Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
So over the past couple shows that I've done by myself,
my solo shows, I've been really focused on some of
the turmoil that's taking place in terms of the riots,
the challenges that we're facing with these kind of radical
ideologies and this large substantial population of illegal immigrants into
(00:22):
the country and the impact that that's taking place. Now,
we all know that one of the main things that
Trump ran on was shutting down the border, and there
is no doubt that we have seen that he has
militarized the border. Border crossings are down like eighty something percent,
and we've just entered into this place like, okay, we stifled,
(00:47):
we stopped the flow, the endless flow of illegal immigration
that we all saw over the last you know, four
plus years, and even you know, prior to Trump's first
uh administration and through the Abomba administrations, this massive influx,
you know, and if if, if if any any person
(01:10):
with it common sense can recognize that the Democratic Party
initially realized they said, listen, you know, our base and
our coalition of groups are starting to really kind of
polarize with each other. The ideological aspects of these groups
are are not so much in line and being able
to keep them together is more difficult. And I have
(01:31):
also believe that you know, over long periods of time,
with any one particular party in power, the natural backlash
is a rise in.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
The other party.
Speaker 1 (01:41):
And I certainly believed that we saw a significant rise
in that conservative traditional mindset right to get back to
the core ideologies of conservativism. And and I think you know,
what we're seeing now is the results of those years
and years of years of mass immigration. So how can
(02:05):
we better understand the position we're in. Is again, one
of the main things that we want to do in
the features that we want to offer you on this
show is to be able to consolidate all this information
and help make sense of it.
Speaker 2 (02:18):
And that's what we're going to do, all right.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
So first, let's just get into a historical evaluation of.
Speaker 2 (02:26):
America and Mexico.
Speaker 1 (02:28):
Now, you have to understand that prior to Mexico being
a Mexican independent state, right, Mexico was a Spanish colony.
So when they talk to us and say, you know, hey,
we're on stolen land, don't forget the Spaniards, the ones
(02:50):
who stole it from Native American first, and then you
had Mexican independence, and then they took it from the Spaniards,
and as a result of our manifest destiny, we ended
up taking it back right. You know, the first part
of this was in Mexico with Texas, right, and you
(03:10):
had you know the famous Alamo, the Texas Revolution, if
you will, which was from eighteen thirty five to eighteen
thirty six, and where we had Anglo settlers, a rebel
against the Tejanos under Mexican rules, sparked by Santa Anna's
repeal of the eighteen twenty four Constitution and attempts to
(03:32):
enforce centralized control clee here of key events included the
Battle of Gonzales and the Siege of Alamo in March
of eighteen thirty six, now.
Speaker 2 (03:43):
Remembered of the Alamo.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
You know what I always love is when I do
go down to Texas and I have the opportunity to go.
I love going to see that and thinking about what
it was like for those hundred plus men to face
three thousand Mexican troops and man, they held their own.
Speaker 2 (03:57):
Like true Texas champ man.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
And you know, I always think of myself as a
wanna be text and hafter the time I spent you know,
with Marcus down there doing the Team Never Quit podcasts
and all my Texas brethren out there, I love you guys.
You know, in Texas declared independence after that March of
eighteen thirty six. Now, you know, the Texas annexation was
(04:23):
a very think you know, unique at time in American
expansionist history. And they had this independence for about a
decade and then finally, you know, we were able to
you know, bring Texas into the fold as you know,
and they were a slave state and that caught it
caused a bunch of controversy, but we brought them in
and and actually added a tremendous size advancement to American
(04:51):
colonies and what that looked like and what America the
your size of it. You know, what was interesting is
that Andrew Jackson and Martin van Buren, you know, they
kind of pushed pushed the issue down the road until
Polk came into power as president and then was admitted
as the twenty eighth state on December ninth, eighteen forty five. Now,
(05:16):
you know, some of those political drivers certainly manifest destiny
that you know, the US believed that North America was
primarily you know, it owned it it was part of
its uh, it's it's overall political and ideological components right
the entire area, you know, and I think a Mexican
(05:40):
American revolution relations had deteriorated, especially because of Texas's revolt
against Mexican and you know, I think it there was
no stopping us from deciding, hey, we want California to
you know what was interesting, California was also a part
(06:00):
of Spanish colon colonies with a very large, very limited
number of Mexican people that had existed in that area,
whether it was mission work or whatever.
Speaker 2 (06:12):
You know. You know, as we began to really.
Speaker 1 (06:17):
You know, send settlers west into California, you know, the
California Trail. By the eighteen forties, hundreds of Americans were
living in Mexico or in California and maintaining their US loyalties.
Speaker 2 (06:35):
You know.
Speaker 1 (06:36):
One of the things that you had to realize is
that as we began to settle in California, we began
to see all these benefits, whether it was having a
seafaring port in San Francisco so we could trade across
the Pacific.
Speaker 2 (06:50):
And then certainly the.
Speaker 1 (06:51):
Gold Rush absolutely helped Americans kind of flood into those areas.
I think it was something like three hundred thousand settlers
moved out to California during the California gold Rush. But
it wasn't until the Mexican American War of eighteen forty
sixty eighteen forty eight, which was essentially led by John C.
(07:15):
Fremont and staged the Bear Flag Revolt in June of
eighteen forty six. You know, it was really important because
we were like, hey, California's viable interest to our national security,
to our national expansion, to all the different types of
things that were going to benefit us from a financial perspective.
(07:37):
And so, you know, US forces ultimately secured the control
of California and signed by January of eighteen forty seven,
signed the Treaty of Calahuenga.
Speaker 2 (07:50):
Is that how I say it, Jordi Calahuenga.
Speaker 3 (07:52):
Dude, I got no clue on that one.
Speaker 1 (07:55):
And then it was the Treaty of Guadalupe Hildago in
eighteen forty eight, you know, in the Mexican American War ended.
Now here's a kicker, and this is a lot of
what you're seeing in some of these you know reporters.
Nick Shirley, I think is the best guy on the
ground doing incredible reporting to these protests that had been
(08:16):
going on in LA and going on.
Speaker 2 (08:19):
You know, and I really believe that.
Speaker 1 (08:23):
You know this, Mexico lost fifty five percent of its
land mass, So fifty over half of Mexican territories were
seceded or taken or conquered, or however you want to
rationalize this. Now, Again, I always try and point out
(08:43):
that human history, to the victor's the spoils and to
those who've lost their land. Man, there's nothing more unfair
than that. But that's just kind of the way things work.
I wish it wasn't that. I wish there was a
lot more of fair disputes. Now, you also got to
know that the president of Mexico at the time did
(09:05):
take fifteen million dollars from the US, and we canceled
a bunch of it, we took over a bunch of
its debt, and and so they didn't go a way
empty empty handed, for sure. But you know, that is
a component of what you're hearing in the riots and
what you certainly have heard from a lot of the
ideological people that are supporting these riots. You know, California
(09:30):
statehood was a pretty phenomenal thing really kind of exploded
that that, you know, head west, go west, young man,
or Horatio Alger's famous quote, I think I just butchered that,
by the way, Jeordie, you know, and the idea of
that manifest destiny.
Speaker 2 (09:50):
Now, the interesting California came in.
Speaker 1 (09:51):
They were non slave state, and so that created some
more tension that ultimately led into the the division of
the United States the Civil War. But gaining Texas in
California was a massive part of America and our ability
to become what we are today. And so you know,
(10:12):
those two annexations represent really the greatest land mass capture
that the United States has ever or has ever has
ever dealt with.
Speaker 2 (10:22):
Now, why do I tell you that.
Speaker 1 (10:24):
Because it's critical for you to really begin to understand.
You know that a lot of a lot of the
ideas behind the border is relative to you know, finding
the land of the free and the home of the brave.
(10:47):
It's it's the American dream which draws people into our country. Right.
We used to say, you know, whether I was at
you know, in the soft community or in the intelligence community. Man,
everybody wants that shiny blue past. And why do they
Because you know, it's quantifiably proven that your ability to
(11:07):
have a brighter future in America is unlike almost any
other place in the world. Now, all these people out
there that are socialists, you know, they want to take
the pepsi chan challenge and say, well, socialism is much more,
much better than capitalism, and you know, you always say well,
(11:28):
and I actually I saw someone interviewed on the street
and they said, well, you know, what are you looking for?
And they're like, well, we want to burn the whole
thing down. We want socialism in America. Socialism works. In
the interview or like always says well, can you give
me an example where socialism has worked, and the guy repeated, well,
(11:51):
in the first four years of the Bolshevik Revolution, socialism
was fantastic and at work.
Speaker 2 (11:59):
And then there was always the proverbial, but.
Speaker 1 (12:03):
Then it didn't right to the tune of sixty five
million people. Now you can take a step back, and
you can go and you can look at what's essentially
been happening I think throughout South and Central America right
with a few exceptions. Obviously El Salvador is you know,
(12:26):
you know that guy's running that place. He's all about capitalism.
He understands rule of law and order. You know, there
are some people that do suggest that they did empty
out their jails and they're saying asylums and got rid
of all their nasty people. Or once he started putting
all these gang members in jail and force, I'd want
(12:47):
to leave there too if I was a bad guy,
for sure. And then there's Paraguay, right, my good friend
and pretty high up at the agency who is in
the know. And Paraguay's a democratically leaning a country that
really needs our support right now in a whole wave
(13:09):
of socialistic countries just overriding and overwhelming Central South America.
I mean, look at Venezuela. Venezuela was one of the
wealthiest nations in the Americas, in both North America and
South America. They implemented socialism. Now they've got a dictator
who just recently just completely throughout the elections imprisoned people
(13:34):
that was up against him. We saw that take place
with Lula in Brazil. We saw that take place in Colombia.
We've seen it now in Mexico. There's a socialist president
in Mexico and we just saw her on TV or
the internet just two days ago. At a few days
(13:57):
ago advocating for the mobilization and the pushback against the
overreach of the American government and ice informant of illegal immigrants,
you know. And then you had another person who was
the head of the Mexican State Senate, also advocating, holding
(14:18):
up an actual map, an eighteen twelve map, saying this
is what was stolen from us. So there is, without
a doubt, a political influence that has overwhelmed Central South America,
and that influence is caused a tremendous amount of immigration
(14:45):
or migration, if you will, because if you type in
immigration challenges or whatever, a lot of the stuff that
comes up, they won't even respond. It's migration, it's asylum seekers,
it's political asylum seekers, all of this. And I think,
you know, once you evaluate the ideologies of these countries
(15:07):
and what has taken place, there's no doubt that people
that are living under pretty oppressive regimes no matter where
they are, whether it's Haiti, whether it's Venezuela, Columbia, Brazil,
you know, wherever. At Mexico itself, with the cartel influence
(15:30):
and violence, you know, and and and you know, that's
a whole other aspect of this that is substantial as
well too, and I'll talk about that at the end.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
So what do you have.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
You have this recipe that just you know, explodes this thing.
You have a US government saying, you know, by the
people in power, hey we want you here to the
tune where my orch is, and the Obimen administration basically
just suspended all immigration laws and said doors open, come
(16:07):
on in.
Speaker 2 (16:07):
We want you to the tune.
Speaker 1 (16:10):
I mean, some people say it's ten to eleven million,
some people say it's twenty to twenty three million. I mean,
I don't think we can even fathom the amount of
those numbers, JORDI. Would you look up numbers of people
that we were able to register starting twenty twenty to
twenty twenty four and then god aways it to and let.
Speaker 2 (16:33):
Me know when you get that. Yep, thank you brother.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
All right, So you have radical ideologies overwhelming Central South America,
people fleeing, wanted to get away. You have the US
government saying, hey, come on in, we want you because
we need you as our new electorate. We added you
into the consensus, so we're going to get more seats
(16:56):
in the House, right, But really, the voting base and
all you want to you really want to understand that is,
look at the states that received the greatest amount of immigration.
My favorite one throughout the whole thing was when DeSantis
and Abbott started busting these immigrants to blue states. And
my favorite, hands down was when they sent all those
(17:19):
immigrants or illegal immigrants up to what was it Martha's
Vineyard and the whole town revolted, and.
Speaker 2 (17:28):
You know, yeah, we want immigrants.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
It's what the backbone of America was built on, you know,
and all this stuff. And then as long as they're
not in our in our in our areas to devalue
our home prices, right, yeah, you know, it's it's it's unbelievable.
Speaker 4 (17:44):
Got those numbers if you want them, Yeah, what are they? Yeah,
So it looks like it's a reasonable estimate. It's hard
to know exactly, but twelve to thirteen million migrants between
twenty twenty to twenty four, twenty twenty four, and in
terms of god ways, looks like they're saying about one
(18:05):
and a half one point one point six million or so.
Speaker 1 (18:10):
One point six million got away. So well, let's call it.
Let's call it twelve to fifteen million human beings easily Okay,
So when you have that level of people that are
coming in to the country, let's just let's just put
the national security part over here, right, Let's just put
(18:34):
that how many you know, Chinese uh people, you know,
adult military age males that we saw.
Speaker 2 (18:43):
Let's put the Hamas groups that have come out, the
Hesbolag groups.
Speaker 1 (18:47):
The ISIS groups, the the Taliban groups, the uh you know,
the whoever else whatever your flavor of terrorists or or
or criminal in a Agua, the Venezuelan gangs MS thirteen.
Let's just put that large clump of people, and everybody's like, well, man,
(19:08):
they're the overwhelming majority are peaceful people. I'll give you that,
and let's just call let's just say let's just say
ten percent. Jordy, you're the mathematician, bro, what's ten percent
of twelve million.
Speaker 3 (19:24):
Well, one hundred and twenty thousand, So.
Speaker 2 (19:27):
Let's let's go.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
Let's just say maybe one hundred and twenty thousand. Sorry, sorry,
that's one percent. Yeah, so let's just say one percent. Yeah,
one hundred twenty thousand people that are terrorists, criminals, psychopaths,
you know, murderers, rapists, child traffickers are in the country,
(19:52):
like that's okay with you.
Speaker 3 (19:54):
I guess that's an army.
Speaker 2 (19:56):
That's an army of people.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
Right. All you got to do is look at the
boombay in look at October seventh in Israel. You know,
it doesn't take that many people to completely disrupt and
destroy local cities, towns, municipalities. Put the government you know,
on high alert, put people you know live in constant fear.
Speaker 2 (20:19):
And that's that's something you have to allow.
Speaker 1 (20:21):
To to percolate in your mind as you're assessing all
of these things. Now, Listen, if you got heartstrings for
you know, those young kids, then why are you not
calling your senator and congressman right now about the three
hundred and forty thousand missing children that have come in
(20:42):
under that time. Now, we all saw the kids in
cages under the Obama administration. We saw aoc to going
down and cry in front of the detention centers. But
nobody's crying for the three hundred and forty thousand missing
children right now. And what have happened to Have they
been trafficked? Are they sex slaves? Are they dead? You know,
(21:03):
they've been sacrificed for their organs to be sold overseas.
And this is all real stuff taking place? Where are
those children?
Speaker 2 (21:13):
All right?
Speaker 1 (21:13):
So when you start to think about all this, what
emerges from these and this is where the things start
becoming diabolical?
Speaker 2 (21:25):
What's up everybody? Sorry again for the interruption.
Speaker 1 (21:27):
I just want to tell you about this incredible five
day challenge that we're offering on David Rutherford dot com
or in the link in the description. And what this
is is this is your Embrace Fear five day Challenge. Now,
over the past thirty years, I've spent a tremendous amount
of time developing what I call the Frog Logic concepts.
(21:48):
I teach people to embrace their fears, to forge their
self confidence, how to live a team life, and to
ultimately live with purpose. So what we want to introduce
you to is how to get going in these ideas.
And so we've got this incredible five day Embrace Fear
Challenge Again, the link is in the description. In this
there's five missions, five to one per day that's going
(22:11):
to ask you to do all different types of things,
which is, identify the fears which are running your life
except the hard truth of where you are, rechain your mindset,
to test your limits, and then to forge your courage
to live with purpose. These involve both physical and emotional
and mental aspects in terms of journaling. But I'm telling
(22:31):
you it's going to kick start your mind as you
begin to think about the number one emotion out of
our eight core motions that impedes us from our successes,
and that's fear. And trust me when I tell you
I've spent a lot of my life being afraid of things.
When you're jumping out of a perfectly good airplane in
the middle of the night, chasing two ducks into the
(22:51):
middle of the ocean, you better believe you're scared. And
this is the ideas that emerged out of my understanding
of fear that I hope you can understand too, that
will end up helping you be able to find your
purpose in life. So here's the kicker. This is a
free challenge. You don't have to pay for it, you
don't have to buy it, you don't have to dow anything.
(23:13):
All you got to do is sign up, take the
challenge and get your life back on track being able
to embrace that fear in order for you to find
purpose in life.
Speaker 2 (23:23):
All right, enjoy who yuh.
Speaker 1 (23:26):
So? What did I where you go when you start
to examine all this, you immediately go to the NGOs,
the non governmental organizations that helped facilitate this because this
is a machine. This became an absolute machine. Now why
because you're talking about billions and billions of dollars that
(23:49):
funded this operation, both externally and internally. So what were
some of the biggies in terms of migratation or in quotation,
refugee support. You had the United Nations Refugee Agency, the
u n HRC, You had the International Organization for Migration,
(24:12):
the IM, the IOM, the International Committee for of the
Red Cross, the ICRC, and you had highest right and.
Speaker 4 (24:25):
And basically these NGOs are just the face, the pretty
face that they put on top of these of their plans.
Speaker 2 (24:33):
That's right, right, that's right.
Speaker 4 (24:35):
Because you don't have to tear down the country budget line.
You know a lot of the budget.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
One hundred percent, one hundred percent.
Speaker 1 (24:43):
And you know the other thing too, is when you
do look at what these NGOs provide. They provide legitimate services, right,
They provide water, they provide tents, they provide internet access,
they provide some kind of debit call, they provide shelters,
they provide food, They provide protection in some cases. But
(25:08):
what all four that's for the mass migration into the
United States, right for what reason? So Highest is, you know,
is the Hebrew Immigration Aid Society, and you know their
role in migration operates in countries like Panama, Columbia, Mexico,
(25:29):
offering to sports and migrants and refugees traveling through Central
South America. And their work includes and provides legal assistance,
humanitarian areas, food shelter, medical care, and guidance on the
asylum process in regions like the Darien Gap, a dangerous
migration route right now. Highest receives its funding from a
(25:49):
bunch of difference, you know, private donations, government grants, that
whole thing.
Speaker 2 (25:54):
So here you go, ready for this.
Speaker 1 (25:56):
So from twenty twenty one to twenty twenty four, Highest
received two one hundred and seventy four point six million
dollars in federal grants to support this cause eighty seven
point seventy seven million per year. And this was during
(26:18):
Alexander Meorkis's tenure at this DHS secretary. It's also known
that he was also the head of Highest prior to
coming in as the head of HHS. All right, So,
like I said in twenty twenty three received eighty seven
million in taxpayer funds. Some posts alleged that highest was
(26:42):
a part of a broader one point four billion funded
by who you guessed it, USAID, right and USAID as
now we found out from Mike Bens and DOGE was
basically funding all different types of illicit programs as a
cutout for the Central Intelligence Agency in the intelligence community.
Speaker 2 (27:07):
Right.
Speaker 1 (27:07):
And so when you understand the work they did over
seas with judicial reform, right, changing the influence of local judges,
getting judges in office, or outright funding color revolutions, funding
media campaigns, funding immigration changes or challenges to certain areas,
(27:29):
you start to understand, well, well they're not just it's
not a us AID organization.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
They're a political influence organization.
Speaker 1 (27:38):
You know, total revenue approximately one hundred and thirty five million,
sixty percent of their total revenue comes from government aid
and funding.
Speaker 2 (27:49):
All Right, So that's that's them.
Speaker 1 (27:52):
How about the un HRC, right, the United Nations High
Commission for Refugees, And again when you look at what
their mission statement is and it looks awesome, right, you know,
here's what it is. Their focus is on protecting and
assisting refugees, asylum seekers, internally displaced persons IDPs, stateless people
(28:15):
in Central South America primarily through humanitarian aid, legal support,
and integration programs. Why the un HRC does not explicitly
allocate funds for migrant support a distinct category in their
programs in the America support forcibly displaced populations, So forcibly
(28:35):
displace populations. Now, when you get into what asylum actually
is and what it means, holy cow, talk about gray
area and definitions. It's pretty substantial, right, hey, jeordie, Will
you try and pull up the definition of an asylum
(28:56):
seeking person by standards of ha, yes, and see if
you can look up the standards prior to the Trump
administration coming in.
Speaker 2 (29:04):
Yep, thank you sir. All right, all right.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
Spending in Central South America, all right, total expenditure in
the Americas in twenty twenty three was approximately three hundred
and fifty five million dollars.
Speaker 2 (29:23):
Let me repeat my last.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
Their spending in the Americas was three hundred and fifty
five million dollars, right against the regional budget of eight
hundred and twenty seven million. And they had some funding
gaps for sure, but they were able to you know
meet those needs. All right, let's see spending. The spending
(29:47):
covered twenty three million forcibly displaced people in their needs
protecting across the region, driven by displacement in Venezuela, Colombia, Haiti,
Central America, Mexico and Nicaragra. So let's look at that number.
Twenty's that's from the UN HRC. Twenty three million displaced people.
(30:12):
So you're telling me that twenty they were able to aggregate, interview,
and and log in that twenty three million people met
their criteria for refugees. I'm calling bullshit on that. It
just is what it is. You're not going to fudge
these numbers. And the reason they fudge these numbers is
(30:34):
so they can get money from the IMF, they can
get money from federal grants, they can get money from
UN grants. Which, by the way, did you find those
that number, Jordy.
Speaker 3 (30:44):
Oh, I found the definitions the definition.
Speaker 1 (30:47):
Give me that real quick book and then and then
we'll go in another one I need your help with.
Speaker 4 (30:51):
Yeah, so it looks like the definition hasn't changed much,
but it doesn't matter because the way it's applied and
the legal reasons of who can be an asylum did
change a lot, and that's where they snuck it in.
Speaker 3 (31:02):
Right.
Speaker 4 (31:02):
So the definition looks like it's, according to HHS, a
person who has fled their country and is seeking protection
from persecution or serious human rights violations in another country.
Speaker 1 (31:16):
Right.
Speaker 4 (31:17):
So they have not yet legally been recognized as a refugee,
but they're in the process of applying for asylum at
the US port of entry or from another country. Now,
the big thing that happened is there's been changes in
that since Trump's first term. So while the core definition
hasn't changed, Trump era policy shifts impacted who could claim
(31:38):
asylum and how their claims are processed. So, in June
of twenty eighteen, Attorney General Sessions ruled domestic violence or
gang based persecution did not qualify as a form of
persecution under asylum law. So you can't claim asylum because
of that.
Speaker 2 (31:57):
We have no Jeff Sessions. Yeah you got the boot.
Speaker 3 (32:02):
Yeah you did.
Speaker 4 (32:03):
And then there was the remain in Mexico policy, So
even if they did claim it, they remained in Mexico.
Speaker 3 (32:08):
Right.
Speaker 2 (32:09):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (32:09):
Now, the big change was under Biden, these rules were
basically just scrapped. And so now even though the definition
hasn't changed. Now, it's basically you can be an asylum
seeker for literally any reason and wait here.
Speaker 1 (32:27):
So think about the number twenty three million people meet
the criteria for the unhrc as forcibly displaced under those
asylum rules. Right, So oppression, how vague can that be?
Domestic violence? I mean you talk about how rampant that
is and impoverished areas all over the world, including the
(32:50):
United States. Right, you talk about oppression. I mean that's
like fighting terrorism. I mean, in my mind, that's the
same concept. You throw out some ambiguous word that has
an unlimited scope of perspective and and and it just
opens the door for everybody and anybody to meet that criteria.
Speaker 2 (33:11):
And that's what happened.
Speaker 3 (33:13):
Seeking protection from persecution.
Speaker 1 (33:16):
Dude, I see protection from persecution in my own mind
every goddamn day. Excuse my French, but it's like, holy cow,
I mean this, They've created a a a mega industry.
We're talking billions of billions of dollars that not only
served two different masters of low wage or you know,
(33:38):
like if I'm a corporation like Walmart or wherever, or
or any unions, and that's that's crazy. I just talked
to somebody this morning whose father grew up in the
unions in New Jersey, and he was telling me that
even his son could not get hired on the docks
because they're only taking undocumented work now. So the people
(34:01):
who once traditionally were protected by the unions are no
longer being displaced by these illegal immigrants.
Speaker 3 (34:08):
Have a union, what's the point?
Speaker 1 (34:10):
Well, you know, I have a union. Unions not only
support a particular political party and a voting block. So
if you can somehow create some type of political loophole
where you can have undocumented workers work under the union pretense,
(34:32):
which are protected jobs in certain states, now it not
only protects them under these assailant rules, but protects them
under these worker laws that they're protected under the unions,
and you can only use the unions on the jobs
for certain political whatever. It's pretty smart, it's ingenious when
you think about it. All. Right now, let me just
get into this now. The u n HI, HRC, HCR. Sorry,
(34:56):
they had all different types of programs, right, They had
the Regional Refugee and Migrant Response Plan.
Speaker 2 (35:06):
They had.
Speaker 1 (35:09):
These other programs that were medical and nature legal in nature.
Speaker 2 (35:16):
You know, think about this too. Some of their funding.
Speaker 1 (35:18):
Out of the three hundred and fifty five million dollars spent,
a significant portion went to local partners. That's fifty seven
percent of global partner funding to local responders. Okay, so
let's say I'm running, you know, a part of the
un HRC, and I come into a particular town that's
being flooded with all these these illegal immigrants or these
(35:43):
asylum seekers or whatever, and it's destroying my town or whatever.
And I say, hey, listen, here's three million dollars, which
is twenty times their annual budget for that municipality. If
you if you allow me to conduct business in your
in your town, what do.
Speaker 2 (35:59):
You think is gonna have up in there?
Speaker 1 (36:01):
So again you think about it, I mean, are are
you going to spend five million dollars on waters or
where does that money?
Speaker 2 (36:10):
Listen. I've run contracts overseas.
Speaker 1 (36:12):
I ran a building contract and when I was at
Blackwater over in Afghanistan, our job was to my job
was to design and build these training facilities and two
spots in Afghanistan, and we had to work with Afghan
building companies and Afghan municipalities are government leaders and I
(36:33):
would say roughly eighty five percent of the money that
we were getting through our contract from the US government
was going to pay off these these these government people
and all this stuff. And I kept bringing up like, hey,
this is this is BS. Why are we doing this.
That's just how it's done. That's just how it's done.
(36:53):
And I'm sure if you were to go in and
talk to these officials at these international aid oils, this
is how it's done. This is how it's done. So people,
not only are we funding our own immigration wave or
of overriding and assistance, but we're also paying people off
all over the these countries in Veneicpipaltis, all over Central
(37:14):
South America.
Speaker 2 (37:16):
All right, Umm, let's go to the next one. Next one,
let me just summarize this.
Speaker 1 (37:22):
So in twenty twenty three, the UNHRC approximately three hundred
and fifty five million million in Central South America refugee
with a twenty twenty four budget of eight hundred and
thirty four they did come up short on that. The
u NRC contributing to the one point four billion dollar
(37:42):
r MRP and those funds support humanitarian aid for the
integrate the integration for and then this one adds it
up twenty three to twenty five million displaced people, primarily Venezuelans,
Haitians and Central Americans.
Speaker 2 (37:59):
All right, How.
Speaker 1 (38:01):
About the International Committee for the Red Cross the ICRC,
all right, ICRC Global and regional spending context.
Speaker 2 (38:10):
Global budget was two point twenty eight.
Speaker 1 (38:14):
Billion dollars, right for what they do, approximately.
Speaker 2 (38:20):
Two point six seven.
Speaker 1 (38:24):
Concerned over operates, one hundred companies addressing arm conflict.
Speaker 2 (38:28):
All right.
Speaker 1 (38:28):
The America's budget, all right was one hundred and fifty
three point seven million dollars, approximately one hundred and eighty
and US dollars migration focus all right, all right, total
(38:53):
estimated spending combined Central South America, the ICRC's annual spending
on migration support twenty twenty three at twenty nine to
fifty million, and the range accounts for Central America nine
to twenty million, South America twenty to thirty million.
Speaker 2 (39:11):
But I don't you know what I love Jeordy two
about this?
Speaker 1 (39:14):
Was that is the spectrum right, nine to twenty million.
Speaker 2 (39:20):
Right, dude, twenty to thirty million. D How difficult is
it to have a budget? How difficult? It is pretty hard?
Speaker 1 (39:31):
Well, you go back and you look at Los Angeles.
I mean It's not just these international aide organizations. It's
a look at Los Angeles County budget, right you look
at let's look at the homeless shelter, the homeless programs.
Speaker 2 (39:44):
Where did all that money go? Where are the receipts
on that? Well?
Speaker 4 (39:47):
How do you have a budget when you have an
unknown amount of people that you're going to be dealing with, Like, literally,
I can't even blame them. How do you even have one?
Speaker 2 (39:58):
You don't.
Speaker 1 (39:59):
What you have is you have a scam. You have
a grift at the highest possible level. You pull on
people's heartstrings, you tell them that we're taking care of
twenty five million displaced people in the world. And listen
before you get all spun up. If you're, again, you know,
on the other side, ideological than I am.
Speaker 2 (40:18):
The reality is is, you.
Speaker 1 (40:20):
Know, we've done our fair share and displaced refugees and
people around the world.
Speaker 2 (40:24):
I get it, I've seen it right.
Speaker 1 (40:27):
But the reality is is people are fleeing these countries
that you know you can go in and yes there's
violence and there's oppression, but they're they're coming here because
you know, there's opportunities unlike any other place, and and
all you have to do is say whatever, Now, if
(40:48):
you're an NGO and you can go out and you
can you can source twenty thirty to fifty million dollars
and have a little bit of fudge wiggle room in
your nonprofit?
Speaker 2 (41:01):
What do you think is gonna happen? Hey, what do
you think is gonna happen?
Speaker 3 (41:05):
You're gonna go for the biggest number possible.
Speaker 1 (41:07):
Well, and how many of these organizations are actually contributing
and working with the criminal organizations that are funding the
actual human trafficking part? I mean, there's an argument to
be made for sure that they're doing the same thing.
They're trafficking human beings. Right now, again, I know that
(41:30):
I'll spend up Now. Now here's the kicker. All right,
are you ready for this one?
Speaker 2 (41:35):
Geordie?
Speaker 3 (41:35):
This was my thing? Now, dude, I'm not.
Speaker 1 (41:37):
This is ridiculous. Okay, here we go. Dude, I don't
even know how to even begin to wrap my mind
around this one. This one was staggering when I found this.
Speaker 3 (41:51):
All Right, there we go.
Speaker 1 (41:52):
So how does the US federal government what role do
they play in this?
Speaker 2 (42:03):
Okay, thank you so much for listening today.
Speaker 1 (42:05):
Pardon the interruption, but I just got to give a
shout out to one of our big sponsors here, and
this comes from my good friend Alex, you know, who
has a family owned business called Firecracker Farm. When I
talk about family business, and I've worked with thousands of
family businesses across the country for the last twenty years
(42:27):
of public speaking, you know.
Speaker 2 (42:28):
It's when I meet them and I know.
Speaker 1 (42:30):
That this business is going to succeed, and it's successful
because it's a business that's that's a part of love
and their family and how they support each other. This
is that place, you know. I've been up. I've been
to their farm. I watch how they raise their peppers
with love. I watch how they process them in this
thing they call the Three Kings, and how they infuse
them into this these this beautiful salt, this spicy salt
(42:54):
that enhances your food. I put it on my eggs
every single morning. I put it on my steak, I
put it on my pro team. It's in these cool
salt shakers. But you know, more so that the product
is impeccable' I've even been able to phase out ultra
process sauces hot sauces, and I'm now I'm using this
spicy salt but the thing I know is just how
(43:15):
much Alex loves doing this, how much his family loves
to support them, and really the quality of the product
sou If you believe me and you trust what I'm
telling you, please visit Firecracker dot Farm and if you
want a discount, you can type in the discount code
rut r ut Romeo uniform tangle one five to get
(43:38):
your discount. Again, a family owned business that's incredible, h
You will love their product. I promise you that's Firecracker
dot Farm. What role is the government that your hard
earned tax dollars, the ones that you're grinding out day
in and day out, that you're going to work, but
(44:00):
you're trying to put food on your table with crazy
inflation because of reckless spending from both sides of the aisle.
Speaker 2 (44:07):
That you're going to work.
Speaker 1 (44:09):
And you're way from your kids for fifty sixty hours
a week because you had to get a second job,
because your wife works, because your kids all work, and
everybody's in this hillacious grind because there's no way to
afford a cost of living, there's no way to buy
your own home. You know, coming out of college, you
know you're in debt up to your eyeballs. Insurance you
(44:30):
can't afford, but yet you're hard earned tax dollars that
if you don't pay, Guess where you're going to jail?
Guess where those tax dollars have been going?
Speaker 3 (44:41):
Can I guess where?
Speaker 2 (44:42):
Do you? What's your guess, Jeordian?
Speaker 4 (44:44):
I'm sure they go towards building a very protected and
well run border and help fund a very smooth, fast, safe,
and legal immigration system that for people to come into
the US. I'm thinking that's what it's going towards.
Speaker 2 (45:03):
All right, all right, Okay, here you go.
Speaker 1 (45:06):
Funding is spread across multiple agencies. Okay, all right, primarily
the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Health and
Human Services, right, the Department of State, like the Shelter
and Services Program, the Emergency Food and Shelter Program, the
Migration and Refugee Assistance Program FEMA, and several others.
Speaker 2 (45:32):
All right, here's what we're gonna do.
Speaker 1 (45:37):
All right, Let's just talk about one under Department of
Homeland Security, and that's the Shelter and Services Program. All right,
twenty twenty three? How much total? Give me a guess,
Jordy for Shelter and Services? Yeah, shelter and Services program.
Speaker 3 (45:58):
I mean, I like shelters and services.
Speaker 1 (46:00):
Let's see, why wouldn't you love to stay in a
five star hotel in New York City or.
Speaker 3 (46:05):
La or here.
Speaker 4 (46:06):
The Roosevelt dude almost stayed there last time I went there.
It sounds like real fun. Twenty million.
Speaker 1 (46:16):
You got to get those numbers up, my fresh.
Speaker 2 (46:21):
Let's push to get those numbers up. Bro? All right,
what do you think it is?
Speaker 3 (46:27):
Two hundred million, bro ten ext it brother.
Speaker 1 (46:32):
Seven hundred and seventy million dollars dude total, including two
hundred and ninety million in June, seventy seven million in August,
over four hundred million via the EFSP, dash h three
hundred and thirty two point five million in May of
twenty twenty three, seventy five million in December.
Speaker 2 (46:54):
Of twenty twenty two.
Speaker 3 (46:57):
Some nice shelters and services right there, bro.
Speaker 2 (47:00):
Don't even holy I'm just I don't even know.
Speaker 1 (47:02):
All right, how about the Office of Refuge and Resettlement
the r R.
Speaker 2 (47:09):
What do you think? What do you want to take
a shot at this one?
Speaker 4 (47:12):
Let's see, Well, they're not building shelters, so I'm gonna
say only four hundred million.
Speaker 1 (47:17):
Well, I love it. I love that you went down right.
They're not involved in shelters or anything. Okay, this is
the Department of Health and Human Services, right hass that's
supposed to be taking care of the health and human
services of American population and public us.
Speaker 2 (47:33):
Right yep, all right?
Speaker 1 (47:37):
From twenty twenty to twenty twenty four, twenty two point
six billion dollars of your money, your money, twenty two
point six billion, and that's from the New York Post
and by open the books as sources, and you can
(48:01):
rock all this stuff you want, right right on Migro,
escalating from two point four billion in twenty twenty one
to ten billion in twenty twenty three.
Speaker 2 (48:14):
This includes costs, righty.
Speaker 1 (48:16):
This is the one that makes me so frigging angry
I can't even see straight. This includes costs for unincompanied
bless you. This includes costs for unaccompanied children resettlement and
services like cars, home loans, and startups. All right, so
(48:39):
we were missing three hundred and forty thousand kids, and
but yet we're giving them ten billion and twenty three
for their their car services, home loans, and for startups.
All right, where's the accounting on that? Jeordie there's no accounting, dude,
there's no accounting. That's what my point of all this are.
(49:02):
You want to know why people are rioting in the streets.
You want to know why programs like the.
Speaker 2 (49:08):
Ford uh uh.
Speaker 1 (49:10):
And Rockefeller Foundations and the Bill and the Linda Gates
Foundations and the Open Society that that piece of ship
George Soros. You want to know why it's so much money?
Is it why there's so much chaos? It's because it's massive,
big business. These NGOs are literally be funded, being funded
(49:34):
by your tax dollars. And I go back to the
episode I did you know a few shows go about
the big beautiful Bill and guess what all that funding?
It didn't come out, It didn't go a There were
little cuts here and there, but it's still in there.
Let me just read a couple more, Jordi, and then
(49:55):
I'm gonna wrap this up.
Speaker 2 (49:57):
It's crazy, all right.
Speaker 1 (50:01):
Federal grants and direct funding from migration operations from twenty
to twenty twenty five total and estimated, are you ready
to make you sick? Forty two point five to forty
seven point five billion dollars.
Speaker 2 (50:18):
To all these Homeland.
Speaker 1 (50:21):
Department of Homeland or all their little programs.
Speaker 2 (50:26):
I just so let me recap. You've got a industry.
I'm not multi, no multi.
Speaker 1 (50:40):
I mean these industries are bigger than most of our
biggest companies in the United States, which are the most
successful companies in the world. Are dwarfing their budgets and
what they're spending in these random areas by funding all
these different programs out there through these ng If you
(51:02):
really want to do a deep dive on this, I
recommend you go look up on X this a guy
named Mike Benz. He is by far doing the deepest
dive on where this money is actually going. The other
is a person called the Data Republican. She's a phenomenal
analyst and researcher. She's incredible to She's exposing all kinds
(51:23):
of this fundy in real time on X. Go see them,
go follow them if you want to continued going down
this rabbit hole. So as these people are trying to
pull on your heartstrings or the heart strings around, they're
trying to get you to realize, yeah, and listen again.
Speaker 2 (51:44):
I just got to restate this.
Speaker 1 (51:47):
If you live in a place where you're being physically
tortured or persecuted and there's a government coming at you
and imprising you and forcing you out of your homes,
taking over your.
Speaker 2 (51:59):
Land and all that. Yeah, I get it, man, I'm
all about it. I'm all about that.
Speaker 1 (52:05):
But this, this is an international grift to the likes
of and how much money do we not know about?
Because every time I went through went to these places
and to these sorcers to look at none of their
books were clear. They don't open their books up so
we can go in and evaluate these nonprofits, these NGOs.
Speaker 2 (52:26):
Some of them do, some of them don't.
Speaker 1 (52:28):
I mean how there were even Catholic organizations and Christian
organizations and Protestant there was one in Texas that went
from forty seven million to two hundred and forty million
dollars in federal grants. Now, listen, I'm a Christian, and
I believe in loving my neighbor, but not to the
(52:48):
detriment of my actual neighbor, not to the detriment of
my kid's future. By putting us into astronomical debt and
flooding our streets with even at one one hundred and
twenty thousand hardened criminals and terrorists and rapists and murderers,
(53:09):
it's just not okay. We need substantial reform on how
the immigration system works. We need to get many of
these radical people out. We need to check big business,
and we certainly need to defund these NGOs, including the
international NGOs that don't seem to have a problem, by
(53:31):
completely destroying the fabric of how our system in America works. Now,
you know, I just we're in a predicament. We're in
(53:53):
a pinch now, and that's where we're at, and so
now is not the time to check out.
Speaker 2 (53:59):
Please. I know you're overwhelmed. I'm overwhelmed.
Speaker 1 (54:03):
And I live and breathe and smell and eat this
stuff day in and day out. And you could ask
my poor wife and my poor children. Man, I'm the
one at the breakfast table when they're getting ready to
go to school, or you know, they're sitting around at
dinner and I'm like, do you know what's taking place?
Do you know how much these engine And they're like,
please stop right.
Speaker 2 (54:23):
I get it. I know it's overwhelming.
Speaker 1 (54:26):
But if you want your country and you want the
thing that you believe in, the thing that you from
when you were a kid, that you really believe in,
that America is the land of opportunity. Then you need
to recognize that there is an ideology that has been
infiltrated into our American social structure and social scene. Whether
it was emerged out of the colleges and universities that
(54:51):
have been promoting socialism at the highest levels for the
last sixty years, right, Or it's the massive wave of
people for coming from other countries around the world that
choose not to assimilate and want to force us and
our weak, you know, our compassion into us assimilating and
giving them what they want for free. Or it's a
(55:13):
political ideology in our own country that want to over
that wants to overwhelm the electorate and destroy the very
checks and balances that have kept this system in place
for two hundred and fifty years, as well as this
criminal element that just wants to make money off the
misery and suffering of other people.
Speaker 2 (55:36):
It's time to get motivated.
Speaker 1 (55:39):
It's time to ask your local meness, go to your
town hall meetings, call your local state congressman or state senators.
Speaker 2 (55:46):
What are you going to do? And more than ever,
get on the email.
Speaker 1 (55:52):
Or you know what all you got to do is
go into groc and give a press.
Speaker 2 (55:57):
Hey, GROC.
Speaker 1 (55:58):
I want you to write a demanding letter of my
local representative up in Washington, d C. Or send it
to here, and I want you to write this big,
beautiful letter demanding that all this be stopped and reformed
and all this. And then you go to your little
printer in your house and you print out, you know,
three hundred and sixty five of those right, Get three
(56:21):
hundred and sixty five letter you know, envelopes, you know,
get a little stamper, had a stamp of the address
of your local commercemen. And have your kids, you know,
sit there, fold them, put them in the.
Speaker 2 (56:36):
Stamp it.
Speaker 1 (56:37):
Put a letter, you know, a little stamp because the
snail mail still works, they still have it. Put it
in the mail every single day for three hundred and
sixty five days, and demand change, because I'm telling you,
you know, if you don't believe that we are the
last shining light on the hill, then you have your
(57:00):
head in the sand.
Speaker 2 (57:01):
And I'm begging you.
Speaker 1 (57:02):
I'm begging you, come up, come out, stand up, Be
proud to be an American citizen, Be proud to represent
what we represent, but more so the people who have
come before, what they fought and died for And that's
a system that functions for you, that doesn't steal your
taxpayer money, that doesn't make your life harder, doesn't give
(57:27):
what you worked forward for free to these people who
are here illegally and don't want to contribute to our society.
Stand up and fight for what you know is right.
Who Yah