September 12, 2025 • 43 mins
Rut delivers a powerful and sobering Week in Review.
We cover:
-
The tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk and what it means for America’s future.
-
A suppressed vaccine safety study from Henry Ford Hospital that challenges the official narrative.
-
Explosive testimony from UFO whistleblowers, revealing secret government programs and alien technology.
-
The dangerous rise of political violence in America – and how history warns us of what’s to come.
Rut calls for courage, faith, and restraint in the face of division and chaos.
👉 Subscribe and join the mission to strengthen your faith, your family, and your country.
➡️ Froglogic Training Curriculum: https://www.froglogicinstitute.com/
➡️ Get David’s new novel, “The Poet Warrior”: https://www.ballastbooks.com/ballast-bookstore/the-poet-warrior
➡️ FIRECRACKER FARM: https://firecracker.farm/
Timestamps:
00:00 - Charlie Kirk
21:43 - Bombshell Vaccine Study
29:43 - New Testimony On UFO’s
Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The assassination of Charlie Kirk, the report from henry Ford
Medical Hospital regarding vaccine safety and efficacy, and government whistleblower
testimony regarding UFOs.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
This week on the David Rutherford.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
Show, What's Up Team, It is with an incredibly somber
emotion that I'm reporting today.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
In our week in review.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
I think before we even begin, I think it's important
that all of you just and I'm sure you've already
gone through a profound amount of reflection if you've listened
to all of the commentary from Clay and Buck, which
has been fantastic yesterday, as well as Megan Kelly, Sean Hannity,
(00:58):
Glenn Beck, all of the heavyweights in the conservative media space,
and they're just profound regard and condolences that they've warnted.
This to include a direct statement from the President two
nights ago, the fact that he's lowered national flags to
(01:21):
half mass until Monday, and then the acknowledgment that Charlie
Kirk will be awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in
the next few weeks. The response that I have regarding
this as first and foremost, this is a tragedy of
(01:41):
epic proportions, mostly for his wife and his two young children.
It's been visually a parent of Charlie's profound faith in
Jesus Christ and how that plays a role as a
father and a husband. I think anybody that's lost a
(02:03):
significant other, spouse or child recognizes this shear magnitude of
this devastation. So it's critical that in some capacity within
all of us, we acknowledged this tremendous tragedy and loss
for those two children and his wife and immediate family
(02:24):
members and close friends. If you're not familiar with who
Charlie Kirk was, he was an absolute juggernaut in the
conservative movement, most particularly in.
Speaker 2 (02:34):
The Maga movement.
Speaker 1 (02:36):
And what made Charlie so special in my mind was
that his main focus was to bring discourse back to
the political atmosphere, to get rid of the tyranny which
had taken place within cancel culture, the woke left, radical
(03:00):
aggressivism not only on college campuses, but within podcasts and
talk show hosts and political pundits and actors and politicians,
and all of the vitriol and the insiduousness that had
emerged in our society or has emerged, and as definitely
(03:21):
president in our society. And what Charlie did was Charlie
went to the heart of discourse. His whole methodology was
to get people to have emotionally in control conversations about
people's points. And the place where he was able to
have the greatest impact is on college campuses. If you
(03:43):
have been paying attention in any way, shape or form,
it is beyond a shadow of a doubt that most
college university colleges and universities around the country, their professor
staff and administrative staff is over meanly left in their
approach in terms of whether just middle of the road
(04:05):
liberal or radical ideological progressivism, outright communism, socialism, that type
of thing. If your kids have gone to college over
the last twenty years, you know that to be consequentially
true as we see it emerging in the next generation
trying to project American socialism as an absolute possibility. And
(04:31):
we've seen this indoctrination manifest itself in all these differ
different movements right and all their ideological frameworks and stoked
by these influences that they've been kind of captured by.
And Charlie took TPSU or Turning Point USA, and you know,
(04:54):
he went out and Charlie started this at basically eighteen
years old and with an activist named Bill Montgomery in
suburban Chicago, basically in his garage.
Speaker 2 (05:08):
You know.
Speaker 1 (05:08):
He got some initial funding from Republican donor Foster Freeze,
which who he met at the Republican National Convention. Other
figures include Ginny Thomas. Now he built this thing and
really kind of launched it to another degree in his
colluding with campaigns Ted Cruz and Mark Rubio in the
(05:31):
twenty sixteen campaign. He was also a staffer and offered
to expense for pro Trump events, you know, which was
a very focused on the IRS violations that had taken place.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
You know.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
In seventeen, he appointed Tyler Bauer Boyer as the chief
operating officer, which really began to blossom and raise funds
for Turning Point. In twenty eighteen, revenues reached twenty eight
point five million dollars with Charlie at the helm of this,
really spearheading this movement. Twenty nineteen, TPSU hires Benny Johnson
(06:11):
as Chief creative Officer and really communications director Candae Owens
and really kind of projected this to another level. At
that time, the anti Defamation League labeled TPSU as an
alt light, criticizing affiliations with for Our Right figures including
(06:31):
Donald Trump twenty twenty. Pro Publica reports questionable financial practices
twenty twenty one. Kirk comments that not all January sixth
Capital Riot participants were insurrectionists, you know. And what I
really you got to understand is that Charlie Kirk was
(06:52):
in the midst of building this organ He was at
the forefront of all of these targeted groups, right, these
groups that were really attacking the conservative movement in every way,
trying to dismantle it, try and attack kind of cancel it. Right,
he continued to build that I think in twenty twenty
four they played a massive, massive role in the re
(07:14):
election of President Trump, which was pretty amazing, you know.
And and and you know what's interesting is and he
has been stated, you know, in these interviews that he'd
done recently, was that, you know, he began to notice
from the first college campuses that he would show up
and debate these kids openly in these public forms in
(07:37):
the parks and center areas around these universities. He would
debate kids about their radical ideas. And you know, he
said overwhelmingly. At first, it was it was you know,
leftist liberal ideas against the very small of people who
were willing to take that fight to where it was.
And he said by by twenty twenty five that had shifted,
(07:59):
and there was a radical shift within young people around America.
I think President Trump validated that by his comments to
the American public two nights ago, suggesting that there would
be no other person that could fill the shoes of
Charlie Kirk, even going so far as to say that
(08:22):
there was a high probability that Charlie Kirk could have
been the President of the United States at some time
in the future.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
You know, when you.
Speaker 1 (08:32):
Look at the landscape of those people who have had
the most profound impact on the American right over the
last five years, in particular, you know COVID post COVID,
you have to include Charlie Kirk at the pinnacle of
that short small list. Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon,
(08:57):
you can argue even Sean Ryan, Joe Rogan, you know,
these juggernauts and conservative traditional values. And I think what
made Charlie even more remarkable is that he was unafraid
to go into the lions, then right to walk with
Christ as his shield, in the armor of Christ's love
(09:19):
around him, and go into the heart of this fomenting,
crazy ideological cult, if you will, preaching not only his
faith in Christ, but preaching his his faith and conservative
values like family and children and the commitment to that
nuclear family and what keeps society and civilization right now.
(09:44):
I think the other profound reality about Charlie's influence was
that he was absolutely just incredible at debating, right. He
was a master orator, if you will. He could, you know,
talk down any barking, imbecilic young person who's just you know,
(10:08):
spewing whatever they've been force fed on their college campus, right,
And he had a legitimate, i think somewhat respectful response
to these people, you know, he and as a result,
he was labeled a Nazi, a white supremacist, a white nationalist,
a Christian nationalist, a fascist, and every type of is
(10:28):
there is as a result. So I think, you know,
it's critical to recognize that this was a man of
true action. He believed what he believed, and he was
willing to, you know, like I said, go to the
front line of this debate, this argument, this this confrontation
of radical progressive ideas, and you know, I think that's
(10:53):
critical to at least acknowledge that his courage for being
able to do that. And there's been some incredible, incredible
monologues that he's given over the years that really exemplify
that courageousness. And I think what I hope and what
I pray is that as his two children have to
(11:15):
be forced to grow up without a father who was
assassinated in this at that college campus out in Utah.
And again, we're still learning the details of this. Obviously,
several details have come out. The person is still at large.
There's video footage, they released a picture yesterday. We know
(11:37):
about the weapon that they found, the etchings on on
the ammunition that was still loaded in the magazine. But
really that's it. We don't know why this person did it.
We don't know how they planned it or how they
funded it. But we do know is that this horrific
tragedy was caught, you know, uh and and by screens
(12:03):
all across that that event. And you know, when I
got home that night and brought it up at family
dinner to my children, two out of my four daughters
had already seen the up closed version of his being
shot in the neck and and the just powerful devastating
impact of his uh, his his crowded artery and what
(12:24):
took place after that, that wound. You know, the aftermath
of that, I think has really been pretty profound and
what many people on the internet are uh calling for
as a turning point in American consciousness. And you know,
(12:47):
we we I gave a release to show about that
just a few days ago, not even I mean, and
that was Jordie and I we were talking about that,
you know, geez. The timing of what's taking place right
now is pretty cataclysmic. And if you go through what
the left is posting online in terms of whether it's
(13:09):
Mike doubd on MSNBC or James the Governor Pritzker, or
you know, the insane radicals cheering for his death, like
those absolute heartless cocksuckers excuse me at TMZ who were
laughing in the background when they were breaking that news,
you know, or the radical crazies on Blue Sky and
(13:34):
what they're saying and projecting at the death of this
young man who tried to be who was never an
advocate himself for violence, He was never an advocate for anything,
forgiving the other side there the rightful ability to converse,
to to get in conversation in order to as a
(13:54):
battle of ideas instead of a battle of violence. But
yet these peopeople are still promoting and cheering this young man,
this young father, this young husband's death as a victory
for their movement. And that makes it pretty apparent as
(14:15):
to the nature of the divisiveness that our country is in.
And it really exemplifies I think the division that has
been sowed by the powers that want this division within us.
If you haven't figured this out yet, they want us
to descend into violence too. They want us to descend
(14:35):
into chaos. And I'm not saying that it's not going
to happen, And I am saying prepare yourself. I am
saying that you should absolutely train, that you should be prepared,
that you should protect your women and children and protect
your communities, that you should actively engage in carrying a
(14:55):
weapon as much as possible out there, and adhere to
the Second Amendment rights.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Because this is the reality.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
I immediately after finding out, reached out to my very
close friends who are very high on the stage of
conservative uh comedia and and and really voiced my concerns.
And and luckily they're they're they're all over it, and
they are fortifying their existence in ways that they will
(15:24):
become hard targets, which they should be because of the
the willful uh uh evolution of political violence. That's that's
that's upticking. And you have to recognize that political violence
is not new. Political violence has existed for as long
(15:45):
as violence has existed. In fact, it's probably a cornerstone
of of of all warfare at some time was initiated
through this political type of violence. Right, it's what ultimately
descends into uh, you know, uh madness or societal collapse.
Speaker 2 (16:02):
In madness.
Speaker 1 (16:03):
You had Mahatma Gandhi in nineteen forty eight, Patrise Lumumba,
the Congolese prime minister in sixty one, John F. Kennedy
in sixty three, Malcolm X in sixty five, Martin Luther
King in sixty eight, Robert F. Kennedy in sixty eight,
Anwar Sadat in eighty one, in Dera Gandhi in eighty four,
(16:24):
Rajev Gandhi in ninety one, Ixat Rabin in ninety five.
In the twenty first century, Lourent Dessire Kabila, the dr
Congo president, Pim fortun the Dutch politician in O two,
Anna Politzeratskova, the Russian journalist in six, Benzir Bhutto, the
(16:45):
Pakistani opposition leader seven Moshin Fakarisa, I didn't think I
said that right in twenty twenty, shinzu Abe in twenty
twenty two, David Ames UK MP stabbed in twenty one,
Melissa Hortman right in Minnesota twenty twenty five, and Charlie
(17:05):
Kirk just the other day.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
This is the reality of politics.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
Is that when you whip groups of people into a
frenzy and you continue to tell them that the other
side is trying to kill them, trying to destroy them,
trying to reduce them to the ashes of history in
terms of their ideology, or you label the opposition as tyrannical, Nazis, communists, whatever.
(17:37):
What do you think is going to happen, in particular
with young people who are so easily influenced, They're going
to become radicalized. And that's what's taken place now as
a result of Charlie's unfortunate and tragic death and assassination.
What's going to happen. The already people on the right, now,
the hard right, are being radicalized themselves. They're calling for
(18:01):
enough is enough. They're calling for an armed stance or
resistance or in some cases going out in attacking, hunting
the other side down. This is not what we probably
need to do right. This is what the powers that
want to control us, that pit us against each other,
that's what they want. So constrain yourself. I'm not saying
(18:25):
don't arm yourself. I'm not saying don't prepare yourself. I'm
not saying you shouldn't be mad, you should be pissed off.
But the way that you counter this movement is by
doing exactly what Charlie Kirk did. Was you strengthen your faith,
You strengthen your family, and you strengthen your belief systems,
(18:46):
and then you have the courage, the courage to take
those belief systems to the public forum and to stand
up for what you believe in and to debate the
other side in a battle of ideas and not of
weapons and violence. So and again, I just want all
(19:08):
of us to consider what it would be like for
us to lose our spouse or a loved one, or
a child two, unnecessary political violence or.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
Any type of activistic violence that.
Speaker 1 (19:25):
Only leads to more death and destruction, to temper that
desire to sit back and.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
To fight for what you believe in.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
But through healthy discourse and political activism.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
God bless you, Charlie.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
I hope Christ has found a real warrior for faith
and we will continue to preach your message.
Speaker 2 (19:49):
God bless you and God bless your family. What's up, Team?
Speaker 1 (19:53):
I realize there are many choices when it comes to
who you choose for your cellf owned service, and there
are new ones popping up all the time.
Speaker 2 (20:01):
But here's the deal.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
There's only one that boldly stands in the gap for
every American that believes that freedom is worth fighting for,
and that's Patriot Mobile. Not only are they leading the
way in the read economy, but Patriot Mobile also outgains
the competition when it comes to technology. Patriot Mobile is
one of the only carriers with access to all three
(20:25):
major US networks. That means exceptional nationwide coverage along with
the ability to have multiple numbers on different networks. Think
about that, multiple numbers on your single smartphone, folks. This
is an absolute game changer. They also offer unlimited data plans,
(20:46):
mobile hotspots, international roaming, and internet backup, and so much more.
Switching is easier than ever. Simply activate in minutes from
the comfort of your own home, keep your number, keep
your phone, or upgrade.
Speaker 2 (21:03):
It's time to make the switch today.
Speaker 1 (21:06):
I want you to go to Patriotmobile dot com, forward
slash Rutherford or call nine to seven to two Patriot.
When you get there, use promo code Rutherford r U
T H E R F O r D for a
free month of service. I repeat my last that is
(21:26):
a free month of service if you use the promo
code Rutherford. That's Patriotmobile dot com, forward slash Rutherford or
call nine seven to two Patriot.
Speaker 2 (21:40):
Who Yah, God bless America.
Speaker 1 (21:43):
The other thing that I thought was absolutely fascinating this
week was there was testimony on Capitol Hill from a
bunch of people that were being faced with questions from
both sides about a lot of the There was a
review well in this questionnaire. One of this things the
(22:04):
study popped up from the henry Ford Health System, which
is a major healthcare provider Michigan often associated with henry
Ford Hospital. In this report was on the health outcomes
of vaccinated versus on vaccinated children. It gained attention in
September twenty five when its results were publicly reviewed during
(22:27):
the US Senate hearing titled how the Corruption of Science
has impacted Public perception and Policies regarding Vaccines.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
This was led by.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson or Wisconsin, and featured
the testimony of an attorney, Ari Siri our own sery,
who represented that anti vaccine groups like the Informed Consent
Action Network has ties to both Robert F.
Speaker 2 (22:53):
Kennedy.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
The analysis, completed in twenty twenty has never been peer
reviewed or published due to concerns of its from its
authors about professional repercussions.
Speaker 2 (23:03):
According to Siri, all right.
Speaker 1 (23:06):
So this report was done, was founded and prompted by
I can ICN, which wanted a large scale comparison of
health outcomes, right, and they approached the henry Ford Health
which the one doctor they approached was Marcus Zervos, MD,
(23:28):
who is an infectious disease specialist at Henry four Health,
with other unnamed authors.
Speaker 2 (23:34):
Because they didn't want their name on this obviously.
Speaker 1 (23:37):
So the data collection span from twenty seventeen to twenty twenty.
But when the analysis was completed in twenty twenty, it
was shelved and the results were shared privately with i CAN,
but not submitted for publication. This is the largest US
birth cohort study of its kind, eighteen four hundred and
(23:58):
sixty eight people who had been vaccinating vaccinated versus I
think two thousand people who had been unvaccinated. All right,
these were through child vaccine schedules, not specifically COVID nineteen,
but the other ones. So it goes in a different
and you can look all this up the methodology, but
(24:19):
here were some of the care key findings that this
lawyer Surrey brought forth.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
Right.
Speaker 1 (24:26):
Overall chronic conditions, fifty seven percent of vaccinated children had
at least one chronic health condition, often multiple, compared to
seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children, which was two point
four to eight times higher likelihood for the vaccinated kids.
Neurodevelopmental disorders, Vaccinated children were four hundred and fifty three
(24:50):
percent more likely to be diagnosed with higher rates of
ADHD or learning disabilities. Specific conditions allergies four point five
times higher in the vaccinated, asthma two point nine times higher,
ear infections two point five times higher. It did say,
there was no association found with autism specifically per the data.
(25:17):
You know, one of the implications for you know, the
pro vaccine injury perspective, and this with this guy argued
was the results showed irrefutable vaccine harm suppressed due to
fear of backlash. He claimed it warrants halting routine vaccinations
and investigation investigating causation. Right, and the hearing framed it
(25:39):
as evidence of corruption in science. All right, You know,
this has been really at the core of the backlash
of what Robert F.
Speaker 2 (25:49):
Kennedy is doing.
Speaker 1 (25:51):
Everybody believes he's going to go in he's anti vax
he's gonna he's kicking out all the people in the
CDC and all the different hhs, and he's kicking out
all these doctors who support vaccines. And he himself has said,
I do sport vaccines, we just need better testing. And
and if you have ever listened or read any of
his papers or books, the reality is is almost none
(26:14):
of these vaccines have been tested in the proper way
that sciences should have tested these with the safety measures.
And the other reality is that what came out is
there's also never been a cumulative test that says, all right,
does the impact from the vaccine schedule have long term,
(26:34):
long term effects on children and becoming young adults versus
kids who didn't get it vaccine versus un vaccine. Now
Here are some criticisms of it. There was methodology, method mythological, methodology,
logical God bless me for trying to say that, Holy cow,
that were flaws in this.
Speaker 2 (26:55):
There was.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
It was lack of a peer reviewed so it wasn't
pre reviewed. It said, there was by and presentation of
the findings. Henry Ford's response was interesting, no official comment.
The system promotes vaccines on its site, emphasizing safety and
debunking myths, saying there was no autism links and then
(27:16):
scientific consensus body like the CDC, the acip A firm
vaccines prevent far more harm than they cause. This analysis
doesn't alter that, per critics. You know, I think what
everybody is going is imagining, is that there's going to
be some aha moment of vaccine efficacy in the next
(27:39):
several months where everybody, and I think the main one
that you know, the anti vax community or not even anti,
but just like, hey, what's going on? Why are our
children sicker? Why was it you know, one in ten
thousand kids prior to nineteen eighty seven or whenever the
schedule bloomed up, kids had autism, and now it's what
one in thirty six one in some ungodly amount of number, right,
(28:03):
and in some areas it's like even lower than that.
What has happened to our children? Why are they immune deficient?
Why are they having these chronic diseases? Or supposedly the
most advanced healthcare system in the entire world, but since
these vaccines have been initiated, our children have categorically gotten sicker.
(28:23):
And so what I think people are looking for, in
particular with the autism correlation, is that there's going to
be a smoking gun with this. What I do believe
is coming is that there's going to be a very
significant investigation into all of these things. I think there
is no reversal of that which is going to take place.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
I think the.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
MAHA movement is firmly entrenched and that that is going
to be that is going to happen. In fact, from
what I understand, there is an investigation going on against
the correlation of vaccines and autism, So I know that's
taking place. What it is take what is happening though,
is there is a movement growing in the MAHA movement,
(29:05):
and I think that's a positive thing. However, I also
believe we need to have a lot more of a
scientific approach to this.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
We need to do the analysis.
Speaker 1 (29:15):
We need to hold our anger in check until we
actually see a legitimate safety study done on these vaccines
that's proper fulfilled and against a large portion of a
population of young people who have been vaccinated versus on vaccinated.
Speaker 2 (29:34):
So this debate is continuing.
Speaker 1 (29:37):
But that's what took place, all right. The next one
was Testimony of Unidentified Anonymalous Phenomena UAP formally known as UFOs.
This took place on September ninth during the here held
(29:59):
by US House Oversight and Government Reform Committees Task Force
on the def Classification of Federal Secrets. Now, if you
saw Luda's Congresswoman Luda's interview with Joe Rogan, I mean
she was pretty much going all in saying, guess what
this is real?
Speaker 2 (30:18):
This is out there.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
As I listened to some of the testimony of these people,
I think it's pretty conclusive that there are top secret
programs taking place. There have been for long, long periods
of time. There is technology which has now been verified
by President Trump on multiple occasions, that exceeds anything that
(30:43):
we believe we have ever been able to do or
concoct in a way that just would, you know, blow
away the competition, if you will. So like we possess
technology that none of are these or Allies or anybody
else has. And I think everybody's pretty comfortable with that
(31:06):
except Jordi. Right, Jordy, you're not there. I'm not fully
convinced on the alien story. But maybe this will do it.
Speaker 2 (31:15):
God bless you for saying, maybe this will do it right?
Maybe maybe maybe.
Speaker 1 (31:20):
What what was interesting was there was multiple people that
talked right. Jeffrey Nucleatelli, A Dylan Borlan, Chief, Alexandro Wiggins,
George Knapp, Joe Spielberger all gave testimony. The one that
(31:42):
really stood out to me which one was it?
Speaker 2 (31:46):
It was.
Speaker 1 (31:48):
Dylan here it was, This was the interesting one, Dylan
Borland's testimony. In his first public disclosure, Borland detailed a
twenty twelve sighting at Langley Air Force Base of a
one hundred foot triangular craft that moved silently and fluidly
before vanishing. The jet altitude in seconds. He claimed exposure
(32:09):
to a UAP crash retrieval program within with a special
access program, and alleged over a decade of retaliation, including
workplace harassment, blacklisting from classified jobs, and obstruction by government agencies.
So the other one, which was pretty radical if you
(32:30):
saw this, Jory, I don't know if you saw this one,
but this one was wild to me. It was recounted
a twenty twenty three incident aboard the USS Jackson where
a self luminous tic TAC shape UAP emerged from the ocean,
linked with three similar objects accelerated away synchronomously whatever that
(32:50):
word is, synchronously at an extreme speed without a sonic
boom or conventional proposal.
Speaker 2 (32:59):
Right, that was interesting.
Speaker 1 (33:01):
And then there was another one where one of these
things was shot with one of our most advanced missile
systems in the missile broken two when it hit it.
So this is what it was a highlight with the
public debut of video footage introduced by Representative Eric Berlinson,
a Republican from Montana, showing a usmq now drone firing
(33:26):
a hellfire missile at a high speed unidentified orb off
Yemeny coast in October twenty twenty four. The missile appeared
to strike the UAP, but it bounced off without destroying it,
with the object to continuing its path and seemingly absorbing debris.
Witnesses like Napp reacted with surprising noting it kept going
(33:49):
and asked, what the hell is that this FUS should
revive calls for scrutiny of UAPs in greater transparency on
military encounters.
Speaker 2 (34:00):
So is it real?
Speaker 1 (34:04):
I believe their technology is absolutely real. I never once
saw anything well I served, I never once heard anybody
talk about it, so I am by far not an expert.
What I can tell you is that there are classified
projects so deep in the government that even the people
(34:27):
who you would imagine have should have access don't have access.
And that's the way things work when you have to
silo information from your enemies. Right.
Speaker 2 (34:37):
You got tic TACs though, tic tax bro for sure.
Speaker 1 (34:42):
They got flying tic TACs, so we know that, and
flying triangles apparently, so we got all kinds of flying
geometric optionects and breath mints that are out there.
Speaker 2 (34:55):
So you know what do I believe.
Speaker 1 (34:59):
I believe that we're on the precipice of a shift
in consciousness as a result of political violence and escalation,
economic calamity, social cultural shifts, illegal immigrant invasion, UAP technology,
(35:23):
and possibly what the big one everybody thinks is coming
as the alien false flag operation that thrust us into
the New World Order, if you will. So they do
need a good alien false flag. Yeah, it's true. Do
you think Elon Musk is going to find aliens? That
(35:43):
guy has repeatedly said over and over and over there
is nothing that I have seen, and this guy is
well read in I know what everybody's saying. But Roddy,
he has to say that if he wants access to
the top secret, if he wants to be able to
keep building rocket ships to go to Mars and all that,
he has to say this, right, He's got a lie,
(36:05):
right or the NDA, you know which is he has
to he has to lie. So yeah, I mean a
billionaires certainly have no problem lying in the past, for sure.
Speaker 2 (36:18):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (36:19):
But you know, I also go, you know what, why
would he lie? I mean he did he did say
that the moon landings were real.
Speaker 2 (36:26):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (36:27):
But again I know that's that's being heavily contested on
online and on x But again, our job, right, is
to offer uh, realistic opinions based around uh contextual evidence
that that it actually exists.
Speaker 2 (36:46):
Right, So there may be flying to attacks. That's what
we've concluded.
Speaker 1 (36:50):
Them saw something that looked like flying tic tac and
they presented that in a congressional hearing. So somebody believes,
I mean it is what it is. You know, I
think when you have a week like this and this
is also you know, nine to eleven anniversary, when you
(37:11):
have such a profound distrust in our institutions that has emerged. Also,
there was another story that I wanted to I want
somehow to con to cover by itself. Catherine Hendridge, in
my opinion, one of the top reporters out there. She
released a an expose which clearly identifies that Saudi people
(37:38):
connected to the government in Saudi Intelligence had not only
supported in multiple ways, but welcome and potentially we're active
in the assistance of two out of the six nine
to eleven pilots in California prior to nine to eleven,
(38:00):
and that that is such a massive story that it
needs to gain its own its own time. So I'm
trying to put together more on that because I'd like
to do there's been a lot of stuff that's emerged
out of the nine.
Speaker 2 (38:14):
To eleven.
Speaker 1 (38:16):
Debacle and travesty and tragedy and that. So I'm going
to restrain myself from going down that rabbit hole right now.
But yeah, we will cover that here soon. But you know,
when you have that type of week, I think the
biggest thing is that people feel overwhelmed. And you know,
obviously my text messages and feed blew up most importantly
(38:43):
about the tragedy, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and like
what happens next, what's going to happen?
Speaker 2 (38:50):
Are we going to war? Is this?
Speaker 1 (38:53):
Are we going to have a civil war? Or are we
going to And you know, I don't know. I really
hope not. I mean, the last thing you actually want
to see is is unrestricted violence in the streets because
your brother, your cousin, your best friend, your children, your wife,
(39:17):
your parents, people are going to die unnecessarily in the
crossfire of this. This this political war, this race war,
this this financial war that that's being fomented way above
everybody else's pay grade, right, I mean, this is this
is how nations thrive and collapse is through this type
(39:39):
of societal manipulation, and so you know, I just go
back to you know, as you are processing all of
these things as your as you're pausing from what you
win and Charlie's horrific death, and you're consumed with that grief,
(40:10):
I think it's pivotal that you give yourself pause to
contemplate what it actually looks like if we devolve into
societal violence, Because the end states of those places, we
(40:33):
know what it looks like, and it's devastating. If you
don't know, then what I recommend is go back and
read some books. Read some books about the cities of Europe,
or read about the towns and the farmlands during the
(40:53):
Civil War in America, or read about the Revolutionary War
and what that did to communities and families and brothers
and sisters. And that's what we have to be aware of.
So before you start pounding your fists and raising the
(41:13):
flag for everybody to get in line and march forth
into this battle space where we meet violence with violence,
just recognize that this is a slippery slope. And once
a society gets a taste for violence, very little can
stop the downfall. And the downfall is not just a
(41:36):
few hundred people die as a result.
Speaker 2 (41:39):
What this will be.
Speaker 1 (41:40):
Is ultimately cataclysmic and a few million people will die.
And with the type of weapons, systems and craziness that
we have, we could far exceed the seventy five million
that were annihilated during World War II on this next
go round. So try and put all that into context
as you find yourself poised to lash out at the
(42:05):
crazies posting stuff on TikTok or on Instagram or on
x you know, try and restrain yourself with the faith
that Charlie Kirk had. And I know what other people
are saying, I'm sick of being the restrained Christian. I
want to be the crusader Christian now. I want to
(42:27):
fight back. And I hear you because there's a part
of me that wants to fight back as well too.
But there's also a part of me that does not
want my children to exist in a time of massive bloodshed,
pain and suffering. So may God bless all of you.
(42:48):
May God bless Charlie Kirk and his family, and may
God bless America that we may find some temperance in
our angers and fears.
Speaker 2 (43:00):
Thank you,
The assassination of Charlie Kirk, the report from henry Ford
Medical Hospital regarding vaccine safety and efficacy, and government whistleblower
testimony regarding UFOs.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
This week on the David Rutherford.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
Show, What's Up Team, It is with an incredibly somber
emotion that I'm reporting today.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
In our week in review.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
I think before we even begin, I think it's important
that all of you just and I'm sure you've already
gone through a profound amount of reflection if you've listened
to all of the commentary from Clay and Buck, which
has been fantastic yesterday, as well as Megan Kelly, Sean Hannity,
(00:58):
Glenn Beck, all of the heavyweights in the conservative media space,
and they're just profound regard and condolences that they've warnted.
This to include a direct statement from the President two
nights ago, the fact that he's lowered national flags to
(01:21):
half mass until Monday, and then the acknowledgment that Charlie
Kirk will be awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in
the next few weeks. The response that I have regarding
this as first and foremost, this is a tragedy of
(01:41):
epic proportions, mostly for his wife and his two young children.
It's been visually a parent of Charlie's profound faith in
Jesus Christ and how that plays a role as a
father and a husband. I think anybody that's lost a
(02:03):
significant other, spouse or child recognizes this shear magnitude of
this devastation. So it's critical that in some capacity within
all of us, we acknowledged this tremendous tragedy and loss
for those two children and his wife and immediate family
(02:24):
members and close friends. If you're not familiar with who
Charlie Kirk was, he was an absolute juggernaut in the
conservative movement, most particularly in.
Speaker 2 (02:34):
The Maga movement.
Speaker 1 (02:36):
And what made Charlie so special in my mind was
that his main focus was to bring discourse back to
the political atmosphere, to get rid of the tyranny which
had taken place within cancel culture, the woke left, radical
(03:00):
aggressivism not only on college campuses, but within podcasts and
talk show hosts and political pundits and actors and politicians,
and all of the vitriol and the insiduousness that had
emerged in our society or has emerged, and as definitely
(03:21):
president in our society. And what Charlie did was Charlie
went to the heart of discourse. His whole methodology was
to get people to have emotionally in control conversations about
people's points. And the place where he was able to
have the greatest impact is on college campuses. If you
(03:43):
have been paying attention in any way, shape or form,
it is beyond a shadow of a doubt that most
college university colleges and universities around the country, their professor
staff and administrative staff is over meanly left in their
approach in terms of whether just middle of the road
(04:05):
liberal or radical ideological progressivism, outright communism, socialism, that type
of thing. If your kids have gone to college over
the last twenty years, you know that to be consequentially
true as we see it emerging in the next generation
trying to project American socialism as an absolute possibility. And
(04:31):
we've seen this indoctrination manifest itself in all these differ
different movements right and all their ideological frameworks and stoked
by these influences that they've been kind of captured by.
And Charlie took TPSU or Turning Point USA, and you know,
(04:54):
he went out and Charlie started this at basically eighteen
years old and with an activist named Bill Montgomery in
suburban Chicago, basically in his garage.
Speaker 2 (05:08):
You know.
Speaker 1 (05:08):
He got some initial funding from Republican donor Foster Freeze,
which who he met at the Republican National Convention. Other
figures include Ginny Thomas. Now he built this thing and
really kind of launched it to another degree in his
colluding with campaigns Ted Cruz and Mark Rubio in the
(05:31):
twenty sixteen campaign. He was also a staffer and offered
to expense for pro Trump events, you know, which was
a very focused on the IRS violations that had taken place.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
You know.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
In seventeen, he appointed Tyler Bauer Boyer as the chief
operating officer, which really began to blossom and raise funds
for Turning Point. In twenty eighteen, revenues reached twenty eight
point five million dollars with Charlie at the helm of this,
really spearheading this movement. Twenty nineteen, TPSU hires Benny Johnson
(06:11):
as Chief creative Officer and really communications director Candae Owens
and really kind of projected this to another level. At
that time, the anti Defamation League labeled TPSU as an
alt light, criticizing affiliations with for Our Right figures including
(06:31):
Donald Trump twenty twenty. Pro Publica reports questionable financial practices
twenty twenty one. Kirk comments that not all January sixth
Capital Riot participants were insurrectionists, you know. And what I
really you got to understand is that Charlie Kirk was
(06:52):
in the midst of building this organ He was at
the forefront of all of these targeted groups, right, these
groups that were really attacking the conservative movement in every way,
trying to dismantle it, try and attack kind of cancel it. Right,
he continued to build that I think in twenty twenty
four they played a massive, massive role in the re
(07:14):
election of President Trump, which was pretty amazing, you know.
And and and you know what's interesting is and he
has been stated, you know, in these interviews that he'd
done recently, was that, you know, he began to notice
from the first college campuses that he would show up
and debate these kids openly in these public forms in
(07:37):
the parks and center areas around these universities. He would
debate kids about their radical ideas. And you know, he
said overwhelmingly. At first, it was it was you know,
leftist liberal ideas against the very small of people who
were willing to take that fight to where it was.
And he said by by twenty twenty five that had shifted,
(07:59):
and there was a radical shift within young people around America.
I think President Trump validated that by his comments to
the American public two nights ago, suggesting that there would
be no other person that could fill the shoes of
Charlie Kirk, even going so far as to say that
(08:22):
there was a high probability that Charlie Kirk could have
been the President of the United States at some time
in the future.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
You know, when you.
Speaker 1 (08:32):
Look at the landscape of those people who have had
the most profound impact on the American right over the
last five years, in particular, you know COVID post COVID,
you have to include Charlie Kirk at the pinnacle of
that short small list. Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon,
(08:57):
you can argue even Sean Ryan, Joe Rogan, you know,
these juggernauts and conservative traditional values. And I think what
made Charlie even more remarkable is that he was unafraid
to go into the lions, then right to walk with
Christ as his shield, in the armor of Christ's love
(09:19):
around him, and go into the heart of this fomenting,
crazy ideological cult, if you will, preaching not only his
faith in Christ, but preaching his his faith and conservative
values like family and children and the commitment to that
nuclear family and what keeps society and civilization right now.
(09:44):
I think the other profound reality about Charlie's influence was
that he was absolutely just incredible at debating, right. He
was a master orator, if you will. He could, you know,
talk down any barking, imbecilic young person who's just you know,
(10:08):
spewing whatever they've been force fed on their college campus, right,
And he had a legitimate, i think somewhat respectful response
to these people, you know, he and as a result,
he was labeled a Nazi, a white supremacist, a white nationalist,
a Christian nationalist, a fascist, and every type of is
(10:28):
there is as a result. So I think, you know,
it's critical to recognize that this was a man of
true action. He believed what he believed, and he was
willing to, you know, like I said, go to the
front line of this debate, this argument, this this confrontation
of radical progressive ideas, and you know, I think that's
(10:53):
critical to at least acknowledge that his courage for being
able to do that. And there's been some incredible, incredible
monologues that he's given over the years that really exemplify
that courageousness. And I think what I hope and what
I pray is that as his two children have to
(11:15):
be forced to grow up without a father who was
assassinated in this at that college campus out in Utah.
And again, we're still learning the details of this. Obviously,
several details have come out. The person is still at large.
There's video footage, they released a picture yesterday. We know
(11:37):
about the weapon that they found, the etchings on on
the ammunition that was still loaded in the magazine. But
really that's it. We don't know why this person did it.
We don't know how they planned it or how they
funded it. But we do know is that this horrific
tragedy was caught, you know, uh and and by screens
(12:03):
all across that that event. And you know, when I
got home that night and brought it up at family
dinner to my children, two out of my four daughters
had already seen the up closed version of his being
shot in the neck and and the just powerful devastating
impact of his uh, his his crowded artery and what
(12:24):
took place after that, that wound. You know, the aftermath
of that, I think has really been pretty profound and
what many people on the internet are uh calling for
as a turning point in American consciousness. And you know,
(12:47):
we we I gave a release to show about that
just a few days ago, not even I mean, and
that was Jordie and I we were talking about that,
you know, geez. The timing of what's taking place right
now is pretty cataclysmic. And if you go through what
the left is posting online in terms of whether it's
(13:09):
Mike doubd on MSNBC or James the Governor Pritzker, or
you know, the insane radicals cheering for his death, like
those absolute heartless cocksuckers excuse me at TMZ who were
laughing in the background when they were breaking that news,
you know, or the radical crazies on Blue Sky and
(13:34):
what they're saying and projecting at the death of this
young man who tried to be who was never an
advocate himself for violence, He was never an advocate for anything,
forgiving the other side there the rightful ability to converse,
to to get in conversation in order to as a
(13:54):
battle of ideas instead of a battle of violence. But
yet these peopeople are still promoting and cheering this young man,
this young father, this young husband's death as a victory
for their movement. And that makes it pretty apparent as
(14:15):
to the nature of the divisiveness that our country is in.
And it really exemplifies I think the division that has
been sowed by the powers that want this division within us.
If you haven't figured this out yet, they want us
to descend into violence too. They want us to descend
(14:35):
into chaos. And I'm not saying that it's not going
to happen, And I am saying prepare yourself. I am
saying that you should absolutely train, that you should be prepared,
that you should protect your women and children and protect
your communities, that you should actively engage in carrying a
(14:55):
weapon as much as possible out there, and adhere to
the Second Amendment rights.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Because this is the reality.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
I immediately after finding out, reached out to my very
close friends who are very high on the stage of
conservative uh comedia and and and really voiced my concerns.
And and luckily they're they're they're all over it, and
they are fortifying their existence in ways that they will
(15:24):
become hard targets, which they should be because of the
the willful uh uh evolution of political violence. That's that's
that's upticking. And you have to recognize that political violence
is not new. Political violence has existed for as long
(15:45):
as violence has existed. In fact, it's probably a cornerstone
of of of all warfare at some time was initiated
through this political type of violence. Right, it's what ultimately
descends into uh, you know, uh madness or societal collapse.
Speaker 2 (16:02):
In madness.
Speaker 1 (16:03):
You had Mahatma Gandhi in nineteen forty eight, Patrise Lumumba,
the Congolese prime minister in sixty one, John F. Kennedy
in sixty three, Malcolm X in sixty five, Martin Luther
King in sixty eight, Robert F. Kennedy in sixty eight,
Anwar Sadat in eighty one, in Dera Gandhi in eighty four,
(16:24):
Rajev Gandhi in ninety one, Ixat Rabin in ninety five.
In the twenty first century, Lourent Dessire Kabila, the dr
Congo president, Pim fortun the Dutch politician in O two,
Anna Politzeratskova, the Russian journalist in six, Benzir Bhutto, the
(16:45):
Pakistani opposition leader seven Moshin Fakarisa, I didn't think I
said that right in twenty twenty, shinzu Abe in twenty
twenty two, David Ames UK MP stabbed in twenty one,
Melissa Hortman right in Minnesota twenty twenty five, and Charlie
(17:05):
Kirk just the other day.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
This is the reality of politics.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
Is that when you whip groups of people into a
frenzy and you continue to tell them that the other
side is trying to kill them, trying to destroy them,
trying to reduce them to the ashes of history in
terms of their ideology, or you label the opposition as tyrannical, Nazis, communists, whatever.
(17:37):
What do you think is going to happen, in particular
with young people who are so easily influenced, They're going
to become radicalized. And that's what's taken place now as
a result of Charlie's unfortunate and tragic death and assassination.
What's going to happen. The already people on the right, now,
the hard right, are being radicalized themselves. They're calling for
(18:01):
enough is enough. They're calling for an armed stance or
resistance or in some cases going out in attacking, hunting
the other side down. This is not what we probably
need to do right. This is what the powers that
want to control us, that pit us against each other,
that's what they want. So constrain yourself. I'm not saying
(18:25):
don't arm yourself. I'm not saying don't prepare yourself. I'm
not saying you shouldn't be mad, you should be pissed off.
But the way that you counter this movement is by
doing exactly what Charlie Kirk did. Was you strengthen your faith,
You strengthen your family, and you strengthen your belief systems,
(18:46):
and then you have the courage, the courage to take
those belief systems to the public forum and to stand
up for what you believe in and to debate the
other side in a battle of ideas and not of
weapons and violence. So and again, I just want all
(19:08):
of us to consider what it would be like for
us to lose our spouse or a loved one, or
a child two, unnecessary political violence or.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
Any type of activistic violence that.
Speaker 1 (19:25):
Only leads to more death and destruction, to temper that
desire to sit back and.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
To fight for what you believe in.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
But through healthy discourse and political activism.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
God bless you, Charlie.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
I hope Christ has found a real warrior for faith
and we will continue to preach your message.
Speaker 2 (19:49):
God bless you and God bless your family. What's up, Team?
Speaker 1 (19:53):
I realize there are many choices when it comes to
who you choose for your cellf owned service, and there
are new ones popping up all the time.
Speaker 2 (20:01):
But here's the deal.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
There's only one that boldly stands in the gap for
every American that believes that freedom is worth fighting for,
and that's Patriot Mobile. Not only are they leading the
way in the read economy, but Patriot Mobile also outgains
the competition when it comes to technology. Patriot Mobile is
one of the only carriers with access to all three
(20:25):
major US networks. That means exceptional nationwide coverage along with
the ability to have multiple numbers on different networks. Think
about that, multiple numbers on your single smartphone, folks. This
is an absolute game changer. They also offer unlimited data plans,
(20:46):
mobile hotspots, international roaming, and internet backup, and so much more.
Switching is easier than ever. Simply activate in minutes from
the comfort of your own home, keep your number, keep
your phone, or upgrade.
Speaker 2 (21:03):
It's time to make the switch today.
Speaker 1 (21:06):
I want you to go to Patriotmobile dot com, forward
slash Rutherford or call nine to seven to two Patriot.
When you get there, use promo code Rutherford r U
T H E R F O r D for a
free month of service. I repeat my last that is
(21:26):
a free month of service if you use the promo
code Rutherford. That's Patriotmobile dot com, forward slash Rutherford or
call nine seven to two Patriot.
Speaker 2 (21:40):
Who Yah, God bless America.
Speaker 1 (21:43):
The other thing that I thought was absolutely fascinating this
week was there was testimony on Capitol Hill from a
bunch of people that were being faced with questions from
both sides about a lot of the There was a
review well in this questionnaire. One of this things the
(22:04):
study popped up from the henry Ford Health System, which
is a major healthcare provider Michigan often associated with henry
Ford Hospital. In this report was on the health outcomes
of vaccinated versus on vaccinated children. It gained attention in
September twenty five when its results were publicly reviewed during
(22:27):
the US Senate hearing titled how the Corruption of Science
has impacted Public perception and Policies regarding Vaccines.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
This was led by.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson or Wisconsin, and featured
the testimony of an attorney, Ari Siri our own sery,
who represented that anti vaccine groups like the Informed Consent
Action Network has ties to both Robert F.
Speaker 2 (22:53):
Kennedy.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
The analysis, completed in twenty twenty has never been peer
reviewed or published due to concerns of its from its
authors about professional repercussions.
Speaker 2 (23:03):
According to Siri, all right.
Speaker 1 (23:06):
So this report was done, was founded and prompted by
I can ICN, which wanted a large scale comparison of
health outcomes, right, and they approached the henry Ford Health
which the one doctor they approached was Marcus Zervos, MD,
(23:28):
who is an infectious disease specialist at Henry four Health,
with other unnamed authors.
Speaker 2 (23:34):
Because they didn't want their name on this obviously.
Speaker 1 (23:37):
So the data collection span from twenty seventeen to twenty twenty.
But when the analysis was completed in twenty twenty, it
was shelved and the results were shared privately with i CAN,
but not submitted for publication. This is the largest US
birth cohort study of its kind, eighteen four hundred and
(23:58):
sixty eight people who had been vaccinating vaccinated versus I
think two thousand people who had been unvaccinated. All right,
these were through child vaccine schedules, not specifically COVID nineteen,
but the other ones. So it goes in a different
and you can look all this up the methodology, but
(24:19):
here were some of the care key findings that this
lawyer Surrey brought forth.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
Right.
Speaker 1 (24:26):
Overall chronic conditions, fifty seven percent of vaccinated children had
at least one chronic health condition, often multiple, compared to
seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children, which was two point
four to eight times higher likelihood for the vaccinated kids.
Neurodevelopmental disorders, Vaccinated children were four hundred and fifty three
(24:50):
percent more likely to be diagnosed with higher rates of
ADHD or learning disabilities. Specific conditions allergies four point five
times higher in the vaccinated, asthma two point nine times higher,
ear infections two point five times higher. It did say,
there was no association found with autism specifically per the data.
(25:17):
You know, one of the implications for you know, the
pro vaccine injury perspective, and this with this guy argued
was the results showed irrefutable vaccine harm suppressed due to
fear of backlash. He claimed it warrants halting routine vaccinations
and investigation investigating causation. Right, and the hearing framed it
(25:39):
as evidence of corruption in science. All right, You know,
this has been really at the core of the backlash
of what Robert F.
Speaker 2 (25:49):
Kennedy is doing.
Speaker 1 (25:51):
Everybody believes he's going to go in he's anti vax
he's gonna he's kicking out all the people in the
CDC and all the different hhs, and he's kicking out
all these doctors who support vaccines. And he himself has said,
I do sport vaccines, we just need better testing. And
and if you have ever listened or read any of
his papers or books, the reality is is almost none
(26:14):
of these vaccines have been tested in the proper way
that sciences should have tested these with the safety measures.
And the other reality is that what came out is
there's also never been a cumulative test that says, all right,
does the impact from the vaccine schedule have long term,
(26:34):
long term effects on children and becoming young adults versus
kids who didn't get it vaccine versus un vaccine. Now
Here are some criticisms of it. There was methodology, method mythological, methodology,
logical God bless me for trying to say that, Holy cow,
that were flaws in this.
Speaker 2 (26:55):
There was.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
It was lack of a peer reviewed so it wasn't
pre reviewed. It said, there was by and presentation of
the findings. Henry Ford's response was interesting, no official comment.
The system promotes vaccines on its site, emphasizing safety and
debunking myths, saying there was no autism links and then
(27:16):
scientific consensus body like the CDC, the acip A firm
vaccines prevent far more harm than they cause. This analysis
doesn't alter that, per critics. You know, I think what
everybody is going is imagining, is that there's going to
be some aha moment of vaccine efficacy in the next
(27:39):
several months where everybody, and I think the main one
that you know, the anti vax community or not even anti,
but just like, hey, what's going on? Why are our
children sicker? Why was it you know, one in ten
thousand kids prior to nineteen eighty seven or whenever the
schedule bloomed up, kids had autism, and now it's what
one in thirty six one in some ungodly amount of number, right,
(28:03):
and in some areas it's like even lower than that.
What has happened to our children? Why are they immune deficient?
Why are they having these chronic diseases? Or supposedly the
most advanced healthcare system in the entire world, but since
these vaccines have been initiated, our children have categorically gotten sicker.
(28:23):
And so what I think people are looking for, in
particular with the autism correlation, is that there's going to
be a smoking gun with this. What I do believe
is coming is that there's going to be a very
significant investigation into all of these things. I think there
is no reversal of that which is going to take place.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
I think the.
Speaker 1 (28:43):
MAHA movement is firmly entrenched and that that is going
to be that is going to happen. In fact, from
what I understand, there is an investigation going on against
the correlation of vaccines and autism, So I know that's
taking place. What it is take what is happening though,
is there is a movement growing in the MAHA movement,
(29:05):
and I think that's a positive thing. However, I also
believe we need to have a lot more of a
scientific approach to this.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
We need to do the analysis.
Speaker 1 (29:15):
We need to hold our anger in check until we
actually see a legitimate safety study done on these vaccines
that's proper fulfilled and against a large portion of a
population of young people who have been vaccinated versus on vaccinated.
Speaker 2 (29:34):
So this debate is continuing.
Speaker 1 (29:37):
But that's what took place, all right. The next one
was Testimony of Unidentified Anonymalous Phenomena UAP formally known as UFOs.
This took place on September ninth during the here held
(29:59):
by US House Oversight and Government Reform Committees Task Force
on the def Classification of Federal Secrets. Now, if you
saw Luda's Congresswoman Luda's interview with Joe Rogan, I mean
she was pretty much going all in saying, guess what
this is real?
Speaker 2 (30:18):
This is out there.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
As I listened to some of the testimony of these people,
I think it's pretty conclusive that there are top secret
programs taking place. There have been for long, long periods
of time. There is technology which has now been verified
by President Trump on multiple occasions, that exceeds anything that
(30:43):
we believe we have ever been able to do or
concoct in a way that just would, you know, blow
away the competition, if you will. So like we possess
technology that none of are these or Allies or anybody
else has. And I think everybody's pretty comfortable with that
(31:06):
except Jordi. Right, Jordy, you're not there. I'm not fully
convinced on the alien story. But maybe this will do it.
Speaker 2 (31:15):
God bless you for saying, maybe this will do it right?
Maybe maybe maybe.
Speaker 1 (31:20):
What what was interesting was there was multiple people that
talked right. Jeffrey Nucleatelli, A Dylan Borlan, Chief, Alexandro Wiggins,
George Knapp, Joe Spielberger all gave testimony. The one that
(31:42):
really stood out to me which one was it?
Speaker 2 (31:46):
It was.
Speaker 1 (31:48):
Dylan here it was, This was the interesting one, Dylan
Borland's testimony. In his first public disclosure, Borland detailed a
twenty twelve sighting at Langley Air Force Base of a
one hundred foot triangular craft that moved silently and fluidly
before vanishing. The jet altitude in seconds. He claimed exposure
(32:09):
to a UAP crash retrieval program within with a special
access program, and alleged over a decade of retaliation, including
workplace harassment, blacklisting from classified jobs, and obstruction by government agencies.
So the other one, which was pretty radical if you
(32:30):
saw this, Jory, I don't know if you saw this one,
but this one was wild to me. It was recounted
a twenty twenty three incident aboard the USS Jackson where
a self luminous tic TAC shape UAP emerged from the ocean,
linked with three similar objects accelerated away synchronomously whatever that
(32:50):
word is, synchronously at an extreme speed without a sonic
boom or conventional proposal.
Speaker 2 (32:59):
Right, that was interesting.
Speaker 1 (33:01):
And then there was another one where one of these
things was shot with one of our most advanced missile
systems in the missile broken two when it hit it.
So this is what it was a highlight with the
public debut of video footage introduced by Representative Eric Berlinson,
a Republican from Montana, showing a usmq now drone firing
(33:26):
a hellfire missile at a high speed unidentified orb off
Yemeny coast in October twenty twenty four. The missile appeared
to strike the UAP, but it bounced off without destroying it,
with the object to continuing its path and seemingly absorbing debris.
Witnesses like Napp reacted with surprising noting it kept going
(33:49):
and asked, what the hell is that this FUS should
revive calls for scrutiny of UAPs in greater transparency on
military encounters.
Speaker 2 (34:00):
So is it real?
Speaker 1 (34:04):
I believe their technology is absolutely real. I never once
saw anything well I served, I never once heard anybody
talk about it, so I am by far not an expert.
What I can tell you is that there are classified
projects so deep in the government that even the people
(34:27):
who you would imagine have should have access don't have access.
And that's the way things work when you have to
silo information from your enemies. Right.
Speaker 2 (34:37):
You got tic TACs though, tic tax bro for sure.
Speaker 1 (34:42):
They got flying tic TACs, so we know that, and
flying triangles apparently, so we got all kinds of flying
geometric optionects and breath mints that are out there.
Speaker 2 (34:55):
So you know what do I believe.
Speaker 1 (34:59):
I believe that we're on the precipice of a shift
in consciousness as a result of political violence and escalation,
economic calamity, social cultural shifts, illegal immigrant invasion, UAP technology,
(35:23):
and possibly what the big one everybody thinks is coming
as the alien false flag operation that thrust us into
the New World Order, if you will. So they do
need a good alien false flag. Yeah, it's true. Do
you think Elon Musk is going to find aliens? That
(35:43):
guy has repeatedly said over and over and over there
is nothing that I have seen, and this guy is
well read in I know what everybody's saying. But Roddy,
he has to say that if he wants access to
the top secret, if he wants to be able to
keep building rocket ships to go to Mars and all that,
he has to say this, right, He's got a lie,
(36:05):
right or the NDA, you know which is he has
to he has to lie. So yeah, I mean a
billionaires certainly have no problem lying in the past, for sure.
Speaker 2 (36:18):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (36:19):
But you know, I also go, you know what, why
would he lie? I mean he did he did say
that the moon landings were real.
Speaker 2 (36:26):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (36:27):
But again I know that's that's being heavily contested on
online and on x But again, our job, right, is
to offer uh, realistic opinions based around uh contextual evidence
that that it actually exists.
Speaker 2 (36:46):
Right, So there may be flying to attacks. That's what
we've concluded.
Speaker 1 (36:50):
Them saw something that looked like flying tic tac and
they presented that in a congressional hearing. So somebody believes,
I mean it is what it is. You know, I
think when you have a week like this and this
is also you know, nine to eleven anniversary, when you
(37:11):
have such a profound distrust in our institutions that has emerged. Also,
there was another story that I wanted to I want
somehow to con to cover by itself. Catherine Hendridge, in
my opinion, one of the top reporters out there. She
released a an expose which clearly identifies that Saudi people
(37:38):
connected to the government in Saudi Intelligence had not only
supported in multiple ways, but welcome and potentially we're active
in the assistance of two out of the six nine
to eleven pilots in California prior to nine to eleven,
(38:00):
and that that is such a massive story that it
needs to gain its own its own time. So I'm
trying to put together more on that because I'd like
to do there's been a lot of stuff that's emerged
out of the nine.
Speaker 2 (38:14):
To eleven.
Speaker 1 (38:16):
Debacle and travesty and tragedy and that. So I'm going
to restrain myself from going down that rabbit hole right now.
But yeah, we will cover that here soon. But you know,
when you have that type of week, I think the
biggest thing is that people feel overwhelmed. And you know,
obviously my text messages and feed blew up most importantly
(38:43):
about the tragedy, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and like
what happens next, what's going to happen?
Speaker 2 (38:50):
Are we going to war? Is this?
Speaker 1 (38:53):
Are we going to have a civil war? Or are we
going to And you know, I don't know. I really
hope not. I mean, the last thing you actually want
to see is is unrestricted violence in the streets because
your brother, your cousin, your best friend, your children, your wife,
(39:17):
your parents, people are going to die unnecessarily in the
crossfire of this. This this political war, this race war,
this this financial war that that's being fomented way above
everybody else's pay grade, right, I mean, this is this
is how nations thrive and collapse is through this type
(39:39):
of societal manipulation, and so you know, I just go
back to you know, as you are processing all of
these things as your as you're pausing from what you
win and Charlie's horrific death, and you're consumed with that grief,
(40:10):
I think it's pivotal that you give yourself pause to
contemplate what it actually looks like if we devolve into
societal violence, Because the end states of those places, we
(40:33):
know what it looks like, and it's devastating. If you
don't know, then what I recommend is go back and
read some books. Read some books about the cities of Europe,
or read about the towns and the farmlands during the
(40:53):
Civil War in America, or read about the Revolutionary War
and what that did to communities and families and brothers
and sisters. And that's what we have to be aware of.
So before you start pounding your fists and raising the
(41:13):
flag for everybody to get in line and march forth
into this battle space where we meet violence with violence,
just recognize that this is a slippery slope. And once
a society gets a taste for violence, very little can
stop the downfall. And the downfall is not just a
(41:36):
few hundred people die as a result.
Speaker 2 (41:39):
What this will be.
Speaker 1 (41:40):
Is ultimately cataclysmic and a few million people will die.
And with the type of weapons, systems and craziness that
we have, we could far exceed the seventy five million
that were annihilated during World War II on this next
go round. So try and put all that into context
as you find yourself poised to lash out at the
(42:05):
crazies posting stuff on TikTok or on Instagram or on
x you know, try and restrain yourself with the faith
that Charlie Kirk had. And I know what other people
are saying, I'm sick of being the restrained Christian. I
want to be the crusader Christian now. I want to
(42:27):
fight back. And I hear you because there's a part
of me that wants to fight back as well too.
But there's also a part of me that does not
want my children to exist in a time of massive bloodshed,
pain and suffering. So may God bless all of you.
(42:48):
May God bless Charlie Kirk and his family, and may
God bless America that we may find some temperance in
our angers and fears.
Speaker 2 (43:00):
Thank you,
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News
Hosts And Creators
Clay Travis
Buck Sexton
Show Links
WebsiteNewsletterPopular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.