Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show H2 – May 9 2022

Harvard study finds remote learning was disastrous for poor, minority, blue-state students. Graph shows how "trust in science" by party changed dramatically with covid. Blue check doctor predicted massive flight cancellations. Carrie Severino, Judicial Crisis Network president and former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas joins C&B to cover the SCOTUS leak. The new White House press secretary is a leftist extremist.

Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to today's edition of the Clay Travis and Buck
Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back in Clay Travis Buck Sexton Show.
Appreciate all of you hanging out with us. Encourage you
to go subscribe to the podcast. Make sure you don't
miss a single minute of this show, which is fighting
for sanity in an insane world every single day. We
appreciate those of you hanging out with us all over

(00:22):
the country and also everybody listening on the podcast right
now at your leisure. And Buck, we were right on
probably the most consequential decision of the twenty first century,
which was, how do we respond to COVID in this country.
Give me a massive number of people that are out

(00:42):
there listening to us. And unfortunately, as we have continued
to discuss the fallout of the wrongheaded decisions by the
lockdown crowd, by people who wanted to shut down schools,
by the people who insisted that you wear masks everywhere,
all of that fallout, and unfortunately it's continuing as young
kids in New York City are forced to continue to

(01:04):
wear masks. Two year olds are still massed up in
New York City. But I saw this study and it
gives me some measure of hope that as we continue
to move through this, there's going to be a reckoning,
and the reckoning needs to happen in November at the
ballot box. But also the reckoning needs to happen in

(01:26):
terms of people having to acknowledge that they're chosen heroes.
The Doctor Fauci's of the world failed them. And I
am encouraged in some level buck by this because some
of the places that are putting out these studies. This
is not right wing news dot com right, this is
not a necessarily outlet that you would anticipate would be

(01:50):
coming out with this study, and the one that I'm
referencing today just came out got a lot of attention
so far. This morning. Harvard did a study and Education
and the impact of lockdowns and remote learning, that oxymoron
of remote learning, and they found that gaps in quote,
math achievement by race and school poverty, which skyrocketed all

(02:14):
over the country predominantly in blue states, didn't widen in
school districts like Florida and Texas that mostly kept schools open,
two biggest red states in the country, Florida and Texas.
And I'm reading directly from their study. Interestingly, gaps in

(02:34):
math achievement did not widen in school districts in Texas
and Florida. Where schools remained in person, gaps did not widen.
This is racial and socioeconomic gaps. Where schools shifted to
remote learning, gaps widened sharply. Shifting to remote instruction was
like turning a switch on a critical piece of our

(02:56):
social infrastructured we'd taken for granted. Our findings imply public
schools truly are the balance wheel of social machinery, and
that that was broken by our COVID responses. So, Buck,
one of the things that needs to happen is a reckoning,
and I believe that reckoning hopefully will start in November.

(03:17):
But also, these people who argued you don't want to
be on the wrong side of history, Buck, they are
going to be on the wrong side of history in
their response to COVID. It's just a question of how
long it will take for this to become consensus opinion.
But for the Rhn decantis Is of the world and

(03:37):
the Greg Abbots, both of whom are up for reelection.
If you're listening to us in Florida and Texas as
many of you are. You need to be sharing this
data with your suburban mother friends, with your friends who
are willing to be persuadable, and we need absolute landslides
in this state to ratify the decisions that were made

(03:57):
in these states. You know, I also down this data
that was shared on the stats website Nate Silver's five
thirty eight about trust in science? Did you saw this graphic? Fascinating?
Just so I can explain to everybody who's listening, I
wish I could show you this graphic, but starting in
about this is the share of Americans who said they
had a great deal of confidence in the scientific community

(04:21):
by party affiliation from nineteen seventy three to twenty twenty one.
The graphic is fascinating because Democrats and Republicans are basically
both in the forty percent range, up and down a
little bit here and there in nineteen eighties, nineteen nineties,
you know, not a lot of change. It's sort of

(04:41):
Democrats and Republicans roughly call it a little you know,
it's usually less than half. I'd say, you know, forty
five percent of Republicans had faith in science until about
two thousand and then it dropped down a little bit
forty percent of Democrats, and it actually dropped down quite
a bit lower a few times. But anyway, overall it's
in the pies. You get to the pandemic and people

(05:03):
who say they have trust in science skyrockets like hockey
stick graph straight up a stock going from one dollar
to a thousand dollars. That's what it looks like. All
of a sudden, Democrats go way up to sixty five
percent and Republicans start dropping off down into the thirties
at the start of the pandemic. And you can see

(05:24):
it by the way, the Democrat line is almost a
straight line up, meaning that there was What this is
showing you, and this is why I think it's so fascinating,
is that it was a political designation. This was not
about what could Because it starts at the beginning of
the pandemic. All of a sudden, Democrats decided where the
Science party, and this became a personal branding issue for them.

(05:45):
And what I think is so fascinating is that if
you go back and look at Marxism, which has a
lot of similarities with the left to the Democrat Party,
If you go back and look at Marxism. It is
a religion that pretends to be a science, and the
language that it uses and the pretense of the Marxists
all along was to try to create the notion that
this is actually just scientific reality that they're putting through

(06:08):
a social theory, when in fact it's really a religious
belief that they're pretending is somehow rooted in reality, fact
and the inevitability of truth. And you see this with
the Democrats. It's the same thing. Science for them became
a political rallying cry and the way that they all

(06:30):
of a sudden identified with I believe in the science,
and I'd be fascinating to see, I bet Clay, they
haven't hasn't dropped off because they don't want to believe
that they were part of this mob mentality of Fouc
she's a genius when he's really a moron. Well, you
and I have talked about before, Buck. The thing that
really gets these left wing people really triggered is the

(06:53):
idea that they're dumb. Right, Like they can handle almost
any other criticism, but the idea that they are a sheep,
the idea that they are dumb, the idea that they
have behaved in an anti science manner, and I thought
there was a perfect metaphor. I was watching Saturday night
the Golden State Warriors playing against Memphis Grizzlies. NBA playoffs
are going on. My kids are big job Morant fans,

(07:15):
so we're sitting around watching this game. One guy in
a twenty thousand seat arena in San Francisco just about
buck is wearing his mask. You know who that was?
King NBA lib Steve Kerr. He would wear his mask.
He's the head coach of the Golden State Warriors. Twenty
thousand seat arena. Virtually no one you could see wearing

(07:38):
a mask. Steve Kerr is the head coach. Is wearing
his mask, and what's he doing? Constantly pulling the mask
down to yell out instructions to his team and then
pull the mask back up. There is no way to
justify wearing the mask. And I thought to myself, this
is Steve Kerr making it clear to all of the

(08:01):
left wing lunatics out there that he is their champion.
He is their ride or die. Because I'm sitting there
watching this and I'm gonna watch it again on Monday
night and I'll probably tweet about it because I didn't
tweet about it on Saturday night. But I'm watching this
because I want to take a picture of it. There's
no one that you can see around him Buck wearing

(08:21):
the mask, and he's regularly constantly pulling it down because
you can't hear what anybody says when they're wearing a mask, right,
especially in a crowded arena where everybody's yelling. And I'm
thinking to myself, he thinks, and he is sending the
message of I am doing what the science dictates, even
though he looks like an absolute and complete moron by

(08:44):
doing this. This is like people who this is the
same the same scientific mentality you could say, as somebody
who thinks that they're protecting themselves effectively from a very
contagious venereal disease by taking the phylactic device on and
off many times over the course of their session. You know,

(09:05):
take it on and take it off, Take it on,
take off. I'm protected kind of. No, you're not. Actually,
you're wasting your time with this, which is the same
thing that you had had with planes and the mask
up between bites and I mean, I am still almost
in all the stupidity of the delta Airlines flight attendant
I have I had just a few weeks ago, maybe

(09:27):
a month ago, who was saying that people were taking
wasn't just me? So people say, oh, it's because she
knows you. No, no, no, anybody who was taking too
long between bites. She thought she was keeping us safe
by saying, sir, you've that's enough, Like that's enough time
between bites. You need to mask up in between bites.
These are people who are mentally ill. They actually have.
This is like people who will not go at This

(09:49):
is like agoraphobia. They will not go outside. They almost
have a fear of breathing fresh air and not having
the mask on their face. In fact, I think we
should come up with some term of phobia without map skiing,
because that's what this really is. I'll have to look
at what the uh what the Greek would be on this,
the ancient Greek. Well, and to your point, did you
see and we need to talk about this too, because

(10:09):
it's just so ridiculous. But I'll give a little bit
of a tease here for later in the show. Did
you see the idiot uh MD online who said, as
soon as masks are removed on airplanes, I want to
read her tweet here. As we get ready to finish
the cancelations everywhere, everyone's gonna get canceled. Every everything on
the planet basically is going to get canceled. Uh, you're

(10:31):
you're not gonna be able to fly anywhere, all of
this ridiculousness and uh, and it completely fell apart. I'm sorry.
Go ahead, I thought you want to. Should we tease it?
Should we play the tease game? And I'll read this
twee when we come back. Let's play when we come back.
What I's gonna say? It's nice, right, you and me
and this audience can sleep well at night knowing that

(10:52):
we were not the jackasses for two years who thought
that all this stuff was a good idea. I'm just
gonna say, there should be some real solid tape in
we were right, they were wrong, and that does have
its own its own it has its own reward. But
I want the scoreboard to reflect it. And that's why
November needs to be So. I want CNN and MSNB

(11:15):
siging literal tiers curling down their cheeks. I want Walter
curled up in a ball in the corner asking Mommy
to make it stop. As those election returns come in,
and I want and I know you're in New York City,
but I want all those people living in New York
in LA who have no idea how the rest of
the country is living, to be trying to explain what

(11:35):
the national electorate is saying. When I feel like living
here in Nashville and traveling around for college football games,
which to me is the heartbeat of America, I feel
like I have my finger on the pulse of America
really really well. And this destruction that is coming in November,
I think it is going to blow the minds of

(11:57):
the East and West coast lives and they're not going
to be able to really understand what the message. It's
the only way to restore balance, it's the only way
to restore sanity. Actually, if if it doesn't happen, we're
in trouble as a country, no doubt. By the way,
inflation is coming out the newest number this week for
the month of April, but we already know it was

(12:17):
an eight and a half percent, and we can feel
the effects on that rising cost of living and that
can be a big challenge to your household budget. But
what can be a positive is your home values probably
increase a decent amount, and American Financing can help you
unlock some of the value in your home. We can't

(12:39):
stress this enough. You have an asset that has appreciated
a great deal, and if you've got credit card debt
or you've got some other form of debt that is
out there that is hanging over your head, you need
to give ten minutes to American Financing and let them
help put your financial house in order. All you have
to do is call American Financing eight hundred seven seven

(13:00):
seven eighty one oh nine. Think about how hard you
work to try and make sure you're saving money on
gas right now driving extra couple of miles. Maybe check
and see what you can save there. You're going into
the grocery store, maybe you're buying different products than you
have before. That can help, But we're talking about thousands
or hundreds of thousands of dollars over the life of

(13:21):
your loan. Why not spend ten minutes right now in
call American Financing and see how your family's financial house
can be put back in order eight hundred seven seven
seven eighty one oh nine. You can also visit American
Financing dot net MLS one eight two three three four
mls Consumer Access dot Org. Welcome back to clay Anne Buck.

(13:49):
We're gonna be joined here in just a couple of
minutes by Carrie Severino, Judicial Crisis Network President, former Clerk
to Justice Clarence Thomas. Will drill down in the latest
and the fighting over this Supreme Court decision, the pending decision. Still,
I think that's gotten lost in some of this conversation.

(14:11):
They obviously leak the draft because there's a desire. I
am seeing some efforts to say it's a conservative who
leaked it. No, doesn't make sense, doesn't doesn't hold together.
This would be he would leak it if you're a conservative,
if it was going to go the other way. Maybe,
but it wouldn't make any sense to leak this at
this stage. And by the way, leaking is bad and

(14:32):
nobody should do that in this context. But the justices
are getting additional security now. People are recognized and I
think recognizing that this is going to keep getting more tense.
This is going to get uglier the longer this drags out.
So we'll be discussing that in just a couple of
moments here. But I'm gonna be flying this weekend, and

(14:52):
if anybody has any Chicago recommendations for me, I've never
been to Now. I flown to the airport, and I
did once go from the airport to like a holiday
in five minutes from the airport, But I have I've
never set foot in Chicago proper in my life, and
as a New Yorker, as somebody who's I've been to

(15:13):
a Rock more times and Afghanistan more time, several more
times over that I have to Chicago. Like I just realized,
this is crazy. I've been to every other great American
city I think, pretty much that I can think of
at this point large I should say large American city.
You know, I just got to Tuscaloosa for the first

(15:33):
time this year. You've never been to the state of Alabama, right,
But again that's a smaller that's that's more of a
midsize city. But for every I've been to every large
American city except Chicago. If you have any recommendations for Chicago,
by all means, hit me up, send me a message
on Facebook or a tweet at me. But Clay, I
will be flying free faced if you will. My face

(15:55):
will be free of the mask, which I have not
experienced it. I'm very excited about this, and they're in
There are not mask cancelations. It turns out, despite the
tweet read tell everybody about this MD blue check doctor first.
First of all, by the way, lou mil Naughties and
I may be mispronouncing that great Chicago deep dish pizza.

(16:16):
So you as great for your co host with Celiac disease.
You give them a pizzeria, well done, play high five.
Maybe they can do a special one that that that
that you can just give me the cheese I have.
The melted cheese. Lou mil Naughties is incredible, all right.
So so yeah, well for most people that would be
a big that would be a big drawl. Denise de
Wald MD, I'm not an MD. I don't have one

(16:37):
after my name on Twitter. As I've been told quite
a few times, She tweeted out as soon as the
mask mandate on airplanes was taken away, all I'm gonna
say is this, expect a lot of canceled flights because
of staff's shortages and finding a rental car will be
be like and she used a gift debate it impossible.
By the way, buck, I went through and read these
comments and it's like living in a different world. Eighty

(17:00):
thousand likes on this woman's tweet about how every her
medical opinion is that everyone is going to have issues
over this. Now. Our friend Ian Miller, who has a
great book, Unmasked, I believe we've had him on the
show several times, he points out. Nearly three weeks after
Twitter and CNN experts claimed US airlines would see mass

(17:23):
cancelations due to maskless travel, yesterday Jet Blue canceled zero
percent of flights, Delta one percent, American zero percent, United
zero percent, and Southwest zero percent. I'm reading from his tweet,
not one of them have admitted they were wrong. Removing masks,
as we all told you on this show, would be

(17:44):
the case, would have zero impact because masks don't work anywhere,
but they particularly do not work on airplanes, which have
incredible air filtration systems in place. If your business has
five or more employees and managed to survive COVID, you're
eligible to receive a payroll tax rebate of twenty six
thousand dollars per employee. This isn't alone. There's no payback,

(18:08):
it's a refund of your taxes. The challenge is getting
your hands on it. How do you cut through the
red tape and get your business the refund that you deserve. Here,
go to get refund dot Com. That's get refund dot Com.
Their tax attorneys are specialists in this little known payroll
tax refund program. They do all the work with no
charge upfront, and they simply share a percentage of the

(18:29):
cash they get back for you. Businesses of all types
can qualify, including those who took PPP, nonprofits, even those
who had an increase in sales. Their average client gets
four hundred thousand dollars back. That's right. Get refunds dot Com.
It's help ten thousand companies receive over a billion dollars
in rebates. They can help you too. Just go to

(18:50):
Get refunds dot Com, click on qualify me and answer
a few questions. That's get refunds dot Com. Getrefunds dot Com.
No risk, high reward, Get refunds dot Com. Welcome back
in Glacier as Buck Sexton Show. Appreciate all of you

(19:12):
hanging out with us as we're rolling through the Monday
edition of the program. Joined now by Carrie Savarino. She's
Judicial Crisis Networks President and a former clerk to Justice
Clarence Thomas. So, Carrie, you have been a Supreme Court clerk,
and I went to law school, but I was nowhere
near smart enough to be a Supreme Court clerk. So

(19:33):
you will know and understand to an unbelievable degree, what
was your reaction when you saw news that this Alito
draft opinion had leaked? How stunning was it? Contextualize it
for us for those of us who will not have
experienced what being a clerk and working at the Supreme Court,
It's like, yeah, that was utterly jaw dropping to see

(19:57):
not just even a leak about, Hey, we think this
is what the votes are, this direction of going, but
like an entire draft opinion as circulated the Justice is
so much though that, like other clerks I know said,
they just they've literally said, this have to be a fake.
There's no way it could be real because that would
never happen. So until the Chief Justice confirmed it, they
were like, Nope, can't I I just don't believe it.

(20:17):
When we were when I was clerking, it was like
you could not have ever left the building with a
piece of paper like that, and the only thing you
could I could take out like if I wanted to
do work at home in the evening with the filings
and the things that had been already publicly filed for
the court, so I could do my background reading. But
that's it. Any internal documents never left the building in
you know, paper form, in digital form, nada. So the idea,

(20:40):
and you know, well Congress is always leaking in the
White House is always leaking the Supreme Court, it just
doesn't happen. Thinking about it, like Bush versus Gore, most
controversial case that certainly that decade, probably in many decades,
very tense. I heard clerks were like literally getting into fights,
like physical fight over how upset they were about this case.

(21:00):
And we didn't have a draft opinion for that. Did
we didn't. I don't even think we had a like
here's what the vote's going to be leak. So this
is completely novel for the Supreme Court to have something
like this, And I think it's going to be a
long time, if ever, that the Court and their internal
processes can recover from something like this, let alone the
threats to the justices that have been triggered by this

(21:23):
type of league, Carrie, So immediately when the league happens,
a lot of us out there start trying to analyze
who the leaker might be, and it's informed speculation to
a certain degree, but nowhere near like what I imagine
the Supreme Court clerk text chains were, like, how would
you assess where this leak was likely to come from?

(21:44):
What did you and your former Supreme Court clerk colleagues
think in terms of analyzing this when you saw the
story so well, our immediate assumption is this has got
to be a leak from one of the liberal clerks.
I think a lot of people assume that maybe someone
like a clerk in justice, so to my Oris Chamber,
because she seems to particularly you know, on fire about

(22:05):
this issue and just perceived as being a little more
political than some of the others, but obviously not based
on any real information. Just like, wow, this seems what
the kind of thing they might do. And I think
you saw people on the right and the left presuming
that this was a liberal clerk leaking it in order
to try to impact the court, in order to try
to trigger exactly the types of protests that we're seeing

(22:26):
right now, in the hopes of impact the justices. And
I think that's maybe a nice way putting it, I
would say more threatening and intimidating the justices if it's
coming from that side, because there's the difference between an
opinion being leaked before it comes out and afterwards it's now.
This is not just people saying I'm really upset about this.
It's trying to say they're upset about it in a

(22:47):
way that will influence the justice is to change their opinion,
whether that's based on just purely seeing outrage or based
on the implicit threats that come of like protesting and
set in front of someone's private residence. Hey Carrie, fuck.
You know, the statutes pretty clear on this. This is
not legal what they are doing, and I'm wondering what

(23:08):
the explanation is for why this is allowed to continue.
My understanding, it's not illegal. It's not legal under Virginia
state law. And also on the federal side, judicial tampering.
I mean, think think about it this way. If if
there was a drug dealer, let's say, who was facing
life in prison, you know, a drug kingpin, and he
had ten of his guys standing outside of the judge's

(23:30):
home waving signs saying you know, you better watch out.
Every would say, well, that's judicial intimidation. Why isn't this
judicial intimidation? Well, I really think it is. I mean,
what can the kind of stuff that's going on here
is it is not just limited to hey, we want
to you know, express that we're annoying your opinion. It's
we want you to change your vote. And that is

(23:53):
effect attempting to affect the direction of the court. And
that again is assuming, um, I think the best of
motive because it worst case scenario. I mean we've we've
heard that Justice Alito had not is not returning to
his home and is relocated to a different secure location.
I mean, this is really disturbing. And what's even more

(24:13):
disturbing is seeing the response from the White House and
their refusal to condemn the idea of justices protesting at
the private residences of these justices, some of whom have
young children, right, So, I mean, this is this is
a really outrageous thing. Um. You know, over the weekend
there were so much outraged that I think they tried

(24:35):
to walk it back a little bit. They still they said, well,
of course, we want them to just be peaceful and
and no not no threats or anything. It took them
four days to even say that much before. They were
just like, Oh, these is they're very passionate, like, let's
let's let them protest. I think there's absolutely a place
for protesting, for making your voice heard, but that place
is in the public sphere, in front of the Supreme Court,

(24:56):
in front of you know, things like that, not in
front of someone's private home. We're talking to Kerry Savarino,
Judicial Crisis Network President, former Clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas. Okay, Kerry, So,
if you had a magic wand and you could waive
it right now, we don't know what Chief Justice Roberts
is going to do right now. It's a five to
four it appears majority. Should they expedite the release of

(25:21):
this opinion? Given the danger that may be out there
for the conservative clerk, the conservative justice is also probably
the conservative clerks, and the overall atmosphere surrounding the Supreme
Court is that the wrong decision. Should Chief Justice Roberts
join on to keep this from being a five to
four decision? You have a magic wand, what's the best
way to restore some form of credibility and normalcy to

(25:45):
the court in the wake of this league? Wow, if
I've done a magic wand let's make it nine zero
while we're at right. You know, I think the Chief
Justice is said, I don't want to do anything differently
because of the league. But I think that's that's as
you know, I think that's a miss conception of what's
going on here. I think you shouldn't change your vote
because of a league. I am absolutely in favor of that,

(26:07):
But I think under the circumstances, you know, the Court,
the Court can expedite opinions when they recognize there's a
serious reason to do so. They did that with the
Texas Heartbeat bill. That goat opinion came out in like
fifty days, which is lightning fast for a significant Supreme
Court decision to come out. They clearly put some you know,
put the heat on and and got that out. They

(26:28):
could do that here, especially because we know there's already
a complete draft. Now we don't know there could have
easily we're talking about months in between February when this
was passed around to the justices and maybe when it
was leaked, so there they already could have made a
lot of you know edits in between. There could have
been justice and saying hey, let's you know what they
can ask for anything from like I'd rather phrase this

(26:49):
differently or move this comma to hey, let's add this
argument or take out this one. So we don't really
know what the current version the justices are working at with,
but I would say, guys, get your act together. That signed.
As long as once all five justices sign on, they
could theoretically release it, even if the descent wasn't ready.
They could say, Okay, you know what, the dissenting opinions
is going to come out when they're when the number

(27:11):
of justices or in the descent are all agreed on it,
or they could they could lean on those justices, especially
since their colleagues are actually being put I think in
physical danger as a result of this. I would hope
that all the justices would say, you know what, let's
let's put this to the top of our pile, get
this done right now and get it out and then um,

(27:31):
you know, some of that pressures off. There's still going
to be people outraged about the opinion. Frankly, whatever ends
up happening with it, it's not going to be one
of those opinions that just yeah, carried. How concerned are
you that we could actually see a flip and that
it would go five four in the other direction and
effectively the leak and pressure campaign and threats would have
been successful. Well, you know what, I hope and I

(27:54):
really do think that the nature of how how outrageous
this was for the justices would um would fortify this
mind of any who were who are considering. You know
that maybe maybe this kind of outrage would be something
that I would not want to see. Maybe they maybe
they didn't want to see, and I think none of
the justices wanted to see want to see this type

(28:16):
of activity. But um, I would hope this would never
be something that would make them switch their votes. Now
we know they have life tenure under the Constitution specifically
to allow them to have that independence to not have
to be looking at the outside effects. Although obviously you
know when you have actual threats and things that that
changes that whether you're at life tenure or not. Right,
But um, but I would hope that they would they

(28:37):
would be able to stay firm. Again, I would love
it if the Chief Justice said, you know what I'm
gonna I'm going to join this opinion just to make
the points that I'm not gonna not gonna be bullied
by by these things, and I think recognizing too that
he's not, you know, trying trying to uphold Row is
simply not legally plausible if you're off holding in the

(28:59):
Misissippi LA as well. It's just completely at odds with
that decision. You have kind of have to take one
or the other, and he's trying to have it both ways.
Sounds like Chief Justice Roberts unfortunately. But Kerry Savarino, everybody,
Judicial Crisis Network President, former Clerk to Justice Thomas Kerry,
thanks for joining us here. We'll talk to you again soon.
Thanks of a great day. Wolf and Shepherd my friends

(29:20):
learned that name now. Wolf and Shepherd is the dress
shoe made and worn by athletes. Their founder is a
former track athlete and designer who brought athletic shoe innovation
to dress shoes. Wolf and Shepherd has a simple mission
equip professionals with footwear they feel comfortable in all day.
When you're watching one of the sports channels, you'll likely
see athletes and sports anchors wearing Wolf and Shepherd shoes

(29:41):
along with a suit and tie. Wolf and Shepherd's crossover
shoe is a business meets athletic shoe that features full
grain Italian leather and an athletic soul. This cross functional
design provides all day comfort and style, making the crossover
game for anything. Rob Gronkowski joined the Wolfpack. He's a
football player, he tells me these things while winning his
fourth Super Bowl with the Buccaneers, and has been wearing

(30:04):
Wolf and Shepherd for over a year. Look, I'm gonna
tell you guys this right now. I own three pairs
of Wolf and Shepherd shoes already. I love these shoes.
I think comfortable footwear. Comfortable feet is essential to performing
at your best and enjoying your life. I cannot recommend
Wolf and Shepherd more highly. I'm wearing these shoes constantly.
I don't think I have anything else three pairs of

(30:24):
the same shoe. I love my Wolf and Shepherd's better
footwear for the work day. That's what this is all about.
Join the pack at Wolf and Shepherd dot com. That's right,
Wolf and Shepherd, Wolf and Shepherd, so write those together
dot com. Wolf and Shepherd, sh E p h e
r D Wolf and Shepherd dot com. Playing Buck Show

(30:51):
going strong, about to be launching the third hour here
shortly and much to discuss with you, and we'll be
joined by our friend Ali Stucky. You'll know her podcast
Relatable and she's at the Blaze. We'll talk to her
about a lot of things, including this formula, this baby
formula shortage. That's it's not like baby formula has gone up,

(31:13):
you know, twenty five cents or something. People can't get it,
They can't find it. Parents are creating these online communication groups,
these these chat rooms, etc. To try to find it,
to try to post about Hey, I'm running out, I
need baby. It's it's really becoming a big problem a
lot of places across the country, obviously creating tremendous stress

(31:34):
on parents who I can imagine, especially with a young child,
they're already dealing with a lot of stress. We'll talk
to her about that and everything going on in politics
here as well. But this was great. Clay sent this
to me because it's a little part of it. The
same way that I appreciate what Brian Stelter the view

(31:54):
Keith Olberman's maniacal, lunatic but kind of sad tweets like,
I appreciate what they bring to the table for us, right,
because yes, sometimes you just need a slow pitch down
the middle, so you can crack it in the upper
stands and impress the girlfriend of the wife, you know
what I mean. Sometime and they provide that slow pitches
down the middle for conservative commentary. Jen Saki and my

(32:15):
Gosh is also in that category, and she is she
has left I believe her role as White House Press secretary.
She has been replaced by Krene Jean Pierre, who has
formerly been with move on dot Org. So she was
at move on dot org, which is just a left

(32:36):
wing hack outfit. We all know move on dot org.
I believe move on dot Org started from move on
from the Clinton lying under oath. That's what that's where
we're supposed to move on from. I mean this, I'm
going deep into my conservative knowledge. I didn't know that.
I'm pretty sure that's what it started from. And so
it goes back away as left wing group. But Clay
sent me these and this is up on Fox News

(32:58):
some amazing previous beliefs and statements like for example, she's
tweeted out that Brett Kavanaugh should not be coaching girls basketball. Okay,
if Brett Kavanaugh indeed does not know the difference between
intercourse and sexual assault, that should disqualify him from being
on the Supreme Court. She I mean, there's a lot

(33:18):
of things in here, folks, we could She claimed the
twenty eighteen governor's race was stolen from Stacy Abrams. But
this one, check this out. The third accuser of Kavanaugh,
Julie sweat Nick, was a lunatic. I mean that was
obvious to don't even who watched her interviews. Who un
legitimate crazy, like a crazy person like they put a
person who was basically saying Brett Kavanaugh gang ranked me

(33:38):
slash space aliens landed put a chip in my brain
and I I need, you know, need immediate mental assistance.
She wrote that about sweat Nick, that he was a
very mean Oh sorry, Julie Swetnick, Thirdkavna accuser, tells NBC
that he was a very mean drunk, so she magnified
the gang rape allegation from sweat Nick. But Clay, this

(34:00):
is a thing. If you're going to be a prominent
person in this Democrat party, you actually have to be
a Russia collusion truther. A Stacey Abrams is the actual
governor of Georgia. Person a Brett Kavanaugh was a serial
gang rapist in high school that nobody ever heard of
until this moment. We wanted to not be on the
Supreme Court. Person. These are requirements act. That's well, that's

(34:22):
why the Soviet Mary Poppins and in the Department of Disinformation,
of course she believes all those things. It's required now
in the Democrat Party. Yeah. And the one that fires
me up the most is reminder. This is a quote
from the new White House Press secretary. Reminder, Brian Kemp
stole the governatorial election from Georgians and Stacy Abrahams. That

(34:46):
is a direct quote from our new Press secretary. Well,
Democrats have spent I've been told buck the last eighteen
months saying that saying that any election is stolen is
a direct assault upon democracy and impermissible. Well, Brian Kemp
in twenty eighteen, he won by over fifty thousand votes

(35:09):
over Stacy Abrams. Word. I mean, look, Donald Trump lost
the presidential election based on the tally that is out there,
by around forty thousand votes. And for the people out
there who haven't done the math, you flip Wisconsin, you
flip Georgia, and you flip Arizona. Trump wins election. That's
about forty thousand votes total. In all those states. So

(35:31):
out of three hundred million or whatever, the one hundred
and fifty million, whatever the tally was of total votes
that were cast, over one hundred and fifty million in
this country a population of over three hundred million. That's
how much the twenty twenty elections swung on. Kemp won
the state of Georgia by more than fifty thousand votes.

(35:53):
So why is it that you can say that election
was stolen? And it's totally unacceptable to say that Trump's
election was stolen. I would love to hear Joe Biden
answer that question. You have as a spokesperson now a
woman who has said the twenty eighteen election was stolen.
Stacey Abrams never conceded. She's a patron, saying of the
Democrat Party. Why is that? I'm just wondering what the

(36:16):
explanation will be the next time Stacy Abrams loses and
the next time Beto loses. You know, they're do you
think you reach a sour grapes maximum where it's like, oh,
I didn't even want to be the governor, Oh they cheated.
You know, you think at some point you reach a
point where it no longer actually will fly even with Democrats.
I wonder they're gonna get No, I'm just gonna get

(36:37):
beat either. Buck. I think Stacy Abrams is gonna get
crushed in Georgia. And I also think, because we were
talking earlier, that Beto's gonna get crushed in Texas. Can
you still be the future of the Democrat Party if
you've lost four straight statewide elections in your home state
of Georgia. Gave Democrats a chance and they have learned
to regret it real fast. Yeah. Play Travis and Buck

(37:04):
Sexton on the front lines of trus