July 10, 2024 • 37 mins
In this episode, Tudor interviews Alex Phillips, a British journalist and former member of the European Parliament, about current events in France, the issue of Muslim extremism in Europe, and concerns about Joe Biden's leadership in the United States. They discuss the manipulation of the recent French elections, the rise of rape gangs in Europe, the erosion of Western values, and the impact of weak leadership on the world stage. They also touch on the dangers of open borders and the need to protect culture and national identity. The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network. For more visit TudorDixonPodcast.com
Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. I am very excited
today because we have some of it with a much
better accent than me, So you get to listen to
someone very cool. Today we have Alex Phillips with us.
She is a British journalist and a former member of
the European Parliament. There's so much in the world going
on right now that we just saw what happened in France,
we just saw what happened in the UK, and now
(00:22):
we obviously are watching what's happening with Joe Biden in
the US, so I thought Alex would be the best
person to bring on. Alex, thank you so much for
joining me.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
It's a real pleasure. Thank you for having me on.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
Absolutely right now, I think I want to ask you
about France first, if you don't mind, because we have
people in the United States who are saying, oh, they cheated,
and of course that's a big deal if you say
that in the United States, and we've got these people
on the left who are like, oh, look, even people
on the right in the United States are saying France cheated.
(00:52):
But they did something to manipulate the vote, didn't they.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
Yeah. I think with I to die so I mean
intensive cheating. I'm sure it's fully within electoral law in France.
But what happened essentially was the party that a lot
of the critics call far right. I think it's complete
misappropriation of that term. Frankly, if you took rassl them
on national equipment in America, they'd probably be centrist, want
to control immigration, and they want to crack down on
(01:19):
Wislim extremism in that country. But there was a huge
push by the establishment of both the media establishments and
the political establishment to block them out of power. That
is why Immanual Wackpole called that snap election so quickly,
hoping to sort of unfoot them really and make sure
that they didn't have a chance to campaign. But then
won the first round of elections for the Senate and
(01:41):
then in the second round basically they created a pact
all the other parties led by Macworn, including an extremely
far left party who have had pretty you know, dodgy policies,
in order to essentially try and push out Russell on
national and prevent and getting a majority of the votes.
And so in the end, that is what happens. I
(02:02):
think a lot of French people will feel cheated because
essentially bassemblement of all of the parties in France got
the most votes.
Speaker 1 (02:10):
So it's interesting you mentioned Muslim extremism, and I think
that it's important for us. I know you've been clear
on this to say that this is not this is
not the Muslim faith. This is when you have extremists,
and when you have extremists in all different cultures, but
you're calling out extremists that I have immigrated into Europe
and one of the things that I would notice you
(02:31):
were recently having a conversation about, and this is something
that I know a lot of Americans have on their
mind as we see people crossing the border and more
crime coming to the United States. One of the things
that you talked about was these get rape gangs, and
that to me was shocking because I think that we
still feel pretty safe here in the United States and
(02:53):
I don't worry about my girls walking home from the
bus stop. But you're talking about teenage and preteen girls
getting gang raped by some of these immigrant gangs that
are coming in. Can you explain a little bit about that.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
Right there have been two massive headline events that have
happened recently in Europe. I mean actually three of you
include Germany. There was one situation in Belgium where a
young teenage girl was coaxed into the forest by her
young boyfriend. What they call this in Belgium the loverboy technique,
where she's got a lot of a boyfriend and he
sort of brooms her and gives the presents and pisa
(03:29):
sort of get to to doing what he wants, and
this eventually lead her into doing things like making illicit
contents for online. Anyway, he took her into this forest
and down he and a load of his mates then
proceeded to gang rape her. And she was under the
age of sixteen. He was older than that. Some of
the participants in this themselves the boys were extremely young,
(03:52):
but they were all essentially Muslim African men. The similar
thing has happened in France, where a young Jewish girl
was gang raped by again Muslim African men as some
form of punishment. There's been an incident where this has
happened as well in Germany. Actually, if you look back
at the twenty three is twenty sixteen New Year's Eve
(04:14):
celebrations in Cologne in Germany, there were one two hundred
and fifty reported sexual assaults and rapes against young German
girls and celebrating that light in the middle of the
square where gowns of men surrounded them a bit like
packs of wolves, so have picked them off and proceeded
to assault them. And there are a couple of rapes
reported then and again the perpetrators were from the Middle
(04:37):
East and from North Africa. We've had a problem with
grooming of young white girls in the north of England,
especially places like Roberham, by Asian grooming gangs. Again, so
at what points I want to know, are we going
to wake up and say, look, we're not talking about
all Muslims, we're not talking about everybody practicing that faith,
(04:57):
but there is something happening here where the common denominator
are young men from that religion or at least with
those cultural values that you find in some countries in
the world. And again not saying everybody from those countries
have those cultural values, but you only have to look
at the way women are treated in countries like Syria, Afghanistan,
Iran to realize that in many respects they're treated as
(05:19):
second class citizens. And a lot of these young men
as well are constantly exposed to adult content that's becoming
more and more prevalent in society. And who are they
seeing in pornography. They're not seeing their own women. They
tend to be seeing Western women. And they're also in
some cases being preached to by their elders that essentially
white women are fair gain they don't have self respect.
(05:41):
And you put all these elements together and you get
a pretty toxic cocktail that unless we are comfortable and
confidence in talking about this, we are jeopardizing the security
and the dignity of our young women.
Speaker 1 (05:54):
I think we're not comfortable talking about it for exactly
this reason, because we're afraid of think someone that you
either interviewed or you were talking to was saying, you know, here,
we are afraid to say that we want to protect culture,
we want to protect our families, we want to protect
our children, and we want to protect our women because
we want to be so welcoming. We want everybody to
(06:14):
think that we've accepted everyone and we're a big melting pot.
In certainly in the United States, it's the same right,
everybody's like, we want to be very welcoming. There is
a difference in cultures, and it is naive to say
there is not a difference in cultures. And that's what
I think we've you know, we're almost in the United States,
almost living the benefit of mistakes that were made in Europe,
(06:36):
where just mass migration was allowed and no vetting, and
now we have the ability to say, it's not that
you don't want to let anybody in, it's that you
want to make sure you're letting the right people in,
and that these people want to become Americans, not that
they want America to become a different country. And I
would imagine that that's the same thing that Ireland wants,
that the UK wants, that France want, or most people
(06:59):
you would think want if you want to come here,
find but become French, I would think, right.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
I mean, this is it that the strength and solidity
of any community or country, it depends upon integration. And
you cannot have parallel cultures running side by side that
don't speak the same language, don't share the same moris
and values, and particularly when one of the cultures actually
vehemently dislikes and disrespects the other, that the culture of
the home country, and that this is witheeing the ghettoization
(07:28):
increasingly in Europe for various reasons when you look at
the old European empires and the old French Empire, the
old British Empire, that this involves Muslim countries, but it's
also about the rate of essentially people coming as well.
Back in the sort of period where we have people
from the Comorth coming to the UK from countries such
as Pakistan, it might have been twenty thousand and thirty thousand.
(07:50):
Over a period of time, these people assimilated. These people
came for jobs, love Britain, they loved the monarchy, They
wanted to adapt, they wanted to be part of the community.
Now we've got figures running over a million gross per
year and we are a country of sixty eight million.
This is a huge proportion of the population suddenly coming
from countries who don't share our values and they don't
(08:13):
seek to integrate. And frankly they don't have to because
they go and live within their families, within their communities,
and they don't mix with us. They go to their
own schools, sometimes they don't even speak the language. This
to me does not seem healthy for any society, and
frankly wouldn't happen if I were to go and live
in Iran, not that I particularly want to, but if
I was going to go live in Iran or North
(08:35):
Africa or whether it may be, I would be expected
to adapt to their way of right, yes, or covering
myself up or you know, speaking the Lan language. I
don't think they'd have much truck with me walking around
in a mini skirt or you know. It's people have
got to be realistic about this, and it's not racist
to talk about this. This is about women's rights, and
I do not think that the security of women should
(08:57):
be sacrificed on the ultra of political correctness.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
And you know, it's interesting that you mentioned that it
used to be that people came because they wanted to
become a member of society. Because we had a factory
here in the United States, and I remember, probably ten
years into owning it, we had an employee who was
high level in the shop and he had always been
with the factory from before we purchased a factory. And
(09:21):
one day immigration came in and they took him out.
You would never have known. You would never have known
because he was an American. I mean, he wanted to
be an American. You know that obviously he was illegal
and he had taken idea and then the identity of
a Californian person, and that's how they ended up finding him.
And the whole factory was devastated. You know, nobody knew
(09:43):
and he was truly part of our team, like a
part of our family. You know, you would never have known. Now,
we already see this where we have communities that are
separated and they don't want the average American to come
into the community and they want to keep it and
it just seems wrong. And that's why I think that
(10:03):
people are so concerned about border strengths. So that brings
me to that brings me to what's happening in the
United States. Obviously, we're in the midst of the Native Summit.
We have President Biden, who is out there leading talking
to folks and running for office again. Now he said
the first time he ran, he would be a one
term president. The first time he ran, I would say
(10:26):
there was a striking difference in twenty nineteen from two
thousand and eight. You know, him running as vice president
was a way different story than him running as president.
You could already see that there was a cognitive change.
I'll say that today. Obviously we saw the debate. We
see what's happening. We've seen it for a while, and
I think folks that are right of center have been
(10:49):
saying for a while, this is very concerning who is
running the country. And we're in the midst of two
we're wars, you know, we're looking at Ukraine, we're looking
at Israel. We're wondering who's in charge. But what we're
really wondering is what do other countries think about us?
So that's why I wanted to ask you what are
they We're hearing drips and dribbles of things coming out
(11:10):
of you know, like D Day and the G seven
where people like man he was really off his game.
What's going on?
Speaker 2 (11:17):
Well, that's what we're all asking, What is going on?
In amount much marbles, how can you've got this senile
old man, a relic of the plus, cleaning onto powers
so hard his knuckles are turning white, saying only God
can take me away from this position. He's humbleson and
says things like he invented NATO, he invented microchips. I mean,
at this point he's sounding a bit like Mugabi or something,
(11:40):
and we just think that we want you to sort
yourself hunt. We want you to get a brilliant president
because you are the leaders of the free world. You've
always been the bastion of democracy and freedom of speech
and common sense and sort of policing the world and
leading the way. And when you've got someone like that
in charge, and we're all looking at your system thinking
we've got, you know, three hundred million odd people in
(12:02):
your country, is this the best you can do? It's
your nominator in a party. Is this it? Really? I've
been asking the question of guests on my own show
back at Home in America in the UK, and guests
from America have been telling me that, you know, they
believe that this is essentially a Barack Obama wanting to
have a fourth term. But when he left as president,
(12:22):
he didn't leave Washington, and Biden is essentially his pick
because he can't stand again.
Speaker 1 (12:28):
Now.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
I don't know if that's true or not. What I
do know is this surely cannot be in the best
interests of not just America, but the West as a whole, because,
like you said, the anti Western axis of China, of Iran,
of Russia, increasingly North Korea's joining that club. They are
on the march. They're doing all sorts of things, including
actually and elements of their Grave Zone warfare is storming
(12:51):
the borders, busting migrants out in different cultures to try
and destabilize our societies. They are really on the move.
And if we continue to sit back and let them
be dominant and our sounds being weak through Wheat leadership
and looking frankly cartoonish and klangdish on the world stage,
we are hurtling headlong towards disaster and there isn't much
(13:11):
time now to reverse this situation. Frankly, the plup is ticking.
I mean, got to get real. America's got to get real.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
Stay tuned for more of my interview with Alex Phillips,
but first I want to take a moment to tell
you more about my partners at IFCJ. Since the start
of the Swords of Iron War in Israel on October seventh,
we've seen death and destruction in the Holy Land for
more than forty years. The International Fellowship of Christians and
Jews has been on the ground in Israel, and within
hours of the war starting, and every day since, they've
(13:41):
been feeding the hungry and protecting the vulnerable. The attacks
continue in the north and in the South of Israel,
but they are resilient survivors who bravely share their stories.
In a new series, The Fellowship calls faces of Iron
survivors like Danny, whose beloved daughter and her husband were
burned alone live on October seventh by Hamas terrorists. Danny
(14:03):
is a commander of the fire and rescue in his community,
and despite fire equipment being nearby, Danny could do nothing
as his daughter's house burned and his daughter and her
husband lost their lives. But Christians like you support Israel
through the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, and it's
that support that helps these survivors remain steadfast and strong.
(14:25):
To hear more stories like this one and show your
support for Israel, visit SUPPORTIFCJ dot org again that support
IFCJ dot org. Stay tuned for more with Alex Phillips
after this. I think the Joe Biden who ran for president,
what was it the eighties or not. I think it
was the eighties when he first ran for president, would
(14:47):
look at this administration and be horrified. And that, to
me is the shocking thing, is that you've got the
Nancy Pelosi's and the Maxine Waters and the Jerry Nadler's
who've been there forever, they didn't feel this way. This
is not what they. I mean, even when the first
term of AOC Alexandrio Casio Cortes came, Nancy Pelosi was horrified.
(15:10):
She is not a globalist or she was not she
was not into this progressive platform that seems they're all
melding together now they're all supporting this guy. They're all
supporting this agenda. They're all supporting this climate change stuff
that is demanding that our auto industry change over completely.
They are all into a radical destruction of the United States.
(15:34):
And it makes no sense other than power containing and
holding power. And I think that they do have some weird,
bizarre fear of Donald Trump, which I think is hilarious
because the entire system is set up so somebody can
only serve for eight years. He's already served for four.
Like I mean, if America didn't break under Joe Biden,
I think we're good, right, I think we can handle
(15:55):
another four years. They're so they're like, oh my gosh,
doom glues, everything is going to fall apart. So over
in Europe, what are folks thinking, like do they look
at the United States and say, if Donald Trump is
president again, the world is coming to an end?
Speaker 2 (16:10):
Well, again, look, we are as divided as you are
on this issue because we've got this polarization at the
left and right, probably increasingly being pushed by the algorithms
of social media, manipulated as well in part by bought
farms from hostile regimes. That's also a huge element in this, right, Yeah,
in a post proof age. And the thing is that
Joe Biden. First of all, he's wrecking his own legacy.
(16:33):
He had a diesel legacy. He could have done been
a one term president, and people have looked back and
pointed to all of his successes. Now, if he, you know,
continues the way he is, he's a laughing stock. He's
going to ruin his reputation forever in the history books.
But I think what matters a fact, right as saying
we live at a post proof age when you look
at the stuff that Donald Trump did on the international
(16:54):
stage geopolitically, the Abraham recalls this was incredible, those peace agreements,
the opening of the normalization of relationships between Israel Saudi Arabia,
the UAE This was just breaking boundaries, was never being
even dreamt of being breached before, and he managed to
do that. And this was very clear. Actually when Iran
(17:16):
rains down all of those rockets and missiles on Israel,
when you looked at the nations that came to intercept
those rockets to make sure that not one hit in
Israeli City, which would have essentially led to some form
of World War three. Of that, I have no doubt.
You had America, you had the United Kingdom, you had farms,
but critically, you had planes taking off from Qatar. You
(17:38):
had Saudi aircraft helping to intercept to protect Israel. Because
they've grown up that they're done with this. They've realized
that actually prosperity is about progress and letting go of
those that sort of retribution tied to the past and
tied to this sort of war of religions. Iran hasn't
grown up. And what Donald Trump managed to do in
(17:59):
comportise that support for Israel, I think, essentially in recent months,
has averted a big global disaster. It's those facts that matter.
I don't care what Donald Trump might say in that
locker room style, you know, it doesn't bother me. What
I care about is security, and from the beginning he's
been a tough man on the international stage. Unpredictable, yes,
(18:20):
but actually that also has its merits and advantages when
you're trying to stand up to leaders like Putin. So
that is the you know, the critical thing here. And
like I was saying about Joe Biden, his legacy was
actually helping with the help of Pakistan to capture Osama
bin Laden. I mean, that should be white what people
remember him for, not falling down steps and jumbling up
(18:43):
his words and coming out with mad sentences, and he's
inclined to do these days. It's a tragedy, but it's
not a laughing matter. It's perilous.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
No, you talk about his legacy. As we're hearing that
there will be a press conference on Thursday, and Karine
Jean Pierre, his own press secretary, is calling it a
big boy press conference, how humiliating. After the debate, Jill says,
you did great, Joe. You answered every single question. And
(19:13):
I think we're all watching this and we're like, oh
my gosh, it's like talking to a toddler, so embarrassing.
And the question is does she talk to him that way?
All the time. Has she lost him to the point
where she talks to him that way all the time,
So she's used to it, didn't realize, Hey, I'm in
front of this crowd. I can't do this anymore. Are
they all so used to it that the press secretary
(19:35):
can come out and say it's a big boy press conference.
It's humiliating.
Speaker 2 (19:40):
These people are sensible people. They're not idiots all they frankly,
you know.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
What I mean.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
I hope I'm the education. They've got eye ees, they've
got e's, they can hear what's going on. They must
have known for a long time. If the rest of
us have seen clips online and footage you like, footage
of his behavior, then it was apparent and there was
a little bit the actually for them to knit this
in the bud a long time ago, before he became
the Democrat nominee. They could have dealt with it. Now
(20:06):
they're in a situation where they can't seem to do
anything about it, And that is what is so ridiculous.
What were they playing at? What was their end game?
Why does none of one have the tenacity or the
carriage to stand up and say this is well And
the only reason they're doing it now is after that
debate has become irrefutable. They can't play the game of
denying it anymore. But if that hadn't happened, they would
(20:27):
be wanting to go on and deny it. Their back
wouldn't be against the ropes having to say, Oh my gosh,
everyone can see him for what he is right now.
You know, we can't spin this anymore. But I mean,
why on earth were they trying to cover it up
in the first place. I don't get it. I mean,
I really don't get it. It's sort of you can
understand why people suddenly get tinfoil hat conspiracy theories when
(20:48):
they look at this rate, because it almost seems incredible,
beyond belief.
Speaker 1 (20:53):
No, and you make a great point because now we're
suddenly hearing that German officials found this out in June
of twenty twenty two when he was supposed to meet
with the German Chancellor and Blincoln shows up and they say, oh,
he had to go to bed. But the Germans were
already making this event early in the evening because they
(21:13):
knew he struggles with evening time, he gets too tired.
This was in twenty two. They were accommodating Germany, was
accommodating our president because he's too tired in the evening,
and he still couldn't make it. That's the crime here.
Where are the people who should have at that point
stood up and said, okay, we have to have a primary.
Speaker 2 (21:34):
Yeah. All I really hope is that when it comes
to all of the institutions and organizations below the present
and that it doesn't matter who is the commander in chief,
because the CIA and you know, the barriers and heads
of military and sold and so forth will keep a
tight shit running despite whatever he's rambling all about it
at the top. But it really doesn't project a sort
(21:55):
of image of America in control, as in, you know,
as a country that needs to be with and listens
to and in the world of diplomacy, especially you know
in the twenty first century where anywhere, whatever country you're from,
has got a mobile phone, handset and scene instant videos,
looking at TikTok, Twitter, Instagram, a lot of it. You know,
it is eluding the reputation of America and that is
(22:18):
so important to maintain because you know, people say that,
you know, when it comes to diplomacy, it might be
equals peace not weakness. You've got to be strong. And
when you've got a man essentially running the country who
has to be tucked up with your load of cocoa
and be drubbed out of his head, I don't know
five o'clock in the evening because he's old and seen. Aw,
(22:38):
that doesn't really reflect that image.
Speaker 1 (22:40):
And if you're saying this, I mean, we haven't hidden this,
and I think that's what the mainstream media in America thinks. Okay,
we've hit it. We've effectively hidden this. Other people don't
realize that. And just the shift in what we've seen
with the mainstream media after the debate, Oh my goodness,
he's actually this is sad. He's a problem. We've got
to get rid of him. And then obviously, whoever those
(23:02):
people that President by Committee you're talking about, It seems
like those people went out to the media and said, enough,
you are going to get back in line. He's the nominee.
We're going to say he's okay, and he's managing the country.
The problem with this, from the perspective of the American people,
we are electing someone to make sure the bureaucracy isn't
(23:25):
taking over it, to represent us. Our representatives are supposed
to keep the bureaucracy and check. It's not supposed to
be that the bureaucracy is managing the president. And you
look at it and they are. I mean, you see
these notes that slip out where it's like, walk straight
to the podium. Here's a picture so you can see
where you're going to walk. Well, like this has never
(23:46):
happened before with the President of the United States. He's
getting pre asked questions. He knows what's going to happen.
And I think that the problem with the debate was
that was you know, there were rules. You can't get
the question ahead of time, you can't bring notes, there
are no teleprompters. He apparently is having teleprompters in kitchens
(24:07):
at fundraisers. How crazy is that?
Speaker 2 (24:10):
Yeah, I mean it is crazy, And you're right. Actually,
this isn't a front of democracy. The president is the
has executive powers and he's chosen by the people to
lead the way. I mean, this isn't just a sort
of ceremonial presidents. This is a man who can actually
make snap decisions that become law, that can be executed.
And so if who are making those decisions, if not him,
(24:30):
Who are the people in charge? And if you can't
see who they are, if they're not being held accountable,
if you can't vote them out, then you've got a
real problem. And this is what is so alarming in
terms of all the values that I was talking about earlier.
The Western value is the countries of the countries in
the West, which is so different from the anti Western
access who aren't democracies. You know, they're tyrannical regimes. And
(24:51):
we are not exactly upholding the things that we go
and around the world and tell other countries that they
should have in their countries. So it's just it's a
breaking everything. And you have commonates is by talking about
this erosion of the West and existential crisis happening within
the West, and it actually, to my eyes, it's being
accelerated at such a rate that you know, I don't
(25:15):
know what it's going to take now for an interventions
put things back on the right.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Stay tuned for more of my interview with Alex Phillips,
but first I want to take a moment to tell
you more about my partners at bond Arms. Hey it's
Tutor Dixon and as everyone knows, I'm a firm believer
in our God given Second Amendment rights. And while we
hope and pray the November election restores everyday American values.
Now is the time to purchase a firearm to protect yourself,
(25:40):
your home, and your loved ones. I'm here to tell
you about an amazing Texas made, thirty year old handgun
company called bond Arms. Bond Arms makes unique, well made
handguns for first time buyers, avid collectors, and people who
just want powerful personal protection in these troubled times. Bond
Arms makes the smallest, most powerful, best built per personal
(26:00):
protection handguns that will allow you and your loved ones
to safely sleep at night. Right now, go to their
website get Bondarms dot com to learn more about the
bond Arms handguns with MSRPs starting as low as two
hundred and seventy seven dollars and you will get a
sense of relief once you own one. Visit get bondarms
dot com to find out how to get up to Oh.
(26:23):
I see people on the other side on your side
saying this is so bizarre. The culture is gone. It's
not the Germany is not the country it used to be.
Sweden is not the country it used to be that
there's the gangs that you talk about, just the lack
of safety, and I think that's something that we have
complained about slightly in the United States but really haven't
(26:46):
taken a hard look at what can happen. And if
you don't have safety, if you're not safe in your
own country, then you really have nothing right because you
can't go to work, you can't have a life, your
kids can't play outside. If you're not safe, you have nothing.
And so I don't think we emphasize that enough as
we see in the United States, and I don't know
how it's happening in Europe, but in the United States
(27:06):
there are actually people funding prosecutors that don't prosecute, attorneys
general who are not prosecuting crime either, people who are
looking the other way when it comes to criminals. And
then the funny thing about it is they get elected
by saying we can't stand gun violence, like guns are
just running around shooting people on their own. They know
(27:29):
what's happening. They've allowed the people who want to shoot
people with guns to go free when they know that
they want to shoot people with guns. And then you're
importing a bunch more people who you know nothing about.
But many times we find out they're on a terror
watch list, or they've killed someone in their home country
and they're escaping there, they're seeking asylum because they're going
to go to prison. This is craziness. And that's why
(27:52):
I wanted to have you on today because I've been
watching what you've been talking about. I think one day
you were on Newsmax right before me, and I'm like,
this is what we need to be talking to people
about so they actually see. This is the kind of
you talk about social media being so damaging. This is
the information share we need to have. What are you seeing?
What are we seeing? What do you see about us?
(28:14):
You know, these are the conversations we refuse to have.
And when you say, wow, this is the kind of
stuff that starts conspiracy theories, it's because we have so
much information and none of it's true, right, And.
Speaker 2 (28:27):
Who is doing this? You know, when when did this
sort of stealth brainwashing begin? For want of a better term,
where all of a sudden, the idea of a country
enforcing its borders, which you need to do even right,
economic planning needed to determine what sort of infrastructure you
need in a country let's a learne the matters of
security and being pride and protecting your culture and heritage.
I mean, at what point did this assimilation of open
(28:51):
borders being good and wanting to just control of your
borders being somehow fascistic? It's not. I don't know where
this messaging came from. I don't know who's behind it.
I don't know what the endgame is for all of this.
I can only imagine somehow this is being corraled and
corry about by people who really don't like America and
really don't like the United Kingdom because the idea that
(29:13):
our own people want this is to me utterly insane,
because you can palpably see now the effect this is howing.
We've just come out of our election cycle here and
you've had MP's having their offices firebond, You've had MP's
with their activists having their tires slashed. You've had six
candidates now elected who have shouted this is for Gaza
(29:35):
alacl acbar. Now we our seats in our parliament. I mean,
this is insane. You can see what is happening. And
yet in the EPA same thing. The politicians on the
left in extreme denial oh, it's diversity is wonderful. Nothing
to see here, even when that if politicians themselves are
losing their seats, they're getting the death threats. We're seeing
these marches every week now across London in favor of power,
(30:00):
where they're chanting deeply warm, wondering anti Semitic slogans. And
we're supposed to think that this is normal and that
this is okay and pretend there's not a problem with this,
because we don't want to be called racist, we don't
want to be called Islamophobic. As far as I can see,
what's beginning to happen is the tale is beginning to
wag the dog. We've given up on our own culture.
(30:21):
We're not allowed to defend it. We have to self
flagulate every five second and say we did the same
trade we were colonialists. Aren't we evil? Aren't we terrible?
Forgetting about all the great things we've done with the
world and the fact that so many countries have emulated
us and as a result become very successful nations. And
then when we do have this imposta culture coming in
(30:41):
who hate our values, who hate our democracy, who hate
our religions and friendly are the fascistic ones. They want
to close down conversation, they want to take over. We
just go, oh, it's lovely, it's diversity. I mean, if
people lost their.
Speaker 1 (30:55):
Minds, it's exactly right. The diversity is there is no
diversity there because those are not the groups. Those groups
are not coming in and saying, you know what, I
want you to be free to be Christian, I want
you to be free to be gay. I want you
to be free to be a working woman. They are
not saying those you talked about Iran and the women,
the way the women are treated there. Look in the seventies,
(31:18):
it wasn't that way. That's how quickly it can change.
They went in and took over that country. Women were
dressing in Western clothes, they had jobs, they were treated well,
they were respected, and now women have no choice. And
you know, people will complain that.
Speaker 2 (31:31):
I say this.
Speaker 1 (31:32):
In the United States, if you want to wear a burka,
or if you want to wear a hit job, you
are free to do that. You are also free to
dress in the Western way as well. In Iran you
are not that. And the people who are saying except this,
those weak people who are saying, you know what, it's Okay,
(31:52):
if you want to shut off and have little borders
here and you want to call this the Chaz zone,
and you want to self govern and not be a
part of the country, those are the people who will
one day be taken over and told now you do
it this way. Now you can't be gay, now you
can't be this, and then they'll go, how did this happen?
You were the ones to asking for it.
Speaker 2 (32:11):
Well, I think there's a couple of things going on here.
First of all, I mean, there's this sort of mad
idea that if you're coming from one of those countries
in the Middle East with these horrific regimes that I
don't know, you land on British soil and you're converted
to sort of a Western mindset, or the fact that
you've managed to go from country to country and find
the end up in the UK, you must already have
had that mindset. It's not plausible that people coming from
(32:33):
these countries half of the mindset of the country that
they're from. I mean, I'm not saying that any one
from Iran is like. It's a whole load of people
trying to stand up to that extremely horrible regime and
fight against it, and those people deserve our protection. Frankly,
I'm not against asylum seekers and refugees, but the thing
is what we're getting are to sylum seekers and refugees.
(32:53):
We're getting people we want to come here because we've
got a benefit system that they can offit from. They
can have a free hands saying well, they probably don't
send the children to score some of these people. But
the thing is, the middle classes are the ones so
have seized hold of power across the West, and it's
that sort of comfortable middle class too. This doesn't affect them,
doesn't affect their kids, It doesn't affect their neighborhoods, because
(33:16):
the immigrants can't afford to live in their neighborhoods. And frankly,
if their neighbor has started to become more multicultural and
diverse and they started to see things like this happening
in their own schools and on their own streets, they
have the money to get up and move. And so
it's all part of this sort of mindset of a
luxury ideology. Since so many other things now have been equalized.
(33:37):
Everyone can have a smartphone basically whenever your income. Most
people in Europe can afford to take a short haul
flight to another country to go on holiday. Regardless of
your income, most people can have a you know, modern
car on finance. So what is it that these people
tute about to show that they are superior to other people?
The luxury ideologies. I'm kind, I like trans writes, I'm kind,
(34:01):
I like you know, immigration, I'm kind. Refugees welcome, And
they're not the sharpen. They're not living through in basic
measures things like wage compression. But it's not their neighborhood's changing.
It's not their little girls being harassed in the suite.
And so for them, they can just brush it under
the carpet. And they do it because they waltson make
themselves look good at the dinner party table. And that
(34:23):
to me is really really sad.
Speaker 1 (34:26):
Wow. Yeah, globalism is the new status symbol. That's it's interesting.
But you're so you're so right, that's exactly what it is.
And that's what it is in the United States. And
we see people bragging about I'm this and I'm that,
and and I had a thought about it that way.
There's not much that separates us because the reality is
we all live pretty similar lives and so now to
(34:47):
have a different life, you have to have this radical
progressive ideology that is different than the culture we've all
grown up and we all appreciate, and we're seeing it
go away. And I think that what we're seeing with
Joe Biden right now is even more terrifying because it
goes to show that there are elites the control behind
the scenes, and what you were saying there, who are
(35:08):
these people and how do we know? And what does
that mean for the future, and how are they controlling elections?
And even what we saw in France by stepping down,
I mean, you really are taking away the person's right
to vote, You're taking away their democracy. And all of
the people who are saying there's a threat to democracy
right now are the threats. That's the gas lighting part
(35:30):
of it is like, wait a minute, yes there is.
Speaker 2 (35:32):
It's you.
Speaker 1 (35:34):
But listen. I've that has been fascinating talking to you.
I'm so glad you came on today. I really appreciate
your time, I really appreciate your perspective, and someday I'd
love to have you back.
Speaker 2 (35:43):
Oh, I'd love to come back. It's been an absolute
pleasure talking to you as well. We've got to keep
fighting this campaign, especially women. I think especially women because
you know, without doing that, in our own sects, more
often than not, it's the middle class women who are
the ones going re few keys, come one, come all,
and we're the ones who have got us uff at first.
So the wolf female voices that join the chorus and
(36:04):
fights for our safety and our security and the maintenance
of our culture of Christian values, which is one of
the most incredible religions in the world when it comes
to protecting and respecting women. Until we as women realize
that this is worth fighting for, we are going to stuff.
Speaker 1 (36:20):
Yeah, well, until you get your choices taken away from you.
Who you can marry, whether you can play sports, if
you can go to college, all of those things, I mean,
those are the things that people don't understand. And then
it goes well beyond that, how women are treated, whether
or not you're respected. All of that is is it
comes with this territory if you don't protect And that's
(36:40):
why it's not outrageous to say, well, hey, I want
American culture to be American culture the way it's been
has been good. I mean, we can always improve, but
not this way. Improve on the culture that we have
now so I appreciated. Alex Phillips, thanks so much, Thank
you absolutely, and thank you all for joining us on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast. For this episode and others, go
(37:02):
to Tutordison podcast dot com, the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts and join us next
time on the Tutor Dixon Podcast. Have a blessed day.
Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. I am very excited
today because we have some of it with a much
better accent than me, So you get to listen to
someone very cool. Today we have Alex Phillips with us.
She is a British journalist and a former member of
the European Parliament. There's so much in the world going
on right now that we just saw what happened in France,
we just saw what happened in the UK, and now
(00:22):
we obviously are watching what's happening with Joe Biden in
the US, so I thought Alex would be the best
person to bring on. Alex, thank you so much for
joining me.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
It's a real pleasure. Thank you for having me on.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
Absolutely right now, I think I want to ask you
about France first, if you don't mind, because we have
people in the United States who are saying, oh, they cheated,
and of course that's a big deal if you say
that in the United States, and we've got these people
on the left who are like, oh, look, even people
on the right in the United States are saying France cheated.
(00:52):
But they did something to manipulate the vote, didn't they.
Speaker 2 (00:56):
Yeah. I think with I to die so I mean
intensive cheating. I'm sure it's fully within electoral law in France.
But what happened essentially was the party that a lot
of the critics call far right. I think it's complete
misappropriation of that term. Frankly, if you took rassl them
on national equipment in America, they'd probably be centrist, want
to control immigration, and they want to crack down on
(01:19):
Wislim extremism in that country. But there was a huge
push by the establishment of both the media establishments and
the political establishment to block them out of power. That
is why Immanual Wackpole called that snap election so quickly,
hoping to sort of unfoot them really and make sure
that they didn't have a chance to campaign. But then
won the first round of elections for the Senate and
(01:41):
then in the second round basically they created a pact
all the other parties led by Macworn, including an extremely
far left party who have had pretty you know, dodgy policies,
in order to essentially try and push out Russell on
national and prevent and getting a majority of the votes.
And so in the end, that is what happens. I
(02:02):
think a lot of French people will feel cheated because
essentially bassemblement of all of the parties in France got
the most votes.
Speaker 1 (02:10):
So it's interesting you mentioned Muslim extremism, and I think
that it's important for us. I know you've been clear
on this to say that this is not this is
not the Muslim faith. This is when you have extremists,
and when you have extremists in all different cultures, but
you're calling out extremists that I have immigrated into Europe
and one of the things that I would notice you
(02:31):
were recently having a conversation about, and this is something
that I know a lot of Americans have on their
mind as we see people crossing the border and more
crime coming to the United States. One of the things
that you talked about was these get rape gangs, and
that to me was shocking because I think that we
still feel pretty safe here in the United States and
(02:53):
I don't worry about my girls walking home from the
bus stop. But you're talking about teenage and preteen girls
getting gang raped by some of these immigrant gangs that
are coming in. Can you explain a little bit about that.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
Right there have been two massive headline events that have
happened recently in Europe. I mean actually three of you
include Germany. There was one situation in Belgium where a
young teenage girl was coaxed into the forest by her
young boyfriend. What they call this in Belgium the loverboy technique,
where she's got a lot of a boyfriend and he
sort of brooms her and gives the presents and pisa
(03:29):
sort of get to to doing what he wants, and
this eventually lead her into doing things like making illicit
contents for online. Anyway, he took her into this forest
and down he and a load of his mates then
proceeded to gang rape her. And she was under the
age of sixteen. He was older than that. Some of
the participants in this themselves the boys were extremely young,
(03:52):
but they were all essentially Muslim African men. The similar
thing has happened in France, where a young Jewish girl
was gang raped by again Muslim African men as some
form of punishment. There's been an incident where this has
happened as well in Germany. Actually, if you look back
at the twenty three is twenty sixteen New Year's Eve
(04:14):
celebrations in Cologne in Germany, there were one two hundred
and fifty reported sexual assaults and rapes against young German
girls and celebrating that light in the middle of the
square where gowns of men surrounded them a bit like
packs of wolves, so have picked them off and proceeded
to assault them. And there are a couple of rapes
reported then and again the perpetrators were from the Middle
(04:37):
East and from North Africa. We've had a problem with
grooming of young white girls in the north of England,
especially places like Roberham, by Asian grooming gangs. Again, so
at what points I want to know, are we going
to wake up and say, look, we're not talking about
all Muslims, we're not talking about everybody practicing that faith,
(04:57):
but there is something happening here where the common denominator
are young men from that religion or at least with
those cultural values that you find in some countries in
the world. And again not saying everybody from those countries
have those cultural values, but you only have to look
at the way women are treated in countries like Syria, Afghanistan,
Iran to realize that in many respects they're treated as
(05:19):
second class citizens. And a lot of these young men
as well are constantly exposed to adult content that's becoming
more and more prevalent in society. And who are they
seeing in pornography. They're not seeing their own women. They
tend to be seeing Western women. And they're also in
some cases being preached to by their elders that essentially
white women are fair gain they don't have self respect.
(05:41):
And you put all these elements together and you get
a pretty toxic cocktail that unless we are comfortable and
confidence in talking about this, we are jeopardizing the security
and the dignity of our young women.
Speaker 1 (05:54):
I think we're not comfortable talking about it for exactly
this reason, because we're afraid of think someone that you
either interviewed or you were talking to was saying, you know, here,
we are afraid to say that we want to protect culture,
we want to protect our families, we want to protect
our children, and we want to protect our women because
we want to be so welcoming. We want everybody to
(06:14):
think that we've accepted everyone and we're a big melting pot.
In certainly in the United States, it's the same right,
everybody's like, we want to be very welcoming. There is
a difference in cultures, and it is naive to say
there is not a difference in cultures. And that's what
I think we've you know, we're almost in the United States,
almost living the benefit of mistakes that were made in Europe,
(06:36):
where just mass migration was allowed and no vetting, and
now we have the ability to say, it's not that
you don't want to let anybody in, it's that you
want to make sure you're letting the right people in,
and that these people want to become Americans, not that
they want America to become a different country. And I
would imagine that that's the same thing that Ireland wants,
that the UK wants, that France want, or most people
(06:59):
you would think want if you want to come here,
find but become French, I would think, right.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
I mean, this is it that the strength and solidity
of any community or country, it depends upon integration. And
you cannot have parallel cultures running side by side that
don't speak the same language, don't share the same moris
and values, and particularly when one of the cultures actually
vehemently dislikes and disrespects the other, that the culture of
the home country, and that this is witheeing the ghettoization
(07:28):
increasingly in Europe for various reasons when you look at
the old European empires and the old French Empire, the
old British Empire, that this involves Muslim countries, but it's
also about the rate of essentially people coming as well.
Back in the sort of period where we have people
from the Comorth coming to the UK from countries such
as Pakistan, it might have been twenty thousand and thirty thousand.
(07:50):
Over a period of time, these people assimilated. These people
came for jobs, love Britain, they loved the monarchy, They
wanted to adapt, they wanted to be part of the community.
Now we've got figures running over a million gross per
year and we are a country of sixty eight million.
This is a huge proportion of the population suddenly coming
from countries who don't share our values and they don't
(08:13):
seek to integrate. And frankly they don't have to because
they go and live within their families, within their communities,
and they don't mix with us. They go to their
own schools, sometimes they don't even speak the language. This
to me does not seem healthy for any society, and
frankly wouldn't happen if I were to go and live
in Iran, not that I particularly want to, but if
I was going to go live in Iran or North
(08:35):
Africa or whether it may be, I would be expected
to adapt to their way of right, yes, or covering
myself up or you know, speaking the Lan language. I
don't think they'd have much truck with me walking around
in a mini skirt or you know. It's people have
got to be realistic about this, and it's not racist
to talk about this. This is about women's rights, and
I do not think that the security of women should
(08:57):
be sacrificed on the ultra of political correctness.
Speaker 1 (09:00):
And you know, it's interesting that you mentioned that it
used to be that people came because they wanted to
become a member of society. Because we had a factory
here in the United States, and I remember, probably ten
years into owning it, we had an employee who was
high level in the shop and he had always been
with the factory from before we purchased a factory. And
(09:21):
one day immigration came in and they took him out.
You would never have known. You would never have known
because he was an American. I mean, he wanted to
be an American. You know that obviously he was illegal
and he had taken idea and then the identity of
a Californian person, and that's how they ended up finding him.
And the whole factory was devastated. You know, nobody knew
(09:43):
and he was truly part of our team, like a
part of our family. You know, you would never have known. Now,
we already see this where we have communities that are
separated and they don't want the average American to come
into the community and they want to keep it and
it just seems wrong. And that's why I think that
(10:03):
people are so concerned about border strengths. So that brings
me to that brings me to what's happening in the
United States. Obviously, we're in the midst of the Native Summit.
We have President Biden, who is out there leading talking
to folks and running for office again. Now he said
the first time he ran, he would be a one
term president. The first time he ran, I would say
(10:26):
there was a striking difference in twenty nineteen from two
thousand and eight. You know, him running as vice president
was a way different story than him running as president.
You could already see that there was a cognitive change.
I'll say that today. Obviously we saw the debate. We
see what's happening. We've seen it for a while, and
I think folks that are right of center have been
(10:49):
saying for a while, this is very concerning who is
running the country. And we're in the midst of two
we're wars, you know, we're looking at Ukraine, we're looking
at Israel. We're wondering who's in charge. But what we're
really wondering is what do other countries think about us?
So that's why I wanted to ask you what are
they We're hearing drips and dribbles of things coming out
(11:10):
of you know, like D Day and the G seven
where people like man he was really off his game.
What's going on?
Speaker 2 (11:17):
Well, that's what we're all asking, What is going on?
In amount much marbles, how can you've got this senile
old man, a relic of the plus, cleaning onto powers
so hard his knuckles are turning white, saying only God
can take me away from this position. He's humbleson and
says things like he invented NATO, he invented microchips. I mean,
at this point he's sounding a bit like Mugabi or something,
(11:40):
and we just think that we want you to sort
yourself hunt. We want you to get a brilliant president
because you are the leaders of the free world. You've
always been the bastion of democracy and freedom of speech
and common sense and sort of policing the world and
leading the way. And when you've got someone like that
in charge, and we're all looking at your system thinking
we've got, you know, three hundred million odd people in
(12:02):
your country, is this the best you can do? It's
your nominator in a party. Is this it? Really? I've
been asking the question of guests on my own show
back at Home in America in the UK, and guests
from America have been telling me that, you know, they
believe that this is essentially a Barack Obama wanting to
have a fourth term. But when he left as president,
(12:22):
he didn't leave Washington, and Biden is essentially his pick
because he can't stand again.
Speaker 1 (12:28):
Now.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
I don't know if that's true or not. What I
do know is this surely cannot be in the best
interests of not just America, but the West as a whole, because,
like you said, the anti Western axis of China, of Iran,
of Russia, increasingly North Korea's joining that club. They are
on the march. They're doing all sorts of things, including
actually and elements of their Grave Zone warfare is storming
(12:51):
the borders, busting migrants out in different cultures to try
and destabilize our societies. They are really on the move.
And if we continue to sit back and let them
be dominant and our sounds being weak through Wheat leadership
and looking frankly cartoonish and klangdish on the world stage,
we are hurtling headlong towards disaster and there isn't much
(13:11):
time now to reverse this situation. Frankly, the plup is ticking.
I mean, got to get real. America's got to get real.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
Stay tuned for more of my interview with Alex Phillips,
but first I want to take a moment to tell
you more about my partners at IFCJ. Since the start
of the Swords of Iron War in Israel on October seventh,
we've seen death and destruction in the Holy Land for
more than forty years. The International Fellowship of Christians and
Jews has been on the ground in Israel, and within
hours of the war starting, and every day since, they've
(13:41):
been feeding the hungry and protecting the vulnerable. The attacks
continue in the north and in the South of Israel,
but they are resilient survivors who bravely share their stories.
In a new series, The Fellowship calls faces of Iron
survivors like Danny, whose beloved daughter and her husband were
burned alone live on October seventh by Hamas terrorists. Danny
(14:03):
is a commander of the fire and rescue in his community,
and despite fire equipment being nearby, Danny could do nothing
as his daughter's house burned and his daughter and her
husband lost their lives. But Christians like you support Israel
through the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, and it's
that support that helps these survivors remain steadfast and strong.
(14:25):
To hear more stories like this one and show your
support for Israel, visit SUPPORTIFCJ dot org again that support
IFCJ dot org. Stay tuned for more with Alex Phillips
after this. I think the Joe Biden who ran for president,
what was it the eighties or not. I think it
was the eighties when he first ran for president, would
(14:47):
look at this administration and be horrified. And that, to
me is the shocking thing, is that you've got the
Nancy Pelosi's and the Maxine Waters and the Jerry Nadler's
who've been there forever, they didn't feel this way. This
is not what they. I mean, even when the first
term of AOC Alexandrio Casio Cortes came, Nancy Pelosi was horrified.
(15:10):
She is not a globalist or she was not she
was not into this progressive platform that seems they're all
melding together now they're all supporting this guy. They're all
supporting this agenda. They're all supporting this climate change stuff
that is demanding that our auto industry change over completely.
They are all into a radical destruction of the United States.
(15:34):
And it makes no sense other than power containing and
holding power. And I think that they do have some weird,
bizarre fear of Donald Trump, which I think is hilarious
because the entire system is set up so somebody can
only serve for eight years. He's already served for four.
Like I mean, if America didn't break under Joe Biden,
I think we're good, right, I think we can handle
(15:55):
another four years. They're so they're like, oh my gosh,
doom glues, everything is going to fall apart. So over
in Europe, what are folks thinking, like do they look
at the United States and say, if Donald Trump is
president again, the world is coming to an end?
Speaker 2 (16:10):
Well, again, look, we are as divided as you are
on this issue because we've got this polarization at the
left and right, probably increasingly being pushed by the algorithms
of social media, manipulated as well in part by bought
farms from hostile regimes. That's also a huge element in this, right, Yeah,
in a post proof age. And the thing is that
Joe Biden. First of all, he's wrecking his own legacy.
(16:33):
He had a diesel legacy. He could have done been
a one term president, and people have looked back and
pointed to all of his successes. Now, if he, you know,
continues the way he is, he's a laughing stock. He's
going to ruin his reputation forever in the history books.
But I think what matters a fact, right as saying
we live at a post proof age when you look
at the stuff that Donald Trump did on the international
(16:54):
stage geopolitically, the Abraham recalls this was incredible, those peace agreements,
the opening of the normalization of relationships between Israel Saudi Arabia,
the UAE This was just breaking boundaries, was never being
even dreamt of being breached before, and he managed to
do that. And this was very clear. Actually when Iran
(17:16):
rains down all of those rockets and missiles on Israel,
when you looked at the nations that came to intercept
those rockets to make sure that not one hit in
Israeli City, which would have essentially led to some form
of World War three. Of that, I have no doubt.
You had America, you had the United Kingdom, you had farms,
but critically, you had planes taking off from Qatar. You
(17:38):
had Saudi aircraft helping to intercept to protect Israel. Because
they've grown up that they're done with this. They've realized
that actually prosperity is about progress and letting go of
those that sort of retribution tied to the past and
tied to this sort of war of religions. Iran hasn't
grown up. And what Donald Trump managed to do in
(17:59):
comportise that support for Israel, I think, essentially in recent months,
has averted a big global disaster. It's those facts that matter.
I don't care what Donald Trump might say in that
locker room style, you know, it doesn't bother me. What
I care about is security, and from the beginning he's
been a tough man on the international stage. Unpredictable, yes,
(18:20):
but actually that also has its merits and advantages when
you're trying to stand up to leaders like Putin. So
that is the you know, the critical thing here. And
like I was saying about Joe Biden, his legacy was
actually helping with the help of Pakistan to capture Osama
bin Laden. I mean, that should be white what people
remember him for, not falling down steps and jumbling up
(18:43):
his words and coming out with mad sentences, and he's
inclined to do these days. It's a tragedy, but it's
not a laughing matter. It's perilous.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
No, you talk about his legacy. As we're hearing that
there will be a press conference on Thursday, and Karine
Jean Pierre, his own press secretary, is calling it a
big boy press conference, how humiliating. After the debate, Jill says,
you did great, Joe. You answered every single question. And
(19:13):
I think we're all watching this and we're like, oh
my gosh, it's like talking to a toddler, so embarrassing.
And the question is does she talk to him that way?
All the time. Has she lost him to the point
where she talks to him that way all the time,
So she's used to it, didn't realize, Hey, I'm in
front of this crowd. I can't do this anymore. Are
they all so used to it that the press secretary
(19:35):
can come out and say it's a big boy press conference.
It's humiliating.
Speaker 2 (19:40):
These people are sensible people. They're not idiots all they frankly,
you know.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
What I mean.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
I hope I'm the education. They've got eye ees, they've
got e's, they can hear what's going on. They must
have known for a long time. If the rest of
us have seen clips online and footage you like, footage
of his behavior, then it was apparent and there was
a little bit the actually for them to knit this
in the bud a long time ago, before he became
the Democrat nominee. They could have dealt with it. Now
(20:06):
they're in a situation where they can't seem to do
anything about it, And that is what is so ridiculous.
What were they playing at? What was their end game?
Why does none of one have the tenacity or the
carriage to stand up and say this is well And
the only reason they're doing it now is after that
debate has become irrefutable. They can't play the game of
denying it anymore. But if that hadn't happened, they would
(20:27):
be wanting to go on and deny it. Their back
wouldn't be against the ropes having to say, Oh my gosh,
everyone can see him for what he is right now.
You know, we can't spin this anymore. But I mean,
why on earth were they trying to cover it up
in the first place. I don't get it. I mean,
I really don't get it. It's sort of you can
understand why people suddenly get tinfoil hat conspiracy theories when
(20:48):
they look at this rate, because it almost seems incredible,
beyond belief.
Speaker 1 (20:53):
No, and you make a great point because now we're
suddenly hearing that German officials found this out in June
of twenty twenty two when he was supposed to meet
with the German Chancellor and Blincoln shows up and they say, oh,
he had to go to bed. But the Germans were
already making this event early in the evening because they
(21:13):
knew he struggles with evening time, he gets too tired.
This was in twenty two. They were accommodating Germany, was
accommodating our president because he's too tired in the evening,
and he still couldn't make it. That's the crime here.
Where are the people who should have at that point
stood up and said, okay, we have to have a primary.
Speaker 2 (21:34):
Yeah. All I really hope is that when it comes
to all of the institutions and organizations below the present
and that it doesn't matter who is the commander in chief,
because the CIA and you know, the barriers and heads
of military and sold and so forth will keep a
tight shit running despite whatever he's rambling all about it
at the top. But it really doesn't project a sort
(21:55):
of image of America in control, as in, you know,
as a country that needs to be with and listens
to and in the world of diplomacy, especially you know
in the twenty first century where anywhere, whatever country you're from,
has got a mobile phone, handset and scene instant videos,
looking at TikTok, Twitter, Instagram, a lot of it. You know,
it is eluding the reputation of America and that is
(22:18):
so important to maintain because you know, people say that,
you know, when it comes to diplomacy, it might be
equals peace not weakness. You've got to be strong. And
when you've got a man essentially running the country who
has to be tucked up with your load of cocoa
and be drubbed out of his head, I don't know
five o'clock in the evening because he's old and seen. Aw,
(22:38):
that doesn't really reflect that image.
Speaker 1 (22:40):
And if you're saying this, I mean, we haven't hidden this,
and I think that's what the mainstream media in America thinks. Okay,
we've hit it. We've effectively hidden this. Other people don't
realize that. And just the shift in what we've seen
with the mainstream media after the debate, Oh my goodness,
he's actually this is sad. He's a problem. We've got
to get rid of him. And then obviously, whoever those
(23:02):
people that President by Committee you're talking about, It seems
like those people went out to the media and said, enough,
you are going to get back in line. He's the nominee.
We're going to say he's okay, and he's managing the country.
The problem with this, from the perspective of the American people,
we are electing someone to make sure the bureaucracy isn't
(23:25):
taking over it, to represent us. Our representatives are supposed
to keep the bureaucracy and check. It's not supposed to
be that the bureaucracy is managing the president. And you
look at it and they are. I mean, you see
these notes that slip out where it's like, walk straight
to the podium. Here's a picture so you can see
where you're going to walk. Well, like this has never
(23:46):
happened before with the President of the United States. He's
getting pre asked questions. He knows what's going to happen.
And I think that the problem with the debate was
that was you know, there were rules. You can't get
the question ahead of time, you can't bring notes, there
are no teleprompters. He apparently is having teleprompters in kitchens
(24:07):
at fundraisers. How crazy is that?
Speaker 2 (24:10):
Yeah, I mean it is crazy, And you're right. Actually,
this isn't a front of democracy. The president is the
has executive powers and he's chosen by the people to
lead the way. I mean, this isn't just a sort
of ceremonial presidents. This is a man who can actually
make snap decisions that become law, that can be executed.
And so if who are making those decisions, if not him,
(24:30):
Who are the people in charge? And if you can't
see who they are, if they're not being held accountable,
if you can't vote them out, then you've got a
real problem. And this is what is so alarming in
terms of all the values that I was talking about earlier.
The Western value is the countries of the countries in
the West, which is so different from the anti Western
access who aren't democracies. You know, they're tyrannical regimes. And
(24:51):
we are not exactly upholding the things that we go
and around the world and tell other countries that they
should have in their countries. So it's just it's a
breaking everything. And you have commonates is by talking about
this erosion of the West and existential crisis happening within
the West, and it actually, to my eyes, it's being
accelerated at such a rate that you know, I don't
(25:15):
know what it's going to take now for an interventions
put things back on the right.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Stay tuned for more of my interview with Alex Phillips,
but first I want to take a moment to tell
you more about my partners at bond Arms. Hey it's
Tutor Dixon and as everyone knows, I'm a firm believer
in our God given Second Amendment rights. And while we
hope and pray the November election restores everyday American values.
Now is the time to purchase a firearm to protect yourself,
(25:40):
your home, and your loved ones. I'm here to tell
you about an amazing Texas made, thirty year old handgun
company called bond Arms. Bond Arms makes unique, well made
handguns for first time buyers, avid collectors, and people who
just want powerful personal protection in these troubled times. Bond
Arms makes the smallest, most powerful, best built per personal
(26:00):
protection handguns that will allow you and your loved ones
to safely sleep at night. Right now, go to their
website get Bondarms dot com to learn more about the
bond Arms handguns with MSRPs starting as low as two
hundred and seventy seven dollars and you will get a
sense of relief once you own one. Visit get bondarms
dot com to find out how to get up to Oh.
(26:23):
I see people on the other side on your side
saying this is so bizarre. The culture is gone. It's
not the Germany is not the country it used to be.
Sweden is not the country it used to be that
there's the gangs that you talk about, just the lack
of safety, and I think that's something that we have
complained about slightly in the United States but really haven't
(26:46):
taken a hard look at what can happen. And if
you don't have safety, if you're not safe in your
own country, then you really have nothing right because you
can't go to work, you can't have a life, your
kids can't play outside. If you're not safe, you have nothing.
And so I don't think we emphasize that enough as
we see in the United States, and I don't know
how it's happening in Europe, but in the United States
(27:06):
there are actually people funding prosecutors that don't prosecute, attorneys
general who are not prosecuting crime either, people who are
looking the other way when it comes to criminals. And
then the funny thing about it is they get elected
by saying we can't stand gun violence, like guns are
just running around shooting people on their own. They know
(27:29):
what's happening. They've allowed the people who want to shoot
people with guns to go free when they know that
they want to shoot people with guns. And then you're
importing a bunch more people who you know nothing about.
But many times we find out they're on a terror
watch list, or they've killed someone in their home country
and they're escaping there, they're seeking asylum because they're going
to go to prison. This is craziness. And that's why
(27:52):
I wanted to have you on today because I've been
watching what you've been talking about. I think one day
you were on Newsmax right before me, and I'm like,
this is what we need to be talking to people
about so they actually see. This is the kind of
you talk about social media being so damaging. This is
the information share we need to have. What are you seeing?
What are we seeing? What do you see about us?
(28:14):
You know, these are the conversations we refuse to have.
And when you say, wow, this is the kind of
stuff that starts conspiracy theories, it's because we have so
much information and none of it's true, right, And.
Speaker 2 (28:27):
Who is doing this? You know, when when did this
sort of stealth brainwashing begin? For want of a better term,
where all of a sudden, the idea of a country
enforcing its borders, which you need to do even right,
economic planning needed to determine what sort of infrastructure you
need in a country let's a learne the matters of
security and being pride and protecting your culture and heritage.
I mean, at what point did this assimilation of open
(28:51):
borders being good and wanting to just control of your
borders being somehow fascistic? It's not. I don't know where
this messaging came from. I don't know who's behind it.
I don't know what the endgame is for all of this.
I can only imagine somehow this is being corraled and
corry about by people who really don't like America and
really don't like the United Kingdom because the idea that
(29:13):
our own people want this is to me utterly insane,
because you can palpably see now the effect this is howing.
We've just come out of our election cycle here and
you've had MP's having their offices firebond, You've had MP's
with their activists having their tires slashed. You've had six
candidates now elected who have shouted this is for Gaza
(29:35):
alacl acbar. Now we our seats in our parliament. I mean,
this is insane. You can see what is happening. And
yet in the EPA same thing. The politicians on the
left in extreme denial oh, it's diversity is wonderful. Nothing
to see here, even when that if politicians themselves are
losing their seats, they're getting the death threats. We're seeing
these marches every week now across London in favor of power,
(30:00):
where they're chanting deeply warm, wondering anti Semitic slogans. And
we're supposed to think that this is normal and that
this is okay and pretend there's not a problem with this,
because we don't want to be called racist, we don't
want to be called Islamophobic. As far as I can see,
what's beginning to happen is the tale is beginning to
wag the dog. We've given up on our own culture.
(30:21):
We're not allowed to defend it. We have to self
flagulate every five second and say we did the same
trade we were colonialists. Aren't we evil? Aren't we terrible?
Forgetting about all the great things we've done with the
world and the fact that so many countries have emulated
us and as a result become very successful nations. And
then when we do have this imposta culture coming in
(30:41):
who hate our values, who hate our democracy, who hate
our religions and friendly are the fascistic ones. They want
to close down conversation, they want to take over. We
just go, oh, it's lovely, it's diversity. I mean, if
people lost their.
Speaker 1 (30:55):
Minds, it's exactly right. The diversity is there is no
diversity there because those are not the groups. Those groups
are not coming in and saying, you know what, I
want you to be free to be Christian, I want
you to be free to be gay. I want you
to be free to be a working woman. They are
not saying those you talked about Iran and the women,
the way the women are treated there. Look in the seventies,
(31:18):
it wasn't that way. That's how quickly it can change.
They went in and took over that country. Women were
dressing in Western clothes, they had jobs, they were treated well,
they were respected, and now women have no choice. And
you know, people will complain that.
Speaker 2 (31:31):
I say this.
Speaker 1 (31:32):
In the United States, if you want to wear a burka,
or if you want to wear a hit job, you
are free to do that. You are also free to
dress in the Western way as well. In Iran you
are not that. And the people who are saying except this,
those weak people who are saying, you know what, it's Okay,
(31:52):
if you want to shut off and have little borders
here and you want to call this the Chaz zone,
and you want to self govern and not be a
part of the country, those are the people who will
one day be taken over and told now you do
it this way. Now you can't be gay, now you
can't be this, and then they'll go, how did this happen?
You were the ones to asking for it.
Speaker 2 (32:11):
Well, I think there's a couple of things going on here.
First of all, I mean, there's this sort of mad
idea that if you're coming from one of those countries
in the Middle East with these horrific regimes that I
don't know, you land on British soil and you're converted
to sort of a Western mindset, or the fact that
you've managed to go from country to country and find
the end up in the UK, you must already have
had that mindset. It's not plausible that people coming from
(32:33):
these countries half of the mindset of the country that
they're from. I mean, I'm not saying that any one
from Iran is like. It's a whole load of people
trying to stand up to that extremely horrible regime and
fight against it, and those people deserve our protection. Frankly,
I'm not against asylum seekers and refugees, but the thing
is what we're getting are to sylum seekers and refugees.
(32:53):
We're getting people we want to come here because we've
got a benefit system that they can offit from. They
can have a free hands saying well, they probably don't
send the children to score some of these people. But
the thing is, the middle classes are the ones so
have seized hold of power across the West, and it's
that sort of comfortable middle class too. This doesn't affect them,
doesn't affect their kids, It doesn't affect their neighborhoods, because
(33:16):
the immigrants can't afford to live in their neighborhoods. And frankly,
if their neighbor has started to become more multicultural and
diverse and they started to see things like this happening
in their own schools and on their own streets, they
have the money to get up and move. And so
it's all part of this sort of mindset of a
luxury ideology. Since so many other things now have been equalized.
(33:37):
Everyone can have a smartphone basically whenever your income. Most
people in Europe can afford to take a short haul
flight to another country to go on holiday. Regardless of
your income, most people can have a you know, modern
car on finance. So what is it that these people
tute about to show that they are superior to other people?
The luxury ideologies. I'm kind, I like trans writes, I'm kind,
(34:01):
I like you know, immigration, I'm kind. Refugees welcome, And
they're not the sharpen. They're not living through in basic
measures things like wage compression. But it's not their neighborhood's changing.
It's not their little girls being harassed in the suite.
And so for them, they can just brush it under
the carpet. And they do it because they waltson make
themselves look good at the dinner party table. And that
(34:23):
to me is really really sad.
Speaker 1 (34:26):
Wow. Yeah, globalism is the new status symbol. That's it's interesting.
But you're so you're so right, that's exactly what it is.
And that's what it is in the United States. And
we see people bragging about I'm this and I'm that,
and and I had a thought about it that way.
There's not much that separates us because the reality is
we all live pretty similar lives and so now to
(34:47):
have a different life, you have to have this radical
progressive ideology that is different than the culture we've all
grown up and we all appreciate, and we're seeing it
go away. And I think that what we're seeing with
Joe Biden right now is even more terrifying because it
goes to show that there are elites the control behind
the scenes, and what you were saying there, who are
(35:08):
these people and how do we know? And what does
that mean for the future, and how are they controlling elections?
And even what we saw in France by stepping down,
I mean, you really are taking away the person's right
to vote, You're taking away their democracy. And all of
the people who are saying there's a threat to democracy
right now are the threats. That's the gas lighting part
(35:30):
of it is like, wait a minute, yes there is.
Speaker 2 (35:32):
It's you.
Speaker 1 (35:34):
But listen. I've that has been fascinating talking to you.
I'm so glad you came on today. I really appreciate
your time, I really appreciate your perspective, and someday I'd
love to have you back.
Speaker 2 (35:43):
Oh, I'd love to come back. It's been an absolute
pleasure talking to you as well. We've got to keep
fighting this campaign, especially women. I think especially women because
you know, without doing that, in our own sects, more
often than not, it's the middle class women who are
the ones going re few keys, come one, come all,
and we're the ones who have got us uff at first.
So the wolf female voices that join the chorus and
(36:04):
fights for our safety and our security and the maintenance
of our culture of Christian values, which is one of
the most incredible religions in the world when it comes
to protecting and respecting women. Until we as women realize
that this is worth fighting for, we are going to stuff.
Speaker 1 (36:20):
Yeah, well, until you get your choices taken away from you.
Who you can marry, whether you can play sports, if
you can go to college, all of those things, I mean,
those are the things that people don't understand. And then
it goes well beyond that, how women are treated, whether
or not you're respected. All of that is is it
comes with this territory if you don't protect And that's
(36:40):
why it's not outrageous to say, well, hey, I want
American culture to be American culture the way it's been
has been good. I mean, we can always improve, but
not this way. Improve on the culture that we have
now so I appreciated. Alex Phillips, thanks so much, Thank
you absolutely, and thank you all for joining us on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast. For this episode and others, go
(37:02):
to Tutordison podcast dot com, the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts and join us next
time on the Tutor Dixon Podcast. Have a blessed day.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News
Hosts And Creators
Clay Travis
Buck Sexton
Show Links
WebsiteNewsletterPopular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.