Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush Limbaugh Show podcast.
I knew it. I hate to be and I told
you so, but I knew. I knew this was going
to happen. I wanted to get here today. I wanted
to beat Biden to the punch, but I wasn't able
to do it because Biden went out there before the
program started. He just finished. These guys have more sensitivity
(00:22):
to what's on this program than the Republicans do. I'm
telling you anyway, I told you i'd be here today, Folktion.
Here we are, Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone.
Three hours of broadcast excellence straight ahead. The telebone numbers
eight hundred and two eight two eight eight two. The
email address l rushmo at EIB dot us. So there's
(00:43):
Joe Biden who thinks he's been elected president and he
hasn't been yet. He has not been elected president. There
hasn't been a certified vote yet. Media networks do not proclaim,
well they can proclaim, but they do not determine who
presidents are. And he is not president yet, but he's
(01:07):
acting like it. Man. Was this guy sad? Man? Is
this guy just apocalyptic and downod dumps. So he said
today that he was going to meet with his new
COVID Advisory Board and they were gonna finally get serious
on dealing with the pandemic, because as you know, not
a single thing up to now has been serious about
(01:30):
COVID nah, because Trump has been running, and of course
that means we can't take anything seriously. His Trump is
an incompetent boot doesn't know what he's been doing. So
I just I wanted to warn everybody here that we
are on the verge of you know, we're we're gonna
We're gonna get the the Biden COVID vaccine, We're gonna
(01:54):
get the Biden economic recovery. We're gonna get the Biden
and the Biden that everything that needs to be fixed,
everything it needs to be ramped up, everything needs to
be resolved, is going to be said by the media
to have been resolved by Biden. We're gonna be here
(02:15):
with a COVID Biden vaccine. We're gonna be hearing the
Biden economic recovery. We're going to be hearing the Biden
end to looting and arson, all of this. I just
want you to be ready for it. I wanted to
get here and have a chance to say this before Biden.
But Biden knows the drill more than the Republicans do.
He knew to beat this program to the punch on that.
(02:37):
But doesn't matter what he said, if you're just joining us,
if you missed what he said, and if I don't
blame you, folks, I know that more and more of
you are just tuning media out and I totally a'm
just including Fox News. I totally understand that if there
(03:02):
was ever a day, if there was ever a time
for devout exclusive listening to the EIB network, than today
it is. So there's Biden. I'm watching this and his
overall demeanor is one of great sadness. He's very down
to the dumps, very very disappointed. And it's all an act,
(03:26):
of course, it's it's designed to convey the seriousness and
the sadness that is associated with the COVID nineteen. And
the sum total of the Biden COVID plan is you
will wear a mask. You're going to wear a mask, folks.
(03:47):
A mask is magic. A mask, said Joe Biden, is
not political. No, no, no no. If we all wear
a mask, why we're going to bring our country together. Well, yeah,
we are going to unify. If everybody just wears the mask,
(04:07):
why we are in fat City, We're gonna fix it all.
We're gonna fix everything Donald Trump broke. We are going
to reunite. We are going to bring the country back together.
And in the process of wearing a mask, guess what
you're doing. You're giving something back. You notice the left
(04:29):
always thinks that you, the people that make the country work,
always have something to give back. They never think that
the rioters and the looters have anything to give back, though,
But you do somehow you owe, you owe the country.
According to the day's Democrat Party in the left, you
(04:49):
need to give something back, and so you can do
that by wearing a mask. If you would just wear
the mask, why it's magic. What would happen? All come
together and we'd all we would all make statements that
are not political. I think it's a just an disappointing tragedy.
(05:12):
What has happened here? And I'll tell you what needs
to be the focus. Oh yeah, this is such great news.
You see what happened with DAL futures today and now
the stock markets of twelve hundred points. The futures were
up twelve hundred points because Fiser say that their vaccine
is ninety percent effective. And let me tell you something,
(05:35):
Joe Biden had nothing to do with the vaccine, but
he's going to get credit for it. It's going to
be the Biden vaccine. He had nothing to do with it.
The Democrat Party should get no credit whatsoever. They have
been braving the vaccine. They have been suggesting of its faults.
They have been suggesting a trumpet, been lying about it,
that it is not going to be ready in time,
and if it is, it isn't going to work. They've
(05:57):
been they have been irresponsibly ripping the vaccine institutionally. They
have been they have been suggesting to people that if
Trump is responsible for it, they can't trust it. Trump
doesn't make it. Trump's not a scientist in a laboratory
wearing a white coat or at bluecoat making a vaccine.
(06:18):
This is Fiser, this is Johnson and Johnson, this is
bio in Tech, all reputed scientific companies, and Joe Biden
and Kamala Harris have both been denigrating the entire concept
of a vaccine because Trump would be behind it or
(06:38):
because Trump would benefit from it. They have been actively
trying to persuade people not to take it, Governor Cuomo
two because Trumps people are irresponsible. So now we've got
the announcement from Fiser that their vaccine is ninety percent effect.
If this causes the stock market to jump an incredible amount.
(07:03):
The President said time after time that vaccines were coming
a Democrats said that he was a liar, that if
such a vaccine was ready, they wouldn't trust it because
he was behind it. And now, my, how things have changed.
We've got the so called President elect, Joe Biden, and
(07:26):
all is well. CNN's even stopped the COVID nineteen countdown.
I have it right here in my formerly nicotine stained fingers. Monday,
November second, ten thirty am. Here c ann screen shot
coronavirus pandemic globally, total cases in the United States, total cases,
(07:47):
total deaths. One week later, November ninth, twenty twenty ten
thirty am, a screen grab of CNN's main page, not
a single mention of coronavirus. And we told you that
coronavirus was going to vanish after the election, and it has.
(08:09):
We didn't tell you the virus itself was going to
vanish don't confuse thing. We didn't say they were gonna do.
We said it was going to stop being a big issue.
And why is it going to stop being a big
issue because they don't want to lay it off on Biden.
We're gonna have a cure. We're gonna have a vaccine.
(08:30):
It's gonna be the Biden vaccine, not the Trump vaccine.
Biden did all this magically while sequestered in his basement.
So we told you after the election, the vaccine or
the virus is going to be way, way diminished. And
(08:53):
so it has been starting out in the pages of
the drive by media and also their television screens. It's
just amazing in a so called President elect Biden world
all as well, Utopia has arrived. Vaccines, vaccines. Why we're
(09:18):
going to be able to trust them now? Except Andrew
Cuomo says no, unless we can get this vaccine out
of Trump's hands and transferred to Biden's, we still shouldn't
trust it. It's all about whether they succeed in persuading
people that Biden had more to do with the creating
and the shepherding of the vaccine than Trump did. So
(09:41):
the dal futures were up twelve hundred points, Fizer Biointech,
COVID nineteen, vaccine ninety percent effective. Folks, here's where we
are with this. It is vital that our constitutional framework
(10:03):
be protected. This recount, this canvassing, This investigation must occur,
it must take place. The founding fathers of our country
knew that there would be always be intense political battles.
(10:25):
They knew that there would be bad actors. They knew
there would be people trying to undermine what they had founded,
what they had created. They knew it. They were not naive.
They knew from the moment they founded the United States
that it would be a threat to an higher group
of people, or many groups of people around the world.
(10:48):
They created defense mechanisms and insurance policies as best they could,
starting with creating three branches of government to sure a
government of law, not of men. You have heard the
phrase a government of law, not of men, checks and
(11:13):
balances throughout our system. It is very important that there
are clear, specific facts presented in a very scholarly and
concise way as this investigation goes forward, that institutions, American
(11:35):
institutions are revered, respected, and protected. Of what I mean
here It's great that we have anecdotal evidence. It's great
that you can get a phone call from somebody, somebody
who says they saw X number of ballots being tampered
with and they saw this, or they saw That's all
well and good, but that's not going to change anything.
They all need to be investigated. They all need to
(11:56):
be tracked down. Do not misunderstand, but there need to
be very clear, specific facts presented in a scholarly and
concise way. I have been urging people all weekend to
name an investigation zar, a vote count zar, whatever, we're
(12:18):
going to quid this, a single person that the Trump
administration sends out every day to update the people of
this country on the latest of the investigation into every state,
into every allegation of vote fraud in every state. You've
got your staff track and all this stuff down. You
have your czar or your figurehead who leads the investigation,
(12:40):
who takes in all the information. He's got a staff,
they codify it each and every day, and they report
to the American people in an honest, straight forward, factual way.
And there will be plenty of information to report. There'll
be plenty of information to gather. There was plenty of
fraud that took place. There's simply no way Joe Biden
(13:01):
was legitimately elected president. That just can't believe it. I
do not believe it intellectually, and as I look at
what I have learned and what I have seen over
the course of the past four or five days, there's
simply no way. And I have an idea. I got
an idea. Let's let's unify the coutany if to see
if this idea will float. Let's unify the country by
(13:26):
conducting a massive investigation to vote fraud, and let's make
Trump look like a fool. Right, that's what they want,
So let's do this massive and because Trump says it's
fraudulent here and fraudulent there, and everybody knows Trump's an idiot,
and everybody knows Trump's a fool, So let's do this.
Wouldn't the left want this? Wouldn't the left want there
(13:47):
to be documentary evidence that Trump doesn't know what he's
talking about. And the only way to get it is
a full fledged, serious, non partisan investigation into what happened.
Are you with me on this? Democrats? Probably not? And
if you're not, why up? Why wouldn't you want to joke,
(14:07):
what are you afraid of being discovered? If you won
this thing legitimately and if there wasn't any chicanery, we
get all the time in the world. Al Gore had
thirty seven days the monkey around in one state. We've
got to get this right, folks. The history and future
(14:29):
this country depends on us getting this right. If we
do not get this election right, if we do not
get the votes counted correctly, tabulated correctly, then we're going
to lose all integrity in elections. The Democrats have been
attempting to do that with four years of being critical
of Trump being an illegitimate winner in twenty sixteen by
(14:52):
saying he tampered with the Russians, colluded with the Russians,
meddled with the Russians, when the Russians didn't do anything.
There wasn't any meddling or collusion. They've already damaged the
integrity of our elections way too much, and they predicted
the Russians we're going to be involved in this election
until they say Biden is the winner. Now we can't
even find the Russians being anywhere near involved. This is
(15:18):
about the future integrity of elect well, you can't. We
cannot have a country where seventy million voters don't trust
the outcome. And that's where we are right now today. Now,
I submit to you, the left doesn't care. All they
want is the win and everything that goes along with it.
They don't care about the integrity of elections. They don't
(15:41):
care about your opinion. They don't care about having to
persuade you to agree with them or any of that.
They don't care. They just want you rendered irrelevant. And
if they have to go so far as to not
count your votes, that's exactly what they will do. The
rule of law, the constitution, efficacy have to dominate using
(16:05):
a targeted approach here in how we track down the
fraud and how we present it to the American people.
If presented in the right way, this can be a
very effective, laser focused message. It can help in the
primary objective, which is to protect the integrity and the
(16:27):
honesty of the American presidential electoral system. And this must happen.
We can't go forward as we are right now with
so many people distrusting it. Anyway. I gotta take a break.
Because of the constraints of time and the programming format,
but we will continue after this. Do not go away,
(16:47):
ladies and gentlemen. We must put our energy and faith
into the founding principles and ideals of this country. That
is what is going to get us through this. The
founding documents of this country, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution.
It's all there. If those documents, particularly the Constitution, if
(17:10):
they are adhered to, because the Constitution is the rule
of law. If that is adhered to, we will get
to the bottom of what happened. And that's where our
energy and that's where our faith must be. It's actually
a teachable moment. It's a golden opportunity to teach relevant
(17:34):
aspects of our founding documents that have not been properly taught.
And I don't mean we need to get into the
weeds on things. You don't need to make it complicated.
But there is a way to do this, and that's
all I'm focusing on. And I don't want anybody to
be mad at me or get or misunderstand. I'm not
saying that the individual anecdotal stories of fraud here and
(17:57):
fraud there are not le I'm not saying that they
aren't worth it, but they are we don't build the
case with scattershot examples. We take all those examples and
we put them into the central clearinghouse run by what
I hope will be the elections are. The elections are
(18:18):
will have a staff, he will take all this is
This is my dream, this is my hope, take all
of that in along with the official investigations the Trump
administration has mounted, along with all the assistants from the
United States Supreme Court, like Justice Alito. If if Alito
prevails in Pennsylvania, you realize Pennsylvania can flip to Trump
(18:42):
if the ballots that were submitted after November third are
rendered irrelevant and are said not the count because they
violate the law. This is big, But we need to
go about this in the strict constitutional, legal fashion, with
no politics attached. Haven't We've been told for four straight years,
(19:03):
ladies and gentlemen, nothing is more important than safeguarding our elections.
Isn't that what everything the Democrats did the last four
years was based on, first the phony Russian coup, which
was designed to get rid of Trump because he stole
the election. Of course we know it's all bs, not
a single fact in it, but look at what they said,
the integrity of our elections is paramount, and they do
(19:24):
the impeachment, and that's based on Trump making a phone
call of somehow violated the integrity of the presidency and
so forth and so on, because it was investigating the
family of his potential presidential opponent, Joe Biden. He said,
the safeguard our elections now, they're not interested in it. Now,
(19:47):
they're not interested in getting at the bottom of what happened.
They want the perception that this thing was stolen to
take hold. They don't know them. They don't want you
to think that they are happy with the outcome, to
the point that if seventy million Americans think the election
is not above board, that's okay with them. They don't care.
(20:10):
Safeguarding our elections is no longer a concern. It really
was a big concern when al Gore wasn't happy back
in two thousand. We spent thirty seven days safeguarding that election.
Thirty seven days. That wasn't basically a three county one
state investigation, and there was no thought of shutting down
(20:32):
that investigation early, like there is this one. What are
they trying to hide? Now, let me show you what
I'm talking about when I talk about a czar or
a central figure operating a clearinghouse dispensing information to people
every day. This happened, by the way, during the Gore
(20:55):
Bush recount, and there were two people that actually maybe
three j A. Baker, The third was George W. Bush's
lead guy, and he had a spokeswoman by the name
of Margaret Terwilliger, and Mary Madeline was occasionally involved in
that effort as well, But it was just those three
(21:15):
and that's where you went to get the latest on
the hanging Chad controversy from the George W. Bush team side.
And last night on Life, Liberty and Levine on the
Fox News Channel, Levin spoke with Ken Starr about the Constitution,
(21:36):
and I think this is what I'm talking when I
talk about his arm. I'm not suggesting it should be Starr,
although he might be good in this role, because you
need somebody serious, you need somebody scholarly, and you need
somebody who who who is unattackable, unassailable on a partisan basis.
Clearly that is not Ken's star. So but listen to
(22:00):
what he says and how he says that it's right
up with the alley. I think we all need to
be going in terms of dealing with getting this fraud discovered, exposed,
and overturned. So the first question from Levine, Article two,
Section one claus to of the Constitution provides as follows,
(22:23):
each state shall appoint, in such manner as the legislature
thereof made direct a number of electors equal to the
whole number of Senators and representatives to which the state
may be entitled in Congress. So, in other words, state
legislatures determine how to select their electors. Isn't that What
that means what happened in Pennsylvania over these recent weeks
(22:47):
is a constitutional travesty. Governor wolf tries to get his
reforms his vision as he was entitled to do, through
the legislature of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. He then goes
to the state Supreme Court, which by a divided vote
accepted the substance of what Governor Wolfe was doing and
(23:08):
then added their on nooks and crannies as well. Happily,
in recent days we've seen Justice Samuel Alito step in
as a single justice. He has the power to do it,
and essentially, in a very short order, say, the legislature
is the boss what the governor did, this is my interpretation,
(23:29):
is utterly unconstitutional. What the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did is
utterly unconstitutional. That is the kind of information that needs
to be sent and transmitted to the American people by
a credible czar every day. As the information is gathered,
somebody who can make it understandable, like me. I mean,
(23:50):
I'm not tizared. Somebody can make the complex understandable. What
Starr has just said here is the governor of Pennsylvania
doesn't have the power to do what he did. It's
not in the United States Constitution. Justice Alito saw what
the governor did and immediately stepped in and said, you're
not going to do it that way. Justice Alito then
(24:11):
ordered the separation of all post election day ballots in Pennsylvania.
On Friday, Republicans asked the US Supreme Court to ensure
county election officials were segregating mail ballots delivered after election day.
On Friday evening, Justice Alito approved the Republican request. He
(24:32):
ordered county boards to comply with state guidance to keep
the late ballots separate because they might end up being
thrown out as illegal. However, even if the High Court
were to ultimately side with the Republicans, the impact it
says here would likely be muted. Pennsylvania officials said they're
(24:54):
already setting aside the small number of mail ballots that
have arrived since Tuesday. No, they weren't. It's why Alito
jumped in there. They were not setting aside a small number,
a large number, any number. It's why Alito had to
issue the order twice. By the way, that small number
is somehow large enough to wipe out Trump's seven hundred
(25:17):
thousand vote lead. This is not a small number. We
go to bed, those of us who did on election night,
Trump's up seven hundred thousand votes in the twenty sixteen election.
Throughout the night, Trump's vote totals kept being added to.
They kept finding more votes. Lo and behold, Trump has
(25:38):
a seven hundred thousand vote lead in Pennsylvania, and they
stopped counting in Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, the two Democrat largest
Democrats sections of the state. They stopped counting, no doubt,
to find out how many votes they're going to need.
And then overnight, while most normal people are asleep, the
magic happens and the seven hundred thousand vote majority starts
(25:59):
to vent seven hundred thousand vote lead and it's gone
and nobody saw how it happened. So there will be
an investigation into this. The Trump team has vowed they
are going to investigate this. Let me give you another
example of Ken Starr, who was on with Levine last night,
(26:23):
Life Liberty levin the Fox News Channel question, we keep
hearing count every vote? Isn't that the issue? Precisely? In
Justice Star which a judge which votes do we count?
Exactly right? In fact, to count every vote maybe a crime.
It may even be a crime under federal law. It's
(26:43):
definitely a crime under state law if that is. And
here's the key word illegal about And that's why you
see and it's shameful that Vice President Biden's people and
the Vice President himself for saying count every vote and
selling a lot of T shirts, that is a potential
(27:03):
and an invitation for absolute lawlessness. Again, this is the
kind of information that needs to be imparted officially from
the Trump administration via the recount or the investigation or
the elections are whatever the title is. Exactly right, in fact,
account every vote may be a crime, you might be
(27:25):
how the hell can that because some of these votes
are illegal, folks. Some of the votes are illegal. They're
illegally placed, they're illegally tabulated, they're illegally made. Some of
these ballots were filled out after the fact. You've heard
the anecdotal stories. Finally, our last comment, I just want
(27:45):
you to hear this as though this is an official
Elections are giving you a report on the day's activity,
the results of the ongoing investigation that they are conducting.
It was very clear from the outset that what the
governor did and what the state Supreme Court did was
utterly unconstitutional. So it's a lawless act. And at this stage,
(28:06):
the Supreme Court has a solemn duty, in light of
the nature of the issue and the stakes at hand,
has to take the case. And I think, by the way,
the earlier determination by Justice Alito to call a halt
to any counting if that had begun of these set
aside ballots, the ones that I view is illegal. They're
(28:27):
just illegal. They don't and should not count. His determination
to do that is a signal. It's not an assurance,
but it's a signal that a majority of the Supreme
Court would uphold what Justice Alito has done. Now, you
might well how do we know that, Well, we don't
know that, but there are assumptions that if Justice Alito
is going to rule as he did, he's got to
(28:50):
be somewhat confident that there is a majority of supporting
the court for it. Those are just factors that are
that are taken into account by judges as they rule
on matters like this, where further requests of participation for
full membership of court maybe thought. Bottom line is that
(29:15):
Judge Starr here is convinced that illegality occurred in Pennsylvania
with seven hundred thousand votes, wants to get to the
bottom of it. For the sake of the integrity of
our electoral system. That must at the end of all this,
regardless who wins, folks, that has to be what happens here.
(29:37):
We cannot go forward with the presidential election system being
doubted by the losing side every time. I mean, they're
going to be people to doubt it. But we can't
have what we have now. We've lost all the integrity.
And the thing is the left doesn't care. Doesn't matter
(29:57):
to them. They've demonstrated this throughout this Pross. I don't care. Well,
somebody has to care. Somebody has to care for the
future the country, the future the constitution, the future of
the rule of law, the future of the integrity of
the rule of law, of the constitution, and our election system.
And that's what this attempt to get to the truth is. Now,
before we go to the break, I want to remind
(30:18):
you of something I told you back in October fifteenth
of receiving a phone call from an elite member of
the drive by media. She has a question for me,
Will I urge my listeners to remain calm while the
vote returns are being counted on election night. She is
(30:43):
assuming that the results might not be available on election
night or in the first few days, because the drive
bys have gotten themselves believing that the results are not
going to be counted because all the mail in ballots,
because of the absentees, and so fourth, they've got themselves
convinced that Trump is gonna on election. I may end
(31:04):
up winning it a landslide, but by the time they
count all these other things, Trump's gonna lose. So she
wants to talk to me about whether or not I'm
going to urge you to be adults, Whether I'm going
to urge you to remain calm and to not raise
hell like I've done so many times. When is the
last time I urged any mass behavior on the part
(31:28):
of anybody in this audience? Answer it doesn't happen. I
don't do it. I mean one an insulting question turned
out it was Leslie Stall and she wanted this was
for her interview with the president as a pre interview
before the election, had one with the Biden one with Trump,
and she wanted me to answer the question, Will I
(31:48):
urge my listeners to stay calm on election, as though
you all are going to be raising hell out there
and it's all going to be hard of the effort
to get trouble elected, but but it's going to be
dishonest and all. This is what I do the right
thing and urge you to remain because there's an attempt
(32:09):
to intimidate, and of course it failed because we don't
take these people seriously. I gotta go quick time out
much more when we get back Rush Limbaugh the EIB
network right after this, and I want to get to
the phones here in just second. I just I need
to make one observation. I know what anybody misunderstand me
and think that I'm being critical of the anecdotal evidence.
(32:32):
I'm not let me. Let me try to explain this
the lawyers if there ever is AZAR, for example, if
my idea were ever adopted and there is a czar,
I know that the lawyers working for the Zara Zar,
if they're gonna need individual examples of fraud, they're gonna
need the anecdotal stories. But that's not what your report.
That's what they assemble. You have to add things up
(32:54):
to have a trend. You need patterns and the and
the individual examples or how you do it. But that's
I'm just saying. You don't go out and make the
case on the individual examples, like you don't make the
case by saying I heard somebody called Russia Limbaugh who
said X number of ballots were dipped into cod liver
oil and that has some super secret watermark on it.
(33:17):
That's not how we do this. You tell the TSAR
that let bizarre run it through the sifter or see
if it's masses a smell test they do all that,
I know lawyers are not going to be handed a
smoking gone of one hundred thousand phony ballots. That isn't
how it happens. And this is also key in state
(33:37):
like Pennsylvania, they've institutionalized the fraud and then legalized it,
like no signatures required on mail in ballots, they did
that in anticipation of this no postal dates on mail
in ballot, they did that on purpose. The decision to
take these safeguards off is part of the issue. Got
(34:01):
to find out who did that and did they have
the legal authority to do it, which makes the uncovering
of fraud harder and harder. This is not going to
be easy. We know it happened. Another fraud has been institutionalized.
Who decided no signatures required? Who decided no postal dates
on mail in ballots? So you've got a bunch of
(34:25):
people say, well, you need tons of fraud to prove
it before you can move the needle. It's more complicated
than that. It is a massive job, folks, to do this.
That's why you need committed people. It is a massive
thing to unwind what the Democrats have done here. It
has to happen, though. This has wrecked the institutions that
(34:50):
we all depend on for integrity and honesty throughout our government,
throughout the electoral system. Okay, here's Steve in Las Vegas,
as we get to the phones. I'm glad you called, sir.
Great to have you rush. God bless you for good health.
I'm rooting for you big time. Thank you, sir. Secondly,
so we have a major coincidence that a week after
(35:11):
an election, all of a sudden, Fiser has discovered a
vaccine that nine effective. They had absolutely no idea about
this before the election. Yeah, they did. There's nothing suspicious
about this. Really, you don't believe no. Trump has been
(35:35):
Trump has been promising this. Trump has been suggesting that
we're on the verge of vaccine. He was hoping to
have an announced beforehand, but he knew that wasn't gonna
be the case, and he told us he knew they
were close. He's been talking Fiser, He's been talking Johnson
and Johnson. I can understand your sister. Okay, now the
election is decided and here comes the announcement the official
(35:57):
that couldn't make the announcement before. That's what you're upset about.
But the fact that this has been done, there's nothing
suspicious about the achievement. What you're curious about here is
the timing, and you're correct about that. Anyway, I'm glad
you called. Do not misunderstand me. We'll be back after
this with much more reminder, ladies and gentlemen, this is
(36:20):
the last day. More than likely, this is it for me.
This week it's treatment week. We'll have Mark Stein and
a whole coterie of guest hosts in the remainder of
the busy broadcast week. We got two hours yet to
go here, so batting down the hatches and buckle in
will make the most of them return before you know it,
don't go away. Yeah, Trump has just fired the Secretary Defense,
(36:44):
Mark Esper, effective immediately. I haven't gotten a reason yet.
We'll get a reason, of course, it doesn't have to
be a reason. Trump can fire whoever he wants, anytime
he wants. Well, he can't fire me because I'm not
part of the regime. But if he can fire anybody
(37:05):
in the regime, he can fire. Call me. When he fired,
call me. It could have fired any number of people.
But he's now fired the Secretary of Defense. Welcome back
Rush Limbaugh and the excellence in broadcasting network. And a reminder,
this for me is treatment week. Actually, folks. Last week
(37:26):
was supposed to be treatment week, and I moved it
by seven days with of course, the acknowledgement of approval
of the medical team to this week so as to
be here during the election and it's aftermath. I'm glad
that happened. The odds are, you know. I always try
(37:50):
to make it back at least one day during treatment week,
and I've been fortunate the past couple of treatment weeks
and I've actually made it back on Thursday in one case, Friday.
Don't know about this week, I have planned. We got
guest hosts lined up for every day, starting with Mark
Stein tomorrow, and he's even on standby for today in
(38:13):
case we had this scdaddle out of here early because
of the weather. You know, we've had this tropical storm
scooting by, and it was something that had to be
watched because I gotta get where I'm going, and if
it meant I had to leave yesterday, then that would
have put Stein in here today. It's worked out great
so that we have a normal day to day and
(38:34):
a normal treatment week, so we have two hours here
and make the most of it. The the circumstance with
where we are, I've got a couple of calls up here.
In fact, I want to take give me line three.
I'm gonna take this blink. It looks it looks is
(38:55):
he still there? Not there? He's there one paper. It
looks good. Sherman. I don't know how he's going to sound,
but it looks it's something I want to bounce off. Anyway,
it was a point that I was going to make anyway,
So let's grab Sherman. Use him as the transition. Sherman
is in ann Arbor, Michigan. Sherman, thanks for calling. How
you doing, buddy, Yes, they're doing great. Thank you, and
(39:17):
I'm glad you're with us today, and I really appreciate
you'd taken the time to come in when you could
have done for treatment week. I really think you need
to hear this, and I think the president needs to
hear this. Everybody is taking the wrong message from this election,
and they're missing the message and they're angry and demoralized.
But they need to stop being angry about it. I'm
(39:37):
forty eight and I actually feel better about the future
of the country than I have in a very long time.
This was not a blue wave or a wipeout or
a repudiation of the president. The Republicans kept the Senate.
Mitch McConnell Lindsey grahams Susan Collins. One. Okay, let hang on,
hang on, just sec now. I'm not I don't want
to throw cold water on anything. And I agree pretty
(39:59):
much what you're saying. It was not a blue wave.
The country's not gone socialist. The country did not embrace
Joe Biden. That's not at all what happened here. That's
your point, right, Yes, sir, but we still had an
election stalled it. We still had Now I agree with
your point two that anger. You're going to have some
of that, but it should not be the guiding emotion.
(40:21):
But on the Senate races, they're still trying to steal
those Sherman and Georgia. One of the reasons why they
have been holding off on giving that state to Trump
and why they've been looking more votes is to force
runoffs in both of those Georgia Senate races, which they've
now done. If they take those two, they run the
Senate because that gives them Kamala Harris as the fifty
(40:42):
first vote as vice president, and that means the blue
wave does become the guiding principles of this country. Yes, sir,
but I don't think it's going to happen. And more importantly,
I think the fact is that the President saved the party,
and he grew the party, and he showed us the
way by rebuilding it into a party of the working people.
(41:03):
And now we need to carry on his work whether
or not he survived this ambush that happened to him
in Philadelphia and Detroit, in Milwaukee. But we have a
six three majority in the Supreme Court, and we've got
Sidney Powell and great people working in the legal fight,
and hopefully they'll win. But even if they don't, the
fact is that we have not lost the country. And
I think, as a matter of fact, the complete opposite
(41:25):
is the case. And I just want to make sure
you know that and are confident about that. I totally
do my point today. My point today has been to
focus on how the investigation of the fraud is handled,
and how the information learned and the investigation is then disseminated,
(41:49):
and what the purpose of the investigation is. In the
first place, I think it needs to happen because I
think fraud cannot be allowed to stand no matter what
we say about you can say, well, look at it
took them cheating to win. I feel really good about
the country, folks, it took them cheating or we can't
leave it at that, and don't take this personally, Sherman.
(42:10):
We can't leave it at they stole it. If they
stole it, then that becomes institutionalized and they'll keep stealing them.
It has to be stopped. The effort has to be
made to uncover what happened and then inform as many
millions as possible. We cannot. You can talk about all
the great things Trump did for the party, great things
(42:31):
for the country, but if the left is permitted by
virtue what happened here to change institutionally the presidential election
system so that they can steal it every four years,
it doesn't matter. That cannot be allowed. We cannot permit
that to stand. Whether the investigation shows Biden one or not.
(42:56):
We want to know whoever one did so Legitimately, there
cannot be a circumstance where seventy million Americans don't trust it.
And that's where we are now. You're calling and saying
we need to look on the bright side. We shouldn't
be mad about it. Trump redid the party. Here's another thing, Sherman.
(43:19):
I don't know if you've noticed, but the Republican Party
as made up of say the never trumpers. They're going
to go in there and they're going to try to
take it back. They're going to try to reconstitute the
party to what it was before Trump. You're saying, good luck.
They ain't got a prayer. The American people. Ninety five
percent of the Republican Party support Trump. That is the part. Yeah,
(43:42):
you say that, but the battle is going to take place.
All of these things that you've cited have happened. Trump
reconstituted and redefined the party. He took it over and
remade it in his own image. No question, Trump is
(44:02):
not going anywhere, no matter what happens in this election,
He's going to do something. I also believe. I got
a note from a friend of mine said, Rush Trump
has earned our support despite his ups and downs. And
my favorite movie Rush The Wild Bunch by Sam Peckinpaw.
(44:26):
You know when they turn on one of their own.
William hold in the start of the movie loses his
temporary yells at these guys. When you side with a man,
you stay with him. If you can't do that, you're
like some animal. You're finished. We're finished, all of us.
If you haven't seen The Wild Bunch, You really ought
to watch, or gets a great great movie. Sam Peckinpaw
(44:47):
was from Fresno, or is from Fresno. But it's all
about loyalty in hard times. And my friends is pointing
out here you side with a guy. We've sided with Trump.
We stay with him. If you can't do that, you're finished.
We're finished. We all deserve to stand by Trump as
he moves forward. I when I stop and think of
(45:12):
this on human terms, the Trump family, they're fine people.
To have been maligned and to have been disabused, to
have been so mischaracterized and lied about, to have their
character assassinated. This is the finest bunch of people that
(45:33):
ever run into They're a great None of Trump's kids
have had problem one. They all work in the family business.
They've all had to work their way up in the
family business. They've been given nothing other than that opportunity,
which is fine. That's what all families try to set
up for their kids. They didn't have to do any
(45:54):
of this, and they did. And it wasn't just Trump himself,
his whole family, from his wife to his daughter, to
his sons to the in laws. They were all in
on this, and they were doing it for us. They
were doing it for the country. They saw the country deteriorating.
They didn't like it. They wanted America restored to its
original promise of our founding. And for that they end
(46:19):
up under attack mercilessly for four years, every day, multiple
times a day. And they didn't have to do it,
and now they've had. They knew they were going to
win this election. That's why they're shocked. That's why they're stunned.
They knew. We knew. You do not draw fifty five
(46:41):
thousand people to rallies while your opponent's sequestered in a basement.
This just doesn't happen. But it did because the Democrats
were six months ahead of us in setting up these systems,
and they run the electoral apparatus in these particular precincts
where all this stuff happened. So it has to be investigated.
(47:05):
It has to be discovered what happened. American people need
to know for the future and the sake of the country,
not for the Trumps. They would be beneficiaries of this.
If it has found that the fraud was wanting or
rapid and all over the place, but this needs to
(47:28):
be done for the sake of the constitution. This needs
to be done for the sake of the rule of law.
It needs. If it isn't, we're on the downhill side
and the country's got a much harder task and job
ahead of it in surviving as founded, and it must
survive as founded. But the human side of this was
(47:53):
what was done to the Trumps in order to bring
this whole result about. Hey, I know, don't about it, Rush,
it's politics. Don't get mad about it. Rush, I know,
don't get mad Rush. There was no blue wave. I
know there was no blue wave. But what if they
can effectively create the illusion that there was by virtue
(48:14):
of cheating and fraud. We know the president got more votes,
but what if they succeed in taking them away. We
didn't lose the state houses, the Senate, not yet. They're
trying to steal two Senate seats in Georgia with these runoffs.
(48:37):
Chuck Schumer is not finished. You think they're just gonna
sit idly by and have Biden and Kamala Harris in
the White House and not be able to do anything
because they don't control the Senate. That's why this cannot
be given up. This effort cannot be stopped. It's a
two pronged effort. Stop the ongoing fraud, stop the ongoing cheating,
(48:58):
and then nailed down that which has happened. And it's
hard work and it's going to take a while, but
it must be properly motivated. And I'm not trying to
sound like a Miss America pageant contestant here when I
say the purpose of this is not so that Donald
Trump gets a fair shake. This should be done so
(49:18):
our constitution survives, so that the institutions and traditions which
have defined our nation's greatness survive, because those are the
institutions under result, those are the things that democrats are
attacking in order to take power that they may not
have and likely did not win at the ballot box.
(49:45):
I've had so many emails from you about Fox News.
I've had so many emails from those of you who
are livid and angry, starting with the Arizona call, starting
and continuing with um with other things, and excuse me.
(50:07):
I think that there's a simple explanation here. There's a
there's a key rule I've always believed in media, which
is what I'm in I'm in talk radio, and it
goes it actually goes back to the William Holden quote
here in that movie The Wild. But you do not
(50:29):
turn on your base. You do not turn on your
audience unless you've had some kind of weight to what.
You just don't for the You don't do it for
the sake of the approval of your enemies. You don't.
You don't turn on the people who got you where
you are because you would rather be friends with other people.
(50:50):
You just don't do it. And that appears to be
what's happened here, Donna Brazil, all over the place, We've
got see everybody on a talking head interview. Half of
them or more are New York Times or Washington Post,
Democrat media people, the Arizona Call Some even with the
(51:15):
Chris Wallace debate, think as an anti Trump move. But
you know, throughout all of this, the media can't turn
talk radio, can they. The media has been desperate to
blow up talk radio and Fox News. They've wanted to
(51:37):
draw up Fox News ever since Fox News was founded
and created, and they've wanted to blow talk radio up
since before that. They've wanted to destroy me and my
character and that of anybody else who hosts a talk
radio program. Why is it? Do you think it looks
(52:00):
like they may be having some success now in blowing
up Fox. I mean you've got you've got the wife
of one of the Murdoch brothers tweeting out, we did it,
we did it, We got rid of Trump, we did it.
I think it was Lackland Murdoch's wife. So it looks
like they may be succeeding in turning portions of Fox
(52:23):
against its base. Let me tell you something, folks. If
the people running Fox succeed in destroying the distinction that
Fox has from the rest of the media, They're going
to destroy They're going to destroy Fox if they If
they are successful in taking away from Fox the things
(52:48):
that distinguish it and make it appear different from the
rest of the drive by media, one thing is going
to happen. The reason they have not been able to
do this with talk radio is we do not stab
our audience in the back. We do not turn on
(53:10):
our base. We remain principled and consistent from me on
down to everybody who does this on the conservative side.
We are not apologetic. We do not seek the approval
of people that don't like us. It's very strange how
(53:32):
no one has figured out why it is talk radio
that remains powerful, popular, unassailable. It's not difficult at all
if you know where to look. Hey, I think I
think I got my Murdoch brothers screwed reversed. It's James
(53:52):
Murdoch's wife who tweeted, we did it, we did it,
we got rid it Trump I said it was Lockland's wife,
and I think it was James Murdoch's wife. The story
is it Lachlan Murdoch. Is this Conserva? That's his story?
All right? Marty in Saint Augustine, Florida. I'm glad you Caaul.
Welcome to the russialyan Ball program. Great, great, great to
(54:14):
have you here. Hi, Hey, Rush, thanks so much for
taking my call. My husband brought me to Rush so
to speak, thirty years ago and been listening ever since.
And we just want you to know we're really thankful
for you and that you've been able to continue to
do your show and we're praying for you. Appreciate that.
Thank you very much, me too, Yeah, thanks. I just
(54:34):
two quick points. I love the idea about the elections.
Are we happen to see Sidney Powell yesterday on Fox
Business Maria Bartoloma's show, and she laid out some really
detailed information about where the investigation is going. Right, I got,
I've got that data coming up. It's pretty comprehensive. It's
pretty impressive what she's already found. We yes. And one
(54:56):
thing that we had not heard about that surprised us
was about this Aware company. Apparently some of the software
used in tabulating the vote. It's out there, This is
all in the hopper. This is exactly the kind of
stuff I've seen it. I know it's out there. This
is the kind of stuff. It needs to be collected, investigated,
looked at, and reported on. And we need to get
(55:17):
to the bottom of it. And so that doesn't remain
just anecdotal. Hey do you hear about this software court?
We need to find out the truth about it. We
need somebody going to look into it and find it.
Is there something there exactly? So I was impressed with
Sidney Powell. I like her anyway, and I didn't know
whether you would think she would be as possible candidate
for the czar position if it goes that way. That
(55:38):
was one point. The other thing we also saw Mark
Levin last night, and he mentioned that we have a
Supreme Court for a reason. You know, as an average voter,
you just feel frustrated because kind of gnashing your teeth,
what can we do? But he mentioned that the Supreme
Court's got to step up and enforce these election laws,
and we're just praying that that's what's going to happen.
Somebody's got to take the case to them and then
(56:01):
they can. They have to want to hear the case,
and that's what I think he's saying. They got to
want to hear the case because the case will will
be taken to them. And now John Roberts could have
shut it down before Amy Coney Barrett when the court
was four or four. Now it's not four four, it's
five four. The odds are greater. I would think we'll
be back. Hey, one and only eib network, Rush Limbaugh,
(56:26):
I am America's real anchorman, meeting and surpassing all audience
expectations every day. Let's go back to the phones. This
is Matt in Lincoln, Nebraska. Great to have you, sir. Hello, Hey, Rush,
very long time listener here. I just wanted to come
on the psychop that was ran by the media. I
(56:48):
one thing I noticed was the coordination before the election.
Days before, every media organization was saying, Hey, you're gonna
think on election night that Donald Trump has won. You're
going to think this, but you've got to wait till
the votes come in the next few days and then
you're going to see who the clear winner is. And
what was interesting about that is they emphasize the fact
(57:11):
this isn't fraud. This is just how this election is.
What do you do you what do you mean? It
just isn't fraud, It's how it is. That's what the
media was saying. Don't think this is fraud. They kept
saying days before the election. Don't think that this is fraud.
When the votes come in after election day and you thought,
(57:34):
this is just how this election is. This tough, and
that was kind of the psychops of all the media
was trying to condition everybody. You're going to think Donald
Trump's gonna win, but what you're really gonna see is
that Biden's gonna win days later. You just have to
have patience and don't let anybody tell you it's fraud
because it really isn't, even though it was, even though
(57:57):
it was right. So your point is that they ran
a psycho ops operation on everybody, telling them what was
going to happen, and then it happened, and then it happened,
and they conditioned people to let them know. This isn't fraud,
This isn't fraud. This is just how this election is
because of these times we're living in. Blame it on
(58:18):
twenty twenty, the year twenty twenty, right, whatever, Well that's
they can do that. I don't care. You know, I
couldn't care less what they say it was. I couldn't
care less if they ran a psy ops operation on us.
All I care about is up rooting what happened. That's
(58:38):
all I want to do. We've got to find out
what happened. Because we all believe Donald Trump won this election.
We all believe that he won it handily. We all
believe common sense says that there is no way a
candidate who did not even have a bond with it
as voters, a candidate who is a nonentity, a andidate
(59:00):
who is an empty vessel, a candidate was simply a faithless,
nameless guy who's never won an election on his own
other than the Senate, is going to get more votes
than anybody else in history. We don't believe it with
a guy drawing fifty five thousand people at rallies, thirty
seven thousand people, with a guy that's in abasement, maybe
drawing twenty people in their cars to honk horns. And
(59:24):
then there's the other evidence that we had the common
sense evidence, so whether they ran their a little operation
here to tell us that no matter what it looks
like an election night, Biden's going to win. We need
to get to the bottom of it. For all of
the reasons that I have stated today. I don't want
(59:46):
to have to repeat everything every phone call I get here.
But this is about preserving the Constitution. It's about preserving
the institutions and traditions that define the United States of
America from every other country on Earth. It's about making
sure we do not descend to banana republic status. We
are damn close. There was no reason on earth for early,
(01:00:11):
early voting and mail in voting to have not been
counted by election night. For example, there's no earthly reason
we have to wait on Friday to count mail in ballots.
There's the mail in ballot anyway, That was the beginning
of the end of all of this. They scare the
hell out of everybody with COVID. They get everybody convinced
you can't go to your polling place and vote without
(01:00:33):
dying or running the risk of dying. So we come
in with mail in ballots, and then we end up
some of us end up criticizing mail in ballots, and
that ends up being a negative because a lot of
people ended up liking the option of mail in ballots.
But they didn't have to show any ID, they didn't
have to show a signature, the signatures didn't have to match,
(01:00:54):
they didn't have to be in by election day. We're saying,
what the hell? And in criticizing mail in ballots, some
people so, well, you we like mail in ballots, so
screw you. So I was told, every time you criticize
mail in ballots, you're just sending more people to use them.
I said, well, that's not good. This is not But
(01:01:15):
that's where all this happened. When you don't have to
have any ID. No, I'm not criticizing apps, tea apps
and tea. You've got to prove who you are. You
don't with mail in what is this business about? You
don't have to count them by election night? When somebody said,
(01:01:38):
as our last scholars, you're gonna think you're winning an
election night, but then have to count the mail in ballots.
That's where that's where Trump's gonna look. Why do we
wait until after election night to count the mail in
ballots when the mail in ballots ostensibly are arriving before
election day ballots, Oh, that's right, because they didn't have
(01:01:58):
to arrive by election day. Why was that decay? Well,
because not everybody can count on the postal service to
do it right, and so we have to get some leeway.
So we said, as long as the ballots are in
by Friday in one place or Saturday in another place,
then we'll go ahead and count it. You think that
isn't a recipe for the disaster that we're in the
middle of here. Mail in Why do you think mail
(01:02:24):
in ballots were not part of the original setup. It's
just too great an opportunity for fraud. So this has
to be run down, tracked down, It has to be discovered.
(01:02:45):
What happened in a lot of states, few states they
were able to count the mail in ballots by election night.
They did it in Florida, they did it in Texas,
they did it in a whole bunch of well run
Republican states. Why can't they do this in Pennsylvania? Why
couldn't they do it in Wisconsin? Why couldn't they do
it in Michigan? Why were we waiting until Saturday? It
(01:03:09):
was ridiculous for the mail in ballots to be count
We all know why they were determining how many they needed.
Democrats said these they purposely were held holding back counting
the early voting in the mail in votes in order
to know how much they would need to find in
order to win. There's no other explanation for this. But
(01:03:29):
I can say that all day long and it doesn't
make it true. That's why we need a czar. That's
why we need somebody to officially run down every aspect
of this. Let me go through a couple of things
Joel Pollock, Bright Bart and a tweet. Democrats had to
change voting rules. They had to censor the president, Twitter
(01:03:52):
and Facebook. They had to kick people off social media.
They had to modify search algorithms i e. Google. They
had to terrorize cities Portland, Seattle, looting and all that.
They had to ban Trump rallies. They had to spend
billions of dollars. They had to raise the dead and
(01:04:14):
have them vote, and they still barely pulled this off.
Donald Trump is a legend, and deservedly so. The thing
that galls me, and it's going to always gall me,
is that there are Republicans who are okay with this.
They're Republicans okay with what the Democrats did to change
(01:04:38):
voting rules, to censor the president, kick people off social media,
to modify search algorithms on Google, to terrorize cities, spend
billions of dollars, have the dead vote. Their Republicans are
okay with this and the process they have given election
fraud their blessing. Well, yeah, they never trumpers, but not
(01:05:02):
just them. Why do you think, seriously, now, why do
you think Trump was able to take over the Republican
Party so quickly? Do you realize today's Republican voter has
nothing much in common with the Republican Party it elected
George W. Bush. Maybe the same people in some overlap,
(01:05:24):
but they're vastly different the way they look at things.
And here I saw somebody was it? It was Molly
Hemingway who tweeted, and I don't have it in front
of me, but she raised it important can you imagine
if George W. Bush. Okay, we can all except that
he doesn't like Trump. Fine, but if during this election cycle,
if George W. Bush had just come out and favor
(01:05:46):
of some of the Senate candidates, if George W. Bush
had just voiced support for some Republicans running for office,
can you imagine what difference it have made? I don't know.
Her point is that here's an ex president, a former president,
(01:06:07):
two term Republican party who's not saying a thing throughout
these four years or this campaign. And she raised the question,
can you imagine what kind of difference there might have
been had George W. Bush waited in saying the Georgia
Senate races or some of the others. And I you know,
(01:06:29):
the Bush family has been tremendous to me, as I
have noted over the over the years, They've just been
they have been great to me. They have given me
access to information and things. I mean, they've they've just
been really great people to me. George H. W. Bush,
George W. Beacause it's tough to join the criticism trail.
(01:06:52):
I'm not immune do it, but it is an interesting question,
but I raise it and I remind you of it
simply to point out how little assistance Trump got from
anybody in the Republican Party. And in fact, he was
attacked by people in the Republican Party. And now let
(01:07:18):
me find this thing and nid Romney after mit. Romney
has been asked to lead Health and Human Services in
the Biden administration. This is the guy. This is the
guy that gave us Obamacare. Remember he wrote Obamacare as
as Massachusetts Healthcare to law. Nick Romney has been asked
(01:07:40):
to lead Health and Human Services in the Biden administration.
He'll I don't know if he's going to take it.
Biden advisors expect that Romney will be tasked with making
the national healthcare system more affordable without legislation that modifies
the Affordable Care Act. Stories in the Buffalo Chronicle. I
(01:08:02):
don't see in this story whether Rodney has accepted the
offer or not, but it wouldn't surprise me if he did. Hey, folks,
holiday shopping this year likely to be that much more
of an online experience. I wonder why nothing against visiting
stores and seeing the merchandise. But convenience and product availability
(01:08:24):
continue to drive change in the way we buy presents
and gifts. Or people. And as you embark on your
online shopping this season, do something smart for yourself and
that has protect your online identity. Get LifeLock protection. Lifelocks
online identity though protection is second to none, there is
(01:08:45):
nobody even close. From the minute you sign up with LifeLock,
their online monitoring systems go to work looking for evidence
that your information has fallen into the wrong hand. You say,
how can it happen that fast? It takes about a
couple of weeks, thanks, a couple of weeks for you
to create an online maybe even less, to create an
online pattern that they can constantly measure against. And they're
(01:09:09):
not chasing you down by name, and they're not watching
individual purchase or watching patterns. And they see something outside
the pattern, they ask you if you're the reason something
outside the patterns have That's how they do it, and
it's brilliant. From the minute you sign up, they're tracking
you to find out to protect you, to see if
(01:09:31):
people have invaded your online space. It can happen when
a data breach occurs, somebody plants malware on your phone
or laptop, opens a new account in your name. You're
not aware of a look, folks, no one company can
prevent all identity, but LifeLock systems are brilliant at detecting
unusual activity and reporting it to you. Quickly sign up
(01:09:55):
today at LifeLock dot com eight hundred and fourty three.
If to found them either way, use my name save
twenty five percent off the plan you choose LifeLock dot
com or eight hundred fourty eight thirty three use my
name as the offer code. Costa Mesa, California. Mike your
next great to have you high. How you do, Rush,
(01:10:16):
God bless you my prayers. Thank you very much, Sir.
I disagree with Sherman. I'm pissed off, Rush. I am
pissed at the rule of law. The Constitution is just
being totally ignored and step on. I am pissed off.
Where is Bill barrs the of vacation already Thanksgiving vacation.
(01:10:36):
Where's the Justice Department? Where's the FBI? I'm pissed. I'm
pissed if we have a president who was firmly re
elected in this country and people are breaking the law
to not have him elected. You know, my son, Rush Baby,
he's forty two now called me Friday and I told
(01:10:58):
him don't listen to meet you all week and number
one and number two. If the constitution and the rule
law or I'll told the way it should be, then
President Trump will be elected President. I'm pissed. Well, they
the constitution, the rule of law must be upheld. And
(01:11:20):
I think you're right if you're saying, if the constitution,
rule of mar upheld, Trump will be elected, this stuff
will all be shown to be bys. Is that what
your point is? Yes, sir, And you're mad that we
have to go through your mad The Democrats are doing mad.
The Democrats got away, but the mad people aren't doing
anams to stop him. That's right. Where is Bill Barr Rush?
(01:11:40):
I haven't heard a word from him. Doesn't the Justice
Department have something to do with the federal law, federal elections?
Where is he? Where is he? I hear you, I
hear you. I'm I've been asking myself where the hell's
John Durham. I don't care about boor if he's invested
game some from a year and a half ago. I
want to go where Bill barrs today? He an election fraud?
(01:12:02):
Where's the Justice Department? Trump? I'm sorry? If Trump is reelected,
he's got to get rid of Bill Bark because when
you need people to be behind you, when you really
need him re as American people are behind Trump. I
think he's going to be more of a powerful man,
whether he's reelected or not than ever because we are
(01:12:23):
pissed out here. Well, uh, look, you bring up you know,
whether he's re elected or not, and that does invite, uh,
some speculation on my part. However this ends up. You guys,
you all have to know Donald Trump isn't going anywhere.
(01:12:43):
I don't know what he's gonna do, but he's not
gonna go. He's not gonna slink away. He's he's uh,
he's not going to go back run the Trump organization,
a reconstitute the TV show The Apprentice, uh, and go
back to that. There's way too much out there that
he would want to do, can do, and it would
(01:13:05):
be oriented toward keeping America great, maintaining his agenda, and
doing what he can to protect it. I have no
doubt that Trump is devoted to his agenda. However he
must to protect it. But I hear you, Mike. Look,
I know everybody's mad. Nobody's mad and frustrated and want
(01:13:29):
fast action on this to deal with it quick time out.
We'll be right back, folks, Hang on, It's the fastest
three hours in media. We have one more busy broadcast
hour remaining. Eight hundred two eight two to eight eight
two is a number if you want to be on
the program and be in this last busy broadcast hour,
probably more than likely my last busy broadcast hour of
(01:13:50):
the week, cause this is treatment week, so know that
we'll be right back. Oh no, don't tell about I
just took a swig of the carbonated Oh no, this
means well, I'll try not to. I'll try not to
what's the better word, belch or burp. I'll try I'll
(01:14:16):
try not to burp at your folks here anyway. Greetings
and welcome back your guiding light, Rush Limbaugh the EIB Network.
Great to have you with this one big exciting broadcast
hour remaining. And again just remindered, this is treatment week
for me. Moved it back a week so I could
(01:14:37):
be here during the election. So we head off later
today and normally during treatment week I try to get
back at least one day, and I've been fairly fortunate
to be able to do that, but it may not
be the case this week's I just want to let
you know in advance, this may be one of those
rugby out the whole week are based on previous experience.
(01:15:02):
If not, though, if I'm able to get in here
and be cogent and um know where I am, and
I'll of course do so. But otherwise we've got we
got it covered with Mark Stein, who don't need to
know the days? Who are they? Who? Todd Herman and
(01:15:24):
and and Stein and Ken Matthews, those um Sidney Fowl.
You know when I when I floated my idea earlier
today that we need a czar running things. Let let
me see if I can if I can explain that
again a little bit better. It's not that difficult to concept.
(01:15:45):
But I'm thinking, think, think Mueller investigation only legit, and
think Mueller accept somebody that knows what they're doing, not
not just a figurehead that's checked out and like Biden
doesn't know where he is half the time. A legitimate
constitutional scholar, legitimate constitutional lawyer, somebody who has been practicing,
(01:16:11):
somebody from a highly reputable firm, somebody with impeccable credentials
to lead this investigation of the twenty presidential election. There
are countless examples of questionable ballots, questionable people voting, that
(01:16:37):
are alive as all kinds of information out that it
needs to be chased down. So this person would not
only head the effort and be the figurehead, but would
be actively involved. Not somebody who just gets a report
every day and then reads the report somebody else wrote.
This would be somebody actively involved, somebody coaching, somebody coherent,
(01:17:02):
somebody who could lead the effort and then hires. And
this would take money, I understand, and it's not mine
that I'm offering up. This has got to come from
the people doing the investigating and be the Trump campaign
or some other entity. But this person would then hire
the team of investigators who would go out and make
(01:17:27):
the case, do whatever they could to find the truth.
And they would have to start, pardon the clearing of
the throat. They'd have to start with all of the stories,
all of the anecdotal stories, and the anecdotal evidence. Let
me define, I keep assuming everybody knows what this is.
(01:17:48):
We always discount anecdotal evidence. I know you hear us,
discount you hear me. Discounted Anecdotal is, of course the
root words anecdote, people telling a story. So you have
somebody that nobody knows who saw something screwy going on
with a ballot, say in Pennsylvania, and they either tweet
(01:18:13):
it or they call a talk show, Hey, I saw this. Okay,
that's an anecdotal bit of evidence, which means it isn't evidence.
It's somebody telling a story, and it could be true,
it could be made up. You don't know if you
don't know the person telling the story. And that's why
(01:18:33):
for me as a talk show host, I don't like
taking those calls because you can't confirm them. And I
don't want to put misinformation on the air. And anybody
can call here and say anything, it's impossible to track
it down. And I don't want to do a talk
show where the react, boy, did you hear the guy
(01:18:54):
that called and said if it's not true, then it's
it's harmful to me. It's not that it doesn't matter,
it's harmful of it and true. And I don't want
to mislead anybody. So I'm not into in terms of
what I do as the leading talk show host in
the world. I'm not interested in anecdotal anything except for
its value, and its value doesn't exist to me here,
(01:19:17):
Now there is value in this evidence as told to
an elections zar, because that's all they're going to have
to work with. They got to track it down. They've
got the week from the chaff separated, and there's going
to be a lot of lying. There's going to be
a lot of people telling a lot of things that
(01:19:38):
aren't true. There's already massive lies out there being made
by people who are believed by certain people in our country.
There's this big story that Trump ran this sting. Have
you heard this one? Trump ran a brilliant sting operation
waiting to unveil it that every ballot in certain states
(01:19:58):
has a secret water ark on it. Have you heard
that one? Well, stupidity. You know how many people believed it? Well,
this is why the stuff is dangerous. You get people
calling a talk show telling stuff like this, and if
the host is not informed and hadn't heard of this,
the host go, wow, man, that is cool, and you're
(01:20:19):
off and running with a bunch of bs. So the investigator,
the czar would would have to wade through all of
that and find out which of it is BS and
which of it is legit. And believe me, there's gonna
be a lot of bs, because everybody wants to get noticed,
(01:20:41):
and everybody wants to say they mattered, and everybody wants
to say they had a role in it. Or they're
gonna be people on the left who are gonna want
to embarrass this. They're gonna want us to accept and
believe some really stupid stuff so that we look like
a bunch of conspiracy theories. This is why whoever does
this has got to be brilliant, has to be patient,
has to have an army or a team that contract
(01:21:04):
this stuff down and not say anything about it to
the American people until they have run it down. And
everything has to be looked at in terms of constitutionality,
because that's what's at stake here, folks, in all of this. Yeah,
we want to we want to say, of the election
for DJ Trump, yep, we want this to get done right.
(01:21:26):
We want Trump to get what he earned, the presidency
and the second term. But more importantly, the integrity of
the process must be maintained in the eyes of as
many millions of Americans as possible. The integrity of the
electoral system must be established. If it isn't, nobody's going
(01:21:49):
to believe it ever again. And you want to talk
about turnout, You want to talk about the moment people
start thinking that their vote really doesn't matter, then you're
going to see people abandoned elections like you've never seen
it before. It's just too important here that the integrity
(01:22:12):
that the constitution at the rule of law, that all
of this be affirmed. And for that to happen, this
election must be investigated. Every lead must be tracked down,
Every reported problem should be investigated as long as it takes.
(01:22:33):
There should not be a time limit. There should not
be a hurt. I mean a reasonable time. Yeah, but
we shouldn't. We shouldn't have to get this under the
end of next week. For example, there's no reason for that.
The next president is not inaugurated until next January. The
next Congress is not seated till next January. We're gonna
have runoff elections in January the two Senate seats in Georgia.
(01:22:53):
There doesn't need to be a hurry. Al Gore got
thirty seven days to try to overturn things in one state,
three counties basically of one state. Now, I maintain that
if there was no fraud, the Democrats would invite Republicans
to examine every aspect of the process and be done
(01:23:13):
with it. The Democrats say, we're not going to do that.
They're going to come in here and plant evidence. No,
we're not going to plant evidence. But I can see
them saying that. But I still believe if there was
no fraud, the Democrats would be a little little bit
more solicitous towards us looking at the process. I would
(01:23:39):
think they would want us to look like fools. I
would think they would want us to look like kooks.
What better way to let us see their legitimate process?
What better way there's massive fraud. If there is massive fraud,
(01:24:01):
there will be a campaign to call the election the opop. Sorry,
that's what's happening now. Sidney Powell claims four hundred and
fifty thousand ballots that voted only for Biden. The Left
Arrest Left Blank. Attorney Sidney Powell claims that her team
(01:24:23):
has found four hundred and fifty thousand ballots with only
votes for Joe Biden and no down ballot selections made.
Sidney Powell suggests this number of single vote ballots is
suspect and indicative in part of abject fraud that she
says flipped the election to Biden. Let me tell you,
(01:24:43):
four hundred and fifty thousand ballots that only vote for
Joe Biden. That's that's that's not suspicious, That is fraud.
That doesn't How can that be. I'll tell you how
it can be. They only cared about the presidential race.
(01:25:04):
They only filled out ballots with Biden's name because that's
all it mattered. Sidney Pale, the attorney for Michael Flynn.
She has been very vocal about the need to challenge
the results of the general election, which she contends is
rife with evidence of a massive and coordinated effort to
steal the election by efforts to delegitimize and destroy votes
(01:25:30):
for Trump and a manufacture votes for Biden. She says,
they have done it in every way imaginable. They've had
dead people voting massive numbers to absolutely fraudulently creating ballots
that exist only voting for Biden. So we've identified four
hundred and fifty thousand ballots in the key states that
(01:25:50):
miraculously only have a mark for Joe Biden. She said
this on the TV show of Maria barkshar Romo. Sidney
Powell pointed to Florida, things were done right. They counted
all the ballots on election at including these precious mail
in ballots, the way the rest of the country should have.
(01:26:13):
She maintains that malicious actors used an algorithm to calculate
the votes they would need to flip, and that they
used computers to flip those votes from Trump to Biden
and from other candidates to their competitors. Also, wasn't just
President Trump. There were many people affected by this, She said,
(01:26:34):
We've got to fight tooth and nail in federal court
to expose this abject fraud and the conspiracy behind it,
and get a recount and audits in every place it
is needed, which is frankly most of the country, folks.
That is a stunning number of ballots, four hundred and
(01:26:56):
fifty thousand, miraculously only have one name on them. Here's
some other statistics from Miranda Divine at the New York Post.
There are five swing states that are within one percent,
(01:27:16):
and every damn one of them has Joe Biden in
the lead. In Georgia, Biden was ahead last night by
just ten thousand, three hundred and fifty two votes. For
how long was he behind in Georgia until they found
a way to moving past it. In Arizona, Biden was
ahead by nineteen thousand, four hundred thirty eight votes. In Wisconsin,
(01:27:39):
he was ahead by twenty thousand, five hundred and forty
Pennsylvania head by forty three thousand, two hundred and fifty
one after being up eight hundred thousand or seven hundred
fifty thousand. In Nevada, Biden was up by thirty one thousand,
three four hundred sixty four votes. It is not outlandish
(01:28:05):
or unprecedented to accept the possibility that at least some
of those margins may be erroneous, whether through human error
or indeed fraud. Look, folks, it is entirely possible that
all of this may not amount to much of anything
at all. But it has to be investigated. It has
(01:28:28):
to be examined because there are seventy one million people
who voted for Trump who are going to think the
election was stolen. And I think they're right. But you
can't have that many people, seventy one million, thinking the
presidential election system in America is so tainted that it
(01:28:51):
can be stolen from somebody who got seventy one million votes.
You can say goodbye to people participating in the process
that which a Democrats would absolutely love. Trump said himself
over the weekend, this is no longer about any single election.
This is about the integrity of our entire election process.
(01:29:13):
And that is bingo. That is right on the money.
Whatever comes to the allegations, nothing is more important than
these two Georgia US Senate runoffs. That's control of the
Senate right there. And what does anybody think the Democrats
(01:29:35):
in Georgia are going to let these Senate seats go
to the Republicans? I mean, if that's the attitude that
we have, then what does it say about our perception
of the system. Already? All right back to the phones,
as people have been patiently waving Walton Hills, Ohio, this
is Jim. Welcome sir, It's great to have you here. Hi, Well,
(01:29:56):
thank you for your time. Rush. I was wondering, I
know you spoke of William Buckley in the past. Is
helping you get your career started and get you in
the path that you're on now? I'm just wondering what
you think he would think of this presidency and this
travesty of an election. You know what, what do you
think his thoughts would be on this um that Okay,
all right, he's asking me what I think, William, if
(01:30:19):
Buckley would think of the Trump uh presidency, this is
fox is gonna be a wild guess. Uh. It will
be a guess informed by intelligence, guided by experience, admittedly. Um.
And what he would think of the well, I know
(01:30:40):
what he thinks this election mess. I'm pretty confident, um
in believing that he would he would think that this
is highly suspicious to be worried about it. Uh. In
Buckley's day, going back now to the forties, fifties, coming
(01:31:05):
from well the fifties on through the seventies, it was
the unions that did all of this stuff that the
Democrats are now doing at the state. Huh. It was
the unions where all of the chicagoy happened. And he
was I can remember being at his home, I'm sorry,
Masonett on Park Avenue seventy third Street, watching election returns,
(01:31:31):
and I remember getting real frustrated. But he was a
pessimistic as hell, And I said, Bill, what are we
even doing here? If you don't think said the rest
of unions to unions. We can't overcome the way the
unions are gonna cheat this. We just can't over, so
he was well aware of the Democrats and their abilities.
What he would think of Trump. Look, folks, this is
(01:31:53):
a wild guess. William F. Buckley was an anomaly. He
was a member in good standing of the New York
City elite. But he was conservative. He was respected and
adored by the New York Liberal elite, and he never
(01:32:18):
once had to compromise his beliefs to do it. He
didn't have to give them a thing. He didn't have
to change one thing that he believed. What he would
think of Trump as president, I think would probably surprise you.
I think he would have loved it. Remember, William AT
(01:32:42):
Buckley was the guy who said he would rather be
governed by the first twelve hundred names in the Boston
phone Book than by the faculty at Harvard, Meaning he
would much rather be governed by a bunch of average
ordinary people in a bunch of elite academics, of which
he was one. He was an elite academic. He was
(01:33:05):
an elite unique mind. He was brilliant, he was hilarious,
He was sardonic, he was sarcastic. He was a conservative,
and he would have he would have had a twinkle
in his eye about Trump, and that Trump had won
and had beaten those people, he would not have had
(01:33:27):
this phony attitude. That Trump's attitude's embarrassed him. He might
then tweeting didn't exist before mister Buckley passed away. But
kindly guess about that. Hi, welcome back, Rush Limbaugh executing
assigned host duties flawlessly, zero mistakes. I want to share
with you a quote from somebody ready. Our safety, our
(01:33:50):
liberty depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States,
as our fathers made it inviolate. For those who in
a real end, that means we can't violate it, means
we cannot abandon it has nothing to do with its
being purple. We cannot abandon it. The people of the
(01:34:13):
United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and
the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow
the men who pervert the Constitution. Always said that Abraham Lincoln,
and all he did was preserve the Union by believing
(01:34:34):
the Constitution was inviolate. Our safety, our liberty depends upon
preserving the Constitution of the United States, as our fathers
founding fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States,
the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts. Not
(01:34:55):
to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who
pervert the constitu That's what this effort should be focused on.
Overthrowing the men who pervert the Constitution, overthrowing the people,
(01:35:16):
in other words, who are ignoring it, who are trampling
on it, who are running the risk of ruining it. Now,
it's going to take time, folks, tracking down all of
(01:35:37):
these reports, the anecdotal evidence, if you will, tracking it
all down, and then getting sworn declarations. You can't just say, hey,
I got this guy over here said this guy's got
to swear to it. All of these people, with their
anecdotal stories and evidence that they tweet or they email
(01:35:58):
or what You've got to get to them and they
have to swear that it's true. They have to sign
declarations and affidavits. They have to subject themselves to perjury charges.
That takes time. It requires interviews, It requires trying to
(01:36:21):
find out who these people are and why they may
be saying this. None of this is going to be easy.
And the Czar that I have this imagination of sitting
in position here overseeing all this is exactly what the
job is overseeing all of this, overseeing all these actions,
(01:36:41):
directing these actions, informing the people that work for the
czar doing the investigations what needs to be done here,
the stuff needs to be tracked down. These are the
people you need to find. These are the people need
to swear to what they're saying happened. And this is
a lot of states. Now this is already happening. There's
(01:37:05):
not a czar per se, but this is already happening.
And it takes time. I know. You read about these
examples on Twitter or Sydney Powell four hundred and fifty
thousand ballots with only Biden's name on him, and you say, well,
(01:37:27):
Sydney Powell would never lie about it. Yeah, still has
to be tracked down, still has to be sworn to,
still has to be signed off on. Nobody's word is good.
In other words, you've got to go through the process. Here.
Here's here's another story that ran and I think it's
(01:37:47):
the Yes American thinker. Wait just a minute, says here,
some very good news may be coming. Now you get
let me give you some pull quotes from this piece. Hey,
this thing is not only not over, it's scary for Biden,
I mean, really scary, and most of all the media
know it. Thus the rush to get everybody in line
(01:38:09):
with the narrative that a seventy eight year old early
dementia former VP who couldn't even draw a crowd larger
than a dozen just beat Donald Trump at a fair
election process. At for a moment, it's not possible. Start
with Pennsylvania. Biden, as of this writing is a two
hundred ninety electoral votes. Pennsylvania is twenty of them. I
(01:38:32):
read that Justice Alito opinion. It's pretty clear he wants
the after election night at eight pm votes separated for
a reason. Well, Biden's going to lose at the Supreme
Court if it goes there, and they know it. This
guy is cuss he's confident that the Supreme Court would
(01:38:53):
throw out those ballots that came in after eight pm
on election night. I'm not, But the writer here is okay, Fine,
we'll go with the writers for the sake of the
interesting aspects. If Biden's going to lose at the Supreme
Court and they know it, four justices already said that
the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cannot adjust voting rules, and they can't. Folks,
(01:39:18):
the state legislature is the only body empowered to change
voting rules. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court can't do it. All
they can do is way in on efforts that have
been made, but they cannot do it themselves. Now we
(01:39:40):
got a new justice, Justice Barrett, and she says that
she's there to apply the rules in the constitution. Okay,
what a bet that she does. If she does, and
if the Supreme Court takes a case, if it goes there,
and if you remove the after eight pm ballots, they
and Biden loses those twenty This guy says, Biden loses
(01:40:05):
Pennsylvania if you take away the ballots. That Alito once
set aside that anything after eight o'clock an election night
is illegal. Pennsylvania Supreme Court said, no, it's not. We're
going to allow them. The point is they can't make
that rules change. Another pool quote, excuse me. We have
(01:40:30):
bloggers with lots of time on their hands, are going
through voter rolls and are showing that person after person
who voted in a swing state also fought in the
Civil War, maybe fought in the War of eighteen twelve.
It was funny at first all these dead people voting,
but then the overwhelming number of dead voters goes beyond humor.
(01:40:52):
Now they're rubbing our faces in it. He says, I
think Donald Jake Trump has to swing one state. Not
only is this thing not over, the Biden team must
be sweating bullets. This is all his opinion. Voter fraud
at a scale seemed like a really cool idea until
(01:41:15):
Trump went to the mattresses. Now that he's fighting it
out one voter at a time, with the Supreme Court
likely to create the starting point at Biden to seventy,
Biden has everything to lose, no more truckloads of votes
coming in. So every ballot Trump's team eliminates gets President
Elect Biden one step closer to former VP Biden, who
(01:41:39):
lives in a basement. Okay, so this is just a
sample of some of the stuff that's out there. People
are reading it, they're getting revved up and excited, and
I don't blame you, but the real process is going
to take some time. Eliminating Biden ballots is going to
take time. It's not going to happen just because somebody
says they saw something. I'm I'm not trying to be
(01:42:02):
critical or mocking of anybody don't don't misunderstand. Here's another one.
Top attorney Lynn would this guy's a First Amendment lawyer,
free speech listen. Guy defended the Covington kids and got
them huge settlement deals from CNN and other news organizations,
(01:42:27):
and he is livid over what he's seen. First Amendment
lawyer says, they took a victory from Donald Trump and
they called it a lie. This country is under attack.
That's Attorney Lynn l I N. Lynnwood on why he's
joined Trump's legal team. He spoke at a rally in
Georgia on Saturday about why he joined the Trump team.
(01:42:51):
He's fighting the Democrats, big media, big tech as they
attempt to steal the election for Biden. Here's how he
began his speech. I was sitting around Tuesday night watching
the election returns. I've loved politics all my life, since
I first voted in nineteen seventy two, and I saw
(01:43:12):
what I assume was going to happen. I saw President
Trump building up what I believe was going to be
an almost historic landslide victory. And then all of a sudden,
all of a sudden, every network, including Fox, starts doing
what they do best. They started lying to the American public,
and they took a victory from Donald Trump and they
(01:43:35):
called it a lie. They took a defeat from Joe
Biden and lied and said that he won. And they
sent you to bed, turning off the count of the
vote so you could wake up the next morning like
I did, and go what the hell happened? What happened?
When I was asked by President Trump to help him
in Georgia perhaps other places around the country, I said yeah,
(01:43:57):
said yes, because there is a cloud over this country
and if we don't get it right, and if we
don't figure out what happened that night, that cloud is
going to get darker and darker until it turns into
a storm cloud, and we're going to lose our freedom. Folks.
If we cannot have fair and open elections with integrity,
(01:44:21):
where people trust the outcome, we have lost our freedom.
So it's time to fight back. This is a constitutional crisis.
If we don't fix it, if we don't find out
what happened that night and get it right, we're going
to lose our constitutional rights. Forty three years of practicing law,
(01:44:44):
I never dream the day would come where I would
be in the United States of America, and there would
be censorship. If they take away your right to free speech,
what are they going to take away next? And your
right to free speech is voting for who you want
to vote for. They can change your vote, if they
can cancel your vote out, you do not have free
speech or free anything else. So Lynnwood says, let's find
(01:45:07):
out what happened. It's about truth versus lies. If you
don't think this was planned, if you don't think this
is all part of some big, giant plan, you go
ahead and enjoy losing your freedom under the Kamala Harris administration.
And she's not going to be running the country. There
are people who are going to be running the country
(01:45:27):
who are rich. They're globalists, some even don't live here.
A lot of them are involved with foreign countries. She's
a placeholder, Biden's a placeholder. It is time to tell
the truth and be truthful and face the truth. Our
country's under attack. This was nothing more than a revolution.
They're trying to take away your rights. They're trying to
take away your constitution, they're trying to take away ultimately
(01:45:50):
your freedom. Don't let them do it. Donald Trump is
for the people, and that's why the people voted for him.
Trump is troubled because he sees what's being done to
the people. It's like the Republicans should stand up for
the president. I've watched him for four years. He's been
out there fighting for the people. He's almost always fighting
(01:46:10):
for himself. Time for us to fight for him. That's
Lynn Wood, well known first Amendment lawyer, on Saturday in Georgia,
explaining why he signed on to the Trump team. This
question always comes up in conversation a holiday time. What
do you get for so and so? Who are you
going to get what? Sometimes you just draw a blank. Well,
(01:46:32):
the answer might well be even bald and Branch this year.
This company known for making the most comfortable, luxurious sheets
that you will ever own. Don't doubt me, there are
so many peopless audience who love them and live by them,
swear by them every night. Balden Branch products made with
a pure organic cotton. They make all of their products
soft and it's unique to this brand, this material each
(01:46:56):
of their products. So the sheets, they start out soft
and co and they only get softer and more comfortable
over time. Same true with their towels, the throw blankets,
everything they make so as you contemplate gift giving, think
about Bolden Branch. Once you discover the luxury of this brand,
you're gonna want to share it with others. For some,
(01:47:16):
it's become the favorite gift item to share with close
friends and family. Every set of sheets that you purchase
comes with a thirty night full money back guarantee. That's
how confident they are in your satisfaction. Online Bolden Branch
dot com, boll n Branch dot com. Use my name
get the special holiday discount right now, one of the
(01:47:38):
few times of the year you can get such a deal.
Bowl and Branch dot com. Make sure to use my
name for the promo code that special discount. The phone
lines are dropping. Strange how that happens. Well, we had
(01:47:58):
a guy up there who I told him to have
him hang on and the phone lines are dropping the
he wanted. There was some guy to call last week
who said that I was not mad enough over what
was happening. Like I was really really mad over the
coup and when they tried to steal the election from Trump.
(01:48:19):
But this guy says, you, you don't sound nearly mad
enough at the fact that they're trying to steal the
election and I don't I wanted to talk to him
because I didn't know what that meant, and he didn't
hang on, so we I don't think I got to him.
Did I get to I talked to him? Well, well,
(01:48:44):
he said the guy that wanted to talk to today
I was talking about was It was an insult to
me to say that. But well, I've forgotten what the
what the guy said to me that I wasn't mad
enough about it, or maybe that I was designed to it,
or what have you. But folks, in my old age here,
(01:49:09):
I started asking myself, what is getting mad at something accomplished?
I mean, it can it can provide you, maybe with
some motivation, but the anger itself doesn't solve anything. Sitting
here yelling and screaming, what's that gonna do? It? May
it may rile you up, and it may be what
you want to hear, and it may be a tonic,
but it's it's not gonna solve any But I don't
(01:49:31):
even think it was a factor because I was livid.
I still am over this. I'm living at on so
many levels, and I'm scared what these people are doing
to our constitution. Folk, I am scared what they're doing
to the rule of law, and they've been doing it
for years. I've been warning people about liberalism my entire career,
and there's parts of me to feel like an abject
(01:49:52):
failure that are not enough. People have heard me, and
we still have to deal with it. Anyway, I gotta go.
I hope to be back by the end of the week,
but it's doubtful. I guess I got to tell you
truthfully now. But I will get back here as soon
as I can. Thank you, folks, oh as you as
you well, my friends, Thank you so much for being
with us. I appreciate it more than you know. I
(01:50:13):
will be back. I will be back soon as is
practicable to be. We've got great guys working this coming week,
so I'll enjoy them. Thank you very much.