August 11, 2025 • 38 mins
Rennae and Caitlin are reunited—with working mics—to discuss the mayhem on the business end of the Canadian Open tournaments, plus the beginning frenzy of Cincy. Meddy's spiritual crisis, Osaka's low moment, Shelton's upswing and Sinner's dominance. It's all here!
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
Hello, one two, one two, Okay, Hi everyone, welcome to
the Renee Stubs Tennis Podcast. If you guys could see
what just happened there, we had our little tiny mics
and we thought Kitlin was a ghost. What we didn't
realize is that I didn't actually have it plugged into
my phone correctly and into our system anyway. Caitlin, welcome back,
Welcome back from Europe.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
I'm glad to be here. I'm glad to be alive, Glad.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
To be alive. We thought Caitlin was a ghost there
for a second.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Anyone who's listened to this podcast for more than a
couple of years may remember before we had makeup films,
when we just basically yelled into ten cans. Yeah, and
the idea on this was so atrocious, and you guys
listened anyway, So thank you, Thank us.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
Guys. Listen, I know, have patience with us. Alright, I'm
setting up at all this stuff. We're trying to do
our best. Caitlyn's just cut back from Europe by the
Hannah Burner on the show last week. How great was that?
Speaker 2 (00:55):
What a great episode.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
And the thing is, listen, there are some people on
tennis networks or tennis experts that have never played tennis.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
Before, and there's people with good microphones and bad content.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
And Cannaburna is a different story because she actually was
a D one college player and played number one at
a very good school. So, Hannah, thank you so much.
She's on tour, so go see her. But what a
fun week of tennis. Caitlin, Oh Canada.
Speaker 2 (01:21):
My wond regret about going to jaunting off to Europe,
as it were, is that I didn't get to go
to my hometown of Montreal and watch what became probably
the tournament of the of history for Montrealers or Canada,
for Canadians. That was about as close to a slam
dunk a heralded but unproven newcomer.
Speaker 1 (01:45):
Well, it was funny because they said, are the first
Canadian champion since twenty nineteen. I was like twenty nineteen.
I thought it'd be forever. And I was like, oh, yeah,
that's right.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
I remember that.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
Bianca undrescue right, whatever happened, I mean, Bianca man, what
a bummer. But anyway, so so I did think about
that for a seconds, like just everybody hold the phone on.
Putting a lot of pressure on this young woman who
was a fantastic kid. I got to interview her in
Washington when she had a good first round win there,
and I thought, what a knowledgeable, gray young woman, and
(02:14):
wow or wow, what awake she had.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
Incredible beating a number of Grant Slime champions. Incredible Sophia
candell Rebackna lay down a match point. I mean much, much,
Much has been made, rightly so of Victoria and Boco's
run to the trophy at the Canadian Open. What we've
(02:37):
also not yet talked about is certainly that last bit
of a match. There's obviously lots of opinions about it. Boy,
here's backlash, there's backlash to the backlash, there's stan culture,
There's all sorts of stuff. Before we get into any
of it, I just want to say having I need
to personally say, I'm so impressed and thrilled that Canada
has a wonderful, level headed, exciting young champion in Victoria
(03:03):
and Bogo, and I really hope that she continues this on.
As Andrea Pekovich noted in her excellent Substack, Victoria has
been tearing up the lower levels of the pro tennis world.
On the lower you know if circuit and now her
maid entitle in a Master's one thousand. It's incredible, pal
mahl as we would say, yeah, incredible.
Speaker 1 (03:22):
And you know a lot of people also made the
distinction between well, you know she's going to be able
to do that away from Canada. Yeah, I do believe
she will because and she has so much upside and
she has so many things she can get better at,
like her second serve. Her technique, you know how I
am about technique is a little bit of an issue
and it will be an issue, and it did hurt
her in the finals and in certain matches where she
was double folding and blah blah blah. So I am
(03:44):
a big proponent in fixing that technique issue. And she
does have some hitches in her serve that is going
to be a problem now that the pressure is on her, okay,
because you know it's it's not easy, but it's it's
easier to win without pressure, right. She had it in
edible support from the crowd anyone who played against her.
It was difficult. Even Rebakina didn't close out the match,
(04:05):
who's usually not totally overwhelmed by crowds and things like that,
because she doesn't really have them on her side often,
but like it certainly affected a lot of really good
players that week because the crowd in Montreal is, i
would argue, is the best crowd in the world the tennis. No, no, seriously,
there's not a time that haven't gone to Montreal to go. Man,
(04:28):
these fans are awesome here. They are so awesome in Canada,
particularly in Montreal, even a little better than Toronto. And
Toronto's great as well.
Speaker 2 (04:35):
Montreal and me loves to hear that.
Speaker 1 (04:37):
What about it. They're just so enthusiastic, Like there's enthusiastic
as fans are in England, except England are just a
little bit more sort of, you know, well, not well behaved.
I want to say that you're Canadian. There's some dude,
they're a little bit more, you know, they clap. One
thing about Wembledon that people will tell you players is
that it's amazing how silent it is before a point
starts at Wembledon. Like a couple of times watching wibledon
(04:59):
from high when I was in London, I was like, oh,
did I turn the volume off? And then I realized,
oh no.
Speaker 2 (05:04):
It's the crowd is literally just waiting to the point.
Speaker 1 (05:08):
Montreal is not really quite like that. But they are
very very parochial and very very enthusiastic.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
And they also don't often have a hometown.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
It's the there isn't it that you know, this is
your hometown from where you're from. It is the biggest
thing all year when the when the Rogers Cup comes into.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
Town, for sure, especially since they last, and this shows
my age and also my my roots. But they lost
the experts, We lost the Montreal Expos which were a
big deal, which were a big deal. Obviously we have
the habs the Canadians, but there's not really another big
sporting event that happens with regularity other than the tours.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
Coming WNBA now going to Toronto. It'll be successful.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
I agree with Canada is the best. So let's start
by talking about the women. Obviously we have some really
exciting results from the men's side too, love seeing Shelton win.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
Are we going to go down to Osaka? Though?
Speaker 2 (05:59):
But we you probably talk about a secon Yeah.
Speaker 1 (06:01):
I mean, look, obviously a lot of people wrote to me.
Anyone who follows me on the socials knows how I
felt about it. I don't like to rip on players.
I was a terrible loser. Myself. I'll be quite honest
for the one thing you always do. I mean, unless
you absolutely and even when I absolutely hated the person
I lost to you begrudgingly, the words still have to
(06:24):
come out of your mouth. Congratulations to X, well done,
what a great week, and to your team. That's it.
If you hate them, that's enough, right. But to forget
quote unquote is what she said. I'm like, honey, you
didn't forget. You just wanted to get off the stage.
You hated every second of it. The WTA supervisor had
to go and find her because she left the court
(06:47):
and was not coming back to the trophy ceremony. It
took them twelve minutes. If you remember, it wasn't shown
on Tennis channel because stupidly, the Canadian Tennis Association thinks it's.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
Really got out of here.
Speaker 1 (07:00):
Let's have the women's before the men's, and let's have
the women's if it goes into three sets, go into
the men's. Like, guys, you're diluting the product. Have the
women at two and have the men at seven, or
have the women at seven and the men at two,
Like figure it out. You can't because you know the
men are or the women are finishing at like frigging
eleven twelve, one o'clock in the morning, Tennis, you got
(07:22):
to fix that. What the fuck put the matches on earlier?
How are you supposed to get a younger audience when
they're not even watching, they're in bed, Honey, I'll tell
you who wins tomorrow. It's eleven o'clock on a on
a school night.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
By the way, well, this is about to be a
huge issue at the US Open with Nate matches, But
that is something that I will probably see my rant
to another time. But yeah, but.
Speaker 1 (07:43):
We had to like not show the men's because we
had the women's on Tennis Channel, and the Tennis Channel
comment says to their credit, well, like I think Mark
Pecchi might have said, what are you guys doing? Like
how you not figuring out how to have both finals
at different times so we're not diluting the product.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
The constant amazement I have that people find watch and
love tennis, in spite of its own insistence on shooting
itself in the foot, truly knows no bounds.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
Yea.
Speaker 2 (08:10):
You know what I want to say about Namo Osaka,
and what you just said about Namo Osaka is that yeah,
you do the bare minimum. Do you do the bare
minimum after any match? Because every match now has a
microphone in a player's face asking for some sort of reaction.
A Madeen title by a player who has been very
open about idolizing you, a match that you know everyone
(08:33):
was getting up for, that You're going to be on
a podium no matter what, probably for a good amount
of time, whether you go hide from the cameras or not,
is not something that she would come as a shocked
to Nami Osaka, who now we have to say is
like a seasoned veteran of the WUTA tour. She's not
a teen?
Speaker 1 (08:48):
Does she not remember the US Open? I mean as
much Raina wanted to like storm off the court and
leave that court after that situation at the US Open,
took it upon herself to put her I'm around Naomi
after she's crying and say, I just want to say
to the crowd like she won the match, Like I mean,
would Serena go back and do things differently, Absolutely, but
(09:09):
she at least congratulate. By the way, it was a
US Open final, wasn't the Canadian Opening?
Speaker 2 (09:14):
Also, Serena Williams, to her incredible credit and She's gotten
a lot of uh guff from everybody, including me about
some of the stuff that went down in that particular
match between her and Nomeosaka. She silenced the crowd tempting
to boo. She was on Nomeosaka's side. She got them
to cheer for her, and she understood even that in
(09:35):
that moment when she was furious and upset and some
would say acting a little petulantly to not take away
this moment from this other person that she shared it with,
which I thought was actually a tremendous effort.
Speaker 1 (09:46):
Yeah, she's done great things, like remember when she beat
Coco and Coco was like a mess and she went
up and put her arms around her and wanted her
to do the interview and also so she's done good things,
but that's when she wins. So this is this was
a terror. This was This was arguably worse than Sebolanka
when Sebolanka was like went hard at the French Open
with Coco about how essentially how lucky she wants to
(10:09):
win the match.
Speaker 2 (10:09):
I totally agree, Like I was more upset about this
than I was about in Seblanca.
Speaker 1 (10:13):
Because she had about twelve minutes after that match to
gather herself to think. The best thing at least I
can do is congratulate her and get off there.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
Also, you know what I will say about Seblanca in
contrast to Nomeo Osaka, is Seblanca is volatile all the time. Yeah,
She's somebody who has spoken about how much she's emotional,
and so I appreciate the fact that she and Coco
especially she made it right and sort.
Speaker 1 (10:42):
Of you kind of got the TikTok at Wimbledon.
Speaker 2 (10:44):
Yeah, and you kind of got the sense that Sebolanka
was like, oh my god, I was acting like a
meathead again. Yeah, that was not my best look name Osaka.
I just feel like for somebody who has asked and
received a ton of grace, a ton of explanation, a
ton of you know, I'm a little disappointed because I
was one of the people who was like, hey, like,
let's really listen to this person. Let's make sure that
(11:05):
the what they're talking about with mental health and what
they're talking about with needing space and needing grace and
needing a lot of understanding, that kind of only works
if they extended to other people. And I have to
say what I've seen from Naomi Osaka is that it
doesn't seem to extend beyond her. Yeah, and I think
that that was the most obvious thing kind of Not
only that, but she like legit tanked the third tanked.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
The thoughts which no excuse.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
For tanking, say what you will about it, Arena Sablenca
storming off a court and smashing a racket or storming
off court and not being her most gracious. She's never tanked.
She will, she'll serve eighty thousand double.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
Faults, but she won't go under amis. She has she.
Speaker 2 (11:41):
Has and and and I think I was just sort
of grossed out.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
Honestly, Yeah, I was bad. Well it started badly when
she said thanks, I guess to the crowd. I was like, no, honey, listen,
the worst thing you it's one thing. And as I said,
I was a terrible loser. And it's really hard to
do a speech, have to lose, really really really hard. Okay,
And the fact that you know Hutchinov, who later that
(12:04):
night lost seven six and the third in an epic
match like and tried his ass off right to the
end and got up there and it made the most
amazing love runner up speech and was so gracious in
his speech. It was like, dude, come on, you've got
it anyway, We've we've ha done it enough. But and
I think she's learned her lesson from it, I hope,
because that was one of the worst moments I've seen
(12:28):
in a long time.
Speaker 2 (12:29):
The last thing I'll say about Osaka.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
I was on and I got to give her credit.
The first thing she goes, I've looked up to you
so much and congrats on a great weed and Dadada.
I was like, oh my god, you But I felt
so badly for her too. This is an eighteen year
old kid that she just won the biggest match of
her career.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
And most of the headlines about this are now about
Namo Asaka nor Idol.
Speaker 1 (12:48):
Yeah, and the Idol didn't even give you credit. That
was brutal to watch.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
I've had a lot of friends be like, oh, I'm
moving for Nami and Naomi and she does these long
posts and the whole thing about it, and it's like,
I don't know, dude, at this point, player don't play.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
Yeah. A lot of friends actually write to me and go,
if you don't root it for Naomi, But I think
I'm not going to anything.
Speaker 2 (13:08):
You run for a Grand Slams.
Speaker 1 (13:09):
You made a ton of money.
Speaker 2 (13:10):
You did great, You're one of the best players certainly active,
certainly in the last couple of years. Fantastic, great career.
But like player, don't play if you don't want to
be out there.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
And take a time to even sort of like post
anything that was considered.
Speaker 2 (13:22):
A turn now, like I'm just kind of like I
like watching players who want to be out there.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
Yeah, anyway, all right, well listen, let's on a more
positive note, and congratulations to Vicky. I'm so glad she
didn't she didn't play this week in Cincinnati because apparently
she had issue with her hand or a wrist when
she fell against Rabaccian. No, but I'm so glad she
didn't play. Get yourself, have the week, do all the press,
which she did all she was on Good Morning America
and everything. Do the press, get going, get your head
(13:47):
back for the US Open. She's going to be really
tough to beat there with her serving and her big shots,
And just give her some grace. She's eighteen, just like Andreeva,
and just like all these young players. She's not going
to light the world on fire every single week. So
make sure that just support them through that, and she's
only going to get better and a great kid. Ben Shelton.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Ben Shelton, Yeah, Benny Shells, you called it earlier the summer,
you were like a player. I got my own as
Benny Shells, and I was kind of.
Speaker 1 (14:10):
Like, I don't know, Benny Shells, tell you what he's saying.
Speaker 2 (14:12):
He's improved his fitness dimensions, But he does. And his backhand, Yes,
that's it.
Speaker 1 (14:17):
That's it.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
He's not just a servant of forehand anymore. His backhand
is not a weakness anymore.
Speaker 1 (14:21):
His backhand. And I said that, someone said, you know,
do you think he can win a Slam? I go,
I don't think so, not over five sets against the
likes of Alcoraz and Sinner, because they just will figure
out a way to take advantage of certain things. And
best of five is a very different story than best
of three, which is why you have a lot more
upsets in the women's And I'll say it to the
day that I am not here anymore. Everyone's like, it's
so hard to win best of five. I'm like, yeah,
(14:42):
it is, but the best player most of the time
will win best of five. Best of three. You can
have a hot day, and you can lose even if
you're a great player like a sable Anca or a
you know, Eagerson Tech or all these players. I would
argue to say that eager Tech probably might not lose
a match on clay. I agree. If it was best
of five, agree, But best of three, someone can have
a hot day, you can have a bit of a
(15:03):
bad day. So I'm not saying it's not harder to
win and best of five physically and.
Speaker 2 (15:08):
Mentally, but it is privileges certain types of play and
certain types of players.
Speaker 1 (15:11):
Thank you, if men's were playing best, which is why
we've had some random people in the gold medal. That's right.
Speaker 2 (15:17):
At the Olympics, listen, sprinters win best of three, distance
runners win best of five. That's generally true, and.
Speaker 1 (15:23):
Sprinters combined with great marathon runners are always going to
win best of five, and that's why Sinner and ol
Chias have won the last seven grand You're a natemare
of play. So Sagen said that, do I think Ben's
going to win the US Open? Probably not because of
the best of five situations, But I tell you what,
he's getting himself to a point where his weakness is
not as glaring, and it's huge how much better he's
(15:44):
hitting the back end because he's hitting it in.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
And he's not hiding it and running around it such
that he's opening up giant spaces of the court, which
is what he was doing before. He's still looking for
the forehand, which I like, but he's looking for it
out of aggression, not out of defense, and not out
of panic, out of panic, out of let me keep
my backhand away from these guys. And I think you're right.
He doesn't look as vulnerable, and I think he is
leveled up, and I think you're right that the backhand
(16:08):
is is.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
A huge product. I also saw. I like what I
saw when he was coming in.
Speaker 2 (16:11):
I've always liked his aggressive positioning, but I thought he
had actually a little bit of at a.
Speaker 1 (16:15):
Dimensional and he can get better in that department, like
even like, you know, just a little inside baseball story
with him at Washington, you know, I mean, obviously, the
only way I made money was making a lot of
really good volleys in my career, and he came off
the court he missed this one volley's big fourhand volley
below the nat and he just used his hands too much.
And I hadn't to mention something to him like a
(16:36):
couple of days before, and then he made this great
volley in Washington and it was a perfect stick, forehand
volley below the neat. It was kind of like what
we had talked about just in passing. And of course,
as soon as he came I interviewed him and we
walked off the corner. He goes, hey, how about did
you like that forehand volley? Because he didn't use his hands,
he gets a little too handsy with his slice and
he gets a little too handy with his volleys, and
he has to learn to just block the volley a
(16:58):
little bit more and use his body as opposed to
his he's trying, he's trying to flick it. He don't
rist and flick your volley. So you just watch great
volley as they never use their hands. And so when
he hit that, he was like, hey, do you like
that volley? So there's those are things that he can
only get better at. And his dad was a really
good vollyer, so hopefully that part of his game is
going to get better.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
Let's talk about one more storyline before we get on
to some of the bigger issues, which is while we're
on the tap of the men. I have to say,
former Grand Slam champion, Russian favorite Danil Medvedev, what is happening?
What is happening?
Speaker 1 (17:32):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (17:32):
It's an emergency.
Speaker 1 (17:33):
It is an emergency. I mean, we saw the melt
down in Washington. I talked about that with Hannah Burner.
We saw him walk off the court in Toronto. He
just left the court. He was like, you know what,
last time I went over after losing a match, I
broke several rackets, I broke every water bottle, I broke
the chair. I thought, you know what, this time, I'm
just going to leave the court. And I think it
(17:55):
was a good decision. And then he loses again to
Adam Walton from Australia. A great kid, works his ass off,
but a match he should not lose. And it's nothing
against Adam. It's just a match that Medvedev should not lose.
And he loses in three sets after winning the first set.
It's like, what is going on? He's lost his confidence,
he looks defeated, he looks confused, and he's lost his
(18:19):
I mean, the guy never made errors and now he's
making errors. He's not returning as well. It's just like
nothing he's not serving well, which is costing him a
lot as well. I just wonder how long he's going
to do this or if he just feels like it
just has to work his way through it. I don't know,
I would be curious.
Speaker 2 (18:37):
I wonder. I mean, he's so smart and he's so thoughtful,
and I also feel like he's not afraid to mind
the more sort of volatile elements of his personality. I
wonder if he knows he needs to work through it,
or if he's contemplating, like maybe this is a good
time for like a little sabbatical.
Speaker 1 (18:55):
A sabbatical or a coaching change. And I love his coach.
I love him. Yeah, and they've been together a long
long time and they've achieved a lot together. But maybe
it's a new voice, you know, maybe a Gora ned
Vanisovitch who's sort of out there floating around, who you know,
didn't this sits a past thing didn't work out, the
Rebarkina thing didn't work out. Maybe it's a volatile personality
(19:18):
who's also worked with some great players. Maybe someone like
that to come in and give him a new fresh look.
And it's not because his coach. His current coach can't
do it. But it's just like you need sometimes a
new outlook. I don't know.
Speaker 2 (19:29):
We talked about this a couple of weeks ago. Sometimes
a new coach is just that new new energy, new ideas,
you know. So yeah, I always root for Metti just
because I like his personality and I think he just
brings so much of the tour. But you're right, when
those balls don't go in, when he isn't able to
just run everything down.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
He just looks his hair is out of he's leaving
the being too long. It's just like there's just something
going on.
Speaker 2 (19:49):
It looks like he's having an existential crisis.
Speaker 1 (19:51):
He did. I have to say another but behind baseball
in Washington when he lost and he had that moment,
I was like, oh my god. A lot of people
like what a tool? What of this?
Speaker 2 (19:59):
What of that?
Speaker 1 (19:59):
Was bad? But I sort of get that volatile personality
because I was a little bit crazy sometimes And I
literally walked over to him in the players area and
I just gave him a hug. I said, I think
I need to just give your any you know, it's
(20:37):
just everyone goes through this, and it's just whether he
can snap himself out. And also you have to think
how depleted he must feel about getting through this Roger
Rafa Novak sort of play and he gets to the
number one in the world. He wins the US Open.
I think the match that we don't talk about enough
is that lost to Rafa at the Australian Open up
two sets to low. He just blew that final. He
(20:58):
would have had two Grand Slams in a row. He
was number one in the world. He was playing unbelievable
and I think that match, really, it really it a
dented him. It's pretty obvious. And so and now olchhrezence
in come along and he's like, seriously.
Speaker 2 (21:13):
There was only that tiny bit of a window. I mean,
you could see the same thing about Testi pass. You
can see the same thing about Zverev. Possibly, like all
of them, you kind of missed their chance.
Speaker 1 (21:21):
They're gone. It's gone. It's gone. It's a little update
on Daniel Collins. She had that she had a back
problem leaving that court. I do want to bring this
up because we love our listeners and I'm going to
give props. I would go into my Twitter, but I
don't want to f up our podcast. Here by going
in and pressing a button kind of going wrong. But
(21:41):
somebody did send me a video of a tennis channel
feed where the Daniel Collins match finished with Taylor Townsend
hitting a great little angle V running shot. Danielle had
quit playing because we found out that she has a
disc problem and she was struggling big time. That's why
she just walked off the because she couldn't even pick
her bags up. But they cut away from the moment
(22:06):
at the net and we got the back end of
them at the net, so nobody knew that. We didn't
see them talk. It was Daniel going to lose it.
What was going on? Everyone was confused and it wasn't
tennis channel. I think it was the because it was
an outdoor side court, so it's the whoever's running that
court from the world feed perspective. I think in London
(22:27):
it's either ATP Media or WTA meter or whoever's doing it.
If it was a tennis channel, guys, why I cannot
say enough. I said it on Twitter, I've said it
on this podcast. I said it last week. B Hannah,
Dear God Almighty, and I know everyone that's listened to
this podcast is going to feel the same way as me.
You cannot take the camera away from the players after
(22:50):
the match. I don't want to see the crowd. I
don't want to see their players box. I want to
see the handshake. I want to see the players reaction.
I don't want to see the fucking players box. I
don't want to see them. I don't want to see
anyone in the crowd. It kills me.
Speaker 2 (23:04):
We've arrived at my favorite part of the podcast, which
is complaining about thee No. But it's not just Daniel Collins,
which if.
Speaker 1 (23:13):
And by the way, it's not Tennis channels, it's everybody.
It's whoever's doing these world feeds. It's the French Open.
They missed a handshake with Sinna and those guys.
Speaker 2 (23:21):
It's like they cut away from the ceremony, cinematographers, they
cut away from Shelton and Koboli at the net having
a very serious no they did. They cut away from
it initially, and they came back to it and the
commentators were like, what's going on? Oh yeah, And the
reason they cut away from it initially is because they
weren't on to the next and they weren't paying attention
to the fact that there was like a little bit
(23:42):
of beef brewing. So for me, I think I want
to set this up a little bit because I don't
want you to go into one of your familiar rants,
because I'm sure you're as tired of doing them as
I'm sure our listeners are hearing them. But in my mind,
the commentators, the coverage is there to bring me, the
audience is the well match. I want to understand what's
(24:03):
happening on the court. If there's something that happened in
another match that adds to my understanding of this match
right now. Sure, if there's something that you want to
pause and go deeper into on this match right here, fine,
I don't want to miss the important moments. I don't
want to miss the player yammering at their coach, even
if it's in another language. I remember watching the color
(24:24):
those one of the color of those as matches when
he had that you know, three am match Againstanic Center
and he's speaking to his box in Spanish, and then
I've got a few.
Speaker 1 (24:31):
Of the commentators. Do we have a Google Translate?
Speaker 2 (24:33):
I wish I knew what he was saying. It was like, well,
I know what he's saying, you could probably figure out
what he's saying. Let's not cut away from this. The
commentators don't, and the coverage doesn't always set itself up
to make me the audience understand what's happening on the court,
especially if you cut away from it. And so I
truly don't understand why missing the handshake, missing these moments
is part of the coverage. Why, in the age of streaming,
(24:55):
why just leave it on?
Speaker 1 (24:56):
Don't let it just? I just I could. I couldn't
believe when someone's in that to me, and I was like, God,
that is as bad as it gets. Like we literally
they're about to shake hands, and we saw a wide
shot of the of the crowd. Directors, producers, please dear God,
do not take the camera off the players. The most
important thing is match points, showing the reactions, showing the
showing the handshake, and then showing the players' reactions after
(25:19):
with the crowd and that and then after that, when
it's a little bit okay, we've seen enough of them,
maybe show the players box. We don't need to see
the crowd. You could flash to it for a second
in Canada to show the crazy crowd reactions. Whatever. Get
it back on, VICKI get it back on this. It
was just it's just it kills me. And it is
incumbent also on and super important for the analysts to
(25:42):
also pay attention to what is happening as well. So
you're explaining that to people at home, for example, and
I did explain this last week. You know, you as
a player, you sort of know from that gesture that
Ben Shelton made about Kobali that was probably Koboli that
made a remark to him, bit of a direct right now,
you it is on you there because the producer might
miss that because they've never played professional tennis and they
(26:03):
don't sort of know those reactions that it probably came
from Koboli. Okay, so you asked the producer, hey, do
you have the shot of Koboli what he was doing?
Because just so you know, there's about ten cameras out
there and they're all on something. They're on the crowd,
they're on the player box, they're on the opponent, they're
on the person who just hit a winner, they're on
the umpire, they're everywhere. The cameras are everywhere, and you
can ask your producer do you have a shot of Koboli.
(26:25):
Do you have a shot of Danielle Collins win seing
on her back and that gives context to what's going
on in the court.
Speaker 2 (26:31):
And it also explains maybe what I'm going to see
in five, ten, fifteen minutes, just like, oh, remember we
saw daniel Collins unable to serve. Oh remember we saw Koboli.
I'll say hand gesture, Oh we saw this that was
leading up to that, and so now we know like, oh, hey,
Nu Masaka is probably not going to be in a
great headspace to give a speech, so it's probably not going.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
To be well, we have a camera of her walking
off the court.
Speaker 2 (26:52):
Because we probably should have followed her while she right
out of the court, or we have a couple of points
where she stopped trying on some of the points, like
this is the story is there? You just you're either
some of the companies are not paying attention to it,
or they're yammering away but something else or the camera's
not it's just you know, I appreciate the fact, and
I think this is why so many people tell you
about it, because they know you. It gets you know,
under your skin. But also you're so good at it,
(27:13):
which is help us understand.
Speaker 1 (27:14):
What we're seeing. It's also why it's very important, and
you know, this is what we're going to get to
at the you know, at the US Open and ESPN.
It's like we do and we did this at Wimbledon.
It's like we have reporters now that are not just
tennis based, right, they're actual actual journalists, actual reporters like
you know yourself, you know how this is. They go
out and find those stories, right, and they go and
get those We as analysts shouldn't be doing that. No,
(27:36):
Like that's not I'm not a journalist.
Speaker 2 (27:37):
I don't need you to report, but I need you
to explain, yes, And I want the journalists to bring
stuff and have that both be part of what I'm seeing.
Speaker 1 (27:44):
But me and I do a lot of court side
my job, and my producer tells me this all the times.
You're our eyes and ears down on the court. When
I see something, I could see something that a person
in the booth, for example, doesn't see because I'm so
close to it, or I have a different angle to them,
they might not be able to see it, like you
was so open. If a player is down the end
where our commentator booth is and they're right behind the court.
(28:05):
You cannot see them. I can see them. So it's
very important for analysts, for play by play people, for
the cameras, for the directors, for the producers to get
it all right. And if we do, it's an amazing production.
And that's where I think you've got to do a
better job with that. And I'll just say it for
the last time, producers do not take the camera off
the players shaking hands. I don't care about their playerbox
(28:29):
and I don't definitely and don't take this the wrong
way spectators. I don't care about the spectators at that point.
Speaker 2 (28:34):
I don't question why, yes, especially the spectators. That makes
absolutely no sense to me. All right, Well, this concludes
Renee's new weekly rant about something that's gone wrong about
tennis coverage, again putting a positive spent on it. It's
amazing to me that display some of these shortcomings and
how we bring the sport to people, or how we
schedule it and how we're passing it that it's still
(28:54):
so popular and it's growing, which.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
Can I just say also provemn these a lot of
these will feed people that are putting this up and
giving the feed to Tennis channel or giving the fee
to you know whoever, the French Federation or whatever. Those
producers are in a dark truck at two in the
morning or a five in the morning or whatever, and
they haven't slept very much and they they are not there,
(29:18):
so it is hard sometimes for them to get a
grasp of what's going on. That's why it's important for
the commentators if they are there on site, they're giving
them that information as well, so you know, it's not
a slot. I don't want to like slap every producer
because they work unbelievably long hours. They's sometimes sitting in
a chair kye on for like ten hours. It's hard
and you do lose your focus sometimes. But I'm just
(29:39):
asking if you are there, that is one thing. Please
stop showing the crowd.
Speaker 2 (29:44):
I think for me, truly, truly, some of my favorite
match watching are obviously if they can be there in
person and just watch and absorb, or like sometimes I
put on the World feed and if it's a match
nobody cares about. All I get is sailants and the
crowd and the balls being strung. That's okay too. I
just don't want additional production to take away from my
(30:04):
tennis watching experience. You're not cinematographers, No, I don't need
you to do much. Yeah, if you're going to photographers,
make sure you're adding something. If you're going to show
me something in a replay or a cutaway, make sure
it's adding something. If it's not, the match itself is great.
That's why I'm watching tennis. I don't need every point
to be a four hundred ball rally. I don't need
every shot to be a you know, behind the backdrop shot.
I just want to watch the tennis and if what
you're doing and the choices you're making are adding to that,
(30:25):
thank you. And if they're not rethinking.
Speaker 1 (30:27):
And man, I got to tell you, if you got ADHD,
it's a great job for you because you are looking
at fifty five different camera shots and it's not easy.
I'm not going to say it's easy, because it's not.
But that's just my one rule.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
So I have a plenty rap of Cincinnati and obviously
look forward, yes in a week's time any storylines that
are sort of bubbling up for you right now as
we are into the second week of as we are
now into Cincinnati and are getting our minds around.
Speaker 1 (30:54):
Well, who's the favorite of the US Open. I think
that's the question that needs to be asked, and certainly
on the women, it is a big unknown. I mean,
Sabilenka is not looking great Cincinnati. We are literally watching
the match right now. It is four to three and
they are having the most epic game. They've gone juice
out about twenty five times in this game. Emma Radakan,
who's looking fantastic over the last couple of months. She's so,
(31:16):
I've got a new coach in Roy, who was also
part of Raffia and Nadals team for a long time,
and various things.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
But yeah, Sabialinka is not looking the kind of dominant
that we are used to seeing her in this Courach's.
Speaker 1 (31:28):
Looking very stressed out.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
Yeah, she's looking stressed out. She's looking very.
Speaker 1 (31:32):
She added someone new to her team in Maximeroni, which
I thought was a little bit surprising. I'm not quite
sure why.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
I don't know. I feel like I don't know. I
haven't felt the Sabilanca of years past, where she's dialed
in where the tennis is, even if it's I.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
Doesn't want to slam this year. She's the most dominant
player this year. Who has not wont to Slam. Maddie Keys,
I think has always played well in Cincinnati. She's scraping
her way through matches as well.
Speaker 2 (31:59):
And I'm going to tell you why I like that,
because I think we saw, certainly in Australia, the Maddi
Keys that can win matches by blowing our opponents off
the court. What everyone loved about that match that she
beat Egosh Fiantek and then Sabalanka in the semis and
finals battle is she battled through and sometimes in those
battles in past, Matti Keys hasn't been.
Speaker 1 (32:18):
Well physically able to get through them alone, to.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
Be able to get through them, and then you know,
obviously there's the emotional stuff. We've talked about it, we
talked to her earlier this year. What I like so
much is, yeah, let her, Let's see her just scrapping,
because we know if she knows, she can win the
tight rap and then forget it if she's feeling good.
Speaker 1 (32:34):
So you're picking her for the USI.
Speaker 2 (32:36):
I definitely am picking her for a week two.
Speaker 1 (32:38):
Are book ending her for the Slams this year?
Speaker 2 (32:41):
I would love that? Why not?
Speaker 1 (32:42):
I mean, listen, she has been so close to winning
that tournament finals of course against Sloan and just capitulated
in that final, just was like somewhere else. Sloan was
just too solid and Maddie was just somewhere else. But
she learned from its why she played so well in
Australia to win that tournament. Sablenka hasn't want to slam
this year. It's arguably her best slam straight and open
as well, hardcart is her best surface. If she wins Cincinnati,
(33:05):
it'll certainly help her going into the into the US Open.
Maddie is certainly going to be up there with the
court surface. She plays well in New York Eager. We're
not quite sure. Okay, we didn't think she was gonna
win Wimbledon, So there are certainly a lot of Rabakina.
I mean, she can't close out these matches. Losing to
Mombacco and then also losing in Washington to uh, who's
(33:27):
she listening Washington. There's been a couple of weeks where
Rabakina hasn't closed out matches that she should have won.
So dangerous on a fast court. I don't know, Emma,
Radakano's looking pretty good.
Speaker 2 (33:39):
I was looking pretty good, you know. Coco unknown has
sort of been after the rider since the French Open,
but I think she usually does a post slam dip
and maybe the timing is ready for her to come back.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
I don't know. I just think it's hard for Coco
to go into the US Open unless she does really
well here in Cincinnati. It's just there's so I mean,
God knows, I want her to do well at the
US Open. She is, she is not. Arguably she is
our biggest draw at ESPN on the coverage at the
US Open. She has the most fans that follow her.
She's a great kid. We wanted to do well, but
(34:11):
man like not having a confidence going into that tournament
knowing she's gonna be an Arthur Rash every single night
with that pressure on her shoulders.
Speaker 2 (34:18):
I just like, man, it's these you hope for her.
She can sort of fly under the radar or come
in just with blazing with confidence. We do knows name
a sector. Maybe she'll bounce back. She played and is
fit again.
Speaker 1 (34:31):
I mean we've said five players.
Speaker 2 (34:33):
Yeah, so that really, you know, speaks to what's gonna happen.
Men's side, I mean, I mean, on this court, I
would love to see Carlos regain his.
Speaker 1 (34:42):
He battled in three sets yesterday against a player that
he should not be battling against.
Speaker 2 (34:47):
It didn't it didn't pretend very well for his pretend
well his hard core season. But will get much much
more in depth next week after we have more information
from Cincinnati.
Speaker 1 (34:57):
But I just want to.
Speaker 2 (34:58):
Say it is delightful to do one of these live
again and we will have a lot of some in
person moments yes with people.
Speaker 1 (35:04):
Next week.
Speaker 2 (35:04):
We're well information to come.
Speaker 1 (35:06):
And Petko, who's been working her a little tailor off
for tennis channels and back, we're going to get her
to do a preview definitely for the US Open. We're
going to wrap that up. We're looking forward to fan
week with the mixed doubles.
Speaker 2 (35:17):
Should we just listed some reader questions. If between now
and then there's anything going into the US Open you
want us to address.
Speaker 1 (35:23):
Send them ourway, Send to me on the socials, or
to Caitlin at Racket Magazine on the socials as well,
or to Kaitlin be nice. If you're not, you'll get blocked,
because I have no problem doing that anymore. The amount
of hate that is going on on the social media's like,
why do you have time to do that, like really
get some check yourself, check yourself, check yourself. I've been protected,
(35:44):
my piece. I don't know. You've been having a good
time in France.
Speaker 2 (35:47):
My. Yeah. We have a new issue of the magazine out.
We have really really big piece on yo, Lena asked Penka.
God knows, I love talking about.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
And of course our friend Michael Costa has an amazing.
Speaker 2 (35:59):
Thing about caster wrote us an original piece about how
tennis and comedy are both very lonely but ultimately very fulfilling.
So we have an optimism issue.
Speaker 1 (36:09):
And as Hannah Burner also said, who's also a comedian,
both Michael and Hannah are killing it in the media space,
and yet both of them play D one college tennis
at a very high level, and they both talk about
how tennis has helped them so much in their careers
after and they both would absolutely in a million like
if you gave them a million dollar said would you
(36:29):
rather be on the pro tour? Like killing it? And
they would be like fuck yes, of course, even though
they're killing it in their lives, they would much prefer
to be professional tennis players for sure. So Michael's book
Lucky Loser and of course Hannah's is on what Her
Special has been out for a while on Netflix, but
also she's on tour right now, so go and see
them both. Pick up Michael's book, pick up Hannah's book
Giggly Squid. I know I'm promoting, which these are our friends,
(36:53):
so we want to do right by them. And also
Jen Welsh and Pumps who also have a book out
that's hilarious. Read it. It just has shit sandwich in it.
That's in the in the cover, okay, so that should
tell you enough. And Emma Radakana is four all in
the third against Aabalnca. So we're going to close this
part out by saying we don't know what's going to
happen here, pretty much like we're going to say about
(37:14):
the women's event at the US Open, and we are
pumped for it and we're going to preview it next week.
Speaker 2 (37:19):
So lovely to be back with you one.
Speaker 1 (37:21):
We'll see you next week. Everybody. Thanks. I keep sending
me the videos.
Speaker 2 (37:25):
I love them.
Speaker 1 (37:26):
Okay, bye, Caitlin. I do just want to also mention
I know you love when I do this, but I
do want to mention a little shout out to Canyon
Ranch up in Lenox, Massachusetts. I spent three days up
there recently. What a beautiful wellness retreat, you know. As
you know, it's been a tough six weeks for me
and I went up there and they were very gracious.
(37:47):
It was incredible. I had If you want wellness, this
is the place to go. It was incredible. I had reiki,
I had massage, I had facial it was just awesome.
And the tennis facilities are amazing. They've got two indoor courts.
They do have pickaball indoor. I'm not a fan of that,
as you know, but it is nice for people that
want to play pickaball. They have indoor squash. They have
(38:10):
three beautiful green clay courts as well. So I think
I'm going to do a thing with them in the fall,
possibly with my old doubles partner Lisa Raymond. We're going
to put something together possibly in a little bit. But
also you and I should do something up there, maybe
next year with racket. But for those of you in
the area, I want to get away, spend a little
time taking care of yourself playing a little tennis. It's amazing.
(38:31):
So Canyon Ranch up in Lenox, Massachusetts, thanks for it.
Just providing such a beautiful three to four days. It
was awesome. Pray Yeah, cool,
Hello, one two, one two, Okay, Hi everyone, welcome to
the Renee Stubs Tennis Podcast. If you guys could see
what just happened there, we had our little tiny mics
and we thought Kitlin was a ghost. What we didn't
realize is that I didn't actually have it plugged into
my phone correctly and into our system anyway. Caitlin, welcome back,
Welcome back from Europe.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
I'm glad to be here. I'm glad to be alive, Glad.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
To be alive. We thought Caitlin was a ghost there
for a second.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Anyone who's listened to this podcast for more than a
couple of years may remember before we had makeup films,
when we just basically yelled into ten cans. Yeah, and
the idea on this was so atrocious, and you guys
listened anyway, So thank you, Thank us.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
Guys. Listen, I know, have patience with us. Alright, I'm
setting up at all this stuff. We're trying to do
our best. Caitlyn's just cut back from Europe by the
Hannah Burner on the show last week. How great was that?
Speaker 2 (00:55):
What a great episode.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
And the thing is, listen, there are some people on
tennis networks or tennis experts that have never played tennis.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
Before, and there's people with good microphones and bad content.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
And Cannaburna is a different story because she actually was
a D one college player and played number one at
a very good school. So, Hannah, thank you so much.
She's on tour, so go see her. But what a
fun week of tennis. Caitlin, Oh Canada.
Speaker 2 (01:21):
My wond regret about going to jaunting off to Europe,
as it were, is that I didn't get to go
to my hometown of Montreal and watch what became probably
the tournament of the of history for Montrealers or Canada,
for Canadians. That was about as close to a slam
dunk a heralded but unproven newcomer.
Speaker 1 (01:45):
Well, it was funny because they said, are the first
Canadian champion since twenty nineteen. I was like twenty nineteen.
I thought it'd be forever. And I was like, oh, yeah,
that's right.
Speaker 2 (01:53):
I remember that.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
Bianca undrescue right, whatever happened, I mean, Bianca man, what
a bummer. But anyway, so so I did think about
that for a seconds, like just everybody hold the phone on.
Putting a lot of pressure on this young woman who
was a fantastic kid. I got to interview her in
Washington when she had a good first round win there,
and I thought, what a knowledgeable, gray young woman, and
(02:14):
wow or wow, what awake she had.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
Incredible beating a number of Grant Slime champions. Incredible Sophia
candell Rebackna lay down a match point. I mean much, much,
Much has been made, rightly so of Victoria and Boco's
run to the trophy at the Canadian Open. What we've
(02:37):
also not yet talked about is certainly that last bit
of a match. There's obviously lots of opinions about it. Boy,
here's backlash, there's backlash to the backlash, there's stan culture,
There's all sorts of stuff. Before we get into any
of it, I just want to say having I need
to personally say, I'm so impressed and thrilled that Canada
has a wonderful, level headed, exciting young champion in Victoria
(03:03):
and Bogo, and I really hope that she continues this on.
As Andrea Pekovich noted in her excellent Substack, Victoria has
been tearing up the lower levels of the pro tennis world.
On the lower you know if circuit and now her
maid entitle in a Master's one thousand. It's incredible, pal
mahl as we would say, yeah, incredible.
Speaker 1 (03:22):
And you know a lot of people also made the
distinction between well, you know she's going to be able
to do that away from Canada. Yeah, I do believe
she will because and she has so much upside and
she has so many things she can get better at,
like her second serve. Her technique, you know how I
am about technique is a little bit of an issue
and it will be an issue, and it did hurt
her in the finals and in certain matches where she
was double folding and blah blah blah. So I am
(03:44):
a big proponent in fixing that technique issue. And she
does have some hitches in her serve that is going
to be a problem now that the pressure is on her, okay,
because you know it's it's not easy, but it's it's
easier to win without pressure, right. She had it in
edible support from the crowd anyone who played against her.
It was difficult. Even Rebakina didn't close out the match,
(04:05):
who's usually not totally overwhelmed by crowds and things like that,
because she doesn't really have them on her side often,
but like it certainly affected a lot of really good
players that week because the crowd in Montreal is, i
would argue, is the best crowd in the world the tennis. No, no, seriously,
there's not a time that haven't gone to Montreal to go. Man,
(04:28):
these fans are awesome here. They are so awesome in Canada,
particularly in Montreal, even a little better than Toronto. And
Toronto's great as well.
Speaker 2 (04:35):
Montreal and me loves to hear that.
Speaker 1 (04:37):
What about it. They're just so enthusiastic, Like there's enthusiastic
as fans are in England, except England are just a
little bit more sort of, you know, well, not well behaved.
I want to say that you're Canadian. There's some dude,
they're a little bit more, you know, they clap. One
thing about Wembledon that people will tell you players is
that it's amazing how silent it is before a point
starts at Wembledon. Like a couple of times watching wibledon
(04:59):
from high when I was in London, I was like, oh,
did I turn the volume off? And then I realized,
oh no.
Speaker 2 (05:04):
It's the crowd is literally just waiting to the point.
Speaker 1 (05:08):
Montreal is not really quite like that. But they are
very very parochial and very very enthusiastic.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
And they also don't often have a hometown.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
It's the there isn't it that you know, this is
your hometown from where you're from. It is the biggest
thing all year when the when the Rogers Cup comes into.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
Town, for sure, especially since they last, and this shows
my age and also my my roots. But they lost
the experts, We lost the Montreal Expos which were a
big deal, which were a big deal. Obviously we have
the habs the Canadians, but there's not really another big
sporting event that happens with regularity other than the tours.
Speaker 1 (05:44):
Coming WNBA now going to Toronto. It'll be successful.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
I agree with Canada is the best. So let's start
by talking about the women. Obviously we have some really
exciting results from the men's side too, love seeing Shelton win.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
Are we going to go down to Osaka? Though?
Speaker 2 (05:59):
But we you probably talk about a secon Yeah.
Speaker 1 (06:01):
I mean, look, obviously a lot of people wrote to me.
Anyone who follows me on the socials knows how I
felt about it. I don't like to rip on players.
I was a terrible loser. Myself. I'll be quite honest
for the one thing you always do. I mean, unless
you absolutely and even when I absolutely hated the person
I lost to you begrudgingly, the words still have to
(06:24):
come out of your mouth. Congratulations to X, well done,
what a great week, and to your team. That's it.
If you hate them, that's enough, right. But to forget
quote unquote is what she said. I'm like, honey, you
didn't forget. You just wanted to get off the stage.
You hated every second of it. The WTA supervisor had
to go and find her because she left the court
(06:47):
and was not coming back to the trophy ceremony. It
took them twelve minutes. If you remember, it wasn't shown
on Tennis channel because stupidly, the Canadian Tennis Association thinks it's.
Speaker 2 (06:59):
Really got out of here.
Speaker 1 (07:00):
Let's have the women's before the men's, and let's have
the women's if it goes into three sets, go into
the men's. Like, guys, you're diluting the product. Have the
women at two and have the men at seven, or
have the women at seven and the men at two,
Like figure it out. You can't because you know the
men are or the women are finishing at like frigging
eleven twelve, one o'clock in the morning, Tennis, you got
(07:22):
to fix that. What the fuck put the matches on earlier?
How are you supposed to get a younger audience when
they're not even watching, they're in bed, Honey, I'll tell
you who wins tomorrow. It's eleven o'clock on a on
a school night.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
By the way, well, this is about to be a
huge issue at the US Open with Nate matches, But
that is something that I will probably see my rant
to another time. But yeah, but.
Speaker 1 (07:43):
We had to like not show the men's because we
had the women's on Tennis Channel, and the Tennis Channel
comment says to their credit, well, like I think Mark
Pecchi might have said, what are you guys doing? Like
how you not figuring out how to have both finals
at different times so we're not diluting the product.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
The constant amazement I have that people find watch and
love tennis, in spite of its own insistence on shooting
itself in the foot, truly knows no bounds.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
Yea.
Speaker 2 (08:10):
You know what I want to say about Namo Osaka,
and what you just said about Namo Osaka is that yeah,
you do the bare minimum. Do you do the bare
minimum after any match? Because every match now has a
microphone in a player's face asking for some sort of reaction.
A Madeen title by a player who has been very
open about idolizing you, a match that you know everyone
(08:33):
was getting up for, that You're going to be on
a podium no matter what, probably for a good amount
of time, whether you go hide from the cameras or not,
is not something that she would come as a shocked
to Nami Osaka, who now we have to say is
like a seasoned veteran of the WUTA tour. She's not
a teen?
Speaker 1 (08:48):
Does she not remember the US Open? I mean as
much Raina wanted to like storm off the court and
leave that court after that situation at the US Open,
took it upon herself to put her I'm around Naomi
after she's crying and say, I just want to say
to the crowd like she won the match, Like I mean,
would Serena go back and do things differently, Absolutely, but
(09:09):
she at least congratulate. By the way, it was a
US Open final, wasn't the Canadian Opening?
Speaker 2 (09:14):
Also, Serena Williams, to her incredible credit and She's gotten
a lot of uh guff from everybody, including me about
some of the stuff that went down in that particular
match between her and Nomeosaka. She silenced the crowd tempting
to boo. She was on Nomeosaka's side. She got them
to cheer for her, and she understood even that in
(09:35):
that moment when she was furious and upset and some
would say acting a little petulantly to not take away
this moment from this other person that she shared it with,
which I thought was actually a tremendous effort.
Speaker 1 (09:46):
Yeah, she's done great things, like remember when she beat
Coco and Coco was like a mess and she went
up and put her arms around her and wanted her
to do the interview and also so she's done good things,
but that's when she wins. So this is this was
a terror. This was This was arguably worse than Sebolanka
when Sebolanka was like went hard at the French Open
with Coco about how essentially how lucky she wants to
(10:09):
win the match.
Speaker 2 (10:09):
I totally agree, Like I was more upset about this
than I was about in Seblanca.
Speaker 1 (10:13):
Because she had about twelve minutes after that match to
gather herself to think. The best thing at least I
can do is congratulate her and get off there.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
Also, you know what I will say about Seblanca in
contrast to Nomeo Osaka, is Seblanca is volatile all the time. Yeah,
She's somebody who has spoken about how much she's emotional,
and so I appreciate the fact that she and Coco
especially she made it right and sort.
Speaker 1 (10:42):
Of you kind of got the TikTok at Wimbledon.
Speaker 2 (10:44):
Yeah, and you kind of got the sense that Sebolanka
was like, oh my god, I was acting like a
meathead again. Yeah, that was not my best look name Osaka.
I just feel like for somebody who has asked and
received a ton of grace, a ton of explanation, a
ton of you know, I'm a little disappointed because I
was one of the people who was like, hey, like,
let's really listen to this person. Let's make sure that
(11:05):
the what they're talking about with mental health and what
they're talking about with needing space and needing grace and
needing a lot of understanding, that kind of only works
if they extended to other people. And I have to
say what I've seen from Naomi Osaka is that it
doesn't seem to extend beyond her. Yeah, and I think
that that was the most obvious thing kind of Not
only that, but she like legit tanked the third tanked.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
The thoughts which no excuse.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
For tanking, say what you will about it, Arena Sablenca
storming off a court and smashing a racket or storming
off court and not being her most gracious. She's never tanked.
She will, she'll serve eighty thousand double.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
Faults, but she won't go under amis. She has she.
Speaker 2 (11:41):
Has and and and I think I was just sort
of grossed out.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
Honestly, Yeah, I was bad. Well it started badly when
she said thanks, I guess to the crowd. I was like, no, honey, listen,
the worst thing you it's one thing. And as I said,
I was a terrible loser. And it's really hard to
do a speech, have to lose, really really really hard. Okay,
And the fact that you know Hutchinov, who later that
(12:04):
night lost seven six and the third in an epic
match like and tried his ass off right to the
end and got up there and it made the most
amazing love runner up speech and was so gracious in
his speech. It was like, dude, come on, you've got
it anyway, We've we've ha done it enough. But and
I think she's learned her lesson from it, I hope,
because that was one of the worst moments I've seen
(12:28):
in a long time.
Speaker 2 (12:29):
The last thing I'll say about Osaka.
Speaker 1 (12:31):
I was on and I got to give her credit.
The first thing she goes, I've looked up to you
so much and congrats on a great weed and Dadada.
I was like, oh my god, you But I felt
so badly for her too. This is an eighteen year
old kid that she just won the biggest match of
her career.
Speaker 2 (12:44):
And most of the headlines about this are now about
Namo Asaka nor Idol.
Speaker 1 (12:48):
Yeah, and the Idol didn't even give you credit. That
was brutal to watch.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
I've had a lot of friends be like, oh, I'm
moving for Nami and Naomi and she does these long
posts and the whole thing about it, and it's like,
I don't know, dude, at this point, player don't play.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
Yeah. A lot of friends actually write to me and go,
if you don't root it for Naomi, But I think
I'm not going to anything.
Speaker 2 (13:08):
You run for a Grand Slams.
Speaker 1 (13:09):
You made a ton of money.
Speaker 2 (13:10):
You did great, You're one of the best players certainly active,
certainly in the last couple of years. Fantastic, great career.
But like player, don't play if you don't want to
be out there.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
And take a time to even sort of like post
anything that was considered.
Speaker 2 (13:22):
A turn now, like I'm just kind of like I
like watching players who want to be out there.
Speaker 1 (13:26):
Yeah, anyway, all right, well listen, let's on a more
positive note, and congratulations to Vicky. I'm so glad she
didn't she didn't play this week in Cincinnati because apparently
she had issue with her hand or a wrist when
she fell against Rabaccian. No, but I'm so glad she
didn't play. Get yourself, have the week, do all the press,
which she did all she was on Good Morning America
and everything. Do the press, get going, get your head
(13:47):
back for the US Open. She's going to be really
tough to beat there with her serving and her big shots,
And just give her some grace. She's eighteen, just like Andreeva,
and just like all these young players. She's not going
to light the world on fire every single week. So
make sure that just support them through that, and she's
only going to get better and a great kid. Ben Shelton.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Ben Shelton, Yeah, Benny Shells, you called it earlier the summer,
you were like a player. I got my own as
Benny Shells, and I was kind of.
Speaker 1 (14:10):
Like, I don't know, Benny Shells, tell you what he's saying.
Speaker 2 (14:12):
He's improved his fitness dimensions, But he does. And his backhand, Yes,
that's it.
Speaker 1 (14:17):
That's it.
Speaker 2 (14:17):
He's not just a servant of forehand anymore. His backhand
is not a weakness anymore.
Speaker 1 (14:21):
His backhand. And I said that, someone said, you know,
do you think he can win a Slam? I go,
I don't think so, not over five sets against the
likes of Alcoraz and Sinner, because they just will figure
out a way to take advantage of certain things. And
best of five is a very different story than best
of three, which is why you have a lot more
upsets in the women's And I'll say it to the
day that I am not here anymore. Everyone's like, it's
so hard to win best of five. I'm like, yeah,
(14:42):
it is, but the best player most of the time
will win best of five. Best of three. You can
have a hot day, and you can lose even if
you're a great player like a sable Anca or a
you know, Eagerson Tech or all these players. I would
argue to say that eager Tech probably might not lose
a match on clay. I agree. If it was best
of five, agree, But best of three, someone can have
a hot day, you can have a bit of a
(15:03):
bad day. So I'm not saying it's not harder to
win and best of five physically and.
Speaker 2 (15:08):
Mentally, but it is privileges certain types of play and
certain types of players.
Speaker 1 (15:11):
Thank you, if men's were playing best, which is why
we've had some random people in the gold medal. That's right.
Speaker 2 (15:17):
At the Olympics, listen, sprinters win best of three, distance
runners win best of five. That's generally true, and.
Speaker 1 (15:23):
Sprinters combined with great marathon runners are always going to
win best of five, and that's why Sinner and ol
Chias have won the last seven grand You're a natemare
of play. So Sagen said that, do I think Ben's
going to win the US Open? Probably not because of
the best of five situations, But I tell you what,
he's getting himself to a point where his weakness is
not as glaring, and it's huge how much better he's
(15:44):
hitting the back end because he's hitting it in.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
And he's not hiding it and running around it such
that he's opening up giant spaces of the court, which
is what he was doing before. He's still looking for
the forehand, which I like, but he's looking for it
out of aggression, not out of defense, and not out
of panic, out of panic, out of let me keep
my backhand away from these guys. And I think you're right.
He doesn't look as vulnerable, and I think he is
leveled up, and I think you're right that the backhand
(16:08):
is is.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
A huge product. I also saw. I like what I
saw when he was coming in.
Speaker 2 (16:11):
I've always liked his aggressive positioning, but I thought he
had actually a little bit of at a.
Speaker 1 (16:15):
Dimensional and he can get better in that department, like
even like, you know, just a little inside baseball story
with him at Washington, you know, I mean, obviously, the
only way I made money was making a lot of
really good volleys in my career, and he came off
the court he missed this one volley's big fourhand volley
below the nat and he just used his hands too much.
And I hadn't to mention something to him like a
(16:36):
couple of days before, and then he made this great
volley in Washington and it was a perfect stick, forehand
volley below the neat. It was kind of like what
we had talked about just in passing. And of course,
as soon as he came I interviewed him and we
walked off the corner. He goes, hey, how about did
you like that forehand volley? Because he didn't use his hands,
he gets a little too handsy with his slice and
he gets a little too handy with his volleys, and
he has to learn to just block the volley a
(16:58):
little bit more and use his body as opposed to
his he's trying, he's trying to flick it. He don't
rist and flick your volley. So you just watch great
volley as they never use their hands. And so when
he hit that, he was like, hey, do you like
that volley? So there's those are things that he can
only get better at. And his dad was a really
good vollyer, so hopefully that part of his game is
going to get better.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
Let's talk about one more storyline before we get on
to some of the bigger issues, which is while we're
on the tap of the men. I have to say,
former Grand Slam champion, Russian favorite Danil Medvedev, what is happening?
What is happening?
Speaker 1 (17:32):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (17:32):
It's an emergency.
Speaker 1 (17:33):
It is an emergency. I mean, we saw the melt
down in Washington. I talked about that with Hannah Burner.
We saw him walk off the court in Toronto. He
just left the court. He was like, you know what,
last time I went over after losing a match, I
broke several rackets, I broke every water bottle, I broke
the chair. I thought, you know what, this time, I'm
just going to leave the court. And I think it
(17:55):
was a good decision. And then he loses again to
Adam Walton from Australia. A great kid, works his ass off,
but a match he should not lose. And it's nothing
against Adam. It's just a match that Medvedev should not lose.
And he loses in three sets after winning the first set.
It's like, what is going on? He's lost his confidence,
he looks defeated, he looks confused, and he's lost his
(18:19):
I mean, the guy never made errors and now he's
making errors. He's not returning as well. It's just like
nothing he's not serving well, which is costing him a
lot as well. I just wonder how long he's going
to do this or if he just feels like it
just has to work his way through it. I don't know,
I would be curious.
Speaker 2 (18:37):
I wonder. I mean, he's so smart and he's so thoughtful,
and I also feel like he's not afraid to mind
the more sort of volatile elements of his personality. I
wonder if he knows he needs to work through it,
or if he's contemplating, like maybe this is a good
time for like a little sabbatical.
Speaker 1 (18:55):
A sabbatical or a coaching change. And I love his coach.
I love him. Yeah, and they've been together a long
long time and they've achieved a lot together. But maybe
it's a new voice, you know, maybe a Gora ned
Vanisovitch who's sort of out there floating around, who you know,
didn't this sits a past thing didn't work out, the
Rebarkina thing didn't work out. Maybe it's a volatile personality
(19:18):
who's also worked with some great players. Maybe someone like
that to come in and give him a new fresh look.
And it's not because his coach. His current coach can't
do it. But it's just like you need sometimes a
new outlook. I don't know.
Speaker 2 (19:29):
We talked about this a couple of weeks ago. Sometimes
a new coach is just that new new energy, new ideas,
you know. So yeah, I always root for Metti just
because I like his personality and I think he just
brings so much of the tour. But you're right, when
those balls don't go in, when he isn't able to
just run everything down.
Speaker 1 (19:44):
He just looks his hair is out of he's leaving
the being too long. It's just like there's just something
going on.
Speaker 2 (19:49):
It looks like he's having an existential crisis.
Speaker 1 (19:51):
He did. I have to say another but behind baseball
in Washington when he lost and he had that moment,
I was like, oh my god. A lot of people
like what a tool? What of this?
Speaker 2 (19:59):
What of that?
Speaker 1 (19:59):
Was bad? But I sort of get that volatile personality
because I was a little bit crazy sometimes And I
literally walked over to him in the players area and
I just gave him a hug. I said, I think
I need to just give your any you know, it's
(20:37):
just everyone goes through this, and it's just whether he
can snap himself out. And also you have to think
how depleted he must feel about getting through this Roger
Rafa Novak sort of play and he gets to the
number one in the world. He wins the US Open.
I think the match that we don't talk about enough
is that lost to Rafa at the Australian Open up
two sets to low. He just blew that final. He
(20:58):
would have had two Grand Slams in a row. He
was number one in the world. He was playing unbelievable
and I think that match, really, it really it a
dented him. It's pretty obvious. And so and now olchhrezence
in come along and he's like, seriously.
Speaker 2 (21:13):
There was only that tiny bit of a window. I mean,
you could see the same thing about Testi pass. You
can see the same thing about Zverev. Possibly, like all
of them, you kind of missed their chance.
Speaker 1 (21:21):
They're gone. It's gone. It's gone. It's a little update
on Daniel Collins. She had that she had a back
problem leaving that court. I do want to bring this
up because we love our listeners and I'm going to
give props. I would go into my Twitter, but I
don't want to f up our podcast. Here by going
in and pressing a button kind of going wrong. But
(21:41):
somebody did send me a video of a tennis channel
feed where the Daniel Collins match finished with Taylor Townsend
hitting a great little angle V running shot. Danielle had
quit playing because we found out that she has a
disc problem and she was struggling big time. That's why
she just walked off the because she couldn't even pick
her bags up. But they cut away from the moment
(22:06):
at the net and we got the back end of
them at the net, so nobody knew that. We didn't
see them talk. It was Daniel going to lose it.
What was going on? Everyone was confused and it wasn't
tennis channel. I think it was the because it was
an outdoor side court, so it's the whoever's running that
court from the world feed perspective. I think in London
(22:27):
it's either ATP Media or WTA meter or whoever's doing it.
If it was a tennis channel, guys, why I cannot
say enough. I said it on Twitter, I've said it
on this podcast. I said it last week. B Hannah,
Dear God Almighty, and I know everyone that's listened to
this podcast is going to feel the same way as me.
You cannot take the camera away from the players after
(22:50):
the match. I don't want to see the crowd. I
don't want to see their players box. I want to
see the handshake. I want to see the players reaction.
I don't want to see the fucking players box. I
don't want to see them. I don't want to see
anyone in the crowd. It kills me.
Speaker 2 (23:04):
We've arrived at my favorite part of the podcast, which
is complaining about thee No. But it's not just Daniel Collins,
which if.
Speaker 1 (23:13):
And by the way, it's not Tennis channels, it's everybody.
It's whoever's doing these world feeds. It's the French Open.
They missed a handshake with Sinna and those guys.
Speaker 2 (23:21):
It's like they cut away from the ceremony, cinematographers, they
cut away from Shelton and Koboli at the net having
a very serious no they did. They cut away from
it initially, and they came back to it and the
commentators were like, what's going on? Oh yeah, And the
reason they cut away from it initially is because they
weren't on to the next and they weren't paying attention
to the fact that there was like a little bit
(23:42):
of beef brewing. So for me, I think I want
to set this up a little bit because I don't
want you to go into one of your familiar rants,
because I'm sure you're as tired of doing them as
I'm sure our listeners are hearing them. But in my mind,
the commentators, the coverage is there to bring me, the
audience is the well match. I want to understand what's
(24:03):
happening on the court. If there's something that happened in
another match that adds to my understanding of this match
right now. Sure, if there's something that you want to
pause and go deeper into on this match right here, fine,
I don't want to miss the important moments. I don't
want to miss the player yammering at their coach, even
if it's in another language. I remember watching the color
(24:24):
those one of the color of those as matches when
he had that you know, three am match Againstanic Center
and he's speaking to his box in Spanish, and then
I've got a few.
Speaker 1 (24:31):
Of the commentators. Do we have a Google Translate?
Speaker 2 (24:33):
I wish I knew what he was saying. It was like, well,
I know what he's saying, you could probably figure out
what he's saying. Let's not cut away from this. The
commentators don't, and the coverage doesn't always set itself up
to make me the audience understand what's happening on the court,
especially if you cut away from it. And so I
truly don't understand why missing the handshake, missing these moments
is part of the coverage. Why, in the age of streaming,
(24:55):
why just leave it on?
Speaker 1 (24:56):
Don't let it just? I just I could. I couldn't
believe when someone's in that to me, and I was like, God,
that is as bad as it gets. Like we literally
they're about to shake hands, and we saw a wide
shot of the of the crowd. Directors, producers, please dear God,
do not take the camera off the players. The most
important thing is match points, showing the reactions, showing the
showing the handshake, and then showing the players' reactions after
(25:19):
with the crowd and that and then after that, when
it's a little bit okay, we've seen enough of them,
maybe show the players box. We don't need to see
the crowd. You could flash to it for a second
in Canada to show the crazy crowd reactions. Whatever. Get
it back on, VICKI get it back on this. It
was just it's just it kills me. And it is
incumbent also on and super important for the analysts to
(25:42):
also pay attention to what is happening as well. So
you're explaining that to people at home, for example, and
I did explain this last week. You know, you as
a player, you sort of know from that gesture that
Ben Shelton made about Kobali that was probably Koboli that
made a remark to him, bit of a direct right now,
you it is on you there because the producer might
miss that because they've never played professional tennis and they
(26:03):
don't sort of know those reactions that it probably came
from Koboli. Okay, so you asked the producer, hey, do
you have the shot of Koboli what he was doing?
Because just so you know, there's about ten cameras out
there and they're all on something. They're on the crowd,
they're on the player box, they're on the opponent, they're
on the person who just hit a winner, they're on
the umpire, they're everywhere. The cameras are everywhere, and you
can ask your producer do you have a shot of Koboli.
(26:25):
Do you have a shot of Danielle Collins win seing
on her back and that gives context to what's going
on in the court.
Speaker 2 (26:31):
And it also explains maybe what I'm going to see
in five, ten, fifteen minutes, just like, oh, remember we
saw daniel Collins unable to serve. Oh remember we saw Koboli.
I'll say hand gesture, Oh we saw this that was
leading up to that, and so now we know like, oh, hey,
Nu Masaka is probably not going to be in a
great headspace to give a speech, so it's probably not going.
Speaker 1 (26:50):
To be well, we have a camera of her walking
off the court.
Speaker 2 (26:52):
Because we probably should have followed her while she right
out of the court, or we have a couple of points
where she stopped trying on some of the points, like
this is the story is there? You just you're either
some of the companies are not paying attention to it,
or they're yammering away but something else or the camera's
not it's just you know, I appreciate the fact, and
I think this is why so many people tell you
about it, because they know you. It gets you know,
under your skin. But also you're so good at it,
(27:13):
which is help us understand.
Speaker 1 (27:14):
What we're seeing. It's also why it's very important, and
you know, this is what we're going to get to
at the you know, at the US Open and ESPN.
It's like we do and we did this at Wimbledon.
It's like we have reporters now that are not just
tennis based, right, they're actual actual journalists, actual reporters like
you know yourself, you know how this is. They go
out and find those stories, right, and they go and
get those We as analysts shouldn't be doing that. No,
(27:36):
Like that's not I'm not a journalist.
Speaker 2 (27:37):
I don't need you to report, but I need you
to explain, yes, And I want the journalists to bring
stuff and have that both be part of what I'm seeing.
Speaker 1 (27:44):
But me and I do a lot of court side
my job, and my producer tells me this all the times.
You're our eyes and ears down on the court. When
I see something, I could see something that a person
in the booth, for example, doesn't see because I'm so
close to it, or I have a different angle to them,
they might not be able to see it, like you
was so open. If a player is down the end
where our commentator booth is and they're right behind the court.
(28:05):
You cannot see them. I can see them. So it's
very important for analysts, for play by play people, for
the cameras, for the directors, for the producers to get
it all right. And if we do, it's an amazing production.
And that's where I think you've got to do a
better job with that. And I'll just say it for
the last time, producers do not take the camera off
the players shaking hands. I don't care about their playerbox
(28:29):
and I don't definitely and don't take this the wrong
way spectators. I don't care about the spectators at that point.
Speaker 2 (28:34):
I don't question why, yes, especially the spectators. That makes
absolutely no sense to me. All right, Well, this concludes
Renee's new weekly rant about something that's gone wrong about
tennis coverage, again putting a positive spent on it. It's
amazing to me that display some of these shortcomings and
how we bring the sport to people, or how we
schedule it and how we're passing it that it's still
(28:54):
so popular and it's growing, which.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
Can I just say also provemn these a lot of
these will feed people that are putting this up and
giving the feed to Tennis channel or giving the fee
to you know whoever, the French Federation or whatever. Those
producers are in a dark truck at two in the
morning or a five in the morning or whatever, and
they haven't slept very much and they they are not there,
(29:18):
so it is hard sometimes for them to get a
grasp of what's going on. That's why it's important for
the commentators if they are there on site, they're giving
them that information as well, so you know, it's not
a slot. I don't want to like slap every producer
because they work unbelievably long hours. They's sometimes sitting in
a chair kye on for like ten hours. It's hard
and you do lose your focus sometimes. But I'm just
(29:39):
asking if you are there, that is one thing. Please
stop showing the crowd.
Speaker 2 (29:44):
I think for me, truly, truly, some of my favorite
match watching are obviously if they can be there in
person and just watch and absorb, or like sometimes I
put on the World feed and if it's a match
nobody cares about. All I get is sailants and the
crowd and the balls being strung. That's okay too. I
just don't want additional production to take away from my
(30:04):
tennis watching experience. You're not cinematographers, No, I don't need
you to do much. Yeah, if you're going to photographers,
make sure you're adding something. If you're going to show
me something in a replay or a cutaway, make sure
it's adding something. If it's not, the match itself is great.
That's why I'm watching tennis. I don't need every point
to be a four hundred ball rally. I don't need
every shot to be a you know, behind the backdrop shot.
I just want to watch the tennis and if what
you're doing and the choices you're making are adding to that,
(30:25):
thank you. And if they're not rethinking.
Speaker 1 (30:27):
And man, I got to tell you, if you got ADHD,
it's a great job for you because you are looking
at fifty five different camera shots and it's not easy.
I'm not going to say it's easy, because it's not.
But that's just my one rule.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
So I have a plenty rap of Cincinnati and obviously
look forward, yes in a week's time any storylines that
are sort of bubbling up for you right now as
we are into the second week of as we are
now into Cincinnati and are getting our minds around.
Speaker 1 (30:54):
Well, who's the favorite of the US Open. I think
that's the question that needs to be asked, and certainly
on the women, it is a big unknown. I mean,
Sabilenka is not looking great Cincinnati. We are literally watching
the match right now. It is four to three and
they are having the most epic game. They've gone juice
out about twenty five times in this game. Emma Radakan,
who's looking fantastic over the last couple of months. She's so,
(31:16):
I've got a new coach in Roy, who was also
part of Raffia and Nadals team for a long time,
and various things.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
But yeah, Sabialinka is not looking the kind of dominant
that we are used to seeing her in this Courach's.
Speaker 1 (31:28):
Looking very stressed out.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
Yeah, she's looking stressed out. She's looking very.
Speaker 1 (31:32):
She added someone new to her team in Maximeroni, which
I thought was a little bit surprising. I'm not quite
sure why.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
I don't know. I feel like I don't know. I
haven't felt the Sabilanca of years past, where she's dialed
in where the tennis is, even if it's I.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
Doesn't want to slam this year. She's the most dominant
player this year. Who has not wont to Slam. Maddie Keys,
I think has always played well in Cincinnati. She's scraping
her way through matches as well.
Speaker 2 (31:59):
And I'm going to tell you why I like that,
because I think we saw, certainly in Australia, the Maddi
Keys that can win matches by blowing our opponents off
the court. What everyone loved about that match that she
beat Egosh Fiantek and then Sabalanka in the semis and
finals battle is she battled through and sometimes in those
battles in past, Matti Keys hasn't been.
Speaker 1 (32:18):
Well physically able to get through them alone, to.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
Be able to get through them, and then you know,
obviously there's the emotional stuff. We've talked about it, we
talked to her earlier this year. What I like so
much is, yeah, let her, Let's see her just scrapping,
because we know if she knows, she can win the
tight rap and then forget it if she's feeling good.
Speaker 1 (32:34):
So you're picking her for the USI.
Speaker 2 (32:36):
I definitely am picking her for a week two.
Speaker 1 (32:38):
Are book ending her for the Slams this year?
Speaker 2 (32:41):
I would love that? Why not?
Speaker 1 (32:42):
I mean, listen, she has been so close to winning
that tournament finals of course against Sloan and just capitulated
in that final, just was like somewhere else. Sloan was
just too solid and Maddie was just somewhere else. But
she learned from its why she played so well in
Australia to win that tournament. Sablenka hasn't want to slam
this year. It's arguably her best slam straight and open
as well, hardcart is her best surface. If she wins Cincinnati,
(33:05):
it'll certainly help her going into the into the US Open.
Maddie is certainly going to be up there with the
court surface. She plays well in New York Eager. We're
not quite sure. Okay, we didn't think she was gonna
win Wimbledon, So there are certainly a lot of Rabakina.
I mean, she can't close out these matches. Losing to
Mombacco and then also losing in Washington to uh, who's
(33:27):
she listening Washington. There's been a couple of weeks where
Rabakina hasn't closed out matches that she should have won.
So dangerous on a fast court. I don't know, Emma,
Radakano's looking pretty good.
Speaker 2 (33:39):
I was looking pretty good, you know. Coco unknown has
sort of been after the rider since the French Open,
but I think she usually does a post slam dip
and maybe the timing is ready for her to come back.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
I don't know. I just think it's hard for Coco
to go into the US Open unless she does really
well here in Cincinnati. It's just there's so I mean,
God knows, I want her to do well at the
US Open. She is, she is not. Arguably she is
our biggest draw at ESPN on the coverage at the
US Open. She has the most fans that follow her.
She's a great kid. We wanted to do well, but
(34:11):
man like not having a confidence going into that tournament
knowing she's gonna be an Arthur Rash every single night
with that pressure on her shoulders.
Speaker 2 (34:18):
I just like, man, it's these you hope for her.
She can sort of fly under the radar or come
in just with blazing with confidence. We do knows name
a sector. Maybe she'll bounce back. She played and is
fit again.
Speaker 1 (34:31):
I mean we've said five players.
Speaker 2 (34:33):
Yeah, so that really, you know, speaks to what's gonna happen.
Men's side, I mean, I mean, on this court, I
would love to see Carlos regain his.
Speaker 1 (34:42):
He battled in three sets yesterday against a player that
he should not be battling against.
Speaker 2 (34:47):
It didn't it didn't pretend very well for his pretend
well his hard core season. But will get much much
more in depth next week after we have more information
from Cincinnati.
Speaker 1 (34:57):
But I just want to.
Speaker 2 (34:58):
Say it is delightful to do one of these live
again and we will have a lot of some in
person moments yes with people.
Speaker 1 (35:04):
Next week.
Speaker 2 (35:04):
We're well information to come.
Speaker 1 (35:06):
And Petko, who's been working her a little tailor off
for tennis channels and back, we're going to get her
to do a preview definitely for the US Open. We're
going to wrap that up. We're looking forward to fan
week with the mixed doubles.
Speaker 2 (35:17):
Should we just listed some reader questions. If between now
and then there's anything going into the US Open you
want us to address.
Speaker 1 (35:23):
Send them ourway, Send to me on the socials, or
to Caitlin at Racket Magazine on the socials as well,
or to Kaitlin be nice. If you're not, you'll get blocked,
because I have no problem doing that anymore. The amount
of hate that is going on on the social media's like,
why do you have time to do that, like really
get some check yourself, check yourself, check yourself. I've been protected,
(35:44):
my piece. I don't know. You've been having a good
time in France.
Speaker 2 (35:47):
My. Yeah. We have a new issue of the magazine out.
We have really really big piece on yo, Lena asked Penka.
God knows, I love talking about.
Speaker 1 (35:57):
And of course our friend Michael Costa has an amazing.
Speaker 2 (35:59):
Thing about caster wrote us an original piece about how
tennis and comedy are both very lonely but ultimately very fulfilling.
So we have an optimism issue.
Speaker 1 (36:09):
And as Hannah Burner also said, who's also a comedian,
both Michael and Hannah are killing it in the media space,
and yet both of them play D one college tennis
at a very high level, and they both talk about
how tennis has helped them so much in their careers
after and they both would absolutely in a million like
if you gave them a million dollar said would you
(36:29):
rather be on the pro tour? Like killing it? And
they would be like fuck yes, of course, even though
they're killing it in their lives, they would much prefer
to be professional tennis players for sure. So Michael's book
Lucky Loser and of course Hannah's is on what Her
Special has been out for a while on Netflix, but
also she's on tour right now, so go and see
them both. Pick up Michael's book, pick up Hannah's book
Giggly Squid. I know I'm promoting, which these are our friends,
(36:53):
so we want to do right by them. And also
Jen Welsh and Pumps who also have a book out
that's hilarious. Read it. It just has shit sandwich in it.
That's in the in the cover, okay, so that should
tell you enough. And Emma Radakana is four all in
the third against Aabalnca. So we're going to close this
part out by saying we don't know what's going to
happen here, pretty much like we're going to say about
(37:14):
the women's event at the US Open, and we are
pumped for it and we're going to preview it next week.
Speaker 2 (37:19):
So lovely to be back with you one.
Speaker 1 (37:21):
We'll see you next week. Everybody. Thanks. I keep sending
me the videos.
Speaker 2 (37:25):
I love them.
Speaker 1 (37:26):
Okay, bye, Caitlin. I do just want to also mention
I know you love when I do this, but I
do want to mention a little shout out to Canyon
Ranch up in Lenox, Massachusetts. I spent three days up
there recently. What a beautiful wellness retreat, you know. As
you know, it's been a tough six weeks for me
and I went up there and they were very gracious.
(37:47):
It was incredible. I had If you want wellness, this
is the place to go. It was incredible. I had reiki,
I had massage, I had facial it was just awesome.
And the tennis facilities are amazing. They've got two indoor courts.
They do have pickaball indoor. I'm not a fan of that,
as you know, but it is nice for people that
want to play pickaball. They have indoor squash. They have
(38:10):
three beautiful green clay courts as well. So I think
I'm going to do a thing with them in the fall,
possibly with my old doubles partner Lisa Raymond. We're going
to put something together possibly in a little bit. But
also you and I should do something up there, maybe
next year with racket. But for those of you in
the area, I want to get away, spend a little
time taking care of yourself playing a little tennis. It's amazing.
(38:31):
So Canyon Ranch up in Lenox, Massachusetts, thanks for it.
Just providing such a beautiful three to four days. It
was awesome. Pray Yeah, cool,
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.