June 20, 2025 • 32 mins
The John Kobylt Show Hour 1 (06/20) - Royal Oakes comes on the show to talk about the latest battle in court between Pres. Trump and Gov. Newsom over the National Guard. Government officials and media lead to more outrage from the public from all of the lying they do. John hates the smell of the elderly.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't. I am six forty. You're listening to the John
Cobelt podcast on the iHeartRadio app We're on every day
between one and four o'clock and every day after four
o'clock it's John Cobelt on demand the podcast, So you
can listen to that tonight, tomorrow, all weekend long, whatever
we do here today in case you don't have time
to sit for the whole three hours. I don't even
(00:21):
have time to sit through the whole three hours, but
if you don't, you make it up there on the podcast,
Moist Line is coming back two rounds on at three
o'clock and that's eight seven seven moist eighty six for
next week. But this week we're already We're already full
and ready to go. And last night the big news
Trump beat Newsome again in court. Trump had gone to
(00:48):
the Court of Appeals in the Ninth Circuit to try
to get our decision reversed. There was a district judge
which said that Trump had no right to commandeer the
California National Guard. This three person panel on the Court
of Appeal said yes he does, and it was three
to nothing the decision. So Trump still has control of
(01:11):
the California National Guard, and this panel said he had
the right to take that control. Let's talk to Royal Oaks,
who's been narrating this journey along the way as it
winds through the courts, and it's not over. Well, where
are you?
Speaker 2 (01:26):
How are right here? It's kind of like that Bill
Murray movie Groundhog Day. I mean it seems like every
day or two we're living the same. Oh it's the
Ninth Circuit doing this and the trial judge and order
about Supreme Court. So you got it exactly right. I mean,
Trump was a big loser last week. The Federal Tronk
Court judge in San Francisco said, you can't send the troops.
There's no rebellion. You didn't talk to the governor. Ninth
(01:49):
Circuit says, actually, Trump wins. He has enormous discretion. It's
not unlimited. You know, if Trump said, well, I'm putting
the troops in the in receipt because I believe Martians
are about to probe people, then the courts would say, no, okay,
you can't do it unless it's crazy like that. The
Ninth Circuit is saying he's got super broad discretion and
(02:11):
he didn't have to talk to the governor. You could
talk to the governor's aid. So that was the decision
last night. But here's the problem for Trump. All Newsom
has to do John is go to the Ninth Circuit
himself this afternoon and say, well, that sucked. You ruled
against me. But I here by demand that you take
a full vote of all the Ninth Circuit judges, and
(02:32):
if a majority of the twenty nine judges say so,
then eleven judges will rehear the thing and they can
wipe out the three judge win for Trump last night.
So I predict he's going to do that tonight or
maybe over the weekend. Meanwhile, more Groundhog Day. The parallel
track is the federal judge who got his hands flapped
last week. He had another hearing this morning at ten
(02:54):
and he's bloviating. He's all unhappy about what the Ninth
Circuit said, and he wants more brief and he didn't
make a decision. But what he focused on is an
issue that could be a problem for Trump. He said.
The big deal here is in America, we have a
tradition you don't send soldiers in to do cops work.
That's what they do in Banana republics in South America
and it's a really bad thing. And so he is
(03:16):
wanting more briefing. He's going to have another hearing shortly,
and so he'll probably once again rule Trump didn't have
a right to send in the military. Maybe guard the
federal building. So nobody throws a Molotov cocktail in the
Boss's corner office, But you can't send the troops fanning
out into you Dodger Stadium and the Grand Avenue Park
(03:37):
and arresting people that don't have their papers. So that
again two tracks. You got the Ninth Circuit as well
as the Troutcourt judge, and looming above all of them,
of course, it's the boss US Supreme Court. If they
feel like getting involved and helping Trump out if he
loses hair in California, then they'll do it.
Speaker 1 (03:56):
So the second question about the Marines is separate from
the National Guard issue.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
Yeah, it's interesting because the previous rulings up until now
they really haven't focused on the Marines, partly because Trump.
You they said I'm sending in the Marines, but they
really didn't do much. You know, a few of them
are just kind of hanging out around a Federal Building.
But yeah, the judges tend to look at things differently.
It's one thing to say, as president, look, i'm nationalizing,
federalizing the National Guard, because if there's an insert insurrection
(04:25):
or an uprising or a natural disaster, you know, presidents
do that. But to send in the Marines, you have
to be proved to judges that this is stuff that
the local cops couldn't do, because in this country we
really don't like militarizing the police by bringing in the
army or the Marines.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
But now so the National Guard is permissible according to
these three judges. And then we're going to find out
if you actually if you go to the Marines, or
is that a bridge too far?
Speaker 2 (04:55):
Exactly right. We're going to find out if it's okay
to send in the Marines. And you know, part of
it on is if things stay kind of calm, that
really strengthens Newsom's hand because whether it's the Ninth Circuit
or the trial court judge, you know, in a few
days a week, if Newsom is able to go in
and say, look, you know things are really nobody's throwing
any bombs. You know, we're having peaceful First Amendment protests,
(05:16):
and you know things have calmed down. Their passes been
posing a curfew that will reduce the chance that the
judges will say, well, you know, president is entitled to
take care of an emergency because hopefully it won't look
like an emergency if people stay calm. And as you know,
the Democrat leaders, including Newsom, they're saying that everybody ate it,
snay on the molotov cocktails, you know, no violent demonstrations.
(05:38):
You just it strengthens Donald Trump's.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
Hand, the Appeals Court wrote, and I think this paragraph
was really the heart of the case. Uh, the undisputed
facts demonstrate that before the deployment of the National Guard,
protesters pinned down several federal officers and through concrete chunks,
bottles of liquid, and other objects. At the office series,
(06:00):
protesters damaged federal buildings and caused the closure of at
least one federal building, and a federal van was attacked
by protesters who smashed in the van's windows. The federal
government's interest in preventing incidents like these is significant. So
what they were saying is this, this was a riot
worthy of the National Guard because there's so much damage
that was being done to federal property and the attacks
(06:23):
on federal law enforcement officials, and that seemed to be
the winning argument there.
Speaker 2 (06:29):
Yeah, And I mean if it sounds like a no brainer,
it's because it is. I mean, what judge in his
right mind would not allow the federal government to take
the extra steffs necessary if the crazy stuff that you
just described, you know, quoting from the Ninth Circuit actually happened.
You know, It's the real problem is the folks on
(06:51):
the federal bench in general are very skeptical of Donald
Trump and his exercise of powers. But you know, if
you've got if you've got an emergency, it's pretty automatic
that they're going to say yes.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
How much of an effect was the the Biden judge
voting with the two Trump judges. How much of an
effect does that have on the rest of the appeals
panel when it comes to a vote as to whether
they hear the case and then eventually when they decide
the case. Does that carry a lot?
Speaker 2 (07:21):
That's huge? That's huge, because I mean I just assumed,
you know, I'm a cynic. I assume you know, Trump
appoint is going to go for Trump, Biden appointee, especially
the Biden appointee she she had already said that Justice
Kavanaugh and if you will confirm him, people are going
to die in the streets. She was an organizer for
the Service Employees Union. I'm thinking, okay, it's going to
be two to one. No, she acknowledged that he has
(07:42):
very broad discretion. Now, of the twenty nine judges on
the Ninth Circuit, there may be several who don't think
like hers as a Biden appointee. They may think like
this guy, Charles Bryer, the Clinton appointees. So it wouldn't
be a shock if the Ninth Circuit takes it up
for the eleven judge panel. But yeah, you're I think
Newsom has his work cut out for him to try
(08:03):
to overcome the recognition by a lot of people that,
you know, the statute is very clear. You know, again,
if there's absolutely no rational basis for it. One are
the things that the Trump lawyers got into trouble with
in front of the Ninth Circuit in the oral argument
the other days. They started out saying Trump lawyer said,
he has absolutely a total discretion. You can't do anything
about it. Well, nobody's going to believe that it's all
(08:23):
a matter of common sense, and if there's a problem
on the ground, let the president do his thing. And
you know, it's all factual. It's determined by how severe
the unrest is.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
Royal Oaks, thank you for coming on again.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
You do beat.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
Thanks Royal Oaks, ABC News legal analysts, We come back.
There was a piece written by Heather MacDonald on The
Wall Street Journal about the two public legal views of
what went on in la one being it was a riot,
the other view being out was nothing much, no need
for the National Guard, certainly not the Marines. There she
(08:59):
quotes some LAPD officers who told her privately just how
bad it was and why it was necessary to bring
in the National Guard. These weren't views that were quoted
by Newsom when he was fighting. Trump seemed to ignore that.
Speaker 3 (09:16):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
John Cobelt's show on every day from one until four o'clock.
We just had Royal Oakson from ABC News. He's their
legal analyst about Trump beating Newsom three nothing. In the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, three judge Panels said that
Trump had the right to send the California National Guard
to la and has the right to maintain control over
(09:44):
the National Guard, which he does right up till today,
and it's going to continue. And now Trump's attorneys were
pushing the concept that when a president sends in the
National Guard or commandeer's the National Guard for any reason,
it is unrevealable. No judge can tell him otherwise. And
(10:06):
the judges said, now, come on, there's no such thing.
And there is virtually everything that government officials do can
be reviewable, and certainly sending in the National Guard. But
what they did say is that the president has a
great amount of difference, should get a great amount of
difference when he makes these decisions. And so they were
(10:28):
giving Trump that difference and told News that too. I
think they said suck eggs at the end of that, right,
didn't they? I thought that's what I saw.
Speaker 4 (10:38):
I think I missed that.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
Huh. I thought that was in your newscast.
Speaker 4 (10:41):
I know, I don't think so.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
Heather MacDonald has a piece in the Wall Street Journal.
We've had her on the show a number of times,
and you know what she did, because she's done her
story here. Really, the heart of it is just how
much public officials like Bass News lie and how much
the media lies or amplifies the lies of these politicians.
(11:07):
It is an ongoing, chronic problem. And they repeat the
lie so often that a certain percentage of the public,
especially ones inclined that way politically, believe the lie and
repeat the lie. And the big lie here was it
was scattered minor violence. LAPD always had it under control.
(11:30):
It was largely peaceful protests, which right now is the
number one phrase of twenty twenty five. I hate the most.
I grip my teeth. This is fingernails on the blackboard
stuff mostly peaceful protests. That is nothing but pure propaganda.
So she wrote a piece in the Wall Street Journal
(11:52):
says the headline is rioting acceptable. If so, how much
you should read it? And she opens by quoting an
LAPD commander. Now, this is an interesting tac to take.
Why don't you go to the police who were in
the middle of the danger, ask them what they thought
(12:13):
of the mostly peaceful protest. Well, this LAPD commander said,
we don't have bleep under control. He said that on Sunday,
we don't have bleep under control. It's a god send
that the National Guard and the Marines are here. Officers
on the street felt the same way, but the LAPD
(12:34):
forbids them to express that view in public. See you
see how this works is the political leaders lie, the
media lies and amplifies the politicians lies as well, and
then the people who tell the truth are prohibited from
speaking the truth. She writes, there's two different pictures of
(12:58):
what happened in Los Angeles official one from California California's
elected leaders in the media, and then the ground level
view from law enforcement. Newsom had told Defense Secretary Pete
Hegseth that local law enforcement officers were sufficient to maintain order. Well.
(13:21):
A week later, a crowd broke into an ice detention
center downtown to try to liberate those being detained. The vandals.
See this is the mostly peaceful part that wasn't covered.
The vandals overpowered the skeletal crew of National Guard soldiers
(13:41):
using improvised bombs made from M eighty firecrackers and nails
in broken glass. So they created these bombs that would
have firecrackers, nails, and broken glass fire flying everywhere. Eventually,
one hundred law enforcement officers arrived to put down the
(14:01):
jail brake, but there was damage to the detention center.
H how much played did this get Did news mentioned
this in bass? Did bass mentioned this?
Speaker 2 (14:13):
Why?
Speaker 1 (14:13):
Now this sounds like extremely serious? HEATHERN McDonald writes. The
day before, according to the commander, I interviewed a mob
of several dozen surrounded two ICE agents taking an illegal
alien into custody in Vermont Boulevard. Six men jumped out
of a truck and grabbed the handcuffed suspect from the
(14:35):
back of the iceman and threw the suspect into their
truck and fled. The ICE agents gave chase, but without
sirens or lights, and the pursuit was futile. Neither of
these incidents were reported in the press, and the commander
said lap did not put out an alert for its
officers to apprehend the kidnappers to avoid violating Los Angeles'
(15:03):
sanctuary law, which banned city personnel from federal immigration enforcement.
So you had guys abducting an illegal alien from an
ICE ban I wonder which nonprofit organization was behind this.
I wonder how much tax money they got. This LAPD
(15:26):
commander said it would be safer if we could work
with ICE. We should be able to block off the
street to assist their agents in making arrests. He thought
that Trump should provide more National Guard soldiers, not fewer,
then they could walk the streets with local officers during
(15:47):
the anarchy. But the official narrative from the liars bassin
Newsom was that the protests were largely peaceful. That's their quote.
Here's what they did, though, These mostly peaceful protesters were
(16:07):
launching commercial grade fireworks loaded with nails and broken glass
at police. Easily could have blind them, blinded them, or
named them, Hurling molotov cocktails at officers, stoning a squad
cart with a female officer inside it, dropping cement blocks,
dropping scooters and grocery carts from freeway overpasses onto CHP officers,
(16:29):
commandeering part of a freeway, blocking intersections with flaming dumpsters,
defacing city landmarks with graffiti, smashing into a eluding retailers
including Adidas, Apple, CVST Mobile, jewelry stores, and a gas station.
But that idiot judged the district judge that found for
Newsmit in the first round. Judge Charles Bryer called them stray,
(16:50):
violent incidents. It's really disgusting.
Speaker 3 (16:55):
Oh more, you're listening to John Cobel's on demand from
KFI A six.
Speaker 1 (17:03):
We have been celebrating Trump's went over Newsom. In the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, three judge panel voted three
nothing said that Trump had the right to send in
the National Guard, that was the good thing to do,
and he can't keep control of the National Guard for
now because, as Heather McDonald has pointed out, and a
(17:26):
lot of this was not covered by all the liars
and incompetence in local media, who they just have no
shame why they need to stick their nose up Gavin
Newsom's you know what? Or Karen, I don't know why.
I don't understand the allegiance. I guess it's because I
grew up on the East Coast and the New York
(17:47):
reporters when I was a kid were just a bunch
of aggresive a holes and they didn't care who was
in office, Republicans, Democrats. They were loud, combative, argumentative, and
just to assume that everybody was lying. And here most
of the news reporters, not all of them, Most of
the reporters and the anchors and the producers and the
(18:08):
editors do public relations. And so if Bass and Newsom
say it's mostly peaceful, then Wilah it's mostly peaceful. Well,
Heather McDonald in the Wall Street Journal went and talked
to the to the LPD cops, the commanders, and found
out it was really, really bad and they wished Trump
had sent more National Guard soldiers in. With stories here
(18:33):
that didn't make the news or didn't make it very much.
Every time I turned on the TV, I was getting
sob stories, you know, about people being grabbed on the streets,
until you find out they'd already been ordered by a
judge to be deported, or you were hearing about, Oh,
it's so wonderful right now, look at the camaraderie. Look,
(18:54):
it's like it's like a carnival atmosphere. And then and
then five minutes later, whoa, it looks like the mood
has changed. Yeah, riots were breaking out and the National
Guard was spraying pepper spray all over. One of the
things Heather McDonald wrote about in the Wall Street Journal
is what was going on that required the National Guard
(19:17):
and the LPD was is every minute of the day
way short of officers. And it's been like this since
the whole George Floyd hysteria in twenty twenty. They can't
find officers who want to work for laped anymore. Once
Garcetti was done vilifying them, he called them killers. Once
(19:41):
he took his knee. Once the police chief at the time,
Michael Moore took his knee, well that was it. And
they know that the city Council is one third socialist.
She writes that on June eighth, the day after the
activation order for the National Guard, the rioting had gotten
so bad that the current police chief, Jim McDonald put
(20:03):
on put the LAPD on tactical alert, canceling all time
off shifts as long as sixteen hours. That's how bad
it is. The cops had to be out sixteen hours
on June tenth, three days after the National Guard order.
That's when Bass announced a curfew for downtown. Still the
disorder continued, and contrary to she writes, the media narrative,
(20:29):
and that's another word that needs to be banned, along
with mostly peaceful or largely peaceful protests. The narrative, what
the hell does that mean? I know, narrative means story,
but it's either a true story or it's a false story,
and in this case, false story. She writes, contrary to
(20:50):
the media narrative, National Guard soldiers are not engaging in
domestic law enforcement. They are not patrolling the streets arresting
looters and vandals. Their sole purpose is to stand guard
at federal buildings and protect federal officers. Because LAPD has
so few officers, they can't guarantee protection of the federal buildings,
(21:13):
something that that bimbo bubblehead Newsom has never mentioned with
all his fake synctimony. The deployment of LAPD officers left
their own divisions even more understaffed than usual in the
post George Floyd era. There were half as many patrol
(21:33):
cars on the streets of Los Angeles' most crime ridden
neighborhoods then there typically would be. So you take all
the worst neighborhoods in LA they had half as many
because they had to deal with the rioters. And if
you have a line of defense around the federal properties,
(21:56):
then that's one less target for cops to worry about,
so the LAPD offers and sheriff's deputies can focus on
the riot violence. You see how that works. That's why
the National Guard is there. Because the National Guard isn't there,
then you have to put sheriff's deputies or LAPD, and
LAPD is way short of its normal staffing, again not
(22:17):
covered by the a holes in the media, and listen
to what it means for the people in the neighborhoods.
One particularly violent division of La saw as many homicides
in the first seven days of the tactical alert as
it usually sees in a month. So the murder rate
(22:41):
in this neighborhood quadrupled in seven days because there weren't
many cops around. They had to take on the rioters.
This is the state we're in again. Bass doesn't talk
about it. She was going, I don't really see what's happening.
(23:03):
Why would he do this? Why is the National Guard
coming in? I don't know why.
Speaker 5 (23:08):
Remember when she was pulling that routine. She's a liar.
Newsome's a war They're just full of They're just full
of crap. They're so anti cop. They hate the cops.
Best hates the cops. Newsom hates the cops.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
Newsom should have sent in the National Guard instead of
playing tug a war in the courts all week. He's dangerous.
Why didn't he respond right away? He's got the access
to the same information that Heather McDonald does. All you
have to do is call the LAPD commanders, you would
have gotten the same story. And then she writes about
(23:44):
what we all saw. People started calling waimo vehicles to
downtown and setting them on fire, and Los Angeles Fire
Department didn't even respond because there weren't enough cops to
protect them. They weren't going to stand out there and
put out a way mo fire and take a brick
(24:05):
in the head. So what you had is total breakdown
of civilization, which is the point. And remember this was
financed in part by your taxes going to organizations like
Churla who sponsored the riot. They might as well have
sponsorship banners like they do at baseball stadiums or NASCAR races.
(24:28):
You know, this riot brought to you by Churlett and
your tax money. The good rioters here in Los Angeles,
thank you for working seven days a week so that
you could finance our riot. That's the truth. That's what's
going on. Good luck find to get in the LA
Times or any or many of the television stations. All right,
(24:49):
we come back something completely different because this has bothered
me since I was five years old, and I'll explain it.
It is the persistent smell of the elderly. You all
know what I'm talking about here, Yes, we do, all right,
so we will. We'll discuss this. There's a scientific reason
and there's a possible cure, but the cure might be
(25:09):
worse than the disease. Here, No, I love so I
didn't think you'd think.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
So you're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI
Am six forty.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
I just found I just found a story in the
City Journal, and you're not gonna believe this. What was
Gavin Newsom doing the day after the riots started? And
this is almost a perfect bookend to what Karen Bass
(25:42):
was doing the day the Palisades fire began. All right,
so we will tell you after two o'clock what was
Gavin Newsom doing the day after the riots? Did he
jump into action to quell this sturbance? This this also
(26:04):
may be a follow up to the French laundry story.
We'll tell you about it, all right, completely different track
for a few minutes.
Speaker 4 (26:12):
We're gonna have some fun.
Speaker 1 (26:14):
This is not fun. Old people stink. Old people smell.
Speaker 4 (26:20):
You know, we're going to get old and we're going
to smell.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
You are not going to smell.
Speaker 4 (26:24):
I'm not going to. I might, yes, you will oh.
Speaker 1 (26:28):
God, this is in the New York Post. There are
a few odors more immediately recognizable and off putting than
old people smell. And it comes from lipid peroxidation on
the top of your skin. If you don't have enough antioxidants,
(26:48):
the smell builds up, and the older you get, you
don't have a lot of cell turnover all right, so
I guess your your dead cells pile up on each other.
Speaker 3 (27:00):
Yuck.
Speaker 1 (27:00):
And this accordey Leslie Kenny, founder of Oxford health Span.
She says, it's like the body rusting smell comes from
a compound called two nonino. It is, well, you know,
one of the one of the oils in your skin,
it's called sebum. Yes, in fact, that you have too
(27:20):
much sebum, that's what can give you acne. Yeah, those suckers, right, Well,
it's sebum that is rusted.
Speaker 4 (27:28):
Oh that's really nasty.
Speaker 1 (27:30):
And that's why it smells. Oh really yeah, yeah, it's
like it's it's gonna be grandma, Grandma Deborah has Grandma.
Speaker 4 (27:41):
Debora is not going to smell because Grandma Deborah is.
Speaker 1 (27:45):
Gonna the results. It comes from increased oxidation of skin
lipids and the production of two nonino. It's the Omega seven,
fatty acids on your skin surface that start to break down.
Old people smell can not be disguised or washed away.
You can't mask it with perfume. The perfume layers on
top of it.
Speaker 4 (28:06):
It makes it worse.
Speaker 1 (28:07):
Yes, when you smell really musty, you can't get rid
of it through more bathing because the cells are not
turning over rapidly enough. They're they're not coming off your body.
I'm really gonna just stick my head in another I mean,
this is.
Speaker 2 (28:24):
So.
Speaker 1 (28:24):
The sen is going to be there no matter what.
Speaker 4 (28:26):
Yeah, there's something you could do about it.
Speaker 1 (28:29):
I'm getting to it, I know.
Speaker 4 (28:30):
But you're saying you're going to stick your head in
an oven. There's something you can do.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Well, Well, it's it's kind of toss up between head
and the oven and what I'd have to do. First
time I noticed this smell, my mother had an aunt
in the convent and we used to go visit her
on some Sundays after church. I'm five years old. Convent
was very dark and had its own damp, woody odor
(28:56):
to it. Dark wood, no sunlight. My mother's aunt was
a nun and she'd come down the stairs, dressed in
the old fashioned habit where you could only see her
nose and two eyes and a mouth, and she looked
one hundred and sixty even then. She's probably her fifties
(29:17):
or sixties. And she would always lean over and kiss us,
me and my brother, and I dreaded that kiss. Did
you gag A gag? Because you know she had these
wrinkled lips. She had old nun odor, old none odor.
(29:39):
Oh yeah, old none odor. There is a certain kind
of smell in certain old buildings where it's wood on
the inside, and I smell it and I'm taken back
to that being five years old.
Speaker 2 (29:50):
Again.
Speaker 1 (29:51):
It was a dungeon, this convent. I don't know what
was going on there, but she was the first time
I experienced old person old person stink. What you can
do is you eat mushrooms. Yes, mushrooms are packed with
an amino acid ergo thianine, a powerful antioxidant with anti
(30:13):
inflammatory properties that stops the lipid peroxidation before the odor
can accumulate. Excellent new See that's what I'm saying.
Speaker 4 (30:23):
You guys would rather smell.
Speaker 1 (30:25):
Old person stink. Mushrooms are head in the oven. Mushrooms
you decide I wish I could at my own game
show like this, I'll jump off a cliff instead, put
my head in an oven.
Speaker 6 (30:39):
Fries some mushrooms with some rice and some spinach and
olive oil and some garlic, and it's yummy.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
Mushrooms are an excellent stores of spermating spermitting.
Speaker 2 (30:50):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (30:50):
Well, it's an organic compound that activates autophagi, which regenerates
the damaged cells autofagie A U T O P A
G Y. So the more mushrooms you eat, the less
you'll smell like a rotting old person?
Speaker 6 (31:12):
Is there a time frame of when you have to
consume all these mushrooms before you?
Speaker 1 (31:16):
I don't you know what whatever, But you know what, I'm.
Speaker 4 (31:20):
Just gonna eat a lot of mushrooms starting today.
Speaker 1 (31:22):
Well you should start. Women should start taking it somewhere
when you're going through menopause. Okay, yeah, And if you
start going heavy on the mushrooms around the menopause years,
then building might be able to ward off the skin
rot that leads to the old person stink.
Speaker 4 (31:44):
Fantastic news.
Speaker 1 (31:47):
All right, we come back. What was Gavin Newsom? And
I'm going to tell you a story you'll believe it
not making it up. City Journal has it. What was
he doing the day after the riots started in La
Debora Mark live in the CAFI twenty four hour newsroom. Hey,
you've been listening to The John Cobalt Show podcast. You
can always hear the show live on KFI AM six
(32:08):
forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
and of course, anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app
Can't. I am six forty. You're listening to the John
Cobelt podcast on the iHeartRadio app We're on every day
between one and four o'clock and every day after four
o'clock it's John Cobelt on demand the podcast, So you
can listen to that tonight, tomorrow, all weekend long, whatever
we do here today in case you don't have time
to sit for the whole three hours. I don't even
(00:21):
have time to sit through the whole three hours, but
if you don't, you make it up there on the podcast,
Moist Line is coming back two rounds on at three
o'clock and that's eight seven seven moist eighty six for
next week. But this week we're already We're already full
and ready to go. And last night the big news
Trump beat Newsome again in court. Trump had gone to
(00:48):
the Court of Appeals in the Ninth Circuit to try
to get our decision reversed. There was a district judge
which said that Trump had no right to commandeer the
California National Guard. This three person panel on the Court
of Appeal said yes he does, and it was three
to nothing the decision. So Trump still has control of
(01:11):
the California National Guard, and this panel said he had
the right to take that control. Let's talk to Royal Oaks,
who's been narrating this journey along the way as it
winds through the courts, and it's not over. Well, where
are you?
Speaker 2 (01:26):
How are right here? It's kind of like that Bill
Murray movie Groundhog Day. I mean it seems like every
day or two we're living the same. Oh it's the
Ninth Circuit doing this and the trial judge and order
about Supreme Court. So you got it exactly right. I mean,
Trump was a big loser last week. The Federal Tronk
Court judge in San Francisco said, you can't send the troops.
There's no rebellion. You didn't talk to the governor. Ninth
(01:49):
Circuit says, actually, Trump wins. He has enormous discretion. It's
not unlimited. You know, if Trump said, well, I'm putting
the troops in the in receipt because I believe Martians
are about to probe people, then the courts would say, no, okay,
you can't do it unless it's crazy like that. The
Ninth Circuit is saying he's got super broad discretion and
(02:11):
he didn't have to talk to the governor. You could
talk to the governor's aid. So that was the decision
last night. But here's the problem for Trump. All Newsom
has to do John is go to the Ninth Circuit
himself this afternoon and say, well, that sucked. You ruled
against me. But I here by demand that you take
a full vote of all the Ninth Circuit judges, and
(02:32):
if a majority of the twenty nine judges say so,
then eleven judges will rehear the thing and they can
wipe out the three judge win for Trump last night.
So I predict he's going to do that tonight or
maybe over the weekend. Meanwhile, more Groundhog Day. The parallel
track is the federal judge who got his hands flapped
last week. He had another hearing this morning at ten
(02:54):
and he's bloviating. He's all unhappy about what the Ninth
Circuit said, and he wants more brief and he didn't
make a decision. But what he focused on is an
issue that could be a problem for Trump. He said.
The big deal here is in America, we have a
tradition you don't send soldiers in to do cops work.
That's what they do in Banana republics in South America
and it's a really bad thing. And so he is
(03:16):
wanting more briefing. He's going to have another hearing shortly,
and so he'll probably once again rule Trump didn't have
a right to send in the military. Maybe guard the
federal building. So nobody throws a Molotov cocktail in the
Boss's corner office, But you can't send the troops fanning
out into you Dodger Stadium and the Grand Avenue Park
(03:37):
and arresting people that don't have their papers. So that
again two tracks. You got the Ninth Circuit as well
as the Troutcourt judge, and looming above all of them,
of course, it's the boss US Supreme Court. If they
feel like getting involved and helping Trump out if he
loses hair in California, then they'll do it.
Speaker 1 (03:56):
So the second question about the Marines is separate from
the National Guard issue.
Speaker 2 (04:02):
Yeah, it's interesting because the previous rulings up until now
they really haven't focused on the Marines, partly because Trump.
You they said I'm sending in the Marines, but they
really didn't do much. You know, a few of them
are just kind of hanging out around a Federal Building.
But yeah, the judges tend to look at things differently.
It's one thing to say, as president, look, i'm nationalizing,
federalizing the National Guard, because if there's an insert insurrection
(04:25):
or an uprising or a natural disaster, you know, presidents
do that. But to send in the Marines, you have
to be proved to judges that this is stuff that
the local cops couldn't do, because in this country we
really don't like militarizing the police by bringing in the
army or the Marines.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
But now so the National Guard is permissible according to
these three judges. And then we're going to find out
if you actually if you go to the Marines, or
is that a bridge too far?
Speaker 2 (04:55):
Exactly right. We're going to find out if it's okay
to send in the Marines. And you know, part of
it on is if things stay kind of calm, that
really strengthens Newsom's hand because whether it's the Ninth Circuit
or the trial court judge, you know, in a few
days a week, if Newsom is able to go in
and say, look, you know things are really nobody's throwing
any bombs. You know, we're having peaceful First Amendment protests,
(05:16):
and you know things have calmed down. Their passes been
posing a curfew that will reduce the chance that the
judges will say, well, you know, president is entitled to
take care of an emergency because hopefully it won't look
like an emergency if people stay calm. And as you know,
the Democrat leaders, including Newsom, they're saying that everybody ate it,
snay on the molotov cocktails, you know, no violent demonstrations.
(05:38):
You just it strengthens Donald Trump's.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
Hand, the Appeals Court wrote, and I think this paragraph
was really the heart of the case. Uh, the undisputed
facts demonstrate that before the deployment of the National Guard,
protesters pinned down several federal officers and through concrete chunks,
bottles of liquid, and other objects. At the office series,
(06:00):
protesters damaged federal buildings and caused the closure of at
least one federal building, and a federal van was attacked
by protesters who smashed in the van's windows. The federal
government's interest in preventing incidents like these is significant. So
what they were saying is this, this was a riot
worthy of the National Guard because there's so much damage
that was being done to federal property and the attacks
(06:23):
on federal law enforcement officials, and that seemed to be
the winning argument there.
Speaker 2 (06:29):
Yeah, And I mean if it sounds like a no brainer,
it's because it is. I mean, what judge in his
right mind would not allow the federal government to take
the extra steffs necessary if the crazy stuff that you
just described, you know, quoting from the Ninth Circuit actually happened.
You know, It's the real problem is the folks on
(06:51):
the federal bench in general are very skeptical of Donald
Trump and his exercise of powers. But you know, if
you've got if you've got an emergency, it's pretty automatic
that they're going to say yes.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
How much of an effect was the the Biden judge
voting with the two Trump judges. How much of an
effect does that have on the rest of the appeals
panel when it comes to a vote as to whether
they hear the case and then eventually when they decide
the case. Does that carry a lot?
Speaker 2 (07:21):
That's huge? That's huge, because I mean I just assumed,
you know, I'm a cynic. I assume you know, Trump
appoint is going to go for Trump, Biden appointee, especially
the Biden appointee she she had already said that Justice
Kavanaugh and if you will confirm him, people are going
to die in the streets. She was an organizer for
the Service Employees Union. I'm thinking, okay, it's going to
be two to one. No, she acknowledged that he has
(07:42):
very broad discretion. Now, of the twenty nine judges on
the Ninth Circuit, there may be several who don't think
like hers as a Biden appointee. They may think like
this guy, Charles Bryer, the Clinton appointees. So it wouldn't
be a shock if the Ninth Circuit takes it up
for the eleven judge panel. But yeah, you're I think
Newsom has his work cut out for him to try
(08:03):
to overcome the recognition by a lot of people that,
you know, the statute is very clear. You know, again,
if there's absolutely no rational basis for it. One are
the things that the Trump lawyers got into trouble with
in front of the Ninth Circuit in the oral argument
the other days. They started out saying Trump lawyer said,
he has absolutely a total discretion. You can't do anything
about it. Well, nobody's going to believe that it's all
(08:23):
a matter of common sense, and if there's a problem
on the ground, let the president do his thing. And
you know, it's all factual. It's determined by how severe
the unrest is.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
Royal Oaks, thank you for coming on again.
Speaker 2 (08:38):
You do beat.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
Thanks Royal Oaks, ABC News legal analysts, We come back.
There was a piece written by Heather MacDonald on The
Wall Street Journal about the two public legal views of
what went on in la one being it was a riot,
the other view being out was nothing much, no need
for the National Guard, certainly not the Marines. There she
(08:59):
quotes some LAPD officers who told her privately just how
bad it was and why it was necessary to bring
in the National Guard. These weren't views that were quoted
by Newsom when he was fighting. Trump seemed to ignore that.
Speaker 3 (09:16):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
John Cobelt's show on every day from one until four o'clock.
We just had Royal Oakson from ABC News. He's their
legal analyst about Trump beating Newsom three nothing. In the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, three judge Panels said that
Trump had the right to send the California National Guard
to la and has the right to maintain control over
(09:44):
the National Guard, which he does right up till today,
and it's going to continue. And now Trump's attorneys were
pushing the concept that when a president sends in the
National Guard or commandeer's the National Guard for any reason,
it is unrevealable. No judge can tell him otherwise. And
(10:06):
the judges said, now, come on, there's no such thing.
And there is virtually everything that government officials do can
be reviewable, and certainly sending in the National Guard. But
what they did say is that the president has a
great amount of difference, should get a great amount of
difference when he makes these decisions. And so they were
(10:28):
giving Trump that difference and told News that too. I
think they said suck eggs at the end of that, right,
didn't they? I thought that's what I saw.
Speaker 4 (10:38):
I think I missed that.
Speaker 1 (10:39):
Huh. I thought that was in your newscast.
Speaker 4 (10:41):
I know, I don't think so.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
Heather MacDonald has a piece in the Wall Street Journal.
We've had her on the show a number of times,
and you know what she did, because she's done her
story here. Really, the heart of it is just how
much public officials like Bass News lie and how much
the media lies or amplifies the lies of these politicians.
(11:07):
It is an ongoing, chronic problem. And they repeat the
lie so often that a certain percentage of the public,
especially ones inclined that way politically, believe the lie and
repeat the lie. And the big lie here was it
was scattered minor violence. LAPD always had it under control.
(11:30):
It was largely peaceful protests, which right now is the
number one phrase of twenty twenty five. I hate the most.
I grip my teeth. This is fingernails on the blackboard
stuff mostly peaceful protests. That is nothing but pure propaganda.
So she wrote a piece in the Wall Street Journal
(11:52):
says the headline is rioting acceptable. If so, how much
you should read it? And she opens by quoting an
LAPD commander. Now, this is an interesting tac to take.
Why don't you go to the police who were in
the middle of the danger, ask them what they thought
(12:13):
of the mostly peaceful protest. Well, this LAPD commander said,
we don't have bleep under control. He said that on Sunday,
we don't have bleep under control. It's a god send
that the National Guard and the Marines are here. Officers
on the street felt the same way, but the LAPD
(12:34):
forbids them to express that view in public. See you
see how this works is the political leaders lie, the
media lies and amplifies the politicians lies as well, and
then the people who tell the truth are prohibited from
speaking the truth. She writes, there's two different pictures of
(12:58):
what happened in Los Angeles official one from California California's
elected leaders in the media, and then the ground level
view from law enforcement. Newsom had told Defense Secretary Pete
Hegseth that local law enforcement officers were sufficient to maintain order. Well.
(13:21):
A week later, a crowd broke into an ice detention
center downtown to try to liberate those being detained. The vandals.
See this is the mostly peaceful part that wasn't covered.
The vandals overpowered the skeletal crew of National Guard soldiers
(13:41):
using improvised bombs made from M eighty firecrackers and nails
in broken glass. So they created these bombs that would
have firecrackers, nails, and broken glass fire flying everywhere. Eventually,
one hundred law enforcement officers arrived to put down the
(14:01):
jail brake, but there was damage to the detention center.
H how much played did this get Did news mentioned
this in bass? Did bass mentioned this?
Speaker 2 (14:13):
Why?
Speaker 1 (14:13):
Now this sounds like extremely serious? HEATHERN McDonald writes. The
day before, according to the commander, I interviewed a mob
of several dozen surrounded two ICE agents taking an illegal
alien into custody in Vermont Boulevard. Six men jumped out
of a truck and grabbed the handcuffed suspect from the
(14:35):
back of the iceman and threw the suspect into their
truck and fled. The ICE agents gave chase, but without
sirens or lights, and the pursuit was futile. Neither of
these incidents were reported in the press, and the commander
said lap did not put out an alert for its
officers to apprehend the kidnappers to avoid violating Los Angeles'
(15:03):
sanctuary law, which banned city personnel from federal immigration enforcement.
So you had guys abducting an illegal alien from an
ICE ban I wonder which nonprofit organization was behind this.
I wonder how much tax money they got. This LAPD
(15:26):
commander said it would be safer if we could work
with ICE. We should be able to block off the
street to assist their agents in making arrests. He thought
that Trump should provide more National Guard soldiers, not fewer,
then they could walk the streets with local officers during
(15:47):
the anarchy. But the official narrative from the liars bassin
Newsom was that the protests were largely peaceful. That's their quote.
Here's what they did, though, These mostly peaceful protesters were
(16:07):
launching commercial grade fireworks loaded with nails and broken glass
at police. Easily could have blind them, blinded them, or
named them, Hurling molotov cocktails at officers, stoning a squad
cart with a female officer inside it, dropping cement blocks,
dropping scooters and grocery carts from freeway overpasses onto CHP officers,
(16:29):
commandeering part of a freeway, blocking intersections with flaming dumpsters,
defacing city landmarks with graffiti, smashing into a eluding retailers
including Adidas, Apple, CVST Mobile, jewelry stores, and a gas station.
But that idiot judged the district judge that found for
Newsmit in the first round. Judge Charles Bryer called them stray,
(16:50):
violent incidents. It's really disgusting.
Speaker 3 (16:55):
Oh more, you're listening to John Cobel's on demand from
KFI A six.
Speaker 1 (17:03):
We have been celebrating Trump's went over Newsom. In the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, three judge panel voted three
nothing said that Trump had the right to send in
the National Guard, that was the good thing to do,
and he can't keep control of the National Guard for
now because, as Heather McDonald has pointed out, and a
(17:26):
lot of this was not covered by all the liars
and incompetence in local media, who they just have no
shame why they need to stick their nose up Gavin
Newsom's you know what? Or Karen, I don't know why.
I don't understand the allegiance. I guess it's because I
grew up on the East Coast and the New York
(17:47):
reporters when I was a kid were just a bunch
of aggresive a holes and they didn't care who was
in office, Republicans, Democrats. They were loud, combative, argumentative, and
just to assume that everybody was lying. And here most
of the news reporters, not all of them, Most of
the reporters and the anchors and the producers and the
(18:08):
editors do public relations. And so if Bass and Newsom
say it's mostly peaceful, then Wilah it's mostly peaceful. Well,
Heather McDonald in the Wall Street Journal went and talked
to the to the LPD cops, the commanders, and found
out it was really, really bad and they wished Trump
had sent more National Guard soldiers in. With stories here
(18:33):
that didn't make the news or didn't make it very much.
Every time I turned on the TV, I was getting
sob stories, you know, about people being grabbed on the streets,
until you find out they'd already been ordered by a
judge to be deported, or you were hearing about, Oh,
it's so wonderful right now, look at the camaraderie. Look,
(18:54):
it's like it's like a carnival atmosphere. And then and
then five minutes later, whoa, it looks like the mood
has changed. Yeah, riots were breaking out and the National
Guard was spraying pepper spray all over. One of the
things Heather McDonald wrote about in the Wall Street Journal
is what was going on that required the National Guard
(19:17):
and the LPD was is every minute of the day
way short of officers. And it's been like this since
the whole George Floyd hysteria in twenty twenty. They can't
find officers who want to work for laped anymore. Once
Garcetti was done vilifying them, he called them killers. Once
(19:41):
he took his knee. Once the police chief at the time,
Michael Moore took his knee, well that was it. And
they know that the city Council is one third socialist.
She writes that on June eighth, the day after the
activation order for the National Guard, the rioting had gotten
so bad that the current police chief, Jim McDonald put
(20:03):
on put the LAPD on tactical alert, canceling all time
off shifts as long as sixteen hours. That's how bad
it is. The cops had to be out sixteen hours
on June tenth, three days after the National Guard order.
That's when Bass announced a curfew for downtown. Still the
disorder continued, and contrary to she writes, the media narrative,
(20:29):
and that's another word that needs to be banned, along
with mostly peaceful or largely peaceful protests. The narrative, what
the hell does that mean? I know, narrative means story,
but it's either a true story or it's a false story,
and in this case, false story. She writes, contrary to
(20:50):
the media narrative, National Guard soldiers are not engaging in
domestic law enforcement. They are not patrolling the streets arresting
looters and vandals. Their sole purpose is to stand guard
at federal buildings and protect federal officers. Because LAPD has
so few officers, they can't guarantee protection of the federal buildings,
(21:13):
something that that bimbo bubblehead Newsom has never mentioned with
all his fake synctimony. The deployment of LAPD officers left
their own divisions even more understaffed than usual in the
post George Floyd era. There were half as many patrol
(21:33):
cars on the streets of Los Angeles' most crime ridden
neighborhoods then there typically would be. So you take all
the worst neighborhoods in LA they had half as many
because they had to deal with the rioters. And if
you have a line of defense around the federal properties,
(21:56):
then that's one less target for cops to worry about,
so the LAPD offers and sheriff's deputies can focus on
the riot violence. You see how that works. That's why
the National Guard is there. Because the National Guard isn't there,
then you have to put sheriff's deputies or LAPD, and
LAPD is way short of its normal staffing, again not
(22:17):
covered by the a holes in the media, and listen
to what it means for the people in the neighborhoods.
One particularly violent division of La saw as many homicides
in the first seven days of the tactical alert as
it usually sees in a month. So the murder rate
(22:41):
in this neighborhood quadrupled in seven days because there weren't
many cops around. They had to take on the rioters.
This is the state we're in again. Bass doesn't talk
about it. She was going, I don't really see what's happening.
(23:03):
Why would he do this? Why is the National Guard
coming in? I don't know why.
Speaker 5 (23:08):
Remember when she was pulling that routine. She's a liar.
Newsome's a war They're just full of They're just full
of crap. They're so anti cop. They hate the cops.
Best hates the cops. Newsom hates the cops.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
Newsom should have sent in the National Guard instead of
playing tug a war in the courts all week. He's dangerous.
Why didn't he respond right away? He's got the access
to the same information that Heather McDonald does. All you
have to do is call the LAPD commanders, you would
have gotten the same story. And then she writes about
(23:44):
what we all saw. People started calling waimo vehicles to
downtown and setting them on fire, and Los Angeles Fire
Department didn't even respond because there weren't enough cops to
protect them. They weren't going to stand out there and
put out a way mo fire and take a brick
(24:05):
in the head. So what you had is total breakdown
of civilization, which is the point. And remember this was
financed in part by your taxes going to organizations like
Churla who sponsored the riot. They might as well have
sponsorship banners like they do at baseball stadiums or NASCAR races.
(24:28):
You know, this riot brought to you by Churlett and
your tax money. The good rioters here in Los Angeles,
thank you for working seven days a week so that
you could finance our riot. That's the truth. That's what's
going on. Good luck find to get in the LA
Times or any or many of the television stations. All right,
(24:49):
we come back something completely different because this has bothered
me since I was five years old, and I'll explain it.
It is the persistent smell of the elderly. You all
know what I'm talking about here, Yes, we do, all right,
so we will. We'll discuss this. There's a scientific reason
and there's a possible cure, but the cure might be
(25:09):
worse than the disease. Here, No, I love so I
didn't think you'd think.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
So you're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI
Am six forty.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
I just found I just found a story in the
City Journal, and you're not gonna believe this. What was
Gavin Newsom doing the day after the riots started? And
this is almost a perfect bookend to what Karen Bass
(25:42):
was doing the day the Palisades fire began. All right,
so we will tell you after two o'clock what was
Gavin Newsom doing the day after the riots? Did he
jump into action to quell this sturbance? This this also
(26:04):
may be a follow up to the French laundry story.
We'll tell you about it, all right, completely different track
for a few minutes.
Speaker 4 (26:12):
We're gonna have some fun.
Speaker 1 (26:14):
This is not fun. Old people stink. Old people smell.
Speaker 4 (26:20):
You know, we're going to get old and we're going
to smell.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
You are not going to smell.
Speaker 4 (26:24):
I'm not going to. I might, yes, you will oh.
Speaker 1 (26:28):
God, this is in the New York Post. There are
a few odors more immediately recognizable and off putting than
old people smell. And it comes from lipid peroxidation on
the top of your skin. If you don't have enough antioxidants,
(26:48):
the smell builds up, and the older you get, you
don't have a lot of cell turnover all right, so
I guess your your dead cells pile up on each other.
Speaker 3 (27:00):
Yuck.
Speaker 1 (27:00):
And this accordey Leslie Kenny, founder of Oxford health Span.
She says, it's like the body rusting smell comes from
a compound called two nonino. It is, well, you know,
one of the one of the oils in your skin,
it's called sebum. Yes, in fact, that you have too
(27:20):
much sebum, that's what can give you acne. Yeah, those suckers, right, Well,
it's sebum that is rusted.
Speaker 4 (27:28):
Oh that's really nasty.
Speaker 1 (27:30):
And that's why it smells. Oh really yeah, yeah, it's
like it's it's gonna be grandma, Grandma Deborah has Grandma.
Speaker 4 (27:41):
Debora is not going to smell because Grandma Deborah is.
Speaker 1 (27:45):
Gonna the results. It comes from increased oxidation of skin
lipids and the production of two nonino. It's the Omega seven,
fatty acids on your skin surface that start to break down.
Old people smell can not be disguised or washed away.
You can't mask it with perfume. The perfume layers on
top of it.
Speaker 4 (28:06):
It makes it worse.
Speaker 1 (28:07):
Yes, when you smell really musty, you can't get rid
of it through more bathing because the cells are not
turning over rapidly enough. They're they're not coming off your body.
I'm really gonna just stick my head in another I mean,
this is.
Speaker 2 (28:24):
So.
Speaker 1 (28:24):
The sen is going to be there no matter what.
Speaker 4 (28:26):
Yeah, there's something you could do about it.
Speaker 1 (28:29):
I'm getting to it, I know.
Speaker 4 (28:30):
But you're saying you're going to stick your head in
an oven. There's something you can do.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Well, Well, it's it's kind of toss up between head
and the oven and what I'd have to do. First
time I noticed this smell, my mother had an aunt
in the convent and we used to go visit her
on some Sundays after church. I'm five years old. Convent
was very dark and had its own damp, woody odor
(28:56):
to it. Dark wood, no sunlight. My mother's aunt was
a nun and she'd come down the stairs, dressed in
the old fashioned habit where you could only see her
nose and two eyes and a mouth, and she looked
one hundred and sixty even then. She's probably her fifties
(29:17):
or sixties. And she would always lean over and kiss us,
me and my brother, and I dreaded that kiss. Did
you gag A gag? Because you know she had these
wrinkled lips. She had old nun odor, old none odor.
(29:39):
Oh yeah, old none odor. There is a certain kind
of smell in certain old buildings where it's wood on
the inside, and I smell it and I'm taken back
to that being five years old.
Speaker 2 (29:50):
Again.
Speaker 1 (29:51):
It was a dungeon, this convent. I don't know what
was going on there, but she was the first time
I experienced old person old person stink. What you can
do is you eat mushrooms. Yes, mushrooms are packed with
an amino acid ergo thianine, a powerful antioxidant with anti
(30:13):
inflammatory properties that stops the lipid peroxidation before the odor
can accumulate. Excellent new See that's what I'm saying.
Speaker 4 (30:23):
You guys would rather smell.
Speaker 1 (30:25):
Old person stink. Mushrooms are head in the oven. Mushrooms
you decide I wish I could at my own game
show like this, I'll jump off a cliff instead, put
my head in an oven.
Speaker 6 (30:39):
Fries some mushrooms with some rice and some spinach and
olive oil and some garlic, and it's yummy.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
Mushrooms are an excellent stores of spermating spermitting.
Speaker 2 (30:50):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (30:50):
Well, it's an organic compound that activates autophagi, which regenerates
the damaged cells autofagie A U T O P A
G Y. So the more mushrooms you eat, the less
you'll smell like a rotting old person?
Speaker 6 (31:12):
Is there a time frame of when you have to
consume all these mushrooms before you?
Speaker 1 (31:16):
I don't you know what whatever, But you know what, I'm.
Speaker 4 (31:20):
Just gonna eat a lot of mushrooms starting today.
Speaker 1 (31:22):
Well you should start. Women should start taking it somewhere
when you're going through menopause. Okay, yeah, And if you
start going heavy on the mushrooms around the menopause years,
then building might be able to ward off the skin
rot that leads to the old person stink.
Speaker 4 (31:44):
Fantastic news.
Speaker 1 (31:47):
All right, we come back. What was Gavin Newsom? And
I'm going to tell you a story you'll believe it
not making it up. City Journal has it. What was
he doing the day after the riots started in La
Debora Mark live in the CAFI twenty four hour newsroom. Hey,
you've been listening to The John Cobalt Show podcast. You
can always hear the show live on KFI AM six
(32:08):
forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
and of course, anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app
The John Kobylt Show News
Host
John Kobylt
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy And Charlamagne Tha God!
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.