Victory! Hegseth Demolishes Democrats as their Smear Campaign Fails

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
We've got three big stories that we're going to start
with today on the show. Number one, fireworks from the
Democrats really dropping to a disgusting and vile level of
personal attacks against Pete Headgseth.

Speaker 2 (00:15):
We're going to deal with that.

Speaker 1 (00:16):
Also, this came out of nowhere and the reasons behind
it are disgusting and even more sinister than you could imagine.
Joe Biden has moved to lift the state sponsor of
terrorism designation for Cuba, and he's blaming it on the
prisoners that he wants to free. I'll explain that to

(00:38):
you as well. And Also, Democrats uniting today apparently there's
nothing that they will do in a bipartisan manner with Republicans,
including protecting women in girls sports. The House passed to
bill banning men from competing girls sports and schools that
receive federal funding, and two hundred and six Democrats voted

(01:01):
against it. Democrats who apparently hate women's rights and girls'
rights in our schools. I'll break that down for you
as well. But first let's get to the fireworks and
the substance of what went on during the confirmation hearing
for Pete Edgseth to become the man in charge of

(01:22):
the Pentagon.

Speaker 2 (01:24):
There were a couple of.

Speaker 1 (01:25):
Things that I want to highlight because the media is
going to want you to see the back and forth
with the Democrats and the leaders and how nasty their
attacks were, and I'll place some of that for you.
But there were actually, I think much more important moments
that came out of this when it came to accountability
and the size of the DoD and our government and

(01:47):
the number of people that just make money off of
being at the Pentagon and hooking their friends up with
massive government contracts. He talked about bureaucracy is out of
control with the Pentagon, and we don't need size of
leadership that we have right now. And all of these
people they just continue to fall forward and get promotions

(02:09):
because they stay in forever. And he talked about the
lack of accountability with the people at the top, for
example generals, saying those days are over.

Speaker 2 (02:19):
Take a listen, because everybody in this room knows.

Speaker 3 (02:22):
If you're a rifleman and you lose.

Speaker 4 (02:24):
Your rifle, they're throwing the book at you. But if
you're a general who loses a war, you get a
promotion that's not going to happen in Donald Trump's Kentagon.
It will be real standards for success. Everyone from the top,
from the most senior general to the most lowly private,
will ensure that they're treated fairly. Men and women inside

(02:45):
that system.

Speaker 1 (02:46):
Now, that is why the system is so scared of
Pete because of the quote that he just gave. If
you're a rifleman and you lose your rifle, they're throwing
the book at you.

Speaker 2 (02:56):
That is correct.

Speaker 1 (02:57):
He's totally accurate, Like that's the easiest way to get kicked
out of military basis. If you're a general and you
lose a war, you get a promotion. He is totally
accurate in saying it the way that he just did.
He then went on and was asked another question about like, well,
what types of changes do you see here, And one
of the questions that he was asked about was the
treatment of prisoners, if we grab prisoners and Geneva Convention

(03:21):
getm you know, the waterboarding of terrorists, all of those
types of things. And I want you to hear what
Pete says in response and listen to, I think really
carefully how he words his answer.

Speaker 4 (03:35):
Senator, how we treat our wounded, How we treat our prisoners.
The applications of the Juvina Conventions are incredibly important, but
we would all have to acknowledge.

Speaker 3 (03:43):
That the way we fought our wars.

Speaker 4 (03:44):
Back when the Geneva Conventions were written are a lot
different than the asymmetric, non conventional environment of counterinsurgency that
I confronted in Iraq and Afghanistan. I was the senior
counterinsurgency instructor in Afghanistan. My job was to understand how
the Taliban and Al Kaida opted so that NATO units
coming in could be informed of what was happening. They
knew our rules of engagement and when they were more restrictive,

(04:07):
they took advantage of them, and it put our men
and women in a more dangerous and difficult place.

Speaker 3 (04:12):
You believe, for future wars we fight.

Speaker 4 (04:13):
We need to have someone atop the pentagon, Sir, who
understands how those ripple effects.

Speaker 5 (04:18):
I just want to understand your position. Your position is
torture is okay? Is that correct? Waterboarding? Torture is no
longer prohibited given the circumstances of whatever war we're in.
Is that correct?

Speaker 3 (04:32):
Enator? That is not what I said.

Speaker 4 (04:34):
I've never been party to torture. We are a country
that fights by the rule of law, and our men
and women always do, and yet we have too many
people here in air conditioned offices that like to point
fingers at the guys in dark and dangerous places, the
gals in helicopters in un enemy territory who are doing
things that people in Washington, d c. Would never dare

(04:55):
to do.

Speaker 1 (04:55):
By the way, I couldn't agree with him more than
what he just said. There we have too many people
here in air condition offices that like to point the
finger at the guys in darkened, dangerous places, and helicopters
in any territory who are doing things people in DC
would never dare to do. He is absolutely right. I
have a different opinion, by the way, on waterboarding. I
have no problem with waterboarding. If someone like Khalid Sheik Muhammad,

(05:17):
the mastermind of nine to eleven, unlike the current president,
they want to give him a deal and spare his life.

Speaker 2 (05:22):
That's what democrats want to do.

Speaker 1 (05:24):
They want to give the terrorists lawyers that you and
I pay for. And when you mastermind nine to eleven,
I'm sorry if you need to be waterboarded for me
to get intel out of you that could save other
people's lives, and some people's lives from another nine to eleven.
I don't have an issue with that. There are others
that will discover me, and that's fine. I don't think

(05:46):
that what you heard there from Pete is him advocating
for waterboarding. What I'm saying is the world that the
left wants us to live in because they wanted to
score points. And if you go back to the waterboarding
controversy and you understand politics, you understand and Democrats really
weren't that angry about waterboarding terrorists. They needed a wedge
issue to make themselves look better. They needed an issue

(06:11):
that would give them the moral high ground and make
conservatives look bad, to make people around Bush look bad.
Remember when John Carey used that to his advantage when
he's like, you know, and then there was the you know,
we don't torture moments that we heard, and there was
all these people in the media, They're like, we don'twn torture,
we don't torture. That's not what we were better. We

(06:32):
were better than that, waight, And it's not what we do.
You grab me a kaleide shake Muhammad and Osama bin
lad and they have information about an imminent threat. I
don't believe that you give them a lawyer. I believe
that you extract that information out of them, and I
think there should be a lot of ways to do that.
I don't have a problem with waterboarding a high level

(06:55):
person and a terrorist organization, and there are some people
there to be Like Ben, I cannot believe that you
just said that I did. I believe that, by the way,
for quite some time. I'm not shy about it. Did
I say that every enemy combat in you waterboard. No,
But if you grab the guys at the top and
there's an active threat and they know what they're doing

(07:16):
and what they're planning, yeah, Like I do believe that
there are too many people in air conditioning offices that
like to point fingers of the guys in dark and
dangerous places and helicopters and enemy territory who are doing
things people in DC would never dare to do. I
agree with that statement from Pete there. It is a
very accurate statement. I also want you to hear what

(07:39):
was said on another issue, and this was back and
forth from Senator Mark Mullen and Democrats really went after
Pete for being divorced and having gotten remarried and having
a young child, and there was a nasty exchange with
Tim Kane. Now, Tim Kanan is a guy that wanted

(08:02):
to throw down in a very, very vile way. It
was one of the worst moments I would say today
in all of this was Tim Kane basically saying you're
a scumbag, Pete. And during Pete's confirmation hearing Senner came
shared his moral outrage as he described over head Says'
previous relationships. He also suggested he wouldn't vote for Pete's

(08:26):
confirmation because of his infidelity. Well, if he does believe
this the way that he was acting like today, then
my question would be, why did you just six months ago,
why did you film a giddy video with a second gentleman,
Doug im Hoff. If you're going to talk about this issue,

(08:48):
then you need to remember that the second husband, right,
Doug Enhoff, cheated on his first wife by getting his
children's nanny pregnant. He's also accused of smacking one of
his previous girl friends in the face. Im Hoff cheated
on his first wife by getting his children's nanny pregnant.

Speaker 2 (09:11):
Okay, that's that's a fact.

Speaker 1 (09:14):
So let me just remind you of what Tim kan
sounded like six months ago, and then I want you
to hear what he had to say today.

Speaker 3 (09:21):
Hey, folks, Tim Kaine here, second gentleman Doug M. Hoff Here.

Speaker 6 (09:26):
We are in Annandale, Virginia, where the Biden Harris campaign
just opened the first coordinating campaign office in Virginia.

Speaker 3 (09:33):
And we are going to one win this election.

Speaker 4 (09:36):
Senator Kane is going to go back to the Senate
and we're all going to do this thing together.

Speaker 1 (09:42):
Now, that was six months ago, So what where was
the outrage?

Speaker 3 (09:47):
Right?

Speaker 1 (09:47):
Hey, I can't support this guy to be the first present,
the first man, right, I can't. I can't support him
because he, you know, again, cheated on his wife by
getting his children's nanny pregnant, also accuse of smacking one
of his previous girlfriends in the face. So where is
that Tim Kaine today? Well, let me let you hear
what he sounded like today.

Speaker 6 (10:09):
You had just fathered a child two months before by
a woman that was not your wife. I am shocked
that you would stand here and say you.

Speaker 3 (10:17):
Are completely cleared.

Speaker 6 (10:19):
Can you so casually cheat on a second wife and
cheat on the mother of a child who had been
born two months before, and you tell us you are
completely cleared. So how is that a complete clear Senator.

Speaker 4 (10:30):
Her child's name is Gwendolen Hope Hegseeth, and she's a
child of God, and she's seven years old. And you
cheated on the mother of that child less than two
months after that daughter was born, didn't you.

Speaker 1 (10:44):
The part here that I think is the most disgusting
by the Democrats is they have no problem at all endorsing, advocating,
or supporting people in their own party that have done
things that they're now saying disqualify you from being in
charge of the Pentagon. Look, I would love if Pete

(11:05):
had a perfect record. How I love if every person
had a perfect record on our side. That's not reality.
People are centers. People make mistakes. Everybody I know, including me,
have made mistakes in their life. I don't think you
judge someone based on a mistake. I think you judge
people based on their body of work. Let me also
say this, I'm not electing the gout to be the

(11:25):
pope or the pastor of my church. What I am
doing is saying, I think this guy understands the military.
He served in the military, and I think he's way
more qualified for that job than the majority of the
people in the United States Senate for their jobs on
both sides of the aisle. And there was another senator

(11:46):
that made this point, and this audio today when I
was watching it, genuinely made me smile because Senator Mullan
came out and just went off the rails after he witnessed.
And I didn't play for you all of the back
and forth with Tim Kane because it was just so disgusting,
but you got the gist of it, and I want

(12:08):
you to hear what Senator Mullen had to say about
the other senators in the room. And it was a
very interesting moment because Democrats got real quiet. They got
real quiet because he was very close to I think,
naming names and shooting a shout across the bow of
all these self rightous senators.

Speaker 2 (12:27):
And this is what he said.

Speaker 3 (12:29):
You know, there's a lot.

Speaker 7 (12:29):
Of talk going about talking about qualifications and then about
us hiring him if we are the board. But there's
a lot of senators here I wouldn't have on my
board because there is no qualifications.

Speaker 3 (12:40):
Except your age.

Speaker 7 (12:42):
And you've got to be living in the state and
you're a citizen of the United States to be a
senator other than the fact we got to convince a
lot of people to vote force. And then when we
start talking about qualifications for if you're qualified for it,
could the chairman tell me what the qualifications are for
the Secretary of Defense? This chairman, could you tell me
what the qualifications are for the Secretary Defense, I'd be

(13:04):
happy forward. I'll read it for you to t me
out me. Let me read it for you because I
was getting some advice from second in command. Yeah, but
I'm just making a point because there's a lot about qualifications,
and I think it's so hypocritical of senators, especially on
the other side. I'll be talking about his qualifications not
going to lead the secretary or be the Secretary of Defense.

(13:27):
And yet your qualifications aren't any better. You guys aren't
any more qualified to be the Senator than I'm qualified
to be the center.

Speaker 3 (13:35):
Except we're lucky enough to be here.

Speaker 7 (13:37):
But let me read you what the qualifications of the
Secretary of Defense is because I googled it, and I
googled it and went through a lot of different sites,
and really it's hard to see. But in general, the
US Secretary of Defense position is filled by a civilian.

Speaker 3 (13:49):
That's it.

Speaker 7 (13:50):
If you have served in the US Army Forces, and
I've been in the service for you have to be
retired for at least seven years, and Congress can weigh that.
And then there's questions that that the senator from from
Massachusetts brought up about serving on a on a board

(14:11):
inside the military industry, and yet your own secretary that
you all voted for Secretary of Austin. We had to
vote on a waiver because he stepped out the border raytheon.
But I guess that's okay because that's a Democrat Secretary
of Defense. But we so quickly forget about that. And
then Senator Kane or I guess I better use the

(14:34):
senator from Virginia starts bringing up the fact that what
if you showed up drunk.

Speaker 3 (14:38):
To your job?

Speaker 7 (14:39):
How many Senators have showed up drunk to vote at night?

Speaker 1 (14:44):
By the way, you hear the laughter in the room.
This happens, and I've witnessed it multiple times in my career.
Multiple times I have been out at dinner, by the way,
with senators who then have to go back and vote
and I have witnessed senators who are hammered go to

(15:05):
the floor of the Senate and vote. Listen to the
laughing in the background. These are staffers. They know it's true.
They know it's true.

Speaker 7 (15:14):
The senator from Virginia starts bringing up the fact that
what if you showed.

Speaker 3 (15:17):
Up drunk to your job?

Speaker 7 (15:20):
How many senators have showed up drunk to vote at night?

Speaker 3 (15:25):
Heavy?

Speaker 1 (15:26):
You hear the laughter like they're all laughing because they
know that it's true. And to put the drinking part
of context, one of the senators went after Pete for
drinking in the past. He is gone sober now and
she started to belittle him and attack him for well
and wanting a demand that he say that he would

(15:46):
resign for the d D if he ever had a
drink while working at the d D. Now he said
very clearly he will not drink while he's in charge
of the Pentagon. And she's like, well, if you do,
if you have a zip of champagne, if if you
crack open a celebratory beer after we kill a terrorist
or whatever the scenario may be, you will you commit

(16:08):
to resigning immediately. And so what Senator Mullen is saying
here is like, dude, like, you guys are such scumbags,
Like I've seen you out drinking. I've seen you casting
votes drunk. I've seen it, by the way, and you
could tell that the senators on the Democratic side got
really awkward because I think they were afraid that he
was going to bring it up. So I'm going to

(16:29):
play that part one more time. Listen to the laughter, and
then listen to his closing moment here.

Speaker 7 (16:33):
I guess I better use the senator from Virginia. It
starts bringing up the fact that what if you showed
up drunk to your job? How many senators have showed
up drunk to vote at night? Have any of you
guys asked him to step down and resign for their job?
And don't tell me you haven't seen it, because I
know you have. And then how many senators do you

(16:55):
know have got a divorce before cheating on their wives?

Speaker 3 (16:58):
Did you ask them just tap down? No? But it's
for show, you guys.

Speaker 7 (17:05):
Make sure you make a big show and point out
the hypocrisy because a man's made a mistake and you
want to sit there and say that he's not qualified.

Speaker 3 (17:14):
Give me a joke.

Speaker 7 (17:15):
It is so ridiculous that you guys hold yourself as
this higher standard and you forget you got a big
plank in your eye. We've all made mistakes. I've made mistakes,
and Jennifer, thank you for loving him through that mistake,
because the only reason why I'm here and not in
prison is because my wife loved me too. I have changed,

(17:38):
but I'm not perfect, but I found somebody that thought
I was perfect. And for whatever reason, you love Pete
and I don't know why, but just like our Lord
and Savior forgave me, my wife's had to forgive me
more than once two and I'm sure you've had to
forgive him too.

Speaker 1 (17:56):
I love that exchange there, and I love how human
it was. And I also love that there was a
senator man enough to say, like, you think we're a
perfect body because democrats like, well, we're the board of
the company here and we've got to hire you. And
he's like, I wouldn't hire any one of us for

(18:17):
this job based on you guys coming to work and
drinking and making a voting late at night drunk. By
the way it happens, He's not exaggerating. There are dozens
of senators that I have seen that have come to
work at night drunk. There are tons of congressmen, by
the way, I've seen do the same thing, especially during

(18:37):
government shutdowns when I lived in DC. In fact, I
was at dinner with congressmen from both sides out who
were drinking and then went and voted, and then went
and voted. Let me just close with this one final
thing about Pete Number one. I do think he's going
to make it, and I think he's going to do
a damn good job at being in charge Pendagon. I

(19:01):
also think the way he handled himself with the Armed
Services Committee and the way that he handled the attacks
from people like Elizabeth Warren were spot on. And I
actually give him credit for surviving this confirmation hearing because
of one thing that he did that allowed him to
make it through, and that was actually working TV, you know,

(19:23):
working at Fox and working in TV. I got better
at my job by working at CNN. I actually think
it was the best blessing of my career, was doing
seven years in hell at CNN because it prepared me
to deal with these types of yahoos.

Speaker 2 (19:36):
And I think Pete has.

Speaker 1 (19:37):
Had to deal with these people in a different way
where when people attack you, you don't let it bother
you as much. I'll give you a great example of this,
and this is the reason why I think he's going
to be confirmed easily. Elizabeth Warren did her best to
rough him up, and there was a twenty second moment
that I'm going to play for you, and again the
committee room laughed at Senator Elizabeth Warren's.

Speaker 8 (20:01):
You're quite sure that every general who serves should not
go directly into the defense industry for ten years? Are
you're not willing to make that same pledge.

Speaker 3 (20:13):
I'm not a general senator.

Speaker 1 (20:17):
To you, I'm not a general senator. He smiled when
he did it. It was a checkmate moment. They did
everything they could to him today to try to destroy
him everything they could. And one final thing that I'll
say about Pete today, and this is the reason why
I think he's the right man for the job, is

(20:37):
because when he was making his comments about why he
wanted the job, it was about accountability. And this is
exactly why so many Democrats are trying to stop him.
He said, there has been no accountability for our disasters,
including Afghanistan's withdrawal.

Speaker 4 (20:54):
Listen, there's been no accountability for the disaster of the
withdrawal in Afghanistan, and precisely why we're here today, shoes
is that leadership now it's been unwilling to take accountability.
It's the time to restore that to our most senior ranks.

Speaker 1 (21:09):
You shouldn't get a promotion when you do what they
did in Afghanistan.

Speaker 2 (21:12):
And that is the point that he said.

Speaker 1 (21:14):
Leadership has been unwilling to take accountability for its problems.
It's failures, and it's time to restore that to our
most senior ranks. This is why Democrats hate him. This
is why Democrats are trying to get rid of him.
I don't think it's going to work. I think he
is going to be confirmed and that is good for

(21:35):
our men and women in uniform. Now, let's get to
something else that's happening while everybody's been obsessed with this,
and it's disgusting. You want to talk about a threat
to our country. It ain't Pete head seth.

Speaker 2 (21:46):
It is.

Speaker 1 (21:47):
However, the Democrats and Joe Biden not having the knees
to do this while he was running for president or
when he thought he was up for reelection. But now
that he's gone, well screw it, and everybody else around decision.
Joe Biden has now moved to lift the state sponsor
of terrorism designation for Cuba, and he's saying he has

(22:09):
no choice but to do it because of the hostage
agreement He's getting done. Biden has officially removed pro Hamas
has blowed tied Cuba from the state Sponsor of Terrorism list,
which is going to change their economy drastically and help
them have better relationships with China, with Russia and with

(22:29):
terrorist groups in the Middle East. The President announced he
would remove Cuba from the State Department's list of state
sponsor of terrorism, leaving only Iran, Syria, and North Korea
on that list. Biden claimed in his declaration that Cuba
had not sponsored terrorism for quote six months, So in
other words, you can sponsor as much terrorism as you want,
but in the democratic world, as long as you're a

(22:50):
good actor for six months will take you off the list.
Apparently that's enough to remove you from this list. He's
admitting that six months ago they were sponsoring terrorism, but
they said in the last six months they haven't, so
therefore they don't need to be on the list. You
want to know how long Cuba has been on the list.
You want to know how ridiculous this whole conversation is
we're having right now. Cuba has been on the list

(23:10):
for most of the years between nineteen eighty two and
twenty twenty five. You want to know when they were
taking off the list, with the exception of six years
between twenty fifteen and twenty twenty one, after President Barack Obama,
whom Biden served as a vice president, removed the communist
regime from a list as part of a quote larger

(23:32):
package of concessions to Havana. The Obama concession policy resulted
in a dramatic increase in political and religious persecution on
the island that has been documented and served also to
in bolden Cuba to forge deeper relationships with global terror
terror entities such as Hesbolah Hamas and the government directly

(23:53):
of Iran. So after Joe Biden and Barack Obama did that,
Resident Elect Donald Trump restored Cuba of the list of
State Sponsors of Terrorism in twenty twenty one on the
grounds of the cast Or regime maintains relationships with several
jihadist terror entities as well as narco terrorists militias such
as the Revolutionary Army Forces of Columbia known as FARK

(24:16):
in Latin America. The state sponsor of Terrorism label comes
with hefty economic sanctions, that's why Joe Biden's helping them
out right, and diplomatic limitations. According to the State Department,
state sponsors of terrorism, reading directly from their wording face quote,
restrictions on US foreign assistants, a ban on defense exports

(24:39):
and sales, certain controls over exports of dual use items,
and miscellaneous financial and other restrictions. Now you may say,
all right, well he's going to do this and immediately
Trump's going to undo it.

Speaker 2 (24:52):
So what's the big deal.

Speaker 1 (24:54):
Everybody that's got their money tied up right now, everybody's
got their money that they can't get because of a
American sanctions, and then being on this list, we'll be
able to grab and get all their money instantly when
this is lifted, and then if you put it back on,
they're going to be like, we don't care because we
got our money out. This is going to fund terrorism,
This is going to fund narco terrorism, This is going

(25:16):
to fund cartels, drug dealers, and the terrorists in the
Middle East instantly with this decision. Now, yeah, Trump's going
to be inaugurated and to a second term as present
on Monday. The Biden administration made the decision less than
a week of its tenure remaining, and announced it the
day before Trump's choice to lead the State Department. Cuban

(25:36):
American Senator Marco Rubio is scheduled to appear before Congress
for confirmation. You need to understand that was done on purpose,
disregarding the substantial evidence that communist Cuba enables terrorists activity
around the world. Biden said in his official certification removing
the country from the list that Cuba had promised not
to do so again in the future because they haven't

(25:59):
been involved in terror.

Speaker 2 (26:00):
He says that at least the last six months. This
is not a joke quote.

Speaker 1 (26:04):
The government of Cuba has not provided any support for
international terrorism.

Speaker 2 (26:08):
During the preceding six month period.

Speaker 1 (26:10):
The government of Cuba has provided assurance says that it
will not support acts of international terrorism in the future.
Oh okay, well that's good to know. So why are
they doing it? For one reason and one reason only.
They wanted to give a big win to the left.
They wanted to give a win to the terrorists. They
wanted to give a win to Cuba, and they wanted,
for whatever reason behind the scenes, to do a deal

(26:32):
and hook them up. That's what this is about. It
also undermines Donald Trump when he comes into office, and
it's another way to screw with Marco Rubio right before
his confirmation hearing you combine all this, you put all
this together, and this is what you get.

Speaker 2 (26:50):
Now, one final.

Speaker 1 (26:52):
Thing I want to say, and I mentioned this earlier
about the vote today that happened. It should not have
been a controversial vote. This should be a bipartisan vote
on protecting girls and boys sports. Unfortunately, Democrats said, screw it,
We're going to screw over women yet again. The House

(27:14):
passed a bill banning men from competing in girls' sports,
specifically in schools that receive federal funding.

Speaker 2 (27:22):
This is huge.

Speaker 1 (27:24):
There were two hundred and six Democrats that vote against it.
Democrats clearly hate women and girls by mandating that men
who identify as a woman can play in their events.
So when they tell you that they are, oh, we're
in favor of girls and women, and we're all in

(27:45):
favor of women in or you know, women's sports and
women succeeding in life.

Speaker 2 (27:51):
No, they're not. They would rather push this woke ideology.

Speaker 1 (27:55):
On your daughter and have men in the in the
locker rooms changing in front of them.

Speaker 2 (28:00):
The list goes on and on.

Speaker 1 (28:04):
There have been so many women whose lives have been
affected by men in the locker room. There have been
women that have been forced to change in front of men.
There have been women that have been attacked a sexually
assaulted because of men. But you also have to remember
something and this actually goes back to Pete head Seth.
For a second, Democrat Jack Reid said head Seth isn't

(28:28):
qualified for the job.

Speaker 2 (28:31):
You want to know who.

Speaker 1 (28:31):
Jack voted for to confirm in the Biden administration a dude, Okay,
a dude who thinks he's a chick. They voted to
confirm multiple men in the military and positions of power
who actually think that they are dudes that are somehow chicks.

(28:54):
Never forget that is the Democratic Party. Make sure you
share this podcast with your fan family and your friends,
and I will see you back here tomorrow.