July 17, 2025 • 34 mins
The John Kobylt Show Hour 1 (07/17) - US Congressman Kevin Kiley comes on the show to talk about Pres. Trump cutting federal funding for CA’s high-speed rail project. More on the federal funding for CA's high-speed rail project being cut by Pres. Trump. SB549 has been walked back to be reworked and reintroduced. The LA Times says conspiracy theories are thwarting the rebuilding efforts in fire burn areas.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't. I am six forty. You're listening to the John
Cobel Podcast on the iHeartRadio app BRON every day from
one until four o'clock. Every day after four o'clock, you
can listen to the podcast John Cobel Show on demand,
So if you miss something in the next three hours
after four, you get to catch up. We have two
big wins, at least two big wins for the moment
(00:23):
happened in the last twelve hours. Number One, we're going
to talk to Kevin Kylie, the California Congressman, in just
a moment. Number one is that Trump the administration officially
cut off four billion dollars to the California High Speed Rail.
So that's it for federal funding. That's done, a done deal. Secondly,
(00:49):
and we'll get to this later in the hour. Yesterday
I told you about a Senate bill that was going
to empower the City of Los Angeles to buy up
burned lots in the Palace Ades and put low income
housing on those lots. Well, that was a firestorm, and
the Senator who authored the bill, Ben Allen of Santa Monica,
(01:11):
has pulled it at pulled it back, and they're going
to rework it and try to launch it again in January.
Two big wins. But you have to shout and kick
and scream. Let's talk to Kevin Kylie now, Northern California Congressman, Kevin,
how are you so great?
Speaker 2 (01:29):
Thanks? John.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
The Trump administration has cut off the four billion dollars
in federal money for the high speed rail. Newsom immediately says,
it's illegal. What's what's illegal about it? What do you
think he's getting at.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
There's nothing illegal about it. California got this money to
build a train, a high speed rail system. They took
the money and didn't build a high speed rail system.
So the Department of Transportation did a compliance review. It
was very thorough and it came to that conclusion that
the state was out of compliance with the terms of
this federal grant. That indeed, there's no viable path forward
(02:09):
for the project, and therefore the state loses those funds
for this project. We're actually advocating for them to be
redeployed for real infrastructure, real transportation needs, and there will
be no federal funding going forward.
Speaker 1 (02:23):
You would think that if you got I don't know
how many bills they've spent about seventeen billion dollars. I
think over the last seventeen years that when somebody blows
the whistle and say, hey, there's no train, there's no train, tracks,
there's no nothing, it has some humility and say, yeah,
you're right, we didn't produce anything useful. I mean, you
(02:46):
do have to produce a training, you have to produce tracks.
Speaker 2 (02:50):
Well exactly, and they have not laid an inch of
track in seventeen years. They have, as you said, spent
seventeen billion dollars. By the way, the project was supposed
to be done in twenty twenty. So five years ago,
we were supposed to have a functional high speed train
from La to San Francisco by the year twenty thirty.
We were supposed to have one hundred million riders a year.
(03:11):
Now the most ambitious plans are to have you know,
at system from Bakersfield to Mercet by twenty thirty three,
and it looks like they're going to miss that deadlck.
Speaker 1 (03:21):
I'm just going to stop you saying that wasn't a joke.
That really was the projection one hundred million projection Sean,
I think it was Sean Duffy in the statement they
put out said, for the one hundred and thirty five
billion that this thing is projected to cost, you could
buy every San Francisco and LA resident two hundred rides
(03:43):
on a plane.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
Right exactly. I mean, if you look at even what
they're saying right now, the head of high speed Rail
came out with this very very ambitious plan. He said
by the year twenty forty five, so twenty years from now,
he's hoping to have it built out from Palmdale to Gilroy.
So if you look at how you then actually make
the trip from LA to San Francisco, you'd actually have
(04:07):
to use two other transit systems in addition to high
speed rail for an overall trip of six hours, using
three transit systems to travel a distance that you could
travel today from you know, on Southwest airlines for like
one hundred dollars in one hour.
Speaker 1 (04:21):
Now, did these guys know how foolish this is right
to announce what was it, Palmdale to Gilroy?
Speaker 2 (04:28):
Yeah, exactly, that's literally what they're come out and says,
this is a big you know, everything goes perfectly, that's
what we'll have in twenty years.
Speaker 1 (04:34):
Well, and right now they're pushing jes for Baker's Field
to Mercette, right, and.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
They're going to miss that deadline twenty thirty three. That'll
by all invocations.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
I don't understand. How could grown men with college degrees
and responsible jobs make these public statements and not expect
the world to laugh at them and eventually they have
the money pulled? Yeah? I mean yeah, I don't understand.
Are they are they? Are they trolling us? Is this
a prank?
Speaker 2 (05:05):
I feel like it's more nefarious than that. In fact,
one of the things that I want now now that
we have this DOT investigation that's been done, is I
think the FBI need is a look to take a
look at this as well and look at where the
money actually went and if there was any malfeasance involved.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
There was several audits done and I remember one of
the audits and I forget which agency did it. They
discovered that there was no paperwork that they couldn't tell
you where the money went. It just the evidence dried up.
It was spent, but they don't know who's spent it
and on what and who received.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
The rank exactly exactly we don't. I mean, seventeen billion
dollars is apparently vanished into thin air without building anything,
so that this is a lot of questions, right.
Speaker 1 (05:50):
It's like the homeless money too. It's the same thing. Yeah,
and this and this and the same issue too in
La here the homeless money disappeared and again they can't
track it. There's like two billion missing, right, and they
don't know where it went and what for. And I
remember Elon Musk found the same thing when he was
doing is a doje on it that there was a
lot of money spent, but where it was suplished to
(06:12):
go was left blank on the electronicity.
Speaker 2 (06:15):
Almost ness to the skyrocketed.
Speaker 1 (06:17):
Yeah, I mean, it just seems there's like a lot
of theft here.
Speaker 2 (06:22):
Exactly. It's which is why you know, I think that
we need to get the FBI involved in this particular project.
And by the way, I have a bill that we're
still going to try to get through soon that we'll
say that we're going to deny federal funding for this
project in perpetuity so that you can't have some other
administration that'll come in and suddenly, you know, start resume
(06:45):
resume funding, because then you know, the state will point
to that possibility to say, oh, well, we just need
to wait out the Trump administration. Well, no, we need
to make it a matter of statutory law that this program,
that this project is ineligible for any further federal funding.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
You spent a lot of time in the lad obviously
in Congress. Now did you ever have any conversations with
any of the Democrats supporting this Did you get the
sense that the new scam was being pulled here, that
money was being stolen? Or are they really wild eyed
true believers. I always wonder are they kidding or are
they just going through this theatrical cover up of massive theft.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
You know, honestly, a lot of the Democrats don't like
it either, and I've had a number of them even
here in DC, come up and tell me that. So
there's just a lot of pressure not to be too
vocal about that. But I can tell you there are
actually a lot of Democrats at both the state and
federal level who would breathe a big sigh of relief
if this project went away.
Speaker 1 (07:43):
Well, it makes everybody look so foolish.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
It does exactly it's become. It makes our state look foolish.
It is a massive embarrassment to our state. It's the
biggest infrastructure failure in United States history, and it has
become just this sort of searing symbol for all that
has gone so catastrophically wrong in California.
Speaker 1 (08:04):
All right, good talking with your good work, Kevin Kylie,
and get that bill passed. Let's put the nail in
this thing for good forever, all right, Kevin Kylie, Republican,
Northern California Congressman. We'll tell you more about this when
we come back. Newsom has some really hysterical quotes that
he unleashed from a guy who tried himself to cancel
(08:27):
this project back in twenty nineteen after he first became governor.
Somebody got to him. Some money is flown somewhere.
Speaker 3 (08:35):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
It is a great day because the Trump administration has
cut off funding to high speed rail. There were still
four billion dollars in the pipeline and they're not paying
because and somebody ought to break this to an old slickhead,
you haven't built a railroad. And he's acting all outraged,
(09:06):
Oily Newsome. Trump wants to hand and as usual, it's
a stream of non sequiturs and nonsense. Trump wants to
hand China the future. You're building a train from Bakersfield
to Merced. You cancel the train, and now China has
the future. Well, what's that mean? And he's abandoning the
(09:33):
Central Valley. We won't let him. The train should not
even be going through the Central Valley. The train ought
to be going down Interstate five. That is the most direct,
shortest route between San Francisco and Los Angeles. If you
were to do this, that would be the logical route.
(09:54):
It had no business winding into the Central Valley. That
that whole concept was absurd from the start. Then he's
got a new verbal tick. Every time he gets criticized,
he quotes some obscure statistic or fact about either Florida
or Texas, because lots of people from California have left
(10:17):
for those two states, and a lot of businesses have
left for those two states. Both states have zero taxes,
Both states have much less regulation. It's an easier life.
Both states don't have tens of thousands of homeless people
teaming in the big cities. They're run properly. They're run
(10:40):
the way states ought to be run. They're not perfect.
Bad things happen there, but at a day to day basis,
you get to keep your money, it's easier to run
your businesses, and you do not have to deal with
all the bizarre human dysfunction that you get, like in
(11:00):
Los Angeles with all the crazy vagrants and mental patients.
So Newsom went on in the statement, with projects like
the Texas High Speed Rail failing to take off. I
don't know anything about it, but my tax money isn't
going for Texas High Speed Rail. That's their problem. Our
(11:22):
tax money, your tax money for the last seventeen bleeping' years,
has gone to this boondoggle. It started with Schwartzenager. This
is not a partisan thing. Both parties contributed to this idiocy.
This was pushed by Schwarzenager during his administration, and then
(11:46):
Jerry Brown and then Newsom. So this has been a
total failure. Every dollar spent, all seventeen billion of them wasted.
Newsom goes on to say, we're now in the track
laying phase. Yeah, go show me where the track's been laid.
(12:08):
Nobody can seem to find it. It's imaginary, invisible track.
And even if they laid all the track, what do
you got at the end of it? You got Bakersfield
to Mercede. Technically, from what I understand, it's Wastco to
Madera because the train stations are outside Bakersfield, and your said,
(12:29):
but let's call it the Bakersfield and merced metropolitan areas,
if there is such a thing California, he goes on
in his statement, is putting all options on the table
to fight this illegal action. Only in his empty, greasy head.
Can you not deliver a product for seventeen years and
(12:52):
then scream it's illegal when the other side says, you
know what, we're not paying for this anymore. A magine.
Imagine you paid a contractor to build a house and
seventeen years later there's still no house. You'd say, I'm
not paying you anymore. Right, I can't think of anything.
(13:17):
I mean, I can't think of anything analogous to a
seventeen year project where you get no deliverable product. Nothing.
Do you think at the movie studios, if there was
some producer who was making a movie for seventeen years,
they'd keep writing them checks to keep the movie going,
(13:38):
even if they had a contract. They and I'm sure
a Newson would admit this, but they must have blown
through all kinds of deadlines. All kinds of checkpoints. You
don't get a blank unlimited a blank check with unlimited
time to complete a project. And he knows this. I'm
(14:00):
gonna be redundant here. But he's lying. He compulsively lies,
acts outraged, acts indignant. I know there's a lot of
people in Sacramento that listen to the show. Listen to
the podcast, because I see the Sacramento numbers, and it's
got to be a lot of people in government on
the staff, and maybe Newsome in his staff listens. Guys,
(14:26):
stop the lying. Your your boss looks like a buffoon
every day to most people, an absolute fool. You should
be embarrassed. Usually we make fun of spokes holes because
they say ridiculous things. Newsom doesn't need an asinine spokeshole.
I've never seen somebody say so many asenine things many
(14:47):
times a day, every day, And for some reason, he's
doing it with more frequency now because he can't stay
off the podcasts. We were playing little Clips the other day.
He actually spent four hours on some guy's podcast, four
hour hours, much of it incoherent. I do not know
what kind of weird cult he has created people who
(15:09):
support him and work for him, you know, get it's
like that woman who swooned for him in South Carolina.
And by the way, i'm i'm I'm blaming women for
his existence because his voting he gets so many female votes. Well,
(15:29):
there's something wrong there. Again, it's your people. I'm sure
plenty of men vote for him too. Yeah, but he
gets the real boost from female voting. And then they
have a new stooge. What's this guy's name, chowdry H chowderhead.
(15:53):
Oh yeah, yeah. Ian chowdre is The new high speed
rail project CEO. Kevin Kyleigue was quoting him as saying,
you know, by twenty forty five, we're gonna be able
to go from Palmdale to Gilroy. Can you imagine twenty
years from now, you're gonna drive to Palmdale, get on
(16:15):
a train, and when you wake up from your little
train nap. Wow, Look it's Gilroy. Everybody garlic festival at
the stink of garlic. I'll wake you up as you
pull into the station. God. This yeah, final, final thing.
(16:36):
New should be spending a billion dollars of your gas
tax money on this high speed rail this year and
every year thereafter. So one of the reasons you're paying
expensive gas is to fund this absurdity, and the people
who have been running this absurdity have been stealing the money.
(16:57):
We have felonsinals involved in all these operations, whether it's
this or the homeless industry. And Kylie is right, the
FBI ought to be investigating this since they obviously used
federal money. There should be a massive federal investigation and
these guys should be forced to do the Purp Walk,
handcuffed and dragged into state prisons. They should be charged
(17:21):
with everything they're criminals. More coming up, Well, will we
come up this other amazing corrupt story here in La
where they tried the sacrament of legislature tried to give
the city of La the power to buy up burned
out lots so they could but they could put low
(17:43):
income housing instead of the homes that the Palisades residents
want to rebuild. And no, La Times, it's not a
conspiracy theory. Nice try.
Speaker 3 (17:56):
You're listening to John Cobel's on demand from KFI forty.
Speaker 1 (18:01):
We are on every day from one until four o'clock
and then after four o'clock. Whatever you miss John Cobelt's
show on demand on that iHeart app and we had
Kevin Kyleie on in the first half hour. So if
you're joining us now, you already missed a little celebration.
Trump administration has pulled all the funding for the high
speed rail. That's four billion dollars that's not coming to
(18:24):
be wasted on high speed rail. And Newsom is squealing
like a little piggy, claiming it's illegal. He's got incredible nerve.
They didn't produce any trains and any track for seventeen
years when the whole thing was supposed to be done
five years ago. And now he's pissed off that the
(18:45):
Feds are pulling funding. And I will keep reminding you
some of your gas taxs' do you pump gas today
on your way home? Going to do a fillip? Some
of that money As the as the gas pump spins round, round,
round round, you see the price going higher, higher, higher, higher.
(19:07):
Some of that is going for high speed rail. But hey,
look at all the fools we had that keep electing
these people. Okay, on another front, another win. All these
wins are temporary State Senator Ben Allen, this schmuck from
Santa Monica. I don't think he's a Republican or a Democrat.
I think it be lungs to the schmuck party. He's
(19:29):
popped up before with stupid stuff and I forget what, Ah,
they're all idiots. He produced Senate Bill five point nine,
and this would create something called the Resilient Rebuilding Authority,
which is a suspicious name right from the start. And
(19:50):
the story was that it would empower the empower that's
the word you like to use. Empower the city of
Los Angeles to buy a up some of the burned
out lots. And then the way some people read the bill,
it's like they could put they could put low income
housing where residents' homes used to be. Now. The La
(20:15):
Times ran a story conspiracy theories thwart rebuilding plan. Conspiracy theories. Well,
there's a lot of context here. Number one context is
Karen Bass has released very few permits after she promised
(20:37):
and Gavin nwsoon promised that all the red tape would
be cut, everything would be streamlined, Permits would come out fast,
and people would be able to rebuild the palisades exactly
as it was. That's what they said, That's what they promised,
and six months later, few permits, cumbersome process, same old
(21:00):
red tape, even more red tape, and hardly any homes,
you know you hardly ground has hardly been broken it
on any homes. And there's seven thousand that were destroyed
in the Palisades. So this is something like Ben Allen
(21:21):
and this writer for The Times, Liam Dillon, ought to understand.
Nobody believes anything you say. Nobody trusts you, Nobody believes
anything that you write. They don't believe anything that the
La Times publishes. The reason the people at Palisades are
(21:41):
in this fix is because because the mayor ignored the loudest,
most detailed, most descriptive fire warnings that anybody's ever seen
in the history of weather, and she ran off to Ghana. Anyway,
they don't believe you because all the employees at the
(22:02):
DWP none of them filled up the reservoir. All the
employees for the city and the DWP, none of them
fixed the fire hydrants. All the employees that the DWP,
none of them turned off the electrical power. The fire
department is only fifty percent funded, the police department is
(22:26):
about two thirds funded, and we see Karen Bass promising
to shovel tax money to illegal aliens. Nobody's believing you
because you're a bunch of liars and you're a bunch
of criminals. The jig is up on this stuff. We
(22:48):
know you're lying, we know your criminals. We know you
have no intention of building the Palisades the way it
used to be. You have no intention of cutting the
red tape none. So get Ben Allen apparently got a
tremendous amount of blowback, and he pulled his bill. Going
to try to bring it back in January, he took
(23:12):
an existing bill, Senate Bill five point forty nine.
Speaker 2 (23:18):
And.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
In the bill, this bill originally was connected to was
connected to low income housing, and he left all the
low income housing language in the bill. Then he added
a second section to the bill about creating this agency
(23:44):
that could buy up burned out lots in the Palisades. Well,
if you see that, half the bill is talking about
low income housing and the other half is talking about
buying up land in the Palisades. No, it's not a
conspiracy theory to say, huh, it looks like they're going
to buy up burned out land and put in low
(24:06):
income housing. Of course, Allen said, it's become this total
meme among the right wing blogsphere who unfortunately picked up
by it was picked up by some lazy ass journalists
that don't bother to read the bill that say, this
bill seeks to turn the entire Palisades into low income housing.
(24:26):
Nobody thinks you're going to turn the entire Palisades into
low income housing, but you certainly want to turn in
part of the Palisades into low income housing. Because again
the context of this, Kevin Newsom announced one hundred million
dollars to go to developers in the Palisades for low
income housing. That happened just a few days ago. Secondly,
(24:47):
Scott Wiener, that insect from San Francisco, has a bill
that's going to allow low income housing to be built
in anybody's single family neighborhood anywhere in the state. So
if Weieder has a bill that's going to allow a
low income apartment dwellings, low income apartment towers anywhere in
(25:11):
the state, Newsom is spending one hundred million dollars in
state tax money to encourage developers to build low income
apartment towers. And then Ben Allen attaches to a low
income housing bill the chance for Los Angeles to buy
up lots, burned out lots I don't think it's a
(25:32):
conspiracy theory on the part of the residents who think, oh,
something bad is going to happen here. This is set
up to screw over the palisades. Of course it is.
And can you imagine how densely worded and confusing the
whole thing is, so that anybody can make anything they
want out of the bill. There's probably all kinds of
(25:55):
circuitous legal language and loopholls, so they could say publicly, oh, no, no,
nothing in the spill authorizes low income housing, and the
agency we're building low income housing on private property, non
or not. Of course they're going to say that, and
then somebody else is going to read it in a
(26:16):
year or two it's like, oh, of course we can
do that. Yeah, we can do that. Nobody believes you.
You're a bunch of liars and crooks. See the homeless industry,
see high speed rail. Got more on this coming up.
Oh yeah, we got to talk about LA times describing
the prejudice against low income housing. That's another good one.
Speaker 3 (26:37):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI Am
sixty on.
Speaker 1 (26:43):
The Epstein story. After two o'clock, we're gonna have Brad
Garrett on ABC News Crime and Terrorism analysts about I
don't know, does anybody know what's going on? Nobody knows
what's going on. Involved don't know what's going on. I
got to continue here on but the despicable fake journalists
(27:07):
at the Los Angeles Times, I just got to quickly,
you know, recap here. So we got a bill in
Sacramento that allows low income apartment towers in any single
family neighborhood. We got Gavin Newsom throwing one hundred million
dollars in to build low income housing in the Palisades,
which used to be mostly single family neighborhoods. And then
(27:31):
Ben Allen takes a bill that was originally designed to
finance low income housing, and he added this language that
creates some housing authority in Los Angeles that they could
buy up the burned lots. And that's the paragraph right
(27:54):
under the paragraph that says, here is the funding mechanism
for low income housing. And so people reacted yesterday in
the Palisades and beyond huge revolt. Everybody's angry because they're
not issuing permits. Now. It was one good bit of
news if it's true, if they follow through after all
(28:17):
these months. The city in the county are supposed to
use Rick Cruso's AI software project that he acquired through
his nonprofit and that should dramatically speed up the permits.
Curious that it was announced yesterday. So the La Times
(28:40):
Liam Dillon took this angle. Conspiracy theories thwart rebuilding plan
and they talk about internet posts have preyed on fears
of neighborhood change. Well, yeah, people are afraid of their
neighborhood getting changed with low income housing. No normal person
wants that. Mistrusted government authorities check on that and prejudice
(29:05):
against low income housing. Oh I saw that. And again
this is Liam Dillon. Apparently this is the new woke
crime at the La Times. You can't have prejudice against
low income housing. Aha, So I'm supposed to embrace a
low income apartment tower in my nice neighborhood. You know what,
(29:30):
one of the motivations most people have to work is
so they could live in a better neighborhood, whatever they
consider a better neighborhood. You work so you could buy
a bigger house, a better house, in a better neighborhood
with people like you whatever you think that means. No,
you don't want low income housing. People who chronically are
(29:52):
low income, you get a certain percentage of people who
have a lot of drug issues, alcohol issues, behavior issues,
mental issues. That's why they're chronically low income. Low income
is also a euphemism for homeless housing. That's the lowest income.
So no, nobody wants a homeless apartment tower in their
(30:16):
middle class, upper middle class neighborhood. No they don't. Yes,
we're prejudiced against it. Yes, we're biased against this. Yes
we hate the idea of it. I use the word hate.
I hate the idea of living next to a low
income apartment tower filled with god knows what all sorts
(30:37):
of behavior disorders. And then some of these people with
their behavior disorders and drug addictions and alcohol addictions have
kids who have all kinds of pathologies that they act
out with. So yeah, I don't want that. Yes, I'm
(30:57):
a nimby. Not in my backyard, Not in my backyard,
Never in my backyard. Don't even think about it. If
you even offer a whiff of this, Ben Allen, you're
going to get it. You are going to get a
big thrashing on the internet, in the phone calls, in
the emails, in person. Nobody wants to hear this, don't
(31:20):
even try in the Palisades. This first day I talked
to people about the Palisades. That's what they were afraid of,
because they knew we were run by a bunch of
communist socialists. We knew this is their lifelong wet dream.
And boom, boom boom, what did we get? Basses contribution
is no permanents permits. Newsom's contribution one hundred million dollars
(31:42):
for low income housing developers. Weiener's contribution, Oh, any any neighborhood,
it'll be permitted to have a low income apartment tower.
And then Ben Allen, oh, hey, here's an age of
see that will buy the burned land, the bird lots,
(32:03):
and it's in the same bill as low income funding.
And then Ben Allen has the nerve to say, well,
this is lazy ass journalists. The LA time says, oh,
this is conspiracy theories. No, it's not. One, two, three, four,
(32:25):
Bass Newsome, Wiener Allen, four pieces of the puzzle. No
homes are built in the Pacific Palisades, but we have
four different pieces of the puzzle that would lead to
a lot of low income housing. They're liars and their criminals.
This is what they do. The developers are paying off everybody.
(32:51):
Assembly people's, state senators, governors, mayors, city council members. The
developers are paying off. I think one of these, one
of these bills would oh, where's where's the number? There
was some some number here about forty percent forty percent
of the money was going to go for low income housing,
or forty percent of the building, something like that. This
(33:14):
is this is a croc and you people, and you
people in Altadena, you're gonna be hit with the same
thing in Malibu, the same thing. In fact, let me
tell you the worst one of it, all of them all,
is Wiener's bill, because Wiener would put these low income
apartment housing in every neighborhood in every town in the state.
Because these socialist communists think that poor people should have
(33:37):
the right to live in nice, middle class, upper middle class,
and wealthy towns, that they have the same rights to it.
They don't have to work for that privilege, they don't
have to behave they don't have to control themselves in
their addictions and their mental problems. That's what they believe.
They just won't say it that bluntly. I'm saying it
(33:59):
that blood, because that is why they're passing these laws.
When you get four of you in a week, four
of them. Yeah, conspiracy theory, my ass. William Dylon, all right,
when we come back, we're going to talk to oh
more conspiracy theories. Brat Garrett, ABC News, Crime in terrorsm
Analyst on, Jeffrey Epstein, Deborah Mark Live in the KFI
(34:19):
twenty four hour newsrem Hey, you've been listening to The
John Covelt Show podcast. You can always hear the show
live on KFI AM six forty from one to four
pm every Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime on
demand on the iHeartRadio app
Can't. I am six forty. You're listening to the John
Cobel Podcast on the iHeartRadio app BRON every day from
one until four o'clock. Every day after four o'clock, you
can listen to the podcast John Cobel Show on demand,
So if you miss something in the next three hours
after four, you get to catch up. We have two
big wins, at least two big wins for the moment
(00:23):
happened in the last twelve hours. Number One, we're going
to talk to Kevin Kylie, the California Congressman, in just
a moment. Number one is that Trump the administration officially
cut off four billion dollars to the California High Speed Rail.
So that's it for federal funding. That's done, a done deal. Secondly,
(00:49):
and we'll get to this later in the hour. Yesterday
I told you about a Senate bill that was going
to empower the City of Los Angeles to buy up
burned lots in the Palace Ades and put low income
housing on those lots. Well, that was a firestorm, and
the Senator who authored the bill, Ben Allen of Santa Monica,
(01:11):
has pulled it at pulled it back, and they're going
to rework it and try to launch it again in January.
Two big wins. But you have to shout and kick
and scream. Let's talk to Kevin Kylie now, Northern California Congressman, Kevin,
how are you so great?
Speaker 2 (01:29):
Thanks? John.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
The Trump administration has cut off the four billion dollars
in federal money for the high speed rail. Newsom immediately says,
it's illegal. What's what's illegal about it? What do you
think he's getting at.
Speaker 2 (01:47):
There's nothing illegal about it. California got this money to
build a train, a high speed rail system. They took
the money and didn't build a high speed rail system.
So the Department of Transportation did a compliance review. It
was very thorough and it came to that conclusion that
the state was out of compliance with the terms of
this federal grant. That indeed, there's no viable path forward
(02:09):
for the project, and therefore the state loses those funds
for this project. We're actually advocating for them to be
redeployed for real infrastructure, real transportation needs, and there will
be no federal funding going forward.
Speaker 1 (02:23):
You would think that if you got I don't know
how many bills they've spent about seventeen billion dollars. I
think over the last seventeen years that when somebody blows
the whistle and say, hey, there's no train, there's no train, tracks,
there's no nothing, it has some humility and say, yeah,
you're right, we didn't produce anything useful. I mean, you
(02:46):
do have to produce a training, you have to produce tracks.
Speaker 2 (02:50):
Well exactly, and they have not laid an inch of
track in seventeen years. They have, as you said, spent
seventeen billion dollars. By the way, the project was supposed
to be done in twenty twenty. So five years ago,
we were supposed to have a functional high speed train
from La to San Francisco by the year twenty thirty.
We were supposed to have one hundred million riders a year.
(03:11):
Now the most ambitious plans are to have you know,
at system from Bakersfield to Mercet by twenty thirty three,
and it looks like they're going to miss that deadlck.
Speaker 1 (03:21):
I'm just going to stop you saying that wasn't a joke.
That really was the projection one hundred million projection Sean,
I think it was Sean Duffy in the statement they
put out said, for the one hundred and thirty five
billion that this thing is projected to cost, you could
buy every San Francisco and LA resident two hundred rides
(03:43):
on a plane.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
Right exactly. I mean, if you look at even what
they're saying right now, the head of high speed Rail
came out with this very very ambitious plan. He said
by the year twenty forty five, so twenty years from now,
he's hoping to have it built out from Palmdale to Gilroy.
So if you look at how you then actually make
the trip from LA to San Francisco, you'd actually have
(04:07):
to use two other transit systems in addition to high
speed rail for an overall trip of six hours, using
three transit systems to travel a distance that you could
travel today from you know, on Southwest airlines for like
one hundred dollars in one hour.
Speaker 1 (04:21):
Now, did these guys know how foolish this is right
to announce what was it, Palmdale to Gilroy?
Speaker 2 (04:28):
Yeah, exactly, that's literally what they're come out and says,
this is a big you know, everything goes perfectly, that's
what we'll have in twenty years.
Speaker 1 (04:34):
Well, and right now they're pushing jes for Baker's Field
to Mercette, right, and.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
They're going to miss that deadline twenty thirty three. That'll
by all invocations.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
I don't understand. How could grown men with college degrees
and responsible jobs make these public statements and not expect
the world to laugh at them and eventually they have
the money pulled? Yeah? I mean yeah, I don't understand.
Are they are they? Are they trolling us? Is this
a prank?
Speaker 2 (05:05):
I feel like it's more nefarious than that. In fact,
one of the things that I want now now that
we have this DOT investigation that's been done, is I
think the FBI need is a look to take a
look at this as well and look at where the
money actually went and if there was any malfeasance involved.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
There was several audits done and I remember one of
the audits and I forget which agency did it. They
discovered that there was no paperwork that they couldn't tell
you where the money went. It just the evidence dried up.
It was spent, but they don't know who's spent it
and on what and who received.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
The rank exactly exactly we don't. I mean, seventeen billion
dollars is apparently vanished into thin air without building anything,
so that this is a lot of questions, right.
Speaker 1 (05:50):
It's like the homeless money too. It's the same thing. Yeah,
and this and this and the same issue too in
La here the homeless money disappeared and again they can't
track it. There's like two billion missing, right, and they
don't know where it went and what for. And I
remember Elon Musk found the same thing when he was
doing is a doje on it that there was a
lot of money spent, but where it was suplished to
(06:12):
go was left blank on the electronicity.
Speaker 2 (06:15):
Almost ness to the skyrocketed.
Speaker 1 (06:17):
Yeah, I mean, it just seems there's like a lot
of theft here.
Speaker 2 (06:22):
Exactly. It's which is why you know, I think that
we need to get the FBI involved in this particular project.
And by the way, I have a bill that we're
still going to try to get through soon that we'll
say that we're going to deny federal funding for this
project in perpetuity so that you can't have some other
administration that'll come in and suddenly, you know, start resume
(06:45):
resume funding, because then you know, the state will point
to that possibility to say, oh, well, we just need
to wait out the Trump administration. Well, no, we need
to make it a matter of statutory law that this program,
that this project is ineligible for any further federal funding.
Speaker 1 (06:58):
You spent a lot of time in the lad obviously
in Congress. Now did you ever have any conversations with
any of the Democrats supporting this Did you get the
sense that the new scam was being pulled here, that
money was being stolen? Or are they really wild eyed
true believers. I always wonder are they kidding or are
they just going through this theatrical cover up of massive theft.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
You know, honestly, a lot of the Democrats don't like
it either, and I've had a number of them even
here in DC, come up and tell me that. So
there's just a lot of pressure not to be too
vocal about that. But I can tell you there are
actually a lot of Democrats at both the state and
federal level who would breathe a big sigh of relief
if this project went away.
Speaker 1 (07:43):
Well, it makes everybody look so foolish.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
It does exactly it's become. It makes our state look foolish.
It is a massive embarrassment to our state. It's the
biggest infrastructure failure in United States history, and it has
become just this sort of searing symbol for all that
has gone so catastrophically wrong in California.
Speaker 1 (08:04):
All right, good talking with your good work, Kevin Kylie,
and get that bill passed. Let's put the nail in
this thing for good forever, all right, Kevin Kylie, Republican,
Northern California Congressman. We'll tell you more about this when
we come back. Newsom has some really hysterical quotes that
he unleashed from a guy who tried himself to cancel
(08:27):
this project back in twenty nineteen after he first became governor.
Somebody got to him. Some money is flown somewhere.
Speaker 3 (08:35):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
It is a great day because the Trump administration has
cut off funding to high speed rail. There were still
four billion dollars in the pipeline and they're not paying
because and somebody ought to break this to an old slickhead,
you haven't built a railroad. And he's acting all outraged,
(09:06):
Oily Newsome. Trump wants to hand and as usual, it's
a stream of non sequiturs and nonsense. Trump wants to
hand China the future. You're building a train from Bakersfield
to Merced. You cancel the train, and now China has
the future. Well, what's that mean? And he's abandoning the
(09:33):
Central Valley. We won't let him. The train should not
even be going through the Central Valley. The train ought
to be going down Interstate five. That is the most direct,
shortest route between San Francisco and Los Angeles. If you
were to do this, that would be the logical route.
(09:54):
It had no business winding into the Central Valley. That
that whole concept was absurd from the start. Then he's
got a new verbal tick. Every time he gets criticized,
he quotes some obscure statistic or fact about either Florida
or Texas, because lots of people from California have left
(10:17):
for those two states, and a lot of businesses have
left for those two states. Both states have zero taxes,
Both states have much less regulation. It's an easier life.
Both states don't have tens of thousands of homeless people
teaming in the big cities. They're run properly. They're run
(10:40):
the way states ought to be run. They're not perfect.
Bad things happen there, but at a day to day basis,
you get to keep your money, it's easier to run
your businesses, and you do not have to deal with
all the bizarre human dysfunction that you get, like in
(11:00):
Los Angeles with all the crazy vagrants and mental patients.
So Newsom went on in the statement, with projects like
the Texas High Speed Rail failing to take off. I
don't know anything about it, but my tax money isn't
going for Texas High Speed Rail. That's their problem. Our
(11:22):
tax money, your tax money for the last seventeen bleeping' years,
has gone to this boondoggle. It started with Schwartzenager. This
is not a partisan thing. Both parties contributed to this idiocy.
This was pushed by Schwarzenager during his administration, and then
(11:46):
Jerry Brown and then Newsom. So this has been a
total failure. Every dollar spent, all seventeen billion of them wasted.
Newsom goes on to say, we're now in the track
laying phase. Yeah, go show me where the track's been laid.
(12:08):
Nobody can seem to find it. It's imaginary, invisible track.
And even if they laid all the track, what do
you got at the end of it? You got Bakersfield
to Mercede. Technically, from what I understand, it's Wastco to
Madera because the train stations are outside Bakersfield, and your said,
(12:29):
but let's call it the Bakersfield and merced metropolitan areas,
if there is such a thing California, he goes on
in his statement, is putting all options on the table
to fight this illegal action. Only in his empty, greasy head.
Can you not deliver a product for seventeen years and
(12:52):
then scream it's illegal when the other side says, you
know what, we're not paying for this anymore. A magine.
Imagine you paid a contractor to build a house and
seventeen years later there's still no house. You'd say, I'm
not paying you anymore. Right, I can't think of anything.
(13:17):
I mean, I can't think of anything analogous to a
seventeen year project where you get no deliverable product. Nothing.
Do you think at the movie studios, if there was
some producer who was making a movie for seventeen years,
they'd keep writing them checks to keep the movie going,
(13:38):
even if they had a contract. They and I'm sure
a Newson would admit this, but they must have blown
through all kinds of deadlines. All kinds of checkpoints. You
don't get a blank unlimited a blank check with unlimited
time to complete a project. And he knows this. I'm
(14:00):
gonna be redundant here. But he's lying. He compulsively lies,
acts outraged, acts indignant. I know there's a lot of
people in Sacramento that listen to the show. Listen to
the podcast, because I see the Sacramento numbers, and it's
got to be a lot of people in government on
the staff, and maybe Newsome in his staff listens. Guys,
(14:26):
stop the lying. Your your boss looks like a buffoon
every day to most people, an absolute fool. You should
be embarrassed. Usually we make fun of spokes holes because
they say ridiculous things. Newsom doesn't need an asinine spokeshole.
I've never seen somebody say so many asenine things many
(14:47):
times a day, every day, And for some reason, he's
doing it with more frequency now because he can't stay
off the podcasts. We were playing little Clips the other day.
He actually spent four hours on some guy's podcast, four
hour hours, much of it incoherent. I do not know
what kind of weird cult he has created people who
(15:09):
support him and work for him, you know, get it's
like that woman who swooned for him in South Carolina.
And by the way, i'm i'm I'm blaming women for
his existence because his voting he gets so many female votes. Well,
(15:29):
there's something wrong there. Again, it's your people. I'm sure
plenty of men vote for him too. Yeah, but he
gets the real boost from female voting. And then they
have a new stooge. What's this guy's name, chowdry H chowderhead.
(15:53):
Oh yeah, yeah. Ian chowdre is The new high speed
rail project CEO. Kevin Kyleigue was quoting him as saying,
you know, by twenty forty five, we're gonna be able
to go from Palmdale to Gilroy. Can you imagine twenty
years from now, you're gonna drive to Palmdale, get on
(16:15):
a train, and when you wake up from your little
train nap. Wow, Look it's Gilroy. Everybody garlic festival at
the stink of garlic. I'll wake you up as you
pull into the station. God. This yeah, final, final thing.
(16:36):
New should be spending a billion dollars of your gas
tax money on this high speed rail this year and
every year thereafter. So one of the reasons you're paying
expensive gas is to fund this absurdity, and the people
who have been running this absurdity have been stealing the money.
(16:57):
We have felonsinals involved in all these operations, whether it's
this or the homeless industry. And Kylie is right, the
FBI ought to be investigating this since they obviously used
federal money. There should be a massive federal investigation and
these guys should be forced to do the Purp Walk,
handcuffed and dragged into state prisons. They should be charged
(17:21):
with everything they're criminals. More coming up, Well, will we
come up this other amazing corrupt story here in La
where they tried the sacrament of legislature tried to give
the city of La the power to buy up burned
out lots so they could but they could put low
(17:43):
income housing instead of the homes that the Palisades residents
want to rebuild. And no, La Times, it's not a
conspiracy theory. Nice try.
Speaker 3 (17:56):
You're listening to John Cobel's on demand from KFI forty.
Speaker 1 (18:01):
We are on every day from one until four o'clock
and then after four o'clock. Whatever you miss John Cobelt's
show on demand on that iHeart app and we had
Kevin Kyleie on in the first half hour. So if
you're joining us now, you already missed a little celebration.
Trump administration has pulled all the funding for the high
speed rail. That's four billion dollars that's not coming to
(18:24):
be wasted on high speed rail. And Newsom is squealing
like a little piggy, claiming it's illegal. He's got incredible nerve.
They didn't produce any trains and any track for seventeen
years when the whole thing was supposed to be done
five years ago. And now he's pissed off that the
(18:45):
Feds are pulling funding. And I will keep reminding you
some of your gas taxs' do you pump gas today
on your way home? Going to do a fillip? Some
of that money As the as the gas pump spins round, round,
round round, you see the price going higher, higher, higher, higher.
(19:07):
Some of that is going for high speed rail. But hey,
look at all the fools we had that keep electing
these people. Okay, on another front, another win. All these
wins are temporary State Senator Ben Allen, this schmuck from
Santa Monica. I don't think he's a Republican or a Democrat.
I think it be lungs to the schmuck party. He's
(19:29):
popped up before with stupid stuff and I forget what, Ah,
they're all idiots. He produced Senate Bill five point nine,
and this would create something called the Resilient Rebuilding Authority,
which is a suspicious name right from the start. And
(19:50):
the story was that it would empower the empower that's
the word you like to use. Empower the city of
Los Angeles to buy a up some of the burned
out lots. And then the way some people read the bill,
it's like they could put they could put low income
housing where residents' homes used to be. Now. The La
(20:15):
Times ran a story conspiracy theories thwart rebuilding plan. Conspiracy theories. Well,
there's a lot of context here. Number one context is
Karen Bass has released very few permits after she promised
(20:37):
and Gavin nwsoon promised that all the red tape would
be cut, everything would be streamlined, Permits would come out fast,
and people would be able to rebuild the palisades exactly
as it was. That's what they said, That's what they promised,
and six months later, few permits, cumbersome process, same old
(21:00):
red tape, even more red tape, and hardly any homes,
you know you hardly ground has hardly been broken it
on any homes. And there's seven thousand that were destroyed
in the Palisades. So this is something like Ben Allen
(21:21):
and this writer for The Times, Liam Dillon, ought to understand.
Nobody believes anything you say. Nobody trusts you, Nobody believes
anything that you write. They don't believe anything that the
La Times publishes. The reason the people at Palisades are
(21:41):
in this fix is because because the mayor ignored the loudest,
most detailed, most descriptive fire warnings that anybody's ever seen
in the history of weather, and she ran off to Ghana. Anyway,
they don't believe you because all the employees at the
(22:02):
DWP none of them filled up the reservoir. All the
employees for the city and the DWP, none of them
fixed the fire hydrants. All the employees that the DWP,
none of them turned off the electrical power. The fire
department is only fifty percent funded, the police department is
(22:26):
about two thirds funded, and we see Karen Bass promising
to shovel tax money to illegal aliens. Nobody's believing you
because you're a bunch of liars and you're a bunch
of criminals. The jig is up on this stuff. We
(22:48):
know you're lying, we know your criminals. We know you
have no intention of building the Palisades the way it
used to be. You have no intention of cutting the
red tape none. So get Ben Allen apparently got a
tremendous amount of blowback, and he pulled his bill. Going
to try to bring it back in January, he took
(23:12):
an existing bill, Senate Bill five point forty nine.
Speaker 2 (23:18):
And.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
In the bill, this bill originally was connected to was
connected to low income housing, and he left all the
low income housing language in the bill. Then he added
a second section to the bill about creating this agency
(23:44):
that could buy up burned out lots in the Palisades. Well,
if you see that, half the bill is talking about
low income housing and the other half is talking about
buying up land in the Palisades. No, it's not a
conspiracy theory to say, huh, it looks like they're going
to buy up burned out land and put in low
(24:06):
income housing. Of course, Allen said, it's become this total
meme among the right wing blogsphere who unfortunately picked up
by it was picked up by some lazy ass journalists
that don't bother to read the bill that say, this
bill seeks to turn the entire Palisades into low income housing.
(24:26):
Nobody thinks you're going to turn the entire Palisades into
low income housing, but you certainly want to turn in
part of the Palisades into low income housing. Because again
the context of this, Kevin Newsom announced one hundred million
dollars to go to developers in the Palisades for low
income housing. That happened just a few days ago. Secondly,
(24:47):
Scott Wiener, that insect from San Francisco, has a bill
that's going to allow low income housing to be built
in anybody's single family neighborhood anywhere in the state. So
if Weieder has a bill that's going to allow a
low income apartment dwellings, low income apartment towers anywhere in
(25:11):
the state, Newsom is spending one hundred million dollars in
state tax money to encourage developers to build low income
apartment towers. And then Ben Allen attaches to a low
income housing bill the chance for Los Angeles to buy
up lots, burned out lots I don't think it's a
(25:32):
conspiracy theory on the part of the residents who think, oh,
something bad is going to happen here. This is set
up to screw over the palisades. Of course it is.
And can you imagine how densely worded and confusing the
whole thing is, so that anybody can make anything they
want out of the bill. There's probably all kinds of
(25:55):
circuitous legal language and loopholls, so they could say publicly, oh, no, no,
nothing in the spill authorizes low income housing, and the
agency we're building low income housing on private property, non
or not. Of course they're going to say that, and
then somebody else is going to read it in a
(26:16):
year or two it's like, oh, of course we can
do that. Yeah, we can do that. Nobody believes you.
You're a bunch of liars and crooks. See the homeless industry,
see high speed rail. Got more on this coming up.
Oh yeah, we got to talk about LA times describing
the prejudice against low income housing. That's another good one.
Speaker 3 (26:37):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI Am
sixty on.
Speaker 1 (26:43):
The Epstein story. After two o'clock, we're gonna have Brad
Garrett on ABC News Crime and Terrorism analysts about I
don't know, does anybody know what's going on? Nobody knows
what's going on. Involved don't know what's going on. I
got to continue here on but the despicable fake journalists
(27:07):
at the Los Angeles Times, I just got to quickly,
you know, recap here. So we got a bill in
Sacramento that allows low income apartment towers in any single
family neighborhood. We got Gavin Newsom throwing one hundred million
dollars in to build low income housing in the Palisades,
which used to be mostly single family neighborhoods. And then
(27:31):
Ben Allen takes a bill that was originally designed to
finance low income housing, and he added this language that
creates some housing authority in Los Angeles that they could
buy up the burned lots. And that's the paragraph right
(27:54):
under the paragraph that says, here is the funding mechanism
for low income housing. And so people reacted yesterday in
the Palisades and beyond huge revolt. Everybody's angry because they're
not issuing permits. Now. It was one good bit of
news if it's true, if they follow through after all
(28:17):
these months. The city in the county are supposed to
use Rick Cruso's AI software project that he acquired through
his nonprofit and that should dramatically speed up the permits.
Curious that it was announced yesterday. So the La Times
(28:40):
Liam Dillon took this angle. Conspiracy theories thwart rebuilding plan
and they talk about internet posts have preyed on fears
of neighborhood change. Well, yeah, people are afraid of their
neighborhood getting changed with low income housing. No normal person
wants that. Mistrusted government authorities check on that and prejudice
(29:05):
against low income housing. Oh I saw that. And again
this is Liam Dillon. Apparently this is the new woke
crime at the La Times. You can't have prejudice against
low income housing. Aha, So I'm supposed to embrace a
low income apartment tower in my nice neighborhood. You know what,
(29:30):
one of the motivations most people have to work is
so they could live in a better neighborhood, whatever they
consider a better neighborhood. You work so you could buy
a bigger house, a better house, in a better neighborhood
with people like you whatever you think that means. No,
you don't want low income housing. People who chronically are
(29:52):
low income, you get a certain percentage of people who
have a lot of drug issues, alcohol issues, behavior issues,
mental issues. That's why they're chronically low income. Low income
is also a euphemism for homeless housing. That's the lowest income.
So no, nobody wants a homeless apartment tower in their
(30:16):
middle class, upper middle class neighborhood. No they don't. Yes,
we're prejudiced against it. Yes, we're biased against this. Yes
we hate the idea of it. I use the word hate.
I hate the idea of living next to a low
income apartment tower filled with god knows what all sorts
(30:37):
of behavior disorders. And then some of these people with
their behavior disorders and drug addictions and alcohol addictions have
kids who have all kinds of pathologies that they act
out with. So yeah, I don't want that. Yes, I'm
(30:57):
a nimby. Not in my backyard, Not in my backyard,
Never in my backyard. Don't even think about it. If
you even offer a whiff of this, Ben Allen, you're
going to get it. You are going to get a
big thrashing on the internet, in the phone calls, in
the emails, in person. Nobody wants to hear this, don't
(31:20):
even try in the Palisades. This first day I talked
to people about the Palisades. That's what they were afraid of,
because they knew we were run by a bunch of
communist socialists. We knew this is their lifelong wet dream.
And boom, boom boom, what did we get? Basses contribution
is no permanents permits. Newsom's contribution one hundred million dollars
(31:42):
for low income housing developers. Weiener's contribution, Oh, any any neighborhood,
it'll be permitted to have a low income apartment tower.
And then Ben Allen, oh, hey, here's an age of
see that will buy the burned land, the bird lots,
(32:03):
and it's in the same bill as low income funding.
And then Ben Allen has the nerve to say, well,
this is lazy ass journalists. The LA time says, oh,
this is conspiracy theories. No, it's not. One, two, three, four,
(32:25):
Bass Newsome, Wiener Allen, four pieces of the puzzle. No
homes are built in the Pacific Palisades, but we have
four different pieces of the puzzle that would lead to
a lot of low income housing. They're liars and their criminals.
This is what they do. The developers are paying off everybody.
(32:51):
Assembly people's, state senators, governors, mayors, city council members. The
developers are paying off. I think one of these, one
of these bills would oh, where's where's the number? There
was some some number here about forty percent forty percent
of the money was going to go for low income housing,
or forty percent of the building, something like that. This
(33:14):
is this is a croc and you people, and you
people in Altadena, you're gonna be hit with the same
thing in Malibu, the same thing. In fact, let me
tell you the worst one of it, all of them all,
is Wiener's bill, because Wiener would put these low income
apartment housing in every neighborhood in every town in the state.
Because these socialist communists think that poor people should have
(33:37):
the right to live in nice, middle class, upper middle class,
and wealthy towns, that they have the same rights to it.
They don't have to work for that privilege, they don't
have to behave they don't have to control themselves in
their addictions and their mental problems. That's what they believe.
They just won't say it that bluntly. I'm saying it
(33:59):
that blood, because that is why they're passing these laws.
When you get four of you in a week, four
of them. Yeah, conspiracy theory, my ass. William Dylon, all right,
when we come back, we're going to talk to oh
more conspiracy theories. Brat Garrett, ABC News, Crime in terrorsm
Analyst on, Jeffrey Epstein, Deborah Mark Live in the KFI
(34:19):
twenty four hour newsrem Hey, you've been listening to The
John Covelt Show podcast. You can always hear the show
live on KFI AM six forty from one to four
pm every Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime on
demand on the iHeartRadio app
The John Kobylt Show News
Host
John Kobylt
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.