October 10, 2024 • 37 mins
In this episode of the Tudor Dixon Podcast, Tudor is joined by Sara Broadwater and Kyle Olson, the team discusses Vice President Kamala Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff. The conversation focuses on allegations against Emhoff, including misogyny, inappropriate workplace behavior, and personal scandals. Tudor criticizes the media's perceived double standards, arguing that similar allegations against Republicans would receive more scrutiny. The episode also explores broader themes of women's treatment in the workplace and politics, emphasizing the need for accountability and equitable treatment. The Tudor Dixon Podcast is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network. For more visit TudorDixonPodcast.com
Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. I have Sarah Broadwater
and Kyle Olsen here with me today. We've been watching
as Kamala Harris has been on her Like Weird podcast
slash Night Show tour, and a lot of that has
just been word solid and disastrous. But in the background
of that, there have been these stories dropping on her husband,
(00:24):
Doug em Hoff, and I feel like these stories have
not gotten a lot of attention. But today's story really
sort of struck me. And it struck me for a
specific reason, and that is that this guy sounds like
every woman's nightmare at work. And as a woman who
worked in a very male dominated field, I have experienced
(00:46):
people like this. But I think you know Carly Fiorina,
when she was running in twenty sixteen, she made a
comment in that election saying, almost every woman has dealt
with some sort of misogyny in their career, and this
story about Doug m Hoff and how he treated women
in his office and how he had these male only
(01:09):
cocktail hours, it's like exactly what she was talking about.
And then last week we all went to the Fox
and Friends breakfast in North Muskegon here in Michigan and
there was. There were two tables of Kamala Harris supporters,
and when I went over to talk to them, it
was overwhelming how much they were like, haven't men hurt you?
(01:31):
Haven't men done something horrible to you? And I mean
it wasn't like I was like, no, never, because I
thought about guys like this. This is how I went
back in my mind and I'm like, you know, it
is different for a woman, and anybody who says it's
not different for a woman, it is. It's because of
jerks like this. And I questioned, why isn't this getting attention,
(01:52):
the fact that this guy did this. But the week before,
or maybe two weeks before this story, we hear the
story about him getting his nanny pregnant and in his
whole marriage breaking down over this. This guy is a
total scumbag. And no one, I mean, if this were
happening on the Republican side, everybody like, you can't mind it.
This guy anywhere near the White House. He is horrible
(02:14):
to women, horrible to him. And Jensaki has him on
her program. She's like, you're like the new face of masculinity.
What beating women, getting him pregnant and then treating them
like crap in the office means great, awesome, that's awesome.
I'm just shocked by this because nobody's talking about it.
Speaker 2 (02:31):
I don't even think you mentioned actually specifically the part
that he literally hit a woman. I mean, there's allegation
his girlfriend lapped his girlfriend around, so slapped.
Speaker 1 (02:39):
Her so hard that she spun around, her body spun
around from being slapped by this man. I mean, that's
beyond this. That's abuse. That is abuse, and nobody's like
this guy's abusive. And the interesting part about sitting with
these women last week is they were like, when a
woman says something happened to her, you have to leave her, okay.
(03:03):
So that then also follows in this scenario where the
girlfriend and he hasn't denied these things. He hasn't denied
getting the nanny pregnant. He admitted to that, he hasn't
denied slapping this woman so hard that our body's spun around.
He has not denied any of these things. Well, he
doesn't do interviews, and then the interviews that he does do,
they would never dare ask about. He did this interview
(03:25):
with Jenzaki and she's like slaughtering all over him, and
they were saying, like everybody wants a relationship like Doug
and Kamalo, like he's like the ultimate husband, Dougie gross. Gross.
Speaker 3 (03:36):
Why do you think it doesn't get more attention?
Speaker 1 (03:39):
I think it is totally off their narrative because this
is the guy who gets someone pregnant and forces her
into the abortion clinic. And we can't tell that story
right now, certainly can't tell. And that is from what
I understand. The nanny who got pregnant ended up having
a miscarriage. However, interesting champion for yeah, let there be
(04:01):
no consequences to me having an affair with you or worse.
I mean, this guy is obviously someone who treats women horribly,
and this is not the narrative they want out there.
They need the woman voter.
Speaker 3 (04:15):
Right well, so does that mean does that mean that
with the media just sort of ignoring this and just
looking the other way that I mean, do you think
it's like you know they're going to win by any
means necessary, even if it's hypocrisy. And of course I'm
being consistent, of.
Speaker 1 (04:36):
Course, absolutely. Of course in the fact that Jensaki, who
would have known this, she was the press secretary, she
would have known every detail of their lives. So she
knows the guy is a total jerk. She knows that
he's treated women badly. I mean he according to this
article in the Daily Mail, and I saw one of
the guys in her beauty. He said, look, this is
(04:58):
We wouldn't have published this if it weren't true. We
interviewed people, we know, we have the receipts. This guy
did this. He not only did he have these cocktail
hours at the office where he did not allow women.
It's not like he was like, hey, this is just
for the guys, it's like women are not allowed. This
is like mad men.
Speaker 2 (05:17):
I mean he's mad madmen. Actually that's the perfect example.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
Yes, he is a man. Everybody's like, we're not going back.
This dude is straight out of nineteen fifty smoking in
the office, drinking behind the door, and not letting the
women see unless they're there for your entertainment, which is
clearly also a part of his life because all of
his assistants were super hot models. Well we were talking
(05:42):
about this too before you got on.
Speaker 3 (05:45):
Where did he was like.
Speaker 1 (05:48):
Men parties the good models for proving this is the problem.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
But I do wonder does he actually believe in Kamalin.
Does he think that she can be president as a
one if that's how he treated the women that he
worked with?
Speaker 1 (06:03):
And is she running or does he see himself as running?
And I say that seriously because she has just come
off of this this train of media interviews where she's
just been humiliated by these people. And it's very interesting
to listen to her in these interviews because she doesn't
know the next part of the answer. And these are
(06:26):
not it's not like she's these are questions she didn't
expect to get. It's like, what are you going to
do about the border? And she hems in Hawes and
she doesn't know. What are you going to do about Israel?
She hems in Hawes and she doesn't know. And she
comes up with these opportunity economy stories, She drinks a beer,
she goes on a sex podcast. She just hasn't been
(06:47):
able to actually put a thought together. And then you
go is the attorney who was the partner, who was
the high falutin misogynist who told people to get the
out of his office when they get women, to get
the f out of his office when they peek their
head in. And then not only did he do that?
(07:07):
I mean, there's so much here. Not only did a
woman say I peeked my head into his office and
he told me to get the f out. Then he
went to the office management and bragged about the fact
that he did this.
Speaker 2 (07:18):
I'm watching Kyle because he's over there kind of laughing,
and I'm like, I think he's probably sitting here going hm,
when you and tutor come in my office next time, Well, I.
Speaker 3 (07:25):
Just I think I think, you know, what would be
an interesting psychological experiment is to go to that group
of women that you talk to and ask them about
this and ask them, do you because I think there's there.
I think that there's this is going to get me
(07:47):
in trouble there. I believe there is a solid contingent
of feminists who just hate men. They hate men, and
and I think.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
That drive because they've been treated like this.
Speaker 3 (08:00):
And so I think that there is a lot of
like they hate Donald Trump so much that they will
tolerate this, and they would be interesting to ask them.
These are allegations against Doug m Hoff, who would be
the first man or whatever they call him, And do
you believe do you believe these women? Do you think
(08:23):
that he should have that position or what.
Speaker 1 (08:28):
Do we need to have I mean, would they want
him interviewed and have to answer for this? Because if
because that's how I feel like, Wait a minute, if
you're going to be close to the oval office and
your wife is going to be in the oval office
and you think so little of women, does your wife
actually does she actually have the power in this situation
(08:49):
or do you somehow feel like you're getting elected into office?
And let's face it, this is not a woman who
got to vote. Well, why would he need a vote?
He just needs to get close to it. And then
is this guy who thinks women I think so little
of women that were just sex toys. And I don't
say that lightly because he obviously hired hot chicks just
so that they could serve him and walk around him
(09:09):
and he could watch them walk around his desk. And
I'm you are smirking, but this is not funny because
it happens to women.
Speaker 3 (09:17):
It seems like it's so the Madman was in the sixties.
When was that? I never watched that the fifties somewhere
on that I can't remember, so it's so, you know, outdated.
I don't know I was going to say traditional, but
that's not the right word. My point is. My point
(09:37):
is that it is. The point is that is that's
not the way it's done in America anymore. But what's
being described is you know that era in America and.
Speaker 1 (09:52):
Very hard for.
Speaker 3 (09:55):
I know this is I feel like I'm being maligned
right now, but no.
Speaker 1 (09:59):
I to know, to be clear, you've never done anything
like this, and you've never acted like this. And I
think that we see people like I had a grandfather
who is like this and made comments like this, and
that was the fifties. Like that was the fifties when
people did this and men got away with it. It
(10:21):
wasn't okay. Men got away with it, you know. And
then one day people were like, no, you can't treat
women like this, and Doug em Hoff didn't get the memo.
Speaker 2 (10:31):
Well, that's the thing is he's lifted up as the
champion of women, whereas there are guys like Kyle I mean,
or when I first worked at in Corporate America, I
was hired by a sixty year old man who was
my mentor, Like, there are men that are champion for women,
So why are we lifting someone up that clearly is
not and it's all a political game.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
And I mean, I guess some people could argue, well,
this is her husband and Hillary Clinton was in the
same boat. But do we always have to have females
in power that have some sort of scumbag guy behind them?
I mean, is that is that really the image we
want to portray? And what happens once he does get close,
because we know what happened with Bill Clinton who couldn't
(11:14):
keep it in his pants and couldn't control himself around
young interns. And Doug has a role. It's not like
the first Well we've never had a first gentleman before,
but we know that the first lady has a role.
And I don't know if he's going to be decorating
for Christmas because he's Jewish, but I don't know what
he's going to do, you know, but he's going to
have a role in hell he an off.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
He has a role now as a second gentleman or
whatever we call him, right, so.
Speaker 1 (11:37):
People women will have to work with him if that's
what he chooses. And he seems to be the person
that does choose, and he chooses a specific kind of
woman that he's going to have in the White House.
And I mean, are we going to have a Monica
Lewinsky situation all over again? And I and I think
this is fair to ask. I think it's really fair
to ask when you have someone who has treated women
like this, should he be in a position where he
(11:59):
gets a stab, where he gets to ride in Air
Force one and control people, because ultimately your spouse does
have some power. And I just think that this is
outrageous that the media isn't going whoa red alert? This
guy is not somebody that should have any clearance in government.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
Well, it's fair to ask, because they ask it of
literally every Republican and these are the people that championed
the Me too movement, So it's very fair to ask.
Speaker 1 (12:27):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast.
Speaker 3 (12:35):
So again, don't you think this sort of exposes the
media and the Democrats? They absolutely loathed Donald Trump, and
they hate him so much that they will tolerate this, right.
Speaker 1 (12:48):
Yeah, absolutely, that this story breaks. I mean, it's just
like Hunter's laptop. This story breaks, and they're like, we're
not touching it. We're not touching this. How can you
have a story of the Vice president's husband who is
running for president right now, has abused a woman, has
beaten a woman. I mean, even if he was just
(13:10):
a total business scumbag and he had like hot chicks
all around the office and he stared at him all
day and he was flirting with him and they and
also in this article, they were given office privileges if
they flirted back with him. So like, even if you
were that kind of scumbag and you hadn't beaten a woman,
that's to me, that's still something to call attention to
hit a woman. He hit a woman, He got his
(13:33):
nanny pregnant, Like he's a champion for abortion. Oh my hello.
All of this is adding up in a very weird
way where I think. I mean, even the women that
we sat down with last week who are Harris supporters,
they were very adamant that that's not what abortion is
used for, for men to abuse women, Like, of course, right,
(13:53):
that's not okay. And yet here's a guy who has
done that and is now championing this cause. I just
don't think that it adds up. I think that women
should be leary of a man who does this. We
have fought so hard to be taken seriously and I
think that's why situations like this, But also when you
(14:15):
have the Gretchen Whitmer's of the world, and even Kamala
Harris out there giggling and making funny and singing in
these videos and Whitmer acting in these videos and putting
little skits together, I don't like that because I think
it takes a lot for women to be taken seriously.
And clearly her own husband doesn't take women seriously. So
(14:36):
when you play into this bimbo kind of you know, stereotype,
I guess I should say, then, how do you get
past the point where men like the vice president's husband
take you seriously and don't act like you're a bimbo
and you're there to serve them and flirt with them
(14:57):
and walk around their desk for them. I mean, I see.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
Kamala Harris and I think, gosh, that's not who I
want to be the first female president, because I think
it ruins for the rest of us.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
Well, I think she's there's something I want to play
because she did, and I think this is the clip
I'm going to put it up. She did go on
sixty minutes, and in this clip, she it's like she's
crying because she gets so confused about how to answer questions.
(15:29):
And that is one thing that I don't think we've
seen any politician in the past that couldn't answer. You know,
we saw a debate here in Michigan between the two
folks that are running for Senate. One's a man, one's
a woman, none of them, neither of them or in
this midst of like stumbling over the words, getting emotional
(15:51):
or sad or laughing ridiculously, like there was no nervousness.
She's constantly coming off as a nervous nelly. And if
you come off that way in an interview, how could
you possibly be running the free world? So this is it.
Speaker 4 (16:11):
You invest in the middle class and you strengthen America's economy.
Small businesses are part of the backbone of America's economy.
Speaker 3 (16:19):
But we're partnering man, President.
Speaker 1 (16:21):
The question was, how are you going to pay for it?
Speaker 4 (16:25):
Well, one of the things is I'm going to make
sure that the richest among us who can afford it,
pay their fair share in taxes. It is not right
that teachers and nurses and firefighters are paying a higher
tax rate than billionaires and the biggest corporations. And I
plan on making that fair.
Speaker 3 (16:46):
But we're dealing with the real world.
Speaker 4 (16:48):
But the real world includes how are you going to
get this to Congress? You know, when you talk quietly
with a lot of folks in Congress, they know exactly
what I'm talking about because they're constituents. Though exactly I'm
talking about.
Speaker 1 (17:01):
Their constituents are those fire orfy So she's stumbling over
her words.
Speaker 3 (17:06):
You can.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
I mean, there's a point where she actually seems like
she's going to cry. And I watched that interview and
I think she's getting more and more uncomfortable because she's
never been asked questions, she's never been held accountable, she's
never been asked the hard questions. And then I find
it really interesting that at the end of that interview
she says, well, you talk quietly to people in Congress,
(17:28):
their constituents actually believe in what she believes in. Well,
then her whole theory on Donald Trump tanking the border
bill as bloney. Why isn't she talking quietly to people
in Congress If she has that capability.
Speaker 3 (17:45):
And they had, the Democrats had control for the first
two years of the Biden administration, why didn't they Why didn't.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
They pass on I could have talk loudly. I mean,
you're have to talk quietly, so all their people.
Speaker 2 (17:59):
It also so it's if I'm going to average American
watching that, I think, so you're gonna do everything smoking
mirrors behind like the closed door. To me, I see
that as very nefarious because she's like, well, we can
make things happen behind the closed door, like we don't
need that doesn't need to be out in the open.
And that's how the Democrats do everything. They don't publicly
(18:20):
do any sparring, they do everything behind closed doors.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
Well, she actually she's given away a little secret, like, hey,
I can talk to people behind the scenes. I'm like, dude,
you're no Nancy Pelosi. Let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Get calmed down.
Speaker 3 (18:34):
And she she thinks that she's so brilliant when she's
making all of these sorts of statements. She reminds me
of because you're right, her style is she doesn't it's
like her brain is not quite keeping up. It's like
a she reminds me of, like a like an old
(18:55):
computer with the little spinning wheel, and you know what
the computer is going to do. You're just waiting for
it to do it, and that's what she's like, it's
just and it's it's painful. And then but when she's
asked a question about well, how are you going to
pay for that or how are you going to get
that through the Congress, she has no answer for that
(19:15):
because she it's like she knows she's read the top
line on the talking points, but then there's no, there's
nothing below it, and she doesn't know what to do.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
It was not expecting to get follow up questions.
Speaker 2 (19:26):
I don't think which I don't give us sixty minutes
credit like that was a very well done interview.
Speaker 1 (19:30):
Yes, and that's what needed to happen. But I fear
that we're so far along in early voting now that
that's why she did it. I mean, it's it's the
classic do the debate well into October because everybody's already voted,
and I think Republicans are still so we just have
this like these rose colored glasses on where we're like, oh,
(19:53):
we still have thirty days to the election. No, I don't.
Half the people have voted, their votes are already and
no one's spoiling their ballots at this point. They don't
care what she said at sixteen minutes. And the fact
is that very few people will see that. They're not
seeking it out. The people that are hardcore have voted.
The people that are independents, not all of them are
(20:15):
going to see that because it's not the full The
media isn't exposing that. Now. I will give CNN credit.
They came out and they were like, she was asked,
you know, what would you do differently than Joe Biden
and the boy she bombed that. She was like, oh,
you know, I don't think I would have done anything different.
And I think everybody that was on the view and
(20:36):
I think everybody's jaw just kind of hit the table,
like not the answer, you know. They all want to
be like no, no, no. And then CNN came out
and said, how could she say that she wouldn't do
anything because she wants to be the candidate of change,
so she has to differentiate herself from Biden a little bit.
It's like it's as if people are just seeing her
(20:58):
for the first time, but they really are. Because she
wasn't a candidate, she didn't have to be vetted. She's
being vetted in the eleventh hour after the votes are in.
I mean, you're we're gonna end up with, like you said,
the computer the fan, and the computer is running, the
hot air is coming out, but there's nothing on the screen.
That's the presidency that we're gonna have. And when you're
(21:19):
in the situation room and the decision has to be
made and the fan is running but nothing's going on,
that's when disaster strikes.
Speaker 2 (21:26):
Is it going to be woman beater Doug em Hooff
making decisions or knucklehead Tim Walls?
Speaker 1 (21:31):
I think Doug is going to be sitting in a
hot tub with champagne constantly. And I mean, I just
feel like that's a.
Speaker 3 (21:39):
Hot tub of champagne.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
Probably we've all worked with this guy when you might
not have. Might not women have worked with this sky
And maybe I'm a little too sensitive to it, but
this is what needs to end in this country. Like
this kind of stuff his like everywhere, you know, and
when it's a it's a it's not a partisan issue.
(22:01):
No matter what side of the aisle you are on.
There are guys like this. And I'm not saying that
there are all guys like this because when these ladies said, well,
you know, haven't you are there? Horrible men men are
just horrible. I say, yeah, I have seen horrible men.
But my dad is like this amazing guy. I love.
My dad was great, you know what a great mentor
was so blessed to have him. I think there are
(22:22):
so many men in this world who are great. I mean, Kyle,
you're another one. You are a great coworker. You've never
done anything creepy. I mean, I know that's like a
lund bar, but that's the bar. I mean, that's the
crazy thing. That's a low bar for people who have
been through the situations that we've been through as women.
(22:43):
It's like when you actually notice it, when you don't
have someone do that to you. And that, to me
is shocking, to mean, I had this happened to me.
I've had this happen to me in many different positions,
whether it was in my job in the steel industry.
Woh gosh. Once you get into like the media world,
(23:06):
it's a whole different animal. I mean, there's always this.
It's not just the sexism, it's the belittlement, it's the misogyny.
It exists, and they pretend. I think it's the thing
that makes me mad is they pretend it doesn't exist
on their side. It's the freaking vice president's husband. The
guy's in jerk. I can't get past it. I'm like,
(23:26):
oh my gosh, this is the guy we all we
all our stomach's turn when we get around this guy.
This is the guy we literally see coming into the room,
and you turn the other way because you're like, I'm
not dealing with this today. Sarah's nodding because she knows.
Speaker 4 (23:43):
See.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
I mean, I've experienced it in politics. I've experienced it
in corporate America. I think it's also interesting to watch
it from like when you were running for guy. I've
worked for two female well, i guess three female politicians,
and it's interesting to watch how they're also treated.
Speaker 1 (23:59):
I mean, whether it's the media coverage, whatever it is.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
I think it's another thing too to see your boss,
who you also look up to, get treated differently because they.
Speaker 1 (24:08):
Are not a man. The media coverage is always interesting.
You and I were talking about this the other day.
When it's a man, no matter what he's done, it's
like former businessman now running for office. When it's me,
no matter what my history was, I was in the
media for two years. I'm almost fifty years old. Yeah,
but I'm a media personality nothing more, and no matter
(24:30):
what we did, they always ran. They never said anything
about my background, and people just think, oh, this is
this like activists who's come in to run for office.
We have so many problems in this state, and they
are problems that someone who wasn't involved in manufacturing probably
doesn't understand. And there were plenty of people out there
running who did not have a manufacturing background, including Gretchen Whitmer.
(24:54):
But did they say, you know, career politician Gretchen Whitmer. No.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
No.
Speaker 1 (25:01):
But my point is like on especially on the on
the side, if you're on the right at all, the
media will just treat you like crap as a woman. Well,
and I even think too if you look at it
on our own side. I mean, let's I'm not going
to get into specifics, but let's look at your primary
You had just as much business experience as many of
those men on that stage, if not a lot more
(25:21):
than some of the men on that stage. But you
were never lifted up in the same way for your
business experience and specifically your manufacturing experience.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
Right.
Speaker 1 (25:31):
No, I know, And I've had multiple times where people
been like, oh, your business closed because you ran it
in on the ground I wasn't. I hadn't been at
that business in four years, you know, But that's not
what they run with. And the other side is like,
we're going to belittle her, but our side does too,
I mean, and I well, is it not. Just a
few days ago one of the people from our side posted,
(25:55):
we can't have another candidate like we did last time.
We have to seOne with business experience. And I'm like,
you dog, you scum me dog. Yeah, I mean, I'm sorry,
but you when you take away someone's when you try
to belittle someone's identity and their experience, it is really
pretty disgusting. And the other side would be like, oh
(26:15):
my gosh, do not belittle what I am. But why
is it okay for them to do it? Why is
it okay for Doug Emhoff to be this guy who
yells get the f out of my office to women,
who slaps women. And I just can't. I saw this,
and I'm just glad you guys are tuning in because
I saw this and I was like, we need to
make this a bigger deal. So if you're listening today,
(26:36):
I think it's really key that you are letting people
know that the people who say they're going to protect
women will put a woman hater, a woman beater, a
cheater into the White House. This is what their plan is.
The guy hit the record is there, he's not denying it,
he's owned up to the getting his name any pregnant
(27:01):
and leaving everybody like the guy is not a good guy,
and they are lifting him up as this phenomenal example
of new masculinity. Hey, ladies' is in new. It's not
new masculinity. We've all dealt with this kind of masculinity.
This is the kind that we hate. This.
Speaker 2 (27:21):
They always like to say toxic masculinity. This is actually
toxic max ranity.
Speaker 1 (27:28):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast. If you cannot feel comfortable walking
past someone's office in your building because you don't know
how the guy is going to treat you or even
look you up and down, there's something wrong. And if
that's what we're putting into the White House, If this
(27:49):
guy is going to have his own staff in his
own office, and the women that are there are going
to have to worry about whether or not their skirts
are long enough or they're wearing pants that day, and
these are the things we have to think about because
of men like Doug Emhoff. And I just find it
appalling that there are not more people speaking out on this.
So I don't know if you want to add anything else.
(28:12):
Kyle's looking at me like, no, I'm done, No, thank you. Well,
I appreciate you all listening to this today because.
Speaker 3 (28:20):
I just I just think, sorry, I will say something.
I just I think it's very telling that the me
too people and the you know, the progressives and all
the feminists and all of those people will not say anything.
And the only logical conclusion is that they are more
(28:40):
partisan than they are ideological, and so when it comes
to their own side, they'll just pretend like this doesn't happen.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
Well, I know you were about to wrap it up,
but I guess it's I mean, it goes along with
what we've talked about on the border, talked about in crime, abortion.
I mean, none of these things protect women, and right, they're.
Speaker 1 (29:00):
All horrible to women. It's the women that get hurt
most under this administration. And I think about the day
that Harris took over as the nominee, just robbed it,
you know, didn't get a vote I just took it
over and Joe Biden called in Do you remember that?
And he was like, you're going to do a great job, kiddo,
And I thought, how dare you call her that? How
(29:23):
dare you call her that? She's a woman, an adult woman.
And I had the same thing in business in the
steel industry, where one of the guys who was a
manager would always be like, Okay, kiddo. It is so
demeaning you never no man ever gets called kiddo by
a man. It just doesn't happen. And I know this
(29:44):
may be hard for people out there to here, but
that's we don't want that. I want to be seen
on the same level. And as we normalize Joe Biden
calling Kamala Harris kiddo, and we normalize Doug Amahoff telling
people to get out of his office and smacking people around,
it makes it ten times harder for every other woman
out there. And I'm not saying that Kamala Harris shouldn't
(30:06):
be able to get she shouldn't be able to advance
because she married a douchebag, but the fact that she
married this guy and he will have access and she
continues to allow him to have access is a concern
for all women because we have to protect each other,
we have to stand up for one another.
Speaker 2 (30:22):
And if we're going to be skeptical, I'm on the whole.
I don't love to be skeptical of candidate's families, depending
on obviously the circumstances, but they're highly skeptical of Millennia.
So that opens up the attacks for Kamala's spouse to all.
Speaker 1 (30:39):
Hillary Clinton became secretary of State. Yeah, I think we
had a certain point. You have to look at the spouse.
They have an office, they have a staff, they come
with the package, they have a role. Yes, yes, this
is not without peril having somebody who is like this
having access to the oval office, having access to women,
(31:00):
having access to discussions with foreign leaders. I mean, he's
going to be at the dinner table with people, and
if he thinks so little of us, what is the
future for women in this country? Does he sit down
with people who are like, yeah, well you know your
wife is not so smart, and he's like, yeah, I
got this, let me take over. I mean, this is
the kind of guy that you read about and you go,
(31:20):
this guy does not respect women. So I perhaps I
think that This is more sensitive for me because I've
lived it, But if you haven't lived it. I mean,
this is when I see people on our side going
after women, I always stand up for them because of this,
Like here's the side that's like, oh, we love women,
(31:41):
give me a break. You cannot. You don't get to
say that. When you don't talk about it's because they
won't talk about it, like address it. If you address it,
then maybe we can figure something out here. But you
won't talk about it. He's not denying it. It obviously happened.
The border thing is another thing where she leaves the
border open and then son CBS. She like, well, we
(32:01):
now closed it. Now it is low. Now the number
is much lower. And he's like, well, wait a minute,
why didn't you do that in the beginning, And she's like,
because Congress should act okay, but they weren't, and so
you could have done this and stopped the flow in
the meantime. And if you have this magical ability to
whisper into people's ears and have like you have some
sort of Jedi mind trick with the congress men and women,
(32:22):
then do the executive order and work.
Speaker 2 (32:24):
You're Jedi magic. But she clearly doesn't. She only has
individual thought like answers and thoughts for things, but she
doesn't think about how any of them weave together. So
policy to her is like she can do one thing
over here, do the complete opposite over here. She thinks
in silos.
Speaker 1 (32:40):
Because she has no executive experience. She is a prosecutor,
so she thinks of one subject at one time and
convincing twelve people. That's what her mindset is. It's like,
I need certain people on my team, so I can
see how she's like, I can whisper into the ears
of Congress and get those people onto my team, and
(33:00):
then I can get things past. That's a very prosecutorial mindset.
That is not a leader's mindset. A leader is not whispering.
I mean, let's just face it. A leader is not
having quiet conversations. A leader leads. A leader is not
having to have quiet conversations because they are open. They're
able to sit down with both sides and have a conversation.
(33:22):
She doesn't understand the job. She's made that clear. She
has not been able to answer the questions of what
she will do. And now we're very close to this
election and it's very tight and I blame the media
for not exposing the truth about not just Doug Emhoff,
but also Kamala Harris. I mean, she was brought out
(33:44):
of the basement to replace the man who is laying
on the beach, and she wasn't ready to answer a
single question. My gosh, she's been doing the job.
Speaker 2 (33:54):
For four years well, and they're going to bring hurt
Kamala's teams. Whole thing right now is that they're bragging
about how they think they've reached over twenty five million
people in her media blitz just in this last week alone.
But let's be honest, Okay, so I think sixty minutes
was about ten million of that. The average sixty minutes
viewer already either voted or knows who they're voting for.
(34:15):
This is a very engaged, plugged in group of people,
So they act as though they're putting her out there
on the stage for a new group of people to
learn about her. That most of the I mean, other
than the call her Daddy podcasts like that, is about
she's reached everyone that she's already talking.
Speaker 1 (34:30):
To, and who knows that that would be any different
for her either. I mean, I just think it's now
the eleventh hour, they're past early voting. They have the
absentee I mean they are watching absentee ballots like hawks,
and we're like, yeah, look, we register these people. I'm like, hello,
focus people, this is not over. And they I believe
that they're counting what's coming in and they're like, we're
(34:52):
in good shape. She can go out and do her
media blitz and be as big a fool as she
wants to that that fan can run ra up in
the coming weeks as she gets closer and closer suddenly
because she's one. Once she's one, she's one, and I
certainly hope that's not the truth, but they see it
that way m and that is scary. So, folks, you
(35:15):
can still go out and make sure your friends are voting, voting,
early voting, on election day, get them out because this
is this stuff that's happening on the other side, and
the fact that she's out there saying these things means
they feel comfortable that they're winning. So make sure you
stay out there talking to people. Explain who this jerk
Doug Mhoff is. Well, that's before you love people go
(35:37):
I think to understand. So Tutor was talking about how
she went over and talked to the Democrat women. I mean,
it's probably a group of eight to ten women. I'm
not saying she changed any minds. I'm not saying she
changed any votes, but I will say there was one
woman in particular from that group that spent extra time
one on one with Tudor afterwards and was probing and
asking questions. They got into the food dye conversation with
(35:59):
RFK Junior, and so you know what, maybe there was
one person that's questioning how they might vote. And so
you have to take things like this dug up hoof
story to people that can be persuadable and let's talk too,
Let's start talking. I mean that's the other issue is
that they were like, you know, forty minutes in when
(36:20):
they're like, what's your name? And I said, I didn't
lead with it because I didn't think we'd talk, and
I don't think we would have. You know, I think
we're at this point of polarization that where people are
unwilling to listen, but I'm still willing to listen. They
were actually still willing to listen. So that gives me
hope that we do have an awesome future in this
country and especially in our state. With that, I will
(36:44):
say thank you to Sarah, thank you to Kyle, for
all of you out there. We will have another podcast tomorrow.
Go to Tutor Dison podcast dot com, iHeartRadio, app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts and join us next
time on the Tutor Dixon Podcast. Have a blessed day.
Welcome to the Tutor Dixon Podcast. I have Sarah Broadwater
and Kyle Olsen here with me today. We've been watching
as Kamala Harris has been on her Like Weird podcast
slash Night Show tour, and a lot of that has
just been word solid and disastrous. But in the background
of that, there have been these stories dropping on her husband,
(00:24):
Doug em Hoff, and I feel like these stories have
not gotten a lot of attention. But today's story really
sort of struck me. And it struck me for a
specific reason, and that is that this guy sounds like
every woman's nightmare at work. And as a woman who
worked in a very male dominated field, I have experienced
(00:46):
people like this. But I think you know Carly Fiorina,
when she was running in twenty sixteen, she made a
comment in that election saying, almost every woman has dealt
with some sort of misogyny in their career, and this
story about Doug m Hoff and how he treated women
in his office and how he had these male only
(01:09):
cocktail hours, it's like exactly what she was talking about.
And then last week we all went to the Fox
and Friends breakfast in North Muskegon here in Michigan and
there was. There were two tables of Kamala Harris supporters,
and when I went over to talk to them, it
was overwhelming how much they were like, haven't men hurt you?
(01:31):
Haven't men done something horrible to you? And I mean
it wasn't like I was like, no, never, because I
thought about guys like this. This is how I went
back in my mind and I'm like, you know, it
is different for a woman, and anybody who says it's
not different for a woman, it is. It's because of
jerks like this. And I questioned, why isn't this getting attention,
(01:52):
the fact that this guy did this. But the week before,
or maybe two weeks before this story, we hear the
story about him getting his nanny pregnant and in his
whole marriage breaking down over this. This guy is a
total scumbag. And no one, I mean, if this were
happening on the Republican side, everybody like, you can't mind it.
This guy anywhere near the White House. He is horrible
(02:14):
to women, horrible to him. And Jensaki has him on
her program. She's like, you're like the new face of masculinity.
What beating women, getting him pregnant and then treating them
like crap in the office means great, awesome, that's awesome.
I'm just shocked by this because nobody's talking about it.
Speaker 2 (02:31):
I don't even think you mentioned actually specifically the part
that he literally hit a woman. I mean, there's allegation
his girlfriend lapped his girlfriend around, so slapped.
Speaker 1 (02:39):
Her so hard that she spun around, her body spun
around from being slapped by this man. I mean, that's
beyond this. That's abuse. That is abuse, and nobody's like
this guy's abusive. And the interesting part about sitting with
these women last week is they were like, when a
woman says something happened to her, you have to leave her, okay.
(03:03):
So that then also follows in this scenario where the
girlfriend and he hasn't denied these things. He hasn't denied
getting the nanny pregnant. He admitted to that, he hasn't
denied slapping this woman so hard that our body's spun around.
He has not denied any of these things. Well, he
doesn't do interviews, and then the interviews that he does do,
they would never dare ask about. He did this interview
(03:25):
with Jenzaki and she's like slaughtering all over him, and
they were saying, like everybody wants a relationship like Doug
and Kamalo, like he's like the ultimate husband, Dougie gross. Gross.
Speaker 3 (03:36):
Why do you think it doesn't get more attention?
Speaker 1 (03:39):
I think it is totally off their narrative because this
is the guy who gets someone pregnant and forces her
into the abortion clinic. And we can't tell that story
right now, certainly can't tell. And that is from what
I understand. The nanny who got pregnant ended up having
a miscarriage. However, interesting champion for yeah, let there be
(04:01):
no consequences to me having an affair with you or worse.
I mean, this guy is obviously someone who treats women horribly,
and this is not the narrative they want out there.
They need the woman voter.
Speaker 3 (04:15):
Right well, so does that mean does that mean that
with the media just sort of ignoring this and just
looking the other way that I mean, do you think
it's like you know they're going to win by any
means necessary, even if it's hypocrisy. And of course I'm
being consistent, of.
Speaker 1 (04:36):
Course, absolutely. Of course in the fact that Jensaki, who
would have known this, she was the press secretary, she
would have known every detail of their lives. So she
knows the guy is a total jerk. She knows that
he's treated women badly. I mean he according to this
article in the Daily Mail, and I saw one of
the guys in her beauty. He said, look, this is
(04:58):
We wouldn't have published this if it weren't true. We
interviewed people, we know, we have the receipts. This guy
did this. He not only did he have these cocktail
hours at the office where he did not allow women.
It's not like he was like, hey, this is just
for the guys, it's like women are not allowed. This
is like mad men.
Speaker 2 (05:17):
I mean he's mad madmen. Actually that's the perfect example.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
Yes, he is a man. Everybody's like, we're not going back.
This dude is straight out of nineteen fifty smoking in
the office, drinking behind the door, and not letting the
women see unless they're there for your entertainment, which is
clearly also a part of his life because all of
his assistants were super hot models. Well we were talking
(05:42):
about this too before you got on.
Speaker 3 (05:45):
Where did he was like.
Speaker 1 (05:48):
Men parties the good models for proving this is the problem.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
But I do wonder does he actually believe in Kamalin.
Does he think that she can be president as a
one if that's how he treated the women that he
worked with?
Speaker 1 (06:03):
And is she running or does he see himself as running?
And I say that seriously because she has just come
off of this this train of media interviews where she's
just been humiliated by these people. And it's very interesting
to listen to her in these interviews because she doesn't
know the next part of the answer. And these are
(06:26):
not it's not like she's these are questions she didn't
expect to get. It's like, what are you going to
do about the border? And she hems in Hawes and
she doesn't know. What are you going to do about Israel?
She hems in Hawes and she doesn't know. And she
comes up with these opportunity economy stories, She drinks a beer,
she goes on a sex podcast. She just hasn't been
(06:47):
able to actually put a thought together. And then you
go is the attorney who was the partner, who was
the high falutin misogynist who told people to get the
out of his office when they get women, to get
the f out of his office when they peek their
head in. And then not only did he do that?
(07:07):
I mean, there's so much here. Not only did a
woman say I peeked my head into his office and
he told me to get the f out. Then he
went to the office management and bragged about the fact
that he did this.
Speaker 2 (07:18):
I'm watching Kyle because he's over there kind of laughing,
and I'm like, I think he's probably sitting here going hm,
when you and tutor come in my office next time, Well, I.
Speaker 3 (07:25):
Just I think I think, you know, what would be
an interesting psychological experiment is to go to that group
of women that you talk to and ask them about
this and ask them, do you because I think there's there.
I think that there's this is going to get me
(07:47):
in trouble there. I believe there is a solid contingent
of feminists who just hate men. They hate men, and
and I think.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
That drive because they've been treated like this.
Speaker 3 (08:00):
And so I think that there is a lot of
like they hate Donald Trump so much that they will
tolerate this, and they would be interesting to ask them.
These are allegations against Doug m Hoff, who would be
the first man or whatever they call him, And do
you believe do you believe these women? Do you think
(08:23):
that he should have that position or what.
Speaker 1 (08:28):
Do we need to have I mean, would they want
him interviewed and have to answer for this? Because if
because that's how I feel like, Wait a minute, if
you're going to be close to the oval office and
your wife is going to be in the oval office
and you think so little of women, does your wife
actually does she actually have the power in this situation
(08:49):
or do you somehow feel like you're getting elected into office?
And let's face it, this is not a woman who
got to vote. Well, why would he need a vote?
He just needs to get close to it. And then
is this guy who thinks women I think so little
of women that were just sex toys. And I don't
say that lightly because he obviously hired hot chicks just
so that they could serve him and walk around him
(09:09):
and he could watch them walk around his desk. And
I'm you are smirking, but this is not funny because
it happens to women.
Speaker 3 (09:17):
It seems like it's so the Madman was in the sixties.
When was that? I never watched that the fifties somewhere
on that I can't remember, so it's so, you know, outdated.
I don't know I was going to say traditional, but
that's not the right word. My point is. My point
(09:37):
is that it is. The point is that is that's
not the way it's done in America anymore. But what's
being described is you know that era in America and.
Speaker 1 (09:52):
Very hard for.
Speaker 3 (09:55):
I know this is I feel like I'm being maligned
right now, but no.
Speaker 1 (09:59):
I to know, to be clear, you've never done anything
like this, and you've never acted like this. And I
think that we see people like I had a grandfather
who is like this and made comments like this, and
that was the fifties. Like that was the fifties when
people did this and men got away with it. It
(10:21):
wasn't okay. Men got away with it, you know. And
then one day people were like, no, you can't treat
women like this, and Doug em Hoff didn't get the memo.
Speaker 2 (10:31):
Well, that's the thing is he's lifted up as the
champion of women, whereas there are guys like Kyle I mean,
or when I first worked at in Corporate America, I
was hired by a sixty year old man who was
my mentor, Like, there are men that are champion for women,
So why are we lifting someone up that clearly is
not and it's all a political game.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
And I mean, I guess some people could argue, well,
this is her husband and Hillary Clinton was in the
same boat. But do we always have to have females
in power that have some sort of scumbag guy behind them?
I mean, is that is that really the image we
want to portray? And what happens once he does get close,
because we know what happened with Bill Clinton who couldn't
(11:14):
keep it in his pants and couldn't control himself around
young interns. And Doug has a role. It's not like
the first Well we've never had a first gentleman before,
but we know that the first lady has a role.
And I don't know if he's going to be decorating
for Christmas because he's Jewish, but I don't know what
he's going to do, you know, but he's going to
have a role in hell he an off.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
He has a role now as a second gentleman or
whatever we call him, right, so.
Speaker 1 (11:37):
People women will have to work with him if that's
what he chooses. And he seems to be the person
that does choose, and he chooses a specific kind of
woman that he's going to have in the White House.
And I mean, are we going to have a Monica
Lewinsky situation all over again? And I and I think
this is fair to ask. I think it's really fair
to ask when you have someone who has treated women
like this, should he be in a position where he
(11:59):
gets a stab, where he gets to ride in Air
Force one and control people, because ultimately your spouse does
have some power. And I just think that this is
outrageous that the media isn't going whoa red alert? This
guy is not somebody that should have any clearance in government.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
Well, it's fair to ask, because they ask it of
literally every Republican and these are the people that championed
the Me too movement, So it's very fair to ask.
Speaker 1 (12:27):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast.
Speaker 3 (12:35):
So again, don't you think this sort of exposes the
media and the Democrats? They absolutely loathed Donald Trump, and
they hate him so much that they will tolerate this, right.
Speaker 1 (12:48):
Yeah, absolutely, that this story breaks. I mean, it's just
like Hunter's laptop. This story breaks, and they're like, we're
not touching it. We're not touching this. How can you
have a story of the Vice president's husband who is
running for president right now, has abused a woman, has
beaten a woman. I mean, even if he was just
(13:10):
a total business scumbag and he had like hot chicks
all around the office and he stared at him all
day and he was flirting with him and they and
also in this article, they were given office privileges if
they flirted back with him. So like, even if you
were that kind of scumbag and you hadn't beaten a woman,
that's to me, that's still something to call attention to
hit a woman. He hit a woman, He got his
(13:33):
nanny pregnant, Like he's a champion for abortion. Oh my hello.
All of this is adding up in a very weird
way where I think. I mean, even the women that
we sat down with last week who are Harris supporters,
they were very adamant that that's not what abortion is
used for, for men to abuse women, Like, of course, right,
(13:53):
that's not okay. And yet here's a guy who has
done that and is now championing this cause. I just
don't think that it adds up. I think that women
should be leary of a man who does this. We
have fought so hard to be taken seriously and I
think that's why situations like this, But also when you
(14:15):
have the Gretchen Whitmer's of the world, and even Kamala
Harris out there giggling and making funny and singing in
these videos and Whitmer acting in these videos and putting
little skits together, I don't like that because I think
it takes a lot for women to be taken seriously.
And clearly her own husband doesn't take women seriously. So
(14:36):
when you play into this bimbo kind of you know, stereotype,
I guess I should say, then, how do you get
past the point where men like the vice president's husband
take you seriously and don't act like you're a bimbo
and you're there to serve them and flirt with them
(14:57):
and walk around their desk for them. I mean, I see.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
Kamala Harris and I think, gosh, that's not who I
want to be the first female president, because I think
it ruins for the rest of us.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
Well, I think she's there's something I want to play
because she did, and I think this is the clip
I'm going to put it up. She did go on
sixty minutes, and in this clip, she it's like she's
crying because she gets so confused about how to answer questions.
(15:29):
And that is one thing that I don't think we've
seen any politician in the past that couldn't answer. You know,
we saw a debate here in Michigan between the two
folks that are running for Senate. One's a man, one's
a woman, none of them, neither of them or in
this midst of like stumbling over the words, getting emotional
(15:51):
or sad or laughing ridiculously, like there was no nervousness.
She's constantly coming off as a nervous nelly. And if
you come off that way in an interview, how could
you possibly be running the free world? So this is it.
Speaker 4 (16:11):
You invest in the middle class and you strengthen America's economy.
Small businesses are part of the backbone of America's economy.
Speaker 3 (16:19):
But we're partnering man, President.
Speaker 1 (16:21):
The question was, how are you going to pay for it?
Speaker 4 (16:25):
Well, one of the things is I'm going to make
sure that the richest among us who can afford it,
pay their fair share in taxes. It is not right
that teachers and nurses and firefighters are paying a higher
tax rate than billionaires and the biggest corporations. And I
plan on making that fair.
Speaker 3 (16:46):
But we're dealing with the real world.
Speaker 4 (16:48):
But the real world includes how are you going to
get this to Congress? You know, when you talk quietly
with a lot of folks in Congress, they know exactly
what I'm talking about because they're constituents. Though exactly I'm
talking about.
Speaker 1 (17:01):
Their constituents are those fire orfy So she's stumbling over
her words.
Speaker 3 (17:06):
You can.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
I mean, there's a point where she actually seems like
she's going to cry. And I watched that interview and
I think she's getting more and more uncomfortable because she's
never been asked questions, she's never been held accountable, she's
never been asked the hard questions. And then I find
it really interesting that at the end of that interview
she says, well, you talk quietly to people in Congress,
(17:28):
their constituents actually believe in what she believes in. Well,
then her whole theory on Donald Trump tanking the border
bill as bloney. Why isn't she talking quietly to people
in Congress If she has that capability.
Speaker 3 (17:45):
And they had, the Democrats had control for the first
two years of the Biden administration, why didn't they Why didn't.
Speaker 1 (17:54):
They pass on I could have talk loudly. I mean,
you're have to talk quietly, so all their people.
Speaker 2 (17:59):
It also so it's if I'm going to average American
watching that, I think, so you're gonna do everything smoking
mirrors behind like the closed door. To me, I see
that as very nefarious because she's like, well, we can
make things happen behind the closed door, like we don't
need that doesn't need to be out in the open.
And that's how the Democrats do everything. They don't publicly
(18:20):
do any sparring, they do everything behind closed doors.
Speaker 1 (18:24):
Well, she actually she's given away a little secret, like, hey,
I can talk to people behind the scenes. I'm like, dude,
you're no Nancy Pelosi. Let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Get calmed down.
Speaker 3 (18:34):
And she she thinks that she's so brilliant when she's
making all of these sorts of statements. She reminds me
of because you're right, her style is she doesn't it's
like her brain is not quite keeping up. It's like
a she reminds me of, like a like an old
(18:55):
computer with the little spinning wheel, and you know what
the computer is going to do. You're just waiting for
it to do it, and that's what she's like, it's
just and it's it's painful. And then but when she's
asked a question about well, how are you going to
pay for that or how are you going to get
that through the Congress, she has no answer for that
(19:15):
because she it's like she knows she's read the top
line on the talking points, but then there's no, there's
nothing below it, and she doesn't know what to do.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
It was not expecting to get follow up questions.
Speaker 2 (19:26):
I don't think which I don't give us sixty minutes
credit like that was a very well done interview.
Speaker 1 (19:30):
Yes, and that's what needed to happen. But I fear
that we're so far along in early voting now that
that's why she did it. I mean, it's it's the
classic do the debate well into October because everybody's already voted,
and I think Republicans are still so we just have
this like these rose colored glasses on where we're like, oh,
(19:53):
we still have thirty days to the election. No, I don't.
Half the people have voted, their votes are already and
no one's spoiling their ballots at this point. They don't
care what she said at sixteen minutes. And the fact
is that very few people will see that. They're not
seeking it out. The people that are hardcore have voted.
The people that are independents, not all of them are
(20:15):
going to see that because it's not the full The
media isn't exposing that. Now. I will give CNN credit.
They came out and they were like, she was asked,
you know, what would you do differently than Joe Biden
and the boy she bombed that. She was like, oh,
you know, I don't think I would have done anything different.
And I think everybody that was on the view and
(20:36):
I think everybody's jaw just kind of hit the table,
like not the answer, you know. They all want to
be like no, no, no. And then CNN came out
and said, how could she say that she wouldn't do
anything because she wants to be the candidate of change,
so she has to differentiate herself from Biden a little bit.
It's like it's as if people are just seeing her
(20:58):
for the first time, but they really are. Because she
wasn't a candidate, she didn't have to be vetted. She's
being vetted in the eleventh hour after the votes are in.
I mean, you're we're gonna end up with, like you said,
the computer the fan, and the computer is running, the
hot air is coming out, but there's nothing on the screen.
That's the presidency that we're gonna have. And when you're
(21:19):
in the situation room and the decision has to be
made and the fan is running but nothing's going on,
that's when disaster strikes.
Speaker 2 (21:26):
Is it going to be woman beater Doug em Hooff
making decisions or knucklehead Tim Walls?
Speaker 1 (21:31):
I think Doug is going to be sitting in a
hot tub with champagne constantly. And I mean, I just
feel like that's a.
Speaker 3 (21:39):
Hot tub of champagne.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
Probably we've all worked with this guy when you might
not have. Might not women have worked with this sky
And maybe I'm a little too sensitive to it, but
this is what needs to end in this country. Like
this kind of stuff his like everywhere, you know, and
when it's a it's a it's not a partisan issue.
(22:01):
No matter what side of the aisle you are on.
There are guys like this. And I'm not saying that
there are all guys like this because when these ladies said, well,
you know, haven't you are there? Horrible men men are
just horrible. I say, yeah, I have seen horrible men.
But my dad is like this amazing guy. I love.
My dad was great, you know what a great mentor
was so blessed to have him. I think there are
(22:22):
so many men in this world who are great. I mean, Kyle,
you're another one. You are a great coworker. You've never
done anything creepy. I mean, I know that's like a
lund bar, but that's the bar. I mean, that's the
crazy thing. That's a low bar for people who have
been through the situations that we've been through as women.
(22:43):
It's like when you actually notice it, when you don't
have someone do that to you. And that, to me
is shocking, to mean, I had this happened to me.
I've had this happen to me in many different positions,
whether it was in my job in the steel industry.
Woh gosh. Once you get into like the media world,
(23:06):
it's a whole different animal. I mean, there's always this.
It's not just the sexism, it's the belittlement, it's the misogyny.
It exists, and they pretend. I think it's the thing
that makes me mad is they pretend it doesn't exist
on their side. It's the freaking vice president's husband. The
guy's in jerk. I can't get past it. I'm like,
(23:26):
oh my gosh, this is the guy we all we
all our stomach's turn when we get around this guy.
This is the guy we literally see coming into the room,
and you turn the other way because you're like, I'm
not dealing with this today. Sarah's nodding because she knows.
Speaker 4 (23:43):
See.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
I mean, I've experienced it in politics. I've experienced it
in corporate America. I think it's also interesting to watch
it from like when you were running for guy. I've
worked for two female well, i guess three female politicians,
and it's interesting to watch how they're also treated.
Speaker 1 (23:59):
I mean, whether it's the media coverage, whatever it is.
Speaker 2 (24:01):
I think it's another thing too to see your boss,
who you also look up to, get treated differently because they.
Speaker 1 (24:08):
Are not a man. The media coverage is always interesting.
You and I were talking about this the other day.
When it's a man, no matter what he's done, it's
like former businessman now running for office. When it's me,
no matter what my history was, I was in the
media for two years. I'm almost fifty years old. Yeah,
but I'm a media personality nothing more, and no matter
(24:30):
what we did, they always ran. They never said anything
about my background, and people just think, oh, this is
this like activists who's come in to run for office.
We have so many problems in this state, and they
are problems that someone who wasn't involved in manufacturing probably
doesn't understand. And there were plenty of people out there
running who did not have a manufacturing background, including Gretchen Whitmer.
(24:54):
But did they say, you know, career politician Gretchen Whitmer. No.
Speaker 2 (25:00):
No.
Speaker 1 (25:01):
But my point is like on especially on the on
the side, if you're on the right at all, the
media will just treat you like crap as a woman. Well,
and I even think too if you look at it
on our own side. I mean, let's I'm not going
to get into specifics, but let's look at your primary
You had just as much business experience as many of
those men on that stage, if not a lot more
(25:21):
than some of the men on that stage. But you
were never lifted up in the same way for your
business experience and specifically your manufacturing experience.
Speaker 2 (25:31):
Right.
Speaker 1 (25:31):
No, I know, And I've had multiple times where people
been like, oh, your business closed because you ran it
in on the ground I wasn't. I hadn't been at
that business in four years, you know, But that's not
what they run with. And the other side is like,
we're going to belittle her, but our side does too,
I mean, and I well, is it not. Just a
few days ago one of the people from our side posted,
(25:55):
we can't have another candidate like we did last time.
We have to seOne with business experience. And I'm like,
you dog, you scum me dog. Yeah, I mean, I'm sorry,
but you when you take away someone's when you try
to belittle someone's identity and their experience, it is really
pretty disgusting. And the other side would be like, oh
(26:15):
my gosh, do not belittle what I am. But why
is it okay for them to do it? Why is
it okay for Doug Emhoff to be this guy who
yells get the f out of my office to women,
who slaps women. And I just can't. I saw this,
and I'm just glad you guys are tuning in because
I saw this and I was like, we need to
make this a bigger deal. So if you're listening today,
(26:36):
I think it's really key that you are letting people
know that the people who say they're going to protect
women will put a woman hater, a woman beater, a
cheater into the White House. This is what their plan is.
The guy hit the record is there, he's not denying it,
he's owned up to the getting his name any pregnant
(27:01):
and leaving everybody like the guy is not a good guy,
and they are lifting him up as this phenomenal example
of new masculinity. Hey, ladies' is in new. It's not
new masculinity. We've all dealt with this kind of masculinity.
This is the kind that we hate. This.
Speaker 2 (27:21):
They always like to say toxic masculinity. This is actually
toxic max ranity.
Speaker 1 (27:28):
Let's take a quick commercial break. We'll continue next on
the Tutor Dixon Podcast. If you cannot feel comfortable walking
past someone's office in your building because you don't know
how the guy is going to treat you or even
look you up and down, there's something wrong. And if
that's what we're putting into the White House, If this
(27:49):
guy is going to have his own staff in his
own office, and the women that are there are going
to have to worry about whether or not their skirts
are long enough or they're wearing pants that day, and
these are the things we have to think about because
of men like Doug Emhoff. And I just find it
appalling that there are not more people speaking out on this.
So I don't know if you want to add anything else.
(28:12):
Kyle's looking at me like, no, I'm done, No, thank you. Well,
I appreciate you all listening to this today because.
Speaker 3 (28:20):
I just I just think, sorry, I will say something.
I just I think it's very telling that the me
too people and the you know, the progressives and all
the feminists and all of those people will not say anything.
And the only logical conclusion is that they are more
(28:40):
partisan than they are ideological, and so when it comes
to their own side, they'll just pretend like this doesn't happen.
Speaker 2 (28:50):
Well, I know you were about to wrap it up,
but I guess it's I mean, it goes along with
what we've talked about on the border, talked about in crime, abortion.
I mean, none of these things protect women, and right, they're.
Speaker 1 (29:00):
All horrible to women. It's the women that get hurt
most under this administration. And I think about the day
that Harris took over as the nominee, just robbed it,
you know, didn't get a vote I just took it
over and Joe Biden called in Do you remember that?
And he was like, you're going to do a great job, kiddo,
And I thought, how dare you call her that? How
(29:23):
dare you call her that? She's a woman, an adult woman.
And I had the same thing in business in the
steel industry, where one of the guys who was a
manager would always be like, Okay, kiddo. It is so
demeaning you never no man ever gets called kiddo by
a man. It just doesn't happen. And I know this
(29:44):
may be hard for people out there to here, but
that's we don't want that. I want to be seen
on the same level. And as we normalize Joe Biden
calling Kamala Harris kiddo, and we normalize Doug Amahoff telling
people to get out of his office and smacking people around,
it makes it ten times harder for every other woman
out there. And I'm not saying that Kamala Harris shouldn't
(30:06):
be able to get she shouldn't be able to advance
because she married a douchebag, but the fact that she
married this guy and he will have access and she
continues to allow him to have access is a concern
for all women because we have to protect each other,
we have to stand up for one another.
Speaker 2 (30:22):
And if we're going to be skeptical, I'm on the whole.
I don't love to be skeptical of candidate's families, depending
on obviously the circumstances, but they're highly skeptical of Millennia.
So that opens up the attacks for Kamala's spouse to all.
Speaker 1 (30:39):
Hillary Clinton became secretary of State. Yeah, I think we
had a certain point. You have to look at the spouse.
They have an office, they have a staff, they come
with the package, they have a role. Yes, yes, this
is not without peril having somebody who is like this
having access to the oval office, having access to women,
(31:00):
having access to discussions with foreign leaders. I mean, he's
going to be at the dinner table with people, and
if he thinks so little of us, what is the
future for women in this country? Does he sit down
with people who are like, yeah, well you know your
wife is not so smart, and he's like, yeah, I
got this, let me take over. I mean, this is
the kind of guy that you read about and you go,
(31:20):
this guy does not respect women. So I perhaps I
think that This is more sensitive for me because I've
lived it, But if you haven't lived it. I mean,
this is when I see people on our side going
after women, I always stand up for them because of this,
Like here's the side that's like, oh, we love women,
(31:41):
give me a break. You cannot. You don't get to
say that. When you don't talk about it's because they
won't talk about it, like address it. If you address it,
then maybe we can figure something out here. But you
won't talk about it. He's not denying it. It obviously happened.
The border thing is another thing where she leaves the
border open and then son CBS. She like, well, we
(32:01):
now closed it. Now it is low. Now the number
is much lower. And he's like, well, wait a minute,
why didn't you do that in the beginning, And she's like,
because Congress should act okay, but they weren't, and so
you could have done this and stopped the flow in
the meantime. And if you have this magical ability to
whisper into people's ears and have like you have some
sort of Jedi mind trick with the congress men and women,
(32:22):
then do the executive order and work.
Speaker 2 (32:24):
You're Jedi magic. But she clearly doesn't. She only has
individual thought like answers and thoughts for things, but she
doesn't think about how any of them weave together. So
policy to her is like she can do one thing
over here, do the complete opposite over here. She thinks
in silos.
Speaker 1 (32:40):
Because she has no executive experience. She is a prosecutor,
so she thinks of one subject at one time and
convincing twelve people. That's what her mindset is. It's like,
I need certain people on my team, so I can
see how she's like, I can whisper into the ears
of Congress and get those people onto my team, and
(33:00):
then I can get things past. That's a very prosecutorial mindset.
That is not a leader's mindset. A leader is not whispering.
I mean, let's just face it. A leader is not
having quiet conversations. A leader leads. A leader is not
having to have quiet conversations because they are open. They're
able to sit down with both sides and have a conversation.
(33:22):
She doesn't understand the job. She's made that clear. She
has not been able to answer the questions of what
she will do. And now we're very close to this
election and it's very tight and I blame the media
for not exposing the truth about not just Doug Emhoff,
but also Kamala Harris. I mean, she was brought out
(33:44):
of the basement to replace the man who is laying
on the beach, and she wasn't ready to answer a
single question. My gosh, she's been doing the job.
Speaker 2 (33:54):
For four years well, and they're going to bring hurt
Kamala's teams. Whole thing right now is that they're bragging
about how they think they've reached over twenty five million
people in her media blitz just in this last week alone.
But let's be honest, Okay, so I think sixty minutes
was about ten million of that. The average sixty minutes
viewer already either voted or knows who they're voting for.
(34:15):
This is a very engaged, plugged in group of people,
So they act as though they're putting her out there
on the stage for a new group of people to
learn about her. That most of the I mean, other
than the call her Daddy podcasts like that, is about
she's reached everyone that she's already talking.
Speaker 1 (34:30):
To, and who knows that that would be any different
for her either. I mean, I just think it's now
the eleventh hour, they're past early voting. They have the
absentee I mean they are watching absentee ballots like hawks,
and we're like, yeah, look, we register these people. I'm like, hello,
focus people, this is not over. And they I believe
that they're counting what's coming in and they're like, we're
(34:52):
in good shape. She can go out and do her
media blitz and be as big a fool as she
wants to that that fan can run ra up in
the coming weeks as she gets closer and closer suddenly
because she's one. Once she's one, she's one, and I
certainly hope that's not the truth, but they see it
that way m and that is scary. So, folks, you
(35:15):
can still go out and make sure your friends are voting, voting,
early voting, on election day, get them out because this
is this stuff that's happening on the other side, and
the fact that she's out there saying these things means
they feel comfortable that they're winning. So make sure you
stay out there talking to people. Explain who this jerk
Doug Mhoff is. Well, that's before you love people go
(35:37):
I think to understand. So Tutor was talking about how
she went over and talked to the Democrat women. I mean,
it's probably a group of eight to ten women. I'm
not saying she changed any minds. I'm not saying she
changed any votes, but I will say there was one
woman in particular from that group that spent extra time
one on one with Tudor afterwards and was probing and
asking questions. They got into the food dye conversation with
(35:59):
RFK Junior, and so you know what, maybe there was
one person that's questioning how they might vote. And so
you have to take things like this dug up hoof
story to people that can be persuadable and let's talk too,
Let's start talking. I mean that's the other issue is
that they were like, you know, forty minutes in when
(36:20):
they're like, what's your name? And I said, I didn't
lead with it because I didn't think we'd talk, and
I don't think we would have. You know, I think
we're at this point of polarization that where people are
unwilling to listen, but I'm still willing to listen. They
were actually still willing to listen. So that gives me
hope that we do have an awesome future in this
country and especially in our state. With that, I will
(36:44):
say thank you to Sarah, thank you to Kyle, for
all of you out there. We will have another podcast tomorrow.
Go to Tutor Dison podcast dot com, iHeartRadio, app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts and join us next
time on the Tutor Dixon Podcast. Have a blessed day.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News
Hosts And Creators
Clay Travis
Buck Sexton
Show Links
WebsiteNewsletterPopular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!