Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
I am six forty you're listening to the John Cobel
podcast on the iHeartRadio app. Imagine you were living your life,
minding your own business, and some judge far away decides
that he's going to send a forty three time rapist
to live in your neighborhood, to live on your block,
(00:23):
maybe next door.
Speaker 1 (00:25):
That's what happened.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
We have a judge, Richard Harrison, who out of his
Hollywood courtroom, decided that Christopher Hubbard, the pillowcase rapist, would
go to live at twenty eight eight hundred Cruthers Creek
Road in Juniper Hills out in the Antelope Valley, East
LA County. There's a hearing scheduled in about twenty units
(00:46):
or so in the Mental Health Courtroom, Number one one
three for the judge Richard Harrison. I guess for the
final details to be put in place so that Hubbard
can live among men, women and children at twenty eight
(01:06):
hundred Crothers Creek Road. He's been convicted of over forty
three counts of sexual assaults rape on women. He puts
pillowcases over their head and rapes them, sometimes in front
of the woman's children. He's been suspected and over on
one hundred, but many of those charges were reduced or
eliminated during plea bargaining. He has been declared a sexually
(01:30):
violent predator, and our stupid government, our cruel, inhumane government,
has let him out again. And every time they let
him out, either out of prison or out of the
mental institution, he starts raping women again or somehow violates
his parole. So let's get Cheryl Poindexter. Cheryl lives in
(01:52):
the general area out in the Annalope Valley. How are you, Cheryl.
Speaker 3 (01:57):
I'm alive.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
This is this is one of those stories. I say
this all the time. I'm reading this out loud. I'm
aware of the story. I just my brain can't accept it.
I just don't believe anybody normal would do this.
Speaker 3 (02:10):
But yeah, I know it's insane and it just I mean,
and you don't know behalf of it. It just keeps
getting worse and worse. And I think you should run
for governor.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
You know.
Speaker 2 (02:25):
I don't want to spend my days fighting one hundred
progressive idiots.
Speaker 1 (02:31):
Honestly, I could I could do. People.
Speaker 2 (02:34):
People just have to vote differently. They don't have to
vote for me. They have to vote differently.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
I don't understand what progressives.
Speaker 2 (02:42):
Ought to be banished from government, and they ought to
be taken out into the ocean and dropped with weights
tied around their ankles. That's what should happen to these
progressive politicians. All right, tell me though, twenty minutes there's
there's a hearing. What's what's going to happen?
Speaker 3 (02:59):
Oh, well, there's They set up a fence around it
looks like a prison, this really tall fence, and it's
been there's all kinds of code violations on it, and
they're trying to delay it because of the fire department
said the house is unsafe. No permits were pulled, and
(03:23):
it's against the Juniper Hills town standards, and the Regional
Planning is doing nothing about it. And so I assume
that they're stalling him coming in. He's not in yet.
There's no furniture in, but they've got the furniture isn't in,
and they've got this huge fence that's over six feet
(03:46):
and it's a privacy fence and there's an opening on
the north and there's no way in hell a fire
truck could get in there too, you know, if there
was a fire, and they say this offense and installed
Starlink satellite for him up there.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
On Tuesday, maybe he gets somebody, we go all hello, stop,
Christopher Hubbard's getting a Starlink satellite so you could download
pornography more efficiently.
Speaker 3 (04:13):
Well that's so they can supposedly watch him on his
you know, check on his GPS. And the thing that's
so crazy is Starlink cost about six hundred dollars a
month for the equipment. I mean six hundred dollars for
the equipment and a minimum of one hundred and forty
dollars a month for service. And there's a lot of
(04:34):
people up here, I mean there's no there's no service
up up there on Brothers Creek. You cannot your GPS
doesn't work, your cell phone does not work, there's nothing.
The only way that people can call nine to one
one is if they have satellite service for the neighbors,
(04:55):
and a lot of the neighbors up there can afford
one hundred and forty dollars a month and one hundred
dollars for the equipment, so they don't have a way
to call nine one one if anything were to happen.
Speaker 2 (05:07):
And so you're talking about it if they're if they're outdoors, yeah, yeah,
there's no there's no cell phone signal, so they'd have
to be inside their house and have Wi Fi to
call nine one one. But if Christopher Hubbard rapes a
woman out in the street, nobody, nobody can nobody can
call exactly.
Speaker 3 (05:27):
Wow, And that's the I mean, why would they choose
to put him up here where there's no service.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
Because they don't care. I mean that, dude, I don't.
Speaker 3 (05:36):
They don't care about the public. They have absolutely they
don't care about us at all.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
No, when you repeatedly release a guy who's wrung up
one hundred rapes and being convicted forty three times, and
you release them again, uh, and you release them in
an area where there's no cell phone service, you're doing
it on purpose. And if women or young girls get raped,
they don't care.
Speaker 3 (06:00):
Well. The last last time that he was busted was
in I think and uh up here in office Lancaster.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
Yeah, yeah, ten years ago we covered that. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (06:11):
Yeah, he was parading around in his yard and his
underwear while the four h kids were walking their lands
and then that slammed them back in there again.
Speaker 1 (06:21):
I mean everything, you know what they would never tell
the reason. They just said he violated parole.
Speaker 2 (06:26):
But he was wandering around in his underwear in front
of school kids.
Speaker 1 (06:30):
Yeah, oh forgot.
Speaker 3 (06:33):
And then they said they're they're required. They're only required
to review his GPS monitoring data once every twenty four hours.
Speaker 2 (06:42):
I don't want to hear about all their excuses and
their stupid protocols.
Speaker 3 (06:46):
No one is watching it live, no one. And in
order to look at the security camera footage, they have
to ask the court to let them see a specific
time period. And per the judge's orders, none of that
data is allowed to be shared with lunch.
Speaker 2 (07:02):
And so the judge, the judge approved these lacks restrictions. Restrictions. Uh,
Richard Richard Harrison. What's with Richard Harrison? Why is he
pro Uh Christopher Hubbard? Why is he giving Christopher Hubbard
so many breaks after all these rape convictions.
Speaker 3 (07:20):
I think it has to do with Liberty, you know,
Liberty Healthcare.
Speaker 1 (07:25):
Liberty Healthcare.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
Yeah, Liberty Healthcare is the company that's in charge of
monitoring Hubbard.
Speaker 1 (07:35):
Why why why is he giving Liberty Healthcare? Uh? Such leeway?
Speaker 2 (07:40):
This this sounds very dangerous, It sounds really absurd.
Speaker 3 (07:46):
And there's no competitive bidding. Of course, we are considered
experts and they're the only ones that are doing this,
and it's.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
It's no competitive building.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
And they're considered experts, right, experts that let a forty
three time convicted rapist live among women and children with
very little supervision.
Speaker 1 (08:07):
Is there anybody gonna be inside his house?
Speaker 2 (08:11):
Not?
Speaker 3 (08:12):
No?
Speaker 1 (08:12):
No, what's the security? What does that look like in reality? Defense?
And if he wanders out into the street, what.
Speaker 3 (08:24):
Happens, Well, nothing happens because people can't there's no you know,
I don't know how they're gonna you.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
Know, so he can run down the block and rape
a woman, put a pillow case over his head and
nothing will happen.
Speaker 3 (08:42):
Somebody might shoot him.
Speaker 1 (08:44):
Yeah, I suppose there's that. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (08:47):
The public's got to take, uh, take things in their
own hands, I guess, provide their own security.
Speaker 3 (08:52):
Yeah, but you know, then they'll be in trouble. You know,
don't go to prison. It's just insane. Nobody is no,
he's protecting it.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
And you've had nobody, no nobody in politics able to
help you.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
No, no, no state centered or assemblyman.
Speaker 3 (09:08):
Everybody's written letters. Everybody's written letters to you know, everybody.
Speaker 2 (09:13):
Yeah, letters are useless. They don't read the letters that
they all write to each other. They don't care.
Speaker 3 (09:17):
Now at the hearing. At the hearing, only five members
of the public are allowed to attend any of the hearings,
and no one is allowed to make any comments or
or either in person or online.
Speaker 1 (09:30):
By design because they don't care.
Speaker 2 (09:32):
Right, they don't care, you know what I mean. You
have a government from Gavin Neusimon down. They don't care
if you get raped by this guy.
Speaker 3 (09:43):
That's right, it's not going to matter to and someone will,
something will happen. And you know, and the thing that
drives me nuts is that once okay, let's say he
goes back to to you know, somebody shoots them or
he dies, or or he goes back to the Nut House,
and that that house will always be designated as the SVP.
Speaker 1 (10:09):
House. Okay always.
Speaker 2 (10:11):
So this I got to run. But is this hearing
the last kind of last formality?
Speaker 3 (10:17):
I think it's just to say that, okay, we got
to sense.
Speaker 1 (10:20):
Up, Okay, what the hearings.
Speaker 2 (10:23):
So he'll be in the neighborhood, you know, any minute now,
probably all right, listen, Cheryl Poindexter, thank you for coming.
Speaker 3 (10:29):
On all right, thank you for having me.
Speaker 4 (10:31):
All right, you're listening to John Cobelt on demand from
KFI AM sixty.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
Yesterday was Karen Bass Day here on the show. Karen
Bass and Kristin Crowley, the two women who completely botched
up their their jobs to protect the people in this
city from losing their homes or losing their lives. Neither
(11:04):
one seemed to hear or react to the extreme fire
warnings that the National Weather Service was giving out for
five six straight days, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh. Yeah,
six days, six days of extreme fire warnings. And Bass
said that she didn't know about it, and she says
(11:29):
Crowley just waved it off as hey, we always get
sant Ana wins. Listen to Karen Bass again. And this
is from Alex Michaelson Fox eleven going to.
Speaker 5 (11:39):
Go to Ghana, which I know you've said was a
mistake now, but I just am curious on the thought
process behind it, because we know that there was warnings
about the weather before you went, and you still went.
What was the thought process behind going to Ghana?
Speaker 6 (11:54):
So let me just tell you a couple of things.
First of all, when the White House called and asked
me if I would report the president. I said, yes,
it was going to be a very very short trip
over a weekend and two business days. We need to
look at everything about the preparation and all of that
for the fires, because I think when we evaluate that,
(12:18):
we will find that although there were warnings that I
frankly wasn't aware of. Although there were warnings, I think
our preparation it wasn't what it typically is, meaning that
before there's a major weather event, for example last week,
and we.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
Get stopped there. So I love the way she slipped
that in there.
Speaker 2 (12:38):
She wasn't aware of the warnings, and we spent a
lot of time yesterday going through the frequency and severity
of the warnings from the National Weather Service. And then
basically what she's saying is Kristen Crowley just didn't get
the fire Department prepared, And it seems that's true. They
were not prepared. There were no extra engines, there were
(13:01):
no extra personnel focused on the Palisades and a number
of other places that the Weather Service said were likely
to go up in flames. But the Los Angeles Fire
Department is angry with Karen Bass because she's claiming The
fire department says that the department followed all standard preparation procedures.
Speaker 1 (13:28):
They posted. Prior to the Palisades fire.
Speaker 2 (13:31):
The LA Fire Department emailed two separate media advisories, conducted
multiple live and recorded media interviews about predicted extreme fire weather,
and notified city officials about the upcoming weather event.
Speaker 1 (13:45):
I have to believe that's all true.
Speaker 2 (13:48):
However, Kristin Crowley did not take those warnings and positioned
the firefighters and the engines in the proper position, and
the fire hydrants many of them didn't work. And of
course we know the idiot Genie Keinoniez left the reservoir empty,
(14:08):
sent in as reservoir one hundred and seventeen million gallons empty.
So while they sent out I don't know emails, media advisories, tweets, posts,
the action was not existence but non existent on the
part of Kristin Crowley and on Karen Bass, who says
(14:28):
I didn't know, I didn't know there was This is massive,
overwhelming in competence. These two should resign, they should be
There's no way to fire them. This is really awful.
They just should go The New York Post. I mean,
this has become a national story. Here's the headline. This
is on the front page of the New York Post today.
(14:51):
La Mayor Karen Bass gives mind boggling excuse for being
in Ghana as their city bird.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
This is what we look like to the rest the world.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
La Mayor Karen Bass gives mind boggling excuse for being
in Ghana as her city burned.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
And she's still here. She's not gone.
Speaker 2 (15:10):
Kristin Crowley's not gone. Denise Kenonas is not gone. These
three were dangerous, are dangerous. What happened was deadly, destructive, tragic, overwhelming,
and it could have been medicated or even prevented. If
(15:31):
they had just sent fire trucks up in the Palisades Hills,
they might have spot of the fire. If if they'd
gone to the spot of the last fire New Year's
Day where the fireworks fire started, that may have been
where it got rekindled. The firefighters should have been positioned
there and they might have been able to snuff that
(15:51):
out very quickly.
Speaker 1 (15:54):
But I have I cannot remember in my whole.
Speaker 2 (15:59):
Life this kind of incompetence coupled with incredible arrogance and denials.
Did Crowley really say, oh, we always get sat Ana wins.
Did Carabas really not know about all the warnings for
two days before she took off for Africa? We got
to have a lot more. I'm not waiting for investigations.
I don't want to hear about investigations.
Speaker 4 (16:21):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI A
six fort.
Speaker 2 (16:27):
Did I hear you in the newscast say that one
of the Menendez brothers claimed that they were bullied in prison.
Speaker 7 (16:34):
They both say that they're bullied in prison. One of
them admits that he was a spoiled brat before the murders.
But they're bullied in prison.
Speaker 2 (16:43):
Bullied in prison, and we're supposed to feel sorry that
they were bullied in prison?
Speaker 7 (16:49):
Yes, uh huh, Well, I don't know if they're supposed to.
I mean, I don't know if they're if they're asking
us to uh be sympathetic.
Speaker 1 (16:57):
Or they just he's still spoiled brat.
Speaker 2 (16:59):
If he's even saying that, of course he was bullied
in prison, probably a lot worse than that.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
I was bullied. You're even you're like fifty four years
old or something, what do you was bullied? God?
Speaker 2 (17:15):
I wish they'd been executed like thirty years ago. But
that's harsh.
Speaker 7 (17:22):
You know there's certain things John that.
Speaker 1 (17:26):
You do.
Speaker 7 (17:27):
You and I'm.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
I believe an instant justice. I know you do. All right, now,
this this may be good news, you know that. Boy.
Speaker 2 (17:39):
I love all this shouting by progressives that Elon Musk
is unelected.
Speaker 1 (17:46):
You know who's unelected?
Speaker 2 (17:47):
That all the progressives are very comfortable with the California
Air Resources Board. Remember that crowd of jackals they passed,
if you remember last fall, a low carbon fuel standard,
which would raise the gas tax by sixty five since
(18:11):
they initially admitted it would be an increase of forty
seven cents per gallon, but new projection says the price
would be sixty five cents and California's average gasoline price
would exceed the national average by as much as sixty
two percent by the end of this year, courtesy of
(18:33):
the unelected California Air Resources Board. Have you ever heard
have you ever heard any of the California progressive politicians
complain about the about car being unelected? No, because they're
happy as long as unelected boards and unelected bureaucrats are
punishing us because they hate us. Now, there was so
(18:59):
much blowback. In fact, there was a petition signed by
thirteen thousand people asking CARB to at least postpone the increase,
and CARB refused to change anything. And now, now, after
all this time, Tuesday, the Office of Administrative Law, I
(19:21):
don't even know what that is. They have rejected this
this field standard and rejected the price increase. This happened
on Tuesday. The Office of Administrative Law disapproved amendments to
(19:41):
the low Carbon Mandate and a CARB spokes hole, David Klegern.
God who goes up to who grows up to be
a spokes hole for the California Air Resources Board. Wow,
that's a good use of your life, he says. The
(20:03):
Office of Administrative Law issued a routine disapproval of amendments
on technical grounds, not on the merits of the regulation.
CARB will refine the language and resubmit for approval. Carbon
has four months to fix the issues and resubmit. But
(20:23):
there's a lot of legislators that want this temporary halt
to be permanent. There is a Senate bill, Senate Bill two,
which is being pushed by two Republicans. I don't know
how to say this woman's name, but I'll give it
a shot. Rosalisi Ochoa bo out of Yukaipa and Brian
(20:46):
Jones out of San Diego. They both called for the
passage that would of this bill, which would void the
new carbon amendments and kill any gas press price rise.
Now we are up to about forty five a gallon,
which is the highest in the country, higher even than Hawaii,
and he had another sixty five cents to that, and
(21:08):
we would be at five dollars and fifty cents a gallon.
And there are some states that sell gas for as
low as two dollars and sixty seven cents. In fact,
there's about forty states that sell it for like three
and a quarter or less, and we're at forty four
(21:29):
plus the sixty five cents. This is another thing from
Gavin Newsom. So like just in the last hour, we've
told you that Gavin Newsom and his administration are bringing
you the forty three time convicted rapist pillowcase rapist Christopher
Hubbard to Juniper Hills.
Speaker 1 (21:48):
And we're very close.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
To still getting the sixty five cent increase in the
gas courtesy of Gavin Newsom. But it looks to be
tied up over a technicality issue. The legislature has to
rescind this increase. There really should be some kind of
(22:15):
rebellion here.
Speaker 1 (22:16):
I feel.
Speaker 2 (22:17):
I feel so frustrated that the rest of the country
is enjoying all the massive cuts that are taking place
in Washington, d C. All the fraudsters, all the criminals,
it's all being shook loose. They're gonna be finally dealing
with the criminals running high speed rail, and yet here
(22:38):
we are in California, mired with the same old garbage,
the same corruption, the same money laundering, the same micromanaging
with their weird obsessions, and it's all about shape, it's
all about stealing money from us. This sixty five cent
increase is just flat out stealing money from us, because
(23:01):
that's the whole point of the government operation.
Speaker 1 (23:07):
I said this yesterday.
Speaker 2 (23:07):
If you wonder how we went from one hundred billion
dollars the first year or Jerry Brown for a state
budget to three hundred billion. Now, I think this week
is proven. They're just stealing the money and they're not
writing down what they're stealing. So there's no way, there's
no way we ought to have to pay another sixty
five cents a gallon. They can't force us into electric
(23:30):
cars there's very few electric chargers out there, and the
electrical grid has not been built.
Speaker 1 (23:37):
It can barely handle what we are what we are using. Now.
They want to ruin our lives.
Speaker 2 (23:47):
They don't think we should be living this way, that
we should not have the freedom to live the way
we live. They progressives really believe this, and they're trying
to And this is like the last bastion of the stuff.
This is no longer going on in much of the country.
It's dead. It's over in much of the country except here.
(24:12):
All right, more coming up three o'clock, we're going to
get back on the high speed rail story because Sean Duffy,
the Transportation Secretary, came to Los Angeles and said they
are going to do a thorough review of high speed
rail because do you know, not one inch of rail
(24:33):
has been built, has been laid down, not one inch
of high speed rail, and they're only trying to do
Bakersfield and or said, and that's not going to happen
for at least ten years. And you know, they're tens
of billions of dollars over budget, and Sean Duffy is
(24:56):
saying enough. Susan Shelley from the Howard Jarvi Taxpayers Association
has more information because there's four billion dollars hanging in
the air that the Biden criminals approved of and Newsome
and high speed Rail wants that four billion. They're not
going to get it, but they're going to go through
(25:17):
the review process.
Speaker 1 (25:18):
First.
Speaker 4 (25:19):
You're listening to John Cobelts on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (25:25):
John Cobelt's show coming up after three o'clock. We got
to Susan Shelley on from the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
about today's trip by Sean Duffy, the Transportation Secretary to
LA to say that they're going to do a compliance
review of high speed Rail. That's the investigation that Trump demanded.
(25:45):
They are going to see where's the money gone. It's
well over ten billion dollars. There's another four billion that
is supposed to come from the FEDS that the Biden
administration set aside. But there's no high speed rail track
that's laid on the ground after sixteen and a half years.
So we'll talk with Susan Shelley coming up. I want
(26:06):
to plan now a clip we've got of Sean Duffy,
and this was the press conference they held at Union Station.
Speaker 1 (26:13):
Transportation Secretary. I want to.
Speaker 8 (26:15):
Address the protesters for a moment if I could.
Speaker 1 (26:18):
I think they were chanting build the rail.
Speaker 8 (26:21):
It's been seventeen years and sixteen billion.
Speaker 1 (26:24):
Dollars and no rail has been built.
Speaker 8 (26:27):
So if you want to go protest somewhere, if you
want to shout at someone, go to the governor's mansion,
go talk to Democrats in the legislature who have brought
us this crappy project.
Speaker 1 (26:37):
Right.
Speaker 8 (26:38):
So, we've seen over the course of the last month
what Dogs has exposed.
Speaker 1 (26:42):
With regard to fraud, waste, and abuse. And we're done
with that. And you know what, you're going to have
people who love fraud, who love waste, who love.
Speaker 4 (26:50):
Trains to nowhere with all of us up here, we
do not love fraud.
Speaker 1 (26:55):
Rice Interviews.
Speaker 8 (26:56):
We are going to use the taxpayer money efficiently.
Speaker 1 (27:01):
And this is.
Speaker 2 (27:03):
The shot shouting build the rail. By the way, Michael
Monks says that was about twenty five people, but the
acoustics of the environment made it sound like there were hundreds.
There weren't that many people. Michael said, they look kind
of ragged. It's a hired crowd. I wish media would
stop covering these protesters. They're often hired, they're often fake protesters.
(27:28):
And what Sean Duffy said is right, you're shouting build
the rail. Well, they spent sixteen billion, they had seventeen years.
Speaker 1 (27:37):
It's over. They didn't build the rail. We had We had.
Speaker 2 (27:44):
Brown and knwsome governing for the last fourteen years, and
Schwarzenegger who was a supporter. So we had the government
in place. Assembly the state said it carb to provide
tax money the governors, and they build it because they
didn't intend to build it. See, it's another racket. It's like,
(28:08):
it's like Newsome and his administration doesn't care to if
they send a forty three time rapist into Junifer Hills.
They also don't care if they see. What they're clever
doing is they try to position this as a fight
between over the climate, a fight between environmentalists and those
(28:28):
who want to continue fouling the environment by driving their
cars around and not taking the train.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
It's like, no, it's not.
Speaker 2 (28:35):
It's you set up a project to make yourselves billions
of dollars and you didn't follow through and build the
rail because it's too difficult to build the rail. It's
way too expensive. They originally said thirty three billion. That
was a lie. These aren't cost overruns. This is what
it costs. But they spent all the money and got
(28:57):
no rail out of it. I can't tell you how
how complex their plans are to rip people, rip taxpayers
off for billions of dollars. It's all thought out well
in advance. They know it's not going to be done
by twenty twenty. They know it's not going to cost
thirty three billion. They know there's going to be no
rail going from Sacramento to San Francisco to La to
(29:19):
Anaheim and San Diego. They knew all that, but they
manipulated you with a phony campaign, and they got fifty
two percent of the public to vote for high speed
rail because it sounds really cool. The same way they
lied to you about Prop forty seven. I told you
it was going to reduce crime, it was going to
(29:40):
make neighborhoods in schools safer. They lie to you, and
they emotionally manipulate you, and more than half the public
falls for it every time. And then ten years later
you look around and say, oh my god, there's all
these drug addicts and mental patients and all these criminals
and thieves running around.
Speaker 1 (29:59):
What happened?
Speaker 2 (30:00):
And you said, you said you think they didn't know that.
Of course they knew that. They knew if they weren't
going to put in thieves and drug addicts in jail,
of course they were going to run all over the street.
Speaker 1 (30:12):
They don't care.
Speaker 2 (30:14):
They have this fanatical ideology where the state has no
right to put human beings away into prison. So that's
how we got Prop forty seven. And the cover story
on this is climate change. And they've manipulated a whole
generation of people into believing that we're all about to
die because the Earth is going to overheat. No, it's not,
(30:34):
it's not going to overheat. We're not going to die.
This is all hysterical emotional manipulation, and it created this
huge pool of money to blow on high speed rail.
Trade unions are profiting from it, executives are profiting from it.
Consulting companies, environmental and engineering and legal consulting, and all
(30:57):
the rest, all the parasites.
Speaker 1 (30:59):
They are making billions.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
You are getting your tax money stolen because you always
fall for their phony emotional arguments, and people are so
caught up in these emotional issues they don't understand guys
like Trump and Musk who are not emotional in that way.
They're not giving you phony emotional arguments. They're telling you, hey,
(31:24):
we're thirty six trillion dollars in debt. Can't do this anymore.
Sean Duffy is telling you, hey, we spent sixteen billion.
There's no track laid down, there are no trains.
Speaker 1 (31:35):
Not emotional. It's facts, it's math.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
And some people can't handle the facts in the math
because they're so used to emotional arguments. Take the emotion
out of it. They had seventeen years, sixteen billion, You
got nothing for it. How many times are you going
to be bent over for this one? How many times?
How many times thirty six trillion dollars in debt in Washington?
How many times you're going to be bent over with
(31:58):
another tax increase? All right, we come back. We're gonna
talk to Susan Shelley from the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.
They are full of facts in math too, not emotional arguments.
Deborah Mark live in the KFI twenty for our newsroom. Hey,
you've been listening to the John Cobalt Show podcast. You
can always hear the show live on KFI Am six
forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
(32:20):
and of course anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.