November 6, 2025 • 37 mins
Don’t be tardy for THIS party, Reigndrops — we’re breaking down all the details of Kim Zolciak and Kroy Biermann’s divorce, plus the legal craziness she’s now being pulled into by her alleged new boyfriend. This has been one of the most bitter, broke, and bewildering divorces in reality TV… and we’re here to get into every messy moment.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
Reality with the King is hosted by me, Carlos King.
I'm an executive producer who have produced some of your
favorite shows from the Real Housewives in Atlanta, New Jersey
and my own creation, The Love and Marriage Franchise and
Bell Collective. Every episode we recap reality television from the
Real Housewives Franchise to The Bachelor or Selling Sunset, in
(00:27):
addition to celebrity guests, whether in the unscripted space or
scripted as well. All Right, rain Drops, if you've been
sipping with us, then you know Reality Crime Stories is
where glam meets grit and the headlines always comes with
(00:51):
a sight of hard truth. Every week, Courtney Parker and
I put Back to the Velvet Robe on.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
Fame, Fortune and the fallout they try to hide.
Speaker 3 (01:01):
That's right, Carlos.
Speaker 4 (01:02):
Everything from reality TV scandals to the crimes committed behind
the cameras, whether it happens on or off the screen,
Carlos and I will bring you the tea surrounding hot
topic crime stories involving all of your favorite reality TV personalities.
Speaker 1 (01:20):
And if today's story taught us anything, child, is that
in this world the tea is never just hot, it's criminal. Hey,
rain Drops, On today's episode of Reality Crime Stories, my
co hosts Corny Parker and I are back to talk
(01:41):
about my girl, Kim Zosiac and what is happening when
it comes to Wins Wallace and divorce wars Cartney, that's.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
A good title. I love it, love it, love it.
Speaker 5 (01:54):
I'm glad you like it, Carlos.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Not nodult. It's really good. So let's get right into it.
From Wiggs and Why to.
Speaker 1 (02:02):
Warrance and withdraw slips, Kim's Zozziak Bearman's picture perfect life
has officially entered war zone. What started off as a
fairytale Bravo romance has become one of the most bitter,
broke and bewildering divorces in reality TV history. I mean,
(02:23):
police calls have been made, so has repossessions, bounced checks,
and now whispers of a billionaire boyfriend with his own
one hundred million dollars scandal. This is not just messy,
this is a bona fide mess Okay. So rain Drops,
we're here to talk about what's going on with Kim's Zoziak,
(02:45):
our favorite Atlanta housewife, and really get down in terms
of what's going on with the new boyfriend in addition
to the divorce from her husband Kroix Beerman.
Speaker 2 (03:01):
It's been a.
Speaker 3 (03:01):
Minute since we've seen or really heard from from Kim,
so I'm super surprised to see how active she's been
in headlines here as of late. She's pretty much kept
a you know, a low profile as far as the
show is concerned. But uh, in her personal life, things
(03:25):
have just been spiraling. The one thing I will say
about Kim is she bounces back.
Speaker 2 (03:33):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (03:33):
And now she's bouncing back with a billionaire.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
Yes, forget forget bounce checks. Howdy. She just bouncing back.
Speaker 1 (03:40):
And that's why we have just Tyranny back to talk
to us too, as.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
We you know, ask her all the important questions.
Speaker 1 (03:49):
That you guys want to know, not not me, You
guys want to know this, So welcome just Tiarranny.
Speaker 2 (03:54):
How are you good?
Speaker 5 (03:56):
How are you guys today?
Speaker 3 (03:58):
Really good? And we now listen before we get into
the questions, we know you're going to give your infamous disclaimer.
You can't talk about active cases.
Speaker 6 (04:11):
I cannot raindrops get so much sat with me because
they want me to go into the details. But I
just have to tell you all that I am here
really just to inform you about the law. Make sure
you have a better understanding, and then you can form
your own opinions based on the facts and the information
(04:33):
that you know as the rain drops, because we all
know that the rain drops know better than most.
Speaker 2 (04:42):
And look, look you clocked up, and that is true.
Solicit Let's get into the.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
Timeline, the coordinating. I'll have you ask the first question,
so rain drops. In twenty twenty two, report surface of
unpaid credit cards and malting tax step that allegedly leaped
over one point one million dollars oh to the IRS.
Kim and Kroy allegedly refinanced their home twice to cover
(05:10):
the expenses. May of twenty twenty three, that's when Kroy
filed for divorced for the first time. Kim counterst a
week later, claiming that they're working it out. Neighbors report
frequent police visits for domestic disputes. August of twenty twenty three,
Kroy files again, but this time he is citing and
(05:32):
reconcilable differences and also demanding full custody. He has alleged
that Kim has a gambling addiction and that financial recklessness.
He also made sure to file in court earlier in
twenty twenty four, the Georgia mansion that we saw on
(05:54):
the show interned foreclosure proceedings. Reports claim that look like
cameras were there filming it. I can tell you they weren't. Okay,
so I can confirm that for you all as of.
Speaker 2 (06:08):
Today, so check this out. They're still not divorced, right,
They're not divorced.
Speaker 1 (06:14):
And in spring of this year is when Kim was
linked to real estate developer Kyle Mowitz, who simultaneously is
enrolled in a one hundred million dollar divorce battle in
Texas where his estranged wife reportedly is accusing him of
(06:37):
funneling marital assets towards another woman. That woman is.
Speaker 2 (06:42):
Kim Zosiak, who has denied amy and involvement.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
This is messy, and the gag is I really wish
cameras were rolling because this is the type of mess
I want to see on Atlanta.
Speaker 3 (06:55):
Housewives exactly, because you've listed so much of those things.
And one of the things that I found very interesting
in Kroy's claim was that the excessive spending, and we've
all seen from the beginning of Housewives of Atlanta to
(07:18):
her own spin off shows, Kim knows how to shop
Kim knows how to spend, even from her days with
Big Papa. The girl knows her labels and and you
know she knows how to shop and spend. My first
(07:38):
question for you, based off of all that Carlos has read, Judge,
is when a couple files what appears to be some
serious yet frivolous legal charges, with so many of them
being filings, dismissals, refilings sometimes at this point, how does
(08:02):
a court even take something like this seriously?
Speaker 6 (08:09):
Well, the first thing I will say is that frivolous
will be a determination by the court. So everyone is
entitled to file suit if they have felt harmed, and
so the court will determine the merits of that lawsuit.
And like you say, in any divorce, there are several
(08:29):
things that if it's a contested.
Speaker 5 (08:31):
Divorce, things are constantly filed.
Speaker 6 (08:37):
Unfortunately, in family law it is very common to see
because it's such a personal nature. People take everything about
a divorce very personal.
Speaker 5 (08:50):
That you see a lot of foulings.
Speaker 6 (08:52):
More so than you see in probably any other practice
of law.
Speaker 5 (08:57):
So you have to keep that in mind.
Speaker 6 (08:59):
One that is, anytime you're dealing with family law, and
so the judges in those courtrooms are going to keep
that in mind.
Speaker 5 (09:07):
They are used to it.
Speaker 6 (09:08):
They're going to be able to tell once they review
the evidence what should move forward and what shouldn't. And
because people are at all time high of emotions, you
very rarely are going to get a judge that is
going to call something frivolous unless you have evidence of
(09:30):
some kind of misrepresentation or mal intent.
Speaker 5 (09:36):
So that's the first thing I would say.
Speaker 6 (09:37):
The second thing I would say too, in family law
is a lot of times, especially when you have domestic
issues involved, you cross from civil law to criminal law,
and that becomes an issue. Because you could have family law.
Divorce cases are considered civil law. But if you get
the police involved and there has been some accusation of
(10:03):
an illegal activity, anything ranging from domestic violence to fraud,
now you are entering into the realm of criminal laws.
And so now you're going to have these things comingling,
which would definitely make it a lot more messier and
a lot more for the judge to kind of sort through, which.
Speaker 5 (10:25):
Leads to what we see in a lot of.
Speaker 3 (10:27):
Cases delays, delayed, delayed delay.
Speaker 6 (10:31):
So people are always, like I thought, for divorce two
years ago, three years ago, you.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
Thought for divorce.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
I now if my PTSD from all of the reality
shows I've done in all these episodes where these divorces
take so much time. So that's why I'm like, you know,
just hearing a line about that. A lot of people
seem like, Okay, if.
Speaker 2 (11:04):
I file and leaves within a year, this can happen.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
But in cases like this, where there's accusations of fraud,
there's accusations of a gambling addiction, these sort of situations
take longer because, like you said, all divorced proceedings starts
off as civil, but this is now entering criminal territory allegedly,
allegedly possibly.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (11:29):
The other issue is anytime you're talking about family law,
you have to also remember that if a couple reconciles
that voids the divorce proceedings, you.
Speaker 5 (11:41):
Have to start all over over, so you.
Speaker 6 (11:45):
Have basically re entered marriage, which will also add time
and delay.
Speaker 3 (11:52):
Got it, And the courts typically that was a good
point because one of the key words that you use
was there are emotions are high even in family court,
especially if there are children involved. There are assets involved
in these kinds of cases. When you see filings, refilings, dismissals.
(12:16):
Do the courts allow room for reconciliation? Are they really
yearing towards and leaning towards hey, because there was once
upon a time love there. Hopefully you can reconcile and
put your family back together and your marriage back together.
Speaker 6 (12:38):
Well, you know, before you actually complete a divorce, you
have to go through a parents in class if you
have kids, but you also have to go through mediation,
which is a signal of one. Are you going to
be able to reconcile? Do you really need the courts
to get involved?
Speaker 3 (12:57):
Or Two?
Speaker 5 (12:57):
If you don't reconcile, can you all.
Speaker 6 (13:00):
Work this out amongst yourself without crowding the doctor of
the court. The court never wants to be involved in
a personal matter, so of course they want to give
you the option to try and work it out between yourselves.
But if for some reason you need a referee, then
(13:20):
the court is going to step in with the rules
and laws of that state to try and balance it
in fairness and equity. But you also have to remember again,
because it's family law and it's so so emotional, everyone
always feels like they were kind of wrong because no
(13:41):
one is going to get exactly what they want.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I do have a question for you, because.
Speaker 2 (13:52):
When you are a married couple. This is from what
I have been told. I've never been married, but I've
been told that when you are a married couple.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
The reason why they tell people make sure that you
know you two people who are joining forces in matrimony,
that your finances are straight, because if one partner is
in serious depth, then if you guys are married, that's
the spouse incurs some of your depth in case you
(14:24):
owe money to the IRS.
Speaker 2 (14:25):
I'm asking that because you.
Speaker 1 (14:27):
Know, when we talk about Kim and Kroy, there are
reports that there's unpaid credit cards and mounting tax depth
that is reaching over a million dollars. So, with that
being said, if let's say, for example, as Kroy's alleging
Kim's alleged gambling addiction is putting them in this situation,
(14:52):
is Kroy safe from owing the I r S that
money if he can prove that let's say Kim is
responsible for the mounting death or because they're married, her
death is automatically his.
Speaker 5 (15:09):
So there's a couple of.
Speaker 6 (15:10):
Things I think about the IRS that people do not realize. One,
even as a married couple, you have to decide if
you're going to you check that box right, Are you
filing married or single? So you can be married and
continue to file single or Hold up? Hold up, you
(15:35):
do not it's an election. You do not have to
file married simply because you are married. Once you become married,
you have the choice to file married, and if you
do file married, you have to continue to file married
every year unless up until you divorce.
Speaker 5 (15:57):
But if you.
Speaker 6 (15:58):
Get married and you continue to file separately as individuals,
you have a separate tax account.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
Okay, So.
Speaker 6 (16:12):
Without me knowing anyone's personal information, the answer to your
question is, if you are married filing married, both parties
will be responsible for the tax dick.
Speaker 5 (16:25):
If you are.
Speaker 6 (16:26):
Married and filing individually, you are only responsible individually for
your tax deck.
Speaker 2 (16:35):
Did you know that, Courtney?
Speaker 3 (16:37):
I know that you have choices? Again, know that because
I have You know, I have a daughter and we're
now at the stage of does she make enough money
to file her own taxes? Is it more beneficial for
me to keep her on my taxes until twenty six?
(16:57):
But when I do that, I have to claim head
of household. So I did know that you had choice,
some choices. What I didn't realize, and this piggyback's off
of Carlos's questions. So when it comes to the acquired
debt as a couple, not just tax wise, but just
(17:18):
as a debt, if he is claiming financial fraud on
Chimp's part, alleging financial fraud on Chimp's part is one
spouse solely responsible for the others regardless of their their
their taxes. They have shared assets and they do they
(17:38):
also share the debt.
Speaker 6 (17:42):
So again, we have a thing called premarital property, right, Okay,
just excluded once you get married.
Speaker 5 (17:49):
They're exclusions.
Speaker 2 (17:50):
Explain that. Explain that to us.
Speaker 6 (17:53):
Okay, So if my grandmother left me a house and
then I went and got married, that house is mine.
It's pre marital property. It is separated from my marital property.
So even though I went and got married, after I
own the house, it still does not become a part
(18:13):
of my marital estate.
Speaker 5 (18:16):
But I get married and.
Speaker 6 (18:18):
My husband and I buy a house that is a
part of the marital estate.
Speaker 5 (18:24):
Everything is lovely.
Speaker 6 (18:25):
If we bought the house for five hundred thousand dollars
and sell it for a million dollars, we make five
hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 5 (18:31):
And we split it. The problem comes.
Speaker 6 (18:34):
We paid five hundred thousand dollars is worth one hundred
thousand dollars, and we owe four hundred thousand dollars. We
equally and jointly owe that money together.
Speaker 5 (18:46):
What does that mean?
Speaker 6 (18:46):
That means that our creditors can come after us individually
or jointly together. They don't have to come and get
half for me or half for my husband, because we
are both responsible for that debt. If I owe four
hundred thousand dollars and he owes four hundred thousand dollars,
but I'm the only person with four hundred thousand dollars,
(19:08):
the credit is going to take the.
Speaker 5 (19:10):
Entire four hundred thousand dollars for me.
Speaker 6 (19:13):
But during my divorce, I am going to say I
paid this entire debt and I should be credited for
paying his half in some way. A judge is going
to take those things into account and try and balance
it out. But as we have taught so much in
(19:33):
other episodes, you have to be someone who can collect
the money from you. Gotta be collectible. You can't just
owe it. I gotta be able to get.
Speaker 5 (19:44):
It from you.
Speaker 3 (19:45):
Collectible. That's our takeaway word.
Speaker 2 (19:48):
Carlos, Okay, I mean the baby.
Speaker 1 (19:51):
That's why they always say it's cheaper to keep up,
and it's cheap or in this case, you know it's
cheaper to keep count.
Speaker 2 (19:58):
Now, as I.
Speaker 6 (19:59):
Always say, you could never go wrong with the prena,
no matter what the value of your state is, because
a prenup lays out the rules and it would eliminate
delays in court, a lot of legal fees, a lot
of high emotions because we have decided all the rules
(20:19):
when we love each other the most.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
I'm always fascinated by these conversations because, look, I do
know Kim personally, and I was then when she Mtcroy
and it was honestly, love at first sight is on camera.
Speaker 2 (20:36):
We filmed it.
Speaker 1 (20:38):
I was coe p of her wedding special and I
was able to see again these two people fall in
love as a married couple and CROI adopting her two
daughters at the time, and now together as a married couple.
(20:59):
They had a that are twins, and I believe another
boy or two if I'm not mistaken. So it's unfortunate
that things have come to this because I did not
see this coming, nor did the Bravo fans.
Speaker 2 (21:14):
Because it's what we always hear.
Speaker 1 (21:17):
You know, when you do get something like a prenuptural agreement,
it's not for the person you're in love with, it's
for the person you're divorcing, because that was our two.
You know, It's not the person you're marrying, it's the
person you're divorcing, which are two different people.
Speaker 2 (21:32):
And that does beg the question that I just don't.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
Know because I'm trying to remember if they did get
a pre nap because when Kim mcfroyd coroy was in
the NFL playing for the Atlanta Falcons, and you know, relatively,
he of course had money. She was, you know, the
star of the house was in Atlanta, she was also
(21:58):
making money. But in terms of a prenup, based on
my memory, and I'm going to research this as we're talking,
I don't think they have one.
Speaker 6 (22:09):
No, And again I am for prenups no matter what
your economic status is, because I think that it is
just the best way. I mean, we do contracts every
single day. You go run an apartment and you have
a contract and you say, hey, I may have to
break the lease.
Speaker 5 (22:27):
This is what happened.
Speaker 6 (22:28):
Hey if you damage something in my apartment, this is
what happens. It's not necessarily a negative thing, but for
some reason, prenom, the word prenup has a negative connotation,
and I wish we could change that because also, similar
to someone you're marrying may have a large amount of
(22:48):
debt that once you get married, you may start paying
that debt. It becomes shared debt at this time, how
are you compensated for that?
Speaker 3 (22:59):
Right?
Speaker 6 (23:00):
So it's just a matter of really, let's just get
secure and comfortable about talking about our finances and our
livelihood of how we would like things to play out, right.
Speaker 3 (23:17):
I have I want to go back and pivot for
just a second. Because Carlo, she brought up the kids.
There were claims that Arianna says that her parents took
money from Brand Deal's for her to help cover some
of the debt. Kim has admitted that she spent some
(23:39):
of that money on bills and promises that she will
pay back if she hasn't already paid back. I'm giving
her a new set of circumstances. I'm sure she has.
What do you are there any legal takeaways regarding that
or how does everybody feel with respect to that?
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Yeah, it's interesting because you know, listen. I'm one of
ten siblings, and my mother was a true housewife. You know,
she gave birth to ten kids. She raised us until
she passed away five years ago. But for of course,
my whole life, my father was the only person working.
Speaker 2 (24:24):
And when me and my siblings started to work, my.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
Father said, okay, it's time for y'all to contribute to
some of these bills, and we're like, get out of
here us, my buddy. But we obviously helped at as
much as we could. So that is an interesting question legally,
ken Arianna Beerman if she wanted to. From what I understand,
(24:48):
her and Kim are fine and everything is good. But
to Courty's point, could Arianna take can a child tech
legal action as a parent by saying, I, as a minor,
accumulated this money for a job I did. I gave
it to my parents because I'm a minor and they
spent it.
Speaker 2 (25:07):
Can it take legal action to get that money back?
Speaker 6 (25:12):
So the short answer is that anyone can take legal action.
Speaker 2 (25:16):
That's true. True.
Speaker 6 (25:20):
Again, that is a part of our great American legal system.
Whether someone is going to be successful, it's going to
depend on a lot of variables.
Speaker 5 (25:33):
Again, we don't know.
Speaker 6 (25:34):
We hear about a lot of child stars and parents
who are not just parents, they are also a part
of their business, and those parents have to be compensated
for their services. And so how that is worked out, Again,
you have to have some kind of auditing and accounting
(25:56):
of the accounts to see once the reconciliation is done,
has the child been given more to the parent than
they should have if they are oh something. And sometimes
in some of those reconciliations, the parent is actually owed
money as well. So again, anybody can sue for anything
(26:19):
in this great American system we have.
Speaker 3 (26:22):
It is very.
Speaker 6 (26:23):
Unfortunate when you have parents and children suing each other,
or parents mishandling funds. But again, unless there is some
kind of action taken, I think that it's very hard
for anyone to jump to judgment without knowing all of
the facts.
Speaker 1 (26:44):
I do want to shift gears a bit because I
want to get into the fact that Kim Zelziak has
a new boyfriend.
Speaker 6 (26:51):
Which.
Speaker 1 (26:53):
Is already starting a lot of controversy. His name is
Kyle Morwitz. His a strange white Jillian Green, has subpoena
Kim in this ongoing contentious lawsuit that the wife has
against the husband, which is very fascinating. So I want
(27:16):
to just recap it again because I'm just like to
leave one crazy situation and to embark on another is
just insane in the membrane.
Speaker 2 (27:28):
But let me just catch your guys up on it.
So again.
Speaker 1 (27:31):
Kim was subpoenaed in a one hundred million dollar divorced
by her new boyfriend's wife, who is demanding answers over guests.
On September thirtieth, court documents were filed that showed this,
in addition to the fact that Jillian Green, which by
(27:53):
the way, Kim was served at a parking lot out
of high school in Georgia.
Speaker 3 (27:57):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
Okay, that's that's how.
Speaker 1 (28:00):
Much Jillian ain't planning with the girls. Okay, but let's
appear Kim turned over all communities with her boyfriend, any
communications between Kim and another third party regarding payment for
services or communications concerning her a strange husband. Jillian also
(28:29):
asks for any documents regarding gifts from him or any
business he owns that he has given her. Last, but
not least, she also requested any and all documents regarding
or pertaining to Kim's financial relationship with Kyle, including but
(28:53):
not limited to gifts given or received from Kyle, expenses
paid on her behalf by Kyle, and again any business
in which he's connected, money's loan to her and money's
paid to her by Kyle or any businesses which he
is connected when it.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Comes to cam.
Speaker 1 (29:16):
Now, look, a lot of people can say, Judge Tearing
in Courtney, this is a woman scored, Okay, But my
question to you is this, Yes, you can take legal
action against anybody, know that. But to file a subpoena
(29:36):
against a woman that's dating your husband and you're trying
to figure out if the money that he accumulated was
used to pay you know, gifts for her or do
any businesses?
Speaker 2 (29:51):
Does that happen often? And if so, does.
Speaker 1 (29:54):
That mean that in case this goes as far in court,
that Kim would have to return these gifts back that
she was given about his band.
Speaker 6 (30:05):
So again, I cannot come back on any open cases,
got it, But I will point you all. I don't
know if you remember the high profile case where the
Lakers owner gave a woman a lot of gifts.
Speaker 3 (30:28):
No, it's the Clippers, I.
Speaker 6 (30:32):
L yeah, and she had to return these things because
in that arrangement. The wife and husband were business partners.
It's not just that we are married, we are business partners.
(30:53):
And the husband did not have the authority to use
the wife's money and business proceeds in that manner. God,
Now again, do you have to look at all of
the facts? And again you said, is this just simply
(31:17):
a woman's scorn? When you start looking at high dollar divorces,
there are a lot more like details that you're going
to have to look at at the assets because it
may not simply be about an emotional retribution. Again, if
(31:41):
you have used marital and or business funds that belong
to me as the wife, I have a right to
know that, and I have a right to know where
my money is invested and what I received for my
money got.
Speaker 3 (32:02):
It for those who don't know, if you will allow
me who Kyle Morwitz is. According to the International Business Times,
he is a businessman and investor who holds a real
estate and finance degree from Florida State University. He graduated
(32:23):
in two thousand and three. He co founded Imperium Blue
Management Group and is a managing partner of Imperium Companies.
His family offices reportedly oversee four point five billion dollars
in assets. His portfolio reportedly includes investments in real estate,
(32:46):
e commerce resistant assets, high barrier businesses alongside his brother.
They have a Morwitz Family endowment at FSU. And the
thing about it is, like you were saying, just tyranny.
This is a high profile, high asset divorce one hundred
(33:08):
million dollars with lots of companies reported within the the
more Wits Imperial Blue Management Imperium Company's portfolio. So to
be able to ask for a hundred million dollars means
that out of this four point five billion dollar managing assets,
(33:35):
he has it, she has it. It's all intertwined within
a marriage and an arrangement that doesn't feel like it
has a pre.
Speaker 5 (33:47):
Nump right, or it could have a pre nump.
Speaker 6 (33:54):
And you know, generally when you see someone with a
pre nump and they are asking questions that are inconsistent
with not having a prenup, they may be trying to
break the prenup for some reason. There may be some
claus in the prenum that allows them to avoid the
(34:17):
prenup under certain circumstances, which like him the answer some
of Carlos questions of why would a woman do this.
Speaker 3 (34:27):
Right and married right, He's still married, she still married,
gets her purchase with family money.
Speaker 2 (34:38):
So yeah, later it was crazy.
Speaker 1 (34:43):
Is the way that Jilly and the wife of Kempsley
boyfriend found out about? Uh this relationship is? She? She
said that Kroy reached out to her. She said she
was contacted by Kroi. She said she met up with
(35:03):
him at her cousin's home to talk about Kim's involvement
with her ex. She said that Kroi told her he
was concerned that Kim will financially drain money from Kyle
Horny boyfriend.
Speaker 2 (35:16):
Jillian said Kroi showed.
Speaker 1 (35:18):
Her receipts of groceries that have been purchased by Kim
using Kyle's credit cards.
Speaker 5 (35:24):
Oh wow.
Speaker 1 (35:25):
Jillian said that Kroi told her that Kim was narcissistic
and had a gathering problem and was not present for
their children. Kim has since denied all allegations brought by Kroi.
Speaker 2 (35:40):
So we're talking about a woman's score one hundred.
Speaker 1 (35:42):
There's a man scort allegedly because babystic Because like you said,
both couples are still married going through this divorce where
the finances are at the top of this sort of
(36:04):
messy situation, infidelity is that the head up this situation
because Jillian is alleging that Kyle cheat itself.
Speaker 2 (36:13):
This has a lot of.
Speaker 1 (36:15):
You know, information that is going to come out in
the coming weeks.
Speaker 2 (36:20):
And this is only part one of what will be
many parts to the story. So John, you gotta come back,
right you do.
Speaker 3 (36:31):
I have one lasting question. You don't have to answer
it out, judge, but could Kroy potentially be called as
a witness or subpoena in their divorce in the Morwitz
family divorce court?
Speaker 6 (36:47):
Well, in court, you know, there's a thing called hearsay,
and so no one can do third party testimony. So
if they were actions or events that actually happened that
only a certain party can testify, they most certainly can
be subpoenas.
Speaker 2 (37:09):
And there you have it.
Speaker 1 (37:11):
That's another episode of reality Crime Stories. Judge, Tyranny, thank
you so much for your expertise.
Speaker 2 (37:17):
Courtney, thank you so much for your research.
Speaker 1 (37:19):
And Rain Johns, We'll be back because let's be clear,
there's more to this story than meets the wig. All right,
I will see y'all next one. Reality with the King
is executive produced by me Carlos King, produced by Lizzie
(37:39):
Nimitz and a partnership.
Speaker 2 (37:41):
With the Lack Effect Network.
Speaker 1 (37:44):
You can also find us on my YouTube channel at
the Carlos King Underscore
Reality with the King is hosted by me, Carlos King.
I'm an executive producer who have produced some of your
favorite shows from the Real Housewives in Atlanta, New Jersey
and my own creation, The Love and Marriage Franchise and
Bell Collective. Every episode we recap reality television from the
Real Housewives Franchise to The Bachelor or Selling Sunset, in
(00:27):
addition to celebrity guests, whether in the unscripted space or
scripted as well. All Right, rain Drops, if you've been
sipping with us, then you know Reality Crime Stories is
where glam meets grit and the headlines always comes with
(00:51):
a sight of hard truth. Every week, Courtney Parker and
I put Back to the Velvet Robe on.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
Fame, Fortune and the fallout they try to hide.
Speaker 3 (01:01):
That's right, Carlos.
Speaker 4 (01:02):
Everything from reality TV scandals to the crimes committed behind
the cameras, whether it happens on or off the screen,
Carlos and I will bring you the tea surrounding hot
topic crime stories involving all of your favorite reality TV personalities.
Speaker 1 (01:20):
And if today's story taught us anything, child, is that
in this world the tea is never just hot, it's criminal. Hey,
rain Drops, On today's episode of Reality Crime Stories, my
co hosts Corny Parker and I are back to talk
(01:41):
about my girl, Kim Zosiac and what is happening when
it comes to Wins Wallace and divorce wars Cartney, that's.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
A good title. I love it, love it, love it.
Speaker 5 (01:54):
I'm glad you like it, Carlos.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Not nodult. It's really good. So let's get right into it.
From Wiggs and Why to.
Speaker 1 (02:02):
Warrance and withdraw slips, Kim's Zozziak Bearman's picture perfect life
has officially entered war zone. What started off as a
fairytale Bravo romance has become one of the most bitter,
broke and bewildering divorces in reality TV history. I mean,
(02:23):
police calls have been made, so has repossessions, bounced checks,
and now whispers of a billionaire boyfriend with his own
one hundred million dollars scandal. This is not just messy,
this is a bona fide mess Okay. So rain Drops,
we're here to talk about what's going on with Kim's Zoziak,
(02:45):
our favorite Atlanta housewife, and really get down in terms
of what's going on with the new boyfriend in addition
to the divorce from her husband Kroix Beerman.
Speaker 2 (03:01):
It's been a.
Speaker 3 (03:01):
Minute since we've seen or really heard from from Kim,
so I'm super surprised to see how active she's been
in headlines here as of late. She's pretty much kept
a you know, a low profile as far as the
show is concerned. But uh, in her personal life, things
(03:25):
have just been spiraling. The one thing I will say
about Kim is she bounces back.
Speaker 2 (03:33):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (03:33):
And now she's bouncing back with a billionaire.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
Yes, forget forget bounce checks. Howdy. She just bouncing back.
Speaker 1 (03:40):
And that's why we have just Tyranny back to talk
to us too, as.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
We you know, ask her all the important questions.
Speaker 1 (03:49):
That you guys want to know, not not me, You
guys want to know this, So welcome just Tiarranny.
Speaker 2 (03:54):
How are you good?
Speaker 5 (03:56):
How are you guys today?
Speaker 3 (03:58):
Really good? And we now listen before we get into
the questions, we know you're going to give your infamous disclaimer.
You can't talk about active cases.
Speaker 6 (04:11):
I cannot raindrops get so much sat with me because
they want me to go into the details. But I
just have to tell you all that I am here
really just to inform you about the law. Make sure
you have a better understanding, and then you can form
your own opinions based on the facts and the information
(04:33):
that you know as the rain drops, because we all
know that the rain drops know better than most.
Speaker 2 (04:42):
And look, look you clocked up, and that is true.
Solicit Let's get into the.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
Timeline, the coordinating. I'll have you ask the first question,
so rain drops. In twenty twenty two, report surface of
unpaid credit cards and malting tax step that allegedly leaped
over one point one million dollars oh to the IRS.
Kim and Kroy allegedly refinanced their home twice to cover
(05:10):
the expenses. May of twenty twenty three, that's when Kroy
filed for divorced for the first time. Kim counterst a
week later, claiming that they're working it out. Neighbors report
frequent police visits for domestic disputes. August of twenty twenty three,
Kroy files again, but this time he is citing and
(05:32):
reconcilable differences and also demanding full custody. He has alleged
that Kim has a gambling addiction and that financial recklessness.
He also made sure to file in court earlier in
twenty twenty four, the Georgia mansion that we saw on
(05:54):
the show interned foreclosure proceedings. Reports claim that look like
cameras were there filming it. I can tell you they weren't. Okay,
so I can confirm that for you all as of.
Speaker 2 (06:08):
Today, so check this out. They're still not divorced, right,
They're not divorced.
Speaker 1 (06:14):
And in spring of this year is when Kim was
linked to real estate developer Kyle Mowitz, who simultaneously is
enrolled in a one hundred million dollar divorce battle in
Texas where his estranged wife reportedly is accusing him of
(06:37):
funneling marital assets towards another woman. That woman is.
Speaker 2 (06:42):
Kim Zosiak, who has denied amy and involvement.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
This is messy, and the gag is I really wish
cameras were rolling because this is the type of mess
I want to see on Atlanta.
Speaker 3 (06:55):
Housewives exactly, because you've listed so much of those things.
And one of the things that I found very interesting
in Kroy's claim was that the excessive spending, and we've
all seen from the beginning of Housewives of Atlanta to
(07:18):
her own spin off shows, Kim knows how to shop
Kim knows how to spend, even from her days with
Big Papa. The girl knows her labels and and you
know she knows how to shop and spend. My first
(07:38):
question for you, based off of all that Carlos has read, Judge,
is when a couple files what appears to be some
serious yet frivolous legal charges, with so many of them
being filings, dismissals, refilings sometimes at this point, how does
(08:02):
a court even take something like this seriously?
Speaker 6 (08:09):
Well, the first thing I will say is that frivolous
will be a determination by the court. So everyone is
entitled to file suit if they have felt harmed, and
so the court will determine the merits of that lawsuit.
And like you say, in any divorce, there are several
(08:29):
things that if it's a contested.
Speaker 5 (08:31):
Divorce, things are constantly filed.
Speaker 6 (08:37):
Unfortunately, in family law it is very common to see
because it's such a personal nature. People take everything about
a divorce very personal.
Speaker 5 (08:50):
That you see a lot of foulings.
Speaker 6 (08:52):
More so than you see in probably any other practice
of law.
Speaker 5 (08:57):
So you have to keep that in mind.
Speaker 6 (08:59):
One that is, anytime you're dealing with family law, and
so the judges in those courtrooms are going to keep
that in mind.
Speaker 5 (09:07):
They are used to it.
Speaker 6 (09:08):
They're going to be able to tell once they review
the evidence what should move forward and what shouldn't. And
because people are at all time high of emotions, you
very rarely are going to get a judge that is
going to call something frivolous unless you have evidence of
(09:30):
some kind of misrepresentation or mal intent.
Speaker 5 (09:36):
So that's the first thing I would say.
Speaker 6 (09:37):
The second thing I would say too, in family law
is a lot of times, especially when you have domestic
issues involved, you cross from civil law to criminal law,
and that becomes an issue. Because you could have family law.
Divorce cases are considered civil law. But if you get
the police involved and there has been some accusation of
(10:03):
an illegal activity, anything ranging from domestic violence to fraud,
now you are entering into the realm of criminal laws.
And so now you're going to have these things comingling,
which would definitely make it a lot more messier and
a lot more for the judge to kind of sort through, which.
Speaker 5 (10:25):
Leads to what we see in a lot of.
Speaker 3 (10:27):
Cases delays, delayed, delayed delay.
Speaker 6 (10:31):
So people are always, like I thought, for divorce two
years ago, three years ago, you.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
Thought for divorce.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
I now if my PTSD from all of the reality
shows I've done in all these episodes where these divorces
take so much time. So that's why I'm like, you know,
just hearing a line about that. A lot of people
seem like, Okay, if.
Speaker 2 (11:04):
I file and leaves within a year, this can happen.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
But in cases like this, where there's accusations of fraud,
there's accusations of a gambling addiction, these sort of situations
take longer because, like you said, all divorced proceedings starts
off as civil, but this is now entering criminal territory allegedly,
allegedly possibly.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (11:29):
The other issue is anytime you're talking about family law,
you have to also remember that if a couple reconciles
that voids the divorce proceedings, you.
Speaker 5 (11:41):
Have to start all over over, so you.
Speaker 6 (11:45):
Have basically re entered marriage, which will also add time
and delay.
Speaker 3 (11:52):
Got it, And the courts typically that was a good
point because one of the key words that you use
was there are emotions are high even in family court,
especially if there are children involved. There are assets involved
in these kinds of cases. When you see filings, refilings, dismissals.
(12:16):
Do the courts allow room for reconciliation? Are they really
yearing towards and leaning towards hey, because there was once
upon a time love there. Hopefully you can reconcile and
put your family back together and your marriage back together.
Speaker 6 (12:38):
Well, you know, before you actually complete a divorce, you
have to go through a parents in class if you
have kids, but you also have to go through mediation,
which is a signal of one. Are you going to
be able to reconcile? Do you really need the courts
to get involved?
Speaker 3 (12:57):
Or Two?
Speaker 5 (12:57):
If you don't reconcile, can you all.
Speaker 6 (13:00):
Work this out amongst yourself without crowding the doctor of
the court. The court never wants to be involved in
a personal matter, so of course they want to give
you the option to try and work it out between yourselves.
But if for some reason you need a referee, then
(13:20):
the court is going to step in with the rules
and laws of that state to try and balance it
in fairness and equity. But you also have to remember again,
because it's family law and it's so so emotional, everyone
always feels like they were kind of wrong because no
(13:41):
one is going to get exactly what they want.
Speaker 1 (13:47):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I do have a question for you, because.
Speaker 2 (13:52):
When you are a married couple. This is from what
I have been told. I've never been married, but I've
been told that when you are a married couple.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
The reason why they tell people make sure that you
know you two people who are joining forces in matrimony,
that your finances are straight, because if one partner is
in serious depth, then if you guys are married, that's
the spouse incurs some of your depth in case you
(14:24):
owe money to the IRS.
Speaker 2 (14:25):
I'm asking that because you.
Speaker 1 (14:27):
Know, when we talk about Kim and Kroy, there are
reports that there's unpaid credit cards and mounting tax depth
that is reaching over a million dollars. So, with that
being said, if let's say, for example, as Kroy's alleging
Kim's alleged gambling addiction is putting them in this situation,
(14:52):
is Kroy safe from owing the I r S that
money if he can prove that let's say Kim is
responsible for the mounting death or because they're married, her
death is automatically his.
Speaker 5 (15:09):
So there's a couple of.
Speaker 6 (15:10):
Things I think about the IRS that people do not realize. One,
even as a married couple, you have to decide if
you're going to you check that box right, Are you
filing married or single? So you can be married and
continue to file single or Hold up? Hold up, you
(15:35):
do not it's an election. You do not have to
file married simply because you are married. Once you become married,
you have the choice to file married, and if you
do file married, you have to continue to file married
every year unless up until you divorce.
Speaker 5 (15:57):
But if you.
Speaker 6 (15:58):
Get married and you continue to file separately as individuals,
you have a separate tax account.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
Okay, So.
Speaker 6 (16:12):
Without me knowing anyone's personal information, the answer to your
question is, if you are married filing married, both parties
will be responsible for the tax dick.
Speaker 5 (16:25):
If you are.
Speaker 6 (16:26):
Married and filing individually, you are only responsible individually for
your tax deck.
Speaker 2 (16:35):
Did you know that, Courtney?
Speaker 3 (16:37):
I know that you have choices? Again, know that because
I have You know, I have a daughter and we're
now at the stage of does she make enough money
to file her own taxes? Is it more beneficial for
me to keep her on my taxes until twenty six?
(16:57):
But when I do that, I have to claim head
of household. So I did know that you had choice,
some choices. What I didn't realize, and this piggyback's off
of Carlos's questions. So when it comes to the acquired
debt as a couple, not just tax wise, but just
(17:18):
as a debt, if he is claiming financial fraud on
Chimp's part, alleging financial fraud on Chimp's part is one
spouse solely responsible for the others regardless of their their
their taxes. They have shared assets and they do they
(17:38):
also share the debt.
Speaker 6 (17:42):
So again, we have a thing called premarital property, right, Okay,
just excluded once you get married.
Speaker 5 (17:49):
They're exclusions.
Speaker 2 (17:50):
Explain that. Explain that to us.
Speaker 6 (17:53):
Okay, So if my grandmother left me a house and
then I went and got married, that house is mine.
It's pre marital property. It is separated from my marital property.
So even though I went and got married, after I
own the house, it still does not become a part
(18:13):
of my marital estate.
Speaker 5 (18:16):
But I get married and.
Speaker 6 (18:18):
My husband and I buy a house that is a
part of the marital estate.
Speaker 5 (18:24):
Everything is lovely.
Speaker 6 (18:25):
If we bought the house for five hundred thousand dollars
and sell it for a million dollars, we make five
hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 5 (18:31):
And we split it. The problem comes.
Speaker 6 (18:34):
We paid five hundred thousand dollars is worth one hundred
thousand dollars, and we owe four hundred thousand dollars. We
equally and jointly owe that money together.
Speaker 5 (18:46):
What does that mean?
Speaker 6 (18:46):
That means that our creditors can come after us individually
or jointly together. They don't have to come and get
half for me or half for my husband, because we
are both responsible for that debt. If I owe four
hundred thousand dollars and he owes four hundred thousand dollars,
but I'm the only person with four hundred thousand dollars,
(19:08):
the credit is going to take the.
Speaker 5 (19:10):
Entire four hundred thousand dollars for me.
Speaker 6 (19:13):
But during my divorce, I am going to say I
paid this entire debt and I should be credited for
paying his half in some way. A judge is going
to take those things into account and try and balance
it out. But as we have taught so much in
(19:33):
other episodes, you have to be someone who can collect
the money from you. Gotta be collectible. You can't just
owe it. I gotta be able to get.
Speaker 5 (19:44):
It from you.
Speaker 3 (19:45):
Collectible. That's our takeaway word.
Speaker 2 (19:48):
Carlos, Okay, I mean the baby.
Speaker 1 (19:51):
That's why they always say it's cheaper to keep up,
and it's cheap or in this case, you know it's
cheaper to keep count.
Speaker 2 (19:58):
Now, as I.
Speaker 6 (19:59):
Always say, you could never go wrong with the prena,
no matter what the value of your state is, because
a prenup lays out the rules and it would eliminate
delays in court, a lot of legal fees, a lot
of high emotions because we have decided all the rules
(20:19):
when we love each other the most.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
I'm always fascinated by these conversations because, look, I do
know Kim personally, and I was then when she Mtcroy
and it was honestly, love at first sight is on camera.
Speaker 2 (20:36):
We filmed it.
Speaker 1 (20:38):
I was coe p of her wedding special and I
was able to see again these two people fall in
love as a married couple and CROI adopting her two
daughters at the time, and now together as a married couple.
(20:59):
They had a that are twins, and I believe another
boy or two if I'm not mistaken. So it's unfortunate
that things have come to this because I did not
see this coming, nor did the Bravo fans.
Speaker 2 (21:14):
Because it's what we always hear.
Speaker 1 (21:17):
You know, when you do get something like a prenuptural agreement,
it's not for the person you're in love with, it's
for the person you're divorcing, because that was our two.
You know, It's not the person you're marrying, it's the
person you're divorcing, which are two different people.
Speaker 2 (21:32):
And that does beg the question that I just don't.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
Know because I'm trying to remember if they did get
a pre nap because when Kim mcfroyd coroy was in
the NFL playing for the Atlanta Falcons, and you know, relatively,
he of course had money. She was, you know, the
star of the house was in Atlanta, she was also
(21:58):
making money. But in terms of a prenup, based on
my memory, and I'm going to research this as we're talking,
I don't think they have one.
Speaker 6 (22:09):
No, And again I am for prenups no matter what
your economic status is, because I think that it is
just the best way. I mean, we do contracts every
single day. You go run an apartment and you have
a contract and you say, hey, I may have to
break the lease.
Speaker 5 (22:27):
This is what happened.
Speaker 6 (22:28):
Hey if you damage something in my apartment, this is
what happens. It's not necessarily a negative thing, but for
some reason, prenom, the word prenup has a negative connotation,
and I wish we could change that because also, similar
to someone you're marrying may have a large amount of
(22:48):
debt that once you get married, you may start paying
that debt. It becomes shared debt at this time, how
are you compensated for that?
Speaker 3 (22:59):
Right?
Speaker 6 (23:00):
So it's just a matter of really, let's just get
secure and comfortable about talking about our finances and our
livelihood of how we would like things to play out, right.
Speaker 3 (23:17):
I have I want to go back and pivot for
just a second. Because Carlo, she brought up the kids.
There were claims that Arianna says that her parents took
money from Brand Deal's for her to help cover some
of the debt. Kim has admitted that she spent some
(23:39):
of that money on bills and promises that she will
pay back if she hasn't already paid back. I'm giving
her a new set of circumstances. I'm sure she has.
What do you are there any legal takeaways regarding that
or how does everybody feel with respect to that?
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Yeah, it's interesting because you know, listen. I'm one of
ten siblings, and my mother was a true housewife. You know,
she gave birth to ten kids. She raised us until
she passed away five years ago. But for of course,
my whole life, my father was the only person working.
Speaker 2 (24:24):
And when me and my siblings started to work, my.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
Father said, okay, it's time for y'all to contribute to
some of these bills, and we're like, get out of
here us, my buddy. But we obviously helped at as
much as we could. So that is an interesting question legally,
ken Arianna Beerman if she wanted to. From what I understand,
(24:48):
her and Kim are fine and everything is good. But
to Courty's point, could Arianna take can a child tech
legal action as a parent by saying, I, as a minor,
accumulated this money for a job I did. I gave
it to my parents because I'm a minor and they
spent it.
Speaker 2 (25:07):
Can it take legal action to get that money back?
Speaker 6 (25:12):
So the short answer is that anyone can take legal action.
Speaker 2 (25:16):
That's true. True.
Speaker 6 (25:20):
Again, that is a part of our great American legal system.
Whether someone is going to be successful, it's going to
depend on a lot of variables.
Speaker 5 (25:33):
Again, we don't know.
Speaker 6 (25:34):
We hear about a lot of child stars and parents
who are not just parents, they are also a part
of their business, and those parents have to be compensated
for their services. And so how that is worked out, Again,
you have to have some kind of auditing and accounting
(25:56):
of the accounts to see once the reconciliation is done,
has the child been given more to the parent than
they should have if they are oh something. And sometimes
in some of those reconciliations, the parent is actually owed
money as well. So again, anybody can sue for anything
(26:19):
in this great American system we have.
Speaker 3 (26:22):
It is very.
Speaker 6 (26:23):
Unfortunate when you have parents and children suing each other,
or parents mishandling funds. But again, unless there is some
kind of action taken, I think that it's very hard
for anyone to jump to judgment without knowing all of
the facts.
Speaker 1 (26:44):
I do want to shift gears a bit because I
want to get into the fact that Kim Zelziak has
a new boyfriend.
Speaker 6 (26:51):
Which.
Speaker 1 (26:53):
Is already starting a lot of controversy. His name is
Kyle Morwitz. His a strange white Jillian Green, has subpoena
Kim in this ongoing contentious lawsuit that the wife has
against the husband, which is very fascinating. So I want
(27:16):
to just recap it again because I'm just like to
leave one crazy situation and to embark on another is
just insane in the membrane.
Speaker 2 (27:28):
But let me just catch your guys up on it.
So again.
Speaker 1 (27:31):
Kim was subpoenaed in a one hundred million dollar divorced
by her new boyfriend's wife, who is demanding answers over guests.
On September thirtieth, court documents were filed that showed this,
in addition to the fact that Jillian Green, which by
(27:53):
the way, Kim was served at a parking lot out
of high school in Georgia.
Speaker 3 (27:57):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
Okay, that's that's how.
Speaker 1 (28:00):
Much Jillian ain't planning with the girls. Okay, but let's
appear Kim turned over all communities with her boyfriend, any
communications between Kim and another third party regarding payment for
services or communications concerning her a strange husband. Jillian also
(28:29):
asks for any documents regarding gifts from him or any
business he owns that he has given her. Last, but
not least, she also requested any and all documents regarding
or pertaining to Kim's financial relationship with Kyle, including but
(28:53):
not limited to gifts given or received from Kyle, expenses
paid on her behalf by Kyle, and again any business
in which he's connected, money's loan to her and money's
paid to her by Kyle or any businesses which he
is connected when it.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
Comes to cam.
Speaker 1 (29:16):
Now, look, a lot of people can say, Judge Tearing
in Courtney, this is a woman scored, Okay, But my
question to you is this, Yes, you can take legal
action against anybody, know that. But to file a subpoena
(29:36):
against a woman that's dating your husband and you're trying
to figure out if the money that he accumulated was
used to pay you know, gifts for her or do
any businesses?
Speaker 2 (29:51):
Does that happen often? And if so, does.
Speaker 1 (29:54):
That mean that in case this goes as far in court,
that Kim would have to return these gifts back that
she was given about his band.
Speaker 6 (30:05):
So again, I cannot come back on any open cases,
got it, But I will point you all. I don't
know if you remember the high profile case where the
Lakers owner gave a woman a lot of gifts.
Speaker 3 (30:28):
No, it's the Clippers, I.
Speaker 6 (30:32):
L yeah, and she had to return these things because
in that arrangement. The wife and husband were business partners.
It's not just that we are married, we are business partners.
(30:53):
And the husband did not have the authority to use
the wife's money and business proceeds in that manner. God,
Now again, do you have to look at all of
the facts? And again you said, is this just simply
(31:17):
a woman's scorn? When you start looking at high dollar divorces,
there are a lot more like details that you're going
to have to look at at the assets because it
may not simply be about an emotional retribution. Again, if
(31:41):
you have used marital and or business funds that belong
to me as the wife, I have a right to
know that, and I have a right to know where
my money is invested and what I received for my
money got.
Speaker 3 (32:02):
It for those who don't know, if you will allow
me who Kyle Morwitz is. According to the International Business Times,
he is a businessman and investor who holds a real
estate and finance degree from Florida State University. He graduated
(32:23):
in two thousand and three. He co founded Imperium Blue
Management Group and is a managing partner of Imperium Companies.
His family offices reportedly oversee four point five billion dollars
in assets. His portfolio reportedly includes investments in real estate,
(32:46):
e commerce resistant assets, high barrier businesses alongside his brother.
They have a Morwitz Family endowment at FSU. And the
thing about it is, like you were saying, just tyranny.
This is a high profile, high asset divorce one hundred
(33:08):
million dollars with lots of companies reported within the the
more Wits Imperial Blue Management Imperium Company's portfolio. So to
be able to ask for a hundred million dollars means
that out of this four point five billion dollar managing assets,
(33:35):
he has it, she has it. It's all intertwined within
a marriage and an arrangement that doesn't feel like it
has a pre.
Speaker 5 (33:47):
Nump right, or it could have a pre nump.
Speaker 6 (33:54):
And you know, generally when you see someone with a
pre nump and they are asking questions that are inconsistent
with not having a prenup, they may be trying to
break the prenup for some reason. There may be some
claus in the prenum that allows them to avoid the
(34:17):
prenup under certain circumstances, which like him the answer some
of Carlos questions of why would a woman do this.
Speaker 3 (34:27):
Right and married right, He's still married, she still married,
gets her purchase with family money.
Speaker 2 (34:38):
So yeah, later it was crazy.
Speaker 1 (34:43):
Is the way that Jilly and the wife of Kempsley
boyfriend found out about? Uh this relationship is? She? She
said that Kroy reached out to her. She said she
was contacted by Kroi. She said she met up with
(35:03):
him at her cousin's home to talk about Kim's involvement
with her ex. She said that Kroi told her he
was concerned that Kim will financially drain money from Kyle
Horny boyfriend.
Speaker 2 (35:16):
Jillian said Kroi showed.
Speaker 1 (35:18):
Her receipts of groceries that have been purchased by Kim
using Kyle's credit cards.
Speaker 5 (35:24):
Oh wow.
Speaker 1 (35:25):
Jillian said that Kroi told her that Kim was narcissistic
and had a gathering problem and was not present for
their children. Kim has since denied all allegations brought by Kroi.
Speaker 2 (35:40):
So we're talking about a woman's score one hundred.
Speaker 1 (35:42):
There's a man scort allegedly because babystic Because like you said,
both couples are still married going through this divorce where
the finances are at the top of this sort of
(36:04):
messy situation, infidelity is that the head up this situation
because Jillian is alleging that Kyle cheat itself.
Speaker 2 (36:13):
This has a lot of.
Speaker 1 (36:15):
You know, information that is going to come out in
the coming weeks.
Speaker 2 (36:20):
And this is only part one of what will be
many parts to the story. So John, you gotta come back,
right you do.
Speaker 3 (36:31):
I have one lasting question. You don't have to answer
it out, judge, but could Kroy potentially be called as
a witness or subpoena in their divorce in the Morwitz
family divorce court?
Speaker 6 (36:47):
Well, in court, you know, there's a thing called hearsay,
and so no one can do third party testimony. So
if they were actions or events that actually happened that
only a certain party can testify, they most certainly can
be subpoenas.
Speaker 2 (37:09):
And there you have it.
Speaker 1 (37:11):
That's another episode of reality Crime Stories. Judge, Tyranny, thank
you so much for your expertise.
Speaker 2 (37:17):
Courtney, thank you so much for your research.
Speaker 1 (37:19):
And Rain Johns, We'll be back because let's be clear,
there's more to this story than meets the wig. All right,
I will see y'all next one. Reality with the King
is executive produced by me Carlos King, produced by Lizzie
(37:39):
Nimitz and a partnership.
Speaker 2 (37:41):
With the Lack Effect Network.
Speaker 1 (37:44):
You can also find us on my YouTube channel at
the Carlos King Underscore
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.