Ukraine, they can wait out the
clock as they try other levers to continue putting pressure
on Russia. So Trump sort of stuck, I think, between
(09:38):
the rock and a hard place, and.
Speaker 7 (09:41):
Stuck because you've got the biggest cheerleaders for this. They
are in the Senates, Tom Cotton, Lindsey Graham. I mean,
they're all in the rest of the Senate. You've got
the NDAA now being negotiated totally in secret, behind closed doors.
Josh Hawley and other Senates tells they have no worth
the idea. What's going on on the Defense art Reization
bill in the House, the America First really movement and people,
(10:05):
you know, the mtgs of people really are non interventionists
are probably a couple of dozen handfuls. And the reason
is is that as soon as Trump's not around to
drop the hammer on them, they're going to go back
to just being a neoliberal. Neoconservatives. It's pretty obvious about that.
The neoconservative and one of the reasons is the defense
industry spread so much massive money around of the tradion
(10:30):
dollars they get Mike Benz, that's exactly right.
Speaker 9 (10:33):
And even within the financial aid space, the DoD has
played in increasingly larger and larger percentage of the development
pie that is starting really in the George bush eradd
began to start to really dominate much of the aid
(10:53):
aid relief programs. Much of this is because of the
sort of dual use sure of aid to begin with,
when we distribute aid to the pension workers, or to
the agriculture workers, or to the public healthcare workers in Ukraine,
we are trying to essentially curry favor with them to
continue a US military mission. And so you know, my
(11:17):
concern is you're shutting down USAID, but you're giving DoD
the biggest budget it's ever had in its history. And
given that DoD plays an active role in foreign aid,
I could very easily see the total dollar number of
AID remaining the same and simply moving it through the Pentagon,
which is not not a whole lot more transparent than USAID.
(11:38):
When you look at the books, they've never passed an audit.
By some accounts, they've lost between five hundred billion and
thirty five trillion dollars of unaccounted for funds.
Speaker 7 (11:50):
Now and essentially say that is that when MOE is
at West Point to one of the areas, then because
women weren't supposed to be in combat, but in that
war in Iraq, there's combat all around you. I think
it was medical services unless she went. Logistics and medical
services were two that were there, but the third was
civic affairs. Right, Civic affairs is a big Civic affairs
(12:11):
is a big branch of the army trust huge.
Speaker 4 (12:16):
Talk to me about civic.
Speaker 8 (12:19):
Tell me.
Speaker 7 (12:20):
Most I'm thinking civic affairs and what does that go ahead?
Speaker 9 (12:25):
So, civic affairs is basically how the military launders the
ability to manipulate civilian politics. Uh, you know, they'll call
it civil affairs. Within that you have like civil political
or political military. And this is because we have four
quadrants in our sort of doctrinal approach.
Speaker 4 (12:44):
To war, four ways to win or lose a war.
Speaker 9 (12:46):
You have the strategic, the tactical, the logistical, and the political.
And oftentimes what wins or loses a war is the
political side of it. It's you know, a lot of
historians think the reason that we lost Vietnam was not
because we were militarily outdone by hillside guerrillas, but because
we lost the political will to do it. And so
(13:08):
there's all sorts of the civil affairs branch exists to
essentially have the military take control or exert influence on
the civilian branch of government, and it kind of inverts
the entire conception of a democracy where you have the
civilian as a commander in chief and the civilian run government,
(13:28):
civilian run military. When the military is top down controlling
the civilian affairs, then you basically have a military junta.
And this is what Trump was confronted by during his
whole first term, was the civil affairs branch of the
military wandering funds to censor the Internet. I ran into
this in the Internet censorship story Left, right and center.
I had become a specialist in the area because I
didn't know what the hell the civil affairs branch was
(13:49):
doing funding the censorship of the.
Speaker 4 (13:51):
Entire Trump movement.
Speaker 10 (13:55):
That would be the domestic the civil affairs of funding
shutting down domestic pass comatatas that right, such a shamp Mike,
hang on for a second.
Speaker 7 (14:07):
We've got a lot more to get into the Great
Mike Benz joins us on a Monday of the wars
and rumors of wars, massive escalation in Ukraine, the United
States not just sending stripping the Pacific of additional patriot missiles,
but now going to send offensive missiles. Of course NATO's
(14:28):
paying for them, but it's a massive exclatory move. The
question is is going to make any difference. Also, you
heard Laura Trump right there with Great Benny Johnson may
replay that. Mike Ben's got some very specific thoughts about
the information we need to come forward if you want
to get to the bottom of the Epstein situation. Mike
bens has got a solution to the problem all next
(14:50):
in the war.
Speaker 6 (14:51):
Room years, all of the consternation out there, and I
think he's going to want to set things right as well.
So I believe that there will probably be more coming
on this, and I believe anything that they are able
(15:11):
to release that doesn't, you know, damage any witnesses or
anyone under age or anything like that, I believe they'll
probably try to get out sooner rather than later, because
they hear it and they understand it. So hopefully we
see that happen sooner in the later and that I
guess that would be my advice. But to everybody out
there who's all worked up about.
Speaker 5 (15:28):
It, there's no great plot to keep.
Speaker 6 (15:31):
This information away that I'm aware of.
Speaker 5 (15:34):
I do just believe.
Speaker 6 (15:35):
That maybe it's been slow roll for reasons that hopefully
we understand down the line, and I think we're probably
going to get more transparents.
Speaker 7 (15:46):
Okay, Laura Trump right there in Jesus dialed in as
you can get to the President, Mike Ben, some my
guests here in the war room. So John Solomon's talking
about there's an investigation going on over in at FB
about and Ben's you're gonna be busy for the next
couple of years because this is the stuff you've been
warning the country about for a while. He's gonna go
(16:08):
there's an investigation about crossfire, hurricane trying to stop Trump
in the summer of sixteen from winning. Then the nullification project,
and you know, the Russia hoax after he was in office,
all the way up to the stealing of the election,
and you know, the impeachment, the perfect phone call, the
stealing the election, maybe even j six and that may
(16:29):
as early as this week have a special counsel to it.
I've been strongly advocating that to get information out and
to get it out as soon as possible. Maybe you
put it in with the special counsel. They can start,
you know, petitioning the court to unseal certain of its
unseal all the evidence, and then they can make a
determination how you get it out. You also have a
(16:51):
lot of specific thoughts because you know the intelligence apparatus
better than anybody. I think about Epstein and all this
put it into perspective, where do you think we are
now in this and how do we kind of get
out of this corner that somehow the movement, the FBI,
DOJ has painted themselves into a corner on sir.
Speaker 9 (17:13):
Well, it's because Epstein was used as a sword during
the campaign cycle and so can't really hold up a
shield about it. I think this is something that will
really dog the administration and depress Republican voter turnout in
twenty twenty six for the midterms. If people feel like
(17:33):
their own government is participating in a cover up after
complaining about the previous governments, now ostensibly we're in control,
I think a lot of voters will think and if
this doesn't change, then it shows they're in on it.
I think that's what people are effectively feeling. But one
of the big questions overhanging this is Epstein's role with
(17:53):
potential intelligence ties, because that converts this from being kind
of a pedophilia or child sex trafficking story into something
much darker, and that looks not like it's just protecting
millionaires and billionaires, but that it's actually some apparatus within
(18:14):
the US government and potentially international governments wanted the Epstein case.
Speaker 4 (18:20):
Dead for their own reasons.
Speaker 9 (18:23):
And it's my belief that when you look at the
profile of Jeffrey Epstein and his entire history coming up
through bear Stearns and then being this sort of financial
bounty hunter who specialized in sheltering assets and then being
a financial fixer to arrange for multimillion dollar financings of
(18:47):
kind of boutique custom deals, that Epstein fits the profile
of a CIA liaison or a cooperative contact or a
CI facilitator rather than a CIA asset, and that you
will not be able to find necessarily a kind of
human to a one file on him, Rather that it
(19:11):
was an informal contact that the intelligence services reached to
as a back channel to broker deals and to set
up financing for various either covert action or economic deals
that were deemed to be in US interests. And I
believe that there's also an international side to the intelligence
(19:34):
story as well, given how many countries are involved in
the source of affairs at Epstein. Epstein's life led through.
But you can't subpoena foreign governments the way you can.
We have control over our own executive branch. And I
think people saw Pam Bondi's response last week when she
was questioned directly, was Epstein an intelligence asset?
Speaker 5 (19:58):
Is?
Speaker 8 (19:58):
What?
Speaker 5 (19:58):
Is?
Speaker 9 (19:58):
How it was phrased to her, and she said in
the White House at the cabinet meeting, Well, she started answered,
then Trump jumped in and said, you don't need to
answer that. She said, I'll answer it anyway. I don't know,
we're looking into it. I'll get back to you. Sitting
right next to her at the cabinet meeting is John Ratcliffe,
the CIA director. He says, absolutely nothing. I mean, the
(20:20):
thing thinks to high heavens that way. But what I'm
trying to communicate is that it's not like the Justice
Department can't do anything on this in two thousand and eight,
there was a very scandalous prosecute plea deal given in
the two thousand and eight prosecution that was helmed by
alex Acosta. Three days after Epstein was indicted the second
(20:43):
time the victed, ward article came out that cited him
as saying that Epstein belonged to intelligence, and he was
told to leave it alone.
Speaker 4 (20:52):
The very next day, July.
Speaker 9 (20:53):
Tenth, twenty nineteen, at a press conference, he's asked directly,
did you say that that Epstein was an intelligence You
belonged to intelligence and that's why you gave him the
sweetheart deal? And he kind of shuffles nervously and says,
I can't answer that.
Speaker 4 (21:09):
I can either confirm nor deny.
Speaker 9 (21:11):
And then the very last piece we have on this
was a formal investigation done by the Justice Department Office
of Professional Responsibility, which was supposed to put this to bed.
It's a three hundred and forty eight page report. The
only disclosure that they have on on asking alex Acosta
about the intelligence question was a random footnote one footnote
(21:34):
its footnote two forty four on page one hundred and
sixty nine, and they asked him if he had knowledge
that Acosta was quote an intelligence asset and a costa.
Speaker 4 (21:46):
This is all summary description, by the way.
Speaker 9 (21:47):
They don't give the transcript, and they said Acosta told
us the answer to that question is no, but we
don't know what exactly they asked about this. And Epstein
wouldn't have a two oh one file on it. You
can belong to intelligence without being a formal asset. I
did a study recently of ten financial fixers that the
CIA had used to fix financing for various deals. Eight
(22:11):
out of the ten folks never had never had a
two a one file, never were formally.
Speaker 4 (22:17):
Classified as assets.
Speaker 9 (22:19):
But there will still be traffic in the intelligence records.
And we need to know if the Justice Department even asked,
because they tried to put this story to bed by saying, oh,
we did this OPR report in alex Acosta walked back
what he said to the Trump transition team or what
he contradicted, Vicky Wards reporting, Well, we don't know that
(22:40):
because we never got the transcript. We got a one
line summary description buried in the two hundred and forty
fourth footnote. Now that OPR investigation is totally sweeping all
of the audio files, all of the transcripts. All of
the interviews can be made public now. OPR reported directly
(23:01):
to Bill Barr. Bill Barr was the CI's mop up
man for Iran Contra. He started his career in the CIA.
The Washington Post called him the CIA's fall guide because
he blocked disclosures of CIA files. It's very possible that
the intelligence angle could have been buried by Bill Barr himself.
So get in that OPR investigation. Get all of Bill
(23:24):
Barr's email traffic, because they deleted alex Acosta's emails on
this What that report showed was an eleven month data gap,
mysterious technological glitch that deleted dog eight all of the
Justice Department DOJ dot gov emails of alex Acosta starting
May two thousand and seven, the very month that the
FBI wanted to arrest Jeffrey Epstein and then alex Acosta
(23:47):
stepped in to stop it. We need the full details
of that to November twenty twenty report Pam Bondi, you
can walk down the hallway tonight and get those files
and make them public.
Speaker 7 (24:01):
And not to make the audience's head blow up anymore,
but Bill Barr's father was the guy that met saw
Epstein one time at a bookstore. I think Epstein was
from Cony Island, had no college degree, gave him a
job at one of the most prestigious boys schools in
the prep schools in New York City. And from there,
(24:21):
quote unquote, he you know, he taught math or he
was a tutor for math. And after Bill Barr's father
hired him, Ace Greenberg's son, I think, took a new
Ace Greenberg. Next thing you know, he's at Bursterns. Next
thing you know, he's a he's he's a partner. Oh,
by the way, another coincidence. Bill Barr was the Attorney
General that drew up the whole new charging document on Epstein.
(24:45):
It was in Bill Barr's control and an authority that
the Bureau Prisoners reported to that Epstein was murdered, Oh
excuse me, committed suicide, suicided himself. It's it stinks to
high heaven, does not, Mike Ben's for someone that goes
through these files all the time, this one's particularly odd.
Speaker 9 (25:06):
Yes, Donald Barr, Bill Barr's father, was the head master
of the Dalton School, the one who hired Jeffrey Epstein
without a college degree to be the mathem physics teacher
there where. You know, he then went on to bear
Stearns through A. S.
Speaker 4 (25:18):
Greenberg.
Speaker 9 (25:19):
The but Donald Barr also was c i A. He
started his career in the OSS and then Bill Barr is,
you know, starts his career in this. It's a CIA family.
It's a family of secrets and Epstein, you know, like
it's a little bit in house that the entire you know,
the key question lording over the whole, the whole plea
(25:41):
deal was did he belong to intelligence? Is relegated to
a single footnote and there's no public disclosure.
Speaker 4 (25:47):
That was a voluntary interview.
Speaker 9 (25:48):
Alex Acosta geb every single question and every single twist
in turn of the handling of that OPR investigation. Was
there any editorial discretion done either by Bill Barr or
by Jeffrey Rosen, the deputy who would have handled the
day to day in terms of asking them to.
Speaker 4 (26:05):
Do or not do various things.
Speaker 9 (26:07):
Now we know that the incoming emails to alex Acosta
were deleted between two thousand and seven and two thousand
and eight. Do they have the balls to have deleted them?
In November twenty twenty, just a couple of years ago
to purge the investigation. We need answers and Pam Bondi
does not need to run a giant labyrinth to give
(26:28):
them to us. Make a show of good faith that
you're taking this investigation seriously and make those documents public.
We want the transcript around the intelligence questions.
Speaker 4 (26:38):
You have it. There's no excuses.
Speaker 7 (26:42):
Ben's, where do people get you? On social media? You're
on fire brother.
Speaker 9 (26:46):
On x at, Mike ben Cyber, also there on YouTube
and Instagram.
Speaker 7 (26:51):
You're incredible. Mike Ben's knows it better than anyone short breaking.
Speaker 5 (27:00):
Out the US paying for someone from additional weapons through John.
Speaker 3 (27:03):
Anthorty found because basically what the president is saying that
he's feeling of course, taking consideration what the US needs itself.
And so it's not that you can have a shopping
list and you can order whatever you want, because the
US has to make sure that the US keeps his
hands on what the US needs also to keep the
whole world safe, because in the end, you are the
police agent of the whole world. You're the most powerful
(27:25):
national on earth, most powerful military on Earth. But given
that the USS decided to indeed massively supply Ukraine with
what is necessary through NATO. You're being one hundred percent
paying for that.
Speaker 7 (27:37):
And what we have been doing over.
Speaker 3 (27:38):
The last couple of days is talking with countries and
just mentioned to ones we in a first wave immediately
said we want to chip in. And then you're really
talking about being numbers.
Speaker 5 (27:48):
Take care.
Speaker 7 (27:49):
I can't I can't stand anymore right there, route And
he's a slick, very cunning, very canny European politician, But
that right there, you hear the Davis mindset. The Davis mindset.
Where the cops, you, your sons and daughters, and we're
paying for where the cops of the world, the United
States keeps the world safe. You're the what the police
(28:11):
agent for the world know. No, the America for us
exactly won eighty and back of that. And what's interesting is,
to me, the most explosive thing he said all day
was that, because it shows.
Speaker 4 (28:21):
You their mindset.
Speaker 7 (28:23):
No mainstream media clipped that at all. This is the
beating heart of it. Remember EU, President Trump, let's not
don't let it be lost on you that he's dropping
a thirty percent tariff on these brothers on August first,
Why they wouldn't even negotiate with us and they've been
ripping us off for years. You got two carried battlegroups
(28:44):
down on the Red Sea fight and the hooties. Why
to keep to keep the Suez Canal open. That ninety
seven percent of the traffic is support European trade. We're
going broke. We're upside down on every trade deal. The
commercial relationship is a terrible President Trump is bringing back.
That's where the terror, that's where we had a surplus
in June of twenty seven billion dollars. We were supposed
(29:04):
to have a deficit I think of eighty seven billion
somewhere like that. And yet the mindset of route and
that's how they're playing you. That's how they're playing you.
They still think America is the beat cop. Now, if
you're the beat cop and got a special deal maybe
on I don't know, trade or commercial right, they're screwing
you on that. And who bears the brunt of it,
(29:26):
the American working man and woman. That's the whole purpose
of MAGA summed up right there, that arrogance of the
Party of Davos. What's very important, because you know you
keep the world safe. We screw you, dude. How about
you guys pick up some of the slack and the
percent ten years is too late. Let's get five percent. Now,
Let's get five percent. Now, this is an escalatory measure
(29:54):
that the people you know, this is the Lindsey Grahams
and the Tom Cottons and the neocons. And do not
think that the Yo Khans and they're on the payroll.
They're on the payroll of the defense industry. Defense they're
doing an NDAA in secret? Is that out there? The
votes are not even recorded. You heard Hawley say that
the other day. Senators don't even know what's going on.
(30:14):
Why Chris, they're cutting the deals for the defense industry.
And I'm no pacifist, but baby, we got to start
beating some swords into plowshares here. We have to. This
is why I said this thing the other day. The
deep state, they are drawing us in. You see it,
and mark my words, I've told the audience says over
(30:35):
and over and over again, these crises are starting to converge.
And now you're going to have the Ukraine situation start
to converge with the Persian situation. And by I don't know,
let's pick a random date, Labor Day where net Yahoo,
because you know he's figuring out how to get regime
changed there, how to draw us into that one, and
(30:56):
the Israel First crowd is cheering him on across all
the neo cons. You know, Lindsay Graham's skipping around. Hey,
like Lindsey Graham making your national security policy. That's sit
well with You think he's lord to President Trump and
you think he's loyal to the MAGA move, But no,
he's loyal to the defense industry. He's over there. Remember
President Trump the other day saying, watch what you're doing,
(31:16):
Watch what you're saying over in Ukraine. That was a
couple of weeks ago. Pompeios down in Odessa saying, we're
going to take a stand in Odessa. Is that the
hills Odessa, Your sons and daughters gonna die in the
defense of Odessa. Well, think about it, because this is
where we're heading. Sam Sorba Joints. What we should be
doing is taking care of business here. We've got a
(31:38):
massive war here in the Los Angeles, in Chicago and
soon to be New York. If you don't see it,
then you're not seeing what you see. Sam Sorber for
Parents Defending Demanding Justice Alliance, what are you guys demanding
Why are you coming to Washington? Sam? I know you
don't like this place. Why are you here? You're going
to have a press conference to where we're going to
(32:00):
what is going on?
Speaker 5 (32:02):
Well, thank you for having me, and I just want
to reiterate you know you say that we're at war
here in the United States. There are various wars. One
of the most important ones to me and to the
American people is the war that the government waged against
its own citizens, most recently with the Merrick Garland's categorization
of parents as domestic terrorists, which shifted the entire sort
(32:25):
of offset of how the schools dealt with parents who
disagreed with policy and with certain books that were in
the classrooms or just maybe in the mass policies, and
they sicked their local law enforcement and the FBI against
these parents. These parents are the parents that we are
now defending. Parents demanding justice. Alliance is asking for an
(32:50):
executive order from the White House to at least acknowledge
that there are parents who went to bat for their kids,
and that we want parents who go to for their kids.
Steve the number one predictor of academic achievement for children
is parental involvement. So when a school board singles out
(33:11):
parents and says you are not allowed on school property
or you must shut up now and we will escort
you out, and they do that, and they did that
to these parents. That is a school board and a
school association that is actually against the parents and against
the academic achievement of children. It actually is a raid
(33:33):
against education itself. And so we're holding a press conference.
We have many speakers. Congressman Ogyls will be there as
well as many others to talk about this, to bring
attention to it and to hopefully get some traction with
the White House.
Speaker 7 (33:48):
I'm seking the President, Sam hang on, yeah, hangover for
a second. I know Kelly Walker's working with you and
some other great folks. No, but here's our stand. The
parents getting involved was the expansion of the mag with
the Make America Health again in the parental rights movement merging.
This is why we had and this is why so
many African American men, Hispanic families, this was part of
(34:10):
not just the economics, but what they saw going in
the culture. The parents in the parents' rights move was
so huge in our victory. I'm kind of stunned that
we have to have a press conference, that Sam has
to fly back to DC. How is this not already done?
I mean, this seems like one of the easiest ones
to do the exist What is there something you guys
(34:31):
are asking for in the executive Order that's so over
the top that that's what's made Because look, I know
it looks cash and Dan Bongino and Pam. Parental rights
has been at the top of the mind for those
guys from the beginning. Merrick Garland, President Trump said today
Lisa Monica Monico is a criminal, right the deputy over
at the FBI, which our guy, Brian Constell has been
(34:53):
telling us for a year. Is there something in the
executive order that's so over the top. Is that's why
you're not getting traction? It seemed to me this will layup.
Speaker 5 (35:02):
No, that's not it at all. And in fact, this
is the first press conference. So let's not go too
hard on the people who are actually on our side.
I think that they aren't maybe aware of just how
egregious the efforts of Merrick Garland's DJ and the FBI
and the individual school boards, and mind you, this is
all fairly localized. So the FBI was involved, but they
(35:26):
tended to offshoot to local law enforcement. And so a
lot of these people may have charges that are brought
against them, may have arrests on their record, and they
can't get it expunged. It's local, and so bringing it
to the federal level is not going to expunge their record.
But having the President at least at least acknowledge that
(35:49):
this egregious targeting went on. And by the way, we
need to reinstate parents. See, we need to make parenting
great again. And Donald Trump, let's face it, he's the
pay parents in chief, so he's perfectly situated to do this.
This is an easy win for the White House and
it's an easy win for domestic policy because we need
(36:10):
to put parents back in the center of children's education,
because that's where children, that's where the education starts. It
starts in the home, and it starts with parents, and
it starts with character. We've taken all of those things
out of the schools and we've bifurcated the family've basically
destroyed the family through our schools. We need to turn
that around, and we need to get parents back involved
(36:32):
in the schools and we need to make the school
boards aware that parents should be speaking out on behalf
of their children, and that schools need to inform the
parents and bring them in. And the fact that we
are having this conversation is proof that the schools tried
to subvert the parents and get stuff done under their
noses without them knowing about it. And that is egregious,
(36:54):
it is terrible, and its child abuse.
Speaker 7 (36:59):
What is a a couple of things in the executive
ority you want or when you say demanding justice, what
are the top two or three things that we have
to push forward to make sure we get well.
Speaker 5 (37:10):
For one, we're looking for restitution, which is not the
same as reparations. Restitution is some people, some of the
people in our list of we have a dossier that
we've compiled of over forty parents, and they represent by
the way, let's take a moment and understand that those
parents represent the intimidation tactics of the federal government and
(37:30):
the local governments against its own citizens, and that was
done as a way of silencing all of the other
parents who otherwise may have spoken out. So even though
our dossier is full of this content, it represents a
mass amount of parents across the United States. So restitution
(37:50):
is what we're looking for. That means we want these
people brought back to a net zero. That they've lost
so much is not acceptable because it's the government that
precipitated those losses, and they need to be brought back
to whole. They need to be made whole. That's what
restitution is. Then the other thing that I'm asking for,
I would like President Trump to hold a ceremony to
(38:13):
acknowledge these parents and to lift them up and to
show other people this is what we look for in
our parents. The way that they behaved is what we
want for our parents and for our families. We need
to bring the family back, Steve, or we will lose
this nation.
Speaker 7 (38:30):
Sam, what time tomorrow is the press conference? We're going
to cover it live, but I want the audience so
particularly people that are here locally that can attend. Where
do people go and what times are it going to be?
Speaker 5 (38:42):
Yes, it's on the Capital Triangle, which is at the Capital.
It will be outside. It is at eleven am in
the morning. You can go to realfreedomtalk dot com for
more information and also if you are an a grieved parent,
if you suffered at the hands of your local government
and your school board. Please reach out to us because
we are still compiling this dossier. We will be we
(39:05):
will be releasing the dossier so that the press can
see some of the drastic measures that were taken against
these parents who did nothing wrong but express themselves verbally
and without any kind of anger or vitriol. They were
just expressing their opinions and these things happen to them.
(39:26):
This is a matter of freedom of speech, and it's
a matter of the fourteenth Amendments, and it's a matter
of the Second Amendment as well. I mean, this is
it's unconstitutional what happened to these parents. They need restitution,
and we need to set the record straight so that
this never happens again.
Speaker 7 (39:46):
It's outrageous, it's a great cause. Eleven o'clock tomorrow, warre
and be covering it live. You can go right when
we go in the capital. I think on the east
side south it should be I guess the southeast side.
You can see the podium right there, so it's quite
easy what they call the triangle to attend. So if
you're in the area, want to attend, It'll be something
eleven am eastern daylight time tomorrow we will cover it,
(40:06):
Sam Sorbo. Thanks to Sam. Where do people go to
find out all the information? And what is your personal
Twitter account? People can follow you?
Speaker 5 (40:15):
Yeah, they can follow me at the samsorbo. The for
all the information is realfreedomtalk dot com. And we are
very happy that Congressman Ogles has sponsored this and also
Congressman Andy Biggs will be there speaking as well, and
we will have parents who are there speaking. We have
a great lineup of speakers. This is something that is
(40:37):
very important for the future of the United States of
America to set us back on the right track. Thank
you so much for covering.
Speaker 4 (40:45):
This the I appreciate you.
Speaker 7 (40:48):
Sam. Of course, great speakers and some real hammers.
Speaker 2 (40:51):
Sam.
Speaker 7 (40:51):
Look forward to seeing to more love an am parents
Demanding Justice, Alliance shortbreak.
Speaker 4 (40:59):
War confuse your hosts, Stephen k Back.
Speaker 7 (41:04):
We are not isolationists. They want to make us isolationists
or pacifist or anti world We're none of that. We're
realists and we understand what's happened to this great country.
We're not an empire and we never wanted to be
an empire. Are found that the revolutionary generation broke off
from an empire. They want us about being an empire,
and you see what happens when you become an empire.
(41:25):
This is what this fight's about. And this is why
I said the other day, you've got to take the
deep state on and Sam Sorbo and there are we
got a hundred of these domestic issues that have to
be dealt with. They have to be dealt with. Now
we're not going to have a country. We have enemies
within and enemies without. But the enemies without don't scare me,
(41:47):
don't concern me. I shouldn't say don't concern me. They
don't scare me. We can handle even the Chinese Communist
Party if we stop the enemies within from collaboration with
our enemies out. And that's where we are. Know it's
a country under siege.
Speaker 4 (42:03):
We have to understand that.
Speaker 7 (42:04):
If you don't understand that, if you're just playing traditional politics,
then you're just going to be wandering around your e
This is the thing with the Republican Party was controlled
opposition for decades and decades and decades. That's how we
got in this situation.
Speaker 4 (42:16):
They just got.
Speaker 7 (42:17):
Tapped along conservatives. They didn't really stand for anything. Look
at all the conservatives are sitting there yammering on about Ukraine,
and Ukraine is getting so dangerous. It's a European problem.
It's a European war. Let Europe deal with it as
they can. They have the resources, they have the manpower,
(42:38):
they don't have the will. What does that tell you
we're supposed to come in and provide that, because that's
really what they're asking for. This is not just about weapons.
This is about well and will and all the flag waving.
Your sons and daughters are going to be defending Odessa.
What do you think Paton would say about that? What
(42:59):
do you think Montgomery you say about that?
Speaker 8 (43:00):
What?
Speaker 7 (43:00):
What what would Eisenhower or General Marshall, or Chester Knimits
or Bull Halsey? What would they say about that? Are
you not say you crazy? We're going to say we're
going to get involved in the Bloodlins where the Germans
in the in the in the and the Russians bled
themselves out, and it's a cursed region of the world.
Speaker 8 (43:21):
It is.
Speaker 7 (43:23):
Some of the worst, most horrific things in world history
have happened there. That is not America. Our folks left
all that and came here. You're being sucked back into
things that generations of Americans left behind for good reason.
We have to fight this. We have to fight this.
We're not going to have a country. We're coming back,
(43:46):
and we're coming back in a big way. But every
day you must focus on the actions we have to
do to sort this mess out. Just look at look
at the major cities of the country. You don't control them,
and you're about to lose the crown jewel. You're going
to lose the crown jewel to the sore hand. And
there's a May and other of him. There's a man
of those guys that the source of the world have promoted.
(44:09):
It's not just that Obama, it was a sore hand,
it's Amandami. They get a million of backup. So that
this is where the country is. That has to that
boil has to be lance. It has to be Lance.
Now turbulence, You're going to see turbulence, Like you can't
believe we're so far from being through this thing. And
there's quite frank a lot of people in the MAGA
(44:30):
movement walking around, fat, dumb and happy that hey, this
is all great. It's not when you see what the
reality is of where we are and where we have
to go, and you're not going to have President Trump forever.
Even when we get him in the ability to run
in twenty eight, you're not going to have him forever. Eventually,
(44:51):
you're going to stand up in your own two feet
and get it done yourself. And sometimes in doing that,
you're not going to be disappointed because now by continuing
to force and say, hey, maybe this is a better way,
you're going to get some documents on this Epstein situation,
something's going to happen. You're gonna have a special prospect
you're and get documents. It's going to start unfolding because
(45:12):
you were determined. You're not you're not rude or you're
not unappreciative. You're sitting there going this has to be
done because cynicism leads to complacency, and complacency leads to
apathy and apathy. You know, the difference between two, three,
(45:34):
four five percent is everything right now. And of course
the Republican they don't care about that. They're sitting there,
look at articles getting money on being lobbyists and they're
running around. You know, it's just their incentive is not
your incentive. Your incentive is to save your country. That's
not theirs. Theirs is to make as much as they can,
put their snout in the tross and get as much
(45:56):
as they can as quickly as they can. This way
Birch Gold. Well, now you've got to understand turbulence. Turbulence
is coming. Take your phone out Bannon nine eight nine
eight nine eight. Get the guide to how to invest
in all the methodologies the iras a four one ks
all this. They make it very simple for you. Most importantly,
you get to meet Philip Patrick and the team Bannon
nine eight nine eight nine eight. The Ultimate Guide for
(46:17):
Investing in Golden Precious Metals. Get it, read it, but
most importantly, make contact with Philip Patrick and his team. Also,
this is why we have Jimmirkers now as a contributor.
I don't think there's anybody better combining you know, capital markets,
national security, intelligence records, warroom dot com. It's a landing
page you can get access to strategic intelligence. There's no
(46:39):
reason in the world between war Room against strategic intelligence
that you're not equipped with as much insight baseball as
C seat C suite chairman and CEOs. I know this
because I know some of these chairmen CEOs and they
contact me go Wow, you're saying something of the pergimia
the day I didn't understand. I didn't know Records Warren's
Strategic Intelligence. You can subscribe to it and get as
(47:01):
much up to speed as those folks. Plus eat those
in a free book money GPT about currency and artificial intelligence,
our favorite topic. Mike Lindell. It's a day of war
and the rumors of war. At the end of the
first hour, I want somebody to give me access to
a deal. I can buy a pill in some sheets, sir.
Speaker 8 (47:23):
Right on, Steve, and you know you hear your spot
on about the controlled opposition Republicans. I've been fighting these
uniparty Republicans for four and a half years and I'm
on my.
Speaker 2 (47:33):
Way back to Minnesota.
Speaker 8 (47:34):
We're gonna have great being proactive after the big win
in Colorado for my pillow, we're being proactive as a company.
You guys were closing out our slippers that we've had.
This is our famous slippers. We're only doing it with
the war room policy. We're raising kapitl here selling it
for wholesale price thirty nine ninety eight.
Speaker 2 (47:54):
Once they're gone, they're gone.
Speaker 8 (47:56):
These are and plus we have the sandals for nineteen
ninety eight. Guys, get as many as you want. Let's
get him out to the war room.
Speaker 2 (48:02):
Posse.
Speaker 8 (48:02):
You guys deserve it. Thirty nine ninety eight Promo Code Warroom.
Go to the website, scroll down, click on Steve the
crosses of their one hundred percent made in the USA,
all the pillows. I'm going to be in my factory tomorrow.
You guys, I want to see that we're breaking records.
Tonight on the Warroom with Promo Code Warroom. All my
home reps Reckers. Tonight on the Warroom with Promo Code Warroom,
(48:26):
All my home Reps eight hundred and eight seven three
one zero six y two. They love it when I'm
on here. They love talking to you all. And you
guys have helped us get through. We broke on through
the biggest cover up of the biggest crimes in history.
Here we are going to secure our elections. And they
came after the wrong company when they came after my pillow.
Speaker 2 (48:48):
You guys helped us get it through. We're here to
say Steve.
Speaker 7 (48:52):
And they came after the wrong guy. In d Mike
Lindell short commercial break a jam Pack second