September 25, 2024 • 36 mins
Iran threatens Trump's life, Biden and Harris silent. The View's Sunny Hostin compares Biden to George Washington. Investigative reporter Julie Kelly joins C&B to discuss today's hearing on the DOJ/FBI Inspector General's report on J6 and Jack Smith's latest move.
Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Third hour, Clay and Buck kicks off. Now we said
we're going to dive into it, let's do it. The
latest news here on the security of President Trump the
threats against it, as we know, two assassination attempts, one
in which shots were fired and a round struck President
Trump in the ear in Butler, Pennsylvania, just before.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
The r n C in July.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
And you will not hear any of this discussion among
the anti Trump media because they still cling to this
narrative that it is Donald Trump who is the threat
to everyone else, and not that their reckless rhetoric is
in fact a threat to Trump himself, to his safety.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
So we'll discuss that at first.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Though. Also there's a credible reporting, or rather there's reporting
of a credible threat against President Trump from Iran, specifically
the Iranians. You have to remember, they despise Trump. The
leadership in Iran despises Trump because he undid the Iran
(01:09):
nuclear Deal, but also killed Custom Solomane or had a
targeted strike on Custom Solomonian Baghdad, a IRGC could's force leader,
and he had killed many, many people, but many Americans
at his direction as well in Iraq. So there's a
(01:31):
vendetta against Trump that is there. But I thought this
was interesting because I really, Clay, still have yet to
hear any forceful denunciation from Democrats of the violence and
the threats against President Trump's safety. You know, they'll say,
we oppose violence, and violence has no place. Okay, yeah,
(01:52):
I mean it's like they're writing some kind of a
corporate poll tested bear minimum phrase of of you know,
distancing themselves from it. Here's what Trump said about anybody
who would threaten a current past or possible future president
(02:13):
a foreign nation.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
Listen.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
So I want to make that statement because we are
under threat. I have been threatened very directly, and I
appreciate the agencies that we've been meeting with, but we've
been threatened very directly by Iran, and I think you
have to let them know because the best way to
do it is through the office of the president. That
you do any attacks on former presidents or candidates for president,
(02:38):
your country gets blown to smithereens as we say, I.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
Mean that that's the kind of that's denunciation, that's a
warning against this kind of political violence, in this case
externally to the state US. Clay, but you know, we
all have to be totally united against threats to our
political figures, and I think Trump is hitting the rite
home with it.
Speaker 4 (03:01):
Truly evil people don't respond to anything but threats of
violence and force. I think that's why Putin didn't invade
Ukraine when Trump was in office. I think that's why
we didn't have Hamas attack Israel while Trump was in office.
You might not like Trump, some of you out there
(03:22):
are not big fans of Trump, but these autocrat dictatorial
leaders fear what Trump may do to them and frankly
their families. And if they don't have that fear, they
will act with impunity. I think that's why Putin came
into Ukraine with Biden in office. I think that's why
(03:43):
Hamas attacked and why we've continued to see attacks on Israel.
That's why I'm concerned that China might decide to act
in Taiwan and what Trump said should be the law
of the land, regardless of your politics. And Buck, you
and I were talking about this Offen the team in
New York. If they can look this up. I seem
(04:04):
to recall there being an Iraqi intelligence that they were
trying to kill George hw Bush because they were angry
over what happened in the First Gulf War, and Bill Clinton,
I believe, was in office, and I think he rained
down some form of holy hell on the Iraqis and
(04:24):
let it be known, you're not targeting George HW. Bush,
and they ran against each other. And I really firmly,
one hundred billion percent believe that if Trump is in office,
and I bet you would too, Buck. In twenty twenty
five and suddenly there was actionable evidence that somebody was
trying to kill Joe Biden or Barack Obama, someone who
(04:44):
was on the Democrat side of the equation, I think
Trump would rain down holy hell on the country that
was threatening him. They're not doing anything Kamala and Biden
to Iran right now, despite the fact that we have
actionable intelligence that they're trying to kill him.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
In April nineteen ninety three, Bill Clinton, as president, had
US warships fired Tomahawk cruise missiles to obliterate Iraqi intelligence
headquarters in Baghdad because of a foiled car bomb assassination
(05:19):
plot against George HW.
Speaker 2 (05:22):
Bush.
Speaker 4 (05:22):
That should be the standard period every president should protect
to the utmost degree the lives of former presidents their family,
regardless of politics. It is shameful not only that Biden
and Kamala don't want to do anything here, but also
let me just point out, is any media even asking them.
I haven't even seen a question directed towards Biden or Kamala. Hey,
(05:46):
you claim to care about democracy and election interference. Is
there a bigger election interference than a foreign adversary of
the United States publicly threatening to kill one of the
leading candidates for president. I can't believe that we're here
or some of these stories buck boggle the mind that
they could be allowed to occur. If Biden had any
(06:07):
intellectual honesty at all in his body, or if Kamala did,
they would come out publicly. First of all, they wouldn't
come out publicly and say anything. They would rain down
Holy Hell in Iran right now and demonstrate what the
consequences would be if they try to act. They're not
doing anything because I think sadly thirty percent of Democrats
actually wants Trump to get killed and they don't kill
care who kills him.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
And the Iranian point of view on this, right, we're
talking leadership obviously, right, we're talking about the Mollahs and
the IRGC, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The Iranian point
of view on this is if they were able to
assassinate former President Trump through whatever the means would be,
(06:50):
there would be a crisis of legitimacy that would follow
for this election because, first of all, a lot of people,
the Iranians.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Would deny it.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
I think very likely, certainly in the early days, they
would say that we had nothing to do with it.
A lot of people would never believe that it was
actually Iran. They would think that it was you know,
enemies within people within this country who were trying to
stop Trump, and there would be a widespread rejection of
legitimacy of a Kamala Harris presidency and that would cause
(07:20):
real problems in this country. And the Iranians know that,
right So I'm just saying their motivation here to sow chaos,
which is what the DNI told Trump's campaign that would work.
I mean, that would be true. It would sow chaos
in the country right now because it would feel like
the American people had their election stolen from them. And
(07:41):
of course there'd be the psychic trauma of losing President Trump,
who were many I mean, he's also a dad, a
grandpa and an American. I mean, I think that that
gets lost a lot in the That was my first
reaction to Clay after Butler was just really the I mean,
this is one of ours, and the fact that there's
not more outrage. I swear that if somebody had taken
(08:03):
a shot at President Biden, I would be outraged too,
because whatever you want to say about Biden, he is
the president right now, and he's an American, and he
deserves to be safe and deserves to be able to
finish out his time in office. So the fact that
there are so many Democrats who don't feel that way
about Trump is just honestly a disgrace.
Speaker 4 (08:24):
We also dodged a bullet literally in many ways. Now,
Corey Campetori didn't. I mean, it's worth mentioning that that
guy went to a rally and is dead because of
the failures of the Secret Service, because they allowed these
seven or eight shots to be fired by the would
be assassin. It's been sixty one years buck since Texas
(08:44):
school book Depository, since JFK was shot in Dallas. If
Trump had been shot on that day and killed, every
single person listening to us right now for the rest
of his or her life would be reading article and
watching movies and television programs and streaming shows arguing about
(09:06):
who was actually responsible for Trump's death. And I think
you can track a real collapse in the belief in
American institutions historically. I do believe this is true, really
starting in earnest with the assassination of JFK and then
following through with the Vietnam War. I don't think to
(09:28):
your point, Buck, on the psychic history and sort of
the psychological profile of the average American, I don't think
after JFK's assassination in sixty three and the failures in Vietnam,
I think those of you who are old enough to
remember it never had the same faith in your government again,
and those of you who like you and me are
younger just lived through COVID, and what we have really
(09:50):
witnessed is just a collapse in any kind of belief
in institutional legitimacy and honesty. We feel like we're being
lied to all the time, and frequently we are. And again,
I just come back to this to me, if you
threaten the life of an American, and I would tie
this Endbuck with what we saw happen on October seventh,
they're still American citizens being held hostage by Hamas and
(10:12):
we've done nothing. I mean, if you allow the hair
on the head of an American citizen to be harmed
to me, as the American President, with no response whatsoever,
you have failed in your primary job, which is to
protect the safety and security of American citizens around the world,
not just here. And we've got still got American citizens
(10:32):
being held hostage. In nineteen eighty, when Jimmy Carter ran
against Ronald Reagan, that was unacceptable. The idea that Iran
could step in and hold American hostages was seen as
a fundamental failure of Jimmy Carter's presidency. Now Kamala and
Biden are allowing Iran to brag about plotting to kill
Trump and we're not doing anything. Meanwhile, Hamas, which is
(10:56):
Iran's terrorism arm, alongside of Hesbolag, are lobbing constant attacks
into Israel and they're actually holding American citizens hostage.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
For nearly a year.
Speaker 4 (11:09):
I don't know how much more weak, impotent, feckless, and
and and and just completely an utterly flawed American leadership
can get.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
It's embarrassing, it really is.
Speaker 1 (11:19):
Well, we've got the odds are very low that that
anyone who's held at this point still by Hamas is
coming back correct live tragically.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
But that's the odds, that's the reality of it, Clay.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
We also have more information about the the the near
miss and I know it hit Trump, but I mean
the near miss of an assassination in Butler, Pennsylvania. More
about the Secret Service, uh for what the Secret Services
mission is. It's hard to imagine how they could have
been worse on that day and and the only reason
(11:55):
President Trump is still alive is the grace of God
and divine intervention because that was an assassination attempt, that
assassination attempt. That everything went right for the assassin except
his aim.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
That's it. Everything.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
He had a clear line of sight, not far away.
Secret Service didn't have the communication set up. You know,
there's a couple of details that we'll share with everybody here.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
It's even worse.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
I mean, the lapse is even worse than we realized.
And it was about as bad as you think it
could be. So we'll discuss that we come back here.
But you know, we were just discussing the situation of Hesbelah.
You know, Hesbela fired a missile at Tel Aviv this morning,
which is Raeli defense force is shot down. But now
(12:39):
there's the possibility of an Israeli ground incursion into Lebanon
in the north, so things are heating up and tens
of thousands of Israeli citizens have been forced from their
homes once again into bomb shelters. As you can imagine,
the stress is just at an absolute peak right now
in Israel. But the International fellow Ship of Christians and Jews,
(13:01):
the IFCJ, is helping day in and day out to
provide as many Israeli citizens as possible with food and
medicine for those bomb shelter stays which can last for
days at a time. For more than forty years, the
IFCJ has been on the ground in Israel within hours
of the attacks by Hamas soldiers last October and every
day since. IFCJ has been feeding the hungry and protecting
(13:23):
the vulnerable. We need to help them, and one way
that you can do this is through the humanitarian efforts
provided by IFCJ, which need your support. They're looking for
financial contributions to help their ongoing efforts in support of
the Israeli people. In anticipation of a show of support
for our friends in Israel. Hundreds, if not thousands, of
churches in America will honor them in the days immediately
(13:46):
leading up to October seventh, the anniversary date of Israel
being attacked by Hamas. Your generous donation today will not
only provide a flag symbolizing your support in churchyards across America,
but it will also support the Fellowship's ongoing emergency efforts
in Israel. Visit SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. That's support IFCJ dot org.
Speaker 4 (14:07):
You know him as conservative radio hosts, Now just get
to know them as guys on this Sunday Hang podcast
with Clay and Fuck. Find it in their podcast feed
on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Welcome back in Clay Travis Buck Sexton Show. Joe Biden
set down for a live interview with the dumbest show
(14:29):
on television on a daily basis in America today. The
view and all sorts of craziness was said, We played
some of that earlier for you, but I didn't want
to forget our good buddy Sonny hostin who Buck, I
may have this is breaking news in my stupidity Power
rankings I might have to elevate Sonny Hostin above Joybahar,
(14:55):
because Joybahar is over eighty and a comedian and was
an ever renowned for her incredible intellect in her entire life.
Sunny Hostin is ostensibly there because she is a lawyer.
She's supposed to be intelligent. She's probably thirty years at
least younger than Joy Behar. She said today that Joe
(15:17):
Biden is like George Washington.
Speaker 5 (15:20):
Listen, I truly believe that his legacy will be etched
in the history books as Washington, as someone who put
that ego aside and put his country ears.
Speaker 4 (15:33):
All right, So to begin by saying, I truly believe.
First of all, Buck, you're a history guy. There have
been what forty five ish presidents, because some have served
different non consecutive terms. About thirty five presidents almost never
get talked about. So you have to be a pretty
good president to even be talked about very historically. Lincoln, Jefferson,
(15:57):
you know, we can run through the roster, Washington, Abby Lee, FDR.
There's relatively few presidents that actually get talked about that
much in the history books. The idea that Joe Biden
is going to be seen as George Washington is so
laughably absurd. It begs the question of whether she's that
dumb or just that committed to the current party orthodoxy
(16:18):
propaganda that she's willing to say it. I will say, scarily, Buck,
if Kamala Harris wins, she will for hundreds of years,
unfortunately be talked about. That is motivation enough for me
not to vote for. But two hundred years from now,
kids will know Kamala Harris's name if she wins. If
she loses, no one will know her name basically for
(16:39):
the rest of history. Big pivot point here.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
No one really thinks Kamala is particularly impressive, but I
would just say you're right about the way the history
will be written, and it is. It's interesting for Joe
Biden because he's in kind of a no lose position. Now,
that's one part of this we haven't talked about. If
he had stayed in gotten beaten by Trump, he would
be considered a loser forever. However, yes, he won in
(17:07):
twenty twenty. I know people don't like when we say that,
but he's been the president for four years. Okay, let's
just he won in twenty twenty, and this is the
way the history will go at least. And now he
either stepped aside for the first female and first black
female president in history, or he was a good soldier
(17:27):
for his side and stepped aside, and man, they never
should have doubted Biden.
Speaker 2 (17:32):
He wins either way.
Speaker 4 (17:33):
Now, that's one hundred percent right, And I think he's
starting to see that by going out and doing all
this media, which we talked about earlier. He was the
good guy and that basically vanished from July twenty first,
when he dropped out through Labor Day. You didn't see
him anywhere. Suddenly he's having cabinet meetings. He's showing back
(17:54):
up Buck. Something's going on here.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
Totally totally agree.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
The value of the US dollar has only diminished in
recent years, over recent decades, actually, the buying power of
her dollars down roughly thirty percent over the last twenty years.
Inflation is the reason for that affects the real value
of the dollars saved in your bank account. Let's make
sure that a portion of your savings is inflation sheltered.
Investing a portion of your savings and something as secure
(18:21):
as gold is a smart tactic. Right now, This is
where I trust the good people at Birch Gold Group
to help you. Birch Gold will assist you in converting
an existing IRA or four oh one K into an
IRA in gold. And the best news you don't have
to pay a penny out of pocket. Text my name
Buck to ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight get a
free info kid on Gold, no obligation, just information on
(18:43):
how to fortify your savings with gold. A plus rating
from the Better Business Bureau. We trust Birch Gold. You
should too. Text the name Buck Buck to ninety eight
ninety eight ninety eight for your free info Kid today.
Julie Kelly back with us now. She is the author
of a declassified on substack and she's covering the hearing
(19:07):
that's going on with regard to January sixth. Where is
the Inspector General report on it? Julie, good to have
you back. What can you tell us about what's going
on today?
Speaker 6 (19:17):
So there is finally testimony today by Department of Justice
Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who has been conducting, we are told,
an investigation into the DOJ FBI's role in the events
of January sixth. Now, every government agency from DHS Secret Service,
Capitol Police, they've all conducted, Department of Defense, they've all
(19:39):
conducted these internal inquiries and published a report. The only
one missing is the one we want the most right,
which is Department of Justice and FBI. So Michael Horowitz said,
there is a draft report that is on his desk.
He will be reviewing it and will have to go
through the classification process. Of course, it will not be
released before election day and possibly won't even be released
(20:04):
until after inauguration day. Now, this is of course straight
up election interferenced by the DOJ. He announced opening this
inquiry on January fifteenth of twenty twenty one. But what
was interesting, claiming Box, he told a weaponization committee today
that he had to put a quote unquote pause on
(20:25):
his internal investigation so it didn't conflict with what he
called a criminal investigation. Now, what it appears that he
was referring to was the work of the j sixth
Select Committee. Because, of course, as you guys know when
we talk about all the time, the DOJ's criminal investigation
into January sixth is ongoing to this day. They're arresting
people every week, So he couldn't have been referring to
(20:48):
the capital what they call a capital breaching prosecution and investigation.
He was referring to the j sixth Committee. So what
the J sixth Committee probably told him is to stand
down for eighteen months, do no investigation or inquiry or
research whatsoever while the Jay sixth Committee was doing their work.
(21:09):
Because what he said today is, oh, yeah, we restarted
it last year, so that would have been, of course,
after the J sixth Committee folded. He also indicated that
the report will address and Chris Ray has said this
as well. His report will address the use of FBI
informants on January sixth, including those who unlawfully entered the building.
Speaker 4 (21:30):
Julie, do you get the sense because I do, that
Kamala's team recognized that jan six was played out and
that threats against democracy was not resonating with the general
election public. Because it feels to me like since Kamala
has come in as the nominee, I know she kind
of occasionally will drop the this is the worst day
since Civil War talk that Biden made the sort of
(21:54):
footprint or foundation of his campaigns. Does it feel to
you like they have sort of recognized that this is
blown up in their face and at best, it's not helpful.
At worst, it actually is encouraging people to vote for Trump.
Speaker 6 (22:10):
I think play The only reason why she has dropped
it as an issue is because of her own involvement
and her misrepresentations about her whereabouts on January sixth. Remember,
she was at the DNC headquarters when the alleged pipeon
was discovered at about one oh five that afternoon. She
inexplicitly left the Capitol after att having a Senate intelligence breathing.
(22:35):
She left the capital at eleven twenty, arrived at DNC
headquarters at eleven twenty five when we were told this
pipeon was sitting right outside of the building. The DHS
Inspector General said that she came within twenty feet of
this device that the FBI was planted the night before.
But she is consistently misrepresented her whereabouts. She still to
(22:56):
this day in interviews, makes it sound like she was
at the Capitol when she was on and she has
never discussed you know, think about this, this is this
would be a huge talking point for her. I survived
a near assassination attempt by a mag Obama on January sixth.
She never mentions it. She misrepresents her whereabouts and her
(23:17):
movements that day, And I do think that that's primarily
why she and her campaign have dropped the issue, because
she does not want to be confronted about these questions
that remain unanswered to this day.
Speaker 1 (23:29):
Julie, what are the you just mentioned the questions that
are unanswered? What do you think we will be able
to finally know once this Inspector General report is released?
I mean, are there some things that will just be
unavoidable and you think will be certain to be confirmed
in this.
Speaker 6 (23:47):
I definitely think what I've been told is a higher
number of SBI informants than, of course the public has
been led to believe. But also that has come out
in these trials. We know from the trials of the
Proud Boys and the Oak Keepers that the FBI had
numerous FBI informants embedded in those groups before and on
(24:07):
January sixth. I have reporting that follows a Proud Boy
FBI informant who committed appeared to commit several times on
January six including going inside the building violence violently. He
was never charged. So I do believe that Horowitz is
going to address the number and where these informants came
out of did they come out of all fifty six
(24:29):
FBI field offices. Recall that we then had of the
Washington FBI Field office. Stephen d'antuano conducted a survey of
all the FBI field offices after he found out that
informants were involved in January six Of course he already
knew that, but that was his public excuse. Will Michael
Horowitz then reveal the results of that internal survey that
(24:52):
was taken, So I definitely think that Horrowitz will address that.
He also talked a little bit about the python and
best as you were saying with the DMC, And what
came out today is that it appears that all the
DNC security footage, not the Capital the Capital Police security
(25:13):
footage that we've been releasing and talking about, but the
security camera installed outside the DNC, that footage captured on
January sixth, when the DNC security system has been deleted.
The FBI does not have that and apparently only has
a short snippet of security footage from the night before.
(25:33):
So here we go, you guys, again, more deleted evidence.
Just the pleefrit service texts were deleted from twenty four
officials related to January sixth and January sixth, So I
don't know if Michael Hort was excuse me, will address
the pipe on investigation, because the FBI was believe on that,
and of course here we are nearly four years later,
(25:56):
no suspect has ever been identified or charged, and of
course the media is completely ignoring this now. But you know,
we have to keep pushing it because, as others have said,
the pipe bomb is revealed as a hoax, is what
it actually looks like? Then the entire January sixth narratives
starts to unravel.
Speaker 4 (26:17):
How many FBI agents or undercover officers do you think
if you were setting it over under Julie do you
think went into the capital that day? Do you think
it was ten? Do you think it was one hundred?
Like what kind of number would you think that they
if they ever give us, What do you think based
on everything that you've seen surrounding this story?
Speaker 6 (26:40):
So I think in terms of either informants, which are sources, right,
so they're not employees from the FBI, or undercover employees
of the FBI or all of the law enforcement agencies.
Do we know had undercover officers DC Metro Police, Capital Police,
DHS Park Police, Secret Service. They all had either plane
(27:04):
clothes or sort of on these undercover agents. In terms
of who is inside the building, you know, probably a
few dozen, but it will be at the end of
the day hundreds of undercover agents or officers or informants
from all of these various agencies who were involved, not
(27:27):
just the night before, but certainly that day, instigating violence,
pushing protesters to do certain things, and probably permitting crimes.
As I said, at least we know with at least
one informist, So there's still a lot to be uncovered.
But I think the DJIG report, whenever we get it,
(27:47):
and to the extent that Marrick Garland doesn't classify that
information about informants, will go a long way and finally
answering what all of us want to know, and that
is how much these agents and officers helped promote and
insight what we thought happened that afternoon.
Speaker 1 (28:07):
Speaking of Julie Kelly declassified is her substack, which you
can subscribe to. Julie give us the latest on another
legal proceeding going on. The Judge chuckin acceptance of a
rather lengthy brief, as I understand it from Jack Smith,
who is very sad over the Supreme Courts ruling.
Speaker 2 (28:30):
What's going on?
Speaker 6 (28:33):
So calent, I'm just teasing you. Of course, it's not
illegal proceeding at all. Right, this is a partisan political
operation by jack Smith, but of course allowed by Judge
Tanya Chucktin the Obama all point to, with a long
record of maybe anti Trumps statements in her courtroom. So
as soon as the Supreme Court ruling and Trump versus left,
(28:53):
the immunity order was received, they kicked it back to
Judge chuck In, and they kicked it back with a
lot of criticism about her initial handling of denying presidential
immunity in the entire case, because of course the J
sixth case relates to conduct by Donald Trump when she
was in the White House, So she denied all forms
(29:14):
of presidential immunity in her December twenty twenty three order.
That is how it got back to the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court Senate back to her, took out certain elements
of Jacksmith's indictment for J. Six and said you need
to conduct what they called a careful evaluation and analysis
of what is immune conduct and what is not. And
(29:35):
Chief Justice John Roberts actually on several occasions criticized her
for failing to do that the first time, for expediting
the case and not doing her due diligence. While she's
doing it all over again. As I said, I was
in her courtroom earlier this month. She strode into her
courtroom for the new hearing with Donald Trump's team and
(29:57):
Jacksmith and his team there like she had just won
nine to oh victory the Supreme Court, instead of being
totally humiliated. So she's doing whatever she can now to
get this case. It'll never get to trial, but at
least allow Jack Smith to make his case. I called
it a paper trial, make his case before the American
(30:17):
people and the media, to sort of salvage his case
and explain, try to explain why the remaining elements of
his new indictment are not covered by presidential immunity. He
is going to file a one hundred and eighty page
brief tomorrow. It will be under seal. Judge Chuck Can
called this brief irregular, and this brief will exceed normal
(30:42):
page limits by four times usually I think forty pages,
forty or fifty pages. So this is going to be
a trial, basically his trial document his opening arguments that
he would have given in a jury trial, that he'll
never have a chance to do that. It will contain
grand jury testimony, wrote told, it will have three to
zero twos from the FBI. He will be laying up
(31:03):
this case with no opportunity for Trump's team to respond
except weeks later and again in the separate filing. So
this is just again so partisan, so unfair, so against
the rule of bland due process. But Judge Chuck k
In wants to thumb her nose at the Supreme Court
at Donald Trump, and she has and he needs to
(31:25):
green light whatever special council Jacksmiths asked for.
Speaker 4 (31:30):
How excited, Julie, would you be to be having a
live feed of Jack Smith if Trump wins on November fifth?
Wouldn't that be amazing footage? I mean, you would know
better than anybody. I mean, the guy has spent thousands
and thousands of hours trying to nail Trump. He's gotten
(31:51):
rejected at every direction he's gone, and if Trump wins,
every like years of his life have basically just gone
up and smoke?
Speaker 2 (32:00):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 4 (32:01):
Or would you not love to have footage of Jack Smith?
Just I don't know if Bourbon's is drink. I don't
know if vodka's his drink. I don't know if he's
just a straight water guy, but him, he's just fulminating
with rage.
Speaker 2 (32:13):
Julie would be I would pay.
Speaker 4 (32:15):
I would pay for a live feet I'm gonna be
honest of Jack Smith camp.
Speaker 6 (32:20):
Remember the video of Ben Rhodes outside where was it
the Prevate Center whatever? Remember the video of him outside
and they did a montage with hello dark as my
oh yes and Ben Rose really like that would be
Jack Smith, And yes, I would pay to do it,
because look, Jack Smith is a stone cold loser. He
(32:41):
has a horrible record as a prosecutor, the Bob McDonald prosecution,
the first Robert Menendez, the John Edwards case. He has
been reviewed by the Supreme Court three times this year
in the Trump case, in the Fisher case with fifteen
twelve y two, and rejecting his unusual call to bypass
the appellate Court and take the immunity question directly to
the Supreme Court. You would be hard pressed to find
(33:03):
a bigger loser in DJ's prosecutor history than Jack Smith.
And keep in mind too, Judge Cannon dismissed his case
in July, the class by Documents case in Florida, think
that he was unconstitutionally appointed, that his appointment by Mark
Garland violated the appointment's cause of the Constitution. So he
(33:24):
can't get a win anywhere, which is why Judge Chuckkin
is doing whatever handholding she possibly can, breaching court normal
court rules, to let him file this brief and try
to salvage at least publicly or in the media this case,
because it's going nowhere after this, even if I would
use it, it's going nowhere.
Speaker 4 (33:46):
Julie, I would give him one win because I would
pay twenty five dollars for a live feed of Jack
Smith crumpled up in the fetal position crying if Trump
ends up winning, because he's just wasted years of his
life and as you pointed out, not even in an insult.
He is one of the biggest losers in the Department
of Justice history by results in court. That is phenomenal.
Speaker 2 (34:06):
Julie. We appreciate all the work.
Speaker 4 (34:07):
We appreciate all the time.
Speaker 6 (34:10):
Thanks guys, thanks for having me on, Julie. Kelly.
Speaker 4 (34:13):
Look, if you don't want to be a loser like Jacksmith,
if you don't want to be a loser like Joe Biden.
If you don't want to be a loser like everybody
who works by and large at MSNBC and is male,
you might need some testosterone in your life. And testosterone
comes as the engine that drives the male performance. Gives
you energy, vem bigger vitality to go about your day.
(34:36):
All you need to do is go to chalk dot
com check it out Male Vitality Stack. You know that
your testosterone is about fifty percent of what your granddad
or your great granddad's testosterone level was, and that explains
why many men are voting for Kamala Harris because they
legitimately don't have any testosterone. Do you want to be
a Kamala voter? Do you want to walk around like
(34:56):
a zombie like Joe Biden? No, you want to have testosterone,
want to have vigor. You want to be a man.
And that's what Chalk can do. Choq dot com. It's
all natural herbal supplement. And if you got questions, and
I know some of you do, You're like, I don't
like being on the internet. I'd prefer to make a
phone call. How about five zero Chalk three thousand. That's
five zero chalk three thousand. The US based customer service
(35:17):
team will give you the best deal on a subscription
out there. Just use my name, Clay. Clay get hooked
up today. Put some energy back into your life with
testosterone through Chalk play.
Speaker 1 (35:29):
Travis and Buck Sexton telling it like it is.
Speaker 4 (35:32):
Find them on the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you
get your podcasts. Jack Smith live cam on election night.
If Trump wins would be funny, Merrick Garland would be hysterical.
Biden might be funny because I think he might actually
be cheerful. If gomal Will loses, I bet Joe Biden,
Doctor Joe Biden would definitely tip back a glass in
(35:56):
a little bit of schaden freud to be experiencing it.
We can have some fun with this if things keep
going our way. Buck, who we would actually like to watch,
have to react to Trump's victory. But my goodness, get
out vote. Make sure you do everything it can be
under forty days by the time we come on air tomorrow.
I can't believe how quickly the time is flying by.
(36:17):
Make sure you subscribe to Clan Buck podcast Network everyone,
if you haven't already, and if you have tell a
friend about it. Carol Markowitz and Merrick k ather Hampt's
news show normally doing great. Sean Parnell, our buddy, he's
got a show there, You got lots and dominating. That
thing has done fantastically well.
Speaker 1 (36:38):
We picked the best, So there you go. Thanks for
rolling with us. More coming tomorrow. And yeah, thank you
for the Frendsche recommendations. By the way, we've got some
of those coming in
Third hour, Clay and Buck kicks off. Now we said
we're going to dive into it, let's do it. The
latest news here on the security of President Trump the
threats against it, as we know, two assassination attempts, one
in which shots were fired and a round struck President
Trump in the ear in Butler, Pennsylvania, just before.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
The r n C in July.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
And you will not hear any of this discussion among
the anti Trump media because they still cling to this
narrative that it is Donald Trump who is the threat
to everyone else, and not that their reckless rhetoric is
in fact a threat to Trump himself, to his safety.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
So we'll discuss that at first.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Though. Also there's a credible reporting, or rather there's reporting
of a credible threat against President Trump from Iran, specifically
the Iranians. You have to remember, they despise Trump. The
leadership in Iran despises Trump because he undid the Iran
(01:09):
nuclear Deal, but also killed Custom Solomane or had a
targeted strike on Custom Solomonian Baghdad, a IRGC could's force leader,
and he had killed many, many people, but many Americans
at his direction as well in Iraq. So there's a
(01:31):
vendetta against Trump that is there. But I thought this
was interesting because I really, Clay, still have yet to
hear any forceful denunciation from Democrats of the violence and
the threats against President Trump's safety. You know, they'll say,
we oppose violence, and violence has no place. Okay, yeah,
(01:52):
I mean it's like they're writing some kind of a
corporate poll tested bear minimum phrase of of you know,
distancing themselves from it. Here's what Trump said about anybody
who would threaten a current past or possible future president
(02:13):
a foreign nation.
Speaker 2 (02:13):
Listen.
Speaker 3 (02:14):
So I want to make that statement because we are
under threat. I have been threatened very directly, and I
appreciate the agencies that we've been meeting with, but we've
been threatened very directly by Iran, and I think you
have to let them know because the best way to
do it is through the office of the president. That
you do any attacks on former presidents or candidates for president,
(02:38):
your country gets blown to smithereens as we say, I.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
Mean that that's the kind of that's denunciation, that's a
warning against this kind of political violence, in this case
externally to the state US. Clay, but you know, we
all have to be totally united against threats to our
political figures, and I think Trump is hitting the rite
home with it.
Speaker 4 (03:01):
Truly evil people don't respond to anything but threats of
violence and force. I think that's why Putin didn't invade
Ukraine when Trump was in office. I think that's why
we didn't have Hamas attack Israel while Trump was in office.
You might not like Trump, some of you out there
(03:22):
are not big fans of Trump, but these autocrat dictatorial
leaders fear what Trump may do to them and frankly
their families. And if they don't have that fear, they
will act with impunity. I think that's why Putin came
into Ukraine with Biden in office. I think that's why
(03:43):
Hamas attacked and why we've continued to see attacks on Israel.
That's why I'm concerned that China might decide to act
in Taiwan and what Trump said should be the law
of the land, regardless of your politics. And Buck, you
and I were talking about this Offen the team in
New York. If they can look this up. I seem
(04:04):
to recall there being an Iraqi intelligence that they were
trying to kill George hw Bush because they were angry
over what happened in the First Gulf War, and Bill Clinton,
I believe, was in office, and I think he rained
down some form of holy hell on the Iraqis and
(04:24):
let it be known, you're not targeting George HW. Bush,
and they ran against each other. And I really firmly,
one hundred billion percent believe that if Trump is in office,
and I bet you would too, Buck. In twenty twenty
five and suddenly there was actionable evidence that somebody was
trying to kill Joe Biden or Barack Obama, someone who
(04:44):
was on the Democrat side of the equation, I think
Trump would rain down holy hell on the country that
was threatening him. They're not doing anything Kamala and Biden
to Iran right now, despite the fact that we have
actionable intelligence that they're trying to kill him.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
In April nineteen ninety three, Bill Clinton, as president, had
US warships fired Tomahawk cruise missiles to obliterate Iraqi intelligence
headquarters in Baghdad because of a foiled car bomb assassination
(05:19):
plot against George HW.
Speaker 2 (05:22):
Bush.
Speaker 4 (05:22):
That should be the standard period every president should protect
to the utmost degree the lives of former presidents their family,
regardless of politics. It is shameful not only that Biden
and Kamala don't want to do anything here, but also
let me just point out, is any media even asking them.
I haven't even seen a question directed towards Biden or Kamala. Hey,
(05:46):
you claim to care about democracy and election interference. Is
there a bigger election interference than a foreign adversary of
the United States publicly threatening to kill one of the
leading candidates for president. I can't believe that we're here
or some of these stories buck boggle the mind that
they could be allowed to occur. If Biden had any
(06:07):
intellectual honesty at all in his body, or if Kamala did,
they would come out publicly. First of all, they wouldn't
come out publicly and say anything. They would rain down
Holy Hell in Iran right now and demonstrate what the
consequences would be if they try to act. They're not
doing anything because I think sadly thirty percent of Democrats
actually wants Trump to get killed and they don't kill
care who kills him.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
And the Iranian point of view on this, right, we're
talking leadership obviously, right, we're talking about the Mollahs and
the IRGC, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The Iranian point
of view on this is if they were able to
assassinate former President Trump through whatever the means would be,
(06:50):
there would be a crisis of legitimacy that would follow
for this election because, first of all, a lot of people,
the Iranians.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Would deny it.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
I think very likely, certainly in the early days, they
would say that we had nothing to do with it.
A lot of people would never believe that it was
actually Iran. They would think that it was you know,
enemies within people within this country who were trying to
stop Trump, and there would be a widespread rejection of
legitimacy of a Kamala Harris presidency and that would cause
(07:20):
real problems in this country. And the Iranians know that,
right So I'm just saying their motivation here to sow chaos,
which is what the DNI told Trump's campaign that would work.
I mean, that would be true. It would sow chaos
in the country right now because it would feel like
the American people had their election stolen from them. And
(07:41):
of course there'd be the psychic trauma of losing President Trump,
who were many I mean, he's also a dad, a
grandpa and an American. I mean, I think that that
gets lost a lot in the That was my first
reaction to Clay after Butler was just really the I mean,
this is one of ours, and the fact that there's
not more outrage. I swear that if somebody had taken
(08:03):
a shot at President Biden, I would be outraged too,
because whatever you want to say about Biden, he is
the president right now, and he's an American, and he
deserves to be safe and deserves to be able to
finish out his time in office. So the fact that
there are so many Democrats who don't feel that way
about Trump is just honestly a disgrace.
Speaker 4 (08:24):
We also dodged a bullet literally in many ways. Now,
Corey Campetori didn't. I mean, it's worth mentioning that that
guy went to a rally and is dead because of
the failures of the Secret Service, because they allowed these
seven or eight shots to be fired by the would
be assassin. It's been sixty one years buck since Texas
(08:44):
school book Depository, since JFK was shot in Dallas. If
Trump had been shot on that day and killed, every
single person listening to us right now for the rest
of his or her life would be reading article and
watching movies and television programs and streaming shows arguing about
(09:06):
who was actually responsible for Trump's death. And I think
you can track a real collapse in the belief in
American institutions historically. I do believe this is true, really
starting in earnest with the assassination of JFK and then
following through with the Vietnam War. I don't think to
(09:28):
your point, Buck, on the psychic history and sort of
the psychological profile of the average American, I don't think
after JFK's assassination in sixty three and the failures in Vietnam,
I think those of you who are old enough to
remember it never had the same faith in your government again,
and those of you who like you and me are
younger just lived through COVID, and what we have really
(09:50):
witnessed is just a collapse in any kind of belief
in institutional legitimacy and honesty. We feel like we're being
lied to all the time, and frequently we are. And again,
I just come back to this to me, if you
threaten the life of an American, and I would tie
this Endbuck with what we saw happen on October seventh,
they're still American citizens being held hostage by Hamas and
(10:12):
we've done nothing. I mean, if you allow the hair
on the head of an American citizen to be harmed
to me, as the American President, with no response whatsoever,
you have failed in your primary job, which is to
protect the safety and security of American citizens around the world,
not just here. And we've got still got American citizens
(10:32):
being held hostage. In nineteen eighty, when Jimmy Carter ran
against Ronald Reagan, that was unacceptable. The idea that Iran
could step in and hold American hostages was seen as
a fundamental failure of Jimmy Carter's presidency. Now Kamala and
Biden are allowing Iran to brag about plotting to kill
Trump and we're not doing anything. Meanwhile, Hamas, which is
(10:56):
Iran's terrorism arm, alongside of Hesbolag, are lobbing constant attacks
into Israel and they're actually holding American citizens hostage.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
For nearly a year.
Speaker 4 (11:09):
I don't know how much more weak, impotent, feckless, and
and and and just completely an utterly flawed American leadership
can get.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
It's embarrassing, it really is.
Speaker 1 (11:19):
Well, we've got the odds are very low that that
anyone who's held at this point still by Hamas is
coming back correct live tragically.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
But that's the odds, that's the reality of it, Clay.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
We also have more information about the the the near
miss and I know it hit Trump, but I mean
the near miss of an assassination in Butler, Pennsylvania. More
about the Secret Service, uh for what the Secret Services
mission is. It's hard to imagine how they could have
been worse on that day and and the only reason
(11:55):
President Trump is still alive is the grace of God
and divine intervention because that was an assassination attempt, that
assassination attempt. That everything went right for the assassin except
his aim.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
That's it. Everything.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
He had a clear line of sight, not far away.
Secret Service didn't have the communication set up. You know,
there's a couple of details that we'll share with everybody here.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
It's even worse.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
I mean, the lapse is even worse than we realized.
And it was about as bad as you think it
could be. So we'll discuss that we come back here.
But you know, we were just discussing the situation of Hesbelah.
You know, Hesbela fired a missile at Tel Aviv this morning,
which is Raeli defense force is shot down. But now
(12:39):
there's the possibility of an Israeli ground incursion into Lebanon
in the north, so things are heating up and tens
of thousands of Israeli citizens have been forced from their
homes once again into bomb shelters. As you can imagine,
the stress is just at an absolute peak right now
in Israel. But the International fellow Ship of Christians and Jews,
(13:01):
the IFCJ, is helping day in and day out to
provide as many Israeli citizens as possible with food and
medicine for those bomb shelter stays which can last for
days at a time. For more than forty years, the
IFCJ has been on the ground in Israel within hours
of the attacks by Hamas soldiers last October and every
day since. IFCJ has been feeding the hungry and protecting
(13:23):
the vulnerable. We need to help them, and one way
that you can do this is through the humanitarian efforts
provided by IFCJ, which need your support. They're looking for
financial contributions to help their ongoing efforts in support of
the Israeli people. In anticipation of a show of support
for our friends in Israel. Hundreds, if not thousands, of
churches in America will honor them in the days immediately
(13:46):
leading up to October seventh, the anniversary date of Israel
being attacked by Hamas. Your generous donation today will not
only provide a flag symbolizing your support in churchyards across America,
but it will also support the Fellowship's ongoing emergency efforts
in Israel. Visit SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. That's support IFCJ dot org.
Speaker 4 (14:07):
You know him as conservative radio hosts, Now just get
to know them as guys on this Sunday Hang podcast
with Clay and Fuck. Find it in their podcast feed
on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Welcome back in Clay Travis Buck Sexton Show. Joe Biden
set down for a live interview with the dumbest show
(14:29):
on television on a daily basis in America today. The
view and all sorts of craziness was said, We played
some of that earlier for you, but I didn't want
to forget our good buddy Sonny hostin who Buck, I
may have this is breaking news in my stupidity Power
rankings I might have to elevate Sonny Hostin above Joybahar,
(14:55):
because Joybahar is over eighty and a comedian and was
an ever renowned for her incredible intellect in her entire life.
Sunny Hostin is ostensibly there because she is a lawyer.
She's supposed to be intelligent. She's probably thirty years at
least younger than Joy Behar. She said today that Joe
(15:17):
Biden is like George Washington.
Speaker 5 (15:20):
Listen, I truly believe that his legacy will be etched
in the history books as Washington, as someone who put
that ego aside and put his country ears.
Speaker 4 (15:33):
All right, So to begin by saying, I truly believe.
First of all, Buck, you're a history guy. There have
been what forty five ish presidents, because some have served
different non consecutive terms. About thirty five presidents almost never
get talked about. So you have to be a pretty
good president to even be talked about very historically. Lincoln, Jefferson,
(15:57):
you know, we can run through the roster, Washington, Abby Lee, FDR.
There's relatively few presidents that actually get talked about that
much in the history books. The idea that Joe Biden
is going to be seen as George Washington is so
laughably absurd. It begs the question of whether she's that
dumb or just that committed to the current party orthodoxy
(16:18):
propaganda that she's willing to say it. I will say, scarily, Buck,
if Kamala Harris wins, she will for hundreds of years,
unfortunately be talked about. That is motivation enough for me
not to vote for. But two hundred years from now,
kids will know Kamala Harris's name if she wins. If
she loses, no one will know her name basically for
(16:39):
the rest of history. Big pivot point here.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
No one really thinks Kamala is particularly impressive, but I
would just say you're right about the way the history
will be written, and it is. It's interesting for Joe
Biden because he's in kind of a no lose position. Now,
that's one part of this we haven't talked about. If
he had stayed in gotten beaten by Trump, he would
be considered a loser forever. However, yes, he won in
(17:07):
twenty twenty. I know people don't like when we say that,
but he's been the president for four years. Okay, let's
just he won in twenty twenty, and this is the
way the history will go at least. And now he
either stepped aside for the first female and first black
female president in history, or he was a good soldier
(17:27):
for his side and stepped aside, and man, they never
should have doubted Biden.
Speaker 2 (17:32):
He wins either way.
Speaker 4 (17:33):
Now, that's one hundred percent right, And I think he's
starting to see that by going out and doing all
this media, which we talked about earlier. He was the
good guy and that basically vanished from July twenty first,
when he dropped out through Labor Day. You didn't see
him anywhere. Suddenly he's having cabinet meetings. He's showing back
(17:54):
up Buck. Something's going on here.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
Totally totally agree.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
The value of the US dollar has only diminished in
recent years, over recent decades, actually, the buying power of
her dollars down roughly thirty percent over the last twenty years.
Inflation is the reason for that affects the real value
of the dollars saved in your bank account. Let's make
sure that a portion of your savings is inflation sheltered.
Investing a portion of your savings and something as secure
(18:21):
as gold is a smart tactic. Right now, This is
where I trust the good people at Birch Gold Group
to help you. Birch Gold will assist you in converting
an existing IRA or four oh one K into an
IRA in gold. And the best news you don't have
to pay a penny out of pocket. Text my name
Buck to ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight get a
free info kid on Gold, no obligation, just information on
(18:43):
how to fortify your savings with gold. A plus rating
from the Better Business Bureau. We trust Birch Gold. You
should too. Text the name Buck Buck to ninety eight
ninety eight ninety eight for your free info Kid today.
Julie Kelly back with us now. She is the author
of a declassified on substack and she's covering the hearing
(19:07):
that's going on with regard to January sixth. Where is
the Inspector General report on it? Julie, good to have
you back. What can you tell us about what's going
on today?
Speaker 6 (19:17):
So there is finally testimony today by Department of Justice
Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who has been conducting, we are told,
an investigation into the DOJ FBI's role in the events
of January sixth. Now, every government agency from DHS Secret Service,
Capitol Police, they've all conducted, Department of Defense, they've all
(19:39):
conducted these internal inquiries and published a report. The only
one missing is the one we want the most right,
which is Department of Justice and FBI. So Michael Horowitz said,
there is a draft report that is on his desk.
He will be reviewing it and will have to go
through the classification process. Of course, it will not be
released before election day and possibly won't even be released
(20:04):
until after inauguration day. Now, this is of course straight
up election interferenced by the DOJ. He announced opening this
inquiry on January fifteenth of twenty twenty one. But what
was interesting, claiming Box, he told a weaponization committee today
that he had to put a quote unquote pause on
(20:25):
his internal investigation so it didn't conflict with what he
called a criminal investigation. Now, what it appears that he
was referring to was the work of the j sixth
Select Committee. Because, of course, as you guys know when
we talk about all the time, the DOJ's criminal investigation
into January sixth is ongoing to this day. They're arresting
people every week, So he couldn't have been referring to
(20:48):
the capital what they call a capital breaching prosecution and investigation.
He was referring to the j sixth Committee. So what
the J sixth Committee probably told him is to stand
down for eighteen months, do no investigation or inquiry or
research whatsoever while the Jay sixth Committee was doing their work.
(21:09):
Because what he said today is, oh, yeah, we restarted
it last year, so that would have been, of course,
after the J sixth Committee folded. He also indicated that
the report will address and Chris Ray has said this
as well. His report will address the use of FBI
informants on January sixth, including those who unlawfully entered the building.
Speaker 4 (21:30):
Julie, do you get the sense because I do, that
Kamala's team recognized that jan six was played out and
that threats against democracy was not resonating with the general
election public. Because it feels to me like since Kamala
has come in as the nominee, I know she kind
of occasionally will drop the this is the worst day
since Civil War talk that Biden made the sort of
(21:54):
footprint or foundation of his campaigns. Does it feel to
you like they have sort of recognized that this is
blown up in their face and at best, it's not helpful.
At worst, it actually is encouraging people to vote for Trump.
Speaker 6 (22:10):
I think play The only reason why she has dropped
it as an issue is because of her own involvement
and her misrepresentations about her whereabouts on January sixth. Remember,
she was at the DNC headquarters when the alleged pipeon
was discovered at about one oh five that afternoon. She
inexplicitly left the Capitol after att having a Senate intelligence breathing.
(22:35):
She left the capital at eleven twenty, arrived at DNC
headquarters at eleven twenty five when we were told this
pipeon was sitting right outside of the building. The DHS
Inspector General said that she came within twenty feet of
this device that the FBI was planted the night before.
But she is consistently misrepresented her whereabouts. She still to
(22:56):
this day in interviews, makes it sound like she was
at the Capitol when she was on and she has
never discussed you know, think about this, this is this
would be a huge talking point for her. I survived
a near assassination attempt by a mag Obama on January sixth.
She never mentions it. She misrepresents her whereabouts and her
(23:17):
movements that day, And I do think that that's primarily
why she and her campaign have dropped the issue, because
she does not want to be confronted about these questions
that remain unanswered to this day.
Speaker 1 (23:29):
Julie, what are the you just mentioned the questions that
are unanswered? What do you think we will be able
to finally know once this Inspector General report is released?
I mean, are there some things that will just be
unavoidable and you think will be certain to be confirmed
in this.
Speaker 6 (23:47):
I definitely think what I've been told is a higher
number of SBI informants than, of course the public has
been led to believe. But also that has come out
in these trials. We know from the trials of the
Proud Boys and the Oak Keepers that the FBI had
numerous FBI informants embedded in those groups before and on
(24:07):
January sixth. I have reporting that follows a Proud Boy
FBI informant who committed appeared to commit several times on
January six including going inside the building violence violently. He
was never charged. So I do believe that Horowitz is
going to address the number and where these informants came
out of did they come out of all fifty six
(24:29):
FBI field offices. Recall that we then had of the
Washington FBI Field office. Stephen d'antuano conducted a survey of
all the FBI field offices after he found out that
informants were involved in January six Of course he already
knew that, but that was his public excuse. Will Michael
Horowitz then reveal the results of that internal survey that
(24:52):
was taken, So I definitely think that Horrowitz will address that.
He also talked a little bit about the python and
best as you were saying with the DMC, And what
came out today is that it appears that all the
DNC security footage, not the Capital the Capital Police security
(25:13):
footage that we've been releasing and talking about, but the
security camera installed outside the DNC, that footage captured on
January sixth, when the DNC security system has been deleted.
The FBI does not have that and apparently only has
a short snippet of security footage from the night before.
(25:33):
So here we go, you guys, again, more deleted evidence.
Just the pleefrit service texts were deleted from twenty four
officials related to January sixth and January sixth, So I
don't know if Michael Hort was excuse me, will address
the pipe on investigation, because the FBI was believe on that,
and of course here we are nearly four years later,
(25:56):
no suspect has ever been identified or charged, and of
course the media is completely ignoring this now. But you know,
we have to keep pushing it because, as others have said,
the pipe bomb is revealed as a hoax, is what
it actually looks like? Then the entire January sixth narratives
starts to unravel.
Speaker 4 (26:17):
How many FBI agents or undercover officers do you think
if you were setting it over under Julie do you
think went into the capital that day? Do you think
it was ten? Do you think it was one hundred?
Like what kind of number would you think that they
if they ever give us, What do you think based
on everything that you've seen surrounding this story?
Speaker 6 (26:40):
So I think in terms of either informants, which are sources, right,
so they're not employees from the FBI, or undercover employees
of the FBI or all of the law enforcement agencies.
Do we know had undercover officers DC Metro Police, Capital Police,
DHS Park Police, Secret Service. They all had either plane
(27:04):
clothes or sort of on these undercover agents. In terms
of who is inside the building, you know, probably a
few dozen, but it will be at the end of
the day hundreds of undercover agents or officers or informants
from all of these various agencies who were involved, not
(27:27):
just the night before, but certainly that day, instigating violence,
pushing protesters to do certain things, and probably permitting crimes.
As I said, at least we know with at least
one informist, So there's still a lot to be uncovered.
But I think the DJIG report, whenever we get it,
(27:47):
and to the extent that Marrick Garland doesn't classify that
information about informants, will go a long way and finally
answering what all of us want to know, and that
is how much these agents and officers helped promote and
insight what we thought happened that afternoon.
Speaker 1 (28:07):
Speaking of Julie Kelly declassified is her substack, which you
can subscribe to. Julie give us the latest on another
legal proceeding going on. The Judge chuckin acceptance of a
rather lengthy brief, as I understand it from Jack Smith,
who is very sad over the Supreme Courts ruling.
Speaker 2 (28:30):
What's going on?
Speaker 6 (28:33):
So calent, I'm just teasing you. Of course, it's not
illegal proceeding at all. Right, this is a partisan political
operation by jack Smith, but of course allowed by Judge
Tanya Chucktin the Obama all point to, with a long
record of maybe anti Trumps statements in her courtroom. So
as soon as the Supreme Court ruling and Trump versus left,
(28:53):
the immunity order was received, they kicked it back to
Judge chuck In, and they kicked it back with a
lot of criticism about her initial handling of denying presidential
immunity in the entire case, because of course the J
sixth case relates to conduct by Donald Trump when she
was in the White House, So she denied all forms
(29:14):
of presidential immunity in her December twenty twenty three order.
That is how it got back to the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court Senate back to her, took out certain elements
of Jacksmith's indictment for J. Six and said you need
to conduct what they called a careful evaluation and analysis
of what is immune conduct and what is not. And
(29:35):
Chief Justice John Roberts actually on several occasions criticized her
for failing to do that the first time, for expediting
the case and not doing her due diligence. While she's
doing it all over again. As I said, I was
in her courtroom earlier this month. She strode into her
courtroom for the new hearing with Donald Trump's team and
(29:57):
Jacksmith and his team there like she had just won
nine to oh victory the Supreme Court, instead of being
totally humiliated. So she's doing whatever she can now to
get this case. It'll never get to trial, but at
least allow Jack Smith to make his case. I called
it a paper trial, make his case before the American
(30:17):
people and the media, to sort of salvage his case
and explain, try to explain why the remaining elements of
his new indictment are not covered by presidential immunity. He
is going to file a one hundred and eighty page
brief tomorrow. It will be under seal. Judge Chuck Can
called this brief irregular, and this brief will exceed normal
(30:42):
page limits by four times usually I think forty pages,
forty or fifty pages. So this is going to be
a trial, basically his trial document his opening arguments that
he would have given in a jury trial, that he'll
never have a chance to do that. It will contain
grand jury testimony, wrote told, it will have three to
zero twos from the FBI. He will be laying up
(31:03):
this case with no opportunity for Trump's team to respond
except weeks later and again in the separate filing. So
this is just again so partisan, so unfair, so against
the rule of bland due process. But Judge Chuck k
In wants to thumb her nose at the Supreme Court
at Donald Trump, and she has and he needs to
(31:25):
green light whatever special council Jacksmiths asked for.
Speaker 4 (31:30):
How excited, Julie, would you be to be having a
live feed of Jack Smith if Trump wins on November fifth?
Wouldn't that be amazing footage? I mean, you would know
better than anybody. I mean, the guy has spent thousands
and thousands of hours trying to nail Trump. He's gotten
(31:51):
rejected at every direction he's gone, and if Trump wins,
every like years of his life have basically just gone
up and smoke?
Speaker 2 (32:00):
Am I wrong?
Speaker 4 (32:01):
Or would you not love to have footage of Jack Smith?
Just I don't know if Bourbon's is drink. I don't
know if vodka's his drink. I don't know if he's
just a straight water guy, but him, he's just fulminating
with rage.
Speaker 2 (32:13):
Julie would be I would pay.
Speaker 4 (32:15):
I would pay for a live feet I'm gonna be
honest of Jack Smith camp.
Speaker 6 (32:20):
Remember the video of Ben Rhodes outside where was it
the Prevate Center whatever? Remember the video of him outside
and they did a montage with hello dark as my
oh yes and Ben Rose really like that would be
Jack Smith, And yes, I would pay to do it,
because look, Jack Smith is a stone cold loser. He
(32:41):
has a horrible record as a prosecutor, the Bob McDonald prosecution,
the first Robert Menendez, the John Edwards case. He has
been reviewed by the Supreme Court three times this year
in the Trump case, in the Fisher case with fifteen
twelve y two, and rejecting his unusual call to bypass
the appellate Court and take the immunity question directly to
the Supreme Court. You would be hard pressed to find
(33:03):
a bigger loser in DJ's prosecutor history than Jack Smith.
And keep in mind too, Judge Cannon dismissed his case
in July, the class by Documents case in Florida, think
that he was unconstitutionally appointed, that his appointment by Mark
Garland violated the appointment's cause of the Constitution. So he
(33:24):
can't get a win anywhere, which is why Judge Chuckkin
is doing whatever handholding she possibly can, breaching court normal
court rules, to let him file this brief and try
to salvage at least publicly or in the media this case,
because it's going nowhere after this, even if I would
use it, it's going nowhere.
Speaker 4 (33:46):
Julie, I would give him one win because I would
pay twenty five dollars for a live feed of Jack
Smith crumpled up in the fetal position crying if Trump
ends up winning, because he's just wasted years of his
life and as you pointed out, not even in an insult.
He is one of the biggest losers in the Department
of Justice history by results in court. That is phenomenal.
Speaker 2 (34:06):
Julie. We appreciate all the work.
Speaker 4 (34:07):
We appreciate all the time.
Speaker 6 (34:10):
Thanks guys, thanks for having me on, Julie. Kelly.
Speaker 4 (34:13):
Look, if you don't want to be a loser like Jacksmith,
if you don't want to be a loser like Joe Biden.
If you don't want to be a loser like everybody
who works by and large at MSNBC and is male,
you might need some testosterone in your life. And testosterone
comes as the engine that drives the male performance. Gives
you energy, vem bigger vitality to go about your day.
(34:36):
All you need to do is go to chalk dot
com check it out Male Vitality Stack. You know that
your testosterone is about fifty percent of what your granddad
or your great granddad's testosterone level was, and that explains
why many men are voting for Kamala Harris because they
legitimately don't have any testosterone. Do you want to be
a Kamala voter? Do you want to walk around like
(34:56):
a zombie like Joe Biden? No, you want to have testosterone,
want to have vigor. You want to be a man.
And that's what Chalk can do. Choq dot com. It's
all natural herbal supplement. And if you got questions, and
I know some of you do, You're like, I don't
like being on the internet. I'd prefer to make a
phone call. How about five zero Chalk three thousand. That's
five zero chalk three thousand. The US based customer service
(35:17):
team will give you the best deal on a subscription
out there. Just use my name, Clay. Clay get hooked
up today. Put some energy back into your life with
testosterone through Chalk play.
Speaker 1 (35:29):
Travis and Buck Sexton telling it like it is.
Speaker 4 (35:32):
Find them on the free iHeartRadio app or wherever you
get your podcasts. Jack Smith live cam on election night.
If Trump wins would be funny, Merrick Garland would be hysterical.
Biden might be funny because I think he might actually
be cheerful. If gomal Will loses, I bet Joe Biden,
Doctor Joe Biden would definitely tip back a glass in
(35:56):
a little bit of schaden freud to be experiencing it.
We can have some fun with this if things keep
going our way. Buck, who we would actually like to watch,
have to react to Trump's victory. But my goodness, get
out vote. Make sure you do everything it can be
under forty days by the time we come on air tomorrow.
I can't believe how quickly the time is flying by.
(36:17):
Make sure you subscribe to Clan Buck podcast Network everyone,
if you haven't already, and if you have tell a
friend about it. Carol Markowitz and Merrick k ather Hampt's
news show normally doing great. Sean Parnell, our buddy, he's
got a show there, You got lots and dominating. That
thing has done fantastically well.
Speaker 1 (36:38):
We picked the best, So there you go. Thanks for
rolling with us. More coming tomorrow. And yeah, thank you
for the Frendsche recommendations. By the way, we've got some
of those coming in
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News
Hosts And Creators
Clay Travis
Buck Sexton
Show Links
WebsiteNewsletterPopular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.