August 6, 2025 • 36 mins
Attorney General Pam Bondi has launched a grand jury investigation regarding the origins of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Don Brown, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, Constitutional Attorney, and US Senate Candidate - North Carolina, will share his “expert legal ” analysis of the Conspiracy allegations being brought by the DOJ and how this will all play out.
The U.S. is planning to put a nuclear reactor on the moon within the next decade. Why is it needed, and how will it be built? National Correspondent RORY O’NEILL shares the story.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, gang, it's me Michael. You can listen to your
morning show live. Make us a part of your morning
routine or your drive to work companion on great stations
like Talk Radio ninety eight point three and fifteen ten
WLAC in Nashville, Tupelos News and Talk one oh one
point one and ten sixty WKMQ, and how about Talk
six fifty KSTE in Sacramento, California. Love to have you
(00:21):
listen live, but are grateful you're here now for the
podcast Enjoy.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
One, two three, starting your morning off right. A new
way of talk, a new way of understanding.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
Because we're in this together.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
This is your morning show with Michael Bill Charm.
Speaker 4 (00:44):
Seven minutes after the hour, Good morning, and welcome to Wednesday,
August six, Yeah, of Our Lord, twenty twenty five.
Speaker 3 (00:51):
If you're just waking up.
Speaker 4 (00:52):
President Trump says jd Vance is most likely the next
leader of the MAGA movement. The President is threatening to
take over one Washington, DC after one of the DOGE
members was attacked. I know which one it was, I
just don't like to say his nickname. The big guy
oh Okay got attacked, and it makes you wonder if
(01:14):
that's why they had to shuffle Eline. You know, if
somebody like that's getting attacked, can you imagine Elon Musk's
life must have been in danger. Maybe that's why they
staged the whole falling out. Who knows, And we crunched
all the numbers. We couldn't make sense of it. I
don't think serious XM can either. And that's why at
one hundred million dollars a year, when Howard Stern's contract
expires this year in the fall, it may not be renewed.
Speaker 3 (01:36):
This may be the end of the Howard Stern era.
Speaker 4 (01:39):
And we did the research yesterday, the Rasmussen poll, and
it's hard to find something in America that seven out
of ten Americans agree on.
Speaker 3 (01:48):
But when it comes to.
Speaker 4 (01:49):
Russia, Russia, Russia, the Trump Russia collusion narrative. And again,
we've had probably four of the greatest political scandals in
American history take place in the last five years. First,
you have the well and that's not even including Hillary's emails.
But you have Russia, Russia, Russia. You have the shadow
(02:11):
campaign to save the democracy. You have the hiding and
fake presidency of Joe Biden. But I'm telling you there's
something about Russia Russia.
Speaker 3 (02:19):
Russia.
Speaker 4 (02:20):
That really cuts through and seven and ten Americans want
accountability and want justice. This is not going to go
away because it's not a political weapon. This is a
demand of the American people, as it should be, to
ensure it never happens again, and to continue to turn
a blind eye is to beg for it to happen again.
(02:40):
Are we on the road to such accountability and justice?
And if so, what's the role of the grand jury
or maybe a special prosecutor? How does all this roll out?
So it's all in Pam Bondi's hands. Don Brown is
a special assistant US Attorney, a constitutional attorney, it's a
JAG attorney for many years. We thank him for service.
He's now a candidate for the US Senate in North
(03:02):
Carolina and he joints US to lend his legal analysis
and expertise. Good morning, Don, pleasure to meet you and
thank you for your service.
Speaker 5 (03:09):
Michael, good morning to you. And I think your initial
commentary there is right on mark. If we don't take
action here, next time they take power, it's going to
be Tiarry on steroids. So Pam Bondi's going to act
and it's going to be interesting to see how this
plays out as we are now getting information about this
grand jury.
Speaker 4 (03:26):
All right, So, first of all, from your background, how
often do we get I mean when I compare, when
I compare the shadow campaign to Save the Democracy, which
is weaponizing COVID, changing election laws at the state legislative level.
No governors, no legislators did any to stop it. It was unconstitutional.
Then they harvest ballots and stole an election to hiding
(03:46):
a president who was cognitively impaired. But these are much
bigger than Watergate, and yet we don't have a pattern
of getting.
Speaker 3 (03:54):
Justice very often.
Speaker 4 (03:55):
So how and Pam Bondi right now isn't on a
roll with how she's handled a few things. How optimistic
are you? How optimistic should we be that we're on
a trajectory towards at least taking a really good shot
of justice.
Speaker 6 (04:08):
Well, of course, the cynical part of.
Speaker 5 (04:10):
Me is that there is a believe it when I'll
see a component. I think a lot of conservatives feel
the same way.
Speaker 6 (04:14):
At the same time, however.
Speaker 5 (04:15):
The news of a grand jury convening or possibly convening,
gives us room for hope. The release of previously classified
information by Tulsea Gabbert d and I director gives us hope,
and I'm gonna be optimistic here, and this is an
opportunity for the wheels of justice finally to turn against
(04:38):
the big you know, deep state conspirators and in some
cases not so deep state former presidents of the United
States for a spoken wheal conspiracy to deprive Americans of
their fundamental rights based upon opposing political beliefs. And really
that's what this is all about. All the four animals
are just laid out a moment ago. And so I'm
(04:59):
going to answer question by saying, I'm going to be
cautiously optimistic here. We're seeing someone's blowing in the right direction.
I think everybody got upset about that scene. I steel
think those whoever had six with the minors need.
Speaker 6 (05:09):
To be brought to justice.
Speaker 5 (05:11):
The people got upset about those responses to right now,
this appears to be a ship termined the right directions.
So we'll be hopeful and optimistic.
Speaker 4 (05:18):
You're the expert, I'm the talk show host. But let
me take a stab at what makes this different. First
of all, there was a great misunderstanding. Everybody thinks there's
some black book that we have and we're hiding the
names to protect them.
Speaker 3 (05:31):
That's not the case.
Speaker 4 (05:31):
These are names that came out of depositions and from
victims about who victimized them who. By the way, every
name mentioned deserves that, you know, do process system to
defend themselves. But these were names that were going to
come out in a trial, a trial that didn't happen
because the accused apparently killed himself or worse.
Speaker 3 (05:54):
So those names are all sealed now.
Speaker 4 (05:56):
Alan Durshowitz, who was in on all those depositions, he
knows the names that were mentioned. He's saying, there's not
anybody in office right now mentioned that would get Trump
off the hook. Doesn't necessarily get Clinton off the hook.
But this is different. This is where you have the
payment being made by Hillary. You have now these new
(06:16):
documents with the directive of Obama not to give the
intelligence assessment and to create a false narrative assessment, even
have a complicit media that's sold. I mean, this case
is a lot different. So even though you'll have a
sealed grand jury, we kind of know a lot of
the nuts and bolts of this case. And it's a
pretty strong case.
Speaker 6 (06:37):
It is.
Speaker 5 (06:37):
Michael and and you make a good point on the
distinction between the two cases. We don't want to be
a distraction to the other. We don't want to take
our eyes off the ball.
Speaker 6 (06:45):
I've said before and I'll say again, if you look
just at the documents that Tulca.
Speaker 5 (06:50):
Gibbert has declassified and made public, God bless her, you
can take those documents and almost build an indictment from
those documents along when you look at the time frame
of when of when the intelligens community knew there was
no Russia hoax, to the when they begin to turn
the tide in that December ninth meeting with Obama to
(07:12):
him now ordering the the intelligence community come up with
a different narrative all the way to has.
Speaker 6 (07:19):
You know, Susan Rice and our famous you know comment going.
Speaker 5 (07:22):
Out of on the day Trumps was inaugurated that Obama
wanted to buy the book she knew it wasn't by
the book.
Speaker 6 (07:27):
That was a c I a uh, you know gesture.
Speaker 5 (07:30):
So Pam so Telsey gabberts that the information declassified is
basically the most the roadmap for an indictment.
Speaker 6 (07:38):
On conspiracy theory.
Speaker 5 (07:39):
So it's laid out there. There's no secrecy about that anymore.
It's laid out there, and it's just a matter of now,
I think the political will to for the Justice Department
to finally pull up a trigger and bring bring these
characters to bear and and and really to pull them
accountable for the way they have basically bastimized our entire
(07:59):
federal judicial system in our Justice Department of the last
four to five years, even going all the way back
to that meeting in the situation when Obama wanted a
different narrative in face of the clear evidence that there
was no ability for Russia to influence our lessons.
Speaker 4 (08:15):
Jack Attorney, constitutional attorney candidate for US Senate and Special
Assistant US Attorney Don Brown joining us talking about the
Russian collusion case. While we know Obama will have some protection,
although you will impact his legacy, and you will, and
I think John Podesta was probably running the White House
the previous four years, as he ran it for eight
years with Obama, as he ran it for eight years
(08:37):
with Clinton. But I think Barack Obama was very involved
and maybe and keep him from being involved in the future,
and he may have other worldly political ambitions. I think
you can impact his legacy, but who it's always the
underlings to take the fall. Who do you think is
most likely to actually face some accountability and or jail time.
Speaker 5 (08:57):
I think certainly Tomy Rennan. I mean those two for sure, Uh,
you know, were right in the middle of it. They
were involved in knowing that the.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
Whole thing was a hoax.
Speaker 5 (09:08):
Yet it was coming who launched the investigation, even in
the beginning days of the Trump administration, anybody who was
authorizing you know.
Speaker 3 (09:18):
These fake uh these.
Speaker 5 (09:20):
Spies a warrant, these spies of course search warrants, knowing
that it was based upon a hoax to begin with,
starting with the Steel adoptia, they knew there was no
probable cause there.
Speaker 6 (09:31):
So I think those two are are front and center
for sure.
Speaker 5 (09:34):
Now you mentioned that Obama may be protected. That may
be true, But I want to go back to.
Speaker 6 (09:40):
The Supreme Court decision and the Trump and the Trump
the United States versus Trump, where Justice Roberts wrote correctly
that there is presidential.
Speaker 5 (09:48):
Immunity, but the presidential community still is not absolutely and
you can draw a distension between what they were trying
to lay on President Trump simply from making a phone
called to Brad Roethlisberger, which is part of his duties
as the chief executive of the United States to ensure
the election process is not painted versus what Obama did.
Speaker 6 (10:06):
Obama had clear evidence, clear evidence.
Speaker 5 (10:09):
From his own intelligence community that there was no Russian involvement,
there was no capability of obomiting.
Speaker 6 (10:15):
Yet he directly ordered his.
Speaker 5 (10:17):
Own intelligence community to come up with a false narrative
totally opposite from the truth. I think you made the
argument that is not within the periphery of.
Speaker 6 (10:25):
His constitutional duties as president. You can make an argument
that he doesn't have automatic protection because he was president.
You cannot a president of the United States.
Speaker 5 (10:35):
Cannot overtly trash the constitution and weaponized the Department of
Justice and the intelligence agencies and you know, to put
them on the path to use them as wrecking balls
against the constitutional rights of American citizens, either whether it's
an elected president or folks like George Papadopolis or Rogerstone,
(10:56):
the poor folks who were eventually in guided under the
motor you know prosecutions, which was also now we know
is totally fraudulent.
Speaker 6 (11:04):
Even the mother.
Speaker 5 (11:06):
I've made the argument that Mother, like Jack Smith, was
unconsciously unconstituted, reported unconstitutionally appointed in violation of the constituent's
appointments clause. But now we know it's fugulingly appointed. So
this is a spoken of real situation. I'm not sure
if that Obama has the same type of community protection
that President Trump had.
Speaker 4 (11:22):
I like to do this when I talk to somebody
of great experience and wealth of knowledge, and then I
just live on God. My gut tells me there's about
a one hundred percent chance Brennan's gonna end up in jail.
There's about a fifty to fifty chance come he's gonna
end up in jail. And there's a less than ten
percent that Obama will face any kind of legal consequence.
Speaker 3 (11:41):
How good's my gut?
Speaker 5 (11:43):
Well, first of all, you're talking about breadth of knowledge
and experience.
Speaker 3 (11:46):
Look at the mirror.
Speaker 5 (11:47):
Brother, You know you bought you've earned that description. But
I think you know we're we're we're shooting in the dark.
But I think that if you're ranking the likelihood of.
Speaker 4 (11:57):
Brennan right now, I'm getting my fair affair as an order.
Speaker 5 (12:01):
You know, I don't know whether there's one hundred and
fifty and ten, but I think you are ranking the
likelihood correctly. Brendan is the guy who is front and
center at the center of the storm, and frankly needs
to be comy also, I mean comedy.
Speaker 6 (12:13):
Has Look, what are the things that we've got to
kind of keep.
Speaker 5 (12:16):
In mind in the back of my mind is that
there's generally a five year statue limitations, you know, poor
federal crimes. However, you can get around that by a llegend.
Conspiracy can also get around that by alleging new discovered evidence,
you know, in other words, pamp BONI just excuse me,
Tulsea Gabbart just releases evidence. And I think these guys
better start a sweating a little bit. And I think
you're correct. I think Obama can certainly argue. If I
(12:38):
were his lawyer, I would never be but they will
argue presidential immunity.
Speaker 7 (12:42):
And there's going to.
Speaker 5 (12:43):
Be a big I want your folks, your audience understand,
there's gonna be a battle on venue here. You know,
you have you got to get this case in Florida
in order to get a conviction. But defensive Council they're
going to try to move it to d C. You
can see a battle. I'm forecasting the battle that's going
to happen if we do that and.
Speaker 4 (12:58):
How that battle goes is how the war will be one.
So you're right to point that out. And I also
I just want to make clear to my own and
I want Colly the most, so trust me, I want
those numbers to change. Don bron closing moments with Don Brown,
all right, so don walk us through the process real quickly.
So the grand jury and it would be sealed. But well,
so let's say the grand jury doesn't find anything. This
(13:20):
whole thing goes away. I think they're going to And
then where does it go from a grand jury?
Speaker 5 (13:25):
Well, if it goes from if the grand jury, you
have to Federal law requires between sixteen and twenty three
Americans on a grand jury, you have to have twelve
to indite. The total number of the grand jury will
be determined eventually a by a distant court judge. Grand
Jury proceedings are partially secret and the government can't talk,
witnesses can talk.
Speaker 6 (13:46):
But if twelve.
Speaker 5 (13:47):
Folks vote to indict anyone, then then the duet will
will come down and then from that point, most likely
arrest will take place and the beginning of the of
the judicial proceedings in the criminal part. This will begin
with the initial appearances et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 6 (14:03):
So it is a kind of a complex process in
terms of what happens from A to B. But there
will be motions by the defense, possibly to dismiss run
of the reasons. You have to.
Speaker 5 (14:11):
Survive those, you know, I'd rather have a judge like
Judge Dolleen Cannon hearing the case and one of these
DC appointed guys, whether it's Bosberg or anybody else. So
that's one of the big battle.
Speaker 3 (14:24):
I think it goes without saying that.
Speaker 4 (14:26):
The other two big things is what will become of
the Democrat Party after this if it goes all the way.
I mean, a couple of guys may go to jail,
but it could be the final death of Democrat Party,
although that's coming from within with the justice Democrats, the
rise of in Islamist branch of the party that was
headed towards death anyway. And the media already has no credibility,
nor does it have ratings, nor does it have revenue.
(14:46):
They are probably the two biggest losers in this case
in terms of final straw real quickly, with thirty seconds,
how's the run for the United States Senate going to
North Carolina? They'd be lucky to have somebody like you.
Speaker 5 (15:00):
Thank you, Thank you, Michael. We're running from Manyo to Murphy,
all over the state and then the western part of
the state. Last night in Cherokee County, the westernmost part
of the state. The grassroots is on fire. Folks can
hear about our campaign at brownfour NC dot com, Brown
etho ORNC dot com. When you don't help, we can
get from the exciting race. It's some of the races
determined by we the people. And one of the things
I'm running on is we've got to end this unequal
(15:22):
system of justice. I want to see Roague prosecutor laws
and I want to see people help to account for
the way they bastavis.
Speaker 3 (15:28):
Our justice system.
Speaker 5 (15:29):
The Constitution begins and the preamble the first objective is
to establish justice before anything else, and they have. The
Democrats have taken our judicial system and basturvized it. The
Democrat Party must come to an end. This may be
the death Nail.
Speaker 3 (15:41):
I hope you're.
Speaker 5 (15:42):
Correct about that. They are even to speaking communists at
the front of the party and we're going to battle
that through this campaign and instant Senate as well.
Speaker 3 (15:48):
Don Brown candidate for the United States Senate and.
Speaker 4 (15:51):
The Tar Hills state of North Carolina, a constitutional attorney
and a US Assistant attorney. In God's favor, you follow
you throughout that state as you introduce you yourself to voters.
Speaker 3 (16:00):
Scott Bless you, sir, Thanks for your time. Thank Michael.
Speaker 6 (16:04):
We'll talk to you soon a couple of times.
Speaker 3 (16:05):
I hope.
Speaker 2 (16:05):
So this is your morning show with Michael del Chuno.
Speaker 4 (16:11):
Real quickly, let's get William in here from Tampa listening
to Impact Radio.
Speaker 3 (16:14):
Good morning, Michael.
Speaker 8 (16:16):
I really would love to get to the bottom of
the Russia hoax, and I hope that we do so.
But at the same time, I would like to know
more about the Epstein files. And I heard President Trump say, well,
he's been dead a long time, so let's move on.
And you know the same could be said for John F.
Kennedy and yet he released his files.
Speaker 3 (16:36):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (16:36):
What I hear is the frustration, you know, coming out
of the shadow campaign to save the democracy. We were
promised to krack and we got nothing. Promised a lot
with JFK, RFK MLK and Epstein got nothing. Although I
can explain why you have nothing on Epstein, I will
mention billne Maxwell's and jail and Epstein is dead. There
is some justice that's already happened, but for some of
(16:58):
the other stuff and people in it's gonna take a
case to do it.
Speaker 8 (17:04):
My name is Joey from Goodier, Arizona, and my morning
show is Your Morning Show with Michael del jeanne.
Speaker 6 (17:16):
Hi.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
I'm Michael del Jorno and your Morning Show can be
heard live as it's happening five to eight am Central
and six to nine Eastern on great stations like six
point twenty WJDX and Jackson, Mississippi, or Akrons News Talk
six forty WHLO and Akron, Ohio and News Radio five
seventy WDAK and Columbus, Georgia. We'd love to be a
part of your morning routine. But we're glad you're here
(17:37):
now enjoyed the podcast.
Speaker 4 (17:39):
I am sitting here and trying to figure out. I
wonder if English leather is the one I wore. There
was another one. I don't think that is what I wore,
But if it is, we were talking about old sense.
English leather is now sixty dollars a bottle. How could
that be? That's his sake? It's but yeah, but you
(18:04):
can get a lot of stuff for sixty dollars a bottle.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
The packaging in English led from the seventies, though, But
I don't know if that's the one I wore or not, doesn't.
Speaker 4 (18:12):
I kind of remember the wooden cab looking like it.
Speaker 3 (18:17):
Was there an old English or something.
Speaker 4 (18:20):
I gotta let me try to find a list of
popular men's clones from the seventies.
Speaker 3 (18:24):
You sure it wasn't Bam, No, it wasn't Bayrum.
Speaker 2 (18:27):
Okay.
Speaker 4 (18:28):
Rory still wears that the US is planning to put
a nuclear reactor the moon. Alan, Why a nuclear reactor
on the moon and within the next decade? Uh?
Speaker 3 (18:40):
Why is this needed? And how will it be built?
Speaker 4 (18:43):
He knows all things space program your why do you
grunt over that?
Speaker 6 (18:49):
Well?
Speaker 3 (18:49):
No, that's an offully high bar for me.
Speaker 7 (18:51):
And you have very intelligent listeners who may well know more.
Speaker 4 (18:54):
So that's I doubt that I would need I need
I don't know, Walter Cronkite to have more.
Speaker 3 (19:00):
But you've been following the program.
Speaker 4 (19:02):
And so but no, I know you get it like
I get it in every step and why we did
the moon and where we're going and how achievable Mars
is and a lot sooner than people think.
Speaker 7 (19:12):
But the Moon and a nuclear reactor, it is yeah,
you wouldn't just have the reactor sitting up there. It
would be there to power some sort of a lunar base.
Think Barbara Bain and Martin Landau and Space nineteen ninety nine.
How about that one? That would be the ultimate vision.
But this is also this is also flexing. Secretary Duffy
(19:34):
has been leading NASA for just a couple of weeks
now as the interim head of NASA, and his announcement
comes just a couple of months after Russia and China
said they were exploring this idea as well. Look, NASA
has been essentially saying, if we're going to build a
moon base, we're going to have to have a nuclear
reactor up there. So this is not a revolutionary idea,
(19:55):
but I guess accelerating the timetable is something new.
Speaker 3 (19:58):
But show me the money.
Speaker 7 (20:00):
You know, we haven't seen that commitment yet, and you
know they're already planning to cut the NASA budget I
think twenty six percent in the next cycle, so I'm
curious to see where this funding is coming from for
such an ambitious project. Then you got to launch and
land the thing safely, which you.
Speaker 4 (20:17):
Know, not a big payload, right, So let me ask you.
And I've been deep diving into Katrina's coming up on
the twentieth anniversary. So I've literally spent twenty hours this
week studying all the rostraints today, hiroshimas today.
Speaker 3 (20:33):
So I've kind of been blind to some of this,
But i know in the.
Speaker 4 (20:35):
Process of getting to Mars, fueling and refueling en route
is a big part of that. Could this be part
of that or is this something completely different? It would
be different.
Speaker 7 (20:47):
What we're hoping is that since we've made the discovery
of lunar ice just below the surface of the Moon,
there's ice there, and when you break down ice h
two oh, you get hydrogen and oxygen and those two
element and make rocket fuel. So the idea is that
tapping into the ice on the Moon is really going
to give us the fuel that we need to further exploration.
(21:08):
It's also obviously going to provide oxygen and water. So
the discovery of ice on the Moon a couple decades
ago really is the dry future of all that exploration.
But yeah, as far as getting to Mars, then you'd
hope to get the fueling station built on the Moon,
perhaps pick up the fuel from there and then move on.
It would not likely be nuclear powered, although it can't
rule that out completely.
Speaker 4 (21:29):
And you bring up the flexing of muscle. We're not
the only one trying to get there and do this there.
So now that race is back.
Speaker 7 (21:38):
Right, which is a good which I'm all for it,
as I told people plenty of times and said, imagine
if the first person on Mars, the first human being
to set foot on Mars, is a person from China,
how's that going to go over?
Speaker 3 (21:53):
Well? Again, I liked there was two things about the
space program. I like, do we have a minute? I
think we do?
Speaker 4 (22:00):
Yes, Okay, The two things I like most and I
think this is why Kennedy picked the Moon. And I
think there was muscle flexing there too. Don't forget Kennedy
thought there was a missile gap and was shocked to
find out yes there was, and it was in our favor.
But he knew just as land was a big deal,
and then on sea was a big deal, and then
in air, these were game changing in warfare, and he
(22:21):
knew space was going to play that role. So there
was a defense vision. There was the stretching of going
to the moon and all the things you would have
to learn and create to get there that would create
industry and economy. He got all of that. It's always
all of the above. It was never to get there
and stay there. And then now there's this vision of
(22:42):
get there, stay there, or it's on the way to
the next place, and that's a whole new race. And
so that's one that the American people don't have to
be sold too, because eventually it'll come down to who's
going to fund all this? But yes, let's get there
and control it before someone else does, or as Kennedy
would say, you know, control it for good rather than
wait and let evil beat you there and control it
(23:04):
for evil. So it's kind of the same game, really,
isn't it.
Speaker 7 (23:09):
Yeah, different destination perhaps well, and a different tactic, I suppose,
because there was just the idea of being there first.
Speaker 3 (23:15):
Right now it's now who gets to keep it?
Speaker 7 (23:18):
The idea being if your if your reactor is there,
either your China, Russia, or US, you sort of then
own that part of the moon. You don't really, but
that's sort of the messaging that's out there. So yeah,
that's why you also want to put that first reactor
up there.
Speaker 3 (23:34):
Can Can I steal twenty more seconds? Yep?
Speaker 4 (23:37):
All right, I'm gonna do something that would do normally
off the earth. Do you have plans for the twentieth
anniversary of Katrina? Because I think Katrina is something that
you and others need to dive deep into because there's
lessons to be learned if we can get beyond the
political matrix. And I don't think those lessons have been learned,
and quite frankly, I don't think we're any more prepared
today than we were twenty years ago. And and there's
(23:58):
blame to go around for every party and every level
of government, from municipal to state to federal. And I
am just having a field day, and I would love
to turn somebody like you will loose on this. But
I would really think we should probably provide a twenty
year anniversary special of some kind. And I wouldn't want
anybody to do it, but you just a little thought. Sure, No, Yeah,
(24:20):
help in any way I can. And yeah, because I
went through it when Katrina hit Florida. So I was here,
you know, standing there in West Palm Beach. Is the
thing hit before it came into the Gulf.
Speaker 3 (24:29):
We didn't get it.
Speaker 4 (24:30):
We didn't do a good job of understanding why that
breakdown happened, why that failure happened, and why it could
still happen again. And there are racial components, but you've
got to do beyond that. And then, but that was
a failure at every level.
Speaker 3 (24:44):
And the more you.
Speaker 7 (24:44):
Study, yeah, yeah, it also highlights how every area of
the country is different. I mean, look at how you
know Asheville, North Carolina suddenly impacted by hurricane in a
very different way than New Orleans, but both of them
devastated by different forces. Oh and the billions we spent
to redo the levees are already obsolete and need to
(25:04):
be improved by twenty twenty three?
Speaker 4 (25:07):
Did I mention it's twenty twenty five? All right, Roy,
I love it, have a great day. We'll talk again tomorrow.
Can't have your morning show without your voice. I want
to start with I think this is a first. Do
we have two from Mississippi?
Speaker 3 (25:24):
That's a possibility.
Speaker 4 (25:25):
It's about time we start getting some representation in Mississippi.
Speaker 3 (25:30):
I know we have Bob in Mississippi. Let's go a Bob,
all right.
Speaker 8 (25:33):
Bob, Hey, mister d I've been waiting for him to
get to the bottom of the flight gate.
Speaker 4 (25:42):
Well, we'll try to get to the flate gate after MLK,
after our FK, after JFK, after the Kracken that never happened,
after Epstein and after Russia game.
Speaker 3 (25:52):
James in Ohio.
Speaker 7 (25:54):
Remember, no matter where you go, that's where you'll be
with Michael D.
Speaker 3 (26:00):
Geez.
Speaker 4 (26:00):
I'm all right. So here's what happened. We had an
emailer try to write a liner for Mike mccannon and
it was pretty good. He gave us about four or
five to choose from that. We're gonna massage you because
I think it's neat if you guys start writing some
of these liners. I like, morning has broken? What'd we
change that to? Morning is broken? And that's why we
(26:21):
have to fix it with understanding? And so are we? Yeah,
I kind of adjusted Mary's a little bit. But I
want to incorporate some of your ideas what I can
do with that.
Speaker 3 (26:30):
One, Jason, But I'll try.
Speaker 4 (26:33):
But if you got an idea for a liner we're
due from Mike McCann's session, I would love to have
you be a part of writing those. Keep those coming
email wise um, the Roseanne bar interview, by the way,
is back on for next week. Oh really, I was
looking forward to and then I got it delayed.
Speaker 3 (26:54):
But can I a question? I just want to ask
a question. One question.
Speaker 4 (26:57):
I'll make it good good, Okay, go no, no, not now,
but when we do Roseanne?
Speaker 3 (27:03):
Okay, Oh well you got a week.
Speaker 8 (27:09):
Uh.
Speaker 4 (27:09):
Rachel wrote, what about morning has broken and common sense
is dawning? This is Rachel that, by the way, I
think it's Rachel.
Speaker 3 (27:18):
You sent me. I've got to go. I was. I
was in bed when it was all opened.
Speaker 4 (27:23):
Like if I'm go to a restaurant and I bring
some food home, do you want to see my kids
hit it like raccoons and it's just devoured and gone?
Speaker 5 (27:30):
All right?
Speaker 3 (27:31):
The raccoons got it.
Speaker 4 (27:32):
So I was in bed, just about to fall asleep
when a package came and I think it's from Rachel.
It's her, her soaps that she makes, and the raccoons
ravaged it. One was like a stethoscope, shaped like a
soap on a rope. Alex took that because she's going
to be a doctor. One smelled like chocolate or cappuccino
(27:55):
or something. I saw one daughter run off with that
Nick took a couple anyway, The Dell journals, I think,
I think are using sudzy Mamma dot com soaps now
and you can find your soaps at sudzy Mama dot com.
Shameless free commercial here on the Your Morning Show network.
They really are amazing. The two that I held in
my hand and smelled r amazing. Now I think I
(28:16):
think it's Rachel, if I'm not mistaken, made me a
clock for the we used to call the studio jungle
room now that we're premier is completely redecorated.
Speaker 3 (28:23):
But and she had made a clock for me. I
think that was Rachel too.
Speaker 4 (28:28):
But sudsy Mama s u d z y Mama m
A m A soudzymma dot com if you want to
send your kids into a frenzy with her soaps as
ours did, all right, keep the emails coming. Michael di
at iHeartMedia dot com. Don't forget the talk back button
on your iHeartRadio app. This is your morning show when
(28:49):
we come back, not one, not two, not three, but
your top five stories the day. I may even I
don't even know if I'm gonna do top five stories
because I want to get in this latest Rasmusen poll,
and I want to do this story on why social
media erupted over the comments of a Democrat representative while
she was in Guatemala. If it means I can't do
(29:09):
the top five stories, I'm going to do it. Those
two stories have got to get in today. Have you
heard of karaaluma? Karaluma is an edible cactus and it's
from Indian. It's known for naturally suppressing appetite. I always
think in my mind, somebody says down, eats a cactus
and then doesn't eat for a few days.
Speaker 3 (29:29):
I'm not hungry after that cactus.
Speaker 4 (29:31):
But we eventually figured out it has an appetite suppress
it naturally in it. It's one of the key ingredients
in the breakthrough weight loss supplement that I take.
Speaker 3 (29:38):
Lean. Jeffrey just ordered some last hour.
Speaker 4 (29:41):
If you're aiming to lose weight, not yo yo, lose
a bunch, then gain it back, lose some more, gain
it all back, and then some. But I mean just slow,
steady weight loss, and that's what it's been for me,
slow steady and eleven pounds. I don't take it to
lose weight, although I'm grateful to. I take cause I
feel great, and I use other brickhouse products, the greens
and the fruits that put my water. But Lean, doctor say,
(30:04):
is the closest they've been able to come to replicate
the benefits of popular injections, and they don't have needles. Obviously,
Lean helps maintain healthy blood sugar levels, control appetite and cravings,
and it doesn't stop there.
Speaker 3 (30:14):
It's rare.
Speaker 4 (30:15):
Natural ingredients are formulated to help your body turn fat
into energy. That's another area where feeling great comes in
best part, no needles, just results. Get twenty percent off today,
just as Jeffrey did. Go to take lean dot com.
Take Lean dot com. Use the promo code yms your
Morning Show twenty for twenty percent off YMMS twenty at
(30:37):
takelean dot Com. That's Takelean dot Com YMS twenty. These
statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. The product
is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease,
and it is not a substitute or an alternative for
care from your healthcare provider.
Speaker 2 (30:49):
It's Your Morning Show with Michael Delchourno.
Speaker 4 (30:54):
This may be one of those days we can't take
our paycheck. We're having too much fun.
Speaker 3 (30:57):
Can't have your morning show without your voice. Let them roll. Hey,
this is Bob from Virginia. Avon for men was wild Country.
If you're still looking, it was good stuff. Patrick from Colorado.
Old Spice was what I go to back in the day.
I just strove to show you how old I am.
Michael and Gang.
Speaker 7 (31:17):
Addition to English leather, there was genies, there was British sterling.
Speaker 3 (31:21):
There was canoe. I hope that helps by.
Speaker 6 (31:25):
A.
Speaker 3 (31:26):
That's maybe one. Michael DG and crew. This is my
morning show, Rob and Saint Louis brush than Weather.
Speaker 4 (31:37):
He's saying, my morning show is Jery.
Speaker 3 (31:40):
Well, you BURGEREDE. Get in the corner.
Speaker 4 (31:42):
I'm gonna take you to the Denmark Zoo Bruch by Faberge.
What about Hi Karati?
Speaker 3 (31:50):
That was a big one, right.
Speaker 4 (31:51):
Good stuff man, Old spice was probably number one or brute?
Speaker 3 (31:56):
What do you think I would?
Speaker 4 (31:57):
I always did English leather and I just found this
on eBay just to kind of wrap the segment up.
It's a vintage English leather cologne. Miss is like fifty
and it's like sixty percent full. So some guy's old
English leather from the seventies. It was sort of and missing,
and I'm like, ew, what was the old stuff Steve
Garvey used to do?
Speaker 3 (32:18):
Was that Aquavelda?
Speaker 4 (32:21):
I think it was Aquavela, Noxima was Joe Namath, but
I think, yeah, all the great colognes of the seventies.
Speaker 3 (32:29):
But you know.
Speaker 4 (32:30):
English leather that I used to wear sixty bucks a bottle,
Now it's good stuff. I do kind of have a
cologne fetish. And I'm kind of over tom Ford and
paying so much. Final story headline. Social media erupts after
(32:50):
House democrat makes shocking comment about America during an overseas trip.
First things, first, you're overseas, don't talk bad about home.
That never works well. Number two, why is it you
(33:12):
love America enough to run for office? Are you running
for office to keep America great? Make America great? Or
change America? Because your comment kind of gives away the latter.
But thirdly, I'd like to thank this member of Congress
for saying what I know most of them are doing
(33:34):
and what millions have done. You see, the key to
immigration is A it'd be legal, and B that it
involve assimilation. My great great parent, great grandparents, yeah, both grandparents.
I think one side might the grandparents as well. My
(33:55):
grandparents and great grandparents left Italy to come here. They
denounced it and pledged their future and their children's future
to America. They assimilated, They spoke our language. They were
a contributor to our culture and economy, not a drain,
(34:19):
but they assimilated. Nobody assimilates anymore. So if you don't
get melting pot versus melting culture, you missed the last
fifty years. So here's Democratic Representative Delia Ramirez of Illinois.
Social media goes crazy over the clip she's in Guatemala
saying I am a proud Guatemalan before I am an American. Now,
(34:42):
this is a problem within one party in a two
party stranglehold that's dying and never was meant to be.
Speaker 3 (34:52):
And this translates in other ways. For AOC, is she
proud of.
Speaker 4 (34:55):
Her Hispanic origins in New York, in her neighborhood or America.
This woman came right on and said it, I'm a
proud Guatemalan before I'm an American. By the way, that
is the most disqualifying comment anybody could make in being
a member of the United States Congress. It would absolutely
(35:16):
disqualify her for citizenship quite frankly, let alone representation. Now,
you don't need outrage on the radio for this. I
would hope if there's any common sense or Americanism left
in Illinois, and there's not a lot, this should take
care of itself in the next election cycle. This is
(35:37):
why the House of Representatives has elections every two years.
You do something dumb, you say something dumb, you're not
there long. And the anger is not about how she
defines herself, but about what it is to be an American.
(35:58):
I think in her case, it's a GPS location. That's
not citizenship. That's not what we pledge to. That's not
what we take oaths to. Revealing yes, shocking, no acceptable.
Speaker 3 (36:16):
I hope not. Time will tell. Hey, that's it for today.
Speaker 2 (36:20):
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael Enhild Joe No
Hey, gang, it's me Michael. You can listen to your
morning show live. Make us a part of your morning
routine or your drive to work companion on great stations
like Talk Radio ninety eight point three and fifteen ten
WLAC in Nashville, Tupelos News and Talk one oh one
point one and ten sixty WKMQ, and how about Talk
six fifty KSTE in Sacramento, California. Love to have you
(00:21):
listen live, but are grateful you're here now for the
podcast Enjoy.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
One, two three, starting your morning off right. A new
way of talk, a new way of understanding.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
Because we're in this together.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
This is your morning show with Michael Bill Charm.
Speaker 4 (00:44):
Seven minutes after the hour, Good morning, and welcome to Wednesday,
August six, Yeah, of Our Lord, twenty twenty five.
Speaker 3 (00:51):
If you're just waking up.
Speaker 4 (00:52):
President Trump says jd Vance is most likely the next
leader of the MAGA movement. The President is threatening to
take over one Washington, DC after one of the DOGE
members was attacked. I know which one it was, I
just don't like to say his nickname. The big guy
oh Okay got attacked, and it makes you wonder if
(01:14):
that's why they had to shuffle Eline. You know, if
somebody like that's getting attacked, can you imagine Elon Musk's
life must have been in danger. Maybe that's why they
staged the whole falling out. Who knows, And we crunched
all the numbers. We couldn't make sense of it. I
don't think serious XM can either. And that's why at
one hundred million dollars a year, when Howard Stern's contract
expires this year in the fall, it may not be renewed.
Speaker 3 (01:36):
This may be the end of the Howard Stern era.
Speaker 4 (01:39):
And we did the research yesterday, the Rasmussen poll, and
it's hard to find something in America that seven out
of ten Americans agree on.
Speaker 3 (01:48):
But when it comes to.
Speaker 4 (01:49):
Russia, Russia, Russia, the Trump Russia collusion narrative. And again,
we've had probably four of the greatest political scandals in
American history take place in the last five years. First,
you have the well and that's not even including Hillary's emails.
But you have Russia, Russia, Russia. You have the shadow
(02:11):
campaign to save the democracy. You have the hiding and
fake presidency of Joe Biden. But I'm telling you there's
something about Russia Russia.
Speaker 3 (02:19):
Russia.
Speaker 4 (02:20):
That really cuts through and seven and ten Americans want
accountability and want justice. This is not going to go
away because it's not a political weapon. This is a
demand of the American people, as it should be, to
ensure it never happens again, and to continue to turn
a blind eye is to beg for it to happen again.
(02:40):
Are we on the road to such accountability and justice?
And if so, what's the role of the grand jury
or maybe a special prosecutor? How does all this roll out?
So it's all in Pam Bondi's hands. Don Brown is
a special assistant US Attorney, a constitutional attorney, it's a
JAG attorney for many years. We thank him for service.
He's now a candidate for the US Senate in North
(03:02):
Carolina and he joints US to lend his legal analysis
and expertise. Good morning, Don, pleasure to meet you and
thank you for your service.
Speaker 5 (03:09):
Michael, good morning to you. And I think your initial
commentary there is right on mark. If we don't take
action here, next time they take power, it's going to
be Tiarry on steroids. So Pam Bondi's going to act
and it's going to be interesting to see how this
plays out as we are now getting information about this
grand jury.
Speaker 4 (03:26):
All right, So, first of all, from your background, how
often do we get I mean when I compare, when
I compare the shadow campaign to Save the Democracy, which
is weaponizing COVID, changing election laws at the state legislative level.
No governors, no legislators did any to stop it. It was unconstitutional.
Then they harvest ballots and stole an election to hiding
(03:46):
a president who was cognitively impaired. But these are much
bigger than Watergate, and yet we don't have a pattern
of getting.
Speaker 3 (03:54):
Justice very often.
Speaker 4 (03:55):
So how and Pam Bondi right now isn't on a
roll with how she's handled a few things. How optimistic
are you? How optimistic should we be that we're on
a trajectory towards at least taking a really good shot
of justice.
Speaker 6 (04:08):
Well, of course, the cynical part of.
Speaker 5 (04:10):
Me is that there is a believe it when I'll
see a component. I think a lot of conservatives feel
the same way.
Speaker 6 (04:14):
At the same time, however.
Speaker 5 (04:15):
The news of a grand jury convening or possibly convening,
gives us room for hope. The release of previously classified
information by Tulsea Gabbert d and I director gives us hope,
and I'm gonna be optimistic here, and this is an
opportunity for the wheels of justice finally to turn against
(04:38):
the big you know, deep state conspirators and in some
cases not so deep state former presidents of the United
States for a spoken wheal conspiracy to deprive Americans of
their fundamental rights based upon opposing political beliefs. And really
that's what this is all about. All the four animals
are just laid out a moment ago. And so I'm
(04:59):
going to answer question by saying, I'm going to be
cautiously optimistic here. We're seeing someone's blowing in the right direction.
I think everybody got upset about that scene. I steel
think those whoever had six with the minors need.
Speaker 6 (05:09):
To be brought to justice.
Speaker 5 (05:11):
The people got upset about those responses to right now,
this appears to be a ship termined the right directions.
So we'll be hopeful and optimistic.
Speaker 4 (05:18):
You're the expert, I'm the talk show host. But let
me take a stab at what makes this different. First
of all, there was a great misunderstanding. Everybody thinks there's
some black book that we have and we're hiding the
names to protect them.
Speaker 3 (05:31):
That's not the case.
Speaker 4 (05:31):
These are names that came out of depositions and from
victims about who victimized them who. By the way, every
name mentioned deserves that, you know, do process system to
defend themselves. But these were names that were going to
come out in a trial, a trial that didn't happen
because the accused apparently killed himself or worse.
Speaker 3 (05:54):
So those names are all sealed now.
Speaker 4 (05:56):
Alan Durshowitz, who was in on all those depositions, he
knows the names that were mentioned. He's saying, there's not
anybody in office right now mentioned that would get Trump
off the hook. Doesn't necessarily get Clinton off the hook.
But this is different. This is where you have the
payment being made by Hillary. You have now these new
(06:16):
documents with the directive of Obama not to give the
intelligence assessment and to create a false narrative assessment, even
have a complicit media that's sold. I mean, this case
is a lot different. So even though you'll have a
sealed grand jury, we kind of know a lot of
the nuts and bolts of this case. And it's a
pretty strong case.
Speaker 6 (06:37):
It is.
Speaker 5 (06:37):
Michael and and you make a good point on the
distinction between the two cases. We don't want to be
a distraction to the other. We don't want to take
our eyes off the ball.
Speaker 6 (06:45):
I've said before and I'll say again, if you look
just at the documents that Tulca.
Speaker 5 (06:50):
Gibbert has declassified and made public, God bless her, you
can take those documents and almost build an indictment from
those documents along when you look at the time frame
of when of when the intelligens community knew there was
no Russia hoax, to the when they begin to turn
the tide in that December ninth meeting with Obama to
(07:12):
him now ordering the the intelligence community come up with
a different narrative all the way to has.
Speaker 6 (07:19):
You know, Susan Rice and our famous you know comment going.
Speaker 5 (07:22):
Out of on the day Trumps was inaugurated that Obama
wanted to buy the book she knew it wasn't by
the book.
Speaker 6 (07:27):
That was a c I a uh, you know gesture.
Speaker 5 (07:30):
So Pam so Telsey gabberts that the information declassified is
basically the most the roadmap for an indictment.
Speaker 6 (07:38):
On conspiracy theory.
Speaker 5 (07:39):
So it's laid out there. There's no secrecy about that anymore.
It's laid out there, and it's just a matter of now,
I think the political will to for the Justice Department
to finally pull up a trigger and bring bring these
characters to bear and and and really to pull them
accountable for the way they have basically bastimized our entire
(07:59):
federal judicial system in our Justice Department of the last
four to five years, even going all the way back
to that meeting in the situation when Obama wanted a
different narrative in face of the clear evidence that there
was no ability for Russia to influence our lessons.
Speaker 4 (08:15):
Jack Attorney, constitutional attorney candidate for US Senate and Special
Assistant US Attorney Don Brown joining us talking about the
Russian collusion case. While we know Obama will have some protection,
although you will impact his legacy, and you will, and
I think John Podesta was probably running the White House
the previous four years, as he ran it for eight
years with Obama, as he ran it for eight years
(08:37):
with Clinton. But I think Barack Obama was very involved
and maybe and keep him from being involved in the future,
and he may have other worldly political ambitions. I think
you can impact his legacy, but who it's always the
underlings to take the fall. Who do you think is
most likely to actually face some accountability and or jail time.
Speaker 5 (08:57):
I think certainly Tomy Rennan. I mean those two for sure, Uh,
you know, were right in the middle of it. They
were involved in knowing that the.
Speaker 3 (09:07):
Whole thing was a hoax.
Speaker 5 (09:08):
Yet it was coming who launched the investigation, even in
the beginning days of the Trump administration, anybody who was
authorizing you know.
Speaker 3 (09:18):
These fake uh these.
Speaker 5 (09:20):
Spies a warrant, these spies of course search warrants, knowing
that it was based upon a hoax to begin with,
starting with the Steel adoptia, they knew there was no
probable cause there.
Speaker 6 (09:31):
So I think those two are are front and center
for sure.
Speaker 5 (09:34):
Now you mentioned that Obama may be protected. That may
be true, But I want to go back to.
Speaker 6 (09:40):
The Supreme Court decision and the Trump and the Trump
the United States versus Trump, where Justice Roberts wrote correctly
that there is presidential.
Speaker 5 (09:48):
Immunity, but the presidential community still is not absolutely and
you can draw a distension between what they were trying
to lay on President Trump simply from making a phone
called to Brad Roethlisberger, which is part of his duties
as the chief executive of the United States to ensure
the election process is not painted versus what Obama did.
Speaker 6 (10:06):
Obama had clear evidence, clear evidence.
Speaker 5 (10:09):
From his own intelligence community that there was no Russian involvement,
there was no capability of obomiting.
Speaker 6 (10:15):
Yet he directly ordered his.
Speaker 5 (10:17):
Own intelligence community to come up with a false narrative
totally opposite from the truth. I think you made the
argument that is not within the periphery of.
Speaker 6 (10:25):
His constitutional duties as president. You can make an argument
that he doesn't have automatic protection because he was president.
You cannot a president of the United States.
Speaker 5 (10:35):
Cannot overtly trash the constitution and weaponized the Department of
Justice and the intelligence agencies and you know, to put
them on the path to use them as wrecking balls
against the constitutional rights of American citizens, either whether it's
an elected president or folks like George Papadopolis or Rogerstone,
(10:56):
the poor folks who were eventually in guided under the
motor you know prosecutions, which was also now we know
is totally fraudulent.
Speaker 6 (11:04):
Even the mother.
Speaker 5 (11:06):
I've made the argument that Mother, like Jack Smith, was
unconsciously unconstituted, reported unconstitutionally appointed in violation of the constituent's
appointments clause. But now we know it's fugulingly appointed. So
this is a spoken of real situation. I'm not sure
if that Obama has the same type of community protection
that President Trump had.
Speaker 4 (11:22):
I like to do this when I talk to somebody
of great experience and wealth of knowledge, and then I
just live on God. My gut tells me there's about
a one hundred percent chance Brennan's gonna end up in jail.
There's about a fifty to fifty chance come he's gonna
end up in jail. And there's a less than ten
percent that Obama will face any kind of legal consequence.
Speaker 3 (11:41):
How good's my gut?
Speaker 5 (11:43):
Well, first of all, you're talking about breadth of knowledge
and experience.
Speaker 3 (11:46):
Look at the mirror.
Speaker 5 (11:47):
Brother, You know you bought you've earned that description. But
I think you know we're we're we're shooting in the dark.
But I think that if you're ranking the likelihood of.
Speaker 4 (11:57):
Brennan right now, I'm getting my fair affair as an order.
Speaker 5 (12:01):
You know, I don't know whether there's one hundred and
fifty and ten, but I think you are ranking the
likelihood correctly. Brendan is the guy who is front and
center at the center of the storm, and frankly needs
to be comy also, I mean comedy.
Speaker 6 (12:13):
Has Look, what are the things that we've got to
kind of keep.
Speaker 5 (12:16):
In mind in the back of my mind is that
there's generally a five year statue limitations, you know, poor
federal crimes. However, you can get around that by a llegend.
Conspiracy can also get around that by alleging new discovered evidence,
you know, in other words, pamp BONI just excuse me,
Tulsea Gabbart just releases evidence. And I think these guys
better start a sweating a little bit. And I think
you're correct. I think Obama can certainly argue. If I
(12:38):
were his lawyer, I would never be but they will
argue presidential immunity.
Speaker 7 (12:42):
And there's going to.
Speaker 5 (12:43):
Be a big I want your folks, your audience understand,
there's gonna be a battle on venue here. You know,
you have you got to get this case in Florida
in order to get a conviction. But defensive Council they're
going to try to move it to d C. You
can see a battle. I'm forecasting the battle that's going
to happen if we do that and.
Speaker 4 (12:58):
How that battle goes is how the war will be one.
So you're right to point that out. And I also
I just want to make clear to my own and
I want Colly the most, so trust me, I want
those numbers to change. Don bron closing moments with Don Brown,
all right, so don walk us through the process real quickly.
So the grand jury and it would be sealed. But well,
so let's say the grand jury doesn't find anything. This
(13:20):
whole thing goes away. I think they're going to And
then where does it go from a grand jury?
Speaker 5 (13:25):
Well, if it goes from if the grand jury, you
have to Federal law requires between sixteen and twenty three
Americans on a grand jury, you have to have twelve
to indite. The total number of the grand jury will
be determined eventually a by a distant court judge. Grand
Jury proceedings are partially secret and the government can't talk,
witnesses can talk.
Speaker 6 (13:46):
But if twelve.
Speaker 5 (13:47):
Folks vote to indict anyone, then then the duet will
will come down and then from that point, most likely
arrest will take place and the beginning of the of
the judicial proceedings in the criminal part. This will begin
with the initial appearances et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 6 (14:03):
So it is a kind of a complex process in
terms of what happens from A to B. But there
will be motions by the defense, possibly to dismiss run
of the reasons. You have to.
Speaker 5 (14:11):
Survive those, you know, I'd rather have a judge like
Judge Dolleen Cannon hearing the case and one of these
DC appointed guys, whether it's Bosberg or anybody else. So
that's one of the big battle.
Speaker 3 (14:24):
I think it goes without saying that.
Speaker 4 (14:26):
The other two big things is what will become of
the Democrat Party after this if it goes all the way.
I mean, a couple of guys may go to jail,
but it could be the final death of Democrat Party,
although that's coming from within with the justice Democrats, the
rise of in Islamist branch of the party that was
headed towards death anyway. And the media already has no credibility,
nor does it have ratings, nor does it have revenue.
(14:46):
They are probably the two biggest losers in this case
in terms of final straw real quickly, with thirty seconds,
how's the run for the United States Senate going to
North Carolina? They'd be lucky to have somebody like you.
Speaker 5 (15:00):
Thank you, Thank you, Michael. We're running from Manyo to Murphy,
all over the state and then the western part of
the state. Last night in Cherokee County, the westernmost part
of the state. The grassroots is on fire. Folks can
hear about our campaign at brownfour NC dot com, Brown
etho ORNC dot com. When you don't help, we can
get from the exciting race. It's some of the races
determined by we the people. And one of the things
I'm running on is we've got to end this unequal
(15:22):
system of justice. I want to see Roague prosecutor laws
and I want to see people help to account for
the way they bastavis.
Speaker 3 (15:28):
Our justice system.
Speaker 5 (15:29):
The Constitution begins and the preamble the first objective is
to establish justice before anything else, and they have. The
Democrats have taken our judicial system and basturvized it. The
Democrat Party must come to an end. This may be
the death Nail.
Speaker 3 (15:41):
I hope you're.
Speaker 5 (15:42):
Correct about that. They are even to speaking communists at
the front of the party and we're going to battle
that through this campaign and instant Senate as well.
Speaker 3 (15:48):
Don Brown candidate for the United States Senate and.
Speaker 4 (15:51):
The Tar Hills state of North Carolina, a constitutional attorney
and a US Assistant attorney. In God's favor, you follow
you throughout that state as you introduce you yourself to voters.
Speaker 3 (16:00):
Scott Bless you, sir, Thanks for your time. Thank Michael.
Speaker 6 (16:04):
We'll talk to you soon a couple of times.
Speaker 3 (16:05):
I hope.
Speaker 2 (16:05):
So this is your morning show with Michael del Chuno.
Speaker 4 (16:11):
Real quickly, let's get William in here from Tampa listening
to Impact Radio.
Speaker 3 (16:14):
Good morning, Michael.
Speaker 8 (16:16):
I really would love to get to the bottom of
the Russia hoax, and I hope that we do so.
But at the same time, I would like to know
more about the Epstein files. And I heard President Trump say, well,
he's been dead a long time, so let's move on.
And you know the same could be said for John F.
Kennedy and yet he released his files.
Speaker 3 (16:36):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (16:36):
What I hear is the frustration, you know, coming out
of the shadow campaign to save the democracy. We were
promised to krack and we got nothing. Promised a lot
with JFK, RFK MLK and Epstein got nothing. Although I
can explain why you have nothing on Epstein, I will
mention billne Maxwell's and jail and Epstein is dead. There
is some justice that's already happened, but for some of
(16:58):
the other stuff and people in it's gonna take a
case to do it.
Speaker 8 (17:04):
My name is Joey from Goodier, Arizona, and my morning
show is Your Morning Show with Michael del jeanne.
Speaker 6 (17:16):
Hi.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
I'm Michael del Jorno and your Morning Show can be
heard live as it's happening five to eight am Central
and six to nine Eastern on great stations like six
point twenty WJDX and Jackson, Mississippi, or Akrons News Talk
six forty WHLO and Akron, Ohio and News Radio five
seventy WDAK and Columbus, Georgia. We'd love to be a
part of your morning routine. But we're glad you're here
(17:37):
now enjoyed the podcast.
Speaker 4 (17:39):
I am sitting here and trying to figure out. I
wonder if English leather is the one I wore. There
was another one. I don't think that is what I wore,
But if it is, we were talking about old sense.
English leather is now sixty dollars a bottle. How could
that be? That's his sake? It's but yeah, but you
(18:04):
can get a lot of stuff for sixty dollars a bottle.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
The packaging in English led from the seventies, though, But
I don't know if that's the one I wore or not, doesn't.
Speaker 4 (18:12):
I kind of remember the wooden cab looking like it.
Speaker 3 (18:17):
Was there an old English or something.
Speaker 4 (18:20):
I gotta let me try to find a list of
popular men's clones from the seventies.
Speaker 3 (18:24):
You sure it wasn't Bam, No, it wasn't Bayrum.
Speaker 2 (18:27):
Okay.
Speaker 4 (18:28):
Rory still wears that the US is planning to put
a nuclear reactor the moon. Alan, Why a nuclear reactor
on the moon and within the next decade? Uh?
Speaker 3 (18:40):
Why is this needed? And how will it be built?
Speaker 4 (18:43):
He knows all things space program your why do you
grunt over that?
Speaker 6 (18:49):
Well?
Speaker 3 (18:49):
No, that's an offully high bar for me.
Speaker 7 (18:51):
And you have very intelligent listeners who may well know more.
Speaker 4 (18:54):
So that's I doubt that I would need I need
I don't know, Walter Cronkite to have more.
Speaker 3 (19:00):
But you've been following the program.
Speaker 4 (19:02):
And so but no, I know you get it like
I get it in every step and why we did
the moon and where we're going and how achievable Mars
is and a lot sooner than people think.
Speaker 7 (19:12):
But the Moon and a nuclear reactor, it is yeah,
you wouldn't just have the reactor sitting up there. It
would be there to power some sort of a lunar base.
Think Barbara Bain and Martin Landau and Space nineteen ninety nine.
How about that one? That would be the ultimate vision.
But this is also this is also flexing. Secretary Duffy
(19:34):
has been leading NASA for just a couple of weeks
now as the interim head of NASA, and his announcement
comes just a couple of months after Russia and China
said they were exploring this idea as well. Look, NASA
has been essentially saying, if we're going to build a
moon base, we're going to have to have a nuclear
reactor up there. So this is not a revolutionary idea,
(19:55):
but I guess accelerating the timetable is something new.
Speaker 3 (19:58):
But show me the money.
Speaker 7 (20:00):
You know, we haven't seen that commitment yet, and you
know they're already planning to cut the NASA budget I
think twenty six percent in the next cycle, so I'm
curious to see where this funding is coming from for
such an ambitious project. Then you got to launch and
land the thing safely, which you.
Speaker 4 (20:17):
Know, not a big payload, right, So let me ask you.
And I've been deep diving into Katrina's coming up on
the twentieth anniversary. So I've literally spent twenty hours this
week studying all the rostraints today, hiroshimas today.
Speaker 3 (20:33):
So I've kind of been blind to some of this,
But i know in the.
Speaker 4 (20:35):
Process of getting to Mars, fueling and refueling en route
is a big part of that. Could this be part
of that or is this something completely different? It would
be different.
Speaker 7 (20:47):
What we're hoping is that since we've made the discovery
of lunar ice just below the surface of the Moon,
there's ice there, and when you break down ice h
two oh, you get hydrogen and oxygen and those two
element and make rocket fuel. So the idea is that
tapping into the ice on the Moon is really going
to give us the fuel that we need to further exploration.
(21:08):
It's also obviously going to provide oxygen and water. So
the discovery of ice on the Moon a couple decades
ago really is the dry future of all that exploration.
But yeah, as far as getting to Mars, then you'd
hope to get the fueling station built on the Moon,
perhaps pick up the fuel from there and then move on.
It would not likely be nuclear powered, although it can't
rule that out completely.
Speaker 4 (21:29):
And you bring up the flexing of muscle. We're not
the only one trying to get there and do this there.
So now that race is back.
Speaker 7 (21:38):
Right, which is a good which I'm all for it,
as I told people plenty of times and said, imagine
if the first person on Mars, the first human being
to set foot on Mars, is a person from China,
how's that going to go over?
Speaker 3 (21:53):
Well? Again, I liked there was two things about the
space program. I like, do we have a minute? I
think we do?
Speaker 4 (22:00):
Yes, Okay, The two things I like most and I
think this is why Kennedy picked the Moon. And I
think there was muscle flexing there too. Don't forget Kennedy
thought there was a missile gap and was shocked to
find out yes there was, and it was in our favor.
But he knew just as land was a big deal,
and then on sea was a big deal, and then
in air, these were game changing in warfare, and he
(22:21):
knew space was going to play that role. So there
was a defense vision. There was the stretching of going
to the moon and all the things you would have
to learn and create to get there that would create
industry and economy. He got all of that. It's always
all of the above. It was never to get there
and stay there. And then now there's this vision of
(22:42):
get there, stay there, or it's on the way to
the next place, and that's a whole new race. And
so that's one that the American people don't have to
be sold too, because eventually it'll come down to who's
going to fund all this? But yes, let's get there
and control it before someone else does, or as Kennedy
would say, you know, control it for good rather than
wait and let evil beat you there and control it
(23:04):
for evil. So it's kind of the same game, really,
isn't it.
Speaker 7 (23:09):
Yeah, different destination perhaps well, and a different tactic, I suppose,
because there was just the idea of being there first.
Speaker 3 (23:15):
Right now it's now who gets to keep it?
Speaker 7 (23:18):
The idea being if your if your reactor is there,
either your China, Russia, or US, you sort of then
own that part of the moon. You don't really, but
that's sort of the messaging that's out there. So yeah,
that's why you also want to put that first reactor
up there.
Speaker 3 (23:34):
Can Can I steal twenty more seconds? Yep?
Speaker 4 (23:37):
All right, I'm gonna do something that would do normally
off the earth. Do you have plans for the twentieth
anniversary of Katrina? Because I think Katrina is something that
you and others need to dive deep into because there's
lessons to be learned if we can get beyond the
political matrix. And I don't think those lessons have been learned,
and quite frankly, I don't think we're any more prepared
today than we were twenty years ago. And and there's
(23:58):
blame to go around for every party and every level
of government, from municipal to state to federal. And I
am just having a field day, and I would love
to turn somebody like you will loose on this. But
I would really think we should probably provide a twenty
year anniversary special of some kind. And I wouldn't want
anybody to do it, but you just a little thought. Sure, No, Yeah,
(24:20):
help in any way I can. And yeah, because I
went through it when Katrina hit Florida. So I was here,
you know, standing there in West Palm Beach. Is the
thing hit before it came into the Gulf.
Speaker 3 (24:29):
We didn't get it.
Speaker 4 (24:30):
We didn't do a good job of understanding why that
breakdown happened, why that failure happened, and why it could
still happen again. And there are racial components, but you've
got to do beyond that. And then, but that was
a failure at every level.
Speaker 3 (24:44):
And the more you.
Speaker 7 (24:44):
Study, yeah, yeah, it also highlights how every area of
the country is different. I mean, look at how you
know Asheville, North Carolina suddenly impacted by hurricane in a
very different way than New Orleans, but both of them
devastated by different forces. Oh and the billions we spent
to redo the levees are already obsolete and need to
(25:04):
be improved by twenty twenty three?
Speaker 4 (25:07):
Did I mention it's twenty twenty five? All right, Roy,
I love it, have a great day. We'll talk again tomorrow.
Can't have your morning show without your voice. I want
to start with I think this is a first. Do
we have two from Mississippi?
Speaker 3 (25:24):
That's a possibility.
Speaker 4 (25:25):
It's about time we start getting some representation in Mississippi.
Speaker 3 (25:30):
I know we have Bob in Mississippi. Let's go a Bob,
all right.
Speaker 8 (25:33):
Bob, Hey, mister d I've been waiting for him to
get to the bottom of the flight gate.
Speaker 4 (25:42):
Well, we'll try to get to the flate gate after MLK,
after our FK, after JFK, after the Kracken that never happened,
after Epstein and after Russia game.
Speaker 3 (25:52):
James in Ohio.
Speaker 7 (25:54):
Remember, no matter where you go, that's where you'll be
with Michael D.
Speaker 3 (26:00):
Geez.
Speaker 4 (26:00):
I'm all right. So here's what happened. We had an
emailer try to write a liner for Mike mccannon and
it was pretty good. He gave us about four or
five to choose from that. We're gonna massage you because
I think it's neat if you guys start writing some
of these liners. I like, morning has broken? What'd we
change that to? Morning is broken? And that's why we
(26:21):
have to fix it with understanding? And so are we? Yeah,
I kind of adjusted Mary's a little bit. But I
want to incorporate some of your ideas what I can
do with that.
Speaker 3 (26:30):
One, Jason, But I'll try.
Speaker 4 (26:33):
But if you got an idea for a liner we're
due from Mike McCann's session, I would love to have
you be a part of writing those. Keep those coming
email wise um, the Roseanne bar interview, by the way,
is back on for next week. Oh really, I was
looking forward to and then I got it delayed.
Speaker 3 (26:54):
But can I a question? I just want to ask
a question. One question.
Speaker 4 (26:57):
I'll make it good good, Okay, go no, no, not now,
but when we do Roseanne?
Speaker 3 (27:03):
Okay, Oh well you got a week.
Speaker 8 (27:09):
Uh.
Speaker 4 (27:09):
Rachel wrote, what about morning has broken and common sense
is dawning? This is Rachel that, by the way, I
think it's Rachel.
Speaker 3 (27:18):
You sent me. I've got to go. I was. I
was in bed when it was all opened.
Speaker 4 (27:23):
Like if I'm go to a restaurant and I bring
some food home, do you want to see my kids
hit it like raccoons and it's just devoured and gone?
Speaker 5 (27:30):
All right?
Speaker 3 (27:31):
The raccoons got it.
Speaker 4 (27:32):
So I was in bed, just about to fall asleep
when a package came and I think it's from Rachel.
It's her, her soaps that she makes, and the raccoons
ravaged it. One was like a stethoscope, shaped like a
soap on a rope. Alex took that because she's going
to be a doctor. One smelled like chocolate or cappuccino
(27:55):
or something. I saw one daughter run off with that
Nick took a couple anyway, The Dell journals, I think,
I think are using sudzy Mamma dot com soaps now
and you can find your soaps at sudzy Mama dot com.
Shameless free commercial here on the Your Morning Show network.
They really are amazing. The two that I held in
my hand and smelled r amazing. Now I think I
(28:16):
think it's Rachel, if I'm not mistaken, made me a
clock for the we used to call the studio jungle
room now that we're premier is completely redecorated.
Speaker 3 (28:23):
But and she had made a clock for me. I
think that was Rachel too.
Speaker 4 (28:28):
But sudsy Mama s u d z y Mama m
A m A soudzymma dot com if you want to
send your kids into a frenzy with her soaps as
ours did, all right, keep the emails coming. Michael di
at iHeartMedia dot com. Don't forget the talk back button
on your iHeartRadio app. This is your morning show when
(28:49):
we come back, not one, not two, not three, but
your top five stories the day. I may even I
don't even know if I'm gonna do top five stories
because I want to get in this latest Rasmusen poll,
and I want to do this story on why social
media erupted over the comments of a Democrat representative while
she was in Guatemala. If it means I can't do
(29:09):
the top five stories, I'm going to do it. Those
two stories have got to get in today. Have you
heard of karaaluma? Karaluma is an edible cactus and it's
from Indian. It's known for naturally suppressing appetite. I always
think in my mind, somebody says down, eats a cactus
and then doesn't eat for a few days.
Speaker 3 (29:29):
I'm not hungry after that cactus.
Speaker 4 (29:31):
But we eventually figured out it has an appetite suppress
it naturally in it. It's one of the key ingredients
in the breakthrough weight loss supplement that I take.
Speaker 3 (29:38):
Lean. Jeffrey just ordered some last hour.
Speaker 4 (29:41):
If you're aiming to lose weight, not yo yo, lose
a bunch, then gain it back, lose some more, gain
it all back, and then some. But I mean just slow,
steady weight loss, and that's what it's been for me,
slow steady and eleven pounds. I don't take it to
lose weight, although I'm grateful to. I take cause I
feel great, and I use other brickhouse products, the greens
and the fruits that put my water. But Lean, doctor say,
(30:04):
is the closest they've been able to come to replicate
the benefits of popular injections, and they don't have needles. Obviously,
Lean helps maintain healthy blood sugar levels, control appetite and cravings,
and it doesn't stop there.
Speaker 3 (30:14):
It's rare.
Speaker 4 (30:15):
Natural ingredients are formulated to help your body turn fat
into energy. That's another area where feeling great comes in
best part, no needles, just results. Get twenty percent off today,
just as Jeffrey did. Go to take lean dot com.
Take Lean dot com. Use the promo code yms your
Morning Show twenty for twenty percent off YMMS twenty at
(30:37):
takelean dot Com. That's Takelean dot Com YMS twenty. These
statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. The product
is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease,
and it is not a substitute or an alternative for
care from your healthcare provider.
Speaker 2 (30:49):
It's Your Morning Show with Michael Delchourno.
Speaker 4 (30:54):
This may be one of those days we can't take
our paycheck. We're having too much fun.
Speaker 3 (30:57):
Can't have your morning show without your voice. Let them roll. Hey,
this is Bob from Virginia. Avon for men was wild Country.
If you're still looking, it was good stuff. Patrick from Colorado.
Old Spice was what I go to back in the day.
I just strove to show you how old I am.
Michael and Gang.
Speaker 7 (31:17):
Addition to English leather, there was genies, there was British sterling.
Speaker 3 (31:21):
There was canoe. I hope that helps by.
Speaker 6 (31:25):
A.
Speaker 3 (31:26):
That's maybe one. Michael DG and crew. This is my
morning show, Rob and Saint Louis brush than Weather.
Speaker 4 (31:37):
He's saying, my morning show is Jery.
Speaker 3 (31:40):
Well, you BURGEREDE. Get in the corner.
Speaker 4 (31:42):
I'm gonna take you to the Denmark Zoo Bruch by Faberge.
What about Hi Karati?
Speaker 3 (31:50):
That was a big one, right.
Speaker 4 (31:51):
Good stuff man, Old spice was probably number one or brute?
Speaker 3 (31:56):
What do you think I would?
Speaker 4 (31:57):
I always did English leather and I just found this
on eBay just to kind of wrap the segment up.
It's a vintage English leather cologne. Miss is like fifty
and it's like sixty percent full. So some guy's old
English leather from the seventies. It was sort of and missing,
and I'm like, ew, what was the old stuff Steve
Garvey used to do?
Speaker 3 (32:18):
Was that Aquavelda?
Speaker 4 (32:21):
I think it was Aquavela, Noxima was Joe Namath, but
I think, yeah, all the great colognes of the seventies.
Speaker 3 (32:29):
But you know.
Speaker 4 (32:30):
English leather that I used to wear sixty bucks a bottle,
Now it's good stuff. I do kind of have a
cologne fetish. And I'm kind of over tom Ford and
paying so much. Final story headline. Social media erupts after
(32:50):
House democrat makes shocking comment about America during an overseas trip.
First things, first, you're overseas, don't talk bad about home.
That never works well. Number two, why is it you
(33:12):
love America enough to run for office? Are you running
for office to keep America great? Make America great? Or
change America? Because your comment kind of gives away the latter.
But thirdly, I'd like to thank this member of Congress
for saying what I know most of them are doing
(33:34):
and what millions have done. You see, the key to
immigration is A it'd be legal, and B that it
involve assimilation. My great great parent, great grandparents, yeah, both grandparents.
I think one side might the grandparents as well. My
(33:55):
grandparents and great grandparents left Italy to come here. They
denounced it and pledged their future and their children's future
to America. They assimilated, They spoke our language. They were
a contributor to our culture and economy, not a drain,
(34:19):
but they assimilated. Nobody assimilates anymore. So if you don't
get melting pot versus melting culture, you missed the last
fifty years. So here's Democratic Representative Delia Ramirez of Illinois.
Social media goes crazy over the clip she's in Guatemala
saying I am a proud Guatemalan before I am an American. Now,
(34:42):
this is a problem within one party in a two
party stranglehold that's dying and never was meant to be.
Speaker 3 (34:52):
And this translates in other ways. For AOC, is she
proud of.
Speaker 4 (34:55):
Her Hispanic origins in New York, in her neighborhood or America.
This woman came right on and said it, I'm a
proud Guatemalan before I'm an American. By the way, that
is the most disqualifying comment anybody could make in being
a member of the United States Congress. It would absolutely
(35:16):
disqualify her for citizenship quite frankly, let alone representation. Now,
you don't need outrage on the radio for this. I
would hope if there's any common sense or Americanism left
in Illinois, and there's not a lot, this should take
care of itself in the next election cycle. This is
(35:37):
why the House of Representatives has elections every two years.
You do something dumb, you say something dumb, you're not
there long. And the anger is not about how she
defines herself, but about what it is to be an American.
(35:58):
I think in her case, it's a GPS location. That's
not citizenship. That's not what we pledge to. That's not
what we take oaths to. Revealing yes, shocking, no acceptable.
Speaker 3 (36:16):
I hope not. Time will tell. Hey, that's it for today.
Speaker 2 (36:20):
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael Enhild Joe No
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.