Buck Brief - Maniacs Rage in Los Angeles as Trump Enforces the Law

Buck breaks down the wild scene that unfolded in Los Angeles as illegal immigration advocates took to the streets, and how federal law enforcement, backed by Trump’s firm stance on sovereignty and border control, shut it down.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:11):
You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
wherever you get your podcasts. In the showdown with illegal
immigration advocates and maniacts running all over the streets of
southern California, specifically Los Angeles County, it looks like it's
Trump one, anti sovereignty zealotz zero. That's right. Things are

(00:37):
beginning to calm down and it looks like order is
slowly being restored. This was madness for a few days,
as we know, all started because federal law enforcement officials
were trying to enforce federal law. Now no one is
arguing that it is not in fact federal law, that

(00:59):
these are not illegal aliens, and that there was anything
that was done initially by Immigrations and Customs enforcement that
was unlawful, that was wrong. No, they just don't like this.
This is what the left has decided when they don't
like something. The Democrats, when they decide they don't like something,

(01:20):
we're not allowed to do it as a country. And
as law enforcement has been with the law enforcement operations
they've been engaged in, this is showing you exactly how
crazy the situation is they can only argue that they
oppose this because it makes them feel angry, not that

(01:41):
Trump is actually doing anything wrong or that his administration
is doing anything wrong by enforcing now I say wrong,
legally wrong. They may not like it morally or ethically,
although I would completely disagree with them there too. They
have no grounds on which to stand when it comes
to opposing the enforcement of federal law. If Democrats don't

(02:02):
like this, they should have members of Congress. They should
have members of the House and members of the Senate
with d's by their name say we want open borders,
we want legal status for everyone who comes here from
all over the world. The problem with that is that
would be too honest. They would be arguing for the
dissolution of America. And when they're honest about it, then

(02:26):
people can actually make decisions like, Wow, the Democrats are
lunatics who are betraying American sovereignty and we can't allow
that to continue. We have to find a way to
to stop this. And so instead they play this game.
They want to have it both ways. Oh, Democrats, we
want there to be enforcement of the law. We just

(02:47):
want it to be nice. Law enforcement is not nice.
You know, my friend Ben Ferguson went on CNN and
he pointed out, there are Americans all over the country
for things sometimes that aren't really that big a deal,
depends on what we're talking about, but there are Americans
who get taken to jail, have to serve time, and

(03:07):
they have kids, and they have wives, and they're crying
and they're upset about this. And I don't have all
these activists running around saying, oh, that's terrible, you're breaking
up families. Incarcerating people breaks up families. Deporting people breaks
up families. But there's a reason that we have the
laws that incarcerate and that deport because otherwise we have

(03:27):
an anarchic society. We have a society where there is
no order, where none of us are protected and none
of us are accountable either. And that's really what you
see with these democrats. They don't want to be accountable,
they don't want to be held to account. They want
to be in a position where they can have it
as they like it. If you're Gavin Newsom, if you're

(03:48):
Mayor Bass, all these different individuals who are complaining about
what has happened here in Los Angeles for the last
few days they can use all this flowery language about
all the immigrants, and remember illegals, illegals. We're talking about here,
the illegals who are doing this and they're working so
hard and they're I don't care. It's against the law,

(04:08):
and the law is supposed to be what it says
and should be enforced as such. You know, we're not
talking about locking people up for decades because they're here legally.
We're just saying, look, you're not allowed to be here.
Go back to your home country. You're trespassing in America.
You know, if somebody was trespassing on my front lawn,
I would say to them, hey, you gotta get off
my lawn. And this is the get off my lawn segment. Hey,

(04:30):
you got to get off my law. And if they refused,
I would call the cops, and I would tell the cops, hey,
this is unlawful. Can you please remove this person from
the premises. I wouldn't, you know, demand that this person
go spend the next twenty years in prison. You know,
I understand what we're talking about here, But if you
can't do that, if you can't call upon law enforcement
to enforce that law of trespassing. It's not your property anymore.

(04:54):
It's not public property. Right, property rights, sovereignty, These things
are very much related. These things are very similar, and essentially,
when you're talking about the sovereignty of who is allowed
to be on us soil, you are talking about the
right of the federal go government to determine who is
lawfully here and who is a trespasser and trespassing. In

(05:16):
any context, you could say, oh, well, it's you know,
this is not that you're just here. It's not that
big a deal. No, you don't want people. You don't
want people in a tent in your backyard. I don't
want illegals, by the tens of millions in this country,
who are demanding that the government enforce taxation against me
to create the resources necessary for them to get illegal

(05:37):
and elicit access to those resources. If the government is
going to tell me, I will lock you up if
you do not pay, if you do not give your time,
your money, your resources to the government to distribute in
this way, if they can lock me up for that,
they have to tell these illegals you got to go,
because otherwise we're operating the world's biggest soup kitchen we're

(05:58):
operating the biggest welfare program, which we already are in
the history of the world. But we're operating a welfare
program for the entire world, and that is unsustainable. That
is not something that can make sense mathematically or ethically,
because a country has to be the people within that country.
It can't be everybody. Okay, we are not just all

(06:20):
one thing, one unit. Here. We are Americans, and then
there are foreigners. And if you come here and you're
a foreigner who pretends that you have a lawful right
to be here, I'm sorry, but that's your problem. There
is a country that you came from and you have
a right to be in that country. I'm also getting
tired of being told of them, Oh we need all
these illegals. If we need all these illegals, what's going

(06:43):
on in their countries? If they're all going to start
the next Google or they're just all willing to do
the jobs Americans won't do, which also I would say,
these are non sequiturs because we have laws and they're
breaking them. But if it's going to be about how
they're bringing all these advantages to this country, why do
we have immigration laws that specifically and we do have
these laws in place that specifically seek out and privilege

(07:05):
those with special skills and that will contribute and that
won't be a public war. And that why do we
even have those laws which we do? Why do we
have laws that make Why have a legal immigration system
that tries to make determinations about who should be here
and who shouldn't. If we're just gonna let everybody come,
what does that mean for the people who have done

(07:26):
it the right way? What does that mean for the
people who are waiting in line? Are they are they?
Are they fools for trying to do the right thing?
This is why there's a huge thing Democrats are panicked
about this. The biggest switch in immigration sentiment in this
country that has occurred of the last four years is
among legal immigrants who do not want more illegals coming

(07:47):
into the country. Legal immigrants have swung hugely by forty
percentage points to the right on this issue. And it's
because they realize, they see and they also resent what's
going on, so they had to play by the rules.
But other people don't and they get the same benefit.
We are a country that is going bankrupt, slowly but surely,

(08:08):
as bankruptcies to, you know, slowly, but then suddenly is
the old joke. We are a country that is going bankrupt,
and we think that we can fund the healthcare and
the upkeep and the benefits of people that arrive here
in violation of our laws, speak no English and aren't
going to be able to contribute on a net basis
to an information based and skills based economy, especially as

(08:31):
AI and all these other things come online. How are
we going to fund this? If sent they're funding this
with your time and your productivity. This is just a
form of global communism. It really is, because everyone who
comes here gets your stuff. The government, the Democrats, they
want to take the stuff that we have and distribute
it more to other people from all over the world.

(08:53):
They're already doing that to Americans and that enough can
be that can be enough of a problem. But now
they want to do it for everybody else. We can't
do this, No one can do this. It makes no sense.
This is also why our sponsor here, Birch Gold, perfect
time to talk about this. I hope Trump can fix
a lot, and I think you will. But you got
to think where are you with your savings and the

(09:16):
wealth that you are setting aside for yourself and your family,
where are you in five years, ten years, twenty years.
Gold has stood the test of time. Gold makes sense terafors, recession, fears, inflation.
These are all things that gold is a hedge against.
And that's why I've been a guy who owns gold
for fifteen years. I totally believe in gold, always have

(09:37):
And there are also a lot of people out there
who this would make sense for converting an existing IRA
or four O one k into an IRA in physical gold,
and that's a great thing to do. Birch Gold Group
the best in the business at this. Text my name
buck to ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight. Birch Gold
will send you a free no obligation infoKit again. Text
my name buck Do ninety eight, ninety eight ninety eight.

(10:00):
That's b U c K Text buck Do ninety eight,
ninety eight, ninety eight Birch Gold Group. You know, you're
also seeing more of where these democrats are are on
the issues of law and order and crime still, and
it is just the hypocrisy around this. It really drives

(10:21):
me nuts because when it came to January sixth, they
were so all in, so all in on Oh, we
support law enforce. The only cops, the only cops the
Democrats have liked in the last decade are any cops
that were pushed, shoved, or punched on January sixth, that's it.

(10:41):
Those are the cops that they care or a cop
who had a heart attack a week later, the Capitol
Hill police, that's it. The cops now getting punched and
getting bricks thrown at them and everything, they don't care
about that at all. In fact, they view the ice
and other law enforcement officials who are trying to restort
and have been trying to restore sanity on the streets

(11:05):
of Los Angeles as part of the problem. I mean,
let's just call it what it is. They really think
that those people are getting what they deserve. And that's
something that I think for a lot of people is
really hard to stomach about. The Democrat position on this
is that they are with the rioters. This is why

(11:25):
they say things like, well, don't continue to riot, because
you'll be giving in. You'll be giving in to the
other side politically. It's not that rioting is bad and
you shouldn't do it. It's if you riot, you will be
helping our political enemies. So that's the problem. What about
you just shouldn't be burning down restaurants and looting cvs

(11:46):
is because you're you know, if you think you have
some excuse, you're having a bad day. Also, the malcontents
who do this stuff, the don't care about immigrants. They
just want to go through this cosplay as revolutionaries and
have an excuse to act out the raids that they
have because they're losers. I know it sound like Trump here,

(12:06):
but it's true. They're losers. They are they're losers. If
you're throwing bricks at cops because you don't like that
the laws of this country are being enforced when it
comes to illegal aliens, you're a loser because you don't
believe in America. You don't believe in law and order.
You believe in some kind of you know, ethnic alliance,

(12:27):
maybe that you have to have solidarity with some people,
not others, only some people. And that's not what America is.
It's not supposed to be, oh, I'm this ethnicity or
i'm this skin color, and I stand with those people
even if they are breaking the law. And you're seeing
that with some of the Latino community in South Southern California.

(12:49):
They just understand that they don't like that it's Latinos.
Trust me, if they were if they were doing this
with Somali illegal immigrants, Let's say in Minnesota. And I don't
even know how many illegal Somali imgorrants there are, but
if they were doing this with Somali, there's a lot
of immigrants there. I think a lot of them are
as you know, got asylum in Minnesota. Do you think
that there would be these people marching and waving Mexican

(13:09):
flag and I'll Salvadoran and other flags on the streets
of La No, of course not. So there's an ethnic
solidarity component of this where you say, well, hold on
a second, where is my first allegiance is to my
fellow Americans of all skin colors, all ethnicities, Americans? What
is this waving a Mexican flag when you're in California

(13:34):
as a way of protesting against the United States government?
Whose team you really want to ask this question? Whose
team are they on? It would never occur to me
ever to wave a foreign flag on the streets of
the United States, any city of the United States, any town,
anywhere in the United States, because it would show well

(13:54):
I'm not really first and foremost an American, and this
is why the public sentiment has turned so much against
what we're seeing in southern California. This is why the
Democrats are having to back off of this. Now Gavin
Newsom and orders being restored, They're gonna say, oh, we
showed Trump. Yeah, sure they did. And that's why these
deportations need to be ramped up. We need to see

(14:15):
deportations at a level that the country has never seen
before in terms of the numbers. We have to have
more deportations than ever before. We have to restore a
sense that this country has borders and this country has
immigration laws. Our sponsor is paradigm pressed. You know, some
nations have a sovereign wealth fund, Japan, Norway, Saudi Arabia.

(14:36):
It's a program that citizens of our country benefit from,
and the development of oil, for example, can be an
asset that leads to a sovereign wealth fund. There are
people who think that in this country there's one hundred
and fifty trillion dollars of wealth buried under our soil
and could be the basis for a sovereign wealth fund.
This endowment, so to speak, is so large it could
pay off our national debt four times over to hear

(14:58):
about this from Jim Rickards, former advisor of the White
House in Federal Reserve. How wants you to go? To
Berthright twenty twenty five dot com. Jim Rickards is a
former advisor of the White House in Federal Reserve. He says,
if you're over fifty, this could be your best chan
to build lasting well from a once in a century event.
Do you hear more of Jim's thinking? Go to Birthright
twenty twenty five dot com. That's birthright twenty twenty five
dot com paid for by Paradigm Press. That's it from

(15:20):
DC for today more tomorrow Shields High