September 2, 2025 • 30 mins
The John Kobylt Show Hour 3 (09/02) - Jon Fleischman comes on the show to talk about who is pouring money into Prop 50, which is Gov. Newsom’s redistricting plan. There was a pursuit with a naked woman that ended in Brentwood today. More on who is pouring money into Prop 50. You can now use cash to pay for Ubers.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't I am six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
You're listening to the John Cobelt Podcast on the iHeartRadio app.
We are on every day from one until four o'clock,
and after four o'clock John Cobelt Show on demand on
the iHeart app.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
Roll back together again.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
John Fleischmann has been involved in Republican politics, conservative politics
for decades, and he's got an online site called so
Doesitmatter dot com Sodesitmatter dot com where he writes a
commentary several times a day, sometimes along with videos. And
(00:36):
he's got a good post today. I didn't realize I
guess while I was gone. A number was assigned to
Gavin Newsom's ballot measure to drive all Republican congressman out
of business here in California, the big redrawing of the
districts and the overriding of the public's desire to have
(01:00):
an independent panel do this job.
Speaker 3 (01:03):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
He needs millions and millions of dollars for all his
phony bolooney television ads, and he's gonna get many millions.
And John Fleischman is going to come on now and
explain where he's getting the money.
Speaker 1 (01:16):
John, how are you?
Speaker 3 (01:18):
I'm good, John, I wish I could tell you that
while you were away, we've solved all of the state's problems,
but as you expect, you still have job security.
Speaker 2 (01:27):
All right, No, it seems like things got worse, which
matter what we do as as possible. Yeah, all right,
So yeah, so Prop fifty. Where's he getting the money
for this?
Speaker 3 (01:43):
Well, you know, there's a pattern that's been in play
with this guy for a long time, and so he's
going back to the well to the It basically works
this way. You, your listeners, me with all of our
tax money gets given away by Gavin Newsom to all
of these special interest groups and then they.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
Fund his campaign.
Speaker 3 (02:02):
So right out the gate, and by the way, I'm
sure these people will put in more. The California Labor Federation,
those are all the non government unions, they pitched in
a million dollars.
Speaker 1 (02:11):
SEIU, which is the.
Speaker 3 (02:12):
Big public employee union in the state, they pitched in
a million dollars. The California Teachers Association pitched in three million.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
Dollars so far.
Speaker 3 (02:26):
And then on top of it, Reed Hastings, who is
the CEO or the former CEO, is now the executive
chairman of Netflix. He personally pitched in two million dollars.
And when you look at all of these numbers, they
all come at it from a reason. We'll start with Netflix,
because I don't know how many of your listeners are
aware of the fact that the legislature approved a seven
(02:47):
hundred and fifty million dollar tax credit program for Hollywood
and already just Netflix alone has gotten seventy million dollars
this year. So many million dollars goes to Netflix, and
at least so far, two million of it comes back
right into Gavin Newsom's Prop fifty campaign. That's the number
(03:08):
they gave it. And then again, we could go to
each of these public employ unions, the California Teachers Association,
those are the folks who shut down, that got the
governor to shut down the schools first during COVID, opened
us last during COVID has gotten them pay raises, padded
retirement benefits, and a lot and this year a three
(03:30):
hundred million dollar infusion for pay and benefits. And then
they turn around and of course give several million dollars
right into this campaign. And then the last two you've
got the SEIU, which secured a twenty five dollars an
hour minimum wage hike for their healthcare workers in their
union secured expansions for paid family leave retention bonuses, a
(03:54):
permanent expansion of paid sick lave for all public workers.
Oh that, I guess that costs a million dollars, right,
So he gets a million bucks for that. And then
the private labor unions they of course got new somerom
to height sign AB five, which you talked a lot
about on this program, which banishes independent contractors, making everything
more expensive and uh. And of course the new housing
(04:17):
bills that were approved require all new housing to be
built at union labor wages. So what that's that's what's.
Speaker 2 (04:24):
Going on, John, Is that is that the million dollars
thing that doesn't Yeah, these are these are kickbacks and
the new some funnies.
Speaker 3 (04:33):
There are all people that gave. These people all gave
millions of dollars to oppose the Newsome recall. And I
should add, by the way, the Newsome Recall committee from
twenty twenty one had a couple million bucks left over
in it that he didn't spend. That he's also put
in this which is kind of like recycling because all
the groups that I just named probably gave him that
(04:55):
money in the first place. What is reed Hastings from
Next Radia, Hastings from Netflix.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
What does what does he have? What does he hate?
Speaker 2 (05:03):
His customers here in California. He's the one who financed
George Gascone.
Speaker 3 (05:09):
It's exactly, as a matter of fact, it's it's it's
pretty ridiculous. And but you could see what they've got
going on. There's no principle, there's no honesty, there's no ethics.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
So he wants.
Speaker 3 (05:21):
Netflix to get hundreds, probably hundreds of millions of dollars
of free money from the state of California. And the
way that he does that is by playing the game.
I guess he's a savvy business guy.
Speaker 1 (05:30):
John.
Speaker 3 (05:31):
He's seen how other people do it, and he's like,
I want to play that game, right and so and so,
and it will keep going. There are so many other unions.
The Prison Guard Union hasn't ponied up in. They're a
big one for newsm Let's not forget Southern California, Edison
and PG and E that may as well be government enemies.
They're gonna chip in be You can look on the
(05:52):
Recall Committee donation sheet and you can tell where it's
all going to come from.
Speaker 2 (05:59):
Uh Yeah, I mean, I mean, it's just this this
terrible cycle where where tax money gets rooted to these
unions or these these corporations, and that eventually the tax
money UH is used to pay Newsome off. And then
now in this case, he's going to use it. He's
(06:19):
going to use it for a propaganda to help drive
off Republican congressman out of the out of the state.
Speaker 3 (06:26):
It's really about him running for president. The whole point
that he's in this fight over congression. He doesn't care
about congressional districts. He cares about himself, and so he's
using this opportunity to promote himself nationally in the national polls.
He's now moved up to first place in the in
the in the sweepstakes to see who wins the Democratic nomination.
Speaker 1 (06:46):
It's all about himself.
Speaker 3 (06:47):
But there is some good news.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
There's one guy.
Speaker 3 (06:49):
You've probably talked to him about him before in the show,
Charles Munger Junior. He's like a scientist out of Stanford
by training and profession, but what he really is is
we call it the Lucky Sperm Club. His dad was
Charles Munger Senior, who was Warren Buffett's business partner and
a billionaire, and so Munger's got a vast ton of money,
(07:09):
and he spent a bunch of it to pass creating
this commission for the drawing of legislative and congressional lines
in the first place. And he's already put in twenty
large twenty million now ten million last week and ten
million this week out of his very deep pockets. But
you know what he doesn't do. He doesn't have any
business with the state of California. He doesn't have any
conflicts of interest. He's just a well off person who
(07:32):
believes in this cause of not having politicians draw their
own lines. So you know, maybe he'll put Arnold Schwarzenegger
on television and then Arnold can make up for some
of the crapp he did to us in his final
term as governor.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
I mean, Schwartzegger could be effective as a spokes per very.
Speaker 3 (07:52):
Much, so very much. There was a poll that came
out while you were on vacation from a outfit called
Harper out of DC, the very credible polster, and they
show that Arnold Schwarzenegger's numbers, especially with independents and Democrats,
are super high. And so if if you take Monger's
money and you take Arnold's star power. I think that
can be very very effective. But we don't really know
(08:14):
how much Arnold is going to get engaged here or not.
But if he engages, I think it could be very
very effective. And so we'll just we'll see what happens.
But you know, I think there's a story to be told.
I think I mentioned it, maybe not on the show,
but and maybe you've told your listeners, but somehow of
these five new congressional districts that are being created for Democrats,
(08:37):
there's one for the Senate President, there's one for the
Assembly speaker, and there's one for the former Assembly speaker.
Speaker 1 (08:44):
Isn't that funny?
Speaker 3 (08:50):
Yes, they've drawn themselves their own seats. And that was
the reason why vote. That was the cynical behavior that
caused voters to want it stripped the legislature of doing
this in the first place, and they're literally proving the
point again.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
I'm so disgusting. Thank you for coming on, John Dicated,
you got it, John, John, I got around.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
John Fleischman, sodes itmatter dot com? Go read all the details?
So does itmatter dot com?
Speaker 1 (09:16):
Uh more? Coming up?
Speaker 4 (09:18):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from kf I
am six forty.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
We're on from one until four every day.
Speaker 2 (09:26):
Oh, Moistline is back eight seven seven Moist Steady six
eight seven seven Moist Steady six, or use the talkback
feature on the iHeart Radio app.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
Oh.
Speaker 2 (09:38):
I heard this story on Debor's News. There was a naked,
screaming woman.
Speaker 5 (09:44):
Yeah, and you're this morning. Yeah, and she had a
dog in the suv with.
Speaker 2 (09:49):
Her and what was she in the car? Wouldn't come out?
Is that the deal?
Speaker 3 (09:55):
Yeah?
Speaker 5 (09:55):
Well there wouldn't come out for yees?
Speaker 1 (09:59):
Do we know h do we know her name? Who
she is?
Speaker 6 (10:03):
I do not have that information yet. I just know
that she was taken into custody. Let me see if
I can find an update.
Speaker 2 (10:12):
I'm betting she's one of the moms we used to
go to school. I just had a couple of candidates
in mind. I'm wondering if my intuition is correct. I
hear screaming naked woman in Brentwood. I thought, I wonder
if if it's well, I won't mention their name here,
but no, they needed three swat vehicles.
Speaker 5 (10:34):
Yeah, it was crazy.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
From six forty five to ten forty five, she climbed
out of the window and sat on the roof in
the hood of the car. Miss Pulvin and Montana, And
so the traffic was snarled for most of the morning
rush hour on the southbound four All five. Why did
they have to shut down the southbound four All five
(11:00):
because there's a screaming naked woman.
Speaker 5 (11:02):
Oh, I know, it's crazy. Traffic was a disaster, But
why why do.
Speaker 1 (11:07):
You have to do that?
Speaker 2 (11:09):
I really, I really don't understand. So, Paula and Montana,
it's not it's not the four O five.
Speaker 6 (11:20):
I couldn't tell you, John, but it was ridiculous and.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
It probably is.
Speaker 5 (11:28):
And the other thing is, I want to know what
happened to the dog?
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Oh yeah, yeah, and I forgot about that.
Speaker 6 (11:37):
Yeah, somebody was telling me that the dog was the
woman when she was just doing her thing. I don't
know what she was doing, but she was naked in
the in the suv and the dog was kind of
just looking at her thinking or the expression on the
dog space was exactly, what the hell what is going
on here?
Speaker 2 (11:56):
For all the people I could end up with, I
got it. Scream screaming naked lady, Well she hadda.
Speaker 5 (12:03):
Said she was blonde. I didn't. I didn't notice the
hair color.
Speaker 1 (12:06):
All right, there you go, there you go.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
That's another side and say, could be a Brentwood mom.
I'm sure, I'm sure they're all blonde. I saw this.
This is one of those things I saved during the
vacation because I put I put a lot of I
put a lot of work into screaming about this for
the last ten years. And finally, Uh. There is a
(12:30):
faint tank aligned with the Democrats known as the Third Way.
They're they're a moderate think tank, and they have they
published a memo forty five words and phrases they want
Democrats to avoid using all the stupid, fake terms, annoying
language they used. And what was really hideous is all
(12:53):
the idiot woke journalists picked up on it and it
started using it, repeating the nonsense even and this is
what made me, uh made me crazy. The Associated Press
started picking up on it because that's filled with woke
a holes, which which meant it started leaking into the
(13:13):
copy here at the radio station. Stuff you've never heard
before that nobody uses.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
In real life.
Speaker 2 (13:19):
It's like, wow, Reassociated press is using it, but some cares.
Everybody got corrupted by this woke virus. Here are the words.
You'll recognize, all this nonsense, uh, microaggression, triggering, body shaving
(13:42):
you you've probably read these against your will. I'm sure
I try not. And well, we used to have a
blockhead here who would insert these systems of oppression cultural appropriation. God,
I remember the first time I would hear or read
these terms.
Speaker 1 (13:58):
It would be on the air. It's like, where the
hell this comfort? And all of a sudden, everybody using it.
Everybody in media.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
Was using it, all the politicians, all the activists, and
if you didn't use it, there was something wrong with
you and you need it to be canceled and kicked
out of the country. All these other irritating terms, radical transparency,
the hell is that? Stakeholders, the unhoused, food insecurity, all
(14:24):
these fake terms. And I would stop and say, what
is food insecurity? How did I exist all my life?
How did civilization exist for thousands of years?
Speaker 1 (14:34):
What does it? Does it mean people are hungry?
Speaker 2 (14:36):
Does that mean they're afraid they're gonna get hungry? The unhoused,
that's the worst one. And I swear to you, you
people in Tellivision, every time I see you on TV
and use that phrase.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
I scream at you, I curse you.
Speaker 5 (14:52):
I don't use that.
Speaker 1 (14:54):
I don'n't.
Speaker 6 (14:55):
I oh, I miss the John Cobalt roar.
Speaker 2 (15:04):
A person, birthing person, that's you. Yeah, you're a birthing person.
Speaker 5 (15:12):
No, I'm not going to say I will never say
birthing person. If I do, you can slap me.
Speaker 2 (15:21):
Okay, uh sis gender, God, cis gender.
Speaker 1 (15:32):
You know what that is.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
That's that's when, that's when, that's when your body parts
line up with what you think you are. They have
to come up with a special name for that. It's
like if you're if you think you're a woman and
you actually have female body parts, you are cis gender.
Speaker 5 (15:54):
I'm just gonna say I'm a woman.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
Well, they they they erased women, the word woman out
of a lot of government documents and congressional bills in
the last few years, Like the word mother was replaced
with berthing persons.
Speaker 5 (16:11):
That's so stupid.
Speaker 1 (16:12):
I mean true dead naming. Yeah, dead naming.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
That's when somebody changes their gender and they change their name,
and then you forget and use their old names.
Speaker 1 (16:24):
You have dead named me.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
It's like I've never heard of that, never heard of
that one. Yeah, uh, bipock, that was a new one.
Black and Indigenous people of color, Oh oh oh, here
we go. Incarcerated people. Oh you mean prisoners? You mean
(16:45):
convicts right? Involuntary confinement. That means you're in jail. God,
I'm saving.
Speaker 5 (16:54):
This, Okay, I'm going to try very hard. You have
my word.
Speaker 4 (17:03):
You're listening to John Cobbel's on Demand from KFI A sixty.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
We're on every day from one until four o'clock and
after four o'clock it's John Cobelt's show on demand whatever
you missed today. And for example, we had Royal Oaks
on to talk about Trump losing around in court with
a district judge who said you can't use the Marines
(17:29):
for a lot of things that Trump wants to use
them for.
Speaker 1 (17:33):
It was the same judge who said that Trump wasn't.
Speaker 2 (17:35):
Really in charge of the National Guard a couple of
months ago, and that got overturned by the appeals court.
So that's where it's headed. It added to the No
Circuit Court of Appeals. You want to hear us discuss that.
That's on the iHeart app We just had John Fleischman
on to talk about how Gavin Newsom is getting financed
by the millions from unions who've received a lot of
(17:59):
government money for news and in return, they're supplying kickbacks
to Newsom's campaign to draw redraw the districting lines and
get rid of Republican congress people in the state. And
one of pisses me off is like Netflix, the the chairman,
Read Hastings, he and his wife keep millions of dollars.
They helped create the George Gascon monster. I mean, people died,
(18:25):
there was so much crime that went unprosecuted because of
Read Hastings candidate. It's like, what what do you have?
What do you have against your customers? Everybody's pouring in.
I don't know how much do I say, charging on
nineteen a month. They've all kinds of different plans. But
(18:48):
you spent, you give it. You give a company, let's say,
twenty bucks a month for some television shows. He takes
the money and then starts spending it on destructive, vile
candidates like George Gascon.
Speaker 1 (19:04):
And then he wants to take.
Speaker 2 (19:05):
Away your right to have an independent commission draw the
congressional districts.
Speaker 1 (19:15):
That's what the people voted for.
Speaker 2 (19:17):
They wanted an independent district an independent panel.
Speaker 1 (19:24):
Well, what's the guy from Netflix doing? What is he doing?
Speaker 2 (19:26):
Just keep putting on all the bad television shows. That's
your purpose in life, to feed bad television to people.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
Nobody asked him to get involved in the.
Speaker 2 (19:36):
District attorney's race or the congressional redistricting issue.
Speaker 1 (19:40):
The hell do you know?
Speaker 2 (19:44):
I mean, most of the crap on these streaming channels,
that's exactly that.
Speaker 1 (19:49):
Most of them. It just sucks. It's terrible. But you know,
people got to do something in the evening.
Speaker 5 (19:56):
That's what I do every night. I just sit in
front of the TV.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
There you go. You know how much money you get
to George gas going along the way.
Speaker 5 (20:03):
I didn't realize that.
Speaker 1 (20:05):
Yeah, well you know you're part of you're part of
the problem.
Speaker 5 (20:09):
Obviously. Can I get my money back?
Speaker 1 (20:14):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (20:14):
You know, that's that's what people ought to start doing.
But be ninety nine point nine percent people don't know this.
I don't know that their their Netflix money ends up
in a George gascon's pocket.
Speaker 5 (20:26):
I just want to watch some shows. I just want
to chill out at night.
Speaker 2 (20:32):
You you whatce you're done here? I mean you just
you shut down completely right.
Speaker 5 (20:38):
Well, I've been on.
Speaker 6 (20:38):
The air since you're thirty in the morning, John, not
since one like some people.
Speaker 5 (20:44):
But since ten thirty. So I'm talked.
Speaker 2 (20:46):
Out at the end of the day almost every day
you tell me that, you know, I've been on since
ten thirty this morning.
Speaker 5 (20:53):
I'm tired. I'm tired of my own voice. I can't
stand here myself anymore.
Speaker 1 (20:59):
We all got a b for two weeks.
Speaker 3 (21:04):
Ah.
Speaker 2 (21:05):
Right, Here's where your money's going to as well. If
you're a live in the city of Los Angeles, it's
going to a law firm named Gibson Done, Gibson Done.
The city council has been asked to send now a
total of six million dollars to Gibson Done and Crutcher.
(21:30):
Crutcher is very important. This is the company, or this
is the law firm that's sent in fifteen lawyers to
keep Karen Bass from answering embarrassing questions about where the
homeless money went. Remember this, I think we're the only
ones you talk about this stuff. So Karen Bass has
(21:53):
blown I don't know, it's like a couple of billion
dollars missing from the homeless account, and she must know
where it is. And she did not want to testify
before a federal judge. So it's a civil lawsuit from
a something called the La Alliance was a collection of
(22:13):
residents and nonprofits and they wanted to know in businesses
and they wanted to know where'd the money go. And
Karen Bass wouldn't tell, and Gibson done, and Crutcher, fifteen
of those guys showed up to create so much legal
mayhem that the other side eventually gave up trying to
get Bass to testify. But the two billion is still missing,
(22:38):
and she still won't say where it went. And it
looks like they want They were given nine hundred thousand
dollars approved three months ago, and now they want a
total of six million. They've already racked up three million
(22:58):
in billings. Wow, they've racked up three million in billings,
but there's been a less than a million set aside
to finance this debacle.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
How about that? Huh?
Speaker 2 (23:09):
The city officially is not allowed to spend anymore, but
they ran up a big bill just to keep Karen
Bass out of court. By August the eighth, they'd racked
up over three million, according to a confidential man. And
it's the city attorney. This weird creature. Heidi Feldstein Soto.
(23:32):
She's the one who keeps making these requests and she
won't talk about it. And there's one council person. I
think I've counted three normal people on the council. One
of his Monica Rodriguez from the Valley, and she voted
against the first round of funding for Gibson Dunn, and
she's voting for the voting against the second round of funding.
(23:56):
And she's got a really fascinating point here. She says,
why isn't this six million dollars being used to house people?
Since it's all about homeless money. Here's six million, why
don't you do something with it to put people under
our roof and get them off the streets. But of
(24:17):
course that's not what these agencies. That's not what this
entire industry is designed to do. It's not designed to
get homeless people indoors. It's designed so that these attorneys
and these nonprofit executives can make a tremendous amount of money.
That's the purpose. So, I mean, you know, I've like
(24:44):
grown past this. I think a few years ago, my
knee jerk response would have been, hey, why don't you
give that money to the homeless people. They're the ones
who need it. That's what the business is supposed to be,
and don't give it to attorneys who are trying to
keep Karen Bass from testifying. And then it occurred to
me one day, I'm a dummy. They don't want to
(25:05):
help the homeless people. They want to steal the money. Well,
there you go. That's what they're doing. And I'm sure
Gibson dun is going to be donating to all the
all the relevant political campaigns in the next cycle.
Speaker 4 (25:19):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM sixty.
Speaker 2 (25:25):
Slide back eight seven seven Moist eighty six eight seven
seven Moist eighty six, or use the talkback feature on
the iHeart app, and you can follow us at John
Cobelt Radio at John Cobelt Radio. All right, conways up
in minutes. This is this is how stupid the world is.
I just got this email a few minutes ago from Uber.
(25:52):
Like everybody, I have an Uber account, so they sent
this to my email, not making this up, introducing a
new way to pay. That was the U that's the tagline.
I clicked it on a new way to pay. I
wonder when cash seriously click up in the email Uber
(26:16):
introducing a new way to pay cash with a photo
of a ten dollars bill. Getting where you need to
go should be accessible to everyone. That's where I've been
making it easier for anyone to ride by accepting cash.
And then they explain how it works, right because you
call it the app and then you have to select
(26:37):
the cash.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
But the really funny part is when.
Speaker 2 (26:40):
They where they try to explain how to behave If
you're using cash, at the end of your trip, you'll
hand the driver cash directly. If there's an issue, Please
don't dispute fares with drivers. Instead, reach out to Uber
support and will handle it. We expect all users to
(27:03):
treat each other with respect. Now, you know, before Uber
for you know, over one hundred years people paid cash
to taxi drivers and everybody knew how it worked, that
you didn't need special instructions. But this this also offers
(27:26):
more advice that it says, please please carry enough cash,
you know to cover the ride. We will need to
make sure you have enough cash to cover the fare.
(27:47):
You will see the cost of the ride up front.
Bring smaller bills to pay with cash.
Speaker 1 (27:54):
Hell, who are they giving rides to here.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
People who don't don't know how to pay for some service, Sir,
that'll be thirty five dollars.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
What do I do? I don't understand.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
Maybe it's because we have an entire generation now who
has spent their entire life staring at a screen ingesting
a destructive social media and the idiots in the legislature
in the Assembly, they now have a social media warning
law that they've proposed.
Speaker 1 (28:37):
Get this if it passes.
Speaker 2 (28:40):
It were to require a warning message to flash on
your screen at least once a day when you visit
a social media site, and then again every hour after
three hours of cumulative use, the message would say. The
Surgeon in General has warned that while social media may
(29:03):
have benefits for some young users, social media is associated
with significant mental health arms and has not been proven
safe for young users. Oh, that'll stop them. According to
a twenty twenty three Surgeon General report, ninety five percent
(29:25):
of youth ages thirteen to seventeen use social media, with
more than a third more than a third say they
use it almost constantly, almost constantly, total complete addiction. Your
child's brain completely hijacked. Soon it will be useless. Soon,
(29:48):
you will need instructions from Uber how to pay with cash,
because the rest of your brain will have died. I
think there's a direct correlation between ingesting social media twenty
four hours a day at not knowing how to pay
cab fare. So we're gonna have to deal with pop
(30:09):
up warnings.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
All right, I've got to go.
Speaker 2 (30:16):
Had a week off one day, I need to go
lie down one day at work. Godway's up next, and
we've got Michael Kurzer lied in the CAFI twenty four
hour News. Hey, you've been listening to the John Covelt
Show podcast. You can always hear the show live on
KFI Am six forty from one to four pm every
Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime on demand on
(30:37):
the iHeartRadio app.
Can't I am six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
You're listening to the John Cobelt Podcast on the iHeartRadio app.
We are on every day from one until four o'clock,
and after four o'clock John Cobelt Show on demand on
the iHeart app.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
Roll back together again.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
John Fleischmann has been involved in Republican politics, conservative politics
for decades, and he's got an online site called so
Doesitmatter dot com Sodesitmatter dot com where he writes a
commentary several times a day, sometimes along with videos. And
(00:36):
he's got a good post today. I didn't realize I
guess while I was gone. A number was assigned to
Gavin Newsom's ballot measure to drive all Republican congressman out
of business here in California, the big redrawing of the
districts and the overriding of the public's desire to have
(01:00):
an independent panel do this job.
Speaker 3 (01:03):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
He needs millions and millions of dollars for all his
phony bolooney television ads, and he's gonna get many millions.
And John Fleischman is going to come on now and
explain where he's getting the money.
Speaker 1 (01:16):
John, how are you?
Speaker 3 (01:18):
I'm good, John, I wish I could tell you that
while you were away, we've solved all of the state's problems,
but as you expect, you still have job security.
Speaker 2 (01:27):
All right, No, it seems like things got worse, which
matter what we do as as possible. Yeah, all right,
So yeah, so Prop fifty. Where's he getting the money
for this?
Speaker 3 (01:43):
Well, you know, there's a pattern that's been in play
with this guy for a long time, and so he's
going back to the well to the It basically works
this way. You, your listeners, me with all of our
tax money gets given away by Gavin Newsom to all
of these special interest groups and then they.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
Fund his campaign.
Speaker 3 (02:02):
So right out the gate, and by the way, I'm
sure these people will put in more. The California Labor Federation,
those are all the non government unions, they pitched in
a million dollars.
Speaker 1 (02:11):
SEIU, which is the.
Speaker 3 (02:12):
Big public employee union in the state, they pitched in
a million dollars. The California Teachers Association pitched in three million.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
Dollars so far.
Speaker 3 (02:26):
And then on top of it, Reed Hastings, who is
the CEO or the former CEO, is now the executive
chairman of Netflix. He personally pitched in two million dollars.
And when you look at all of these numbers, they
all come at it from a reason. We'll start with Netflix,
because I don't know how many of your listeners are
aware of the fact that the legislature approved a seven
(02:47):
hundred and fifty million dollar tax credit program for Hollywood
and already just Netflix alone has gotten seventy million dollars
this year. So many million dollars goes to Netflix, and
at least so far, two million of it comes back
right into Gavin Newsom's Prop fifty campaign. That's the number
(03:08):
they gave it. And then again, we could go to
each of these public employ unions, the California Teachers Association,
those are the folks who shut down, that got the
governor to shut down the schools first during COVID, opened
us last during COVID has gotten them pay raises, padded
retirement benefits, and a lot and this year a three
(03:30):
hundred million dollar infusion for pay and benefits. And then
they turn around and of course give several million dollars
right into this campaign. And then the last two you've
got the SEIU, which secured a twenty five dollars an
hour minimum wage hike for their healthcare workers in their
union secured expansions for paid family leave retention bonuses, a
(03:54):
permanent expansion of paid sick lave for all public workers.
Oh that, I guess that costs a million dollars, right,
So he gets a million bucks for that. And then
the private labor unions they of course got new somerom
to height sign AB five, which you talked a lot
about on this program, which banishes independent contractors, making everything
more expensive and uh. And of course the new housing
(04:17):
bills that were approved require all new housing to be
built at union labor wages. So what that's that's what's.
Speaker 2 (04:24):
Going on, John, Is that is that the million dollars
thing that doesn't Yeah, these are these are kickbacks and
the new some funnies.
Speaker 3 (04:33):
There are all people that gave. These people all gave
millions of dollars to oppose the Newsome recall. And I
should add, by the way, the Newsome Recall committee from
twenty twenty one had a couple million bucks left over
in it that he didn't spend. That he's also put
in this which is kind of like recycling because all
the groups that I just named probably gave him that
(04:55):
money in the first place. What is reed Hastings from
Next Radia, Hastings from Netflix.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
What does what does he have? What does he hate?
Speaker 2 (05:03):
His customers here in California. He's the one who financed
George Gascone.
Speaker 3 (05:09):
It's exactly, as a matter of fact, it's it's it's
pretty ridiculous. And but you could see what they've got
going on. There's no principle, there's no honesty, there's no ethics.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
So he wants.
Speaker 3 (05:21):
Netflix to get hundreds, probably hundreds of millions of dollars
of free money from the state of California. And the
way that he does that is by playing the game.
I guess he's a savvy business guy.
Speaker 1 (05:30):
John.
Speaker 3 (05:31):
He's seen how other people do it, and he's like,
I want to play that game, right and so and so,
and it will keep going. There are so many other unions.
The Prison Guard Union hasn't ponied up in. They're a
big one for newsm Let's not forget Southern California, Edison
and PG and E that may as well be government enemies.
They're gonna chip in be You can look on the
(05:52):
Recall Committee donation sheet and you can tell where it's
all going to come from.
Speaker 2 (05:59):
Uh Yeah, I mean, I mean, it's just this this
terrible cycle where where tax money gets rooted to these
unions or these these corporations, and that eventually the tax
money UH is used to pay Newsome off. And then
now in this case, he's going to use it. He's
(06:19):
going to use it for a propaganda to help drive
off Republican congressman out of the out of the state.
Speaker 3 (06:26):
It's really about him running for president. The whole point
that he's in this fight over congression. He doesn't care
about congressional districts. He cares about himself, and so he's
using this opportunity to promote himself nationally in the national polls.
He's now moved up to first place in the in
the in the sweepstakes to see who wins the Democratic nomination.
Speaker 1 (06:46):
It's all about himself.
Speaker 3 (06:47):
But there is some good news.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
There's one guy.
Speaker 3 (06:49):
You've probably talked to him about him before in the show,
Charles Munger Junior. He's like a scientist out of Stanford
by training and profession, but what he really is is
we call it the Lucky Sperm Club. His dad was
Charles Munger Senior, who was Warren Buffett's business partner and
a billionaire, and so Munger's got a vast ton of money,
(07:09):
and he spent a bunch of it to pass creating
this commission for the drawing of legislative and congressional lines
in the first place. And he's already put in twenty
large twenty million now ten million last week and ten
million this week out of his very deep pockets. But
you know what he doesn't do. He doesn't have any
business with the state of California. He doesn't have any
conflicts of interest. He's just a well off person who
(07:32):
believes in this cause of not having politicians draw their
own lines. So you know, maybe he'll put Arnold Schwarzenegger
on television and then Arnold can make up for some
of the crapp he did to us in his final
term as governor.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
I mean, Schwartzegger could be effective as a spokes per very.
Speaker 3 (07:52):
Much, so very much. There was a poll that came
out while you were on vacation from a outfit called
Harper out of DC, the very credible polster, and they
show that Arnold Schwarzenegger's numbers, especially with independents and Democrats,
are super high. And so if if you take Monger's
money and you take Arnold's star power. I think that
can be very very effective. But we don't really know
(08:14):
how much Arnold is going to get engaged here or not.
But if he engages, I think it could be very
very effective. And so we'll just we'll see what happens.
But you know, I think there's a story to be told.
I think I mentioned it, maybe not on the show,
but and maybe you've told your listeners, but somehow of
these five new congressional districts that are being created for Democrats,
(08:37):
there's one for the Senate President, there's one for the
Assembly speaker, and there's one for the former Assembly speaker.
Speaker 1 (08:44):
Isn't that funny?
Speaker 3 (08:50):
Yes, they've drawn themselves their own seats. And that was
the reason why vote. That was the cynical behavior that
caused voters to want it stripped the legislature of doing
this in the first place, and they're literally proving the
point again.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
I'm so disgusting. Thank you for coming on, John Dicated,
you got it, John, John, I got around.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
Thank you.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
John Fleischman, sodes itmatter dot com? Go read all the details?
So does itmatter dot com?
Speaker 1 (09:16):
Uh more? Coming up?
Speaker 4 (09:18):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from kf I
am six forty.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
We're on from one until four every day.
Speaker 2 (09:26):
Oh, Moistline is back eight seven seven Moist Steady six
eight seven seven Moist Steady six, or use the talkback
feature on the iHeart Radio app.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
Oh.
Speaker 2 (09:38):
I heard this story on Debor's News. There was a naked,
screaming woman.
Speaker 5 (09:44):
Yeah, and you're this morning. Yeah, and she had a
dog in the suv with.
Speaker 2 (09:49):
Her and what was she in the car? Wouldn't come out?
Is that the deal?
Speaker 3 (09:55):
Yeah?
Speaker 5 (09:55):
Well there wouldn't come out for yees?
Speaker 1 (09:59):
Do we know h do we know her name? Who
she is?
Speaker 6 (10:03):
I do not have that information yet. I just know
that she was taken into custody. Let me see if
I can find an update.
Speaker 2 (10:12):
I'm betting she's one of the moms we used to
go to school. I just had a couple of candidates
in mind. I'm wondering if my intuition is correct. I
hear screaming naked woman in Brentwood. I thought, I wonder
if if it's well, I won't mention their name here,
but no, they needed three swat vehicles.
Speaker 5 (10:34):
Yeah, it was crazy.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
From six forty five to ten forty five, she climbed
out of the window and sat on the roof in
the hood of the car. Miss Pulvin and Montana, And
so the traffic was snarled for most of the morning
rush hour on the southbound four All five. Why did
they have to shut down the southbound four All five
(11:00):
because there's a screaming naked woman.
Speaker 5 (11:02):
Oh, I know, it's crazy. Traffic was a disaster, But
why why do.
Speaker 1 (11:07):
You have to do that?
Speaker 2 (11:09):
I really, I really don't understand. So, Paula and Montana,
it's not it's not the four O five.
Speaker 6 (11:20):
I couldn't tell you, John, but it was ridiculous and.
Speaker 1 (11:27):
It probably is.
Speaker 5 (11:28):
And the other thing is, I want to know what
happened to the dog?
Speaker 1 (11:35):
Oh yeah, yeah, and I forgot about that.
Speaker 6 (11:37):
Yeah, somebody was telling me that the dog was the
woman when she was just doing her thing. I don't
know what she was doing, but she was naked in
the in the suv and the dog was kind of
just looking at her thinking or the expression on the
dog space was exactly, what the hell what is going
on here?
Speaker 2 (11:56):
For all the people I could end up with, I
got it. Scream screaming naked lady, Well she hadda.
Speaker 5 (12:03):
Said she was blonde. I didn't. I didn't notice the
hair color.
Speaker 1 (12:06):
All right, there you go, there you go.
Speaker 2 (12:07):
That's another side and say, could be a Brentwood mom.
I'm sure, I'm sure they're all blonde. I saw this.
This is one of those things I saved during the
vacation because I put I put a lot of I
put a lot of work into screaming about this for
the last ten years. And finally, Uh. There is a
(12:30):
faint tank aligned with the Democrats known as the Third Way.
They're they're a moderate think tank, and they have they
published a memo forty five words and phrases they want
Democrats to avoid using all the stupid, fake terms, annoying
language they used. And what was really hideous is all
(12:53):
the idiot woke journalists picked up on it and it
started using it, repeating the nonsense even and this is
what made me, uh made me crazy. The Associated Press
started picking up on it because that's filled with woke
a holes, which which meant it started leaking into the
(13:13):
copy here at the radio station. Stuff you've never heard
before that nobody uses.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
In real life.
Speaker 2 (13:19):
It's like, wow, Reassociated press is using it, but some cares.
Everybody got corrupted by this woke virus. Here are the words.
You'll recognize, all this nonsense, uh, microaggression, triggering, body shaving
(13:42):
you you've probably read these against your will. I'm sure
I try not. And well, we used to have a
blockhead here who would insert these systems of oppression cultural appropriation. God,
I remember the first time I would hear or read
these terms.
Speaker 1 (13:58):
It would be on the air. It's like, where the
hell this comfort? And all of a sudden, everybody using it.
Everybody in media.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
Was using it, all the politicians, all the activists, and
if you didn't use it, there was something wrong with
you and you need it to be canceled and kicked
out of the country. All these other irritating terms, radical transparency,
the hell is that? Stakeholders, the unhoused, food insecurity, all
(14:24):
these fake terms. And I would stop and say, what
is food insecurity? How did I exist all my life?
How did civilization exist for thousands of years?
Speaker 1 (14:34):
What does it? Does it mean people are hungry?
Speaker 2 (14:36):
Does that mean they're afraid they're gonna get hungry? The unhoused,
that's the worst one. And I swear to you, you
people in Tellivision, every time I see you on TV
and use that phrase.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
I scream at you, I curse you.
Speaker 5 (14:52):
I don't use that.
Speaker 1 (14:54):
I don'n't.
Speaker 6 (14:55):
I oh, I miss the John Cobalt roar.
Speaker 2 (15:04):
A person, birthing person, that's you. Yeah, you're a birthing person.
Speaker 5 (15:12):
No, I'm not going to say I will never say
birthing person. If I do, you can slap me.
Speaker 2 (15:21):
Okay, uh sis gender, God, cis gender.
Speaker 1 (15:32):
You know what that is.
Speaker 2 (15:34):
That's that's when, that's when, that's when your body parts
line up with what you think you are. They have
to come up with a special name for that. It's
like if you're if you think you're a woman and
you actually have female body parts, you are cis gender.
Speaker 5 (15:54):
I'm just gonna say I'm a woman.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
Well, they they they erased women, the word woman out
of a lot of government documents and congressional bills in
the last few years, Like the word mother was replaced
with berthing persons.
Speaker 5 (16:11):
That's so stupid.
Speaker 1 (16:12):
I mean true dead naming. Yeah, dead naming.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
That's when somebody changes their gender and they change their name,
and then you forget and use their old names.
Speaker 1 (16:24):
You have dead named me.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
It's like I've never heard of that, never heard of
that one. Yeah, uh, bipock, that was a new one.
Black and Indigenous people of color, Oh oh oh, here
we go. Incarcerated people. Oh you mean prisoners? You mean
(16:45):
convicts right? Involuntary confinement. That means you're in jail. God,
I'm saving.
Speaker 5 (16:54):
This, Okay, I'm going to try very hard. You have
my word.
Speaker 4 (17:03):
You're listening to John Cobbel's on Demand from KFI A sixty.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
We're on every day from one until four o'clock and
after four o'clock it's John Cobelt's show on demand whatever
you missed today. And for example, we had Royal Oaks
on to talk about Trump losing around in court with
a district judge who said you can't use the Marines
(17:29):
for a lot of things that Trump wants to use
them for.
Speaker 1 (17:33):
It was the same judge who said that Trump wasn't.
Speaker 2 (17:35):
Really in charge of the National Guard a couple of
months ago, and that got overturned by the appeals court.
So that's where it's headed. It added to the No
Circuit Court of Appeals. You want to hear us discuss that.
That's on the iHeart app We just had John Fleischman
on to talk about how Gavin Newsom is getting financed
by the millions from unions who've received a lot of
(17:59):
government money for news and in return, they're supplying kickbacks
to Newsom's campaign to draw redraw the districting lines and
get rid of Republican congress people in the state. And
one of pisses me off is like Netflix, the the chairman,
Read Hastings, he and his wife keep millions of dollars.
They helped create the George Gascon monster. I mean, people died,
(18:25):
there was so much crime that went unprosecuted because of
Read Hastings candidate. It's like, what what do you have?
What do you have against your customers? Everybody's pouring in.
I don't know how much do I say, charging on
nineteen a month. They've all kinds of different plans. But
(18:48):
you spent, you give it. You give a company, let's say,
twenty bucks a month for some television shows. He takes
the money and then starts spending it on destructive, vile
candidates like George Gascon.
Speaker 1 (19:04):
And then he wants to take.
Speaker 2 (19:05):
Away your right to have an independent commission draw the
congressional districts.
Speaker 1 (19:15):
That's what the people voted for.
Speaker 2 (19:17):
They wanted an independent district an independent panel.
Speaker 1 (19:24):
Well, what's the guy from Netflix doing? What is he doing?
Speaker 2 (19:26):
Just keep putting on all the bad television shows. That's
your purpose in life, to feed bad television to people.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
Nobody asked him to get involved in the.
Speaker 2 (19:36):
District attorney's race or the congressional redistricting issue.
Speaker 1 (19:40):
The hell do you know?
Speaker 2 (19:44):
I mean, most of the crap on these streaming channels,
that's exactly that.
Speaker 1 (19:49):
Most of them. It just sucks. It's terrible. But you know,
people got to do something in the evening.
Speaker 5 (19:56):
That's what I do every night. I just sit in
front of the TV.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
There you go. You know how much money you get
to George gas going along the way.
Speaker 5 (20:03):
I didn't realize that.
Speaker 1 (20:05):
Yeah, well you know you're part of you're part of
the problem.
Speaker 5 (20:09):
Obviously. Can I get my money back?
Speaker 1 (20:14):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (20:14):
You know, that's that's what people ought to start doing.
But be ninety nine point nine percent people don't know this.
I don't know that their their Netflix money ends up
in a George gascon's pocket.
Speaker 5 (20:26):
I just want to watch some shows. I just want
to chill out at night.
Speaker 2 (20:32):
You you whatce you're done here? I mean you just
you shut down completely right.
Speaker 5 (20:38):
Well, I've been on.
Speaker 6 (20:38):
The air since you're thirty in the morning, John, not
since one like some people.
Speaker 5 (20:44):
But since ten thirty. So I'm talked.
Speaker 2 (20:46):
Out at the end of the day almost every day
you tell me that, you know, I've been on since
ten thirty this morning.
Speaker 5 (20:53):
I'm tired. I'm tired of my own voice. I can't
stand here myself anymore.
Speaker 1 (20:59):
We all got a b for two weeks.
Speaker 3 (21:04):
Ah.
Speaker 2 (21:05):
Right, Here's where your money's going to as well. If
you're a live in the city of Los Angeles, it's
going to a law firm named Gibson Done, Gibson Done.
The city council has been asked to send now a
total of six million dollars to Gibson Done and Crutcher.
(21:30):
Crutcher is very important. This is the company, or this
is the law firm that's sent in fifteen lawyers to
keep Karen Bass from answering embarrassing questions about where the
homeless money went. Remember this, I think we're the only
ones you talk about this stuff. So Karen Bass has
(21:53):
blown I don't know, it's like a couple of billion
dollars missing from the homeless account, and she must know
where it is. And she did not want to testify
before a federal judge. So it's a civil lawsuit from
a something called the La Alliance was a collection of
(22:13):
residents and nonprofits and they wanted to know in businesses
and they wanted to know where'd the money go. And
Karen Bass wouldn't tell, and Gibson done, and Crutcher, fifteen
of those guys showed up to create so much legal
mayhem that the other side eventually gave up trying to
get Bass to testify. But the two billion is still missing,
(22:38):
and she still won't say where it went. And it
looks like they want They were given nine hundred thousand
dollars approved three months ago, and now they want a
total of six million. They've already racked up three million
(22:58):
in billings. Wow, they've racked up three million in billings,
but there's been a less than a million set aside
to finance this debacle.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
How about that? Huh?
Speaker 2 (23:09):
The city officially is not allowed to spend anymore, but
they ran up a big bill just to keep Karen
Bass out of court. By August the eighth, they'd racked
up over three million, according to a confidential man. And
it's the city attorney. This weird creature. Heidi Feldstein Soto.
(23:32):
She's the one who keeps making these requests and she
won't talk about it. And there's one council person. I
think I've counted three normal people on the council. One
of his Monica Rodriguez from the Valley, and she voted
against the first round of funding for Gibson Dunn, and
she's voting for the voting against the second round of funding.
(23:56):
And she's got a really fascinating point here. She says,
why isn't this six million dollars being used to house people?
Since it's all about homeless money. Here's six million, why
don't you do something with it to put people under
our roof and get them off the streets. But of
(24:17):
course that's not what these agencies. That's not what this
entire industry is designed to do. It's not designed to
get homeless people indoors. It's designed so that these attorneys
and these nonprofit executives can make a tremendous amount of money.
That's the purpose. So, I mean, you know, I've like
(24:44):
grown past this. I think a few years ago, my
knee jerk response would have been, hey, why don't you
give that money to the homeless people. They're the ones
who need it. That's what the business is supposed to be,
and don't give it to attorneys who are trying to
keep Karen Bass from testifying. And then it occurred to
me one day, I'm a dummy. They don't want to
(25:05):
help the homeless people. They want to steal the money. Well,
there you go. That's what they're doing. And I'm sure
Gibson dun is going to be donating to all the
all the relevant political campaigns in the next cycle.
Speaker 4 (25:19):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM sixty.
Speaker 2 (25:25):
Slide back eight seven seven Moist eighty six eight seven
seven Moist eighty six, or use the talkback feature on
the iHeart app, and you can follow us at John
Cobelt Radio at John Cobelt Radio. All right, conways up
in minutes. This is this is how stupid the world is.
I just got this email a few minutes ago from Uber.
(25:52):
Like everybody, I have an Uber account, so they sent
this to my email, not making this up, introducing a
new way to pay. That was the U that's the tagline.
I clicked it on a new way to pay. I
wonder when cash seriously click up in the email Uber
(26:16):
introducing a new way to pay cash with a photo
of a ten dollars bill. Getting where you need to
go should be accessible to everyone. That's where I've been
making it easier for anyone to ride by accepting cash.
And then they explain how it works, right because you
call it the app and then you have to select
(26:37):
the cash.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
But the really funny part is when.
Speaker 2 (26:40):
They where they try to explain how to behave If
you're using cash, at the end of your trip, you'll
hand the driver cash directly. If there's an issue, Please
don't dispute fares with drivers. Instead, reach out to Uber
support and will handle it. We expect all users to
(27:03):
treat each other with respect. Now, you know, before Uber
for you know, over one hundred years people paid cash
to taxi drivers and everybody knew how it worked, that
you didn't need special instructions. But this this also offers
(27:26):
more advice that it says, please please carry enough cash,
you know to cover the ride. We will need to
make sure you have enough cash to cover the fare.
(27:47):
You will see the cost of the ride up front.
Bring smaller bills to pay with cash.
Speaker 1 (27:54):
Hell, who are they giving rides to here.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
People who don't don't know how to pay for some service, Sir,
that'll be thirty five dollars.
Speaker 1 (28:09):
What do I do? I don't understand.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
Maybe it's because we have an entire generation now who
has spent their entire life staring at a screen ingesting
a destructive social media and the idiots in the legislature
in the Assembly, they now have a social media warning
law that they've proposed.
Speaker 1 (28:37):
Get this if it passes.
Speaker 2 (28:40):
It were to require a warning message to flash on
your screen at least once a day when you visit
a social media site, and then again every hour after
three hours of cumulative use, the message would say. The
Surgeon in General has warned that while social media may
(29:03):
have benefits for some young users, social media is associated
with significant mental health arms and has not been proven
safe for young users. Oh, that'll stop them. According to
a twenty twenty three Surgeon General report, ninety five percent
(29:25):
of youth ages thirteen to seventeen use social media, with
more than a third more than a third say they
use it almost constantly, almost constantly, total complete addiction. Your
child's brain completely hijacked. Soon it will be useless. Soon,
(29:48):
you will need instructions from Uber how to pay with cash,
because the rest of your brain will have died. I
think there's a direct correlation between ingesting social media twenty
four hours a day at not knowing how to pay
cab fare. So we're gonna have to deal with pop
(30:09):
up warnings.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
All right, I've got to go.
Speaker 2 (30:16):
Had a week off one day, I need to go
lie down one day at work. Godway's up next, and
we've got Michael Kurzer lied in the CAFI twenty four
hour News. Hey, you've been listening to the John Covelt
Show podcast. You can always hear the show live on
KFI Am six forty from one to four pm every
Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime on demand on
(30:37):
the iHeartRadio app.
The John Kobylt Show News
Host
John Kobylt
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal
Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.