May 2, 2025 • 30 mins
The John Kobylt Show Hour 3 (05/02) - John is joined by attorney John Manley, who calls out Assemblyman Nick Shultz and Senator Scott Weiner for what he describes as enabling pedophilia by blocking a bill that would make buying sex from a 16- or 17-year-old a felony. Manley and John agree this isn’t politics — it’s evil. They question the motives behind the Democrats’ vote, the racial and cultural implications of their decision, and the disturbing message it sends to predators. Then, LA County DA Nathan Hochman joins the show to discuss the Menendez case and why he’s pushing back on efforts to have him removed. Plus, it’s Friday — so it’s time for the latest edition of The Moist Line.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't. I am six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
You're listening to the John Cobelt Podcast on the iHeartRadio app.
Every day we're on from one until four o'clock and
every day after four o'clock. If you miss stuff, and
we had a lot of good, good material today with this,
with these perverts, pedophiles and predators in the Assembly, you
really should listen to the whole show after four o'clock
(00:23):
John Cobelt Show on demand, it's the podcast, or listen tomorrow,
or listen on Sunday. It's good at any time. We
want to reiterate that Assembly Member Nick Schultz, the Democratic
Assembly been from here in Burbank, Burbank and Glendale. He's
having a town hall meeting tonight at the ACF Burbank
Youth Center, seventy five East Senate Anita Avenue from seven
(00:47):
to nine o'clock tonight, and maybe he'll explain why he
thinks it's okay that people buy sixteen and seventeen year
olds for sex and it's not an automatic felony. Maybe
he'll explain tonight. That's ACF Burbank Youth Center, seventy five
East Santa Anita Avenue here in Burbank. If you have children,
(01:10):
you have teenagers, girl or boy, you've got to do
something because there's fifty five Democrats who don't think it's
a bad thing.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
To buy to buy a child for sex.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
And on that issue, which we've been covering for most
of the show, we're now going to talk with John Manley.
John Manley has been on our show many times and
he's with Manly, Stuart and Finalde, the nation's leading firm
representing victims of sexual abuse. He's been involved in all
the major cases here in Los Angeles over the years,
(01:46):
most notably the La Archdiocese. We just talked to him
a few days ago, and he's got a lot to
say on what the Assembly Public Safety Committee is doing
by blocking the bill that would make buying sixteen and
seventeen year old is an automatic sellony buying him for sex.
Speaker 1 (02:03):
John Banley, how are you hey?
Speaker 3 (02:05):
Good John? How you doing?
Speaker 1 (02:07):
What the hell is going on here?
Speaker 4 (02:09):
Well?
Speaker 3 (02:10):
These people have lost their mind. The bill was actually
co sponsored by Maggie Krell, who's a Democrat, a former prosecutor,
and they took the bill out of their name. And
the two main culprits here in my view are Senator Schultz,
who you mentioned, and then Scott Wiener, yes Wiener from
(02:32):
San Francisco, who and who has pushed all kinds of
stuff to minimize his career, to minimize prosecution of men
and men who have sex with sixteen and seventeen year olds.
This is about the first time he's done this, I know.
(02:54):
And he's running, and he's running for Nancy Pelosi seat,
and Nancy Pelosi's daughter is blasting him. And the question
you have to ask yourself is who wants to the
pretext of this, by the way, to allow men who
buy children and seven sixteen I'm sorry, seventeen and sixteen
(03:14):
year olds in California their children. I don't know if
you've seen a sixteen year old girl lately, but you know,
imagine a sixty year old or a seventy year old
dude going up and taking that child and a rapinger
because he paid her pimp and these I can't even
say the word when I think of a horrible people
(03:38):
who have no moral compass want to make that a misdemeanor,
meaning you don't even go to jail. You can get
a citation. You have sex, what you pay for sex
with a child, and you get a citation. They don't
even do that in Thailand. I mean, in Thailand it's
a felony.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
And is it legalizes rape of children?
Speaker 3 (03:57):
It's rape.
Speaker 1 (03:58):
That's what Schultz and are promoting.
Speaker 3 (04:01):
And the Democrats wonder. And I'm not a partisan, I'm
not a Republican, I'm not a Democrat. But the Democrats
wonder why they're in deep, deep trouble and it's because
of this. It's insane. Good for Governor Newsom, who I'm
not always a fan of, to say, I'm vetoing it
should be a felony, full stop. But what the hell
(04:21):
is going on with fifty five representatives elected representatives and
the California legislature are voting to reduce the penalty to
have sex with a child. It's insane and it goes
along with this guy Ben Allen, another state senator from
Santa Monica, What a surprise, who sponsored SB thirty two,
(04:43):
who would essentially made it impossible to pursue a public
school when they know they know a child is being
molested and they do nothing. Something is amiss here. I
don't believe the pretext. It's because we're concerned about gay
youth and inter racial relationship a bunch of that's a
bunch of b Show me, show me a situation where
(05:04):
that's happened, where some parent has you know, used this
law because my daughter's dating a black boy. That's bs
your enablement of pedophilia.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
You you have you've pointed out that most of the
victims are are black and Latino boys and girls.
Speaker 3 (05:21):
Yeah, yeah, they are. The vast majority of our clients
in LA and in the Bay Area have been kids
of color, and and you know these are you know,
Scott Wiener is just this white dude who runs around
and you know, in San Francisco and talks to all
these you know, groups with you know, the woke of
(05:46):
the woke and decides to impose that on the rest
of us. And it's it's the reason that the Democratic
Party can't win an election in a national election and
is in trouble, and it's it's just bad policy and
the dangerous children. I hope that if this passes, the
Justice Department issues a regulation which they could do and
basically says, if you don't make it a felony to
(06:10):
to you know, for buying sex with a sixteen or
seventeen year old, then we're going to cut off all
your federal funds to your state. You know, if government
can't protect children, what good is it. That's its basic function,
protecting the vulnerable. There's you know in these kids. They
may they may they may have you know, they may
have breasts, they may look developed, but their children and
(06:31):
you don't have the capacity to know what's going on.
And they're being this is not like they're consenting. They're
being sold by temps. You're going to make that a misdemeanor.
Are you insane?
Speaker 1 (06:42):
And forced into sex?
Speaker 2 (06:43):
And we had Shannon Grove on as state senator who
started this ball rolling last year with her legislation, And
these girls are forced into hours and hours of sex
with multiple men, they have to hit a.
Speaker 3 (06:57):
Comentative John I represented them there. They get off a
bus and it's like the old story, and they're they're
lured into his life. They're beaten, they're they're applied with drugs,
they're controlled, they're slaves. It's slavery. You know, this guy
runs around and talks about you know, black people and
the legacy of slavery. Well, you got it right here,
(07:17):
right now. It's going on the streets to San Francisco,
and Los Angeles and you want to make it easier
on the slavers. That's great.
Speaker 1 (07:25):
What is the upside for this? I don't I don't understand.
Speaker 3 (07:32):
Yeah, it is taking progression. It's how deep down the
whole of progressive nonsense can you go. We're not talking
about civil rights here, We're not talking about this. We're
talking about you know. And I believe there's an element
in in that community in San Francisco that really does
(07:57):
want to make sex with boys legal. I'm sorry I did,
and you know, maybe I'll get some heat for it.
I really don't care. But there's elements in our country,
in our state that want to make sex with children legal.
And you don't have to believe me. The La la
USD ten years ago was arguing in court that sixteen
year olds could consent to sex. It's out there and
(08:21):
you know, and believing then it will be fifteen year olds.
And there's a history to this and it's not right.
And what this does and reinforces all the crazy right
wing series about pedophileya and everybody in the Democratic Party
is a pedophile. That's not true.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
But cretic Assembly members not wanting to make this a felony.
Then you know a lot of people are going to wonder, well,
what are these people doing?
Speaker 3 (08:48):
Well, this is This is because the left wing of
the party, of that party, it falls in lockstep, and
they're afraid to stand up, use common sense and protect
people because they're going to get criticized by the the
you know, the crazed. I'm looking at gay rights. I'm
(09:09):
talking about transactivists who you know, believe that all men
are are the patriarchy controls everything, and marriage is rape
and all that kind of insanity. That's what you're dealing
with here. And you know, we got to stand up,
whether we're Republicans or Democrats and call that what it is,
which is evil. This is evil, and you can you
(09:30):
can you can come up and excuse whatever you want
and say, well, it's a danger that you know, you know,
people who own docsins might be prosecuted. What what are
we talking about? This is this is this is slavery.
If sexual slavery, it should be a felony. People should
go to jail for a long time. For God's sakes,
(09:50):
what are you doing. I'm just I've just had you know,
this session of legislature. You know, I testified up there
three weeks ago and about the public school bill, and
I felt like I got some sympathy. And they're definitely
Democrats up there who get it. And you know, kudos
(10:10):
to Maggie Qull for standing up and taking a hit.
They hated her so much for doing it. They took
her name off the bill, and she got up and said,
I don't care if my name's off the bill. We
got to protect kids. There's people out there on both
sides who want to do the right thing, but the woke,
crazy left of the Democratic Party is you know, poised
(10:34):
to do this, but in the process they're destroying themselves,
which is just weird to watch. But I don't understand it.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
John Manley, I've got to go. Thank you for coming on.
We'll see what happens next week.
Speaker 3 (10:47):
Thanks John, John.
Speaker 2 (10:48):
Manley, who's been has a brilliant career defending well, protecting
children from sexual abuse, going after the predators and the
institutions that enable and encouraged predators.
Speaker 1 (11:01):
Moistline Round one coming up.
Speaker 5 (11:04):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (11:10):
It is now time for round one of the Moistline.
Here and Sean, thanks for calling the moistline. I'm so
excited to hear from you. Come out time.
Speaker 3 (11:19):
Those shopping cards.
Speaker 6 (11:20):
Are kind of expensive for the stores, and yet see
a number of homeless people pushing them around the entire city.
How come the.
Speaker 3 (11:29):
Grocery stores don't charge the homeless individuals with dout?
Speaker 6 (11:34):
How come they don't put a stop to that?
Speaker 7 (11:37):
This ain't the moist line. There's no moist line eleven.
Speaker 3 (11:41):
Why do they need to cover.
Speaker 2 (11:42):
Over the reservoir?
Speaker 8 (11:43):
And why can't they just fill it without cover?
Speaker 9 (11:45):
Of course, there's no encampments in Florida.
Speaker 10 (11:49):
They have alligators.
Speaker 5 (11:52):
They get a unionize and go on strike, threatening not
to clean up the homeless.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
How are we going to know when.
Speaker 6 (11:58):
They're on strike.
Speaker 11 (12:00):
I'm hoping Mahoney is elected pope just to hear you
blow a gasket.
Speaker 9 (12:04):
I believe before they do those characters, they should follow
the money for the homeless programs to begin with.
Speaker 12 (12:10):
I'm homeless and they won't give me a dime.
Speaker 13 (12:13):
Why don't the people that donate to the.
Speaker 14 (12:16):
Politicians take that money and donate to the shelters until
the politicians figure it out, which they'll do really quickly
without having those campaign funds.
Speaker 12 (12:30):
This homeless issue should be a federal responsibility. California shouldn't
have to take care of everyone from all over the
United States and the rest of the world.
Speaker 1 (12:42):
It's not right.
Speaker 8 (12:43):
I don't know who voted for Karen da but I
just came from a job in La Lawrence and Grand
That neighborhood is just dumpy craft everywhere, not the check
up product filled jump all over the street. It looks
worse than the slums of India.
Speaker 6 (13:05):
Good luck.
Speaker 8 (13:05):
Maybe we'll vote for her again.
Speaker 13 (13:08):
So Karen Bass won't let anyone do an audit on
her inside things. So let's that tell you right at
the gate. If you're afraid of someone checking out your books,
like most people that own a business don't have any choice.
You have to, you know, to get wants to look
at my books. I gotta show them. It's just ridiculous,
and I just doags can't get here fast enough, and
(13:33):
I mean her new some all these guys, they're all
siphing in the money from the train I mean to
nowhere to come on. Enough of this crap and it's
got to stop. It's got to stop, and let's expose it.
And people should be in prison for real me and
you would.
Speaker 14 (13:48):
Be is she still planning on protecting all the illegal aliens?
Why she's laying everybody off.
Speaker 8 (13:55):
In the city.
Speaker 15 (13:56):
Nobody is even questioning the hundreds of millions that die
the LADWP contributes every year to the city General Fund
to be wasted by the Democrats running the city on
social programs, illegal immigrant attorneys, and homeless benefits. Where's that
(14:16):
money going and why now you know why they're defending LADWP.
Speaker 6 (14:22):
It's their slash fund.
Speaker 16 (14:25):
Not one public service in California works properly. I don't think,
at least not the major ones. Anything we pay money
to our taxes go to fails miserably, except for the
politicians who get to line their pockets with money. And
then when they lose thirty two billion dollars, they throw
(14:46):
up their hands and they go, well, we don't know
where it went. How come they're not held responsible? How
come there's no one in prisonment.
Speaker 17 (14:53):
I'm curious as to why the government is so adamant
in particular about who they let on airplanes and the process.
Speaker 7 (14:59):
To go on airplanes.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
But they don't care who comes into the country or
who votes. Our government knows who I am where I
was born.
Speaker 6 (15:09):
My social Security number, I paid gas bill, I pay
taxes all day.
Speaker 15 (15:13):
Wanted another thirty five bucks.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
And I refuse to do it. I'd rather have a passport.
Speaker 3 (15:18):
Hey, John, got an idea for a game for the show.
It's called Jet of State.
Speaker 8 (15:23):
What you do? You take wagers for the week before.
Speaker 3 (15:26):
And after either Debbie or jd Vance visited country. It's
the whether that country set a state is going to die.
Speaker 12 (15:32):
It's coy for leaving your message.
Speaker 4 (15:34):
Please hang up, good fine, it's right.
Speaker 1 (15:38):
Met the pope in the next day. The Pope dropped dead. Yeah,
and you did that to the Queen. I did yeah. Yeah,
So you and jd Vance wiped out the Queen and
the Pope. Wow, we have a lot of power. That's
a that's a good game. All right.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
We've got another round of the moistline coming up in
about twenty minutes. After Debra does the news here, Nathan
hut Haakman is coming on. You may have heard that
Mark Garragos, who's representing Lyle and Eric Menendez, has filed
a motion demanding that Hawkman recuse himself from the case. Well,
Hakman is opposing this motion, and he's going to explain
(16:16):
his position on our show in minutes.
Speaker 5 (16:20):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (16:26):
La County District Attorney Nathan Hakman is coming on here.
You may have heard that in the Lyle and Eric
Menendez case, their attorney Mark Garrigos has filed a motion
to have Hawkman recused from the case. They're debating whether
the Menendez brothers ought to get resentenced or released from prison,
(16:46):
and coming up May night, there's a hearing with La
County Superior Court Judge Michael Jessic and Nathan Hakman announced
today that he's going to be opposing this recusal suggestion Garagos,
and we're going to get attorney District Attorney Hawkman on
now to talk about it.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Welcome, How are you.
Speaker 13 (17:09):
Very good?
Speaker 7 (17:10):
Thank you very much for having me on.
Speaker 1 (17:11):
All right, lay out what's going on here.
Speaker 7 (17:14):
So what's happened is the Menendez brothers have followed the
motion to refuse the entire District Attorney's office, which is,
you know, it's just something that you do when you're
not going to go head on with the facts the
rather than can test the facts for resentencing and whether
or not they should get resentenced. They decided to do
an in run or a side step, and they said
(17:36):
that there are certain situations that have come up which
we have gone through each one of them and show
their devoid of merit that would necessitate getting the DA's
office off the case. So, for instance, they say that
we brought on to be the director of our Bureau
of Victim Services a woman named Kathleen Katie, who's one
(17:57):
of the most experienced prosecutors in the office before she left,
and one of the most experienced victim advocates in the country.
But she had represented Milson Anderson, the one Menendez family
member who did not want the Menenda's family men and
his brothers to be released, and she represented him before
she became the director. What they failed to say is
(18:17):
that when she became the director, we completely walled her
off from any contact on the Menendez case. And also
she never represented the Menendez brother She had nothing to
share that would put her in a conflict with the
Menendez brothers themselves, other than her client took a different
position than other family members. So they know that this
(18:37):
is not a legal conflict. They know it's not a
factual conflict. Yet they don't want to deal with the
facts straight on, and they're adopting the old adage. It says,
if you don't have the facts, pound the law, and
if you don't have the law, pound the facts. And
if you don't have the law or the facts, pound
the prosecutor. So again, I'm happy to take whatever attempts
(18:58):
they want to make to try and avoid the facts
and the law, but ultimately the facts in the law
will prevail.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
I was confused by this.
Speaker 2 (19:09):
It seemed kind of crazy to demand that the prosecutor, Well,
the whole office is supposed to be removed from the case.
It's like, well, says if gart was just saying, well,
we don't want any opposition. We want the opposition removed
by the judge, And it just sounded nutty.
Speaker 7 (19:26):
And you're absolutely right what they want. What they're unhappy
with is our position. In an adversarial position, we have
taken a different position in the prior district attorney. His
position was to let him out and let them go
through reseentencing. Our position, which was based on an eighty
seven page analysis itself based on a review of over
fifty thousand pages of trial transcripts, hundreds of hours of
(19:50):
videotaped evidence, thousands of pages of prison files, speaking to
Menendez family members for over three hours, defense counsel, law enforcement,
and scooters. Our position was, ultimately the Menendez brothers are
not ready yet for resentencing because they continue to not
come clean with all the lies and the cover up
(20:11):
that they engaged have engaged in over the last thirty years.
And I want to make it clear those lines are
not that they were sexually abused. That wasn't their defensive trial.
Their defensive trial is self defense that they thought their
parents were going to kill them that night, so they
had to shotgun them first. We have shown that that
is a complete fabrication based on their pre planned alibi,
(20:34):
find the shotguns two days before, and staging the hit
the killings to look like a mafia hit by shooting
the father through the back of the head, the mother
through a point blank range shot on her cheek while
she lay dying on the ground, and then shooting them
through the kneecaps after they were dead. So we have
shown that that self defense defense is a lie. They've
(20:56):
never come clean with it, and even when they do
come clear, then they could be possibly ready for resetencing.
Right now, is it not yet?
Speaker 2 (21:06):
Yeah, if they woon't admit what clearly they did, I
don't know how you let them out.
Speaker 7 (21:12):
But I agree more because it shows that they haven't
been rehabilitated fully, which means they continue to pose a
risk of danger to society, which is the actual legal
standard on how you don't get out of prison and
you don't get reset.
Speaker 2 (21:27):
Okay, So this is May ninth. You're going to have
this hearing just on the recusal motion. All right, we'll
talk with you again soon.
Speaker 7 (21:36):
Look forward to it.
Speaker 2 (21:37):
Nathan Hakman, the La County District Attorney. One more time,
I'm going to tell you tonight you want to go
to this town hall in Burbank. Nick Schultz is the assemblyman,
and he is the chairman of the Public Safety Committee,
and he is blocking the bill that would allow no
(22:00):
how people who buy sixteen and seventeen year olds for
sex to be treated as a felon. Right now, it
is not an automatic felony if you are caught buying
a sixteen or seventeen year old for sex. And there's
a bill by Maggie Krell, a Democrat, to do so,
(22:20):
and Schultz took the bill away from her took her
name off the bill and is now holding it hostage.
He used to be the mayor of Burnbank. He's only
been an assemblyman for four months, five months. He's thirty
six years old, and he doesn't think that guys who
basically rape sixteen and seventeen year olds ought to be
(22:43):
treated as felons. When you buy a girl or a
boy for sex at sixteen, they have a pimp, and
the pimp in these cases orders them to have as
much sex as possible with as many clients and hit
a certain quota in terms of the income, or they're beaten,
starved and denied sleep. And these guys are raping these
(23:07):
girls and these boys. Obviously it's not consensual, and Schultz
wants to protect the customers who do the buying. We're
the only state in the Union where it's not a
felony to buy a teenager for sex. Bizarrely, Schultz is
having a town hall tonight in Burbank ACF Burbank Youth Center,
(23:28):
seventy five East Santa I Needa Avenue. I'd go there,
seventy five East Santa I Needa Avenue, ACF Burbank Youth Center,
seven to nine o'clock and.
Speaker 1 (23:37):
Go talk to Nick Schultz about it.
Speaker 2 (23:39):
All right, We got the moistline coming up, and I
understand there is a depor mention in the moistline, so
we'll see. Oh I forgot to tell you something one
just funny little thing. So you remember a few weeks
ago and I lost my phone three hours. I was
looking all over the building for it.
Speaker 1 (23:54):
Of course.
Speaker 2 (23:55):
Okay, yesterday as I was leaving, happened again. I lost
my phone.
Speaker 1 (24:00):
Were you here for three hours?
Speaker 12 (24:01):
Again?
Speaker 3 (24:01):
Well?
Speaker 2 (24:02):
No, what I did is you know, to find my iPhone? Yeah, app,
I clicked that. I was standing in the studio here
with Conway and Sharon Belly because I was hoping one
of them had seen it, and so I clicked the
app and you know, it makes the phone buzz and
ring started buzzing in Conway's pants.
Speaker 12 (24:20):
Are you kidding?
Speaker 1 (24:21):
No? What was he doing with your phone?
Speaker 2 (24:24):
He says he found it lying somewhere and he absent
mindedly put it in his pants pocket. So the thing
went off in his pants.
Speaker 1 (24:34):
That's hysteric. And I got my phone back. Well, good,
all right?
Speaker 3 (24:37):
Happy?
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Conway's coming up in about fifteen minutes.
Speaker 5 (24:41):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (24:47):
After the show ends early in the four o'clock hour,
it's posted as a podcast. John Cobolt Show on Demand.
We did much of the show on the Democratic Assembly
people blocking an attempt to make it a felony to
buy sixteen and seventeen year olds for sex. We had
John Manley on the attorney who represents many sex victims.
(25:09):
We had Shannon Grove on the state senator who wrote
the original legislation a year or two ago that started
this whole issue, and it was it's quite a day.
And as I said, you want, if you can in Burbank,
go see this crazy assembly member Nick Schultz, he used
to be the mayor of Burbank. Now he's running the
Assembly Public Safety Committee and he is blocking the bill
(25:32):
that makes it a felony to buy sex from a
sixteen or seventeen year old. Seven to nine o'clock ACF
Burbank Youth Center, seventy five East Santa Anita Avenue. If
you're a parent, there's nothing more important you should be
doing than this, because this has got to stop. ACF
Burbank Youth Center, seventy five East Santa Anita Avenue seven
(25:54):
to nine tonight and tell Schultz that this nonsense has
got to stop.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
Time for the Moistline, Part two.
Speaker 7 (26:01):
Thank San thanks.
Speaker 1 (26:02):
For calling him oistline.
Speaker 3 (26:04):
I'm so excited to hear from you.
Speaker 1 (26:06):
Come that time.
Speaker 11 (26:07):
I'm in a complete shop that Kamala Harris is even
being considered for governor of California. I thought I couldn't
get any worse than Gavin Newsom, But Kamala Harris, it
can get worse. And like I said, how the hell
does she get up? Teld me that level is beyond me.
Speaker 16 (26:27):
I'm assuming, although I'm putting a lot of credit in this,
that the elephant metaphor, it was about Republicans elephants.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
That's all I can come up with.
Speaker 8 (26:39):
John, You're such an idiot.
Speaker 2 (26:41):
Kamala Harris is just doing the weave, my friends, She's
doing the Weave's gonna pomp.
Speaker 3 (26:48):
Over the terrace.
Speaker 10 (26:49):
Huh.
Speaker 6 (26:49):
Wasn't he just spending him some millions of dollars for
the policy books?
Speaker 2 (26:54):
Mood moved, Dude, lock them up and throw away the
key and pedophiles and fire the Democrats.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
You vote against our bill.
Speaker 10 (27:03):
Why don't we make a law that says, Hey, if
you get caught, if it's okay, it's not a felony,
but we're gonna throw you in general population. What the
rest of it makes Believe me, they'll get it real quick,
real quick.
Speaker 3 (27:20):
What do you think.
Speaker 17 (27:21):
You can't even get the Epstein list out.
Speaker 1 (27:25):
You can't even get those.
Speaker 17 (27:27):
Poor women, girls underage, and you expect these idiots to
do this with a law.
Speaker 4 (27:35):
So city council person who's sworn to uphold and defend
the Constitution the United States would rather fund an illegal
immigrant work program than the police and the fire for
the city. That makes a lot of sense.
Speaker 9 (27:54):
I am so sick of hearing about that MS thirteen
gang member they want to bring back from those out
of them. If you came here without due process, you
do not serve due process when you get to boarded.
Speaker 6 (28:05):
Get over it, people, he's.
Speaker 9 (28:06):
Gone and I went to stay in El Salvamore where
he belongs.
Speaker 17 (28:11):
You know what, unless an officer writes that ticket, I'm
not paying that ticket because just because they take a
picture of my car that supposedly is illegally parked, which
could be photoshopped very easily, I don't have to pay
that ticket unless an officer signs it and putting not
(28:32):
my windshield. I am paying for that ticket, you big knuckleheads.
Speaker 6 (28:36):
What in the actual is the ATM doing setting fire
to investigate why it was setting to begin with? The
ADF doesn't have nothing to do with fires. You're an alcohol,
tobacco fire arms and close it. They need to be
defunded and abolished. Just let the IRN.
Speaker 7 (28:55):
Thank you for leaving your message.
Speaker 4 (28:57):
Please hang up goodbye till Monday.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
I'm going to do some homework on this weekend.
Speaker 2 (29:02):
We've got fifty five Assembly members who voted against the
idea of it being a felony to buy a sixteen
or seventeen year old for sex, and I'm going to
go through the list and pick out the ones who
live and represent southern California and they will be highlighted
starting Monday, the way we highlighted Nick Schultz today, who
(29:24):
represents Burbank in Glendale, and he has his town hall
tonight at that youth center in Burbank and will do
all the others. So you know exactly who the people
are in the pervert, pedophile, predator caucus in Sacramento. So
this is only beginning if they don't stop this nonsense.
Conway's Next. Michael Krauzer has the news live in the
(29:46):
KFI twenty four hour News. Hey, you've been listening to
the John Cobalt Show podcast. You can always hear the
show live on KFI Am six forty from one to
four pm every Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime
on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
Can't. I am six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
You're listening to the John Cobelt Podcast on the iHeartRadio app.
Every day we're on from one until four o'clock and
every day after four o'clock. If you miss stuff, and
we had a lot of good, good material today with this,
with these perverts, pedophiles and predators in the Assembly, you
really should listen to the whole show after four o'clock
(00:23):
John Cobelt Show on demand, it's the podcast, or listen tomorrow,
or listen on Sunday. It's good at any time. We
want to reiterate that Assembly Member Nick Schultz, the Democratic
Assembly been from here in Burbank, Burbank and Glendale. He's
having a town hall meeting tonight at the ACF Burbank
Youth Center, seventy five East Senate Anita Avenue from seven
(00:47):
to nine o'clock tonight, and maybe he'll explain why he
thinks it's okay that people buy sixteen and seventeen year
olds for sex and it's not an automatic felony. Maybe
he'll explain tonight. That's ACF Burbank Youth Center, seventy five
East Santa Anita Avenue here in Burbank. If you have children,
(01:10):
you have teenagers, girl or boy, you've got to do
something because there's fifty five Democrats who don't think it's
a bad thing.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
To buy to buy a child for sex.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
And on that issue, which we've been covering for most
of the show, we're now going to talk with John Manley.
John Manley has been on our show many times and
he's with Manly, Stuart and Finalde, the nation's leading firm
representing victims of sexual abuse. He's been involved in all
the major cases here in Los Angeles over the years,
(01:46):
most notably the La Archdiocese. We just talked to him
a few days ago, and he's got a lot to
say on what the Assembly Public Safety Committee is doing
by blocking the bill that would make buying sixteen and
seventeen year old is an automatic sellony buying him for sex.
Speaker 1 (02:03):
John Banley, how are you hey?
Speaker 3 (02:05):
Good John? How you doing?
Speaker 1 (02:07):
What the hell is going on here?
Speaker 4 (02:09):
Well?
Speaker 3 (02:10):
These people have lost their mind. The bill was actually
co sponsored by Maggie Krell, who's a Democrat, a former prosecutor,
and they took the bill out of their name. And
the two main culprits here in my view are Senator Schultz,
who you mentioned, and then Scott Wiener, yes Wiener from
(02:32):
San Francisco, who and who has pushed all kinds of
stuff to minimize his career, to minimize prosecution of men
and men who have sex with sixteen and seventeen year olds.
This is about the first time he's done this, I know.
(02:54):
And he's running, and he's running for Nancy Pelosi seat,
and Nancy Pelosi's daughter is blasting him. And the question
you have to ask yourself is who wants to the
pretext of this, by the way, to allow men who
buy children and seven sixteen I'm sorry, seventeen and sixteen
(03:14):
year olds in California their children. I don't know if
you've seen a sixteen year old girl lately, but you know,
imagine a sixty year old or a seventy year old
dude going up and taking that child and a rapinger
because he paid her pimp and these I can't even
say the word when I think of a horrible people
(03:38):
who have no moral compass want to make that a misdemeanor,
meaning you don't even go to jail. You can get
a citation. You have sex, what you pay for sex
with a child, and you get a citation. They don't
even do that in Thailand. I mean, in Thailand it's
a felony.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
And is it legalizes rape of children?
Speaker 3 (03:57):
It's rape.
Speaker 1 (03:58):
That's what Schultz and are promoting.
Speaker 3 (04:01):
And the Democrats wonder. And I'm not a partisan, I'm
not a Republican, I'm not a Democrat. But the Democrats
wonder why they're in deep, deep trouble and it's because
of this. It's insane. Good for Governor Newsom, who I'm
not always a fan of, to say, I'm vetoing it
should be a felony, full stop. But what the hell
(04:21):
is going on with fifty five representatives elected representatives and
the California legislature are voting to reduce the penalty to
have sex with a child. It's insane and it goes
along with this guy Ben Allen, another state senator from
Santa Monica, What a surprise, who sponsored SB thirty two,
(04:43):
who would essentially made it impossible to pursue a public
school when they know they know a child is being
molested and they do nothing. Something is amiss here. I
don't believe the pretext. It's because we're concerned about gay
youth and inter racial relationship a bunch of that's a
bunch of b Show me, show me a situation where
(05:04):
that's happened, where some parent has you know, used this
law because my daughter's dating a black boy. That's bs
your enablement of pedophilia.
Speaker 2 (05:15):
You you have you've pointed out that most of the
victims are are black and Latino boys and girls.
Speaker 3 (05:21):
Yeah, yeah, they are. The vast majority of our clients
in LA and in the Bay Area have been kids
of color, and and you know these are you know,
Scott Wiener is just this white dude who runs around
and you know, in San Francisco and talks to all
these you know, groups with you know, the woke of
(05:46):
the woke and decides to impose that on the rest
of us. And it's it's the reason that the Democratic
Party can't win an election in a national election and
is in trouble, and it's it's just bad policy and
the dangerous children. I hope that if this passes, the
Justice Department issues a regulation which they could do and
basically says, if you don't make it a felony to
(06:10):
to you know, for buying sex with a sixteen or
seventeen year old, then we're going to cut off all
your federal funds to your state. You know, if government
can't protect children, what good is it. That's its basic function,
protecting the vulnerable. There's you know in these kids. They
may they may they may have you know, they may
have breasts, they may look developed, but their children and
(06:31):
you don't have the capacity to know what's going on.
And they're being this is not like they're consenting. They're
being sold by temps. You're going to make that a misdemeanor.
Are you insane?
Speaker 1 (06:42):
And forced into sex?
Speaker 2 (06:43):
And we had Shannon Grove on as state senator who
started this ball rolling last year with her legislation, And
these girls are forced into hours and hours of sex
with multiple men, they have to hit a.
Speaker 3 (06:57):
Comentative John I represented them there. They get off a
bus and it's like the old story, and they're they're
lured into his life. They're beaten, they're they're applied with drugs,
they're controlled, they're slaves. It's slavery. You know, this guy
runs around and talks about you know, black people and
the legacy of slavery. Well, you got it right here,
(07:17):
right now. It's going on the streets to San Francisco,
and Los Angeles and you want to make it easier
on the slavers. That's great.
Speaker 1 (07:25):
What is the upside for this? I don't I don't understand.
Speaker 3 (07:32):
Yeah, it is taking progression. It's how deep down the
whole of progressive nonsense can you go. We're not talking
about civil rights here, We're not talking about this. We're
talking about you know. And I believe there's an element
in in that community in San Francisco that really does
(07:57):
want to make sex with boys legal. I'm sorry I did,
and you know, maybe I'll get some heat for it.
I really don't care. But there's elements in our country,
in our state that want to make sex with children legal.
And you don't have to believe me. The La la
USD ten years ago was arguing in court that sixteen
year olds could consent to sex. It's out there and
(08:21):
you know, and believing then it will be fifteen year olds.
And there's a history to this and it's not right.
And what this does and reinforces all the crazy right
wing series about pedophileya and everybody in the Democratic Party
is a pedophile. That's not true.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
But cretic Assembly members not wanting to make this a felony.
Then you know a lot of people are going to wonder, well,
what are these people doing?
Speaker 3 (08:48):
Well, this is This is because the left wing of
the party, of that party, it falls in lockstep, and
they're afraid to stand up, use common sense and protect
people because they're going to get criticized by the the
you know, the crazed. I'm looking at gay rights. I'm
(09:09):
talking about transactivists who you know, believe that all men
are are the patriarchy controls everything, and marriage is rape
and all that kind of insanity. That's what you're dealing
with here. And you know, we got to stand up,
whether we're Republicans or Democrats and call that what it is,
which is evil. This is evil, and you can you
(09:30):
can you can come up and excuse whatever you want
and say, well, it's a danger that you know, you know,
people who own docsins might be prosecuted. What what are
we talking about? This is this is this is slavery.
If sexual slavery, it should be a felony. People should
go to jail for a long time. For God's sakes,
(09:50):
what are you doing. I'm just I've just had you know,
this session of legislature. You know, I testified up there
three weeks ago and about the public school bill, and
I felt like I got some sympathy. And they're definitely
Democrats up there who get it. And you know, kudos
(10:10):
to Maggie Qull for standing up and taking a hit.
They hated her so much for doing it. They took
her name off the bill, and she got up and said,
I don't care if my name's off the bill. We
got to protect kids. There's people out there on both
sides who want to do the right thing, but the woke,
crazy left of the Democratic Party is you know, poised
(10:34):
to do this, but in the process they're destroying themselves,
which is just weird to watch. But I don't understand it.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
John Manley, I've got to go. Thank you for coming on.
We'll see what happens next week.
Speaker 3 (10:47):
Thanks John, John.
Speaker 2 (10:48):
Manley, who's been has a brilliant career defending well, protecting
children from sexual abuse, going after the predators and the
institutions that enable and encouraged predators.
Speaker 1 (11:01):
Moistline Round one coming up.
Speaker 5 (11:04):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (11:10):
It is now time for round one of the Moistline.
Here and Sean, thanks for calling the moistline. I'm so
excited to hear from you. Come out time.
Speaker 3 (11:19):
Those shopping cards.
Speaker 6 (11:20):
Are kind of expensive for the stores, and yet see
a number of homeless people pushing them around the entire city.
How come the.
Speaker 3 (11:29):
Grocery stores don't charge the homeless individuals with dout?
Speaker 6 (11:34):
How come they don't put a stop to that?
Speaker 7 (11:37):
This ain't the moist line. There's no moist line eleven.
Speaker 3 (11:41):
Why do they need to cover.
Speaker 2 (11:42):
Over the reservoir?
Speaker 8 (11:43):
And why can't they just fill it without cover?
Speaker 9 (11:45):
Of course, there's no encampments in Florida.
Speaker 10 (11:49):
They have alligators.
Speaker 5 (11:52):
They get a unionize and go on strike, threatening not
to clean up the homeless.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
How are we going to know when.
Speaker 6 (11:58):
They're on strike.
Speaker 11 (12:00):
I'm hoping Mahoney is elected pope just to hear you
blow a gasket.
Speaker 9 (12:04):
I believe before they do those characters, they should follow
the money for the homeless programs to begin with.
Speaker 12 (12:10):
I'm homeless and they won't give me a dime.
Speaker 13 (12:13):
Why don't the people that donate to the.
Speaker 14 (12:16):
Politicians take that money and donate to the shelters until
the politicians figure it out, which they'll do really quickly
without having those campaign funds.
Speaker 12 (12:30):
This homeless issue should be a federal responsibility. California shouldn't
have to take care of everyone from all over the
United States and the rest of the world.
Speaker 1 (12:42):
It's not right.
Speaker 8 (12:43):
I don't know who voted for Karen da but I
just came from a job in La Lawrence and Grand
That neighborhood is just dumpy craft everywhere, not the check
up product filled jump all over the street. It looks
worse than the slums of India.
Speaker 6 (13:05):
Good luck.
Speaker 8 (13:05):
Maybe we'll vote for her again.
Speaker 13 (13:08):
So Karen Bass won't let anyone do an audit on
her inside things. So let's that tell you right at
the gate. If you're afraid of someone checking out your books,
like most people that own a business don't have any choice.
You have to, you know, to get wants to look
at my books. I gotta show them. It's just ridiculous,
and I just doags can't get here fast enough, and
(13:33):
I mean her new some all these guys, they're all
siphing in the money from the train I mean to
nowhere to come on. Enough of this crap and it's
got to stop. It's got to stop, and let's expose it.
And people should be in prison for real me and
you would.
Speaker 14 (13:48):
Be is she still planning on protecting all the illegal aliens?
Why she's laying everybody off.
Speaker 8 (13:55):
In the city.
Speaker 15 (13:56):
Nobody is even questioning the hundreds of millions that die
the LADWP contributes every year to the city General Fund
to be wasted by the Democrats running the city on
social programs, illegal immigrant attorneys, and homeless benefits. Where's that
(14:16):
money going and why now you know why they're defending LADWP.
Speaker 6 (14:22):
It's their slash fund.
Speaker 16 (14:25):
Not one public service in California works properly. I don't think,
at least not the major ones. Anything we pay money
to our taxes go to fails miserably, except for the
politicians who get to line their pockets with money. And
then when they lose thirty two billion dollars, they throw
(14:46):
up their hands and they go, well, we don't know
where it went. How come they're not held responsible? How
come there's no one in prisonment.
Speaker 17 (14:53):
I'm curious as to why the government is so adamant
in particular about who they let on airplanes and the process.
Speaker 7 (14:59):
To go on airplanes.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
But they don't care who comes into the country or
who votes. Our government knows who I am where I
was born.
Speaker 6 (15:09):
My social Security number, I paid gas bill, I pay
taxes all day.
Speaker 15 (15:13):
Wanted another thirty five bucks.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
And I refuse to do it. I'd rather have a passport.
Speaker 3 (15:18):
Hey, John, got an idea for a game for the show.
It's called Jet of State.
Speaker 8 (15:23):
What you do? You take wagers for the week before.
Speaker 3 (15:26):
And after either Debbie or jd Vance visited country. It's
the whether that country set a state is going to die.
Speaker 12 (15:32):
It's coy for leaving your message.
Speaker 4 (15:34):
Please hang up, good fine, it's right.
Speaker 1 (15:38):
Met the pope in the next day. The Pope dropped dead. Yeah,
and you did that to the Queen. I did yeah. Yeah,
So you and jd Vance wiped out the Queen and
the Pope. Wow, we have a lot of power. That's
a that's a good game. All right.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
We've got another round of the moistline coming up in
about twenty minutes. After Debra does the news here, Nathan
hut Haakman is coming on. You may have heard that
Mark Garragos, who's representing Lyle and Eric Menendez, has filed
a motion demanding that Hawkman recuse himself from the case. Well,
Hakman is opposing this motion, and he's going to explain
(16:16):
his position on our show in minutes.
Speaker 5 (16:20):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (16:26):
La County District Attorney Nathan Hakman is coming on here.
You may have heard that in the Lyle and Eric
Menendez case, their attorney Mark Garrigos has filed a motion
to have Hawkman recused from the case. They're debating whether
the Menendez brothers ought to get resentenced or released from prison,
(16:46):
and coming up May night, there's a hearing with La
County Superior Court Judge Michael Jessic and Nathan Hakman announced
today that he's going to be opposing this recusal suggestion Garagos,
and we're going to get attorney District Attorney Hawkman on
now to talk about it.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Welcome, How are you.
Speaker 13 (17:09):
Very good?
Speaker 7 (17:10):
Thank you very much for having me on.
Speaker 1 (17:11):
All right, lay out what's going on here.
Speaker 7 (17:14):
So what's happened is the Menendez brothers have followed the
motion to refuse the entire District Attorney's office, which is,
you know, it's just something that you do when you're
not going to go head on with the facts the
rather than can test the facts for resentencing and whether
or not they should get resentenced. They decided to do
an in run or a side step, and they said
(17:36):
that there are certain situations that have come up which
we have gone through each one of them and show
their devoid of merit that would necessitate getting the DA's
office off the case. So, for instance, they say that
we brought on to be the director of our Bureau
of Victim Services a woman named Kathleen Katie, who's one
(17:57):
of the most experienced prosecutors in the office before she left,
and one of the most experienced victim advocates in the country.
But she had represented Milson Anderson, the one Menendez family
member who did not want the Menenda's family men and
his brothers to be released, and she represented him before
she became the director. What they failed to say is
(18:17):
that when she became the director, we completely walled her
off from any contact on the Menendez case. And also
she never represented the Menendez brother She had nothing to
share that would put her in a conflict with the
Menendez brothers themselves, other than her client took a different
position than other family members. So they know that this
(18:37):
is not a legal conflict. They know it's not a
factual conflict. Yet they don't want to deal with the
facts straight on, and they're adopting the old adage. It says,
if you don't have the facts, pound the law, and
if you don't have the law, pound the facts. And
if you don't have the law or the facts, pound
the prosecutor. So again, I'm happy to take whatever attempts
(18:58):
they want to make to try and avoid the facts
and the law, but ultimately the facts in the law
will prevail.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
I was confused by this.
Speaker 2 (19:09):
It seemed kind of crazy to demand that the prosecutor, Well,
the whole office is supposed to be removed from the case.
It's like, well, says if gart was just saying, well,
we don't want any opposition. We want the opposition removed
by the judge, And it just sounded nutty.
Speaker 7 (19:26):
And you're absolutely right what they want. What they're unhappy
with is our position. In an adversarial position, we have
taken a different position in the prior district attorney. His
position was to let him out and let them go
through reseentencing. Our position, which was based on an eighty
seven page analysis itself based on a review of over
fifty thousand pages of trial transcripts, hundreds of hours of
(19:50):
videotaped evidence, thousands of pages of prison files, speaking to
Menendez family members for over three hours, defense counsel, law enforcement,
and scooters. Our position was, ultimately the Menendez brothers are
not ready yet for resentencing because they continue to not
come clean with all the lies and the cover up
(20:11):
that they engaged have engaged in over the last thirty years.
And I want to make it clear those lines are
not that they were sexually abused. That wasn't their defensive trial.
Their defensive trial is self defense that they thought their
parents were going to kill them that night, so they
had to shotgun them first. We have shown that that
is a complete fabrication based on their pre planned alibi,
(20:34):
find the shotguns two days before, and staging the hit
the killings to look like a mafia hit by shooting
the father through the back of the head, the mother
through a point blank range shot on her cheek while
she lay dying on the ground, and then shooting them
through the kneecaps after they were dead. So we have
shown that that self defense defense is a lie. They've
(20:56):
never come clean with it, and even when they do
come clear, then they could be possibly ready for resetencing.
Right now, is it not yet?
Speaker 2 (21:06):
Yeah, if they woon't admit what clearly they did, I
don't know how you let them out.
Speaker 7 (21:12):
But I agree more because it shows that they haven't
been rehabilitated fully, which means they continue to pose a
risk of danger to society, which is the actual legal
standard on how you don't get out of prison and
you don't get reset.
Speaker 2 (21:27):
Okay, So this is May ninth. You're going to have
this hearing just on the recusal motion. All right, we'll
talk with you again soon.
Speaker 7 (21:36):
Look forward to it.
Speaker 2 (21:37):
Nathan Hakman, the La County District Attorney. One more time,
I'm going to tell you tonight you want to go
to this town hall in Burbank. Nick Schultz is the assemblyman,
and he is the chairman of the Public Safety Committee,
and he is blocking the bill that would allow no
(22:00):
how people who buy sixteen and seventeen year olds for
sex to be treated as a felon. Right now, it
is not an automatic felony if you are caught buying
a sixteen or seventeen year old for sex. And there's
a bill by Maggie Krell, a Democrat, to do so,
(22:20):
and Schultz took the bill away from her took her
name off the bill and is now holding it hostage.
He used to be the mayor of Burnbank. He's only
been an assemblyman for four months, five months. He's thirty
six years old, and he doesn't think that guys who
basically rape sixteen and seventeen year olds ought to be
(22:43):
treated as felons. When you buy a girl or a
boy for sex at sixteen, they have a pimp, and
the pimp in these cases orders them to have as
much sex as possible with as many clients and hit
a certain quota in terms of the income, or they're beaten,
starved and denied sleep. And these guys are raping these
(23:07):
girls and these boys. Obviously it's not consensual, and Schultz
wants to protect the customers who do the buying. We're
the only state in the Union where it's not a
felony to buy a teenager for sex. Bizarrely, Schultz is
having a town hall tonight in Burbank ACF Burbank Youth Center,
(23:28):
seventy five East Santa I Needa Avenue. I'd go there,
seventy five East Santa I Needa Avenue, ACF Burbank Youth Center,
seven to nine o'clock and.
Speaker 1 (23:37):
Go talk to Nick Schultz about it.
Speaker 2 (23:39):
All right, We got the moistline coming up, and I
understand there is a depor mention in the moistline, so
we'll see. Oh I forgot to tell you something one
just funny little thing. So you remember a few weeks
ago and I lost my phone three hours. I was
looking all over the building for it.
Speaker 1 (23:54):
Of course.
Speaker 2 (23:55):
Okay, yesterday as I was leaving, happened again. I lost
my phone.
Speaker 1 (24:00):
Were you here for three hours?
Speaker 12 (24:01):
Again?
Speaker 3 (24:01):
Well?
Speaker 2 (24:02):
No, what I did is you know, to find my iPhone? Yeah, app,
I clicked that. I was standing in the studio here
with Conway and Sharon Belly because I was hoping one
of them had seen it, and so I clicked the
app and you know, it makes the phone buzz and
ring started buzzing in Conway's pants.
Speaker 12 (24:20):
Are you kidding?
Speaker 1 (24:21):
No? What was he doing with your phone?
Speaker 2 (24:24):
He says he found it lying somewhere and he absent
mindedly put it in his pants pocket. So the thing
went off in his pants.
Speaker 1 (24:34):
That's hysteric. And I got my phone back. Well, good,
all right?
Speaker 3 (24:37):
Happy?
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Conway's coming up in about fifteen minutes.
Speaker 5 (24:41):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (24:47):
After the show ends early in the four o'clock hour,
it's posted as a podcast. John Cobolt Show on Demand.
We did much of the show on the Democratic Assembly
people blocking an attempt to make it a felony to
buy sixteen and seventeen year olds for sex. We had
John Manley on the attorney who represents many sex victims.
(25:09):
We had Shannon Grove on the state senator who wrote
the original legislation a year or two ago that started
this whole issue, and it was it's quite a day.
And as I said, you want, if you can in Burbank,
go see this crazy assembly member Nick Schultz, he used
to be the mayor of Burbank. Now he's running the
Assembly Public Safety Committee and he is blocking the bill
(25:32):
that makes it a felony to buy sex from a
sixteen or seventeen year old. Seven to nine o'clock ACF
Burbank Youth Center, seventy five East Santa Anita Avenue. If
you're a parent, there's nothing more important you should be
doing than this, because this has got to stop. ACF
Burbank Youth Center, seventy five East Santa Anita Avenue seven
(25:54):
to nine tonight and tell Schultz that this nonsense has
got to stop.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
Time for the Moistline, Part two.
Speaker 7 (26:01):
Thank San thanks.
Speaker 1 (26:02):
For calling him oistline.
Speaker 3 (26:04):
I'm so excited to hear from you.
Speaker 1 (26:06):
Come that time.
Speaker 11 (26:07):
I'm in a complete shop that Kamala Harris is even
being considered for governor of California. I thought I couldn't
get any worse than Gavin Newsom, But Kamala Harris, it
can get worse. And like I said, how the hell
does she get up? Teld me that level is beyond me.
Speaker 16 (26:27):
I'm assuming, although I'm putting a lot of credit in this,
that the elephant metaphor, it was about Republicans elephants.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
That's all I can come up with.
Speaker 8 (26:39):
John, You're such an idiot.
Speaker 2 (26:41):
Kamala Harris is just doing the weave, my friends, She's
doing the Weave's gonna pomp.
Speaker 3 (26:48):
Over the terrace.
Speaker 10 (26:49):
Huh.
Speaker 6 (26:49):
Wasn't he just spending him some millions of dollars for
the policy books?
Speaker 2 (26:54):
Mood moved, Dude, lock them up and throw away the
key and pedophiles and fire the Democrats.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
You vote against our bill.
Speaker 10 (27:03):
Why don't we make a law that says, Hey, if
you get caught, if it's okay, it's not a felony,
but we're gonna throw you in general population. What the
rest of it makes Believe me, they'll get it real quick,
real quick.
Speaker 3 (27:20):
What do you think.
Speaker 17 (27:21):
You can't even get the Epstein list out.
Speaker 1 (27:25):
You can't even get those.
Speaker 17 (27:27):
Poor women, girls underage, and you expect these idiots to
do this with a law.
Speaker 4 (27:35):
So city council person who's sworn to uphold and defend
the Constitution the United States would rather fund an illegal
immigrant work program than the police and the fire for
the city. That makes a lot of sense.
Speaker 9 (27:54):
I am so sick of hearing about that MS thirteen
gang member they want to bring back from those out
of them. If you came here without due process, you
do not serve due process when you get to boarded.
Speaker 6 (28:05):
Get over it, people, he's.
Speaker 9 (28:06):
Gone and I went to stay in El Salvamore where
he belongs.
Speaker 17 (28:11):
You know what, unless an officer writes that ticket, I'm
not paying that ticket because just because they take a
picture of my car that supposedly is illegally parked, which
could be photoshopped very easily, I don't have to pay
that ticket unless an officer signs it and putting not
(28:32):
my windshield. I am paying for that ticket, you big knuckleheads.
Speaker 6 (28:36):
What in the actual is the ATM doing setting fire
to investigate why it was setting to begin with? The
ADF doesn't have nothing to do with fires. You're an alcohol,
tobacco fire arms and close it. They need to be
defunded and abolished. Just let the IRN.
Speaker 7 (28:55):
Thank you for leaving your message.
Speaker 4 (28:57):
Please hang up goodbye till Monday.
Speaker 1 (29:01):
I'm going to do some homework on this weekend.
Speaker 2 (29:02):
We've got fifty five Assembly members who voted against the
idea of it being a felony to buy a sixteen
or seventeen year old for sex, and I'm going to
go through the list and pick out the ones who
live and represent southern California and they will be highlighted
starting Monday, the way we highlighted Nick Schultz today, who
(29:24):
represents Burbank in Glendale, and he has his town hall
tonight at that youth center in Burbank and will do
all the others. So you know exactly who the people
are in the pervert, pedophile, predator caucus in Sacramento. So
this is only beginning if they don't stop this nonsense.
Conway's Next. Michael Krauzer has the news live in the
(29:46):
KFI twenty four hour News. Hey, you've been listening to
the John Cobalt Show podcast. You can always hear the
show live on KFI Am six forty from one to
four pm every Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime
on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
The John Kobylt Show News
Host
John Kobylt
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!