Battleground LIVE: Nothing Adds Up About the Trump Assassination Attempt

Tonight on Battleground LIVE:

In the Arena Tonight: Rich Baris, Director of Big Data Poll and Host of Inside the Numbers

• New video emerges from the July 13th Trump rally

• Acting Director of the USSS testimony on Capitol Hill gives almost no detail as to what really happened

• The massive propaganda campaign propping up Kamala

• The Kamala high is temporary

• PA Election law update

 

Follow Sean on Instagram - @officialseanparnell

Follow Sean on Twitter - @SeanParnellUSA

Get your Battleground apparel at www.officialseanparnell.com

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:03):
Warning Europe about to enter the arena and join the
Battle to.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
Save America with your host Sean Parnell.

Speaker 3 (00:14):
Good evening, Battle Crew.

Speaker 4 (00:16):
Welcome to Battleground Live, my fellow Americans, patriots. It is
good to see you from see the Shining Sea in
everybody in between, welcome to the show.

Speaker 3 (00:30):
Listen. You know how much I hate missing shows. I
hate it. I hate it.

Speaker 4 (00:37):
I had a lot of trouble getting down to Florida.
I don't know if I told you all why we
were even down there in the first place. I had
to go down there for iHeartRadio and Premiere Networks, and
I had the first time I've ever done anything like
this in my life, and I really know what I
was getting myself into or what it was going to

(00:59):
be like really what to wear.

Speaker 3 (01:02):
And I got.

Speaker 4 (01:03):
Down there and all of Premier's conservative talk radio people
were there. I mean, Sean Handy was there, Jesse Kelly
was there. I mean I've known Jesse Kelly for a
long time. But Clay Travis and Buck Sexton were both
there again, no Buck for a long time as well.
But this was their advertiser summit, and they had a

(01:25):
bunch of the advertisers who had invested money into iHeart,
into conservative talk radio, and they were all there and
they invited me to this meeting, and it was all
a big surprise to me. I mean, they didn't invite
me down there as a surprise for me, but it
was like drinking from a fire hose for me. I'd
never again a low guy on the totem pole, so

(01:47):
it was interesting to be a fly on the wall
at all of this stuff. And it was actually kind
of an amazing experience. And you know, when we landed
down in Florida on the way to this event, of
course we used book a Limo again, which is a
great conservative sponsor of this show. Meant, I mean that

(02:09):
company just kicks ass. And we had a driver, a
gentleman pick us up. He had a slight accent, but
he spoke English very very well. And you know, I
asked him where he was from, and he said that
he was from Venezuela, and I said, you know, that's
that's interesting because on my mind, going through my mind

(02:32):
was that I just did a show not the day
before about Venezuela and what was happening there and how Madoro,
who was a socialist communist dictator there is rigging the
election despite only receiving like thirty four percent of the vote.
And he was like, I'm from Venezuela. But the first
couple of things that he the first couple of things
that he had mentioned to me, was that I kind

(02:55):
of realized he was on our side, so to speak.
Is he said, you know, nothing has been that. I'm
not surprised that the flight is late. Your flight is
as late as it is. He's like, since this whole
crowd crowds, crowd strike, you know, software patch, He's like,
things just haven't been the same. And by the way,
everybody in the airlines, like the folks that I was

(03:16):
talking to there, they all acknowledged that since that global
ground stop and that crowd strike snafu, whatever it was,
I mean, they say it was just a failure a
software patch did an update properly, so it was initially
reported as a cyber attack. The reality is, I don't know,
but many of these people that work in and around
the airline industry said things just haven't been the same.

(03:38):
And it was the strangest travel experience that I've had
in a long time. And this is coming from somebody
who has done thirty five plus or used to do
thirty five plus speaking events a year on the road
a significant amount of time. So it was just a
very very strange experience. But I knew within a few
minutes of talking to this gentleman, who by the way,

(04:00):
was a class act. I knew he was, he was
one of us. I knew he was a patriot. I
knew he was a conservative. And I asked him, I said, so,
what do you think about everything that's going on down
there in Venezuela and rigging elections and with Maduro. And
he said to me, you know when Mace he's got
he had two sons. He said, when my sons were

(04:22):
one and two. You know, it was in it was
like early two thousands, Hugo Chavez had just taken power.
And he said, you know, I don't want my sons
having to grow up in a communist country. And remember,
the day before I had met this gentleman, I had

(04:43):
done a show on the slow Progressive Descent into Hell
in Venezuela, and so this was right around the time,
just before things were going to get really really bad,
and he's like, I don't want my sons to be
raised in a communist country.

Speaker 3 (05:00):
I knew what was coming. And he said, you know.

Speaker 4 (05:02):
What's crazy about this election with Maduro and the rigging
elections and the rigging of elections there. He's like, he
said to me, and I'll never forget this. He's like,
I feel like I fled one communist country to come
to the best country on the on the face of

(05:22):
the earth, in America, the freest country in the face
of the earth, the land of opportunity. He's like, and
I feel like America is going down that path right now.
He's like all of these democrats, he's like, it's like
they don't appreciate the freedom. They don't appreciate what we
have here in this country. They don't appreciate the blessings

(05:47):
that we have here in America. And he's like, I
was able to raise myself and this is like, this
is an old, an older gentleman driving around for book
a limo just to pay his way for his family.
He's like, both of my sons have been to call
college here. And he said one of his sons came
back from a college semester and again he was obviously
a conservative guy, come from Venezuela. And he said one

(06:08):
of his sons came back from a semester at school,
and you know, every freshman that comes back from college
has that first Thanksgiving at home.

Speaker 3 (06:17):
Where I was never like that.

Speaker 4 (06:19):
I was always a card carrying, hardcore conservative, but there
are I have heard stories. And I come from a
big Italian family where you know, freshman kids come home,
they get exposed to like some crazy socialist liberal insanity
at college, and they come home and they try that
stuff on maybe a conservative family, and in some cases
it doesn't go very well.

Speaker 3 (06:40):
Well.

Speaker 4 (06:41):
This this gentleman told me of an experience like that
with his oldest son, who he had raised to be conservative,
going to college in America for the first time and
came home and started trashing on Ronald Reagan.

Speaker 3 (06:52):
And he said, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa wo son, No, no, no, no, no.

Speaker 4 (06:55):
And he's like listen, he's like, that is that's not correct.
And his son said, well, Dad, you're just because you're
a it's just because you're a Republican. He's like, listen
to me. He's like, we fled the hell of communism
and fascism and socialism and in Venezuela and we're.

Speaker 3 (07:12):
Lucky to be here. He's like, and this is this,
this is this driver telling me this.

Speaker 4 (07:16):
I mean, think about it through through the lens of
how we look at this show and participate in this
show together. Just talked about Venezuela on Monday. He's saying
to his son, he's like, I don't give a damn
about Democrat Republican. None of that matters to me. He's like,
I don't care. He's like, he's like, I want you
to appreciate what we have here. I want you to

(07:36):
appreciate freedom. And he's like, you know a lot. He's
the problem with many Americans who grew up here is
that many Americans kind of take for granted the freedoms
that we have here in this country. And you know, Democrats,
that party has changed significantly. It's not the party of
the union, working class man or woman anymore. We've talked

(07:59):
to about this many times before. They're not the party
of Bill Clinton. They're not the party of secure borders,
they're not the party of balanced budgets. They're not the
party of any of that anymore. They have truly embraced
socialism in a way that and you know, you hear
all these conservative politicians oh, they're socialists. They're socialists, And

(08:22):
of course it's become cliche, it's a term that's overused.
But these Democrats truly are ignorant to just how terrible
how socialism is often a harbinger of death and destruction
and famine everywhere that poisoned philosophy is implemented at the

(08:43):
highest levels of government. Great tragedy and great human suffering
follows shortly thereafter, probably within one generation, descent into actual hell.
You vote yourself into a socialist healthscape once, and oftentimes
the end result is fighting your way out of it.

Speaker 3 (09:02):
But listen to what Waltz who By the way, I don't.

Speaker 4 (09:06):
Think this dude is going to be Kamala Harris's vice
presidential pick, but was on the short list. Just listen
to how he talks about socialism.

Speaker 3 (09:13):
But we can get out there, reach out, make the case,
and for one thing, don't ever shy away from mark
progressive values. One person's socialism is another person's neighborliness.

Speaker 4 (09:25):
That's the dumb I'm sorry excuse my language here, but
that's the dumbest shit I've ever heard of my life.
You know, America, We've got to do better than that.
These democrats just first of all, they rewrite history. They're dangerous.
They don't acknowledge basic historical facts, while at the same
time look through rose colored glasses at very devastating political

(09:48):
philosophies and think that even though socialism and communism has
been implemented all over the world with a trail of
human bodies in its wake, that it will somehow work here. Oh,
we're just you know, it just hasn't been implemented the
right way before. But this time we'll get it right.
I'm sorry, that's not a risk that I'm willing to take.
So kind of off on a tangent there about this

(10:09):
iHeartRadio thing that I was at. But there's so much
to talk about today. Of course it's Savage Wednesday. We've
got Savage Rich Barris on deck. So I got to
talk very quickly before we bring Savage Rich on about
this new video from the Trump rally on the thirteenth,
and we'll get into this with Savage Rich as well.
And the acting Director of the United States Secret Service

(10:32):
row his testimony on Capitol Hill. His exchange was, Josh Holly,
I am saying here right here, right now, and again,
I want to get Rich's take on all of this.
But this Kamala high that we're seeing, it's temporary. It's temporary,
and it will pass. And I'll explain to you why
here in a second. But also just before the show,

(10:54):
like the Trump of the National Association of Black Journalists
the NAB j oh my god, I mean there, that
is an embarrassment of riches of just amazing, incredible, extraordinary
Trump sound bites. I'm probably not gonna get into all.

(11:15):
I'm probably not gonna get into that today unless Rich
and I are discussing it. But I'm definitely when I'm
in the chair for Wendy Bell tomorrow. So I'm in
the chair for Wendy Belt Thursday, Friday and all next week.
We're gonna do a deep dive at Trump at the
National Association of Black Journalists tomorrow morning. So if you're
watching here, make sure you're with us the battle crew.
Make sure you're with us tomorrow on the Wendy Belt

(11:37):
Radio program from nine to noon. You know where to
find her. Many of you all are are fans of
Wendy Bell as it is. Okay, So back to the
Trump assassination attempt, and I got savage Rich Barrison Deck here.
I want to get him on as soon as I can.
I don't like to waste his time. But two weeks ago,
over two weeks ago now, President Trump almost assassinated one millimeter.

(12:02):
The man was within one millimeter of him dying, turns
his head.

Speaker 3 (12:06):
At the last second.

Speaker 4 (12:09):
No press conferences, nothing from local law enforcement, nothing from
federal authorities. Absolutely nothing. And the reason why I keep
talking about this is because people in the media, both
on the conservative side, especially on the liberal side, they

(12:34):
seem desperate to move on from this. When we talked
on Monday about how Google was was fact checking and
erasing any sort of search history of the Trump assassination attempts,
we have Facebook and Instagram fact checking the actual picture
of Trump raising his fists saying fight fight. Every liberal

(12:56):
or every AI artificial intelligence program doesn't even recognize an
assassination attempt on President Trump's life, except for Grock, the
AI on Twitter slash x, which of course run by
Elon Musk. This is unbelievably concerning, and so much of
what we've been talking about is how we're living in
almost like a nineteen eighty four type environment where they're

(13:20):
denying basic historical facts and going out of their way
to rewrite history, or if they can't rewrite it, just
delete it all together. And that's exactly what they're doing
on the Internet, which is interesting when you think about
how that puts the importance of print media, magazines and
newspapers like kind of highlights how important they are. Right,

(13:43):
you can't digitally alter anything that you're holding in your hands,
So who the hell knows, Maybe we'll see a comeback
of all of this stuff, but there's a reason why
the media wants to move on as fast as humanly
possible from this assassination attempt on President Trump. And the
question that we should all be asking, And I've asked
everyone that I talked to, especially members here of the

(14:04):
battle Crew and mcgroin nation who are watching the show,
or people who watch Riches show inside the numbers and
are joining us tonight. And I'm looking at my live
chat right now and I'm gonna ask you all, and
I want to hear your responses. Do you think that
the government had a hand in this? Just answer in

(14:27):
here and out check and maybe if you don't think,
if you don't want to go that far, do you
think that the government was willfully negligent in the assassination
attempt on President Trump's life. So yes, yes, yes, yes, Hell, yes, yes, Heidi, yes,
everybody like f yes they did, Dory, yes, Outlaw, yes, Jim, yes, Geno.

(14:51):
I mean it's like otis Heidi. I mean like it's
like I appreciate the f yeses.

Speaker 3 (14:58):
Really I do.

Speaker 4 (15:00):
As an infrature guys, a knuckle dragger, I really do
appreciate that level of honesty and intensity. But you realize
that we're not even allowed to ask that question, right.
You realize that anytime any member of Congress, especially I'm
looking at I'm thinking of Corey Mills, he goes on
television and CNN, on Fox and on any network that

(15:22):
will have him, and he'll just ask, Hey, you know,
was this wilful, willfully negligent? Did the government have a
role in any of this? And the anchors to a
person cut them off. Ah, I'm uncomfortable. We've ben talking
about that. Listen to me, America, that is the most

(15:44):
important question to ask. The question that they that regime
in the media is most resistant to asking is precisely
the most important question that all of us have to ask.

Speaker 3 (16:00):
And listen.

Speaker 4 (16:03):
If we rule it out, like, rule it out in
a couple days. Great, But it's impossible to rule out
that possibility if we're afraid to ask the question in
the first place. So you see the rate at which
the media is trying to move on from this assassination attempt.
You see them trying to crush us just asking very
basic questions. Was this willfully negligent? How did a twenty

(16:26):
year old know nothing? Outsmart the best protective service, the
United States Secret Service in the world, and nobody, hardly
anybody even talks about this. But they found allegedly found
explosives in his car. They found a remote detonator on
this twenty year old kid's person. Trump only announced the

(16:47):
rally eight days before the rally itself. So you mean
to tell me that this kid fabricated explosive devices despite
having no training whatsoever. This kid reconned the site, used
drone to do it. I mean, you can't just build
a fabricate explosives with RC capability. And you mean to

(17:07):
tell me he was able to defeat the United States
Secret Service and climb on top of a building.

Speaker 3 (17:12):
Which, by the way, which by the way.

Speaker 4 (17:16):
Wasn't even within the perimeter of the United States Secret
Services protection detail, which is mind blowing to me because
it was like, right, there's this is why I've been
talking about this and posting all these pictures of that
I got from both rally goers and pictures that I
took of the event itself, because people that the satellite
imagery doesn't do it justice.

Speaker 3 (17:38):
Look at this new video that dropped today.

Speaker 4 (17:40):
You can see the shooter running on the roof, and
if you look closely down on the bottom right, you
can see me in the bottom right hand corner of
this video.

Speaker 3 (17:49):
Look at this.

Speaker 4 (18:05):
The United States the acting director of the United States
Secret Service said that the Secret Service didn't see him,
but even people in the crowd could see him.

Speaker 3 (18:13):
I'm telling you, folks, this stinks to high heaven. This
makes no sense.

Speaker 4 (18:17):
And when you have smart people saying stupid things on
Capitol Hill, usually there is some form of corruption there. So, okay, listen,
I've got to get the Savage Rich Barris. I've kept
him waiting way too long. Okay, So Savage Rich. If
you don't know who he is, he's the director of
Big Data poll and he's the host of a great
show on Rumble called Inside the numbers. You should definitely

(18:40):
go and subscribe. Follow his show on Rumble, subscribe to
him on Locals. I don't take and put a lot
of stock into polsters. In fact, he's the only polster
that I trust, and it's why we have him on
every Wednesday. But without further ado, my friend Savage Rich Barris, welcome,
good to see.

Speaker 5 (18:57):
You, Hey, brother, how's it going? And look, yeah, look
she wants to give a little wave.

Speaker 3 (19:02):
Hey, savage Laura.

Speaker 5 (19:04):
It was I said, look, commander Melanie went.

Speaker 3 (19:06):
On, Savage Laura, get on, get over here.

Speaker 5 (19:09):
She won't do what I'm telling you. She's not gonna do.
She'll flick her hair at us. And it's pretty hair, Laura.

Speaker 4 (19:14):
I could hear her laughing in the background. See, this
is how Melanie gets like if I, if I so, this.

Speaker 3 (19:19):
Is how tease, such a tease, if I so, Here's
how this works.

Speaker 4 (19:25):
This is how my relationship with Melanie is. If I
tell her to do something, and I don't even mean
like not like hey, you need to do this, like
nothing like that, right, but she's instantly resistant to anything
that I say, if it has anything about me trying
to tell her at all what to do. So me saying,
do Savage Laura get on here. My sense is that

(19:47):
Savage Laura will just say screw you.

Speaker 3 (19:49):
Sean on way.

Speaker 5 (19:50):
Are you just gonna say that you don't do.

Speaker 3 (19:52):
That to me?

Speaker 5 (19:53):
Were you seriously gonna make it okay?

Speaker 3 (19:56):
All right?

Speaker 5 (20:01):
And she doesn't like recognizing you want to hear something cool.
So like there was a guy wearing a People's Pundit
shirt in publics. That has never happened to me in
a public place. I have stopped in Virginia to get
gas and these two girls ran up and we're like,
oh my god, there's the People's pundit. Let me get

(20:22):
a picture that's happened. That's happened. But like, I'm not
like that visible, and she's worried about that. And then
but if I go to events, if I go to
political events, obviously, you know, then that's different. But in
general public, the most I've ever gotten that is no joke.
A local radio program. It's super popular here. Everybody in

(20:46):
North Carolina listens to it. The guy's a local hero.
Like a lot of states have those guys, you know
what I mean, Like Opus and Anthony or whatever it
used to be in New York and New Jersey.

Speaker 3 (20:55):
You know, he's like that.

Speaker 5 (20:56):
So I go to rent a storeage unit and the
guy imediately recognized my voice and was like, oh my god,
you're on Talk of the Town all the time. And
I'm like, wow, you know, but she's worried about it.
I don't think we're there yet, but I get her worry.
Get her worried, you know what I mean.

Speaker 4 (21:11):
People in the chat are like, we want Savage Laura.
People are demanding it.

Speaker 5 (21:18):
There for all of you and my sassy tweets. I
haven't started yet, but she's waiting.

Speaker 3 (21:30):
Got banned, she got she got suspended on Twitter.

Speaker 5 (21:33):
Yeah, and Elon just brought her back with the help
if it appears by the way, it appears, with the
help of Benny Johnson, who is very friendly and with Elon,
and I'm I love Benny. Benny's a great guy and
I can't thank him enough because they just did that
to her to get to me. Everyone knows, like if

(21:54):
you want to, if you want to, No, no, I
don't mean it like that, but like everyone knows, if
you want to book like it happened after you booked
me on Tucker and then boom, she's gone.

Speaker 3 (22:03):
You know.

Speaker 5 (22:03):
So it was like they were like kill her so
he can't go on TV anymore, you know, like it's
met dude, we live in it. No, your tweets weren't nice,
but they weren't bannable, you know.

Speaker 4 (22:15):
Hey, can we also circle back like Jensaki style to
people like wearing people's pundit shirts. There's you have somehow
made polling sexy and that's a that is a that
is an accomplishment as a merit.

Speaker 6 (22:30):
It's the best we can I tell you that, which,
by the way, is Laura because I remember back in
my Wall Street days, I used to rock the suspenders
like Gordon Gecko and she was like, you know, we're
gonna three piece you.

Speaker 5 (22:44):
And I'm like, all right, I mean I'll try.

Speaker 3 (22:46):
And then first one.

Speaker 5 (22:46):
I like, really put on. I remember it was a
brown armand.

Speaker 3 (22:51):
Was with your pictures right your little jacket over your shoe.

Speaker 5 (22:54):
That's another one, that's a different one. But at the
very first suit put me in was a chocolate brown
pinstriped RMANI with a with and it was a three
piece and I'm like and this was back in the
Wall Street days, and I mean I put that on
and I was like, oh my God, and I just
fell in.

Speaker 3 (23:11):
Love and I was excuse me. I want to put
Savage Laura on the spot.

Speaker 4 (23:14):
I just want to hear you could just be the
voice of God, Savage Laura. I've been asking everybody this,
Do you think the government was either willfully negligent or
involved in the assassination attempt on President Trump?

Speaker 3 (23:28):
Yeah? Every listen.

Speaker 4 (23:32):
I swear to God. I swear to God. Democrats are like, look,
the government don't like Trump. I mean like everybody I
talked to is like like they might not say it,
but they know it. And it's just like if everyone
knows it, then why are we moving.

Speaker 3 (23:48):
On so fast? It's it's I can't. I just I'm
not going to stop talking about it.

Speaker 5 (23:54):
It's just you shouldn't.

Speaker 3 (23:55):
You shouldn't.

Speaker 5 (23:56):
I mean, I don't, I I I They have done
everything in their power. I keep saying this, but it's true,
Like we're getting hit with once in a lifetime kind
of stories every other week now. They are doing everything
in their power to move on from this. This man
could have been killed. When we were talking when it
first happened, we were saying, like another inch. The truth is,

(24:18):
it was like another half inch. It was even less
than that. It was that close, and these acting director.
Notice he flipped out on Ted Cruz when Ted Cruz
brought up how political some of these government bureaucrats and
agents are. He totally lost his mind on that, as
if like he was outraged by the question. Let's not

(24:39):
forget there was a female Secret Service officer who was
removed from duty when Donald Trump was actually the sitting
president of the United States because she said on her
Facebook page that she would let him get hit by
a bullet. Okay, let's not forget about that. Let's not
forget about all the other things that people have been
drummed up and pulled off of their Facebook pages ever since.
This guy who's there now testified on Capitol Hill yesterday

(25:02):
is a Democratic hack an activist. I mean, this is
who was the head of the Secret Service. Listen, I
don't even care what anybody says. I do not. You
have to be a moron to believe that they were
this incompetent, that it was totally like, you know, innocent mistakes.
There's no chance in my mind that they weren't looking

(25:24):
at these polls and saying the only other optionist to
remove Joe Biden. We have to try to kill this guy,
there's no doubt, and like we or not even we
have to try to kill him, but we have to
stand aside and let some other nutcase that we know
all about. Apparently we know all about this guy.

Speaker 3 (25:42):
He's on the radar.

Speaker 5 (25:43):
So let's just wait until the opportunity presents itself and
just kind of turn our hands.

Speaker 4 (25:50):
And how about the reports that I'm getting from like
my buddies who are in Congress, they're saying that his
house is oddly sterile.

Speaker 5 (25:58):
No silverware, like dude.

Speaker 4 (26:01):
Like so, And by the way, like when you talk,
when you talk willful negligence, you know, like if you're uncomfortable,
if you're uncomfortable thinking about this because of Trump, or
you if you're a hate listener, which we welcome hate
listeners all are welcome here. But they did the same
thing to RFK. Biden basically said f you to RFK.
RFK had two family members that were assassinated. But now

(26:24):
we know that the government had a hand in those things,
and they were doing the same thing to President Trump.
We know for a fact now this has come out
that President Trump has asked for an enhanced security detail
and was denied time and time again. The Biden administration
threw up red tape left and right. We know now
that that the building itself wasn't inside the perimeter. We
know now that the counter snappers weren't even on site.

Speaker 5 (26:46):
We knew that already. Though we knew that already, we
just didn't say it publicly. I told you in the
the advanced team did not have that building marked off.
So we knew that immediately, we just didn't go public
with it. So the audience understands there are a bunch
of details that we all knew already. Really like, I mean,
you hear things from sources. You hear whether they're I

(27:08):
don't want to say where they are, but you hear
things from sources you're not ready or prepared to go
public with until the Congress does their job and then
corroborates what they're telling you. And these things have been corroborated. Right,
they knew about this guy. There's obviously a very very
important messages text messages that they will not tell us

(27:30):
the content of for whatever reason. Also, we know where
he got the firearm from. We know he had been
to ranges because listen, There's another thing I want to
tell you about. Like people don't think it's like any
when we say it's an easy shot. It's an easy
shot because I went. I was in the army and
not only did what I eventually did, but I was

(27:52):
expert infantryman badge before I even got there. I know
how to fire that weapon at one hundred and fifty meters.
I'm trained to do that, you know, from twenty five
to two hundred and fifty, you know, and beyond if
I have to with iron sights, with iron sights, that
is a prime distance for that weapon. If you know

(28:12):
how to fire and handle that weapon. All of a sudden,
like people just thought, like, you know, this isn't a
sir hand, sir hand moment. When you take a freaking
revolver and walk up to somebody, he's in the prone raw.
He's in the prone position, which is the firing position.
They will first teach you when you get to Fort
Benning and they teach you how to fire in M
ten or an M four or in M sixteen.

Speaker 3 (28:34):
Or whatever that is.

Speaker 5 (28:36):
That was absolutely someone who knew what distance to get
what building would be the perfect distance. And again that
building not being on the advanced team's radar. Not being
on the perimeter, not being listed on the perimeter, and
not being guarded is the most It's impossible. It's impossible

(28:58):
to be in oversight. It is impossible. This is what
they do, thank you, I mean what they do exactly.

Speaker 3 (29:05):
Listen, listen, listen to this.

Speaker 4 (29:07):
Listen to this interview because I'm glad because I'm from
a Beaver Butler County, West western Pennsylvania guy, but like
I'm glad that the local law Oh sorry, guys, well,
I'm just glad that the local law enforcement are speaking
out about this and the whistle blowers are coming forward.
Listen to this SoundBite of the local law enforcement telling
telling Fox News that they were not directed to have

(29:30):
snipers on that.

Speaker 6 (29:32):
Roof in those first two windows.

Speaker 7 (29:33):
So he's wrong about the assignment.

Speaker 6 (29:35):
Absolutely.

Speaker 2 (29:36):
I think the biggest thing to not lose sight of is,
you know, their job was on being on the outside
unsecured perimeter looking inward at those you know that had
already gone through security.

Speaker 7 (29:51):
The local officials told Fox this was the view their
two snipers had. You can see this is a different
warehouse window than the one Row pointed to, and the
vantage point is at the ground level, looking into the crowd,
and not onto the roof. The commander of the local
snipers says, if the Secret Service had told them to
place their snipers on the roof, they would have. Acting

(30:14):
Director Roe says, that.

Speaker 3 (30:17):
Is okay, done for me. None team on the ground.

Speaker 4 (30:22):
So I did this big interview with Fox News and
they wrote this big article about it. I said, immediately,
there are two counter sniper teams behind President Trump. Okay,
I agree with both of those locations. They're looking out
over the crowd. They didn't have a great angle on
the building where the shots actually came from, but there's
actual a tactical reason for them to be on that building.
There's also a tactical reason for counter snipers to be

(30:44):
on the water tower.

Speaker 3 (30:45):
Now, I don't believe.

Speaker 4 (30:47):
Initially I believed there were shooters in the water tower
just because that was the assumption I was operating under
without all the facts, like immediately assumed the most deadly
course of action and then adjust your operational plan accordingly.
But but when I realized that it was like a
likely a two two three round from that high and
that far away the trajectory down, there were no bullets

(31:07):
hitting the ground around me. And another thing that nobody's
talking about with the water tower is unless you're on
a suicide mission mission as a sniper, there's no X,
Phil Bro. You're not getting down off that thing about
someone seeing you, you know. So to me, it's just
it was unlikely. But my point is this, there was
a tactical reason for counter snipers to be on that

(31:31):
building where the shots came from, and on the water
tower and behind the rally looking in the tree line
behind President Trump. Yet none of that happened. And listen, Rich,
every single day that goes by, we found out a
little new snippet of information. Like I said, it was
incomprehensible on day one. Now we know a lot more.
And it's just like the more we learn, the worse

(31:53):
it gets.

Speaker 5 (31:54):
Sean, there's nothing these people won't do to keep this
man out of office. And it's not just him, it's
just a He is a tool in a vehicle against
the status quo. Regimes do not give up power. They
don't walk away. When you get to a point when
a regime is this invested in remaining in power, as unfortunately,
we have allowed our government to become this is what happens.

(32:16):
It's been like, the truth is, it's been like this
for a long time. It's just nobody really was a
threat to that status quo.

Speaker 3 (32:21):
He is.

Speaker 5 (32:22):
If it was you or me and they viewed us
the same way, they would do the same thing. And
it's like, I'm getting really like tired of people not
coming around to where we are in this country. It
was almost immediately clear to me that there's this is
not possible. Anyone who's ever visited the president, anyone who

(32:45):
has ever gone to see the president. This is not
how they conduct, you know, their business of protecting a
former president. And because that's another thing he was trying
to make it out during the testimony, like well, he's
not a sitting president anymore, as if like they don't
go all out to protect former presidents too. This is
insane And they don't have a Listen to their attitude, folks,

(33:06):
if you need, because every bit is a piece of evidence,
and I would argue that their attitude is the probably
the best indication you have.

Speaker 3 (33:15):
They give the damn.

Speaker 5 (33:16):
They don't care whether you think they tried to kill
him or not. They're not worried about you. They don't
care and look, look what they did in twenty twenty.
It's like just shy of the one of the worst
possible things you could do, But it's just shy of
removing a president with deadly force. They used a pandemic
to completely upend our political system, in our economic system.

(33:40):
And it didn't matter. If you know, they killed one
hundred thousand people in Florida to do it. They killed
another one hundred thousand in this state. They like that.
None of that matters to them. They don't care. And
we need to stop getting you know, we need to
stop getting in our own way. And I think this
I said this on Twitter a couple weeks ago. The
sooner we all come to grip with the fact that
they did this intentionally, I think the better it will

(34:03):
be for all of us, because they're prolonging this and
trying to run out the clock, and they're doing information
warfare to try to get Harris to be in a
more favored position, and they're gonna use that and try
to run out the clock so they can make it
look legitimate when they do whatever they do in November
to try to pull this away from you too. So
I mean, they're not just gonna roll over and give

(34:25):
up what is their bread and butter, what you know
they live for, it's their way of life. At this point,
we have let this government get so big, so powerful,
so scary that you cannot put anything past them. And
by the way, I mean, once you let them kill one,
you know, it's always going to be an option for
them on the table, because nobody ever paid for the

(34:45):
first president they killed. So I mean, let's be real
for a second, or allowed to be killed if that's
more accurate. And I guess we'll never know. We'll never
be able to ask him because instead of putting two
in his leg or one in his arms so he
couldn't fire the weapon.

Speaker 3 (34:58):
Anymore, they just killed him with the quickness.

Speaker 5 (35:01):
So you know, it would have been nice to take
him into custody and ask him how the hell he
pulled this off all by himself.

Speaker 3 (35:09):
Folks.

Speaker 5 (35:10):
He's not a guy of any import. He's not a
smart you know, by all accounts, he's not some genius.
He's not some brilliant dude. He's not some trained Navy seal.
He's not some trained temph Infantry Division coooter. He's not
you know, first fifth or second or anything Special Forces group.
He's a run of the mill dumbass who who got

(35:31):
just enough training and somehow, oh yeah, coincidence, I'm sure,
totally the opportunity to get up on that building. I mean,
this reeks to high heaven and then, you know whatever,
He's no, he's no longer around to tell his story.
I wish you would, because.

Speaker 4 (35:47):
It's it's such You're so right, that's a great point,
it would be great.

Speaker 5 (35:51):
He's nobody. He's a nobody, Sean. He's not some brilliant tactician.
He's not even a successful person. He's a young moron
who managed to pull this off.

Speaker 3 (36:04):
Nope, okay, I want to get savage.

Speaker 4 (36:06):
Rich Barris, and for those who are just joining us,
we're talking to Rich Barris, director of Big Data Poll.
He's the best poster in the business. He also hosts
of a great show on Rumble called Inside the Numbers. Rich,
thank you for staying with us. But always let me
let me show you this video. Let me show you
this video of Crooks's father. And we had talked prior

(36:27):
to the break about just the way that people have
been reacting to this defensive with attitude problem. Doesn't lend
itself to any sort of credibility in the things that
they're saying. All it does is raise more questions. And
look at look at Crooks's father today. This is the
father of the would be assassin at the Trump rally.

(36:48):
Watch this, listen to this, mister Cooks, was there anything
that might have made you aware of what your son
is up?

Speaker 5 (36:53):
To?

Speaker 3 (36:57):
Explain what your son is? There's a limited social service.
Is there any statement you'd be willing to share with
us right now?

Speaker 5 (37:05):
Mister Crooks, I got a pain?

Speaker 4 (37:15):
Oh, in case you didn't hear that, He just turns
to them and says, I got a pee?

Speaker 3 (37:22):
What the hell is that?

Speaker 5 (37:25):
He doesn't feel he owes the country an explanation at all?
Could you imagine if a Trump supporter took a shot
at Barack Obama and hit him, nearly killing him, and
then they chased down the young man's father, who turned
out to be some maga Republican and he acted like that,

(37:50):
they would call for him to be tarred and feathered.
They would call for him to be tarred and feathered.
This man doesn't believe he owes the nation an explanation
or an apology at all. And I understand he's going
to be dealing with law enforcement, and you don't want
to make public statements that can incriminate you. But you
don't believe even Ted Bundy's fucking grandmother acted more sympathetic

(38:16):
to the victims than this guy and his family did.
All right, I'm not kidding. You know that Zinsky family
was more sympathetic to the unibomber's victims than this guy.
You know, I mean, this is but this is the
this is why, because nobody gives a shit, because nobody

(38:36):
feels like they're going to be held accountable at all.
I mean, the director was pushed out, you know, Kimberly
was pushed out. But the next one is no bad
I mean, could be arguable worse.

Speaker 3 (38:49):
Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 5 (38:51):
The fact of the matter is this is the culture
that is in this country now, and tone from the
top matters. And you know, when he's turning on his
television every day, if you were in let's let's be honest.
Let's let's take a second here. He got them right,
he got the firearm, he got the rifle, fir a son.
Let's say he knew about it. Let's say he was
maybe even in on it or something, right, would you

(39:12):
be concerned. Would you be concerned that anyone's coming for you, Sean.
The only reason why is maybe because you failed, and
maybe they're gonna use you as a scapegoat. That's the
only thing I would be concerned about. Otherwise I wouldn't
at all have one iota or shread of concern or

(39:33):
anxiety or trepidation that that this was gonna come down
on me at all, because nobody in the media, because
nobody in DC outside of some Republicans, give a damn
except for some of the local law enforcement people. And
God bless them for it, you know, God blessed them
for it, honestly, because they're the only ones who are
still pushing for answers.

Speaker 4 (39:55):
It's really frustrating. And what took me was the callous
nature of his response and the comp fleet show of
disrespect to the victims.

Speaker 3 (40:04):
I mean, yeah, you fad have a ship. Corey's dead.
You have to take a pee. You have to take
a pee.

Speaker 5 (40:11):
The president's almost was almost killed in front of his
family and his supporters. A man, a decent man, is
dead in front of his wife and daughter.

Speaker 3 (40:20):
You know what the hell is.

Speaker 5 (40:21):
Wrong with these people?

Speaker 3 (40:23):
Stop your face some more you know, I know, it's
it's really I I know, and again I'll say it again. Pe,
you need to run.

Speaker 5 (40:33):
You gotta go on, Atkins, That's what you gotta do.

Speaker 4 (40:37):
The media is trying to think they're trying to move
on from it, and you know, kudos to those reporters
that were asking those questions because the family hasn't even
issued a statement.

Speaker 3 (40:47):
So hey, so can we shift gears to do.

Speaker 4 (40:51):
Some politicking here and talk about Kamala versus Trump? You know,
because I was down at this iHeart Like Advertising summit
yesterday so had a crazy day yesterday, but I logged
on to Twitter slash x to get caught up with
the news cycle, and the top trend was Kamala Harris
beating Trump in the polls. That was the top trend.

(41:14):
And I'm like, you know, okay, if that, I don't
think that's true. But if it is, it's it's temporary
because they're trying to make her out to be the
second coming of Jesus Christ, like you know, when it
wasn't six months ago that they were saying CNN especially
was saying she was going to be a drag on
Biden's ticket. So can you give us a sense of

(41:34):
what the hell's going on to help us read the
tea leaves a little bit.

Speaker 5 (41:37):
I think that, well, let me just say for context,
I think that they're doing an information warfare campaign where
they repeat something over and over again and hope it
becomes true. So they start with a scam and lies
and narrative in that includes polling, and it's not true
right now, but it making it may become true because
they did it. A great example of this is white

(41:59):
women in the suburbs in twenty sixteen. They went on
the ultimate shame campaign against white women and they repeated
it until it became true. It was not true. Donald
Trump carried white suburban women in twenty sixteen Republicans in
Georgia and the fifth Congressionalhi won them, and that's how
they were able to hold on with Karen Handel against

(42:20):
John Assof. They repeated it over and over and over,
including with the race and gone backyard, Rick McCone versus
Connor Lamb, and it became true because it's what's called
a social desirability bias, and it was intentional. There were
memos from David Brock, I mean, this was and the
media signed on to it fully and this is what
they did, and they shamed white women, white suburban women.

(42:43):
Remember Hillary Clinton's comment, you know, white women can't vote
unless their husband tells them to vote, basically like too
many white women do that.

Speaker 1 (42:50):
That was a part of that. I mean, they did that.
So the difference here is that they have a little
they have little time, and we have two years of
polling data to show that Kamala Harris is not a
strong candidate. Nothing that she did different vices, our time
is made or a better public speaker or a better candidate.

Speaker 5 (43:08):
Uh, but they will push this nowag Bloomberg poll. I
will say this, this is not the first, this isn't
even the second. This is now the third time we
talked about it on your show that that Morning Console
has done this for Bloomberg. And at first I gave
them a pass, But I'm not going to give them
a pass now because the first time, you may remember, folks,

(43:31):
Biden sturtages post State of the Union to Biden's surges
in the battleground states post State of the Union. And
then you look at the polls that they're using. Those
were Morning Console polls for for Bloomberg and the interviews
were conducted before Joe Biden ever even gave the goddamn speech.
So this was I mean this, but as a poster,

(43:53):
you know, you should have come forward and that should
have been something that you should have said, like, well,
wait a minute, the media is saying this, but all
all of our interviews were conducted before that speech was given.
They didn't say a damn thing. And then I said,
all right, and I put it under my hat. And
then you know, the polls bounced back for Trump.

Speaker 3 (44:09):
And that was that.

Speaker 5 (44:11):
The second time. And then now this is the third time.
I mean, fool me one, shame on you. Fool me twice,
shame on me. Now it's like nobody's speaking up. Everyone
I spoke to last night from I mean, I want
to name the outlets, but I will tell you this
right now. Fox News does not want Donald Trump to
win this election. I was talking to people last night.
They're all in on Kamala and they're going to push

(44:33):
their own bullshit polls real soon, like this is coming
all right, So we're now going to re enter twenty
twenty and they're going to hope it sticks and we'll
see what happens. But we just got out of the field.
I just haven't written up the press release yet. It's shared.
If you want to show it.

Speaker 3 (44:47):
It's a report that you have it. Do you have it? Yeah?

Speaker 4 (44:50):
I do, all right, So explain for people what this
poll is now, throw it up there.

Speaker 5 (44:54):
This is a national poll of Trump first, Kamala Harris.
But there's a bunch of other things in here which
I think are very important. And what you're looking at
is the back of a tool we use to make
cross tabs called market Site. A lot of people use it.
It's really cool. And these are different variables, so education, right,
these represent the questions. Rows are questions we asked. Columns
are typically demographics. Right, There is no doubt and I think,

(45:18):
as in my experience as a pulser, I think this
is largely a response bias. But we will see, okay,
and I'm going to show you why it is tightened.
It has if you look at the we asked different
ways for the presidential election, but we have Trump up
over Harris still forty six point seven to forty five
point five, although that's pretty close, even though nationally that's

(45:39):
still a win for Trump and the electoral college. All right,
if you look at black voters for instance, because this
is something the media is doing a lot with, this
is gender by race. You can see that black females
did move back to Harris more because you and I
have talked about like remember I was we were on
the phone after my last poll, and I was really
getting concerned that some of this was unbelievable to me.

(46:02):
And black women were one of those demographics identified where
they I just thought their margin for Trump was too
much like it was. I didn't I didn't believe that
this looks more believable to me. Now, whereas she's actually
winning seventy eight percent of Black women, Trump is still
getting twelve percent of Black women. Note this, however, she's

(46:22):
only getting fifty eight point eight percent of Black men.
He's still getting a third of the black male vote.
So what is that compared to last month? No change,
Absolutely no change. So black men did not move. And
Hispanic men are still very you know, Trump is still
doing very strong with them, forty six point one percent

(46:44):
of the Hispanic male vote. He's getting a third of
the Hispanic female vote. When you combine these together, Sean
and look by race, let me just roll that up
really real quick. You see that Trump overall is still
getting twenty two percent of the black vote, She's only
getting sixteen nine before you lean voters, and he's getting
just under forty percent of this Hispanic vote, She's getting

(47:06):
forty nine. So no, like, it's not a game changer here.
What it is it's that black voters were about sixteen
percent more likely to want to be interviewed this month
than they were the last two months, which they were
identical the last two months. So when you do ask
people to lean, Trump is getting about he's getting a
little bit less than he got last month of the

(47:28):
black vote, but he actually popped up a little bit
with Hispanics, where he's getting forty five percent of this
Spanic vote compared to fifty five percent for Kamala. And then
the white vote is about the twenty twenty margin. So
you know, not really a big change there. It's just that,
you know, I think this is a textbook response bias.
The our sample was more democratic this month than it

(47:50):
was it has been for months. Why because more Democrats
just were wanting to be interviewed. That's a textbook response bias,
and it's your job as a poll to identify that
and make sure that every group is represented correctly.

Speaker 3 (48:04):
So did it tighten?

Speaker 5 (48:06):
I do think it tightened. Is it gain changing? Is
she in the lead? Not in R polling? And I
honestly this is a pretty still still a significant electoral
college loss for her. But I don't it has I
don't see any reason why outside of the If the
media's campaign is successful, then it will have staying power.
But it really shouldn't. And here's why. Here's Harris's approval Okay,

(48:32):
twenty five point six percent strongly approved the job she's
doing as vice president. Twenty one percent, uh, somewhat approve.
So you're looking at approval rating of roughly forty seven percent,
while fifty percent disapproved. So she's still slightly negative. She's
negative three. Here's her favorability rating. Okay, her favorability rating

(48:53):
has gone up, because it was in the thirties. Now
it's forty two point two with fifty five actually fifty
six percent have Oh no, I'm sorry, that's Biden. Sorry, sorry, sorry,
I was like, wait a minute, that's too high for her.
Here we go, fifty point four percent have an unfavorable
opinion of her, and she has increased to the mid
forty well mid to high forties. She's at forty seven

(49:15):
percent roughly of people who say that they have a
favorable opinion, so she's negative three. Watch this here is
Trump's retrospective approval rating, meaning do you approve or disapprove
of the way Donald Trump handled his job while he
was president? Okay, he is now for the first time
since he was inaugurated in January twenty sixteen in our

(49:38):
poll and twenty seventeen, excuse me, in our polling, he
is now not only positive, but he's majority approve and positive. Okay,
So thirty two point three percent strongly approved of how
he handled the job when he was president. Another twenty
percent nineteen point nine uh, somewhat approved. So putting that together, folks,

(49:59):
about fifty two percent approved the job he was approved
the job that it's actually fifty yeah, fifty two, right,
fifty two percent approve of the job he did as president,
while about forty seven percent disapproved. That's just the way
it's going to be. You're gonna have. Actually, sorry, it's
less than that. It's thirty six point five plus eight

(50:20):
point seven, so for yeah, about if we rounded, so
he's still positive though about five points if you look
at his favorability because there's I always tell people this
approval is how they see your policy with a little
bit of image. Favorability is your image with a little
bit of that policy, if you're already been an elected person.

(50:42):
So it's like the you know it basically is two
of the same things go into that how people view that,
but it's the reverse. And I would say, how much
goes into that? So thirty three percent now view him
very favorably, seventeen point six percent somewhat favorably sewn only
forty eight percent view unfavorably combined, so he is now

(51:05):
majority and positive viewed favorably. This is nuts. This hasn't
happened since Donald Trump was inaugurated, and I haven't released
it yet, but people will see it. We asked who
people trust to handle the issues more, and Trump is
just molly whopping her on the key issues. And here's
here's something else that jumps out at me. Immediately. Trump

(51:28):
voters they almost unanimously say I trust Trump more. Many
of Harris's voters they'll either say neither, or they'll say undecided,
or they'll flatly tell you that they trust Trump more
to handle the economy, they trust Trump more to handle inflation.
That tells me her support even in my own poll
here is very soft. That's a response bias. This is

(51:51):
due to glowing coverage and Democrats being more excited that
that their their candidates walking corpse. I mean, that's really
It's what it comes down to. There's no indication that
this would last. There isn't and anyone being intellectually honest
in my position would tell you that the only way

(52:13):
it would is if the media is successful in what
they're trying to do. Oh and by the way, guess
I didn't put this out there. Her most vulnerable thing
is immigration. Guess how many people know that Kamala Harris's
job was to be the borders Are or to have
to get the border under control. Only thirty four point

(52:34):
six percent correctly identified that Kamala Harris was appointed by
Biden to get the border under control. So she's super
vulnerable there, which explains why the media immediately rushed to
rewrite history to get rid of all references of her
being the Borders Are to push back on that title
because they ran the polling their damn cells and they

(52:55):
know it. And that was a huge hugeotential pitfall for her.
So listen, if sitting in Newbern, North Carolina, I got
my hands on some of that polling, then rest is sure.
The New York Times have seen it, The Washington Post
has seen it. They all have seen it. Folks, CNN, MSNBC,

(53:16):
even Fox News who doesn't like you, so get over that.
They're a conservative network.

Speaker 3 (53:20):
They're not.

Speaker 5 (53:20):
They hate your guts, all right, they can't stand you.
They're pretending to be you, so you give them their money,
your money, I mean, so that really is They're like
a fake version of the Hallmark channel of cable news.
It's a total scam, all right. So they know it
and that's why they did this. As soon as I
saw that number, it was so clear to me, Sean
that they knew this. And that's why because at first

(53:42):
it really didn't make sense, like.

Speaker 3 (53:43):
Why are you?

Speaker 5 (53:44):
How could you? How could you expect to rewrite history
like that?

Speaker 3 (53:47):
Right?

Speaker 5 (53:48):
But it does make sense if you realize not too
many people know yet, and if you act quickly you
can head it off.

Speaker 4 (53:55):
Awesome, all right, man? So where can people tell? Everybody
where they can find you?

Speaker 5 (54:01):
Yeah, and all of this is going to be up
there first of course, which is on Locals people's pundit
dot locals dot com. This is done for the public
polling project. People could go to locals and you'll see
a little little hands in the air saying support our polls.
You could be, you know, a supporter of that which
which is great. Or if you can't, because we do
understand how bare the economy is. Even if you just

(54:22):
shared it far and wide with your with your friends
and say, hey, you know you want to pull that
you can you know is in corporate sponsored or media sponsored,
you know, meaning free to just do what I think
is the best job for you guys, then then share
it with them, because the bigger the contributor based, the better.

Speaker 3 (54:38):
Buddy.

Speaker 4 (54:39):
Obviously rich you are again, smartest guy in the business,
my friend. Seriously, I love having you on. Hopefully I
can just go on Wendy Bell Radio tomorrow or something.

Speaker 5 (54:50):
You could look at your take a look at your text.
I had a pre tape thing, but it's always so quick,
so like it's ten twenty five, but I like wonder
whether or not I'm gonna be done in time because
it's quick. It's always like all right, because it's TV,
you know, TV is it's like, you know, it's so
fast you don't have time to say much and you're done.

Speaker 3 (55:12):
What about I mean, well, we'll figure it out.

Speaker 4 (55:13):
I mean I figured out that would like normally like
the the that was a good I figured out was
the highest rated time, the best time slot. But there
are other times, so we'll work I work around your schedule.
But either way, man, thank you for giving us like
the time that you do on Wednesday night. Man, I
know that the battle crew of the audience absolutely loves you.

Speaker 3 (55:33):
Man.

Speaker 5 (55:34):
Thanks brother, anytime, anytime.

Speaker 3 (55:36):
See you guys, all the.

Speaker 4 (55:37):
Best, See you brother. That was Savage Rich Bearest, the
best polster in the business.

Speaker 3 (55:42):
And again.

Speaker 4 (55:43):
Savage Rich Bearess is the director of Big Data Poll
and he's the host of Inside the Numbers. Go follow,
subscribe on Rumble, and subscribe to him on locals if
you can. Yeah, folks, I hear you in the live chat.
An hour goes way too fast, way too fast. So
before we leave today, make sure you smash that like button,

(56:04):
that little green thumb beneath the video. If you're watching
on your phone, you got to close out of the
live chat. Smash the like button. Once the live chat
is closed. If you're watching on your television on a rocoot,
if you press the up up button and the like
button is right there, so smash that like button. Tell
your family and your friends have subscribed to battleground Live.
Story had asked you know how do we secure elections?

(56:26):
I'll tell you very briefly. In Pennsylvania, two very very
very critical things passed. And the reason why I talk
about Pennsylvania is because Pennsylvania is the linchpin for everything.
Democrats have to have it. It's a zero sum game
for them. If they lose Pennsylvania, they're done. They don't
have they don't have many pathways outside that. Republicans and
Trump has a couple of other pathways, but it's outcome

(56:47):
determinative for Republicans as well. If they win Pennsylvania, they
likely win Wisconsin and Michigan as well. So Pennsylvania, I think,
is just that it's it's everything for either party. And
Pennsylvania just banned zucker Bucks, so zucker Bucks of funding
these unsupervised rock boxes in Pennsylvania. They'll probably still receive

(57:07):
funding through state level appropriations, but no more zucker Bucks.
That is a huge positive development. And second, once they
start counting the votes in the state of Pennsylvania. And
you notice that this wasn't reported. But once they start
counting the votes in the state of Pennsylvania, they cannot stop.
Like I listen, it's difficult to impress upon you all

(57:36):
how important that is, because what happened in twenty twenty
was that they just stopped counting for days, figured out
how many votes they needed to backfill the election day turnout,
and then they did that.

Speaker 3 (57:46):
Well, now in Pennsylvania, they can't stop. They have to go.
So we've got work to do.

Speaker 4 (57:51):
I know the RNC is training, you know, hundreds, if
not thousands of people to be like real deal poll watchers.
And there's lots of good things happening behind the scenes.
But that very very positive developments for Pennsylvania with regards
to election integrity. So to Dory that wanted to answer
your answer, your question and give you all some much
needed positive news on the election integrity front, which I

(58:13):
keep keep an eye out for all the time and
as soon as I get information, I pass it on
to you. Okay, listen, folks, do not forget to represent
in the chat tomorrow for Wendy Bell Radio. I'll be
there from nine to noon, so don't miss out. So
be there on Wendy Bell nine to noon on what

(58:35):
is It Thursday Friday of this week, and then my
show is live at five, and then same thing next
week Monday through Friday Wendy Bell from nine to noon
and then my show at five. So planing a great
show for you tomorrow morning and an even better show.
Well maybe not even better, but hopefully you just get
better every time. Right, different news cycle at five pm,
so you'll see me double dose right at nine to

(58:56):
twelve on Wendy in the Chair for the Great Powerful
Way Belt and on Battleground Live. So thank you all, folks,
thank you for sticking with this show. I'm sure you've
noticed the growth. But God bless you all.

Speaker 3 (59:09):
I love you.

Speaker 4 (59:09):
This is your show, it always will be. God bless
you all, and God bless this amazing country that we
call home. Take care, see you tomorrow morning and good
night