Battleground LIVE: October Is Going To Be Madness w/Bryan Dean Wright

Tonight on Battleground LIVE:

In the arena tonight: Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA Ops Officer and host of the Wright Report Daily podcast

• Michael Strahan gave Walz the toughest interview yet!

• Yes, Kamala’s campaign is stalling majorly

• How the Dems see men

• Dems are back to their same old dirty tricks again

• Can the US Govt manipulate the weather?

• Elon’s new tech is the stuff of science fiction but its real now

 

Follow Sean on Instagram - @officialseanparnell

Follow Sean on Twitter - @SeanParnellUSA

Get your Battleground apparel at www.officialseanparnell.com

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:03):
Morning.

Speaker 2 (00:04):
You're about to enter the arena and join the Battle
to Save.

Speaker 3 (00:09):
America with your host Sean Parnell.

Speaker 4 (00:14):
Good evening, America, Welcome to Battleground Live. This is the
show where we kick ass, we take names, we lockhorns
with the radical left. We never quit, we never surrender.
From sea to shining Sea and everybody in between. Welcome
Patriots on this glorious Friday. Boy, it's great to be that.

(00:38):
This was a long week, wasn't it. It's great. It's
thank god it's Friday. Right. Listen, folks, The hits just
keep on coming for Kamala Harris. It can't help but
think that Kamala Harris and her campaign is a sinking ship.
I told you yesterday after having my name on the

(01:00):
ballot a couple of different times, and have done this before.
At this point in time in the election, you want
to be surging. You want to have momentum, you want
to be riding that wave until election day. And clearly
President Trump has that and Kamala Harris. Again, the hits
just keep on coming. Did you see the news that

(01:23):
broke just before the show that on the same day
that Kamala Harris four days ago was out there bitching
and complaining about DeSantis and not answering her phone call.
Who the hell knows if that was even true. But
four days ago, on the same day that she was
bitching about DeSantis, you know, as Governor DeSantis is down
in Florida and responding to multiple natural disasters. It was

(01:44):
the same day that Kamala Harris was at a photo
shoot for being on the cover of Vogue. Folks, listen,
do you remember when I told you that it was
a huge campaign mistake to attack someone that you're not
running against. You know, I've said this multiple times this week,
but it's important. If you're running for office, you don't

(02:07):
want to ever attack somebody that you're not running against.
They can to attack you back. They're not on the ballot.

Speaker 2 (02:12):
You are.

Speaker 4 (02:13):
You have everything to lose. And here we are, four
or even five days later, where we are still talking
about this because Kamala Harris made this kind of mistake,
and a mistake that just continues to cost her. Also,
this Axios headline, I mean, it about blew my mind

(02:34):
last night, and I'm already going off on a tangent,
but there's just so much news to cover, and I
got to hit some of it. Because guess what tonight is,
Right night, We've got the great Brian Dean right on
deck tonight. He is a former CIA operations officer. He's
the host of a great podcast called The Right Report

(02:56):
Daily Podcast, which is essentially your own personal presidential daily brief.
And what's interesting about it is it only lasts about
twenty five to thirty minutes, but it's packed full with
information that you need to know, I mean seriously, that
the news doesn't cover. And what's great about Brian is
that he substantiates all of his work with a ton

(03:18):
of research, so you know, what you're getting is well
researched and true, and in this day and age, it's
hard to get that. Okay, So before we talk about
this Axios headline, make sure you smash that like button,
that little green thumb beneath the video, make sure you
smash it. Also, don't forget about Official Seanparnell dot com.

(03:38):
I am going to be taking a look at all
of the names that you submitted in the comment sections
on Official Seanparnell dot com. The Battle Brief, the sit Rep,
battle crew News, whatever. It's the homepage of my website. Folks.
I design that to be a one stop shop for

(03:59):
all things America first news for you. So every day
check the website. We're updating stories on there, you know,
probably every couple of hours. So definitely check it out again.
The website's official Sean Parnell dot com. Uh, don't don't
forget about it. Also, okay, she's gotta get back to
this Axios headline. Okay, so it says, Scoop, some top

(04:24):
Democrats won't commit to certifying a Trump win. Are you
freaking kidding me? Let me, let me, let me read you.
You heard me correctly, Some top Democrats won't commit to
certifying a Trump win. This is from Axios. So listen,
listen to this. Just get this. It's amazing. You know

(04:46):
that there are two standards. The hypocrisy, of course, is brazen.
It's out there in the open. Uh, like only one
party gets to protest elections in this country without being
thrown in prison. Uh. But listen to how Axios frames this.
They say zooming out. So taking a thirty thousand foot
look at this claim. So the two parties have very

(05:09):
different histories when it comes to election objections, with Democrats
lodging doomed symbolic challenges as part of largely uneventful proceedings.
Isn't that just like a crazy sentence? The two parties
have very different histories when it comes to election objections,

(05:29):
with Democrats lodging doomed symbolic challenges as part of largely
uneventful proceedings. Ain't that some shit? It is saying good?
The article goes on to say. In two thousand and five,
Democrats objection to Bush's win in Ohio failed thirty one
to two sixty seven in the House and one to

(05:50):
seventy four in the Senate. In twenty seventeen and a
half dozen Democrats filed objections to ten Trump elector slates,
but failed to get the backing of a Senate and
were unable to force any votes. In twenty twenty one,
a major a majority of House Republicans voted to object
to a President Biden's wins in Arizona and Pennsylvania. It

(06:14):
was part of a sprawling effort to overturn the twenty
twenty election that culminated in the deadly attack on January sixth,
and Jamie Raskin said. Jamie Raskin said Democrats don't engage
in election fraud and election fabrication. Come on right, absolutely ridiculous. Okay.

(06:41):
So Michael Strahan, by the way, like just shifting gears
real quickly. Michael Strahan, who is a Hall of Fame
NFL athlete, NFL football player. I think he's like on
the Today Show, just so happened to give Waltz Tim
Walls one of the toughest interviews yet. Okay, Michael Strahan
back to the show here, Michael Strahan, who would have

(07:04):
thought that an ex NFL athlete, Hall of Fame athlete
would have given Tim Walls his toughest interview to date?
But he did check this out?

Speaker 3 (07:16):
Talk about your record, and you call yourself with a knucklehead.
Call yourself with a knuckleheadcause you've made some statements that
just aren't true. In a common about weapon of the
war that I carried in ward, which you didn't.

Speaker 1 (07:27):
You said you were in Hong.

Speaker 3 (07:28):
Kong doing a tan and in Square massacre when you weren't.
You kind of chalked it all up to bad grammar,
getting the dates wrong. But your opponents say you lied
to make yourself look better. Do they have a point?

Speaker 5 (07:42):
Well, look, thirty five years ago, got the opportunity to
be in Hong Kong, be in China, learned a lot
about it. Served twenty four years in the National Guard,
passionately in an instance talking about gun violence in schools
on an instance there. Proud of the service that I've done,
Proud to be teacher in that classroom, Proud to have
been very public all these years and owning it when I,

(08:05):
you know, said, look, I was there in August of
eighty nine, and I think what you see here you
saw in Minnesota. I've been elected eight times here, these
things have been very public for folks here. They see
the results of things that we passed. We see a
state that's a top five state for business. We see
third best state, top three state for raising a child,
and we've got the best healthcare.

Speaker 1 (08:25):
And I think the policies, whether it be.

Speaker 5 (08:26):
Dealing with China and understanding China's human rights record, what
you can be certain there is that Kamala Harris and
I aren't going to you know, pick.

Speaker 1 (08:34):
Dictators on speed dial.

Speaker 5 (08:36):
See Si Jing Ping is doing a good job during COVID,
as Donald Trump said, And I think those lessons learned
over a lifetime of being very public, whether it's in
the classroom or being.

Speaker 4 (08:45):
Elected, not answering, you know.

Speaker 3 (08:46):
But if it's one thing of a trusting to be
some people who say we can't trust him even tell
the truth about himself, what do you say to them?

Speaker 5 (08:54):
Well, I said, they know who I am. I know
who I am, I know the work that I've done.
I know that things get gets fun in a playolitical environment.
But I think what they see is if we want
to compare that talking about immigration policy or seeing the
things that Donald Trump would say, I think there's a
big difference than missing a date when you're there and
again spinning something for a political reason.

Speaker 1 (09:14):
I'm very clear of who I've been.

Speaker 5 (09:16):
I'm very proud of twenty four years of doing that work,
and I think going to Congress and working for veterans,
they want to see it and make the difference look
a little different. I think people in Minnesota, my students,
the folks I've worked with members of Congress, they know
who I am, and they know the policies we put
in place have made an impact.

Speaker 4 (09:35):
Look at that creepy smile. Democrats are idiots. When they're
asked even basic questions, they cannot answer. I swear to God,
it would be the easiest thing in the world to
run as a Democrat. You could have any scandals you
want in your background. Nobody ever asked you any questions.
Here you get an NFL football player, an ex NFL
football player, asking just basic questions about this guy's past.

(09:56):
Not only can he not answer him, he's awkward as hell,
a real Jerry Sandusky vibe too.

Speaker 3 (10:02):
But listen and Vice President Harrison, as she told you
to be a little bit more careful.

Speaker 5 (10:09):
Well, I did it, you know, even the other day
of just speaking passionately about these gun violent situations and
meeting with these survivors. I've said in the room with
the Sandy Hook folks, a friend with David Hogg, who's
been an activist on this. People knowing that, and then
that gets spun in that way. He didn't say something true.
It was very clear that I was talking about these veterans,
very clear that I wear you know, my I wear

(10:32):
my emotions on my sleeve. And I do think in
these positions, whether the governor being Vice president of the
United States, you do need to be collect careful.

Speaker 1 (10:39):
You do need to be a little more thoughtful on it.

Speaker 5 (10:42):
And I think what you see as as someone who's
been in classrooms a lot, I been around coaching a lot.
I speak passionately, and I think doing that you need
to combine the two.

Speaker 1 (10:54):
And I think that's which.

Speaker 4 (10:55):
By speaking passionately, do you mean huge, disgusting, revolting.

Speaker 5 (11:00):
Liar she's referring to and you spit years.

Speaker 4 (11:07):
I can't handle it with these people. So this was
the guy, by the way, this was the guy that
they're saying, along with Doug m Hoff, who is redefining masculinity,
America's dad can't even answer basic questions. So you know,
when we talk about Kamala Harris's campaign stalling, we'll bring

(11:27):
on Savage Rich. We'd give you the empirical data analysis
of why that is. I'm showing you the political stuff
about why her mistakes that she's making on the campaign trail.
But here's the other thing. It doesn't matter how much
money you have. It doesn't matter that Kamala Harris raised
a billion dollars, which she did probably illegally through Act Blue,

(11:50):
by the way, doesn't matter. Nothing makes up for shitty candidates.
And what's more, it said democrats are hemorrhaging men, back men,
white men. It doesn't matter. The Democrats right now, Kamala
Harris specifically are hemorrhaging men, and they're concerned, especially down
ticket in states like Wisconsin and in Michigan, we're both Democrats.

(12:13):
Incumbents who are running for Senate in those states have said, hey,
Harris is underwater. You're pulling far beneath me. And this
is what the Democrats did in response to them losing
men like young men leaving the Democrat Party in droves.
This is the ad they dropped today to bring those
voters back. Check this out.

Speaker 6 (12:36):
I'm a man, I'm a man man, and I'm man enough.
I'm man enough to enjoy a barrel proof bourbon.

Speaker 2 (12:42):
Meat, man enough to cook my steak.

Speaker 3 (12:44):
Rare, man enough to dead lift five hundred and then bring
it out of my daughter's hair.

Speaker 4 (12:48):
Do you think I'm afraid to rebuild a carburetor? You
carbureted for breakfast.

Speaker 2 (12:52):
I'm afraid of bears.

Speaker 1 (12:53):
That's what beer hugs are for.

Speaker 6 (12:54):
I'll tell you another thing I share. I'm not afraid
of women.

Speaker 4 (12:59):
I'm not afraid of women.

Speaker 1 (13:00):
I'm not afraid of women.

Speaker 2 (13:01):
They want to control their bodies, I say.

Speaker 4 (13:03):
Go for it.

Speaker 7 (13:04):
They want to use ivy have to start a family.
I'm not afraid of families.

Speaker 2 (13:07):
They want to be child as cat ladies have all
the cats you want.

Speaker 7 (13:10):
Woman wants to be president, well, I hope she has
the guts to look me right in the eye.

Speaker 4 (13:14):
Okay, just take just I gotta do a pause, and
then we'll get right back into the ad. Have you
ever seen a dude sit on the back of his
truck tail gate like that? If you do something ain't right.
I'm just saying something ain't right.

Speaker 7 (13:26):
And accept my full throated endorsement because I'm man enough
to support.

Speaker 2 (13:30):
Women, man enough to know what kind of doing that time,
Man enough to admit I'm lost even when I refuse
to ask for directions.

Speaker 4 (13:36):
Man enough to not ban young women from reading Little
Women or.

Speaker 2 (13:40):
One of those pants books that the sisters like.

Speaker 6 (13:42):
I'm man enough to raw Dog of Flight. It sucked,
We're not worth it. I'm man enough to be emotional
in front of my wife, in front of my kids,
in front of my horse.

Speaker 4 (13:52):
I'm man enough to tell you that I cry. I
love actually God.

Speaker 7 (13:55):
Come on, dude, wish story and bred and I'm sick
of so called meneering, belittling and controlling women just so
they can feel more power.

Speaker 4 (14:04):
That's not how my mama raised.

Speaker 2 (14:06):
I love women.

Speaker 6 (14:07):
I love women who support their families.

Speaker 7 (14:08):
Women who decide not to have families, women who take charge.

Speaker 6 (14:11):
And I'm man enough to help them win.

Speaker 4 (14:15):
Okay, So, first of all, s love, thank you for
the rumble rant tip. One hundred percent of what we
get goes right back into the show, and this shows yours.
It's for you, the viewers, the battle crew, and it
always will be Listen, folks. Democrats there, they're hot mess
right now? Is my daughter likes to say they're hot mess.
That was their message to men to try to rain

(14:35):
them back in. So okay, got Brian Dean right on deck.
I don't like to waste even a second when he's here.
Brian is a former CIA operations officer. He's the host
of a great podcast called The Right Report Daily podcast.
It's every day wherever you listen to podcasts, it's about
thirty minutes. It's awesome. Many of you. I get emails

(14:56):
from you all the time. I know you all. Most
of y'all who are likely listening to this his podcast already.
But for those who are first time listeners, first time viewers,
you definitely go and subscribe to that, but without further ado.
Brian Dean Wright, welcome back, my friend. Now are you
voting Democrat? Now that you see that ad.

Speaker 2 (15:14):
The lead in for this segment and hit today, friend,
thank you so much for that. What I puked in
my mouth, it's still in my sinuses. That ad was horrible.
I love it. No, it's so great. Right, So I'm
not afraid of women. I mean I kind of am women.

Speaker 6 (15:33):
I hear you.

Speaker 2 (15:34):
Yeah, every husband or like boyfriend knows like, eh, it's
a little bit of fear. They're always yeah, yeah, yes.
And then the other part of you know, like I'm
not afraid to say it. Well, that's because some of
those fellows like to dress like women. So that's probably
why they're not afraid. Let's be honest, no judgment. I'm
just saying, as we look at them, let's be honest.
So what would a disaster? Right, It's a caricature that

(15:54):
Ada is a character is what men are. It's like
a minstrel show, right. It really is the male version
of a menstrul show. And it's wrong. It's just stupid,
politically stupid, and it is now going to be one
of the things that we laugh at and not with a.

Speaker 4 (16:10):
I know, it reminds me of have you ever seen
the like the TikTok videos of like these men who
dress up as women and they're doing these like selfie videos.
Like that kid who is like on the Canna bud
light I can't remember his name, but he's like dancing
around like he's a two year old girl, but like
acting as if that's how women act. I remember, Yeah,

(16:33):
my wife watched that and she was like, like, this
is insanely insulting to women. Does he actually think that
women act like this, like, you know, dancing around like
like a two year old and it and it got
me thinking that, you know, when looking at this ad
about men men as well, is that the Democrats, this
is how they view almost everybody. They see everything through

(16:54):
the lens of race, creed, socioeconomic status, religion. It's unbelievable.
And because that's the only lens that they see through,
they don't really judge someone by their character and they
don't truly understand people, and so you get this crazy
character crap. It's just unbelievable to me that they think

(17:16):
this will work. Brian, Yeah, well, the other piece.

Speaker 2 (17:18):
Of course, we spent the past what five plus years
unable to define in this country, apparently what a woman is, right,
so now we have, I guess decided what men o. Sure,
the Harris campaign is now running what they think men are,
which apparently men are whatever they just created? What the
hell that video was? So look none of it. This

(17:39):
is the Democrat party. Is what happens when you stop
using your brain and all you do is you use
your emotion. You just sort of flare around with you
whatever you feel in that particular moments, like a toddler
is not running that party right where your emotions change
every couple of minutes. You're not using your mind or
critical thinking facts and data, logic and reason. That's what

(17:59):
adults do. And so when you become a party of
toddler like people, that's the kind of video you get
and you can't decide what a man or woman is
and then you come up with whatever the hell we
just saw. So yeah, it really I think underlines the
importance of this vote right in November. Exactly what will
the future of this country be? Well, you have a
pretty good video that shows you what the leadership might

(18:21):
look like if you choose the other guys.

Speaker 4 (18:24):
Well, you know what's crazy to me is that my
thesis all week, my central thesis all week has been,
you know, Kamala Harris's campaign and momentum is stalled and
I feel like I've gone out of my way to
show empirical evidence of that in the polling. And yeah,
while people shouldn't trust one singular poll, you look at
a bunch of polls and it looks clearly as if

(18:45):
her momentum is completely stalled out. But it's not just that,
you know this, she had to reinvent her strategy and
go back out there and try to do a bunch
of interviews. But the problem for Kamala Brian is that
the more she interviews, she's not charismatic like Barack Obama. Yeah,
he was divisive, he was a terrible president. He damages
country a lot, but he talked a good game and

(19:06):
he faked it to make it, and he has charisma.
And so she trots out Obama, brings him to Pittsburgh,
my hometown yesterday to basically shame young black men and
devoting for Kamala Harris because he knows, along with many
other senior members of the Democrat Party that Kamala Harris
is hemorrhaging black men, and not just black men, men

(19:26):
across the board are abandoning her campaign. So not only
that she's doing these interviews and it's like the more
she talks, the less popular she gets, but she's also
making unbelievable strategic mistakes like attacking Governor DeSantis during a
horrific natural disaster. And so my, I think she's sinking. Man,
It's just it's my feeling, but it's I just think

(19:47):
things ain't going so well for her right now. What
do you think?

Speaker 2 (19:50):
Yeah, Look, let's talk about what we know is true
in the Democrat Party and how they regard black folks.
Remember Joe Biden here about four years ago, this said,
if you don't vote for me, you ain't black. So
that is an extinction that is in the DNA of
the party right now when they say that. So I
think that that's really important to remember that the folks
in the Democrat Party, the leadership, irrespective of their color
or skin or gender or whatever, they view back black

(20:13):
people as those who have to vote for them otherwise
they're denied part of their identity. So let's just start
with that that's interesting.

Speaker 4 (20:19):
That is that's actually that's exactly what That's exactly what
he means by that. Sure, exactly what Biden meant by that.

Speaker 2 (20:25):
And you also have to understand, you know, last May
he was in Philadelphia. Biden was and he was talking
about the importance of diversity in the party, and he
was talking about diversity equity, although he called it equality,
but diversity, equity, and inclusion. He said he has the
most diverse and equitable and inclusive administration in the history
of the country. And he said that starts at the

(20:46):
top and the vice president's office. So what does that
tell you about why he chose her? Right? Right? So look,
and sometimes people might bristle at that. I'm like, oh gosh,
that sounds sort of awkward or socially uncouth to but
Biden said it himself. And again we know this is
true throughout the Democrat Party that they view people, they
slice and dice folks based on kind of a diversity Olympics,

(21:08):
and you get the kind of rhetoric that we're hearing
nowt and you get kind of the candidate that is
miss Harris. And that is why she was not elevated
because she was particularly smart or adept because she was
good at rhetoric and then putting together thoughtful debates and arguments.
She just had a certain look and that was good
enough for the party. And so yes, of course, when
you put her in front of a camera with a
host without a teleprompter to tell her exactly what to say,

(21:32):
she falls apart with word salads and she sticks with
the one thing that she knows how to say, which
are things like I'm from a middle class family. Okay,
got it. I asked you about climate change. Its middle
class family anyway. So that's the kind of candidate you get.
And I think that that's what more people The longer
that she is out there campaigning, the more that people

(21:53):
see her, the more that you are what you're showing
in the polls is true, and that is that. Empirically,
her campaign is faltering some very very important states by
posters who are actually fair minded, and I know you
talked to those people and bring them on your show.
She's not doing well, and that's because she's not a
good candidate. For all the reasons the Democrat Party is
flailing around this country.

Speaker 4 (22:12):
It's it's it's so funny, like she does default into
I come from a middle class fan like she's some
sort of robot that can't comprehend, that can't comprehend basic English.
She gets stuck in those talking points, and.

Speaker 2 (22:26):
Basically the best part those when she uses different accents
to say that same thing yesterday, the new Hispanic one.
Oh my god, I wanted to put a sombrero on her,
maybe the cordion, to just have her talk to the people.
That was amazing.

Speaker 4 (22:39):
It really is.

Speaker 2 (22:41):
You don't get to me at the best part. I'm
gonna tell you, I'm gonna I'm gonna make I'm gonna
make another offer. I would give up an organ if
she were willing to do a speech in a a
in a town hall with an Asian crowd.

Speaker 4 (22:53):
Can you imagine?

Speaker 2 (22:55):
Can you imagine the Asian Kamala Harris doing that accent?
Oh Lord, have mercy. I would laugh four months. Yeah,
if I was feeling down, you know, I'd just put
that on. But look at Kamality in the Asian accent anyway.
It really is offensive. She's such an offensive person. She's
not smart at all. And I really do hope that
not only she loses, but loses majorly Wigley and goes

(23:16):
back to San Francisco and enjoys that crap hole because
that's where she belongs.

Speaker 4 (23:20):
She can't even take basic questions from people, Brian, I'm
sure you saw, like on Univision yesterday, if she's taking
questions from the audience just the most, I mean, the
if you're a candidate, that's like what you do is
you talk to people, right, That's that's your job. She's
taking questions from the audience and she's reading from a
teleprompter and responding that to that, I mean, like it's.

Speaker 2 (23:40):
Very authentic, or she would have said last night authentical.
You know, she's with the hispanics. Yeah, there you go.

Speaker 4 (23:46):
It's it's it really is, okaylown all right, So I
would like to shift gears to something that I've been
prattling on about. Let's shift you a couple of couple
of times today already, but also throughout the course of
the week. So obviously we had her, Kane, Helene, and
we've had Milton, and on the heels of that, Marjorie
Taylor Green came out and said, well, of course the
government can control the weather, and then almost everybody from

(24:09):
President Biden on down attacked her relentlessly and saying, oh,
we can't control the weather, we can't contray He's crazy.
It's a conspiracy theory. So I'd like to lead into
this discussion with two video clips, if you will allow
me just to set up everything. And so because I
I'm obsessed with the idea of weather wars right, the
idea that if we could control the weather, it would

(24:32):
give a tactical advantage you strike somewhere without actually striking.
The whole concept is fascinating. So this was the History
Channel back in two thousand and nine.

Speaker 2 (24:41):
Look what I dug up, quest to play god.

Speaker 8 (24:46):
To control the weather and use it as a weapon
like corrential rains, hurricanes targeted at the end off.

Speaker 9 (24:54):
Oh yeah, ult war is if you never have to
fire around nobody ever knew the fight.

Speaker 8 (25:00):
Yeah, is it possible there have already been attacks using
weather weapons.

Speaker 9 (25:08):
If you get down low enough, you can actually see
a clear layer above the antenna.

Speaker 1 (25:12):
It is actually pushing.

Speaker 9 (25:14):
These water particles up, and that's exactly how HARP works.
What we've done is we've not only pushed the cloud
off of the HARP antenna, but as you can see,
our cloud is almost completely gone inside HARP does exactly
the same thing. It ionizes the particles pushes them out
into space.

Speaker 8 (25:35):
HARP is one of several ELF wave transmitters located all
over the globe. The United States owns and operates three
of them, one in Kakona, Alaska, another in Fairbanks, Alaska,
and one in Aricibo, Puerto Rico. Russia has one in
Vassilurski ner Nizhni Lofgarad, and the European Union has one

(25:56):
near Krumsa in Norway. In tandem, these transmitters could potentially
alter the weather anywhere in the world, changing the jet
stream's course entirely, triggering massive rainstorms or droughts. Even hurricane
steering would be possible by heating up the atmosphere and
building up high pressure domes that could deflect or change

(26:19):
the course of hurricane.

Speaker 4 (26:21):
Okay, so there's that. So there's that. Before you think
them crazy, there's that, and then here's CIA. Former CIA
director Brannan.

Speaker 10 (26:28):
Another example is the array of technologies often referred to
collectively as geo engineering, that potentially could help reverse the
warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained
my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection or SAI, a
method of seating the stratosphere with particles that can help
reflect the Sun's heat and much the same way that

(26:50):
volcanic eruptions do. An SAI program could limit global temperature increases,
reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures, and providing the
world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. This
process is also relatively inexpensive. The National Research Council estimates
that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about ten

(27:12):
billion dollars yearly. As promising as it may be, moving
forward on SAI would also raise a number of challenges
for our government and for the international community. On the
technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions which still have to
accompany SAI to address other climate change effects such as
ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases

(27:34):
from the atmosphere.

Speaker 2 (27:36):
On the geopolitical side, the.

Speaker 10 (27:38):
Technology's potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions
of the world at the expense of other regions could
trigger sharp opposition by some nations.

Speaker 4 (27:50):
Okay, so prove me wrong, like we can weather wars.
It's a thing, right.

Speaker 2 (27:56):
The short answer is yes.

Speaker 4 (27:59):
The longer. I set this up. I set this up perfectly,
and every game the CIA right now is watching this
and thinking, Brian, Brian, dammit, you're disclosing all of our secrets.

Speaker 2 (28:11):
Oh Man, and you had to leave with Brennan. I
hate that guy. But anyway, look, this goes actually back
if we're looking at this objectively speaking, the idea of
either manipulating weather or controlling weather, this idea goes back
to late eighteen hundreds. Eighteen ninety one. Actually, the US
government funded a study in Midland, Texas. And that's because

(28:31):
we had some Civil war generals who said whenever that
day would have big fights in battles, it would seem
to just rain a lot more, and they didn't quite
understand why what could be causing that. Well, the idea
at the time in the late early eighteen nineties was
that the acoustics of all the explosions plus whatever was
in the gunpowder was causing some sort of atmospheric change

(28:54):
that encouraged weather, encouraged rain. So they went to Midland
in eighteen ninety one. They did this for a number
of hours. It didn't go well at first, but they
eventually pulled it off. Twelve hours later it rained. Everybody,
of course around the world was like, oh my god,
it's amazing.

Speaker 1 (29:08):
Now.

Speaker 2 (29:08):
Whether or not that actually happened and it rained because
of them or just it just occurred was up for debate.
But the point is it set off this race throughout
the world to try to replicate this, because it could
be a very powerful thing to offer, say for drought
ridden areas or yes, as a weapon of war. The
Germans tried it under Hitler and before. And then we
get to the early nineteen forties when scientists at General

(29:30):
Electric started a project and what they did is they
dropped little pellets of ice basically a frozen ice, a
dry ice, into a storm in western Massachusetts. And it
was three miles long, is what they dropped out of
the plane, and sure enough they had three miles of
snow and rain. So what that then did, well, of course,

(29:51):
it set off this this tremendous interest in geoengineering. And
then the US military said shut it down. Well, that's
because they had their own project called Project Cirrus, and
they took those scientists from ge and they started working.
This was in February forty seven. They started working for
the next nine months in October of forty seven, the
Hurricane King was going through Miami and they thought, what

(30:12):
a great opportunity to drop this dry ice in the
center of a hurricane and see what we can see. Now.
They didn't think that it would do much of anything.
It was only think eighty pounds of dry eyes, but
they dropped it in the eye the hurricane, and Hurricane
King was supposed to go do east out into the Atlantic.
It didn't. It turned one thirty degrees back towards the

(30:32):
United States, hit Georgia and caused all kinds of devastation.
At that point, people were like, well, wait a minute,
maybe this Project Serious is a bad idea. We don't
know how to control exactly what we're doing here. Let's
shut it down. The public outwind of it, a lot
of people got very angry. So yes, Project Serious was
shut down, but two others were started up in its place.
So now we have from the forties and to the

(30:53):
fifties and to the nineteen sixties to the war in Vietnam.
There was an operation called Operation Popeye that was an
effort by the US military seed some clouds caused flooding
in northern Vietnam against the Viet Cong. Well, then we
get into the early This is all public stuff, by
the way, and in the early nineteen eighties the US
government said, look, it's a really interesting proposition about this
clouds heating stuff and controlling and manipulating weather to include

(31:15):
and especially hurricanes, because the idea would be if we
could bust apart the clouds as they were approaching the
United States, we could prevent a lot of damage, a
lot of a lot of damage. But they believed that
the technology wasn't really there, so apparently, allegedly they shut
down those programs in their early nineteen eighties, but guess what,
the cat was out of the back. So a lot
of other countries around the world were very much interested

(31:38):
in this. The Soviets were quite interested, also, the Chinese.
They currently have a clouds heating program, which we'll get
back to in a second. But the Arabs have really
led the way since the early nineteen eighties into the
nineties and early aughts, especially Saudi Arabia and the United
Arab Emirates. They have invested a tremendous amount of money
into cloud seating because they're a desert and they want
more rain, so they leaned on some really interesting research

(32:00):
out of South Africa that found that a local paper
mill was admitting, you know, stop out of its chimney,
and they kept seeing that there would be these clouds
around the mill that were just dump rain. And so
scientists looked into us and what they came to understand
was that if you inject certain kinds of particles into clouds,
what these particles can do is actually glom onto this

(32:21):
microscopic water that's in the air, and it causes more
rain drops and gets them to be even bigger, forcing
rain to fall. So the Arabs used that technology and
that science and that accidental discovery in South Africa. They
have been deploying it for many years now. And here's
the great thing. They believe that it works. There's some
debate about whether or not that's true, but they sure do.
The Saudis and the Amorades certainly believe it's true and

(32:43):
it might be working too well. This past summer in
Dubai they had a massive flood. It was it happened
right as they were seeing a bunch of clouds. The UAE,
Bloomberg News and others reported on this. It was because
of a cloud seating effort. A lot of people try
to cover that up. No, no, no, that's not true. Meanwhile,
the Chinese they do the same thing. Their program their
cloud seating programs are very much classified state secrets. Although

(33:07):
they too had an issue just last month where they
were seeding in one area that was a drought prone
Well they overseated it. That caused a day louse in
the afternoon with tremendous rains. When everybody had their clothes
out for drying after they washed them in the morning, Well,
that's spread clothes throughout this particular city. And so there
was this joke that people were going around the city

(33:28):
trying to find their underwear and meeting like boyfriends and girlfriends. Right,
so we know that this is happening around the world,
we also know it's happening in this country. In twenty seventeen,
project SNOWEEDT, which is a very interesting project University of Colorado, Boulder,
they decided they wanted to really prove that the technology
could work, not only cloud seating, but that they could
prove that human efforts could change weather or modify that

(33:49):
with And so what they did is they took the
same sodium iodine and they dropped it in a series
of clouds above the Rockies back in twenty seventeen. But
they did something very interesting. They deployed the sodium iodine
in a zigzag pattern. Because, as one of the scientists
at the time, mother nature does not produce zigzag patterns.
Who we can prove that our human efforts caused whatever

(34:11):
weather might occur. Sure enough it dead it snowed tremendously
along as zigzag pattern. So Ever since then, organizations like
the Scientific American have reported that in the Western United
States at least eight different states are engaged in cloud
modification or cloud seeding efforts to try to improve the snowpack,
try to imp improve rainfall during this tremendous megage route

(34:33):
that we've had over the past ten or so years.
They think that they have increased moisture by about ten
to fifteen percent. That is what Scientific American has reported.
But the big question, of course, is not only so
we know the cloud setting is real, The question is
now can we manipulate to the point where we're controlling
it right, controlling the hurricanes? Now you play that clip

(34:53):
showing that there is this project that could be possible
here if in fact that it is something that's happening,
it's could be very much classified. But secondly, back in
about twenty years ago, the deprivement of Homeland Security and
others gathered scientists for this very idea, should we research
like hurricane control? And the scientists at the time, including
one gentleman at the MIT who's now retired, said absolutely not,

(35:17):
because one of the ideas was to bring up cold
water from the depths of the ocean, spread it out
above the on the surface, and that'll bust up the
hurricane clouds. That's true. In fact, there's a Norwegian firm
working on that right now. But his response twenty years
ago is don't do it, because what happens when those
clouds get busted apart and they go into other parts
of the world and flood or destroy and kill who's
responsible for that? So that was his point that we

(35:39):
are starting to really mess around with some profound stuff
that we're not really going to be able to control properly.
Same idea, if I can put this in different context
with nuclear energy and nuclear scientists, right, they understood the threat,
they also understood the profound gift of nuclear energy, an
endless supply of relatively green and clean energy, if I
can use that phrase, but it was also deadly could

(36:01):
destroy the entire planet. So that I think is what
this debate falls into. And from my optic, you know,
it's real shame that this is getting politicized because the
science is there that we can modify the weather. Whether
or not we can control it, that's up for debate.
The US military, US government, private enterprise are all trying
to control it, not just manipulate it all around the world.

(36:22):
And we should really be having this conversation as sober adults,
using good science, a good logic and reason to talk
about should we be doing it? What are the dangers
of that?

Speaker 4 (36:32):
Yeah? Oh so I have a question for you. How
the hell do you know all of this information? Like
when you when you go to like Thanksgiving dinner, do
you have a conversations with your family?

Speaker 2 (36:42):
Yeah, everyone leaves. Everyone leaves because they're like, we just
want the game. I'm on cocktail number four in this
asshole is talking about you know, eighteen ninety one Civil
war weather really.

Speaker 4 (36:52):
Problem the hell do you? How does anyone have all
of this? Zoo? How do anyone every place travel?

Speaker 2 (36:58):
We're having a good time over here, Brian's bust and
every about these shops and talking about the serious stuff.

Speaker 4 (37:02):
Oh, there goes Brian, just talking about this the war
weather and save the world again. Brian, Uh, absolutely unbelievable knowledge.
Here I am talking about it in the most superficial,
knuckle knuckle dragger way ever. Oh yeah, weather wars. Yeah,
and here you are giving a global history lesson of
not only like, yes, it's been happening since well before

(37:24):
the Civil War, other countries are doing it, and also
science backs it up. That's that's insane to me.

Speaker 2 (37:31):
Yeah, well, this is the if we had somebody, if
I may, a guy like JD. Vance who can actually
you know, go to the mic and say all right, look,
let's be adults and have this conversation and have a
smart and thoughtful, informed factor of in conversation about this,
and let's declassify some stuff. Let's see what we're doing,
let's talk about what we know other governments are doing,
because this is really important. You want to have this

(37:51):
conversation before the equivalent of developing a nuclear bomb and
something very horrible happens, or hey what about what what
did we just experience in Wuhan? But were there there
maybe some some viral modifications going on there for whatever
apparent scientific reasons that we want to justify. Fine, but
it created likely an awful global pandemic. So this is
the kind of stuff I'm not a fan of. Ironically enough,

(38:13):
keeping stuff secret when it comes to a lot of
these things. I did work with the CIA, so I
understand the importance of secrecy.

Speaker 4 (38:18):
But when it comes to this everything secret now, Brian everything,
It's like there's a yeah, classification problem, and.

Speaker 2 (38:24):
That is another huge issue. But the bottom line is
I'm not afraid of having a truthful conversation. Let's have
the truth, Let's debate it, and if it's smart, then
let's think about it. Or if there's a cost, there
are pros and cons, let's have that conversation too. There
was a recent study that came out of the University
of Arizona actually here in Tucson, were they were talking
about we could do a lot of weather modifications, but

(38:45):
it'll screw up the weather in western Europe and cause
flooding there. So it's like, okay, well, then let's have
that conversation. Is weather modification geoengineering appropriate? Can we really
control the weather? We might be to be able to
manipulate it, but not necessarily control it, and that is important.

Speaker 4 (39:02):
Okay, back with Brian Dean Wright, host of Inside a,
host of The Right Report Daily podcast, was pivoting back
to Rich Barres on Wednesday, host of The Right Report
and Daily podcast, and former CIA operations officers. So, Elon Musk, right, Yeah,
I'm at the Button rally with Trump on Saturday, which

(39:22):
was crazy on a lot of different levels.

Speaker 2 (39:24):
Brian, by the way, brilliant speech. Can we just acknowledge
that for a second. I'm so proud of you. Anyway,
Thanks man, No no more compliments for you. Keep going well,
thank you.

Speaker 4 (39:35):
I appreciate you saying that. I yeah, just wanted to
commemorate the people of Butler. They're amazing people. And Elon
Musk shows up and he gets up on stage and
he's like jumping around like he's a kid, and you know,
he gets in front of the podium and you can
tell this is like the richest guy in the world,
right or one of them, and he's clearly nervous. He

(39:57):
was very, very nervous to talk to that group, and
I just thought it was interesting. He's clearly the richest,
one of the most powerful people on Earth, and he's
nervous to talk in front of a crowd, which I
thought was interesting. But he's not only is he involved
here politically, and I think he's on the right side.
I know he's on the right side of history here,
but he's also doing all of these things that will

(40:20):
quite literally change the world. And that's not an overstatement.
I mean some of the stuff that he's doing with
rocket science is just unbelievable. He was talking about colony
on Mars within the next four years. Yesterday he unveiled
some stuff like in terms of artificial intelligence with robots,
self driving cabs and buses, things that look like they're

(40:43):
straight out of a sci fi book or something like that,
And all I kept thinking was, you know, some sort
of super intelligent artificial intelligence and robot form. I've seen
this movie before and it doesn't go well a humans.
So like, check this out, Brian, look at this.

Speaker 2 (41:03):
This is the robot and saying it's even talking, and
my friend.

Speaker 4 (41:06):
John, listen to this. That's the robot talk here. Oh hello, John,
how are you?

Speaker 6 (41:13):
It is crazy.

Speaker 4 (41:14):
I'm talking to robots from Santase, probably from where you
were from where you were born.

Speaker 6 (41:19):
In the Silicon Valley. Wonderful.

Speaker 2 (41:21):
Where do you live in walk.

Speaker 6 (41:26):
No, I live in Los Atto, wonderful.

Speaker 4 (41:30):
Yeah, where do you live? There is? Where do you live?
Also at the current figures?

Speaker 6 (41:40):
Yeah, this is this is awesome.

Speaker 7 (41:42):
That's where they.

Speaker 4 (41:43):
Trade us, that where we get our bills, and.

Speaker 2 (41:45):
That's where we look at.

Speaker 4 (41:46):
I'm sorry, but that's it. That's insane to me. He's
even saying, well, I live like almost as if it's thinking.
And I saw, I mean, I saw a whole host
of videos like this of people like talking to one
of these things behind the bar that want a drink,
wearing a cowboy hat. I'm glad to see that the
stop and chat with a robot is also as uncomfortable
it is with an actual human. So there's that. I'm

(42:09):
just saying, how does any of this bode well? You
see an army in these things. Elon's marching them out
like he's Tony Stark or something. And I'm thinking, Like
you talked about not dabbling with the weather because you
can't control it, this also seems like one of those
things you can't really control.

Speaker 2 (42:27):
So I'm gonna tell you this is one of the
things that I actually looked at when I was at
the CIA. I don't know if I've ever told you this,
but here's the upshot. We've got robotics, which we've had
for a long long time, plus automation and then this
idea of machine learning or AI. And what's happening right now.
What you just saw in that clip is we are
starting to combine a body with a super intelligent mind.

(42:49):
We are creating a different kind of life. Well, that's incredible.
All kinds of different implications of that and for that,
from warfare to economics to the purpose of humans, but
also some really incredible things like we can use that
stuff to explore the galaxy because it's not a carbon
based life form, so it's not going to get burnt
up with you know, solar radiation, or it doesn't need food, etc.

(43:10):
So there are lots of wonderful things to think about
with this technology. But imagine for a moment in terms
of asking people right now, you know, why should I
care about this? This seems cool or interesting. Let's just
think about one issue immigration. What you just saw is
a clip of less human labor. Because if you can
you can find whatever percentage of a human brain and

(43:31):
put it inside of a human body or humanoid body,
what's your value? Because you need bathroom breaks, you need
a salary, you need benefits. Now you know I need
to take some time off go on vacation. Robots don't.
They don't at all. So that's why this is really
such a big deal. This challenge is the need for
human labor or as much of it. So when we
talk about the immigration crisis in this country and the

(43:52):
southern border, we think about how many migrants we need
in this country. We talk about like the demographics collapse.
Elon Musk's to ask a lot about you know, we
need more human more babies. Maybe that's true, maybe, but
when you create lots of robots, they can do what
humans can do for an exceptionally tiny cost, certainly over
the life of human What valu does human labor have
when we can replace all of it? So that should

(44:14):
be right now, what are the critical conversations about our
immigration policy? And it's why I believe that we should
seal up that dag on southern border and kick a
lot of people out because I see what Elon Musk
is doing, I see what a lot of these other
guys are doing. By the way, one of the computer
chip it's called a GPU that powers this robot, and
it powers the AI revolution, artificial intelligence revolution. They are

(44:37):
pouring in trillions of dollars over the next couple of
years into these chips. That shows you there's a major
bet on this technology. So our immigration policy should be
a hell of a lot smarter because of where this
is going and very soon. Oh by the way, how
does this impact other countries? Some of our allies that
maybe use a lot of manual labor and that's what
most of their economy is. Well, what happens when you

(44:59):
start losing ten, twenty, thirty sixty percent of your jobs
and Ethiopia or Guatemala or whatever, what are all those
people gonna do? It raises a lot of really important,
very existential questions about human labor, and we could go
through a really intense period of time from a national
security perspective as well. So here I go again being
the Thanksgiving guy who's getting out and everybody's like, I'm

(45:19):
out of here. I just wanted the turkey in the
football game.

Speaker 4 (45:22):
But really I can see that the robot doesn't wear
pants like you do from the waist down. So yeah,
that's a shame.

Speaker 2 (45:28):
That's a shame. No, but look at it. It's a
really amazing moment. It's right. It's almost like the beginning
of the Industrial Revolution, where there's so many possibilities but
also so many profound, frightening things that could happen. And
you have, for instance, the port shutdowns last couple of weeks.

Speaker 4 (45:45):
I was just gonna say, the port workers should be really.

Speaker 2 (45:47):
Worried, right, so this is not just a port situation.
One of the things that we know over the past month,
some of the data from the University I'm sorry, the
Labor Department shows that the unemployment rates for IT professionals
is increasing. It's something about six and a half percent
right now. Why because their jobs can be done by
artificial intelligence. They don't need as many computer coders, they
don't need as many people to do the jobs because

(46:09):
we're be able to automate that. So you got a
lot of IT professionals being tossed out on the street.
So there are a lot of things happening right now
that we need some really smart leadership in the White
House to talk about this with the American people, change
our policies. Unfortunately, the current guy there has dementia, so
that's unfortunate. And then the other guy who's currently running,
she does her little hams ring working to get up
there either. So I really think that this election is

(46:31):
important for a lot of reasons, and I think that
Elon Musk understands that. That's why he is so deeply
committed to the Trump campaign and to JD. Vance. He
gets it that this moment in history requires a new
kind of leadership, and we're not going to get it
with the Democrat Party. We're just not.

Speaker 4 (46:46):
I mean, there's no way. I mean, like, just think
about how this technology will revolutionize the battlefield, and by
the way, how important it is tactically and strategically for
us to get our hands on it first, you know,
I mean, this is the kind of stuff that you like,
if you're, you know, a human on the battlefield facing
down a robot, can you imagine the psychological tolld that

(47:10):
that would. I know that sounds crazy, but we just
saw it, like we're not that far away from that. Hey,
my life, I'm a human and if this robot I'm
getting killed by something. I mean, it just seems so
like but it's only happening right now, you know, sa
the morale of who you're fighting. You know, look, this
is not a future problem. This is a right now problem.
Go to Ukraine.

Speaker 2 (47:29):
The world's drone operators are infusing their drones with artificial
intelligence and they're engaging in swarm operations. Ask the guys
who are fighting on the Russian side or the Ukrainian
side of what that's like. It's a nightmare. These drones
are dropping molten lava, molten rock on top of people,
right They can carry these buckets. So it's happening right now.
Using artificial intelligence, you can actually release these drones and

(47:52):
they talk amongst themselves, they do their own target identification.
If the connection is cut with the human they continue
to fly forward. That's happening right now. So this new
era that we're launching into, it's really important to think
about and to talk about. I know, we get caught
up on lots of other things, but this really is
a big deal. So I'm glad you brought it up.
And by the way, energy plays into this too. How

(48:12):
are you going to power the AI revolution if you're
shutting down all of your nuclear or coal or natural
gas plants and you're just using sunshine and wind and
now that doesn't necessarily work all the time. So that's
what the Chinese are doing. They're investing in over thirty
nuclear power plants right now, and we're shutting our stuff down,
our liable stuff, because they want to.

Speaker 4 (48:31):
Win that war.

Speaker 2 (48:31):
They're not stupid, right from weather modification to the Ai Revolution,
the Chinese ain't playing. They know what's going on. They
know the future, and so does Elon Musk and that's
why he's back and truck.

Speaker 4 (48:41):
I mean, and let's talk about China for a second,
and the cyber attacks and Salt Typhoon and access to
Verizon and all of this stuff, like give us a
sense of what's going on with that, all right.

Speaker 2 (48:52):
So one of the things that you and I have
talked about over the summer is that this idea that
volt Typhoon is a Chinese hacking group and they've gotten
inside of our water systems, our electrical systems, pipelines, and
our ports. The idea is that they want to do
exactly what the Israelis did with their walkie talkies and
their pages, which is flip the switch and everything shuts
down or blows up on what have you. So that's

(49:13):
the bolt Typhoon cyber hacking group. Well, there have been
a few others. There's a one called flax Typhoon. They've
gotten into different Internet tethered devices like our cameras or
refrigerators and that kind of stuff. That was over the
past six weeks as well. But this latest one, it's
a bad deal. It's called salt Typhoon. Microsoft is naming these,
by the way, So salt Typhoon. What they have done

(49:36):
is they've gotten into the system. The Chinese have gotten
into our system where the Department of Justice and the
FBI requests information from our big tech providers like Verizon
or T Mobile or Sentry Link. Those guys then have
to comply with those requests things like surveillance or Internet
data and all the rest of it. So the Chinese

(49:58):
were able to get into that system with the FBI
or the Department of Justice request that information. Why is
that a big deal? Well, now the Chinese have our
knowledge of who we are looking at, who we're investigating from, say,
are white collar crimes that would include not only our businessmen,
but our politicians their staff as the Department of Justice
and the FBI are investigating them. Well, what might Beijing

(50:20):
do that insider information. Ah, maybe christ some blackmail ops
and approach people say hey, we know you're doing with
your computer or your phone, we know the shenanigans you're
engaging in. Work with us and we'll help you this
problem go with. They're also they've also hacked into some
information regarding not just this white collar crime, but also
counter espionage and counter intel operations or investigations. So now

(50:42):
the Chinese know or did some degree though if there
are Chinese spies inside of this country, whether or not
they're under our scope, or maybe the Russians under our
scope because they got into this wire tapping system. So
this is Salt Typhoon. It was discovered about three weeks ago,
or at least the public side of it was offered
up to American people. It's a bad deal. Like Bolt

(51:03):
Typhoon and the rest of it. The Chinese are very
very good cyber operators. We are too. We just have
really terrible leadership in the White House not releasing some
of our best tools against the Chinese. That's a political decision.
We could fight. So that's good news. If we get
new leadership, we can do something about all of this stuff.
But right now we are so very vulnerable.

Speaker 4 (51:22):
So at the height of the Afghan surrender, I was
screaming from the rooftops that we can't let unvetted Afghans
into our country.

Speaker 2 (51:29):
We just can't.

Speaker 4 (51:30):
Like they don't know when their own birthday is. It's
not like there's a Social Security office where they vet people.
They you know, your histories, they commit And I said, like,
you just don't know who's coming into our country. So
the FBI apparently a couple of days ago, arrested somebody,
an Afghan who had come into this country during the
collapse of Afghanistan plotting an election day terrorist attack, either

(51:54):
blowing up or shooting a bunch of people. Give us
an inside look into how something like this happened.

Speaker 2 (52:02):
Look, this is such a disaster, not just because of
this case, but what it means for the country because
we have hundreds of thousands, millions of people who've come
in using one of the two systems that this guy
came to this country, all right, So yes, he comes
into this nation in September of twenty twenty one under
humanitarian parole, right because he worked for the CIA, So
he was vetted in Afghanistan by the CIA. They then

(52:24):
continually vetted him as he was employed in the CIA
protecting a base or a station somewhere in Afghanistan. Then
he gets vetted when he lands in September of twenty
twenty one under humanitarian parole. Then he applies for something
called a Special Immigrant Visa or SIV that has a
lot more aggressive vetting processes. Right at the time, a

(52:44):
lot of people said, well, wait a minute, those two things.
Humanitarian parole, there's very little vetting, and that's true, there is,
but the SIV there is more. But we're not very
good at that vetting process. So don't allow all these
Afghans in. This is a bad, bad deal. Let's be
very very careful. Not one hundred and twenty five thousand.
And that's exactly what the Biden White House did. They
lived in over one hundred and twenty five thousand Afghans

(53:04):
and did not sufficiently vet them. The Pentagon chief, of course,
mister Lloyd Austin, said at the time, Oh, yes, they
will come to this country, but they will be strictly vetted. Well,
one of the guys is now this guy, Tall Hetty.
He used in Oklahoma City. He was resettled there. He
apparently was radicalized in this country. I don't buy that, sorry,
but the points even if he were radicalized, what does

(53:25):
that say. What does that say about one hundred and
twenty five thousand Afghans are now in this country that
they could be radicalized over two three years, nothing that
they were vetted by the way. This guy he came
initially under humanitarian parole. That program was nineteen fifty era
program that was supposed to allow in handfuls of people
each year. Like let's say a kiddo has cancer, we

(53:45):
want to bring him in, don't have time for the
visa process. We got got him and get him into
the hospital. The Biden Hearers administration is using that thirty
thousand people a month are coming into this country under
that humanitarian parole program. It is so riightfle corruption and
inability to vet people that they shut it down in
August because there was so much corruption. One month they

(54:06):
had to shut it down because all the sponsors for
those humanitarian paroyees were actually but to shysters. So the
other program to SIV program that's supposed to be much
more aggressive, much more thoughtful in terms if it's vetting, Well,
if that's not true and that didn't happen. Then we let
this guy in. What about all the millions of people
that supposedly we are vetting the gun in this country
that the White House tells us they're vetting, they're not.

(54:27):
And we know this. You and I talked about this.
The databases where they vet these people, they don't talk
to each other. We don't have connectivity to a lot
of foreign databases, nor can we say that those foreign
databases are even complete. So we have no idea who's
coming into this country. And oh, by the way, we
have hundreds of thousands of IDs that are being ditched
at the border. The cartels are giving people new names

(54:47):
and new identifications to come into the border. It's a mess.
We've got a massive crisis. And that's what this case really,
I think highlights, is the vetting's broken. We have millions
of people in this country, we have no idea who
they are, and they're gonna target us some percentage of them.
Will It's gonna happen?

Speaker 4 (55:04):
God Okay, so Haitian deportation from the Dominican Republic. Switching gears, Yes,
Switching gears is global intel update, like just going the lightning.
Let's do it.

Speaker 2 (55:13):
All right, So, yes, we know that this country has
some Haitians. Apparently they eat dogs and cats. The allegation is, well,
there's a lot of them that they share an island
of course with the Dominican Republic, and a lot of
those Haitians have gone into the dr. Well, the president
there has said enough, you guys are chocol block full
of criminals and people that we don't like, so get

(55:33):
the hell out. And so he is now deporting ten
thousand Haitians a week, saying get out of my country.
Go back to Haiti. I don't care if your country
is a crap hole. It is, but we're not going
to fix that. I can't fix the root cause, so
get out until you guys can figure it out, we
are not going to be responsible. And they've been in
the Dominican Republic for fixing your country. He's god of

(55:54):
Nations humanitarian rights. You know, people were like, oh my god,
that's mean and bad, and our presidents like, yeah, I
don't care. So I think that that's really important and
illustrative for good leadership. Who says I'm going to protect
my country over anybody else's and I don't care about
your flim flam humanitarian stuff. I am a Dominican and
I'm gonna protect my people. I like that kind of

(56:14):
leadership myself me too.

Speaker 4 (56:16):
I mean, I wonder what was the I mean was
the what was the rea? He was just like, they're
not going to assimilate into our culture, like they don't
they don't care about it was criminality.

Speaker 2 (56:26):
There were these massive heation gangs that were creating all
kinds of problems in terms of death and destruction and
drugs and all the rest of it. And he was like,
enough out.

Speaker 4 (56:36):
My god, and that that very same thing is happening
is happening here, like with with these Venezuelan gangs and
things like that.

Speaker 2 (56:44):
Trump and you know what, their newcomer's friend, that's what
they're called now, their newcomers, And he's get thousands of
dollars every month, free hotel food, the rest of it.
Their newcomers get your lenk, you big it a just look,
it underlines the absurd When a Dominican president can see
exactly the problem, he has more leadership than the current

(57:05):
ding dong and the second lady what the hell she is?
Come on, It really underlines the absurdity of our current leadership.

Speaker 4 (57:13):
All right, Brian, tell us how we can support you.
We love to hear about it.

Speaker 2 (57:16):
Come with Thanksgiving. I'm all by myself. I need people
to talk to. Beyond that, you could listen to my podcast.

Speaker 1 (57:23):
It's lovely.

Speaker 2 (57:24):
It's the Right Report, like the Right Brothers wr IJC.
Right Report available use you by five six am every
day Monday through Friday. I take you around the country
of the world. We talk about all this stuff. And
for people on my substack you can get all the
sourcing that I use. Because it might sound crazy, like
the weather modification. Ah, I've got it all documented. So
that's a Rightreport dot substack dot com six bucks a month.

(57:44):
People can download that and click on all the hyperlinks
and share that with friends and get smart on different issues.

Speaker 4 (57:49):
You should definitely do that. Folks who are listening watching
you should definitely support Brian. And I'm telling you, Brian,
I hear from people all the time who are like
I listened to Brian this morning. He only had a
six minute episode, but he promises he's gonna make it
up on Friday.

Speaker 2 (58:02):
Why do the people who listen to you sound like that?

Speaker 4 (58:04):
What's wrong?

Speaker 6 (58:04):
I don't know?

Speaker 4 (58:05):
That was just that was just how I had it
in my mind. That was honestly how it was.

Speaker 2 (58:10):
In my head. That was amazing. Well, it sounds like
they're all from Long Island, so that's you have a
huge fan base on Long Island. That's amazing.

Speaker 4 (58:19):
Well, Brian, as always my friend, Thanks for coming on.
I hopefully we'll get you on next week. Let's do
it all right, all right, thanks brother, all right, have
a good one, Brian. That is Brian Dean Wright, one
of the smartest guys around. I love having them on. Okay,
before we pop smoke, make sure you smash that like button,
that little green thumb beneath the video, smash that like button. Okay, folks,

(58:41):
Brian Dean Wright, that guy's amazing, right, awesome, awesome show prep.
He he's awesome. We love having him. Also, folks, I
want you to have a great weekend. We run the
home stretch of this selection. Good news out there is
that it looks like I really believe that Amla's campaign
is slowing down. She's peaked out. Now. Anything can happen

(59:03):
in the next couple of weeks. But the title of
this episode is October is going to be madness because
the Left well, they're just crazy, so buckle up, enjoy
time with your family, enjoy time with your friends. They
focused on the horizon and the mission at hand, and
that mission is saving this country. So don't forget to

(59:24):
smash that like button on your way out. Tell your
family and your friends to subscribe to Battleground Live because
we want them in the trenches right here, fighting to
save this country. Official Seanparnell dot com is my website.
It's your one stop shop for all things America.

Speaker 2 (59:39):
First news that.

Speaker 4 (59:40):
You're not gonna hear anywhere else. And don't forget about
my locals. I mean, we're going to be rolling out
some very very cool stuff on locals. There's a subscription
model where I think it's five bucks a month or
something like that. But if you can't do that, that's fine.
Just go join us on locals, be a part of
the conversation as all these folks. God bless you all,
God bless this amazing country that we call home. Keep

(01:00:00):
the faith. The best is yet to come. God bless
you all, folks. Have a great weekend and I will
see you on Monday. Battle Crue take care, good night,
have a great weekend.