September 2, 2025 • 35 mins
Chris Krok is filling in for Michael DelGiorno this week.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hi, it's Michael.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
Your morning show can be heard on great radio stations
across the country like News Talk ninety two point one
and six hundred WREC in Memphis, Tennessee, or thirteen hundred
The Patriot in Tulsa, our Talk six to fifty KSTE
in Sacramento, California. We invite you to listen live while
you're getting ready in the morning, to take us along
for the drive to work. But as we always say,
better late than never. Thanks for joining us for the podcast.
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Starting your morning off right.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
A new way of talk, a new way of understanding,
because we're in this together.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
This is your morning show with Michael O'Dell Charman across America.
Speaker 4 (00:39):
This is your morning show with Buncle del Jorno from
Sacramento in Dallas to Tampa and DC with Cleve Acron,
a grin Cleve Akron and Memphis in between.
Speaker 1 (00:50):
This is your morning show.
Speaker 5 (00:53):
Hey.
Speaker 1 (00:53):
We get to chime in with.
Speaker 4 (00:56):
In just a moment, our national correspondent Rory O'Neil kicking
back and Sessions starting today. There's so many things on
their play. We'll talk to Rory in just a second,
and then Rocanna, Thomas Massey and congress a Democrat Republican respectively,
have said they're going to be doing a big, big
press conference with the Epstein victims some of them, and
(01:17):
some of the Epstein victims already lashing out publicly at
the Trump administration. They're demanding more release of more files.
I have a lot to talk about with you on that,
and I can't wait for your talkbacks on that as
well anything we talked about this morning. Joined the conversation
by using that talkback button on your iheartstream, clicked the
microphone icon. Rory O'Neill, our national correspondent on Congress return, Rory,
(01:43):
thanks for joining us this morning, sir.
Speaker 5 (01:45):
Sure Chris, happy September.
Speaker 4 (01:47):
Woo here it is. We're in it, Barby and to
win it. So we have all sorts of stuff going
on for Congress. They returned today after a month away.
The most important thing is is it the spending with
the effective Congress will run on our money here shortly
well right.
Speaker 6 (02:06):
The fiscal year, as it always does, ends at the
end of September, so we hit the start button on
that countdown clock to a government shutdown. And of course,
Republicans holding such a slim majority in both the House
and the Senate and Congressman Massy out there among the
Republicans who are loathed to vote in favor of any
(02:27):
continuing resolution could push us further to a government shutdown.
Democrats getting a bit more organized and frustrated after the
White House did that recision package.
Speaker 5 (02:37):
Remember they went.
Speaker 6 (02:38):
Back and pulled out nine billion dollars in spending and
President Trump just tried to pull a pocket recision of
another five billion.
Speaker 5 (02:45):
So a lot of Democrats are feeling.
Speaker 6 (02:47):
Burned, saying, well, why I agree with anything if all
they're going to do is do a pocket recision later on.
Speaker 4 (02:51):
So I'm seeing that the stopgap spending will probably be
what they do to avert the October first deadline. So
what do you if that happened, How likely will it
be to go through? And how long will that take
us through to avoid a shut down?
Speaker 5 (03:06):
Right?
Speaker 6 (03:06):
Well, those are two of the sticking points, right, So
there's not enough time to go through each of the
major spending bills, which they should do, and a lot
of Congress already feels like, hey, we got the one big,
beautiful bill. The White House feels the same way as well,
that their top legislative priorities were already wrapped up into that.
Speaker 5 (03:22):
So if they can just continue with.
Speaker 6 (03:24):
Where we have been with spending, they'd be mostly happy
with that. So we'll see that how long they want
to kick that can down the road. Is it to
the end of the year, do they want to go
to February something like that. So it's a bit of
a wait and see. And these are the negotiations that
are really getting underway in earnest right now is I
think when you take out the week for Rasashana, they've
(03:44):
got twenty two days working days ahead of them.
Speaker 4 (03:47):
We have a two week deadline on Russia and Ukraine.
What's that looking there right now? It looks like Trump
might need to bring the hammer down on Putin because
nothing seems to be moving in the right direction there.
Speaker 6 (03:57):
Right where two plus suiteps out from that meeting in
a last and things actually seem to be worse in
Ukraine with Russia launching some of its largest attacks just
last week, with what six hundred drone strikes in one
of those attacks, So that seems to be going backwards
issues about providing more funding to Israel, and as it
relates to weaponry for their battle with Hamas, that's also
(04:18):
something up there Plus you've got the Trump administration wants
two billion dollars to beautify Washington, DC. Budget hawks won't
really be thrilled with that. And then funding all these
ice and military operations to take out and remove people
who are in the country illegally.
Speaker 5 (04:34):
Something else that is a bit of an issue.
Speaker 4 (04:37):
And rory lasting on the docket that Congress has dead
lands coming up in the Trump administration, I should say,
is that Supreme Court battle over tariffs. High Court likely
to take up the case as early as autumn. They
might see hear it, but they're not going to get
a result probably to the end of the year. Do
you think where do you see that playing How do
you see that playing out? Do you think that maybe
(04:59):
they might court might put a stay on it through
until their decision.
Speaker 6 (05:03):
Yeah, that's a possibility that's floating around again. The Trump
administration's tariff plans got slapped down by another court last
week Friday. The President said though that look, you know,
while this is being appealed, the tariffs remain in place.
Speaker 5 (05:18):
Essentially, the Justice is saying he didn't.
Speaker 6 (05:20):
Make his argument for this being under emergency authority, that
these tariffs normally are something that Congress would deal with.
But so far Congress has had a hands off approach
to this thing, sort of seeding their power to the
White House.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
Interestingly, and so the state.
Speaker 4 (05:35):
When I refer to a stay, I mean the decision
that the US Federal Appeals Court, the Enbank of Full Panel.
The reason why they they've stayed their decisions saying the
tariffs is striking them down. So they're in effect still,
as you know, about six more weeks. And so you
think I'm hoping, and I think most of us are
hoping that the Federal the U Supreme Court, when they
(05:56):
hear it, are going to keep it's a stay, so
the teriff negotiations he's done, what's in place that will
continue to.
Speaker 1 (06:03):
Roll until the Supreme Court does a decision.
Speaker 4 (06:06):
Do you think that's going to take place through the
decision by the Supreme Court?
Speaker 5 (06:10):
Yeah, I don't.
Speaker 6 (06:11):
I'm hard pressed to think that would happen. But you know, look,
this is obviously a court that's favorable to the President.
So perhaps and maybe it gives them time to get
that elusive deal with China and some other big players
out here.
Speaker 4 (06:23):
Right, Rory, thank you very much. We talked to later
in the show. Roy O'Neil our National Course Pond. Thanks
appreciate you very much. Okay, So Rocana and Thomas Massey
holding a joint press conference with Epstein victims. Quote, people
are going to be outraged. Let's play cut number four
from Rocana.
Speaker 1 (06:41):
Here he is.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
We've got two hundred and twelve Democrats and twelve Republicans,
including Marjorie Tayler Green Lauren Bubbert. Look, this is not
about Donald Trump, and it's not partisan. This is about
justice for the victims of rich and powerful men who.
Speaker 5 (06:57):
Abused underage girls.
Speaker 3 (06:59):
And ten of these victims are speaking out for the
first time at a press conference that Massey and I
are organizing on the steps of the Capitol on September third.
In this country, people want transparency, they want accountability. I'm
confident we're going to get the two hundred and eighteen
votes for the discharge petition. I'll talk about that news
conference because you're kind of touting it that it's going
to be, if not explosive, there's going to be some newsmade. Well,
(07:22):
these victims haven't spoken for decades. When Epstein got that
lenient plea deal, no one talked to the victims or
their lawyers. No one talked to the victims of their
lawyers when Maxwell was sentenced.
Speaker 5 (07:33):
No one has ever heard what do they want?
Speaker 3 (07:35):
And my belief is when the American people actually hear
the victims for the first time, they are going to sympathize.
Their hearts are going to be broken. And all the
victims are saying is for closure. We need the Epstein
files release that there are a lot of other rich,
powerful men, politicians, business leaders who have committed abuse and
(07:57):
who have not been held accountable. That's what we're going
to hear on September third, and people are going to
be outraged. And I don't see how after that the
House can't vote for the release of these files.
Speaker 1 (08:07):
Here's the thing.
Speaker 4 (08:08):
The idea there's gonna be something damning on President Trump,
to me is a complete and total lie.
Speaker 1 (08:13):
That's not gonna happen. There's no way Joseph R.
Speaker 4 (08:17):
Biden and his dj would have held anything back for
four years if they had anything on Trump knowing he
was going to run again.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
There's no way.
Speaker 4 (08:25):
Second of all, the same thing for the former Obama administration.
They I mean, they are a stand accused and I
believe fully as the Trump DOJ and intelligence officials have said,
there's horrible things the FBI. Well, we know the FBI
colluded in the Department of Justice and the Intelligence agency
colluded with Barack Obama at his behest and redid a
(08:49):
whole assessment on Russia to make it look like Trump
was colluding with Russia. All those warrants and tapping of
phones and spy there was nothing there.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
It was all fake.
Speaker 4 (08:58):
So do you honestly think the obamadministration wouldn't have used Epstein'
stuff against Trump?
Speaker 1 (09:02):
Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? There's no way.
Speaker 4 (09:05):
So this idea Trump is bat The Democrats, I think,
are making themselves look like fools. And you know, in
the end, it might be something that comes out where
you know, overall, I don't know if it's going to
necessarily hit a politician.
Speaker 1 (09:18):
It might, and I hope it does.
Speaker 4 (09:19):
If it does, if it's people implicated, let them be implicated.
But you might end up seeing it might be a
slight more hit on the Dems versus the Republicans. With
what comes out, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (09:30):
Let me hear. Let's hear a cut number five.
Speaker 4 (09:32):
This is a Epstein one of the Epstein victims, who
says the Republicans need courage.
Speaker 1 (09:37):
Listen to this.
Speaker 5 (09:38):
I think what we're looking.
Speaker 7 (09:39):
For with all of these meetings is courage on the
part of Republican representatives because this is most importantly a
bipartisan issue. This is not something that anyone, anyone on
any side of the aisle should be four should before
(10:01):
child sex trafficking and allowing perpetrators to escape justice, and
no one should before systems failing to prosecute over decades.
Speaker 4 (10:12):
So here's the thing. She says, Republicans need courage. Now, look,
I'm not recovering anything up. The reason why so much
stuff is so redacted is because there are so many
victims and people mentioned here that listen closely, that have
not been implicated or not been accused of anything wrong,
but their names are popping up.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
That is a problem.
Speaker 4 (10:34):
If nobody's been convicted, that there's no accusations against people
that are in these documents. I mean, look, if anybody
it's a massive politician and this implicated looks bad of
this to me, it's Bill Clinton. I mean there's a
picture of him being given a massage by one of
these underaged Epstein minor victims. He also was flown a
whole bunch of times. I think twenty three times or
(10:54):
more on the low lead that expressed, and I believe
I cannot recall specifically, but I think he may have
actually flown to some of these locations from what I've seen,
But I could be off on that, but I know
he looks the worst out of all of them, along
with Prince Andrew, looks absolutely destroyed his reputation, and rightfully so,
(11:14):
I'm not against this. I don't think it's some kind
of a bipartisan thing. Second of all, you want the
client list. What's been needed is that I'm not attacking
the victims. Do not hear what I'm not saying, because
they are total victims. There were children being sex trafficked.
They're victims through and through. Okay, now they're adult victims
from the childhood trauma that was put on them as
an innocent child. But the only way to get the
(11:36):
victim list is through the victims themselves.
Speaker 1 (11:39):
I'm sorry. The client list is through the victims to say.
Speaker 4 (11:43):
This man, this man, this man, this man, this man,
and look, they can do that, and that could have
been done a long time ago. But they decided, and
I'm not attacking them in their time. There now some
of them coming out like that one victim right there
who you just heard from, and there's going to be
up to ten more joining Rocanna and Thomas Massey in
a press conference. Of course, Massi's a Republican from Kentucky,
(12:05):
very conservative. So the victims are the key to sharing
who and what, and I support this, but they have
not come out other than one or two over the years.
They are now so that's where the client list is.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
They know it.
Speaker 4 (12:23):
And because there's no list specifically, so I don't think
they're gonna there's anything political behind this. And I welcome sharing,
but I think you're gonna keep getting surprised of how
little is there. But the stories being shared are great,
they're powerful. We need to hear them. I have no
problem with that. But I want you to chime in
right now. Do you think there's something there? Do you
(12:46):
think that anybody's really covering anything up on this? Do
you think we're gonna find anything terribly new in all this?
Chim in right now, join the conversation. Use that talkbag
button on your iheartstream, click the microphone icon, and just
go to town.
Speaker 1 (12:58):
We'd love to hear from you.
Speaker 4 (13:00):
I want to do a little bit more on this
with some specifics on the survivors upset about what the
DJ did meeting with what's named Glady Maxwell in prison.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
You're damned if you do. You're damned if you don't.
Speaker 4 (13:13):
Also, the most infamous man stealing a hat appear, it
appears to me stealing a hat from a child at
the US open. That case has blown open. The man
that you've seen on social media allegedly stealing the cap
from the little boy has come forward. He's being attacked
all of this nation and all of the world on
(13:33):
social media. If you haven't seen this, just go to
my Twitter feed at Chris Crockshow. That's at Chris Crockshow,
chrsk okay and scroll down a little bit.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
You'll see it and you'll know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 4 (13:43):
Do not miss what that man who's now been implicated
in doing it, he's come forward and doing me a
couple what he has said. This is Chris crock And
from Michael Delsaro. This is your morning show.
Speaker 1 (13:55):
This is your morning show with Michael del Chrono. This
is your morning show. Join our conversation.
Speaker 4 (14:02):
Hit that talkback button on your heart stream cliped the
Michael bon go to town like Blaine did at Kasi.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
This Ebstein thing.
Speaker 8 (14:10):
They're trying to beat Trump with it, and it's not
gonna work. Rocan is a fraud, and the goofy guy
from Kentucky is not really a republic and he might
as well be a Democrat. He's just a joke MASSI.
He's trying to stir up crap and he actually costs
the party a lot more than it's worth. And I
don't know who he's standing out for it all. And
the I've seen people got paid five hundred million dollars,
(14:31):
So you know this thing's over.
Speaker 4 (14:32):
Actually, well it's not over if there's more new information.
And the women have not spoke. The victims have not
spoken out much, most of them they are now, which
I have no problem with, but I think and here
they're also upset, some of these victims that are not
speaking out, or that we'll be speaking out of the
press conference with Rocann and Thomas Massy, I think of
a day or two Wednesday. I believe they are upset
(14:56):
that the DJ's number two official attorney, Deputy Attorney General
Todd Blanche held multiple private interviews with Glen Maxwell for
publicly releasing the charge Sex sex traffickers testimony one of
the victims that I feel pretty gutted. It entirely is
devastating to the entire survivor community.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
Look, you're damned if you do. If you damned if
you don't release the files. We release what we have.
Don't release the files. You're hiding it.
Speaker 4 (15:25):
Go work with the one surviving person has been convicted
with Epstein, who was in a factor of PIV.
Speaker 1 (15:31):
How dare you?
Speaker 4 (15:33):
This is why the Trump administration literally said they had
all the stuff, they're going to release it all before
they knew exactly what was in there.
Speaker 1 (15:40):
They set themselves up for this whole situation. The Democrats
know that there's nothing there against Trump.
Speaker 4 (15:45):
If there was, they would have been released under Bidener
or Obama.
Speaker 1 (15:48):
So they're playing a game.
Speaker 4 (15:50):
So now Trump has to do the best he can
to release everything and in fact, yes, force it, release it.
I think you're still going to be pod watch all
that unfold. Let's hear from w LAC in Nashville, one
of our listeners who doesn't.
Speaker 9 (16:02):
Want accountability from Epstein files. Everybody does, But how are
the victims going to get accountability when Epstein's already gone.
So unless there's enough information in all these files for
you to then press charges against whatever politician or powerful
businessmen or whatever, what's the point.
Speaker 4 (16:24):
You cannot please everyone. You cannot please everyone. We have
some great audio going back and forth on CNN with
one of their guests. We'll play that a little bit
later in the eight o'clock hour of the show Eastern
aka seven in Central. Coming up next, we're going to
(16:45):
check in with two folks or two things.
Speaker 1 (16:47):
We're going to talk to.
Speaker 4 (16:48):
John Decker, our White House correspondent and attorney on the
Trump tariffs and the appeals court saying no no, no,
no no.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
And a tennis fan who.
Speaker 4 (16:58):
Appears to have stolen the half of a child, and
now issues of me a couple because people like you
and me saw this.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
And are outraged. I'm executive chef George Harvel.
Speaker 10 (17:10):
My Morning Show is Your Morning Show with Michael Dojorno.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
Hi, it's Michael.
Speaker 2 (17:19):
Your Morning Show airs live five to eight am Central,
six to nine Eastern in great cities like Memphis, Tennessee,
tell USA, Oklahoma, Sacramento, California. We'd love to be a
part of your morning routine. So we're happier here now
enjoyed the podcast.
Speaker 4 (17:32):
In just a moment, we'll talk to John Decker, our
national correspondent, our White House correspondent, and an attorney who
can talk about the tariffs. Trump had a ruling Friday,
late Friday from the federal US Federal Court of Appeals,
a panel I think seven to four smacking down Trump's terriff,
but they stay in place for now. I think about
(17:55):
six weeks left, and this is going to be interesting.
I'm gonna get in since since John Deck and only
White House corresponded, okay, good, but god him he's also
an attorney, John Decker joining us right now, Hawaii, You.
Speaker 1 (18:07):
Sir, I'm doing great.
Speaker 5 (18:09):
Are you doing today?
Speaker 1 (18:10):
Good?
Speaker 4 (18:10):
I didn't know you're in an attorney at law while
you're an attorney.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
That's pretty cool, kind of fancy.
Speaker 11 (18:18):
Okay.
Speaker 5 (18:19):
Yeah. I'm a member of the.
Speaker 10 (18:20):
Supreme Court bar so I love to talk about legal
issues as well as talking about what's happening at the
White House, and sometimes the two issues intersect, and that
certainly is the case as it relates to a major
legal challenge that could upend the president's.
Speaker 11 (18:36):
Legislative and economic.
Speaker 10 (18:38):
Agenda for the remainder of his second term, and that's
the tariffs policy that he's implemented. A federal appeals court
late Friday essentially.
Speaker 11 (18:46):
Struck down those reciprocal terriffs.
Speaker 10 (18:48):
That the president has imposed, and now it will likely
be up.
Speaker 11 (18:52):
To the US Supreme Court to.
Speaker 10 (18:53):
Decide whether President Trump backed it constitutionally when he imposed
those reciprocal terrofts.
Speaker 4 (19:00):
So there's a six week stay on the ruling. In
other words, Trump could tear to stay in place for
at least six weeks. The Supreme Court is most likely
going to hear it and perhaps this fault, but they're
not going to be able to rule give a rule
until what like January February or something of that nature
at the earliest.
Speaker 1 (19:19):
You can about to say that.
Speaker 11 (19:21):
I would not say that.
Speaker 5 (19:22):
We've seen the Supreme Court act very quickly.
Speaker 10 (19:24):
Sometimes within literally a month's time as it relates to
issues related to President Trump and the Trump administration. You
may recall last February, the Supreme Court ruled very quickly
on the issue of whether President Trump's name Donald Trump's
name could appear on the ballot in Colorado. They turned
around that decision in just a month's time. So the
(19:47):
Supreme Court has shown that it can act quickly, and
perhaps the lact quickly in this particular case.
Speaker 4 (19:53):
Now, the other thing is in between the time when
the Supreme Court here is that if they decide to
hear it, do you do you think they'll probably do
a issuous stay as well, regardless saying its stays in
policy until we make our decision.
Speaker 11 (20:09):
Never predict what the Supreme Court may or may not do.
Speaker 10 (20:13):
I don't do so until I hear oral arguments that
have been presented to the US Supreme Court, and typically
in the Supreme Court when those are oral arguments take place.
Speaker 5 (20:24):
So we'll see what happens.
Speaker 10 (20:25):
Ultimately, likely in the next few weeks, do we expect
an appeal being filed by the Trump administration? And I
certainly expect the Supreme Court to take this matter up.
Speaker 4 (20:35):
And the other thing, John, it's important for folks that
might want to know, hey, to the tariffs that have
already been negotiated, that's not going to be changed.
Speaker 5 (20:44):
Right, Well, we'll see.
Speaker 9 (20:46):
You know.
Speaker 10 (20:47):
I always thought that for many countries around the world
that did not negotiate a trade deal with the President,
I always felt maybe they're going to wait and see
what happens in the federal courts to see how this
all plays out. Be forced striking any kind of trade
deal with the United States. Obviously that wasn't the case
for the European Union, it wasn't the case for the
(21:10):
United Kingdom, and for other countries around the world that
decided to cut trade deals with the US over the
course of the last few weeks.
Speaker 4 (21:18):
What I should have rephrased it by saying is the ones,
the deals that are already been made, won't be struck down.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
They're going to stay. That's what I meant to say.
Speaker 10 (21:26):
Right I would think so, I would think they would stay,
but we'll have to wait and see. For many of
the deals, they are just contours of deals, frameworks of deals.
So they're not the kind of deals that take care
of all of the ancillary issues related to trade policy.
That's something that takes a lot of time to put together.
Speaker 5 (21:47):
In fact, the US.
Speaker 10 (21:49):
Mexico Canada Trade Agreement took one full year to put
that agreement together from start to finish. So that was
what I mean when I say it's not a full deal,
but rather a framework of a deal.
Speaker 4 (22:00):
Right now, Jonathan Adler wrote in the Wall Street Journal
of the Week on a professor at William and Mary
Law School talks about the Major Questions doctrine, which I
know you know, but it means policies addressing questions of
vast economic and political significance require clear authorization from Congress. However,
he says that there could be a decision in Trump's
favored by the Supreme Court because of this, I'll share
(22:22):
with the real fast and I want your reaction as
a counselor attorney at law, but also White House correspondent.
The whole point, he writes, of enacting statutes like AIPA,
which is what their Trump administration says, gives him the
authority to have these powers for tariffs. The whole point
of it is to address emergencies when they arise. He writes,
(22:45):
The courts have rarely felt competent to second guest the
executive branch's national security determinations presidential powers at its zenith
in matters of national security and foreign affairs, It's understandable
Congress may delegate broad authority in such context other than
domestic affairs. He cites a few Supreme Court decisions Curtis
Wright Export Corp. Against the US Congress must often accord
(23:09):
the President a degree of discretion and freedom from statutory restriction,
which would not be admissible where domestic affairs are allowed.
FCC versus consumers research the consumer research.
Speaker 1 (23:19):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (23:20):
In twenty twenty five, Justice Kavanaugh said the Major Questions
Canon has not been applied by this Court and the
national security or foreign policy contexts because it doesn't reflect
ordinary Congressional intent in those areas. Rather, the usual understanding
is that Congress intends to give the president substantial authority
and flexibility to protect American and the America and the
American people, and that Congress specifies limits on the president
(23:42):
when it wants to restrict presidential powers and those national
security and foreign policy domains.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
What are your thoughts on that commentary?
Speaker 10 (23:50):
Well, you've read a lot regarding an opinion of one
particular professor. I'd love to weigh in on all of that,
but unfortunately I don't have the time to do so
right now, so we'll have to pick up all right.
Speaker 4 (24:03):
That's right, Thank you very much, sir. We'll pick it
up tomorrow. Yeah, and I'll just share my thoughts, Thank
you very much.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
John.
Speaker 4 (24:09):
Basically, he says that this is quite possibly.
Speaker 1 (24:16):
Because of foreign policy.
Speaker 4 (24:18):
Because of national security and foreign policy, those issues are
given more wider latitude and the court is very long.
They don't want to step in when it comes to
national foreign policy and national security because that the president
has broad authority on that and Congress hasn't been specific
in mentioning this area.
Speaker 1 (24:40):
So that's where he says there's an opening.
Speaker 4 (24:42):
So really, what he's saying is this is not Major
Questions doctrine in my opinion, because it involves foreign policy
and possibly national security, and that the president has wide
powers that we are loath to get involved in. So
it could go that way. Not I guaranteed could go.
I didn't realize John had a shorter time on that part,
(25:04):
otherwise I would have not read all that. I apologized
for that, but we're grateful for him joining us. All right,
So look, have you seen the video of this poor
kid at the US Open And you see I don't
know this This US Open player's Polish. There's no and
I'm a pull off from Chicago. There's three million Poles
(25:24):
in the city of Chicago, the only city that has
more Polish people in it. This is not an exaggeration.
There's only one city in the world that has more
polls than Chicago, and that's Warsaw, which is, you know,
the largest city in Poland. So all the other cities
in Poland don't have as many poles as Chicago does. Okay,
that's why I'm born and raised Chicago. Polock if you will.
But so, but I can't pronounce this guy's name. But
(25:47):
this US Open player was autographing stuff after he had
an amazing victory and he's going down the line.
Speaker 1 (25:55):
He took his hat off, signed it, and then handed
it to a child.
Speaker 4 (26:00):
The child was excited for a split second, and then
break next to him. A man snatches the hat out
of the kid's hand and stuffs it, gives it to us,
goes to his wife on the other side, and stuffs
it in the bag that she's holding, and then goes
on that poor kid was robbed. And I thought I
(26:20):
was trying to give deference to this. I thought that
the I thought that the man may have been the
kid's dad, as in saying, grab the hat, stuff it, kid,
We're gonna make sure nobody else grabs it.
Speaker 1 (26:33):
No, he didn't know the kid.
Speaker 4 (26:37):
He grabbed it out of the child's hand. It was
clearly in the custody of the child for one or
one second or something of that nature, and.
Speaker 1 (26:44):
The guy just grabbed it.
Speaker 4 (26:45):
It's unbelievable. If you haven't seen it, go to my
Twitter feed at Chris croc Show. That's at Chris Crocs Show.
C hrisk Okay, gut us go down a little bit,
but you'll see it. And it is absolutely outrageous. So
the world saw this, people like you and me, and
I mean the Internet goes epoplectic when they see something
(27:06):
like this, including people that are doing things in appropriate.
Speaker 1 (27:09):
So this went nuts. This guy got just slammed.
Speaker 4 (27:12):
People dosed him, meaning they found out who he is,
what his name is, where he lives, that he owns
a business with a paving He's a Polish paving company.
So the weight of the world on social media attacking
this man brought him to heal, brought him to his knees.
He apologized, by the way the US Open player, uh,
(27:36):
it's tennis start Camille man, I'm not gonna be able.
Speaker 1 (27:39):
To pronounce thatak.
Speaker 4 (27:42):
And he ended up meeting with the boy and giving
him a whole bag of merchandise and signing stuff.
Speaker 1 (27:49):
And taking pictures of him that was on social media.
Speaker 4 (27:51):
So the tennis player when this blew up, he found
out about it, took care of that little boy. But
this guy, this Polish guy, he has issued a massive
mea culpa, an apology, but to me, it's a fake apology.
He still pretends like he didn't realize he grabbed it
out of the child's hands, stole it from a child. Dude,
this guy got caught one hundred percent. You chime in
(28:12):
if you've seen this video and you tell me, do
you believe this guy who's now issuing a groveling apology
but claims he still didn't know. He says, today, I no,
I did something that looked like I deliberately took a
souvenir from a child. It wasn't my intention, but that
doesn't change the fact that I hurt the boy and
disappointed the fans. The cap was given to the boy,
(28:34):
and an apology is due to the family. I hope
that I have at least partially repaired the harm, he says.
He starts out his apology. To me, it's a non
apology because he still says I didn't know. I didn't
realize it dude, he was in his hand. He stole
it from a child and thought that it wouldn't be
caught in this age of social media. He says, I
made a grave mistake in the midst of my emotion
(28:56):
amidst the crowd celebration after the victory, I was convinced
that the tennis player was asking the.
Speaker 1 (29:00):
Cap to me.
Speaker 6 (29:02):
Holy gosh, it's the kids possession.
Speaker 4 (29:06):
I thought he was passing it to me for my sons,
who had previously asked for autograph. This mistaken belief caused
me to instinctively reach out. Dude is lying, period, in
my opinion, So do you believe this guy, especially if
you've seen the video? Do you believe this guy that
grabbed the head out of the kid's hand at the
US Open and got busted? He goes on and hit
(29:30):
the talkback button. By the way, on the iheartstream, Just
go to the iheartstream, clip the microphone icon, go to town.
You tell me if you believe this guy, he says.
For years, my wife and I have been involved in
helping children and young athletes, but this situation has shown
me the one moment of an action excuse me, inattention
can under years of work and support. This is a
painful but necessary lesson in humility for me. Therefore, I
(29:54):
will be even more But wait, there's more. I will
be even more actively involved in initiatives supporting children and
young people and actions against violence and hates. I believe
that only through actions I can rebuild lost trust. Okay,
to me, this guy is groveling, He's nailed, he's peeped
off everybody. I'm sure in Poland, especially because the tennis
(30:16):
player that won in the US Open that competition is
from Poland. This guy is from Poland, and that poor
kid's the victim. So I believe this man is getting
totally the way to the world on him. And you know,
for the most part rightfully so. And that is not
an apology to me, a full admission is I grabbed it.
I thought I could not get caught. I'm sorry me
(30:36):
a couple hundred percent that would be more respectable. Chime
in on that talkback button on the iheartstream, cook the
micropron icon, and I'd love to hear from you if
you think this guy, if you believe this guy, because
I certainly don't. Coming up next, we have the top
five the top five stories of the day. You do
not want to see this, including with audio from Rosie
(30:58):
o donut apologizing after falsely claiming the church shooter of
Minneapolis was Maga. Oh my gosh, ah, that's next. This
is Chris Rock and from Michael del Geno. He's back Monday.
Speaker 1 (31:10):
It's your Morning Show with Michael del Jarno. This is
your Morning Show. It's Chris Crock feeling for Michael.
Speaker 4 (31:18):
All right, we have the top five stories of the day.
Speaker 1 (31:27):
Wet roll rastro. I'm sure you caught this.
Speaker 4 (31:30):
Rosie o'donnah apologizing after falsely claiming Minneapolis church shooter was
Republican and Maga, let's play that cut number eight where
she says, yes, it's a Trump, white supremacist at the
Minneapolis shooting of the church with those four children.
Speaker 12 (31:48):
So about the Minnesota shooting, and it brought me right
back to Columbine in nineteen ninety nine when I just.
Speaker 5 (31:57):
Could not get it through my head.
Speaker 12 (32:00):
That students in America were shooting each other in schools
and this was a church inside a Catholic school. And
what do you know was a white guy, Republican? Maga person,
what do you know? White supremacist?
Speaker 4 (32:24):
She didn't read the sick and even satanic stuff written
on the guns, including wine to kill our president.
Speaker 1 (32:33):
So wow was she way way? She called him a guy.
Speaker 4 (32:37):
By the way too, I'm sure she's as a as
a as a very left leftist type person. She attacked
a guy who the media is calling a woman even
though he's a bilochical mail Let's hear her mea kopa.
Speaker 12 (32:50):
Hi, everybody, it's Rosio o'jonald Star of the Flintstones.
Speaker 9 (32:55):
Can you posit?
Speaker 4 (32:55):
Can you posit? Star of the Flintstones? When did that
movie come out? A broducer Jeff like twenty five years
ago and.
Speaker 1 (33:03):
Had to be so Star of the Flintstones? Well, man,
have the people you're talking to haven't even been born?
Speaker 12 (33:08):
Go ahead, sir, Hi, everybody, it's Rosie O'Donnell, Star of
the Flintstones. Listen a coll sar. I know happens, get
run down, you know?
Speaker 5 (33:20):
Anyway?
Speaker 12 (33:21):
I know a lot of you were very upset about
the video I made before I went away for a
few days. I didn't go online and haven't seen them
till today.
Speaker 1 (33:31):
But you are right.
Speaker 12 (33:32):
I did not do my due diligence before I made
that emotional statement, and I said things about the shooter
that were incorrect. I assumed, like most shooters, they followed
a standard mo O and had standard you know, feelings
of you know, uh nra love and kind of gun people. Anyway,
(33:54):
the truth is I messed up, and when you mess up,
you fess up.
Speaker 5 (33:57):
I'm sorry.
Speaker 12 (33:59):
This is my apolog ji Vedo video and I.
Speaker 1 (34:02):
Hope it's enough.
Speaker 4 (34:04):
Emo's show. She said she's got a cold sore. You
know what, that's the sign of guilt.
Speaker 1 (34:09):
Ah.
Speaker 4 (34:11):
Okay, maybe not standard mo No, we have the transgender
terrorist shooter doing the same thing at a church she
went to, at school she went to, and intentionally doing
as many murdering of children as she could, which also
was demonic in my opinion, unequivocally. So no, Rosie, No, no,
(34:32):
no no. Another person who's leaving Another story from today's
Top five, actress Robin Wright, who was in Forrest Gump.
She was Jena, I Love you Jedi in House of
card Star. She's leaving because it's liberating to going to
the UK and America is an S word show.
Speaker 1 (34:50):
Wow, Okay, what else do we have?
Speaker 4 (34:52):
Trump naming Rudy Giuliani the first Medal of Freedom recipient
of his second term for his great job as a
New York City mayor. Where I'm sitting in New York
City right now. I met him when he was the mayor,
and I agree, and I'm glad he's getting that. Meanwhile,
Trump says he's putting up a portrait of Joe Biden's
auto pen at the White House Road Rose Garden patio.
(35:13):
It's going to be up in two weeks. It's going
to be it's all being prepared. You have Trump first term,
then the auto pen and Trump's second term frame all
that next to each other.
Speaker 1 (35:22):
I think that's hysterical. And lastly, the White.
Speaker 4 (35:25):
House exposing two CDC resignations that just occurred under RFK Junior.
They both donated, according to this report from journalist Eric Dherty,
thousands of dollars to Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Stacy Abrams,
Barack Obama, Elizabeth Warren, and Raphael Warnock.
Speaker 1 (35:40):
Well maybe they had an agenda. You think we're all
in this together. This is your Morning Show with Michael
Vindheld Joano
Hi, it's Michael.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
Your morning show can be heard on great radio stations
across the country like News Talk ninety two point one
and six hundred WREC in Memphis, Tennessee, or thirteen hundred
The Patriot in Tulsa, our Talk six to fifty KSTE
in Sacramento, California. We invite you to listen live while
you're getting ready in the morning, to take us along
for the drive to work. But as we always say,
better late than never. Thanks for joining us for the podcast.
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Starting your morning off right.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
A new way of talk, a new way of understanding,
because we're in this together.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
This is your morning show with Michael O'Dell Charman across America.
Speaker 4 (00:39):
This is your morning show with Buncle del Jorno from
Sacramento in Dallas to Tampa and DC with Cleve Acron,
a grin Cleve Akron and Memphis in between.
Speaker 1 (00:50):
This is your morning show.
Speaker 5 (00:53):
Hey.
Speaker 1 (00:53):
We get to chime in with.
Speaker 4 (00:56):
In just a moment, our national correspondent Rory O'Neil kicking
back and Sessions starting today. There's so many things on
their play. We'll talk to Rory in just a second,
and then Rocanna, Thomas Massey and congress a Democrat Republican respectively,
have said they're going to be doing a big, big
press conference with the Epstein victims some of them, and
(01:17):
some of the Epstein victims already lashing out publicly at
the Trump administration. They're demanding more release of more files.
I have a lot to talk about with you on that,
and I can't wait for your talkbacks on that as
well anything we talked about this morning. Joined the conversation
by using that talkback button on your iheartstream, clicked the
microphone icon. Rory O'Neill, our national correspondent on Congress return, Rory,
(01:43):
thanks for joining us this morning, sir.
Speaker 5 (01:45):
Sure Chris, happy September.
Speaker 4 (01:47):
Woo here it is. We're in it, Barby and to
win it. So we have all sorts of stuff going
on for Congress. They returned today after a month away.
The most important thing is is it the spending with
the effective Congress will run on our money here shortly
well right.
Speaker 6 (02:06):
The fiscal year, as it always does, ends at the
end of September, so we hit the start button on
that countdown clock to a government shutdown. And of course,
Republicans holding such a slim majority in both the House
and the Senate and Congressman Massy out there among the
Republicans who are loathed to vote in favor of any
(02:27):
continuing resolution could push us further to a government shutdown.
Democrats getting a bit more organized and frustrated after the
White House did that recision package.
Speaker 5 (02:37):
Remember they went.
Speaker 6 (02:38):
Back and pulled out nine billion dollars in spending and
President Trump just tried to pull a pocket recision of
another five billion.
Speaker 5 (02:45):
So a lot of Democrats are feeling.
Speaker 6 (02:47):
Burned, saying, well, why I agree with anything if all
they're going to do is do a pocket recision later on.
Speaker 4 (02:51):
So I'm seeing that the stopgap spending will probably be
what they do to avert the October first deadline. So
what do you if that happened, How likely will it
be to go through? And how long will that take
us through to avoid a shut down?
Speaker 5 (03:06):
Right?
Speaker 6 (03:06):
Well, those are two of the sticking points, right, So
there's not enough time to go through each of the
major spending bills, which they should do, and a lot
of Congress already feels like, hey, we got the one big,
beautiful bill. The White House feels the same way as well,
that their top legislative priorities were already wrapped up into that.
Speaker 5 (03:22):
So if they can just continue with.
Speaker 6 (03:24):
Where we have been with spending, they'd be mostly happy
with that. So we'll see that how long they want
to kick that can down the road. Is it to
the end of the year, do they want to go
to February something like that. So it's a bit of
a wait and see. And these are the negotiations that
are really getting underway in earnest right now is I
think when you take out the week for Rasashana, they've
(03:44):
got twenty two days working days ahead of them.
Speaker 4 (03:47):
We have a two week deadline on Russia and Ukraine.
What's that looking there right now? It looks like Trump
might need to bring the hammer down on Putin because
nothing seems to be moving in the right direction there.
Speaker 6 (03:57):
Right where two plus suiteps out from that meeting in
a last and things actually seem to be worse in
Ukraine with Russia launching some of its largest attacks just
last week, with what six hundred drone strikes in one
of those attacks, So that seems to be going backwards
issues about providing more funding to Israel, and as it
relates to weaponry for their battle with Hamas, that's also
(04:18):
something up there Plus you've got the Trump administration wants
two billion dollars to beautify Washington, DC. Budget hawks won't
really be thrilled with that. And then funding all these
ice and military operations to take out and remove people
who are in the country illegally.
Speaker 5 (04:34):
Something else that is a bit of an issue.
Speaker 4 (04:37):
And rory lasting on the docket that Congress has dead
lands coming up in the Trump administration, I should say,
is that Supreme Court battle over tariffs. High Court likely
to take up the case as early as autumn. They
might see hear it, but they're not going to get
a result probably to the end of the year. Do
you think where do you see that playing How do
you see that playing out? Do you think that maybe
(04:59):
they might court might put a stay on it through
until their decision.
Speaker 6 (05:03):
Yeah, that's a possibility that's floating around again. The Trump
administration's tariff plans got slapped down by another court last
week Friday. The President said though that look, you know,
while this is being appealed, the tariffs remain in place.
Speaker 5 (05:18):
Essentially, the Justice is saying he didn't.
Speaker 6 (05:20):
Make his argument for this being under emergency authority, that
these tariffs normally are something that Congress would deal with.
But so far Congress has had a hands off approach
to this thing, sort of seeding their power to the
White House.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
Interestingly, and so the state.
Speaker 4 (05:35):
When I refer to a stay, I mean the decision
that the US Federal Appeals Court, the Enbank of Full Panel.
The reason why they they've stayed their decisions saying the
tariffs is striking them down. So they're in effect still,
as you know, about six more weeks. And so you
think I'm hoping, and I think most of us are
hoping that the Federal the U Supreme Court, when they
(05:56):
hear it, are going to keep it's a stay, so
the teriff negotiations he's done, what's in place that will
continue to.
Speaker 1 (06:03):
Roll until the Supreme Court does a decision.
Speaker 4 (06:06):
Do you think that's going to take place through the
decision by the Supreme Court?
Speaker 5 (06:10):
Yeah, I don't.
Speaker 6 (06:11):
I'm hard pressed to think that would happen. But you know, look,
this is obviously a court that's favorable to the President.
So perhaps and maybe it gives them time to get
that elusive deal with China and some other big players
out here.
Speaker 4 (06:23):
Right, Rory, thank you very much. We talked to later
in the show. Roy O'Neil our National Course Pond. Thanks
appreciate you very much. Okay, So Rocana and Thomas Massey
holding a joint press conference with Epstein victims. Quote, people
are going to be outraged. Let's play cut number four
from Rocana.
Speaker 1 (06:41):
Here he is.
Speaker 3 (06:42):
We've got two hundred and twelve Democrats and twelve Republicans,
including Marjorie Tayler Green Lauren Bubbert. Look, this is not
about Donald Trump, and it's not partisan. This is about
justice for the victims of rich and powerful men who.
Speaker 5 (06:57):
Abused underage girls.
Speaker 3 (06:59):
And ten of these victims are speaking out for the
first time at a press conference that Massey and I
are organizing on the steps of the Capitol on September third.
In this country, people want transparency, they want accountability. I'm
confident we're going to get the two hundred and eighteen
votes for the discharge petition. I'll talk about that news
conference because you're kind of touting it that it's going
to be, if not explosive, there's going to be some newsmade. Well,
(07:22):
these victims haven't spoken for decades. When Epstein got that
lenient plea deal, no one talked to the victims or
their lawyers. No one talked to the victims of their
lawyers when Maxwell was sentenced.
Speaker 5 (07:33):
No one has ever heard what do they want?
Speaker 3 (07:35):
And my belief is when the American people actually hear
the victims for the first time, they are going to sympathize.
Their hearts are going to be broken. And all the
victims are saying is for closure. We need the Epstein
files release that there are a lot of other rich,
powerful men, politicians, business leaders who have committed abuse and
(07:57):
who have not been held accountable. That's what we're going
to hear on September third, and people are going to
be outraged. And I don't see how after that the
House can't vote for the release of these files.
Speaker 1 (08:07):
Here's the thing.
Speaker 4 (08:08):
The idea there's gonna be something damning on President Trump,
to me is a complete and total lie.
Speaker 1 (08:13):
That's not gonna happen. There's no way Joseph R.
Speaker 4 (08:17):
Biden and his dj would have held anything back for
four years if they had anything on Trump knowing he
was going to run again.
Speaker 1 (08:24):
There's no way.
Speaker 4 (08:25):
Second of all, the same thing for the former Obama administration.
They I mean, they are a stand accused and I
believe fully as the Trump DOJ and intelligence officials have said,
there's horrible things the FBI. Well, we know the FBI
colluded in the Department of Justice and the Intelligence agency
colluded with Barack Obama at his behest and redid a
(08:49):
whole assessment on Russia to make it look like Trump
was colluding with Russia. All those warrants and tapping of
phones and spy there was nothing there.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
It was all fake.
Speaker 4 (08:58):
So do you honestly think the obamadministration wouldn't have used Epstein'
stuff against Trump?
Speaker 1 (09:02):
Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? There's no way.
Speaker 4 (09:05):
So this idea Trump is bat The Democrats, I think,
are making themselves look like fools. And you know, in
the end, it might be something that comes out where
you know, overall, I don't know if it's going to
necessarily hit a politician.
Speaker 1 (09:18):
It might, and I hope it does.
Speaker 4 (09:19):
If it does, if it's people implicated, let them be implicated.
But you might end up seeing it might be a
slight more hit on the Dems versus the Republicans. With
what comes out, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (09:30):
Let me hear. Let's hear a cut number five.
Speaker 4 (09:32):
This is a Epstein one of the Epstein victims, who
says the Republicans need courage.
Speaker 1 (09:37):
Listen to this.
Speaker 5 (09:38):
I think what we're looking.
Speaker 7 (09:39):
For with all of these meetings is courage on the
part of Republican representatives because this is most importantly a
bipartisan issue. This is not something that anyone, anyone on
any side of the aisle should be four should before
(10:01):
child sex trafficking and allowing perpetrators to escape justice, and
no one should before systems failing to prosecute over decades.
Speaker 4 (10:12):
So here's the thing. She says, Republicans need courage. Now, look,
I'm not recovering anything up. The reason why so much
stuff is so redacted is because there are so many
victims and people mentioned here that listen closely, that have
not been implicated or not been accused of anything wrong,
but their names are popping up.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
That is a problem.
Speaker 4 (10:34):
If nobody's been convicted, that there's no accusations against people
that are in these documents. I mean, look, if anybody
it's a massive politician and this implicated looks bad of
this to me, it's Bill Clinton. I mean there's a
picture of him being given a massage by one of
these underaged Epstein minor victims. He also was flown a
whole bunch of times. I think twenty three times or
(10:54):
more on the low lead that expressed, and I believe
I cannot recall specifically, but I think he may have
actually flown to some of these locations from what I've seen,
But I could be off on that, but I know
he looks the worst out of all of them, along
with Prince Andrew, looks absolutely destroyed his reputation, and rightfully so,
(11:14):
I'm not against this. I don't think it's some kind
of a bipartisan thing. Second of all, you want the
client list. What's been needed is that I'm not attacking
the victims. Do not hear what I'm not saying, because
they are total victims. There were children being sex trafficked.
They're victims through and through. Okay, now they're adult victims
from the childhood trauma that was put on them as
an innocent child. But the only way to get the
(11:36):
victim list is through the victims themselves.
Speaker 1 (11:39):
I'm sorry. The client list is through the victims to say.
Speaker 4 (11:43):
This man, this man, this man, this man, this man,
and look, they can do that, and that could have
been done a long time ago. But they decided, and
I'm not attacking them in their time. There now some
of them coming out like that one victim right there
who you just heard from, and there's going to be
up to ten more joining Rocanna and Thomas Massey in
a press conference. Of course, Massi's a Republican from Kentucky,
(12:05):
very conservative. So the victims are the key to sharing
who and what, and I support this, but they have
not come out other than one or two over the years.
They are now so that's where the client list is.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
They know it.
Speaker 4 (12:23):
And because there's no list specifically, so I don't think
they're gonna there's anything political behind this. And I welcome sharing,
but I think you're gonna keep getting surprised of how
little is there. But the stories being shared are great,
they're powerful. We need to hear them. I have no
problem with that. But I want you to chime in
right now. Do you think there's something there? Do you
(12:46):
think that anybody's really covering anything up on this? Do
you think we're gonna find anything terribly new in all this?
Chim in right now, join the conversation. Use that talkbag
button on your iheartstream, click the microphone icon, and just
go to town.
Speaker 1 (12:58):
We'd love to hear from you.
Speaker 4 (13:00):
I want to do a little bit more on this
with some specifics on the survivors upset about what the
DJ did meeting with what's named Glady Maxwell in prison.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
You're damned if you do. You're damned if you don't.
Speaker 4 (13:13):
Also, the most infamous man stealing a hat appear, it
appears to me stealing a hat from a child at
the US open. That case has blown open. The man
that you've seen on social media allegedly stealing the cap
from the little boy has come forward. He's being attacked
all of this nation and all of the world on
(13:33):
social media. If you haven't seen this, just go to
my Twitter feed at Chris Crockshow. That's at Chris Crockshow,
chrsk okay and scroll down a little bit.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
You'll see it and you'll know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 4 (13:43):
Do not miss what that man who's now been implicated
in doing it, he's come forward and doing me a
couple what he has said. This is Chris crock And
from Michael Delsaro. This is your morning show.
Speaker 1 (13:55):
This is your morning show with Michael del Chrono. This
is your morning show. Join our conversation.
Speaker 4 (14:02):
Hit that talkback button on your heart stream cliped the
Michael bon go to town like Blaine did at Kasi.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
This Ebstein thing.
Speaker 8 (14:10):
They're trying to beat Trump with it, and it's not
gonna work. Rocan is a fraud, and the goofy guy
from Kentucky is not really a republic and he might
as well be a Democrat. He's just a joke MASSI.
He's trying to stir up crap and he actually costs
the party a lot more than it's worth. And I
don't know who he's standing out for it all. And
the I've seen people got paid five hundred million dollars,
(14:31):
So you know this thing's over.
Speaker 4 (14:32):
Actually, well it's not over if there's more new information.
And the women have not spoke. The victims have not
spoken out much, most of them they are now, which
I have no problem with, but I think and here
they're also upset, some of these victims that are not
speaking out, or that we'll be speaking out of the
press conference with Rocann and Thomas Massy, I think of
a day or two Wednesday. I believe they are upset
(14:56):
that the DJ's number two official attorney, Deputy Attorney General
Todd Blanche held multiple private interviews with Glen Maxwell for
publicly releasing the charge Sex sex traffickers testimony one of
the victims that I feel pretty gutted. It entirely is
devastating to the entire survivor community.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
Look, you're damned if you do. If you damned if
you don't release the files. We release what we have.
Don't release the files. You're hiding it.
Speaker 4 (15:25):
Go work with the one surviving person has been convicted
with Epstein, who was in a factor of PIV.
Speaker 1 (15:31):
How dare you?
Speaker 4 (15:33):
This is why the Trump administration literally said they had
all the stuff, they're going to release it all before
they knew exactly what was in there.
Speaker 1 (15:40):
They set themselves up for this whole situation. The Democrats
know that there's nothing there against Trump.
Speaker 4 (15:45):
If there was, they would have been released under Bidener
or Obama.
Speaker 1 (15:48):
So they're playing a game.
Speaker 4 (15:50):
So now Trump has to do the best he can
to release everything and in fact, yes, force it, release it.
I think you're still going to be pod watch all
that unfold. Let's hear from w LAC in Nashville, one
of our listeners who doesn't.
Speaker 9 (16:02):
Want accountability from Epstein files. Everybody does, But how are
the victims going to get accountability when Epstein's already gone.
So unless there's enough information in all these files for
you to then press charges against whatever politician or powerful
businessmen or whatever, what's the point.
Speaker 4 (16:24):
You cannot please everyone. You cannot please everyone. We have
some great audio going back and forth on CNN with
one of their guests. We'll play that a little bit
later in the eight o'clock hour of the show Eastern
aka seven in Central. Coming up next, we're going to
(16:45):
check in with two folks or two things.
Speaker 1 (16:47):
We're going to talk to.
Speaker 4 (16:48):
John Decker, our White House correspondent and attorney on the
Trump tariffs and the appeals court saying no no, no,
no no.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
And a tennis fan who.
Speaker 4 (16:58):
Appears to have stolen the half of a child, and
now issues of me a couple because people like you
and me saw this.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
And are outraged. I'm executive chef George Harvel.
Speaker 10 (17:10):
My Morning Show is Your Morning Show with Michael Dojorno.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
Hi, it's Michael.
Speaker 2 (17:19):
Your Morning Show airs live five to eight am Central,
six to nine Eastern in great cities like Memphis, Tennessee,
tell USA, Oklahoma, Sacramento, California. We'd love to be a
part of your morning routine. So we're happier here now
enjoyed the podcast.
Speaker 4 (17:32):
In just a moment, we'll talk to John Decker, our
national correspondent, our White House correspondent, and an attorney who
can talk about the tariffs. Trump had a ruling Friday,
late Friday from the federal US Federal Court of Appeals,
a panel I think seven to four smacking down Trump's terriff,
but they stay in place for now. I think about
(17:55):
six weeks left, and this is going to be interesting.
I'm gonna get in since since John Deck and only
White House corresponded, okay, good, but god him he's also
an attorney, John Decker joining us right now, Hawaii, You.
Speaker 1 (18:07):
Sir, I'm doing great.
Speaker 5 (18:09):
Are you doing today?
Speaker 1 (18:10):
Good?
Speaker 4 (18:10):
I didn't know you're in an attorney at law while
you're an attorney.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
That's pretty cool, kind of fancy.
Speaker 11 (18:18):
Okay.
Speaker 5 (18:19):
Yeah. I'm a member of the.
Speaker 10 (18:20):
Supreme Court bar so I love to talk about legal
issues as well as talking about what's happening at the
White House, and sometimes the two issues intersect, and that
certainly is the case as it relates to a major
legal challenge that could upend the president's.
Speaker 11 (18:36):
Legislative and economic.
Speaker 10 (18:38):
Agenda for the remainder of his second term, and that's
the tariffs policy that he's implemented. A federal appeals court
late Friday essentially.
Speaker 11 (18:46):
Struck down those reciprocal terriffs.
Speaker 10 (18:48):
That the president has imposed, and now it will likely
be up.
Speaker 11 (18:52):
To the US Supreme Court to.
Speaker 10 (18:53):
Decide whether President Trump backed it constitutionally when he imposed
those reciprocal terrofts.
Speaker 4 (19:00):
So there's a six week stay on the ruling. In
other words, Trump could tear to stay in place for
at least six weeks. The Supreme Court is most likely
going to hear it and perhaps this fault, but they're
not going to be able to rule give a rule
until what like January February or something of that nature
at the earliest.
Speaker 1 (19:19):
You can about to say that.
Speaker 11 (19:21):
I would not say that.
Speaker 5 (19:22):
We've seen the Supreme Court act very quickly.
Speaker 10 (19:24):
Sometimes within literally a month's time as it relates to
issues related to President Trump and the Trump administration. You
may recall last February, the Supreme Court ruled very quickly
on the issue of whether President Trump's name Donald Trump's
name could appear on the ballot in Colorado. They turned
around that decision in just a month's time. So the
(19:47):
Supreme Court has shown that it can act quickly, and
perhaps the lact quickly in this particular case.
Speaker 4 (19:53):
Now, the other thing is in between the time when
the Supreme Court here is that if they decide to
hear it, do you do you think they'll probably do
a issuous stay as well, regardless saying its stays in
policy until we make our decision.
Speaker 11 (20:09):
Never predict what the Supreme Court may or may not do.
Speaker 10 (20:13):
I don't do so until I hear oral arguments that
have been presented to the US Supreme Court, and typically
in the Supreme Court when those are oral arguments take place.
Speaker 5 (20:24):
So we'll see what happens.
Speaker 10 (20:25):
Ultimately, likely in the next few weeks, do we expect
an appeal being filed by the Trump administration? And I
certainly expect the Supreme Court to take this matter up.
Speaker 4 (20:35):
And the other thing, John, it's important for folks that
might want to know, hey, to the tariffs that have
already been negotiated, that's not going to be changed.
Speaker 5 (20:44):
Right, Well, we'll see.
Speaker 9 (20:46):
You know.
Speaker 10 (20:47):
I always thought that for many countries around the world
that did not negotiate a trade deal with the President,
I always felt maybe they're going to wait and see
what happens in the federal courts to see how this
all plays out. Be forced striking any kind of trade
deal with the United States. Obviously that wasn't the case
for the European Union, it wasn't the case for the
(21:10):
United Kingdom, and for other countries around the world that
decided to cut trade deals with the US over the
course of the last few weeks.
Speaker 4 (21:18):
What I should have rephrased it by saying is the ones,
the deals that are already been made, won't be struck down.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
They're going to stay. That's what I meant to say.
Speaker 10 (21:26):
Right I would think so, I would think they would stay,
but we'll have to wait and see. For many of
the deals, they are just contours of deals, frameworks of deals.
So they're not the kind of deals that take care
of all of the ancillary issues related to trade policy.
That's something that takes a lot of time to put together.
Speaker 5 (21:47):
In fact, the US.
Speaker 10 (21:49):
Mexico Canada Trade Agreement took one full year to put
that agreement together from start to finish. So that was
what I mean when I say it's not a full deal,
but rather a framework of a deal.
Speaker 4 (22:00):
Right now, Jonathan Adler wrote in the Wall Street Journal
of the Week on a professor at William and Mary
Law School talks about the Major Questions doctrine, which I
know you know, but it means policies addressing questions of
vast economic and political significance require clear authorization from Congress. However,
he says that there could be a decision in Trump's
favored by the Supreme Court because of this, I'll share
(22:22):
with the real fast and I want your reaction as
a counselor attorney at law, but also White House correspondent.
The whole point, he writes, of enacting statutes like AIPA,
which is what their Trump administration says, gives him the
authority to have these powers for tariffs. The whole point
of it is to address emergencies when they arise. He writes,
(22:45):
The courts have rarely felt competent to second guest the
executive branch's national security determinations presidential powers at its zenith
in matters of national security and foreign affairs, It's understandable
Congress may delegate broad authority in such context other than
domestic affairs. He cites a few Supreme Court decisions Curtis
Wright Export Corp. Against the US Congress must often accord
(23:09):
the President a degree of discretion and freedom from statutory restriction,
which would not be admissible where domestic affairs are allowed.
FCC versus consumers research the consumer research.
Speaker 1 (23:19):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (23:20):
In twenty twenty five, Justice Kavanaugh said the Major Questions
Canon has not been applied by this Court and the
national security or foreign policy contexts because it doesn't reflect
ordinary Congressional intent in those areas. Rather, the usual understanding
is that Congress intends to give the president substantial authority
and flexibility to protect American and the America and the
American people, and that Congress specifies limits on the president
(23:42):
when it wants to restrict presidential powers and those national
security and foreign policy domains.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
What are your thoughts on that commentary?
Speaker 10 (23:50):
Well, you've read a lot regarding an opinion of one
particular professor. I'd love to weigh in on all of that,
but unfortunately I don't have the time to do so
right now, so we'll have to pick up all right.
Speaker 4 (24:03):
That's right, Thank you very much, sir. We'll pick it
up tomorrow. Yeah, and I'll just share my thoughts, Thank
you very much.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
John.
Speaker 4 (24:09):
Basically, he says that this is quite possibly.
Speaker 1 (24:16):
Because of foreign policy.
Speaker 4 (24:18):
Because of national security and foreign policy, those issues are
given more wider latitude and the court is very long.
They don't want to step in when it comes to
national foreign policy and national security because that the president
has broad authority on that and Congress hasn't been specific
in mentioning this area.
Speaker 1 (24:40):
So that's where he says there's an opening.
Speaker 4 (24:42):
So really, what he's saying is this is not Major
Questions doctrine in my opinion, because it involves foreign policy
and possibly national security, and that the president has wide
powers that we are loath to get involved in. So
it could go that way. Not I guaranteed could go.
I didn't realize John had a shorter time on that part,
(25:04):
otherwise I would have not read all that. I apologized
for that, but we're grateful for him joining us. All right,
So look, have you seen the video of this poor
kid at the US Open And you see I don't
know this This US Open player's Polish. There's no and
I'm a pull off from Chicago. There's three million Poles
(25:24):
in the city of Chicago, the only city that has
more Polish people in it. This is not an exaggeration.
There's only one city in the world that has more
polls than Chicago, and that's Warsaw, which is, you know,
the largest city in Poland. So all the other cities
in Poland don't have as many poles as Chicago does. Okay,
that's why I'm born and raised Chicago. Polock if you will.
But so, but I can't pronounce this guy's name. But
(25:47):
this US Open player was autographing stuff after he had
an amazing victory and he's going down the line.
Speaker 1 (25:55):
He took his hat off, signed it, and then handed
it to a child.
Speaker 4 (26:00):
The child was excited for a split second, and then
break next to him. A man snatches the hat out
of the kid's hand and stuffs it, gives it to us,
goes to his wife on the other side, and stuffs
it in the bag that she's holding, and then goes
on that poor kid was robbed. And I thought I
(26:20):
was trying to give deference to this. I thought that
the I thought that the man may have been the
kid's dad, as in saying, grab the hat, stuff it, kid,
We're gonna make sure nobody else grabs it.
Speaker 1 (26:33):
No, he didn't know the kid.
Speaker 4 (26:37):
He grabbed it out of the child's hand. It was
clearly in the custody of the child for one or
one second or something of that nature, and.
Speaker 1 (26:44):
The guy just grabbed it.
Speaker 4 (26:45):
It's unbelievable. If you haven't seen it, go to my
Twitter feed at Chris croc Show. That's at Chris Crocs Show.
C hrisk Okay, gut us go down a little bit,
but you'll see it. And it is absolutely outrageous. So
the world saw this, people like you and me, and
I mean the Internet goes epoplectic when they see something
(27:06):
like this, including people that are doing things in appropriate.
Speaker 1 (27:09):
So this went nuts. This guy got just slammed.
Speaker 4 (27:12):
People dosed him, meaning they found out who he is,
what his name is, where he lives, that he owns
a business with a paving He's a Polish paving company.
So the weight of the world on social media attacking
this man brought him to heal, brought him to his knees.
He apologized, by the way the US Open player, uh,
(27:36):
it's tennis start Camille man, I'm not gonna be able.
Speaker 1 (27:39):
To pronounce thatak.
Speaker 4 (27:42):
And he ended up meeting with the boy and giving
him a whole bag of merchandise and signing stuff.
Speaker 1 (27:49):
And taking pictures of him that was on social media.
Speaker 4 (27:51):
So the tennis player when this blew up, he found
out about it, took care of that little boy. But
this guy, this Polish guy, he has issued a massive
mea culpa, an apology, but to me, it's a fake apology.
He still pretends like he didn't realize he grabbed it
out of the child's hands, stole it from a child. Dude,
this guy got caught one hundred percent. You chime in
(28:12):
if you've seen this video and you tell me, do
you believe this guy who's now issuing a groveling apology
but claims he still didn't know. He says, today, I no,
I did something that looked like I deliberately took a
souvenir from a child. It wasn't my intention, but that
doesn't change the fact that I hurt the boy and
disappointed the fans. The cap was given to the boy,
(28:34):
and an apology is due to the family. I hope
that I have at least partially repaired the harm, he says.
He starts out his apology. To me, it's a non
apology because he still says I didn't know. I didn't
realize it dude, he was in his hand. He stole
it from a child and thought that it wouldn't be
caught in this age of social media. He says, I
made a grave mistake in the midst of my emotion
(28:56):
amidst the crowd celebration after the victory, I was convinced
that the tennis player was asking the.
Speaker 1 (29:00):
Cap to me.
Speaker 6 (29:02):
Holy gosh, it's the kids possession.
Speaker 4 (29:06):
I thought he was passing it to me for my sons,
who had previously asked for autograph. This mistaken belief caused
me to instinctively reach out. Dude is lying, period, in
my opinion, So do you believe this guy, especially if
you've seen the video? Do you believe this guy that
grabbed the head out of the kid's hand at the
US Open and got busted? He goes on and hit
(29:30):
the talkback button. By the way, on the iheartstream, Just
go to the iheartstream, clip the microphone icon, go to town.
You tell me if you believe this guy, he says.
For years, my wife and I have been involved in
helping children and young athletes, but this situation has shown
me the one moment of an action excuse me, inattention
can under years of work and support. This is a
painful but necessary lesson in humility for me. Therefore, I
(29:54):
will be even more But wait, there's more. I will
be even more actively involved in initiatives supporting children and
young people and actions against violence and hates. I believe
that only through actions I can rebuild lost trust. Okay,
to me, this guy is groveling, He's nailed, he's peeped
off everybody. I'm sure in Poland, especially because the tennis
(30:16):
player that won in the US Open that competition is
from Poland. This guy is from Poland, and that poor
kid's the victim. So I believe this man is getting
totally the way to the world on him. And you know,
for the most part rightfully so. And that is not
an apology to me, a full admission is I grabbed it.
I thought I could not get caught. I'm sorry me
(30:36):
a couple hundred percent that would be more respectable. Chime
in on that talkback button on the iheartstream, cook the
micropron icon, and I'd love to hear from you if
you think this guy, if you believe this guy, because
I certainly don't. Coming up next, we have the top
five the top five stories of the day. You do
not want to see this, including with audio from Rosie
(30:58):
o donut apologizing after falsely claiming the church shooter of
Minneapolis was Maga. Oh my gosh, ah, that's next. This
is Chris Rock and from Michael del Geno. He's back Monday.
Speaker 1 (31:10):
It's your Morning Show with Michael del Jarno. This is
your Morning Show. It's Chris Crock feeling for Michael.
Speaker 4 (31:18):
All right, we have the top five stories of the day.
Speaker 1 (31:27):
Wet roll rastro. I'm sure you caught this.
Speaker 4 (31:30):
Rosie o'donnah apologizing after falsely claiming Minneapolis church shooter was
Republican and Maga, let's play that cut number eight where
she says, yes, it's a Trump, white supremacist at the
Minneapolis shooting of the church with those four children.
Speaker 12 (31:48):
So about the Minnesota shooting, and it brought me right
back to Columbine in nineteen ninety nine when I just.
Speaker 5 (31:57):
Could not get it through my head.
Speaker 12 (32:00):
That students in America were shooting each other in schools
and this was a church inside a Catholic school. And
what do you know was a white guy, Republican? Maga person,
what do you know? White supremacist?
Speaker 4 (32:24):
She didn't read the sick and even satanic stuff written
on the guns, including wine to kill our president.
Speaker 1 (32:33):
So wow was she way way? She called him a guy.
Speaker 4 (32:37):
By the way too, I'm sure she's as a as
a as a very left leftist type person. She attacked
a guy who the media is calling a woman even
though he's a bilochical mail Let's hear her mea kopa.
Speaker 12 (32:50):
Hi, everybody, it's Rosio o'jonald Star of the Flintstones.
Speaker 9 (32:55):
Can you posit?
Speaker 4 (32:55):
Can you posit? Star of the Flintstones? When did that
movie come out? A broducer Jeff like twenty five years
ago and.
Speaker 1 (33:03):
Had to be so Star of the Flintstones? Well, man,
have the people you're talking to haven't even been born?
Speaker 12 (33:08):
Go ahead, sir, Hi, everybody, it's Rosie O'Donnell, Star of
the Flintstones. Listen a coll sar. I know happens, get
run down, you know?
Speaker 5 (33:20):
Anyway?
Speaker 12 (33:21):
I know a lot of you were very upset about
the video I made before I went away for a
few days. I didn't go online and haven't seen them
till today.
Speaker 1 (33:31):
But you are right.
Speaker 12 (33:32):
I did not do my due diligence before I made
that emotional statement, and I said things about the shooter
that were incorrect. I assumed, like most shooters, they followed
a standard mo O and had standard you know, feelings
of you know, uh nra love and kind of gun people. Anyway,
(33:54):
the truth is I messed up, and when you mess up,
you fess up.
Speaker 5 (33:57):
I'm sorry.
Speaker 12 (33:59):
This is my apolog ji Vedo video and I.
Speaker 1 (34:02):
Hope it's enough.
Speaker 4 (34:04):
Emo's show. She said she's got a cold sore. You
know what, that's the sign of guilt.
Speaker 1 (34:09):
Ah.
Speaker 4 (34:11):
Okay, maybe not standard mo No, we have the transgender
terrorist shooter doing the same thing at a church she
went to, at school she went to, and intentionally doing
as many murdering of children as she could, which also
was demonic in my opinion, unequivocally. So no, Rosie, No, no,
(34:32):
no no. Another person who's leaving Another story from today's
Top five, actress Robin Wright, who was in Forrest Gump.
She was Jena, I Love you Jedi in House of
card Star. She's leaving because it's liberating to going to
the UK and America is an S word show.
Speaker 1 (34:50):
Wow, Okay, what else do we have?
Speaker 4 (34:52):
Trump naming Rudy Giuliani the first Medal of Freedom recipient
of his second term for his great job as a
New York City mayor. Where I'm sitting in New York
City right now. I met him when he was the mayor,
and I agree, and I'm glad he's getting that. Meanwhile,
Trump says he's putting up a portrait of Joe Biden's
auto pen at the White House Road Rose Garden patio.
(35:13):
It's going to be up in two weeks. It's going
to be it's all being prepared. You have Trump first term,
then the auto pen and Trump's second term frame all
that next to each other.
Speaker 1 (35:22):
I think that's hysterical. And lastly, the White.
Speaker 4 (35:25):
House exposing two CDC resignations that just occurred under RFK Junior.
They both donated, according to this report from journalist Eric Dherty,
thousands of dollars to Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Stacy Abrams,
Barack Obama, Elizabeth Warren, and Raphael Warnock.
Speaker 1 (35:40):
Well maybe they had an agenda. You think we're all
in this together. This is your Morning Show with Michael
Vindheld Joano
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal
Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.