Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hi, I'm Michael. We'd love to have you listen every
weekday morning to your morning show live, even take us
along with you on the drive to work. We can
be heard on great radio stations like one oh four
nine The Patriot in Saint Louis, Our Talk Radio ninety
eight point three and fifteen ten WLAC and Nashville and
News Talk five point fifty k FYI and Phoenix, Arizona.
Love to be a part of your morning routine, but
we're always grateful you're here. Now. Enjoy the podcast, Stop.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Whin and Pizza Boy one two three.
Speaker 1 (00:27):
Starting your morning off right. A new way of talk,
a new way of understanding because we're in this together.
This is your Morning Show with Michael Gill John. I
haven't said a word yet. How can I be whining
seven minutes after the hour? Good morning, Rise and shine,
(00:48):
Get those little boats sleep out of your eye, shuffle
your way to the coffee pot. Time to start. Thursday,
May the eighth Year of Our Lord, twenty twenty five
on the Aaron, streaming live on your iHeartRadio app. This
is your morning show. Chef Michael has some specials for
you for breakfast today at the America's kitchen table, we
are serving a wonderful polls of plenty. What Chef Michael
(01:12):
is going to do is he's going to take a
look at how America feels about COVID years later. What
you're going to see is an eroding trust in experts,
and it depends on your own information. Through research. We're
going to garnish that with a California voter pole who
(01:33):
are thoroughly convinced that all their governor cares about is
running for president and out their problems. Then we're going
to dust the plate with a little BLM. The American
people have come to the conclusion BLM accomplished nothing for
people of color whatsoever. Still, black smoke means no first vote.
What you can't see behind the scenes in Vatican City
(01:56):
is where it goes from here. That initial vote is
very key. You'll see the coalitions put their candidates forward.
So my guess is, right now you've got three really
consequential leaders, and then all the others will start coalescing.
You'll probably have after a second and a third vote,
(02:17):
things probably narrowed down pretty close to two. Now. In
Francis's case, we got white smoke day two, so within
three votes. Usually third day, somewhere in the fourth or
fifth vote is when it happens. So will we have
a pope today or will we have a pope tomorrow?
I don't think you'll wait much longer, but we'll have
(02:39):
the latest down that with Rory O'Neil. President Trump expected
to make a big announcement on a trade deal with
the United Kingdom, which is very good news. He's also
very concerned about Pakistan and India fighting. You can't have
a Russian Ukraine war. You can't have negotiations over nukes
(03:01):
with Iran, and still trouble in the Middle East between
Israel and ultimately Hamas and Iran. And now add this
to the table. But we'll talk more about that with
our White House correspondent John Decker, also more on that tease.
Could it be? I don't think so. You don't think
(03:21):
when we talked about yesterday Donald Trump alluding to a
big announcement, really good news that he would do shortly
before his trip to the United Emirates. You don't think
this is about renaming the Persian golf the Arab golf,
do you? I'm kind of leaning that way, and I'll
tell you why later. In the show. What a great
(03:43):
visit we're going to have with Jason Bailey. Now he's
a historian and an author and his subject James Gandolphini.
The new book Gandolphini Jim Tony and the Life of
a Legend. Listen title alone. This guy's got it nailed, right.
I mean though, I'll tell you that well now listen,
(04:03):
mus Burger, keep quiet till you got something to really hit.
But no, the title says it all, doesn't it. We
all know Tony Soprano? Do we know James Gandolphini? How
different was he from Tony? What would he have done
if he hadn't passed so soon? We're gonna look at Gandolfini,
Jim Tony and the Life of a Legend later in
the show as well. Most airports are operating smoothly after
(04:26):
the first day of real ID, and the Eastern Conference
is officially in shambles. Somehow, the Knicks went into Boston
and took two from the Celtics. They returned home to
Madison Square Garden up two games to nothing. That wasn't
supposed to happen to the returning champs. Meanwhile, our Calves
(04:47):
are down two games to nothing. Because the Pacers came
into our house and slapped us around twice. That wasn't
the case for oklahooa city who even their series up yesterday,
will have more in sports and a reserve, leaving interest
rates unchanged. I guess everybody wanted to see it ticked
down a little bit, but it's not for the moment.
We'll have more on that as well. And our polls
(05:08):
of plenty are just they're they're very, very fascinating, and
I suspect very accurate, but not all poles are. And
that really is you know, going to come out in
our Sounds of the day, I love. I mean, you know,
(05:29):
we were just talking off the year, which is distracting
me about what happened to Anne Culter. He just disappeared
and then you thought she was an anchor and I said, no,
that's Ann Curry. It's by the way, we should play
twenty five thousand dollars pyramid, the way you're giving clues
and I'm giving answers. That was awesome. Yeah, you pulled
that out quickly. How I remembered her and you are
(05:50):
Bill right, No, but no, we're really every now and
then you know, there's a when there's a sea of
voices and an ocean of noise. It's as if please
don't be offended by this. It says, if God gives
us windows of people that rise up at just the
(06:11):
right time to listen to their voice. And that's kind
of how I feel about Victor Davis Hansen, and he
in our Sounds of the Day, he's going to dress poles.
I wanted to feature it a little bit more extensively
here because he can't really and Sounds the Day go
for that long, and he nails what I've always said,
(06:34):
our poles. First of all, if a pole is even accurate,
it's a glimpse. What does that mean. It's a moment
in time that by the time you get the results
it's already over. So it's just sticking a finger in
the water and getting the temperature at that moment. That
doesn't mean it's going to be that temperature a week
from now, two weeks from now. So sample size is
(06:57):
everything for accuracy. But even if it's accurate, keep in
mind it's a snapshot and it's gone immediately, and is
it designed to then be trended so we can see
if the temperature is rising or going down, what do
(07:18):
you do with the information? How do you ask the question?
Then there's the big problem the polls are having, and
that is getting people why because you can knock on
our door, but if I look at my ring and
I don't know who you are, I'm not answering. If
you call my landline, it doesn't exist anymore. And if
(07:39):
you call my mobile phone and I don't your name
doesn't pop up, I don't answer. That's a problem when
you're trying to get proper sample size and random pulling.
So technology and availability is a big problem for polling.
But always I say this motive is everything with polling
twenty five years research and radio as a manager. How
(08:04):
many people's research prize did in AWE watch this were
designed to make them look good at their job, Meaning
I'm going to go find the answers that prove that
the things that I did had been working and you
were smart to hire me. Or was it really focused
on what the listener's perceptions are, what their desires are
(08:27):
and fulfilling them. Is it listener focus or agenda focused?
And I'd see that at local radio stations, let alone
these polls. That's why it matters when it says an
NBC or a CNN poll about. The only real flaw
(08:47):
in that theory is Fox, who used to traditionally have
the worst polling numbers for Donald Trump. But there was
an explanation for that. Fox is not conservative. It's had
to morph a little bit and be wiser than CNN
and MSNBC were with their handling of the Obama era.
But make no mistake about it, Fox is establishment Republican.
(09:12):
So remember the most famous altercation and the toughest unfair
moment for Donald Trump was Megan Kelly in a debate
in Fox News. Now, of course on our podcast, He's
Mega Meg. She should use that name, by the way,
(09:33):
Meg and Meg, And don't get me wrong, I love
Megan Kelly, but people forget these things now. I do
think that Tucker Carlson evolved from establishment Republican into a
true conservative. I also think that spiritually he has had
(09:54):
a major shift in his life with faith. He's a
much more dangerous person and then he ever was at
box right now. But the point is, are these polls
designed to accurately tell you what America is thinking on
(10:15):
any given topic, or is it designed to get you
to think something about any given topic. And that's that's
exactly what Victor nails right on the head. I'm just
gonna play just a minute or two a daily signal.
Speaker 3 (10:29):
We've touched on poles before, but I don't think I've
seen anything quite agree as egregious and pollsters bias as
recently when they comparently or supposedly or purportedly surveyed the
first one hundred days of Donald Trump and the public
reaction almost immediately, headlines blared worst first one hundred days
(10:53):
in history. Trump drops from fifty two to forty one.
Speaker 1 (10:57):
Forty two.
Speaker 3 (10:58):
Everybody was confound because the economic news was pretty good.
Job growth was just spectacular, over one hundred and seventy
thousand jobs. Inflation was down, energy prices were down, corporate
profits were up, there was a movement on the trade
question Ukraine. There was no bad news except the controversy
(11:20):
and chaos of a counter revolution. So what were the
posters trying to tell us? Or were they trying to
manipulate us? And I think it's the latter. Larry Kudler,
for example, the Fox former Fox Business, I think he
still is at Fox. He pointed out that when he
examined the New York Times and the Washington Post polls,
(11:41):
they were deliberately not counting people who surveyed that they
were Trump voters in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 1 (11:48):
That was half the country. They were only imagine omitting
half the country and a question about approval of a
president after one hundred days. Really, when you think about it,
they're quite remarkable numbers, considering it's only people who didn't
vote for Donald Trump. But again, that's why, you know,
(12:11):
David Sinati has a strange quirk that I love. For
the longest time, I would just read articles and I
would discern and I would dissect and you know, fact
check and so on, and either glean something from it
that I would share with everyone, or i'd rip it
apart on the air. David always starts with who wrote it?
(12:36):
And I never used to do that because they're just names.
I don't even know them. Who could they possibly be.
Of course, in this age of the internet, you can
go get their complete bio and everywhere they ever worked
and everyone they get money from. You should spend more
time studying the writer than what he wrote. And I
should know that because one of the chapters in my
(12:57):
book is the making of the Messenger as I make
the case that the making of a messenger is as
important as the message. And so now I don't read
any articles without first starting, well, who is this kid?
Who is this guy? Who is she? And then before
you ever start reading, you know the worldview, the agenda
(13:17):
to which it's coming from. Well, the same can be
said for polls. You go immediately to the sample makeout.
Then the next thing I do is I go to
the questions and how they're asked, because that can be
very misleading. And then the third thing I do is
I always compare the results with the analysis. I used
(13:38):
to have an old saying, and I know I'm wrapping
up amount of time. I used to have an old saying,
behind every headline is a story, and behind every story
there's so much to talk about. That's where the devil
is in the details, That's where the understanding comes from. Well,
then I went through an era on the air where
the headlines where the story disproved the headline in many cases,
(14:01):
or the story had nothing to do whatsoever with the headline.
And that's when I began to realize, Oh, they know,
people are busy and nobody's reading. That's why the Atlantic
lays out manifestos because they do it in very long form.
Their stories are long, in some cases twelve fourteen pages.
(14:26):
Nobody reads like that anymore. People read a headline and
move on, or they read a headline in the first
paragraph and move on. So what they were doing is
through cumulative exposure, we're making their agenda points, even though
the article would go on to disprove it. So whenever
I see poles, I go straight to the question that
(14:46):
I go straight to the sample. Then the makeup we
could play more from Victor. The bottom line is not
all polls. Now, all polls have one thing in it's
difficult to find people because they don't have landlines and
they won't answer their mobile phone, and that's difficult to
(15:08):
get around. That's a challenge for all of them. But
not all poles are designed with the motive to sell
an agenda and manipulate the way you think. Some really
want to know where America is sitting, and some are
better than others. I say all this because in our
polls of plenty, we're going to look at COVID nineteen
in Black Lives Matter, two very very influential things in
(15:32):
the last decade. It's Your Morning Show with Michael del Journo,
The three big things you really need to know today.
Still no Pope. First round of voting, black smoke. We
expect that two more rounds today. You might get two
more rounds of black smoke. It could be Friday, could
be today. We await the next Pope of the Catholic Church.
(15:54):
The Federal Reserve leaving interest rates unchanged. Transportation Secretary Sean
Duffy said to announce today his plan for overhauling the
nation's air traffic control system, and it's needed. Most airports
operated smoothly after the first day of real id requirements.
And Donald Trump wants the fighting with Indian Pakistan to stop.
(16:14):
He doesn't need another war to try to make peace with.
This is Paul David Patterson down in Toledo District, Belize.
And my morning show is your Morning Show with michaelvill Jorna. Hey,
it's Michael. Your Morning Show can be heard live each
weekday morning on great stations like thirteen sixty The Patriot
(16:36):
in San Diego, News Talk, one oh six point three
and AM eighteen eighty WMQ oh Claire, Wisconsin and one
oh four nine The Patriot and Saint Louis, Missouri. Would
love to be a part of your morning routine. But
so glad you're here now, enjoyed the podcast. I'm Michael
del Jorno, Humboldt and thrilled to be serving you. Jeffrey's
got the sound red keeping an eye on the content,
(16:57):
and I got polls of plenty swinging a bat on deck.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffi's set to announce today his plan
for overhauling the national air traffic control system. The FED
left interest rates unchanged and most airports operated smoothly after
the first day of real lied deed, So we did
an opening monologue. If you didn't hear it, you can
catch up on the podcast later this morning. But talking
(17:19):
about polls and how some can be accurate, some are
on purpose not accurate. They're more about manipulating you into
thinking something than showing you how America collectively thinks about
a topic. And they all have the challenge of trying
to reach people because we don't have landlines anymore, and
we don't answer our mobile phones unless we know who's calling.
(17:40):
So we take them all with a grain of salt,
and understanding grain of salts. Some are better than others.
Rasmusen's one of them. I suspect accurately the data would
be even worse. But let's look at COVID nineteen. Did
the experts get it right? Is the question? Now? So
(18:01):
much history here. I remember there was a time I
thought I was crazy because at first it was just
plain discernment. My discernment detector went off when everybody was
on the same page and it didn't matter. And I
don't even remember if it was Visa, but I'm just
going to use this as an example. When Visa commercials,
(18:23):
we're saying the same thing as the White House. By
way of fauci As. Everybody in the media was saying,
stay home, stay safe, this is the new normal. And
right off the bat, knowing nothing, I was like, well,
I know that's a lie. Because a virus is a virus.
(18:49):
They can, in some cases, depending on comorbidities, create death,
but they always create immunity. We never defeat a virus,
we always absorb it and live with it. So never
would a virus be a new normal in death or immunity.
(19:12):
It's never a new normal. So that was the first
sniff test failed. Then we were getting all these models
projecting something. Well, it was new, so there was no data.
I mean even data from Italy hadn't come in yet.
(19:38):
So I'm not a rocket scientist. And believe me, when
I'm the smartest guy in the room, the room's really
misled or stupid. In this case, it was misled. So
I see where all these models are coming from, the
University of Washington. I go to the University of Washington
because I know they don't have data, so there must
be putting in assumptions. What are the assumption? And I
(20:00):
couldn't find them anywhere. We weren't allowed to see them.
Now what is an assumption? Well, the analogy I always
used was from the movie Outbreak. McDreamy gets off the plane.
His skin is all patchy, his eyes are red, there's
(20:21):
mucus coming out of his ears, his nose, his mouth,
he's sweating in the midst of a deep fever. And
what does his girlfriend do waiting for him at the airport? Which,
by the way, how did she get to the gate? Well,
actually was outbreak? Outbreak might have been pre nine to eleven.
What does she do? She French kisses him as he
gets off the plane. Now, listen, I love my wife.
(20:43):
But my wife ever got off a plane with red
around her nose, red around her eyes, looking all congested
and in a deep sweat of fever. And you know,
staggering off a plane. I'm not French kissing her. Was
that how the assumptions were based. Never mind all the
things we know they've since made up, never mind the
(21:05):
crazy things we witnessed. Oh, you need to mask when
you walk into the restaurant. You need to mask walking
to your table. But once you get to your table,
you can take your mask off. Your safe Like a
virus doesn't know how to set at the table with you.
I mean you w It is a lot of dumb
stuff down the line. But that was the basics of it,
basis of it. And everything changed when Fauci, who we
(21:28):
now see for what he really is, not a viral expert,
but part of the creation of this virus, with a
financial motivation in this virus. So this fox in the
henhouse is telling us all what to know about this
(21:51):
and he's And that was another thing that went off
early in my discernment Radar. Nobody ever just said doctor
Anthony Fauci. It was the foremost authority, the most respected author.
They would always add that to his name, as if
they were conditioning you buy whatever. He says, Well, he
walked into the Oval office until Donald Trump. Two million
people would be dead in America by Easter. And the
(22:12):
President didn't have the same discernment then that I had,
or the same questions then that I had. And he
trusted him, and he believed him, and he shut the
economy down. Then we started deciding who was essential and
who was and who could work who couldn't, and then
paid people to stay home. Oh, you release a trillion
dollars into a market unearned, that's inflationary, and all it
(22:36):
became was a weapon of division. It quickly went shirts
and skins, COVID deniers, COVID fearmongers, anti VAXX, pro vacs,
anti mask, pro mask. Oh what a nightmare. But who
in the end was right? Did I almost did I
(23:01):
channel Russia? Limbaugh there for a second. It gets all excited, Okay,
I'm back. I mean start with the you know, we
were talking about how we're gonna have Jason Bailey on
later his book is Gandolphini, Jim Tony and the Life
of a Legend, because you know Tony, but you don't know, Jim.
What a great title for the book on Gandolphini. What
(23:23):
a great question for Rasmussen to ask. Guess what it's
five years later? Somebody was right, somebody was wrong. I
was told, you bring up anything anti mask, you bring
up anything that would discourage somebody from getting a vaccine.
You don't get the vaccine yourself, You're fired. I looked
(23:46):
at my wife and I said, well, it gets me fired.
It gets me fired. But whether I'm going to end
this job the way I started it speaking the truth?
Now they never could get me because of the way
I did it on that they got me later. But boy,
isn't that the question? Did they get it right? America
(24:08):
is divided, But as we can see with the trending data,
more and more with every day that passes, Americans are
more and more skeptical. The more faucy and COVID is
investigated and the truth is exposed, this number continues to fall.
So five years after COVID nineteen, Americans remain divided over
(24:30):
whether health experts were right or wrong in their advice
on dealing with the pandemic. Now that in and out
itself is a big all encompassing question right, because there
were a lot of things that they were blatantly wrong about.
There were some things that they were deceivingly wrong about,
and there were a couple things that were right about.
(24:51):
But by and large, very wrong is the answer. And
what we're left stan is a mistrust. That's the biggest
problem in America. We don't trust the people talking to
us on TV. We don't trust the news we're reading.
(25:13):
We don't trust our doctors, let alone viral experts, let
alone presidents because of the way they handle these things.
So you can talk about the death of journalism, but
that's not a good thing. It's a bad thing for
a republic. You need journalism, you need freedom of the press.
Somebody's got to hold these elected officials accountable. So it's
(25:36):
not enough to leave it dead, this loss of trust.
It's not enough to just leave it with no trust,
because there are going to be things we have to trust.
You've got to be able to trust your doctor. I
don't as much as I used to because I watched
them follow the same protocols that I was disapproving in
my own research. So remember when we were talking about polls,
(25:59):
there are a poll you look at the snapshot, and
then there's polls. You take that snapshot added to the
previous snapshots and look at the trend. Forty one percent
of American adults think most experts were basically right about
COVID nineteen during the pandemic. But that's down from forty
five percent a year ago. So right now the country's
(26:20):
evenly divided. Forty one percent think they were right, forty
one percent think they were wrong. But it's headed towards
completely wrong. And I don't think there's any of those
eighteen percent that aren't sure they're going to be going
into the column of they were right, because if you're
going to ignorantly default, you're going to default to blind
trust and right. But it is interesting it was about
(26:48):
ninety five percent while it was happening blindly trusting. It's
down to forty one percent who believe they were wrong.
So all the people that were being treated as crazy
for not wearing a mask, crazy for not social distancing,
crazy for not getting the vaccine, crazy for not listening
(27:10):
to what authorities were saying daily in their news conferences.
Daily with the crawl of the bottom of the screen
death tolls, that's grown to forty one percent. Now a
lot of people who followed along agree with the people
they thought were crazy. Isn't that an interesting way to
look at it? On health related issues, just eight percent
(27:33):
have a lot of trust in experts who give advice
on TV or other media. Loss of trust. Thirty one
percent have some trust in media experts. Thirty eight percent
say they don't have any trust at all. Among those
who think most of the experts were basically wrong about
(27:54):
the pandemic, three quarters either have not very much trust
forty nine percent or no trust at all twenty five percent.
In health advice, bottom line is Fauci probably belongs in jail,
but the likelihood of another Fauci is slim to none.
(28:14):
That's the good news, because no one's gonna trust them
if they come along. The bad news is we don't
have somebody to trust, and we find ourselves in a
blind pickle again in terms of their own health care decisions.
Listen to this. This is the dismount by the way
I like to do it. Yeah, there's a lot of
dismounts you can do. I like to go Mary lou Reddin,
(28:35):
I like to do them, and then I go, let's
be careful, be careful. That's a Mary lou Reddin dismount
to pull something in terms of their own health care decisions. Oh,
I've done it with my mother. Oh I do it
with myself. My wife does it even more with myself.
This is how we live now because we've come to
trust no one in terms of their own health care decisions.
(28:59):
Thirty percent believe it's safe to trust advice from experts.
Sixty percent say it's important to do your own research.
And I did this greatly with the help of David
Zanati and an amazing man and an amazing doctor that
(29:22):
David works closely with. I could not have navigated without
either of them. But that's exactly what I did in
real time during COVID, and my research never matched the
commands that were being given. My research never matched the
explanations they were giving, and my research never matched what
(29:43):
they were calling the protocol to be. And I'm so
glad I did it then, and I suspect I'll be
doing it the rest of my life. And I suspect
this poll is accurate. And if anything, the pictures and
the problem is that loss of trust and if and
(30:08):
even if how it could ever be regained and how
damaged we are because we can't. What a great question
to ask, by the way, if you want to know
by the partisan breakup, sixty three percent of Republicans, fifty
three percent of Democrats, sixty two percent of those unaffiliated.
(30:28):
I think it's important to do your own research. So
the Democrats will never admit it to you, but they've
had loss of trust too. To the tune of six
and ten, Republicans, fifty nine percent are more likely than Democrats,
twenty five percent are unaffiliated. Forty percent of believe most
experts were basically wrong. But the way it's trending is
(30:49):
they're all going to get there. Everything else is about
the same. You know, slightly more whites than blacks and Hispanics,
but by and la, this is a an American conclusion.
And I just end with what a great question to
the experts get it right? And the answer is we're
in an exact tie right now. Four out of ten
(31:11):
think they did, four out of ten think they didn't,
Two out of ten don't know. But it's trending, and
with every story and every new piece of evidence, everyone
that was treated as crazy or the smart ones, everyone
that was treated as an expert authority or the liars
and the misleaders and the trust it appears to be
(31:34):
lost forever. That's suppole worth looking at. This is Your
Morning Show with Michael Del Trono. President Trump wants the
fighting between Indian and Pakistan to and Mark Mayfield has
that story.
Speaker 4 (31:50):
Speaking from the White House, Trump said, the US has
great relations with both countries and he'll step in to
help if asked, and I want.
Speaker 1 (31:56):
To see him work it out.
Speaker 4 (31:57):
I want to see him stop.
Speaker 1 (32:00):
They can stop now they've gotten.
Speaker 4 (32:02):
For Tensions between the neighboring countries intensified on Wednesday. It
comes after India's military launch strikes against Pakistan in response
to a militant attack in Kashmir last month.
Speaker 1 (32:12):
I'm Mark Neefield. Speaking of polls of plenty, President Trump's
average approval rating is on the rise.
Speaker 5 (32:17):
According to Decision Desk HQ's favorability tracker, Trump is averaging
a fifty one point seven percent unfavorable rating, which is
two point nine percentage points better than his average on
April thirtieth. However, the rating is lower than the forty
four point four percent favorable rating he held when he
first took office. The new data comes as Trump has
(32:39):
railed against pollsters over his declining popularity numbers after marking
one hundred days of his return to the White House.
Speaker 1 (32:47):
I'm Brian shuk Well, we have Golf of America. Why
don't they have Golf of Arabia. Tammi Trihio reports.
Speaker 6 (32:55):
Trump spoke to reporters Wednesday about his schedule trip to
Saudi Arabia, Cutter and the United Arab Emirates. Was asked
about recent reports that he was going to rename the
Persian Gulf to the Arabian Golf.
Speaker 1 (33:06):
I'll have to make a decision. Saudi Arabian.
Speaker 6 (33:08):
Other Arab states have commonly called it the Arabian Golf.
Iran's foreign minister, however, says the proposed name change is
politically motivated and intended to anger Iranians all over the
world and agitate them. I'm Tammy Trhio.
Speaker 1 (33:21):
I couldn't help but think of Roger when when I
was laying this story out. We get up every morning
at three am because it's time to go to work.
If you wake up at three am just because new
medical information says you're completely.
Speaker 2 (33:35):
Normal, psychology today says one third of the population wakes
up at three am about three times a week, and
they say it's a normal part of sleep, but it
is age related because as we get older, the natural
sleep cycle transitions around three in the morning. That's when
we switch between deep sleep and light sleep. Sleep Foundation
says you can drift right back to sleep if you
(33:56):
do one thing. Put your phone down. I'm pre tennis.
Speaker 1 (34:00):
In NBA playoff action, the Nicks up two games to nothing.
Now after beating the Celtics ninety one to ninety beat
them by one, but up two games to nothing and
won both those games on the road. Thunder Thunder upped
and evened up their series one game apiece, Big one
forty nine, one zero six over the Nuggets last night.
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
(34:20):
with Michael Nheld Joano