July 9, 2025 • 17 mins
The DOJ says the Epstein case is closed. Buck Sexton says: Not so fast. Buck breaks down why the newly released DOJ memo raises more questions than it answers. From the lack of transparency to the mishandling of public expectations, Buck calls out the glaring failures that continue to erode trust in the justice system. He dives into why Pam Bondi’s explanation doesn’t hold up, what happened to the supposed “client list” and surveillance tapes, and the unanswered questions surrounding Epstein’s mysterious wealth.
Never miss a moment from Buck by subscribing to the Buck Sexton Show Podcast on IHeart Radio, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts!
Connect with Buck Sexton:
Facebook – / bucksexton
X – @bucksexton
Instagram – @bucksexton
TikTok - @BuckSexton
YouTube - @BuckSexton
Website – https://www.bucksexton.com/
Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcastle make sure
you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
wherever you get your podcasts. So is the Epstein case
case closed? The DJ says yes. A lot of people say, sorry,
that's not going to cut it. There's still more that
(00:32):
there has to be answered for. There are more questions
that are out there, and I know we've spent a
couple of days now in the news talking about this issue.
It's because the DJ released this memo, and the memo
was not helpful. If you think the purpose of it
was to restore faith in the DOJ's willingness to be
(00:56):
transparent about this. Saying you're transparent is not the same
thing as being transparent. Now, I want to break this
down and be very clear about this, because their passions
run very high on this issue. I understand that I
have thought that there was a lot and still think
that there's a lot that we don't know about the
(01:16):
Epstein case, in terms of connections, in terms of co conspirators,
in terms of perhaps external influences or forces on all
of this. And let me break down what I mean
by that. I see this at a few levels there's
the memo and the management of this as it pertains
(01:37):
to public expectations. Okay, So let's break this down this way.
I'm even going to make a note of this as
I'm talking about it, so I don't skip past this.
There's the memo and the management. Okay, there's the DOJ
Justice faith good faith issue, and then there's the questions
(01:59):
I still want answers for. Okay, Now let's start with
this because it's the easiest one. The handling of this
has not been good by the Attorney General. Pan body. Now,
I understand she has said she misspoke on that Fox
News show, or rather it was misinterpreted what she meant
when she said I have it on my desk, she
(02:21):
meant all the Epstein stuff is on her desk. I
also want to be clear that President Trump today was
asked about this, and he's just sick of hearing about
this at all. He doesn't want to hear about it,
and he really tried to shut the whole thing down
during his lengthy cabinet meeting.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been
talked about for years. You're asking, we have Texas, we
have this, We have all of the things right, and
are people still talking about this guy, this creep that
is unbelievable. Do you want to waste the time? And
do you feel like answering?
Speaker 3 (03:01):
I don't mind answering.
Speaker 4 (03:02):
I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on
at epstin at a time like this where we're having
some of the greatest success and also gragedy with what
happened in Texas. It just seems like a desecration.
Speaker 1 (03:15):
But okay, so we've got Trump saying why are you
even talking about this? And you could tell a lost
patience with the whole thing. Pambondi has put herself in
a tough spot with this one because we had people
that were brought to influencers, who were brought to the
White House given binders, and there was a whole Epstein
(03:37):
transparency thing. There was nothing new in those binders, as
we knew, as we found out, and I knew all along,
and I didn't think there would be any big revelations
from the Epstein files this whole time. I've always thought
that there was. Now I want to get into why,
I think that I'll get to that in a moment.
But still the way that this was handled by the DOJ,
(03:59):
has not been tactful, has not been helpful to answering
the public's questions and making people think that this is
truly case closed. I don't think that's beyond dispute at
this point, because you still have You've got the White
House saying basically, shut up, we've told you everything. I
don't want to hear it anymore. And a lot of
(04:20):
people out there are saying, we'll hold on a second.
I still I'm not buying it doesn't add up to
me here, I'm not buying it. So that's that's the
first part of it. The memo and the management of expectations.
It's been a mess. They should and you could say,
oh buck, what should they have done differently? It should
have been announced that there would be a a presentation
a press conference by the Attorney General Pambondi. It should
(04:44):
have been a statement that was more fulsome than one
was put out that little memo. It should have addressed
the outlying questions, and it should have been open to
the press to ask questions. Then and there this little
memo that they dropped which felt very perfunctory, you know,
(05:05):
just just the bare minimum and like they didn't feel
like they really had to deal with very much that
was not good, that was not helpful. Now we can
get into the DOJ side of this of the case,
the Epstein case. I'm going to get to unanswered questions
in a second, the Epstein case. But first up, our
sponsor here is Birch Gold. And as you know, the
(05:26):
big beautiful bill passed. There's a lot of good stuff
coming in the Trump economy. Trump economy is already really cooking,
and I think it's going to get even better. But
he's only in office for four years and the thirty
seven trillion in debt we have is not going away.
Purchasing power has been going down for years and years
now because of the excessive spending, and you need to
(05:47):
find ways to protect your wealth and to diversify. That's
where gold comes in. It's time for you to get
some gold to hedge against inflation, economic instability, and the
long term challenges we have to the dollar. And Birch
Gold is who I trust to do this for you.
They've helped tens of thousands convert an existing IRA or
four oh one k into an IRA in physical gold. Okay,
(06:11):
Birch Gold Group text my name buck to ninety eight
ninety eight ninety eight Birch Gold to help you with
a free no obligation infoKit. Text my name Buck to
ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight today Birch Gold Group.
They are the best in the business at this all
right now, my friends, Now we are going to look
(06:32):
at the DOJ side of this. Now. Here's here's the thing.
The handling of this by the DOJ up to this
point in time has been abominable. Right now, I mean
a pre Trump era. I'm saying, the way that this
(06:54):
was handled, the inability to me in Epstein. They're telling
us now how to thousand victims, a thousand victims and
got away with this for what almost twenty years at
least one thousand victims. No one could prosecute this guy.
No one wanted to prosecute this guy, except an absolute
(07:17):
sweetheart deal by the Florida Attorney General of Florida US
attorney at the time federal and so much so that
he had to step down from the Trump administration later
when it came out that he had given Epstein this
sweetheart deal. This, my friends, is just crazy, that this
(07:39):
is how it went. They didn't really get after Epstein
until twenty nineteen and raiding the homes and the Bahamas
and New York and Pompeach the Justice Department. If what
they're saying right now is true, If what they're saying
is true, and I know a lot of you, and
we'll get to the unanswered questions here in a second.
If what they're saying is true, it means that one
(08:02):
of the most egregious serial pedophile monsters of our lifetime
was able to act with relative impunity for decades and
rub shoulders, so to speak, with some of the wealthiest,
(08:22):
most powerful people on the planet over many of those years.
And it was only when there was a public outcry
that you know, because of the Miami Herald expose. Basically
in twenty nineteen and twenty nineteen, things get rolling again
and they decide they had to do something. How could
this guy have gotten away with it for so long?
Speaker 3 (08:42):
You know?
Speaker 1 (08:42):
This is he again put aside any conspiracy or outside
act or anything else. I'm gonna get to that in
a second. That he was able to do this, What
does it say about our justice system? And think about
the the single minded ferocity with which the federal law
enforcement agencies went after nonviolent J six protesters. I understand
(09:04):
very different, right. One is, you know, one of guy's
a sex criminal something, and this is very these are
different cases. Yeah, But my point is the focus of
resources they had something like what was a thirty percent
of the FBI agents were at least involved in some
way in January six cases. People that walked into the
building took photos themselves. They have resources in time for that,
(09:26):
but for years and years and years, no resources to
go after Jeffrey Epstein. What does this say about our
justice system? Again? I mean this in the most the
most macro general level.
Speaker 3 (09:43):
We do.
Speaker 1 (09:43):
We have a justice system. They're supposed to prevent things
like this. The most important things justice system can really
do protect our physical being from from assault, from murder,
from rape, from sexual assault, from someone who's preying upon
children it's sexually. This is the most important stuff the
(10:05):
state can do. And they failed this badly for this long.
You know, this is I think a big part of
why people are so rightly so outraged, so angry about
all this. And now we're just told, yeah, you know,
and he killed himself in the Manhattan Correctional Center of
the mcc the only person who was ever able to
(10:27):
do that, the person who should have been on the
highest level of suicide watch of probably any inmate they've
ever had in that facility. And they've had some, they've
had lots of really bad ones, I know. But in
terms of the sense that if this guy gets off
in custody Epstein, there are gonna be a lot of
people that don't accept that this just and they let
(10:48):
it happen, just unthinkable that they could be And I
know the guy fell asleep in the camera. And now
they're saying, and they said this today, sixty second hole,
sixty second hole in the surveillance footage. But it's a
hole that's there every night. Well, a lot can happen
in sixty seconds. So what the heck is that all about?
(11:08):
And why didn't they tell us that in the memo beforehand?
No people had to find it again, mismanagement, mismanagement, DOJ failure. Okay,
so this's mismanagement. There's DOJ failure. And now we get
to well unanswered questions coming up next. A sponsor here
is Paradigm Press. There's something under American soil that has
a value to it in the trillions of dollars one
hundred and sixty trillion to be more precise, It's been
(11:30):
there forever. This is not new. This endowment is so
large it could pay off our national debt four times over. Now,
thanks to a Supreme Court decision that Trump administration could
soon release that endowment to the public. Jim Rickards, former
advisor to the White House and Federal Reserve, says, if
you're over fifty, this could be your best chance to
build lasting wealth from a once in a century event.
It's a big statement. To hear more of what Jim
(11:51):
has to say, go online to birthright twenty twenty five
dot com. That's birthright twenty twenty five dot com to
get the details free of charge, paid for by Paradigm Press.
Now the questions that I have that are on answered,
the biggest one Pambondi was asked today. She was asked about,
or rather she spoke to the issue of was there
any foreign intelligence connection for Epstein. They said they don't
(12:13):
know of.
Speaker 3 (12:14):
One February, I did an interview on Fox and it's
been getting a lot of attention because I said I
was asking a question about the client list, and my
response was it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed,
meaning the file along with the JFK MLK files as well.
(12:35):
That's what I meant by that. Also, to the tens
of thousands of video they turned out to be child
porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein. Child porn is
what they were never going to be released, never going
to see the lighted day to him being an agent.
I have no knowledge about that. We can get back
to you on that. And the minute missing from the video.
(12:58):
We released the video showing definitively the video was not conclusive,
but the evidence prior to it was showing he committed suicide.
And what was on that there was a minute that
was off the counter. And what we learned from euro
of Prisons was every year, every night they redo that
(13:20):
video as old from like nineteen ninety nine, So every
night the video is reset and every night should have
the same minute missing. So we're looking for that video
to release that as well, showing that a minute is
missing every night. And that's it on Epstein.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
Okay, now you may disregard, or rather you may completely
disagree and say that's bull crap. He's running a blackmail operation.
Clearly had that had been what I had thought this
whole time, and I am not convinced otherwise. Now, that
doesn't mean that the people who have come forward on
this are lying. They may not know Pambondi said, not
(13:59):
that we have no evidence to that effect. Is it
possible that this guy Epstein, who had so much money
and so much access to very powerful people, could fly
all over the world in his private shed? Is Is
it possible? Is it even likely that he had some
contact with intelligence services? Yeah, yeah, it's very possible. For sure.
(14:19):
We can arg we can debate whether or not it
would be likely or just possible. It's definitely possible, so
much so that they cannot rule it out. So there's
what they know and there's what they don't know. And
they're saying they don't know of any intelligence intelligence nexus
with Epstein. I am I find that hard to believe,
(14:40):
Rather that he didn't have one. They may not know.
Now you might think that's a huge cover up, and
I understand that, but think about who you're implying then
as part of the cover up. That's that's really uh,
that's heavy. Just say it that way. That's heavy, And
I don't I know some of the people who are involved.
I know some of them personally at the top level
(15:00):
of the dog in the FBI, and I think these
are very good people and their patriots and I would
never allow anyone in my presence to disparage the patriotism
or the ethics of Director Patel or deputy Director Bongino.
I don't know Pam Bondi, but she has a very
(15:22):
good reputation, So you know, I think that people should
be careful before they cast any aspersions here about who
would be involved in this stuff. I'm just going to
say that. But now for unanswered questions, right, so I
dealt with the Intel component of this, or the Intel
agency connection might be there. Where did the money come from? Again,
(15:44):
he was handling money for people financial advisor. You don't
make six hundred million dollars like that. Sorry, that's just
not no. And trading the market. Please, it's preposterous. And
I've heard people say, oh, no, they've explained where the
money came from, not in a way that makes any sense,
not in a way that's credible or believable. So I
(16:05):
still still has not been explaining to me how this
guy also was given I think a sixteen million dollars,
depends on how you want to value it. But you
know it's given a mansion in New York City. Given
a mansion, do you know anybody else? You ever heard
of anyone else given a mansion by a non family
member or not a you know, a husband or a
wife situation given a mansion. Okay, so that's very strange.
(16:28):
I also have a problem with the belief that is
being put forward now that the only person, remember Epstein
is accused, was accused of trafficking a young girl who
came at she's now passed away as a as an adult,
but she accused a member of the English British royal
family rather of sleeping with her while she was being
(16:50):
trafted by Epstein, and where to believe he was the
only one, he was the only guy, of all the
people Epstein was affiliating with, the only person who engaged
in uh, sexually criminal conduct. I find that very very
hard to believe. So why are we being told that
(17:14):
that is also a part of this I think is unanswered.
And also why did the US attorney A. Costa say
he belongs to intelligence. We know that's a matter of record.
Why did he give Epstein a plea deal that included
unnamed co conspirators. Not a thing that happens in federal
(17:35):
law and federal plea bargains any other time I've ever
heard of. And I've asked federal prosecutors who have been
doing it for decades, they say, no, that's not something
you do. Why was Acosta quoted as saying that Epstein
should be quote left alone because he again, he belongs
to intelligence. No one's ever seemed to answer this, So yeah,
there are I have unanswered questions, and I'm not satisfied
(17:57):
with where this investigation has been left off. So we'll
continue to look, continue to ask those questions. Thanks for
being here with me, Shield time.
You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcastle make sure
you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
wherever you get your podcasts. So is the Epstein case
case closed? The DJ says yes. A lot of people say, sorry,
that's not going to cut it. There's still more that
(00:32):
there has to be answered for. There are more questions
that are out there, and I know we've spent a
couple of days now in the news talking about this issue.
It's because the DJ released this memo, and the memo
was not helpful. If you think the purpose of it
was to restore faith in the DOJ's willingness to be
(00:56):
transparent about this. Saying you're transparent is not the same
thing as being transparent. Now, I want to break this
down and be very clear about this, because their passions
run very high on this issue. I understand that I
have thought that there was a lot and still think
that there's a lot that we don't know about the
(01:16):
Epstein case, in terms of connections, in terms of co conspirators,
in terms of perhaps external influences or forces on all
of this. And let me break down what I mean
by that. I see this at a few levels there's
the memo and the management of this as it pertains
(01:37):
to public expectations. Okay, So let's break this down this way.
I'm even going to make a note of this as
I'm talking about it, so I don't skip past this.
There's the memo and the management. Okay, there's the DOJ
Justice faith good faith issue, and then there's the questions
(01:59):
I still want answers for. Okay, Now let's start with
this because it's the easiest one. The handling of this
has not been good by the Attorney General. Pan body. Now,
I understand she has said she misspoke on that Fox
News show, or rather it was misinterpreted what she meant
when she said I have it on my desk, she
(02:21):
meant all the Epstein stuff is on her desk. I
also want to be clear that President Trump today was
asked about this, and he's just sick of hearing about
this at all. He doesn't want to hear about it,
and he really tried to shut the whole thing down
during his lengthy cabinet meeting.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been
talked about for years. You're asking, we have Texas, we
have this, We have all of the things right, and
are people still talking about this guy, this creep that
is unbelievable. Do you want to waste the time? And
do you feel like answering?
Speaker 3 (03:01):
I don't mind answering.
Speaker 4 (03:02):
I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on
at epstin at a time like this where we're having
some of the greatest success and also gragedy with what
happened in Texas. It just seems like a desecration.
Speaker 1 (03:15):
But okay, so we've got Trump saying why are you
even talking about this? And you could tell a lost
patience with the whole thing. Pambondi has put herself in
a tough spot with this one because we had people
that were brought to influencers, who were brought to the
White House given binders, and there was a whole Epstein
(03:37):
transparency thing. There was nothing new in those binders, as
we knew, as we found out, and I knew all along,
and I didn't think there would be any big revelations
from the Epstein files this whole time. I've always thought
that there was. Now I want to get into why,
I think that I'll get to that in a moment.
But still the way that this was handled by the DOJ,
(03:59):
has not been tactful, has not been helpful to answering
the public's questions and making people think that this is
truly case closed. I don't think that's beyond dispute at
this point, because you still have You've got the White
House saying basically, shut up, we've told you everything. I
don't want to hear it anymore. And a lot of
(04:20):
people out there are saying, we'll hold on a second.
I still I'm not buying it doesn't add up to
me here, I'm not buying it. So that's that's the
first part of it. The memo and the management of expectations.
It's been a mess. They should and you could say,
oh buck, what should they have done differently? It should
have been announced that there would be a a presentation
a press conference by the Attorney General Pambondi. It should
(04:44):
have been a statement that was more fulsome than one
was put out that little memo. It should have addressed
the outlying questions, and it should have been open to
the press to ask questions. Then and there this little
memo that they dropped which felt very perfunctory, you know,
(05:05):
just just the bare minimum and like they didn't feel
like they really had to deal with very much that
was not good, that was not helpful. Now we can
get into the DOJ side of this of the case,
the Epstein case. I'm going to get to unanswered questions
in a second, the Epstein case. But first up, our
sponsor here is Birch Gold. And as you know, the
(05:26):
big beautiful bill passed. There's a lot of good stuff
coming in the Trump economy. Trump economy is already really cooking,
and I think it's going to get even better. But
he's only in office for four years and the thirty
seven trillion in debt we have is not going away.
Purchasing power has been going down for years and years
now because of the excessive spending, and you need to
(05:47):
find ways to protect your wealth and to diversify. That's
where gold comes in. It's time for you to get
some gold to hedge against inflation, economic instability, and the
long term challenges we have to the dollar. And Birch
Gold is who I trust to do this for you.
They've helped tens of thousands convert an existing IRA or
four oh one k into an IRA in physical gold. Okay,
(06:11):
Birch Gold Group text my name buck to ninety eight
ninety eight ninety eight Birch Gold to help you with
a free no obligation infoKit. Text my name Buck to
ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight today Birch Gold Group.
They are the best in the business at this all
right now, my friends, Now we are going to look
(06:32):
at the DOJ side of this. Now. Here's here's the thing.
The handling of this by the DOJ up to this
point in time has been abominable. Right now, I mean
a pre Trump era. I'm saying, the way that this
(06:54):
was handled, the inability to me in Epstein. They're telling
us now how to thousand victims, a thousand victims and
got away with this for what almost twenty years at
least one thousand victims. No one could prosecute this guy.
No one wanted to prosecute this guy, except an absolute
(07:17):
sweetheart deal by the Florida Attorney General of Florida US
attorney at the time federal and so much so that
he had to step down from the Trump administration later
when it came out that he had given Epstein this
sweetheart deal. This, my friends, is just crazy, that this
(07:39):
is how it went. They didn't really get after Epstein
until twenty nineteen and raiding the homes and the Bahamas
and New York and Pompeach the Justice Department. If what
they're saying right now is true, If what they're saying
is true, and I know a lot of you, and
we'll get to the unanswered questions here in a second.
If what they're saying is true, it means that one
(08:02):
of the most egregious serial pedophile monsters of our lifetime
was able to act with relative impunity for decades and
rub shoulders, so to speak, with some of the wealthiest,
(08:22):
most powerful people on the planet over many of those years.
And it was only when there was a public outcry
that you know, because of the Miami Herald expose. Basically
in twenty nineteen and twenty nineteen, things get rolling again
and they decide they had to do something. How could
this guy have gotten away with it for so long?
Speaker 3 (08:42):
You know?
Speaker 1 (08:42):
This is he again put aside any conspiracy or outside
act or anything else. I'm gonna get to that in
a second. That he was able to do this, What
does it say about our justice system? And think about
the the single minded ferocity with which the federal law
enforcement agencies went after nonviolent J six protesters. I understand
(09:04):
very different, right. One is, you know, one of guy's
a sex criminal something, and this is very these are
different cases. Yeah, But my point is the focus of
resources they had something like what was a thirty percent
of the FBI agents were at least involved in some
way in January six cases. People that walked into the
building took photos themselves. They have resources in time for that,
(09:26):
but for years and years and years, no resources to
go after Jeffrey Epstein. What does this say about our
justice system? Again? I mean this in the most the
most macro general level.
Speaker 3 (09:43):
We do.
Speaker 1 (09:43):
We have a justice system. They're supposed to prevent things
like this. The most important things justice system can really
do protect our physical being from from assault, from murder,
from rape, from sexual assault, from someone who's preying upon
children it's sexually. This is the most important stuff the
(10:05):
state can do. And they failed this badly for this long.
You know, this is I think a big part of
why people are so rightly so outraged, so angry about
all this. And now we're just told, yeah, you know,
and he killed himself in the Manhattan Correctional Center of
the mcc the only person who was ever able to
(10:27):
do that, the person who should have been on the
highest level of suicide watch of probably any inmate they've
ever had in that facility. And they've had some, they've
had lots of really bad ones, I know. But in
terms of the sense that if this guy gets off
in custody Epstein, there are gonna be a lot of
people that don't accept that this just and they let
(10:48):
it happen, just unthinkable that they could be And I
know the guy fell asleep in the camera. And now
they're saying, and they said this today, sixty second hole,
sixty second hole in the surveillance footage. But it's a
hole that's there every night. Well, a lot can happen
in sixty seconds. So what the heck is that all about?
(11:08):
And why didn't they tell us that in the memo beforehand?
No people had to find it again, mismanagement, mismanagement, DOJ failure. Okay,
so this's mismanagement. There's DOJ failure. And now we get
to well unanswered questions coming up next. A sponsor here
is Paradigm Press. There's something under American soil that has
a value to it in the trillions of dollars one
hundred and sixty trillion to be more precise, It's been
(11:30):
there forever. This is not new. This endowment is so
large it could pay off our national debt four times over. Now,
thanks to a Supreme Court decision that Trump administration could
soon release that endowment to the public. Jim Rickards, former
advisor to the White House and Federal Reserve, says, if
you're over fifty, this could be your best chance to
build lasting wealth from a once in a century event.
It's a big statement. To hear more of what Jim
(11:51):
has to say, go online to birthright twenty twenty five
dot com. That's birthright twenty twenty five dot com to
get the details free of charge, paid for by Paradigm Press.
Now the questions that I have that are on answered,
the biggest one Pambondi was asked today. She was asked about,
or rather she spoke to the issue of was there
any foreign intelligence connection for Epstein. They said they don't
(12:13):
know of.
Speaker 3 (12:14):
One February, I did an interview on Fox and it's
been getting a lot of attention because I said I
was asking a question about the client list, and my
response was it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed,
meaning the file along with the JFK MLK files as well.
(12:35):
That's what I meant by that. Also, to the tens
of thousands of video they turned out to be child
porn downloaded by that disgusting Jeffrey Epstein. Child porn is
what they were never going to be released, never going
to see the lighted day to him being an agent.
I have no knowledge about that. We can get back
to you on that. And the minute missing from the video.
(12:58):
We released the video showing definitively the video was not conclusive,
but the evidence prior to it was showing he committed suicide.
And what was on that there was a minute that
was off the counter. And what we learned from euro
of Prisons was every year, every night they redo that
(13:20):
video as old from like nineteen ninety nine, So every
night the video is reset and every night should have
the same minute missing. So we're looking for that video
to release that as well, showing that a minute is
missing every night. And that's it on Epstein.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
Okay, now you may disregard, or rather you may completely
disagree and say that's bull crap. He's running a blackmail operation.
Clearly had that had been what I had thought this
whole time, and I am not convinced otherwise. Now, that
doesn't mean that the people who have come forward on
this are lying. They may not know Pambondi said, not
(13:59):
that we have no evidence to that effect. Is it
possible that this guy Epstein, who had so much money
and so much access to very powerful people, could fly
all over the world in his private shed? Is Is
it possible? Is it even likely that he had some
contact with intelligence services? Yeah, yeah, it's very possible. For sure.
(14:19):
We can arg we can debate whether or not it
would be likely or just possible. It's definitely possible, so
much so that they cannot rule it out. So there's
what they know and there's what they don't know. And
they're saying they don't know of any intelligence intelligence nexus
with Epstein. I am I find that hard to believe,
(14:40):
Rather that he didn't have one. They may not know.
Now you might think that's a huge cover up, and
I understand that, but think about who you're implying then
as part of the cover up. That's that's really uh,
that's heavy. Just say it that way. That's heavy, And
I don't I know some of the people who are involved.
I know some of them personally at the top level
(15:00):
of the dog in the FBI, and I think these
are very good people and their patriots and I would
never allow anyone in my presence to disparage the patriotism
or the ethics of Director Patel or deputy Director Bongino.
I don't know Pam Bondi, but she has a very
(15:22):
good reputation, So you know, I think that people should
be careful before they cast any aspersions here about who
would be involved in this stuff. I'm just going to
say that. But now for unanswered questions, right, so I
dealt with the Intel component of this, or the Intel
agency connection might be there. Where did the money come from? Again,
(15:44):
he was handling money for people financial advisor. You don't
make six hundred million dollars like that. Sorry, that's just
not no. And trading the market. Please, it's preposterous. And
I've heard people say, oh, no, they've explained where the
money came from, not in a way that makes any sense,
not in a way that's credible or believable. So I
(16:05):
still still has not been explaining to me how this
guy also was given I think a sixteen million dollars,
depends on how you want to value it. But you
know it's given a mansion in New York City. Given
a mansion, do you know anybody else? You ever heard
of anyone else given a mansion by a non family
member or not a you know, a husband or a
wife situation given a mansion. Okay, so that's very strange.
(16:28):
I also have a problem with the belief that is
being put forward now that the only person, remember Epstein
is accused, was accused of trafficking a young girl who
came at she's now passed away as a as an adult,
but she accused a member of the English British royal
family rather of sleeping with her while she was being
(16:50):
trafted by Epstein, and where to believe he was the
only one, he was the only guy, of all the
people Epstein was affiliating with, the only person who engaged
in uh, sexually criminal conduct. I find that very very
hard to believe. So why are we being told that
(17:14):
that is also a part of this I think is unanswered.
And also why did the US attorney A. Costa say
he belongs to intelligence. We know that's a matter of record.
Why did he give Epstein a plea deal that included
unnamed co conspirators. Not a thing that happens in federal
(17:35):
law and federal plea bargains any other time I've ever
heard of. And I've asked federal prosecutors who have been
doing it for decades, they say, no, that's not something
you do. Why was Acosta quoted as saying that Epstein
should be quote left alone because he again, he belongs
to intelligence. No one's ever seemed to answer this, So yeah,
there are I have unanswered questions, and I'm not satisfied
(17:57):
with where this investigation has been left off. So we'll
continue to look, continue to ask those questions. Thanks for
being here with me, Shield time.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News
Hosts And Creators
Clay Travis
Buck Sexton
Show Links
WebsiteNewsletterPopular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.