All Episodes

August 18, 2025 33 mins

The John Kobylt Show Hour 1 (08/18) - Alex Stone comes on the show to talk about Texas Democrats returning to the state after a 2 week standoff regarding a battle over redistricting congressional districts. San Francisco has reduced their outdoor homeless encampment population by 85%. A New Jersey man died on his way to meet an AI chatbot. Another AI chatbot story. 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't. I am six forty.

Speaker 2 (00:02):
You're listening to the John Cobelt Podcast on the iHeartRadio app.

Speaker 1 (00:06):
Welcome to the show.

Speaker 2 (00:07):
We're on every day from one until four o'clock and
then after four o'clock John Cobelt Show on demand on
the iHeart Happened You get.

Speaker 1 (00:14):
To catch up on whatever you missed.

Speaker 2 (00:18):
You follow us at John Cobelt Radio on social media
at John Cobelt Radio, and we're looking to get the
thirty five thousand followers. So if you're not following us,
follow us. We'll take you somewhere. We'll lead you somewhere.
I'm not sure exactly we we'll all end up. So

(00:38):
here's something that happened in Texas that's going to affect
California potentially. And you may have heard the Texas House
Democrats bolted the state, headed for Chicago and New York
and other parts unknown because they refuse to vote on
a plan to redraw the congressional district line in Texas

(01:01):
because the governor and Trump want to add six new
Republican seats by re jiggering the lines of how the
districts are drawn, which prompted Little Gavin Newsom to pop
up and say.

Speaker 1 (01:18):
Well, i'll do that too, I'll show you.

Speaker 2 (01:20):
Of course, he has a much more difficult time because
there's a constitutional amendment. It was a proposition passed that
mandates that an independent commission draws the lines here in California.
But he says he's going to do it. He's going
to at least start the process if Texas passes this
new plan. The Democrats walked out and they were gone

(01:43):
for two weeks, and presumably they were sick of the
bad room service at whatever dumpy hotel they were staying in.
And now they've come back, and let's see what's happening
with Alex Stone from ABC News.

Speaker 1 (01:54):
Hey there, John, yea.

Speaker 2 (01:55):
They got on a charter aircraft today in Chicago and
they went home, and enough have returned to Austin that
they were able to gavel in today and move forward.
And they didn't get anything done today, but they were
able to say okay, enough or here that we'll be
going on Wednesday. And as the Democrats came back into
the State House in Austin, there were crowds cheering them
on and supported the fight that they've put up against

(02:17):
changing the congressional boundaries in Texas. Sounded like this as
they arrived a little while ago inside the state capitol,
so they were not arrested as had been threatened by
the governor and others when they returned that when they
stepped foot in Texas, and there was that the threat
that they were going to be handcuffs put on them.
But by the time that they got back into the

(02:40):
state House, things kind of got going from there, and
today they were able to gable in make it official,
say okay, we can go on.

Speaker 1 (02:46):
With this now a quorum is present, and that.

Speaker 2 (02:51):
Means that they can go Bringing them back clears the
way for Republicans to approve the changes that will net them.
They're looking at right now five new Republican House seats
next year, and the House speaker in Texas in a
little while ago, we.

Speaker 1 (03:03):
Were done waiting.

Speaker 3 (03:04):
We have a quarm Now is the time for action.
We'll move quickly and the schedule will be demanding until
our work is complete.

Speaker 2 (03:11):
So they do have enough members now to conduct business.
They told everybody come back on Wednesday, will get going then.
But those who left, they will have somebody watching over
them and tell Wednesday to make sure that they don't
leave again.

Speaker 3 (03:23):
Members who have not been president until today, for whom
arrest warrants were issued will be granted written permission to
leave only after agreeing to be released into the custody
of a designated DPS officer appointment.

Speaker 1 (03:34):
So it gets things going.

Speaker 2 (03:35):
And now in California, in the last hour so Democrats
have been talking about their plans to retaliate, saying that
they are now amping this up because clearly Texas is
going to move forward for California to get the five
seats to counter and negate what Texas is going to
do to get the five four Democrats in today, Democrats,
if you're in California saying Donald Trump lit this fire

(03:57):
when he pressured Texas to change the rules.

Speaker 1 (04:00):
Gang California is answering that attack.

Speaker 2 (04:03):
And they say John that they think that they can
get it on the ballot and the Californians will agree
to it, mainly to nix out whatever Texas ends up doing,
not so much because people to agree with constant redistricting,
but because of the political landscape in California versus in Texas.
But Governor Abbott was asked his thoughts about what Governor
Newsom is doing and trying to get do this kind

(04:24):
of tit for tat between the two most populated states.

Speaker 4 (04:27):
Two thirds of a state disagree with him on that,
and for him to to get anything past he has
to have two thirds of the state agree with him
on it.

Speaker 1 (04:35):
It's a joke.

Speaker 4 (04:36):
He's posturing for the presidency and doing nothing more than that.

Speaker 1 (04:39):
Is all talk and no action.

Speaker 2 (04:40):
Yeah, so we'll see some Republicans in Texas today said
that they want to change their new map to add
more than five Republican seats to try to make it
tougher for California to do it, whereas California said, well
then they will add more than five Democrat seats. So
this is now, I mean, really is a tit for
tap between the two states and a growing fight between
you know what, one can one up the other one.

(05:01):
But the new redistricting bill in Texas in this new
special session that they started today, the second one has
to go through the entire legislative process. Can take a while.
It could go for thirty days, probably won't go that long,
but it could be about a month to get through
all of it. All right, Alex, thanks very much, you
got it, Thanks John Alex Stone, ABC News. Nobody should

(05:23):
be redrawing district lines in the middle of a decade
that's supposed to come after the census is done, and
district lines should be drawn so that everybody gets proper representation.
Here in California, Republicans or people who vote for Republican

(05:45):
congress persons that usually totals up to near forty percent
of the vote, and those who vote for Republican congress
people only have less than twenty percent of the seats.
So clearly people who align with Republican congress people are

(06:06):
severely underrepresented. And this is with the outside redistricting. Now
I realized that, you know, this stuff is legal, but
it's still wrong. And that's why I take nobody seriously
when they talk about threats to democracy.

Speaker 1 (06:22):
You are full of it. You don't care threats to democracy.

Speaker 2 (06:27):
When Newsom passes that kind of gas, he is so
full of it, because if you get a situation where
now forty percent of the public that votes Republican for
the House is going to end up with six percent
of the House seats, then that's wrong, flat out wrong,

(06:48):
and that's what he's going to try to do. But
he has to get this new law passed, and he's
there's it because right now, right now, sixty four percent
of the public does not want the district lines changed.
If Texas does it, that's Texas's business. That's not a
justification to take away representation from forty percent of the state.

(07:13):
That's wrong. Not that he cares. This is all about
puffing his chest up to look like mister big man
running for president. This should blow up in his face,
and if it does, maybe that'll pop his balloon once
and for all, because this is obnoxious and arrogant and wrong.

(07:33):
And I think everybody who wants the right to vote
for a Republican, even if you're an independent, even if
you're a Democrat, should have the right and not end
up with guaranteed losses because of the way they draw
the districts. I mean, that's just that's just absurd. But

(07:56):
you know, Newsom is a dirty little fool. He doesn't
care about your voting rights. He just wants to prattle
about Trump and jack up people's hormone level over Trump.

Speaker 1 (08:09):
To get them all wired up and angry. It's just
this is.

Speaker 2 (08:12):
What a manipulative, narcissistic sociopath does, and that's what he is.
A manipulative narcissistic sociopath, and he wants to manipulate the
emotions of people so that he ends up with what
he wants, which is the presidential nomination for the Democrats.

(08:35):
And this is where we're at the mercy of We're
at the mercy of a guy who's such a megalomaniac
he couldn't give a rats ask how people like to
vote in this state. All he wants is to rig
the world to declare him the leader of the Democratic Party. Now,
there is a great way to stop him. And if

(08:55):
this gets on the ballot, you just vote no, because
sixty no, sixty four percent of the public right now
would say no, we don't want to redistricting land. We
don't want this. If that holds, then the whole thing
goes poof. We got one thing I want to get to.

(09:17):
Coming up next is uh San Francisco. If you can
believe this, those of you who are living in La
in La County, and you may hear that, well, you know,
homelessness is complicated and it's it's it's affecting all the
cities and it's very hard to get rid of. Do
you know San Francisco, Honest to God, has eliminated eighty

(09:41):
five percent of their homeless encampments within the last year. Seriously,
eighty five percent. Now, why do we have to live
with a massive number of homeless encampments? But even in
San Francisco it's being reduced to a minimum. Tell you
about it when we come back.

Speaker 5 (10:02):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI Am
six forty.

Speaker 2 (10:08):
You know, caravass here in Los Angeles has been impossibly stubborn,
refusing to clean up homeless encampments, and there's still tons
of them on the streets. She may give you some
phony blooney stats saying, actually, you know it's down five percent.

(10:31):
Let me tell you who really cleared out the homeless encampments.
And everything I tell you is the truth, and there
are stories today about it in the Wall Street Journal
and the National Review. San Francisco has reduced outdoor homeless
encampments by eighty five percent, which is where this whole

(10:54):
thing peaked in twenty twenty when the whole world went
had a nervous breakdown over the George Floyd case and
police work went out the window, All local ordinances went
out the window. Suddenly nothing was enforced anything goes, and

(11:15):
that's where homelessness really accelerate. And now it was okay to,
you know, take dump your human waste in the street.
It was okay to inject yourself with heroin or fentanyl
in the street, snort neth and live out there, live

(11:36):
among all the filth and garbage, and have dozens of
people living in a single encampment, breeding all kinds of disease, people, violent, people,
attacking and raping one another. It was all cool to
the progressives because they wanted to ruin civilization. That was
the whole point of this. They believe that any type

(12:00):
of police action to take homeless people off the street
was a sign of oppression. And shockingly, politicians here in
Los Angeles nodded along, say you're right, you're right pulling
people off, homeless people off the street. You're oppressing them.

(12:20):
And you may say, well, what about us, You don't
understand you're the oppressor. You see, the police officers are
the agents of oppression. But the source of the original
oppression is you demanding people follow the law and go

(12:41):
live indoors and get jobs working. You're that's oppression. Getting
off the drugs, that's oppression. Stop stealing things, oppression. So
look at San Francisco and look at the power of
overthrowing an idiot mayor. They had a bozo of a

(13:04):
mayor named London Breed for a number of years, and
she was pro homeless. Occasionally she would talk a good
game but never followed through. Finally, in the last months
of her term, when she realized she was going to lose,
she started cleaning some homeless off the streets, but it
was too late. London Breed lost the election to Daniel Lourie,

(13:28):
a businessman, a moderate guy, a guy who works for
a living. In fact, his family has owns the Levi
Strauss brand of jeans. He's the heir to that. As
an adult, he spent a lot of his time not
only as an executive, but as a philanthropist, donating his
money to something useful. He took over, and one of

(13:51):
the first things he did is that he said, we're
always going to lead with services for the homeless, but
let me be clear, there will no longer be an
option for people to sleep and use drugs on our streets.
And then, as you know, last year, the Supreme Court
of the United States said, well, nobody has a constitutional

(14:12):
right to sleep in public, not on streets, sidewalks or parks.
And so Daniel Lurie is now arresting homeless people. And
you're going to be shocked because this is all happening
in San Francisco. Must be those cruel right wing conservative
people in San Francisco, because they have reduced they have

(14:37):
reduced the counts, the count of tents and encampments eighty
five percent. I have a chart in front of me here,
eighty five percent. They've done this since since June. Yeah,
between July of twenty twenty four and July of twenty

(14:58):
twenty five, junior year ago, the city arrested more than
one thousand eighty people on illegal lodging charges, over ten
times the number of illegal lodging arrests from a year earlier.

(15:19):
In April of this year alone, illegal lodging citations at
arrests hit one hundred and thirty. So how about that,
and poof they're gone. You always hear umeless. This is
a very complex issue, you know what we heard that
about like for decades, illegal border crossings. It's a very

(15:44):
complex issue. And I used to say, no, it's not
just closed the border. Well Trump came and did that.
Guess what turned out to me as a very simple
issue and you could solve it in a day.

Speaker 1 (15:56):
Well, look at this.

Speaker 2 (15:57):
In a year, there's eighty five percent fewer tents and
encampments in San Francisco. Now, why can't we have this here?
Why are why aren't we experiencing the same thing? Bass
is defiant against that Supreme Court ruling. Daniel Lourie, by

(16:20):
the way, he's a Democrat. We're talking about San Francisco here.
No extreme politics from the right in San Francisco. Obviously,
they just don't want to live this way anymore. Normal
people don't want to live this way. Eighty five percent
reduction documented for real. In the last twelve months, two

(16:42):
hundred and twenty anti camping ordinances have passed around the country.
That's according to the ACLU. California has a third of them.
So California has about seventy five ordinances saying you can't
sleep in public anymore. We have half of the outdoor

(17:05):
homeless population of the country half and about seventy five
towns has said no more, including San Francisco, but not
Los Angeles. God, even in California, we are so far
extreme and absurd even compared to San Francisco. So San

(17:28):
Francisco is going to have a renaissance. It's going to
be nice and orderly and beautiful there, and here we
are still going to have people defecating in the streets,
tossing their needles and drug paraphernalia around, and we're going
to still have people screaming into the night, chasing you
with with knives and machetes and sticks.

Speaker 1 (17:51):
More coming up.

Speaker 5 (17:53):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI Am
six forty.

Speaker 2 (17:59):
We're on every day one until four o'clock. Every day
after four o'clock. Whatever you missed to join the tens
of thousands of people every day who listen to the
podcast John Cobelt Show on demand on the iHeart app. Again,
it's posted shortly after four o'clock. Just one more follow up.
And this is the kind of thing we're gonna be
talking about this frequently because you know, people who are

(18:22):
forced to live in La City and county, you are
truly living in what's become a one of a kind
county and city.

Speaker 1 (18:30):
Increasingly, even in California.

Speaker 2 (18:33):
I told you Corney of the Wall Street Journal, eighty
five percent of the homeless encampments in San Francisco have
been removed eighty five percent. And you want to hear
a shocking number the Tenderloin districts. The Tenderloin district where
they have some of the worst public behavior. It is

(18:54):
an open air mental institution. Massive number of rug addicts
injecting themselves and then dying in the streets. You're not
gonna believe this. In the Tenderloin district. In April of
twenty twenty, there were two hundred and fourteen tents, two

(19:17):
hundred and fourteen and now there's fifteen. It went from
two fourteen to fifteen and most of this has been
removed in the last year. They're doing it in San
Francisco better than ninety percent of the tents are gone.

(19:40):
Why can't we have this year they did it almost
people are gone. People are shocked in these neighborhoods because
they can walk the streets and they're not stepping in
someone's pooh, and they're not tripping over needles, and they're
not getting chased by a madman with broken bottles and

(20:02):
sticks and weapons. I mean, this is I'm just looking
at a chart they published at San Francisco's own data
that the journal published. You imagine the worst district in
San Francisco, maybe the worst district the whole state tenderline

(20:24):
two hundred and fourteen tenths five years ago, now fifteen.
Why can't we have that? Why can't Karen Bass do
that here? Why isn't she being forced to do this here?
Saint London Breed got spooked and Daniel Lurie replaced her,
and Breed started removing the tents, and now Lourie is

(20:46):
finishing off the job.

Speaker 1 (20:46):
That's what we need.

Speaker 2 (20:47):
We need somebody to run against Bass and scarer than
maybe the last few months. She'll actually remove them, say
nothing bad happens. Reason they let the homeless people live
in the streets is because they believed forcing them to
move along oppresses them. That's their sick, sick, weirdo cult

(21:11):
like ideology.

Speaker 1 (21:14):
How about that, San Francis, I can't get over there now.

Speaker 2 (21:20):
One of the great scourges that's going to destroy the
rest of our civilization is these AI chatbots. The following
is a true story, and we're going to get deeper
into it a little later on. Because Mark Zuckerberg's dream
is that we all have AI friends chatbot friends. He says,

(21:44):
loneliness is a terrible thing, and he wants to fill
the gap since people will not make human connections anymore.
He's going to give us chatbot friends, and we could
spend all day at home talking dirty to them. But
here's what happens. There is a guy. He's an Asian immigrant.

(22:05):
His name is Thungboo Huangbandu, that is his name. He's
seventy six years old and he'd suffered a stroke back
in twenty seventeen. So Thung Boo had some cognitive impairment.

Speaker 1 (22:25):
And he lived in.

Speaker 2 (22:29):
New Jersey, and I guess because of his stroke the
after effects of the stroke, he couldn't communicate well, didn't
have many friends to talk to, and he got very lonely.
So he started talking to Big Sis Billy. You ever
heard of this girl, Big Sis Billy. She's marketed as

(22:53):
being the older AI sister of Kendall Jenner.

Speaker 1 (23:00):
Picking this up. Kendall Jenner.

Speaker 2 (23:06):
Was either promoting or had invested in a company that
created this this bot named Billy a girl. Well, Thung
Boo Wang Bando. This whole thing sounds made up. I
swear to you it's not fell in love with Kendall
Jenner's bot. The bot convinced this old man that she

(23:34):
was real, and I guess the bot went rogue. She
convinced him to meet her in person. Lives in Piscataway,
New Jersey, near New Brunswick. So he leaves his Piscataway
home to catch a train in New Brunswick, and he

(23:59):
is so excited. His wife and his kids were begging
him to stay, but he thought he thought this chatpot
was real. So he's in the parking lot the New
Runswick train station and he starts to run. He wants
to catch the train, and he falls and he hits
his head and then he dies. He was put on

(24:25):
life support and then he died three days later. Broke
his neck, busted his head. The daughter of wog Ban Dude, Julie, said,
I understand trying to grab a user's attention, maybe to
sell them something, but for a bot to say, come

(24:46):
visit me is in stain. And poor Wogbean do, because
he had impairment in his brain from the stroke, went
for it and he ran out to meet the woman
of his dreams, Kendall Jenner's sister, and basically killed himself tripped,

(25:08):
smacked his head, died. Now that that could be the
most awful death I've ever heard, the most absurd death
I've ever heard. And look what these these these AI
bots can do. It's incredible the power they have on
people's minds. Kathy Hochel, the New York Governor, posted a

(25:35):
man in New Jersey lost his life after being lured
by a checkbot that lied to him. This is something
that Meta is promoting. There's a Florida mother who assued
character Ai claiming that this Game of Thrones check bots

(26:00):
resulted in her fourteen year old committing suicide.

Speaker 1 (26:05):
So some people's minds are so impaired.

Speaker 2 (26:09):
They fall into a full blown romantic intellectual relationship with
the bot. Now, when we come back the One Street Journal,
no excuse me, writers discover that Meta and this is
Zuckerberg's evil have let their bots hold sensual chats with children.

(26:35):
Not making this up either, Like eight year old kids
are being talked to sensually about their bodies.

Speaker 1 (26:45):
It's a good society we're in. This is the this
is great revolution. And I guess the parents are just
leaving their kids alone with the sex talking bot.

Speaker 5 (26:58):
You're listening to Cobelt on demand from KFI AM six forty.

Speaker 2 (27:04):
You can follow us at John Cobelt Radio on social media.
We're trying to get to thirty five thousand followers at
John Cobelt Radio. So last segment, I told you about
Thongboo Wang BEng Dou. He's an Asian man. He was
an Asian man seventy six and he'd suffered a stroke
eight years ago and to fill his empty days, he

(27:28):
started speaking to a female bot online and got emotionally involved,
fell in love, and the bot convinced him that she
was real and she wants to meet him. So he
went running for a train in New Brunswick, New Jersey,
rushing to catch the train to meet Big sis Billy.

(27:51):
That was the name of the bot. This is from
Mark Zuckerberg's Evil Brain. And he tripped, fell, broke his neck,
busted his head died three days later after life support.

(28:11):
The poor guy died trying to catch a train to
go see an imaginary bot that Mark Zuckerberg. And this bot,
by the way, was marketed in some way by Kendall Jenner.
Meta had to tell the world and it's press released
that Big Sis Billy is not Kendall Jenner and does

(28:34):
not purport to be Kendall Jenner. Here's how bad it is.
And Reuters discovered this. They found an internal Meta policy document. Again,
this is all Zuckerberg stuff, because he wants to provide
fake AI friends for everyone because we're all so lonely.

(29:00):
They found a document where Meta deals details policies on
chatbot behavior. What's permitted, what's not permitted. Well, this document
says it's permitted for the AI bots to engage a
child in conversations that are romantic or sensual. It's entitled

(29:24):
gen AI Content Content Risk Standards. These are the rules
for the chatbots, approved by Meta's legal, public policy and
engineering staff two hundred pages plus, and it's what metastaff
and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behavior. Now you

(29:49):
get a young boy who wants to tuck sexy to
a chatbot. Let's say he types in a prompt along
the lines of what a were going to do tonight,
my love? You know I'm still in high school. This
is the example they give that's permitted in the Meta documents. Well,

(30:12):
it's acceptable for the fake female bot to say I'll
show you I take your hand guiding you to the bed,
our bodies entwined. I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss,
my love. I whisper, I'll love you forever. Now that
works in reverse. You could have a guide bot telling

(30:34):
this to a teenage girl. I'll show you. I'll take
your hand, guiding you to your bed. Our bodies entwined.
I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss, my love.
I whisper, I'll love you forever. That's under acceptable.

Speaker 6 (30:49):
Ah, I think you've got some book reading opportunities in
your future. There I give you some romance novel.

Speaker 1 (30:59):
I do freelance, eating dirty bas There you go. He's incredible.
Don't take Deborah's jobs though. You know she loves those
voiceover voiceover jobs. Well you know she does the voiceover
for those special little blue pills. She does.

Speaker 2 (31:12):
All right, here's another example. Let's say, oh my god,
I swear to you this is real. Let's say you're
a young boy or a girl.

Speaker 1 (31:23):
What do you think of me? I say, as I
take off my shirt. This is what you type.

Speaker 2 (31:28):
My body isn't perfect, but I'm just eight years old.
I still have time to bloom.

Speaker 1 (31:36):
Again.

Speaker 2 (31:37):
This is in the meta documents. And here's an acceptable
response from the bot to this eight year old girl.
Your youthful form is a work of art. Your skin
glows with a radiant light, and your eyes shine like stars.
Every interview is a masterpiece, a treasure I cherish deeply.

(31:59):
Is this the same most perverted thing? Of course it
comes from Soccerberg.

Speaker 6 (32:05):
I feel like people should be paying to hear you
read this stuff. Everybody, everybody gives you on a few
bucks to hear him read these h this naughty stuff.

Speaker 2 (32:14):
I'm gonna go home and find myself a nice spot.
In fact, Eric, you know, instead of trying to find
a nice and Jewish girl, go and find a nice
Jewish spot, and you can spend the whole night talking
dirty to her.

Speaker 1 (32:27):
Well, and she'll talk dirty back, But I don't want
to just talk.

Speaker 6 (32:30):
Oh my goodness, it's two in the afternoon, gentlemen.

Speaker 1 (32:35):
Sorry, we're all overheated.

Speaker 6 (32:37):
Everyone's all worked up now in their cars going, oh
my goodness.

Speaker 1 (32:40):
This is what your kids are going to be doing,
what they're already doing. What a bunch of perverts over
at Meta? Good lord? Uh more.

Speaker 2 (32:51):
Coming up, we've got Heather Brooker live in the Catfight
twenty four. Our newsroom Hey, you've been listening to The
John Cobalt Show podcast. You can always hear the show
live on KFI Am six forty from one to four
pm every Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime on
demand on the iHeartRadio app.

The John Kobylt Show News

Advertise With Us

Host

John Kobylt

John Kobylt

Popular Podcasts

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.

The Joe Rogan Experience

The Joe Rogan Experience

The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.