July 30, 2025 • 34 mins
It used to be “reading, writing and arithmetic,” but for college students of today, learning artificial intelligence is a fundamental skill. National Correspondent RORY O’NEILL explains.
When it comes to AI, we don’t really understand what it is…let alone what it’s going to become. Senior Contributor David Zanotti joins us for our journey of discovery and all the unintended consequences.
Only days after President Trump met with Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to discuss the economy, the officials who decide the nation’s monetary policy are meeting to talk about interest rates. White House Correspondent JON DECKER has the latest on what is expected from the meeting of the Federal
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, it's me Michael. Your morning show can be heard
live five to eight am Central, six to nine Eastern
and great cities like Jackson, Mississippi, Akron, Ohio, or Columbus, Georgia.
We'd love to be a part of your morning routine
and we're grateful you're here.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Now. Enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
Two three starting your morning off right.
Speaker 4 (00:18):
A new way of talk, a new way of understanding
because we're in the stage.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
This is your morning show with Michael gil Cham Good morning,
Michael show that you are looking for.
Speaker 5 (00:33):
That was Arnold Shorts big break in the film was
Conan the Barbarians.
Speaker 2 (00:39):
Ah, thank you Love, I got it.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
Shortly after we went to break to which Jeffrey and
Red just shot me down. He just grunted in that
that wasn't that was won the game. This big break
Conan the Barbarian. I think the Terminator series is probably
what he's most famous for. All Right, good morning, eight
minutes after the hour. Welcome to Wednesday the thirtieth, twenty
twenty five on the Aaron streaming live on your iHeartRadio app.
(01:04):
We had an eight point eight magnitude earthquake off the
coast of Russia, sending tsunami warnings to Hawaii, Alaska, and
northern California. We got through the Alaska portion and everybody's
feeling a little bit better about that. Authorities are working
to determine whether the shooter in New York City and
the Manhattan attack that killed five had some help, and
Happy Gilmore setting records on Netflix. If you're just waking up,
(01:27):
it used to be reading, writing, and arithmetic, but for
college students today, AI is the fundamental skill to master.
Our your morning show national correspondent Rory O'Neil is here
to explain, Well, that only makes sense. We better get
our arms around this because it's already moving on to
the next, second and third generation.
Speaker 6 (01:46):
Well exactly, by the way, it wasn't Hercules the first
movie for Schwarzenegger, and then he was the star of.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
I've never seen anything the ones I've seen.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
The only one I've seen is Terminator.
Speaker 6 (01:59):
But his say he was badly dubbed, and I think
that was his first first verse.
Speaker 2 (02:04):
But then yeah, yeah, it hurts these firsts. Okay, right,
and let's ask AI that question.
Speaker 6 (02:09):
I suppose, because you know, half of students now think
that learning how to use AI may be the most
important thing they'll learn while in college. So it's interesting
they're trying to sort of have it both ways, right.
The college professors don't want the students using AI, but
the students are saying, look, I got to know how
to use this stuff. As six to two percent say,
responsibly using AI will likely be a big part of
(02:31):
their future career.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
So we talked about this yesterday, right, kind of like
with handwriting, Well, why should we learn how to write
in cursive? Why should we worry about penmanship? We're going
to type, We're going to text. Why should we learn
about writing and critical thought and how to express ourselves?
Speaker 2 (02:46):
We're going to use AI.
Speaker 1 (02:47):
I mean that all may be well and good, and
it's certainly a class and some credits, and it's certainly
a tool, but I don't like where this is headed.
Speaker 6 (02:55):
Well, right, yeah, my signature now is only on the
screen with my one index finger, right, I was thinking
about that signing a check like, boy, I haven't done
that in a long time. But yeah, no, but you know,
my hey, look, my teacher said, you're not going to
have a calculator everywhere you go, Well, yeah, I do,
probably a couple of them, and that's the way the
world is changing. You know, half the students in the
(03:15):
survey programmarly say that they were using AI to help
them brainstorm ideas. Some use it for spell check and grammar.
I thought it was interesting. About a third said they
ask AI questions they're otherwise too embarrassed to ask to
other people.
Speaker 1 (03:30):
Yeah, and I think you know, I've made this statement before.
I think, Jeffrey, yeah, you need to get DZ. I'm
just gonna say real quick, oh you do, Okay. I
was just gonna say, this may just be the beta, right,
it may not even be the VHS, let alone the
compact disc, let alone the digital downloads, So good luck
(03:51):
keeping up with that too.
Speaker 2 (03:52):
You may be mastering the current.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
AI as the new AI is coming out, or ultimately
when we get to quantum and other computing, this becomes obsolete,
doesn't it at some point?
Speaker 6 (04:03):
Well, look, and when these college kids are starting in
the career and old folkies like me are going to
be the ones asking them, how does this work?
Speaker 2 (04:12):
What do I do? You know?
Speaker 6 (04:13):
So we're going to turn to those young college graduates
to ask how to use all this stuff, as they're
more likely to be in the loop when it comes
to using these developing technologies.
Speaker 2 (04:23):
We just don't have a lot of need for AI
around here. We have Rory. He's like AI. He knows everything.
He'll be back.
Speaker 1 (04:28):
Big companies like Procter and Gamble are always doing market
research on American habits and they've done it again. The
results next in the third hour with Roy O'Neil. Thanks
for joining us, Rory. All right, let's continue this conversation
with AI and bringing our senior contributor David Zanati. David,
I know you and the team at the Public Square
are looking into this. What fascinates me first and foremost
(04:50):
is when it comes to AI, artificial intelligence. We know
most Americans know very little about it. We don't understand
anything about it. We probably don't have a grasp of
what it's going to do to the electrical grid and
all the costs of energy and electricity.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
But we don't get what.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
It is now, let alone what it's going to become
and all the unintended consequences that are buried in that
Pandora's box. And once you put it, there's no putting
it back. What are we missing? What should we be
concerned about that we're not Good morning, Michael, good morning.
The answer I think to your question in one word,
(05:28):
is history. Before I get too far and too fast,
I got to tell you I was just at a
charity outing in Youngstown, Ohio the other day, dog Gone.
If you weren't the subject of conversation around the tables,
I am the king of Youngstown, and the king is thinking.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
About visiting his kingdom. It was refreshing.
Speaker 3 (05:49):
A whole lot of people are from different walks of life,
and they were all talking about your morning show.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
Maybe so really believe they We're very grateful for all
of our youngstun listeners. So the question is history.
Speaker 3 (05:59):
And and I know that this one AI because of
all the films that we watched over the years. It's very,
very tempting to believe this is the ticket. But I
was talking to doctor Allen recently about this, and he's
seen an X number of computer attempts, and I've seen
a few myself.
Speaker 2 (06:18):
We've seen a.
Speaker 3 (06:19):
Lot of bombs come and go. And of course, part
of the reason why AI is so hot is because
the tech world's still chasing people's money, and all we
hear is upside upside, upside, upside, upside. We don't hear
a lot of the other realities. Let me just put
it to you in this way in regards to history.
You talked earlier about backcracking as you were reporting of
(06:41):
the Major League scores from yesterday. You know, I'm really
glad that when it comes to a ball field like
Wrigley or so many other wonderful classic baseball fields.
Speaker 2 (06:51):
That we don't hear the ping of the bat, we
hear the crack of the bat.
Speaker 3 (06:56):
The point is that there are some things you can do,
but you don't have to because you go too far.
And the way that the AI process is being sold
is so far out of the box of reality, and
there's no accountability because it's all still blue sky. But
when people who are using it come to the realization
of what it does to their companies, what it does
(07:17):
to their company culture, what it does to their leadership dynamic.
When college professors now coming to the place saying, you're
not going to be able to hand in any papers,
You're going to write them in our presence on a
blue book like you used to do in the old days,
because we know what you're doing, and we're not interested
in what AI thinks. We're interested in what you think
(07:37):
there are so many holes that are yet coming in
this boat that it may not actually sail the way
people think it's going.
Speaker 1 (07:45):
I keep using the VHS Beta let alone, compact desk,
let alone, digital downloading and then compressing digital files, which
is the real changer, game changer. But maybe RFID is
worth looking at too.
Speaker 2 (08:01):
You know.
Speaker 1 (08:01):
R FID kind of made itself really usable, and it
didn't really get noticed by name. You know, we would
just invite it into our life. Oh, I pull up
to the gas station instead of having to enter my code,
instead of telling it what octane gas, I just pull up.
It senses the RFID on my keychain and boom, everything's
(08:24):
ready to just pump.
Speaker 2 (08:25):
Oh isn't that great? I'll do it.
Speaker 1 (08:27):
Or RFID, you know, in terms of you know, I'm
walking down an aisle and it knows I need shampoos,
so it tells me when I'm in front of the shampoo.
Speaker 2 (08:35):
Oh, that's helpful, thanks.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
But there's a lot of other dangers right on down
to people's fear of it ultimately being the mark of
the beast and controlling commerce.
Speaker 2 (08:43):
We can then put it inside the body.
Speaker 1 (08:46):
We kind of didn't get anywhere with that now here
comes AI and what AI can become down the road,
will we reel it in like r FID or by
the time it's time to reel it in, well, AI
have moved on to quantum computing and something even greater
that we can't stop. You may not get an off
(09:07):
ramp like he did with RFID.
Speaker 5 (09:10):
Well.
Speaker 3 (09:11):
I was just listening the other day again somebody talking
to Glenn Beck about it was all concerned about quantum
computing and they basically say, Glenn, get a hold of yourself.
We've been through this before. Period being creality. For example,
let's talk about cash, one of your favorite subjects.
Speaker 2 (09:30):
Right, Let's talk about the Joe Big era of paying
things in cash.
Speaker 3 (09:36):
And I'm not talking about just a bucket of money
in your pocket. If you've ever had the opportunity to
buy a big item ticket that you usually financed, but
this time you were able to pay for it with cash.
It might be a couch, might be a used car.
The difference between paying cash for something and the burdens
that we have today on accountability and all of that
(09:58):
computerized mumbo jumble, whether you're trying to get a loan
or how you're trying to get it done. Cash is
still king and people are not going to forget that, Michael.
I mean the burdens that the technical world have created
eventually are going to wash themselves out into a place
where people have more peace of mind and more happiness.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
AI is very, very early in the.
Speaker 3 (10:23):
Game, and people who've been through this with history before
are saying, yeah, it's interesting.
Speaker 2 (10:28):
Yes it's going to be around, but I'm not so sure.
I'm taking the big train on this one.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
Well, when we come back, here's a blind spot, here's
an unattended consequence.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
All right.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
So companies using AI and maybe managers are using it
to rewrite their reports or any of the significant objectives
or goals for the company or interdepartmental key memos. The
problem is AI is gathering that information. Nothing is anywhere
in secret. It all goes into the brain. And if
(11:00):
you start asking AI questions about your competitor, it's going
to be in the brain. How safe are the secrets
of companies that are early on embracing AI.
Speaker 4 (11:12):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Del Trono.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
Morning, Michael, Crew.
Speaker 7 (11:18):
I would never bash your competition because you have no competition,
since today is a rush Limbaugh. All the other people
out there, I believe are a bloated self other former
days that got them to where they were, much like
Elvis did in his latter days before his end.
Speaker 2 (11:36):
I really hope you guys go National.
Speaker 1 (11:40):
Of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento, Phoenix, Seattle, Detroit,
Saint Louis, Nashville, Memphis, DC tamp. I think we went
to National, didn't, but thank you for your your wish
is my come on twenty five minutes after the hour,
(12:01):
we're talking about AI with our senior contributor David Soonati.
You know, David, it reminds me of when RCS came
out with a software to help program directors schedule music,
which was you know, we used to have to do
that manually. Used to be the disc jockey's job. You
had categories and index cards and you would stack your
music and then pull it and then RCS would schedule it. Now,
(12:23):
if it was only as good as the rules you
put into it, So if you didn't tell it that
Paul McCartney and the Beatles couldn't be near each other,
it play a Beatles song or right into Paul McCartney,
or even worse right into wings because it doesn't know
what it doesn't know, and so the better you were
as a program director putting the rules in, then it
became something great. What I don't like about AI, and
(12:45):
getting back to the security issue, the ones that are
putting the most information in and the rules to make
it operate best are feeding the most unsecured into a
brain that other people could get access to, and the
fools will have the least vulnerability. These are the things
I'm not anti AI at all, and I will not
argue that I could run and I was.
Speaker 2 (13:06):
I've written a book, You've written several books.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
I mean, we can write, but you know I can
get AI to write an even better paragraph than I wrote.
I'm not, you know, not embracing it. I'm just thinking
we got understand it. It's totality. My biggest thing is
the electricity grid where it's headed. We don't even understand
what it is as we're inviting it in and where
it's going and the unintended consequences in the workforce and
(13:28):
cost of energy, and then security keeping company secrets. But
that down the road is a big issue, isn't it.
If you don't get our arms around.
Speaker 3 (13:40):
Sure, it's a huge issue when you invite AI to
come in and know your corporation, it will know every
nook and cranny as it's programmed in, which means you're
going to have security issues like you have not even
dreamed of that AI can't solve. So, Yes, the corporate
side of this is very shaky and people need to
(14:01):
be greatly aware of that. But more significantly, we're having
a conversation where we talked about history. I'd throw one
more word into that, and that's nature. Yes, you wrote
a book, and you know what I liked reading your
book because I knew that book was you.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
AI will always.
Speaker 8 (14:17):
Play to the middle because it has to right because
it and it sounds like it, and you can feel
it and you can smell it when you're involved around AI,
and you always will be able to.
Speaker 3 (14:30):
It's just a matter of years, Michael, before people come
out AI.
Speaker 2 (14:34):
It becomes a byword. Now.
Speaker 3 (14:37):
It may not be that the technology ever disappears. We
may find better and better and smarter ways to use it,
but the idea that it's going to change everything probably not.
Speaker 1 (14:46):
Yeah, and I'm sure there's something that think we're being
old fuddy duddy about it.
Speaker 2 (14:48):
We're not. We're embracing it for what it is. We're
trying to understand it.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
We're looking at the negatives, the positives and long term
is it the wave? I still will stand by my
discernment that this is the VHS or the beta, not
the VHS, let alone the compact disc So it's what
it's going to become that we need to be really
geared up for, and we're not even understanding what it is.
Speaker 2 (15:10):
But you're right, you know.
Speaker 1 (15:11):
I was thinking about the great authors, Charles Finney, David Wilkerson,
Leonard Ravenhill, the people who have impacted my life. If
the future is no individuals writing like you're talking about
and influencing and their unique revelations or insights, do we
lose thought Somewhere along the line. I will say this,
(15:33):
David has the best AI discernment in the world. He
can sense it by the certain phrasing of words already,
and I don't think that gets much better. And professors
are way ahead of kids who have gotten away with
Can I just make one last bold statement in thirty seconds,
I know from my kids how they've gotten away with
murder using AI and high school. I don't think it's
(15:55):
going to get by the professors as easy. A little
warning to the kids before they go off to college,
all right, and then you and the and the team
at Public Square are going to be tackling this some
more in the coming weeks.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
Oh absolutely.
Speaker 3 (16:07):
In fact, we've got some wonderful program coming up on
this and some powerful program in coming up on Declaration
two fifty.
Speaker 2 (16:13):
It's a theme we've started that you take.
Speaker 3 (16:16):
The most classic document in the history of the world
for us, other than the scriptures, the Declaration of Independence didn't.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
Take ai No, and it's its two hundred fiftieth birthday
coming up.
Speaker 2 (16:26):
All right.
Speaker 1 (16:27):
You can listen to the Public Square on two our
stations nationwide on demand anytime at the Public Square dot com.
Our senior contributor and close to the Public Square David Snatti.
Speaker 3 (16:38):
Hey, this is Jeff from Tulsa, oklaholm and my morning
show is your Morning Show with Michael Denjorno.
Speaker 2 (16:51):
Hey, it's me Michael.
Speaker 1 (16:52):
Your Morning show has heard live from five to eight
am Central, six to nine am Eastern, three to six
am Pacific on great radio stations like News Radio eleven
ninety k EX in Portland, News Talk five point fifty
k FYI and Phoenix, Arizona in Freedom one oh four
seven in Washington, d C.
Speaker 2 (17:08):
We'd love to have you.
Speaker 1 (17:09):
Join us live in the morning, even take us along
on the drive to work, but better late than never.
Enjoyed the podcast. Thanks for bringing us along with you.
After all, this is your morning show. I'm Michael. Jeffrey's
got the sound, not quite his ADHD medicine, red is
it drowning? And empty bourbon bottles and keeping an eye
on the content. We had an eight point eight earthquake
(17:30):
off the coast of Russia and it caused a tsunami warning.
Really for we were most concerned about Hawaii. It is
now passed there and we got through okay, so we're
not as alarmed about what's headed towards Alaska, northern California,
and the Senate is confirming President Trump's pick to head
the CDC, and authorities are looking into whether or not
the gunman in Manhattan had a helper. We have a
(17:53):
new website, by the way, all things your morning show
on the radio. We're your morning show online. Were your
Morning Show online dot com and that's where you'll find
the cities and stations we're at nationwide, links to our podcast,
to our social media sites, to stories that we've covered,
to breaking news, to bios on all of the cast members,
(18:16):
including our White House correspondent John Decker or David Zanatti
that you just heard, and links to their shows and
other activities, so all things your Morning Show online check
them out and your Morningshow online dot com. A lot
of people worked hard to put a great website together
for you, and I think you're gonna.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
Like it all right.
Speaker 1 (18:33):
Only days after President Trump met or embarrassed Federal Reserve
Chairman Jerome Powell, officials who decide the nation's monetary policies
our meeting to talk about interest rates. White House Correspondent
John Decker's here with the very latest.
Speaker 2 (18:47):
Good morning, John, Hey, good morning to you. Michael.
Speaker 9 (18:50):
That's right, the Federal Open Market Committee. Those are those
officials that you just reference. It's not just Jerome Poal.
It's twelve individuals who decide whether to lower or raise
interest rates or keep them unchanged. And the widely expected
view is that the said today when it announces its
decision at two pm Eastern time, will leave interest rates unchanged.
(19:13):
And I have to tell you, Michael, that will not
please President Donald J.
Speaker 2 (19:18):
Trump. Yeah, so I'm thinking of the nil sadakison bad
mad ru rud at.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
Some point, and we've said this out loud to each other.
I don't agree with the President's interest rate should be
zero or one percent, but for goodness sakes, I think
we can all agree on three and maybe as low
as two and a half at some point. And I
know it's all narrative and one side will say one thing,
the other will say another, but it sure seems like
at this point the President has isolated and criticized Jerome
(19:49):
Powell to such a degree and I realized he's one
of twelve.
Speaker 2 (19:52):
But I can't. I can't put my arms.
Speaker 1 (19:55):
We're gonna talk to a money expert next hour, but
it's starting to feel personal. And I don't know if
they keep the rates the same, how it's going to
be sold to not look personal.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
But we'll find out. Right first, they got to hold them.
We'll find out.
Speaker 9 (20:10):
You know, what happens is is that the FED announces
what its decision is in the afternoon two pm Eastern time,
and then the FED Chairman Jerome Powell explains the decision
of the Federal Open Market Committee. Those twelve members that
made this decision, and also gives a forecast about what
we can expect for the remainder of the year. And
(20:32):
I think that's where the president could get a glimmer
of good news. I think that Jerome Powell will indicate
that because there is indeed relatively low inflation, that the
tariffs have not led to higher upticks and prices to
the extent that keeping rates unchanged is necessary. I think
(20:53):
the Fed Shairman will indicate he does expect a rate cut,
maybe not at their next meeting, but between now and
the end of the year.
Speaker 1 (21:02):
All right, Well, you may get m a glimmer of
a glimmer of hope in the future, but the President's
not going to take kindly to holding the rights. And
I think we know what to expect from the president
once it happens. I want to go to Gallaine Maxwell.
We knew it was going to come to this. Oh
you want me to talk, I'll go before Congress. I'll
tell you everything you want to know. But I want
clemency or immunity. And you know there's the old Supreme
(21:23):
Court bar attorney John Decker in there. I've said this
a million times, This can't be about anything other.
Speaker 2 (21:31):
Than the victims and justice for the victims. If we give.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
This woman who arranged all of these criminal gatherings and
even participated in some of them, that's not justice for
the victims. And if that's just to tickle all of
our curiosity to create political weaponry, man, that seems that
seems like a bad trade off.
Speaker 9 (21:56):
I'm in agreement with you, Michael, And you know that's
the reason. It's a head scratcher to me. While the
president why the President just doesn't say I am ruling
out any type of clemency, any type of pardon for
this monster who was convicted of those terrible crimes and
is now serving a twenty year prison sentence. And rightly so,
(22:18):
I think the President should get in front of this story,
say that, put that to rest, and let I think
the public know how he feels about this situation. And
I would imagine it's the same way you just expressed
you feel about the situation, Michael, I would hope.
Speaker 2 (22:35):
So, do we have thirty more seconds or more? Of course?
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Okay, So I want to go to it was your
question to the President that he thought was a great
idea that one senators along with Bernie Sanders are taking
and running. And so the latest is Senate Republicans wanting
Americans to get up to six hundred dollars checks from
tariff revenue up to suggests anyway, and they don't get
(23:00):
give you any explanation, some level of means testing a
max of twenty four hundred per family, so up to
six hundred for each adult and child. And we're trying
to figure out the math on this in such a
way that there's no way of knowing what the tariff
revenue is going to be, but what it is already,
you're giving back more than you've saved from DOGE. So
(23:22):
I don't know if that's too much, if it's means tested,
and they're not telling us, where do you think this
is headed? And I'm sure the devil's in the details.
How many details have you seen?
Speaker 9 (23:32):
Yeah, the devil is in the details. We'll see when
the Senate comes back from their August recess what this
legislation looks like. It's just really a headline more than
anything else, but pretty remarkable. I make this suggestion to
the President. He says, great idea, and then you have
just within an hour Josh Hally says, I'm going to
make this a reality by introducing legislation to this effect,
(23:55):
so we'll see. You know, I think that the US
Treasury has taken well over one hundred billion dollars in
tariff revenue so far, and that number is going to
increase substantially come October, come August the first, when more
tariff revenue is expected to come in as the President
raises tariff rates on all of our trading partners.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
John Decker, who once said to President Trump some ten
years ago, shouldn't we guard the border? Secure the border?
Certain doodka. Every question you ask, you create news. John Decker,
White House Correspondent, Thank you so much. Don't forget His
White House Briefing podcast will be out by noon Central today.
Check it out. John Decker, thank you so much. All right, talkbacks.
(24:40):
Can we start now with Jay Robert in Oklahoma City.
Speaker 3 (24:44):
You picked me up, you get me going, and then
I know it's another day in paradise with Michael del Jorno.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
So what he's saying is I am the wing between
his wings or the wind between beneath his wings. Jay Robert,
Oklahoma City, where I once lived, not far from the
smiling water, Towers of.
Speaker 2 (25:04):
More great to have you listening on KTOK in Oklahoma City.
All Right, who's next? I don't have names.
Speaker 5 (25:09):
Well, and a lot of these don't come in with names.
They've got like avatar names. So I did like this one.
I thought I would give this.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
One to you.
Speaker 10 (25:18):
Has lots of great movies besides Terminator and Predator, Kindergarten.
Speaker 2 (25:24):
Cop, Who is your Daddy? And what does she do?
Jingle all the Way, the Skate Plan, Conan and the Barbarian,
the Running Man. Let's see who's in the expendables about it?
Speaker 5 (25:36):
Lou?
Speaker 1 (25:37):
Yeah, so that's what you were working hard on. And
the who's your daddy? To her talkbacks a lot? It's
Donold Schwartzen Niggers. What was it seventy eighth birthday? You
just scroll down now, Yes, seventy eighth birthday. What's really
funny is you? But all I was saying was most
famous for I mean, I thought the Terminator series was spectacular.
Speaker 5 (25:55):
The crazy thing is is you set up a great
couple of questions for the talkbacks, but all anybody wants
to talk about is eral sports.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
Well, because the questions I laid out first of all,
shameless plugged for the podcast, I beg you not to
listen to the first hour. I'll leave it at that, well,
because that's where I admit that I've never seen. Well,
I gave a thumbs down to Happy Gilmore Too, which
is now setting Netflix records.
Speaker 5 (26:23):
That is the platinum hour, though that's always a great hour.
And yet I watched Funny Girl with Barbara Streisand and
liked it. I don't want anyone to know that, and
now they know it even in the second hour. But yeah,
we had a long discussion about both the two things.
I'm struggling the most with that the woman who set
(26:44):
up every one of these criminal sexual assaults could get
clemency or immunity to satisfy our political curiosity or the
political weaponry of the name.
Speaker 2 (26:56):
She could list.
Speaker 1 (27:00):
And I constantly get these calls, Well, if there's no
black book and there's no list, she shouldn't be in prison.
She's in prison because there's a list, and she's in
prison because of her involvement in arranging every underage girl,
even sickly joining in. These weren't massages, they were threesomes,
(27:25):
and the list exists. The names are redacted because a
judge has placed them in redaction because the names came
out in depositions of a trial that never happened because
the accused and I'm doing air quotes, killed himself.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
But I am uncomfortable.
Speaker 1 (27:44):
This is the woman to know, and she could do
some talking, and she could initiate some cases where justice
could prevail eventually, But I'm not into getting her off
the hook and giving her immunity and clemency to satisfy
political fights and curiosities. That makes me uncomfortable in the
name of justice for the victims, one of which took
(28:05):
their life just months ago, and then the other was I.
I think we're either serious about the threat of debt
or we're not. I mean, I think COVID has proven
(28:26):
a fake I'm not saying COVID was fake, but it
was weaponized for control. I think global warmings days are
as numbered as transgendered athletes and wokeness is numbered. But
the real threat, the real existential threat to our future debt.
(28:48):
Are we serious and we haven't even collected this revenue
from these tariff deals and these investment deals, and we're
already to divvy back to the American people. Means tested
says one. Are you for that more than we're taking in.
It just suggests to me we're not very serious about
dead After all, that was what we wanted you to
(29:12):
comment on. And I guess the point blank question is,
should we give Glaine Maxwell immunity and clemency, give her
a get out of jail card for everything she's done,
just to go deeper into outing names and we already
(29:34):
know from the attorney that knows the names. I mean,
if you're playing cards, she's bluffing.
Speaker 2 (29:38):
I mean, she doesn't really hold anything we don't know.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
And Alan Dershowhich Is more than made it crystal clear
there's nothing in there on Trump. In fact, there's nothing
in there on any politician still in office. Some are dead,
some are out of office, but they're in there. And
the Democrats are playing this game knowing we're not going
to throw away our constitutional, judicial republic.
Speaker 2 (30:09):
For political weaponry.
Speaker 1 (30:11):
But they know there's more of their names in there
than names that will bother Republicans.
Speaker 2 (30:17):
That's how sure they are. It's never going to come out.
So I give her a deal.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Should we give Gallaine Maxwell clemency or immunity in exchange
for names? And should we really be giving every adult
up to and somebody tell us what up to means,
because if that's means testing, tell us upfront. This is
just a bunch of Republicans that are going to take
money that hasn't even been brought in yet and go
back to their districts and pander it. And it shows
(30:42):
me they're not serious about the debt. That's what I
think we wanted talk backs on. That's what we wanted
emails at Michael di atiheartmedia dot com. But yes, I
am familiar with all of Arnes Schwarzenegger's great movies, so
keep those coming as well.
Speaker 4 (30:58):
It's your show with Michael del Chano.
Speaker 1 (31:03):
President Trump says his administration is going to be being
more involved after he saw images of starving children in
the Gaza Mark Mayfield has more.
Speaker 11 (31:13):
According to a senior White House official, the President was
disturbed and troubled by the images, most of which he
saw in news clips.
Speaker 5 (31:20):
There's nothing you can say either that it's Sarah, but
when you see the kids, and those the kids, you know,
whether they talk starvation or not, those are kids that
are starving.
Speaker 11 (31:30):
Trump has said publicly he does not agree with Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin at Yahoo's assessment that no one is
starving in Gaza and plans to work with international partners
to fund and set up food delivery centers. Trump previously
approved sixty million dollars for aid to Gaza and pointed
out the ongoing need for assistance.
Speaker 2 (31:46):
I'm Mark Neefield.
Speaker 1 (31:47):
President Trump is also threatening to raise tariffs on Indian imports.
Speaker 2 (31:51):
Brian Shook you all morning log has more.
Speaker 12 (31:54):
According to the President, they are going to pay twenty
five percent if the Allied Nations cannot see you're a
trade agreement. US trade representative Jamison Greer told CNBC that
an elusive India trade agreement would require more discussion between
the two countries, and it comes after Trump has previously
called America's trade relationship with India very tough.
Speaker 2 (32:17):
I'm Brian Shook. Well, looking around the.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
World, people are living better lives and they're more optimistic
about the future. Broy O'Neil with a few good news details.
Speaker 6 (32:27):
Across more than one hundred and forty nations, more people
are said to be thriving. The annual Gallup Survey vines
about a third of people around the world are said
to be doing well. That number was closer to twenty percent.
In two thousand and eight. Globally, seven percent were classified
as suffering in life, matching the lowest point on record
going back to two thousand and seven.
Speaker 2 (32:48):
I'm Rory O'Neil.
Speaker 1 (32:49):
Well, some dog breeds seem to be more likely than
others to beg for or steal food.
Speaker 2 (32:53):
I can tell you the English.
Speaker 1 (32:55):
Shepherd is very good at begging and stealing food. With
all the breed, here's Sammy Triho.
Speaker 10 (33:01):
A new study in the American Journal of Veterinary Research
found sporting dogs like Labradors and Golden Retrievers are more
likely to try and scam some extra food. Hound dogs
were next on the list. Other non sporting breeds like
bulldogs and poodles were actually less likely than the average
dog when it came to begging for scraps. Dogs who
live in homes with other dogs were also more likely
(33:21):
to try and get some extra food. I'm Tammy trheo.
Speaker 1 (33:24):
You can just shut up Maybay because you hate America
and you love a voice.
Speaker 2 (33:27):
Want it all these South Park, Yeah and an all
new South Park.
Speaker 1 (33:32):
They're bringing back Donald Trump's character for episode two of
their new season. The popular parody cartoon released a trailer
Tuesday for its new episode, which airs next week. It
shows Trump's character attending a banquet with Satan and groping
his leg under the table. The trailer also shows cart
Man turning into a conservative podcaster Charlie Kirk. Episode two
(33:55):
of South Park will are on Wednesday, August the sixth
on Comedy Central and stream the next day on Pair
Amount Closet.
Speaker 4 (34:00):
We're all in this together. This is your morning show
with Michael del Jorno.
Hey, it's me Michael. Your morning show can be heard
live five to eight am Central, six to nine Eastern
and great cities like Jackson, Mississippi, Akron, Ohio, or Columbus, Georgia.
We'd love to be a part of your morning routine
and we're grateful you're here.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Now. Enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
Two three starting your morning off right.
Speaker 4 (00:18):
A new way of talk, a new way of understanding
because we're in the stage.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
This is your morning show with Michael gil Cham Good morning,
Michael show that you are looking for.
Speaker 5 (00:33):
That was Arnold Shorts big break in the film was
Conan the Barbarians.
Speaker 2 (00:39):
Ah, thank you Love, I got it.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
Shortly after we went to break to which Jeffrey and
Red just shot me down. He just grunted in that
that wasn't that was won the game. This big break
Conan the Barbarian. I think the Terminator series is probably
what he's most famous for. All Right, good morning, eight
minutes after the hour. Welcome to Wednesday the thirtieth, twenty
twenty five on the Aaron streaming live on your iHeartRadio app.
(01:04):
We had an eight point eight magnitude earthquake off the
coast of Russia, sending tsunami warnings to Hawaii, Alaska, and
northern California. We got through the Alaska portion and everybody's
feeling a little bit better about that. Authorities are working
to determine whether the shooter in New York City and
the Manhattan attack that killed five had some help, and
Happy Gilmore setting records on Netflix. If you're just waking up,
(01:27):
it used to be reading, writing, and arithmetic, but for
college students today, AI is the fundamental skill to master.
Our your morning show national correspondent Rory O'Neil is here
to explain, Well, that only makes sense. We better get
our arms around this because it's already moving on to
the next, second and third generation.
Speaker 6 (01:46):
Well exactly, by the way, it wasn't Hercules the first
movie for Schwarzenegger, and then he was the star of.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
I've never seen anything the ones I've seen.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
The only one I've seen is Terminator.
Speaker 6 (01:59):
But his say he was badly dubbed, and I think
that was his first first verse.
Speaker 2 (02:04):
But then yeah, yeah, it hurts these firsts. Okay, right,
and let's ask AI that question.
Speaker 6 (02:09):
I suppose, because you know, half of students now think
that learning how to use AI may be the most
important thing they'll learn while in college. So it's interesting
they're trying to sort of have it both ways, right.
The college professors don't want the students using AI, but
the students are saying, look, I got to know how
to use this stuff. As six to two percent say,
responsibly using AI will likely be a big part of
(02:31):
their future career.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
So we talked about this yesterday, right, kind of like
with handwriting, Well, why should we learn how to write
in cursive? Why should we worry about penmanship? We're going
to type, We're going to text. Why should we learn
about writing and critical thought and how to express ourselves?
Speaker 2 (02:46):
We're going to use AI.
Speaker 1 (02:47):
I mean that all may be well and good, and
it's certainly a class and some credits, and it's certainly
a tool, but I don't like where this is headed.
Speaker 6 (02:55):
Well, right, yeah, my signature now is only on the
screen with my one index finger, right, I was thinking
about that signing a check like, boy, I haven't done
that in a long time. But yeah, no, but you know,
my hey, look, my teacher said, you're not going to
have a calculator everywhere you go, Well, yeah, I do,
probably a couple of them, and that's the way the
world is changing. You know, half the students in the
(03:15):
survey programmarly say that they were using AI to help
them brainstorm ideas. Some use it for spell check and grammar.
I thought it was interesting. About a third said they
ask AI questions they're otherwise too embarrassed to ask to
other people.
Speaker 1 (03:30):
Yeah, and I think you know, I've made this statement before.
I think, Jeffrey, yeah, you need to get DZ. I'm
just gonna say real quick, oh you do, Okay. I
was just gonna say, this may just be the beta, right,
it may not even be the VHS, let alone the
compact disc, let alone the digital downloads, So good luck
(03:51):
keeping up with that too.
Speaker 2 (03:52):
You may be mastering the current.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
AI as the new AI is coming out, or ultimately
when we get to quantum and other computing, this becomes obsolete,
doesn't it at some point?
Speaker 6 (04:03):
Well, look, and when these college kids are starting in
the career and old folkies like me are going to
be the ones asking them, how does this work?
Speaker 2 (04:12):
What do I do? You know?
Speaker 6 (04:13):
So we're going to turn to those young college graduates
to ask how to use all this stuff, as they're
more likely to be in the loop when it comes
to using these developing technologies.
Speaker 2 (04:23):
We just don't have a lot of need for AI
around here. We have Rory. He's like AI. He knows everything.
He'll be back.
Speaker 1 (04:28):
Big companies like Procter and Gamble are always doing market
research on American habits and they've done it again. The
results next in the third hour with Roy O'Neil. Thanks
for joining us, Rory. All right, let's continue this conversation
with AI and bringing our senior contributor David Zanati. David,
I know you and the team at the Public Square
are looking into this. What fascinates me first and foremost
(04:50):
is when it comes to AI, artificial intelligence. We know
most Americans know very little about it. We don't understand
anything about it. We probably don't have a grasp of
what it's going to do to the electrical grid and
all the costs of energy and electricity.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
But we don't get what.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
It is now, let alone what it's going to become
and all the unintended consequences that are buried in that
Pandora's box. And once you put it, there's no putting
it back. What are we missing? What should we be
concerned about that we're not Good morning, Michael, good morning.
The answer I think to your question in one word,
(05:28):
is history. Before I get too far and too fast,
I got to tell you I was just at a
charity outing in Youngstown, Ohio the other day, dog Gone.
If you weren't the subject of conversation around the tables,
I am the king of Youngstown, and the king is thinking.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
About visiting his kingdom. It was refreshing.
Speaker 3 (05:49):
A whole lot of people are from different walks of life,
and they were all talking about your morning show.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
Maybe so really believe they We're very grateful for all
of our youngstun listeners. So the question is history.
Speaker 3 (05:59):
And and I know that this one AI because of
all the films that we watched over the years. It's very,
very tempting to believe this is the ticket. But I
was talking to doctor Allen recently about this, and he's
seen an X number of computer attempts, and I've seen
a few myself.
Speaker 2 (06:18):
We've seen a.
Speaker 3 (06:19):
Lot of bombs come and go. And of course, part
of the reason why AI is so hot is because
the tech world's still chasing people's money, and all we
hear is upside upside, upside, upside, upside. We don't hear
a lot of the other realities. Let me just put
it to you in this way in regards to history.
You talked earlier about backcracking as you were reporting of
(06:41):
the Major League scores from yesterday. You know, I'm really
glad that when it comes to a ball field like
Wrigley or so many other wonderful classic baseball fields.
Speaker 2 (06:51):
That we don't hear the ping of the bat, we
hear the crack of the bat.
Speaker 3 (06:56):
The point is that there are some things you can do,
but you don't have to because you go too far.
And the way that the AI process is being sold
is so far out of the box of reality, and
there's no accountability because it's all still blue sky. But
when people who are using it come to the realization
of what it does to their companies, what it does
(07:17):
to their company culture, what it does to their leadership dynamic.
When college professors now coming to the place saying, you're
not going to be able to hand in any papers,
You're going to write them in our presence on a
blue book like you used to do in the old days,
because we know what you're doing, and we're not interested
in what AI thinks. We're interested in what you think
(07:37):
there are so many holes that are yet coming in
this boat that it may not actually sail the way
people think it's going.
Speaker 1 (07:45):
I keep using the VHS Beta let alone, compact desk,
let alone, digital downloading and then compressing digital files, which
is the real changer, game changer. But maybe RFID is
worth looking at too.
Speaker 2 (08:01):
You know.
Speaker 1 (08:01):
R FID kind of made itself really usable, and it
didn't really get noticed by name. You know, we would
just invite it into our life. Oh, I pull up
to the gas station instead of having to enter my code,
instead of telling it what octane gas, I just pull up.
It senses the RFID on my keychain and boom, everything's
(08:24):
ready to just pump.
Speaker 2 (08:25):
Oh isn't that great? I'll do it.
Speaker 1 (08:27):
Or RFID, you know, in terms of you know, I'm
walking down an aisle and it knows I need shampoos,
so it tells me when I'm in front of the shampoo.
Speaker 2 (08:35):
Oh, that's helpful, thanks.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
But there's a lot of other dangers right on down
to people's fear of it ultimately being the mark of
the beast and controlling commerce.
Speaker 2 (08:43):
We can then put it inside the body.
Speaker 1 (08:46):
We kind of didn't get anywhere with that now here
comes AI and what AI can become down the road,
will we reel it in like r FID or by
the time it's time to reel it in, well, AI
have moved on to quantum computing and something even greater
that we can't stop. You may not get an off
(09:07):
ramp like he did with RFID.
Speaker 5 (09:10):
Well.
Speaker 3 (09:11):
I was just listening the other day again somebody talking
to Glenn Beck about it was all concerned about quantum
computing and they basically say, Glenn, get a hold of yourself.
We've been through this before. Period being creality. For example,
let's talk about cash, one of your favorite subjects.
Speaker 2 (09:30):
Right, Let's talk about the Joe Big era of paying
things in cash.
Speaker 3 (09:36):
And I'm not talking about just a bucket of money
in your pocket. If you've ever had the opportunity to
buy a big item ticket that you usually financed, but
this time you were able to pay for it with cash.
It might be a couch, might be a used car.
The difference between paying cash for something and the burdens
that we have today on accountability and all of that
(09:58):
computerized mumbo jumble, whether you're trying to get a loan
or how you're trying to get it done. Cash is
still king and people are not going to forget that, Michael.
I mean the burdens that the technical world have created
eventually are going to wash themselves out into a place
where people have more peace of mind and more happiness.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
AI is very, very early in the.
Speaker 3 (10:23):
Game, and people who've been through this with history before
are saying, yeah, it's interesting.
Speaker 2 (10:28):
Yes it's going to be around, but I'm not so sure.
I'm taking the big train on this one.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
Well, when we come back, here's a blind spot, here's
an unattended consequence.
Speaker 2 (10:38):
All right.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
So companies using AI and maybe managers are using it
to rewrite their reports or any of the significant objectives
or goals for the company or interdepartmental key memos. The
problem is AI is gathering that information. Nothing is anywhere
in secret. It all goes into the brain. And if
(11:00):
you start asking AI questions about your competitor, it's going
to be in the brain. How safe are the secrets
of companies that are early on embracing AI.
Speaker 4 (11:12):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Del Trono.
Speaker 2 (11:16):
Morning, Michael, Crew.
Speaker 7 (11:18):
I would never bash your competition because you have no competition,
since today is a rush Limbaugh. All the other people
out there, I believe are a bloated self other former
days that got them to where they were, much like
Elvis did in his latter days before his end.
Speaker 2 (11:36):
I really hope you guys go National.
Speaker 1 (11:40):
Of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento, Phoenix, Seattle, Detroit,
Saint Louis, Nashville, Memphis, DC tamp. I think we went
to National, didn't, but thank you for your your wish
is my come on twenty five minutes after the hour,
(12:01):
we're talking about AI with our senior contributor David Soonati.
You know, David, it reminds me of when RCS came
out with a software to help program directors schedule music,
which was you know, we used to have to do
that manually. Used to be the disc jockey's job. You
had categories and index cards and you would stack your
music and then pull it and then RCS would schedule it. Now,
(12:23):
if it was only as good as the rules you
put into it, So if you didn't tell it that
Paul McCartney and the Beatles couldn't be near each other,
it play a Beatles song or right into Paul McCartney,
or even worse right into wings because it doesn't know
what it doesn't know, and so the better you were
as a program director putting the rules in, then it
became something great. What I don't like about AI, and
(12:45):
getting back to the security issue, the ones that are
putting the most information in and the rules to make
it operate best are feeding the most unsecured into a
brain that other people could get access to, and the
fools will have the least vulnerability. These are the things
I'm not anti AI at all, and I will not
argue that I could run and I was.
Speaker 2 (13:06):
I've written a book, You've written several books.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
I mean, we can write, but you know I can
get AI to write an even better paragraph than I wrote.
I'm not, you know, not embracing it. I'm just thinking
we got understand it. It's totality. My biggest thing is
the electricity grid where it's headed. We don't even understand
what it is as we're inviting it in and where
it's going and the unintended consequences in the workforce and
(13:28):
cost of energy, and then security keeping company secrets. But
that down the road is a big issue, isn't it.
If you don't get our arms around.
Speaker 3 (13:40):
Sure, it's a huge issue when you invite AI to
come in and know your corporation, it will know every
nook and cranny as it's programmed in, which means you're
going to have security issues like you have not even
dreamed of that AI can't solve. So, Yes, the corporate
side of this is very shaky and people need to
(14:01):
be greatly aware of that. But more significantly, we're having
a conversation where we talked about history. I'd throw one
more word into that, and that's nature. Yes, you wrote
a book, and you know what I liked reading your
book because I knew that book was you.
Speaker 2 (14:15):
AI will always.
Speaker 8 (14:17):
Play to the middle because it has to right because
it and it sounds like it, and you can feel
it and you can smell it when you're involved around AI,
and you always will be able to.
Speaker 3 (14:30):
It's just a matter of years, Michael, before people come
out AI.
Speaker 2 (14:34):
It becomes a byword. Now.
Speaker 3 (14:37):
It may not be that the technology ever disappears. We
may find better and better and smarter ways to use it,
but the idea that it's going to change everything probably not.
Speaker 1 (14:46):
Yeah, and I'm sure there's something that think we're being
old fuddy duddy about it.
Speaker 2 (14:48):
We're not. We're embracing it for what it is. We're
trying to understand it.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
We're looking at the negatives, the positives and long term
is it the wave? I still will stand by my
discernment that this is the VHS or the beta, not
the VHS, let alone the compact disc So it's what
it's going to become that we need to be really
geared up for, and we're not even understanding what it is.
Speaker 2 (15:10):
But you're right, you know.
Speaker 1 (15:11):
I was thinking about the great authors, Charles Finney, David Wilkerson,
Leonard Ravenhill, the people who have impacted my life. If
the future is no individuals writing like you're talking about
and influencing and their unique revelations or insights, do we
lose thought Somewhere along the line. I will say this,
(15:33):
David has the best AI discernment in the world. He
can sense it by the certain phrasing of words already,
and I don't think that gets much better. And professors
are way ahead of kids who have gotten away with
Can I just make one last bold statement in thirty seconds,
I know from my kids how they've gotten away with
murder using AI and high school. I don't think it's
(15:55):
going to get by the professors as easy. A little
warning to the kids before they go off to college,
all right, and then you and the and the team
at Public Square are going to be tackling this some
more in the coming weeks.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
Oh absolutely.
Speaker 3 (16:07):
In fact, we've got some wonderful program coming up on
this and some powerful program in coming up on Declaration
two fifty.
Speaker 2 (16:13):
It's a theme we've started that you take.
Speaker 3 (16:16):
The most classic document in the history of the world
for us, other than the scriptures, the Declaration of Independence didn't.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
Take ai No, and it's its two hundred fiftieth birthday
coming up.
Speaker 2 (16:26):
All right.
Speaker 1 (16:27):
You can listen to the Public Square on two our
stations nationwide on demand anytime at the Public Square dot com.
Our senior contributor and close to the Public Square David Snatti.
Speaker 3 (16:38):
Hey, this is Jeff from Tulsa, oklaholm and my morning
show is your Morning Show with Michael Denjorno.
Speaker 2 (16:51):
Hey, it's me Michael.
Speaker 1 (16:52):
Your Morning show has heard live from five to eight
am Central, six to nine am Eastern, three to six
am Pacific on great radio stations like News Radio eleven
ninety k EX in Portland, News Talk five point fifty
k FYI and Phoenix, Arizona in Freedom one oh four
seven in Washington, d C.
Speaker 2 (17:08):
We'd love to have you.
Speaker 1 (17:09):
Join us live in the morning, even take us along
on the drive to work, but better late than never.
Enjoyed the podcast. Thanks for bringing us along with you.
After all, this is your morning show. I'm Michael. Jeffrey's
got the sound, not quite his ADHD medicine, red is
it drowning? And empty bourbon bottles and keeping an eye
on the content. We had an eight point eight earthquake
(17:30):
off the coast of Russia and it caused a tsunami warning.
Really for we were most concerned about Hawaii. It is
now passed there and we got through okay, so we're
not as alarmed about what's headed towards Alaska, northern California,
and the Senate is confirming President Trump's pick to head
the CDC, and authorities are looking into whether or not
the gunman in Manhattan had a helper. We have a
(17:53):
new website, by the way, all things your morning show
on the radio. We're your morning show online. Were your
Morning Show online dot com and that's where you'll find
the cities and stations we're at nationwide, links to our podcast,
to our social media sites, to stories that we've covered,
to breaking news, to bios on all of the cast members,
(18:16):
including our White House correspondent John Decker or David Zanatti
that you just heard, and links to their shows and
other activities, so all things your Morning Show online check
them out and your Morningshow online dot com. A lot
of people worked hard to put a great website together
for you, and I think you're gonna.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
Like it all right.
Speaker 1 (18:33):
Only days after President Trump met or embarrassed Federal Reserve
Chairman Jerome Powell, officials who decide the nation's monetary policies
our meeting to talk about interest rates. White House Correspondent
John Decker's here with the very latest.
Speaker 2 (18:47):
Good morning, John, Hey, good morning to you. Michael.
Speaker 9 (18:50):
That's right, the Federal Open Market Committee. Those are those
officials that you just reference. It's not just Jerome Poal.
It's twelve individuals who decide whether to lower or raise
interest rates or keep them unchanged. And the widely expected
view is that the said today when it announces its
decision at two pm Eastern time, will leave interest rates unchanged.
(19:13):
And I have to tell you, Michael, that will not
please President Donald J.
Speaker 2 (19:18):
Trump. Yeah, so I'm thinking of the nil sadakison bad
mad ru rud at.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
Some point, and we've said this out loud to each other.
I don't agree with the President's interest rate should be
zero or one percent, but for goodness sakes, I think
we can all agree on three and maybe as low
as two and a half at some point. And I
know it's all narrative and one side will say one thing,
the other will say another, but it sure seems like
at this point the President has isolated and criticized Jerome
(19:49):
Powell to such a degree and I realized he's one
of twelve.
Speaker 2 (19:52):
But I can't. I can't put my arms.
Speaker 1 (19:55):
We're gonna talk to a money expert next hour, but
it's starting to feel personal. And I don't know if
they keep the rates the same, how it's going to
be sold to not look personal.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
But we'll find out. Right first, they got to hold them.
We'll find out.
Speaker 9 (20:10):
You know, what happens is is that the FED announces
what its decision is in the afternoon two pm Eastern time,
and then the FED Chairman Jerome Powell explains the decision
of the Federal Open Market Committee. Those twelve members that
made this decision, and also gives a forecast about what
we can expect for the remainder of the year. And
(20:32):
I think that's where the president could get a glimmer
of good news. I think that Jerome Powell will indicate
that because there is indeed relatively low inflation, that the
tariffs have not led to higher upticks and prices to
the extent that keeping rates unchanged is necessary. I think
(20:53):
the Fed Shairman will indicate he does expect a rate cut,
maybe not at their next meeting, but between now and
the end of the year.
Speaker 1 (21:02):
All right, Well, you may get m a glimmer of
a glimmer of hope in the future, but the President's
not going to take kindly to holding the rights. And
I think we know what to expect from the president
once it happens. I want to go to Gallaine Maxwell.
We knew it was going to come to this. Oh
you want me to talk, I'll go before Congress. I'll
tell you everything you want to know. But I want
clemency or immunity. And you know there's the old Supreme
(21:23):
Court bar attorney John Decker in there. I've said this
a million times, This can't be about anything other.
Speaker 2 (21:31):
Than the victims and justice for the victims. If we give.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
This woman who arranged all of these criminal gatherings and
even participated in some of them, that's not justice for
the victims. And if that's just to tickle all of
our curiosity to create political weaponry, man, that seems that
seems like a bad trade off.
Speaker 9 (21:56):
I'm in agreement with you, Michael, And you know that's
the reason. It's a head scratcher to me. While the
president why the President just doesn't say I am ruling
out any type of clemency, any type of pardon for
this monster who was convicted of those terrible crimes and
is now serving a twenty year prison sentence. And rightly so,
(22:18):
I think the President should get in front of this story,
say that, put that to rest, and let I think
the public know how he feels about this situation. And
I would imagine it's the same way you just expressed
you feel about the situation, Michael, I would hope.
Speaker 2 (22:35):
So, do we have thirty more seconds or more? Of course?
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Okay, So I want to go to it was your
question to the President that he thought was a great
idea that one senators along with Bernie Sanders are taking
and running. And so the latest is Senate Republicans wanting
Americans to get up to six hundred dollars checks from
tariff revenue up to suggests anyway, and they don't get
(23:00):
give you any explanation, some level of means testing a
max of twenty four hundred per family, so up to
six hundred for each adult and child. And we're trying
to figure out the math on this in such a
way that there's no way of knowing what the tariff
revenue is going to be, but what it is already,
you're giving back more than you've saved from DOGE. So
(23:22):
I don't know if that's too much, if it's means tested,
and they're not telling us, where do you think this
is headed? And I'm sure the devil's in the details.
How many details have you seen?
Speaker 9 (23:32):
Yeah, the devil is in the details. We'll see when
the Senate comes back from their August recess what this
legislation looks like. It's just really a headline more than
anything else, but pretty remarkable. I make this suggestion to
the President. He says, great idea, and then you have
just within an hour Josh Hally says, I'm going to
make this a reality by introducing legislation to this effect,
(23:55):
so we'll see. You know, I think that the US
Treasury has taken well over one hundred billion dollars in
tariff revenue so far, and that number is going to
increase substantially come October, come August the first, when more
tariff revenue is expected to come in as the President
raises tariff rates on all of our trading partners.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
John Decker, who once said to President Trump some ten
years ago, shouldn't we guard the border? Secure the border?
Certain doodka. Every question you ask, you create news. John Decker,
White House Correspondent, Thank you so much. Don't forget His
White House Briefing podcast will be out by noon Central today.
Check it out. John Decker, thank you so much. All right, talkbacks.
(24:40):
Can we start now with Jay Robert in Oklahoma City.
Speaker 3 (24:44):
You picked me up, you get me going, and then
I know it's another day in paradise with Michael del Jorno.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
So what he's saying is I am the wing between
his wings or the wind between beneath his wings. Jay Robert,
Oklahoma City, where I once lived, not far from the
smiling water, Towers of.
Speaker 2 (25:04):
More great to have you listening on KTOK in Oklahoma City.
All Right, who's next? I don't have names.
Speaker 5 (25:09):
Well, and a lot of these don't come in with names.
They've got like avatar names. So I did like this one.
I thought I would give this.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
One to you.
Speaker 10 (25:18):
Has lots of great movies besides Terminator and Predator, Kindergarten.
Speaker 2 (25:24):
Cop, Who is your Daddy? And what does she do?
Jingle all the Way, the Skate Plan, Conan and the Barbarian,
the Running Man. Let's see who's in the expendables about it?
Speaker 5 (25:36):
Lou?
Speaker 1 (25:37):
Yeah, so that's what you were working hard on. And
the who's your daddy? To her talkbacks a lot? It's
Donold Schwartzen Niggers. What was it seventy eighth birthday? You
just scroll down now, Yes, seventy eighth birthday. What's really
funny is you? But all I was saying was most
famous for I mean, I thought the Terminator series was spectacular.
Speaker 5 (25:55):
The crazy thing is is you set up a great
couple of questions for the talkbacks, but all anybody wants
to talk about is eral sports.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
Well, because the questions I laid out first of all,
shameless plugged for the podcast, I beg you not to
listen to the first hour. I'll leave it at that, well,
because that's where I admit that I've never seen. Well,
I gave a thumbs down to Happy Gilmore Too, which
is now setting Netflix records.
Speaker 5 (26:23):
That is the platinum hour, though that's always a great hour.
And yet I watched Funny Girl with Barbara Streisand and
liked it. I don't want anyone to know that, and
now they know it even in the second hour. But yeah,
we had a long discussion about both the two things.
I'm struggling the most with that the woman who set
(26:44):
up every one of these criminal sexual assaults could get
clemency or immunity to satisfy our political curiosity or the
political weaponry of the name.
Speaker 2 (26:56):
She could list.
Speaker 1 (27:00):
And I constantly get these calls, Well, if there's no
black book and there's no list, she shouldn't be in prison.
She's in prison because there's a list, and she's in
prison because of her involvement in arranging every underage girl,
even sickly joining in. These weren't massages, they were threesomes,
(27:25):
and the list exists. The names are redacted because a
judge has placed them in redaction because the names came
out in depositions of a trial that never happened because
the accused and I'm doing air quotes, killed himself.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
But I am uncomfortable.
Speaker 1 (27:44):
This is the woman to know, and she could do
some talking, and she could initiate some cases where justice
could prevail eventually, But I'm not into getting her off
the hook and giving her immunity and clemency to satisfy
political fights and curiosities. That makes me uncomfortable in the
name of justice for the victims, one of which took
(28:05):
their life just months ago, and then the other was I.
I think we're either serious about the threat of debt
or we're not. I mean, I think COVID has proven
(28:26):
a fake I'm not saying COVID was fake, but it
was weaponized for control. I think global warmings days are
as numbered as transgendered athletes and wokeness is numbered. But
the real threat, the real existential threat to our future debt.
(28:48):
Are we serious and we haven't even collected this revenue
from these tariff deals and these investment deals, and we're
already to divvy back to the American people. Means tested
says one. Are you for that more than we're taking in.
It just suggests to me we're not very serious about
dead After all, that was what we wanted you to
(29:12):
comment on. And I guess the point blank question is,
should we give Glaine Maxwell immunity and clemency, give her
a get out of jail card for everything she's done,
just to go deeper into outing names and we already
(29:34):
know from the attorney that knows the names. I mean,
if you're playing cards, she's bluffing.
Speaker 2 (29:38):
I mean, she doesn't really hold anything we don't know.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
And Alan Dershowhich Is more than made it crystal clear
there's nothing in there on Trump. In fact, there's nothing
in there on any politician still in office. Some are dead,
some are out of office, but they're in there. And
the Democrats are playing this game knowing we're not going
to throw away our constitutional, judicial republic.
Speaker 2 (30:09):
For political weaponry.
Speaker 1 (30:11):
But they know there's more of their names in there
than names that will bother Republicans.
Speaker 2 (30:17):
That's how sure they are. It's never going to come out.
So I give her a deal.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Should we give Gallaine Maxwell clemency or immunity in exchange
for names? And should we really be giving every adult
up to and somebody tell us what up to means,
because if that's means testing, tell us upfront. This is
just a bunch of Republicans that are going to take
money that hasn't even been brought in yet and go
back to their districts and pander it. And it shows
(30:42):
me they're not serious about the debt. That's what I
think we wanted talk backs on. That's what we wanted
emails at Michael di atiheartmedia dot com. But yes, I
am familiar with all of Arnes Schwarzenegger's great movies, so
keep those coming as well.
Speaker 4 (30:58):
It's your show with Michael del Chano.
Speaker 1 (31:03):
President Trump says his administration is going to be being
more involved after he saw images of starving children in
the Gaza Mark Mayfield has more.
Speaker 11 (31:13):
According to a senior White House official, the President was
disturbed and troubled by the images, most of which he
saw in news clips.
Speaker 5 (31:20):
There's nothing you can say either that it's Sarah, but
when you see the kids, and those the kids, you know,
whether they talk starvation or not, those are kids that
are starving.
Speaker 11 (31:30):
Trump has said publicly he does not agree with Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin at Yahoo's assessment that no one is
starving in Gaza and plans to work with international partners
to fund and set up food delivery centers. Trump previously
approved sixty million dollars for aid to Gaza and pointed
out the ongoing need for assistance.
Speaker 2 (31:46):
I'm Mark Neefield.
Speaker 1 (31:47):
President Trump is also threatening to raise tariffs on Indian imports.
Speaker 2 (31:51):
Brian Shook you all morning log has more.
Speaker 12 (31:54):
According to the President, they are going to pay twenty
five percent if the Allied Nations cannot see you're a
trade agreement. US trade representative Jamison Greer told CNBC that
an elusive India trade agreement would require more discussion between
the two countries, and it comes after Trump has previously
called America's trade relationship with India very tough.
Speaker 2 (32:17):
I'm Brian Shook. Well, looking around the.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
World, people are living better lives and they're more optimistic
about the future. Broy O'Neil with a few good news details.
Speaker 6 (32:27):
Across more than one hundred and forty nations, more people
are said to be thriving. The annual Gallup Survey vines
about a third of people around the world are said
to be doing well. That number was closer to twenty percent.
In two thousand and eight. Globally, seven percent were classified
as suffering in life, matching the lowest point on record
going back to two thousand and seven.
Speaker 2 (32:48):
I'm Rory O'Neil.
Speaker 1 (32:49):
Well, some dog breeds seem to be more likely than
others to beg for or steal food.
Speaker 2 (32:53):
I can tell you the English.
Speaker 1 (32:55):
Shepherd is very good at begging and stealing food. With
all the breed, here's Sammy Triho.
Speaker 10 (33:01):
A new study in the American Journal of Veterinary Research
found sporting dogs like Labradors and Golden Retrievers are more
likely to try and scam some extra food. Hound dogs
were next on the list. Other non sporting breeds like
bulldogs and poodles were actually less likely than the average
dog when it came to begging for scraps. Dogs who
live in homes with other dogs were also more likely
(33:21):
to try and get some extra food. I'm Tammy trheo.
Speaker 1 (33:24):
You can just shut up Maybay because you hate America
and you love a voice.
Speaker 2 (33:27):
Want it all these South Park, Yeah and an all
new South Park.
Speaker 1 (33:32):
They're bringing back Donald Trump's character for episode two of
their new season. The popular parody cartoon released a trailer
Tuesday for its new episode, which airs next week. It
shows Trump's character attending a banquet with Satan and groping
his leg under the table. The trailer also shows cart
Man turning into a conservative podcaster Charlie Kirk. Episode two
(33:55):
of South Park will are on Wednesday, August the sixth
on Comedy Central and stream the next day on Pair
Amount Closet.
Speaker 4 (34:00):
We're all in this together. This is your morning show
with Michael del Jorno.
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy, Jess Hilarious, And Charlamagne Tha God!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.