December 18, 2025 • 29 mins
The John Kobylt Show Hour 2 (12/18) - Independent journalist Daniel Guss joins the show to talk about another LA City Councilman who is in some big trouble. The LADWP is going to drain the Santa Ynez Reservoir again. DO NOT VOTE FOR GAVIN NEWSOM FOR PRESIDENT! More on the homeless industrial complex.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
I am six forty.
Speaker 3 (00:02):
You're listening to the John Cobel podcast on the iHeartRadio app.
There is another coming up later after we talked to
Daniel Gus. They are draining the reservoir again in the Palisades.
I couldn't believe this, and it may be empty for
the next nine months, that one hundred and seventeen million
(00:23):
gallon reservoir that was drained and so there was no
water for the fire. They're draining it again again. Something
to do with the cover. It's it's insanity. Doesn't even
begin to describe what's going on here, and of course
nobody's explaining this. Let's talk to Daniel Gus. There's a
new LA Council member who is not going to jail, buddy.
(00:45):
He's getting hit with a fine, a big fine for
taking gifts that he shouldn't have taken. Las Vegas is
involved in this story, as it always seems to be.
Let's get Daniel Gus on.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Hey John, how are you?
Speaker 3 (01:01):
I'm all right? Where can people find your writings? Remind
people where to go online?
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Sure?
Speaker 4 (01:07):
Thank you?
Speaker 1 (01:08):
I have a subset Danielgus dot substack dot com. Gus
with two says follow me on Twitter at the Gus Report.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (01:19):
Well, with the collapse of the traditional media, people like
Daniel Gus especially Daniel has really filled a huge gap
in local news, especially for Los Angeles. Now here you
had the Los Angeles Ethics Commission. So these aren't criminal charges.
They found that John Lee, who is a council member
(01:41):
in the northwest San Fernando Valley, and he has to
pay one hundred and thirty eight thousand dollars plus in fines,
explain what he did.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
Well, it's actually a heck of a lot more money
that's eventually going to be paid than that.
Speaker 4 (01:57):
But so.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
Both who presently represents District twelve, which is the Chatsworth area,
the northwestern part of the valley, he and Kenvilan former
council member Mitch Englander, have been elbowing each other to
succeed Greg and before him, Al Bernson over the past
(02:20):
several decades and over the course of their being councilmen,
they're approached by a lot of lobby developers, people who
need book and favorable opinions in city hall. And in
twenty seventeen there was an infamous trip to Vegas with
(02:44):
a couple of these types of both businessmen and a
former city council staffer to then city Council President Michael
by b Ai. And it appears, according to all of
the records that I've read, they were with alcohol and
(03:07):
women who were probably less than half age, and casino
chips and dinner in the price range that would make
your head spin. John, I don't know if you've ever
had a five hundred or thousand dollars dinner, but apparently
these guys did and had even more money spent on
alcoholers they call it in Vegas bottle service, flashing lights,
(03:32):
and these magnificent looking young women. And apparently they either
didn't report or underreported the value of this debauchery, and
gradually people started poking around. Englander lied about what went
(03:54):
on in Vegas. He lied to an FBI agent and
wound up in federal prison for whatever reason. John Lee
did not but in a lot of records Lee concluded
by was the person staff or be on that investigation
(04:14):
about Englander, and he was in piece of staff for
quite a few years and in criminal charges, so he
did not crime. He's never been charged with the crime
as we know. He had to pay a fine that
went through the administrative process, trait of law. Judge and
(04:36):
week the Los Angeles Essex con decided to lower the
boom on Lee of one hundred and thirty eight thousand dollars.
So that's that's the core of the issue.
Speaker 3 (04:49):
So it was mostly meals, booze, hotels, transportation, gambling, trip chips.
I mean, that's the prize package that Lee was enjoy
along with these other characters.
Speaker 1 (05:04):
Yeah, and apparently the women right, massage services and you
know things that John you wouldn't know about this, but
sometimes middle aged men we're too young, but sometimes they
get a little full of themselves after more years of
marriage and think, well, gee, I have a marketable power
(05:26):
in public office, are and I entitled to a weekend
of craziness in Vegas without the trappings of life in
Los Angeles. So that's apparently more of what this fine
against John Lee is for.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
I saw one of the reports that John Lee was
actually telling investigators or telling the judge looking at this
case that well, yeah, I was served the food, but
I didn't eat it. He actually said he didn't eat it.
Speaker 2 (05:59):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
You know, you know, whenever you know, a five star
restaurant puts, you know, a menu in front of me
for a food that I've never experienced in my life.
Of course you're going to turn it down right at
the water grill and uh, you know five star restaurants
in LA and in Vegas, and I don't know what
you get for three thousand dollars worth of a round
(06:21):
or three rounds of bottle service in Vegas. I wouldn't
turn it down. It was legal for me to accept it.
But yeah, and then Lee had the audacity during the
investors state, well, I tried to pay it back. I'm
trying to figure out how does that map when you
try to pay back something that you weren't entitled to
(06:45):
in the first place. And so, in my opinion, he's
getting lucky here with an enormous civil find through through
the six Commission, But don't to he According to ethics
records that I'm looking at, he's more than one hundred,
(07:05):
well over one hundred thousand dollars hole for the legal representation.
And for some reason, this deputy chief of staff has
loaned and legal defense fund almost five dollars. So I'm
not going to say it's criminell, but graft like transactions
(07:29):
to have ended at minimum disturbing red flags and they
continue this have to come out of John Lee's pocket
unless he can raise one heck of a lot of
money for his lead, which adds fast billings. You know,
the last quarter he only has fourteen hundred bucks left
in that and he's finding on appealing.
Speaker 3 (07:50):
This, so it turned into a very expensive meal. All right, Daniel, thanks.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
For coming on anytime. John.
Speaker 3 (07:55):
You have a nice Daniel wesh that's substat dot com
and you could eat all about all the corruption going
on in La City.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
All right, this could be hard to believe, but.
Speaker 3 (08:06):
You remember the reservoir that they drained in the Palisades
and then the fire hit and then they claimed that well,
the one hundred and seventeen million gallons that wouldn't have
made a difference.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
They're still trying to sell that one.
Speaker 3 (08:21):
Well, they're going to be draining the reservoir again and
it could be empty for a long time. This is
incredibly stupid people once again in the Department of Water
and Power, which has the same incredible bubblehead Genie kino
Yez with her same exorbitant salaries seven hundred and fifty
(08:41):
thousand dollars, and they're draining the reservoir again, and I
guess just hoping there isn't another wildfire because there's nothing
left to burn in the Palisades.
Speaker 2 (08:51):
Talk about it when we come back.
Speaker 4 (08:53):
You're listening to John Cobelts on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (09:00):
Unbelievable.
Speaker 3 (09:01):
The Santienez reservoir that was the one that Jenny's Kinonias
stupidly drained and so there was no water to put
out the Palisades fire. Just the dumbest act by the
dumbest bureaucrat and now they're gonna be draining the reservoir again.
Listen to this Fox eleven reporter Matthew Seedorf.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
A lot of residents are angry.
Speaker 5 (09:25):
This reservoir was broken, then it was fixed, now is
broken again, and the timing couldn't be worse.
Speaker 2 (09:33):
An angry wind.
Speaker 5 (09:34):
Shaking trees and Pacific Palisades as residents learned a critical
water reservoir could soon go dry again.
Speaker 2 (09:41):
Frustrating and annoying.
Speaker 1 (09:42):
Concerns me about the safety of my family.
Speaker 5 (09:48):
We were here last January as the Palisades fire grew
out of control and hydrants ran dry. The nearby Santa
and As reservoir empty offline for repairs. In June, LEDWP
announced the problem was fixed. We're placing a damaged floating cover,
but now just months later the cover is damaged again.
(10:08):
So now the reservoir is expected to be drained and
take an offline for an estimated nine months, starting around
the one year mark of the Palisades fire.
Speaker 1 (10:17):
It's tone deaf, to say the least, to think that
they somehow think it's okay at this time and under
these circumstances.
Speaker 2 (10:25):
I mean, look how windy it is even tonight.
Speaker 3 (10:27):
To be able to take down the reservoir again for
another nine months just makes no sense.
Speaker 5 (10:32):
Is it going to be even usable again in nine
months after they do their repairs like this last repair
just lasted three months. To reduce fire risk, LEDWP has
plans for a six mile ten inch high pressure hose
line from Topega tanks designed to pump water in if
there's a fire.
Speaker 2 (10:48):
We want a full reservoir for wildfire fighting. We don't
want garden hose.
Speaker 6 (10:53):
At the end of the day, Matt, this permeable cover
is a problem to trace.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
Your parts to rip or.
Speaker 6 (10:58):
Get damaged every time.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
The wind blows.
Speaker 5 (11:02):
LA Councilwoman Tracy Park also expressing frustration, calling for a
permanent fix.
Speaker 6 (11:07):
The long term solution is to put a permanent cover
on the reservoir. It needs to be concrete, and this
is something that we are already in discussion with DWP about.
Speaker 5 (11:17):
In a statement, LADWP tells Fox eleven replacing the cover
as a necessary interim step to prevent unexpected failures and
to protect water quality.
Speaker 1 (11:26):
Why do they need to take it down for nine
months just to.
Speaker 2 (11:30):
Repair a tarp doesn't make any sense to me.
Speaker 5 (11:33):
So right now today I thought water reservoir is still online.
It does have water in it, but it could be
drained whenever this construction begins.
Speaker 3 (11:42):
Honestly, this is the dumbest story, and it's been going
on two years now. I absolutely don't understand this. This
reservoir was built originally in nineteen sixty four after the
bell Air fire which burned five hundred homes back in
sixty one, and it was built as the la times
just prove typically for fires, you don't need it for
(12:02):
drinking water. Obviously, the reservoir was drained for a year
up until June of this year. It was drained when
the fire happened. Nobody was ever short of water. I
don't understand this. In fact, from nineteen seventy until twenty twelve,
there was no cover.
Speaker 2 (12:19):
It's just a tarp. It's like your pool cover.
Speaker 3 (12:22):
So for over forty years they never had a pool cover.
They claimed all of the law changed. Why did the
law change? And they don't use it for drinking water
obviously because they closed it in in February of twenty
twenty four. The fire happened in January of twenty twenty five,
(12:45):
and when they finally got around to fixing it. God,
they're so lazy and so stupid at the DWP. That's
really a bunch of lazy, stupid buffoons working there, starting
with Jenny's Canonias. It's a corrupt agency. It's been corrupt
since I moved here. It's an empty hole you have
to fill with water, that's all. And when it had
no cover for over forty years, nothing bad ever happened.
(13:11):
This is baffling. There's gotta be something else to this.
They also could have fixed it very quickly back in
twenty twenty four, and that ever bothered. Then the fire happened,
and now they're gonna drain it again. It says it's
the cover needs to be fixed to prevent unexpected tears. Well,
(13:33):
why didn't you do that the first time or the
second time? It's a tarp i.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
Now they're gonna, they're gonna, they're gonna.
Speaker 3 (13:43):
Install a six mile high pressure hose line from Watar
tanks and to Banga and Topanga. Why didn't they do
that in twenty twenty four before the Palisades fire hit.
None of this makes sense, and they don't explain anything.
There is no need to use this reservoir for drinking water.
That is complete, utter nonsense. It's meant to put out fires,
(14:04):
and yes, unequivocally, without a doubt, one hundred and seventeen
million gallons would have saved some homes in the Palisades.
Anybody who says that, who says otherwise must be a
defendant in the lawsuit or or stone cold stupid.
Speaker 2 (14:19):
Shouldn't Bess and Kenonia's and the.
Speaker 3 (14:22):
Fire chief all be marched out and forced to explain everything?
I mean, Matthew Seedorf did a good story here, But
where is the week we got? We got six we
have six TV news departments, We've got several newspapers and
radio stations. Nobody, nobody is aggressive enough. The only Times
(14:43):
has been, but very very few other journalists or outside journalists,
independent or network journalists. Jesus Los Angeles is the biggest
urban fire in US history. Katie Grimes from California Globe
yesterday said, they're just uninterested.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
They just don't care. All the public's interested.
Speaker 3 (15:04):
Everybody I talked to, especially on the West Side, talks
about this stuff all the time. Really, you'd get an
audience what's wrong with you?
Speaker 2 (15:12):
What's wrong?
Speaker 3 (15:13):
I'm addressing all the journalists I know, many of them
listen to the show What's wrong with all of you?
Speaker 2 (15:17):
And today's Kenoians what is wrong with her?
Speaker 3 (15:20):
There's a lot of mental disorders going on here. It's
actually to actually drain the reservoir. Again, it's an alternate
reality we've all been dropped into when we come back.
I've been telling you this and it's turning out to
be true. There are a lot of people who want
to run for president on the Democratic side. We're not
named Gavin Newsom, and they are developing all kinds of
(15:44):
opposition research to take him out early and decisively, because
we all know that he's a complete fraud and a
complete screw up, and all these other would be candidates
and their staffs are busy compiling all the dirt.
Speaker 2 (15:59):
Tell you about it when we come back.
Speaker 4 (16:02):
You're listening to John Kobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
There's kind of a friend of mine the other day,
friend I know since high school, and I know he
usually votes Democratic. He lives way out of state, and
I told him, I said, whatever you do, don't vote
for Gavin Newsom. And he says to me, well, I'm
not voting for a mega guy. I'm not telling you
to vote for a maga guy. You vote whatever Democrat,
(16:28):
but not Gavin Newsom. All right, you vote that Gavin
Newsom for president. You're going to be dealing with Republican
presidents for twenty years after that. This guy's a disaster.
And there's a lot of Democrats in the party, the
ones who run the party run campaigns. They know he's
a disaster waiting to happen. So Axios acxios dot com,
they're a political news website.
Speaker 2 (16:49):
They did a story.
Speaker 3 (16:50):
They looked, they talked with twenty Democratic operatives, a number
of them who work for twenty twenty eight possible candidates.
And while they admit Newsom is the guy to beat
right now because he's leading the polls, they've got a
lot of ammunition to use against him and all the
stuff we're real familiar with. And that's the thing. We're
(17:12):
all burned out on Newsom. We all know the history.
The rest of the country does it, though, and when
they hear it, if these opposition campaigns are run properly,
it's going to be bang bang bang bang bang bang.
And people around the country are going, what the hell
is this guy? This is disgusting what he's done. The
policies are so destructive his personal life, and what they
(17:37):
plan is to characterize And these are Democrats.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
He's gonna get, Forget the Republicans.
Speaker 3 (17:44):
He's gonna get destroyed by his fellow Democrats because they
know this guy is a loser. He's not going to
appeal to more than he's gonna do worse than Kamala Harris.
Kamala Harris only one I think nineteen state e he's
gonna win fifteen, maybe maybe less.
Speaker 2 (18:04):
There's no appeal. And they said, as far as.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
Policy, illegal alien healthcare, do you know how unpopular that
it is around the country. And sometimes you only need
one issue to be wildly unpopular to be a hot button,
and it sinks the whole candidacy. Look at all the
damage done to Kamala Harris because they found an old
video clip of her approving of what was a taxpayer
(18:30):
paid healthcare for no taxpayer paid gender reassignment surgery for
illegal alien criminals.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
That was a grand slam.
Speaker 3 (18:39):
Huh, taxpayer money for sex reassignment surgery for chopping off penises.
That's two for illegal alien three criminals. That's four guys
in prison if they decided to bond be a woman
and they wanted to get their penises chopped off by
a doctor. She was all in favor of us paying
for it. That was the famous part of the famous
(19:02):
Kamala is for They them commercials, and the Democrats admit
that was the single most devastating series of commercials. They
could measure it. They could measure how many points, how
many votes it costs them. What kind of commercials do
you think they that other Democrats could create with because
a lot of other Democrats are running away from the
illegal alien issue because they lost it. They lost it badly.
(19:26):
If there's anything Trump has wildly succeeded on in the
first year is that he'd proved that the Democrats were
lying like hell. They were actively allowing millions of illegal
aliens to come into the country to benefit Democrats. Someday
what they would get amnesty and become voters. That's what
it was for. And that plan was blown to hell,
(19:48):
and Trump proved that you could close the border in
five minutes. Now they may come up with some complicated
plans to slowly let in immigrants, but it's going to
be a very controlled, targeted plan, maybe to increase legal immigration,
but they're not opening the border, and nobody's going to
(20:11):
Nobody is going to get elected running on opening the border.
Gavin though, legal AI owned healthcare, which almost single handedly
has put us into a massive deficit thirteen billion dollars
of money, thirteen billion dollars in California tax money. So
I mean that alone is going to sink him. Then
what's he going to carp about affordability? We have the
highest housing prices, the highest rental prices, We've got the
(20:36):
highest inflation in the country, we got the highest taxes
in the country. Gas is going for four to fifty
a gallon and two fifty in a lot of other states.
Does that been saying for several years now, what's he
running on here? The Democrats are going to take him
out first, because whoever succeeds Trump is going to massacre
new some on these issues. Homelessness, oh my god, and
(20:58):
the all right, we got hundreds of thousands of homeless
in this state.
Speaker 1 (21:03):
You know.
Speaker 3 (21:04):
Newsom first announced in two thousand and four, he's first homeless,
planned to end the problem.
Speaker 2 (21:10):
Two thousand and four.
Speaker 3 (21:11):
We are now approaching year twenty two of his end
homelessness program. Meantime, we got almost two hundred thousand homeless.
And you know the videos. You see the videos, it's
part of the nightly news. Those are campaign videos. He
cannot he cannot just post angry anti Trump Twitter messages,
especially when Trump isn't going to be running. That is
(21:34):
not a campaign. That's the only reason he has any
support now, because he's trying to tap into that to
the insane, irrational, deranged anger that a lot of people
have about Trump. But absent that, there's no candidacy, there's
nothing there. He's also writing a book about how he
came from a modest background, or he had one foot
(21:57):
in a modest background and one foot in wealth, you know,
because his dad was closely tied.
Speaker 2 (22:01):
To the Getties.
Speaker 3 (22:02):
He's going to try to position himself as a small businessman. Well,
the Getty family. The Getty family's money built ten of
his first eleven businesses, the wineries, the restaurants, vineyards. Ten
out of the first eleven were paid for by the Gettys.
I don't think there's any other small business person that
can make that claim. If you're a small business person,
(22:22):
did the Gettys help you out at all? Helped him
out ten times. Then the sleeves bag had an affair
with his campaign manager's wife who was also working in
his office. That's when he was mayor, campaign manager's wife.
And then the French laundry. One advisor to a possible
arrival for president said, French laundry is never going to
(22:43):
go away. It's one of the stickiest things ever. Nobody
ever forgot the image of him sitting in close quarters
with twelve other people healthcare lobbyists while he had imposed
the strictest, strictest COVID lockdown world of any state in
the Union. And I've never I know, he said, Oh,
I've a mistake. I've never understood. There was such dire
(23:07):
warnings about COVID. Why wasn't he afraid?
Speaker 2 (23:10):
Did he know?
Speaker 3 (23:10):
Did he know it was all a fake? He must
have knew it was a fake. But this was a
fantastic way to control people. You scare him, you control them.
And he did that, and then he went out and
partied drinking at a party, like bass drinking at a
party in Ghana. Well, his opponents in the Democratic part
priority Democratic Party are going to beat him over the
(23:31):
head with that. All right, we got more coming up
after three o'clock. We're going to talk with John Fleischmann.
Here's another scandal news is they're spending a billion dollars
on an extension of the California State Capitol in Sacramento.
It's called the Capital Annex Project. It's over a billion
(23:52):
dollars and nobody after five years, nobody knows the thing
about it. Hundreds of people have been forced to force
to non disclosure agreements, and it's way over budget, and
it's way late. It's a big scam, and there's only
one reporter in the whole state who's been investigating it,
because again, we have lazy, stupid reporters generally in the media,
(24:15):
who are afraid of losing access more coming up.
Speaker 4 (24:19):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 3 (24:25):
We're gonna have John Fleischman on. He's got a website,
so does Itmatter dot com. He's a political writer and commentator,
and he's delving into the billion dollar Sacramento Capital Annex,
this huge construction project that has gone on for years.
Speaker 2 (24:44):
It's cost a billion dollars in your tax money.
Speaker 3 (24:46):
This really amuses me because there has been a lot
of anger, people, puppet fists, the furious that Trump is
building a ballroom which is financed with private money, but
Newsome is spending billion dollars of California taxpayer money on
this addition to the Capitol building. And it's some kind
(25:07):
of high speed rail like boondoggle that's wasting money that
nobody wants to talk about. That news some lies about
and it doesn't get much coverage. Well we'll talk about it.
We'll have John Fleischbannon coming up, as you know, and
this is going to be another rich target. As Newsom
continues as presidential campaign for his Democratic opponents, twenty four
(25:29):
billion dollars of tax money has disappeared. Twenty four billion
that was allocated to end homelessness. Right, And Elon Musk,
there's a clip of him. He was on some show
and he was talking about the big scam in California
(25:50):
when homeless money is sent from Newsom's government to these
nonprofit organizations.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
Play this clip.
Speaker 7 (25:59):
Homeless is the wrong word. Like the homeless implies that
somebody got a little behind in their mortgage payments and
if they just got a job offer, they'd be back
on their feet. But someone who's I mean, you see
these videos of people that are just shuffling, you know,
they're on the fentanyl. They're they're like, you know, taking
a dump in the middle of the streets, you know,
and they got like open sores and stuff. They're not
(26:21):
like one drop offer away from getting back on their feet.
Speaker 1 (26:24):
Right.
Speaker 7 (26:24):
It's not a homeless almemless, it's a profit underword.
Speaker 1 (26:28):
Right.
Speaker 7 (26:29):
So and then the the the you know these sort
of charities, Uh, of course are they get money proportionate
to the number of homeless people or a number of
drug zombies. So their incentive structure is to maximize the
number of drug zombies, not minimize it. That's why they
(26:50):
don't arrest the drug dealers, because if they arrest the
drug dealers. The drug zombies leave.
Speaker 2 (26:57):
So they know who the drug dealers are.
Speaker 7 (26:59):
They don't arrest them on purpose, because otherwise the drug
zombies would leave and they would stop getting money from
the state of California and from all the charity.
Speaker 3 (27:09):
He wanted to say, this is a diabolical scam. You're
taxed on any money going through the system in San Francisco.
That money goes to the homeless industrial complex. When you
add up all the money that's flowing, they're getting close
to a million dollars per drug zombie, like nine hundred
thousand dollars or something, he said, some crazy amount going
to these organizations. So they want to keep people just
(27:31):
barely alive, and that is that is a great point,
and we've talked about this. They want they're getting nine
hundred thousand dollars per drug zombie. These nonprofits they spend
just enough so these guys don't die, and then they
keep the rest. They run off with the rest because
(27:52):
Musk says, they need to keep them in the area
so they get the revenue, because if they actually cured
their drug addictions and got them jobs, then.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
What would they do. And they need We.
Speaker 3 (28:04):
Told you a few days ago that there are there's
human trafficking going on where drug addicts are actually flown
in from out of state in order to get benefits
here because the homeless nonprofits need new bodies, they need
new flesh to exploit. So there's drug zombies being flown
in or bust in all the time. So we could
(28:25):
pay our million dollars in tax money. The people running
the nonprofit continue to get richer and richer. They don't arrest,
they don't arrest the drug dealers, they don't arrest the
drug zombies. They want that action. And the politicians are
getting a cut of all this as well. The politicians,
I can San Francisco like here in La they get
a kickback, they get a cut. We pay tax money,
(28:47):
it goes to the drug not the homeless nonprofits. The
homeless non profits then kick back some money to the
politicians so that.
Speaker 2 (28:54):
The drug addicts aren't arrested, the.
Speaker 3 (28:56):
Drug dealers aren't arrested, and we just keep getting built
for more tax That is exactly what's happening. It's been
going on for well over ten years now, and of course,
when it comes time to vote for new taxes to
help the homeless people, do it every time.
Speaker 2 (29:10):
It is the damnedest thing.
Speaker 3 (29:12):
It's a colossal scam that the public is a part of.
All Right, we'll talk with John Fleishman coming up next. Hey,
you've been listening to the John Cobalt Show podcast. You
can always hear the show live on KFI AM six
forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
and of course, anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
Can't.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
I am six forty.
Speaker 3 (00:02):
You're listening to the John Cobel podcast on the iHeartRadio app.
There is another coming up later after we talked to
Daniel Gus. They are draining the reservoir again in the Palisades.
I couldn't believe this, and it may be empty for
the next nine months, that one hundred and seventeen million
(00:23):
gallon reservoir that was drained and so there was no
water for the fire. They're draining it again again. Something
to do with the cover. It's it's insanity. Doesn't even
begin to describe what's going on here, and of course
nobody's explaining this. Let's talk to Daniel Gus. There's a
new LA Council member who is not going to jail, buddy.
(00:45):
He's getting hit with a fine, a big fine for
taking gifts that he shouldn't have taken. Las Vegas is
involved in this story, as it always seems to be.
Let's get Daniel Gus on.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
Hey John, how are you?
Speaker 3 (01:01):
I'm all right? Where can people find your writings? Remind
people where to go online?
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Sure?
Speaker 4 (01:07):
Thank you?
Speaker 1 (01:08):
I have a subset Danielgus dot substack dot com. Gus
with two says follow me on Twitter at the Gus Report.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (01:19):
Well, with the collapse of the traditional media, people like
Daniel Gus especially Daniel has really filled a huge gap
in local news, especially for Los Angeles. Now here you
had the Los Angeles Ethics Commission. So these aren't criminal charges.
They found that John Lee, who is a council member
(01:41):
in the northwest San Fernando Valley, and he has to
pay one hundred and thirty eight thousand dollars plus in fines,
explain what he did.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
Well, it's actually a heck of a lot more money
that's eventually going to be paid than that.
Speaker 4 (01:57):
But so.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
Both who presently represents District twelve, which is the Chatsworth area,
the northwestern part of the valley, he and Kenvilan former
council member Mitch Englander, have been elbowing each other to
succeed Greg and before him, Al Bernson over the past
(02:20):
several decades and over the course of their being councilmen,
they're approached by a lot of lobby developers, people who
need book and favorable opinions in city hall. And in
twenty seventeen there was an infamous trip to Vegas with
(02:44):
a couple of these types of both businessmen and a
former city council staffer to then city Council President Michael
by b Ai. And it appears, according to all of
the records that I've read, they were with alcohol and
(03:07):
women who were probably less than half age, and casino
chips and dinner in the price range that would make
your head spin. John, I don't know if you've ever
had a five hundred or thousand dollars dinner, but apparently
these guys did and had even more money spent on
alcoholers they call it in Vegas bottle service, flashing lights,
(03:32):
and these magnificent looking young women. And apparently they either
didn't report or underreported the value of this debauchery, and
gradually people started poking around. Englander lied about what went
(03:54):
on in Vegas. He lied to an FBI agent and
wound up in federal prison for whatever reason. John Lee
did not but in a lot of records Lee concluded
by was the person staff or be on that investigation
(04:14):
about Englander, and he was in piece of staff for
quite a few years and in criminal charges, so he
did not crime. He's never been charged with the crime
as we know. He had to pay a fine that
went through the administrative process, trait of law. Judge and
(04:36):
week the Los Angeles Essex con decided to lower the
boom on Lee of one hundred and thirty eight thousand dollars.
So that's that's the core of the issue.
Speaker 3 (04:49):
So it was mostly meals, booze, hotels, transportation, gambling, trip chips.
I mean, that's the prize package that Lee was enjoy
along with these other characters.
Speaker 1 (05:04):
Yeah, and apparently the women right, massage services and you
know things that John you wouldn't know about this, but
sometimes middle aged men we're too young, but sometimes they
get a little full of themselves after more years of
marriage and think, well, gee, I have a marketable power
(05:26):
in public office, are and I entitled to a weekend
of craziness in Vegas without the trappings of life in
Los Angeles. So that's apparently more of what this fine
against John Lee is for.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
I saw one of the reports that John Lee was
actually telling investigators or telling the judge looking at this
case that well, yeah, I was served the food, but
I didn't eat it. He actually said he didn't eat it.
Speaker 2 (05:59):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
You know, you know, whenever you know, a five star
restaurant puts, you know, a menu in front of me
for a food that I've never experienced in my life.
Of course you're going to turn it down right at
the water grill and uh, you know five star restaurants
in LA and in Vegas, and I don't know what
you get for three thousand dollars worth of a round
(06:21):
or three rounds of bottle service in Vegas. I wouldn't
turn it down. It was legal for me to accept it.
But yeah, and then Lee had the audacity during the
investors state, well, I tried to pay it back. I'm
trying to figure out how does that map when you
try to pay back something that you weren't entitled to
(06:45):
in the first place. And so, in my opinion, he's
getting lucky here with an enormous civil find through through
the six Commission, But don't to he According to ethics
records that I'm looking at, he's more than one hundred,
(07:05):
well over one hundred thousand dollars hole for the legal representation.
And for some reason, this deputy chief of staff has
loaned and legal defense fund almost five dollars. So I'm
not going to say it's criminell, but graft like transactions
(07:29):
to have ended at minimum disturbing red flags and they
continue this have to come out of John Lee's pocket
unless he can raise one heck of a lot of
money for his lead, which adds fast billings. You know,
the last quarter he only has fourteen hundred bucks left
in that and he's finding on appealing.
Speaker 3 (07:50):
This, so it turned into a very expensive meal. All right, Daniel, thanks.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
For coming on anytime. John.
Speaker 3 (07:55):
You have a nice Daniel wesh that's substat dot com
and you could eat all about all the corruption going
on in La City.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
All right, this could be hard to believe, but.
Speaker 3 (08:06):
You remember the reservoir that they drained in the Palisades
and then the fire hit and then they claimed that well,
the one hundred and seventeen million gallons that wouldn't have
made a difference.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
They're still trying to sell that one.
Speaker 3 (08:21):
Well, they're going to be draining the reservoir again and
it could be empty for a long time. This is
incredibly stupid people once again in the Department of Water
and Power, which has the same incredible bubblehead Genie kino
Yez with her same exorbitant salaries seven hundred and fifty
(08:41):
thousand dollars, and they're draining the reservoir again, and I
guess just hoping there isn't another wildfire because there's nothing
left to burn in the Palisades.
Speaker 2 (08:51):
Talk about it when we come back.
Speaker 4 (08:53):
You're listening to John Cobelts on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 2 (09:00):
Unbelievable.
Speaker 3 (09:01):
The Santienez reservoir that was the one that Jenny's Kinonias
stupidly drained and so there was no water to put
out the Palisades fire. Just the dumbest act by the
dumbest bureaucrat and now they're gonna be draining the reservoir again.
Listen to this Fox eleven reporter Matthew Seedorf.
Speaker 2 (09:23):
A lot of residents are angry.
Speaker 5 (09:25):
This reservoir was broken, then it was fixed, now is
broken again, and the timing couldn't be worse.
Speaker 2 (09:33):
An angry wind.
Speaker 5 (09:34):
Shaking trees and Pacific Palisades as residents learned a critical
water reservoir could soon go dry again.
Speaker 2 (09:41):
Frustrating and annoying.
Speaker 1 (09:42):
Concerns me about the safety of my family.
Speaker 5 (09:48):
We were here last January as the Palisades fire grew
out of control and hydrants ran dry. The nearby Santa
and As reservoir empty offline for repairs. In June, LEDWP
announced the problem was fixed. We're placing a damaged floating cover,
but now just months later the cover is damaged again.
(10:08):
So now the reservoir is expected to be drained and
take an offline for an estimated nine months, starting around
the one year mark of the Palisades fire.
Speaker 1 (10:17):
It's tone deaf, to say the least, to think that
they somehow think it's okay at this time and under
these circumstances.
Speaker 2 (10:25):
I mean, look how windy it is even tonight.
Speaker 3 (10:27):
To be able to take down the reservoir again for
another nine months just makes no sense.
Speaker 5 (10:32):
Is it going to be even usable again in nine
months after they do their repairs like this last repair
just lasted three months. To reduce fire risk, LEDWP has
plans for a six mile ten inch high pressure hose
line from Topega tanks designed to pump water in if
there's a fire.
Speaker 2 (10:48):
We want a full reservoir for wildfire fighting. We don't
want garden hose.
Speaker 6 (10:53):
At the end of the day, Matt, this permeable cover
is a problem to trace.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
Your parts to rip or.
Speaker 6 (10:58):
Get damaged every time.
Speaker 2 (11:00):
The wind blows.
Speaker 5 (11:02):
LA Councilwoman Tracy Park also expressing frustration, calling for a
permanent fix.
Speaker 6 (11:07):
The long term solution is to put a permanent cover
on the reservoir. It needs to be concrete, and this
is something that we are already in discussion with DWP about.
Speaker 5 (11:17):
In a statement, LADWP tells Fox eleven replacing the cover
as a necessary interim step to prevent unexpected failures and
to protect water quality.
Speaker 1 (11:26):
Why do they need to take it down for nine
months just to.
Speaker 2 (11:30):
Repair a tarp doesn't make any sense to me.
Speaker 5 (11:33):
So right now today I thought water reservoir is still online.
It does have water in it, but it could be
drained whenever this construction begins.
Speaker 3 (11:42):
Honestly, this is the dumbest story, and it's been going
on two years now. I absolutely don't understand this. This
reservoir was built originally in nineteen sixty four after the
bell Air fire which burned five hundred homes back in
sixty one, and it was built as the la times
just prove typically for fires, you don't need it for
(12:02):
drinking water. Obviously, the reservoir was drained for a year
up until June of this year. It was drained when
the fire happened. Nobody was ever short of water. I
don't understand this. In fact, from nineteen seventy until twenty twelve,
there was no cover.
Speaker 2 (12:19):
It's just a tarp. It's like your pool cover.
Speaker 3 (12:22):
So for over forty years they never had a pool cover.
They claimed all of the law changed. Why did the
law change? And they don't use it for drinking water
obviously because they closed it in in February of twenty
twenty four. The fire happened in January of twenty twenty five,
(12:45):
and when they finally got around to fixing it. God,
they're so lazy and so stupid at the DWP. That's
really a bunch of lazy, stupid buffoons working there, starting
with Jenny's Canonias. It's a corrupt agency. It's been corrupt
since I moved here. It's an empty hole you have
to fill with water, that's all. And when it had
no cover for over forty years, nothing bad ever happened.
(13:11):
This is baffling. There's gotta be something else to this.
They also could have fixed it very quickly back in
twenty twenty four, and that ever bothered. Then the fire happened,
and now they're gonna drain it again. It says it's
the cover needs to be fixed to prevent unexpected tears. Well,
(13:33):
why didn't you do that the first time or the
second time? It's a tarp i.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
Now they're gonna, they're gonna, they're gonna.
Speaker 3 (13:43):
Install a six mile high pressure hose line from Watar
tanks and to Banga and Topanga. Why didn't they do
that in twenty twenty four before the Palisades fire hit.
None of this makes sense, and they don't explain anything.
There is no need to use this reservoir for drinking water.
That is complete, utter nonsense. It's meant to put out fires,
(14:04):
and yes, unequivocally, without a doubt, one hundred and seventeen
million gallons would have saved some homes in the Palisades.
Anybody who says that, who says otherwise must be a
defendant in the lawsuit or or stone cold stupid.
Speaker 2 (14:19):
Shouldn't Bess and Kenonia's and the.
Speaker 3 (14:22):
Fire chief all be marched out and forced to explain everything?
I mean, Matthew Seedorf did a good story here, But
where is the week we got? We got six we
have six TV news departments, We've got several newspapers and
radio stations. Nobody, nobody is aggressive enough. The only Times
(14:43):
has been, but very very few other journalists or outside journalists,
independent or network journalists. Jesus Los Angeles is the biggest
urban fire in US history. Katie Grimes from California Globe
yesterday said, they're just uninterested.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
They just don't care. All the public's interested.
Speaker 3 (15:04):
Everybody I talked to, especially on the West Side, talks
about this stuff all the time. Really, you'd get an
audience what's wrong with you?
Speaker 2 (15:12):
What's wrong?
Speaker 3 (15:13):
I'm addressing all the journalists I know, many of them
listen to the show What's wrong with all of you?
Speaker 2 (15:17):
And today's Kenoians what is wrong with her?
Speaker 3 (15:20):
There's a lot of mental disorders going on here. It's
actually to actually drain the reservoir. Again, it's an alternate
reality we've all been dropped into when we come back.
I've been telling you this and it's turning out to
be true. There are a lot of people who want
to run for president on the Democratic side. We're not
named Gavin Newsom, and they are developing all kinds of
(15:44):
opposition research to take him out early and decisively, because
we all know that he's a complete fraud and a
complete screw up, and all these other would be candidates
and their staffs are busy compiling all the dirt.
Speaker 2 (15:59):
Tell you about it when we come back.
Speaker 4 (16:02):
You're listening to John Kobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 3 (16:08):
There's kind of a friend of mine the other day,
friend I know since high school, and I know he
usually votes Democratic. He lives way out of state, and
I told him, I said, whatever you do, don't vote
for Gavin Newsom. And he says to me, well, I'm
not voting for a mega guy. I'm not telling you
to vote for a maga guy. You vote whatever Democrat,
(16:28):
but not Gavin Newsom. All right, you vote that Gavin
Newsom for president. You're going to be dealing with Republican
presidents for twenty years after that. This guy's a disaster.
And there's a lot of Democrats in the party, the
ones who run the party run campaigns. They know he's
a disaster waiting to happen. So Axios acxios dot com,
they're a political news website.
Speaker 2 (16:49):
They did a story.
Speaker 3 (16:50):
They looked, they talked with twenty Democratic operatives, a number
of them who work for twenty twenty eight possible candidates.
And while they admit Newsom is the guy to beat
right now because he's leading the polls, they've got a
lot of ammunition to use against him and all the
stuff we're real familiar with. And that's the thing. We're
(17:12):
all burned out on Newsom. We all know the history.
The rest of the country does it, though, and when
they hear it, if these opposition campaigns are run properly,
it's going to be bang bang bang bang bang bang.
And people around the country are going, what the hell
is this guy? This is disgusting what he's done. The
policies are so destructive his personal life, and what they
(17:37):
plan is to characterize And these are Democrats.
Speaker 2 (17:41):
He's gonna get, Forget the Republicans.
Speaker 3 (17:44):
He's gonna get destroyed by his fellow Democrats because they
know this guy is a loser. He's not going to
appeal to more than he's gonna do worse than Kamala Harris.
Kamala Harris only one I think nineteen state e he's
gonna win fifteen, maybe maybe less.
Speaker 2 (18:04):
There's no appeal. And they said, as far as.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
Policy, illegal alien healthcare, do you know how unpopular that
it is around the country. And sometimes you only need
one issue to be wildly unpopular to be a hot button,
and it sinks the whole candidacy. Look at all the
damage done to Kamala Harris because they found an old
video clip of her approving of what was a taxpayer
(18:30):
paid healthcare for no taxpayer paid gender reassignment surgery for
illegal alien criminals.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
That was a grand slam.
Speaker 3 (18:39):
Huh, taxpayer money for sex reassignment surgery for chopping off penises.
That's two for illegal alien three criminals. That's four guys
in prison if they decided to bond be a woman
and they wanted to get their penises chopped off by
a doctor. She was all in favor of us paying
for it. That was the famous part of the famous
(19:02):
Kamala is for They them commercials, and the Democrats admit
that was the single most devastating series of commercials. They
could measure it. They could measure how many points, how
many votes it costs them. What kind of commercials do
you think they that other Democrats could create with because
a lot of other Democrats are running away from the
illegal alien issue because they lost it. They lost it badly.
(19:26):
If there's anything Trump has wildly succeeded on in the
first year is that he'd proved that the Democrats were
lying like hell. They were actively allowing millions of illegal
aliens to come into the country to benefit Democrats. Someday
what they would get amnesty and become voters. That's what
it was for. And that plan was blown to hell,
(19:48):
and Trump proved that you could close the border in
five minutes. Now they may come up with some complicated
plans to slowly let in immigrants, but it's going to
be a very controlled, targeted plan, maybe to increase legal immigration,
but they're not opening the border, and nobody's going to
(20:11):
Nobody is going to get elected running on opening the border.
Gavin though, legal AI owned healthcare, which almost single handedly
has put us into a massive deficit thirteen billion dollars
of money, thirteen billion dollars in California tax money. So
I mean that alone is going to sink him. Then
what's he going to carp about affordability? We have the
highest housing prices, the highest rental prices, We've got the
(20:36):
highest inflation in the country, we got the highest taxes
in the country. Gas is going for four to fifty
a gallon and two fifty in a lot of other states.
Does that been saying for several years now, what's he
running on here? The Democrats are going to take him
out first, because whoever succeeds Trump is going to massacre
new some on these issues. Homelessness, oh my god, and
(20:58):
the all right, we got hundreds of thousands of homeless
in this state.
Speaker 1 (21:03):
You know.
Speaker 3 (21:04):
Newsom first announced in two thousand and four, he's first homeless,
planned to end the problem.
Speaker 2 (21:10):
Two thousand and four.
Speaker 3 (21:11):
We are now approaching year twenty two of his end
homelessness program. Meantime, we got almost two hundred thousand homeless.
And you know the videos. You see the videos, it's
part of the nightly news. Those are campaign videos. He
cannot he cannot just post angry anti Trump Twitter messages,
especially when Trump isn't going to be running. That is
(21:34):
not a campaign. That's the only reason he has any
support now, because he's trying to tap into that to
the insane, irrational, deranged anger that a lot of people
have about Trump. But absent that, there's no candidacy, there's
nothing there. He's also writing a book about how he
came from a modest background, or he had one foot
(21:57):
in a modest background and one foot in wealth, you know,
because his dad was closely tied.
Speaker 2 (22:01):
To the Getties.
Speaker 3 (22:02):
He's going to try to position himself as a small businessman. Well,
the Getty family. The Getty family's money built ten of
his first eleven businesses, the wineries, the restaurants, vineyards. Ten
out of the first eleven were paid for by the Gettys.
I don't think there's any other small business person that
can make that claim. If you're a small business person,
(22:22):
did the Gettys help you out at all? Helped him
out ten times. Then the sleeves bag had an affair
with his campaign manager's wife who was also working in
his office. That's when he was mayor, campaign manager's wife.
And then the French laundry. One advisor to a possible
arrival for president said, French laundry is never going to
(22:43):
go away. It's one of the stickiest things ever. Nobody
ever forgot the image of him sitting in close quarters
with twelve other people healthcare lobbyists while he had imposed
the strictest, strictest COVID lockdown world of any state in
the Union. And I've never I know, he said, Oh,
I've a mistake. I've never understood. There was such dire
(23:07):
warnings about COVID. Why wasn't he afraid?
Speaker 2 (23:10):
Did he know?
Speaker 3 (23:10):
Did he know it was all a fake? He must
have knew it was a fake. But this was a
fantastic way to control people. You scare him, you control them.
And he did that, and then he went out and
partied drinking at a party, like bass drinking at a
party in Ghana. Well, his opponents in the Democratic part
priority Democratic Party are going to beat him over the
(23:31):
head with that. All right, we got more coming up
after three o'clock. We're going to talk with John Fleischmann.
Here's another scandal news is they're spending a billion dollars
on an extension of the California State Capitol in Sacramento.
It's called the Capital Annex Project. It's over a billion
(23:52):
dollars and nobody after five years, nobody knows the thing
about it. Hundreds of people have been forced to force
to non disclosure agreements, and it's way over budget, and
it's way late. It's a big scam, and there's only
one reporter in the whole state who's been investigating it,
because again, we have lazy, stupid reporters generally in the media,
(24:15):
who are afraid of losing access more coming up.
Speaker 4 (24:19):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KFI AM
six forty.
Speaker 3 (24:25):
We're gonna have John Fleischman on. He's got a website,
so does Itmatter dot com. He's a political writer and commentator,
and he's delving into the billion dollar Sacramento Capital Annex,
this huge construction project that has gone on for years.
Speaker 2 (24:44):
It's cost a billion dollars in your tax money.
Speaker 3 (24:46):
This really amuses me because there has been a lot
of anger, people, puppet fists, the furious that Trump is
building a ballroom which is financed with private money, but
Newsome is spending billion dollars of California taxpayer money on
this addition to the Capitol building. And it's some kind
(25:07):
of high speed rail like boondoggle that's wasting money that
nobody wants to talk about. That news some lies about
and it doesn't get much coverage. Well we'll talk about it.
We'll have John Fleischbannon coming up, as you know, and
this is going to be another rich target. As Newsom
continues as presidential campaign for his Democratic opponents, twenty four
(25:29):
billion dollars of tax money has disappeared. Twenty four billion
that was allocated to end homelessness. Right, And Elon Musk,
there's a clip of him. He was on some show
and he was talking about the big scam in California
(25:50):
when homeless money is sent from Newsom's government to these
nonprofit organizations.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
Play this clip.
Speaker 7 (25:59):
Homeless is the wrong word. Like the homeless implies that
somebody got a little behind in their mortgage payments and
if they just got a job offer, they'd be back
on their feet. But someone who's I mean, you see
these videos of people that are just shuffling, you know,
they're on the fentanyl. They're they're like, you know, taking
a dump in the middle of the streets, you know,
and they got like open sores and stuff. They're not
(26:21):
like one drop offer away from getting back on their feet.
Speaker 1 (26:24):
Right.
Speaker 7 (26:24):
It's not a homeless almemless, it's a profit underword.
Speaker 1 (26:28):
Right.
Speaker 7 (26:29):
So and then the the the you know these sort
of charities, Uh, of course are they get money proportionate
to the number of homeless people or a number of
drug zombies. So their incentive structure is to maximize the
number of drug zombies, not minimize it. That's why they
(26:50):
don't arrest the drug dealers, because if they arrest the
drug dealers. The drug zombies leave.
Speaker 2 (26:57):
So they know who the drug dealers are.
Speaker 7 (26:59):
They don't arrest them on purpose, because otherwise the drug
zombies would leave and they would stop getting money from
the state of California and from all the charity.
Speaker 3 (27:09):
He wanted to say, this is a diabolical scam. You're
taxed on any money going through the system in San Francisco.
That money goes to the homeless industrial complex. When you
add up all the money that's flowing, they're getting close
to a million dollars per drug zombie, like nine hundred
thousand dollars or something, he said, some crazy amount going
to these organizations. So they want to keep people just
(27:31):
barely alive, and that is that is a great point,
and we've talked about this. They want they're getting nine
hundred thousand dollars per drug zombie. These nonprofits they spend
just enough so these guys don't die, and then they
keep the rest. They run off with the rest because
(27:52):
Musk says, they need to keep them in the area
so they get the revenue, because if they actually cured
their drug addictions and got them jobs, then.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
What would they do. And they need We.
Speaker 3 (28:04):
Told you a few days ago that there are there's
human trafficking going on where drug addicts are actually flown
in from out of state in order to get benefits
here because the homeless nonprofits need new bodies, they need
new flesh to exploit. So there's drug zombies being flown
in or bust in all the time. So we could
(28:25):
pay our million dollars in tax money. The people running
the nonprofit continue to get richer and richer. They don't arrest,
they don't arrest the drug dealers, they don't arrest the
drug zombies. They want that action. And the politicians are
getting a cut of all this as well. The politicians,
I can San Francisco like here in La they get
a kickback, they get a cut. We pay tax money,
(28:47):
it goes to the drug not the homeless nonprofits. The
homeless non profits then kick back some money to the
politicians so that.
Speaker 2 (28:54):
The drug addicts aren't arrested, the.
Speaker 3 (28:56):
Drug dealers aren't arrested, and we just keep getting built
for more tax That is exactly what's happening. It's been
going on for well over ten years now, and of course,
when it comes time to vote for new taxes to
help the homeless people, do it every time.
Speaker 2 (29:10):
It is the damnedest thing.
Speaker 3 (29:12):
It's a colossal scam that the public is a part of.
All Right, we'll talk with John Fleishman coming up next. Hey,
you've been listening to the John Cobalt Show podcast. You
can always hear the show live on KFI AM six
forty from one to four pm every Monday through Friday,
and of course, anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.
The John Kobylt Show News
Host
John Kobylt
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!