May 8, 2025 • 35 mins
Did BLM accomplish anything for blacks?
The last several weeks have been a challenge for the Federal Aviation Administration, and the issues at Newark’s Liberty International Airport are now causing major problems for flights in the northeast. What is the FAA saying about solving the problems at Newark – and what could it mean for your summer vacation plans? National Correspondent RORY O”NEILL has the story.
Always revealing and often entertaining, it’s The Sounds of The Day!
Americans are being told to leave parts of Pakistan where fighting erupted with India earlier this week. Why are India and Pakistan fighting? White House Correspondent JON DECKER has the latest on the conflict between the two nuclear powers – and why Americans should be concerned.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hi, it's me Michael. Your morning show can be heard
on great stations across the country like Talk Radio eleven
ninety and Dallas Fort Worth, Freedom one oh four point
seven and Washington, DC and five point fifty k FYI
and Phoenix, Arizona. We'd love to be a part of
your morning routine or take us along on the drive
to work. But as we always say, better late than never.
Enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
Starting your morning off right, A new way of talk,
a new way of understanding, because we're in this together.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Gill Truman.
Speaker 1 (00:34):
Tomorrow right here on the Big Big Show Friday with
forty seven. Later on This Big Big Show, David bonson,
we had that Gallup poll hust time for everybody.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
Dump their stocks. The only thing to trust is golden
real estate.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Not so fast as coach lead Corso would say, a
visit with her money was David Bonson. Coming up, and
historian and author Jason Bailey will join us. The new
book is called Gandalf Jim Tony and the Life of
a Living Legend. The title says it all, doesn't it.
Oh you know Tony, but do you know Jim James Gandelphini.
You will after this interview, and especially if you buy
(01:11):
the book. That's all coming up for you. If you're
just waking up this morning. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is
said to announce today his plans to overhauling the nation's
air traffic control system.
Speaker 3 (01:23):
I think that's going to involve maybe.
Speaker 1 (01:24):
Some technology and a lot of hiring. That shows leave
interest rates unchanged. Most airports operated smoothly the first day
of real ID. It's because they allowed people to get
on without their real ID and the only puff of
smoke was black. Therefore, we had one round of votes
for the pope. Is Rory here you at?
Speaker 3 (01:43):
Yeah? Yeah, Sidy's here. Yeah, let me talk to him
real quick.
Speaker 1 (01:46):
Rory, So, good morning after a first vote, and we're
gonna get to your story. But what fascinates me is
that first vote confirms the coalitions. If you will, I
promise you probably the four cardinals emerged as getting significant
amount of votes.
Speaker 3 (02:05):
Then they leave.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
Now they come back today with some coalitions, you know,
and movement, and that'll get them closer. The question is, well,
we have a pope today or tomorrow, and my guess
is more likely tomorrow. But if we could only know
where they're at after a first vote, you know what
I mean.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
But so Baza Balla is right in there. Yeah, that
would be fun.
Speaker 4 (02:25):
So they had the one vote last night, as you said,
we saw the black smoke. They wrapped things up, and
then the sporting two rounds of voting. The second balloting
brought about that black smoke. So as we speak, they're
in their break having a meal. And then this is
when the politicking happens, because when you're in the Sistine Chapel,
essentially it's just silence and voting.
Speaker 3 (02:45):
There isn't much more that happens there.
Speaker 4 (02:46):
It's when they're on these breaks that's exactly when the
real movement happens.
Speaker 1 (02:50):
It's when all the negotiations go. And I know, I
was watching a bishop yesterday and I always say this.
Speaker 3 (02:54):
I don't know why I do.
Speaker 1 (02:55):
We're all Christians, but I'm not Catholic, and so I
like to respectfully not come I meant, but I'm fascinated
by the process. And this bishop was saying, look, the
main job of a pope is the same as peters,
to proclaim the resurrection of Christ. Enough of all this
politics stuff. But we all know it does get political
(03:17):
as part of the selection process, and a lot of Catholics,
practicing Catholics are very interested to see it. Does the
church continue the way of Francis, which is more progressive
and inclusive, or does it get more traditional and conservative.
And if it gets traditional and conservative, I suspect it's
pizza Bala or it's perhaps from Africa, our first black
(03:39):
pope that would be elected. But there's a lot of
Francis voters. What was it like, eighty three of the
one hundred and whatever that are going to be voting.
He's kind of stacked the deck to continue in his direction.
Speaker 4 (03:51):
Well, right, so eighty percent of the cardinals were appointed
by Francis. So this is their very first conclave now
representing seventy one different nation and so it's also the
most diverse, and you know, does this push toward the
southern hemisphere also continue with as you said, either a
black pope or an Asian pope would be the other
big consideration here because that's where the church is seeing
(04:14):
growth right now.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
Yeah, I kind of from as an outsider, I want
the next pope to have the humility and the love
and the personal touch of Francis. Maybe a little return
to a more traditional doctrine, but we'll see. I don't
think it'll be today. Francis was pretty remarkable and that
it was a third vote, right.
Speaker 4 (04:37):
Yeah, they all came relatively quickly, and that's been the
trend as of late. So Francis came on ballot number five.
Benedict was a ballot number four. But it was only
two days for both Francis and Benedict.
Speaker 1 (04:51):
We could have I mean, all these cardinals come shuffling
in with their suitcases, only one leaves as the pope.
That could be as soon as today. Rory's going to
be back. Next hour, we're going to talk about the FAA.
They're having an issue at Newark's Liberty International Airport and
it's now causing major problems for flights, especially for those
of you listening in the northeast. Royal had the complete
(05:12):
details coming up next hour. We were doing polls of
plenty and you know, I thought, the first one on
COVID five years later, and it sent us late, but
it was worth doing.
Speaker 3 (05:26):
It was that important one way or another.
Speaker 1 (05:30):
Unlike JFK, unlike OURFK, the truth, the truth of COVID
is going to come to the surface.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
It already is.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
America is exactly evenly divided on the important question did
the experts get it right? Forty one percent say no,
they didn't, forty one percent say yes they did. Exact tie.
But that's down from a year ago where forty five
percent said yes, they got it right. And the more
you learn about Falci, and the more you look in
the research and the information comes forward, you're gonna come
(06:03):
to the conclusion obviously.
Speaker 3 (06:04):
They got it wrong.
Speaker 1 (06:06):
You got it wrong from the outset, and it's the
loss of trust that we live with and I don't
know how it's ever regained, and we're not better for it.
Just like death of journalism, it's not a win for
the right, even though journalism had gone far left, having
no freedom of the press and no one legitimately holding
(06:27):
elected officials accountable. That's not good for the republic, and
we're seeing the same thing with loss of trust. Black
Lives Matter is another interesting one to look at. And
again I think you know when I say Black Lives Matter,
the biggest problem the movement had was that it was
tied to an event, and that one event doesn't prove
(06:51):
a systemic problem. It proves a problem mainly with Chauvan
one cop and the two morons that watched him do it.
And it almost disproves BLM in that while it shouldn't
have happened, they were all charged and they were all convicted,
(07:12):
and that simply wouldn't have happened.
Speaker 3 (07:14):
So what they did is they took.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
An event in real time twenty nineteen and then brought
back up things that we've overcome for fifty years as
if we never overcame them, and that divided America. That's
why you had some people saying black lives matter. Well,
of course they do. All life matters as it is
attached to a creator, and we are his creation, and
(07:36):
unlike animals, we are made in his image, with a
soul and an eternal purpose. And if you said all
lives matter, they took that as you don't think black
lives matter. It just it became well, you remember you
lived in Well the few Research just did a project
on black lives matter five years later. I think a
(08:01):
lot of this anti police movement, which is to suggest
because there were three bad cops, all cops are bad.
The individual who died at their hands, George Floyd, did
not live an exemplary life, but they tried to twist
that into all bad guys are victims and good and
all the good guys are bad and violent, and all
(08:24):
of America watches and doesn't care because black lives don't matter.
I mean, God help us if that isn't destined to fail, right,
because if it succeeds, that means all cops are bad,
and I know that ain't true. So even though the
(08:47):
question is ultimately did it do good? And the poll
said seventy two percent of America adults believe the focus
on race after the George Floyd killing in May twenty
twenty did not lead to changes for black people. So
(09:08):
if you look at it from a black perspective, they're
not any better off for it happening.
Speaker 3 (09:12):
I think it was absorbed.
Speaker 1 (09:14):
Look a lot of times those Black Lives Matter things
had bad elements within it, mostly greed and pocketing money.
But then Antifa would come along in hijacket, and then
they would do nothing to differentiate themselves from that, so
it became anarchy. No one's going to be better for that.
(09:38):
Attacking a cop car that did nothing doesn't get you anywhere.
Attacking some person's home or business does nothing, Especially when
they were businesses in black communities, you were just hurting yourself.
In other words, there's the perception from the pole, then
there's the reality. When you break it down, it's illogical.
I don't need a poll to tell you that black
(09:58):
lives matter didn't any black lives matter more, and they
already mattered a lot to me before it. But seventy
two percent of Americans believe our focus on race did
not lead to changes. Are we better or worse for it?
(10:19):
I did not like when Barack Obama won the election.
I didn't, But I wasn't a big fan of John
McCain either, and so I was kind of I remember
going to bed thinking, you know, I have seen this
life mostly through my eyes and my experience, even though
(10:42):
my goal every day is to see people through through
Christ's eyes. But I went to bed thinking, you know what,
if I had been born with color, it'd be nice
to see a president of color. I did feel that
I've worried about this particular guy, and that proved to
(11:03):
be true. But I'll ask you an even more important
question in our election, and trust me, I know his
blood makeup fifty percent Caucasian. He's actually more Arab than
he is black, but he perceives himself black. He looks black,
and we acknowledge he's the first black president. Did our
(11:26):
racial relations improve or get worse? Well, you elected a
divider a community organizer, which, by the way, that works
great as a community organizer, play good guy, bad guy
on a local main street. But when you're everyone's president,
pitting half the people you're serving against the other half
you're serving, it doesn't work so good.
Speaker 3 (11:45):
So had nothing to do with the pigment of his skin.
Speaker 1 (11:48):
It had everything to do with his worldview, his policy views,
and his background. This guy was a student of Sawlolenski.
But I think the answer is much worse. Race relations
got worse, not better, with the election of a black president.
As for race relations from BLM, did that make it
(12:10):
better or worse? Well, it's certainly did to make it
better for black people. Seventy two percent of American adults
believe the focus on race after the Floyd killing did
not lead to changes for black people themselves, up from
fifty seven percent in April of twenty three and forty
six percent who said it would not have that effect.
(12:35):
The best thing to do on this one is go
right to the chart. In September twenty twenty, fifty two
percent of the Americans polled thought it would lead to change,
it would make black lives better, Forty six percent said
it won't lead to change. Then in twenty twenty three,
(12:57):
three years later, forty percent said it would lead to changes,
fifty seven percent said it would not lead to any changes.
To wonder Donald Trump. By February of twenty twenty five,
twenty seven percent believe it led to change, seventy two
percent believe it led to no changes at all. And
(13:17):
then somewhere right before that February twenty twenty five, in
November is an election with an eroding black vote for Democrats.
I mean, I just broke down to you at its
route and its motive, how flawed it was. But I
think it's pretty obvious for us all to see this
(13:39):
poll can't be too far off, because we just saw
the makeup of the electorate in in a presidential election
and this was a big problem for them, especially among
black men. So our polls are plenty today where's BLM
dying with a mass majority of America's thinking it did
(14:01):
nothing to make black lives better? And oh by the way,
they mattered a lot before it started. We didn't need
a political movement, and it really brought up a lot
of old wounds. The other pole of plenting COVID were
the expert's right. It's a dead tie trending towards they
(14:22):
were dead wrong. It's your Morning Show with Michael del Journo.
This is your morning show. I'm Michael del John. President
Trump is expected to announce a big trade deal with
the United Kingdom today.
Speaker 5 (14:34):
That's according to multiple reports, which indicate the announcement will
come Thursday. This after President Trump, in a post on
Truth of Social Wednesday night, said he was going to
announce a major trade deal. Trump says he's going to
hold a news conference in the Oval Office, closing the
post by saying the deal is the first of many.
The expected deal comes in an economic uncertainty caused by
global tariffs recently announced by the Trump administration.
Speaker 3 (14:56):
I'm Mark Mayfield.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
Speaking of polls, Brian Schucks here to tell you President
Trump's average poll rating is creeping up.
Speaker 6 (15:02):
According to Decision Desk HQ's favorability tracker, Trump is averaging
a fifty one point seven percent unfavorable rating, which is
two point nine percentage points better than his average on
April thirtieth. However, the rating is lower than the forty
four point four percent favorable rating he held when he
first took office. The new data comes as Trump has
(15:24):
railed against polsters over his declining popularity numbers after marking
one hundred days of his return to the White House.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
I'm Brian shuk.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
I remember when I said early in the Obama administration,
will never be a president who has much more than
fifty That'll be the new high point. Fifty percent. People
thought I was crazy. Fifty percent is well, what's seventy
five used to be? Netflix is rolling out on a
redesign of its homepage on TVs. I love their design,
I love their little sound effect.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
Why you touching perfection?
Speaker 1 (15:56):
Well, because it's been ten year, twelve years actually, and
it's time for a new look.
Speaker 7 (16:00):
Netflix CEO Greg Peters sat down to discuss some of
the changes on NBC's Today's Show.
Speaker 1 (16:06):
Really, at the end of the day, we're looking at,
you know, what is the viewing behavior, because that's the
thing that matters the most. Are we satisfying viewers and
are they watching?
Speaker 7 (16:13):
Starting next week, the homepage will feature fewer titles but
more video. Company officials say the goal is a sleeker
design that will get more people to press play and stay.
I'm Tammy Trihio.
Speaker 8 (16:27):
I'm Daniel Colsney and Tampa and my morning show is
Your Morning Show with Michael, Jill Joram.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
Hey gang, it's Michael. Your Morning Show can be heard
live each weekday morning on great radio stations like k
EIB in Los Angeles, WFDF nine ten AM Detroit, Michigan,
the Superstation, and the Rock Up Talk sixteen hundred AM
KIVA and Albuquerque, New Mexico. We'd love to have you
listen live every morning, but glad you're here now for
the podcast.
Speaker 3 (16:56):
Enjoy good morning, Michael.
Speaker 9 (16:57):
I wonder if we're underestimated Francis's affect with the Cardinals
and their wokeness and their fear of not voting for
the first black or Asian pope, and how that may
affect the conservativeness of the.
Speaker 3 (17:17):
Church going forward.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
That was kind of dusted out in the movie Conclave.
There was a leading candidate who was from Africa and
of color. He's removed from the voting for a sex
scandal thirty years earlier. That's revealed during the conclave. It
is presumed in one of the dialogues at the table
(17:41):
that if one of the liberal cardinals at the table
isn't elected, he could get elected, and that left only
his color as the reason. I don't think that plays
any role in this. You know, hopefully by design this
is all about leading of the Holy Spirit for the
(18:03):
right person to proclaim the resurrection of Christ. But there
is politics involved, and I'm not blind to that. I
just thought it was worthy to note, by the way,
if we do get a black and there's two candidates,
Turksan being the leader, the leader and very conservative and
from Africa, that's a point Red would want me to
make people careful what you asked for. You get a
(18:25):
pope that's black, it's going to be from Africa and
very conservative, and that's a tough coalition to get to
with eighty Francis appointed cardinals voting not because of the
color of his skin, but because of the conservativeness of
his views. But we've had black popes. We had Pope
Galasias that was the forty ninth pope, not in a
(18:48):
modern era by any stretch, and he was from Rome
by way of Africa. So he was a Roman citizen
but of African descent. So this would not be the
first pope black pope, nor would it be the first
if it ends up being Asian. In fact, nine of
the early popes are said to have been Asian, Constantine,
(19:10):
John the fifth, and John the sixth, so neither would
be a first in contemporary times and in recent history.
But I suspect, well, you know, my prediction was, my
original prediction was what's his name? No, I'm blank, No,
(19:33):
I like Pizza Balas who end up rooting Foropy Zoopy,
and Zoopy would be very in line with Francis. And
my prediction was that it would be very good one
read thank you so much, Soope, And my prediction, my
nos true del journer, was it'll be Zoopy and that
he will choose the name Francis the second.
Speaker 3 (19:53):
But I'm telling you, Pizza Bala, his star is on
the rise.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
What's interesting is you have a first vote, and I
suspect there were four or five in double digits. Then
they stop after a first vote, and then as Rory
was laying out, that's when the lobbying. Literally they're all sequestered,
but they go off in groups and they'll start coalescing
(20:18):
behind and you'll get a conservative and a liberal that
will rise the top. And then one and something in
the hope would be the Holy Spirit leads them to
the significant two thirds majority, and then you see white smoke,
but one vote, black smoke, two votes today. Could we
have a new pope by later this afternoon or will
(20:40):
it more likely be tomorrow time. We'll tell keep your
eyes on the chimney. Meanwhile, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is
set to announce today his plans for overhauling the nation's
air traffic control system. I think the first thing is personnel.
I mean that look, the findings of what happened at
National Airport is on the helicopter pilot who confused the
(21:03):
visual warning with the wrong plane and ascended right in
to the commercial aircraft. So you can make fun of
you know. I think Red Off the Air said this
technology they're using up in the control tower looks like
from the movie Airplane, and it does.
Speaker 3 (21:23):
It looks antiquate, it looks like asteroids.
Speaker 1 (21:26):
So I wonder how much technology is a part of
this vision. But the first obvious thing to do is
staff up, and I would start with all the qualified
people that were passed up because of woke diversity agendas.
(21:46):
But we'll see, it'll all be revealed today. The FED
chose to leave interest rates unchanged. I think the President
would like to see them come down. The Fed is
yet to take that action. And the President has a
big announcement today on a trade deal with the United Kingdom. Again,
I think the brilliance of this is the President could
have singled out China from the very beginning, and that
really would have been instantly a trade war, and that
(22:11):
would have made the US the aggressor. But by making
it in principle across the board, you isolate China, and
if China doesn't negotiate, well, then that was their choice
to isolate themselves. But these deals are starting to fall
in place and they do play a role in us
making things.
Speaker 5 (22:33):
Now.
Speaker 1 (22:33):
We're going to talk to our money with an economist
David Bonson later and he'saying, there's some things I don't
care to make, and we went through just my studio.
You know, I got a board that comes from another country.
I got a microphone that comes from this country. If
it makes sense to it, if it makes more sense
and it's more affordable to have certain parts or certain
(22:54):
products come from other places. Great, but I think by
and large you do want to create jobs. That helps
you get to that overall equation of more tax payers
burdened less. Now, the real brilliant move could be once
you get all this trade imbalance fixed, you don't need
an income tax. That would be really huge. That's how
(23:18):
we used to fund ourselves. But just by getting rid
of the imbalance and making more things and then buying them,
making them here and buying them here, you're going to
bring down inflation. You're going to improve the economy. Just
don't go crazy with them. I don't think the President is.
But we expected India, France, United Kingdom, we expected our
(23:42):
friends to cut deals. I think what the President did
to isolate Canada, especially in the Oval Office this week,
makes that not a done deal yet. But it doesn't
sound like the President is really interested in cutting a
deal with Canada. Look, we love you, we'll protect you,
but we don't want your cars and we don't want
your steel.
Speaker 3 (24:02):
We'll make it ourselves.
Speaker 1 (24:06):
So I think a lot of this trade stuff is
getting cleaned up to the point where a lot of
the uncertainty is being removed in China finds itself isolated.
Speaker 3 (24:15):
Meanwhile, you have the gallup pole saying dump your stocks,
put it all in gold, put.
Speaker 1 (24:18):
It all in real estate, not the gold or real
estate or bad investments or a key part of diversifying.
And I said, anecdotally, real estate is certainly out did
in five years what my four oh one k portfolio
did in fifteen years. But that's anecdotal. Is it time
to dump stocks?
Speaker 3 (24:38):
Money? Was David Bonson Next Hour?
Speaker 1 (24:41):
All right, that's Pope, that's Bonson, John Decker in moments
from now on. The President obviously got his eye on
India and Pakistan. He wants to stop this fighting before
it gets out of hand. We'll do that in a moment.
Speaker 3 (24:54):
But foist thing's voiced, stop it.
Speaker 5 (25:01):
Don't you ever let anybody take your power from you.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
God no, No, keep calm, come on, always revealing and
often entertaining.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
It's time for your sounds. Can we start with Joe Biden?
Speaker 1 (25:17):
These are those moments, whether it's a word salad from
Kamala or a drunk rant from Kamala, or Joe resurfacing
as he has Uh, you just stop and you sweat
for a moment. You go wow, one swing state away
from Kamala Harris being present.
Speaker 3 (25:38):
That'll make your palm sweat.
Speaker 1 (25:39):
Come on, man, Or what if he hadn't had the
bad debate and didn't get forced out by his own party.
Can you imagine a second term of Joe Biden. Well,
he sat down with the BBC and there hasn't been
much progress on the cognitive front.
Speaker 3 (25:54):
I assure you.
Speaker 6 (25:55):
Should you have withdrawn earlier given someone else a big
a job.
Speaker 3 (25:58):
I don't. I don't think it would have mattered.
Speaker 10 (26:05):
We left at a time when we had a good candidate,
She's fully funded. And what happened was mom about that
I had become what we had set out to do.
No one thought we could do. I become so successful
(26:26):
our Jenny. It was hard to say now, I'm gonna
stop now. I remember what I said when I started that.
I think it's I'm preparing to hand this to you.
Speaker 3 (26:35):
Can't do it.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
There's people driving they could literally fall asleep at the wheel.
Just a tad lack of energy there. Bernie Sanders, Well,
you know what the narrative is from the left right.
I guess Donald Trump is the great Satan. Elon Musk
is the little satan and oligarchy is what it's really
(26:56):
all about. Not people trustworthy, successful, looking at the books,
looking at the numbers and identifying misspending, overspending and criminal activity. No, no,
(27:16):
that's oligarchy. So Brett Behar has Bernie Sanders out, you
want to talk about oligarchy, Well, here comes a question.
Speaker 11 (27:24):
Melissa Slockin, senator from Michigan. She said, you shouldn't be
using an oligarchy. It's over people's head. You've gotten criticized
from other people. Freebeacon says Bernie Sanders spent two hundred
twenty one thousand on private jets fighting the oligarchy tour,
paid for by friends of Bernie Sanders.
Speaker 1 (27:39):
By the way, I used to love when all the
stars on global warming would fly individual private jets across
the world. I mean the carbon footprint of that. As
you're racing to make a statement we have an existential threat.
Our activities were the cause. We're the problem. I'm going
(28:02):
to exasperate the problem on my way to make a presence.
That makes no difference at a conference to draw attention.
You drew attention to your hypocrisy, not the global warming
or any proof of global warming. So is Bernie doing
the same thing when he flies a private jet two
hundred and twenty one thousand dollars. It's very oligarchical, isn't it.
Speaker 11 (28:20):
That you've spent millions of dollars in campaign funds on
private jet travel over the years.
Speaker 3 (28:25):
How do you push back on both of those things?
Speaker 8 (28:27):
The last time you saw Donald Trump during a campaign
mode at National Airport.
Speaker 3 (28:33):
No, no, no, it doesn't.
Speaker 11 (28:34):
But he's also not fighting the oligarchy.
Speaker 12 (28:36):
No.
Speaker 8 (28:37):
And you run a campaign and you do three or
four or five rallies in a week, the only way
you can get around to book to thirty thousand people.
I think I'm going to be sitting on a waiting
line at United waiting.
Speaker 3 (28:48):
You know what.
Speaker 8 (28:48):
Thirty thousand people are waiting.
Speaker 3 (28:49):
That's the only way you can get around.
Speaker 1 (28:50):
Now, see the add and me stopped right there, And
all I could do is picture a disheveled Bernie Sanders
pacing around, you know, being the angry old man griping
at the gate.
Speaker 3 (29:00):
I could see it.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
I don't know anybody that has broken down the tariff
negotiations to Donald Trump told little girls to just get
used to having less dolls, and that that's a real
sticking point. But that's the point CNN was trying to
make and asking Scott Jennings, why can't this president explain
(29:31):
things better?
Speaker 2 (29:32):
Listen put his comments together with Secretary Besson. What they're
saying is the American dream is not solely based on
our ability to get the cheapest junk we can from China.
The American dream is built on us not being reliant
on our enemy, but having jobs here, having better jobs here,
having a better pathway for your family to make a
better living for yourself. That has nothing to do with
(29:54):
being able to get cheap junk from China. So I
do think what their message is rooted in has to
do with a long term statement about what constitutes the
American dream and don't fall into the trap of believing
that we have to be relying on our enemy for
you to have a dream of what owning a bunch
of junk. The dream is we make stuff here, it
will be high quality and the people who make it
(30:15):
will make a fair wage.
Speaker 3 (30:17):
That's the American dream.
Speaker 13 (30:17):
I think it's it's even broader than that too. It's
not just about the dolls. I think it's how much
pain are people willing to take for this notion of
making America better? How much pain are people going to
take Themtter wallets for this nebulous value.
Speaker 3 (30:34):
I like there's any child on Christmas morning, Mom, this
doll sucks. It's not from China. I don't even get that.
Where the debates are going.
Speaker 1 (30:49):
Don't you ever let anybody take your power from you?
Speaker 10 (30:52):
For it is the motto.
Speaker 3 (30:56):
Yet, keep calm, come along energy that This is your
morning show with Michael del Chrono. So we talked.
Speaker 1 (31:07):
I think On Tuesday, Gallup came out with a new
poll fewer Americans see stock as ideal long term investments.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
The tone of it was.
Speaker 1 (31:18):
Stocks, smocks, it at gold, it ain't real estate. Our
economist of Money with David Bonson is joining us from
the Bonson Financial Group. He also presides, I mean I'm
doing a tease. Oh I thought you said joining us.
Speaker 14 (31:31):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (31:31):
And we're gonna ask him is it time to dumb
stocks and gold? You know, if President Trump was not
President Trump and something started brewing between India and Pakistan,
he might be likely to say that would have ever
happened if I was president. Well, he is president and
it is happening. Why is it happening and can he
get it to stop. He says he wants it to stop.
(31:52):
John Decker is here to go over that with us.
Speaker 3 (31:54):
John.
Speaker 1 (31:57):
India has never liked Pakistan. India has never liked pack
Good luck.
Speaker 12 (32:03):
Yeah, good luck, good luck.
Speaker 14 (32:05):
Well, you can tamp down the conflict, that's for sure,
you know, I mean, you can never put it, you know,
completely to rest.
Speaker 12 (32:10):
And this is something that has a lot of history.
Speaker 14 (32:14):
What we've seen is that there have.
Speaker 12 (32:17):
Been strikes, missile strikes by both countries into each other's
territory over the last few days. The State Department has
issued two warnings.
Speaker 14 (32:27):
One if you are an American who is now in
the conflict area on the India Pakistan border, leave that
area immediately. And the other State Department warning is do
not travel to Pakistan right now. So hopefully every American
heeds those warnings.
Speaker 12 (32:45):
In the meantime, the President has said he has a
very good.
Speaker 14 (32:48):
Relationship with the leaders of both India and Pakistan, and
he says that, you know, he will reach out to
those leaders to try to tamp things down from the
place where they've been over the last two days.
Speaker 1 (33:01):
Well, we know why they've been fighting for decades why
are they fighting now?
Speaker 14 (33:07):
This is an area, the Kashmir area along the India
Pakistan border, that has always presented issues for both of
these countries. And I can't say why specifically in the
last few days this area is now the point of
conflict once again, but it is.
Speaker 3 (33:27):
And as a result we see.
Speaker 14 (33:30):
Pakistan claiming they've shot down a number of Indian fighter jets.
No confirmation of that, Michael coming from India just yet,
but you know, clearly this is this is something that
you know, I don't think any president is fully put
to bed. And you know, we'll see whether the president
can deal with his other trumb spot. You know, look,
he's dealing with a lot. He's got a lot on
(33:51):
his plate, the war in Ukraine, Israel's war against Tamas,
and now this trouble spot as well.
Speaker 1 (33:58):
Yeah, you know, Kashmir is an interest experiment. Let's face it,
that has been quite frankly a disaster. Would have been
like after nine to eleven, we give a portion of
New York to to Islamists and think, well, that'll be peaceful.
We'll just give everybody a little portion of this land
and that it's been a source of fighting and we'll
continue to be boy. You know the old the scripture
(34:20):
is Blessed is the peacemaker Jesus teaching on the Sermon
on the Mount. That's really what this presidency has been become.
I mean, he's trying to stop Ukraine and Russia from fighting.
He's trying to stop Iran and their influence with Hamas
and Israel.
Speaker 3 (34:33):
And now Indian Pakistan.
Speaker 1 (34:34):
He's going to need a lot of prayers because and
a lot of blessings.
Speaker 3 (34:37):
This is a lot of fighting going on. This one.
Speaker 1 (34:40):
You don't want to see escalate, will end and dismount
with both have nuclear capabilities and weapons they've come close
to exchanging in the past. We don't want that in
the future. Appreciate it, John so much. We're talking again tomorrow.
Speaker 3 (34:52):
Thanks. Well, we're all in this together. This is your
Morning Show with Michael nhild Jo now
Speaker 4 (35:00):
I the po
Hi, it's me Michael. Your morning show can be heard
on great stations across the country like Talk Radio eleven
ninety and Dallas Fort Worth, Freedom one oh four point
seven and Washington, DC and five point fifty k FYI
and Phoenix, Arizona. We'd love to be a part of
your morning routine or take us along on the drive
to work. But as we always say, better late than never.
Enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:20):
Starting your morning off right, A new way of talk,
a new way of understanding, because we're in this together.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Gill Truman.
Speaker 1 (00:34):
Tomorrow right here on the Big Big Show Friday with
forty seven. Later on This Big Big Show, David bonson,
we had that Gallup poll hust time for everybody.
Speaker 3 (00:47):
Dump their stocks. The only thing to trust is golden
real estate.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Not so fast as coach lead Corso would say, a
visit with her money was David Bonson. Coming up, and
historian and author Jason Bailey will join us. The new
book is called Gandalf Jim Tony and the Life of
a Living Legend. The title says it all, doesn't it.
Oh you know Tony, but do you know Jim James Gandelphini.
You will after this interview, and especially if you buy
(01:11):
the book. That's all coming up for you. If you're
just waking up this morning. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is
said to announce today his plans to overhauling the nation's
air traffic control system.
Speaker 3 (01:23):
I think that's going to involve maybe.
Speaker 1 (01:24):
Some technology and a lot of hiring. That shows leave
interest rates unchanged. Most airports operated smoothly the first day
of real ID. It's because they allowed people to get
on without their real ID and the only puff of
smoke was black. Therefore, we had one round of votes
for the pope. Is Rory here you at?
Speaker 3 (01:43):
Yeah? Yeah, Sidy's here. Yeah, let me talk to him
real quick.
Speaker 1 (01:46):
Rory, So, good morning after a first vote, and we're
gonna get to your story. But what fascinates me is
that first vote confirms the coalitions. If you will, I
promise you probably the four cardinals emerged as getting significant
amount of votes.
Speaker 3 (02:05):
Then they leave.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
Now they come back today with some coalitions, you know,
and movement, and that'll get them closer. The question is, well,
we have a pope today or tomorrow, and my guess
is more likely tomorrow. But if we could only know
where they're at after a first vote, you know what
I mean.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
But so Baza Balla is right in there. Yeah, that
would be fun.
Speaker 4 (02:25):
So they had the one vote last night, as you said,
we saw the black smoke. They wrapped things up, and
then the sporting two rounds of voting. The second balloting
brought about that black smoke. So as we speak, they're
in their break having a meal. And then this is
when the politicking happens, because when you're in the Sistine Chapel,
essentially it's just silence and voting.
Speaker 3 (02:45):
There isn't much more that happens there.
Speaker 4 (02:46):
It's when they're on these breaks that's exactly when the
real movement happens.
Speaker 1 (02:50):
It's when all the negotiations go. And I know, I
was watching a bishop yesterday and I always say this.
Speaker 3 (02:54):
I don't know why I do.
Speaker 1 (02:55):
We're all Christians, but I'm not Catholic, and so I
like to respectfully not come I meant, but I'm fascinated
by the process. And this bishop was saying, look, the
main job of a pope is the same as peters,
to proclaim the resurrection of Christ. Enough of all this
politics stuff. But we all know it does get political
(03:17):
as part of the selection process, and a lot of Catholics,
practicing Catholics are very interested to see it. Does the
church continue the way of Francis, which is more progressive
and inclusive, or does it get more traditional and conservative.
And if it gets traditional and conservative, I suspect it's
pizza Bala or it's perhaps from Africa, our first black
(03:39):
pope that would be elected. But there's a lot of
Francis voters. What was it like, eighty three of the
one hundred and whatever that are going to be voting.
He's kind of stacked the deck to continue in his direction.
Speaker 4 (03:51):
Well, right, so eighty percent of the cardinals were appointed
by Francis. So this is their very first conclave now
representing seventy one different nation and so it's also the
most diverse, and you know, does this push toward the
southern hemisphere also continue with as you said, either a
black pope or an Asian pope would be the other
big consideration here because that's where the church is seeing
(04:14):
growth right now.
Speaker 1 (04:15):
Yeah, I kind of from as an outsider, I want
the next pope to have the humility and the love
and the personal touch of Francis. Maybe a little return
to a more traditional doctrine, but we'll see. I don't
think it'll be today. Francis was pretty remarkable and that
it was a third vote, right.
Speaker 4 (04:37):
Yeah, they all came relatively quickly, and that's been the
trend as of late. So Francis came on ballot number five.
Benedict was a ballot number four. But it was only
two days for both Francis and Benedict.
Speaker 1 (04:51):
We could have I mean, all these cardinals come shuffling
in with their suitcases, only one leaves as the pope.
That could be as soon as today. Rory's going to
be back. Next hour, we're going to talk about the FAA.
They're having an issue at Newark's Liberty International Airport and
it's now causing major problems for flights, especially for those
of you listening in the northeast. Royal had the complete
(05:12):
details coming up next hour. We were doing polls of
plenty and you know, I thought, the first one on
COVID five years later, and it sent us late, but
it was worth doing.
Speaker 3 (05:26):
It was that important one way or another.
Speaker 1 (05:30):
Unlike JFK, unlike OURFK, the truth, the truth of COVID
is going to come to the surface.
Speaker 3 (05:40):
It already is.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
America is exactly evenly divided on the important question did
the experts get it right? Forty one percent say no,
they didn't, forty one percent say yes they did. Exact tie.
But that's down from a year ago where forty five
percent said yes, they got it right. And the more
you learn about Falci, and the more you look in
the research and the information comes forward, you're gonna come
(06:03):
to the conclusion obviously.
Speaker 3 (06:04):
They got it wrong.
Speaker 1 (06:06):
You got it wrong from the outset, and it's the
loss of trust that we live with and I don't
know how it's ever regained, and we're not better for it.
Just like death of journalism, it's not a win for
the right, even though journalism had gone far left, having
no freedom of the press and no one legitimately holding
(06:27):
elected officials accountable. That's not good for the republic, and
we're seeing the same thing with loss of trust. Black
Lives Matter is another interesting one to look at. And
again I think you know when I say Black Lives Matter,
the biggest problem the movement had was that it was
tied to an event, and that one event doesn't prove
(06:51):
a systemic problem. It proves a problem mainly with Chauvan
one cop and the two morons that watched him do it.
And it almost disproves BLM in that while it shouldn't
have happened, they were all charged and they were all convicted,
(07:12):
and that simply wouldn't have happened.
Speaker 3 (07:14):
So what they did is they took.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
An event in real time twenty nineteen and then brought
back up things that we've overcome for fifty years as
if we never overcame them, and that divided America. That's
why you had some people saying black lives matter. Well,
of course they do. All life matters as it is
attached to a creator, and we are his creation, and
(07:36):
unlike animals, we are made in his image, with a
soul and an eternal purpose. And if you said all
lives matter, they took that as you don't think black
lives matter. It just it became well, you remember you
lived in Well the few Research just did a project
on black lives matter five years later. I think a
(08:01):
lot of this anti police movement, which is to suggest
because there were three bad cops, all cops are bad.
The individual who died at their hands, George Floyd, did
not live an exemplary life, but they tried to twist
that into all bad guys are victims and good and
all the good guys are bad and violent, and all
(08:24):
of America watches and doesn't care because black lives don't matter.
I mean, God help us if that isn't destined to fail, right,
because if it succeeds, that means all cops are bad,
and I know that ain't true. So even though the
(08:47):
question is ultimately did it do good? And the poll
said seventy two percent of America adults believe the focus
on race after the George Floyd killing in May twenty
twenty did not lead to changes for black people. So
(09:08):
if you look at it from a black perspective, they're
not any better off for it happening.
Speaker 3 (09:12):
I think it was absorbed.
Speaker 1 (09:14):
Look a lot of times those Black Lives Matter things
had bad elements within it, mostly greed and pocketing money.
But then Antifa would come along in hijacket, and then
they would do nothing to differentiate themselves from that, so
it became anarchy. No one's going to be better for that.
(09:38):
Attacking a cop car that did nothing doesn't get you anywhere.
Attacking some person's home or business does nothing, Especially when
they were businesses in black communities, you were just hurting yourself.
In other words, there's the perception from the pole, then
there's the reality. When you break it down, it's illogical.
I don't need a poll to tell you that black
(09:58):
lives matter didn't any black lives matter more, and they
already mattered a lot to me before it. But seventy
two percent of Americans believe our focus on race did
not lead to changes. Are we better or worse for it?
(10:19):
I did not like when Barack Obama won the election.
I didn't, But I wasn't a big fan of John
McCain either, and so I was kind of I remember
going to bed thinking, you know, I have seen this
life mostly through my eyes and my experience, even though
(10:42):
my goal every day is to see people through through
Christ's eyes. But I went to bed thinking, you know what,
if I had been born with color, it'd be nice
to see a president of color. I did feel that
I've worried about this particular guy, and that proved to
(11:03):
be true. But I'll ask you an even more important
question in our election, and trust me, I know his
blood makeup fifty percent Caucasian. He's actually more Arab than
he is black, but he perceives himself black. He looks black,
and we acknowledge he's the first black president. Did our
(11:26):
racial relations improve or get worse? Well, you elected a
divider a community organizer, which, by the way, that works
great as a community organizer, play good guy, bad guy
on a local main street. But when you're everyone's president,
pitting half the people you're serving against the other half
you're serving, it doesn't work so good.
Speaker 3 (11:45):
So had nothing to do with the pigment of his skin.
Speaker 1 (11:48):
It had everything to do with his worldview, his policy views,
and his background. This guy was a student of Sawlolenski.
But I think the answer is much worse. Race relations
got worse, not better, with the election of a black president.
As for race relations from BLM, did that make it
(12:10):
better or worse? Well, it's certainly did to make it
better for black people. Seventy two percent of American adults
believe the focus on race after the Floyd killing did
not lead to changes for black people themselves, up from
fifty seven percent in April of twenty three and forty
six percent who said it would not have that effect.
(12:35):
The best thing to do on this one is go
right to the chart. In September twenty twenty, fifty two
percent of the Americans polled thought it would lead to change,
it would make black lives better, Forty six percent said
it won't lead to change. Then in twenty twenty three,
(12:57):
three years later, forty percent said it would lead to changes,
fifty seven percent said it would not lead to any changes.
To wonder Donald Trump. By February of twenty twenty five,
twenty seven percent believe it led to change, seventy two
percent believe it led to no changes at all. And
(13:17):
then somewhere right before that February twenty twenty five, in
November is an election with an eroding black vote for Democrats.
I mean, I just broke down to you at its
route and its motive, how flawed it was. But I
think it's pretty obvious for us all to see this
(13:39):
poll can't be too far off, because we just saw
the makeup of the electorate in in a presidential election
and this was a big problem for them, especially among
black men. So our polls are plenty today where's BLM
dying with a mass majority of America's thinking it did
(14:01):
nothing to make black lives better? And oh by the way,
they mattered a lot before it started. We didn't need
a political movement, and it really brought up a lot
of old wounds. The other pole of plenting COVID were
the expert's right. It's a dead tie trending towards they
(14:22):
were dead wrong. It's your Morning Show with Michael del Journo.
This is your morning show. I'm Michael del John. President
Trump is expected to announce a big trade deal with
the United Kingdom today.
Speaker 5 (14:34):
That's according to multiple reports, which indicate the announcement will
come Thursday. This after President Trump, in a post on
Truth of Social Wednesday night, said he was going to
announce a major trade deal. Trump says he's going to
hold a news conference in the Oval Office, closing the
post by saying the deal is the first of many.
The expected deal comes in an economic uncertainty caused by
global tariffs recently announced by the Trump administration.
Speaker 3 (14:56):
I'm Mark Mayfield.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
Speaking of polls, Brian Schucks here to tell you President
Trump's average poll rating is creeping up.
Speaker 6 (15:02):
According to Decision Desk HQ's favorability tracker, Trump is averaging
a fifty one point seven percent unfavorable rating, which is
two point nine percentage points better than his average on
April thirtieth. However, the rating is lower than the forty
four point four percent favorable rating he held when he
first took office. The new data comes as Trump has
(15:24):
railed against polsters over his declining popularity numbers after marking
one hundred days of his return to the White House.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
I'm Brian shuk.
Speaker 1 (15:33):
I remember when I said early in the Obama administration,
will never be a president who has much more than
fifty That'll be the new high point. Fifty percent. People
thought I was crazy. Fifty percent is well, what's seventy
five used to be? Netflix is rolling out on a
redesign of its homepage on TVs. I love their design,
I love their little sound effect.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
Why you touching perfection?
Speaker 1 (15:56):
Well, because it's been ten year, twelve years actually, and
it's time for a new look.
Speaker 7 (16:00):
Netflix CEO Greg Peters sat down to discuss some of
the changes on NBC's Today's Show.
Speaker 1 (16:06):
Really, at the end of the day, we're looking at,
you know, what is the viewing behavior, because that's the
thing that matters the most. Are we satisfying viewers and
are they watching?
Speaker 7 (16:13):
Starting next week, the homepage will feature fewer titles but
more video. Company officials say the goal is a sleeker
design that will get more people to press play and stay.
I'm Tammy Trihio.
Speaker 8 (16:27):
I'm Daniel Colsney and Tampa and my morning show is
Your Morning Show with Michael, Jill Joram.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
Hey gang, it's Michael. Your Morning Show can be heard
live each weekday morning on great radio stations like k
EIB in Los Angeles, WFDF nine ten AM Detroit, Michigan,
the Superstation, and the Rock Up Talk sixteen hundred AM
KIVA and Albuquerque, New Mexico. We'd love to have you
listen live every morning, but glad you're here now for
the podcast.
Speaker 3 (16:56):
Enjoy good morning, Michael.
Speaker 9 (16:57):
I wonder if we're underestimated Francis's affect with the Cardinals
and their wokeness and their fear of not voting for
the first black or Asian pope, and how that may
affect the conservativeness of the.
Speaker 3 (17:17):
Church going forward.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
That was kind of dusted out in the movie Conclave.
There was a leading candidate who was from Africa and
of color. He's removed from the voting for a sex
scandal thirty years earlier. That's revealed during the conclave. It
is presumed in one of the dialogues at the table
(17:41):
that if one of the liberal cardinals at the table
isn't elected, he could get elected, and that left only
his color as the reason. I don't think that plays
any role in this. You know, hopefully by design this
is all about leading of the Holy Spirit for the
(18:03):
right person to proclaim the resurrection of Christ. But there
is politics involved, and I'm not blind to that. I
just thought it was worthy to note, by the way,
if we do get a black and there's two candidates,
Turksan being the leader, the leader and very conservative and
from Africa, that's a point Red would want me to
make people careful what you asked for. You get a
(18:25):
pope that's black, it's going to be from Africa and
very conservative, and that's a tough coalition to get to
with eighty Francis appointed cardinals voting not because of the
color of his skin, but because of the conservativeness of
his views. But we've had black popes. We had Pope
Galasias that was the forty ninth pope, not in a
(18:48):
modern era by any stretch, and he was from Rome
by way of Africa. So he was a Roman citizen
but of African descent. So this would not be the
first pope black pope, nor would it be the first
if it ends up being Asian. In fact, nine of
the early popes are said to have been Asian, Constantine,
(19:10):
John the fifth, and John the sixth, so neither would
be a first in contemporary times and in recent history.
But I suspect, well, you know, my prediction was, my
original prediction was what's his name? No, I'm blank, No,
(19:33):
I like Pizza Balas who end up rooting Foropy Zoopy,
and Zoopy would be very in line with Francis. And
my prediction was that it would be very good one
read thank you so much, Soope, And my prediction, my
nos true del journer, was it'll be Zoopy and that
he will choose the name Francis the second.
Speaker 3 (19:53):
But I'm telling you, Pizza Bala, his star is on
the rise.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
What's interesting is you have a first vote, and I
suspect there were four or five in double digits. Then
they stop after a first vote, and then as Rory
was laying out, that's when the lobbying. Literally they're all sequestered,
but they go off in groups and they'll start coalescing
(20:18):
behind and you'll get a conservative and a liberal that
will rise the top. And then one and something in
the hope would be the Holy Spirit leads them to
the significant two thirds majority, and then you see white smoke,
but one vote, black smoke, two votes today. Could we
have a new pope by later this afternoon or will
(20:40):
it more likely be tomorrow time. We'll tell keep your
eyes on the chimney. Meanwhile, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is
set to announce today his plans for overhauling the nation's
air traffic control system. I think the first thing is personnel.
I mean that look, the findings of what happened at
National Airport is on the helicopter pilot who confused the
(21:03):
visual warning with the wrong plane and ascended right in
to the commercial aircraft. So you can make fun of
you know. I think Red Off the Air said this
technology they're using up in the control tower looks like
from the movie Airplane, and it does.
Speaker 3 (21:23):
It looks antiquate, it looks like asteroids.
Speaker 1 (21:26):
So I wonder how much technology is a part of
this vision. But the first obvious thing to do is
staff up, and I would start with all the qualified
people that were passed up because of woke diversity agendas.
(21:46):
But we'll see, it'll all be revealed today. The FED
chose to leave interest rates unchanged. I think the President
would like to see them come down. The Fed is
yet to take that action. And the President has a
big announcement today on a trade deal with the United Kingdom. Again,
I think the brilliance of this is the President could
have singled out China from the very beginning, and that
really would have been instantly a trade war, and that
(22:11):
would have made the US the aggressor. But by making
it in principle across the board, you isolate China, and
if China doesn't negotiate, well, then that was their choice
to isolate themselves. But these deals are starting to fall
in place and they do play a role in us
making things.
Speaker 5 (22:33):
Now.
Speaker 1 (22:33):
We're going to talk to our money with an economist
David Bonson later and he'saying, there's some things I don't
care to make, and we went through just my studio.
You know, I got a board that comes from another country.
I got a microphone that comes from this country. If
it makes sense to it, if it makes more sense
and it's more affordable to have certain parts or certain
(22:54):
products come from other places. Great, but I think by
and large you do want to create jobs. That helps
you get to that overall equation of more tax payers
burdened less. Now, the real brilliant move could be once
you get all this trade imbalance fixed, you don't need
an income tax. That would be really huge. That's how
(23:18):
we used to fund ourselves. But just by getting rid
of the imbalance and making more things and then buying them,
making them here and buying them here, you're going to
bring down inflation. You're going to improve the economy. Just
don't go crazy with them. I don't think the President is.
But we expected India, France, United Kingdom, we expected our
(23:42):
friends to cut deals. I think what the President did
to isolate Canada, especially in the Oval Office this week,
makes that not a done deal yet. But it doesn't
sound like the President is really interested in cutting a
deal with Canada. Look, we love you, we'll protect you,
but we don't want your cars and we don't want
your steel.
Speaker 3 (24:02):
We'll make it ourselves.
Speaker 1 (24:06):
So I think a lot of this trade stuff is
getting cleaned up to the point where a lot of
the uncertainty is being removed in China finds itself isolated.
Speaker 3 (24:15):
Meanwhile, you have the gallup pole saying dump your stocks,
put it all in gold, put.
Speaker 1 (24:18):
It all in real estate, not the gold or real
estate or bad investments or a key part of diversifying.
And I said, anecdotally, real estate is certainly out did
in five years what my four oh one k portfolio
did in fifteen years. But that's anecdotal. Is it time
to dump stocks?
Speaker 3 (24:38):
Money? Was David Bonson Next Hour?
Speaker 1 (24:41):
All right, that's Pope, that's Bonson, John Decker in moments
from now on. The President obviously got his eye on
India and Pakistan. He wants to stop this fighting before
it gets out of hand. We'll do that in a moment.
Speaker 3 (24:54):
But foist thing's voiced, stop it.
Speaker 5 (25:01):
Don't you ever let anybody take your power from you.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
God no, No, keep calm, come on, always revealing and
often entertaining.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
It's time for your sounds. Can we start with Joe Biden?
Speaker 1 (25:17):
These are those moments, whether it's a word salad from
Kamala or a drunk rant from Kamala, or Joe resurfacing
as he has Uh, you just stop and you sweat
for a moment. You go wow, one swing state away
from Kamala Harris being present.
Speaker 3 (25:38):
That'll make your palm sweat.
Speaker 1 (25:39):
Come on, man, Or what if he hadn't had the
bad debate and didn't get forced out by his own party.
Can you imagine a second term of Joe Biden. Well,
he sat down with the BBC and there hasn't been
much progress on the cognitive front.
Speaker 3 (25:54):
I assure you.
Speaker 6 (25:55):
Should you have withdrawn earlier given someone else a big
a job.
Speaker 3 (25:58):
I don't. I don't think it would have mattered.
Speaker 10 (26:05):
We left at a time when we had a good candidate,
She's fully funded. And what happened was mom about that
I had become what we had set out to do.
No one thought we could do. I become so successful
(26:26):
our Jenny. It was hard to say now, I'm gonna
stop now. I remember what I said when I started that.
I think it's I'm preparing to hand this to you.
Speaker 3 (26:35):
Can't do it.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
There's people driving they could literally fall asleep at the wheel.
Just a tad lack of energy there. Bernie Sanders, Well,
you know what the narrative is from the left right.
I guess Donald Trump is the great Satan. Elon Musk
is the little satan and oligarchy is what it's really
(26:56):
all about. Not people trustworthy, successful, looking at the books,
looking at the numbers and identifying misspending, overspending and criminal activity. No, no,
(27:16):
that's oligarchy. So Brett Behar has Bernie Sanders out, you
want to talk about oligarchy, Well, here comes a question.
Speaker 11 (27:24):
Melissa Slockin, senator from Michigan. She said, you shouldn't be
using an oligarchy. It's over people's head. You've gotten criticized
from other people. Freebeacon says Bernie Sanders spent two hundred
twenty one thousand on private jets fighting the oligarchy tour,
paid for by friends of Bernie Sanders.
Speaker 1 (27:39):
By the way, I used to love when all the
stars on global warming would fly individual private jets across
the world. I mean the carbon footprint of that. As
you're racing to make a statement we have an existential threat.
Our activities were the cause. We're the problem. I'm going
(28:02):
to exasperate the problem on my way to make a presence.
That makes no difference at a conference to draw attention.
You drew attention to your hypocrisy, not the global warming
or any proof of global warming. So is Bernie doing
the same thing when he flies a private jet two
hundred and twenty one thousand dollars. It's very oligarchical, isn't it.
Speaker 11 (28:20):
That you've spent millions of dollars in campaign funds on
private jet travel over the years.
Speaker 3 (28:25):
How do you push back on both of those things?
Speaker 8 (28:27):
The last time you saw Donald Trump during a campaign
mode at National Airport.
Speaker 3 (28:33):
No, no, no, it doesn't.
Speaker 11 (28:34):
But he's also not fighting the oligarchy.
Speaker 12 (28:36):
No.
Speaker 8 (28:37):
And you run a campaign and you do three or
four or five rallies in a week, the only way
you can get around to book to thirty thousand people.
I think I'm going to be sitting on a waiting
line at United waiting.
Speaker 3 (28:48):
You know what.
Speaker 8 (28:48):
Thirty thousand people are waiting.
Speaker 3 (28:49):
That's the only way you can get around.
Speaker 1 (28:50):
Now, see the add and me stopped right there, And
all I could do is picture a disheveled Bernie Sanders
pacing around, you know, being the angry old man griping
at the gate.
Speaker 3 (29:00):
I could see it.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
I don't know anybody that has broken down the tariff
negotiations to Donald Trump told little girls to just get
used to having less dolls, and that that's a real
sticking point. But that's the point CNN was trying to
make and asking Scott Jennings, why can't this president explain
(29:31):
things better?
Speaker 2 (29:32):
Listen put his comments together with Secretary Besson. What they're
saying is the American dream is not solely based on
our ability to get the cheapest junk we can from China.
The American dream is built on us not being reliant
on our enemy, but having jobs here, having better jobs here,
having a better pathway for your family to make a
better living for yourself. That has nothing to do with
(29:54):
being able to get cheap junk from China. So I
do think what their message is rooted in has to
do with a long term statement about what constitutes the
American dream and don't fall into the trap of believing
that we have to be relying on our enemy for
you to have a dream of what owning a bunch
of junk. The dream is we make stuff here, it
will be high quality and the people who make it
(30:15):
will make a fair wage.
Speaker 3 (30:17):
That's the American dream.
Speaker 13 (30:17):
I think it's it's even broader than that too. It's
not just about the dolls. I think it's how much
pain are people willing to take for this notion of
making America better? How much pain are people going to
take Themtter wallets for this nebulous value.
Speaker 3 (30:34):
I like there's any child on Christmas morning, Mom, this
doll sucks. It's not from China. I don't even get that.
Where the debates are going.
Speaker 1 (30:49):
Don't you ever let anybody take your power from you?
Speaker 10 (30:52):
For it is the motto.
Speaker 3 (30:56):
Yet, keep calm, come along energy that This is your
morning show with Michael del Chrono. So we talked.
Speaker 1 (31:07):
I think On Tuesday, Gallup came out with a new
poll fewer Americans see stock as ideal long term investments.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
The tone of it was.
Speaker 1 (31:18):
Stocks, smocks, it at gold, it ain't real estate. Our
economist of Money with David Bonson is joining us from
the Bonson Financial Group. He also presides, I mean I'm
doing a tease. Oh I thought you said joining us.
Speaker 14 (31:31):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (31:31):
And we're gonna ask him is it time to dumb
stocks and gold? You know, if President Trump was not
President Trump and something started brewing between India and Pakistan,
he might be likely to say that would have ever
happened if I was president. Well, he is president and
it is happening. Why is it happening and can he
get it to stop. He says he wants it to stop.
(31:52):
John Decker is here to go over that with us.
Speaker 3 (31:54):
John.
Speaker 1 (31:57):
India has never liked Pakistan. India has never liked pack
Good luck.
Speaker 12 (32:03):
Yeah, good luck, good luck.
Speaker 14 (32:05):
Well, you can tamp down the conflict, that's for sure,
you know, I mean, you can never put it, you know,
completely to rest.
Speaker 12 (32:10):
And this is something that has a lot of history.
Speaker 14 (32:14):
What we've seen is that there have.
Speaker 12 (32:17):
Been strikes, missile strikes by both countries into each other's
territory over the last few days. The State Department has
issued two warnings.
Speaker 14 (32:27):
One if you are an American who is now in
the conflict area on the India Pakistan border, leave that
area immediately. And the other State Department warning is do
not travel to Pakistan right now. So hopefully every American
heeds those warnings.
Speaker 12 (32:45):
In the meantime, the President has said he has a
very good.
Speaker 14 (32:48):
Relationship with the leaders of both India and Pakistan, and
he says that, you know, he will reach out to
those leaders to try to tamp things down from the
place where they've been over the last two days.
Speaker 1 (33:01):
Well, we know why they've been fighting for decades why
are they fighting now?
Speaker 14 (33:07):
This is an area, the Kashmir area along the India
Pakistan border, that has always presented issues for both of
these countries. And I can't say why specifically in the
last few days this area is now the point of
conflict once again, but it is.
Speaker 3 (33:27):
And as a result we see.
Speaker 14 (33:30):
Pakistan claiming they've shot down a number of Indian fighter jets.
No confirmation of that, Michael coming from India just yet,
but you know, clearly this is this is something that
you know, I don't think any president is fully put
to bed. And you know, we'll see whether the president
can deal with his other trumb spot. You know, look,
he's dealing with a lot. He's got a lot on
(33:51):
his plate, the war in Ukraine, Israel's war against Tamas,
and now this trouble spot as well.
Speaker 1 (33:58):
Yeah, you know, Kashmir is an interest experiment. Let's face it,
that has been quite frankly a disaster. Would have been
like after nine to eleven, we give a portion of
New York to to Islamists and think, well, that'll be peaceful.
We'll just give everybody a little portion of this land
and that it's been a source of fighting and we'll
continue to be boy. You know the old the scripture
(34:20):
is Blessed is the peacemaker Jesus teaching on the Sermon
on the Mount. That's really what this presidency has been become.
I mean, he's trying to stop Ukraine and Russia from fighting.
He's trying to stop Iran and their influence with Hamas
and Israel.
Speaker 3 (34:33):
And now Indian Pakistan.
Speaker 1 (34:34):
He's going to need a lot of prayers because and
a lot of blessings.
Speaker 3 (34:37):
This is a lot of fighting going on. This one.
Speaker 1 (34:40):
You don't want to see escalate, will end and dismount
with both have nuclear capabilities and weapons they've come close
to exchanging in the past. We don't want that in
the future. Appreciate it, John so much. We're talking again tomorrow.
Speaker 3 (34:52):
Thanks. Well, we're all in this together. This is your
Morning Show with Michael nhild Jo now
Speaker 4 (35:00):
I the po
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.