November 24, 2025 • 32 mins
The John Kobylt Show Hour 1 (11/24) - LAFD was caught lying about the fire response once again! Jon Fleischman comes on the show to talk about the Trump Administration suing California over illegal immigrant students attending state colleges at a heavily discounted rate compared to American students. An update on the gay sheep.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
I am six forty. You're listening to the John Cobel
podcast on the iHeartRadio app. We are on every day
from one until four o'clock. Write that down, Always be prompt,
Always attend right at one o'clock. If you have an
excused absence, we have a podcast where you can make
up the lesson from after four o'clock John Cobel's show
(00:22):
on demand, and it's the same as the radio show,
and you could listen to what you missed. I feel
like I've done a segment like this, like like thirty
forty times in recent months. But every week it seems
there's the same story. Los Angeles officials lied about something
(00:45):
important when it came to the fire, and I just
can't believe how consistent the lies are. Like almost everything
they said in the early weeks and months turned out
to be false. And we have another entrant. I got to,
you know what, I got to put together a master
list now because it's hard to keep track of this.
(01:09):
I actually that's what Spencer Pratt was very good at
right off the top of his head when we did
the interview last week. You know, he was able to
reel off one fact after another, one lie after another,
and now the interim fire chief, Ronnie von Aeva. This
guy is a minor character along the way. He replaced
(01:30):
Kristin Crowley after Bass fired Crowley for telling the truth
on how badly underfunded the fire department was under Bass.
Of course, Crowley committed many of her own's sins. But
Ronnie vi on Aeva. When reports came out that the
(01:50):
January seventh fire was a rekindling of a January first
fire known as the Lachman fire, he said, well, well
you know it wasn't us. In fact, we went back
to the area on January third, heard there was some
smoke and we cold trailed an additional time, a cold trail,
(02:11):
meaning what does that mean? They used their hands to
feel for heat and dug out the hotspots. Now that
is labor intensive, doesn't it is? Does to sound that way. Yes,
you've got a whole group of firefighters, hands and knees
and the crown and the dirt likewing like cats digging
(02:31):
into the roots looking for heat, looking for signs of smoke,
and as we know, the day before, a group of
firefighters they didn't want. They were rebelling against their battalion.
Chief Mary Garcia. They said, we shouldn't leave here. The
(02:52):
rocks are hot, the tree stumps are hot. There's smoke
smoldering coming out of the ground and out of the
tree limbs and whatnot. And the battalion chief said, no,
everybody go home. Oh, roll up your hoses, out out.
There was some state official in the mix from the
Parks department. She wanted everybody out. The next day. Now,
(03:17):
Ronnie vian Aweva said, well, there was a group of
firefighters that went on the third Here's what really happened.
The in a Weeva claimed they cold trailed in additional time,
but The Los Angeles Times has obtained records that call
into question the statements. In other words, found out they lied.
(03:44):
If len Aweva had originally said, we went back over
there again, we dug it all out again, we put
ladders on it, we did everything we could do, coldtrail again. Dispatch.
A loog obtained by the Time shows that the firefighters
are right, I'm at the scene that day and quickly
quickly reported seeing no smoke. They then canceled the order
(04:08):
for another engine that was on the way. The call
was cleared within thirty four minutes. The log does not
mention cold trailing. You can't tell if the cruise took
any other actions because there's nothing on the log and
(04:29):
the Los Angeles Fire Department has not answered any questions
about it. The Time said they made multiple requests for
comment to LA Fire Department spokesperson Captain Eric Scott. They
emailed Captain Scott, they texted him, they made requests in person,
(04:50):
but the agency is refusing to explain the discrepancy. The
UUEVA described detailed cold trailing again. That means they use
their hands to feel for heat, they dig out hotspots,
they put ladders on it. Don't know exactly what that means.
We went back over there, we dug it out all
(05:12):
over again. We did everything that we could do, but
nobody wrote that down and nobody wants to talk about it.
Speaker 3 (05:22):
Well, people need to be subpoenat here.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
Where there should be now, this is what I want
to see with an investigation. People should have to testify
absolutely before I mean, maybe I guess it's going to
have to be a federal hearing because the state won't
do it. Newsom is protecting everybody. This is what you
get with one party rule. You could actually burn a
town down like almost seven thousand homes and other structures displaced,
(05:50):
tens of thousands of people, and everybody can line and say, oh,
we did everything we could. Yeah, right by the book. Yeah,
we got the documents here and nobody will nobody questions it,
and when the truth comes out, nobody has any comment.
Speaker 3 (06:07):
Everybody is afraid of being fired. How sad is that?
Speaker 2 (06:11):
And a lot of these people need to be fired. Yes,
some of these people need to be yes.
Speaker 4 (06:15):
Absolutely, But the people that want to come out and
tell the truth, I mean, no, I.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
Know there's got to be there's got to be dozens,
if not hundreds of people in the LA Fire Department
who know the truth. Yeah, you're right, and they're they're afraid,
and I understand.
Speaker 3 (06:29):
And they will be fired.
Speaker 2 (06:30):
Yeah, no, I understand why. But I mean, this is
what investigative. You put people under oath. You have a
like a state Senate or a state Assembly committee hearing.
You put them under oath where they have to tell
the truth or they go to jail, or you have
a federal hearing that.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
Has to be done. In this case, this is just ridiculous.
Speaker 2 (06:51):
Already, it says here in the Times conflict between the
fire Department's statements and its own record is likely to
intensify frustration and anger among Palisades fire victims. Y, no thanks,
and who wrote this?
Speaker 3 (07:06):
I didn't know that.
Speaker 2 (07:07):
Oh, Paul Pringle and Eleen Chick Median. All right, there
you go. They are the They are sharp tools, those two.
But I appreciate that they dug out this information, that
they did the reporting. And it's almost a year now, yes,
but about six weeks it'll be a year. And there's
still gaps in what the fire department has told the
(07:29):
public about what it did to prepare for and respond
to the fire. Their gaps because nothing was done.
Speaker 4 (07:34):
Everybody wants to not not the people that suffered, but
the politicians.
Speaker 3 (07:38):
Everybody wants to just move on. We're rebuilding.
Speaker 4 (07:41):
Just let's move on.
Speaker 3 (07:43):
It's almost been a year.
Speaker 4 (07:44):
No, you can't move on. There possibly criminal activity going
on here.
Speaker 2 (07:50):
The fire Department's after action report makes only a passing
reference to the Lochman blaze, even though that was the
origin of it.
Speaker 3 (07:58):
We have somebody in city.
Speaker 2 (08:01):
Yeah, the arsonist fire was not put out, and good
luck finding that in the seventy page report. And missing
from the seventy page report is report of smoke in
the area on January third, and a battalion chief's decision
to pull the firefighters out of the scene the day before.
(08:24):
So smoke was seen on January second and January third,
and no wonder, I got whipped up by the strong winds.
I guess they thought none of this was ever going
to come out. Do you know when you take away
thousands of homes from people, everything's going to come out?
That that tragedy is so overwhelming, I mean, so searing.
(08:49):
I met, Oh, in fact, I told you, we always
take hikes there. Yeah, So my wife and I met
a couple on the hike and asked them what their
experience was. We interview everybody on the hike.
Speaker 3 (09:01):
I'm sure. Oh no, there's the cow belts.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Turn out, always full of questions. And the gist of
their story was the husband stood outside with a hose.
He had a two and a half inch fire hose
because his family was threatened by a fire in the
same area nineteen seventy eight when he was a kid.
(09:25):
Eventually took over the house and he knew to have
a fire hose and other things, and he said the
fire department never came for much of the time. When
they finally showed up, they said, yeah, we got to
get a roof crew, like they wanted to water down
the roofs. He said, the roof crew never showed up.
Speaker 4 (09:47):
I told you I have a friend whose house burned
down in the Palisades, and same thing.
Speaker 3 (09:52):
No one came.
Speaker 2 (09:53):
Nobody can't be to their neighborhood. So he saved several
homes in his neighborhood by himself with his two and
a half inch which goes back to last week's discussion. Yeah,
one hundred and seventeen million gallons would have made a difference.
This guy was able to save his home and several
others with his one lonely hose.
Speaker 4 (10:10):
And there should be hearing on that too, Yes, a
federal investigation. If the reservoir was filled, could that have
prevented homes from being lost?
Speaker 2 (10:20):
We're going to take a break. More coming up.
Speaker 5 (10:23):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM six.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
Forty every day from one until four after four o'clock
John Cobelt Show on demand. All Right, Debra's got news
at one thirty. Immediately after the news, I do where
not put my reading glasses? This really isn't gonna work.
Speaker 3 (10:47):
The probably fell on the floor.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
Very good, You're exactly right, yeah, I know. Coming up
after your news we're gonna have John fleischmannon. He's the
political analyst. Sodoesitmatter dot com is his website, and he's
written a piece and it's been in all the newspapers
over the weekend. The Trump administration is now suing California
(11:14):
because we have eighty thousand illegal alien students in this
state going to California University's cal State system and they
are getting such a deal, Like there's one example in
the La Times where one student is only paying six
hundred and nineteen dollars a semester, and it costs an
(11:37):
out of state student fifty two hundred. So an American
citizen out of state pays fifty two hundred to go
to a school here in California fifty two hundred. Illegal
alien living here pays six hundred. It's against the law.
It's actually a clear violation of federal law. John Fleischman
will talk about it after one thirty, talking about is
(12:01):
this another big lie? This one told by the interim
fire chief Ronnie vien Aweva. He claimed that the Palisades
fire burn area. Well, you know, the original fire was
the Lockmann fire on the first Palisades on the seventh
of January. Vienna Wavas said on January third, they cold
trailed that fire area, which means they use their hands
(12:26):
to feel for heat. They dug out hotspots. Actually they
did none of those things. It looks like Dotter did
he make that up because it's not in any of
the records. Times got a hold of him. Nothing in
the log and they keep asking by text, email and
in person, but the spokeshole, Captain Eric Scott, refuses to
(12:47):
explain the discrepancy. The Awava also refuses to explain. They
emailed him directly, they asked for an interview. Nothing. So
people are lying. They're making things up. Now, remember we
were just talking about the after action report. Yes, listen
to this claim by Genethia Hudley Hayes, president of the
(13:09):
Board of Fire Commissioners. The after action review that was
presented to the commission is exactly what we asked for,
she said. The review is only supposed to cover the
first seventy two hours after the Palisades fire. She claims
it's not an investigation. It should not include things that
the newspaper seems to feel like it should be included. Well,
(13:31):
they sold this thing as, oh, the after action report
will give us the answers, because reporters are asking Bass
and Crowley and everybody else's like, what about this? What
about that? Oh, the after action report they lied and
Janeatha Hudley Hayes claims not. It's supposed to be that way.
But you're supposed to not have a report to tell
(13:53):
you how this thing started. Remember, the FEDS discovered the FEDS,
the ATF discovered the origin that it was an arsonist.
The after action report detailed the mistakes in response to
the Palisades fire, but two former LA Fire Department chief
(14:17):
officers said the after action report should have provided what
might have gone wrong in the mop up of the
Wachman fire. According to la FD Battalion Chief Rick Crawford,
you noticed these guys are willing to give their names
and be quoted on the record. A good after action
(14:37):
report documents what happened before the incident. He retired last
year from the agency and now he works for the
US Capital. This after action report should have gone back
all the way to December thirty. First, here's another. Patrick Butler,
former assistant chief for the LAFD, worked on several after
(14:58):
action teams for the FEDS. If you limit an after
action report to an artificial timeline, you're not going to
uncover everything you need to learn from I'm thinking this
was done on purpose. They snowed us with this claim
of an after action report. We thought we were going
to get the full story, and you got a small
(15:20):
fraction of the story. And then they go, oh, well,
we never intended to give you the full story.
Speaker 3 (15:25):
But do you really think that these people.
Speaker 4 (15:29):
Would think that reporters, I know, I know what you
think about a lot of the reporters out there, but
that no one would follow up, that everybody would just
kind of get in line and say, oh, okay, okay,
let's move on.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
I think they thought by time it came out, nobody
would care anymore. I really do.
Speaker 4 (15:48):
This was too big, too awful, too tragic for people
to just forget. I mean, there's going to be so
much coverage when we hit the one year mark. I mean,
this was such a huge, huge story.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
Yeah, and still and because they weren't able to the
rebuilding is so excruciatingly slow. I mean, what Spencer Pratt
said on our show last week, is they've got three
hundred permits approved and there's almost seven thousand structures burned,
I mean most of them homes. Well, at that rate,
it's going to be twenty one years, right, so we're
(16:24):
talking about the year twenty forty five before the Palisades
is rebuilt. Patrick Butler, former assistant chief, said to exclude
the Lockman fire from the report gives the appearance of
a cover up, a cover up of foundational facts. Yeah,
(16:46):
foundational facts, the original facts.
Speaker 3 (16:48):
Whose heads are going to rule?
Speaker 2 (16:50):
John Butler says, it's not a harmless oversight. The consequences
can be significant and far reaching. Well, we've got a
lot of people participating in the cover up. Now we
have three different chiefs, and you notice the third chief,
Hi Memore. He doesn't want to hear any criticism of
what happened. He wants to keep his job, being a
waiver claim that you know, hey, there was nothing there.
(17:16):
Kristin Crowley blamed Bass and didn't want to take any
responsibility Bass.
Speaker 3 (17:20):
How did that go?
Speaker 2 (17:20):
Yeah, you know what, it's better you want to keep
your job. You don't blame Karen Bass. No, everything I
hear about that We've talked about on the air, and
things I hear off the air is she's extremely vindictive.
You cross her, you're dead. And that's why, that's why
everybody has shut up inside the Los Angeles Fire Department
(17:43):
because they got they got their families to feed. Well,
we're not going to give up. She can't fire us.
Speaker 3 (17:48):
She can't.
Speaker 2 (17:50):
Wouldn't surprise me if she tries. You try John Fleischman
coming up. He's a political analyst, so does itmatter? Dot
com is his website. The Trump administration is suing California.
We've got eighty thousand illegal alien college students going to
California colleges and universities and they're paying a tiny fraction
(18:12):
of the money that American out of state students are charged.
Speaker 5 (18:17):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
John Cobelt Show. We are on every day from one
until four o'clock, and every day after four o'clock you
get John Cobelt Show on demand. That's the podcast version,
same as the radio show, and you could pick up
on what you missed. The Trump administration is suing the
state of California. You see this goes both ways. You
may have heard of this that you know we have
eighty thousand illegal alien college students in the state, just
(18:46):
at California state colleges and universities, eighty thousand. And if
you are an illegal alien here in California, you can go,
for example, to East LA College for six hundred and
nineteen dollars a semester. You believe that price six nineteen
if you're an out of state American student five thousand,
(19:09):
two hundred and eighty six dollars. So you could see
a whopping disparity between what an American student has to
pay and an illegal alien student in California. That is
the out of state tuition five two hundred and eighty
six dollars versus in state of six nineteen. And that's
that's eligible for illegal aliens, illegal alien students to pay.
(19:34):
And it's obviously so wrong. We're going to talk now
with John Fleischman about it because it violates federal law.
And that's why the Trump administration is suiting. John Fleischman
and political analyst, and his website is so does Itmatter
dot Com, which I read every day. So does Itmatter
dot Com? John is is federal law as clear cut
(19:54):
as it seems to be here.
Speaker 6 (19:58):
I believe that it is. You know, these days, the
law is whatever whatever judge you picked decides it is.
But we are, you know, I think in pretty firm
ground here to say that, you know, Americans have a
right to be able to enjoy everything. You know, maybe
I should phrase it a different way. If you're not
(20:20):
here in the country legally, you should not be able
to have things that people who are here in the
country legally cannot have. And I think that's the entire
basis for the lawsuits, is the idea that actually, you're
better off being an illegal alien going to college in California,
as you pointed out, than being an American. And there's
(20:43):
it's also the it's not just foreign it's not just
Americans out. You mentioned the out of state tuition, but
there's a lot of these programs that allow illegal aliens
to get better rates than in state California students that
those low numbers that you talked about aren't available to
every Californian who wants to go. Only to really really order,
(21:06):
I guess people that you know need economic assistence. So
the whole thing is crazy, and I thought you opened
things up correctly by saying that the shoe is on
the other foot, because it always seems like Gavin Newsom
and Bonta their happiness. They boast about suing the Trump
administration like every other day and twice on Sundays, right,
(21:26):
And so I think that it's great that we've now
got people at the Department of Justice in this case
that's over at the Civil Rights Division, which has our
Californian har Meat Dylan as the Assistant Attorney General, and
they are suing back and they're winning these cases. And
I think it's great because, you know, Newsom and company
are just completely fixated on obliterating the distinction between people
(21:50):
that are here legally and people that are here illegally,
and I'm glad we're finally doing.
Speaker 2 (21:55):
Something about it. Well, nobody in politics on that side
of things, and mostly in the media, nobody uses the
word illegal. And they even stop using all their euphemisms
like undocumented, unauthorized, lacking proper paperwork, all that other stuff.
They don't use. It just everybody's an immigrant, and it makes.
Speaker 6 (22:15):
You it's totally frustrating, it's totally ridiculous.
Speaker 1 (22:20):
And they've come up with this fiction. I've even heard
the Chief of Police of Los.
Speaker 6 (22:23):
Angeles use this during the riots, where they say, oh, well,
illegal immigration is a civil violation, it's not a criminal violation.
And you know, because I've heard you talk about it
on your show, that is completely not true. There is
a federal immigration law called illegal entry, and when you
violate it, you violate the law, your subject to potential imprisonment,
(22:45):
certainly deportations, and that's a criminal violation.
Speaker 1 (22:48):
It's just that they've come up with.
Speaker 6 (22:49):
This fiction that's completely not true.
Speaker 2 (22:52):
No, and they repeated over and over again thousands of times,
and it gets amplified by the media thousands of times
as a civil violation. And after a while, even I'm
like scratching my head, is like, did I misunderstand this issue?
That something changed, they pass a new law, it is
a criminal violation.
Speaker 1 (23:09):
They did not. As a matter of fact, I have
a quick download.
Speaker 6 (23:11):
If anybody's going to sodesnmatter dot com, you'll see a
button for the archives. You click on it and type
in illegal entry, and you will get my blog poster.
Maybe we can put it in the show notes. It
literally is a toolkit that shows you exactly what federal
law is being violated because I'm telling you this is
their mantrip. They are literally trying to make obliterate the
(23:33):
difference between legal and illegal, and it's whether you should
be able to go to the schools, you should be
able to get free medical attention, you should be able
to get well in this case, free tuition, practically free
tuition for all these California State universities. And it's completely nuts,
completely nuts, because we, as a sovereign country, have the right.
Speaker 1 (23:55):
To know who's coming here and decide if they.
Speaker 6 (23:57):
Should be coming in or not.
Speaker 2 (24:00):
Instead.
Speaker 1 (24:00):
I mean, I well, I listened to you during four
years of the Biden administration and it was.
Speaker 6 (24:06):
Just every single day it was literally, let's open up
the floodgates. Because what they want at the end of
the day. When I say they, I mean the liberal Democrats.
They want to allow millions now over ten million people
in the country and then they want to give them
all a pathway to citizenship, knowing that the same kinds
of people that don't care about violating the law to
come here.
Speaker 1 (24:26):
Are the same kind.
Speaker 6 (24:27):
Of people that will register Democrats and vote to give
themselves more free stuff. And it's just an ongoing cycle,
and this lawsuit is the latest example of.
Speaker 1 (24:37):
The Trump administration fighting back. Yeah, I think it's awesome.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
Yeah and I and of course the headline in the
La Times talk about these students are worrying that their
dreams are now going to be slipping away. You know,
it sounds harsh, but American students are intied to their
dreams first, and really healy that.
Speaker 6 (24:58):
But it's important to remember that the parents of the
it's likely that many of these students were brought into
the United States over the border illegally in the middle
of the night by parents who were making victims out
of their own children. But it doesn't change the fact that,
you know, they're citizens of a country, just not this country,
(25:20):
and it's not okay for them to just kind of
pretend that that difference doesn't exist.
Speaker 2 (25:24):
Yeah, eighty thousand. I had no idea the number was
that great, and they're actually in the various cal state
and university systems that that's an overwhelming number that we're subsidizing.
Speaker 6 (25:35):
Is it's crazy and every single person listening should be
outraged because there's almost no one in elective office in
Los Angeles County that doesn't completely subscribe and endorse this,
and they're all kind of responsible for it, and none
of them get held accountable for it.
Speaker 2 (25:53):
Because now there's parts.
Speaker 6 (25:56):
Of Los Angeles where there are more people illegally living
in somebody say Assembly district then there are living legally.
It's crazy, man upside down, it's bonkers.
Speaker 1 (26:06):
And again, thank goodness for the Trump administration.
Speaker 2 (26:09):
And I hear those representatives referring to them as my constituents,
John Fleischman, So does itmatter? Dot com? Thank you for
coming on with us about this.
Speaker 1 (26:18):
We got it.
Speaker 2 (26:19):
Thanks John, see you more coming up.
Speaker 5 (26:21):
You're listening to John Cobel on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (26:27):
Coming up after two o'clock. You know, you have an
Attorney General named Rob Bonta who has not investigated anything
about the Palisades fire, although that's his job. What he
is doing is meeting with a lot of donors and
he's involved in a scandal. And one of his donors, well,
(26:51):
there's a business partner of one of the donors who
says he has a compromising video of Rob Bonta. Now
the first thing I thought of, well, maybe this is
Rob Bonton naked or.
Speaker 3 (27:03):
You know, dressed up as a furry. I mean that
would be that'd be.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
Something that that that'd be the gold mine, right Rob.
And I can see that I can see.
Speaker 4 (27:14):
I'm not saying I can see that. I'm just I
can see it wondering.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
I can imagine it. Put that right, right.
Speaker 3 (27:21):
But we're just, you know, we're just poking fun here.
Speaker 2 (27:24):
Sure, we're not. We're not. We're not suggested that he
actually is a furry.
Speaker 3 (27:30):
I'm not any I mean, he.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
Would make a cute furry though he's kind of a
diminutive guy. Yeah, he would look like just this little charming,
cuddly Okay, stopping you know. Uh anyway, Uh, there are
documents that show Bonton knew that his donor was facilitating
prostitution for elected officials. The donor and Bonta knew about it,
(27:51):
and supposedly there's a video making it clear Bonta knew
about it. Got to report for you. We're going to
play from a station up in northern California. Other things. Now,
last week we had a story on gay sheep, right,
and if you didn't hear the original story, it is
simply that there are two people who are well, one
(28:15):
of them Michael Stookey founded a company called Rainbow Wool,
and the wool comes from gay male sheep. He grew
up a farm in Germany and discovered along the way
that eight percent of the male population, the rams, have
a preference for other males, and those gay males are
(28:38):
killed because if you're not going to reproduce, if you're
not going to get it on with the female sheep,
you're worthless. And so the gay sheep would be taken
to slaughter, and he thought that's not right, and so
he has rescues these sheep by having its wool made
(28:59):
out of well turned into products and they're selling it.
In fact, this this whole line of wool products made
an appearance at a New York fashion show that's part
two of the story, just this past week. The fashion
line is called a Wool Survive and the designer is
(29:21):
Michael Schmidt. So you've got Michael Stuck as the owner
of the company. Michael Schmidt took the wool and designed.
Now he has styled Madonna and Share and currently the
gay dating app Grinder is involved. I don't want to know,
(29:42):
and they have let me see, now what are what
are they making here? I had a whole list of
their letters. Yes, stresses, polo shirts, shorts, robes. Oh, I
got to get one of those. I got to get
a robe made of gay sheep wool. Yes, so it was.
(30:08):
It was all displayed on the fashion show stage this week.
And I guess, I mean, he's from Los Angeles, Michael,
Michael Schmidt, and so it's got to be Yeah, he's
from Los Angeles, so it's got to be available here.
I would think it's got to show up in stores.
Wool hats, dungarees, a wolf sailor's outfit, and a dressing gown.
Speaker 4 (30:32):
You know what I wonder though, And I'm all in
favor of this. I mean, you don't discriminate kill gay sheep.
I mean, that's just that's horrible. But when you take
the when you take the wool off the sheep, aren't
they cold?
Speaker 3 (30:50):
I mean I picture them shivering, and then that's really mean.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Right, and you have these bald.
Speaker 4 (30:57):
Gayhe I mean, I hope that maybe if that's the case,
that they're wrapping them up in blanket.
Speaker 2 (31:03):
You know, I know nothing about sheep hurting.
Speaker 3 (31:06):
I don't either.
Speaker 2 (31:06):
I don't know anything about the raising sheep for the
wool industry. I'd have to look that up.
Speaker 3 (31:15):
I know a lot of vegans don't wear wool.
Speaker 2 (31:17):
Why not for the reason I just well, they ought
to wear the gable.
Speaker 4 (31:21):
Yes, maybe they would because those sheep have been spared,
so that that's why I'm in favor of this. But
I'm just wondering if those poor sheep are shivering and
their wool is sheer.
Speaker 2 (31:31):
Look, they're alive, Okay, they could be warmer and dead.
You can't have everything.
Speaker 4 (31:36):
Okay, that's a fair point there, all right.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
When we come back Rob Bonta, who apparently there's a
compromising video of himself, but supposedly it has to do
with being involved in a conversation with a donor who
was involved in legal activities. Not that he's a furry,
not that there's any gay sheep in the video.
Speaker 3 (31:58):
This is kind of boring.
Speaker 2 (32:00):
Yeah, I know, it's excited. I know. I wanted. I
wanted to make people like stick through your news thinking
they're gonna hear some audio and Rob Bonta with the
terrible news right, doing what I can here anyway, that's
next stepamark is life in the CAFI twenty four our newsroom. Hey,
you've been listening to The John Cobalt Show podcast. You
(32:22):
can always hear the show live on KFI A M
six forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
and of course, anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app
Can't.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
I am six forty. You're listening to the John Cobel
podcast on the iHeartRadio app. We are on every day
from one until four o'clock. Write that down, Always be prompt,
Always attend right at one o'clock. If you have an
excused absence, we have a podcast where you can make
up the lesson from after four o'clock John Cobel's show
(00:22):
on demand, and it's the same as the radio show,
and you could listen to what you missed. I feel
like I've done a segment like this, like like thirty
forty times in recent months. But every week it seems
there's the same story. Los Angeles officials lied about something
(00:45):
important when it came to the fire, and I just
can't believe how consistent the lies are. Like almost everything
they said in the early weeks and months turned out
to be false. And we have another entrant. I got to,
you know what, I got to put together a master
list now because it's hard to keep track of this.
(01:09):
I actually that's what Spencer Pratt was very good at
right off the top of his head when we did
the interview last week. You know, he was able to
reel off one fact after another, one lie after another,
and now the interim fire chief, Ronnie von Aeva. This
guy is a minor character along the way. He replaced
(01:30):
Kristin Crowley after Bass fired Crowley for telling the truth
on how badly underfunded the fire department was under Bass.
Of course, Crowley committed many of her own's sins. But
Ronnie vi on Aeva. When reports came out that the
(01:50):
January seventh fire was a rekindling of a January first
fire known as the Lachman fire, he said, well, well
you know it wasn't us. In fact, we went back
to the area on January third, heard there was some
smoke and we cold trailed an additional time, a cold trail,
(02:11):
meaning what does that mean? They used their hands to
feel for heat and dug out the hotspots. Now that
is labor intensive, doesn't it is? Does to sound that way. Yes,
you've got a whole group of firefighters, hands and knees
and the crown and the dirt likewing like cats digging
(02:31):
into the roots looking for heat, looking for signs of smoke,
and as we know, the day before, a group of
firefighters they didn't want. They were rebelling against their battalion.
Chief Mary Garcia. They said, we shouldn't leave here. The
(02:52):
rocks are hot, the tree stumps are hot. There's smoke
smoldering coming out of the ground and out of the
tree limbs and whatnot. And the battalion chief said, no,
everybody go home. Oh, roll up your hoses, out out.
There was some state official in the mix from the
Parks department. She wanted everybody out. The next day. Now,
(03:17):
Ronnie vian Aweva said, well, there was a group of
firefighters that went on the third Here's what really happened.
The in a Weeva claimed they cold trailed in additional time,
but The Los Angeles Times has obtained records that call
into question the statements. In other words, found out they lied.
(03:44):
If len Aweva had originally said, we went back over
there again, we dug it all out again, we put
ladders on it, we did everything we could do, coldtrail again. Dispatch.
A loog obtained by the Time shows that the firefighters
are right, I'm at the scene that day and quickly
quickly reported seeing no smoke. They then canceled the order
(04:08):
for another engine that was on the way. The call
was cleared within thirty four minutes. The log does not
mention cold trailing. You can't tell if the cruise took
any other actions because there's nothing on the log and
(04:29):
the Los Angeles Fire Department has not answered any questions
about it. The Time said they made multiple requests for
comment to LA Fire Department spokesperson Captain Eric Scott. They
emailed Captain Scott, they texted him, they made requests in person,
(04:50):
but the agency is refusing to explain the discrepancy. The
UUEVA described detailed cold trailing again. That means they use
their hands to feel for heat, they dig out hotspots,
they put ladders on it. Don't know exactly what that means.
We went back over there, we dug it out all
(05:12):
over again. We did everything that we could do, but
nobody wrote that down and nobody wants to talk about it.
Speaker 3 (05:22):
Well, people need to be subpoenat here.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
Where there should be now, this is what I want
to see with an investigation. People should have to testify
absolutely before I mean, maybe I guess it's going to
have to be a federal hearing because the state won't
do it. Newsom is protecting everybody. This is what you
get with one party rule. You could actually burn a
town down like almost seven thousand homes and other structures displaced,
(05:50):
tens of thousands of people, and everybody can line and say, oh,
we did everything we could. Yeah, right by the book. Yeah,
we got the documents here and nobody will nobody questions it,
and when the truth comes out, nobody has any comment.
Speaker 3 (06:07):
Everybody is afraid of being fired. How sad is that?
Speaker 2 (06:11):
And a lot of these people need to be fired. Yes,
some of these people need to be yes.
Speaker 4 (06:15):
Absolutely, But the people that want to come out and
tell the truth, I mean, no, I.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
Know there's got to be there's got to be dozens,
if not hundreds of people in the LA Fire Department
who know the truth. Yeah, you're right, and they're they're afraid,
and I understand.
Speaker 3 (06:29):
And they will be fired.
Speaker 2 (06:30):
Yeah, no, I understand why. But I mean, this is
what investigative. You put people under oath. You have a
like a state Senate or a state Assembly committee hearing.
You put them under oath where they have to tell
the truth or they go to jail, or you have
a federal hearing that.
Speaker 3 (06:48):
Has to be done. In this case, this is just ridiculous.
Speaker 2 (06:51):
Already, it says here in the Times conflict between the
fire Department's statements and its own record is likely to
intensify frustration and anger among Palisades fire victims. Y, no thanks,
and who wrote this?
Speaker 3 (07:06):
I didn't know that.
Speaker 2 (07:07):
Oh, Paul Pringle and Eleen Chick Median. All right, there
you go. They are the They are sharp tools, those two.
But I appreciate that they dug out this information, that
they did the reporting. And it's almost a year now, yes,
but about six weeks it'll be a year. And there's
still gaps in what the fire department has told the
(07:29):
public about what it did to prepare for and respond
to the fire. Their gaps because nothing was done.
Speaker 4 (07:34):
Everybody wants to not not the people that suffered, but
the politicians.
Speaker 3 (07:38):
Everybody wants to just move on. We're rebuilding.
Speaker 4 (07:41):
Just let's move on.
Speaker 3 (07:43):
It's almost been a year.
Speaker 4 (07:44):
No, you can't move on. There possibly criminal activity going
on here.
Speaker 2 (07:50):
The fire Department's after action report makes only a passing
reference to the Lochman blaze, even though that was the
origin of it.
Speaker 3 (07:58):
We have somebody in city.
Speaker 2 (08:01):
Yeah, the arsonist fire was not put out, and good
luck finding that in the seventy page report. And missing
from the seventy page report is report of smoke in
the area on January third, and a battalion chief's decision
to pull the firefighters out of the scene the day before.
(08:24):
So smoke was seen on January second and January third,
and no wonder, I got whipped up by the strong winds.
I guess they thought none of this was ever going
to come out. Do you know when you take away
thousands of homes from people, everything's going to come out?
That that tragedy is so overwhelming, I mean, so searing.
(08:49):
I met, Oh, in fact, I told you, we always
take hikes there. Yeah, So my wife and I met
a couple on the hike and asked them what their
experience was. We interview everybody on the hike.
Speaker 3 (09:01):
I'm sure. Oh no, there's the cow belts.
Speaker 2 (09:05):
Turn out, always full of questions. And the gist of
their story was the husband stood outside with a hose.
He had a two and a half inch fire hose
because his family was threatened by a fire in the
same area nineteen seventy eight when he was a kid.
(09:25):
Eventually took over the house and he knew to have
a fire hose and other things, and he said the
fire department never came for much of the time. When
they finally showed up, they said, yeah, we got to
get a roof crew, like they wanted to water down
the roofs. He said, the roof crew never showed up.
Speaker 4 (09:47):
I told you I have a friend whose house burned
down in the Palisades, and same thing.
Speaker 3 (09:52):
No one came.
Speaker 2 (09:53):
Nobody can't be to their neighborhood. So he saved several
homes in his neighborhood by himself with his two and
a half inch which goes back to last week's discussion. Yeah,
one hundred and seventeen million gallons would have made a difference.
This guy was able to save his home and several
others with his one lonely hose.
Speaker 4 (10:10):
And there should be hearing on that too, Yes, a
federal investigation. If the reservoir was filled, could that have
prevented homes from being lost?
Speaker 2 (10:20):
We're going to take a break. More coming up.
Speaker 5 (10:23):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM six.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
Forty every day from one until four after four o'clock
John Cobelt Show on demand. All Right, Debra's got news
at one thirty. Immediately after the news, I do where
not put my reading glasses? This really isn't gonna work.
Speaker 3 (10:47):
The probably fell on the floor.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
Very good, You're exactly right, yeah, I know. Coming up
after your news we're gonna have John fleischmannon. He's the
political analyst. Sodoesitmatter dot com is his website, and he's
written a piece and it's been in all the newspapers
over the weekend. The Trump administration is now suing California
(11:14):
because we have eighty thousand illegal alien students in this
state going to California University's cal State system and they
are getting such a deal, Like there's one example in
the La Times where one student is only paying six
hundred and nineteen dollars a semester, and it costs an
(11:37):
out of state student fifty two hundred. So an American
citizen out of state pays fifty two hundred to go
to a school here in California fifty two hundred. Illegal
alien living here pays six hundred. It's against the law.
It's actually a clear violation of federal law. John Fleischman
will talk about it after one thirty, talking about is
(12:01):
this another big lie? This one told by the interim
fire chief Ronnie vien Aweva. He claimed that the Palisades
fire burn area. Well, you know, the original fire was
the Lockmann fire on the first Palisades on the seventh
of January. Vienna Wavas said on January third, they cold
trailed that fire area, which means they use their hands
(12:26):
to feel for heat. They dug out hotspots. Actually they
did none of those things. It looks like Dotter did
he make that up because it's not in any of
the records. Times got a hold of him. Nothing in
the log and they keep asking by text, email and
in person, but the spokeshole, Captain Eric Scott, refuses to
(12:47):
explain the discrepancy. The Awava also refuses to explain. They
emailed him directly, they asked for an interview. Nothing. So
people are lying. They're making things up. Now, remember we
were just talking about the after action report. Yes, listen
to this claim by Genethia Hudley Hayes, president of the
(13:09):
Board of Fire Commissioners. The after action review that was
presented to the commission is exactly what we asked for,
she said. The review is only supposed to cover the
first seventy two hours after the Palisades fire. She claims
it's not an investigation. It should not include things that
the newspaper seems to feel like it should be included. Well,
(13:31):
they sold this thing as, oh, the after action report
will give us the answers, because reporters are asking Bass
and Crowley and everybody else's like, what about this? What
about that? Oh, the after action report they lied and
Janeatha Hudley Hayes claims not. It's supposed to be that way.
But you're supposed to not have a report to tell
(13:53):
you how this thing started. Remember, the FEDS discovered the FEDS,
the ATF discovered the origin that it was an arsonist.
The after action report detailed the mistakes in response to
the Palisades fire, but two former LA Fire Department chief
(14:17):
officers said the after action report should have provided what
might have gone wrong in the mop up of the
Wachman fire. According to la FD Battalion Chief Rick Crawford,
you noticed these guys are willing to give their names
and be quoted on the record. A good after action
(14:37):
report documents what happened before the incident. He retired last
year from the agency and now he works for the
US Capital. This after action report should have gone back
all the way to December thirty. First, here's another. Patrick Butler,
former assistant chief for the LAFD, worked on several after
(14:58):
action teams for the FEDS. If you limit an after
action report to an artificial timeline, you're not going to
uncover everything you need to learn from I'm thinking this
was done on purpose. They snowed us with this claim
of an after action report. We thought we were going
to get the full story, and you got a small
(15:20):
fraction of the story. And then they go, oh, well,
we never intended to give you the full story.
Speaker 3 (15:25):
But do you really think that these people.
Speaker 4 (15:29):
Would think that reporters, I know, I know what you
think about a lot of the reporters out there, but
that no one would follow up, that everybody would just
kind of get in line and say, oh, okay, okay,
let's move on.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
I think they thought by time it came out, nobody
would care anymore. I really do.
Speaker 4 (15:48):
This was too big, too awful, too tragic for people
to just forget. I mean, there's going to be so
much coverage when we hit the one year mark. I mean,
this was such a huge, huge story.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
Yeah, and still and because they weren't able to the
rebuilding is so excruciatingly slow. I mean, what Spencer Pratt
said on our show last week, is they've got three
hundred permits approved and there's almost seven thousand structures burned,
I mean most of them homes. Well, at that rate,
it's going to be twenty one years, right, so we're
(16:24):
talking about the year twenty forty five before the Palisades
is rebuilt. Patrick Butler, former assistant chief, said to exclude
the Lockman fire from the report gives the appearance of
a cover up, a cover up of foundational facts. Yeah,
(16:46):
foundational facts, the original facts.
Speaker 3 (16:48):
Whose heads are going to rule?
Speaker 2 (16:50):
John Butler says, it's not a harmless oversight. The consequences
can be significant and far reaching. Well, we've got a
lot of people participating in the cover up. Now we
have three different chiefs, and you notice the third chief,
Hi Memore. He doesn't want to hear any criticism of
what happened. He wants to keep his job, being a
waiver claim that you know, hey, there was nothing there.
(17:16):
Kristin Crowley blamed Bass and didn't want to take any
responsibility Bass.
Speaker 3 (17:20):
How did that go?
Speaker 2 (17:20):
Yeah, you know what, it's better you want to keep
your job. You don't blame Karen Bass. No, everything I
hear about that We've talked about on the air, and
things I hear off the air is she's extremely vindictive.
You cross her, you're dead. And that's why, that's why
everybody has shut up inside the Los Angeles Fire Department
(17:43):
because they got they got their families to feed. Well,
we're not going to give up. She can't fire us.
Speaker 3 (17:48):
She can't.
Speaker 2 (17:50):
Wouldn't surprise me if she tries. You try John Fleischman
coming up. He's a political analyst, so does itmatter? Dot
com is his website. The Trump administration is suing California.
We've got eighty thousand illegal alien college students going to
California colleges and universities and they're paying a tiny fraction
(18:12):
of the money that American out of state students are charged.
Speaker 5 (18:17):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (18:23):
John Cobelt Show. We are on every day from one
until four o'clock, and every day after four o'clock you
get John Cobelt Show on demand. That's the podcast version,
same as the radio show, and you could pick up
on what you missed. The Trump administration is suing the
state of California. You see this goes both ways. You
may have heard of this that you know we have
eighty thousand illegal alien college students in the state, just
(18:46):
at California state colleges and universities, eighty thousand. And if
you are an illegal alien here in California, you can go,
for example, to East LA College for six hundred and
nineteen dollars a semester. You believe that price six nineteen
if you're an out of state American student five thousand,
(19:09):
two hundred and eighty six dollars. So you could see
a whopping disparity between what an American student has to
pay and an illegal alien student in California. That is
the out of state tuition five two hundred and eighty
six dollars versus in state of six nineteen. And that's
that's eligible for illegal aliens, illegal alien students to pay.
(19:34):
And it's obviously so wrong. We're going to talk now
with John Fleischman about it because it violates federal law.
And that's why the Trump administration is suiting. John Fleischman
and political analyst, and his website is so does Itmatter
dot Com, which I read every day. So does Itmatter
dot Com? John is is federal law as clear cut
(19:54):
as it seems to be here.
Speaker 6 (19:58):
I believe that it is. You know, these days, the
law is whatever whatever judge you picked decides it is.
But we are, you know, I think in pretty firm
ground here to say that, you know, Americans have a
right to be able to enjoy everything. You know, maybe
I should phrase it a different way. If you're not
(20:20):
here in the country legally, you should not be able
to have things that people who are here in the
country legally cannot have. And I think that's the entire
basis for the lawsuits, is the idea that actually, you're
better off being an illegal alien going to college in California,
as you pointed out, than being an American. And there's
(20:43):
it's also the it's not just foreign it's not just
Americans out. You mentioned the out of state tuition, but
there's a lot of these programs that allow illegal aliens
to get better rates than in state California students that
those low numbers that you talked about aren't available to
every Californian who wants to go. Only to really really order,
(21:06):
I guess people that you know need economic assistence. So
the whole thing is crazy, and I thought you opened
things up correctly by saying that the shoe is on
the other foot, because it always seems like Gavin Newsom
and Bonta their happiness. They boast about suing the Trump
administration like every other day and twice on Sundays, right,
(21:26):
And so I think that it's great that we've now
got people at the Department of Justice in this case
that's over at the Civil Rights Division, which has our
Californian har Meat Dylan as the Assistant Attorney General, and
they are suing back and they're winning these cases. And
I think it's great because, you know, Newsom and company
are just completely fixated on obliterating the distinction between people
(21:50):
that are here legally and people that are here illegally,
and I'm glad we're finally doing.
Speaker 2 (21:55):
Something about it. Well, nobody in politics on that side
of things, and mostly in the media, nobody uses the
word illegal. And they even stop using all their euphemisms
like undocumented, unauthorized, lacking proper paperwork, all that other stuff.
They don't use. It just everybody's an immigrant, and it makes.
Speaker 6 (22:15):
You it's totally frustrating, it's totally ridiculous.
Speaker 1 (22:20):
And they've come up with this fiction. I've even heard
the Chief of Police of Los.
Speaker 6 (22:23):
Angeles use this during the riots, where they say, oh, well,
illegal immigration is a civil violation, it's not a criminal violation.
And you know, because I've heard you talk about it
on your show, that is completely not true. There is
a federal immigration law called illegal entry, and when you
violate it, you violate the law, your subject to potential imprisonment,
(22:45):
certainly deportations, and that's a criminal violation.
Speaker 1 (22:48):
It's just that they've come up with.
Speaker 6 (22:49):
This fiction that's completely not true.
Speaker 2 (22:52):
No, and they repeated over and over again thousands of times,
and it gets amplified by the media thousands of times
as a civil violation. And after a while, even I'm
like scratching my head, is like, did I misunderstand this issue?
That something changed, they pass a new law, it is
a criminal violation.
Speaker 1 (23:09):
They did not. As a matter of fact, I have
a quick download.
Speaker 6 (23:11):
If anybody's going to sodesnmatter dot com, you'll see a
button for the archives. You click on it and type
in illegal entry, and you will get my blog poster.
Maybe we can put it in the show notes. It
literally is a toolkit that shows you exactly what federal
law is being violated because I'm telling you this is
their mantrip. They are literally trying to make obliterate the
(23:33):
difference between legal and illegal, and it's whether you should
be able to go to the schools, you should be
able to get free medical attention, you should be able
to get well in this case, free tuition, practically free
tuition for all these California State universities. And it's completely nuts,
completely nuts, because we, as a sovereign country, have the right.
Speaker 1 (23:55):
To know who's coming here and decide if they.
Speaker 6 (23:57):
Should be coming in or not.
Speaker 2 (24:00):
Instead.
Speaker 1 (24:00):
I mean, I well, I listened to you during four
years of the Biden administration and it was.
Speaker 6 (24:06):
Just every single day it was literally, let's open up
the floodgates. Because what they want at the end of
the day. When I say they, I mean the liberal Democrats.
They want to allow millions now over ten million people
in the country and then they want to give them
all a pathway to citizenship, knowing that the same kinds
of people that don't care about violating the law to
come here.
Speaker 1 (24:26):
Are the same kind.
Speaker 6 (24:27):
Of people that will register Democrats and vote to give
themselves more free stuff. And it's just an ongoing cycle,
and this lawsuit is the latest example of.
Speaker 1 (24:37):
The Trump administration fighting back. Yeah, I think it's awesome.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
Yeah and I and of course the headline in the
La Times talk about these students are worrying that their
dreams are now going to be slipping away. You know,
it sounds harsh, but American students are intied to their
dreams first, and really healy that.
Speaker 6 (24:58):
But it's important to remember that the parents of the
it's likely that many of these students were brought into
the United States over the border illegally in the middle
of the night by parents who were making victims out
of their own children. But it doesn't change the fact that,
you know, they're citizens of a country, just not this country,
(25:20):
and it's not okay for them to just kind of
pretend that that difference doesn't exist.
Speaker 2 (25:24):
Yeah, eighty thousand. I had no idea the number was
that great, and they're actually in the various cal state
and university systems that that's an overwhelming number that we're subsidizing.
Speaker 6 (25:35):
Is it's crazy and every single person listening should be
outraged because there's almost no one in elective office in
Los Angeles County that doesn't completely subscribe and endorse this,
and they're all kind of responsible for it, and none
of them get held accountable for it.
Speaker 2 (25:53):
Because now there's parts.
Speaker 6 (25:56):
Of Los Angeles where there are more people illegally living
in somebody say Assembly district then there are living legally.
It's crazy, man upside down, it's bonkers.
Speaker 1 (26:06):
And again, thank goodness for the Trump administration.
Speaker 2 (26:09):
And I hear those representatives referring to them as my constituents,
John Fleischman, So does itmatter? Dot com? Thank you for
coming on with us about this.
Speaker 1 (26:18):
We got it.
Speaker 2 (26:19):
Thanks John, see you more coming up.
Speaker 5 (26:21):
You're listening to John Cobel on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (26:27):
Coming up after two o'clock. You know, you have an
Attorney General named Rob Bonta who has not investigated anything
about the Palisades fire, although that's his job. What he
is doing is meeting with a lot of donors and
he's involved in a scandal. And one of his donors, well,
(26:51):
there's a business partner of one of the donors who
says he has a compromising video of Rob Bonta. Now
the first thing I thought of, well, maybe this is
Rob Bonton naked or.
Speaker 3 (27:03):
You know, dressed up as a furry. I mean that
would be that'd be.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
Something that that that'd be the gold mine, right Rob.
And I can see that I can see.
Speaker 4 (27:14):
I'm not saying I can see that. I'm just I
can see it wondering.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
I can imagine it. Put that right, right.
Speaker 3 (27:21):
But we're just, you know, we're just poking fun here.
Speaker 2 (27:24):
Sure, we're not. We're not. We're not suggested that he
actually is a furry.
Speaker 3 (27:30):
I'm not any I mean, he.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
Would make a cute furry though he's kind of a
diminutive guy. Yeah, he would look like just this little charming,
cuddly Okay, stopping you know. Uh anyway, Uh, there are
documents that show Bonton knew that his donor was facilitating
prostitution for elected officials. The donor and Bonta knew about it,
(27:51):
and supposedly there's a video making it clear Bonta knew
about it. Got to report for you. We're going to
play from a station up in northern California. Other things. Now,
last week we had a story on gay sheep, right,
and if you didn't hear the original story, it is
simply that there are two people who are well, one
(28:15):
of them Michael Stookey founded a company called Rainbow Wool,
and the wool comes from gay male sheep. He grew
up a farm in Germany and discovered along the way
that eight percent of the male population, the rams, have
a preference for other males, and those gay males are
(28:38):
killed because if you're not going to reproduce, if you're
not going to get it on with the female sheep,
you're worthless. And so the gay sheep would be taken
to slaughter, and he thought that's not right, and so
he has rescues these sheep by having its wool made
(28:59):
out of well turned into products and they're selling it.
In fact, this this whole line of wool products made
an appearance at a New York fashion show that's part
two of the story, just this past week. The fashion
line is called a Wool Survive and the designer is
(29:21):
Michael Schmidt. So you've got Michael Stuck as the owner
of the company. Michael Schmidt took the wool and designed.
Now he has styled Madonna and Share and currently the
gay dating app Grinder is involved. I don't want to know,
(29:42):
and they have let me see, now what are what
are they making here? I had a whole list of
their letters. Yes, stresses, polo shirts, shorts, robes. Oh, I
got to get one of those. I got to get
a robe made of gay sheep wool. Yes, so it was.
(30:08):
It was all displayed on the fashion show stage this week.
And I guess, I mean, he's from Los Angeles, Michael,
Michael Schmidt, and so it's got to be Yeah, he's
from Los Angeles, so it's got to be available here.
I would think it's got to show up in stores.
Wool hats, dungarees, a wolf sailor's outfit, and a dressing gown.
Speaker 4 (30:32):
You know what I wonder though, And I'm all in
favor of this. I mean, you don't discriminate kill gay sheep.
I mean, that's just that's horrible. But when you take
the when you take the wool off the sheep, aren't
they cold?
Speaker 3 (30:50):
I mean I picture them shivering, and then that's really mean.
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Right, and you have these bald.
Speaker 4 (30:57):
Gayhe I mean, I hope that maybe if that's the case,
that they're wrapping them up in blanket.
Speaker 2 (31:03):
You know, I know nothing about sheep hurting.
Speaker 3 (31:06):
I don't either.
Speaker 2 (31:06):
I don't know anything about the raising sheep for the
wool industry. I'd have to look that up.
Speaker 3 (31:15):
I know a lot of vegans don't wear wool.
Speaker 2 (31:17):
Why not for the reason I just well, they ought
to wear the gable.
Speaker 4 (31:21):
Yes, maybe they would because those sheep have been spared,
so that that's why I'm in favor of this. But
I'm just wondering if those poor sheep are shivering and
their wool is sheer.
Speaker 2 (31:31):
Look, they're alive, Okay, they could be warmer and dead.
You can't have everything.
Speaker 4 (31:36):
Okay, that's a fair point there, all right.
Speaker 2 (31:41):
When we come back Rob Bonta, who apparently there's a
compromising video of himself, but supposedly it has to do
with being involved in a conversation with a donor who
was involved in legal activities. Not that he's a furry,
not that there's any gay sheep in the video.
Speaker 3 (31:58):
This is kind of boring.
Speaker 2 (32:00):
Yeah, I know, it's excited. I know. I wanted. I
wanted to make people like stick through your news thinking
they're gonna hear some audio and Rob Bonta with the
terrible news right, doing what I can here anyway, that's
next stepamark is life in the CAFI twenty four our newsroom. Hey,
you've been listening to The John Cobalt Show podcast. You
(32:22):
can always hear the show live on KFI A M
six forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
and of course, anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app
The John Kobylt Show News
Host
John Kobylt
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.