Harris Caught Cheating in Fake Univision Town Hall

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
As Hurricane Milton was bareling down on Florida. What was
Kamala Harris doing doing interviews with Howard Stern when there
was another Hurricane Helene last week?

Speaker 2 (00:14):
What was she doing? She was doing.

Speaker 1 (00:16):
Interviews with the Call Her Daddy Sexual, That's what it
is podcast. She also did a interview with sixty Minutes,
and now the sixty Minutes fallout from that interview is
having the Harris campaign quote distance themselves from the edit controversy.

(00:40):
Now I've played this for you on the show a
couple days ago when all of this hit.

Speaker 2 (00:45):
It has now become a mainstream issue.

Speaker 1 (00:48):
But before I remind you of the edits that took place,
I want you to hear the narrative that the left
is trying to push.

Speaker 2 (00:56):
Howard Stern talking.

Speaker 1 (00:57):
To VP Harris and saying, why would Donald Trump not
do the interview with sixty Minutes? Why would he turn
it down? Well, we know why. It's because it's a
bias news organization that is literally editing and making up
answers that were never given to questions by kama Harris.
So if that's what you're up against, why would you
do the interview? In fact, I would have told the president,

(01:20):
do not do the interview with sixty minutes because it's
a no win situation, and especially knowing that they can
edit and change your answers. How do we know they
do that, because that's exactly what they did to help
Kamala Harris.

Speaker 2 (01:34):
Listen.

Speaker 3 (01:35):
By the way, I thought, what was so amazing about
sixty minutes is the fact that Trump turned it down. Yeah.
I mean, it just says so much he didn't want
to be fact check. This is maddening, This is insanity.
What do you mean you don't want to be fact check?

Speaker 4 (01:51):
I think that you know Howard? People ask me like,
what do you think is going on? And what is
the tension here? What's at stake? And there are many things,
and I can be much more articulate than what I'm
going to say, but ultimately I do believe that this
is an election that is about strength versus weakness, and

(02:15):
weakness as projected by someone who puts himself in front
of the American people and does not have the strength
to stand in defense of their needs, their dreams, their desires.

Speaker 1 (02:29):
I find it incredibly ironic that is she saying this
and Coward Stern saying this about fact checking that Vice
President Kamala Harris is now threatening to use law enforcement
against social media platforms Now, let me tell you about
our friends real quick at Patriot Mobile, Americans. If you're

(02:50):
like me, you are sick and tired and frustrated by
a stalling economy. You're frustrated by inflation, You're in frustrated
by the endless wars of the left and the relentless
assault on.

Speaker 2 (03:01):
Our American values.

Speaker 1 (03:03):
There are major companies that you are giving your money
to every month with your cell phone service, Big Mobile,
that are actually helping these things to happen. How because
they give massive donations to democratic causes, candidates, including Harris,
including Biden, including Obama.

Speaker 2 (03:23):
The list goes on and on.

Speaker 1 (03:24):
And they give money to organizations that pay for abortions.
If you don't want your money going there, you need
to switch to Patriot Mobile. Because Patriot Mobile was created
after there was a group of conservatives that found out
just how radical Big Mobile had gotten, and they believe
in America, in our constitution. Now I'm proud to say

(03:46):
I use Patriot Mobile. I am proud to say I've
been telling you about them for years, and they are
on the front lines fighting every day for our rights
because when you pay your bill every month at no
extra cost to you, they take about five percent of
that bill and they give it back to First and
Second Amendment causes sanctity of life groups and organizations, and

(04:06):
they give to our military, our veterans, our first responders,
and are wounded warrior heroes. So you can take a
stand with every phone call you make. And switching now
is easy because in twenty twenty four you're going to
use the same towers when you switch to Patriot Mobile
that you're using right now. They operate on all three
of the major networks in this country, and they back

(04:28):
their service with a coverage guarantee, So switching is easy.

Speaker 2 (04:32):
You do it all over the phone.

Speaker 1 (04:33):
Go to Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriot
Mobile dot com slash ferguson, and you're gonna get a
free month when you use the offer code ferguson. You
can also call them and just make the switch over
the phone. Nine seven to two Patriot is their number.
Nine seven to two Patriot. Call them and make the
switch and make a difference.

Speaker 2 (04:53):
Every day.

Speaker 1 (04:55):
You look at Vice President Harris and this statement that
she put out and this is what communists do. And
I say that not to just throw it out there.
This is exactly what communists do to gain power. They
come after and put regulations and rules on free speech.

Speaker 2 (05:19):
Our founding fathers knew.

Speaker 1 (05:21):
That that was a recipe for socialism, communism, Marxism, and disaster.
They wanted free speech from England. It's pretty clear when
they were running our constitution that they were all about
freedom of speech and understanding that that's how you have
a free society. So Vice President Harris released this statement
announcing that quote, police would be trained to battle extremism

(05:45):
and hold social media platforms responsible for promoting what.

Speaker 2 (05:50):
She calls hate speech.

Speaker 1 (05:52):
By the way, her definition of hate speech is very
different than what the Constitution and what the Supreme Court
says hate speech is. And that's the distinguishing fact that
you need to listen to.

Speaker 2 (06:04):
Here.

Speaker 1 (06:04):
Harris was making the same point during a campaign appearance
when she made reference to how online communities encourage hate
and misinformation, which is quote harmful. And of course their
favorite word is they act like they're defending democracy. Right,
She's like, it's harmful to democracy. No, she's fundamentally trying
to change this country. Here is her exact quote. You

(06:27):
could I could give you this quote, and I could
say that this is a quote by Putin, could tell
you it's quote by Mussolini. I could tell you it's
a quote by Stalin, and it would match up. You
wouldn't not believe me. I could tell you this was
a quote from Fidel Castro back in the day. You
would believe me. Chavez, you would believe me. So what

(06:49):
did she say? Quote? We will direct law enforcement to
counter this extremism. We will hold social media platforms accountable
for hate infiltrying their platforms because they have a responsibility
to our democracy.

Speaker 2 (07:05):
Now, if you look at that.

Speaker 1 (07:09):
Quote, that statement from her, we will direct law enforcement
to counter this extremism.

Speaker 2 (07:14):
We will hold social media platforms accountable.

Speaker 1 (07:16):
So that I think was also a direct threat to
Elon Mussin X Okay, like direct threat that was if
you keep letting people say what they believe and have
true free speech, if I'm elected president, I'm going to

(07:38):
use the Department of Justice, the FBI, the CIA to
come after you and to shut you down or to
lock you up. This is no different than when social
media was silenced. Many conservatives, including places like Parlor. Remember
when Parlor got big, and what happened. They deplatformed them.
They shut them down, saying, oh, well they're not you know,

(07:59):
the Apple Store, and then Amazon Web Services shut them down.
So this platform that was created, they didn't like what
was being said, They didn't like conservatives being on there,
they didn't like their being an alternative to at the
time Twitter and Facebook, and they were a threat to
those companies. And so what happened was is they said, hey,
we don't like this, so we're just going to deplatform

(08:21):
and shut it down. That was an attack on free speech.
But then the other question is this, and I go
back to common I'm going to give you a real
world example. Right now, here's a headline from CNN. This
was put up on their social media. My question is
would you shut down CNN if you're Kamala Harris based
on her logic because this is a headline from CNN.

(08:43):
GOP claims Afghan refugees are arriving unvetted.

Speaker 2 (08:48):
That's not true.

Speaker 1 (08:52):
That was a headline CNN's headline from this week. Okay,
Afghan national charge with the leg terrorist plot in the US.

Speaker 2 (09:02):
The man was unvetted.

Speaker 1 (09:04):
My question is using her logic, which she's shut down
in silent CNN because they lied to the American people
when they put up their headline that the GOP claims
Afghan refugees and this was after the pull out of
Afghanistan are arriving unvetted. Well, now we know that it
is absolutely true, and we know this because the federal
government is putting it in court documents that an Afghan

(09:27):
national who was unvetted was charged with election day terrorist
plot and it has now been found he was on
the run. So when you look at that standard okay,
and you look at it from the perspective of of
you know, truth as she describes it, I think based

(09:47):
on what she's saying is you would have to shut
down CNN. Now I don't think Harris would shut down
CNN because she's on their team.

Speaker 2 (09:55):
But let's use another example.

Speaker 1 (09:57):
Kamala Harris has distanced herself now from the sixty minutes
edit controversy, saying we do not control CBS's production decision.
So my question is when they lied on her behalf,
when they changed her answer on her behalf, her word
salad on Israel, and who knows what else they changed,

(10:19):
My question is woul Kamala Harris shut down sixty Minutes
for manipulating in line because the Kama Harris campaign is
now like running away from this controversy surrounding sixty Minutes
in her interview. After Donald Trump demanded the network apologized
for airing two different versions a vice president's response to
a question. Now, there may be others that they changed,

(10:39):
we don't know yet. In a teaser clip release online,
which also aired on Face the Nation on October the six,
Harris provide a lengthy response to sixty Minutes correspondence Bill
Whitaker's question about whether the US lacks influence over the
Israeli primester and at Yahoo. But in the final interview
that actually aired on sixty Minutes on October the seventh,

(11:00):
the day later, Harris's answer was edited completely differently. The
two clips have circulated on social media side by side
as the network faces calls to release the full interview transcript.
Wanting to find out what else do they lie to
the American people about. Trump wrote in a true social
post on Wednesday that CBS quote must be investigated, accusing

(11:22):
the network of making Harris appear more presidential.

Speaker 2 (11:24):
In the edit. Both versions of Harris's response.

Speaker 1 (11:27):
Are transcribed now by the network, forcing them to admit, yes,
we altered and lied to the American people based on
her standard that she has come out with which she
shut down sixty minutes. Now, I want to play for
you real quick. The sixty minutes heavily edited Kamala Harris
word salad where she gives a real answer. They know

(11:52):
it's a disaster answer on Israel, so then they just
decided to take another answer and throw it in there
to match it up to make it look like she
had a better answer.

Speaker 2 (12:01):
This happened. The campaign's now running from it.

Speaker 1 (12:05):
See sixty minutes is now under attack because they're like,
all right, well, what else did you alter and edit?
What else did you change? What else did you cut?
That was Kama Harris's answers that you think the American
people wouldn't want to hear. Here is the actual answer.
First listen carefully.

Speaker 2 (12:19):
But it seems that Prime Minister Netanya who is not listening.

Speaker 4 (12:24):
Well, Bill, The work that we have done has resulted
in a number of movements in that region by Israel
that were very much prompted by or a result of
many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen

(12:45):
in the region.

Speaker 1 (12:46):
But it seems okay, So that's her first answer. That's
the real answer from what we understand. They may have
even edited that down more. We don't know. So then
what did they air on sixty minutes? You heard the
word sou there. It was terrible, it was a bad response.
They knew it was going to hurt her. So then
what did sixty minutes do? Same question on the front end,

(13:08):
but the answer changes completely.

Speaker 2 (13:11):
But it seems that Prime Minister Netanya who is not listening.

Speaker 4 (13:15):
We're not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for
the United States to be clear about where we stand
on the need for this war to end.

Speaker 1 (13:23):
So there it is, they took something else, they matched
it up. Sixty minutes has admitted this. Now would she
shut down sixty minutes with her new demands because she
made these remarks amid growing demands from members of the
Democratic Party to take action quote against internet propaganda and
hate speech. Now, their definition of internet propaganda is anything

(13:46):
they don't want you to hear or see. Their definite
definition of hate speech is standing up for our traditional
values as Christians and Conservatives, standing up for unborn babies.
It's been the same in the last two weeks for
several other Democratic leaders, including Hillary and John Carey, begging
to step up and act on the Internet.

Speaker 2 (14:04):
Attacking the Internet.

Speaker 1 (14:05):
They believe it's helping, as they described it, propagate violent views,
so therefore they want censorship.

Speaker 2 (14:15):
There's a growing chorus by the way of concern from.

Speaker 1 (14:18):
Democrats because they feel like they're losing the American people
on some issues and can't control them. Harris's comments match
up with a trend Hillary Clinton last week. Social media
disinformation was compromising democracy, she said, and should be regulated.
Clinton had been a big advocate for making big tech
accountable for their own content, as she described it, and

(14:41):
the fact that they benefited from disinformation, she claims, is
why she lost the twenty sixteen presidential election. John Kerrey,
former Secretary of State and climate envoy, also gained headlines
earlier this week when he attacked social media outlets for
not controlling what he described his hate speech and extremism. Now,
what is his definition of extremism. Well, if I say

(15:03):
I don't believe in his global warming hoax the way
that he describes it, apparently I'm an extremist. If I
say he's an idiot because I don't like the fact
that he's demanding that I go buy an electric car.
Is that hate speech? Probably in his mind it is,
And so what would he want to do. He would
want to take me off social media if I say

(15:23):
that on social media. Carrie insisted that the Internet was
responsible for quote intelligent debate, that we should hold and
should prevent hate and deception from flourishing unrestrained. So he
believes that everything should be regulated by the government. And
then Kama Harri's like, yeah, anyone that doesn't play by

(15:44):
our rules. We believe the federal government in a capacity
specifically related to law enforcement, so we will arrest you.
Should be the ones that police what you can and
cannot say. Harris is calling for quote accountability is likely aimed.

(16:05):
Another headline says at platforms such as x YouTube, which
have been criticized for their algorithm algorithms that often amplify
they claim device of content. Over the past few years,
social media giants have faced growing scrutiny for how they
moderate content, particularly after events such as quote January the

(16:26):
sixth Capital Riot, the insurrection. The statement from Vice President
Harris implies that a Harris administration would do more, not
just to regulate what you say online, but specifically threaten
you with law enforcement if they decide that what you
say is extremists. Well, let's also be clear what they

(16:46):
believe an extremist is. They believe that an extremist is
someone that votes for Donald Trump. They believe in extremists
is someone that would go to a Trump rally. They
believe that an extremist is someone that would give money
to organizations that stand up for your Second Amendment. They

(17:09):
believe that, for example, the NRA is an extremist organization.
Some of them even think it's a terrorist organization. You
have to understand that what they want to regulate is
anything that they do not believe.

Speaker 3 (17:26):
In.

Speaker 2 (17:27):
It's that simple. That's literally what this is.

Speaker 1 (17:32):
October seventh was the one year mark of the worst
massacre of the Jewish people since the Holocaust. Twelve hundred
Israelis were murdered and more than two hundred and fifty
taken hostage. Yet the war in Israel rages on today,
with a Ran firing a massive barrage of nearly two
hundred ballistic missiles earlier this month. Israel and her people

(17:55):
are facing attacks from enemies on all sides. The International
Fellowship of Christians Jews is on the ground providing food, shelter,
and safety to those in need during this crisis. Since
the war started, thousands of reservists every day Israeli citizens
have left their families to serve their country. Soldiers have
been injured, and their families now need your help. That's

(18:18):
why I'm asking for you to give one hundred and
fifty dollars to help the Fellowship provide food and other
emergency necessities for these families to help them survive. And
this is the other reason why I ask you for
one hundred and fifty dollars, because a generous donor has
said that they will match every gift of one hundred
and fifty or more, doubling your impact. So join me

(18:42):
and letting those families know that listeners like you stand
with Israel. You can call to make your one hundred
and fifty dollars gift right now to eight and eight
for eight eight IFCJ. That's eight and eight four eight
eight four three two five. You can give securely online
as well at support IFCJ dot org. That's one word,

(19:06):
support if CJ dot org. Support IFCJ dot org or
eight at eight four eight eight if CJ now Kamala
Harris coming out saying, Oh, we're going to distance ourselves
in the sixty minutes interview for example, like that's a joke.
In a statement addressing the controversy surrounding the edited response,

(19:27):
an aid for the Hairs campaign told Variety, quote, we
do not control CBS's production decisions and refer all questions
to CBS.

Speaker 2 (19:37):
They're not condemning it.

Speaker 1 (19:38):
They're not saying that news outlets should never change the
answers for people running for president in their interviews. Right,
that's not what they're saying. They just said, Oh, it's
a production decision. CBS not responding to Variety's requests for comment.
But what we know for a fact is and this

(19:59):
isn't a conspiracy theory, which I'm sure the Harris campaign
would label it if they could lock you up. Because
during Monday night's broadcast, CBS said Trump backed out of
a sixty minute interview. Was correspondent as Scott Pelly saying
that the campaign complained that we would fact check the interview.

Speaker 2 (20:18):
Quote.

Speaker 1 (20:18):
We fact check every story that's not true. If you did,
you wouldn't have changed Harris's story. You changed her story
because you knew the answer was wrong. So what you
did is you edited it to change it and to
change what she said. So they're liars. And now you
understand why Trump didn't want to do the sixty minute interview.

(20:39):
The other question that I have, and I go back
to sixty.

Speaker 2 (20:43):
Minutes here quote.

Speaker 1 (20:46):
This marks the first general election year since nineteen sixty
eight in which both presidential candidates did not sit down
for a sixty minutes interview. In October, we'll stop being
lying scumbags at sixty minutes, and maybe you can get
both candidates to go on there. But if I'm Donald
Trump and I see what they just did here, I
wouldn't do an interview with them. I would only do

(21:07):
an interview with them if it was a live interview.
I wouldn't do an interview with an organization that puts
out this type of propaganda. I also think that you know,
either Whittaker should be fired for this, especially if he
was involved in the edit.

Speaker 2 (21:26):
How can I trust anything they ever air again?

Speaker 1 (21:28):
This is like using AI to generate responses to an interview.
If you can't watch CBS News or sixty minutes, okay,
and you can't watch them without wondering if everything they're
putting out there is actually fake, Like is actually fake y'all?

(21:50):
Like we're actually talking about it being fake. If you
can't watch this without worrying, that's fake and it's fake
news that they're putting out there. I go back to
what Harris said earlier, and what Harris said earlier is well,
we need to have law enforcement going.

Speaker 2 (22:10):
Okay, are you going to have law enforcement going on CBS?
Would you?

Speaker 1 (22:13):
That's the question that should be asked by everybody because
they put out fake information, they put out misinformation, they
put out propaganda. Now granted it was to help you,
was to save you, but they did it. There was
something else that happened, and it wasn't just CBS this
time that is lying to you. It happened during the

(22:37):
Univision town hall. During the Univision town hall, Kamala Harris
was busted using a teleprompter for that town hall, and
she was reading from the teleprompter virtually a script for
how to answer different questions that were asked from the audience.

(22:58):
This is, again another exam of the dishonesty of the media.

Speaker 2 (23:03):
Do you really think Univision.

Speaker 1 (23:04):
Would allow Donald Trump to use a teleprompter during a
town hall. No, but they're all in for Kamala Harris.
Why because Kamala Harris has now said in this town
hall that she has absolutely a pathway for people that
are quote hardworking.

Speaker 2 (23:21):
What is the definition of hardworking? We don't know.

Speaker 1 (23:25):
But regardless of that talking point that was on Univision,
they were allowing her to have a scripted teleprompter that
she could rely on to give answers that we're supposed
to look to the audience like they were off the
cuff and original and authentic. They were not. It's all
a lie. The CBS interviews a lie. The town hall

(23:48):
is a lie. Kamala Harris was also asked a question
during the Univision fake town hall about inflation. This is
where part of what she was saying was a crypt
not an actual answer. Now let me also add, you're
gonna hear a question Spanish. You will hear the translator
come in because this was on Univision and the person

(24:09):
in the audience is speaking Spanish and Kamway Harris is
going to give an answer.

Speaker 2 (24:14):
Take a listen, you spend.

Speaker 5 (24:18):
Two hundred and fifty dollars the food, and now it
goes up to three hundred hundred.

Speaker 6 (24:23):
Over three hundred and fifty dollars in groceries.

Speaker 5 (24:26):
No, none of us, you know.

Speaker 7 (24:28):
Not only that is why.

Speaker 5 (24:30):
I talk about food, but close everything much more expensive
energy close. See, he went on, was Jomo jo media.
I am middle class a lot, and just like everybody

(24:51):
almost work very none of us is that vision. Sometimes
it's really been difficult because Monty is going up and
we just simply cannot go ahead.

Speaker 2 (25:05):
We can't move ahead women.

Speaker 7 (25:06):
And you said we're ambitious, but it's hardly maintained that
ambition when conditions are so so hard, so challenging.

Speaker 2 (25:14):
Yes, So about my question is as follows.

Speaker 5 (25:20):
You're going to health the middle class so that the
cost of living does not.

Speaker 4 (25:26):
Destroy its Thank you for the question and your point. Listen,
I know prices are too high still. You know prices
are too high still, and we have to deal with it.
Here's how I feel about it. Again, you've heard my story.
I come from the working class.

Speaker 2 (25:42):
I'm never going to.

Speaker 4 (25:42):
Forget where I come from. And part of what we
have to do is build what I call an opportunity economy.
Where people have the opportunity, like you have described, for
you to be able to work hard, and your five
daughters have an opportunity to end what they and what
you aspire for them to be able to do without

(26:03):
having to worry about just getting by. I want you
to be able to get ahead.

Speaker 2 (26:07):
So here's my plan.

Speaker 4 (26:09):
It includes what we need to do to bring down
the cost of, for example, groceries. One of the issues
I'm going to be taking on is price gouging.

Speaker 1 (26:18):
That's the answer. I know, prices are too high still,
and we will deal with it. Why aren't you dealing
with it right now? And she then again blames this
fictitious thing out there right the evil rich man that
is price gouging. Where is this boogeyman? Is the question

(26:38):
that I would ask Kamala Harris. It's a question that
every voter should ask. Now, where did she get that
answer from? We have to assume she got the answer
from whoever was running the teleprompter. That's what it seems
to be. Kevin O'Leary going on Fox News Shark Tank Investor,

(26:59):
you know, is mister wonderful. He had a very interesting
point about Harris's strategy of Kumbaya.

Speaker 2 (27:06):
Is it working? Churst?

Speaker 7 (27:08):
Kevin O'Leary is here, So, Kevin, you know you're seeing
the betting markets move. You've seen a lot of i'd
call it angst consternation on the left and the press.

Speaker 2 (27:21):
Are you seeing what they're seeing?

Speaker 8 (27:24):
Yeah?

Speaker 9 (27:24):
I think what everybody's learning about this election cycle, and
that's important lesson is there is no one channel that
reaches independent voters in seven states and forty three counties.
You got to hit everything. You've got to do social media,
got to go everywhere. You've got to do real, live interviews,
and you have to do a lot of them.

Speaker 2 (27:42):
And because that's really what it's boiling down to.

Speaker 9 (27:44):
And I think the strategy of the Kumbai heavy sugar
no protein, which we saw I don't know eight weeks ago,
clearly not working because there's not enough of it. And
so you know, I'm always amazed. I love policy, and
I really I love campaigning, but of this campaign, the
media is so biaffrocated, and there's so many different channels.

(28:07):
You've got to spend twenty five hours a day on
every single media, and you got to go live no editing,
like what's killing her?

Speaker 6 (28:15):
Now?

Speaker 2 (28:15):
Are these edits?

Speaker 9 (28:16):
CBS did, and I watched that tonight.

Speaker 2 (28:18):
That's brutal. What a mistake that was.

Speaker 7 (28:20):
So it's like selling a product. You know a couple
things about that.

Speaker 8 (28:23):
You got to just hit everyone everywhere wherever you can
and use that moment, in each moment to give people
the xyz how it works, why it works, how much
it costs.

Speaker 2 (28:35):
She just doesn't do that.

Speaker 9 (28:37):
Why do you think she does Well, there's two types
of interviews she's doing. She's dogging the sugar interviews with
celebrities you know that like her. I get that, but
there's no protein on the other side. You got to
do sugar a protein, protein or live interviews with real
reporters like you and many others where you sit down.
It's not going to be edited, it's going to be live.

(28:59):
Not enough protein. Now I think they might fix that
because they know they're not doing it. You got to
do sugar and protein.

Speaker 2 (29:06):
You got to do sugar and protein. He says.

Speaker 1 (29:09):
What they're doing right now isn't working. Here's something else
that came out today that's interesting. Inflation rate is now
at two point four percent in September, topping expectations. Something
else that happened jobless claims the highest since August of
twenty twenty three. The timing of this, it's not good,

(29:32):
Sean Hannity saying, the joy is gone from the Harris
campaign and things are starting to get pretty weird because
you can't do actual interviews the way you're supposed to,
and she has to use a teleprompter to even do
a town hall on Telemundo, right, Like, that's weird any.

Speaker 10 (29:51):
Of those questions about her past stated radical positions, meaning
in the last four years, for crying out loud, we
know that she enjoys Raisin Brand and Miller Lyte. But
despite all the heavy lifting by virtually everyone in the
media mop to help her, a Harris campaign is still
taking on water.

Speaker 2 (30:10):
The joy apparently is gone.

Speaker 10 (30:12):
As Axios put it, Democrats are experiencing the blue Wall
blues quote. Top Democratic politicians and operatives tell us the
vital states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania are getting tougher for
Vice President Kamala Harris and the party Senate candidates. Internal
and now external polling is now showing Trump is winning

(30:34):
in these states, including a new Emerson pole that has
Donald Trump up by one in Pennsylvania. That's following inside
her advantage that shows he's up by two in Pennsylvania. Meanwhile,
Quinnipiac is showing Trump up by two in Wisconsin and
four in Michigan. Panic is now set in and things
are starting to get pretty weird. By the way, here's

(30:54):
Michigan's Governor, Gretchen Whitmer, who is also a Harris campaign
co chair.

Speaker 2 (30:59):
You can explain this to me.

Speaker 10 (31:01):
Please dial in and call the show and tell our
producer take a look. In a statement, Governor Whitmer's office
defended the video, writing, in part quote, the governor's social
media is well known for infusing her communications with pop culture.

Speaker 2 (31:24):
They said the.

Speaker 10 (31:25):
Governor was just recreating a trend and promoting the Chips Act,
which is about semiconductor production. Looks like a Dorito's commercial.
To me, I'm not sure how that bizarre video promotes
the Harris campaign or semiconductors. Some of the comments online
are pretty downright funny, but it's clear Democrats are getting desperate.

(31:47):
I remember this is the same campaign that called JD
Van sweird and needless to say, things are not going
well for the Democratic Party and they're getting more weird
of the day, James Carvill my own friend sounding the
alarm rightly, So take a listen.

Speaker 6 (32:03):
The only thing I feel is the election is coming
November fifth to death and I'll get a time to
you know.

Speaker 3 (32:09):
If you're not in a reflective mood, not in a.

Speaker 6 (32:11):
Particular effective mood. Right now, I'm very, very compired of.

Speaker 2 (32:14):
What does Harris need to do with the month left.

Speaker 6 (32:16):
They need to be shocked, they need to be aggressive,
they need to stop answering questions and start asking questions.
They're doing all this and sitting down with sixty minutes
and sitting down in Colbert and sitting now, no matter what,
if I come on your show, you're going to ask
me the question.

Speaker 2 (32:31):
That's true. If I have a press conference, I get
to ask the question.

Speaker 3 (32:34):
You'd like to see or do more press conferences.

Speaker 2 (32:36):
I'd like for to.

Speaker 6 (32:37):
Put more things in play.

Speaker 1 (32:40):
James Carvill right there. He's smart, he's spot on, he's
telling the truth. He's absolutely right. But they're not going
to do that because they don't have a candidate that
is capable of doing it.

Speaker 2 (32:53):
That's the problem.

Speaker 1 (32:56):
If you can't get the candidate to pull off a
town in a friendly environment like Telemundo, you've got a
real big problem.

Speaker 2 (33:06):
You've got a problem that is massive, So they're stuck.
The question is will the media continue to change her answers?

Speaker 1 (33:18):
Will the media continue to cover for her, will tell
Amunda to continue to have fake events with Kamala Harris.

Speaker 2 (33:28):
If they do that, there is yes, a good chance
she can win.

Speaker 1 (33:33):
But the big question is will the media start to
get called out and will people stop believing them.

Speaker 2 (33:39):
CBS took a very big hit.

Speaker 1 (33:42):
They should release the transcript of the interview with Kamala
Harris right away. I don't think they'll do it because
there's no telling what else they're trying to hide. Make
sure you take this podcast please and share it on
social media wherever you are, and I'll see you back
here tomorrow