September 11, 2024 • 34 mins
How will the debate impact the polls?
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hi, It's Michael.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
Your morning show can be heard live on great radio
stations across the country like wilm and w DOV and
Wilmington and Dover, Delaware or wgst AM seven twenty the
voice in Middle Georgia.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
And we're going to need some blankets.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
News Radio six fifty k e NI, Anchorage, Alaska. We'd
love to be a part of your morning routine. Now
enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 3 (00:21):
Well two three, starting your morning off right. A new
way of talk, a new way of understanding, because we're
interest to give.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
This is your morning show with Michael, Bill Jordan, Horizon Shine,
Embrace the day.
Speaker 2 (00:41):
Welcome one and all to Wednesday, September the eleventh, twenty
third anniversary of nine to eleven Y're of our Lord
twenty twenty four. The anniversary is today, commemorating events in
New York City, Washington, d C. And in Shanksville. Francine
will make landfall in Louisiana as a hurricane. And a
(01:01):
lot of people talking about the debate last night, did
Kamala Harris perform well? While she prosecuted well? There was
no one there to hold her accountable and fact check her,
force her to answer. I mean, if you've ever been
a boat captain, you know sometimes due to conditions shallow
(01:23):
waters or rocks or this or that, you have to
be navigated carefully through. Captains of submarines know what that's like.
That's how ABC was pulling her through the land mines,
had the tough portions to aid her and then crucifying
Donald Trump on his eyes. So I've kind of paraphrased
it this way. She prosecuted the debate. Well, he poorly performed.
(01:48):
I loved the Dana Perina quote, which was he took
debait every time and he seized none of the opportunities.
That's kind of how it felt all night long. But
ABC was just graceful, absolutely disgraceful.
Speaker 1 (02:02):
All right.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
So here's what we've been up against. We had several
things planned for you. You know, normally we give you the
news on the quarter hours, if you will to use
a radio expression, we don't have access to that. I
had all the sound prepared, the highlights, the low lights.
However you would have perceived them what I thought were
key moments from the debate last night. That's gone my
(02:25):
studio and there's no explanation. So the equipment that we
use has never not worked, It's never done what it did.
I'm not an engineer, but since COVID I am when
it comes to my studio. I have no explanation for
why we couldn't get on the air from the home
studio other than you know, I believe in spiritual warfare,
(02:48):
and I know what we had planned today, and I
know why somebody wouldn't have wanted us to be on
the air. But we're here now and we have each
other and we can talk. Not that I need it,
but if you want to, I really am more interested
in what you think. I can't tell you how many
emails and text messages I got from people that didn't
(03:10):
even watch themselves and are wanting to know. I want
to share one with you, just to give you the
perspective of what I'm talking about, and this is more
common than not common. I'm not going to share the
name because I don't know if he wanted me to
(03:32):
Morning Michael. While life was going on last night, daughter
softball game, getting sun ready for bed, I tried to
listen in to the debate. I didn't catch all of it,
but from what I did catch, I doubt I missed
anything important. Maybe you caught something worthwhile that I missed
in real time. I had a disturbed feeling that I
(03:54):
couldn't quite place. But the title of my email kind
of captures it all. In a cunt of people absolutely
starving for true, genuine, thoughtful, selfless leadership, all we saw
last night were two contestants flippantly throwing around a bunch
(04:14):
of tired tribe, and the moderators, beyond providing the fair
got in some tosses too. To me, the whole thing
came across as a grand production. I want to stop
right there, because let me tell you something. For somebody
who didn't watch the whole thing, oh you got it.
(04:34):
This whole candidacy of Kamala Harris as an orchestration, whether
you're voting for her or can't stand herd and voting
against her, it is an orchestration.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
That's just a reality. And it was funny.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
Even when Donald Trump would say things that were absolutely true,
it looked like Donald Trump was crazy last night. What
happens in a world where the narratives feel more real
than reality, when the lies almost are more or undiscernible
from the truth. But they orchestrated this entire thing from
(05:12):
the poor performance of Joe Biden in the debate, to
the exit of Kamala Harris to taking every earned vote
and delegate and just handing it to her to the
ultimate Hollywood production the convention. Well, ABC and Disney did
a little orchestrating of their own disguised as a debate
(05:34):
last night.
Speaker 1 (05:35):
Oh, I think you got it all.
Speaker 2 (05:38):
I do agree too that there are times where they
didn't feel like they were talking to me either. I mean,
I wasn't particularly impressed with either. Is my honest, truthful
statement doesn't change at all how I'm going to vote
(05:58):
and think of that statement alone. I wasn't impressed with either.
She I knew was lying, she I knew was getting
help from ABC. She I knew was not held accountable
for the flip flopping, accountable for the border, accountable for
the economy, and ABC was letting her get away with it.
Him just not capable to seize any of the opportunities
(06:23):
and make it about the future. They were constantly bringing
him back, whether it was January sixth, whether it was
the border legislation that apparently he got on a phone
and killed and then I'm waiting for Donald Trump to
explain why he would have been against that border bill.
That border bill would have made law. The lawlessness that's
(06:45):
going on. I mean, somebody say it out loud, ABC
isn't going to and so at the end of the day,
you're just like, it's just so frustrating. I said, the
keys to this debate were, in my mind, the person
that doesn't talk and fight with the other but communicates
to the American people wins. Kamala Harris did that. I
(07:08):
didn't perceive it necessarily genuine, but she did it. The
person who keeps the other on the defensive wins.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
She did it.
Speaker 2 (07:16):
She was prosecuting all night, and yeah it was unfair,
was three on one, but it still was what it was.
So really no disguising it if you're just waking up.
Good performance for Kamala Harris, I don't know. You know
that whole line that Roy O'Neal in particular is very
(07:37):
uncomfortable talking about because she's a woman.
Speaker 1 (07:40):
It comes across misogynistic. No, doesn't. After all, this is
a part of their production, right.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
There's smiling, happy, joyful Kamala serious about letting go of
the past and moving on to the future. And then
there's the prosecute it. And all night long she would say,
and she would look at him. She did everything but
call him a thing and this like she was gonna
say this thing over here and this this form of president.
(08:13):
But she would say degrading things about him all night
long and say we've got to be above this. She
would dig up the pass and say, this is what
the American people don't want.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
They want us to look forward.
Speaker 4 (08:25):
Now.
Speaker 2 (08:26):
I can't promise you, I can tell you that many
people have been made a fool underestimating the American people.
They get more than you think, and just when you
lose hope, they see through it all. They see through
the media bias, they see through the lies of the candidates.
(08:47):
But I mean, that was to me such an easy moment.
I mean, where's Richard Nixon from nineteen sixty last night?
Every time she would go off on something, all he
had to do was pivot right back to the way we.
Speaker 1 (09:07):
Were, the way we'll be again, and how.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
We'll get there because everybody's tired of all these extremes.
There's a silent center out there and they get it,
and here's where we're going now. She kept doing it,
but Donald Trump didn't. So by all matrix, I think
anybody that tells you Donald Trump performed well is lying.
Speaker 1 (09:32):
He didn't.
Speaker 2 (09:33):
Anybody that tells you Kamala stunk, she lied very effectively.
It was definitely Kamala the prosecutor, Mamala.
Speaker 1 (09:42):
Kamala didn't show up to the debate.
Speaker 2 (09:45):
Cheerful, joyful, optimistic, futuristic Kamala from the script at the
convention didn't show up. The prosecutor showed up, and an
innocent man was made to look guilty.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
It's that simple.
Speaker 2 (10:01):
Now, where do we go from here? And how close
does it get from here? I don't think as close
as you think. I don't think it's a game changer.
I suspect and this is just me and I can't
wait to hear your talkbacks or emails at Michael d
at iHeartMedia dot com. I think Donald Trump, even performing poorly,
even going up three to one against ABC, I bet
(10:25):
you he strengthened and grabbed some independent, undecided males. And
I think Kamala probably grabs some undecided females. The question
is where I noticed quick fact checking on fracking would
disprove to everyone in Pennsylvania the truth about Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
A Google search would will it? I don't know.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
I already gave her Pennsylvania, so I gave her Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania,
and I still got a two sixty nine, two sixty
nine with all eyes on the breast. So did anything
happen last night that changes that scenario? No, I just
think it makes it a lot closer. Now, this whole
notion of wanting a second debate, I don't buy. I
think you had a good performance. He had a bad performance.
(11:15):
ABC had a disgraceful performance. You throw it out there
like you're not afraid, but you never agree to one.
They would. They would be crazy to give Ali a
second chance at Frasier. So I think that's a bunch
of bull. But there's no question she performed well. Donald
Trump performed poorly. He took bait, like we said, not
(11:38):
too often. They made him look like a nut, as
if there are no Haitians like we have, you know,
but you know, and I thought that was interesting too.
How there's two realities in the world, the narrativised mainstream
media reality and then there's the Internet reality. So I
can't wait to talk about that with Davidson Audi, especially
(12:00):
because I think when you when we look at this
post mortem, it may look one way to you, but
there's a whole crowd out there, and there's far more
on X than watching all those talking head networks last
night combined.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
And then what.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
Donald Trump was saying was not crazy, and the look
Kamala Harris was giving was infuriating.
Speaker 1 (12:27):
So I won't.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
Go through the acrobatics, and I'm not that flexible to
try to convince you Donald Trump performed well. I thought
he was terrible. Did not perform well, did not seize
any of the opportunities. I think an average talk show
host from a medium sized market could have handled Kamala
better than he did. Nasty Kamala did show up. Prosecutor
(12:53):
Kamala did show up. ABC was disgraceful.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
Let us know what you.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
Think you was a talkback button on your and your
iHeartRadio app. It's a microphone. Press it. I'll go three
two one, ask your question, make your comment, give us
something fresh and new. You guys are as smart as
we are.
Speaker 1 (13:09):
This is your morning show with Michael del Chono.
Speaker 2 (13:14):
Michael d at iHeartMedia dot com for emails and of
course the talkback button on your iHeartRadio app. Simply press
the microphone and leave us a message. In fact, we've
got two now, Michael.
Speaker 4 (13:25):
The bait last night was like listening to two third
graders complained that are teachers, and then two of the
teachers took the side of one of the third creatives.
Speaker 1 (13:34):
I had to turn off after twenty minutes so.
Speaker 3 (13:37):
Waiting for Kamala Harris to answer the number one question.
She beat around the bush, but she never answered it,
and the moderators just let her get away with stuff
like that all night. And if I have to hear
one more time about how she was raised by a
single mother, oh Lord, every time she gets in trouble
(13:59):
she pulls that's story out and for me getting old.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
Yeah, see, I think both of those.
Speaker 2 (14:06):
Are worth hearing, because well the first one it did
at times. Unfortunately, these are serious times. Remember that moment
an American president finally Michael Douglas's character. These are serious times,
and it takes serious people. I'm Matthew Shepherd and I
am president. You know that whole thing. Yeah, there was
a lot of the feeling last night, a lot of
(14:28):
the bickering last night that felt more about them and
a lot less about us. She's as guilty or more
guilty than Donald Trump and not being overly harsh on
Donald Trump. That's frustrating, But there's no question ABC was
no middleman and those were not moderators. That was a
Disney ABC Theatrical completely navigated three on one against Donald Trump,
(14:59):
which leads to this in person's comments, which I think,
ultimately and with this is why I can look you
in the eye this morning and say Donald Trump did
not perform well. And she certainly didn't knock herself out
like Joe Biden. And she was on the offensive, he
was on the defensive. There was an unfair judge in
(15:20):
the courtroom. Although the ultimate judges American people, hopefully they
see through this deception. But but you know, he did
take all the bait and he didn't seize any of
the pretty easy opportunities to bury her. Yeah, are you
better off than four years ago? He did, finally at
the very end get in the well. He had the
(15:41):
one in the middle too, where he said why don't
you leave here right now go to Washington to make
the point, But even that wasn't clear. I like the
Maga hat line too, The Maga hat line I think
will be a you know, could be a memorable one.
Her stage one is you're not running against Joe Biden,
You're running against me. If I were at the podium,
that's what I mean. That's serving up a slam dunk
(16:05):
an ali oop. Are you kidding me? It's the Biden
Harris administration. I'll give you my time. What did you
believe in on the border the economy Israel or Ukraine?
That Joe Biden didn't tell us the difference. Otherwise, there's
no difference who I'm debating. It's the same policy he
got in the cut and paste. ABC of course didn't
(16:28):
bother to fact check that, and she certainly didn't deny it.
She never asked the question are you better off than
four years ago? That was frustrating. They orchestrated and navigated
her through the whole Her values are the same, but
just all of her positions conveniently have changed. Again, I
don't think this for everybody that was already for Trump,
(16:51):
or for everybody that was already for Kamala Harris doesn't
change a thing. You just look and say, well, she's
a little nasty. ABC was unfair, but she had a
better Knight than Trump.
Speaker 1 (17:00):
Vote for Trump. Hey, it's me Michael.
Speaker 2 (17:01):
You can listen to your morning show live on the
air or streaming live on your iHeart app Monday through
Friday from three to six Pacific, five to eighth Central,
and six to nine Eastern on great radio stations like
Talk six to fifty KSTE in Sacramento one oh four nine.
The Patriot in Saint Louis had Impact Radio one oh
five nine and twelve fifty w h d Z at Tampa, Florida.
(17:22):
Sure hope you can join us live and make us
a part of your morning routine. In the meantime, enjoy
the podcast. Francine is about to make landfall in Louisiana
as a hurricane. And the big debate was last night.
Well prosecuted by Kamala Harris. I'll handle that. Poorly performed
by Donald Trump, but ABC disgraceful. Let's do both with
our national correspondent Roory O'Neil roy. First things first, the debate, well,
(17:46):
we said, the person that's on the offense and keeps
the other on the defensive wins if she can get
to him and you know, get his goat and he
can take the bait.
Speaker 1 (17:56):
She wins.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
He took the bait. He never sees the opportunity. I mean,
it's hard to really slice this pie anyway other than
Trump performed poorly. She prosecuted well, probably won the debate.
What is that winner though? Well, time will tell.
Speaker 4 (18:12):
Right, well, right, And look, Donald Trump has a ceiling
and a floor. His poll numbers don't move very much
in all this, maybe a point or two at most.
She really had the most on the line last night,
so I think it just solidified that.
Speaker 1 (18:27):
Oh okay, so she got a race.
Speaker 4 (18:30):
Well right, Oh, so she can complete the thought form
a sentence, because you know, look, Donald Trump had literally
been calling her dumb and stupid, and I think that
he was raising the bar for himself and lowering it
for her with the name calling and this, so long
as she came in and didn't sound like a babbling
idiot or Joe Biden during at June debate, it was
(18:53):
going to look like a whim.
Speaker 2 (18:54):
Fascinating to me is how well she pulled off the convention.
I mean, that was a a Hollywood written script delivered
if it's acting by an Oscar winning actress. I mean,
she nailed the convention. She bombed in making us wait
thirty nine days and in an interview, and then the
prosecutor showed up and he allowed himself to be prosecuted.
(19:18):
So she prosecuted very very well, and an innocent man
looked very guilty. Maybe it's just interviews she can't do well.
Speaker 4 (19:27):
Yeah, and the CNN interview we talked about before it
was fine. You know, it was so much hype and
pressure around it, but then it turned out to be
barely twenty minutes and it was mostly nice oft these and.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
Not a whole lot of new ground there.
Speaker 4 (19:39):
But yeah, this was a chance to see her live,
thinking on her feet, seeing how she could respond. And look,
this was also the clear benefits of preparation on display.
You know, she had that little line ready to go
when they're talking about Vladimir Putin and she says, you know,
tell the eight hundred thousand Polish people living in Pennsylvania,
(20:00):
you don't mind Puten moving into Ukraine and then targeting
Poland next. I mean, obviously this race is about Pennsylvania
right now. But you know, she had that factoid ready
to go to specifically appeal to the Pennsylvania voter, just
the same way that Donald Trump was going after fracking
to try to convince the Pennsylvania voter that he's the
right decision to make in November.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
But Robin's just going to do the restage. Roy O'Neil
is joining us.
Speaker 2 (20:26):
Our national correspondent on the debate last night, brit Hume
said it this way, that's not the ABC.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
I worked for for twenty three years. That was disgraceful.
It was.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
It did feel like three on one. I'll give you
an example. The opening question, are we better off than
we were four years ago? She never answered. ABC didn't
press her. If Donald Trump didn't answer something, they'd press
him twice three times.
Speaker 4 (20:47):
You know.
Speaker 2 (20:47):
That's like when you do an objection in a courtroom,
just so the jury can see. They're avoiding the question.
So it really wasn't fair. And now all the hype
they want to do a second one. I think that's
a stunt. I think they're saying that we will never
agree to it. Why would they? They don't want to
give Ali another chance at free?
Speaker 1 (21:04):
Who do they no?
Speaker 4 (21:06):
And then who get what network gets it? We've already got,
you know, CNN had one. They're not going to go
to Fox. CBS is going to have the upcoming vice
presidential debate. Obviously this was an ABC one, So you know,
do they want to go to NBC or slash MS
DNC as Donald Trump would say, that seems.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
Unlikely as well.
Speaker 2 (21:25):
Can we say this everybody out there that's probably rooting
for Donald Trump. He certainly didn't knock her out, and
she certainly didn't knock herself out like Joe Biden. And
he performed poorly. She performed well. ABC performed disgracefully. All right,
let's move on to Francine. Definitely going to make landfall today.
Definitely going to be at least a cat one, if
(21:47):
not a cat too.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
What's the latest?
Speaker 5 (21:49):
Right?
Speaker 4 (21:50):
It is approaching New Orleans and I'm the Louisiana coast
from the south southwest, which is probably a better trajectory
because it's less populated on that side. But storm surge
is the big concern with this one, more so than
the rain. Yeah, I mean New Orleans is low level enough.
Five to ten inches of rain is a bad thing.
But I think that this is not the big one,
(22:12):
but it clearly is something they'll need to prepare for.
Lots of power outages expected. But the storm surge, I
think is the big thread here and then moving quickly
up through the middle of the country throughout the rest
of the week.
Speaker 2 (22:24):
It's the trajectory again. Whenever you're dealing with New Orleans,
you worry about intensifying because the warm Gulf waters intensify hurricane.
Speaker 1 (22:32):
So that always makes.
Speaker 2 (22:33):
A three or five a tropical storm of two that
intensity happened. You don't want it coming right up the
mouth of the Mississippi because that causes the Mississippian Lake
Poncha train to fill the bowl and the pumps not
keep up. I don't see any of that happening. I
see a weather event, and I see power outages.
Speaker 4 (22:51):
Right. The only concern is that because it is approaching
from the south southwest, is that the counterclockwise motion means
that New Orleans will sort of get the wamp of
of that top right corner, and that's the harshest of it.
But because it is from that direction, I think the
storm surge will be mitigated by a lot of the
swamp land out there.
Speaker 1 (23:13):
Has protected To Orleans.
Speaker 2 (23:14):
You know what we call that downa knowleds, just like
we named dirty rice. We call that the dirty side
of the hurricane. You don't like to get that dirty
side coming through. That's the nasty side. Roy O'Neil has
always thank you. Got a couple of great talkbacks that
I want to play. The first one, I feel like
I'm laying next to him on the pillow, So it
was just a little too long and uncomfortable. I think
(23:35):
he was sneaking the call with his wife right next
to him. But he made a spectacular important point. Why no, see,
I think Donald Trump would have benefited all night long
using his time to ask the questions ABC didn't. I
don't know why that wasn't a legitimate strategy. In other words,
ask me whatever question you want, ABC. My answer is
(23:57):
going to be to ask her the questions you're not
asking her. And this one particular caller said, why did
he never ask her why they hid Joe and why
she allowed them to hide Joe. Now, he made slams
towards that. I mean, basically, you know, he even said
it one, I don't know who's president. I don't if
you were president, I don't know who was president. Another
(24:18):
time he said, why don't you go to the Capitol today,
wake up Joe at four o'clock you know, in the day,
and go and do all these executive orders, and then
towards the end, in a little bit in the middle,
he made the point, if you have all these great ideas,
why don't you go do them right now? Why didn't
you do them for three and a half years. But
what the caller was suggesting is why didn't you point
blank look at her and ask her the question, when
(24:39):
did you know Joe Biden was incompetent to run for president?
And how is he competent to be president if he's
not competent to run for president? And why did you
hide it for so long? She never an ABC wasn't
going to do it. I mean, remember, Trump performed poorly,
she prosecuted well. ABC was a disgrace. That mouse is
(25:02):
already on my you know what list for blocking me
in sports already this year. Oh I can't stand Disney.
I wouldn't spend a dime with him. I know he
made a great point, though, but it's beyond just that point.
It's beyond just that question. Donald Trump should have been
asking all those painful questions all day, all night long,
(25:25):
and he didn't, and certainly ABC didn't. Let's get the
other two end before the break.
Speaker 1 (25:29):
Good morning, Michael Mark from Arizona.
Speaker 6 (25:32):
I just wanted to comment on Kamala's expressions when she
was listening to him talk.
Speaker 1 (25:40):
It was very telling.
Speaker 6 (25:42):
So if we are waking up as Americans, I think
a lot of people are going to notice how she
was reacting to some of the truths that he was
saying last night.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
Can I do one quick pause and before you do the
next one?
Speaker 2 (25:56):
Yeah. David Sinati said this yesterday, and I thought it was
a key. He said, debates are more visual than they
are audible. We play all the sound, we play the
famous lines, we remember the famous lines, but the visuals
really move the meter. Looking at a watch costs your
(26:20):
presidency sweating.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
I mean.
Speaker 2 (26:24):
The very first in this style, too, was the Nixon
Kennedy debate. Everybody listening on the radio thought Nixon one.
Everybody watching on the new television thought Kennedy one. That's
how important visual is. It was funny because I was
going back and forth afterwards. I am and I said
this earlier. If you weren't listening, I'm appalled by the
whole spin room game that these networks in the matrix
(26:48):
that we live in. So if you're far right, you're
watching your far right stars. If your far left or
on your far left soars, and you just you matrix
yourself and they tell you what's going to happen. Then
they tell you what you just heard. And I don't
want to wake up in the morning be that. I
didn't think Donald Trump did well at all. She stayed
on the offensive. She prosecuted and an innocent man got
prosecuted last night because we had a despicable, disgraceful, corrupt
(27:12):
judge ABC. But visually I went to CNN, they were
praising it. Oh, I love the way and that one
time when she put her hand under her chin. First
of all, I don't know, she looks just like Caesar Romero.
I don't mean that critical, but she looks like Caesar
(27:33):
Romero is the joker and Batman's exactly. If you put
the pictures next to each other, it's uncanny. Yes, And
when she did that post, she really did. And I
you know, I don't know how the visual played, but
if David's anat, he's right. As much as she dominated
the debate, visually she lost the debate. Donald Trump, though,
did look kind of.
Speaker 1 (27:52):
Gruff and.
Speaker 2 (27:55):
As if he was trying to look like the dictator
she was trying to make him, and he did come
crossed angry. So I don't know that either one visually
or who lost more visually. But if we go through
the keys to a debate, were there any great memorable moments?
Speaker 1 (28:11):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
The maga hat the right will latch on? Do I
think the left has a lot to latch on. Do
you're running against me? When she prosecuted him, I mean
they make abortion sound like life. The way they twisted
I mean, the lies, they are getting to the level
of satan.
Speaker 1 (28:28):
It really is.
Speaker 2 (28:29):
You better have discernment, man, or you're you're dead. But
she had a lot of winning lines and a lot
of winning moments, but none that I think are like
I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator,
You're not Jack Kennedy, by the way he Trump used it.
There you go again, lying again. There was no oh
(28:51):
you'd be in jail line. Yeah, it was just all
and then no matter what they did to pull him back,
and then they would take the high road.
Speaker 1 (28:59):
See, this is what America don't want looking back. We
want to move forward.
Speaker 2 (29:02):
Well, you brought up January sixth, you brought up the
border vote, But yeah, I'm with you. Visuals are important,
and I think on the split screen she was a
little more Hillary than I'm sure her handlers wanted to be.
Speaker 1 (29:18):
Let's get that last one in, do we have that
one more? That moment Kamala talked about crowd sizes, I
mean that really got under it.
Speaker 4 (29:26):
Again.
Speaker 3 (29:26):
I couldn't believe it, but.
Speaker 4 (29:28):
He was on the defensive after that.
Speaker 5 (29:30):
His whole tone and.
Speaker 3 (29:31):
Demeanor change right after that.
Speaker 4 (29:33):
Yeah, that's the thing with Trump, and he shoots himself in.
Speaker 2 (29:38):
The foot all the time, and once he gets into
those rabbit holes and so hard, he loses people. Look,
everybody's got strength, everybody's got a weakness. Donald Trump is
as compassionate as you can imagine. He just doesn't secret
and it doesn't come across that way. He does have
weaknesses too, his pride, his ego, and she knew just
(30:01):
how to get his goat.
Speaker 1 (30:04):
And that one did.
Speaker 2 (30:05):
You are absolutely correct. How dare anybody question his crowd size?
By the way, very little mention of I mean, he
did get into the law fair. I love the line
he had about I even took a bullet to the head.
It they just didn't It was kind of like a fight.
(30:25):
I can take you through, and I would have if
I was still home. We had a major technical issue
that tried to the end. We tried to botch our
entire show. But I had all this laid out to
demonstrate you with actually and demonstrate to you with actual audio.
But it's like a fight. I can tell you the
hook happened. I can tell you the uppercut happened. I
can tell you the jab happened. I can tell you
(30:46):
the right overhand happened. They just didn't seem to land
for Donald Trump, and I think he would have been
better off taking attack to asking questions the questions ABC
wouldn't ask Dana Prino and I keep coming back to that,
but she really did say it best. He took every
bait and he didn't seize any opportunity.
Speaker 3 (31:07):
Hi, this is Jimmy Bourne.
Speaker 2 (31:09):
My morning show is your Money Show with Michael de Jana.
Thanks for working up with your Warning show on the
Aaron streaming live on your iHeart app. Big debate in
Pennsylvania last night. Our White House correspondent John Decker was there.
Speaker 1 (31:22):
John, I have.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
It well prosecuted by Kamala, poorly performed by Trump, been
a disgracefully led quote unquote debate by ABC.
Speaker 5 (31:33):
What did you see, Well, I thought it was a
very good knife for the Vice president, a very bad
knight for Donald Trump. You could argue, we'll have to
wait and see. I think you could say this was
his June the twenty seventh. Of course, that's the date
that Joe Biden had a disastrous debate performance in Atlanta. Look,
Kamala Harris exceeded all expectations. That's partly the fall of
(31:58):
the Trump campaign and Donald Trump for saying that she
wasn't intelligent. She stood up there, she took the punches,
she stood toe to toe with Donald Trump, and he,
as the debate were on, just became more and more agitated.
And that's not what I think his campaign was preparing for.
Preparation counts for a lot, and that's four days of preparation.
(32:21):
I think it showed for the Vice president on that
debate stage last night. One other thing I will mention,
and you and I are talking about our views, let
me give you the view of one of the strongest
allies for Donald Trump in the US Senate. It's Senator
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. He called it a disaster
for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (32:40):
Yeah, it was a terrible performance Dana Perino at Fox.
And by the way, you should know this about me
because we haven't known each other very long. I don't
know why I find all of them useless. I find
them all very biased and ridiculous and polarizing at times.
But for some reason, I guess because I am a conservative,
Fox usually aggravates me the most. But I got a
(33:01):
hand it to Dana Prino really nailed it. She said
he took every bait and he didn't seize any of
the opportunities.
Speaker 1 (33:06):
Man. That's that's it in one sentence.
Speaker 5 (33:10):
That's it. That's it in one sentence. I'm reading some
of the opinions in the Wall Street Journal, which is
at the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, which
is conservative, and you know, I think that they are
replicating a lot of what Dana Perino said on Fox
News last night, and they're doing it in their own way.
William mcgern, for instance, from the Wall Street Journal said
(33:32):
the fight in Philly was like the thriller in Manila.
The third and final heavyweight boxing match between Muhammad Ali
and Joe Fraser, which ended in a victory for Ali,
though Donald Trump threw some good punches. Philadelphia was an
upset victory for Commons.
Speaker 2 (33:47):
Oh, how clever the wording is there. You don't buy
that they want a second debate, right? They want to
look like they do and never agree to it.
Speaker 5 (33:55):
I mean, why would you, right, why would you take
the victory knockout punch to use William mcgern's analogy and
go home? Don't risk this all over again? And what's
going to be learned in a new debate. I don't
think anything particularly new. We've had two I would love
an opportunity to question both of them on a debate.
Speaker 2 (34:18):
Oh, I would love for you to do it, because
ABC certainly didn't. John deckerd have a safe trip home.
We'll talk again tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (34:23):
We're all in this together. This is Your Morning Show
with Michael enheld Chown
Hi, It's Michael.
Speaker 2 (00:00):
Your morning show can be heard live on great radio
stations across the country like wilm and w DOV and
Wilmington and Dover, Delaware or wgst AM seven twenty the
voice in Middle Georgia.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
And we're going to need some blankets.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
News Radio six fifty k e NI, Anchorage, Alaska. We'd
love to be a part of your morning routine. Now
enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 3 (00:21):
Well two three, starting your morning off right. A new
way of talk, a new way of understanding, because we're
interest to give.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
This is your morning show with Michael, Bill Jordan, Horizon Shine,
Embrace the day.
Speaker 2 (00:41):
Welcome one and all to Wednesday, September the eleventh, twenty
third anniversary of nine to eleven Y're of our Lord
twenty twenty four. The anniversary is today, commemorating events in
New York City, Washington, d C. And in Shanksville. Francine
will make landfall in Louisiana as a hurricane. And a
(01:01):
lot of people talking about the debate last night, did
Kamala Harris perform well? While she prosecuted well? There was
no one there to hold her accountable and fact check her,
force her to answer. I mean, if you've ever been
a boat captain, you know sometimes due to conditions shallow
(01:23):
waters or rocks or this or that, you have to
be navigated carefully through. Captains of submarines know what that's like.
That's how ABC was pulling her through the land mines,
had the tough portions to aid her and then crucifying
Donald Trump on his eyes. So I've kind of paraphrased
it this way. She prosecuted the debate. Well, he poorly performed.
(01:48):
I loved the Dana Perina quote, which was he took
debait every time and he seized none of the opportunities.
That's kind of how it felt all night long. But
ABC was just graceful, absolutely disgraceful.
Speaker 1 (02:02):
All right.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
So here's what we've been up against. We had several
things planned for you. You know, normally we give you the
news on the quarter hours, if you will to use
a radio expression, we don't have access to that. I
had all the sound prepared, the highlights, the low lights.
However you would have perceived them what I thought were
key moments from the debate last night. That's gone my
(02:25):
studio and there's no explanation. So the equipment that we
use has never not worked, It's never done what it did.
I'm not an engineer, but since COVID I am when
it comes to my studio. I have no explanation for
why we couldn't get on the air from the home
studio other than you know, I believe in spiritual warfare,
(02:48):
and I know what we had planned today, and I
know why somebody wouldn't have wanted us to be on
the air. But we're here now and we have each
other and we can talk. Not that I need it,
but if you want to, I really am more interested
in what you think. I can't tell you how many
emails and text messages I got from people that didn't
(03:10):
even watch themselves and are wanting to know. I want
to share one with you, just to give you the
perspective of what I'm talking about, and this is more
common than not common. I'm not going to share the
name because I don't know if he wanted me to
(03:32):
Morning Michael. While life was going on last night, daughter
softball game, getting sun ready for bed, I tried to
listen in to the debate. I didn't catch all of it,
but from what I did catch, I doubt I missed
anything important. Maybe you caught something worthwhile that I missed
in real time. I had a disturbed feeling that I
(03:54):
couldn't quite place. But the title of my email kind
of captures it all. In a cunt of people absolutely
starving for true, genuine, thoughtful, selfless leadership, all we saw
last night were two contestants flippantly throwing around a bunch
(04:14):
of tired tribe, and the moderators, beyond providing the fair
got in some tosses too. To me, the whole thing
came across as a grand production. I want to stop
right there, because let me tell you something. For somebody
who didn't watch the whole thing, oh you got it.
(04:34):
This whole candidacy of Kamala Harris as an orchestration, whether
you're voting for her or can't stand herd and voting
against her, it is an orchestration.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
That's just a reality. And it was funny.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
Even when Donald Trump would say things that were absolutely true,
it looked like Donald Trump was crazy last night. What
happens in a world where the narratives feel more real
than reality, when the lies almost are more or undiscernible
from the truth. But they orchestrated this entire thing from
(05:12):
the poor performance of Joe Biden in the debate, to
the exit of Kamala Harris to taking every earned vote
and delegate and just handing it to her to the
ultimate Hollywood production the convention. Well, ABC and Disney did
a little orchestrating of their own disguised as a debate
(05:34):
last night.
Speaker 1 (05:35):
Oh, I think you got it all.
Speaker 2 (05:38):
I do agree too that there are times where they
didn't feel like they were talking to me either. I mean,
I wasn't particularly impressed with either. Is my honest, truthful
statement doesn't change at all how I'm going to vote
(05:58):
and think of that statement alone. I wasn't impressed with either.
She I knew was lying, she I knew was getting
help from ABC. She I knew was not held accountable
for the flip flopping, accountable for the border, accountable for
the economy, and ABC was letting her get away with it.
Him just not capable to seize any of the opportunities
(06:23):
and make it about the future. They were constantly bringing
him back, whether it was January sixth, whether it was
the border legislation that apparently he got on a phone
and killed and then I'm waiting for Donald Trump to
explain why he would have been against that border bill.
That border bill would have made law. The lawlessness that's
(06:45):
going on. I mean, somebody say it out loud, ABC
isn't going to and so at the end of the day,
you're just like, it's just so frustrating. I said, the
keys to this debate were, in my mind, the person
that doesn't talk and fight with the other but communicates
to the American people wins. Kamala Harris did that. I
(07:08):
didn't perceive it necessarily genuine, but she did it. The
person who keeps the other on the defensive wins.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
She did it.
Speaker 2 (07:16):
She was prosecuting all night, and yeah it was unfair,
was three on one, but it still was what it was.
So really no disguising it if you're just waking up.
Good performance for Kamala Harris, I don't know. You know
that whole line that Roy O'Neal in particular is very
(07:37):
uncomfortable talking about because she's a woman.
Speaker 1 (07:40):
It comes across misogynistic. No, doesn't. After all, this is
a part of their production, right.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
There's smiling, happy, joyful Kamala serious about letting go of
the past and moving on to the future. And then
there's the prosecute it. And all night long she would say,
and she would look at him. She did everything but
call him a thing and this like she was gonna
say this thing over here and this this form of president.
(08:13):
But she would say degrading things about him all night
long and say we've got to be above this. She
would dig up the pass and say, this is what
the American people don't want.
Speaker 1 (08:22):
They want us to look forward.
Speaker 4 (08:25):
Now.
Speaker 2 (08:26):
I can't promise you, I can tell you that many
people have been made a fool underestimating the American people.
They get more than you think, and just when you
lose hope, they see through it all. They see through
the media bias, they see through the lies of the candidates.
(08:47):
But I mean, that was to me such an easy moment.
I mean, where's Richard Nixon from nineteen sixty last night?
Every time she would go off on something, all he
had to do was pivot right back to the way we.
Speaker 1 (09:07):
Were, the way we'll be again, and how.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
We'll get there because everybody's tired of all these extremes.
There's a silent center out there and they get it,
and here's where we're going now. She kept doing it,
but Donald Trump didn't. So by all matrix, I think
anybody that tells you Donald Trump performed well is lying.
Speaker 1 (09:32):
He didn't.
Speaker 2 (09:33):
Anybody that tells you Kamala stunk, she lied very effectively.
It was definitely Kamala the prosecutor, Mamala.
Speaker 1 (09:42):
Kamala didn't show up to the debate.
Speaker 2 (09:45):
Cheerful, joyful, optimistic, futuristic Kamala from the script at the
convention didn't show up. The prosecutor showed up, and an
innocent man was made to look guilty.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
It's that simple.
Speaker 2 (10:01):
Now, where do we go from here? And how close
does it get from here? I don't think as close
as you think. I don't think it's a game changer.
I suspect and this is just me and I can't
wait to hear your talkbacks or emails at Michael d
at iHeartMedia dot com. I think Donald Trump, even performing poorly,
even going up three to one against ABC, I bet
(10:25):
you he strengthened and grabbed some independent, undecided males. And
I think Kamala probably grabs some undecided females. The question
is where I noticed quick fact checking on fracking would
disprove to everyone in Pennsylvania the truth about Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
A Google search would will it? I don't know.
Speaker 2 (10:51):
I already gave her Pennsylvania, so I gave her Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania,
and I still got a two sixty nine, two sixty
nine with all eyes on the breast. So did anything
happen last night that changes that scenario? No, I just
think it makes it a lot closer. Now, this whole
notion of wanting a second debate, I don't buy. I
think you had a good performance. He had a bad performance.
(11:15):
ABC had a disgraceful performance. You throw it out there
like you're not afraid, but you never agree to one.
They would. They would be crazy to give Ali a
second chance at Frasier. So I think that's a bunch
of bull. But there's no question she performed well. Donald
Trump performed poorly. He took bait, like we said, not
(11:38):
too often. They made him look like a nut, as
if there are no Haitians like we have, you know,
but you know, and I thought that was interesting too.
How there's two realities in the world, the narrativised mainstream
media reality and then there's the Internet reality. So I
can't wait to talk about that with Davidson Audi, especially
(12:00):
because I think when you when we look at this
post mortem, it may look one way to you, but
there's a whole crowd out there, and there's far more
on X than watching all those talking head networks last
night combined.
Speaker 1 (12:18):
And then what.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
Donald Trump was saying was not crazy, and the look
Kamala Harris was giving was infuriating.
Speaker 1 (12:27):
So I won't.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
Go through the acrobatics, and I'm not that flexible to
try to convince you Donald Trump performed well. I thought
he was terrible. Did not perform well, did not seize
any of the opportunities. I think an average talk show
host from a medium sized market could have handled Kamala
better than he did. Nasty Kamala did show up. Prosecutor
(12:53):
Kamala did show up. ABC was disgraceful.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
Let us know what you.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
Think you was a talkback button on your and your
iHeartRadio app. It's a microphone. Press it. I'll go three
two one, ask your question, make your comment, give us
something fresh and new. You guys are as smart as
we are.
Speaker 1 (13:09):
This is your morning show with Michael del Chono.
Speaker 2 (13:14):
Michael d at iHeartMedia dot com for emails and of
course the talkback button on your iHeartRadio app. Simply press
the microphone and leave us a message. In fact, we've
got two now, Michael.
Speaker 4 (13:25):
The bait last night was like listening to two third
graders complained that are teachers, and then two of the
teachers took the side of one of the third creatives.
Speaker 1 (13:34):
I had to turn off after twenty minutes so.
Speaker 3 (13:37):
Waiting for Kamala Harris to answer the number one question.
She beat around the bush, but she never answered it,
and the moderators just let her get away with stuff
like that all night. And if I have to hear
one more time about how she was raised by a
single mother, oh Lord, every time she gets in trouble
(13:59):
she pulls that's story out and for me getting old.
Speaker 1 (14:03):
Yeah, see, I think both of those.
Speaker 2 (14:06):
Are worth hearing, because well the first one it did
at times. Unfortunately, these are serious times. Remember that moment
an American president finally Michael Douglas's character. These are serious times,
and it takes serious people. I'm Matthew Shepherd and I
am president. You know that whole thing. Yeah, there was
a lot of the feeling last night, a lot of
(14:28):
the bickering last night that felt more about them and
a lot less about us. She's as guilty or more
guilty than Donald Trump and not being overly harsh on
Donald Trump. That's frustrating, But there's no question ABC was
no middleman and those were not moderators. That was a
Disney ABC Theatrical completely navigated three on one against Donald Trump,
(14:59):
which leads to this in person's comments, which I think,
ultimately and with this is why I can look you
in the eye this morning and say Donald Trump did
not perform well. And she certainly didn't knock herself out
like Joe Biden. And she was on the offensive, he
was on the defensive. There was an unfair judge in
(15:20):
the courtroom. Although the ultimate judges American people, hopefully they
see through this deception. But but you know, he did
take all the bait and he didn't seize any of
the pretty easy opportunities to bury her. Yeah, are you
better off than four years ago? He did, finally at
the very end get in the well. He had the
(15:41):
one in the middle too, where he said why don't
you leave here right now go to Washington to make
the point, But even that wasn't clear. I like the
Maga hat line too, The Maga hat line I think
will be a you know, could be a memorable one.
Her stage one is you're not running against Joe Biden,
You're running against me. If I were at the podium,
that's what I mean. That's serving up a slam dunk
(16:05):
an ali oop. Are you kidding me? It's the Biden
Harris administration. I'll give you my time. What did you
believe in on the border the economy Israel or Ukraine?
That Joe Biden didn't tell us the difference. Otherwise, there's
no difference who I'm debating. It's the same policy he
got in the cut and paste. ABC of course didn't
(16:28):
bother to fact check that, and she certainly didn't deny it.
She never asked the question are you better off than
four years ago? That was frustrating. They orchestrated and navigated
her through the whole Her values are the same, but
just all of her positions conveniently have changed. Again, I
don't think this for everybody that was already for Trump,
(16:51):
or for everybody that was already for Kamala Harris doesn't
change a thing. You just look and say, well, she's
a little nasty. ABC was unfair, but she had a
better Knight than Trump.
Speaker 1 (17:00):
Vote for Trump. Hey, it's me Michael.
Speaker 2 (17:01):
You can listen to your morning show live on the
air or streaming live on your iHeart app Monday through
Friday from three to six Pacific, five to eighth Central,
and six to nine Eastern on great radio stations like
Talk six to fifty KSTE in Sacramento one oh four nine.
The Patriot in Saint Louis had Impact Radio one oh
five nine and twelve fifty w h d Z at Tampa, Florida.
(17:22):
Sure hope you can join us live and make us
a part of your morning routine. In the meantime, enjoy
the podcast. Francine is about to make landfall in Louisiana
as a hurricane. And the big debate was last night.
Well prosecuted by Kamala Harris. I'll handle that. Poorly performed
by Donald Trump, but ABC disgraceful. Let's do both with
our national correspondent Roory O'Neil roy. First things first, the debate, well,
(17:46):
we said, the person that's on the offense and keeps
the other on the defensive wins if she can get
to him and you know, get his goat and he
can take the bait.
Speaker 1 (17:56):
She wins.
Speaker 2 (17:57):
He took the bait. He never sees the opportunity. I mean,
it's hard to really slice this pie anyway other than
Trump performed poorly. She prosecuted well, probably won the debate.
What is that winner though? Well, time will tell.
Speaker 4 (18:12):
Right, well, right, And look, Donald Trump has a ceiling
and a floor. His poll numbers don't move very much
in all this, maybe a point or two at most.
She really had the most on the line last night,
so I think it just solidified that.
Speaker 1 (18:27):
Oh okay, so she got a race.
Speaker 4 (18:30):
Well right, Oh, so she can complete the thought form
a sentence, because you know, look, Donald Trump had literally
been calling her dumb and stupid, and I think that
he was raising the bar for himself and lowering it
for her with the name calling and this, so long
as she came in and didn't sound like a babbling
idiot or Joe Biden during at June debate, it was
(18:53):
going to look like a whim.
Speaker 2 (18:54):
Fascinating to me is how well she pulled off the convention.
I mean, that was a a Hollywood written script delivered
if it's acting by an Oscar winning actress. I mean,
she nailed the convention. She bombed in making us wait
thirty nine days and in an interview, and then the
prosecutor showed up and he allowed himself to be prosecuted.
(19:18):
So she prosecuted very very well, and an innocent man
looked very guilty. Maybe it's just interviews she can't do well.
Speaker 4 (19:27):
Yeah, and the CNN interview we talked about before it
was fine. You know, it was so much hype and
pressure around it, but then it turned out to be
barely twenty minutes and it was mostly nice oft these and.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
Not a whole lot of new ground there.
Speaker 4 (19:39):
But yeah, this was a chance to see her live,
thinking on her feet, seeing how she could respond. And look,
this was also the clear benefits of preparation on display.
You know, she had that little line ready to go
when they're talking about Vladimir Putin and she says, you know,
tell the eight hundred thousand Polish people living in Pennsylvania,
(20:00):
you don't mind Puten moving into Ukraine and then targeting
Poland next. I mean, obviously this race is about Pennsylvania
right now. But you know, she had that factoid ready
to go to specifically appeal to the Pennsylvania voter, just
the same way that Donald Trump was going after fracking
to try to convince the Pennsylvania voter that he's the
right decision to make in November.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
But Robin's just going to do the restage. Roy O'Neil
is joining us.
Speaker 2 (20:26):
Our national correspondent on the debate last night, brit Hume
said it this way, that's not the ABC.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
I worked for for twenty three years. That was disgraceful.
It was.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
It did feel like three on one. I'll give you
an example. The opening question, are we better off than
we were four years ago? She never answered. ABC didn't
press her. If Donald Trump didn't answer something, they'd press
him twice three times.
Speaker 4 (20:47):
You know.
Speaker 2 (20:47):
That's like when you do an objection in a courtroom,
just so the jury can see. They're avoiding the question.
So it really wasn't fair. And now all the hype
they want to do a second one. I think that's
a stunt. I think they're saying that we will never
agree to it. Why would they? They don't want to
give Ali another chance at free?
Speaker 1 (21:04):
Who do they no?
Speaker 4 (21:06):
And then who get what network gets it? We've already got,
you know, CNN had one. They're not going to go
to Fox. CBS is going to have the upcoming vice
presidential debate. Obviously this was an ABC one, So you know,
do they want to go to NBC or slash MS
DNC as Donald Trump would say, that seems.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
Unlikely as well.
Speaker 2 (21:25):
Can we say this everybody out there that's probably rooting
for Donald Trump. He certainly didn't knock her out, and
she certainly didn't knock herself out like Joe Biden. And
he performed poorly. She performed well. ABC performed disgracefully. All right,
let's move on to Francine. Definitely going to make landfall today.
Definitely going to be at least a cat one, if
(21:47):
not a cat too.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
What's the latest?
Speaker 5 (21:49):
Right?
Speaker 4 (21:50):
It is approaching New Orleans and I'm the Louisiana coast
from the south southwest, which is probably a better trajectory
because it's less populated on that side. But storm surge
is the big concern with this one, more so than
the rain. Yeah, I mean New Orleans is low level enough.
Five to ten inches of rain is a bad thing.
But I think that this is not the big one,
(22:12):
but it clearly is something they'll need to prepare for.
Lots of power outages expected. But the storm surge, I
think is the big thread here and then moving quickly
up through the middle of the country throughout the rest
of the week.
Speaker 2 (22:24):
It's the trajectory again. Whenever you're dealing with New Orleans,
you worry about intensifying because the warm Gulf waters intensify hurricane.
Speaker 1 (22:32):
So that always makes.
Speaker 2 (22:33):
A three or five a tropical storm of two that
intensity happened. You don't want it coming right up the
mouth of the Mississippi because that causes the Mississippian Lake
Poncha train to fill the bowl and the pumps not
keep up. I don't see any of that happening. I
see a weather event, and I see power outages.
Speaker 4 (22:51):
Right. The only concern is that because it is approaching
from the south southwest, is that the counterclockwise motion means
that New Orleans will sort of get the wamp of
of that top right corner, and that's the harshest of it.
But because it is from that direction, I think the
storm surge will be mitigated by a lot of the
swamp land out there.
Speaker 1 (23:13):
Has protected To Orleans.
Speaker 2 (23:14):
You know what we call that downa knowleds, just like
we named dirty rice. We call that the dirty side
of the hurricane. You don't like to get that dirty
side coming through. That's the nasty side. Roy O'Neil has
always thank you. Got a couple of great talkbacks that
I want to play. The first one, I feel like
I'm laying next to him on the pillow, So it
was just a little too long and uncomfortable. I think
(23:35):
he was sneaking the call with his wife right next
to him. But he made a spectacular important point. Why no, see,
I think Donald Trump would have benefited all night long
using his time to ask the questions ABC didn't. I
don't know why that wasn't a legitimate strategy. In other words,
ask me whatever question you want, ABC. My answer is
(23:57):
going to be to ask her the questions you're not
asking her. And this one particular caller said, why did
he never ask her why they hid Joe and why
she allowed them to hide Joe. Now, he made slams
towards that. I mean, basically, you know, he even said
it one, I don't know who's president. I don't if
you were president, I don't know who was president. Another
(24:18):
time he said, why don't you go to the Capitol today,
wake up Joe at four o'clock you know, in the day,
and go and do all these executive orders, and then
towards the end, in a little bit in the middle,
he made the point, if you have all these great ideas,
why don't you go do them right now? Why didn't
you do them for three and a half years. But
what the caller was suggesting is why didn't you point
blank look at her and ask her the question, when
(24:39):
did you know Joe Biden was incompetent to run for president?
And how is he competent to be president if he's
not competent to run for president? And why did you
hide it for so long? She never an ABC wasn't
going to do it. I mean, remember, Trump performed poorly,
she prosecuted well. ABC was a disgrace. That mouse is
(25:02):
already on my you know what list for blocking me
in sports already this year. Oh I can't stand Disney.
I wouldn't spend a dime with him. I know he
made a great point, though, but it's beyond just that point.
It's beyond just that question. Donald Trump should have been
asking all those painful questions all day, all night long,
(25:25):
and he didn't, and certainly ABC didn't. Let's get the
other two end before the break.
Speaker 1 (25:29):
Good morning, Michael Mark from Arizona.
Speaker 6 (25:32):
I just wanted to comment on Kamala's expressions when she
was listening to him talk.
Speaker 1 (25:40):
It was very telling.
Speaker 6 (25:42):
So if we are waking up as Americans, I think
a lot of people are going to notice how she
was reacting to some of the truths that he was
saying last night.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
Can I do one quick pause and before you do the
next one?
Speaker 2 (25:56):
Yeah. David Sinati said this yesterday, and I thought it was
a key. He said, debates are more visual than they
are audible. We play all the sound, we play the
famous lines, we remember the famous lines, but the visuals
really move the meter. Looking at a watch costs your
(26:20):
presidency sweating.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
I mean.
Speaker 2 (26:24):
The very first in this style, too, was the Nixon
Kennedy debate. Everybody listening on the radio thought Nixon one.
Everybody watching on the new television thought Kennedy one. That's
how important visual is. It was funny because I was
going back and forth afterwards. I am and I said
this earlier. If you weren't listening, I'm appalled by the
whole spin room game that these networks in the matrix
(26:48):
that we live in. So if you're far right, you're
watching your far right stars. If your far left or
on your far left soars, and you just you matrix
yourself and they tell you what's going to happen. Then
they tell you what you just heard. And I don't
want to wake up in the morning be that. I
didn't think Donald Trump did well at all. She stayed
on the offensive. She prosecuted and an innocent man got
prosecuted last night because we had a despicable, disgraceful, corrupt
(27:12):
judge ABC. But visually I went to CNN, they were
praising it. Oh, I love the way and that one
time when she put her hand under her chin. First
of all, I don't know, she looks just like Caesar Romero.
I don't mean that critical, but she looks like Caesar
(27:33):
Romero is the joker and Batman's exactly. If you put
the pictures next to each other, it's uncanny. Yes, And
when she did that post, she really did. And I
you know, I don't know how the visual played, but
if David's anat, he's right. As much as she dominated
the debate, visually she lost the debate. Donald Trump, though,
did look kind of.
Speaker 1 (27:52):
Gruff and.
Speaker 2 (27:55):
As if he was trying to look like the dictator
she was trying to make him, and he did come
crossed angry. So I don't know that either one visually
or who lost more visually. But if we go through
the keys to a debate, were there any great memorable moments?
Speaker 1 (28:11):
I don't know.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
The maga hat the right will latch on? Do I
think the left has a lot to latch on. Do
you're running against me? When she prosecuted him, I mean
they make abortion sound like life. The way they twisted
I mean, the lies, they are getting to the level
of satan.
Speaker 1 (28:28):
It really is.
Speaker 2 (28:29):
You better have discernment, man, or you're you're dead. But
she had a lot of winning lines and a lot
of winning moments, but none that I think are like
I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator,
You're not Jack Kennedy, by the way he Trump used it.
There you go again, lying again. There was no oh
(28:51):
you'd be in jail line. Yeah, it was just all
and then no matter what they did to pull him back,
and then they would take the high road.
Speaker 1 (28:59):
See, this is what America don't want looking back. We
want to move forward.
Speaker 2 (29:02):
Well, you brought up January sixth, you brought up the
border vote, But yeah, I'm with you. Visuals are important,
and I think on the split screen she was a
little more Hillary than I'm sure her handlers wanted to be.
Speaker 1 (29:18):
Let's get that last one in, do we have that
one more? That moment Kamala talked about crowd sizes, I
mean that really got under it.
Speaker 4 (29:26):
Again.
Speaker 3 (29:26):
I couldn't believe it, but.
Speaker 4 (29:28):
He was on the defensive after that.
Speaker 5 (29:30):
His whole tone and.
Speaker 3 (29:31):
Demeanor change right after that.
Speaker 4 (29:33):
Yeah, that's the thing with Trump, and he shoots himself in.
Speaker 2 (29:38):
The foot all the time, and once he gets into
those rabbit holes and so hard, he loses people. Look,
everybody's got strength, everybody's got a weakness. Donald Trump is
as compassionate as you can imagine. He just doesn't secret
and it doesn't come across that way. He does have
weaknesses too, his pride, his ego, and she knew just
(30:01):
how to get his goat.
Speaker 1 (30:04):
And that one did.
Speaker 2 (30:05):
You are absolutely correct. How dare anybody question his crowd size?
By the way, very little mention of I mean, he
did get into the law fair. I love the line
he had about I even took a bullet to the head.
It they just didn't It was kind of like a fight.
(30:25):
I can take you through, and I would have if
I was still home. We had a major technical issue
that tried to the end. We tried to botch our
entire show. But I had all this laid out to
demonstrate you with actually and demonstrate to you with actual audio.
But it's like a fight. I can tell you the
hook happened. I can tell you the uppercut happened. I
can tell you the jab happened. I can tell you
(30:46):
the right overhand happened. They just didn't seem to land
for Donald Trump, and I think he would have been
better off taking attack to asking questions the questions ABC
wouldn't ask Dana Prino and I keep coming back to that,
but she really did say it best. He took every
bait and he didn't seize any opportunity.
Speaker 3 (31:07):
Hi, this is Jimmy Bourne.
Speaker 2 (31:09):
My morning show is your Money Show with Michael de Jana.
Thanks for working up with your Warning show on the
Aaron streaming live on your iHeart app. Big debate in
Pennsylvania last night. Our White House correspondent John Decker was there.
Speaker 1 (31:22):
John, I have.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
It well prosecuted by Kamala, poorly performed by Trump, been
a disgracefully led quote unquote debate by ABC.
Speaker 5 (31:33):
What did you see, Well, I thought it was a
very good knife for the Vice president, a very bad
knight for Donald Trump. You could argue, we'll have to
wait and see. I think you could say this was
his June the twenty seventh. Of course, that's the date
that Joe Biden had a disastrous debate performance in Atlanta. Look,
Kamala Harris exceeded all expectations. That's partly the fall of
(31:58):
the Trump campaign and Donald Trump for saying that she
wasn't intelligent. She stood up there, she took the punches,
she stood toe to toe with Donald Trump, and he,
as the debate were on, just became more and more agitated.
And that's not what I think his campaign was preparing for.
Preparation counts for a lot, and that's four days of preparation.
(32:21):
I think it showed for the Vice president on that
debate stage last night. One other thing I will mention,
and you and I are talking about our views, let
me give you the view of one of the strongest
allies for Donald Trump in the US Senate. It's Senator
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina. He called it a disaster
for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (32:40):
Yeah, it was a terrible performance Dana Perino at Fox.
And by the way, you should know this about me
because we haven't known each other very long. I don't
know why I find all of them useless. I find
them all very biased and ridiculous and polarizing at times.
But for some reason, I guess because I am a conservative,
Fox usually aggravates me the most. But I got a
(33:01):
hand it to Dana Prino really nailed it. She said
he took every bait and he didn't seize any of
the opportunities.
Speaker 1 (33:06):
Man. That's that's it in one sentence.
Speaker 5 (33:10):
That's it. That's it in one sentence. I'm reading some
of the opinions in the Wall Street Journal, which is
at the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, which
is conservative, and you know, I think that they are
replicating a lot of what Dana Perino said on Fox
News last night, and they're doing it in their own way.
William mcgern, for instance, from the Wall Street Journal said
(33:32):
the fight in Philly was like the thriller in Manila.
The third and final heavyweight boxing match between Muhammad Ali
and Joe Fraser, which ended in a victory for Ali,
though Donald Trump threw some good punches. Philadelphia was an
upset victory for Commons.
Speaker 2 (33:47):
Oh, how clever the wording is there. You don't buy
that they want a second debate, right? They want to
look like they do and never agree to it.
Speaker 5 (33:55):
I mean, why would you, right, why would you take
the victory knockout punch to use William mcgern's analogy and
go home? Don't risk this all over again? And what's
going to be learned in a new debate. I don't
think anything particularly new. We've had two I would love
an opportunity to question both of them on a debate.
Speaker 2 (34:18):
Oh, I would love for you to do it, because
ABC certainly didn't. John deckerd have a safe trip home.
We'll talk again tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (34:23):
We're all in this together. This is Your Morning Show
with Michael enheld Chown
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.