October 30, 2025 • 48 mins
Wrongful Conviction with Lauren Bright Pacheco is back November 13th with all new episodes. So today, we’re revisiting one of the most memorable episode from her last season, episode #454, James Soto:James “Jimmy” Soto was wrongfully convicted at age 20 for a 1981 double homicide in Chicago’s Little Village despite no physical evidence and multiple alibi witnesses. Jimmy and his cousin David spent 42 years in prison — the longest wrongful conviction sentences in Illinois history. While incarcerated, Jimmy earned a college degree and became a jailhouse lawyer, helping others, including his former cellmate Robert Almodovar. The two formed a lifelong bond — and now, both exonerated, they’re rebuilding their lives together on the outside.
To learn more and get involved, visit:
https://www.gofundme.com/f/life-after-42-yrs-of-wrongful-imprisonment
https://paroleillinois.org/
Wrongful Conviction with Lauren Bright Pacheco is a production of Lava for Good™ Podcasts in association with Signal Co. No1.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
Hey, it's Lauren brad Pacheco, and I am so excited
to be back in the host chair for Wrongful Conviction.
The new season drops November thirteenth with brand new episodes
and more unbelievable stories of people who refuse to let
injustice to find them. But while we gear up for launch,
I want to take you back to one of my
(00:26):
all time favorite conversations from last season. It's with the
incredibly inspiring and absolutely unstoppable Jimmy Soto. Jemmy spent forty
two years behind bars, making his case the longest wrongful
conviction in Illinois history. You'll also hear from his close friend,
fellow ex honoree and former cellmate Robert Almodovar. Together, these
(00:52):
two are absolutely unforgettable. I mean, dynamic duo doesn't even
begin to cover it. I hope you'll enjoy spending time
with them as much as I did, and I'll be
back in two weeks with more unforgettable profiles of people
who turned in justice into strength and hope into freedom.
(01:17):
Tens of thousands of people incarcerated in the US have
been wrongfully convicted and are being held in captivity for
crimes even as they adamantly maintain their innocence. What's it
like to be one of those imprisoned people, and what's
it like to be their ally, the one outside committed
to fighting for their freedom. I'm Lauren Bride Pacheco, and
(01:39):
this is wrongful conviction. When he was just twenty years old,
an act of violence would change James Soto's life forever
and the trajectory for the next four decades. At about
(02:00):
nine pm on August sixteenth, nineteen eighty one, shots rang
out in Chicago's Little Village neighborhood, killing two people and
injuring a third. Although eyewitnesses initially pointed to other suspects,
police ultimately arrested a few members of the two sixth
Street gang, which controlled the territory, including James Soto. Despite
(02:22):
no physical evidence tying him to the crime and plenty
of defense witnesses, James was convicted of the shooting and
sentenced to life without parole. Soto and his cousin David Ayala,
would spend forty two years in prison, the longest served
wrongful conviction sentences in Illinois history, until they were exonerated
(02:44):
in December of twenty twenty three. James Soto is joining
me today with a man who's been a tremendous support
to him and shares much in common with James as well.
In addition to also having been rightfully convicted and exonerated,
Robert Almodovar is not only a close friend to James,
(03:07):
but the two men were actually cellmates while in prison.
Both now share the same passion for raising awareness for
criminal justice reform. We have so much to cover. Thank
you both for joining me, Jimmy and Robert, well.
Speaker 2 (03:21):
Thank you for hosting us and having us here.
Speaker 3 (03:24):
Absolutely, thank you.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
So Just Jimmy to go back to the very beginning.
You know you're now in your sixties, but take me
back to the young man you were before all this
happened in nineteen eighty one. Where did you grow up
and what was your upbringing?
Speaker 3 (03:39):
Like?
Speaker 2 (03:41):
All right, Well, I grew up in the Pullman area,
which is on the far south side of Chicago on
ninety eighth in Avalon. I've learned later in life that
the neighborhoods that we grew up in in our formative
years really make us who we are. So I will
always be a Southsider from Chicago and the people as
youicgo because we're so segregated. We're very proud from whatever
(04:04):
section of the city that we come from. But yeah,
I grew up there. I had a fondness for sports.
Baseball was my number one thing. I was on the
Avalon Cubs, which at a young age made me a
Cup fan, and I am a Cup fan for life,
and I was so glad when they won the World Series.
Fortunately I was locked up when that happened, but I'll
(04:25):
take it. So the summer of my fourteenth birthday, we
moved to the Brighton Park area, which is on the
southwest side of Chicago, and I stayed there for most
of high school. Then in nineteen eighty one, my uncle
was murdered by gun violence in the Little Village area,
and that was my cousin and co defendant, David Yalla's father,
(04:48):
I'll Fonso, and they had her house in Westchester anyway,
in the western suburbs, and I wound up going to
live with David shortly thereafter. It was a very nice
urban home, had a built in swimming pool, It had
a mini gym, a greenhouse, five bedrooms, two and a
half bats basement, fully furnished so you can imagine David
(05:12):
was eighteen and I was twenty. I wouldn't say young men.
We were more like late adolescents, teenagers more so. Living
in a nice house. And yeah, I mean Dave had
some money that his father left them. There was a
life insurance policy, so he didn't have to work at
the time. I was working at United Parcel Service as
(05:34):
a sorterer. But to say that we weren't enjoying ourselves
living pretty lavishly would be an understatement. So having all
that naturally made the Chicago Police Department CPD seeing us
driving luxury, fancy cars, Lincoln Cadillacs, those are the cars
of that time period, you.
Speaker 1 (05:55):
Know, Oh, that's it. So they made the assumption that
they knew how you were bankrolling all that.
Speaker 2 (06:02):
Yeah, the assumption was that it was coming from, you know,
illicit drug sales, but that was not the truth. The
truth was it was just some things that were left
over to David and I'm working. I actually was paying
car notes, so my car was being financed. So had
they dug a little deeper, they would have realized my
car particular was not paid off.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
Coming from the neighborhoods that you did was gang activity
very much on your radar on a daily basis throughout
high school.
Speaker 2 (06:31):
No, absolutely not, it was not. It wasn't really until
nineteen seventy nine when David's brother Alfonso the third gets
killed by gun violence. It was very hard for me
because it was my brother, David's oldest brother Tyrone. Then
it's me and then Alfonso and then David, and we're
(06:52):
all one year apart. So I would spend a lot
of summers at David's house when they were living in
little village. And so that's how I wound up getting
involved in any gang was because my cousin had been killed.
You know, I took it pretty hard, and as a
young he was seventeen, so I would have been eighteen.
(07:14):
As a young eighteen year old to have to deal
with that, you know, there was no one that gave
me any therapy for the trauma I was dealing with,
and the loss of I consider more like a brother
than a cousin, and so to know that he was
killed in that way, I misguidingly wanted to be part
(07:35):
of the same thing that he was involved in, to
seek some type of revenge. But it wasn't like I
was out looking for revenge it was just a way
in his honor that I thought, I need to be
a part of this, I need to do something. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (07:49):
And there's also a huge social component of that too.
Of course, it's belonging in friendship and camaraderie.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Yeah, but I would not defined myself as a hardcore
game member. I was what people would label as a
marginal gang member. I was on the fringes. I was
not someone because I'm working, I don't have no time
to go hang out and do whatever.
Speaker 1 (08:14):
So had you ever been on law enforcement radar before
the incident in the time leading up to it, had
you ever had trouble with the law?
Speaker 2 (08:25):
No? Well, yeah, I was arrested one time for what's
called a uu W unlawful use of a weapon. Some
detectives that pulled me over and found a gun, unregistered
gun in my car and charged me. But when it
came down to the problem cause of why they stopped me,
it was simply because I was in a Lincoln Continental
(08:46):
and I was just I guess you would say, profiled.
And my lawyer was able to get the case thrown
out pretty easily because of the illegal stop, and the
judge threw it out so that was on my criminal record.
I had no other runs with law enforcement. When there
would be various shootings. Once they knew I was part
(09:08):
of a game, I was taken in several times and
questioned about it. I just, you know, said I want
a lawyer, and they pretty much left me alone.
Speaker 1 (09:16):
And at the time, so you're employed for two years
at that point with you said, ups, what were your
thoughts or plans for the future.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
I mean, you know, I had a girlfriend at the time.
I just learned, maybe two weeks before I was arrested
on this case, that she was pregnant. So in my mind,
I'm like, okay, she's going to have a baby. When
I learned she was pregnant, my thought was, I'm going
to settle down. I'm going to have to get my
own place and start a little family.
Speaker 1 (09:45):
So take me to the night of the incident. So
it was August sixteenth, nineteen eighty one, around nine pm
on the southwest side of Chicago. Where were you at
the time.
Speaker 2 (10:01):
I was in Westchester. It was me, my cousin David,
his girlfriend, my girlfriend, and my oldest sister with two
of her kids were at the house, and my sister
had prepared a meal for us, and I remember that
I just got my two plates and I went up
to my bedroom with my girlfriend and we were watching
(10:22):
some movies on the VCR, so long ago. Those things
are now no longer in existence. And yeah, she left
later in the evening, at around ten o'clock. So they
had the story on the ten o'clock news about, you know,
two people being shot killed and one third one being
(10:43):
injured at an incident in Petrowski or a Keiler park.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
So, for somebody who's not familiar with the geography, how
far were you physically away from where the shooting occurred.
Speaker 2 (10:55):
I would say that was a distance of about thirty
miles at least.
Speaker 1 (11:00):
Thirty miles away. And unfortunately, yes, three people were shot
to fatally wounded, a sixteen year old Julie Limas who
was aspiring to be a police officer, and an eighteen
year old Hector Valeriano, who was on leave from the
US Marine Corps at the time. So it's a tragic incident,
(11:24):
but you're thirty miles away from it at the time.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
Yeah, my thought was, you know, that's a terrible thing
that happened in the neighborhood of the gang or organization
that we were part of, but I didn't give it
a second thought to think who might have had any
involvement in it. I figured, oh, they're going to get
somebody for this, But little did I know they would
eventually try to point the finger at me.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
So yeah, the investigation ends up focusing on gang rivalries,
and even though eyewitness accounts identified entirely different people, the
investigation then starts focusing on the two six gang that
you're affiliated with, but just on the fringe. When did
you find out that you were on the investigators radar?
Speaker 2 (12:14):
To my knowledge, my name doesn't really come up until
the month of October. I believe that's when they finally
start saying, well, okay, because they thought they was involved.
They said, okay, well this other guy has to be
involved as well. But it was never really founded on,
like you said, on any eyewitness identifying me. It was
(12:35):
just they now said, okay, if David's involved, this other
guy got to be involved as well.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
So they just bundled you with your cousin and neither
of you were there, correct, So how were you arrested?
How did that go down? Where were you? Who were
you with?
Speaker 2 (12:51):
So I got arrested on October fifteenth, Once again, I
was in Westchester with my girlfriend, and ironically my sister
was there as well, the oldest, so that would be
later be my alibi. She was there. She made another
homemade meal, I remember it. It was spaghetti with homemade
meatballs and Italian sausage and a garlic bread. And I
(13:13):
was just beginning my plate to take it upstairs with
me and my girl to share, when we hear the
knock on the door, boom boom, and then there's a
pounding on the back door, boom boom. I'm like, what's
going on? So we look out the window and we
see all these lights and policemen running up to the thing.
We open the door and they come in and cuple
us up. They just said they had a warrant. They
(13:34):
didn't say it was an unrest warrant. They didn't say
whether it was a search warrant. Yeah, So they went
about the house searching it, obviously not coming up with anything,
and they took us into custody. And when I get
to the police station is when I first learned that.
They tell me you're under arrest for two murders and
a tent murder and this is a capital of fence
(13:57):
and you better say something now if you want to
save yourself.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
Well, Jimmy, what was going through your mind? You must
have thought, all right, stupid mistake. It's going to be corrected.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
That's exactly what's going through my mind. I'm like, this
can't be right, you know. Fortunately, there was an attorney
that was at the police station who would later become
my trial attorney. And he came and spoke with me
and said, they said they have witnesses, and he said,
I don't have any of the paperwork. He asked me,
point blank, did you have anything to do with it?
Of course I told him no, And he's like, well,
(14:28):
don't worry about it. If you didn't have nothing to
do with it, it'll work out. Just don't say anything.
And that was it. So in my mind, I'm thinking, Okay,
it's a mistake, and you know, they could be cleared
up fairly soon and I'll be out. But that wasn't
the case.
Speaker 1 (14:44):
From that moment on. You're held until your trial.
Speaker 2 (14:47):
Yeah. I was held with no bond in the Cook
County jail. I was there for probably a year before
I went to trial. I went to September of nineteen
eighty two to trial, but leading up to it, I
would eventually find out some pieces of like that they
only had one witness who would be best termed an
accomplished witness. He was a young teenager as well, and
(15:11):
he made a statement that David and I were supposedly
conspiring prior to the shooting with a group of other
individuals to attack a rival group. That David gets a
phone call and David then provides the key to a
custom blue van and gives us weapons, and we go
(15:31):
out to the park and me and another co defendant
supposedly walk down the gangway and shoot at the people.
And you know there was three victims as a result.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
But that seems like a very convenient theory.
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Well it was for them. Yeah, I didn't know that
they had rounded up again to the Colaster trial, that
they rounded up twenty five people with the West warrants,
and that out of the twenty five, at least maybe
ten or maybe twelve of them made statements which collaborated
in some sense what this individual was saying. But you
have to bear in mind that there was probably only
(16:07):
out of the twenty five people, maybe five were over
the age of seventeen. Everybody else was fifteen and sixteen
year olds, and I was really mad that, you know,
these individuals who were supposed to be part of a
group that I was involved in, would break down and
make this false narrative. And so my reaction was as
a young man that these guys are punks, they're chumps,
(16:28):
they're snitches. But as I became more mature and I
was doing my studies, I realized that they were just
as much victims and or even more so than anyone
else other than those that lost their lives and the
other that got shot. Because they were held for three days.
Imagine you a fifteen year old held three days in custody.
(16:50):
Some of them urinated on themselves, being choked, getting nothing
to eat, denied water, I mean, the sleep deprivation. I
had to look at it. Putting myself in their shoes,
I probably would have broke down and said anything they
wanted me to say at that point. So, you know,
the police officers, law enforcement have techniques that they could
(17:11):
make a grown man who was innocent telling themselves, so,
let alone a juveniles. So that started to make sense
to me as in the following years after my conviction.
What really was going on?
Speaker 1 (17:23):
I'm trying just to get my mindset wrapped around. You're
living your life, have a steady job, have a steady girlfriend,
have a baby on the way. You're twenty years old,
and your life is just interrupted, taken away from you.
(17:44):
What was that year like for you being held in
the Cook County jail.
Speaker 2 (17:50):
I mean, it was probably one of the worst and
hardest years of my life because my girlfriend would eventually
lose the baby. She had a miscare. It was due
to squarely to stress. She wasn't eating right because she's
worried about me. I'm locked up. My car gets repossessed.
You know, expensive rims on my car. I had a
(18:11):
nice sound system. When they repossess it, it's not like
they're going to give it back. They take all that
with it. So I lost that. I was upset with that.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
But are you in contact at all with your cousin
David at this point? Is he being held at the
same facility.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
Yeah, I'm with him for the most part. For I
would say at least half of that time, or maybe
seven months we were held together. There was periods where
we would be split up. You know, That's how the
jail is oftentimes you're moving to another section of the
jail and they don't really give you any reasons why.
It's just it's disruptive. The jail is not nice, it's
(18:46):
super violent, and you're going to get in fights. It's
just part of what's going on there. And we're packed
in there. There was overcrowding problem. It was people sleeping
on the floor in the dayroom. So you got this
group of people and you don't have so much time.
It was always fights over the phone if nothing else.
So yeah, Dad, in TV, what show you're gonna watch,
(19:06):
what channel you're gonna watch on TV? I would always
wind up be in a fight.
Speaker 1 (19:10):
So in terms of you and David, your mindset heading
into that trial, how would you categorize the trial in general?
And were you at all confident?
Speaker 2 (19:22):
I didn't. I don't know much about the law of
the legal system. It's process, and so my attorney puts
on an alibi defense, and I told you, the only
evidence that really comes up that indicates either David or
I is this so called accomplished witness, and he had
implicated two people in this conspiracy as being part of
(19:43):
this meeting that led up to the shooting. One was
in the hospital in a coma told state after being
hit by a car. So he's in Mother Cabreinging hospital
on the West Side in a coma. Mind you, this
guy testifies before the grand jury that he's evolved with
the case. The second individual was in juvenile custody and
(20:06):
he had to plcase him as well. So this individual
locked up ten days before this crimer, maybe even longer.
And I'm thinking, Okay, we're showing that he clearly lied
before the grand jury. And here's another fact. The accomplished
witness says that David owned a Blue Custom van. No
Blue Custom band was ever recovered. They never showed David
(20:27):
owned one. Now one person says he owns this band,
that he ever had a van, There's no weapons ever recovered.
And then they said there's a phone call that happens
from Home Run and Pizza to David's house in Westchester
slightly probably a half hour before the shooting happens, supposedly
from two young women who say that they alert David
(20:49):
that there's a rival group in there. Well day subpoena
the Illinois Bell telephone records, which showed no phone call
was made from home run in that entire night. Today
its house. So again these things I'm hearing during trial,
and I'm thinking, oh, well, there's no way they're going
to find me guilty if they're hearing dead And so
(21:09):
I'm thinking in my mind, as my lawyer told me,
you're going to beat this case. You're going home whenever
the jury comes back. There's no way they're going to
find you guilty. So I'm thinking, yeah, I'm going home.
Speaker 1 (21:21):
Because you have multiple witnesses who attest your alibi and
innocence being told by your defense that you should be confident.
Take me to the moment that the jury announces their verdict.
Speaker 2 (21:37):
It was maybe close to nine and a half hours
at a period of two days, the first evening into
the next day that the jury is deliberating, and they
send a note down and tell the judge that they're
struggling to come up with a verdict and they think
that they might be a hung jury because they cannot
come to a unanimous decision on this case. And so
(21:58):
my lawyer said, well, that's a good thing. That means
they're struggling. Well, the judge just tells the jury go back.
He wouldn't accept them saying that they were hung. About
a half hour later, they come in guilty of all charges.
So when I hear that verdict, when you know you
got to stand up to hear it, the reaction was,
you can hear of some gasp. The state's attorneys were jubilant.
(22:19):
They were high five in each other, and I'm looking
at them. Then I turn around to look at my
family and just see them all breaking down in tears.
To see my father, who was the rock, the foundation
of our family, broken down crying. My sister's crying, my
girlfriend crying. It made me furious. I looked at my attorney.
I said, I thought you said we're going to beat this.
(22:39):
What happened. I looked at the judge, I looked at
the jury, looked them in the eye, and I'm like,
how could this happen? How could you come up with
a guilty verdict based on such flimsy evidence. So when
I do talk to my lawyer once again in the bullpen,
he comes to see me. He's seeing the how upset
I was, and he was like, no, you got to
(22:59):
hang in there. You got to be strong. I said,
it's easy for you to say, and I said, so,
what are we looking at and he's telling me that, well, unfortunately,
the laws in Illinois are that if you're found guilty
of two or more murders, you've got to mandatorily get
natural life. And I'm like, so what does that mean.
He's like, it means what it means. And I'm like really,
(23:21):
and he said, no, don't worry, We're going to go
on appeal. We're going to do the appeal. There's a
lot of things they're done wrong.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
So months turned to years turned to decades.
Speaker 2 (23:41):
What was the.
Speaker 1 (23:42):
Biggest hurdle for you transitioning to life in prison.
Speaker 2 (23:48):
The most difficult thing is being away from family, hearing
the family milestones, graduations, baptisms, communions, weddings. I wasn't there
to see people have their you know, the birth of
a child that's such a celebration, and so many families
when a new life comes in there and I'm not there,
it was difficult for me to deal with. And then
of course trying to maintain a relationship that certainly was
(24:12):
very hard. They got to come visit, you got to
make phone calls, et cetera, and so forth.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
Well, there's so many layers to that. Onion, and also
in terms of you know, you're missing those events with
your family, but your family is missing them with you.
Speaker 2 (24:29):
Yeah. Yeah, And I would always want to put on
the strong front. I'm okay, don't worry about me, you know.
And as I started studying the law, I was able
to articulate to them some of the things that were wrong. Hey, listen,
my attorney didn't do this, or the prosecution did this.
And so when I was able to do that, I
guess they would see the hope emanating from me, and
(24:49):
so it would make them feel a little bit more
at ease. But there was times it wasn't easy. Prisons
in the eighties and early nineties was in Illinois were
particularly violent. State Bill was very violent. I mean murders
occurring there. There was a lot of things that, you know,
a lot of stabbings, a lot of assaults.
Speaker 1 (25:05):
That's a question that I have for you because even
though your affiliation with a gang ended up getting you
on the radar of the police in a way, did
that affiliation protect you at all once you were in
the inside.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
Yeah, you had to be. I was definitely affiliated with
the gangs in there. But the downside of that is
that when other individuals would do, you know, do things like,
for example, somebody would gamble and then not be able
to pay. Now this individual is going to get into
a fighter. I have problems with another group, another person
from another group, which then involves everybody, and now here
(25:43):
it is we're fighting in there over somebody who should
have never been gambling because he didn't have the money
to pay in the first place. At some point in
the mid nineties, I said, this isn't getting me anywhere.
You know, I was smart enough to know that this
behavior is viewed as a negative, and I didn't want
to be in that light. And so I'm no longer.
I don't want to be a part of it, no
long no more. I'm sure people looked at me like
(26:06):
he's flaking out, he's he can't handle it, But I
didn't care. I think that was one of the best
choices in my life. That happened around ninety six. And yeah,
I mean, well.
Speaker 1 (26:15):
You know what, it's maturity too, But you were doing
what you needed to do to survive through your younger twenties.
How long did you and your girlfriend stay together?
Speaker 2 (26:27):
We were probably together for the first ten years of
my incarceration, and in retrospect, I look at it. We're
arguing about really simple things like how come you to
pick up my phone call? Where were you at? You know,
Accusations that she might be cheating on me, and those
type of things eventually deteriorated us and she wound up
having a relationship with someone else. But she would period
I'm in and out of my life over my incarceration,
(26:49):
and in the end for the last like you know,
seven years, I would say she was there for me.
But yeah, it makes it easier to have a love
interest in prison, knowing that somebody cares about you. I
never really doubted the fact that she didn't have feelings
for me or her loved me.
Speaker 1 (27:06):
It's hard to maintain a relationship exactly.
Speaker 2 (27:09):
The physical absence is hard.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
As you mentioned, you began spending a chunk of your
time in the law library.
Speaker 2 (27:18):
Well. As I became more and more proficient in the
tenants and the operation of the law procedures, etc. I
began to have success winning particularly at first just sensed
reductions for a lot of individuals, and eventually I wont
some new trials. I began to get more new trials,
more sentence reductions, and so I was also doing civil complaints.
(27:41):
Guys would eventually went on that.
Speaker 1 (27:43):
So you became what they call a jail house lawyer.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
Yeah. I never did particularly like that term. I like
to call myself a prisoner advocate, but yeah, that's definitely
what that was termed.
Speaker 1 (27:55):
But I think that's so admirable.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Jimmy.
Speaker 1 (27:58):
What was the turning point for you? Because I can't
imagine the anger and the frustration your life's been taken
away from you and decades at this point, where did
you turn that into I'm going to figure out enough
to help not only myself, but to help other people.
Speaker 2 (28:18):
My thought process was this that if I could be
proficient or do adequate work for other individuals, it would
just make me a better litigator and I could hone
my skills that way work it through others. Again, looking back,
my early attempts was by trial and error, and I'm
a bit of a perfectionist, I will admit that, and
so I said I could do this. But I always
(28:40):
kept education at the forefront. I was always involved in
some type of classes or some type of program, and
a lot of it sometimes with self taught. I would
just bother to use the materials there with the law library.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
So now we're getting to the point where you crossed
paths with our other wonderful esteemed guests. Robert, we've talked
about this. I'm not gonna dive too heavily into the specifics,
but in a nutshell, you and a co defendant were
convicted in nineteen ninety five of a double homicide the
year before, and at the time you were a young father,
(29:16):
working long hours and attending night school, and when you
were rested, you had no previous convictions. You were twenty
when you were convicted, which is something that you two
gentlemen share in common. And the case against you rested
on eyewitness reports obtained by a rather notorious now retired
(29:38):
Chicago police detective named Rinaldo Guervera. He's since come under
fire over allegations he coerced witnesses and framed innocent people
in dozens of other investigations. But you two are in prison.
You're both wrongfully convicted. Take me to the first moment
(29:59):
you're has crossed, and Robert, why don't you tell me
about meeting mister Soto for the first time.
Speaker 3 (30:06):
Jimmy Soto. I heard of him.
Speaker 4 (30:08):
You know his name is under like a legend in
prison basically because everybody know who he was. Everybody knows
all the work he did and how he helped a
lot of people. So I knew of him before I
ever met him. So he was in state Ville, he
didn't getting trampied to Minar. When he got to Thenar,
you know, believe or not, everybody was like static because
this guy who helped a lot of people is now
(30:31):
in Minar. So everybody wanted to reach out to him,
contact him, some type of way to get his assistant something,
because he a type of prison you know, his reputation
receives him as far as he's an up, upstanding guy.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
So you arrived at Minard with a fan club in place,
Yes he did.
Speaker 4 (30:49):
He's really shy about that, I guess, but this is
who he is. This is reputation.
Speaker 1 (30:54):
Then do you remember the first time you met him?
Speaker 4 (30:57):
Yes, I was in the same set house as he
was Soft Flowers in Minar. He was on two, I
was on four and I think his SETI was in
up going home or something like that.
Speaker 2 (31:08):
Yeah, he got parole, Yeah, he.
Speaker 4 (31:10):
Got parole and he was looking for the sally And
one of the gadded workers asked me what your life is,
Jimmie Soler SELLI.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
I was like, hell, yeah, why wouldn't that be?
Speaker 4 (31:20):
So they end up moving me to his cell at
the time, he was in the yard. So I'm gonna
sell by myself. I got my property in there, I
got situated, and when he came in to cell, I
went to induce myself my name is you know with
Berta Amovar.
Speaker 3 (31:35):
He like, I know who you are? Ready? Like how
you know me already? How the hell you know who
I am? Said? I know your uncle.
Speaker 4 (31:42):
I was a lot with your uncle in Stateville, and
hesld me everything about your case, everything bout you, And
I was like, whoa.
Speaker 3 (31:48):
I was surprised.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
I loved the nicknamed Sally for sale made. It's very
much an Illinois thing too. I've never met anybody who
spent time in Illinois who didn't use selly. But how
does that impact on a day to day if you've
got a good cell mate or a bad cellmate? Because
just describe the space that you two were sharing.
Speaker 4 (32:12):
Oh my god, to sell like what how big was?
This was a spall sl six by nine, six by nine,
bumpits and sinking Tobb in the back of the room.
Real small compact cell. And as far as Sally's, it
make a big difference. You've got a good SETI or
a bad seting. It can you know, it can make
your time hard or easy. And so we do get
(32:33):
a good seting. You want to keep them far long
as you can.
Speaker 1 (32:37):
So you guys were seal mates for four years?
Speaker 3 (32:41):
About four three years?
Speaker 2 (32:42):
Yeah, more likely? All right?
Speaker 1 (32:44):
So what made you guys good sale mates?
Speaker 3 (32:47):
We just jail real quickly.
Speaker 4 (32:48):
I mean, so you walk in the cell, you you
could tell you right away by the first couple of
second is you two will get along with that right
there and then. And we never had no arguments. We
never had no disagreement. We just jail. We cooked together,
we ate together. We had common ground as far as
our cases go. I look at to him like a
(33:10):
big brother, like a father figure. I mean he showed
me and taught me a little about the law and
just the case we did separated. He basically taught me
what I wrote that note, so what I need to
do just case get separated, And that's way I know
what to do with my legal stuff. He became family,
you know, because being at cell like twenty three to one,
(33:32):
most of the time, you know, the cell is so small.
You get you know, there's nothing to do but top
and you know each other backgrounds, family stuff, so it
got real personal. He probably know me better than my
own family. To be honest with.
Speaker 1 (33:46):
You, I can imagine that any bad character trait the
other person has is like magnified, you know, put on
volume ten. Absolutely so neither one of you had annoying
habits that bothered the other one.
Speaker 2 (34:00):
Come on, I mean he came in, he didn't have
a lot of hair on his face, but he would
take a long time to shave. In fact, he probably
won't admit this, but one of the things I did
do was Robert got locked up fairly young too, and
I would later learn that his father wasn't in his
life when he came into purbity. When his hair is
coming in, so Robert was shaving against the grain, and
(34:21):
I would tell him, you got to go with the
grain in order not to have irritation, because sometimes he
would have it. Roberts has very sensitive skin, and so
I would tell him you got to go with it, so,
you know, to show him how to shave.
Speaker 1 (34:32):
I love that you taught him how to shave correctly.
Speaker 2 (34:35):
No more razor, the right way to she knew how
to shave right.
Speaker 1 (34:41):
And Robert Jimmy didn't do anything that that ever got
on your nerves.
Speaker 2 (34:46):
I mean it was now and then he would play
some music a bit loud when I was doing legal work,
but I would just with my own headphones on the
list to my own music, you know. I mean, there
was ways in which we could avoid being in each
other's space. We did eventually get separated, and I would
eventually wind up going to another unit, North one, and
he remained in the South House.
Speaker 4 (35:06):
But due at the time though, he was able to
still stay able to communicate with Yeah. Yes, and the
way we did that we wrote kites and ky started
just like letters basically keep him up today, what's going
on with my family? Was going on my case and
vice versa or sometimes and we meet up at church
and we talk about certain things and stuff like that
at church.
Speaker 1 (35:26):
So, you guys, it very much sounds like Jimmy, you
took Robert under your way.
Speaker 2 (35:31):
Yes he did well, Yeah, I mean, but it was reciprocal.
It wasn't all that stad. He would look out for me,
make sure I was straight. You need anything, if you
need something, let me know. You know. So there was
times that one unit might go on lockdown. The other
wooden man, you know, send me some summer sausages and
send me this. He would gladly send it. Tuna. I
love tuna, so he would send me tune.
Speaker 3 (35:51):
He's a big It was the same way.
Speaker 2 (35:52):
If he needed something, I would look out for him.
Speaker 3 (35:54):
But not just that.
Speaker 4 (35:55):
Jimmy fortunately be across in crosserted for Solan that he
knows a lot of people he got connect and sue.
As far as politics and stuff like that, he can't
taught me at that politics game. In prison, you know,
have to govern around things also, and like I usually
get what onions, tomatoes, you know, eased to buy them
off the gay green peppers, you know, ice cream, ice
(36:17):
cream suits get ice cream, you know.
Speaker 1 (36:19):
So there were ways you could maneuver better, better food choices.
Speaker 2 (36:25):
Yeah, I've been locked up longer. So going to Minard,
I knew a lot of individuals that were down there already.
I had done legal work for some of them. They
were so glad to see me, they wanted to send
me stuff. I would never tell somebody give me, you know,
expert doing work. Why you know, you get it you
know this for that, but they would gladly say the
same thing. Robert would say, are you okay? So there
(36:45):
was a lot of people would often has to be
you need something, I'm over in the kitchen. I need
someone over here while I get some ice cream. Mode.
Speaker 1 (36:51):
So that kind of support must be so important just
in terms of your emotional and mental state.
Speaker 3 (36:59):
Mental state, Yeah, absolutely, But.
Speaker 1 (37:01):
How did you guys? Do you remember any time, particularly
for the one another, where you guys hit a tough
patch where you showed up for the other person.
Speaker 2 (37:12):
For him, I understood, you know, he was away from
his daughter, so she was going up, or she would
the family would set a visit and were able to come,
and vice versa. My family would set a visit, they
wouldn't come, so we would pick each other up. You
are right, or you know, we'd make a special meal,
or he did most of the cooking, to be honest,
because I'm not a very good chef. But yeah, he
made a good piece of puff. I'll tell you that
(37:34):
I caught it hot pockets. Yeah, well it's a piece
of puff. But anyway, No, the thing is that you know,
if you're really in there with somebody like this, in
a small space, you could pick up on the energies
and sometimes just not talking to somebody isn't enough. Just
give them their space because they're in their thoughts and
I would do that or he would do that for me,
(37:54):
and we would know not to bother the other person.
So it's just that type of sense makes it much
more companion.
Speaker 4 (38:01):
Also also just also for like the birthdays, Christmas and
stuff like that, because we are so far. The Menar
is like six to eight hours for the city, so
to get visits and stuffing that is very hard. My family,
I didn't see my fan for a while. You know,
they come for first to once every three months, once
every six months, once a year. They went so once
every three years. Then it's just you know it away.
Speaker 1 (38:24):
Again it's that passing of time. And so so you know, Robert,
you were in there for over two decades and then
in twenty seventeen life changed for you big time. You're
(38:53):
listening to Wrongful Conviction with Lauren Bright Pacheco. You can
listen to this and all the Lava for Good podcasts
one week early and adfree by subscribing to Lava for
Good Plus on Apple Podcasts. So when you found out
you were getting out. How did you tell Jimmy? Do
(39:15):
you remember?
Speaker 3 (39:18):
Well?
Speaker 4 (39:19):
I was a menar for I think about twenty one years,
twenty one and a half years, and during my twenty
first year, they asked.
Speaker 3 (39:26):
Me, I want to go to Gailsburg. I'm like, sure,
no problem, why not?
Speaker 4 (39:32):
But the thing is, I tell him about the news
that you know, there's some stuff going on in my case,
but I really know what's going to happen. I was
in Gailsburg for about two to three weeks and that's
when I get the phone call from my lawyer talking about, man,
I got some good.
Speaker 3 (39:45):
News for you. You basically coming home tomorrow Friday.
Speaker 1 (39:49):
Wow.
Speaker 3 (39:49):
I'm like, it was just so so real. I just couldn't.
Speaker 4 (39:53):
I was just shocked, you know, because you think about
this day, you dream about that day, you just already
fantasy about it.
Speaker 3 (40:00):
When it do come, you're just like, is it really happening?
Is it a dream?
Speaker 4 (40:03):
I was a static and coming home of course, being
reunited with my daughter and my family. You know.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
So Robert take me to after you get out, how
does your friendship change? How do you continue staying in
touch and do you have almost survivors guilt. Do you
feel that pressure to get Jimmy out?
Speaker 4 (40:24):
The thing is Jimmy and I just Jimmy, but all
the friends I made with in prison, they become family,
you know. I didn't feel with Morris, but I feel
like I need to do something to help the guys
out any way I can. So basically through you know,
I going to courts, supporting the other guys, shawing my support,
(40:45):
my lawyer Jennifer Byji, who also know other lawyers. Eventually,
you know, I know these other lawyers basically networking, and
like I tried to help other guys when I can
so far as like with Jimmy. Jimmy asked me, do
I know a lawyer named Lauren. So at the time like, yeah,
I know Lauren.
Speaker 3 (41:05):
She's my girl. She's cool with me. Were tight. He's like, man,
I need you to talk to her. See she could
take my case. I got you, I got you.
Speaker 4 (41:13):
So I end up talking to Lauren, and so Lauren, yeah,
you know. And my friend Jimmie, he's a good guy.
They did him wrong, and I wondered if you look
at his case, and she's like, sure, send it to me.
So I sent her in the paperwork and she reviewed
it and she said, oh my gosh, she's this case.
Speaker 3 (41:29):
They did him wrong.
Speaker 4 (41:31):
Yeah, and so she started looking into it. She talked
to her boss like yes, and she got into it too.
So anyway back to Jimmy. Jimmy called me, asked me,
you talked to Lauren. I said, yeah, I talked to
Lauren Man. She says she got to She's like, wait
a minute. I talked to Lauren and she said, you
didn't talk to her.
Speaker 3 (41:47):
I said, what do you mean. So there's two Laurence. Yes,
I didn't know.
Speaker 1 (41:51):
Yes, there is a Lauren at the Illinois Innocence Project,
Lauren Keseberg. And then there's the Lauren that we are
speaking of, who is Lauren Meerskoff Mueller. And she's with
the Exoneration Project at the University of Chicago Law School,
and she joined on Jimmy's team filing a clemency petition,
(42:16):
and from.
Speaker 3 (42:16):
There he basically ended again in the Dream Team.
Speaker 1 (42:18):
Lauren gets involved in twenty twenty and in May of
twenty twenty three, Governor Pritzker commutes your sentence Jimmy to
parole eligible, and then December fourteenth, twenty twenty three, the
Cook County States Attorney's Office agreed that the charges against you, Jemmy,
and your cousin David should be vacated, and the charges
(42:43):
were dismissed. Robert, what was your feeling leading up to
that date?
Speaker 4 (42:49):
So the day before I find out that he was
coming home, I was just like ecstatic, this is finding's
going to happen. After forty two years, finally Jimmy going
to have his day. He helped so many other people
come home, and now he's coming home.
Speaker 3 (43:06):
And I was in tears. I did lie.
Speaker 4 (43:07):
I was just so happy for him, just running up
and down my apartment like, yes, this is happening.
Speaker 1 (43:13):
So by the time Jimmy, you and David got out,
you had spent forty two years.
Speaker 2 (43:22):
Well, no, I spent forty two years, two months, and
two days.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
That's the longest wrong incarceration in Illinois history. If I'm
not mistaken, No, you're right.
Speaker 2 (43:33):
That is the National Registry based Michigan officially said we
were the longest serving axuneries in Illinois state history. It's
not a badge of honor, it's a title I would
gladly relinquish. I would not wish that on anybody, but Unfortunately,
that's what it is.
Speaker 4 (43:52):
And this is the club we're in, you know, Unfortunately,
this is a club that nobody want to be in,
but we are.
Speaker 3 (43:58):
You know.
Speaker 1 (43:59):
Now, I've seen the video of when you got out, Jimmy,
but tell me the moment you remember catching one another's
eye when you walked out.
Speaker 2 (44:08):
Okay, I get out from the gatehouse, which is the
first entry point when you're going into Stateville Prison. So
now I'm exiting it. I changed my clothes and I
jump in a vehicle and one of the officers say,
see that those lights down there at the end of
this little road. I said, yeah, he said, that's all
for you. He said, the press is down there to
talk to you. So we drive down there and I
(44:29):
get out the car and I see Robert. I see
Robert dressed and a camouflage outfit jacket and pants, and
I see him with his glasses and he got a
grin from ear to ear, and so yeah, I mean
the first ones I hug, naturally is one of my
other sisters. And then after that, I think Robert was
the second one that came. He hugged me, and they're like, man,
(44:51):
you know, we just hugged it. Was an emotional moment.
Speaker 4 (44:55):
Yeah we did it, you know, and food circle, and
I was so happy for him. This squeeze, I'm so tight,
and now we're home.
Speaker 2 (45:03):
You know, it was very surreal to be on the
other side of the wall with somebody that you had
forged a bond of relationship with and to see that
our past life's journey had crossed and now it was
once again coming to cross, but in a good way
where you know, I was now a free person, free man.
Speaker 1 (45:24):
I mean, you guys share such a strong bond, and
you have so much in common and have well over
a combined sixty years spent in prison for crimes you
did not commit. What does it mean to have one
another in your lives in these big transitions.
Speaker 2 (45:46):
Well, to me, I could tell you it means a lot. Because,
of course, he was released years before me. He was
released in twenty seventeen, and here I am. I'm released
in twenty twenty three, so there's a you know, that gap.
But uh, to know that he was able to transition
into quote unquote uh the real world before me, he
(46:08):
already learned how to navigate it, and so he was
very helpful in telling me the things I need to do,
for example, going to get my state of Illinois, I
d getting me used to going to drive a car again.
Speaker 3 (46:20):
A little bit with the phone too, But.
Speaker 2 (46:22):
Yeah, he helped me and Daddy and I thank him.
I thank God to have him there to be able
to tell me, you know, some of these things and
how to navigate them myself.
Speaker 4 (46:32):
The thing is, though, I feel like, you know, he
was able to help me, but then when I was incarcerated,
now not able to pay it for and help him
out regard to how smart it is. It just feels
so good to help him in any way I can.
And he's my brother. I'll do anything for him. At
the end of the day.
Speaker 3 (46:48):
That's my brother, and thank you for having me.
Speaker 2 (46:50):
Thank you. That's my little that's my little son. Now
that's my brother.
Speaker 1 (46:57):
While he was incarcerated, Jimmy Soto earned a Bachelors of
Science and Sociology from the Northwestern Prison Education Program. He
graduated magna cum Laudie and is now studying for his
LSAT to go to law school. I know he is
absolutely going to ace that test. He is also part
of Parole Illinois, an organization fighting to bring back parole
(47:18):
to a state that has effectively had no parole program
since nineteen seventy eight. To support James in his continuing
fight for justice and in his goal for earning a
law degree, you can donate to his gofund me, which
is linked at the end in the episode description. Thank
(47:44):
you for listening to Wrongful Conviction. I'm Lauren Bright Pacheco.
Please support your local innocence organizations and go to the
links in the episode description to see how you can help.
I'd like to thank our executive producers Jason Flamm, Jeff Kempler,
and Kevin Wardis, as well as our producers Annie Chelsea,
Kathleen Fink, and Jackie Pauley. This series is produced, edited
(48:07):
and hosted by me Lauren Bright Pacheco. Our senior producer
is Kara Kornhaber. Story editing by Hannah Bial, research by
Shelby Sorels, mixing and sound design by Nick Massetti, with
additional production by Jeff Clyborne. Our theme music is by
Jay Ralph. Be sure to follow us across all social
media platforms at Lava for Good and at Wrongful Conviction.
(48:30):
You can also follow me on all platforms at Lauren
Bright Pacheco Wrongful Conviction is a production of Lava for
Good podcasts in association with signal Company Number one
Hey, it's Lauren brad Pacheco, and I am so excited
to be back in the host chair for Wrongful Conviction.
The new season drops November thirteenth with brand new episodes
and more unbelievable stories of people who refuse to let
injustice to find them. But while we gear up for launch,
I want to take you back to one of my
(00:26):
all time favorite conversations from last season. It's with the
incredibly inspiring and absolutely unstoppable Jimmy Soto. Jemmy spent forty
two years behind bars, making his case the longest wrongful
conviction in Illinois history. You'll also hear from his close friend,
fellow ex honoree and former cellmate Robert Almodovar. Together, these
(00:52):
two are absolutely unforgettable. I mean, dynamic duo doesn't even
begin to cover it. I hope you'll enjoy spending time
with them as much as I did, and I'll be
back in two weeks with more unforgettable profiles of people
who turned in justice into strength and hope into freedom.
(01:17):
Tens of thousands of people incarcerated in the US have
been wrongfully convicted and are being held in captivity for
crimes even as they adamantly maintain their innocence. What's it
like to be one of those imprisoned people, and what's
it like to be their ally, the one outside committed
to fighting for their freedom. I'm Lauren Bride Pacheco, and
(01:39):
this is wrongful conviction. When he was just twenty years old,
an act of violence would change James Soto's life forever
and the trajectory for the next four decades. At about
(02:00):
nine pm on August sixteenth, nineteen eighty one, shots rang
out in Chicago's Little Village neighborhood, killing two people and
injuring a third. Although eyewitnesses initially pointed to other suspects,
police ultimately arrested a few members of the two sixth
Street gang, which controlled the territory, including James Soto. Despite
(02:22):
no physical evidence tying him to the crime and plenty
of defense witnesses, James was convicted of the shooting and
sentenced to life without parole. Soto and his cousin David Ayala,
would spend forty two years in prison, the longest served
wrongful conviction sentences in Illinois history, until they were exonerated
(02:44):
in December of twenty twenty three. James Soto is joining
me today with a man who's been a tremendous support
to him and shares much in common with James as well.
In addition to also having been rightfully convicted and exonerated,
Robert Almodovar is not only a close friend to James,
(03:07):
but the two men were actually cellmates while in prison.
Both now share the same passion for raising awareness for
criminal justice reform. We have so much to cover. Thank
you both for joining me, Jimmy and Robert, well.
Speaker 2 (03:21):
Thank you for hosting us and having us here.
Speaker 3 (03:24):
Absolutely, thank you.
Speaker 1 (03:25):
So Just Jimmy to go back to the very beginning.
You know you're now in your sixties, but take me
back to the young man you were before all this
happened in nineteen eighty one. Where did you grow up
and what was your upbringing?
Speaker 3 (03:39):
Like?
Speaker 2 (03:41):
All right, Well, I grew up in the Pullman area,
which is on the far south side of Chicago on
ninety eighth in Avalon. I've learned later in life that
the neighborhoods that we grew up in in our formative
years really make us who we are. So I will
always be a Southsider from Chicago and the people as
youicgo because we're so segregated. We're very proud from whatever
(04:04):
section of the city that we come from. But yeah,
I grew up there. I had a fondness for sports.
Baseball was my number one thing. I was on the
Avalon Cubs, which at a young age made me a
Cup fan, and I am a Cup fan for life,
and I was so glad when they won the World Series.
Fortunately I was locked up when that happened, but I'll
(04:25):
take it. So the summer of my fourteenth birthday, we
moved to the Brighton Park area, which is on the
southwest side of Chicago, and I stayed there for most
of high school. Then in nineteen eighty one, my uncle
was murdered by gun violence in the Little Village area,
and that was my cousin and co defendant, David Yalla's father,
(04:48):
I'll Fonso, and they had her house in Westchester anyway,
in the western suburbs, and I wound up going to
live with David shortly thereafter. It was a very nice
urban home, had a built in swimming pool, It had
a mini gym, a greenhouse, five bedrooms, two and a
half bats basement, fully furnished so you can imagine David
(05:12):
was eighteen and I was twenty. I wouldn't say young men.
We were more like late adolescents, teenagers more so. Living
in a nice house. And yeah, I mean Dave had
some money that his father left them. There was a
life insurance policy, so he didn't have to work at
the time. I was working at United Parcel Service as
(05:34):
a sorterer. But to say that we weren't enjoying ourselves
living pretty lavishly would be an understatement. So having all
that naturally made the Chicago Police Department CPD seeing us
driving luxury, fancy cars, Lincoln Cadillacs, those are the cars
of that time period, you.
Speaker 1 (05:55):
Know, Oh, that's it. So they made the assumption that
they knew how you were bankrolling all that.
Speaker 2 (06:02):
Yeah, the assumption was that it was coming from, you know,
illicit drug sales, but that was not the truth. The
truth was it was just some things that were left
over to David and I'm working. I actually was paying
car notes, so my car was being financed. So had
they dug a little deeper, they would have realized my
car particular was not paid off.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
Coming from the neighborhoods that you did was gang activity
very much on your radar on a daily basis throughout
high school.
Speaker 2 (06:31):
No, absolutely not, it was not. It wasn't really until
nineteen seventy nine when David's brother Alfonso the third gets
killed by gun violence. It was very hard for me
because it was my brother, David's oldest brother Tyrone. Then
it's me and then Alfonso and then David, and we're
(06:52):
all one year apart. So I would spend a lot
of summers at David's house when they were living in
little village. And so that's how I wound up getting
involved in any gang was because my cousin had been killed.
You know, I took it pretty hard, and as a
young he was seventeen, so I would have been eighteen.
(07:14):
As a young eighteen year old to have to deal
with that, you know, there was no one that gave
me any therapy for the trauma I was dealing with,
and the loss of I consider more like a brother
than a cousin, and so to know that he was
killed in that way, I misguidingly wanted to be part
(07:35):
of the same thing that he was involved in, to
seek some type of revenge. But it wasn't like I
was out looking for revenge it was just a way
in his honor that I thought, I need to be
a part of this, I need to do something. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (07:49):
And there's also a huge social component of that too.
Of course, it's belonging in friendship and camaraderie.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Yeah, but I would not defined myself as a hardcore
game member. I was what people would label as a
marginal gang member. I was on the fringes. I was
not someone because I'm working, I don't have no time
to go hang out and do whatever.
Speaker 1 (08:14):
So had you ever been on law enforcement radar before
the incident in the time leading up to it, had
you ever had trouble with the law?
Speaker 2 (08:25):
No? Well, yeah, I was arrested one time for what's
called a uu W unlawful use of a weapon. Some
detectives that pulled me over and found a gun, unregistered
gun in my car and charged me. But when it
came down to the problem cause of why they stopped me,
it was simply because I was in a Lincoln Continental
(08:46):
and I was just I guess you would say, profiled.
And my lawyer was able to get the case thrown
out pretty easily because of the illegal stop, and the
judge threw it out so that was on my criminal record.
I had no other runs with law enforcement. When there
would be various shootings. Once they knew I was part
(09:08):
of a game, I was taken in several times and
questioned about it. I just, you know, said I want
a lawyer, and they pretty much left me alone.
Speaker 1 (09:16):
And at the time, so you're employed for two years
at that point with you said, ups, what were your
thoughts or plans for the future.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
I mean, you know, I had a girlfriend at the time.
I just learned, maybe two weeks before I was arrested
on this case, that she was pregnant. So in my mind,
I'm like, okay, she's going to have a baby. When
I learned she was pregnant, my thought was, I'm going
to settle down. I'm going to have to get my
own place and start a little family.
Speaker 1 (09:45):
So take me to the night of the incident. So
it was August sixteenth, nineteen eighty one, around nine pm
on the southwest side of Chicago. Where were you at
the time.
Speaker 2 (10:01):
I was in Westchester. It was me, my cousin David,
his girlfriend, my girlfriend, and my oldest sister with two
of her kids were at the house, and my sister
had prepared a meal for us, and I remember that
I just got my two plates and I went up
to my bedroom with my girlfriend and we were watching
(10:22):
some movies on the VCR, so long ago. Those things
are now no longer in existence. And yeah, she left
later in the evening, at around ten o'clock. So they
had the story on the ten o'clock news about, you know,
two people being shot killed and one third one being
(10:43):
injured at an incident in Petrowski or a Keiler park.
Speaker 1 (10:46):
So, for somebody who's not familiar with the geography, how
far were you physically away from where the shooting occurred.
Speaker 2 (10:55):
I would say that was a distance of about thirty
miles at least.
Speaker 1 (11:00):
Thirty miles away. And unfortunately, yes, three people were shot
to fatally wounded, a sixteen year old Julie Limas who
was aspiring to be a police officer, and an eighteen
year old Hector Valeriano, who was on leave from the
US Marine Corps at the time. So it's a tragic incident,
(11:24):
but you're thirty miles away from it at the time.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
Yeah, my thought was, you know, that's a terrible thing
that happened in the neighborhood of the gang or organization
that we were part of, but I didn't give it
a second thought to think who might have had any
involvement in it. I figured, oh, they're going to get
somebody for this, But little did I know they would
eventually try to point the finger at me.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
So yeah, the investigation ends up focusing on gang rivalries,
and even though eyewitness accounts identified entirely different people, the
investigation then starts focusing on the two six gang that
you're affiliated with, but just on the fringe. When did
you find out that you were on the investigators radar?
Speaker 2 (12:14):
To my knowledge, my name doesn't really come up until
the month of October. I believe that's when they finally
start saying, well, okay, because they thought they was involved.
They said, okay, well this other guy has to be
involved as well. But it was never really founded on,
like you said, on any eyewitness identifying me. It was
(12:35):
just they now said, okay, if David's involved, this other
guy got to be involved as well.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
So they just bundled you with your cousin and neither
of you were there, correct, So how were you arrested?
How did that go down? Where were you? Who were
you with?
Speaker 2 (12:51):
So I got arrested on October fifteenth, Once again, I
was in Westchester with my girlfriend, and ironically my sister
was there as well, the oldest, so that would be
later be my alibi. She was there. She made another
homemade meal, I remember it. It was spaghetti with homemade
meatballs and Italian sausage and a garlic bread. And I
(13:13):
was just beginning my plate to take it upstairs with
me and my girl to share, when we hear the
knock on the door, boom boom, and then there's a
pounding on the back door, boom boom. I'm like, what's
going on? So we look out the window and we
see all these lights and policemen running up to the thing.
We open the door and they come in and cuple
us up. They just said they had a warrant. They
(13:34):
didn't say it was an unrest warrant. They didn't say
whether it was a search warrant. Yeah, So they went
about the house searching it, obviously not coming up with anything,
and they took us into custody. And when I get
to the police station is when I first learned that.
They tell me you're under arrest for two murders and
a tent murder and this is a capital of fence
(13:57):
and you better say something now if you want to
save yourself.
Speaker 1 (14:00):
Well, Jimmy, what was going through your mind? You must
have thought, all right, stupid mistake. It's going to be corrected.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
That's exactly what's going through my mind. I'm like, this
can't be right, you know. Fortunately, there was an attorney
that was at the police station who would later become
my trial attorney. And he came and spoke with me
and said, they said they have witnesses, and he said,
I don't have any of the paperwork. He asked me,
point blank, did you have anything to do with it?
Of course I told him no, And he's like, well,
(14:28):
don't worry about it. If you didn't have nothing to
do with it, it'll work out. Just don't say anything.
And that was it. So in my mind, I'm thinking, Okay,
it's a mistake, and you know, they could be cleared
up fairly soon and I'll be out. But that wasn't
the case.
Speaker 1 (14:44):
From that moment on. You're held until your trial.
Speaker 2 (14:47):
Yeah. I was held with no bond in the Cook
County jail. I was there for probably a year before
I went to trial. I went to September of nineteen
eighty two to trial, but leading up to it, I
would eventually find out some pieces of like that they
only had one witness who would be best termed an
accomplished witness. He was a young teenager as well, and
(15:11):
he made a statement that David and I were supposedly
conspiring prior to the shooting with a group of other
individuals to attack a rival group. That David gets a
phone call and David then provides the key to a
custom blue van and gives us weapons, and we go
(15:31):
out to the park and me and another co defendant
supposedly walk down the gangway and shoot at the people.
And you know there was three victims as a result.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
But that seems like a very convenient theory.
Speaker 2 (15:45):
Well it was for them. Yeah, I didn't know that
they had rounded up again to the Colaster trial, that
they rounded up twenty five people with the West warrants,
and that out of the twenty five, at least maybe
ten or maybe twelve of them made statements which collaborated
in some sense what this individual was saying. But you
have to bear in mind that there was probably only
(16:07):
out of the twenty five people, maybe five were over
the age of seventeen. Everybody else was fifteen and sixteen
year olds, and I was really mad that, you know,
these individuals who were supposed to be part of a
group that I was involved in, would break down and
make this false narrative. And so my reaction was as
a young man that these guys are punks, they're chumps,
(16:28):
they're snitches. But as I became more mature and I
was doing my studies, I realized that they were just
as much victims and or even more so than anyone
else other than those that lost their lives and the
other that got shot. Because they were held for three days.
Imagine you a fifteen year old held three days in custody.
(16:50):
Some of them urinated on themselves, being choked, getting nothing
to eat, denied water, I mean, the sleep deprivation. I
had to look at it. Putting myself in their shoes,
I probably would have broke down and said anything they
wanted me to say at that point. So, you know,
the police officers, law enforcement have techniques that they could
(17:11):
make a grown man who was innocent telling themselves, so,
let alone a juveniles. So that started to make sense
to me as in the following years after my conviction.
What really was going on?
Speaker 1 (17:23):
I'm trying just to get my mindset wrapped around. You're
living your life, have a steady job, have a steady girlfriend,
have a baby on the way. You're twenty years old,
and your life is just interrupted, taken away from you.
(17:44):
What was that year like for you being held in
the Cook County jail.
Speaker 2 (17:50):
I mean, it was probably one of the worst and
hardest years of my life because my girlfriend would eventually
lose the baby. She had a miscare. It was due
to squarely to stress. She wasn't eating right because she's
worried about me. I'm locked up. My car gets repossessed.
You know, expensive rims on my car. I had a
(18:11):
nice sound system. When they repossess it, it's not like
they're going to give it back. They take all that
with it. So I lost that. I was upset with that.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
But are you in contact at all with your cousin
David at this point? Is he being held at the
same facility.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
Yeah, I'm with him for the most part. For I
would say at least half of that time, or maybe
seven months we were held together. There was periods where
we would be split up. You know, That's how the
jail is oftentimes you're moving to another section of the
jail and they don't really give you any reasons why.
It's just it's disruptive. The jail is not nice, it's
(18:46):
super violent, and you're going to get in fights. It's
just part of what's going on there. And we're packed
in there. There was overcrowding problem. It was people sleeping
on the floor in the dayroom. So you got this
group of people and you don't have so much time.
It was always fights over the phone if nothing else.
So yeah, Dad, in TV, what show you're gonna watch,
(19:06):
what channel you're gonna watch on TV? I would always
wind up be in a fight.
Speaker 1 (19:10):
So in terms of you and David, your mindset heading
into that trial, how would you categorize the trial in general?
And were you at all confident?
Speaker 2 (19:22):
I didn't. I don't know much about the law of
the legal system. It's process, and so my attorney puts
on an alibi defense, and I told you, the only
evidence that really comes up that indicates either David or
I is this so called accomplished witness, and he had
implicated two people in this conspiracy as being part of
(19:43):
this meeting that led up to the shooting. One was
in the hospital in a coma told state after being
hit by a car. So he's in Mother Cabreinging hospital
on the West Side in a coma. Mind you, this
guy testifies before the grand jury that he's evolved with
the case. The second individual was in juvenile custody and
(20:06):
he had to plcase him as well. So this individual
locked up ten days before this crimer, maybe even longer.
And I'm thinking, Okay, we're showing that he clearly lied
before the grand jury. And here's another fact. The accomplished
witness says that David owned a Blue Custom van. No
Blue Custom band was ever recovered. They never showed David
(20:27):
owned one. Now one person says he owns this band,
that he ever had a van, There's no weapons ever recovered.
And then they said there's a phone call that happens
from Home Run and Pizza to David's house in Westchester
slightly probably a half hour before the shooting happens, supposedly
from two young women who say that they alert David
(20:49):
that there's a rival group in there. Well day subpoena
the Illinois Bell telephone records, which showed no phone call
was made from home run in that entire night. Today
its house. So again these things I'm hearing during trial,
and I'm thinking, oh, well, there's no way they're going
to find me guilty if they're hearing dead And so
(21:09):
I'm thinking in my mind, as my lawyer told me,
you're going to beat this case. You're going home whenever
the jury comes back. There's no way they're going to
find you guilty. So I'm thinking, yeah, I'm going home.
Speaker 1 (21:21):
Because you have multiple witnesses who attest your alibi and
innocence being told by your defense that you should be confident.
Take me to the moment that the jury announces their verdict.
Speaker 2 (21:37):
It was maybe close to nine and a half hours
at a period of two days, the first evening into
the next day that the jury is deliberating, and they
send a note down and tell the judge that they're
struggling to come up with a verdict and they think
that they might be a hung jury because they cannot
come to a unanimous decision on this case. And so
(21:58):
my lawyer said, well, that's a good thing. That means
they're struggling. Well, the judge just tells the jury go back.
He wouldn't accept them saying that they were hung. About
a half hour later, they come in guilty of all charges.
So when I hear that verdict, when you know you
got to stand up to hear it, the reaction was,
you can hear of some gasp. The state's attorneys were jubilant.
(22:19):
They were high five in each other, and I'm looking
at them. Then I turn around to look at my
family and just see them all breaking down in tears.
To see my father, who was the rock, the foundation
of our family, broken down crying. My sister's crying, my
girlfriend crying. It made me furious. I looked at my attorney.
I said, I thought you said we're going to beat this.
(22:39):
What happened. I looked at the judge, I looked at
the jury, looked them in the eye, and I'm like,
how could this happen? How could you come up with
a guilty verdict based on such flimsy evidence. So when
I do talk to my lawyer once again in the bullpen,
he comes to see me. He's seeing the how upset
I was, and he was like, no, you got to
(22:59):
hang in there. You got to be strong. I said,
it's easy for you to say, and I said, so,
what are we looking at and he's telling me that, well, unfortunately,
the laws in Illinois are that if you're found guilty
of two or more murders, you've got to mandatorily get
natural life. And I'm like, so what does that mean.
He's like, it means what it means. And I'm like really,
(23:21):
and he said, no, don't worry, We're going to go
on appeal. We're going to do the appeal. There's a
lot of things they're done wrong.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
So months turned to years turned to decades.
Speaker 2 (23:41):
What was the.
Speaker 1 (23:42):
Biggest hurdle for you transitioning to life in prison.
Speaker 2 (23:48):
The most difficult thing is being away from family, hearing
the family milestones, graduations, baptisms, communions, weddings. I wasn't there
to see people have their you know, the birth of
a child that's such a celebration, and so many families
when a new life comes in there and I'm not there,
it was difficult for me to deal with. And then
of course trying to maintain a relationship that certainly was
(24:12):
very hard. They got to come visit, you got to
make phone calls, et cetera, and so forth.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
Well, there's so many layers to that. Onion, and also
in terms of you know, you're missing those events with
your family, but your family is missing them with you.
Speaker 2 (24:29):
Yeah. Yeah, And I would always want to put on
the strong front. I'm okay, don't worry about me, you know.
And as I started studying the law, I was able
to articulate to them some of the things that were wrong. Hey, listen,
my attorney didn't do this, or the prosecution did this.
And so when I was able to do that, I
guess they would see the hope emanating from me, and
(24:49):
so it would make them feel a little bit more
at ease. But there was times it wasn't easy. Prisons
in the eighties and early nineties was in Illinois were
particularly violent. State Bill was very violent. I mean murders
occurring there. There was a lot of things that, you know,
a lot of stabbings, a lot of assaults.
Speaker 1 (25:05):
That's a question that I have for you because even
though your affiliation with a gang ended up getting you
on the radar of the police in a way, did
that affiliation protect you at all once you were in
the inside.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
Yeah, you had to be. I was definitely affiliated with
the gangs in there. But the downside of that is
that when other individuals would do, you know, do things like,
for example, somebody would gamble and then not be able
to pay. Now this individual is going to get into
a fighter. I have problems with another group, another person
from another group, which then involves everybody, and now here
(25:43):
it is we're fighting in there over somebody who should
have never been gambling because he didn't have the money
to pay in the first place. At some point in
the mid nineties, I said, this isn't getting me anywhere.
You know, I was smart enough to know that this
behavior is viewed as a negative, and I didn't want
to be in that light. And so I'm no longer.
I don't want to be a part of it, no
long no more. I'm sure people looked at me like
(26:06):
he's flaking out, he's he can't handle it, But I
didn't care. I think that was one of the best
choices in my life. That happened around ninety six. And yeah,
I mean, well.
Speaker 1 (26:15):
You know what, it's maturity too, But you were doing
what you needed to do to survive through your younger twenties.
How long did you and your girlfriend stay together?
Speaker 2 (26:27):
We were probably together for the first ten years of
my incarceration, and in retrospect, I look at it. We're
arguing about really simple things like how come you to
pick up my phone call? Where were you at? You know,
Accusations that she might be cheating on me, and those
type of things eventually deteriorated us and she wound up
having a relationship with someone else. But she would period
I'm in and out of my life over my incarceration,
(26:49):
and in the end for the last like you know,
seven years, I would say she was there for me.
But yeah, it makes it easier to have a love
interest in prison, knowing that somebody cares about you. I
never really doubted the fact that she didn't have feelings
for me or her loved me.
Speaker 1 (27:06):
It's hard to maintain a relationship exactly.
Speaker 2 (27:09):
The physical absence is hard.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
As you mentioned, you began spending a chunk of your
time in the law library.
Speaker 2 (27:18):
Well. As I became more and more proficient in the
tenants and the operation of the law procedures, etc. I
began to have success winning particularly at first just sensed
reductions for a lot of individuals, and eventually I wont
some new trials. I began to get more new trials,
more sentence reductions, and so I was also doing civil complaints.
(27:41):
Guys would eventually went on that.
Speaker 1 (27:43):
So you became what they call a jail house lawyer.
Speaker 2 (27:48):
Yeah. I never did particularly like that term. I like
to call myself a prisoner advocate, but yeah, that's definitely
what that was termed.
Speaker 1 (27:55):
But I think that's so admirable.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Jimmy.
Speaker 1 (27:58):
What was the turning point for you? Because I can't
imagine the anger and the frustration your life's been taken
away from you and decades at this point, where did
you turn that into I'm going to figure out enough
to help not only myself, but to help other people.
Speaker 2 (28:18):
My thought process was this that if I could be
proficient or do adequate work for other individuals, it would
just make me a better litigator and I could hone
my skills that way work it through others. Again, looking back,
my early attempts was by trial and error, and I'm
a bit of a perfectionist, I will admit that, and
so I said I could do this. But I always
(28:40):
kept education at the forefront. I was always involved in
some type of classes or some type of program, and
a lot of it sometimes with self taught. I would
just bother to use the materials there with the law library.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
So now we're getting to the point where you crossed
paths with our other wonderful esteemed guests. Robert, we've talked
about this. I'm not gonna dive too heavily into the specifics,
but in a nutshell, you and a co defendant were
convicted in nineteen ninety five of a double homicide the
year before, and at the time you were a young father,
(29:16):
working long hours and attending night school, and when you
were rested, you had no previous convictions. You were twenty
when you were convicted, which is something that you two
gentlemen share in common. And the case against you rested
on eyewitness reports obtained by a rather notorious now retired
(29:38):
Chicago police detective named Rinaldo Guervera. He's since come under
fire over allegations he coerced witnesses and framed innocent people
in dozens of other investigations. But you two are in prison.
You're both wrongfully convicted. Take me to the first moment
(29:59):
you're has crossed, and Robert, why don't you tell me
about meeting mister Soto for the first time.
Speaker 3 (30:06):
Jimmy Soto. I heard of him.
Speaker 4 (30:08):
You know his name is under like a legend in
prison basically because everybody know who he was. Everybody knows
all the work he did and how he helped a
lot of people. So I knew of him before I
ever met him. So he was in state Ville, he
didn't getting trampied to Minar. When he got to Thenar,
you know, believe or not, everybody was like static because
this guy who helped a lot of people is now
(30:31):
in Minar. So everybody wanted to reach out to him,
contact him, some type of way to get his assistant something,
because he a type of prison you know, his reputation
receives him as far as he's an up, upstanding guy.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
So you arrived at Minard with a fan club in place,
Yes he did.
Speaker 4 (30:49):
He's really shy about that, I guess, but this is
who he is. This is reputation.
Speaker 1 (30:54):
Then do you remember the first time you met him?
Speaker 4 (30:57):
Yes, I was in the same set house as he
was Soft Flowers in Minar. He was on two, I
was on four and I think his SETI was in
up going home or something like that.
Speaker 2 (31:08):
Yeah, he got parole, Yeah, he.
Speaker 4 (31:10):
Got parole and he was looking for the sally And
one of the gadded workers asked me what your life is,
Jimmie Soler SELLI.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
I was like, hell, yeah, why wouldn't that be?
Speaker 4 (31:20):
So they end up moving me to his cell at
the time, he was in the yard. So I'm gonna
sell by myself. I got my property in there, I
got situated, and when he came in to cell, I
went to induce myself my name is you know with
Berta Amovar.
Speaker 3 (31:35):
He like, I know who you are? Ready? Like how
you know me already? How the hell you know who
I am? Said? I know your uncle.
Speaker 4 (31:42):
I was a lot with your uncle in Stateville, and
hesld me everything about your case, everything bout you, And
I was like, whoa.
Speaker 3 (31:48):
I was surprised.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
I loved the nicknamed Sally for sale made. It's very
much an Illinois thing too. I've never met anybody who
spent time in Illinois who didn't use selly. But how
does that impact on a day to day if you've
got a good cell mate or a bad cellmate? Because
just describe the space that you two were sharing.
Speaker 4 (32:12):
Oh my god, to sell like what how big was?
This was a spall sl six by nine, six by nine,
bumpits and sinking Tobb in the back of the room.
Real small compact cell. And as far as Sally's, it
make a big difference. You've got a good SETI or
a bad seting. It can you know, it can make
your time hard or easy. And so we do get
(32:33):
a good seting. You want to keep them far long
as you can.
Speaker 1 (32:37):
So you guys were seal mates for four years?
Speaker 3 (32:41):
About four three years?
Speaker 2 (32:42):
Yeah, more likely? All right?
Speaker 1 (32:44):
So what made you guys good sale mates?
Speaker 3 (32:47):
We just jail real quickly.
Speaker 4 (32:48):
I mean, so you walk in the cell, you you
could tell you right away by the first couple of
second is you two will get along with that right
there and then. And we never had no arguments. We
never had no disagreement. We just jail. We cooked together,
we ate together. We had common ground as far as
our cases go. I look at to him like a
(33:10):
big brother, like a father figure. I mean he showed
me and taught me a little about the law and
just the case we did separated. He basically taught me
what I wrote that note, so what I need to
do just case get separated, And that's way I know
what to do with my legal stuff. He became family,
you know, because being at cell like twenty three to one,
(33:32):
most of the time, you know, the cell is so small.
You get you know, there's nothing to do but top
and you know each other backgrounds, family stuff, so it
got real personal. He probably know me better than my
own family. To be honest with.
Speaker 1 (33:46):
You, I can imagine that any bad character trait the
other person has is like magnified, you know, put on
volume ten. Absolutely so neither one of you had annoying
habits that bothered the other one.
Speaker 2 (34:00):
Come on, I mean he came in, he didn't have
a lot of hair on his face, but he would
take a long time to shave. In fact, he probably
won't admit this, but one of the things I did
do was Robert got locked up fairly young too, and
I would later learn that his father wasn't in his
life when he came into purbity. When his hair is
coming in, so Robert was shaving against the grain, and
(34:21):
I would tell him, you got to go with the
grain in order not to have irritation, because sometimes he
would have it. Roberts has very sensitive skin, and so
I would tell him you got to go with it, so,
you know, to show him how to shave.
Speaker 1 (34:32):
I love that you taught him how to shave correctly.
Speaker 2 (34:35):
No more razor, the right way to she knew how
to shave right.
Speaker 1 (34:41):
And Robert Jimmy didn't do anything that that ever got
on your nerves.
Speaker 2 (34:46):
I mean it was now and then he would play
some music a bit loud when I was doing legal work,
but I would just with my own headphones on the
list to my own music, you know. I mean, there
was ways in which we could avoid being in each
other's space. We did eventually get separated, and I would
eventually wind up going to another unit, North one, and
he remained in the South House.
Speaker 4 (35:06):
But due at the time though, he was able to
still stay able to communicate with Yeah. Yes, and the
way we did that we wrote kites and ky started
just like letters basically keep him up today, what's going
on with my family? Was going on my case and
vice versa or sometimes and we meet up at church
and we talk about certain things and stuff like that
at church.
Speaker 1 (35:26):
So, you guys, it very much sounds like Jimmy, you
took Robert under your way.
Speaker 2 (35:31):
Yes he did well, Yeah, I mean, but it was reciprocal.
It wasn't all that stad. He would look out for me,
make sure I was straight. You need anything, if you
need something, let me know. You know. So there was
times that one unit might go on lockdown. The other
wooden man, you know, send me some summer sausages and
send me this. He would gladly send it. Tuna. I
love tuna, so he would send me tune.
Speaker 3 (35:51):
He's a big It was the same way.
Speaker 2 (35:52):
If he needed something, I would look out for him.
Speaker 3 (35:54):
But not just that.
Speaker 4 (35:55):
Jimmy fortunately be across in crosserted for Solan that he
knows a lot of people he got connect and sue.
As far as politics and stuff like that, he can't
taught me at that politics game. In prison, you know,
have to govern around things also, and like I usually
get what onions, tomatoes, you know, eased to buy them
off the gay green peppers, you know, ice cream, ice
(36:17):
cream suits get ice cream, you know.
Speaker 1 (36:19):
So there were ways you could maneuver better, better food choices.
Speaker 2 (36:25):
Yeah, I've been locked up longer. So going to Minard,
I knew a lot of individuals that were down there already.
I had done legal work for some of them. They
were so glad to see me, they wanted to send
me stuff. I would never tell somebody give me, you know,
expert doing work. Why you know, you get it you
know this for that, but they would gladly say the
same thing. Robert would say, are you okay? So there
(36:45):
was a lot of people would often has to be
you need something, I'm over in the kitchen. I need
someone over here while I get some ice cream. Mode.
Speaker 1 (36:51):
So that kind of support must be so important just
in terms of your emotional and mental state.
Speaker 3 (36:59):
Mental state, Yeah, absolutely, But.
Speaker 1 (37:01):
How did you guys? Do you remember any time, particularly
for the one another, where you guys hit a tough
patch where you showed up for the other person.
Speaker 2 (37:12):
For him, I understood, you know, he was away from
his daughter, so she was going up, or she would
the family would set a visit and were able to come,
and vice versa. My family would set a visit, they
wouldn't come, so we would pick each other up. You
are right, or you know, we'd make a special meal,
or he did most of the cooking, to be honest,
because I'm not a very good chef. But yeah, he
made a good piece of puff. I'll tell you that
(37:34):
I caught it hot pockets. Yeah, well it's a piece
of puff. But anyway, No, the thing is that you know,
if you're really in there with somebody like this, in
a small space, you could pick up on the energies
and sometimes just not talking to somebody isn't enough. Just
give them their space because they're in their thoughts and
I would do that or he would do that for me,
(37:54):
and we would know not to bother the other person.
So it's just that type of sense makes it much
more companion.
Speaker 4 (38:01):
Also also just also for like the birthdays, Christmas and
stuff like that, because we are so far. The Menar
is like six to eight hours for the city, so
to get visits and stuffing that is very hard. My family,
I didn't see my fan for a while. You know,
they come for first to once every three months, once
every six months, once a year. They went so once
every three years. Then it's just you know it away.
Speaker 1 (38:24):
Again it's that passing of time. And so so you know, Robert,
you were in there for over two decades and then
in twenty seventeen life changed for you big time. You're
(38:53):
listening to Wrongful Conviction with Lauren Bright Pacheco. You can
listen to this and all the Lava for Good podcasts
one week early and adfree by subscribing to Lava for
Good Plus on Apple Podcasts. So when you found out
you were getting out. How did you tell Jimmy? Do
(39:15):
you remember?
Speaker 3 (39:18):
Well?
Speaker 4 (39:19):
I was a menar for I think about twenty one years,
twenty one and a half years, and during my twenty
first year, they asked.
Speaker 3 (39:26):
Me, I want to go to Gailsburg. I'm like, sure,
no problem, why not?
Speaker 4 (39:32):
But the thing is, I tell him about the news
that you know, there's some stuff going on in my case,
but I really know what's going to happen. I was
in Gailsburg for about two to three weeks and that's
when I get the phone call from my lawyer talking about, man,
I got some good.
Speaker 3 (39:45):
News for you. You basically coming home tomorrow Friday.
Speaker 1 (39:49):
Wow.
Speaker 3 (39:49):
I'm like, it was just so so real. I just couldn't.
Speaker 4 (39:53):
I was just shocked, you know, because you think about
this day, you dream about that day, you just already
fantasy about it.
Speaker 3 (40:00):
When it do come, you're just like, is it really happening?
Is it a dream?
Speaker 4 (40:03):
I was a static and coming home of course, being
reunited with my daughter and my family. You know.
Speaker 1 (40:09):
So Robert take me to after you get out, how
does your friendship change? How do you continue staying in
touch and do you have almost survivors guilt. Do you
feel that pressure to get Jimmy out?
Speaker 4 (40:24):
The thing is Jimmy and I just Jimmy, but all
the friends I made with in prison, they become family,
you know. I didn't feel with Morris, but I feel
like I need to do something to help the guys
out any way I can. So basically through you know,
I going to courts, supporting the other guys, shawing my support,
(40:45):
my lawyer Jennifer Byji, who also know other lawyers. Eventually,
you know, I know these other lawyers basically networking, and
like I tried to help other guys when I can
so far as like with Jimmy. Jimmy asked me, do
I know a lawyer named Lauren. So at the time like, yeah,
I know Lauren.
Speaker 3 (41:05):
She's my girl. She's cool with me. Were tight. He's like, man,
I need you to talk to her. See she could
take my case. I got you, I got you.
Speaker 4 (41:13):
So I end up talking to Lauren, and so Lauren, yeah,
you know. And my friend Jimmie, he's a good guy.
They did him wrong, and I wondered if you look
at his case, and she's like, sure, send it to me.
So I sent her in the paperwork and she reviewed
it and she said, oh my gosh, she's this case.
Speaker 3 (41:29):
They did him wrong.
Speaker 4 (41:31):
Yeah, and so she started looking into it. She talked
to her boss like yes, and she got into it too.
So anyway back to Jimmy. Jimmy called me, asked me,
you talked to Lauren. I said, yeah, I talked to
Lauren Man. She says she got to She's like, wait
a minute. I talked to Lauren and she said, you
didn't talk to her.
Speaker 3 (41:47):
I said, what do you mean. So there's two Laurence. Yes,
I didn't know.
Speaker 1 (41:51):
Yes, there is a Lauren at the Illinois Innocence Project,
Lauren Keseberg. And then there's the Lauren that we are
speaking of, who is Lauren Meerskoff Mueller. And she's with
the Exoneration Project at the University of Chicago Law School,
and she joined on Jimmy's team filing a clemency petition,
(42:16):
and from.
Speaker 3 (42:16):
There he basically ended again in the Dream Team.
Speaker 1 (42:18):
Lauren gets involved in twenty twenty and in May of
twenty twenty three, Governor Pritzker commutes your sentence Jimmy to
parole eligible, and then December fourteenth, twenty twenty three, the
Cook County States Attorney's Office agreed that the charges against you, Jemmy,
and your cousin David should be vacated, and the charges
(42:43):
were dismissed. Robert, what was your feeling leading up to
that date?
Speaker 4 (42:49):
So the day before I find out that he was
coming home, I was just like ecstatic, this is finding's
going to happen. After forty two years, finally Jimmy going
to have his day. He helped so many other people
come home, and now he's coming home.
Speaker 3 (43:06):
And I was in tears. I did lie.
Speaker 4 (43:07):
I was just so happy for him, just running up
and down my apartment like, yes, this is happening.
Speaker 1 (43:13):
So by the time Jimmy, you and David got out,
you had spent forty two years.
Speaker 2 (43:22):
Well, no, I spent forty two years, two months, and
two days.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
That's the longest wrong incarceration in Illinois history. If I'm
not mistaken, No, you're right.
Speaker 2 (43:33):
That is the National Registry based Michigan officially said we
were the longest serving axuneries in Illinois state history. It's
not a badge of honor, it's a title I would
gladly relinquish. I would not wish that on anybody, but Unfortunately,
that's what it is.
Speaker 4 (43:52):
And this is the club we're in, you know, Unfortunately,
this is a club that nobody want to be in,
but we are.
Speaker 3 (43:58):
You know.
Speaker 1 (43:59):
Now, I've seen the video of when you got out, Jimmy,
but tell me the moment you remember catching one another's
eye when you walked out.
Speaker 2 (44:08):
Okay, I get out from the gatehouse, which is the
first entry point when you're going into Stateville Prison. So
now I'm exiting it. I changed my clothes and I
jump in a vehicle and one of the officers say,
see that those lights down there at the end of
this little road. I said, yeah, he said, that's all
for you. He said, the press is down there to
talk to you. So we drive down there and I
(44:29):
get out the car and I see Robert. I see
Robert dressed and a camouflage outfit jacket and pants, and
I see him with his glasses and he got a
grin from ear to ear, and so yeah, I mean
the first ones I hug, naturally is one of my
other sisters. And then after that, I think Robert was
the second one that came. He hugged me, and they're like, man,
(44:51):
you know, we just hugged it. Was an emotional moment.
Speaker 4 (44:55):
Yeah we did it, you know, and food circle, and
I was so happy for him. This squeeze, I'm so tight,
and now we're home.
Speaker 2 (45:03):
You know, it was very surreal to be on the
other side of the wall with somebody that you had
forged a bond of relationship with and to see that
our past life's journey had crossed and now it was
once again coming to cross, but in a good way
where you know, I was now a free person, free man.
Speaker 1 (45:24):
I mean, you guys share such a strong bond, and
you have so much in common and have well over
a combined sixty years spent in prison for crimes you
did not commit. What does it mean to have one
another in your lives in these big transitions.
Speaker 2 (45:46):
Well, to me, I could tell you it means a lot. Because,
of course, he was released years before me. He was
released in twenty seventeen, and here I am. I'm released
in twenty twenty three, so there's a you know, that gap.
But uh, to know that he was able to transition
into quote unquote uh the real world before me, he
(46:08):
already learned how to navigate it, and so he was
very helpful in telling me the things I need to do,
for example, going to get my state of Illinois, I
d getting me used to going to drive a car again.
Speaker 3 (46:20):
A little bit with the phone too, But.
Speaker 2 (46:22):
Yeah, he helped me and Daddy and I thank him.
I thank God to have him there to be able
to tell me, you know, some of these things and
how to navigate them myself.
Speaker 4 (46:32):
The thing is, though, I feel like, you know, he
was able to help me, but then when I was incarcerated,
now not able to pay it for and help him
out regard to how smart it is. It just feels
so good to help him in any way I can.
And he's my brother. I'll do anything for him. At
the end of the day.
Speaker 3 (46:48):
That's my brother, and thank you for having me.
Speaker 2 (46:50):
Thank you. That's my little that's my little son. Now
that's my brother.
Speaker 1 (46:57):
While he was incarcerated, Jimmy Soto earned a Bachelors of
Science and Sociology from the Northwestern Prison Education Program. He
graduated magna cum Laudie and is now studying for his
LSAT to go to law school. I know he is
absolutely going to ace that test. He is also part
of Parole Illinois, an organization fighting to bring back parole
(47:18):
to a state that has effectively had no parole program
since nineteen seventy eight. To support James in his continuing
fight for justice and in his goal for earning a
law degree, you can donate to his gofund me, which
is linked at the end in the episode description. Thank
(47:44):
you for listening to Wrongful Conviction. I'm Lauren Bright Pacheco.
Please support your local innocence organizations and go to the
links in the episode description to see how you can help.
I'd like to thank our executive producers Jason Flamm, Jeff Kempler,
and Kevin Wardis, as well as our producers Annie Chelsea,
Kathleen Fink, and Jackie Pauley. This series is produced, edited
(48:07):
and hosted by me Lauren Bright Pacheco. Our senior producer
is Kara Kornhaber. Story editing by Hannah Bial, research by
Shelby Sorels, mixing and sound design by Nick Massetti, with
additional production by Jeff Clyborne. Our theme music is by
Jay Ralph. Be sure to follow us across all social
media platforms at Lava for Good and at Wrongful Conviction.
(48:30):
You can also follow me on all platforms at Lauren
Bright Pacheco Wrongful Conviction is a production of Lava for
Good podcasts in association with signal Company Number one
Hosts And Creators
Lauren Bright Pacheco
Maggie Freleng
Jason Flom
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Ruthie's Table 4
For more than 30 years The River Cafe in London, has been the home-from-home of artists, architects, designers, actors, collectors, writers, activists, and politicians. Michael Caine, Glenn Close, JJ Abrams, Steve McQueen, Victoria and David Beckham, and Lily Allen, are just some of the people who love to call The River Cafe home. On River Cafe Table 4, Rogers sits down with her customers—who have become friends—to talk about food memories. Table 4 explores how food impacts every aspect of our lives. “Foods is politics, food is cultural, food is how you express love, food is about your heritage, it defines who you and who you want to be,” says Rogers. Each week, Rogers invites her guest to reminisce about family suppers and first dates, what they cook, how they eat when performing, the restaurants they choose, and what food they seek when they need comfort. And to punctuate each episode of Table 4, guests such as Ralph Fiennes, Emily Blunt, and Alfonso Cuarón, read their favourite recipe from one of the best-selling River Cafe cookbooks. Table 4 itself, is situated near The River Cafe’s open kitchen, close to the bright pink wood-fired oven and next to the glossy yellow pass, where Ruthie oversees the restaurant. You are invited to take a seat at this intimate table and join the conversation. For more information, recipes, and ingredients, go to https://shoptherivercafe.co.uk/ Web: https://rivercafe.co.uk/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/therivercafelondon/ Facebook: https://en-gb.facebook.com/therivercafelondon/ For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iheartradio app, apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.