Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't. I am six forty. You're listening to the John
Cobel Podcast on the iHeartRadio app. We are on every
day from one until four. And if you, oh, you
might be one of these people that has a job
and now you've been ordered into the office. That's why
we provide a public service John Cobell Show on demand.
It's the podcast version of the radio show. So if
(00:22):
you're not in attendance between one and four, a little
bit after four o'clock, we post it and you can
listen to that for anytime the rest of the day
and forever. Moistline is eight seven seven mois s eighty
six eight seven seven Moist eighty six. The final calls
of twenty twenty four will air them a Friday in
the three o'clock hour twice. You can also use the
(00:43):
talkback feature on the iHeartRadio app. When I came to California,
I've said this many times. San Francisco we visited years
ago and it was the most beautiful city I had
ever seen, and the last time I left San Francisco
a few months back, it had become one of the
most disgusting cities I've ever seen, probably the most disgusting
(01:05):
in America. I've seen a few others overseas, and who
presided over the decline of San Francisco over the past
few years. It's the mayor London Breed, who's now on
her way out. She lost an election to Daniel Lourie.
Lourie is heir to the Levi Strauss fortune. He's a
(01:25):
nonprofit executive and he is going to try to resuscitate
really has become a tragic story. One of the people
who have helped chronicle what's gone on in San Francisco
the last few years is Richie Greenberg, the writer and commentator,
and we have him on again because Richie, welcome, Hello from.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
San Francisco, home of tsunami warnings and tornado warnings and earthquakes.
And I'm glad to be with her day.
Speaker 1 (01:56):
And that's the that's all that is on the least
your problems. So London Breed loses the election and on
her way out, she's saying, no matter what the results said,
I'm still a winner.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
Well, yes, she's a winner in her mind and to
those people who benefited tremendously off of her being the
mayor over the last few years. Of course, she's a winner.
There a winner, and I predict right now it's going
to be a little bit difficult for the incoming mayor
to try and pry these fingers, pry away the nonprofits
(02:36):
and others who have been drifting off of the San
Francisco taxpayers that were established commissions and departments and initiatives
that were started by London Breed. That's going to be
a challenge for the incoming mayor.
Speaker 1 (02:52):
I guess those are the other winners you were referring to,
and this would be the homeless mental illness industrial complex
that has grown into a huge force.
Speaker 2 (03:02):
Yeah, but they're also leaving out something that's very important
and I'm going to say pretty much unique to San
Francisco is that we are one of the cities that
they made a hard push for reparations. And so even
though the reparations plan itself, which I've written extensively about
(03:24):
and done a deep dive, even though they shelled the plan,
many aspects of the plan wound up being put into
operation anyway, but not package as reparations. So there is
a specific initiative that was established under London Breed called
(03:46):
the dream Keeper Initiative, which was funneling millions of dollars
through certain recipients Black African American in San Francisco, So
that is also they are winners per se as well.
Speaker 1 (04:02):
Well, can can can How much can Daniel Lurie do?
Can he? Can he turn off the money spigot to
all these nonprofits, whether it's over reparations or it's the
mental illness and homeless h grift that's going on. I mean,
I mean, what what what can he do to end
the drain of taxpayers money to organizations that aren't doing
(04:23):
anybody any good.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
Well, yeah, there's going to need to be a very
serious sit down and concerted effort between him, the executive office,
the mayor, and our board of Supervisors, our city council,
because they deal with not only these different programs, but
they deal with the funding as well. And one of
(04:45):
the things that is the major responsibility of a mayor
is to do the budgets. They do the budgeting, so
they say, Okay, the doors are open, let's start talking
about next year and the year after. What will our
plan be for you know, giving out the money to
these different departments and different agencies, And you have people
(05:08):
coming in that are begging for money. They're different apartments.
We need, we need this amount, we need these number
millions or tens of millions or hundreds of millions. And
that's what makes the mayor's job so complicated because they
have to look at how much the budget is and
look at what who is asking and see, you know,
the deficit. We're going to be approaching nearly a billion
(05:32):
dollar deficit coming up in the next year or so,
almost a billion dollars billion dollars one billion. Right now
it was eight hundred and sixty seven or eight seventy
six a million, and next year is going to be
even worse because we have all of these organizations and
agencies and nonprofits that have been demanding money, and we
(05:57):
have a lower property value, so people are asking to
have their property taxes reevaluated. We have a decimated retail core.
We have a still our office the downtown office segment
is they're they're mostly empty as well. So we've lost
a lot of revenue and will continue to lose a
(06:19):
lot of revenue.
Speaker 1 (06:20):
So the the the office is emptied out and a
lot of workers are still not back, and that has
really ruined business for all the restaurants and bars and
retail shops in the area because people used to do
all their shopping and entertainment.
Speaker 2 (06:34):
Uh Domino effect, nomin no effect.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
So the tax you know, the tax money from those
establishments are gone. The tax money that came from these
these companies that worked in San Francisco, that's gone, and
and and many blocks are just empty. There's no people
and there's no money anymore.
Speaker 2 (06:56):
Correct. And I often go downtown to do certain work
and around where my office used to be because I
left earlier this year. I finally gave up in I
think it was in February. I gave notice, and that
was that I had shared office space right in our
downtown financial district because people weren't going there anymore, and
clients said that they just didn't want to come into
(07:17):
the city anymore. But then there's also another challenge is
bringing in tourism, and San Francisco relies hugely, a very
high percent on tourist dollars, not only hotel rooms and
hotel taxes, but the small businesses that also catered to
(07:38):
visiting people to the city. And until we are able
to get or not way, but the mayor is able
to get a handle on crime homelessness, drug dealing, the
drug addicts, intents, and graffiti and safety and all of
those very well known, very documented issues. We won't be
(08:01):
able to turn the city around. And that is why
we're hoping someone from the outside, Daniel Lurie, will be
able to make a difference. And right now we are
supporting him, but we're watching his statements that he's made
over the last couple of weeks, the last couple of days,
and we're hope, we're cautious.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
Yeah, let me ask you something because I'm you know,
I'm getting the following statistics from the La Times, which
I don't trust at all. Hannah while she writes and
she says various criminal categories, robberies down twenty two percent,
burglaries down twelve percent, motor vehicle theft down twenty one percent,
homicides down, she's clearing homeless encampments. Breed is claiming sixty
(08:48):
percent fewer tents across the city. Is that true? And
if that were true, then why was Breed chased out?
Was it too little, too late? Or these are just
a bunch of phony numbers I'm looking at.
Speaker 2 (09:01):
I believe it's both the phony numbers. Ways to explain
those numbers and too little, too late, that she bears
responsibility for everything that happens, going back to when she
was first elected in the twenty eighteen in a race
that actually me yours truly happened to run in against
her as well in twenty eighteen. But you know, I
(09:26):
have been quoted numerous times recently that when you empty
out the businesses, when they have closed up, boarded up
and left town, and you have blocks and blocks of
very little or to no cafes, restaurants, retail, then there's
nothing to rob anymore. So the criminals leave, they've left town.
(09:51):
So at the beginning, back in twenty twenty or twenty
twenty one, when we had those massive looting events and
coordinated looting and the retail and the smash and grabs
of both cars and shops, uh, when they're just not there.
They're not there. So what are you going to do?
Speaker 1 (10:11):
You don't have any drops, you don't have any potential
targets for crime.
Speaker 2 (10:16):
Exactly exactly. Now, that's that's a realistic, logical explanation to
say crime went down, Well, that's because there's nothing to
rob anymore. Yeah, I believe that's totally I.
Speaker 1 (10:29):
Hadn't thought of that. Now you're you're you're probably right
that that that makes that makes perfect sense here because
I know they moved over to Oakland's.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
Yet, and that's what happened to Oakland. So now they're
still they're just like a year behind us.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
I just have another minute. But don't you marvel at
how the people in San Francisco put up with all
this civil destruction for so many years. It's it's actually
frightening that they were willing to endure all this without
any serious pushback.
Speaker 2 (11:01):
Well, they or we. I'm part of that. I moved
here in twenty twenty one, twenty twenty one, so I've
been here for twenty four years or so. Not every
square inch of the city is under siege by the
drug addicts. There are there are areas that are better.
So there are the core parts of the city that
(11:22):
do have the humanitarian disaster that are still ongoing today.
And that is one of the things that Daniel Lurie
promised on day one he was going to be tackling that.
It's not just a tenderloin, but it's maybe half a
mile south of there, in an area Soma south of
Market Soma sixth Street and Mission. Sixth and Mission is
another ground zero. He promised to go after that with
(11:46):
the drug dealers and dealing and homeless and all that.
That is what he promises from day one. He even
tweeted that yesterday or today is something. So we are hopeful.
I am hopeful. We're hoping that our hard work and
our tax dollars are to be used prudently from this
(12:07):
point going forward.
Speaker 1 (12:08):
All right, Richie Greenberg, thank you very much.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
My pleasure. Thank you.
Speaker 1 (12:12):
From San Francisco Mayor London Breed finally been kicked out of office.
You got a business executive going to be running things
and try to put the place back together.
Speaker 3 (12:21):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (12:27):
Follow us at John Cobelt Radio at John co Belt Radio,
and we are seven hundred and seventy four followers away
from twenty thousand. I was just a couple of weeks ago,
and we were a lot more than that, seven hundred
and seventy four followers to go, trying to get there
by the new year. After two thirty, this ruined by morning.
(12:50):
I'm going through all the news sites. I found two
two excuse me two two news articles about Kamala Harris
becoming governor of California, and I thought, oh, come on, now,
stop it. This can't be. And these are articles that
are explaining how it could happen and why it could happen,
(13:11):
and we'll get to it after two thirty. This is
good news. Kevin Kylie. We've hit him on the show
a number of times. He is a former state legislator
now a congressman from northern California. Kevin Kylie, he's going
to introduce a federal bill that would cut off all
(13:33):
the funding for the failed California High Speed Rail project,
and that's going to save the United States of America
at least eight billion dollars. California High Speed Rail is
nothing but a giant, corrupt money suck. There is no
(13:56):
other project like this in the world. Trust me. I've looked.
I have. I've gone to foreign countries looking for a
worse project. There is nothing. This is the most money
spent on a project that's produced nothing, absolutely nothing, and
it's going to be many, many years before they project
(14:20):
any kind of rail service will be available. And all
they're looking at is Bakersfield. To me, Orr said the
construction estimates, which started sixteen plus years ago. The original
estimate is thirty three billion dollars. May I remind you
(14:42):
the thirty three billion dollars was going to get us
high speed rail that ran from Sacramento to San Francisco
to Los Angeles, through Anaheim and down to San Diego.
That was the original plan, Sacramento to San Diego and
everywhere in between for thirty three billion. Right now the
projection is one hundred and thirty five billion, and you're
(15:07):
only going to get Bakersfield to Merced one hundred and
thirty five billion. They're desperately trying to connect Bakersfield and
Merced because then they then they'll say, hey, look what
we did. And they've never heard of the term don't
throw good money after bad. This is such an embarrassing disaster.
(15:33):
And the thing is they keep spending the money and
nobody in government ever addresses all the horrible waste. This
is like living in East Germany or the Soviet Union,
where all kinds of terrible disasters happen. It's like even
when Chernobyl imploded back in back in the Soviet Union,
(15:57):
all the officials just look the other way, nothing happened,
and the high speed rail is our financial version of Chernobyl.
It is a complete disaster. Now, the vic Rnaswami confirmed
last week that the DOGE Commission is going to be
looking at removing all the funding from high speed rail.
(16:19):
So Kevin Kyleie is going to introduce a bill and
see this will carry some weight, because you'll have a
California Republican convincing the rest of the California well convincing
the rest of the Republican House and Republican Senate that
it's time to end this thing. Now. Trump has other
(16:41):
ways to end it, but the most permanent way would
have Congress pass a bill that Trump signs. He could
end it by blocking the money through the Federal Railroad Administration.
He could issue executive orders, he could have the Department
of Justice tie up the construction with legal issues. But
as as one expert here says, Tylie's bill is the
(17:08):
cleanest way to do it. It would be simply passed
legislation that Trump would never veto. Trump can stop funding
in other ways if for some reason it didn't get through,
but this would be much more permanent, and this would
be a great way to stick it to Gavin Newsom,
because Newsom has presided over almost the entire history of
(17:32):
high speed rail. Remember he was lieutenant governor for eight
years and six years as governor. That's fourteen out of
the sixteen years Gavin Newsom has held a high office
in California and watched all the billions of dollars go
into the toilet. And he tried, he wanted to stop it,
but he didn't have the guts because he's a he's
(17:56):
one of these pajama boys, and he couldn't stand up
to the instruction unions which wanted to suck out the
money to give their members make work, fake work jobs,
which is what this is all. That's the only thing
at Brager are all the jobs that created You created
fake jobs. You have hundreds of workers working every day
(18:18):
producing nothing. There is no rail and there's not going
to be any rail. They haven't even bought up all
the land yet after sixteen plus years, the state doesn't
even own all the land that they need. So hopefully
Kevin Kylie's bill will be this will be the final flush.
(18:38):
That's what they ought to call the bill, the final flush.
Now when we return, this really ruined my morning. Some
people ought to get off the stage and stay off
the stage, and Kamala Harris is trying to find a
way to climb back on the stage and maybe run
for governor. This, this is horrifying. She's an absolute idiot
(19:01):
and she's got no business running California. She had no
business running for president. I'm seriously, well, I'll save it
till we come back. There you go, I what a genius.
Speaker 3 (19:17):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
Coming up after three o'clock, Alex Stone from ABC News
is going to give us the latest information on the
shooting at that Christian school in Madison, Wisconsin earlier in
the day. Turns out it's a girl who did the shooting,
seventeen year old female. I can't I cannot remember the
last time a girl was the perpetrator.
Speaker 4 (19:46):
What's so funny is that earlier today you're like, of
course it's a guy.
Speaker 1 (19:49):
Yeah, I did I said that to you off there.
Of course it's a guy.
Speaker 4 (19:53):
And it turns out in this case when you said
that that it's not I know.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Well, let's be shore, is there really a girl or
as somebody with a confused sexual situation.
Speaker 4 (20:08):
As of now, we are being told a seventeen year old.
Speaker 1 (20:11):
Female, seventeen year old girl, this guy just can't recall
the last time that happened, all right, onto something that
this whole, this whole issue should not really exist. In
a normal world, nobody would consider Kamala Harris to become
governor of California. Yet not. I read not one but
two articles today, one in the La Times and one
(20:34):
in one CNN. George Skelton Is this ancient columnist? He's
somewhere in his mid eighties, I think, who still writes
for the La Times? And the headline says Kamala Harris
should run for governor if she wants to solve California's problems? Well,
(20:58):
how does does anyone think Kamala Harris can solve any political,
any public problem? What indication has there been? She helped
create some of the worst problems in the state when
she wrote the title in summary for Prop. Forty seven,
the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act that unleashed so much crime,
(21:23):
so much public drug addiction, and so much homelessness. Much
of the problems over the last ten years goes back
to the day that she or someone on her staff
typed the words safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act, thereby lying
to the public on what Prop forty seven was going
to do. The intention was to further clear out the
(21:49):
prisons and the jails and not put anyone away for anything.
George Gascon was the co writer. So what do you
think the intent was? She teamed up with George Gascon
to massively deceive the public and create an intolerable situation
of crime and homelessness and public drug addiction. And she's
(22:12):
the one considered a favorite to be governor. Why would
you do that? And how come nobody in the media
asks that? Am I insane? She really wrote that that
really had an effect on Prop forty seven passing, and
it really was this disgusting disaster which we just repealed.
We just repealed by a seventy to thirty margin, most
(22:36):
of Prop forty seven. So why would you do this?
We just got rid of the guy who wrote Prop
forty seven, George Gascone. He got kicked out of office
in La County. I mean, the two most left wing
disasters of a city are La and San Francisco. The
(22:58):
mayor's been kicked out of San Francis. The DA has
been kicked out. Several school board members were kicked out.
Here in La the DA was finally kicked out. Why
would you go back to Kamala Harris. She's a loser,
she's a failure. She never did anything, but oh, let's
go to her vice presidency. I'm sorry to keep beating
(23:18):
this dead horse, but really, she was in charge of
the border and ten million people crossed it. Total failure.
And we saw what she's like as a candidate. She
can't talk, she can't think, She had no ideas, she
made no sense most of the time. I mean, I
(23:40):
wonder if she's got really some kind of brain disorder.
And then she though. The only thing she's put out
publicly since U since the loss was a video to
her supporters where it seemed like she was drunk. In fact,
much of the time when she spoke and we played
all the clips, she sounded like she was stoned. You
(24:00):
can't be serious. We already have a disaster of a governor.
Why would you follow up Gavin Newsom with Kamala Harris.
Ah Newsom comes across as Albert Einstein next to Kamala Harris,
and I am right on this, and you know you
(24:21):
feel the same way. Who wants her? Who the hell
would want Kamala Harris? She has been a failure and
we just watched her for one hundred days. You can't say, well,
you don't really know the real Kamala Harris. You know,
behind closed Doris she was from very of fact. No
she wasn't. And now we've seen her out in the open.
(24:45):
Then I read these ridiculous stories in CNN. It says
top aides and people close to Kamala Harris are divided
over whether she should head home to run for California
and it all comes down to whether they believe she
could win the Democratic nomination for president. Oh no, she
(25:05):
can't win that There are much more accomplished, smarter, and
more articulate Democrats. She is going to end up like
she did in twenty nineteen, dropping out before the primaries
because she makes no sense when she talks. And who
are these advisors? Are the people who told her, Hey,
(25:28):
when you go on television, tell everybody that you're going
to do exactly the same thing as Joe Biden. You're
not going to change a thing. Be insane. Other aides
worry that in a longer campaign longer than one hundred days,
(25:49):
Harris might fizzle out and follow her loss to Trump
with the humiliation of being rejected by her own party.
She was rejected by her own party in twenty nineteen.
She she was rejected by her own party in the
state of California when she ran for president. Of course
(26:09):
she's going to be rejected because even Democratic seem because
you know, because the vice presidency job. Ye Biden said it.
He wanted, he wanted to. He wanted a black woman.
That's the only reason she got it. He made it
clear up front, who's going to be vice president. You've
you've got You've got hundreds of possibilities, plausible candidates for
(26:33):
vice president. He said, I want to have a black woman.
And he picked a terrible candidate. I'm sure there was
a better choice than Kamala even with those restrictions. Oh
my god. And everybody knows this, and they pretend otherwise.
(26:54):
Why do they pretend otherwise? Quit the Commila campaign and
go go find another candidate who's intelligent, who speaks clearly,
who has original thoughts or copies other people's thoughts. As
long as there's something useful there, But stop it with this.
This sounds sounds like just got brain damage.
Speaker 2 (27:19):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (27:20):
Half the time when we played her clips, I had
no idea what she was talking about. Nobody else did either.
Everybody was just faking it and playing pretend. There's nothing
in there, there's nothing. Can't make her governor. But short
Skeleton wrote, Kamala could make history as the first woman
(27:43):
in person of color to be elected California governor. No,
who cares? What is the obsession with skin color at
this late day and this obsession with what gender you are?
You gotta have somebody competent. We had an incompetent white
man for the last six years. It's been horrible. Why
(28:03):
would you followed up with an incompetent black woman? Why
why do we only have incompetent people being elected? And
then everybody fixates on color and gender. No, it's it's
their intelligence, it's their judgment. Of course, that's never discussed.
You know, I wish they would stop stop describing candidates
(28:25):
by their by their race and their gender. Why don't
you start describing them by their intelligence level. Let's have
public IQ tests and we reveal the results. She doesn't
make triple digits, But George just Skelton says she'd have
(28:47):
to be eager to deal with homelessness. Deal with homelessness.
She created all this, the housing shortage, the housing shortage.
You know, if we weren't housing several million illegal aliens,
there'd be a lot of empty housing that we could
use to put in American citizens. We could increase the
(29:07):
supply of housing tremendously if we weren't a sanctuary for
millions of illegal aliens. Apparently that's another thing you can't discuss.
She'd have to deal with street crime again see Prop
forty seven over regulation. Well, that's all done by her party.
It's a one party system, so she has to deal
(29:31):
with this and this and this and this, except it's
her own party. And when she was in Congress, she
voted as the most liberal senator out of all of them.
The most liberal was Kamala Harris. So she's not going
to fix homelessness. Her party creates homelessness, They create a
housing shortage, they create the street crime, they create the overregulation.
(29:55):
What is she going to do? Come on, no, you know,
if you're in business and you saw her walking in
to run your company, you'd be putting out new resumes
in five minutes because you know the place would be
going into the ground.
Speaker 3 (30:14):
Oh yeah, you're listening to John Cobels on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 1 (30:22):
Alex Stone from ABC tell us what he knows about
the school shooting situation in Wisconsin. A girl, this, this
story just came in minutes ago. I am not making
this up. Have you ever heard of Casa Diablo in Portland?
You might have. I have not. You have not. You
(30:45):
know what it is.
Speaker 2 (30:45):
I do not.
Speaker 1 (30:47):
It is a famous vegan strip club.
Speaker 4 (30:50):
Oh wait, what what vegans?
Speaker 1 (30:55):
Vegan strip?
Speaker 4 (30:56):
What they just saw? Vegan meals when you're watching people strip?
Speaker 1 (31:00):
I guess. So this is a strip club. Maybe four
vegans who want to have a uh, non meat, non
dairy dinner. Uh well, one of the strippers lost her
mind and stabbed the DJ several times. Her boss the
woman's name is Peyton Lathan, and her boss said she
(31:21):
started acting as if she was possessed by a demon,
and she took a knife and started stabbing the DJ.
Duncan Allen from behind, thrust a knife into his back,
stabs him four times, including once in the chest, and
then runs away. He struggles and then collapses in the kitchen.
(31:44):
Even have this on video. He said, I was standing
in the DJ booth. Next thing I knew, I felt
like a five hundred pound man punched me in the back. Half.
The girls were in shock and started freaking out. The
other half were help me survive. He was fading in it,
out of consciousness, blood loss, lack of oxygen. His lun
collapsed and the staff started applying pressure to the wound.
(32:08):
Wound and called nine one one. What did I tell
you about these?
Speaker 4 (32:14):
It could have been this could have happened anywhere, but
it didn't act. Okay, we had a school shooting today.
It wasn't a vegan school.
Speaker 1 (32:25):
Well we don't know yet, We don't know about it.
It was a.
Speaker 4 (32:29):
Christian school K through twelve, Christian school.
Speaker 1 (32:33):
The only thing that kept him going, he said, he
was worried about his dog Stone. Oh that's the only
thing that kept me going. I didn't want to leave
this world and have Stone not know what happened to
his dad, not see my body and all that. And
first responders took him to the hospital and he's recovering.
And now the uh, the stripper she'd worked for ten
(32:57):
years and seemed a little off. Let's see, she's a sper.
Do you think she's a little off? No, I do not.
She goes to work in a place where they only
serve vegan meals and she takes off her clothes for
the customers every day. Now, why would you think she'd
(33:19):
be a little off. I don't know. She definitely had
a mental health crisis, said the owner, Johnny Johnny de
Johnny Diablo Zuckly. I think she intended to kill someone
and it just happened to be Duncan. And when I
think about it, she was in the dressing room for
about ten minutes, seeming like she was possessed like a demon.
Speaker 4 (33:39):
I bet you she's not a vegan. She's working at
a vegan place, but she's not a vegan.
Speaker 1 (33:46):
You want to if you go to the website, you
know what their slogan is. Vixen's not vegan, Sizzle not steak,
and we put the meat on the pole, not on
the plate. Diablo. The dancers are known as Starcakes, Amethyst
(34:09):
and Trouble, one of Portland's best exotic clubs, they claim,
and they eat what they serve for food. What Amy's
tofu pad tie. I don't like tofu mac and cheese bowl.
But it's not cheese. I don't like that either. So
she's been arrested and charged. And now the stripper claimed
(34:34):
that the DJ was a drug dealer. But he he says,
that's not true. You'll never find a trace of drugs
in my body. So, I mean, turns out he survived them.
But don't trust a vegan stripper. I just I told
you there's a lot going wrong in there. Get you anything.
(34:55):
She's not a vegan. She just works.
Speaker 2 (35:01):
I mean.
Speaker 4 (35:02):
I think she eats meat something, maybe something bad. She
had some bad meat. It's caused her to go cuckoo.
Speaker 1 (35:08):
All right, just one of the odds I'd find that story,
Oh very good. I live all day to find that.
I know you all right. When we come back, we're
going to talk with Alex Stone and Debra is gonna
have a lot of details here, but Alex will give
us some behind the scenes color as well. ABC News correspondent.
(35:29):
It's the Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, and there
was a school shooting today with a girl. Now, also,
we are going to do more on the drones. We
did some earlier but I have some other audio to play.
There are a number of politicians that are are getting
angry with the UH, with the federal government because they
will not explain. Trump claims that the Biden administration knows
(35:53):
what's going on, and instead they send out these UH,
these dip bags like Alejan Romi Orcus and John Kirby
who make absolutely no sense with their non explanations and
their non denials. And at this point, when you've got
you know, most of the country aware of this story,
and we all know that the administration knows what's going on,
(36:17):
just say what it is. You're not blowing any big secret.
We've already seen the drones flying around with our own eyes.
And the thing is, despite all this intense commentary and
criticism and people being afraid, they keep sending out the
drones anyway every night, Like what are they trying to prove?
What are they testing?
Speaker 2 (36:36):
Oh?
Speaker 1 (36:36):
And they remember last week there was a congress I
think he was a state legislator in New Jersey who
claimed that there's a drone ship from Iran. Well he
was right. They do have a drone ship that left
Iran a few weeks ago. And I'll tell you all
about that as well. He claimed he had it from
(36:59):
a very reliance and everybody thought he was crazy. He
wasn't crazy. We'll talk about it when we come back.
Deborah Mark Live in the KFI twenty four hour Newsroom. Hey,
you've been listening to The John Cobalt Show podcast. You
can always hear the show live on KFI Am six
forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
and of course, anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.