June 10, 2025 • 35 mins
The John Kobylt Show Hour 1 (06/10) - Royal Oakes comes on the show to talk about the legality of Pres. Trump sending the National Guard and the Marines to LA during the anti-ICE protests. More on some of the violent criminals that ICE arrested during their raids in LA. Riverside County Sheriff and Republican candidate for governor Chad Bianco comes on the show to give his reaction to what he saw during the anti-ICE protests in LA. Congresswoman Maxine Waters said protestors did not commit any acts of violence during the anti-ICE protests.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
I am six forty.
Speaker 3 (00:02):
You're listening to the John Cobel podcast on the iHeartRadio app.
Welcome to the show, broadcasting live from the center of
chaos here in Los Angeles. Actually we're in Burbank. Yes,
we're on the edge of chaos, but.
Speaker 4 (00:15):
We're safe in our cushy little studio.
Speaker 3 (00:17):
Yeah, and the chaos never crosses the Burbank border. I
don't know how they do it, but you never see
any of this nonsense over here. Well, you know what's
going on. I don't have to tell you. And there
is a war going on between Newsom and Trump. Trump
took over the California National Guard and has deployed hundreds
(00:40):
of National guardsmen here at the moment, they're guarding federal buildings.
Newsom is filing a lawsuit, in fact, he's filed an
emergency filing in court saying that Trump's got no right
to do this. He says that the governor is in
charge of each state's National Guard except in very rare circumstances,
(01:03):
and this circumstance doesn't meet the criterion. Well, we thought
we'd talked to Royal Oaks, because Royal knows everything. He's
the ABC news legal analyst. This lawsuit is on, it's happening,
and we're going to see who royal things has the
better argument.
Speaker 1 (01:20):
Well, I don't know the capital of Bolivia, but I
do know that there's a common insight baseball fight. John.
There are two ways you can justify sending troops, and
one is there's a statute federal law says, hey, the
president may federalize the National Guard if there's a rebellion.
The local competion just can't do it. But you've got
to go through the governor to do it, and that's
the basis of Newsom's suit. There's another basis, though the
(01:43):
federal government may go in under the Insurrection Act. Trump
can say, look, I don't need the governors, okay to
invoke the Insurrection Act. But it's a little harder to
justify neither rebellion, failure to enforce federal court orders, constitutional
rights are being violated, the destruction of federal law. The
locals just can't do it. And the President is saying,
(02:04):
you know, I'm thinking about that, but I guess his
lawyers told him let's go the other way. So, as
you say, yesterday there was a big lawsuit probably robbed
on to Newsom. And today, just seven minutes ago, John
is when Newsom has asked the judge in San Francisco
to stop Trump send those troops home. And of course
it was just a request. There's no big deadline the
(02:25):
judge has to do anything. But we could get a
decision this afternoon. And the judge who's been assigned to
the case of pri in San Francisco is Charles Bryer.
And if the name sounds familiar as a Clinton appointees,
the brother of Stephen Brier was on the US Supreme Court.
So they both kind of left of center guys. So
wouldn't be a shock if Briar comes through for Newsom,
(02:46):
In which point Trump goes to the Ninth Circuit Court
of Appeals. Good luck there, as you know. But then
he can go to the US Supreme Court and say, hey, guys,
three of you I appointed, you got to reverse all
this because the town is burning. You got to let
me send those troops back in.
Speaker 3 (03:01):
I saw one analysis in the National Review Andrew McCarthy,
a former federal prosecutor.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
I'm sure you've probably read.
Speaker 3 (03:07):
His stuff, and he said it came down to this
word which you used, is that the president has to
go through Gavin Newsom. But McCarthy's argument is, it doesn't
say Newsom has to approve it. It just means you
have to the Secretary of State has to notify the governor. Hey,
(03:28):
this is what we're doing. In other words, you call
the governor. It's like a courtesy call. But he doesn't
he doesn't have the right to veto the plan. Do
you see it that way?
Speaker 1 (03:40):
Yeah, And McCarthy may be right, it's sort of a wobbler.
It's a big thing. But I mean, let's face it,
the Trump's lawyers don't like getting yelled at, and so
if he loses, you know, at any level, because his
lawyers told him to rely on this law as opposed
to the Interaction Act, you know they're going to have
some explain him to do. I mean, you know, back
in the fifties and the southern racist states wouldn't desegregate
(04:02):
the schools. Eisenhower descend in troops, federal troops, and he
didn't go He may have gone through the governor, but
he didn't need the governor's request because the governors down
there were all a bunch of racists didn't want to
desegregate the school. So yeah, Trump may win on that basis,
But John, I think it's a win win deal for
Trump either way. Either the judges say yeah, Trump's the president,
(04:23):
he can send in the Marines and so on, or
they say no, in which point, which what Trump is
to tell the nation, Well, that's really good. Look what
the judges are doing. Turn your TV. They're destroying federal property.
People are being injured, people will get killed, and the
judges won't let me send in the United States Marines.
So yeah, it's going to energize his base. It's going
to energize a lot of people. So, as I say,
(04:45):
it could work out fine for Donald Trump either way.
Speaker 3 (04:48):
Yeah, especially since he has a majority support across the
country to evict all illegal aliens. I'll get into that later,
but all right. One of the things you two things
you said one is is that you know they're guarding
primary now federal buildings. Isn't that well within the president's
powers if he thinks the federal buildings are under attack.
(05:08):
The LAPD is stressed out here, why can't he have
the National Guard providing that security for the federal buildings.
Speaker 1 (05:16):
Well, it makes sense, and you'd think a judge who
would be receptive to a claim of an emergency. But
then it gets back to those statutes and to the extent,
the only grounds on which a president may send troops
in whether it's the National Guard or in the Insurrection
Acts case, the Marines, or regular military folks as well.
If the only grounds are either get the governor's approval.
(05:37):
If you believe that argument, or demonstrate that there is
a rebellion, then you know you could stop the president
on that basis saying, well, you know, it looks bad,
it's not that terrible, And that gets down to the
basic argument here. A lot of folks on the left
are saying, oh my gosh, he's chilling our First Amendment
rights to protest and demonstrate. And if you believe them,
you know the cast of Portlandia and Red Armison are
(05:59):
singing we shall overcome, and they're having their heads bashed
in by billy clubbs, by this lady's evil Trump troops.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Everybody's seen on TV.
Speaker 3 (06:08):
We've seen the concrete blocks being hurled on those police cars.
So enough with this peaceful protest nonsense and exercising their
First Amendment right. No, this is just pure violence. This
is pure destruction. What they were doing here.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
And that's the strength of the Trump argument. You know,
you're going to believe their lion eyes here. Everybody can
see on TV that people are going beyond the peaceful protest,
and Trump's trying trying to draw a good comparison to
the George Floyd protest a few years ago, when the
Left was saying, oh, there's just making peaceful protests. Why
are you arresting these people that are just so furious
(06:43):
about the murder of George Floyd. Remember the classic CNN
reporters standing there after dark saying, as you can see,
things are pretty much under control. People on the back,
there's this conflagration and the flames that thirty.
Speaker 2 (06:56):
The news media has gone completely to hell.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
I mean, some of the reporting I saw over the
weekend was so atrocious, and the same thing during the
George Floyd riots. But speaking of those George Floyd riots,
things got out a hand here in l A. Eighty
eight businesses burned in the Fairfax District, large part of
the Santa Monica business district burned. Minneapolis was completely ruined.
(07:20):
Isn't there an argument for calling in the National Guard
as a preventative messag method I'm sorry, a preventative method
so things do not get out of control. Why do
you have to call them in on the third day,
after half the city's burned down. Why not get him
in right at the start, in the first hour.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
Yeah, that's a great question. And you know, I don't
really see too many legal disputes on that issue, so
it's hard to know how a judge would respond. You know,
some judges who don't have much use for Donald Trump
would say, hey, you know, read the law. There must
be a rebellion, an inability of local forces to enforce
the law, and that isn't there yet. You just think
it might be. Other judges might take a different view
(07:57):
and say, the danger is very clear. You o, the
last few days have been really dangerous and awful. People
are about to lose their lives. So we are going to,
as a preventive measure, go in. And you know, it
just gets to be political. I mean, the judges in
San Francisco, all fourteen of them appointed by Democrat presidents,
and so sure enough is Charles Bryer is one of
them handling this here in LA It's about to not
(08:19):
quite as bad as two to one Democrat Republicans. But
ultimately Trump can go to the US Supreme Court, no
matter how many times he loses down below, and say, hey,
you know, I really need relief. You guys need to
let me unleash me and let me send in the
Marines to stop the violence.
Speaker 3 (08:34):
Jim McDonald, the police chief here it for LAPD. He
was on television. I saw this, We played the clip.
He said, we were overwhelmed. LAPD was overwhelmed by what
was going on, and he said they did they did
everything they could think of to us. Now, isn't that
statement in itself a justification for bringing in the National
(08:57):
Guard when the LAPD chief is saying we're over helmed. Absolutely,
I mean that's a hugely powerful legal argument for the
Trump players to go into court and say, look what
the local.
Speaker 1 (09:08):
Headtop is saying. Are you really going to stand in
the way of us sending in troops to save lives
when the local law enforcement people are saying we can't
do it, which is the main criterion for both of
the Insurrection Act and the other law regarding the governor's approval.
So is you know, as liberal as this Judge Brier
(09:29):
might be up in San Francisco, it could be a
tough call for him to say, yeah, I'm going with
Newsom on this. I'm going to stop these troops because
then whatever bad happens after that, it's going to be
on his head. The blood is going to be on
his hand. Now.
Speaker 3 (09:43):
Can you imagine if the judge says the National Guard
has to leave Los Angeles and next thing you know,
we've got ten thousand protesters burning the city down.
Speaker 2 (09:52):
Is it judge going to take that risk?
Speaker 1 (09:55):
Yeah? And that's why to me, it's kind of a
win win for Donald Trump because either he gets his
troops or he doesn't get his troops, and then he
gets to point to the nation, look what's happening out there,
and the judges are obviously tying my hands. We got
to do something about this at a political level as
well as a judicial level.
Speaker 2 (10:12):
Thank you for coming on, Royal Oaks. It's good talking
to you.
Speaker 3 (10:14):
You bet all right, Royal Oaks, ABC News Legal Analyst.
We had more weight ta here, you know. I'm telling you,
I've looked at the rap sheets, the ones that have
been published on some of these guys that Ice has arrested.
They actually arrested a guy who is involved in a
famous shooting murdered two people from nineteen ninety four. This
(10:41):
was big news at the time. I don't remember it.
I'm going to read you the details of the shooting.
And this guy's back out on the street as an
illegal alien and got nabbed in the raids.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
We'll talk about it when we come back.
Speaker 5 (10:53):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI Am
six forty.
Speaker 3 (11:00):
If you want the mooistline, you can be on it
Friday eight seven seven Moist eighty six, eight seven seven
Moist eighty six.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Okay, you.
Speaker 3 (11:10):
Cannot believe the tremendous number of criminals that ICE is
rounding up here and all over the country. And what
is absolutely infuriating about the protesters and the vegetable heads
in the media is that's the main purpose of these raids,
because Karen Bass and Gavin Newsom allow these people to
(11:32):
roam amongst us even after they've been convicted, after they've
been imprisoned. They do not cooperate with ICE when their
sentences are up and turn them over to be deported.
They don't cooperate with ICE when they get arrested to
turn them over and get deported. Here's one of the
(11:52):
guys they picked up. You're not going to believe this.
A Vietnamese national by the name of Kwang Chon Fan.
He's forty nine years old. He was once convicted of
carrying out a mass shooting at a high school graduation
party in San Marino. I looked up the story La
(12:17):
Times back when they covered news August tenth, nineteen ninety four.
I don't have any memory of this, but apparently this
was a big deal. Fan was convicted of second degree murder.
He was among the dozens of illegal aliens who were
arrested here in La this weekend. So he was convicted
(12:39):
a second degree murder. He was charged, along with many others,
of spraying thirty partygoers with bullets. This is a graduation party.
Let me read you from the article from nineteen ninety
four in the La Times. With one hundred and twenty
(13:00):
sheriff's deputies and police fanned out through the San Gabriel
Valley to arrest nine alleged gang members in the June
fifth killings of two teenagers high school graduation party in
San Marino, angered at being asked to leave the party
after a dispute, Gang members returned with semi automatic weapons
(13:21):
and sprayed thirty partygoers with bullets. Dennis Bond of South
Pasadena and David Hang of San Marino were killed, both teenagers.
Witnesses were reluctant to identify the suspects because these were
gang members. Those arrested again this is back in nineteen
(13:41):
ninety four, were identified as Quang Chan Fun, age eighteen,
of Moderey Park, the same Quang Chan Fun who's now
forty nine years old and was arrested by Ice over
the weekend. Somehow he got convicted of second degree murder
as that they shot up of a freaking graduation party.
Speaker 2 (14:06):
And then there's a long.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
List of of other gang members who were arrested and
charged as well. They were described as mainly ethnic Chinese
from Vietnam, belonging to a well established multi ethnic Vietnamese gang,
and they were believed to be responsible for two other
killings earlier in nineteen ninety four in the San Gabriel Valley,
(14:30):
authorities recovered five weapons, a nine millimeter handgun, an a
K forty seven rifle, two shotguns, a three eighty caliber handgun, and.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
They also city they seized a car.
Speaker 3 (14:49):
It's the same guy you get convicted of murder in
California shooting up thirty people at a graduation party, you
get convicted of murder eventual, when you're set free, you
are not deported until Tom Holman and Trump's crew comes
and finds you again. In fact, Quang Chan Fan, he
(15:15):
was the guy kicked out of the party. He's the
one who instigated the mass shooting. This is who the
protesters are are fighting for. This is who Karen Bass
and Gavin Newsom are trying to protect. This guy, Kwang
Chan Fen. This was in the news this morning. I
(15:36):
know Bass had a big press conference. Anybody ask her
about this?
Speaker 1 (15:41):
Is it?
Speaker 2 (15:41):
Is it wrong that that.
Speaker 3 (15:42):
Trump and Holman are getting this guy arrested and deported
thirty years after he tried to pull off a massacret
to graduation party. How the hell did he get out?
I mean, this was nineteen ninety four, This was the
year of three strikes. Second to green Burder, he's still
out anyway, and he's only forty nine and he's back
(16:05):
getting into trouble again. I'm just so fed up with
this Bass Newsome crowd. I'm so fed up. This is
no way to live. Guys who tried to do a
mass murder thirty years ago. Are running around, and then
(16:28):
you have the protesters throwing concrete blocks.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
At the police.
Speaker 3 (16:33):
You noticed Newsoman Bass don't say anything about how the
police were attacked and assaulted. They don't see any say
anything about all the bad guys that were rounded up.
This is all public information. It's published in the newspapers.
I don't have any secret sources for this.
Speaker 6 (16:50):
Well.
Speaker 7 (16:51):
Bass did say today during her news conference that those
violent protesters that they're going to be prosecuted, that violence
is not allowed.
Speaker 2 (16:59):
Violence, this is not allowed.
Speaker 4 (17:00):
Well, I'm paraphrasing the violence is not allowed.
Speaker 2 (17:04):
That means it sound like it's a kindergarten.
Speaker 4 (17:06):
I know this is I can't remember the exact wording.
Speaker 3 (17:10):
Oh, the interart reminds me of it's a kindergarten teacher. Well,
Nathan Hockman, I think is gonna Well, they're also bill
of sale with the with the federal charges. We saw
Pam Bondi the attorney general. Uh, they're looking for one
of the guys who was throwing rocks or concrete.
Speaker 7 (17:25):
Yeah, they've identified him. We have a picture on our website.
Speaker 3 (17:28):
Good and I hope he gets caught, and I hope
he gets a concrete boulder in his head. Unacceptable. All right,
well it's only thirty seconds. Let's play that before we
do the news.
Speaker 6 (17:42):
When the administration started, they said that this was about
When the administration started, they said that this was about crime.
They were going to go after violent felons, drug dealers,
and I don't know how that matches.
Speaker 3 (17:56):
All right, stop sucking. We got we got that. We
got the one thing. It's okay, all right, we come back.
We got Chad Bianco coming on the Riverside County sheriff
who's running for governor. Listened to him when he comes on.
He's running for governor. He's the only prominent Republican I'm
aware of who's in the race. The rest of him
are running his Democrats, and they seem to be part
(18:17):
of Newsom's cabinet. So we're going to bring you his
reaction to this, because he had a strong one about
Newsom constantly popping off against Trump. We'll have Chad Bionco next.
Speaker 5 (18:31):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI, A
six forty.
Speaker 3 (18:37):
Ron every day from one until four o'clock, and whatever
you miss, you can pick up after four o'clock John
Cobelt's show on demand on the iHeart app, and you
could still listen to yesterday's show and the interview with
Tom Homan, the head of the Immigration Enforcement that's gotten
a lot of attention onto the Riverside County Sheriff, Chad Bianco,
(18:59):
and he's the right pre eminent Republican running for governor.
There's a long list of Democrats running, but the Republican
side is pretty short, and Chad Bianco's name is probably
the only one you'd recognize. He is the county sheriff
and Riverside and she's had a lot to say analyzing
Devin Newsom's performance this week.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
Let's get chat on.
Speaker 8 (19:20):
Hey, John, how are you?
Speaker 2 (19:21):
I'm good, How are you?
Speaker 8 (19:23):
I'm doing well, paying attention to the news and things
going on and what we have going on with our deputies.
But so far it's going okay.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
So you don't have any problems in Riverside County, No,
not yet.
Speaker 8 (19:34):
They have scheduled protests coming up toward the end of
the week. But we have deputies in Los Angeles.
Speaker 3 (19:39):
Now, oh, you've sent some to LA. That's good. They'll
get some practice. They'll be ready to go in case
something happens in your county. You've been outspoken about Newsom.
You said that he's doing nothing but fueling this process.
What do you mean by that?
Speaker 8 (19:56):
He actually should have absolutely nothing to say about any
of this. He's trying to blame Trump. He's trying to
say he's suing Trump. He's saying, you know, blaming the
National Guard for being here. And it's more and more
of the same from him. It's just the political lies
every time he talks. And from a law enforcement perspective,
all we care about the truth and he doesn't know
(20:17):
what the truth is. The truth is you can't change
a timeline and you can't change facts. The facts are
the LAPD, the largest, second largest in the country, and
the LA Sheriff the top largest in the country, were
being overrun in Los Angeles and nothing was being done
about it, and so the President sent people in. And
then he knew. Some claims that that's why this started
(20:39):
was because Trump sent the National Guard. Well why did
he send the National Guard? It was because it was
completely out of control, and these were not protests. They
were paid for rioters from the left. And now they
are using this as a political tool or a political
way of blaming someone else for there for decades of
what they have done to criminals here in California, which
is a name them.
Speaker 3 (21:01):
LAPD chief Jim McDonald said that LAPD was overwhelmed by
what was going on and that the rioters were coming
up with everything they could think of to attack the officers.
I think everybody should be happy and grateful that there's
a backup now from the National Guard and the Marines.
Speaker 8 (21:21):
Absolutely, And so here's the reality of them coming in.
They're not even here yet. They're starting to flow in.
But the two largest law enforcement agencies in the country
weren't unable to protect the residents and the property and
the businesses in Los Angeles County, and they had to
call upon their partners. And we willingly went from San Bernardino,
(21:42):
Orange County, from Riverside County, we willingly go to help
because that's what law enforcement is supposed to do. But
the reality of this and making it political is, to
be quite honest with you, they should have been stopped
the first night. They should not allowed it to go
three nights before they really started putting an effort into
who arresting these people. You set a big example. First,
(22:03):
in the beginning, you lay down the parameters, and when
people start going to jail, everyone going to jail that
deserves to go to jail. Then this doesn't snowball into
what we're seeing it now.
Speaker 3 (22:15):
When you have a sanctuary city for decades, a sanctuary
state that protects criminals to make it difficult for the
federal government to deport people who have been convicted of
violent crimes, of course you're going to get this Eventually.
These guys are let out of prison in jail and
nobody reports that to ICE, and so these guys can
(22:37):
run around and create more mayhem.
Speaker 8 (22:39):
Yeah, and so here's where we are with this. You
have a absolute lying politicians Karen Bathom, Governor Newsom saying
that this was that they're protesting ICE raiding home depots.
Both of them know one hundred percent factual that this
was a targeted ICE operation that was targeting individual with
(23:00):
deportation orders with felony warrants who are murders, rapists, robbers,
drug dealers, human traffickers, including a business that was human trafficking.
And that is what this protest is about. That's what
they're protesting. To help me make it make sense.
Speaker 2 (23:15):
Have you seen the rap sheets on some of these guys.
Speaker 8 (23:19):
Yes, and that's who they're protesting. They're protesting the removal
of our country from illegal aliens who are here victimizing us,
and not only victimizing us, but victimizing us with horrendous crimes.
Speaker 3 (23:32):
This insanity of saying it's Trump's fault that people are
writing people are rioting because they went out to riot.
Whoever has thrown the bottles of molotop cocktails. They're committing
the criminal acts. Nobody's forcing them to do that. They
chose to get out of their apartments and start throwing
weapons at police officers.
Speaker 8 (23:51):
Absolutely, and to be quite honest with you, they should
be suffering consequences for what they're doing, and unfortunately they're not.
Started last night they arrested a lot of people last night.
But in the law enforcement world, in my opinion, is
it's three or four nights too late.
Speaker 3 (24:09):
Well, I mean, look how out of hand like the
Minneapolis situation got with George Floyd, Tim Walls, the governor
up there, didn't call in the National Guard for several
days and then the whole city gets obliterated. Right, I mean,
we've had we've had, like all the major riots over decades,
(24:29):
what I've always noticed is everybody's late to bring in
the shock troops, to bring in the National Guard, to
bring in extra help. They're always late, and then and
then things get out of hand. And so this time,
maybe this is preemptive action. Good, bring in a couple
of thousand more to keep things from happening.
Speaker 8 (24:49):
You're exactly right, and that's how it should be. And
I will tell you, I will there's there's no better
proof than in southern California than what happened in twenty
twenty when the when the Rioters came to Riverside County
and we ended it with an overwhelming show of force
and an overwhelming, overpowering show of force where we arrested people,
We forced them out of our city and technically out
(25:11):
of our county because they never came back, because they
knew they were going to suffer a consequence. And that
was what was trying to happen now, and the Democrats
are against it. Wrapping your head around that.
Speaker 3 (25:21):
Meantime, here in La they torched the Fairfax District and
eighty eight businesses were destroyed.
Speaker 2 (25:27):
Santa Monica is destroyed.
Speaker 3 (25:29):
Just so I understand why wait until the Fairfax and
Santa Monica districts have burned down, have been looted, have
been completely I mean completely wrecked, and.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
Has not recovered to this day.
Speaker 3 (25:42):
I know for sure in Santa Monica, the area that
was destroyed by looters is still destroyed.
Speaker 8 (25:48):
It's short sighted politics. They use this as a tool.
If they would have ended it the first night, Bath
and Newsom wouldn't be able to be talking about it today.
They are blaming Trump. They're blaming everybody for their inactions
and their agenda for the last twenty years that's enabled
all of this. And this is they allow.
Speaker 1 (26:06):
It to happen.
Speaker 8 (26:07):
They allow it to get out of control so they
can talk about it and blame someone else. I mean
conspiracy theorists. You almost want to say, oh, look, they
planned it, they knew it was going to happen. They
encouraged people to come out and protest knowing what was
going to happen. And then now they're blaming someone else
for what they did.
Speaker 3 (26:23):
One more question, and then I got to go progressive activists.
I know they're anarchists, right, they want to take down civilization.
Why are Bass and Newsome on that team.
Speaker 8 (26:35):
Because they're on the well, because they're the ones in
power right now. They're the ones that have everything to
gain from this. They are the when you're fighting for this,
the Marxism, the socialism, the communism, there's people on top
that benefit, that reaped the rewards of being on top,
and that's where they are.
Speaker 3 (26:54):
Thank you very much for coming on. Chad Bionco, he's
the Riverside County sheriff and he's running for governor as
a Republican.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
We'll talk soon.
Speaker 8 (27:03):
Thanks, Sean.
Speaker 2 (27:04):
All right, we have more coming up.
Speaker 5 (27:08):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI Am sixty.
Speaker 3 (27:14):
John Cobelt Show, can't five Am six forty more stimulating
talk radio moistline is eight seven seven Moist eighty six
eight seven seven Moist eighty six, or use the talkback
feature on the iHeart app.
Speaker 2 (27:26):
Do we have that Maxine Waters thing?
Speaker 3 (27:28):
Yeah, listen to this delusional bag lady who wanders around
with a terrible wig on her head. Maxine Waters, congressman
from a lost congresswoman from Los Angeles.
Speaker 2 (27:40):
This is what she said at a news conference.
Speaker 9 (27:42):
And even though who were out of step with what
we are advocating peaceful books.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
There did not create any violence.
Speaker 9 (27:50):
No matter was shot, nobody was killed.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
Get it in your head.
Speaker 9 (27:54):
And so when martial low is called, what are you
going to say, I missed the boy.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
Don't miss to haunt.
Speaker 9 (28:00):
You all don't think that somehow because they called out
the national.
Speaker 2 (28:05):
Daunt there was violence. There was no violence.
Speaker 9 (28:08):
I was on the street, I know, and I went
from downtown attention back out into the community talking to people.
What happened in Paramount, what happened in Content, what happened
in Inglewood. So first of all, get it straight, and
don't just rely on what you've been told on the
two incidents that you saw.
Speaker 2 (28:29):
Was no violence.
Speaker 4 (28:29):
She ninety six people were arrested last night.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
There was no violence.
Speaker 3 (28:35):
So the video of them throwing rocks and concrete blocks
and Molotov cocktails and fireworks. She's a US congressmoman. She's insane,
or she's s nile, or she's both. So this is
the crowd that told us Biden was in senile for
the last few years. Now they've got the new big lie.
(28:56):
There was no violence over the weekend in Los Angeles.
And she's quite passionate. And I didn't hear any reporter
stop her and say, are you insane?
Speaker 4 (29:06):
Okay, ninety six people arrested last night. Not over the weekend,
but six.
Speaker 3 (29:11):
Last night was supposed to be the quiet night. I
turned on the TV last night before I went to bed,
So things are much quieter than they were the night before.
It looks like things have calmed down quite a bit.
You wake up, it's another ninety six people in jail.
Speaker 2 (29:27):
What do you know. Here's an interesting statistic. You should remember.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
Donald Trump got inaugurated on what January twentieth of twenty
twenty five. On January nineteenth, Axios and Ipsos did a
poll on immigration and found that sixty six percent of
Americans supported deporting immigrants who were in the country illegally.
Sixty six percent, So you have a two to one
(29:56):
majority on January nineteenth. If Trump gets into office, he's
been running on immigration at this point for ten years.
Speaker 2 (30:06):
What do you think he's going to do? He said
he was going to deport everybody.
Speaker 3 (30:12):
Now, first they said they were going to deport criminals,
and for the most part they have been I want
to talk about this next hour because we were discussing
this yesterday. There was a little change in it's not
a change in the policy. I have a feeling they're
doing exactly what they always planned, but they're starting to
slowly admit that they're going to be going after people
(30:35):
who are not violent criminals.
Speaker 7 (30:37):
And people are concerned about their housekeepers and their nannies
and their pool men and women and gardeners, etc.
Speaker 3 (30:43):
Yes, so we will talk about that coming up after
two o'clock after Carl Demyo. Carl Meyer is a Republican Assemblement.
He found that the state is giving thirty four million
dollars of your tax money to Churla. Curla is one
of the organizations that was advocating organizing to riot.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
So we'll do that whenever we get a chance.
Speaker 3 (31:03):
We're going to play some clips from Karen bast She
had a press conference this morning and this is her
delusional reality play cut number two.
Speaker 6 (31:12):
Administration started. They said that this was about crime. They
were going to go after violent felons, drug dealers, and
I don't know how that matches with the scenes that
we saw of people in home depot running through the
parking lot because they were afraid that they were going
to get arrested. You were talking about people who are
trying to survive day by day, which is what a
(31:32):
day laborer is doing, and why they would be considered
as part of a problem as opposed to contributing to
our economy is very difficult for me to understand.
Speaker 3 (31:43):
Well, how would she know if the day laborers are
criminals or not. There's no way to know that they
could be day laborers and criminals. In fact, being a
day laborer is a good way to get inside somebody's
house or get on their property. You think I don't
hire those laborers? Do you think I trust those guys?
Speaker 4 (32:03):
A lot of people do hire them.
Speaker 2 (32:04):
I know they do.
Speaker 3 (32:05):
And you know, since they're out there and they're really cheap,
there's a market here. But you can't tell me you
know that they're not. They don't have a rap sheet
and a rest record either here in their home country.
How the hell did you know that? The young guys,
the young guys without much money. Let's play time. One
(32:27):
word cut. This is best talking about the National Guard's
job and what Trump did has done to Newsom's power.
Speaker 6 (32:37):
The National Guard that are here now have one assignment
and that is to protect one building, which is the
Federal Building downtown. The second building which is the Federal
Building on Westwood Boulevard. And as far as I know,
nothing has happened in Westwood at all, So this was
not needed. The idea that the administration would usurp the
authority of our state government, take it away from our
(33:00):
governor Gavin Newsom. The governor knows that if we put
a request in for the National Guard and it went
to him, he would comply. There was never an issue
there because we were never thinking about calling upon the
National Guard. So I do want you to know that
the violence that has happened has required LAPD to ask.
Speaker 3 (33:22):
Wa, wait, hold on, there was no violence. Karen Bass
needs to call Maxine Waters. Maxine said, there was no violence.
I don't understand. I'm confused.
Speaker 7 (33:35):
Well, she is talking. Things got out of control really
last night. I mean they were out of control the
other night, but last night it was worse.
Speaker 2 (33:44):
But there was violence both nights. Yes, they all knights.
Speaker 7 (33:48):
You know, you had the fireworks and the Molotov cocktails
and last night you really had a lot of looting.
Speaker 2 (33:53):
And you know what, everybody's gliding around that.
Speaker 3 (33:56):
The police chief, Jim McDonald's said that LAPD was overwhelm umped. Well,
if a police chief says he's overwhelmed. Then he needs help, right,
who's going to provide the help? And why wouldn't you
have the National Guard on standby ready to go. Don't
wait three days. That's what cities and states always do.
(34:19):
They wait like three or four days and then everything's
gone to hell. That's what that idiot Tim Waltz did
up in Minneapolis.
Speaker 2 (34:28):
Didn't call the National Guard in for three days. Those
stupid George Floyd riots.
Speaker 3 (34:33):
We've just had this happen and wrecked big chunks of
the city five years ago. National Guard wasn't called or
wasn't called quickly. Well, that doesn't do any good.
Speaker 6 (34:45):
John.
Speaker 7 (34:45):
Somebody just sent me an email a listener that there
was ads on Craigslist offering money to insurrectionists to come
to the protest between six k to twelfth k a week.
Speaker 4 (35:00):
Yeah, to go to these protests.
Speaker 2 (35:01):
Yeah, I got a mat protest. I got a bass
clip on that too. Because she's absolutely clueless.
Speaker 3 (35:06):
All right, But right after Debra's news boy so much
as like planes stacked up at the airport, we got
Carlton Llyer coming on and he's going to tell us
about Churla and the thirty four million dollars of your
tax bundy that's gone to Churla, and Curla has been
a leading antagonist and instigator of these riots.
Speaker 2 (35:25):
Deborah mark Lyve in the KFI twenty four hour Newsroom, Hey,
you've been listening to the John Cobalt Show podcast.
Speaker 3 (35:31):
You can always hear the show live on KFI Am
six forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
and of course, anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
Can't.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
I am six forty.
Speaker 3 (00:02):
You're listening to the John Cobel podcast on the iHeartRadio app.
Welcome to the show, broadcasting live from the center of
chaos here in Los Angeles. Actually we're in Burbank. Yes,
we're on the edge of chaos, but.
Speaker 4 (00:15):
We're safe in our cushy little studio.
Speaker 3 (00:17):
Yeah, and the chaos never crosses the Burbank border. I
don't know how they do it, but you never see
any of this nonsense over here. Well, you know what's
going on. I don't have to tell you. And there
is a war going on between Newsom and Trump. Trump
took over the California National Guard and has deployed hundreds
(00:40):
of National guardsmen here at the moment, they're guarding federal buildings.
Newsom is filing a lawsuit, in fact, he's filed an
emergency filing in court saying that Trump's got no right
to do this. He says that the governor is in
charge of each state's National Guard except in very rare circumstances,
(01:03):
and this circumstance doesn't meet the criterion. Well, we thought
we'd talked to Royal Oaks, because Royal knows everything. He's
the ABC news legal analyst. This lawsuit is on, it's happening,
and we're going to see who royal things has the
better argument.
Speaker 1 (01:20):
Well, I don't know the capital of Bolivia, but I
do know that there's a common insight baseball fight. John.
There are two ways you can justify sending troops, and
one is there's a statute federal law says, hey, the
president may federalize the National Guard if there's a rebellion.
The local competion just can't do it. But you've got
to go through the governor to do it, and that's
the basis of Newsom's suit. There's another basis, though the
(01:43):
federal government may go in under the Insurrection Act. Trump
can say, look, I don't need the governors, okay to
invoke the Insurrection Act. But it's a little harder to
justify neither rebellion, failure to enforce federal court orders, constitutional
rights are being violated, the destruction of federal law. The
locals just can't do it. And the President is saying,
(02:04):
you know, I'm thinking about that, but I guess his
lawyers told him let's go the other way. So, as
you say, yesterday there was a big lawsuit probably robbed
on to Newsom. And today, just seven minutes ago, John
is when Newsom has asked the judge in San Francisco
to stop Trump send those troops home. And of course
it was just a request. There's no big deadline the
(02:25):
judge has to do anything. But we could get a
decision this afternoon. And the judge who's been assigned to
the case of pri in San Francisco is Charles Bryer.
And if the name sounds familiar as a Clinton appointees,
the brother of Stephen Brier was on the US Supreme Court.
So they both kind of left of center guys. So
wouldn't be a shock if Briar comes through for Newsom,
(02:46):
In which point Trump goes to the Ninth Circuit Court
of Appeals. Good luck there, as you know. But then
he can go to the US Supreme Court and say, hey, guys,
three of you I appointed, you got to reverse all
this because the town is burning. You got to let
me send those troops back in.
Speaker 3 (03:01):
I saw one analysis in the National Review Andrew McCarthy,
a former federal prosecutor.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
I'm sure you've probably read.
Speaker 3 (03:07):
His stuff, and he said it came down to this
word which you used, is that the president has to
go through Gavin Newsom. But McCarthy's argument is, it doesn't
say Newsom has to approve it. It just means you
have to the Secretary of State has to notify the governor. Hey,
(03:28):
this is what we're doing. In other words, you call
the governor. It's like a courtesy call. But he doesn't
he doesn't have the right to veto the plan. Do
you see it that way?
Speaker 1 (03:40):
Yeah, And McCarthy may be right, it's sort of a wobbler.
It's a big thing. But I mean, let's face it,
the Trump's lawyers don't like getting yelled at, and so
if he loses, you know, at any level, because his
lawyers told him to rely on this law as opposed
to the Interaction Act, you know they're going to have
some explain him to do. I mean, you know, back
in the fifties and the southern racist states wouldn't desegregate
(04:02):
the schools. Eisenhower descend in troops, federal troops, and he
didn't go He may have gone through the governor, but
he didn't need the governor's request because the governors down
there were all a bunch of racists didn't want to
desegregate the school. So yeah, Trump may win on that basis,
But John, I think it's a win win deal for
Trump either way. Either the judges say yeah, Trump's the president,
(04:23):
he can send in the Marines and so on, or
they say no, in which point, which what Trump is
to tell the nation, Well, that's really good. Look what
the judges are doing. Turn your TV. They're destroying federal property.
People are being injured, people will get killed, and the
judges won't let me send in the United States Marines.
So yeah, it's going to energize his base. It's going
to energize a lot of people. So, as I say,
(04:45):
it could work out fine for Donald Trump either way.
Speaker 3 (04:48):
Yeah, especially since he has a majority support across the
country to evict all illegal aliens. I'll get into that later,
but all right. One of the things you two things
you said one is is that you know they're guarding
primary now federal buildings. Isn't that well within the president's
powers if he thinks the federal buildings are under attack.
(05:08):
The LAPD is stressed out here, why can't he have
the National Guard providing that security for the federal buildings.
Speaker 1 (05:16):
Well, it makes sense, and you'd think a judge who
would be receptive to a claim of an emergency. But
then it gets back to those statutes and to the extent,
the only grounds on which a president may send troops
in whether it's the National Guard or in the Insurrection
Acts case, the Marines, or regular military folks as well.
If the only grounds are either get the governor's approval.
(05:37):
If you believe that argument, or demonstrate that there is
a rebellion, then you know you could stop the president
on that basis saying, well, you know, it looks bad,
it's not that terrible, And that gets down to the
basic argument here. A lot of folks on the left
are saying, oh my gosh, he's chilling our First Amendment
rights to protest and demonstrate. And if you believe them,
you know the cast of Portlandia and Red Armison are
(05:59):
singing we shall overcome, and they're having their heads bashed
in by billy clubbs, by this lady's evil Trump troops.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Everybody's seen on TV.
Speaker 3 (06:08):
We've seen the concrete blocks being hurled on those police cars.
So enough with this peaceful protest nonsense and exercising their
First Amendment right. No, this is just pure violence. This
is pure destruction. What they were doing here.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
And that's the strength of the Trump argument. You know,
you're going to believe their lion eyes here. Everybody can
see on TV that people are going beyond the peaceful protest,
and Trump's trying trying to draw a good comparison to
the George Floyd protest a few years ago, when the
Left was saying, oh, there's just making peaceful protests. Why
are you arresting these people that are just so furious
(06:43):
about the murder of George Floyd. Remember the classic CNN
reporters standing there after dark saying, as you can see,
things are pretty much under control. People on the back,
there's this conflagration and the flames that thirty.
Speaker 2 (06:56):
The news media has gone completely to hell.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
I mean, some of the reporting I saw over the
weekend was so atrocious, and the same thing during the
George Floyd riots. But speaking of those George Floyd riots,
things got out a hand here in l A. Eighty
eight businesses burned in the Fairfax District, large part of
the Santa Monica business district burned. Minneapolis was completely ruined.
(07:20):
Isn't there an argument for calling in the National Guard
as a preventative messag method I'm sorry, a preventative method
so things do not get out of control. Why do
you have to call them in on the third day,
after half the city's burned down. Why not get him
in right at the start, in the first hour.
Speaker 1 (07:36):
Yeah, that's a great question. And you know, I don't
really see too many legal disputes on that issue, so
it's hard to know how a judge would respond. You know,
some judges who don't have much use for Donald Trump
would say, hey, you know, read the law. There must
be a rebellion, an inability of local forces to enforce
the law, and that isn't there yet. You just think
it might be. Other judges might take a different view
(07:57):
and say, the danger is very clear. You o, the
last few days have been really dangerous and awful. People
are about to lose their lives. So we are going to,
as a preventive measure, go in. And you know, it
just gets to be political. I mean, the judges in
San Francisco, all fourteen of them appointed by Democrat presidents,
and so sure enough is Charles Bryer is one of
them handling this here in LA It's about to not
(08:19):
quite as bad as two to one Democrat Republicans. But
ultimately Trump can go to the US Supreme Court, no
matter how many times he loses down below, and say, hey,
you know, I really need relief. You guys need to
let me unleash me and let me send in the
Marines to stop the violence.
Speaker 3 (08:34):
Jim McDonald, the police chief here it for LAPD. He
was on television. I saw this, We played the clip.
He said, we were overwhelmed. LAPD was overwhelmed by what
was going on, and he said they did they did
everything they could think of to us. Now, isn't that
statement in itself a justification for bringing in the National
(08:57):
Guard when the LAPD chief is saying we're over helmed. Absolutely,
I mean that's a hugely powerful legal argument for the
Trump players to go into court and say, look what
the local.
Speaker 1 (09:08):
Headtop is saying. Are you really going to stand in
the way of us sending in troops to save lives
when the local law enforcement people are saying we can't
do it, which is the main criterion for both of
the Insurrection Act and the other law regarding the governor's approval.
So is you know, as liberal as this Judge Brier
(09:29):
might be up in San Francisco, it could be a
tough call for him to say, yeah, I'm going with
Newsom on this. I'm going to stop these troops because
then whatever bad happens after that, it's going to be
on his head. The blood is going to be on
his hand. Now.
Speaker 3 (09:43):
Can you imagine if the judge says the National Guard
has to leave Los Angeles and next thing you know,
we've got ten thousand protesters burning the city down.
Speaker 2 (09:52):
Is it judge going to take that risk?
Speaker 1 (09:55):
Yeah? And that's why to me, it's kind of a
win win for Donald Trump because either he gets his
troops or he doesn't get his troops, and then he
gets to point to the nation, look what's happening out there,
and the judges are obviously tying my hands. We got
to do something about this at a political level as
well as a judicial level.
Speaker 2 (10:12):
Thank you for coming on, Royal Oaks. It's good talking
to you.
Speaker 3 (10:14):
You bet all right, Royal Oaks, ABC News Legal Analyst.
We had more weight ta here, you know. I'm telling you,
I've looked at the rap sheets, the ones that have
been published on some of these guys that Ice has arrested.
They actually arrested a guy who is involved in a
famous shooting murdered two people from nineteen ninety four. This
(10:41):
was big news at the time. I don't remember it.
I'm going to read you the details of the shooting.
And this guy's back out on the street as an
illegal alien and got nabbed in the raids.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
We'll talk about it when we come back.
Speaker 5 (10:53):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI Am
six forty.
Speaker 3 (11:00):
If you want the mooistline, you can be on it
Friday eight seven seven Moist eighty six, eight seven seven
Moist eighty six.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
Okay, you.
Speaker 3 (11:10):
Cannot believe the tremendous number of criminals that ICE is
rounding up here and all over the country. And what
is absolutely infuriating about the protesters and the vegetable heads
in the media is that's the main purpose of these raids,
because Karen Bass and Gavin Newsom allow these people to
(11:32):
roam amongst us even after they've been convicted, after they've
been imprisoned. They do not cooperate with ICE when their
sentences are up and turn them over to be deported.
They don't cooperate with ICE when they get arrested to
turn them over and get deported. Here's one of the
(11:52):
guys they picked up. You're not going to believe this.
A Vietnamese national by the name of Kwang Chon Fan.
He's forty nine years old. He was once convicted of
carrying out a mass shooting at a high school graduation
party in San Marino. I looked up the story La
(12:17):
Times back when they covered news August tenth, nineteen ninety four.
I don't have any memory of this, but apparently this
was a big deal. Fan was convicted of second degree murder.
He was among the dozens of illegal aliens who were
arrested here in La this weekend. So he was convicted
(12:39):
a second degree murder. He was charged, along with many others,
of spraying thirty partygoers with bullets. This is a graduation party.
Let me read you from the article from nineteen ninety
four in the La Times. With one hundred and twenty
(13:00):
sheriff's deputies and police fanned out through the San Gabriel
Valley to arrest nine alleged gang members in the June
fifth killings of two teenagers high school graduation party in
San Marino, angered at being asked to leave the party
after a dispute, Gang members returned with semi automatic weapons
(13:21):
and sprayed thirty partygoers with bullets. Dennis Bond of South
Pasadena and David Hang of San Marino were killed, both teenagers.
Witnesses were reluctant to identify the suspects because these were
gang members. Those arrested again this is back in nineteen
(13:41):
ninety four, were identified as Quang Chan Fun, age eighteen,
of Moderey Park, the same Quang Chan Fun who's now
forty nine years old and was arrested by Ice over
the weekend. Somehow he got convicted of second degree murder
as that they shot up of a freaking graduation party.
Speaker 2 (14:06):
And then there's a long.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
List of of other gang members who were arrested and
charged as well. They were described as mainly ethnic Chinese
from Vietnam, belonging to a well established multi ethnic Vietnamese gang,
and they were believed to be responsible for two other
killings earlier in nineteen ninety four in the San Gabriel Valley,
(14:30):
authorities recovered five weapons, a nine millimeter handgun, an a
K forty seven rifle, two shotguns, a three eighty caliber handgun, and.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
They also city they seized a car.
Speaker 3 (14:49):
It's the same guy you get convicted of murder in
California shooting up thirty people at a graduation party, you
get convicted of murder eventual, when you're set free, you
are not deported until Tom Holman and Trump's crew comes
and finds you again. In fact, Quang Chan Fan, he
(15:15):
was the guy kicked out of the party. He's the
one who instigated the mass shooting. This is who the
protesters are are fighting for. This is who Karen Bass
and Gavin Newsom are trying to protect. This guy, Kwang
Chan Fen. This was in the news this morning. I
(15:36):
know Bass had a big press conference. Anybody ask her
about this?
Speaker 1 (15:41):
Is it?
Speaker 2 (15:41):
Is it wrong that that.
Speaker 3 (15:42):
Trump and Holman are getting this guy arrested and deported
thirty years after he tried to pull off a massacret
to graduation party. How the hell did he get out?
I mean, this was nineteen ninety four, This was the
year of three strikes. Second to green Burder, he's still
out anyway, and he's only forty nine and he's back
(16:05):
getting into trouble again. I'm just so fed up with
this Bass Newsome crowd. I'm so fed up. This is
no way to live. Guys who tried to do a
mass murder thirty years ago. Are running around, and then
(16:28):
you have the protesters throwing concrete blocks.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
At the police.
Speaker 3 (16:33):
You noticed Newsoman Bass don't say anything about how the
police were attacked and assaulted. They don't see any say
anything about all the bad guys that were rounded up.
This is all public information. It's published in the newspapers.
I don't have any secret sources for this.
Speaker 6 (16:50):
Well.
Speaker 7 (16:51):
Bass did say today during her news conference that those
violent protesters that they're going to be prosecuted, that violence
is not allowed.
Speaker 2 (16:59):
Violence, this is not allowed.
Speaker 4 (17:00):
Well, I'm paraphrasing the violence is not allowed.
Speaker 2 (17:04):
That means it sound like it's a kindergarten.
Speaker 4 (17:06):
I know this is I can't remember the exact wording.
Speaker 3 (17:10):
Oh, the interart reminds me of it's a kindergarten teacher. Well,
Nathan Hockman, I think is gonna Well, they're also bill
of sale with the with the federal charges. We saw
Pam Bondi the attorney general. Uh, they're looking for one
of the guys who was throwing rocks or concrete.
Speaker 7 (17:25):
Yeah, they've identified him. We have a picture on our website.
Speaker 3 (17:28):
Good and I hope he gets caught, and I hope
he gets a concrete boulder in his head. Unacceptable. All right,
well it's only thirty seconds. Let's play that before we
do the news.
Speaker 6 (17:42):
When the administration started, they said that this was about
When the administration started, they said that this was about crime.
They were going to go after violent felons, drug dealers,
and I don't know how that matches.
Speaker 3 (17:56):
All right, stop sucking. We got we got that. We
got the one thing. It's okay, all right, we come back.
We got Chad Bianco coming on the Riverside County sheriff
who's running for governor. Listened to him when he comes on.
He's running for governor. He's the only prominent Republican I'm
aware of who's in the race. The rest of him
are running his Democrats, and they seem to be part
(18:17):
of Newsom's cabinet. So we're going to bring you his
reaction to this, because he had a strong one about
Newsom constantly popping off against Trump. We'll have Chad Bionco next.
Speaker 5 (18:31):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI, A
six forty.
Speaker 3 (18:37):
Ron every day from one until four o'clock, and whatever
you miss, you can pick up after four o'clock John
Cobelt's show on demand on the iHeart app, and you
could still listen to yesterday's show and the interview with
Tom Homan, the head of the Immigration Enforcement that's gotten
a lot of attention onto the Riverside County Sheriff, Chad Bianco,
(18:59):
and he's the right pre eminent Republican running for governor.
There's a long list of Democrats running, but the Republican
side is pretty short, and Chad Bianco's name is probably
the only one you'd recognize. He is the county sheriff
and Riverside and she's had a lot to say analyzing
Devin Newsom's performance this week.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
Let's get chat on.
Speaker 8 (19:20):
Hey, John, how are you?
Speaker 2 (19:21):
I'm good, How are you?
Speaker 8 (19:23):
I'm doing well, paying attention to the news and things
going on and what we have going on with our deputies.
But so far it's going okay.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
So you don't have any problems in Riverside County, No,
not yet.
Speaker 8 (19:34):
They have scheduled protests coming up toward the end of
the week. But we have deputies in Los Angeles.
Speaker 3 (19:39):
Now, oh, you've sent some to LA. That's good. They'll
get some practice. They'll be ready to go in case
something happens in your county. You've been outspoken about Newsom.
You said that he's doing nothing but fueling this process.
What do you mean by that?
Speaker 8 (19:56):
He actually should have absolutely nothing to say about any
of this. He's trying to blame Trump. He's trying to
say he's suing Trump. He's saying, you know, blaming the
National Guard for being here. And it's more and more
of the same from him. It's just the political lies
every time he talks. And from a law enforcement perspective,
all we care about the truth and he doesn't know
(20:17):
what the truth is. The truth is you can't change
a timeline and you can't change facts. The facts are
the LAPD, the largest, second largest in the country, and
the LA Sheriff the top largest in the country, were
being overrun in Los Angeles and nothing was being done
about it, and so the President sent people in. And
then he knew. Some claims that that's why this started
(20:39):
was because Trump sent the National Guard. Well why did
he send the National Guard? It was because it was
completely out of control, and these were not protests. They
were paid for rioters from the left. And now they
are using this as a political tool or a political
way of blaming someone else for there for decades of
what they have done to criminals here in California, which
is a name them.
Speaker 3 (21:01):
LAPD chief Jim McDonald said that LAPD was overwhelmed by
what was going on and that the rioters were coming
up with everything they could think of to attack the officers.
I think everybody should be happy and grateful that there's
a backup now from the National Guard and the Marines.
Speaker 8 (21:21):
Absolutely, And so here's the reality of them coming in.
They're not even here yet. They're starting to flow in.
But the two largest law enforcement agencies in the country
weren't unable to protect the residents and the property and
the businesses in Los Angeles County, and they had to
call upon their partners. And we willingly went from San Bernardino,
(21:42):
Orange County, from Riverside County, we willingly go to help
because that's what law enforcement is supposed to do. But
the reality of this and making it political is, to
be quite honest with you, they should have been stopped
the first night. They should not allowed it to go
three nights before they really started putting an effort into
who arresting these people. You set a big example. First,
(22:03):
in the beginning, you lay down the parameters, and when
people start going to jail, everyone going to jail that
deserves to go to jail. Then this doesn't snowball into
what we're seeing it now.
Speaker 3 (22:15):
When you have a sanctuary city for decades, a sanctuary
state that protects criminals to make it difficult for the
federal government to deport people who have been convicted of
violent crimes, of course you're going to get this Eventually.
These guys are let out of prison in jail and
nobody reports that to ICE, and so these guys can
(22:37):
run around and create more mayhem.
Speaker 8 (22:39):
Yeah, and so here's where we are with this. You
have a absolute lying politicians Karen Bathom, Governor Newsom saying
that this was that they're protesting ICE raiding home depots.
Both of them know one hundred percent factual that this
was a targeted ICE operation that was targeting individual with
(23:00):
deportation orders with felony warrants who are murders, rapists, robbers,
drug dealers, human traffickers, including a business that was human trafficking.
And that is what this protest is about. That's what
they're protesting. To help me make it make sense.
Speaker 2 (23:15):
Have you seen the rap sheets on some of these guys.
Speaker 8 (23:19):
Yes, and that's who they're protesting. They're protesting the removal
of our country from illegal aliens who are here victimizing us,
and not only victimizing us, but victimizing us with horrendous crimes.
Speaker 3 (23:32):
This insanity of saying it's Trump's fault that people are
writing people are rioting because they went out to riot.
Whoever has thrown the bottles of molotop cocktails. They're committing
the criminal acts. Nobody's forcing them to do that. They
chose to get out of their apartments and start throwing
weapons at police officers.
Speaker 8 (23:51):
Absolutely, and to be quite honest with you, they should
be suffering consequences for what they're doing, and unfortunately they're not.
Started last night they arrested a lot of people last night.
But in the law enforcement world, in my opinion, is
it's three or four nights too late.
Speaker 3 (24:09):
Well, I mean, look how out of hand like the
Minneapolis situation got with George Floyd, Tim Walls, the governor
up there, didn't call in the National Guard for several
days and then the whole city gets obliterated. Right, I mean,
we've had we've had, like all the major riots over decades,
(24:29):
what I've always noticed is everybody's late to bring in
the shock troops, to bring in the National Guard, to
bring in extra help. They're always late, and then and
then things get out of hand. And so this time,
maybe this is preemptive action. Good, bring in a couple
of thousand more to keep things from happening.
Speaker 8 (24:49):
You're exactly right, and that's how it should be. And
I will tell you, I will there's there's no better
proof than in southern California than what happened in twenty
twenty when the when the Rioters came to Riverside County
and we ended it with an overwhelming show of force
and an overwhelming, overpowering show of force where we arrested people,
We forced them out of our city and technically out
(25:11):
of our county because they never came back, because they
knew they were going to suffer a consequence. And that
was what was trying to happen now, and the Democrats
are against it. Wrapping your head around that.
Speaker 3 (25:21):
Meantime, here in La they torched the Fairfax District and
eighty eight businesses were destroyed.
Speaker 2 (25:27):
Santa Monica is destroyed.
Speaker 3 (25:29):
Just so I understand why wait until the Fairfax and
Santa Monica districts have burned down, have been looted, have
been completely I mean completely wrecked, and.
Speaker 2 (25:41):
Has not recovered to this day.
Speaker 3 (25:42):
I know for sure in Santa Monica, the area that
was destroyed by looters is still destroyed.
Speaker 8 (25:48):
It's short sighted politics. They use this as a tool.
If they would have ended it the first night, Bath
and Newsom wouldn't be able to be talking about it today.
They are blaming Trump. They're blaming everybody for their inactions
and their agenda for the last twenty years that's enabled
all of this. And this is they allow.
Speaker 1 (26:06):
It to happen.
Speaker 8 (26:07):
They allow it to get out of control so they
can talk about it and blame someone else. I mean
conspiracy theorists. You almost want to say, oh, look, they
planned it, they knew it was going to happen. They
encouraged people to come out and protest knowing what was
going to happen. And then now they're blaming someone else
for what they did.
Speaker 3 (26:23):
One more question, and then I got to go progressive activists.
I know they're anarchists, right, they want to take down civilization.
Why are Bass and Newsome on that team.
Speaker 8 (26:35):
Because they're on the well, because they're the ones in
power right now. They're the ones that have everything to
gain from this. They are the when you're fighting for this,
the Marxism, the socialism, the communism, there's people on top
that benefit, that reaped the rewards of being on top,
and that's where they are.
Speaker 3 (26:54):
Thank you very much for coming on. Chad Bionco, he's
the Riverside County sheriff and he's running for governor as
a Republican.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
We'll talk soon.
Speaker 8 (27:03):
Thanks, Sean.
Speaker 2 (27:04):
All right, we have more coming up.
Speaker 5 (27:08):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI Am sixty.
Speaker 3 (27:14):
John Cobelt Show, can't five Am six forty more stimulating
talk radio moistline is eight seven seven Moist eighty six
eight seven seven Moist eighty six, or use the talkback
feature on the iHeart app.
Speaker 2 (27:26):
Do we have that Maxine Waters thing?
Speaker 3 (27:28):
Yeah, listen to this delusional bag lady who wanders around
with a terrible wig on her head. Maxine Waters, congressman
from a lost congresswoman from Los Angeles.
Speaker 2 (27:40):
This is what she said at a news conference.
Speaker 9 (27:42):
And even though who were out of step with what
we are advocating peaceful books.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
There did not create any violence.
Speaker 9 (27:50):
No matter was shot, nobody was killed.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
Get it in your head.
Speaker 9 (27:54):
And so when martial low is called, what are you
going to say, I missed the boy.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
Don't miss to haunt.
Speaker 9 (28:00):
You all don't think that somehow because they called out
the national.
Speaker 2 (28:05):
Daunt there was violence. There was no violence.
Speaker 9 (28:08):
I was on the street, I know, and I went
from downtown attention back out into the community talking to people.
What happened in Paramount, what happened in Content, what happened
in Inglewood. So first of all, get it straight, and
don't just rely on what you've been told on the
two incidents that you saw.
Speaker 2 (28:29):
Was no violence.
Speaker 4 (28:29):
She ninety six people were arrested last night.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
There was no violence.
Speaker 3 (28:35):
So the video of them throwing rocks and concrete blocks
and Molotov cocktails and fireworks. She's a US congressmoman. She's insane,
or she's s nile, or she's both. So this is
the crowd that told us Biden was in senile for
the last few years. Now they've got the new big lie.
(28:56):
There was no violence over the weekend in Los Angeles.
And she's quite passionate. And I didn't hear any reporter
stop her and say, are you insane?
Speaker 4 (29:06):
Okay, ninety six people arrested last night. Not over the weekend,
but six.
Speaker 3 (29:11):
Last night was supposed to be the quiet night. I
turned on the TV last night before I went to bed,
So things are much quieter than they were the night before.
It looks like things have calmed down quite a bit.
You wake up, it's another ninety six people in jail.
Speaker 2 (29:27):
What do you know. Here's an interesting statistic. You should remember.
Speaker 3 (29:34):
Donald Trump got inaugurated on what January twentieth of twenty
twenty five. On January nineteenth, Axios and Ipsos did a
poll on immigration and found that sixty six percent of
Americans supported deporting immigrants who were in the country illegally.
Sixty six percent, So you have a two to one
(29:56):
majority on January nineteenth. If Trump gets into office, he's
been running on immigration at this point for ten years.
Speaker 2 (30:06):
What do you think he's going to do? He said
he was going to deport everybody.
Speaker 3 (30:12):
Now, first they said they were going to deport criminals,
and for the most part they have been I want
to talk about this next hour because we were discussing
this yesterday. There was a little change in it's not
a change in the policy. I have a feeling they're
doing exactly what they always planned, but they're starting to
slowly admit that they're going to be going after people
(30:35):
who are not violent criminals.
Speaker 7 (30:37):
And people are concerned about their housekeepers and their nannies
and their pool men and women and gardeners, etc.
Speaker 3 (30:43):
Yes, so we will talk about that coming up after
two o'clock after Carl Demyo. Carl Meyer is a Republican Assemblement.
He found that the state is giving thirty four million
dollars of your tax money to Churla. Curla is one
of the organizations that was advocating organizing to riot.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
So we'll do that whenever we get a chance.
Speaker 3 (31:03):
We're going to play some clips from Karen bast She
had a press conference this morning and this is her
delusional reality play cut number two.
Speaker 6 (31:12):
Administration started. They said that this was about crime. They
were going to go after violent felons, drug dealers, and
I don't know how that matches with the scenes that
we saw of people in home depot running through the
parking lot because they were afraid that they were going
to get arrested. You were talking about people who are
trying to survive day by day, which is what a
(31:32):
day laborer is doing, and why they would be considered
as part of a problem as opposed to contributing to
our economy is very difficult for me to understand.
Speaker 3 (31:43):
Well, how would she know if the day laborers are
criminals or not. There's no way to know that they
could be day laborers and criminals. In fact, being a
day laborer is a good way to get inside somebody's
house or get on their property. You think I don't
hire those laborers? Do you think I trust those guys?
Speaker 4 (32:03):
A lot of people do hire them.
Speaker 2 (32:04):
I know they do.
Speaker 3 (32:05):
And you know, since they're out there and they're really cheap,
there's a market here. But you can't tell me you
know that they're not. They don't have a rap sheet
and a rest record either here in their home country.
How the hell did you know that? The young guys,
the young guys without much money. Let's play time. One
(32:27):
word cut. This is best talking about the National Guard's
job and what Trump did has done to Newsom's power.
Speaker 6 (32:37):
The National Guard that are here now have one assignment
and that is to protect one building, which is the
Federal Building downtown. The second building which is the Federal
Building on Westwood Boulevard. And as far as I know,
nothing has happened in Westwood at all, So this was
not needed. The idea that the administration would usurp the
authority of our state government, take it away from our
(33:00):
governor Gavin Newsom. The governor knows that if we put
a request in for the National Guard and it went
to him, he would comply. There was never an issue
there because we were never thinking about calling upon the
National Guard. So I do want you to know that
the violence that has happened has required LAPD to ask.
Speaker 3 (33:22):
Wa, wait, hold on, there was no violence. Karen Bass
needs to call Maxine Waters. Maxine said, there was no violence.
I don't understand. I'm confused.
Speaker 7 (33:35):
Well, she is talking. Things got out of control really
last night. I mean they were out of control the
other night, but last night it was worse.
Speaker 2 (33:44):
But there was violence both nights. Yes, they all knights.
Speaker 7 (33:48):
You know, you had the fireworks and the Molotov cocktails
and last night you really had a lot of looting.
Speaker 2 (33:53):
And you know what, everybody's gliding around that.
Speaker 3 (33:56):
The police chief, Jim McDonald's said that LAPD was overwhelm umped. Well,
if a police chief says he's overwhelmed. Then he needs help, right,
who's going to provide the help? And why wouldn't you
have the National Guard on standby ready to go. Don't
wait three days. That's what cities and states always do.
(34:19):
They wait like three or four days and then everything's
gone to hell. That's what that idiot Tim Waltz did
up in Minneapolis.
Speaker 2 (34:28):
Didn't call the National Guard in for three days. Those
stupid George Floyd riots.
Speaker 3 (34:33):
We've just had this happen and wrecked big chunks of
the city five years ago. National Guard wasn't called or
wasn't called quickly. Well, that doesn't do any good.
Speaker 6 (34:45):
John.
Speaker 7 (34:45):
Somebody just sent me an email a listener that there
was ads on Craigslist offering money to insurrectionists to come
to the protest between six k to twelfth k a week.
Speaker 4 (35:00):
Yeah, to go to these protests.
Speaker 2 (35:01):
Yeah, I got a mat protest. I got a bass
clip on that too. Because she's absolutely clueless.
Speaker 3 (35:06):
All right, But right after Debra's news boy so much
as like planes stacked up at the airport, we got
Carlton Llyer coming on and he's going to tell us
about Churla and the thirty four million dollars of your
tax bundy that's gone to Churla, and Curla has been
a leading antagonist and instigator of these riots.
Speaker 2 (35:25):
Deborah mark Lyve in the KFI twenty four hour Newsroom, Hey,
you've been listening to the John Cobalt Show podcast.
Speaker 3 (35:31):
You can always hear the show live on KFI Am
six forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
and of course, anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
The John Kobylt Show News
Host
John Kobylt
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.