January 9, 2023 • 31 mins
Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco comes on the show to talk about a judge who freed a man who killed one of Bianco's deputies in the line of duty. More on the drug crisis. Brazil had a Jan. 6th type event this weekend when new government came into power.
**The John and Ken Show can be heard live on KFI-AM640 from 1p-4p PST, or you can podcast the show anywhere you listen to podcasts at any time you want!**
**The John and Ken Show can be heard live on KFI-AM640 from 1p-4p PST, or you can podcast the show anywhere you listen to podcasts at any time you want!**
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Welcome everybody. Our show is now one to four pm.
If you miss any of it live, I don't know
why you do that. All the exciting things happen live,
but you can pick up the podcast which is posted
immediately after we end the show at four o'clock to
listen to any or all of the hours. Another keyword
is about fifteen minutes away. In the KFI cash Refill
(00:20):
contest which is going going on for a week now,
you can win one thousand dollars. Just listen for the
keyword and then the instructions that follow for your chance
at the money. And of course, big storm tonight tomorrow,
heavy rain. They've already told people in Montecito up there
in Santa Barbara County to leave other areas of being
(00:41):
evacuated as well ahead of the heavy rainfall. Well, we
now have the opportunity to talk to the Riverside County Sheriff,
Chad Bianco, who's been in the news concerning the death
of one of his deputies. Back on December twenty ninth,
Isaiah Cordero did a traffic stop. The creep that was
driving the car was William sha McKay, who's a three
(01:02):
strike felon already convicted of the third strike, but was
awaiting sentencing, obviously was going to appeal. He acted as
his own lawyer. Apparently anyway, he shot Deputy Cordero, took off.
They eventually tracked him down and killed him. By questions now,
as to why he was a free man on that the.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
The blame goes to the San Bernardino County Superior Court
Judge Kara Hudson. She's the one who let him out
on bail, even after she personally convicted him of the
third strike. He didn't want he didn't want a jury trial,
so Kara Hudson judged it, made the decision that he
(01:40):
was guilty, and then lets.
Speaker 3 (01:42):
Him go free on bail.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
This is what the three strikes laws were about. These
people with long, serious criminal offenses. You get that third strike,
that's it, twenty five years to life.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
And then he got arrested again and was let out
on bail again.
Speaker 1 (01:59):
She did it again.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
Yes, it's impossible to understand this. Let's get Chad Bianco
on the Riverside County Sheriff.
Speaker 4 (02:07):
Chad.
Speaker 3 (02:07):
Welcome to John and Ken Show. How are you?
Speaker 4 (02:10):
Thank you? I'm doing well. Thanks for having me on.
Speaker 1 (02:12):
Well, yeah, first, our condolence is the loss of your deputy.
I'm sure it was a big, terrible.
Speaker 4 (02:16):
Loss, Thank you very much. It certainly was not only
for us, but his family of course, and really law
enforcement as a whole, especially as it relates to why
you even have me on and what we're even talking about.
Speaker 2 (02:29):
Well, what's calling about this is he'd been arrested so
many times, convicted so many times, sentenced, got the three strikes.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
You know, usually when you get the third strike, you're.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Really done, and I still he still was out running
around even after getting arrested again post third strike.
Speaker 4 (02:50):
Yeah, it very much highlights where we are in public
safety and the direction we are going with these very liberal,
very soft on crime, very pro criminal, anti victim direction
of public safety that we're going. And while this was
(03:12):
horrendous for the judge, and as I'm listening to you
describe it, there is no one that can listen to
what this happened or how this happened and the circumstances
behind it. There is no one that says, oh, yeah,
she made the right decision, or oh yeah, I can
see why she did that. This is just appalling. But
yet there are people sticking up for her. There are
other judges sticking up for her. And this is the
(03:35):
problem that we're facing with our current direction in the state,
that we are just completely taking away consequences for people.
We want to push noe, but we want everybody to
be let go, not held for your consequences for committing
crime and heinous crimes against persons. It astonds me that
we're even talking about this, So.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
Even a police murder doesn't matter anymore.
Speaker 4 (03:58):
It doesn't. For judges to be sticking up for her
shows that we have a serious, serious problem in the
justice system.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Are they sticking up for her because this is some
sort of judges agreement they have to always stand by
one another, or do they actually think she was right?
Speaker 4 (04:17):
You know what I think it is is I think
they're using a crutch of things. She didn't do anything
legally wrong. She did something completely morally wrong and ethically wrong,
but it's not illegal in the law, so they think
it's okay. And it's disgusting to me. It's hard to
even find words that we are in a position in
(04:39):
society where there are people like that. We went through
this in the eighties in where the seventies and the
eighties were horrible crime and we started getting tough on
crime and it was working. So what did we do?
The left, far progressive agenda wanted to change it all
and now here we are.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Did Kara Hudson have a history of these kinds of decision?
I can't find very much online about.
Speaker 3 (05:02):
Her at all.
Speaker 4 (05:04):
Yeah, I don't know, and I haven't looked into it.
She's in a different county than us, at San Bernardino County,
so I don't know personally any of the cases that
she's tried. But one of the things that I find
alarming with this is when you look at the facts
about this particular suspect and you see that she let
him go as heinous as his crimes were convicted of,
(05:26):
his third strike failed to appear committed, another crime was
released again. You cannot tell me that this is an
isolated incident with her. This is happening over and over
and over with her. If she's doing something with this
bad the other person just with just a little bit less,
they're out on the street too.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
Is it's still this idea that the prisons in jails
are too full. We ought to give people a chance
to be free. For as long as possible, even though
I mean, she's faced with a three striker that shouldn't
even be a consideration.
Speaker 4 (05:58):
I'll tell you what it is if you look into
I believe it was in the La Times. There was
a pretty good article in support of what she did
wrong in the La Times. But yet the headline was
that she didn't do anything wrong. And when you read
the entire article, anyone with common sense would say, holy cow,
how did she do that? She should have he should
(06:19):
have been in custody. But this is what I think
at highlights, I get highlights that I'm not sticking up
for her at all. But the left agenda is an agenda,
and it goes all the way to the governor. The
governor's agenda is to close all the prisons that he can,
let as many people out of prison that he can.
Our legislators are passing laws to make it harder for
(06:41):
us to arrest people. They're eliminating laws that people used
to go to jail. Now they don't go to jail anymore.
And that agenda really carries over into how she is believing.
When you read that article and in her ruling for
his kidnapping charge, she found him not guilty. However, he
met all of the requirements for kidnapping. He bound up
(07:01):
his victim, he beat her and drug her around, which
meets the requirements for kidnapping, and she found him not guilty.
And then she blamed the victim of the crime because
she said the victim wasn't an angel. Correct.
Speaker 2 (07:18):
So this fanaticism has completely taken over the justice system.
We have like almost like a strange new religion that
people are pledging their their souls to.
Speaker 4 (07:32):
It really is there. And this is the scary thing
is they the far left. They do this in many things,
but they're using words. Words are important, and they use
it against us because they call it criminal justice reform.
And they use the word reform. Well, everyone thinks that
criminal justice needs reform because we all know what we're
up against. But their version of reform is it's society's fault.
(07:54):
It's these criminals are not really criminals, they're clients and
they're victims of society.
Speaker 2 (07:59):
All right, They're in powerful positions, this crowd, But numerically,
the number of people who believe in this is pretty small.
Speaker 3 (08:06):
Where is everybody.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
Else pushing back, overwhelming them, marginalizing them. They don't have
the numbers. It's not even close. They should be They
should be obliterated publicly in these kinds of disputes.
Speaker 4 (08:22):
The problem is is that it's do you want me
to tell you how many people have reached out to
me to talk about this? You?
Speaker 2 (08:27):
That's it.
Speaker 4 (08:28):
No one else wants to talk about it. The media
doesn't want us telling you what your legislators are doing.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
Can you hold on? Sheriff Bianco?
Speaker 4 (08:37):
Absolutely all right.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
We want to ask you a couple more questions. This
is Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, our guest, and uh boy,
we're glad we have him speaking out. He lost to
Sheriff's deputy Isaiah Cordero was gunned down by a three
striker back on December twenty ninth. It's a simple traffic stop.
Fortunately the three striker was killed later by police. But
(08:59):
he should have been on the streets and it's because
of a decision by a San Bernardino County judge by
the name of Kara Hudson that he was. I'm reading
a quote, this quote from a former La County prosecutor,
Dimitri Goren, who said, in my thirty years as a
defense attorney, and prosecutor. I've never heard of a third
strike felon awaiting sentencing, getting out on bail, and then
(09:21):
being arrested while out on bail, and then being released again.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
I don't remember anything like this, because if it happened,
we would have covered it.
Speaker 1 (09:29):
We will talk more with the sheriff. Next up is
your Chance at Money the keyword for one thousand dollars
Johnny KENKFI AM six forty Live Everywhere, the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
We return now to Chad Bianco, the Riverside County Sheriff.
Speaker 1 (09:42):
Yeah, we're talking about the death of one of his
deputy's big news December twenty ninth. It was a traffic stop.
Isaiah Cordero was pulling over a motorist who turned out
to be a three striker out on bond, and he
opened fire and killed the deputy. He was later killed.
But we're also dealing with the consequences of a judge
giving this man not once, but twice bond so he
(10:05):
could be free on the streets. A long criminal history
for this creep, and we're talking to the sheriff about that,
I mean, Sheriff Fianca, what do you say to deputy
Cordero's family members. I heard his mother was pretty emotional
talking about these types of decisions being made down with
a criminal justice system. Is this where we're at that
more judges are going to give three strikers this kind
(10:27):
of bond and this kind of freedom.
Speaker 4 (10:30):
Well, I hope not. You know, I'd like for all
of them to talk with his mother and spend a
couple of days with her and see if they would
change their mind. If that's the way that they're going.
And we're always in this position where, you know, we
look at our politicians that are making these laws, and
you look at this judge and say, what's it going
(10:51):
to take to change their mind and get them in
the right path. Would it be one of their family members?
Would it be different if it was their family member
that was the victim or something happened to them.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
Much of the frustration is usually comes from someone who
doesn't get a conviction that he should get, or doesn't
get a sentence that he should get. But in this case,
he got the conviction. The sentence was a three strike sentence.
There was a minimum sentence that would put him away
for a long time. It's that she just never bothered
to complete the final act and put them away and
(11:22):
instead lets him out on an absurd bail.
Speaker 3 (11:24):
I mean, nobody's ever seen this before.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
This was like a new way to get around what
the public wants.
Speaker 4 (11:32):
It most certainly is, and it's a way to get
around it without having to tell anyone. And unfortunately, we
have a severe tragedy. I mean as big as there's
nothing more worse than a death. That's the highest issue
you can get. And then we have a murder, and
that murder would have been prevented had she done her job.
Speaker 1 (11:52):
That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 4 (11:53):
It doesn't get any worse.
Speaker 3 (11:54):
This decision created a murder.
Speaker 2 (11:56):
Usually the decisions don't punish the killer, but this one
created another death that was completely unnecessary.
Speaker 4 (12:05):
Yes, and how many other people are out there in
the same situation that have been let free by judges.
They just haven't killed anybody, so we haven't brought it forth.
The same similar situation could be said about the the
Almanti police officers that were killed. That person should have
been in custody for different reasons. But this one, this
one's a little bit different than The judge actually just
(12:26):
let him go like he was some type of a
good person that O y'all show up when you tell
me I have to go to prison for the rest
of my life.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
Yeah, Jacqueline Rodriguez, public affairs officer for the San Bordardino
County DA's office, said, currently there's no legislation that states
that a post convicted three strikes felon out on bond
cannot post bond on a subsequent offense.
Speaker 4 (12:50):
Yeah, we recurred to my problem. Yeah, that is the
problem because they're looking instead of saying, oh my gosh,
what a screw up, and let's immediately fix this, they're
just blaming it on somebody else.
Speaker 3 (13:02):
Well, because they're taking nobody's ever done this, Nobody ever
thought we needed a.
Speaker 4 (13:08):
Law like that exactly. You would think it would be
common sense, common sense, good judgment, reality, And instead she's
allowed to do this, and then their excuses, well, there's
nothing in the law that prevented her from doing it.
It is sickening, all.
Speaker 1 (13:27):
Right, sheriff. We appreciate you spending some time with us.
We know you're pretty busy. Thanks a lot.
Speaker 4 (13:33):
Thank you. I appreciate you guys talking about it, and
I certainly am not going to stop.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
No, keep speaking out and is Riverside County Sheriff Chad
Bianco is our guest, thank you so much for coming on,
he pointed out. Nobody's asked him about this but us.
Speaker 4 (13:46):
Yeah, which is thanks guys.
Speaker 1 (13:48):
So frankly really puzzling, as he pointed out, the Times
did a long story over the weekend, sort of like,
you know, explaining, although you didn't get anything from the judge,
three strikes fell and on bail twice. Over was on
the streets where he gunned down a deputy and that's
where we're reading some of these quotes in here. They're
not exactly defending the judge. They couldn't get a comment
(14:10):
from her, but you know that.
Speaker 2 (14:12):
It mostly lays out his criminal history and the series
of events that led to this in the last year
or so.
Speaker 1 (14:20):
Right, well, we're not going to let this story go
because this is breaking new horrific ground. If we have
judges allowing three strikers out on bond and bail, not once,
but twice. Right, they picked up this guy again and
again she gave him bond more. Coming up, John and
Ken Kfi am six forty live everywhere the iHeartRadio.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
App Maybe if the woke jerks in the local TV
news departments would cover this.
Speaker 3 (14:43):
It might help John and Ken.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
That's right. We're on one to four, which means, holy mackerel,
we're done in twenty five minutes. But if you can't
listen live, you can always download the show, the podcast,
the iHeartRadio app, the website tool. These are places to
find John and Ken all three hours at your convenience.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Or you could come with me on my drive home
and I'll just talk to you in the car.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
Is that how you fill the fourth hour? Now? Yes,
you do, like a little show in your car in
the car, yeah, and on a rainy day it could
be a longer show.
Speaker 2 (15:13):
I just pick up anybody on the street and say, hey,
you want to hear a radio show, come on, Oh
like a vagrant sit down?
Speaker 3 (15:18):
Yeah, sure, that's cool.
Speaker 2 (15:20):
And then I tell him how terrible all these homeless
people are any grace?
Speaker 3 (15:24):
He says, You're absolutely right. Shouldn't be like this.
Speaker 1 (15:27):
We spent some time in the last month exploring the
drug problem and the homeless. Remember Sam Canonas was one
of our guests. Used to be an La Times writer.
Now he's written the book The Least of Us. A
lot of it was about super meth and fentanyl. And
what they're doing is it they ravaged the homeless population,
not just that. Obviously you're reading about fentanyl overdoses among
(15:49):
those who are not homeless. The New York Times is
weighed in with a new angle on this, and let
me just read you the first couple of paragraphs, because
I think you'll get the really creepy idea what's going on.
Over a matter of weeks, Tracy McCann watched in horror
as the bruises she was accustomed to getting from injecting
(16:10):
fentanyl began hardening, hardening into an armor of crusty black
and tissue. Something must have gotten into the supply. Switching
corner dealers didn't help. People were saying that everyone's dope
was being cut with something that was causing gruesome, painful wounds.
McCann said, I wake up in the morning crying because
(16:31):
my arms are dying. What we're talking about is trank dope.
Trank dope, that's right. Apparently the new thing to do
is to stick an animal tranquilizer called zilee xylazine into
(16:52):
common fentanyl to make it even more potent. Philadelphia's already
been hit hard by this problem of dope or zombie drugs.
Uh Xylazine causes wounds that erupt with a scaly dead
tissue called ishar. Untreated, it can lead to amputation.
Speaker 2 (17:14):
Well, if you have black tissue, you have dead tissue.
It kills your your your skins, and it skill. It
kills the tissue beneath the skin.
Speaker 1 (17:25):
Yes, it induces a blackout stupor too for hours, rendering
users vulnerable to rape and robbery. When people come to
the high from the fentanyl is long since fade, and
they immediately crave more. I know the story is bad.
It just gets worse with the fentanyl and the drugs,
doesn't it.
Speaker 3 (17:45):
Just because people are on the streets taking.
Speaker 5 (17:47):
Anything because it's cheap and there's no questions. I asked, well, yes,
and you end up with your skin turning black and
rotting off at some point, don't you hear about it?
Speaker 1 (18:00):
Choices can have consequences, is what I say to that.
Speaker 3 (18:02):
You know, it's really hard to have sympathy after a while.
Speaker 1 (18:06):
It is. It is, but their addicts and they can't stop.
Speaker 2 (18:09):
There's places to go if you're an addict. See, it's
not like we haven't spent hundreds of billions of dollars
on this?
Speaker 3 (18:17):
What else do you want people to do? Really?
Speaker 2 (18:20):
What else more could we do than spend all the
money and set up all the treatment that they're is
that does.
Speaker 1 (18:26):
Exist because xylazine is the sedative, not an opioid, it
resists standard opioid overdose reversal treatments such as that nax alone.
So there you go. Now, this crowd, which is led
by the LA Times, let's just do you see the
time story the other day, we should all be carrying
with us now nar can?
Speaker 3 (18:46):
I saw, Yeah, yeah, okay, I got it.
Speaker 1 (18:50):
People run into.
Speaker 3 (18:51):
Now now it's my obligation.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
If I run into a vagrant on the street who's overdosed,
I'm the one who has to revive him.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
Well, if they took one of these trank door versions
of foot and it may not work.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
But wait a second, what are we paying for already?
Why do I have to arm myself with Narcan? With
all the money we've paid for law enforcement, for drug treatment,
for homeless programs, we've done everything that we possibly can do.
Speaker 1 (19:22):
Now they're going to say, what if you're one of
your children, well gets the drugs online when you don't
even know about it, and they're in an overdose situation.
You want to have the.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
Most kids don't.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
There's actually a way to raise your kids, so they
don't do that because most kids don't do it.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
I mean I couldn't.
Speaker 2 (19:43):
I couldn't imagine my kids buying random pills in an alley,
and most parents couldn't imagine their kids and they don't.
Speaker 3 (19:51):
These are all These are all mostly.
Speaker 2 (19:52):
The troubled families, the troubled kids, the ones who the
kids have been neglected and abused by the parents.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Xylazine was developed in nineteen sixty two is an anesthetic
for veterinary procedures. Trials and humans were shut down because
the drug led to respiratory depression and low blood pressure.
Its use as an addictive substitute for heroin most likely
started in the two thousands.
Speaker 2 (20:16):
Do you wonder if there's a story out there that
we don't know as to why the US government allows
this to go on. We know ten major things they
can do.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
People always say, because they're making money.
Speaker 3 (20:31):
No, I don't know. Is there some sort of follow
the money?
Speaker 4 (20:35):
No?
Speaker 3 (20:35):
Is there there's some I heard what was it? All right?
Speaker 2 (20:39):
I was driving home. I was listen to something on cable,
and it's one of those things that I ordinarily would dismiss,
but I did stop and think about it. And the
host was talking to somebody who used to run a
division of the DEA who'd been to Mexico and dealt
with the drug issues, and he says he suspects that
are hands off policy. Is got elements of the CIA
(21:03):
involved manipulating things in Mexico because they want to keep
Mexico destabilized. So we have a lot of influence in
control over what goes on in Central America.
Speaker 3 (21:13):
And I never heard that theory.
Speaker 2 (21:15):
Well, this guy, this guy actually had a big title
retired from from the DEA, and he says he thinks
that's what's going on, That the US government is actually
actively involved in keeping the Mexican government dependent on us
by keeping the population and just the whole society unstable
and off balance, by allowing the drug cartels to have
(21:36):
its way, and that they're more interested in having domination
and control over the region than they care about, you know,
vagrants in the street dying. Normally, I would dismiss that stuff,
but I couldn't get out of my head. I was
driving home and I'm thinking what if there's another story here,
because this doesn't make any sense, And when something doesn't
make any sense for this long, it means there's something
(21:58):
out there we don't know.
Speaker 1 (21:59):
I thought it was more that countries, particularly Mexico, are
so dysfunctional that the drug trade at least brings some
revenue in so that the people aren't even more starving
and ready for revolt. That's what I always say.
Speaker 2 (22:13):
The belief was so so we allow it to happen
because at least these this keeps people fed in Mexico
and they don't start rioting. It's a source of employment,
it's a big element of their so they don't overthrow
the government. So we don't end up in a worse
situation that we're willing to sacrifice a certain number of
like homeless losers to drugs and maybe a few kids,
(22:37):
and in return, we don't get some apocalyptic situation in
Mexico that would affect us even worse. That's kind of
along the same lines, though, you know, it's it's a
it's a it's about not trusting Mexico to be on
its own and us having to have some influence.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
Now here's why reversing an overdose when there is xylazine
involved is tricky. And again we're talking about apparently the
new drug is mixing fentanyl with this animal tranquilizer, a xylazine,
a dose of the overdose halting medicine nalazone or narcan.
It blocks or reverses opioids effect on brain receptors, will
(23:14):
address the fentanyl, but it's not going to arouse a
victim who's sedated with the laz We've tried two or
three times, but they could end up vomiting and writhing. Well,
I guess they're gonna die.
Speaker 6 (23:24):
These people.
Speaker 3 (23:26):
What are we gonna be saying?
Speaker 1 (23:26):
It's already too late for Philadelphia. This drug is everywhere.
Speaker 3 (23:31):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (23:31):
Maybe this is gonna self correct. Yeah, there is a
little bit of Darwinism here, and maybe all these people
are going to kill themselves in this extremely horrible way,
and then that you know, they'll be off the streets
and maybe a few others are going to see what's
happening and give up the stuff. Because there's nothing the
government can do. The government's not good at this, and
(23:52):
nobody in government's particularly interested in this unless they can
hire a lot of people, and people can make money. Right,
so you get all the fake on profits and they
get the tax funding after they've guilted the normal population.
They guilt us. We give them money. Okay, you know
it's inhuman what's going on. They take the money, laugh
(24:13):
at us because we're gullible, naive. We fall for it
every time. Then they blow it on their stupid agencies.
Everybody's making six figures, but.
Speaker 3 (24:20):
They don't care.
Speaker 2 (24:22):
I don't I don't think it's it's possible for the
government to treat all these these these addicts or treat
all these mental patients.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
And I don't think there's any interest on the.
Speaker 2 (24:29):
Part of the government workers and the bureaucrats or the politicians.
Speaker 1 (24:33):
They just realize this story with another good in your
face to outfits like politicians, and they elsa gon to
times and think, well, just have narcan. Yeah, well it's
not going to work in the case of people that
get this try and dope.
Speaker 2 (24:46):
But you see how they keep keep expanding our responsibility
for this. It's not our fault. Whenever I hear somebody says, oh,
you know, it's society's probably you know, I want to
hit them. It's like, no, it's not society's proble. Well,
it's not my problem.
Speaker 3 (25:01):
I gave all right, we.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
Got more coming up. Johnny ken k If I am
six forty live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2 (25:08):
I found the name of the former government official who
was on TV the other day talking about how he
thinks the CIA may be involved in not.
Speaker 3 (25:18):
Trying to stop all the drugs coming over because.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
It works to our benefit to keep Mexico destabilized. His
name is Derek Maltz. M Altz, He's the former DEA
Special Operations Director and he went he was on originally
to talk about oh video Guzman being arrested El Chapo's son,
and then there's some clips online. He was on one
(25:42):
of the Fox shows. And I'm just thinking that there's
a lot more to this that's not being discussed.
Speaker 1 (25:53):
And this would carry over from like president to president
to kind of keep this policy.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
Yeah, this would be the permanent government, you know, the
permanent FBI, the permanent CIA. You know that Trump called
the deep state. There is a lot of truth to that,
like it runs on its own because presidents come and go,
Congress control comes and goes. But there's people there who've
been working for twenty thirty forty years and more. Who
(26:19):
they've got their own agenda, Like nobody really governs the CIA.
You know, if the CIA wants to disrupt the presidency,
they will. We saw how the FBI disrupted the Trump presidency.
I mean there's countering agendas going on obviously.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
Well, speaking of Trump for a moment, you may have
heard over the weekend that thousands of people storm Brazil's
National Congress building shades of January sixth. There was an
election in that country and the man that lost, Bolasonaro,
question the results the victory went to and he was
(26:56):
the incumbent. He's very Trump like he was, he's compared
to Trump. And guess where he is right now. Bolsonaro
is in Florida, apparently spending his time waiting in line
at publics, eating alone a Kentucky Fried Chicken, and posting
selfies for people. But there was a Brazilian dentist who
losened Florida. He said, we wanted to go see him.
We'd rather see him than we care more about seeing
(27:19):
him the mickey mouse. He does have some very very
loyal supporters the way Trump did, and because they had
questions about the outcome of this election. Well, there you go,
just like January sixth, they stormed the Brazili by the thousands,
by the thousands, right, it was very similar. Some think
that this guy has given them sort of the wink
(27:41):
and the nod, just like they did with Trump.
Speaker 2 (27:43):
Oh weisted, the election was stolen. Now I just saw
a headline here, I'm clicking on the story. Well, it's
a British tabloid saying that Bossonara was worse to the
hospital in Orlando today.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
Yeah, he had stomach problems. Yeah, somebody plats Is it
from eating all the fast food? Because that's what the
Washington Post is saying is that's a lot of time
going to fast food places.
Speaker 3 (28:01):
He wasn't used to it. He come to America fast
food for a week's.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
People calling for them to take his visa away and
get him out of the US.
Speaker 2 (28:09):
Well, his visa is only supposed to work as long
as he's president, and now that he's not, he's right,
so now he doesn't have that visa special visa protection anymore.
Speaker 1 (28:18):
He's hanging out in Florida enjoying the sunshine.
Speaker 3 (28:22):
Conway's here.
Speaker 7 (28:23):
Hey, hey, now he has stomach problems because the guy
stabbed him with a nine inch knife in the stomach.
That's the ridge, that's the origin of his stomach problems.
Speaker 3 (28:35):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (28:36):
How long ago did that happen?
Speaker 6 (28:38):
Two years and twenty eighteen, So four years ago?
Speaker 1 (28:41):
Okay, ok, yeah, today he went to the hospital. I
guess he's still having Yeah.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
I think it was the food.
Speaker 7 (28:47):
I mean, look, I've never been stabbed in the stomach
and I'm I'm you know, on the toilet twice a week.
Speaker 3 (28:53):
Only twice a week? Wow?
Speaker 1 (28:57):
Yeah, twice a week is pretty long.
Speaker 3 (29:00):
To drink some water there a little no, No.
Speaker 6 (29:03):
I've been on a serious level. All right. Bill's deamorrow.
Speaker 7 (29:08):
Hamlin has been discharged, and there's a rumor going around
that he could have gone home on Saturday or Sunday,
but the NFL had all these big tributes for him
on yesterday and it would have looked odd if he
went home.
Speaker 6 (29:20):
And they're still doing the tributes.
Speaker 1 (29:22):
And now he's going to play this coming week, right.
Speaker 7 (29:24):
Yes, I think he's gonna play. If the playoff game,
if the Bill's making of the second round, I think
the second round. Yeah, he's gonna be back. But look,
I think it's great that he's home. He's recovering he's
he might be one hundred percent. But to see, you know,
season football pros crying on the air after the Bills
(29:45):
scored it their opening drive. You know there was a kickoff,
the kickoff, Yeah, they ran it back for a touchdown.
Speaker 6 (29:51):
I thought we need to take it down Fellas just
a little bit.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
I felt the same way yesterday. We need to just
step back. It was a terrible medical emergency. That's right,
he's okay. Yeah, he's going to recover. He's in better
shape than I am.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
Right, I mean you should have gone down a long
time ago. How many times you see on the ball
over exactly?
Speaker 3 (30:07):
He worked?
Speaker 7 (30:08):
He worked out today, he worked. I haven't worked out
since Portola Junior High.
Speaker 4 (30:17):
Uh.
Speaker 6 (30:17):
And then if you know it's raining outside, we'll cover that.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Yeah, you cover that rain, buddy, Yours start March, they log.
Speaker 7 (30:24):
I love last week when you said hey, when we
were doing the cross talk, and the last thing you said,
Ken was hey, you got a head to higher ground.
Speaker 1 (30:31):
Yeah, I got another one for you.
Speaker 3 (30:33):
Turn around, don't drown.
Speaker 7 (30:34):
I know that's that great we have during the fires,
we have ready set go.
Speaker 6 (30:38):
Now we have turnaround. Don't drown.
Speaker 2 (30:40):
Dumber people, Huh, that stupid thing when you were a kid.
Anybody on the news telling end though, don't drive into
a flooded road.
Speaker 7 (30:48):
I remember ever having evacuations either. You just wrote it out. Yeah,
you find a place to go. Yeah, Conway's dog, real men, Yes,
last the real man.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
Uh. Crozer's decks can't fight KOSDHD two Los Angeles, Orange
County Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
Welcome everybody. Our show is now one to four pm.
If you miss any of it live, I don't know
why you do that. All the exciting things happen live,
but you can pick up the podcast which is posted
immediately after we end the show at four o'clock to
listen to any or all of the hours. Another keyword
is about fifteen minutes away. In the KFI cash Refill
(00:20):
contest which is going going on for a week now,
you can win one thousand dollars. Just listen for the
keyword and then the instructions that follow for your chance
at the money. And of course, big storm tonight tomorrow,
heavy rain. They've already told people in Montecito up there
in Santa Barbara County to leave other areas of being
(00:41):
evacuated as well ahead of the heavy rainfall. Well, we
now have the opportunity to talk to the Riverside County Sheriff,
Chad Bianco, who's been in the news concerning the death
of one of his deputies. Back on December twenty ninth,
Isaiah Cordero did a traffic stop. The creep that was
driving the car was William sha McKay, who's a three
(01:02):
strike felon already convicted of the third strike, but was
awaiting sentencing, obviously was going to appeal. He acted as
his own lawyer. Apparently anyway, he shot Deputy Cordero, took off.
They eventually tracked him down and killed him. By questions now,
as to why he was a free man on that the.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
The blame goes to the San Bernardino County Superior Court
Judge Kara Hudson. She's the one who let him out
on bail, even after she personally convicted him of the
third strike. He didn't want he didn't want a jury trial,
so Kara Hudson judged it, made the decision that he
(01:40):
was guilty, and then lets.
Speaker 3 (01:42):
Him go free on bail.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
This is what the three strikes laws were about. These
people with long, serious criminal offenses. You get that third strike,
that's it, twenty five years to life.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
And then he got arrested again and was let out
on bail again.
Speaker 1 (01:59):
She did it again.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
Yes, it's impossible to understand this. Let's get Chad Bianco
on the Riverside County Sheriff.
Speaker 4 (02:07):
Chad.
Speaker 3 (02:07):
Welcome to John and Ken Show. How are you?
Speaker 4 (02:10):
Thank you? I'm doing well. Thanks for having me on.
Speaker 1 (02:12):
Well, yeah, first, our condolence is the loss of your deputy.
I'm sure it was a big, terrible.
Speaker 4 (02:16):
Loss, Thank you very much. It certainly was not only
for us, but his family of course, and really law
enforcement as a whole, especially as it relates to why
you even have me on and what we're even talking about.
Speaker 2 (02:29):
Well, what's calling about this is he'd been arrested so
many times, convicted so many times, sentenced, got the three strikes.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
You know, usually when you get the third strike, you're.
Speaker 2 (02:41):
Really done, and I still he still was out running
around even after getting arrested again post third strike.
Speaker 4 (02:50):
Yeah, it very much highlights where we are in public
safety and the direction we are going with these very liberal,
very soft on crime, very pro criminal, anti victim direction
of public safety that we're going. And while this was
(03:12):
horrendous for the judge, and as I'm listening to you
describe it, there is no one that can listen to
what this happened or how this happened and the circumstances
behind it. There is no one that says, oh, yeah,
she made the right decision, or oh yeah, I can
see why she did that. This is just appalling. But
yet there are people sticking up for her. There are
other judges sticking up for her. And this is the
(03:35):
problem that we're facing with our current direction in the state,
that we are just completely taking away consequences for people.
We want to push noe, but we want everybody to
be let go, not held for your consequences for committing
crime and heinous crimes against persons. It astonds me that
we're even talking about this, So.
Speaker 3 (03:55):
Even a police murder doesn't matter anymore.
Speaker 4 (03:58):
It doesn't. For judges to be sticking up for her
shows that we have a serious, serious problem in the
justice system.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Are they sticking up for her because this is some
sort of judges agreement they have to always stand by
one another, or do they actually think she was right?
Speaker 4 (04:17):
You know what I think it is is I think
they're using a crutch of things. She didn't do anything
legally wrong. She did something completely morally wrong and ethically wrong,
but it's not illegal in the law, so they think
it's okay. And it's disgusting to me. It's hard to
even find words that we are in a position in
(04:39):
society where there are people like that. We went through
this in the eighties in where the seventies and the
eighties were horrible crime and we started getting tough on
crime and it was working. So what did we do?
The left, far progressive agenda wanted to change it all
and now here we are.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Did Kara Hudson have a history of these kinds of decision?
I can't find very much online about.
Speaker 3 (05:02):
Her at all.
Speaker 4 (05:04):
Yeah, I don't know, and I haven't looked into it.
She's in a different county than us, at San Bernardino County,
so I don't know personally any of the cases that
she's tried. But one of the things that I find
alarming with this is when you look at the facts
about this particular suspect and you see that she let
him go as heinous as his crimes were convicted of,
(05:26):
his third strike failed to appear committed, another crime was
released again. You cannot tell me that this is an
isolated incident with her. This is happening over and over
and over with her. If she's doing something with this
bad the other person just with just a little bit less,
they're out on the street too.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
Is it's still this idea that the prisons in jails
are too full. We ought to give people a chance
to be free. For as long as possible, even though
I mean, she's faced with a three striker that shouldn't
even be a consideration.
Speaker 4 (05:58):
I'll tell you what it is if you look into
I believe it was in the La Times. There was
a pretty good article in support of what she did
wrong in the La Times. But yet the headline was
that she didn't do anything wrong. And when you read
the entire article, anyone with common sense would say, holy cow,
how did she do that? She should have he should
(06:19):
have been in custody. But this is what I think
at highlights, I get highlights that I'm not sticking up
for her at all. But the left agenda is an agenda,
and it goes all the way to the governor. The
governor's agenda is to close all the prisons that he can,
let as many people out of prison that he can.
Our legislators are passing laws to make it harder for
(06:41):
us to arrest people. They're eliminating laws that people used
to go to jail. Now they don't go to jail anymore.
And that agenda really carries over into how she is believing.
When you read that article and in her ruling for
his kidnapping charge, she found him not guilty. However, he
met all of the requirements for kidnapping. He bound up
(07:01):
his victim, he beat her and drug her around, which
meets the requirements for kidnapping, and she found him not guilty.
And then she blamed the victim of the crime because
she said the victim wasn't an angel. Correct.
Speaker 2 (07:18):
So this fanaticism has completely taken over the justice system.
We have like almost like a strange new religion that
people are pledging their their souls to.
Speaker 4 (07:32):
It really is there. And this is the scary thing
is they the far left. They do this in many things,
but they're using words. Words are important, and they use
it against us because they call it criminal justice reform.
And they use the word reform. Well, everyone thinks that
criminal justice needs reform because we all know what we're
up against. But their version of reform is it's society's fault.
(07:54):
It's these criminals are not really criminals, they're clients and
they're victims of society.
Speaker 2 (07:59):
All right, They're in powerful positions, this crowd, But numerically,
the number of people who believe in this is pretty small.
Speaker 3 (08:06):
Where is everybody.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
Else pushing back, overwhelming them, marginalizing them. They don't have
the numbers. It's not even close. They should be They
should be obliterated publicly in these kinds of disputes.
Speaker 4 (08:22):
The problem is is that it's do you want me
to tell you how many people have reached out to
me to talk about this? You?
Speaker 2 (08:27):
That's it.
Speaker 4 (08:28):
No one else wants to talk about it. The media
doesn't want us telling you what your legislators are doing.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
Can you hold on? Sheriff Bianco?
Speaker 4 (08:37):
Absolutely all right.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
We want to ask you a couple more questions. This
is Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, our guest, and uh boy,
we're glad we have him speaking out. He lost to
Sheriff's deputy Isaiah Cordero was gunned down by a three
striker back on December twenty ninth. It's a simple traffic stop.
Fortunately the three striker was killed later by police. But
(08:59):
he should have been on the streets and it's because
of a decision by a San Bernardino County judge by
the name of Kara Hudson that he was. I'm reading
a quote, this quote from a former La County prosecutor,
Dimitri Goren, who said, in my thirty years as a
defense attorney, and prosecutor. I've never heard of a third
strike felon awaiting sentencing, getting out on bail, and then
(09:21):
being arrested while out on bail, and then being released again.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
I don't remember anything like this, because if it happened,
we would have covered it.
Speaker 1 (09:29):
We will talk more with the sheriff. Next up is
your Chance at Money the keyword for one thousand dollars
Johnny KENKFI AM six forty Live Everywhere, the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
We return now to Chad Bianco, the Riverside County Sheriff.
Speaker 1 (09:42):
Yeah, we're talking about the death of one of his
deputy's big news December twenty ninth. It was a traffic stop.
Isaiah Cordero was pulling over a motorist who turned out
to be a three striker out on bond, and he
opened fire and killed the deputy. He was later killed.
But we're also dealing with the consequences of a judge
giving this man not once, but twice bond so he
(10:05):
could be free on the streets. A long criminal history
for this creep, and we're talking to the sheriff about that,
I mean, Sheriff Fianca, what do you say to deputy
Cordero's family members. I heard his mother was pretty emotional
talking about these types of decisions being made down with
a criminal justice system. Is this where we're at that
more judges are going to give three strikers this kind
(10:27):
of bond and this kind of freedom.
Speaker 4 (10:30):
Well, I hope not. You know, I'd like for all
of them to talk with his mother and spend a
couple of days with her and see if they would
change their mind. If that's the way that they're going.
And we're always in this position where, you know, we
look at our politicians that are making these laws, and
you look at this judge and say, what's it going
(10:51):
to take to change their mind and get them in
the right path. Would it be one of their family members?
Would it be different if it was their family member
that was the victim or something happened to them.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
Much of the frustration is usually comes from someone who
doesn't get a conviction that he should get, or doesn't
get a sentence that he should get. But in this case,
he got the conviction. The sentence was a three strike sentence.
There was a minimum sentence that would put him away
for a long time. It's that she just never bothered
to complete the final act and put them away and
(11:22):
instead lets him out on an absurd bail.
Speaker 3 (11:24):
I mean, nobody's ever seen this before.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
This was like a new way to get around what
the public wants.
Speaker 4 (11:32):
It most certainly is, and it's a way to get
around it without having to tell anyone. And unfortunately, we
have a severe tragedy. I mean as big as there's
nothing more worse than a death. That's the highest issue
you can get. And then we have a murder, and
that murder would have been prevented had she done her job.
Speaker 1 (11:52):
That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 4 (11:53):
It doesn't get any worse.
Speaker 3 (11:54):
This decision created a murder.
Speaker 2 (11:56):
Usually the decisions don't punish the killer, but this one
created another death that was completely unnecessary.
Speaker 4 (12:05):
Yes, and how many other people are out there in
the same situation that have been let free by judges.
They just haven't killed anybody, so we haven't brought it forth.
The same similar situation could be said about the the
Almanti police officers that were killed. That person should have
been in custody for different reasons. But this one, this
one's a little bit different than The judge actually just
(12:26):
let him go like he was some type of a
good person that O y'all show up when you tell
me I have to go to prison for the rest
of my life.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
Yeah, Jacqueline Rodriguez, public affairs officer for the San Bordardino
County DA's office, said, currently there's no legislation that states
that a post convicted three strikes felon out on bond
cannot post bond on a subsequent offense.
Speaker 4 (12:50):
Yeah, we recurred to my problem. Yeah, that is the
problem because they're looking instead of saying, oh my gosh,
what a screw up, and let's immediately fix this, they're
just blaming it on somebody else.
Speaker 3 (13:02):
Well, because they're taking nobody's ever done this, Nobody ever
thought we needed a.
Speaker 4 (13:08):
Law like that exactly. You would think it would be
common sense, common sense, good judgment, reality, And instead she's
allowed to do this, and then their excuses, well, there's
nothing in the law that prevented her from doing it.
It is sickening, all.
Speaker 1 (13:27):
Right, sheriff. We appreciate you spending some time with us.
We know you're pretty busy. Thanks a lot.
Speaker 4 (13:33):
Thank you. I appreciate you guys talking about it, and
I certainly am not going to stop.
Speaker 1 (13:37):
No, keep speaking out and is Riverside County Sheriff Chad
Bianco is our guest, thank you so much for coming on,
he pointed out. Nobody's asked him about this but us.
Speaker 4 (13:46):
Yeah, which is thanks guys.
Speaker 1 (13:48):
So frankly really puzzling, as he pointed out, the Times
did a long story over the weekend, sort of like,
you know, explaining, although you didn't get anything from the judge,
three strikes fell and on bail twice. Over was on
the streets where he gunned down a deputy and that's
where we're reading some of these quotes in here. They're
not exactly defending the judge. They couldn't get a comment
(14:10):
from her, but you know that.
Speaker 2 (14:12):
It mostly lays out his criminal history and the series
of events that led to this in the last year
or so.
Speaker 1 (14:20):
Right, well, we're not going to let this story go
because this is breaking new horrific ground. If we have
judges allowing three strikers out on bond and bail, not once,
but twice. Right, they picked up this guy again and
again she gave him bond more. Coming up, John and
Ken Kfi am six forty live everywhere the iHeartRadio.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
App Maybe if the woke jerks in the local TV
news departments would cover this.
Speaker 3 (14:43):
It might help John and Ken.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
That's right. We're on one to four, which means, holy mackerel,
we're done in twenty five minutes. But if you can't
listen live, you can always download the show, the podcast,
the iHeartRadio app, the website tool. These are places to
find John and Ken all three hours at your convenience.
Speaker 2 (15:03):
Or you could come with me on my drive home
and I'll just talk to you in the car.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
Is that how you fill the fourth hour? Now? Yes,
you do, like a little show in your car in
the car, yeah, and on a rainy day it could
be a longer show.
Speaker 2 (15:13):
I just pick up anybody on the street and say, hey,
you want to hear a radio show, come on, Oh
like a vagrant sit down?
Speaker 3 (15:18):
Yeah, sure, that's cool.
Speaker 2 (15:20):
And then I tell him how terrible all these homeless
people are any grace?
Speaker 3 (15:24):
He says, You're absolutely right. Shouldn't be like this.
Speaker 1 (15:27):
We spent some time in the last month exploring the
drug problem and the homeless. Remember Sam Canonas was one
of our guests. Used to be an La Times writer.
Now he's written the book The Least of Us. A
lot of it was about super meth and fentanyl. And
what they're doing is it they ravaged the homeless population,
not just that. Obviously you're reading about fentanyl overdoses among
(15:49):
those who are not homeless. The New York Times is
weighed in with a new angle on this, and let
me just read you the first couple of paragraphs, because
I think you'll get the really creepy idea what's going on.
Over a matter of weeks, Tracy McCann watched in horror
as the bruises she was accustomed to getting from injecting
(16:10):
fentanyl began hardening, hardening into an armor of crusty black
and tissue. Something must have gotten into the supply. Switching
corner dealers didn't help. People were saying that everyone's dope
was being cut with something that was causing gruesome, painful wounds.
McCann said, I wake up in the morning crying because
(16:31):
my arms are dying. What we're talking about is trank dope.
Trank dope, that's right. Apparently the new thing to do
is to stick an animal tranquilizer called zilee xylazine into
(16:52):
common fentanyl to make it even more potent. Philadelphia's already
been hit hard by this problem of dope or zombie drugs.
Uh Xylazine causes wounds that erupt with a scaly dead
tissue called ishar. Untreated, it can lead to amputation.
Speaker 2 (17:14):
Well, if you have black tissue, you have dead tissue.
It kills your your your skins, and it skill. It
kills the tissue beneath the skin.
Speaker 1 (17:25):
Yes, it induces a blackout stupor too for hours, rendering
users vulnerable to rape and robbery. When people come to
the high from the fentanyl is long since fade, and
they immediately crave more. I know the story is bad.
It just gets worse with the fentanyl and the drugs,
doesn't it.
Speaker 3 (17:45):
Just because people are on the streets taking.
Speaker 5 (17:47):
Anything because it's cheap and there's no questions. I asked, well, yes,
and you end up with your skin turning black and
rotting off at some point, don't you hear about it?
Speaker 1 (18:00):
Choices can have consequences, is what I say to that.
Speaker 3 (18:02):
You know, it's really hard to have sympathy after a while.
Speaker 1 (18:06):
It is. It is, but their addicts and they can't stop.
Speaker 2 (18:09):
There's places to go if you're an addict. See, it's
not like we haven't spent hundreds of billions of dollars
on this?
Speaker 3 (18:17):
What else do you want people to do? Really?
Speaker 2 (18:20):
What else more could we do than spend all the
money and set up all the treatment that they're is
that does.
Speaker 1 (18:26):
Exist because xylazine is the sedative, not an opioid, it
resists standard opioid overdose reversal treatments such as that nax alone.
So there you go. Now, this crowd, which is led
by the LA Times, let's just do you see the
time story the other day, we should all be carrying
with us now nar can?
Speaker 3 (18:46):
I saw, Yeah, yeah, okay, I got it.
Speaker 1 (18:50):
People run into.
Speaker 3 (18:51):
Now now it's my obligation.
Speaker 2 (18:53):
If I run into a vagrant on the street who's overdosed,
I'm the one who has to revive him.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
Well, if they took one of these trank door versions
of foot and it may not work.
Speaker 2 (19:04):
But wait a second, what are we paying for already?
Why do I have to arm myself with Narcan? With
all the money we've paid for law enforcement, for drug treatment,
for homeless programs, we've done everything that we possibly can do.
Speaker 1 (19:22):
Now they're going to say, what if you're one of
your children, well gets the drugs online when you don't
even know about it, and they're in an overdose situation.
You want to have the.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
Most kids don't.
Speaker 2 (19:32):
There's actually a way to raise your kids, so they
don't do that because most kids don't do it.
Speaker 1 (19:41):
I mean I couldn't.
Speaker 2 (19:43):
I couldn't imagine my kids buying random pills in an alley,
and most parents couldn't imagine their kids and they don't.
Speaker 3 (19:51):
These are all These are all mostly.
Speaker 2 (19:52):
The troubled families, the troubled kids, the ones who the
kids have been neglected and abused by the parents.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Xylazine was developed in nineteen sixty two is an anesthetic
for veterinary procedures. Trials and humans were shut down because
the drug led to respiratory depression and low blood pressure.
Its use as an addictive substitute for heroin most likely
started in the two thousands.
Speaker 2 (20:16):
Do you wonder if there's a story out there that
we don't know as to why the US government allows
this to go on. We know ten major things they
can do.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
People always say, because they're making money.
Speaker 3 (20:31):
No, I don't know. Is there some sort of follow
the money?
Speaker 4 (20:35):
No?
Speaker 3 (20:35):
Is there there's some I heard what was it? All right?
Speaker 2 (20:39):
I was driving home. I was listen to something on cable,
and it's one of those things that I ordinarily would dismiss,
but I did stop and think about it. And the
host was talking to somebody who used to run a
division of the DEA who'd been to Mexico and dealt
with the drug issues, and he says he suspects that
are hands off policy. Is got elements of the CIA
(21:03):
involved manipulating things in Mexico because they want to keep
Mexico destabilized. So we have a lot of influence in
control over what goes on in Central America.
Speaker 3 (21:13):
And I never heard that theory.
Speaker 2 (21:15):
Well, this guy, this guy actually had a big title
retired from from the DEA, and he says he thinks
that's what's going on, That the US government is actually
actively involved in keeping the Mexican government dependent on us
by keeping the population and just the whole society unstable
and off balance, by allowing the drug cartels to have
(21:36):
its way, and that they're more interested in having domination
and control over the region than they care about, you know,
vagrants in the street dying. Normally, I would dismiss that stuff,
but I couldn't get out of my head. I was
driving home and I'm thinking what if there's another story here,
because this doesn't make any sense, And when something doesn't
make any sense for this long, it means there's something
(21:58):
out there we don't know.
Speaker 1 (21:59):
I thought it was more that countries, particularly Mexico, are
so dysfunctional that the drug trade at least brings some
revenue in so that the people aren't even more starving
and ready for revolt. That's what I always say.
Speaker 2 (22:13):
The belief was so so we allow it to happen
because at least these this keeps people fed in Mexico
and they don't start rioting. It's a source of employment,
it's a big element of their so they don't overthrow
the government. So we don't end up in a worse
situation that we're willing to sacrifice a certain number of
like homeless losers to drugs and maybe a few kids,
(22:37):
and in return, we don't get some apocalyptic situation in
Mexico that would affect us even worse. That's kind of
along the same lines, though, you know, it's it's a
it's a it's about not trusting Mexico to be on
its own and us having to have some influence.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
Now here's why reversing an overdose when there is xylazine
involved is tricky. And again we're talking about apparently the
new drug is mixing fentanyl with this animal tranquilizer, a xylazine,
a dose of the overdose halting medicine nalazone or narcan.
It blocks or reverses opioids effect on brain receptors, will
(23:14):
address the fentanyl, but it's not going to arouse a
victim who's sedated with the laz We've tried two or
three times, but they could end up vomiting and writhing. Well,
I guess they're gonna die.
Speaker 6 (23:24):
These people.
Speaker 3 (23:26):
What are we gonna be saying?
Speaker 1 (23:26):
It's already too late for Philadelphia. This drug is everywhere.
Speaker 3 (23:31):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (23:31):
Maybe this is gonna self correct. Yeah, there is a
little bit of Darwinism here, and maybe all these people
are going to kill themselves in this extremely horrible way,
and then that you know, they'll be off the streets
and maybe a few others are going to see what's
happening and give up the stuff. Because there's nothing the
government can do. The government's not good at this, and
(23:52):
nobody in government's particularly interested in this unless they can
hire a lot of people, and people can make money. Right,
so you get all the fake on profits and they
get the tax funding after they've guilted the normal population.
They guilt us. We give them money. Okay, you know
it's inhuman what's going on. They take the money, laugh
(24:13):
at us because we're gullible, naive. We fall for it
every time. Then they blow it on their stupid agencies.
Everybody's making six figures, but.
Speaker 3 (24:20):
They don't care.
Speaker 2 (24:22):
I don't I don't think it's it's possible for the
government to treat all these these these addicts or treat
all these mental patients.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
And I don't think there's any interest on the.
Speaker 2 (24:29):
Part of the government workers and the bureaucrats or the politicians.
Speaker 1 (24:33):
They just realize this story with another good in your
face to outfits like politicians, and they elsa gon to
times and think, well, just have narcan. Yeah, well it's
not going to work in the case of people that
get this try and dope.
Speaker 2 (24:46):
But you see how they keep keep expanding our responsibility
for this. It's not our fault. Whenever I hear somebody says, oh,
you know, it's society's probably you know, I want to
hit them. It's like, no, it's not society's proble. Well,
it's not my problem.
Speaker 3 (25:01):
I gave all right, we.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
Got more coming up. Johnny ken k If I am
six forty live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 2 (25:08):
I found the name of the former government official who
was on TV the other day talking about how he
thinks the CIA may be involved in not.
Speaker 3 (25:18):
Trying to stop all the drugs coming over because.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
It works to our benefit to keep Mexico destabilized. His
name is Derek Maltz. M Altz, He's the former DEA
Special Operations Director and he went he was on originally
to talk about oh video Guzman being arrested El Chapo's son,
and then there's some clips online. He was on one
(25:42):
of the Fox shows. And I'm just thinking that there's
a lot more to this that's not being discussed.
Speaker 1 (25:53):
And this would carry over from like president to president
to kind of keep this policy.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
Yeah, this would be the permanent government, you know, the
permanent FBI, the permanent CIA. You know that Trump called
the deep state. There is a lot of truth to that,
like it runs on its own because presidents come and go,
Congress control comes and goes. But there's people there who've
been working for twenty thirty forty years and more. Who
(26:19):
they've got their own agenda, Like nobody really governs the CIA.
You know, if the CIA wants to disrupt the presidency,
they will. We saw how the FBI disrupted the Trump presidency.
I mean there's countering agendas going on obviously.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
Well, speaking of Trump for a moment, you may have
heard over the weekend that thousands of people storm Brazil's
National Congress building shades of January sixth. There was an
election in that country and the man that lost, Bolasonaro,
question the results the victory went to and he was
(26:56):
the incumbent. He's very Trump like he was, he's compared
to Trump. And guess where he is right now. Bolsonaro
is in Florida, apparently spending his time waiting in line
at publics, eating alone a Kentucky Fried Chicken, and posting
selfies for people. But there was a Brazilian dentist who
losened Florida. He said, we wanted to go see him.
We'd rather see him than we care more about seeing
(27:19):
him the mickey mouse. He does have some very very
loyal supporters the way Trump did, and because they had
questions about the outcome of this election. Well, there you go,
just like January sixth, they stormed the Brazili by the thousands,
by the thousands, right, it was very similar. Some think
that this guy has given them sort of the wink
(27:41):
and the nod, just like they did with Trump.
Speaker 2 (27:43):
Oh weisted, the election was stolen. Now I just saw
a headline here, I'm clicking on the story. Well, it's
a British tabloid saying that Bossonara was worse to the
hospital in Orlando today.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
Yeah, he had stomach problems. Yeah, somebody plats Is it
from eating all the fast food? Because that's what the
Washington Post is saying is that's a lot of time
going to fast food places.
Speaker 3 (28:01):
He wasn't used to it. He come to America fast
food for a week's.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
People calling for them to take his visa away and
get him out of the US.
Speaker 2 (28:09):
Well, his visa is only supposed to work as long
as he's president, and now that he's not, he's right,
so now he doesn't have that visa special visa protection anymore.
Speaker 1 (28:18):
He's hanging out in Florida enjoying the sunshine.
Speaker 3 (28:22):
Conway's here.
Speaker 7 (28:23):
Hey, hey, now he has stomach problems because the guy
stabbed him with a nine inch knife in the stomach.
That's the ridge, that's the origin of his stomach problems.
Speaker 3 (28:35):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (28:36):
How long ago did that happen?
Speaker 6 (28:38):
Two years and twenty eighteen, So four years ago?
Speaker 1 (28:41):
Okay, ok, yeah, today he went to the hospital. I
guess he's still having Yeah.
Speaker 3 (28:46):
I think it was the food.
Speaker 7 (28:47):
I mean, look, I've never been stabbed in the stomach
and I'm I'm you know, on the toilet twice a week.
Speaker 3 (28:53):
Only twice a week? Wow?
Speaker 1 (28:57):
Yeah, twice a week is pretty long.
Speaker 3 (29:00):
To drink some water there a little no, No.
Speaker 6 (29:03):
I've been on a serious level. All right. Bill's deamorrow.
Speaker 7 (29:08):
Hamlin has been discharged, and there's a rumor going around
that he could have gone home on Saturday or Sunday,
but the NFL had all these big tributes for him
on yesterday and it would have looked odd if he
went home.
Speaker 6 (29:20):
And they're still doing the tributes.
Speaker 1 (29:22):
And now he's going to play this coming week, right.
Speaker 7 (29:24):
Yes, I think he's gonna play. If the playoff game,
if the Bill's making of the second round, I think
the second round. Yeah, he's gonna be back. But look,
I think it's great that he's home. He's recovering he's
he might be one hundred percent. But to see, you know,
season football pros crying on the air after the Bills
(29:45):
scored it their opening drive. You know there was a kickoff,
the kickoff, Yeah, they ran it back for a touchdown.
Speaker 6 (29:51):
I thought we need to take it down Fellas just
a little bit.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
I felt the same way yesterday. We need to just
step back. It was a terrible medical emergency. That's right,
he's okay. Yeah, he's going to recover. He's in better
shape than I am.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
Right, I mean you should have gone down a long
time ago. How many times you see on the ball
over exactly?
Speaker 3 (30:07):
He worked?
Speaker 7 (30:08):
He worked out today, he worked. I haven't worked out
since Portola Junior High.
Speaker 4 (30:17):
Uh.
Speaker 6 (30:17):
And then if you know it's raining outside, we'll cover that.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Yeah, you cover that rain, buddy, Yours start March, they log.
Speaker 7 (30:24):
I love last week when you said hey, when we
were doing the cross talk, and the last thing you said,
Ken was hey, you got a head to higher ground.
Speaker 1 (30:31):
Yeah, I got another one for you.
Speaker 3 (30:33):
Turn around, don't drown.
Speaker 7 (30:34):
I know that's that great we have during the fires,
we have ready set go.
Speaker 6 (30:38):
Now we have turnaround. Don't drown.
Speaker 2 (30:40):
Dumber people, Huh, that stupid thing when you were a kid.
Anybody on the news telling end though, don't drive into
a flooded road.
Speaker 7 (30:48):
I remember ever having evacuations either. You just wrote it out. Yeah,
you find a place to go. Yeah, Conway's dog, real men, Yes,
last the real man.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
Uh. Crozer's decks can't fight KOSDHD two Los Angeles, Orange
County Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app.
The John Kobylt Show News
Host
John Kobylt
Popular Podcasts
Are You A Charlotte?
In 1997, actress Kristin Davis’ life was forever changed when she took on the role of Charlotte York in Sex and the City. As we watched Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte navigate relationships in NYC, the show helped push once unacceptable conversation topics out of the shadows and altered the narrative around women and sex. We all saw ourselves in them as they searched for fulfillment in life, sex and friendships. Now, Kristin Davis wants to connect with you, the fans, and share untold stories and all the behind the scenes. Together, with Kristin and special guests, what will begin with Sex and the City will evolve into talks about themes that are still so relevant today. "Are you a Charlotte?" is much more than just rewatching this beloved show, it brings the past and the present together as we talk with heart, humor and of course some optimism.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.