Battleground LIVE: Definitely Not Tired Of Winning Yet w/Bryan Dean Wright

Tonight on Battleground LIVE I talk about the Hegseth confirmation vote, Trump in NC and in California, the Dem resistance collapsing, and as always your global intel update with Bryan Dean Wright.

Buckle up

 

Follow Sean on Instagram - @officialseanparnell

Follow Sean on Twitter - @SeanParnellUSA

Get your Battleground apparel at www.officialseanparnell.com

Support the show: https://officialseanparnell.com/

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:03):
Warning Europe down to enter the arena and join the
Battle to Save.

Speaker 2 (00:09):
America with your host Sean Carnell.

Speaker 1 (00:14):
Good evening, America, Welcome to Battleground Live. This is the
show where we kick ass, and we take names and
we lock horns with the radical left. We never quit,
we never surrender. From sea to shining Sea and everybody
in between. Welcome patriots on this glorious Friday, and thank

(00:36):
god it is Friday, folks. Five days in the books.
Now Trump's presidency is off and running. He's got more
done in five days than Biden has done in five hundred.
The guy is he's just on fire. The title of
the episode is I'm not tired of winning. Well, I

(00:58):
mean the truth is, because I'm not tired of winning.
Trump is not wasting any time, just unraveling the radical
left's agenda. And frankly, folks, we don't have a whole
lot of time. We've got four years to put a
a complete stop to what the progressive left, what I

(01:18):
like to call the regressive left, and their agenda. Times
stop that agenda, but really move the Overton window back
to the right and save this country. We don't have
a whole hell of a lot of time, So let
me just a couple of admin notes. Let me thank
Dan Nunn and his nunchucks. Let me also thank the
Patriot Raiders for rating this stream. Both of you take.

(01:42):
Both of these groups are great Americans. And if to
the Battle Crew, if you're not following Dan Nunn and
the nun Report, or you're not following Patriot Raiders, you
definitely should go support these Patriot groups because they're amazing. Also,
make sure you smash that like button, that little gray
thumb beneath the video. When you smash it, it turns

(02:03):
green when you smash the like button. It helps us
make the leader board on Rumble. Very very excited about
that because we make it because of you and this
is your show and it always will be. Now we've
got Brian Dean right on decks, will be talking to
him about everything under the sun, and very excited to

(02:25):
do it because he was. I thought I had him
lined up for last week, but had some well Brian's
just a very busy person, so couldn't lock him down
for last week. So we've gone probably two weeks now,
gone through some BDW, some Brian Dean right withdraw. I
know you all absolutely love Brian Dean Wright. I think

(02:46):
he's the best. But he is on deck for tonight,
super excited to talk about him. Okay, let me tell you,
let me thank you some of the people who have
thrown some rumble ran tips in the show, you know,
for people that are listening watching for the first time.
You know, we engage about an hour prior to the

(03:07):
show going live, sometimes a little bit earlier, and lots
of people throwing these rumble rant tips in the live
chat prior to going live. That first of all, thank
you all, but no bones. Thank you, no bones tipped
a bunch of times. Seriously, no bones. Thank you so
much for everything. One hundred percent. By the way, for
those listening and watching it the first time, one hundred

(03:27):
percent of what we get goes right back into the
show to give you a better quality viewing and listening experience. Todd,
he said, He said to Todd tipped, he said, this
isn't singles for the ladies and right night, because yes,
the ladies do like Brian Dean Wright and Dorry She
Dorry says, please remind Brian Valance Hei's day is coming

(03:48):
up and he has lots of girlfriends in here you
all are the best audience on Earth. I will be
sure to remind Brian of that. Okay, let me just
jump right into it real quick. So today, I'm sure
that many of you all saw the news that Trump
revoked Fauci's security detail, he revoked Mike Pompeo's security detail,

(04:14):
he revoked John Bolton's security detail, and all of these
people went on the news and kind of complained about
it and said that they had gotten This is what
they're saying. So I'm just telling you what they're saying,
and then I'm gonna tell you what the reality is.
They're saying, Well, hey, look they've been threatened by Iran
and their life is at risk. Trump shouldn't have done it. Well,

(04:37):
Trump said, these people have tens of millions, if not
hundreds of millions of dollars in the bank. They can
afford security on their own. I agree with Trump. You know,
these people, especially Fauci, What the hell does Fauci still
have a Secret Service security protection detail for It absolutely
makes no sense they should that this needed to happen.

(05:00):
By the way, the American taxpayers are saving over forty
two million dollars a year doing it. So I'm for this. Okay,
let's segue very quickly to the Heg Seth vote. HEG says,
confirmation vote. Now, this is the big one. This isn't
the vote out of the Armed Services Committee. This isn't

(05:22):
the vote for Kloture was yesterday to basically say, Okay,
we're done. We got thirty hours to signal to everybody,
got thirty hours left the debate. That thirty hours is
up tonight. The vote, HEG says, confirmation vote is tonight
at eight pm Eastern Standard time. Everything hangs in the balance.
And what I'm hearing talk to a couple senators today,

(05:46):
what I am hearing is it is very very close. Now,
we had fifty one votes yesterday, we lost Murkowski and
we lost Collins again. I also just say i I'm
I'm far more upset with Lisa Murkowski that I am
with Susan Collins. I I would not vote like either
of them were I in the Senate. But maybe for

(06:09):
those who didn't hear my logic, let me explain very quickly.
Suzanne Collins represents the state of Maine, that is a
Democrat state, that is a liberal state, Yet somehow, as
a Republican she manages to win it. So my logic is,
I would rather have somebody who is with the Republican
Party and votes with us in the Senate fifty sixty

(06:30):
percent of the time than a Democrat in that seat
who votes with us none percent of the time. You
see my point right now? Lisa Murkowski Trump won her
state by something like twenty points, so to me, there's
absolutely no excuse for her voting against Heiksas Trump won

(06:52):
a mandate, we should support Trump's nominees, especially if you
come from a deep red state like Alaska. And the
only reason why Lisa Murkowski won is of court. Remember
her father was a senator before her held state white
office in Alaska. But she literally rigged the primary with
rank choice voting. That's why she's a US senator today.

(07:13):
But you know, she talks about Pete Hagsa's judgment. She
cites his judgment as a reason why she's not going
to be voting for him. But this is Lisa Murkowski
talking about Brett Kavanaugh.

Speaker 3 (07:26):
Listen, a nomination for a judge goes forward, you rate
them not only on their professional competence what they have
demonstrated through their record, but also matters of temperament and

(07:49):
just demeanor, which are very very important. I have a
very high bar for any nominee to the Supreme Court
of the United States in my conscience, because that's how
I have to vote the end of the day, is
with my conscience, I could not conclude that he is

(08:13):
the right person for the Court at this time.

Speaker 1 (08:18):
She voted for nineteen of Biden's nominees. She voted for
Dick Levine, the guy who pretends to be a woman
who is named the secretary, I think an undersecretary for
Health and Human Services. So, by the way, she didn't
think Kavanaugh had the right temperament. The guy was falsely
accused of some of the most horrific stuff in the world.

(08:41):
He's got young kids, his wife sitting right behind him,
one of the most horrifying smear campaigns that I have
ever witnessed, not just me, but most of America has
ever witnessed. And he gets indignant when he's asked questions
about this. He gets pissed off when he's asked questions
about this. And here you have Murkowski saying, oh, wow,

(09:05):
he didn't have the temperament. I mean, I think the
guy has a right to get angry, frustrated, and indignant
when he's falsely accused of horrifying crimes in front of
his children. But the fact that Lisa Murkowski, again from Alaska,
a state that President Trump won by twenty points, the

(09:26):
fact that she's citing Pete haik Seth's judgment and anonymous allegations,
is the reason why she won't vote for him, to
me is abhorrant. And Elizabeth Warren Pocahontas has been out
there taking swipes of Pete haik Seth saying that the
Secretary of Defense, it's the most important cabinet nominee, which
I would agree with her there, but she says he
has to be ready to go twenty four hours a day,

(09:48):
three hundred and sixty five days a year. I mean,
for the love of God, the Secretary of Defense, Secretary
of Defense Austin, who was responsible for the Afghani surrender,
who left billions of dollars of our equipment and weapons
in Afghanistan, disappeared for four weeks and did not tell

(10:09):
anybody where he went. You heard that right. Our own
Secretary of Defense under Joe Biden, went a wall. He
had surgery. The surgery didn't go, well, I mean, I'm
glad he's okay, but what if he was not okay?
He didn't even tell the commander in chief not to
mention that Elizabeth Warren taking swipes at Pete Hegseth is

(10:33):
quite ironic, given that people like Elizabeth Warren covered up
for Joe Biden, who was a dementia patient for four
years and he was the commander in chief. All of
this is just it's just such ridiculous political theater. If
you and what these Democrats are banking on are Americans Simply,

(10:55):
they're just hoping that Americans aren't paying attention, and then
they're just gonna buy the fake new narrative as they're
pushing it. But I think times have changed. I mean,
outside of people like Suzanne Collins and Lisa Murkowski, I
think the vast majority of the American people see through
this insane bullshit. Now. I don't think these smear campaigns

(11:17):
are gonna work. We will see come tonight at eight o'clock.
You know, I think the math right now still looks
pretty good for Pete haig Seth. I would also remind
people that Fetterman people like to say federal' look Fetterman's
he's a pragmatic Democrat. Look, he's supporting Trump's nominees. He

(11:38):
did not. He did not vote to advance Pete's nomination yesterday,
so he was a no on Cloture. So I mean
that could be different today. He could give Pete haig
Seth the trumpet of approval today, So withhold judgment until
that time. But to me, the big question mark is
Mitch McConnell. If Mitch McConnell is a thumbs down on Pete,

(12:00):
which he voted to it, he voted to he voted
for Klochure yesterday, so that was that was great. I
thought that was a great development. But Mitch McConnell kind
of does his own thing, and he's very tight lipped
historically about how he's going to vote on given nominees
until he actually votes. That's just how he rolls. And
so if if Mitch McConnell votes against Hegcath, and Murkowski

(12:23):
votes against hag Seth, and h Collins votes against hag Seth,
that gives you can lose three. So that would require
jd Vance to come in and break the tie. So
right now the math looks pretty good. But to me,
again hag Seth. This nomination with Pete Hegseth is an
important one. Okay, I've got Brian Dean right on deck.

(12:44):
Before I get to him. I want to, I want to.
I gotta do a quick ad read because I want
as much uninterrupted time with Brian as possible. But I
also have to say something about Donald Trump in North Carolina.
There are two horrific disasters happening in America right now,
the stuff that's happening in North Carolina Western North Carolina
the stuff that's happening in California. In the first week

(13:06):
of Trump's presidency, he went to both places, boots on
the ground in both places, and he gave survivors, especially
in the Carolina and North Carolina while of the horrible floods.
He gave survivors a platform to tell their story. And
this resonates with me deeply because I think so much

(13:28):
of being a good leader and a good servant leader
is showing up, not just when times are good, but
especially when times are very very bad. Just being there
with people, listening to what they're saying, telling them that
you have their back. That to me is so much
about what it means to be a leader and Trump

(13:50):
did that. Listen to him engage with this woman who
lost everything in North Carolina, and then I'll do a
quick ad read and then we'll get to Brian Dean right,
get his thoughts.

Speaker 4 (14:01):
I'm a pastorn next our church right down the road.
We had only purchased in May, and it's.

Speaker 2 (14:09):
A big church.

Speaker 4 (14:10):
We're a small congregation. And I had people say, what
are you going to do with this big building? And
I said, only God knows. And we had our dedication
in the storm came the next week and the outpouring
of people. My son brought the first load of supplies
and from there I stayed there for about three months.

(14:33):
I slept on the floor for about three weeks because
the need was so great. The people were so devastated,
and I said, I want to be here for them.
And they were coming in just day and night, so
there's really no need for me to go home. But
we had people from Kentucky, Tennessee, Texas, Indiana, Oklahoma, people

(14:56):
from all over. We have not received any help from
and government anything, but I said, Lord, if you want
us to do that, people all over the states.

Speaker 1 (15:10):
Female locals wasted time and morning.

Speaker 4 (15:13):
The locals and the people that knew us. And before
the week was over, our church was so packed with
supplies we couldn't even we couldn't even walk even in
our sanctuary. It was up to the platform of things,
and in our halls and in our rooms. And we're
just now beginning to get a little straightened out. But

(15:34):
somebody said, how long are you going to be here?
I said, I'm going to be here through the winter
and even on if possible, because when you meet people
that's been through the struggle. I had a little lady
come up and I said, can we do anything special
for you? And she said, I don't want to be selfish,

(15:54):
but said could I have a cup of coffee? And
I handed her that coffee and she stood there and
and Kears just poured. She said, you don't realize how
important that the little things. It's not the big things
in life that we have, but it's the little things
and knowing that God.

Speaker 1 (16:14):
So that I just want you to wrap your mind
around this. That's the President of the United States, the
most powerful man in the world, the leader of the
free world, standing to the side of a podium with
the Presidential seal intended for him, giving up that platform
to allow her survivor someone that's done good for the

(16:35):
people of North Carolina to speak. This is what Trump
does so well. He uses the platform of the president,
the bully pulpit of the president, to draw attention to
certain critical issues. At times like this, he's not getting
in the way, but you notice he's listening to her.
He says, FEMA, FEMA didn't do anything yet, people coming

(16:57):
in from all around here. It took him here that
to activate what will become I think an internal investigation
and reform of FENA. The FEMA staffed by Department of
Homeland Security folks, and I think the Secretary of Defense
and Defense folks will be involved in restructuring FEMA. But
it took Trump listening to people in North Carolina to

(17:19):
take that action. But again, sometimes being a leader means
showing up, and man, nobody does it better than Trump. Okay,
I got Brian dean Wright enough of me, without further ado,
let me get my buddy on here. Brian Dean Wright,
host of The Right Report Daily podcast and former CIA
operations officer. Brian Welcome back, my friend.

Speaker 2 (17:38):
Good to see you.

Speaker 4 (17:38):
Now.

Speaker 2 (17:39):
I want a hamburger. That good rancher sounds tasty.

Speaker 1 (17:43):
Before we get in, before we get into all of
the news, because there's been just a ton that's happened
since the last time that you were on.

Speaker 2 (17:51):
Yeah, So a lot of the.

Speaker 1 (17:53):
Women in the live chat in the audience would like
to remind you that you've got a lot of girlfriends
in the live chat and that Valentine Day is coming
up and they're wondering what you're going to do for them.
All of You've got all these girlfriends. I'm not sure
you know about it, but you're very admired in the
live chat.

Speaker 2 (18:10):
Wow, I need to clean my house. Let's you will
have a big table. Come on over, ladies, let's talk,
you know. Wow, let me think about the gifts.

Speaker 1 (18:21):
A lot of Valentine A lot of Valentine's gifts you
gotta get.

Speaker 2 (18:24):
I'm gonna need to h up the credit limit on
a credit card. This is gonna be an expensive February
coming up. Good lord, Okay, thank you for the heads up.
I'm working on a couple of things. Let's start with
the hag Seth stuff.

Speaker 1 (18:37):
Where are you at on that? How do you feel
do you feel do you agree with me that this
this narrative that the Democrats are pushing. They've tried everything.
Do you do you think it's you think it's gonna
work or not.

Speaker 2 (18:49):
I'm so stuck on the fact that I have thousands
of girlfriends. I'm sorry the rest of this podcast. Let's
just cancel it right now.

Speaker 1 (18:55):
Shaken, I'm shaking. I've shaken the unshake. You're unshakable, You're unflapped.

Speaker 2 (19:00):
No, No, it's like being an operation and somebody's distracted
me and the whole thing is off. The whole off
is off. I gotta go home. Look anyway, back to
the news, Pete Hegseth. Yet, Look, the President of United
States has both an opportunity and an obligation to use
the voice of the people getting him into office to
choose the team he wants. That is what Hegseeth is

(19:21):
all about. He has made his choice. You know that
the Senate here, I think, has expressed their concerns. Some
of it's fair, some of it's not. I think a
lot of the questions around his experience versus discernment and
judgment totally fair. I think he's done a very good
job at answering those questions.

Speaker 1 (19:36):
I agree, By the way, to me That's what I
was telling Melanie last night. If you're gonna if you
were a senator and you're in armed services, or you're
in an open debate, why not just if you're a Democrat,
why not just attack experience? Why not just attack you know, policy?

Speaker 2 (19:55):
Why not?

Speaker 1 (19:56):
I think those are far stronger than Oh, look he
his ex wives don't like him, and oh look like
all these false accusations, Like I just think people are
sick of that. I think a more effective way to
attack him.

Speaker 2 (20:11):
Look, friend, the last eight years, what have we seen
with Trump? But you know, they're throwing everything they can get,
like speedig in the wall and Trump that has been
one of the many allegations against him has been his
personal life, the number of women that he has married
over his years. So you know, it's just sort of
like the Passes prolog. They're going to keep throwing the
same stuff at the wall. But you're right in the
opening and now you've just said it again. The American

(20:31):
people have heard those arguments over and over. We're tired
of them. What else you had got? In fact, we
have a lot of really fantastic news axios and others
are reporting the Democrats in DC have no idea what
to do at this point. They're completely in disarray. You
and I were talking earlier about this. There are some
brilliant quotes from some Democrat operatives in Washington, DC this afternoon,

(20:51):
saying things like, you know, nobody wants to be alive
for their autopsy. They can't figure out what's wrong. Another
Democrat operative said, man, we as a party suck. Yeah,
you do, but part of that is because of your behavior.
And I think that what we're seeing on Capitol Hill
right now is what we are are just getting frustrated.
I think a lot of us about not focusing on

(21:12):
the stuff that matters, like experience versus judgment fair. But
we're doing this personal attack stuff, and I think a
lot of us are over that. It's not relevant, it's
not Germane. Let's move forward.

Speaker 1 (21:21):
You could hear what I was. Melody and I were
at Pete's hearing in the Armed Services Committee, and first
of all, when Herono's asking these questions, so I take
that is that yes, you will use the Department of
Defense and odd troops to invade Greenland.

Speaker 2 (21:37):
And that's a gorgeous accent. By the way, is that
native Hawaiian I think yes, it's like duck Malana, It's gorgeous.
I love it.

Speaker 1 (21:44):
And then a ten second pause where she's like, you'll
take over Greenland and the Panama Canal and I'm like,
oh my god. Everybody in the room. Everybody in the
room was like what. And then Tim Kaine starts talking.
And then Tim Kaine just goes way down the path
of like his wife is sitting behind him, like his

(22:04):
parents are there, his wife's parents are there, like and
you could hear the whole room just like collectively, oh
my god, man, come on. And so you're right, Like
the Democrats, there's been polling released on this too, Brian,
where who's the leader of the Democrat Party? It's at
Barack Obama? Is it Joe Biden? Is that Kamala Harris?
Is it nobody? Or I don't know. I don't know.

(22:27):
Got the majority of twenty nine percent out of that
pall I.

Speaker 2 (22:31):
Voted in aple. Actually it's Carl Mars He's the head
of the party right now.

Speaker 1 (22:35):
I mean, but you're right, the Democrats are in complete disarray,
and you know, talking about like Trump out there at
the California wildfires, and a perfect example of this is
as the so so many, so many examples of horrible
leadership coming out of the California. At the tragic California

(22:55):
wildfire situation, where you have the mayor of Los Angeles,
Karen Bass, like at an inauguration for the president of Ghana,
not even there, despite knowing that there was a huge
risk of wildfires or the wildfires were just getting off,
she decides to go there. Anyway, you have all of
these reservoirs empty. The water still to this day really

(23:16):
isn't flowing in the way they should. Fire hydrants were
completely empty. An overt focus on diversity, equity and inclusion.
What are the chances that all three fire chiefs, by
the way, that make between three hundred thousand and five
hundred thousand dollars a year are all lesbians. I'm sorry,
I got nothing. I got nothing against gays, lesbians, editing
like that, but like, no, what are the chances?

Speaker 2 (23:36):
Though? You play those videos anyway, But the point is,
compare what you just talked about with Karen Bass to
what President Trump is just doing in North Carolina. He's
going out and he's speaking with the people, he is
there with him. That's that is politically speaking, that is
one heck of a contrast, all right, that you've got
a man who is of the people and understands that.
And speaking of Los Angeles, one of the things you

(23:57):
and I talked about before a lot of people. If
you're unaware of this, you should be aware of it.
And that is the fact that the La Times owner
has said recently. I mean, this is this guy who's
on the left, his party. He has papers on the
left saying this last election showed and demonstrated that Donald
Trump and the Republican Party represent what the Democrats used
to be, and that was fighting for and with the
workingman and the working woman. They understand that their party

(24:20):
on the left is no longer what it used to be.
And I think that is part of the struggle in Washington,
DC right now and why they're throwing this garbage at
our dear friend, mister Hegseth, because they got nothing. Their
party is nothing because ten to fifteen, twenty years ago
they decided to embrace the radical left, and now the
country said, we don't want that lock stock and barrel.
We think it's all trash, and we think you're trash
because you've adopted that. So that is why the party,

(24:42):
and we could laugh and chuckle and we should at saying,
you know, watching them even describe themselves as dead and
dying and have an autopsy and that they socked. Sure,
all that's true, but their death represents something I think
far more ominous and for us all to remember, and
that is they chose to die because they adopt radicalism,
radical left, Marxism and the rest of it. And this

(25:03):
country just said no. And you had a man rise
up irrespect that he really really isn't the traditional Republican,
is he? Mister Trump? The president rose up saying, I'm
going to represent the people. I'm going to make this
country great again. Irrespective of your background. We're going to
fight like hell, and we're going to make this country exceptional.
And a lot of people across the ideological divide, certainly
the racial divide, and yes, the sexual orientation divide. By

(25:23):
the way, a lot of gay, lesbian, and bisexual folks
voted for Trump as well, because he doesn't care. He
just wants awesome people in positions that fight for this
country and salute the flag and love the constitution. That's
what Trump, I think fundamentally understands about this nation that
all of us, whatever our divisions or disagreements, we think
this place is pretty awesome and we want to fight
for it. So I think that is the kind of

(25:44):
leadership that he showed in North Carolina. That is what
he is demonstrating out in California, and even Democrats out there,
like the La Times owner is saying, we see it too.
So it's a very clear message to this country.

Speaker 1 (25:55):
Yeah, it's funny, and it's because you mentioned on your
show today this this idea because the Democrats being in disarray.
Chuck Schumer, who is the Senate minority leader right now,
is having a closed door meeting to try to figure
out one what to do with Trump's cabinet nominations, but

(26:15):
two what to do as a party. And there's this
divide within the Democrat Party right now of just like
hardcore resistors do whatever whatever the hell you have to
do to resist the Trump agenda. And what's what's crazy
is you also talked about on your show this morning,
and we can address both of these points that while
the wildfire was raging, the California legislature, which is a

(26:36):
super majority of Democrats, are are cobbling together this fifty
million dollar resist Trump fund while their state is burning,
which is just like talk about being a microcosm for
every failed Democrat leadership, right, this is it's a perfect
example of how the Democrats just fail and how they're
just way off the reservation in terms of what their

(26:59):
priority should be. But then you have the other half
of the Democrat Party, maybe it's not half, but a
significant percentage of them saying wait a second. Trump won
all seven swing states, for example, and Georgia. You know
you have asof and Warnock. Trump won Georgia pretty handily.
They're up for election in a couple of years. They
can't be resistors or they will lose their seats. So

(27:21):
give us a sense of what you're thinking about that,
which way do you think it will break?

Speaker 2 (27:26):
So what we know now in the Senate is there
are a number of Senate seats, about six that represent
very trumpy states either that he won or came very
close to, whether that be Georgia, Michigan, or New Hampshire.
So there was at least six Senate seats that are
represented by Democrats that these people, just pragmatically speaking, don't
want to lose their seats, and the party doesn't want

(27:47):
to lose their seats, so they have to be really
careful about, you know what battles they're going to pick
with Trump because they want to have some degree of
ability to run an AD or talk to Republicans in
their home states. So, hey, I will work with you
and President Trump as needed and as necessary and as
my principles allow. That's going to be the talking point.
That's the AD. So I think that what the GP
leadership in the Senate now is doing very wisely, is

(28:08):
all right, let's put that to the test. Let's squeeze
these guys. The Lacol and Riley Act was one of
the first this past week that did pass because it
got a lot of Democrats support, not because they earnestly
wanted it to pass, but they're mindful of twenty twenty six.
So that is what I think that we're going to
see over the next three to six months, a lot
of these very tough votes for Republicans squeeze in Democrats
who are in disarray, and they're basically going to make

(28:31):
the argument, look politically speaking, pragmatically, if you want to
win the election or even going to have a hope
of it, support us on this. We'll deal with the
fight in twenty twenty six when it comes. But let's
pass some legislation right now. And that is so critical
because Trump is passing all these executive orders. We've got
to get this stuff into law because it can get reversed.
So the House in the Senate have to pass laws

(28:51):
that lock this up into place. That's why they're going
to need some of these Democrats on board, and I
think that they stand a pretty good chance of doing
it in the next six months. Well.

Speaker 1 (28:59):
Into interesting is that the Democrat Party being so off
the reservation. I mean, this resists fund out in California,
this fifthy you know, like you were saying, this is
the reason why you left the Democrat Party. They just
have lost their freaking minds. And you know what's fascinating
about this is that I think Trump knows that the
Democrats are in disarray in a very big way. I mean,

(29:20):
he gave he was at the I think he was
at the Resolute Desk the other day or no, maybe
he was doing an interview with Hannity. Can't remember where
he said it, but he said, people know that Democrat
policies are terrible. They cannot govern, they cannot govern and
I thought that was a very effective way to say it,
because by every empirical metric, whether it's crime or legal

(29:41):
immigration or disaster response, demas response in North Carolina Newsomber's
response to the wildfire, they are an abject failure on
all things. It's ridiculous.

Speaker 2 (29:52):
Let's put a little bit more more meat to that bone.
In Massachusetts, just about twenty thirty minutes ago, the Boston
Globe put out a piece talking about, hey, how how
can you support immigrants and immigrant rights in our state
of Massachusetts. Brother, Over the past two weeks, Ice has
nabbed and wrapped up guys who are part of MS thirteen. Pedophiles,

(30:13):
we have murderers. They were allowed to be back on
the streets because the state of Massachusetts, the Democrat run
state of Massachusetts, allowed them to do that. We also
know last month the governor, Heay of that state, for
the first time in four years, said, you know, we
should do background checks on the migrants going into our facilities,
into our migrant shelters, because only because they had cases

(30:34):
of these migrants engaging in sex with kids, pedophiles, rugs, guns.
Now four years after now they want to clean up
their migrant shelters. So we have this as background. You
get the Boston Globe today says, hey, how can we
support migrant rights. It's absolutely absurd. When you start talking
about real governance, people's lives get affected by this stuff.

(30:54):
You know. Fox News reported earlier this week that when
these Ice guys were going out and grabbing these dudes
off the streets, people were coming out of their homes
in Boston saying to the Ice officers, thank you, thank you,
thank you for arresting the MS thirteen's and the murders
and the rapists in my neighborhood. I don't want the
pedophiles here. I don't care if they're migrants or not.
Get them out. That I think is what the Democrat

(31:17):
Party just continues to ignore, is that we don't care
if you're a Republican or Democrat. Just make sure our
streets are safe. Thank you. No more pedophiles living next door,
No more M S thirteen gang members living next door. Nope,
let's leave. So that is why that party that I
was a part of for twenty years has lost people
like me, Because at the end of the day, we
love our country and we are just normal humans that

(31:39):
want safe neighborhoods. So that is the underlying collapse of
the Democrat Party. It's crazy, it's lost its borrel bearings,
and it's lots of its ability to govern because so
many of us just don't trust them.

Speaker 1 (31:50):
I don't mean to keep talking about this, but does
He talked about like, you know, ICE and you know,
basically finally being unshackled, and they're doing all these raids
targeting violent offenders. But the way that the media is
responding to this, Brian, they just don't understand where the
American people are right now. They just they have failed
so miserably for so long that the American people don't

(32:11):
trust them, and they have not shown not even the
slightest bit of being able to do any sort of
self audit to figure out why why they're so lost.
I'm seeing, yeah, no contrition at all. And I'm seeing people,
you know, these these reporters say, oh, you know, they're
you know, the Trump's ice is is rating farmers in

(32:32):
California illegal undocument undocuments another thing, undocumented migrants who have
committed no crime. And I'm reading this stuff and I'm
thinking they came to the country illegally. They are here illegally.
Their presence undermines the American work. I mean, there's a
million different ways this hurts our country. Not from a

(32:53):
national security standpoint, we don't know who the hell these
people are, but like, how how are we not making
the connection here that these people. Yeah, I'm sure they're
very nice, but they broke the law coming here. And
when I break the law, and when you break the law,
there are consequences. But when illegal aliens, people who should

(33:15):
not even be entitled to our constitutional rights that we
have here in this country, have more rights than we do,
it drives me crazy.

Speaker 2 (33:23):
Brian, Well, in California they're getting benefits, whereas the people
out in North Carolina they don't. That's the point, isn't it. Yeah,
when you flag this issue in terms of journalism, why
aren't some more of these journalists, let alone the Democrat Party,
Why an't more of these journalists throwing a flag on
this stuff? Well, part of its pride they don't want
to admit that they were or have been buffoons. Part

(33:43):
of it is because they're ideologues, and they are trying
to give cover to their federal ideaologues on Capitol Hill. Democrats,
but part of it, my friend, is that there is
an ideology to support it. Open borders for four years.
That wasn't an accident. They wanted to remake the country
by leaving the borders open. You know, you know, I've
talked about this before. We know that open borders is

(34:04):
something supported by Marxists because they believe the human labor
should be able to go across borders just as much
as business should be able to do that. So borders
are actually violence, is what Marxists, Democrats, Socialists of America
DSA members like Alexandria Acasio Cortes and others Democrats, they
will make this argument. So the reaction, the response to
your seeing, which is like, we got to protect all

(34:24):
the migrants and the immigrants. If it's so divorced from
facts in reason and logic and data, at some point
you have to start going beyond just pride or foolishness,
and you have to understand that there's probably some ideology
behind it. Because it's so irrational, something else has to
explain it. And that's a big, big part of it,
I think, is this ideology of the left that doesn't

(34:45):
believe in borders, and they don't really even like America
because we're founded on you know, things like individual rights
and the constitution and capitalism. So that's part of this
debate that I think is always percolating when we see
a lot of the coverage on this issue and it
just gets it's absurd. But yet you can understand it
if you really understand this underlying ideological piece.

Speaker 1 (35:06):
So shift gears with me, and let's talk Ukraine for
a second, because I read something today that I think
Secretary of State Marco Rubio suspended all foreign eight across
the board or called for it today, and President Trump
suspended all foreign aid to Ukraine, so to me. And
then then you've got Keith Kellogg, who is Trump's Special

(35:28):
envoy to Ukraine. President Trump charged him you got one
hundred days to end this thing. President Trump came out
with a statement saying, Hey, I love the American people,
but I love the Russian people. But you know, I
don't want to harm them. But Vladimir Putin, if you
don't figure this out, I'm going to basically sanction you
and use the full might of the American economy to
punish you. I don't want to do that. So there's

(35:50):
a lot of things happening on the Ukraine front. Give
us a sense of what's going on. Break it down
for us, my friend.

Speaker 2 (35:57):
So, I think that the President Trump has at here.
So let's start with the carrots and the sticks. I
think what we saw this week is Trump is actually
giving Putin a little bit. And what he's doing. He
has said he's going to withdraw about twenty twenty five
thousand US troops from Europe that are currently stationed in
places like Germany. That is a demonstration to Putin up. Look,
I appreciate your sensitivity about NATO. I'm gonna withdraw some

(36:21):
of my troops. I'm gonna give you something in recognition
of your concern, and I'm gonna squaze your brother. I'm
gonna squeze you Putin. I know that your economy is struggling.
Router's News service had a really brilliant piece on that
this week. We also know that Putin's economy is in
serious trouble because of oil. It is deeply reliant on
their oil natural gas exports. So what were to happen

(36:42):
if the price of oil were to collapse, That would
be a nightmare for Putin because he's trying to finance
his of course's war. So that you saw President Trump
reach out this week to the Saudist saying, we need
you to drill and pump baby drill and pump baby drill.
Like so get it going. Let's get this price, get
the supply going. Let's pushed down the overall cost for
a barrel of oil that was squeeze putin as well.

(37:05):
He doesn't want to end this war in Ukraine. So
I think that we're starting to see this. And by
the way, you and I talked about this separately that
mister Trump is also talking about, you know, extending more
aid to Ukraine. His team is talking about, you know,
maybe we need more draft members out of Ukraine. Well
other than they really mean that, I don't know.

Speaker 1 (37:24):
Oh yeah, let's let's expound on this. So that's I'm
so glad that you brought that up. I've been meaning
to talk about this on the show for some time now.
But the national incoming, well not the incoming now. The
National Security Advisor Mike Walltz, former congressman from Florida, said
that we've talked about, you know, Ukraine lowering their draft
age to eighteen. Well, the European Union and European countries

(37:46):
have been asking Ukraine to do that. So Lensky and
the rest of the Ukrainian governments like, we're not doing that.
Why because they need young men to repopulate their country
after the tens of thousands of young men were slaughtered
in this stalemate of a war. And you and I
kind of war gained this like what's going on here?
And you know, I'll let you explain it better than me.

(38:07):
But we kind of thought maybe it was just an
odd way to put pressure on Zelenski to get the
damn thing done.

Speaker 2 (38:15):
Yeah. So look, there are lots of different strategies that
you could try to end this war, and part of them,
or one of them, is you got to make sure
the Putin wants it. He has to be incentivized to
end this war. So he's got to have some economic squeeze.
We tried sanctions for four years. Those haven't worked. There's
been assinctions have not worked because Putin has had friends
in places like China and India and others that are
buying his oil. So what Trump has said this week is, look,

(38:38):
let's depress the price of oil so that he's collecting
less revenue. That's going to cause profound problems within the
Russian economic system. So if Trump can pull that off
depressed the price of oil, that's one strategy. The other
is to basically say, look, I want out of this war,
Trump says to Putin, but you're forcing my hand here.
You're gonna make me involved in this period of time.

(39:00):
So whether that is more war aid or I'm gonna
encourage the Ukrainians to bring even more men to the
war battlefield, that's what we're gonna do. So even though
we don't want to, even if we want to end
this war, we got to continue until we can squeeze
you Putin to knock it off. So I think that
that is part of the strategy here. It's a little
bit of carrot and stick, and I think Trump would
drawing twenty twenty five thousand NATO troops is a demonstration

(39:22):
to Putin of like, I'll make a deal with you,
but you got to make me halfway, all right. So
I think that that's what we're going to see over
the next number of weeks and months, is Trump reaching
out to Putin to say I'll make a deal with you.
We can do this easily or hard way if you
want to do it the hard way. I'm gonna squeeze
your oil prices. I'm gonna clap your economy. And oh,
by the way, that is how the Soviets eventually met
their demise if we recalled. That was one of the

(39:44):
ways that Reagan did it was with an energy war
and crushing the internal Soviet economy. So I think that
that Putin's got to be wise here if he knows
he's dealing with a guy who's pretty serious about trying
to end this war. It's just a lot of some
carrots and sticks here.

Speaker 1 (39:58):
You know, you've been right about it everything, and I
think you're right about this too. And speaking of you
being right about everything thus far, you know the the
Trump wanted that.

Speaker 2 (40:08):
I have a thousand gals waiting for me for.

Speaker 1 (40:10):
I think that might be.

Speaker 4 (40:11):
No.

Speaker 1 (40:11):
I have a part of it is that also, you
dress well, your articulate. You've got very white teeth. People
like that.

Speaker 2 (40:19):
I brush who dental care?

Speaker 1 (40:23):
There's no substitute for good dental care. You're right? So okay,
do you haven't? Brian? What the hell was I talking about?

Speaker 2 (40:30):
You said I was right about something Trump?

Speaker 1 (40:33):
Yes, thank you all the things. Yeah, I got distracted
by your white teeth. I goes like it was blind
man like. So the the cartels, the car was the
first executive order declaring the cartel is a terrorist organization.
You called this one. How you know what's the next
play here? You think Trump's gonna So people were saying, like,

(40:54):
people are kind of freaking out, Well, what's you gonna
target target Mexico without time in with the Mexican government?
And people in the Trump administration are saying, yeah, maybe
if they're not willing to play ball in the Mexican government.
I mean, it's not a secret that the Cartel has
compromised many in the Mexican government as well, So maybe

(41:15):
you do just draw up targeting packages and just wipe
them all out. So let me ask you, is it
a good time for members of the cartel to get
jobs in different industries or are they going to dig
in and fight life insurance? Yeah?

Speaker 2 (41:28):
So I think there are two things that are happening
right now with Mexico the people need to know of.
The one is the surface issues, so let's talk about that.
The second one is banking, So let's come back to
that in a second. So, the Cartel being labeled as
terror groups So what this allows is our CIA officers,
there's an element within DHS that does some good stuff
as well as our soft guys are Special Forces guys
in San Antonio and others coming up with these targeting packages,

(41:51):
shocking off campaign, blowing up infrastructure, blowing up people. The
cartel members, god forbid, their family members. There's going to
be some collateral damage. Unquestionably, they're gonna start lighting people up,
much like we did in the Global War on Terror.
That's where I anticipate this is going to go next,
and so that that's the first piece. Yeah, they should
probably get some life insurance policies. Those guys are gonna
be in trouble. That doesn't mean that there won't be

(42:12):
some very unexpected consequences from this. We should be very
sober with this. Cartaels are inside of this country right now.
Last time that you and I talked, I discussed how
they are in Tucson, Arizona, and lots of other places.
These guys are bringing over guns. They can light us
up internally, so we should be very sober. This is
this is going to be a tough war. So that's
the first part. We got to do it, though obviously

(42:33):
we gotta. We got to bring these guys down a peg.
They have assaulted this country in so many different ways,
so we got to get rid of the cartels or
degrade them. The second issue that this designation allows that
we need to know about is the banking issue, because
now banks in Mexico, they don't they are disallowed. They're
gonna have massive fines a criminal and civil if they

(42:53):
work with cartel members. But in Mexico, how do you
figure that out?

Speaker 1 (42:57):
I know? But if they don't, they just bury their
cash in the jungle. Seriously, I watched I watched what
the hell was the one with Pablo Escobar narcas I've
seen that I'm based on right, Well.

Speaker 2 (43:08):
Yeah no, But the crazy thing is that the cartels
have become so so audacious and how powerful they are.
The bank they don't mind putting there because they think
they can all bankers. They control the government. So now
these this has been slapped on the on, these cartels
have been designated, the banks are going to get very
nervous because of know your customer laws and rules. They

(43:30):
have to know who these people are. So it's going
to create a massive headache for these banks, and they're
gonna start withdrawing in certain places because they can't ensure
that they're going to escape liability. This is also true
because or also a major problem for President Scheinbaum of
Mexico because there are a lot of people who have
secondary and tertiary connections to the cartels. In some cases,
you know, they're just like the drug runners or they're

(43:52):
running money. You know, they're they're helping them with their
businesses in avocado and timber and the rest of it.
So this this has massive reach. Twenty to thirty percent
some estimates are to the Mexican economy is controlled by
directly or indirectly the cartels. So you got have a
serious crisis for a president Shiabaum and she knows it
from a banking perspective, from an economic perspective, her country

(44:13):
is going to get in serious trouble because of this
designation from a money perspective. So it's a big move.
Not only the kinetic stuff and blowing people up and infrastructure,
but the banking stuff squeezing here again, just like in Russia,
Trump is going after the money. He's going after the economy,
just like he did it with Putin in Russia. He's
doing the same thing in Mexico. I think it's very

(44:33):
very smart. You control people through their wallets. Trump knows this.
Amongst many guys in the world who know this, he
knows that. Especially he's a businessman. He gets it.

Speaker 1 (44:43):
So Trump called the Prime Minister of Denmark today and
apparently the Prime minister of Denmark and the government in
Denmark is kind of freaking out. And I'll read it
to you. The intent. It was all about Greenland. So
the intent was very clear. They won it. In parentheses Greenland.
The Danes are now in crisis mode. The Danes are

(45:04):
utterly freaked out about this. Apparently the Danish Prime minister
thought that this was just some negotiating ploy by Trump,
but when when got on the phone with President Trump,
he was like, Graveyard, serious, we want Greenland, try to
make a deal. And now they're all super freaked out
about it. It wasn't messing around. He's for real.

Speaker 2 (45:26):
Yeah, yeah, I would have loved to have been on
that call. Can you imagine? You know, what what can
we do? SA So convince you I want it, I
just want it. I'm gonna build a beautiful building, the
base one you've ever seen. It's gonna be on Greenland.
So look, there's a really serious reason for why President
Trump is going after Greenland. Bottom line is he does

(45:46):
not want Russia or China to control it directly or indirectly.
So the Arctic, the fight for the Battle for the
Arctic is a huge, huge issue, and I think the
President understands that Greenland is very vulnerable in no small
part because Denmark's not going to be able to defend
that island. They're not going to be able to do it,
so the United States can and should. And sure, of

(46:07):
course Trump also knows that there's a lot of mineral
resources on Greenland, but we should also be very sober
about that trying to get at those minerals underneath God
only knows how many feet to a mile of ice
and such. This is not a great place we should
go to in mine in Alaska, that's much a better
place to go get our stuff if we want to
do that. But he understands that this is a strategic
play and to have the Russians with the Chinese control

(46:29):
Greenland between the United States and Europe, that's a no no,
We're not going to do that. Denmark can't control or
take care of it, So we need to solve this issue.
There's some interesting polling that shows that a lot of
actually people in Denmark, I'm sorry, in Greenland, about forty
percent would love to be Americans. I've seen some polling
showing sixty percent to only sixty thousand people in Greenland.
So let's see if actually when they vote for independents,

(46:50):
if they just vote to be an American or not.
I think, you know, Denmark's kind of like that that
old crotchety you know, the royal family that used to
be something and now is nothing, and there watching their
former glory dissipate. I think that's why they're upset. And
what are you gonna do?

Speaker 1 (47:04):
I think you might be right, and I say, what
the hell. If we're going for Greenland, we might as
well go for Iceland too. We have military bases there.
Why not just go for Iceland, you know? And why
stop there? We got Canada.

Speaker 2 (47:15):
You know, we've.

Speaker 1 (47:16):
Talked Panama Canal, right, Marco Rubio, Secretary of State. Rubio's
down there now, which, by the way, I'm freaking sorry.
If the communist Chinese are controlling the Panama Canal, we're
taking that effort back. I'm sorry. Let's taking it back.

Speaker 2 (47:32):
Let's understand this for a second. So they controlled the Chinese.
Chinese company controls the port operations on both sides of
the canal.

Speaker 1 (47:39):
At Chinese laws. That is ridiculous.

Speaker 2 (47:41):
Chinese law mandates that a Chinese citizen, whether you inside
of China or beyond, if you're living Panama, you must
respond to the military or intelligence requirements of the Chinese
Communist Party. You must. There is no if answer, but
there's not. You get your lawyer and you work it
out with them. No, you do it. So Trump is
correct to say, wait a minute, You've got a Chinese

(48:02):
company that is controlled effectively by the Chinese Communist Party
and charge import operations on both sides of the canal
that we built, we gave back to nineteen seventy seven,
and we have a treaty agreement that says that has
to remain neutral. It's not neutral. Stop the silly games.
You're either going to kick them out or we're going
to take it back one way or the other. We

(48:22):
don't care. And that's why you saw this past week,
by the way, the Comptroller of Panama ordered a surprise
audit of the Chinese company. Well, that's interestingly timed. So
what I am wondering is the Panamanian government, who is
led by a conservative by the way conservative president. He
understands that they're in trouble, and so he's going to
send in his auditors. They're going to find some magic
being somewhere that shouldn't be there, and they're going to

(48:44):
kick out the Chinese as a pretext. That's how I
expect this to go. It might not happen, though, who knows.
The Panamanians might go crazy, the Chinese might go crazy.
President she probably doesn't want to give up control this canal.
So that's why I expect. Actually with the Chinese relationship,
Trump and this team are going behind the scenes working
out some drug deals with She to be like, look,
we have a lot of problems with each other. You

(49:06):
got to get out out of Panama, sorry, friend. Like
this would be us hanging out in like you know
me and more like in your back door. It's just
it's not gonna work. Well, you gotta get out.

Speaker 1 (49:16):
There's a treaty here, right, isn't There isn't the whole
Panama Canal thing codified in a treaty. I say, just
take it back.

Speaker 2 (49:23):
Take it that that's ours Panama.

Speaker 1 (49:27):
I've gotten to the point. I've gotten to a point
where you know, Okay, so so you've explained this so
brilliantly on the show before about cultural Marxism. It's like, uh,
these empires, these colonies, like we're taking it back, We're
equaling the scale. I'm sorry, Like, I'm actually fine with
growing the American Empire if it means keeping Americans safe.

(49:49):
I'm sorry, Greenland is I mean, you're right from a
strategy standpoint, and in terms of controlling maritime shipping lanes
in the Arctic and things like that, it's very very important.
And now you've got another.

Speaker 2 (50:02):
One on your radar, friend, the Chagos Island in the
Indian Ocean. Diego Garcia a very important US military base
there that we do a lot of stuff in the
Indian Ocean into the Middle East that belongs to the UK.
They're trying to give it away to an African country.
The African country of Mauritius claims that these lands were
taken from them, but now in the UK wants to

(50:24):
give it back to Marcius. But Trump's team is like, no, no,
we are going to stay in the Chagos Islands. In
the middle of the Indian Ocean, and if you U UK,
try to give it back. This is a great example
where we are the only ones there were We in
the Brits are the only people on these islands. So
this would be a great example of Trump saying, look,
U K, these islands are ours now, you're not going
to give it back to Mauritius and Africa. Our military

(50:46):
base is there for a very important reason because if
we get us back to this African country of Mauritius.
Mauritius has a very good close relationship with guess who, China,
So they're going to give back the Chagos and Diego
Garcia to the Chinese, are going to ge it to them.
Now the Chinese controlled the Indian Ocean, that's going to
create a bad set of problems as you're shipping stuff
from Africa into the Middle East and then obviously into Asia.

(51:09):
Also a bad news because it squeezes India right, So
the country of India having its its access limited to
the Indian Ocean, that could create some problems between those
two nations as they've experienced for centuries, really thousands of years.
So there's another great example Greenland. We can add the Chagos.
We can talk about Panama. This administration is very serious
about flectin American muscle, and I think the Chagos is

(51:31):
gonna be the next place we do it.

Speaker 1 (51:32):
Wow, God, how is this How is this not being
covered on the media at all?

Speaker 2 (51:38):
The report? Friend, Oh, don't you worry.

Speaker 1 (51:41):
A well, we all listen.

Speaker 2 (51:43):
We all listened. Believe me.

Speaker 1 (51:45):
I was speaking of you're talking this morning about this
AI stuff and how there's this AI. There was this
study that was done how AI can detect human emotion
and how you know it was for example, listening to
like a shareholder call talking about you know, a company's
P and L profitability versus loss, and the AI can

(52:06):
actually detect in that CEO's voice whether he's depressed or not,
which could lead to all sorts of crazy stuff. So
give us a And by the way, Trump signed some
executive order on artificial intelligence. Elon Musk, he's kind of
pissed off about it. When Trump was asked about it,
Trump was basically like, yeah, Elon Musk doesn't like the
guy who's involved. I don't like plenty of the people

(52:27):
that I do business with either. I don't blame him.
So that's kind of how Trump, but give us a
sense of what's going on in the AI world.

Speaker 2 (52:35):
This is one of the most underreported stories this week
with with one of the biggest impacts on our lives
and the future of humanity. And I don't say that
in a way that's hyperbole. I really truly mean it.
For folks who are unaware the AI revolution what Silicon
Valley is trying to do. They are trying to recreate
the human mind through these supercomputers to a chip company

(52:55):
called Nvidia, creating something called a GPU. It processes information
at a much faster pace and scale lots of video. Anyway,
the point is the AI revolution is trying to recreate
the human mind. Well imagine if you could do that
and put lots of different kinds of products and services,
but also if you put it into a humanoid robot.
We really are talking about potentially creating not just something

(53:17):
that is equal to the human ability, but actually it excels,
it supersedes. It's It's a remarkable thing that Silicon Valley
is working.

Speaker 1 (53:25):
On, Brian, I mean, creating a humanoid robot with intelligence
that exceeds that of humans is how you end up
with terminator robots. Trying to kill us all.

Speaker 2 (53:36):
Well, that is one of the fears, right and that's
why President Trump earlier this week he actually rolled back
some of the safety regulations to prevent that from happening,
which you might think, well, why would he have done that,
that's crazy. He had to prevent terminators. The problem right
now is it's not just Silicon Valley looking at this technology.
It's the Chinese as well, and they are very very

(53:57):
close to becoming just as good as we are. To
imagine if they had an intel the equivalent of the
human mind, if not superior, and they could then put
that into their weaponry, into their energy systems, they would
dominate us. You know, we talked about all the drones
off the coast of the northeast of this country over
the past number of months. Imagine that stuff. Whatever those
drones were or are, if they were infused with AI,

(54:20):
they had this ability to outcompete us. It's a frightening
thing that the Chinese government could dominate us. It's a
very real concern. So that's why this AI revolution is
a big deal. Trump is rolling back some of the
safety rules and regulations, not because he necessarily wants to,
but because the Chinese are going to do it anyway,
and so we got to catch up between now and

(54:40):
then those terminator days. AA is going to do a
lot of crazy things, to include what you just talked about,
which is there's an AI tool that can now discern
our emotions even when we really don't want people to
know what those emotions are. So yeah, in the world
of business, if you've got this earnings call and you're
saying everything's great, profit's fantastic, sales are up, this AI
can actually discern with tremendous accuracy the things that the

(55:02):
human ear can't quite even perceive. They compare these earning
calls to samples that people who've taken tests who say
that they are depressed. So they're learning from the people
who are depressed and then applying it to say your
voice or my voice, or these CEO's voices and determining
who's really lying about the state of their company. So yes,
imagine you could shorten a stock. You know, your auditors

(55:25):
the irs could be like, wait a minute, we just
got a red flag about this guy. He said everything's great,
but his voice suggests something's not right. So a lot
of really interesting implications for all these different AI applications
out there, but the big one that Trump recognized this week,
you know, a five hundred billion dollar plus investment in
data centers all around this country. Appline Texas being one

(55:46):
trying to get ahead of China and stay ahead of
China and this AI revolution. Otherwise, we are in serious
trouble if they create the advanced human brain that is
far beyond our capacity. If they do it first this country,
in this world, humanity is in a big, big trouble.

Speaker 1 (56:01):
I mean this strikes me as something that could be
as big as developing the atomic bomb during World War Two.

Speaker 2 (56:08):
Bigger, bigger. This is the equivalent of the Manhattan Project
we are all living through right now. This is history.
So if you watch that Oppenheimer movie over last summer,
this is that time's ten. It is really that big
of a deal because we're not just talk about a bomb.
We're talking about something that has the ability to think
beyond what a human can do and create things that
a human can't. That is this technology. And right now,

(56:30):
if we can look at this from like an analogy perspective,
a human going from a baby to an old person,
we've got like a teenager going into College. That's where
AI is at right now. So it's advancing and we
could see some pretty tremendous things this year, and certainly
under Donald Trump. And that is why I think he's
rolling back these safety regulations, saying we might not like it,

(56:52):
but we got to go. We got to go fast
and hard because the Chinese are going to beat us.
And it is all of humanity in this country. We
are under their thumb. President She and the Communist Party
get it first.

Speaker 1 (57:02):
Well, when you say that China, when you say that
China is not that far behind us, how they How
are they able to even keep pace? I mean, are
they just stealing our research? Is that basically what it is.

Speaker 2 (57:16):
That's part of it, you know, part of it is
they steal stuff, but part of it is we allow
them to so we have these academic and research exchanges.
In fact, Biden has extended that back in December for
another ten I think ten fifteen years, that we want
to exchange some of our scientists from say MIT or
from Stanford others, because you know, it's good human human relations.

(57:38):
That's such a liberal, leftist flam flam argument. Knowing that
they're trying to crush us in every way, right. But
the point is we are actually our own worst enemy here.
But it's not just that they're cheating or that they're stealing.
They're actually just they are doing some fantastic research on
their own. They have now used and stolen enough that

(57:58):
domestically they can create some really some products. Again, it's
it's based on a foundation of theft. That's true. Marco
Rubio during his confirmation hearing talked about that, and it's
absolutely true. But now we have a competitor, a really strong, tough,
tenacious competitor that is right behind us, and we've got
to win this war and many others as well. But
the AI won sure is a big deal.

Speaker 1 (58:18):
Okay, So before I let you go, I got to
ask one last very important question. Everybody is wondering about,
what did you think of Milania Trump's hat?

Speaker 2 (58:28):
Oh my gosh, I was like, girl, you stole mine?
How where'd you get it? I thought it was my closet. No, no,
I don't have that kind of hat. That's like, where
in the world is Carmen san Diego? That gal came
in too ready to fight? I was waiting for her toads.
I think you would do.

Speaker 1 (58:44):
I thought it would the hat was going to be like,
you know, bladed on the end. She throws it like
like odd job or something in James Bond. You know,
I thought she throw it at a Democrat in the
crowd or something.

Speaker 2 (58:55):
If I were to be abroad and see that, knowing
on this situation, I would say that it's a very
clear signal from the family and from her of like
we're back. This is this is a very clear signal
to you all who try to crush us, like we're
coming for you.

Speaker 1 (59:10):
And I'm calling the shots the lady with the hat.

Speaker 2 (59:13):
Yes, this is about vengeance and I'm gonna look hot
as I slit your throat.

Speaker 1 (59:19):
Okay, my friend, tell us where we can find you
and how we can support the Right Report.

Speaker 2 (59:24):
Well, Malania's a closet. Clearly, all be in there trying
on our hats. You can find me there. But if
you can't get in the White House, well you can
find me on your favorite podcast platform, the Right Reports,
like the Right Brothers. They even have my mug today.
Look at this here we are.

Speaker 1 (59:36):
Everyone wants every everyone's been saying they want to get
a Right Report mug.

Speaker 2 (59:40):
You know what these are made in America? Which is
awesome made in Arizona, but gosh, sending these things the mail.
Have you seen the cause of this stuff? We need
Trump to get on top of this shipment stuff so expensive.

Speaker 1 (59:51):
It's very having your own merch is It's not. The
logistics of it are tough. Yeah, the making of it
is fun. That's the cool fun, very true. The just
part of like how do you ship it? How do
you package it?

Speaker 2 (01:00:03):
Taking its so this couple will be like forty dollars
to get to somebody. It's ridiculous. Anyway. Bottom line is
you can listen to the podcast. You can do it
for free if you want, all your favorite podcast platforms,
or you can look at all the research that I do.
Every day I put out transcripts. All the links are
in the transcripts so you can double check my work.
That is rightreport dot substack dot com six bucks a month,

(01:00:24):
seventy bucks a year, but otherwise every day no later
than five am Eastern you can find me Monday through Friday.

Speaker 1 (01:00:30):
All right, my friend, have a great weekend. Hopefully we
see you soon. Talk to you later. Brother. You got
to be well, see Brian, that is Brian Dean Wright.
Listen definitely follow, subscribe to his podcast, go subscribe to
his substack as well. It is well worth it, trust me, folks,
it's money well spent. And again, you know, we've got
to support independent content. Content creators so important. Smash that

(01:00:55):
like button, that rumble button, that little gray thumb beneath
the video, smash it, turn it green. It helped just
make the leaderboard, folks. Brian Dean Wright is awesome. I
hope you all have an amazing, amazing weekend. Before I go,
I've got to thank people, the folks who tipped. Oh
my gosh, No Bones, you're amazing. Thank you, No Bones,

(01:01:17):
bulldog patriot, he says, I think we turned the corner.
The only people that trust Legacy News are in their
mid sixties with blue hair or our nineteen patriarch in
gender studies. I tend to agree.

Speaker 2 (01:01:29):
No Bones.

Speaker 1 (01:01:29):
Now you're a monthly supporter. Thank you, and I think
Jurgen is a monthly supporter too, Thank you as well.
Boston guy, He says, winning like this feels amazing. I
don't think we'll ever have a president like this ever. Again, Boston,
I completely agree, and No Bones, you are just crushing it.

(01:01:50):
Thank you for all of these Rumble, Rant Tips, Winnie's World,
say Love Battleground, great conversation. Well, we love you too,
we love having you, We love this audience. Are the
best in the world. Seriously, folks, thank you all for everything.
I hope I got everyone and the thank in my
shout outs section here in the show. If I miss somebody,

(01:02:11):
Aunt Cindy will sure she will let me know and
I will make sure that I thank you on Monday.
You know, sometimes this is an imperfect art and do
the best that I can. But as always, folks, I
want you to have a great weekend, enjoy these wins
that are being posted relentlessly by President Trump, and as always,

(01:02:31):
I'll see you Monday. God bless you all, and God
bless this amazing country that we call home. Take care,
good night, have a great weekend. See you on Monday.
Battle Crew,