July 17, 2025 • 34 mins
A new poll is out on American attitudes on President Trump, Congress, Jeffrey Epstein and the “Big Beautiful Bill” that cuts taxes and spending. National Correspondent RORY O’NEILL shares the results.
YMS senior contributor David Zanotti introduces you to Maame Ewusi Mensah Frimpong. This judge is everything you need to know about the socialist democrats' intent, strategy and end game!
What is the future of the Epstein files? Will the investigation be reopened –if so, why? Also, what is next for Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell? White House Correspondent JON DECKER asked the President directly about Powell’s future, and the response was telling.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, it's me Michael.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
You can listen to your morning show live on the
air or streaming live on your iHeart app Monday through
Friday from three to six Pacific, five to eighth Central,
and six to nine Eastern on great radio stations like
Talk six fifty KSTE and Sacramento or one oh four
nine The Patriot in Saint Louis and Impact Radio one
oh five nine and twelve fifty w HDZ in Tampa, Florida. Sure,
(00:21):
hope you can join us live and make us a
part of your morning routine. In the meantime, enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
This is your morning show with michael'dil Truman.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
And there is no place I'd rather be than right
here with you. And that's even after hearing some of
your talk facs.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
Shame on you, Shame on all of you. I've got
some ball. You can kick her out. You won't have
me to kick her out anymore.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
Seven minutes after the hour, good morning, and welcome to Thursday,
July to seventeenth.
Speaker 1 (00:50):
President Trump has taken it to a new level. Now
this is going to upset some of you, he says.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
The media and some of you Republicans are wasting time
on what he calls the Epstein hoax. Now and the
Kami went to Washington, Zora, and Mom Dommi goes to
Washington the guest of AOC, and all the far left
Justice Democrats Socialist Democrats are.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
Googly eyed over Mom Donnie.
Speaker 2 (01:17):
And wondering why the rest of the party doesn't want
to unite behind him as the standard bearer. Why would
you make that problem a national mistake? And the happiest
place on Earth turned seventy. Disneyland first opened its skates
two guests on this day in nineteen fifty five. It
has been suggested to me that we add an eleventh commandment.
(01:38):
We have ten commandments for your morning show. That's what
keeps it about you, not us. That's what keeps it
on journey of discoveries and understanding and self pleasurizing and
grandizing talk. Red would like to add an eleventh amendment
that we do not quote Quinnipiac University polls.
Speaker 1 (01:56):
Well, that's going to be a problem.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Roy O'Neil, are your morning show national correspondence here, I'm
presuming that all these American attitudes are coming from Quinnipiac.
Speaker 4 (02:05):
Well, the attitudes are coming from the American The polling
data is coming from Quinnipiac, and we talk about them
because they do this every month. So to look at
the trend, not necessarily you know, a spike in a
number one way here or there. President Trump's approval numbers
still on the same rock trend. About forty percent of
voters approve of the way he's doing his job as president,
(02:26):
fifty four percent disapprove. That's pretty much unchanged from the
last time they did this poll in June. There's some
feedback on how well the Attorney General, the director of
the FBI, and his number two men are doing the job.
Pam Bondi gets thirty two percent approval, Cash Ptel thirty
six percent, and Dan Bongino thirty four percent approval.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
First of all, there's there's two kinds of things. And
I am not being contentious orry because I really I
don't really care. But Quinnipiac seems to have a different
view than the consensus of all the polls. But Quinnipiac
does this every month, and so that's why I agree
with you. You look at the trend, I don't know
what the president's polling in some cases seven.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
Points higher in other poles than Quinnipiac.
Speaker 2 (03:12):
But to the point I wanted to make about trending
that you were making Pam Bondy Bongino if depending on
how he ultimately plays his hand, you'll see their numbers
fall quick. Why because the left already hates them, and
then now there's a portion of the right that thinks
that they didn't follow through on something they said or
are not doing their job well. So that one doesn't
(03:32):
surprise me. I expected that. What about the Big Beautiful Bill.
Speaker 4 (03:37):
Yeah, And by the way, I would also tell you
that if you talk, if you're on the streets, I'd
be surprised if you could find ten people out of
one hundred that know who any of those three people are.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
Seriously, No, well not Dan Bongeen. I think Bongino.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
Maybe not Pam Bondy, but I think he could find
a cashel, you know, cash Betel.
Speaker 1 (03:57):
I mean, he's even kept a low profile since getting
the job as direct it.
Speaker 4 (04:00):
Anyway, as far as the Big Beautiful Act, a majority
of voters fifty five percent oppose this Big Beautiful Act,
thirty five percent support it.
Speaker 1 (04:10):
Again, back to the how much do they really know
about it?
Speaker 4 (04:13):
A majority think the Big Beautiful Act will actually hurt
the country. Forty four percent of voters think it will
hurt them personally, and roughly six and ten say they
are either very concerned or somewhat concerned, or they know
someone who may personally be affected by cuts to Medicaid
and food stamps programs.
Speaker 2 (04:33):
And again, how many to your point, you know, how
many people know these people? How many people know what's
in that bill? It was one thousand pages, you know,
let alone.
Speaker 4 (04:40):
So I wish I can find five hundred and thirty five.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
People who don't know what's in that bill.
Speaker 2 (04:48):
But I mean, so, what you're really getting is a
reflection of the narratives that people are getting. And so,
but this is a little a little bit similar to
what I was dissecting earlier. The right doesn't think it
cut an off. The left, of course, thinks the world
is going to collapse and poor people are going to
die with flies in their eyes and alleys. So yeah,
(05:08):
I mean, pulling in general is problematic. People don't like
to respond to them. It's how you ask the questions.
But that's quinnipiac. And until we change in at an
eleventh commitment, it commit commitment commanders.
Speaker 4 (05:21):
Say they did ask if you think the American dream
is still alive, only fifty percent think the American dream
is still attainable forty three percent. I think rather fifty
percent think the dream is not attainable. Forty three percent
think the American dream is still alive. And well, I
know you need to go, but what would be the
American dream anymore?
Speaker 5 (05:41):
Right?
Speaker 2 (05:41):
They didn't specify in the question your all personal dream.
I believe it's still attainable. I still believe it's under
attack as well. We're or he's going to be back
in the third hour. While most immigration headlines are focusing
on deportation, there's also other border news crackdowns in California, Arizona,
New Mexico, and Texas.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
And then we had borders.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
Our homans suggest that perhaps you know you have to
call David right, No, I did not, but I will.
Speaker 1 (06:10):
Yeah, it's sitting right there on your sheet for crying
out loud.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
Now, can we get some talkbacks on your mistake? Although
I didn't make a mistake. I just I do a
pause every now and then. But no, Holman is indicating
that perhaps there's going to be a crackdown on farms
that is coming, and so we'll keep an eye on
all of that for you, all right, if you're just
waking up thirteen minutes after the hour, I don't know
(06:41):
David's ready. David is kind of he's our senior contributor,
He's my dearest friend. And it really doesn't matter who's
in the room. He is the soundest, wisest, most mature
person in the room. We tend to left to our
own devices become immature. Let's run this read by David
(07:01):
and see what he thinks, Red believes. And it seems
blasphemous to even suggest that we add an eleventh commandment
to our ten commandments of your morning show, and that
is we do.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
Not quote Quinnipiac University polls anyway.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
But no, but you know I used to respect to
some degree Quinnipiac. Look all, polling in general is a problem.
People don't answer phones anymore, they don't have landlines anymore,
they don't trust polsters anymore. That's a big problem in
and of itself. How the questions asked, What you do
with the answers, whether you trend them or not. I mean,
there's all kinds of games that are played with them.
(07:39):
I think the polling system is broke, and even in
and of itself, we're guided by the spirit and the
intent of the Declaration of Independence and the roadmap of
the Constitution, not opinion polls anyway, And opinion polls are
just really reflecting back the narratives, which is the problem,
not the solution.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
I mean, I could go on and on, but Quinnipiac.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Is way worse than it used to be, and it's
trying to be a lone contrarian voice, it would seem.
Speaker 1 (08:06):
Do you Cat Do you sensing any of that?
Speaker 6 (08:08):
Good morning, Michael, Good morning all the team.
Speaker 7 (08:13):
I just need to I'm going to answer your question,
but before I do, I want to make sure I
don't forget. I think I've just heard you use the
term googly eyed about five minutes ago.
Speaker 5 (08:23):
Does that age me?
Speaker 6 (08:26):
Really?
Speaker 1 (08:26):
You said googly I did you see AOC.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
I'm telling you that if I was AOC's boyfriend, I'd
be worried she's in.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
Love with this guy.
Speaker 7 (08:37):
I immediately flashback the toy story with the potato heads
and the google eyes.
Speaker 6 (08:43):
Oh okay, I love you bringing up Quinnipiac. However, it's rightly.
Speaker 5 (08:50):
I wanted to that.
Speaker 7 (08:54):
I have seen you wear on air a Quinnipiac sweatshirt
or T shirt?
Speaker 1 (08:59):
What are the other sweatshirt?
Speaker 7 (09:01):
So I just think that are you a made man
behind the scenes with quis No and think and thank god, uh, well,
actually it probably fits again now thanks to lean Quinnipiac University.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
I got that because Ralph Bristol used to be our
morning host in Nashville, and he's also very different and Ralph,
Ralph kind of shouted a little bit like Paul Harvey
and had a little shaken a little Katherine Hepberg to
his voice, and he would always go Quinnipiac University. And
so whenever I would do a Quinnipiac pole, I would
always go Quidnippi act University.
Speaker 1 (09:31):
And do Ralph's voice.
Speaker 2 (09:33):
Well, my producer got me a Quinnipiac University sweatshirt for
Christmas there one year.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
That's how I ended up wearing it.
Speaker 2 (09:40):
And then Aaron Real, who was one of my favorite correspondents,
a graduate of Quinnipiac University. So I don't think it's
Quinnipiac University, but their polls stink to high heaven.
Speaker 7 (09:52):
Well, and I think what's really happening here is you're
bringing up a question that actually has very deep historic roots.
Speaker 6 (09:57):
And that's the question is of self government versus mob rule.
Speaker 7 (10:01):
Right, there's no reason for us to be so concerned
on a daily regular basis about something is obscure to
be able to honestly quantify to what people think about
the president's job performance.
Speaker 6 (10:15):
Most people are worried about their own job performance if
they've got a job. Okay, well, and you.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Know that was the fame of our first hour.
Speaker 7 (10:24):
Yes, So the notion that these people continue to have
a public relations campaign to get their name out there,
the entering basically bowling alley gossip is just fundamentally it
doesn't set well well.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
And by the way, and by the way, by intent
and by design, the only polling that really matters is
election day.
Speaker 7 (10:47):
Be told that there is and really the only polling
that really matters is when you walk in the door,
Are you alone, are you married? Do you have a
happy family? How are your mom and dad doing? What
the boss thinking of you today? Those are the polls
that really matter. Who could quantify the president's performance? I
study public policy. We work in the field of public
(11:09):
policy for forty five years, twenty four hours a day
on call.
Speaker 6 (11:12):
And you know what I don't know what the president's
doing today, So the idea that we're going to be.
Speaker 7 (11:17):
Able as to take a poll that would be quantitatively
valid as to how he's doing in and of itself
is absurd.
Speaker 6 (11:23):
But let's not get confused with the facts. I mean
the fun the details are far more fun.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
David's an out of our senior contributor joining us. I'll
take what the president did do. He referred to the
obsession that the media and some Republicans have on Epstein
a waste of time, and he even referred to it
as the Epstein hoax.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
I hope what he means is the.
Speaker 2 (11:47):
Way the left once you focused on Epstein because they
think that's dividing the Republicans, not because they care of
what happened to any of these women or care about
justice in any way. The problem with the Epstein case
is it was never tried. Depositions were done, victims came forward,
they provided names accusers, but it never went to court,
(12:09):
and the names have all been redacted by a judge's order.
So you don't have a black book of clients. Which
you have are people that were named in depositions by victims.
So this can't go anywhere because he's dead and it's
not going to go to trial. Now his cohort, who's
in jail, she could come forward with some names and
make news. But so if the president's referring to the
(12:31):
hoax being the left is pushing Epstein because they think
it's dividing us, then maybe it's a hoax. But to
just try to sweep it under the rock, as I said,
this is a hot potato issue for the president, and
I don't know that they're handling the hot potato well.
I don't know why they can't simply explain it the
way I just did, for crying out loud.
Speaker 1 (12:52):
Did I just say for crying out loud?
Speaker 2 (12:54):
After I said, googly eyes.
Speaker 6 (12:56):
Yeah you did.
Speaker 7 (12:58):
There's first brids eleventh commandment. I wouldn't say it's a commandment,
but it's a strong suggestion on the top of the
let's let's get to our main topic. I was just
gonna say, let's get to our main topic. We'll take
a quick break when we come back.
Speaker 8 (13:15):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Del Chrono.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
Good Morning.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
Twenty six minutes after the hour, the House Republicans have
cleared a procedural hurdle to unlock consideration of three cryptocurrency bills.
Mister Kami went to Washington' zur Ron Mom Dami was
in DC hosted by AOC and all the far left socialists.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
Were fawning over him.
Speaker 2 (13:37):
Why they're going to make a local mistake a national
mistake is beyond me. And we're visiting with your morning
show senior contributor David Sanati. We're gonna introduce you to
a person called Maymi. We see Mensa Frimpog. We can
only introduce you to her in this segment. Will follow
up after the news break at the bottom of the hour.
But David, you believe this judge is everything we need
(13:59):
to know about the social list democrats intend strategy and
endgame house.
Speaker 7 (14:03):
Yeah, well, it's representation of a perfect strategy, which is
the socialist goal is to deconstruct the American system of
self government in civil government, using whatever branch of our
government is necessary at any given time to deconstruct the system.
And Judge Frimpon, who came up out of la is
now a federal judge, is responsible for attempting to say
(14:27):
that the administration cannot enforce the laws of this land
regards to immigration because in such enforcement is discriminatory.
Speaker 6 (14:36):
That's the fundamental principle.
Speaker 7 (14:37):
And then she's citing very specifics on how the government
is targeting people based upon race, or occupation or certain behaviors.
In essence, she's trying to make this a local discriminatory
case when it's in fact federal policy and she's single
handedly it's attempting to stop the president from doing his
job from the federal benche.
Speaker 2 (14:58):
Well even further though, if you die sected, how would
all law enforcement work based on her view or precedent?
Speaker 7 (15:08):
Yeah, sort of like if you're in law enforcement and
someone is in every circumstances and situation looking like they're guilty,
you can't talk to him.
Speaker 2 (15:17):
He's not a bank robbery, he's just a person of color,
and you're discriminating.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
I mean, but they've been doing this.
Speaker 5 (15:22):
Gift maintenance, Carrie, heavy weapons.
Speaker 6 (15:24):
That's all.
Speaker 5 (15:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
So I think the big compelling question is what's up
with her? But what's up with Zoran? And what's up
with AOC bringing him to DC? Because now you're taking
I mean, first of all, the Democrat Party, one of
two parties, is probably dying on the vine, and they're
gonna double down on left and go full blown socialist communist,
(15:51):
even bring him to Washington and try to sell him
as well as Representative Jaya Paul Well from Washington said,
why he's bringing our party together and somewhere in the
distance is the echo of Margaret Thatcher. The problem with
socialism is eventually you run out of everybody else's money.
Speaker 9 (16:16):
I'm Joe Big and Tampa and my morning show is
your Morning Show with Michael del Jono.
Speaker 5 (16:28):
Hi.
Speaker 1 (16:28):
It's me Michael.
Speaker 2 (16:29):
Your Morning show can be heard live daily on great
radio stations like News Radio six fifty k e n
I Anchorage, Alaska, Talk Radio eleven ninety Dallas, Fort Wirt,
and Freedom one oh four seven in Washington, d C.
We'd love to have you listen live every day. Make
us a part of your morning routine, but better late
than never. Enjoy the podcast. I am Michael del Journal
Honor to serve you. Jeffrey's got the sound. Red's keeping
(16:51):
an eye on the content. The top story's waking up,
the President says. The media and some Republicans are wasting
time on what he calls the Epstein hoax. Mister he
went to Washington, AOC hosted a breakfast touting Mom Donnie
as the future of the party, and a lot of
the Socialist Democrats were loving it, and House Republicans clear
to procedural hurdle to unlock consideration for three crypto bills.
Speaker 1 (17:15):
Can't have your morning show without your voice.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
Before we get back to David Zanati, our senior contributor,
let's start with I think Dallas in Nashville is first.
Speaker 1 (17:24):
I'm gonna go on my whole life without knowing that.
Speaker 10 (17:26):
About Steve miller Man, I probably never want to heard
about it, but that leads me to a very important
question I've wondered often.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
What was your first concert that you went through?
Speaker 5 (17:38):
Mom?
Speaker 10 (17:39):
Was the Four Tops and Temptations of Bully Green Kentucky.
Speaker 1 (17:42):
Just got to know what yours was? Four Tops and
the Temptations?
Speaker 11 (17:46):
You win.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
I was a big Kansas fan growing up Foghat and
Kansas was my first concert. It may have been Amy
Grant and Dion Demucci. They were roughly at the same time,
and I reckoned my brain can't remember which one was first,
but I think Four Top Temptations may have me beat
James and Youngstown.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
Good Morning, Michael.
Speaker 10 (18:06):
The big new act will at least knock out maybe
a million or so people who are not entitled to
the stuff they got through Obamacare, a scam and a half,
and they're still We're still.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
Paying for all that nonsense. Something has to be done
with all this nonsense.
Speaker 10 (18:21):
If you're staying at home, I'm sixty five and I'm
still working, now, that's because i want to work and
I'm not going to sit on my butt. So anyway,
you can't retire to his sixty seven. Anyway, Have a
good day.
Speaker 1 (18:33):
All right, that was plain. Actually, now let's get James Morning.
Speaker 12 (18:37):
Michael gang Hi fruittose corn syrup which is used in
visually all soft drinks ten times sweeter than sugar, but
unfortunately our bodies don't know what to do with it,
and so it stores it as fat. Along with partially
hydrogenated vegetable oils. These two man made products are serious
threats or health.
Speaker 6 (18:55):
Great show, and.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
That's why the President wants to replace and believes he
has an agreement from Coke to replace these chemicals with
actually sugarcane, so not cocaine.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
Sugarcane. Joe and Pa gets the final say.
Speaker 9 (19:09):
Good morning, Michael. Hey, I don't think it's an age
issue with the pausing. My father taught me at a
young age to pause instead of saying or awe, because
it made me sound more articulate in my wording have
a great day.
Speaker 2 (19:26):
Everybody is more interested in the pause and conversation than
the issues.
Speaker 1 (19:31):
David Zanatti, our senior contributor, is joining us.
Speaker 2 (19:34):
As I said earlier, I've always said, look, if I
don't pause, then.
Speaker 1 (19:39):
I'm just talking and I'm talking at you.
Speaker 2 (19:42):
If I'm having a conversation with you, there's going to
be pauses, just like if we were having a conversation.
And then sometimes it's for effect to give you time
to think. And then some of the longer pauses could
maybe be searching. I joked, searching for a word or
a thought, and you got you guys have gone off
on that.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
Am I that much of a pause er?
Speaker 7 (19:59):
David old Michael if these folks know, And first off,
I love your listeners, I really do.
Speaker 6 (20:06):
I dazed at.
Speaker 7 (20:07):
How this has developed so quickly across the country and
how people care. And I could probably tell them because
in the fact, you and I have worked for quite
a while on the construction of this broadcast, the technology
that we've gone through for us to all be able
to see each other on a regular basis.
Speaker 6 (20:23):
Now today I'm remote.
Speaker 7 (20:24):
But one of the reasons we've spent all this time
energy efforts, you spent a lot of money out of
your own pocket to get the technology that we have
is so we can see each other, so we can
pause effectively to listen. Because when we're just on remotes
like this, we tend to have you kind of have
to interrupt to get in because you can't see the
person stopping and breathing.
Speaker 6 (20:42):
So yeah, I mean, how we talk on this show
really does matter.
Speaker 7 (20:47):
And if again, if people could sit in the golf
cart with us when we have the rare occasion to
be able to go out and play together, it'd be great.
Speaker 6 (20:53):
Wish we could record those conversations.
Speaker 1 (20:55):
Yeah, because that's the difference.
Speaker 5 (20:57):
You know.
Speaker 1 (20:58):
We think it was time the talk radio became a
conversation again.
Speaker 2 (21:03):
I think that was a driving force in the design
of all of this, that it not be about the
host and their ego or them telling you how to think,
but rather journeys of discovery, real information and trusting you
to come to your own conclusions and then sharing your
thoughts and the sharing of the thoughts. And I love
(21:23):
the talk back because you don't have to rote on
hold that. You know, just like any conversation you would
have with someone, their opinion matters just like your opinion matters,
and sometimes their opinion helps shape yours even greater or
change it a little.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
We can't be afraid to have a conversation.
Speaker 2 (21:41):
And so if it's about ego, if it's about me,
if it's about talking, if it's about radio.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
Yeah, they'll never be a pause.
Speaker 2 (21:47):
If it's a conversation, if it's a journey of understanding,
it should feel like a conversation. And then sometimes it's
simply to give you time to let that absorb. What
I just said is so profoundly true that I could
either say, take a moment think about that, or I
could just pause and give you the moment to think
about it. But isn't it funny how they're more interested
in that this morning than this the conversation. All right,
(22:08):
in our closing moments, Zoran, Mom, Tommy, get.
Speaker 6 (22:11):
About me for a while, to talk about me, all right? No,
I want to go back to Frimpong. I want to
go back to Frimpong. Caill we do that?
Speaker 5 (22:21):
Sure?
Speaker 7 (22:21):
Because I know it were because I didn't get the
second thought in that I really wanted to. The thing
about Frimpong is the judge Frimpong, is that not only
was she fast tracked into the federal judiciary, but in
her confirmation in twenty twenty one, something's been covered up,
and that's the fact that the Republicans were so intimidated
by this particular judge coming up through the system that
(22:43):
even though they had fifty votes in the Senate and
could have at least forced to tie on her confirmation,
twenty four, Republicans refused to vote at all regardless.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
Which is a dead giveaway of what David I'm afraid of.
Speaker 7 (22:57):
Being called, no, I will consider afraid of being called
race is because she's black, and because she was born overseas,
and because she has the last thing that's got about
twenty syllables in it, and so they just duck the issue.
Speaker 6 (23:08):
It's not about her credentials for philosophy or judicial tenor.
Speaker 7 (23:11):
And now she's on the bench trying to be president
of the United States, and the Republicans complained about her outcome,
but they didn't have the courage to even cast a
vote against her in the confirmation process twenty four Republicans
put in a no vote.
Speaker 6 (23:23):
Twenty four said no and two said yes.
Speaker 2 (23:29):
You'll find that most of the problems we have are
the result of both parties. Let's close with this. What
are the Democrats doing? I mean, how could they take?
First of all, they used a Shenanigan and a tactic
with rank file to get this guy through a primary.
He would have never survived. There would have been a
runoff with Cuomo, and Cuomo would have won. Now you've
got a four person race and it looks like he's
(23:50):
still going to lose. But it's a squeaker and he's
an all out beyond socialist communist. You'll hear in sounds
of the day all these leftist members have come Congress
that are loving him. They're talking about everything he's saying
he's going to do. And then when you ask them,
did he talk about how he was going to pay
for it all?
Speaker 5 (24:06):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (24:06):
No, he never talked about that. And that brings back
Margaret Thatcher and the problem with socialism. Sooner or later
you run out of everybody else's money because the government
doesn't have any money of its own. But it's even
worse at a municipal level because people can leave the city,
they can leave the state. But why would you take
such a negative character, such a revealing character of how
much the Democrat Party is no longer a Democrat party,
(24:28):
it's a Socialist party.
Speaker 1 (24:29):
They're really two parties and they're outnumbered.
Speaker 2 (24:32):
Why would you make this a national referendum that sounds
so foolish that it almost needs dissection.
Speaker 7 (24:38):
Well, it's because what the Socialist Party is attempting to
do in the United States, which is in essence the
Democrat Party, is to feature, whether it's Judge Frempong or
whether it's Mandami, is to bring people who have born
been outside this country or have not been here very long.
Speaker 6 (24:54):
Mondami's only been here since IK twenty and eighteen. These
are folks that.
Speaker 7 (24:59):
Don't really know America, and they're trying to move them
based on their gifting in regards to public flattery and
speech and excitement and enthusiasm. They're fronting them these folks.
How can these folks really know how America operates? They're
basically first generation in America. Now they're being forwarded into
(25:20):
points of leadership.
Speaker 6 (25:21):
Loquen.
Speaker 7 (25:22):
I mean, when our parents and grandparents came over here
from Italy, they knew they had to serve a long
time to become America and earn the right. We're catapulting
people into leadership. I'm not even sure, and I don't
care what degrees they have because we don't know what
they were taught at Harvard and Yale, but we know
that probably weren't taught the Declaration and the Constitution. This
is all affront, and it's affront to create political power and.
Speaker 6 (25:47):
They hand it over to people who don't even know
how the system works.
Speaker 2 (25:50):
That smart I was just going to say, only but
in the country since twenty eighteen and now a federal judge.
I don't even know if that's about domies since they
well mom dommy too. Yeah, but I mean, I don't
know if that's enough time to assimilate properly. Let come
on exactly, that's yeah. I'll stand by my guns. They
(26:14):
could be being smart, uh, and they're going to run
on mom dommy and it's going to fail miserably, and
then they're going to run reasonably uh in twenty twenty
eight with someone like Ronny Manuel or Wes Moore. But
you know, AOC has had the torch patch to her
by Bernie Sanders you know she's going to be the
(26:35):
early front runner. Why she's up front selling this guy. Uh,
she's creating her own demise. And I don't think it's
that smart. I think they're that left. I think they're
that socialist. I think that they're they're that committed in
going further left. This to me is the solidification I
believe of the the parasite defeating the host, the host dying,
(26:58):
therefore the parasite dies, both end up dead. This is
the fulfilling moments of the Democrat Party, and maybe even
the Republican Party as well, may not exist by the
end of the decade.
Speaker 1 (27:10):
I still think it's that.
Speaker 7 (27:11):
Thing that, Yeah, joining the profess as from happening is
Republican scandal because the Democrats always count on Republicans creating
enough of a scandal that people, in their anger at
the Republicans will turn to whoever the Democrats give, basically
as a form of retribution or accountability.
Speaker 6 (27:28):
That's where the Trump people have to be very.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
Careful, and they're trying to create that scandal and creating
a death in their insurrection of border security and Ice.
So far, Ice hasn't taken the bait, and that's why
they're pushing the Epstein story so much. They don't have
the scandal yet, but they're trying to create exactly what
you're saying. Davids and Audi is the CEO of the
American Policy Roundtable, host to the Public Square. He's our
senior contributor and we value our time together. Thank you
(27:52):
so much, David.
Speaker 8 (27:53):
It's your morning show with Michael del Chino.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Can't have your morning show without your voice too, James,
we go, Michael.
Speaker 1 (28:01):
Your pauses are brilliant.
Speaker 12 (28:03):
That's taught in effective public speaking because it causes the
listener to refocus in case their mind is wandering away,
and to hang on the next words that are gonna
come out.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
That is excellent public speaking.
Speaker 2 (28:17):
This obsession on my pause is it reminds me of
I was my dad's program director for a short period
of time. We did a morning show together, and one
time I was going over something. I said, here's what
you do brilliantly. My dad stopped me.
Speaker 1 (28:29):
I don't want to know any of this.
Speaker 2 (28:31):
I do everything naturally, and if I start understanding it
or studying it, it'll ruin it.
Speaker 1 (28:35):
H No, I'm just being me.
Speaker 2 (28:37):
If there's pauses, I don't know, but let's have this
debate with James. I agree, it's brilliant. It's effective to
Oklahoma City.
Speaker 6 (28:44):
We go long half man? Are you kidding?
Speaker 5 (28:47):
But a band?
Speaker 3 (28:48):
I saw them first time they came through Denver. I
wonder if you have to catch that tour When Dave
was wearing his snake pants. I'll never forget him. Wish
I had a picture, can find a photo anywhere?
Speaker 6 (29:03):
What a show. They brought the house down.
Speaker 2 (29:05):
Love You fog Hat was great, great great stuff. Slow
Ride obviously their biggest hit. I was actually in Paul Capitano,
who is now a pastor but at the time was
a pothead and lude taker. He was driving, My brother
Bobby was in the front seat, Me and my friend
Keith Anders were in the back seat when in a
cloud of marijuana smoke, he went eighty miles an hour
(29:26):
into the back of a parked truck on an exit ramp.
I ended up in the front seat, my brother ended
up underneath the dash. All of us got out and
walked away. It's a miracle from God. And Slow Ride
was playing.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
When that happened. So I have bittersweet memories of Foghead.
Speaker 2 (29:44):
Tomorrow our spotlight interview of the week is White House
correspondent John Decker. We'll talk more about why tomorrow, but
today I noticed you made news again. One of the
top stories of the day speculation on the future of
the FED chair a Jerome Powell.
Speaker 1 (29:58):
That all began with your question.
Speaker 11 (30:01):
It did. That began with a series of questions I
asked the President as he was departing the White House
just the other day on his way to Pittsburgh.
Speaker 5 (30:09):
You may recall I asked the President wanted.
Speaker 11 (30:11):
To see his reaction. I said, do you plan to
nominate Jerome Palell to another four year teraman? As you know,
he was pretty shocked with that question.
Speaker 5 (30:20):
Gave me a four four word.
Speaker 11 (30:23):
Answer, not a Ford letter answer for word answer. He said,
are you kidding me? And yesterday he was asked as
he intended to fire Jerome Powell different variation on my question,
and the President said, no, I think he's going to
wait until May of next year, when Jerome Palell's term ends.
A reminder that President Trump actually nominated Jerome Powell in
(30:43):
the first place to be FED chairman, and the President
has indicated Michael that he already has a number of
replacements in mind to replace Jerome Powell as the FED chairman.
Speaker 1 (30:54):
Shall we read between the lines?
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Is this a message the President's giving him between now
and May might want to start seeing interest rates my.
Speaker 5 (31:01):
Way or else?
Speaker 2 (31:03):
Because I think he's being pretty clear not going to
fire him, but I'm not going to renominate him either.
Speaker 11 (31:08):
Yeah, I mean, I think that Jerome Palll is his intention.
Speaker 5 (31:12):
Is to leave with his head.
Speaker 11 (31:14):
Held high, to not resign his position.
Speaker 5 (31:18):
To serve until the final day of his term, and.
Speaker 11 (31:21):
He will stick to what he thinks is the best
policy as far as interest rates are concerned.
Speaker 5 (31:26):
You know, it's always good.
Speaker 11 (31:27):
To remind people that it's not just one person. It's
not just Jerome pal there's one individual who gets decide
whether interest rates should remain the same or be lowered
or be raised. It's a group of Fed governors, and
Jerome Palell is just.
Speaker 5 (31:43):
One of them.
Speaker 11 (31:43):
So even if you replace Jerome pal there's no guarantee
that the replacement will get his way and convince the
other Fed governors to go along with him or her
in terms of lowering FED interest rates. Visiting with White
House correspondent John Decker.
Speaker 1 (32:00):
Epstein.
Speaker 2 (32:01):
The Epstein files have now become a political hot potato.
The left can't bring it up enough because it can
divide the president's base and it gets attention off other things.
The right, in contrast, they can't talk enough about Mandani
for the same reason. So, going beyond the politics and
(32:22):
hot potato and narrative game, I get the matrix. You're
an attorney, a US Supreme Court bar attorney, and a
White House correspondent who's covered eight presidents.
Speaker 1 (32:32):
But I want to talk to the attorney for a second.
Speaker 2 (32:35):
This is a case and there are victims and they
didn't get their day in court because the accused killed
himself and is dead. They should come back maybe in
civil trials. But the names, it was always names from
depositions in a court case that didn't happen, not a
black book that exists and is now being hidden.
Speaker 1 (32:55):
Why is that so hard to freaking explain?
Speaker 11 (32:58):
Oh, I think you explained it really well.
Speaker 2 (33:00):
Oh you know.
Speaker 11 (33:00):
And there's an attorney who is a senator as well,
who is a very well respected legal mind and a
very good senator. His name is Josh Holly. He's one
of those individuals who's a big backer of President Donald Trump.
Beg maga Republican, But he too, is calling for the
release by the Department of Justice of.
Speaker 5 (33:20):
All the files they have on Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 11 (33:24):
And you know, I think that tells you a lot
when someone like Josh Hawley, his name is added to
that list of a growing number of very influential Republicans
urging the doj urging Pam Bondi, the Attorney General to
release these files.
Speaker 2 (33:39):
The problem is, all right, if you're going to have
that conversation, the names have all been redacted by a
judge order. You'd have to get that lifted in order
to do it, and then you never hear me speak
on behalf of the accused.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
But they never had their day in court.
Speaker 2 (33:53):
Their names just came up from victims who claim they
were victimized by them, and they deserve the right for
that to be before revealed. Otherwise you're just gonna implicate
everybody and they're gonna assume the worst. It's really not
that hard to follow. But that ain't how we work anymore.
We live in a matrix. We go by narratives and
we pick permanent positions and they're immovable, and that's the chaos.
(34:14):
But it is a political hot potato, and the President's
just simply saying it's a hoax.
Speaker 1 (34:18):
That's not gonna play well with this base either.
Speaker 11 (34:21):
Well, look, you know, I think the president's counting on
the news cycle just moving so incredibly quickly. As you know,
it does move quickly. But this is a story, this
is a story that's been around now for a few
weeks now. It's not going away, and I don't see
how you.
Speaker 5 (34:37):
Get it going away anytime soon.
Speaker 2 (34:39):
DoD Decker will be our spotlight interview tomorrow and you're
gonna love the news.
Speaker 8 (34:43):
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael ndheld Choo
Hey, it's me Michael.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
You can listen to your morning show live on the
air or streaming live on your iHeart app Monday through
Friday from three to six Pacific, five to eighth Central,
and six to nine Eastern on great radio stations like
Talk six fifty KSTE and Sacramento or one oh four
nine The Patriot in Saint Louis and Impact Radio one
oh five nine and twelve fifty w HDZ in Tampa, Florida. Sure,
(00:21):
hope you can join us live and make us a
part of your morning routine. In the meantime, enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
This is your morning show with michael'dil Truman.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
And there is no place I'd rather be than right
here with you. And that's even after hearing some of
your talk facs.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
Shame on you, Shame on all of you. I've got
some ball. You can kick her out. You won't have
me to kick her out anymore.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
Seven minutes after the hour, good morning, and welcome to Thursday,
July to seventeenth.
Speaker 1 (00:50):
President Trump has taken it to a new level. Now
this is going to upset some of you, he says.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
The media and some of you Republicans are wasting time
on what he calls the Epstein hoax. Now and the
Kami went to Washington, Zora, and Mom Dommi goes to
Washington the guest of AOC, and all the far left
Justice Democrats Socialist Democrats are.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
Googly eyed over Mom Donnie.
Speaker 2 (01:17):
And wondering why the rest of the party doesn't want
to unite behind him as the standard bearer. Why would
you make that problem a national mistake? And the happiest
place on Earth turned seventy. Disneyland first opened its skates
two guests on this day in nineteen fifty five. It
has been suggested to me that we add an eleventh commandment.
(01:38):
We have ten commandments for your morning show. That's what
keeps it about you, not us. That's what keeps it
on journey of discoveries and understanding and self pleasurizing and
grandizing talk. Red would like to add an eleventh amendment
that we do not quote Quinnipiac University polls.
Speaker 1 (01:56):
Well, that's going to be a problem.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
Roy O'Neil, are your morning show national correspondence here, I'm
presuming that all these American attitudes are coming from Quinnipiac.
Speaker 4 (02:05):
Well, the attitudes are coming from the American The polling
data is coming from Quinnipiac, and we talk about them
because they do this every month. So to look at
the trend, not necessarily you know, a spike in a
number one way here or there. President Trump's approval numbers
still on the same rock trend. About forty percent of
voters approve of the way he's doing his job as president,
(02:26):
fifty four percent disapprove. That's pretty much unchanged from the
last time they did this poll in June. There's some
feedback on how well the Attorney General, the director of
the FBI, and his number two men are doing the job.
Pam Bondi gets thirty two percent approval, Cash Ptel thirty
six percent, and Dan Bongino thirty four percent approval.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
First of all, there's there's two kinds of things. And
I am not being contentious orry because I really I
don't really care. But Quinnipiac seems to have a different
view than the consensus of all the polls. But Quinnipiac
does this every month, and so that's why I agree
with you. You look at the trend, I don't know
what the president's polling in some cases seven.
Speaker 1 (03:10):
Points higher in other poles than Quinnipiac.
Speaker 2 (03:12):
But to the point I wanted to make about trending
that you were making Pam Bondy Bongino if depending on
how he ultimately plays his hand, you'll see their numbers
fall quick. Why because the left already hates them, and
then now there's a portion of the right that thinks
that they didn't follow through on something they said or
are not doing their job well. So that one doesn't
(03:32):
surprise me. I expected that. What about the Big Beautiful Bill.
Speaker 4 (03:37):
Yeah, And by the way, I would also tell you
that if you talk, if you're on the streets, I'd
be surprised if you could find ten people out of
one hundred that know who any of those three people are.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
Seriously, No, well not Dan Bongeen. I think Bongino.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
Maybe not Pam Bondy, but I think he could find
a cashel, you know, cash Betel.
Speaker 1 (03:57):
I mean, he's even kept a low profile since getting
the job as direct it.
Speaker 4 (04:00):
Anyway, as far as the Big Beautiful Act, a majority
of voters fifty five percent oppose this Big Beautiful Act,
thirty five percent support it.
Speaker 1 (04:10):
Again, back to the how much do they really know
about it?
Speaker 4 (04:13):
A majority think the Big Beautiful Act will actually hurt
the country. Forty four percent of voters think it will
hurt them personally, and roughly six and ten say they
are either very concerned or somewhat concerned, or they know
someone who may personally be affected by cuts to Medicaid
and food stamps programs.
Speaker 2 (04:33):
And again, how many to your point, you know, how
many people know these people? How many people know what's
in that bill? It was one thousand pages, you know,
let alone.
Speaker 4 (04:40):
So I wish I can find five hundred and thirty five.
Speaker 1 (04:44):
People who don't know what's in that bill.
Speaker 2 (04:48):
But I mean, so, what you're really getting is a
reflection of the narratives that people are getting. And so,
but this is a little a little bit similar to
what I was dissecting earlier. The right doesn't think it
cut an off. The left, of course, thinks the world
is going to collapse and poor people are going to
die with flies in their eyes and alleys. So yeah,
(05:08):
I mean, pulling in general is problematic. People don't like
to respond to them. It's how you ask the questions.
But that's quinnipiac. And until we change in at an
eleventh commitment, it commit commitment commanders.
Speaker 4 (05:21):
Say they did ask if you think the American dream
is still alive, only fifty percent think the American dream
is still attainable forty three percent. I think rather fifty
percent think the dream is not attainable. Forty three percent
think the American dream is still alive. And well, I
know you need to go, but what would be the
American dream anymore?
Speaker 5 (05:41):
Right?
Speaker 2 (05:41):
They didn't specify in the question your all personal dream.
I believe it's still attainable. I still believe it's under
attack as well. We're or he's going to be back
in the third hour. While most immigration headlines are focusing
on deportation, there's also other border news crackdowns in California, Arizona,
New Mexico, and Texas.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
And then we had borders.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
Our homans suggest that perhaps you know you have to
call David right, No, I did not, but I will.
Speaker 1 (06:10):
Yeah, it's sitting right there on your sheet for crying
out loud.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
Now, can we get some talkbacks on your mistake? Although
I didn't make a mistake. I just I do a
pause every now and then. But no, Holman is indicating
that perhaps there's going to be a crackdown on farms
that is coming, and so we'll keep an eye on
all of that for you, all right, if you're just
waking up thirteen minutes after the hour, I don't know
(06:41):
David's ready. David is kind of he's our senior contributor,
He's my dearest friend. And it really doesn't matter who's
in the room. He is the soundest, wisest, most mature
person in the room. We tend to left to our
own devices become immature. Let's run this read by David
(07:01):
and see what he thinks, Red believes. And it seems
blasphemous to even suggest that we add an eleventh commandment
to our ten commandments of your morning show, and that
is we do.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
Not quote Quinnipiac University polls anyway.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
But no, but you know I used to respect to
some degree Quinnipiac. Look all, polling in general is a problem.
People don't answer phones anymore, they don't have landlines anymore,
they don't trust polsters anymore. That's a big problem in
and of itself. How the questions asked, What you do
with the answers, whether you trend them or not. I mean,
there's all kinds of games that are played with them.
(07:39):
I think the polling system is broke, and even in
and of itself, we're guided by the spirit and the
intent of the Declaration of Independence and the roadmap of
the Constitution, not opinion polls anyway, And opinion polls are
just really reflecting back the narratives, which is the problem,
not the solution.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
I mean, I could go on and on, but Quinnipiac.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Is way worse than it used to be, and it's
trying to be a lone contrarian voice, it would seem.
Speaker 1 (08:06):
Do you Cat Do you sensing any of that?
Speaker 6 (08:08):
Good morning, Michael, Good morning all the team.
Speaker 7 (08:13):
I just need to I'm going to answer your question,
but before I do, I want to make sure I
don't forget. I think I've just heard you use the
term googly eyed about five minutes ago.
Speaker 5 (08:23):
Does that age me?
Speaker 6 (08:26):
Really?
Speaker 1 (08:26):
You said googly I did you see AOC.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
I'm telling you that if I was AOC's boyfriend, I'd
be worried she's in.
Speaker 1 (08:35):
Love with this guy.
Speaker 7 (08:37):
I immediately flashback the toy story with the potato heads
and the google eyes.
Speaker 6 (08:43):
Oh okay, I love you bringing up Quinnipiac. However, it's rightly.
Speaker 5 (08:50):
I wanted to that.
Speaker 7 (08:54):
I have seen you wear on air a Quinnipiac sweatshirt
or T shirt?
Speaker 1 (08:59):
What are the other sweatshirt?
Speaker 7 (09:01):
So I just think that are you a made man
behind the scenes with quis No and think and thank god, uh, well,
actually it probably fits again now thanks to lean Quinnipiac University.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
I got that because Ralph Bristol used to be our
morning host in Nashville, and he's also very different and Ralph,
Ralph kind of shouted a little bit like Paul Harvey
and had a little shaken a little Katherine Hepberg to
his voice, and he would always go Quinnipiac University. And
so whenever I would do a Quinnipiac pole, I would
always go Quidnippi act University.
Speaker 1 (09:31):
And do Ralph's voice.
Speaker 2 (09:33):
Well, my producer got me a Quinnipiac University sweatshirt for
Christmas there one year.
Speaker 1 (09:39):
That's how I ended up wearing it.
Speaker 2 (09:40):
And then Aaron Real, who was one of my favorite correspondents,
a graduate of Quinnipiac University. So I don't think it's
Quinnipiac University, but their polls stink to high heaven.
Speaker 7 (09:52):
Well, and I think what's really happening here is you're
bringing up a question that actually has very deep historic roots.
Speaker 6 (09:57):
And that's the question is of self government versus mob rule.
Speaker 7 (10:01):
Right, there's no reason for us to be so concerned
on a daily regular basis about something is obscure to
be able to honestly quantify to what people think about
the president's job performance.
Speaker 6 (10:15):
Most people are worried about their own job performance if
they've got a job. Okay, well, and you.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Know that was the fame of our first hour.
Speaker 7 (10:24):
Yes, So the notion that these people continue to have
a public relations campaign to get their name out there,
the entering basically bowling alley gossip is just fundamentally it
doesn't set well well.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
And by the way, and by the way, by intent
and by design, the only polling that really matters is
election day.
Speaker 7 (10:47):
Be told that there is and really the only polling
that really matters is when you walk in the door,
Are you alone, are you married? Do you have a
happy family? How are your mom and dad doing? What
the boss thinking of you today? Those are the polls
that really matter. Who could quantify the president's performance? I
study public policy. We work in the field of public
(11:09):
policy for forty five years, twenty four hours a day
on call.
Speaker 6 (11:12):
And you know what I don't know what the president's
doing today, So the idea that we're going to be.
Speaker 7 (11:17):
Able as to take a poll that would be quantitatively
valid as to how he's doing in and of itself
is absurd.
Speaker 6 (11:23):
But let's not get confused with the facts. I mean
the fun the details are far more fun.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
David's an out of our senior contributor joining us. I'll
take what the president did do. He referred to the
obsession that the media and some Republicans have on Epstein
a waste of time, and he even referred to it
as the Epstein hoax.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
I hope what he means is the.
Speaker 2 (11:47):
Way the left once you focused on Epstein because they
think that's dividing the Republicans, not because they care of
what happened to any of these women or care about
justice in any way. The problem with the Epstein case
is it was never tried. Depositions were done, victims came forward,
they provided names accusers, but it never went to court,
(12:09):
and the names have all been redacted by a judge's order.
So you don't have a black book of clients. Which
you have are people that were named in depositions by victims.
So this can't go anywhere because he's dead and it's
not going to go to trial. Now his cohort, who's
in jail, she could come forward with some names and
make news. But so if the president's referring to the
(12:31):
hoax being the left is pushing Epstein because they think
it's dividing us, then maybe it's a hoax. But to
just try to sweep it under the rock, as I said,
this is a hot potato issue for the president, and
I don't know that they're handling the hot potato well.
I don't know why they can't simply explain it the
way I just did, for crying out loud.
Speaker 1 (12:52):
Did I just say for crying out loud?
Speaker 2 (12:54):
After I said, googly eyes.
Speaker 6 (12:56):
Yeah you did.
Speaker 7 (12:58):
There's first brids eleventh commandment. I wouldn't say it's a commandment,
but it's a strong suggestion on the top of the
let's let's get to our main topic. I was just
gonna say, let's get to our main topic. We'll take
a quick break when we come back.
Speaker 8 (13:15):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Del Chrono.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
Good Morning.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
Twenty six minutes after the hour, the House Republicans have
cleared a procedural hurdle to unlock consideration of three cryptocurrency bills.
Mister Kami went to Washington' zur Ron Mom Dami was
in DC hosted by AOC and all the far left socialists.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
Were fawning over him.
Speaker 2 (13:37):
Why they're going to make a local mistake a national
mistake is beyond me. And we're visiting with your morning
show senior contributor David Sanati. We're gonna introduce you to
a person called Maymi. We see Mensa Frimpog. We can
only introduce you to her in this segment. Will follow
up after the news break at the bottom of the hour.
But David, you believe this judge is everything we need
(13:59):
to know about the social list democrats intend strategy and
endgame house.
Speaker 7 (14:03):
Yeah, well, it's representation of a perfect strategy, which is
the socialist goal is to deconstruct the American system of
self government in civil government, using whatever branch of our
government is necessary at any given time to deconstruct the system.
And Judge Frimpon, who came up out of la is
now a federal judge, is responsible for attempting to say
(14:27):
that the administration cannot enforce the laws of this land
regards to immigration because in such enforcement is discriminatory.
Speaker 6 (14:36):
That's the fundamental principle.
Speaker 7 (14:37):
And then she's citing very specifics on how the government
is targeting people based upon race, or occupation or certain behaviors.
In essence, she's trying to make this a local discriminatory
case when it's in fact federal policy and she's single
handedly it's attempting to stop the president from doing his
job from the federal benche.
Speaker 2 (14:58):
Well even further though, if you die sected, how would
all law enforcement work based on her view or precedent?
Speaker 7 (15:08):
Yeah, sort of like if you're in law enforcement and
someone is in every circumstances and situation looking like they're guilty,
you can't talk to him.
Speaker 2 (15:17):
He's not a bank robbery, he's just a person of color,
and you're discriminating.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
I mean, but they've been doing this.
Speaker 5 (15:22):
Gift maintenance, Carrie, heavy weapons.
Speaker 6 (15:24):
That's all.
Speaker 5 (15:26):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
So I think the big compelling question is what's up
with her? But what's up with Zoran? And what's up
with AOC bringing him to DC? Because now you're taking
I mean, first of all, the Democrat Party, one of
two parties, is probably dying on the vine, and they're
gonna double down on left and go full blown socialist communist,
(15:51):
even bring him to Washington and try to sell him
as well as Representative Jaya Paul Well from Washington said,
why he's bringing our party together and somewhere in the
distance is the echo of Margaret Thatcher. The problem with
socialism is eventually you run out of everybody else's money.
Speaker 9 (16:16):
I'm Joe Big and Tampa and my morning show is
your Morning Show with Michael del Jono.
Speaker 5 (16:28):
Hi.
Speaker 1 (16:28):
It's me Michael.
Speaker 2 (16:29):
Your Morning show can be heard live daily on great
radio stations like News Radio six fifty k e n
I Anchorage, Alaska, Talk Radio eleven ninety Dallas, Fort Wirt,
and Freedom one oh four seven in Washington, d C.
We'd love to have you listen live every day. Make
us a part of your morning routine, but better late
than never. Enjoy the podcast. I am Michael del Journal
Honor to serve you. Jeffrey's got the sound. Red's keeping
(16:51):
an eye on the content. The top story's waking up,
the President says. The media and some Republicans are wasting
time on what he calls the Epstein hoax. Mister he
went to Washington, AOC hosted a breakfast touting Mom Donnie
as the future of the party, and a lot of
the Socialist Democrats were loving it, and House Republicans clear
to procedural hurdle to unlock consideration for three crypto bills.
Speaker 1 (17:15):
Can't have your morning show without your voice.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
Before we get back to David Zanati, our senior contributor,
let's start with I think Dallas in Nashville is first.
Speaker 1 (17:24):
I'm gonna go on my whole life without knowing that.
Speaker 10 (17:26):
About Steve miller Man, I probably never want to heard
about it, but that leads me to a very important
question I've wondered often.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
What was your first concert that you went through?
Speaker 5 (17:38):
Mom?
Speaker 10 (17:39):
Was the Four Tops and Temptations of Bully Green Kentucky.
Speaker 1 (17:42):
Just got to know what yours was? Four Tops and
the Temptations?
Speaker 11 (17:46):
You win.
Speaker 2 (17:47):
I was a big Kansas fan growing up Foghat and
Kansas was my first concert. It may have been Amy
Grant and Dion Demucci. They were roughly at the same time,
and I reckoned my brain can't remember which one was first,
but I think Four Top Temptations may have me beat
James and Youngstown.
Speaker 1 (18:05):
Good Morning, Michael.
Speaker 10 (18:06):
The big new act will at least knock out maybe
a million or so people who are not entitled to
the stuff they got through Obamacare, a scam and a half,
and they're still We're still.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
Paying for all that nonsense. Something has to be done
with all this nonsense.
Speaker 10 (18:21):
If you're staying at home, I'm sixty five and I'm
still working, now, that's because i want to work and
I'm not going to sit on my butt. So anyway,
you can't retire to his sixty seven. Anyway, Have a
good day.
Speaker 1 (18:33):
All right, that was plain. Actually, now let's get James Morning.
Speaker 12 (18:37):
Michael gang Hi fruittose corn syrup which is used in
visually all soft drinks ten times sweeter than sugar, but
unfortunately our bodies don't know what to do with it,
and so it stores it as fat. Along with partially
hydrogenated vegetable oils. These two man made products are serious
threats or health.
Speaker 6 (18:55):
Great show, and.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
That's why the President wants to replace and believes he
has an agreement from Coke to replace these chemicals with
actually sugarcane, so not cocaine.
Speaker 1 (19:06):
Sugarcane. Joe and Pa gets the final say.
Speaker 9 (19:09):
Good morning, Michael. Hey, I don't think it's an age
issue with the pausing. My father taught me at a
young age to pause instead of saying or awe, because
it made me sound more articulate in my wording have
a great day.
Speaker 2 (19:26):
Everybody is more interested in the pause and conversation than
the issues.
Speaker 1 (19:31):
David Zanatti, our senior contributor, is joining us.
Speaker 2 (19:34):
As I said earlier, I've always said, look, if I
don't pause, then.
Speaker 1 (19:39):
I'm just talking and I'm talking at you.
Speaker 2 (19:42):
If I'm having a conversation with you, there's going to
be pauses, just like if we were having a conversation.
And then sometimes it's for effect to give you time
to think. And then some of the longer pauses could
maybe be searching. I joked, searching for a word or
a thought, and you got you guys have gone off
on that.
Speaker 1 (19:57):
Am I that much of a pause er?
Speaker 7 (19:59):
David old Michael if these folks know, And first off,
I love your listeners, I really do.
Speaker 6 (20:06):
I dazed at.
Speaker 7 (20:07):
How this has developed so quickly across the country and
how people care. And I could probably tell them because
in the fact, you and I have worked for quite
a while on the construction of this broadcast, the technology
that we've gone through for us to all be able
to see each other on a regular basis.
Speaker 6 (20:23):
Now today I'm remote.
Speaker 7 (20:24):
But one of the reasons we've spent all this time
energy efforts, you spent a lot of money out of
your own pocket to get the technology that we have
is so we can see each other, so we can
pause effectively to listen. Because when we're just on remotes
like this, we tend to have you kind of have
to interrupt to get in because you can't see the
person stopping and breathing.
Speaker 6 (20:42):
So yeah, I mean, how we talk on this show
really does matter.
Speaker 7 (20:47):
And if again, if people could sit in the golf
cart with us when we have the rare occasion to
be able to go out and play together, it'd be great.
Speaker 6 (20:53):
Wish we could record those conversations.
Speaker 1 (20:55):
Yeah, because that's the difference.
Speaker 5 (20:57):
You know.
Speaker 1 (20:58):
We think it was time the talk radio became a
conversation again.
Speaker 2 (21:03):
I think that was a driving force in the design
of all of this, that it not be about the
host and their ego or them telling you how to think,
but rather journeys of discovery, real information and trusting you
to come to your own conclusions and then sharing your
thoughts and the sharing of the thoughts. And I love
(21:23):
the talk back because you don't have to rote on
hold that. You know, just like any conversation you would
have with someone, their opinion matters just like your opinion matters,
and sometimes their opinion helps shape yours even greater or
change it a little.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
We can't be afraid to have a conversation.
Speaker 2 (21:41):
And so if it's about ego, if it's about me,
if it's about talking, if it's about radio.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
Yeah, they'll never be a pause.
Speaker 2 (21:47):
If it's a conversation, if it's a journey of understanding,
it should feel like a conversation. And then sometimes it's
simply to give you time to let that absorb. What
I just said is so profoundly true that I could
either say, take a moment think about that, or I
could just pause and give you the moment to think
about it. But isn't it funny how they're more interested
in that this morning than this the conversation. All right,
(22:08):
in our closing moments, Zoran, Mom, Tommy, get.
Speaker 6 (22:11):
About me for a while, to talk about me, all right? No,
I want to go back to Frimpong. I want to
go back to Frimpong. Caill we do that?
Speaker 5 (22:21):
Sure?
Speaker 7 (22:21):
Because I know it were because I didn't get the
second thought in that I really wanted to. The thing
about Frimpong is the judge Frimpong, is that not only
was she fast tracked into the federal judiciary, but in
her confirmation in twenty twenty one, something's been covered up,
and that's the fact that the Republicans were so intimidated
by this particular judge coming up through the system that
(22:43):
even though they had fifty votes in the Senate and
could have at least forced to tie on her confirmation,
twenty four, Republicans refused to vote at all regardless.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
Which is a dead giveaway of what David I'm afraid of.
Speaker 7 (22:57):
Being called, no, I will consider afraid of being called
race is because she's black, and because she was born overseas,
and because she has the last thing that's got about
twenty syllables in it, and so they just duck the issue.
Speaker 6 (23:08):
It's not about her credentials for philosophy or judicial tenor.
Speaker 7 (23:11):
And now she's on the bench trying to be president
of the United States, and the Republicans complained about her outcome,
but they didn't have the courage to even cast a
vote against her in the confirmation process twenty four Republicans
put in a no vote.
Speaker 6 (23:23):
Twenty four said no and two said yes.
Speaker 2 (23:29):
You'll find that most of the problems we have are
the result of both parties. Let's close with this. What
are the Democrats doing? I mean, how could they take?
First of all, they used a Shenanigan and a tactic
with rank file to get this guy through a primary.
He would have never survived. There would have been a
runoff with Cuomo, and Cuomo would have won. Now you've
got a four person race and it looks like he's
(23:50):
still going to lose. But it's a squeaker and he's
an all out beyond socialist communist. You'll hear in sounds
of the day all these leftist members have come Congress
that are loving him. They're talking about everything he's saying
he's going to do. And then when you ask them,
did he talk about how he was going to pay
for it all?
Speaker 5 (24:06):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (24:06):
No, he never talked about that. And that brings back
Margaret Thatcher and the problem with socialism. Sooner or later
you run out of everybody else's money because the government
doesn't have any money of its own. But it's even
worse at a municipal level because people can leave the city,
they can leave the state. But why would you take
such a negative character, such a revealing character of how
much the Democrat Party is no longer a Democrat party,
(24:28):
it's a Socialist party.
Speaker 1 (24:29):
They're really two parties and they're outnumbered.
Speaker 2 (24:32):
Why would you make this a national referendum that sounds
so foolish that it almost needs dissection.
Speaker 7 (24:38):
Well, it's because what the Socialist Party is attempting to
do in the United States, which is in essence the
Democrat Party, is to feature, whether it's Judge Frempong or
whether it's Mandami, is to bring people who have born
been outside this country or have not been here very long.
Speaker 6 (24:54):
Mondami's only been here since IK twenty and eighteen. These
are folks that.
Speaker 7 (24:59):
Don't really know America, and they're trying to move them
based on their gifting in regards to public flattery and
speech and excitement and enthusiasm. They're fronting them these folks.
How can these folks really know how America operates? They're
basically first generation in America. Now they're being forwarded into
(25:20):
points of leadership.
Speaker 6 (25:21):
Loquen.
Speaker 7 (25:22):
I mean, when our parents and grandparents came over here
from Italy, they knew they had to serve a long
time to become America and earn the right. We're catapulting
people into leadership. I'm not even sure, and I don't
care what degrees they have because we don't know what
they were taught at Harvard and Yale, but we know
that probably weren't taught the Declaration and the Constitution. This
is all affront, and it's affront to create political power and.
Speaker 6 (25:47):
They hand it over to people who don't even know
how the system works.
Speaker 2 (25:50):
That smart I was just going to say, only but
in the country since twenty eighteen and now a federal judge.
I don't even know if that's about domies since they
well mom dommy too. Yeah, but I mean, I don't
know if that's enough time to assimilate properly. Let come
on exactly, that's yeah. I'll stand by my guns. They
(26:14):
could be being smart, uh, and they're going to run
on mom dommy and it's going to fail miserably, and
then they're going to run reasonably uh in twenty twenty
eight with someone like Ronny Manuel or Wes Moore. But
you know, AOC has had the torch patch to her
by Bernie Sanders you know she's going to be the
(26:35):
early front runner. Why she's up front selling this guy. Uh,
she's creating her own demise. And I don't think it's
that smart. I think they're that left. I think they're
that socialist. I think that they're they're that committed in
going further left. This to me is the solidification I
believe of the the parasite defeating the host, the host dying,
(26:58):
therefore the parasite dies, both end up dead. This is
the fulfilling moments of the Democrat Party, and maybe even
the Republican Party as well, may not exist by the
end of the decade.
Speaker 1 (27:10):
I still think it's that.
Speaker 7 (27:11):
Thing that, Yeah, joining the profess as from happening is
Republican scandal because the Democrats always count on Republicans creating
enough of a scandal that people, in their anger at
the Republicans will turn to whoever the Democrats give, basically
as a form of retribution or accountability.
Speaker 6 (27:28):
That's where the Trump people have to be very.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
Careful, and they're trying to create that scandal and creating
a death in their insurrection of border security and Ice.
So far, Ice hasn't taken the bait, and that's why
they're pushing the Epstein story so much. They don't have
the scandal yet, but they're trying to create exactly what
you're saying. Davids and Audi is the CEO of the
American Policy Roundtable, host to the Public Square. He's our
senior contributor and we value our time together. Thank you
(27:52):
so much, David.
Speaker 8 (27:53):
It's your morning show with Michael del Chino.
Speaker 2 (27:57):
Can't have your morning show without your voice too, James,
we go, Michael.
Speaker 1 (28:01):
Your pauses are brilliant.
Speaker 12 (28:03):
That's taught in effective public speaking because it causes the
listener to refocus in case their mind is wandering away,
and to hang on the next words that are gonna
come out.
Speaker 1 (28:14):
That is excellent public speaking.
Speaker 2 (28:17):
This obsession on my pause is it reminds me of
I was my dad's program director for a short period
of time. We did a morning show together, and one
time I was going over something. I said, here's what
you do brilliantly. My dad stopped me.
Speaker 1 (28:29):
I don't want to know any of this.
Speaker 2 (28:31):
I do everything naturally, and if I start understanding it
or studying it, it'll ruin it.
Speaker 1 (28:35):
H No, I'm just being me.
Speaker 2 (28:37):
If there's pauses, I don't know, but let's have this
debate with James. I agree, it's brilliant. It's effective to
Oklahoma City.
Speaker 6 (28:44):
We go long half man? Are you kidding?
Speaker 5 (28:47):
But a band?
Speaker 3 (28:48):
I saw them first time they came through Denver. I
wonder if you have to catch that tour When Dave
was wearing his snake pants. I'll never forget him. Wish
I had a picture, can find a photo anywhere?
Speaker 6 (29:03):
What a show. They brought the house down.
Speaker 2 (29:05):
Love You fog Hat was great, great great stuff. Slow
Ride obviously their biggest hit. I was actually in Paul Capitano,
who is now a pastor but at the time was
a pothead and lude taker. He was driving, My brother
Bobby was in the front seat, Me and my friend
Keith Anders were in the back seat when in a
cloud of marijuana smoke, he went eighty miles an hour
(29:26):
into the back of a parked truck on an exit ramp.
I ended up in the front seat, my brother ended
up underneath the dash. All of us got out and
walked away. It's a miracle from God. And Slow Ride
was playing.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
When that happened. So I have bittersweet memories of Foghead.
Speaker 2 (29:44):
Tomorrow our spotlight interview of the week is White House
correspondent John Decker. We'll talk more about why tomorrow, but
today I noticed you made news again. One of the
top stories of the day speculation on the future of
the FED chair a Jerome Powell.
Speaker 1 (29:58):
That all began with your question.
Speaker 11 (30:01):
It did. That began with a series of questions I
asked the President as he was departing the White House
just the other day on his way to Pittsburgh.
Speaker 5 (30:09):
You may recall I asked the President wanted.
Speaker 11 (30:11):
To see his reaction. I said, do you plan to
nominate Jerome Palell to another four year teraman? As you know,
he was pretty shocked with that question.
Speaker 5 (30:20):
Gave me a four four word.
Speaker 11 (30:23):
Answer, not a Ford letter answer for word answer. He said,
are you kidding me? And yesterday he was asked as
he intended to fire Jerome Powell different variation on my question,
and the President said, no, I think he's going to
wait until May of next year, when Jerome Palell's term ends.
A reminder that President Trump actually nominated Jerome Powell in
(30:43):
the first place to be FED chairman, and the President
has indicated Michael that he already has a number of
replacements in mind to replace Jerome Powell as the FED chairman.
Speaker 1 (30:54):
Shall we read between the lines?
Speaker 2 (30:56):
Is this a message the President's giving him between now
and May might want to start seeing interest rates my.
Speaker 5 (31:01):
Way or else?
Speaker 2 (31:03):
Because I think he's being pretty clear not going to
fire him, but I'm not going to renominate him either.
Speaker 11 (31:08):
Yeah, I mean, I think that Jerome Palll is his intention.
Speaker 5 (31:12):
Is to leave with his head.
Speaker 11 (31:14):
Held high, to not resign his position.
Speaker 5 (31:18):
To serve until the final day of his term, and.
Speaker 11 (31:21):
He will stick to what he thinks is the best
policy as far as interest rates are concerned.
Speaker 5 (31:26):
You know, it's always good.
Speaker 11 (31:27):
To remind people that it's not just one person. It's
not just Jerome pal there's one individual who gets decide
whether interest rates should remain the same or be lowered
or be raised. It's a group of Fed governors, and
Jerome Palell is just.
Speaker 5 (31:43):
One of them.
Speaker 11 (31:43):
So even if you replace Jerome pal there's no guarantee
that the replacement will get his way and convince the
other Fed governors to go along with him or her
in terms of lowering FED interest rates. Visiting with White
House correspondent John Decker.
Speaker 1 (32:00):
Epstein.
Speaker 2 (32:01):
The Epstein files have now become a political hot potato.
The left can't bring it up enough because it can
divide the president's base and it gets attention off other things.
The right, in contrast, they can't talk enough about Mandani
for the same reason. So, going beyond the politics and
(32:22):
hot potato and narrative game, I get the matrix. You're
an attorney, a US Supreme Court bar attorney, and a
White House correspondent who's covered eight presidents.
Speaker 1 (32:32):
But I want to talk to the attorney for a second.
Speaker 2 (32:35):
This is a case and there are victims and they
didn't get their day in court because the accused killed
himself and is dead. They should come back maybe in
civil trials. But the names, it was always names from
depositions in a court case that didn't happen, not a
black book that exists and is now being hidden.
Speaker 1 (32:55):
Why is that so hard to freaking explain?
Speaker 11 (32:58):
Oh, I think you explained it really well.
Speaker 2 (33:00):
Oh you know.
Speaker 11 (33:00):
And there's an attorney who is a senator as well,
who is a very well respected legal mind and a
very good senator. His name is Josh Holly. He's one
of those individuals who's a big backer of President Donald Trump.
Beg maga Republican, But he too, is calling for the
release by the Department of Justice of.
Speaker 5 (33:20):
All the files they have on Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 11 (33:24):
And you know, I think that tells you a lot
when someone like Josh Hawley, his name is added to
that list of a growing number of very influential Republicans
urging the doj urging Pam Bondi, the Attorney General to
release these files.
Speaker 2 (33:39):
The problem is, all right, if you're going to have
that conversation, the names have all been redacted by a
judge order. You'd have to get that lifted in order
to do it, and then you never hear me speak
on behalf of the accused.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
But they never had their day in court.
Speaker 2 (33:53):
Their names just came up from victims who claim they
were victimized by them, and they deserve the right for
that to be before revealed. Otherwise you're just gonna implicate
everybody and they're gonna assume the worst. It's really not
that hard to follow. But that ain't how we work anymore.
We live in a matrix. We go by narratives and
we pick permanent positions and they're immovable, and that's the chaos.
(34:14):
But it is a political hot potato, and the President's
just simply saying it's a hoax.
Speaker 1 (34:18):
That's not gonna play well with this base either.
Speaker 11 (34:21):
Well, look, you know, I think the president's counting on
the news cycle just moving so incredibly quickly. As you know,
it does move quickly. But this is a story, this
is a story that's been around now for a few
weeks now. It's not going away, and I don't see
how you.
Speaker 5 (34:37):
Get it going away anytime soon.
Speaker 2 (34:39):
DoD Decker will be our spotlight interview tomorrow and you're
gonna love the news.
Speaker 8 (34:43):
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael ndheld Choo
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.